HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 6667113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Ordinance: 6667
File Number: 2023-710
AMENDMENT - §166.25 (UDC):
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND § 166.25 COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MIXED USE DESIGN AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO CLARIFY THAT CROSS
ACCESS BETWEEN PROPERTIES IS REQUIRED
WHEREAS, subsection (D)(2) Driveways of § 166.25 Commercial, Office and Mixed Use Design and
Development Standards currently states that "shared drives and cross access between properties shall be encouraged
to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties"; and
WHEREAS, Planning staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of an amendment clarifying that cross
access shall be required rather than encouraged; and
WHEREAS, § 156.03, which provides for variances to development, parking, and loading requirements, provides an
opportunity for applicants to demonstrate why the requirement would result in an adverse safety impact, or if the
standard should not apply due to a unique situation; and
WHEREAS, shared drives are separately addressed with greater detail in § 166.08 Street Design and Access
Management Standards and can be removed from § 166.25.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby repeals subsection (D)(2) Driveways of §
166.25 Commercial, Office and Mixed Use Design and Development Standards and enacts a replacement §
166.25(D)(2) as follows:
"(2) Cross Access. Cross access shall be required to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties."
PASSED and APPROVED on June 6, 2023
Page 1
Ordinance: 6667
File Number.' 2023-710
Approved:
Page 2
Attest:
1 /1YrTi rV!l.1.:
Kara Paxton, Ciry der reasurer
!t1 ii1it�%0\,
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MEETING OF JUNE 6, 2023
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
2023-710
TO: Mayor Jordan and City Council
THRU: Susan Norton, Chief of Staff
Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director
FROM: Britin Bostick, Long Range Planning/Special Projects Manager
DATE:
SUBJECT: ADM-2023-0011: Administrative Item (Amend UDC Chapter 166 -
Development): Submitted by CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE STAFF. The request is an
amendment to 166.25 — Commercial, Office and Mixed Use Design and Development
Standards. The proposed code change would require cross access to adjacent
properties.
RECOMMENDATION:
City staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of an amendment to the Unified Development
Code amending § 166.25(D)(2) - Driveways to remove the reference to driveways and shared driveways and
to change the encouraged cross access to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties to required cross
access.
BACKGROUND:
Section 166.25 of the Unified Development Code (UDC) addresses design and development standards for
commercial, office, and mixed -use properties. Within that section is 166.25(D) Site Development and Design,
and more specifically, language in 166.25(D)(2) that reads: "Driveways. Shared drives and cross access
between properties shall be encouraged to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties." While the staff
interpretation of this section of the code for several years has been that the language "shall be encouraged"
amounts to a requirement for the provision of cross access, and there has not been an appeal of that
interpretation, the interpretation was recently scrutinized in the review of a proposed development and a
variance application that was submitted for that development.
Per a memo issued by the Assistant City Attorney on March 14, 2023, "A plain reading of §166.25(D)(2) of the
Unified Development Code provision reveals that cross access is not something that has been required by the
City Council. That subsection says, `shared drives and cross access between properties shall be encouraged
to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties.' It does not say cross access "may be required" or "shall
be required." The memo continued with observations related to the specific development and the variance
being requested.
Planning staff reviewed and considered the memo as well as the current code language and the longstanding
staff interpretation of the code. Several options were considered for text amendments that would provide clarity
and specificity for cross access and shared driveway requirements and consistency in applying the code.
Considerations included the connection between shared drives and cross access in site design and
Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
development, as well as the city's ongoing corridor work and goals related to pedestrian and cyclist safety and
reducing conflicts between those users and motorized vehicles. Staff discussed an administrative approval
option for variance requests and under what criteria or circumstances a variance to a cross access
requirement could be administratively reviewed. Ultimately, staff did not recommend an administrative variance
option given the current interpretation of cross access as a requirement; the public benefit sought by cross
access requirements for commercial, office, and mixed use properties; and the established process to request
a variance by the Planning Commission. The current variance in UDC §156.03(C)(2) provides an opportunity
for applicants to demonstrate why the requirement would result in an adverse safety impact, or if the standard
should not apply due to a unique situation. Planning staff would continue to evaluate and make
recommendations on variance requests for cross access requirements to the Planning Commission.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of this amendment is to address the regulatory deficiency identified by the Assistant City Attorney
and to make clear in the UDC that cross access is required and not merely encouraged. Additionally, there is
an opportunity to remove overlapping language in the code.
In reviewing the UDC text related to cross access and shared driveways with the Assistant City Attorney,
Planning staff identified that shared driveways are already addressed in Section 166.08 — Street Design And
Access Management Standards. Section 166.08(F)(2) reads:
"Separation for two (2) family, three (3) family, multi -family and nonresidential development.
(a) Regional and Regional High Activity Links. Where a street with a lower functional classification exists
that can be accessed, curb cuts shall access onto those streets. When necessary, curb cuts along
regional links shall be shared between two (2) or more lots. Where a curb cut must access the regional
link, it shall be located a minimum of 250 feet from an intersection or driveway.
(b) Neighborhood Links. Curb cuts shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from an intersection or
driveway. When necessary, curb cuts along neighborhood links shall be shared between two (2) or more
lots.
(c) Residential Links. Curb cuts shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from an intersection or driveway.
In no case shall a curb cut be located within the radius return of an adjacent curb cut or intersection."
Section 166.08(F) continues with (3) and (4), which specify shared curb cut requirements, i.e. shared
driveways, for single-family homes and when joint access driveways and cross access easements may be
used in reducing separation distance. Planning staff found that shared driveways are sufficiently covered with
requirements in this section and propose to remove the language for driveways and shared drives from
166.25(D)(2), instead focusing that section on cross access and replacing "shall be encouraged" with "shall be
required".
A variance option is available for properties that have a hardship in complying with the cross access
requirement. Property development that cannot provide cross access to adjacent developed and undeveloped
properties may request a variance from the Planning Commission under UDC Section 156.03 - Development,
Parking and Loading. The applicable variance and criteria for evaluation is already codified under the General
Requirements in 156.03(A):
(A) General Requirements.
(1) Undue Hardship. If the provisions of Development, Chapter 166, or Parking and Loading, Chapter
Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
172 are shown by the developer to cause undue hardship as they apply to this proposed development
(including, but not limited to financial, environmental, or regulatory) and that the situation is unique to the
subject property, the City Planning Commission may grant a variance, on a temporary or permanent
basis, to the development from such provision, so that substantial justice may be done and the public
interest secured; provided that the variation will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of
the development or parking and loading regulations. No variance shall be granted for any property which
does not have access to an improved street.
(2) Conditions and Safeguards. In granting variances, the Planning Commission may prescribe
appropriate conditions and safeguards to secure substantially the objectives of the standards or
requirements so varied.
When the Planning Commission considered the item in their April 24, 2023 meeting there was unanimous
support for the item with Commissioner Garlock stating his reasons for supporting the item, including
improvements to traffic safety and the variance opportunity in the event of a hardship. Commissioner Winston
made the motion to forward the item to the City Council with a recommendation of approval, seconded by
Commissioner McGetrick. A vote of 9-0-0 followed. No public comment was received either prior to or during
the public hearing.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
N/A
ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Proposed Ordinance, Proposed Ordinance - Strikethrough, ADM-2023-0011
SRF, Cross Connectivity Memo
Mailing address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Legislation Text
File #: 2023-710
ADM-2023-0011: Administrative Item (Amend UDC Chapter 166 - Development): Submitted by
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE STAFF. The request is an amendment to 166.25 — Commercial,
Office and Mixed Use Design and Development Standards. The proposed code change would
require cross access to adjacent properties.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND § 166.25 COMMERCIAL, OFFICE AND MIXED USE DESIGN AND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO CLARIFY THAT
CROSS ACCESS BETWEEN PROPERTIES IS REQUIRED
WHEREAS, subsection (D)(2) Driveways of § 166.25 Commercial, Office and Mixed Use Design
and Development Standards currently states that "shared drives and cross access between properties
shall be encouraged to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties"; and
WHEREAS, Planning staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of an amendment
clarifying that cross access shall be required rather than encouraged; and
WHEREAS, § 156.03, which provides for variances to development, parking, and loading
requirements, provides an opportunity for applicants to demonstrate why the requirement would result in
an adverse safety impact, or if the standard should not apply due to a unique situation; and
WHEREAS, shared drives are separately addressed with greater detail in § 166.08 Street Design and
Access Management Standards and can be removed from § 166.25.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby repeals subsection (D)(2)
Driveways of § 166.25 Commercial, Office and Mixed Use Design and Development Standards and
enacts a replacement § 166.25(D)(2) as follows:
"(2) Cross Access. Cross access shall be required to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties."
Page 1
Exhibit A
166.25 Commercial, Office and Mixed Use Design And Development Standards
(D) Site Development and Design Standards.
(2) Cross Access. Cross access shall be required to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties.
(Supp. No. 28)
Created: 2023-03-23 14:01:27 [EST]
Page 1 of 1
166.25 Commercial, Office and Mixed Use Design And Development Standards
(D) Site Development and Design Standards.
(2) Cross Access.Dr4vebve^ � Shared driver. -and c-Cross access between prepeFties shall be lea
required to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties.
(Supp. No. 28)
Created: 2023-03-23 14:01:27 [EST]
Page 1 of 1
Britin Bostick
Submitted By
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form
2023-710
Item ID
5/16/2023
City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only
N/A for Non -Agenda Item
4/28/2023 LONG RANGE PLANNING (634)
Submitted Date Division / Department
Action Recommendation:
ADM-2023-0011: Administrative Item (Amend UDC Chapter 166 - Development): Submitted by CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE STAFF. The request is an amendment to 166.25 — Commercial, Office and Mixed Use Design and
Development Standards. The proposed code change would require cross access to adjacent properties
Account Number
Project Number
Budgeted Item? No
Does item have a direct cost? No
Is a Budget Adjustment attached? No
Purchase Order Number:
Change Order Number:
Original Contract Number:
Comments:
Budget Impact:
Fund
Project Title
Total Amended Budget
$ -
Expenses (Actual+Encum)
$ -
Available Budget
Item Cost
$ -
Budget Adjustment
$ -
Remaining Budget
V20221130
Previous Ordinance or Resolution #
Approval Date:
mt DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE y--
OFFICE OF THE
CITY ATTORNEY
Kit Williams
TO:
Planning Commission
City Attorney
Blake Pennington
CC:
Jessie Masters, Development Review Mana
Assistant City Attorney
Jodi Backer
Paralegal
FROM:
Blake Pennington, Assistant City A
DATE:
March 14, 2023
RE:
Cross -Connectivity
Often the Planning Commission considers large scale developments with a
staff recommendation requiring cross -connectivity to other adjacent properties.
Planning staff have long considered this a requirement rather than a goal of the
Unified Development Code.
A plain reading of § 166.25(D)(2) of the Unified Development Code provision
reveals that cross access is not something that has been required by the City Council.
That subsection says, "shared drives and cross access between properties shall be
encouraged to adjacent developed and undeveloped properties." It does not say
cross access "may be required" or "shall be required."
Even though the developer of the Aronson 112 project has not appealed the
staff interpretation of this provision, the Planning Commission can make its decision
independently. I encourage you to not be overly strict in your application of this
provision.
With respect to the parcel to the east of the Aronson development, the parcel's
landlocked status appears to be a self-imposed condition. This parcel, which has a
tree preservation easement on the south end, as well as the car lot to the immediate
south of that are owned by the same company. Both parcels were also owned by the
same owner at the time the tree preservation easement was created in 2004, which
cut off the landlocked parcel's access to Highway 112 through the car lot parcel.
Arkansas law provides a landlocked property owner with options to gain
access to a public street. Depending on prior ownership of the property, the current
owner may be able to seek an access easement, whether by necessity or implied
reservation. If those are not options, the property owner could seek the establishment
of a road through the county court pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 27-66-401.