HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-02-22 - Agendas - FinalCITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
%PF ARKANSAS
MEETING AGENDA
Water, Sewer, and Solid Waste Committee
22 February 2022
5:30 P.M.
(Or immediately following City Council Agenda Session)
This is a Virtual Meeting
Committee: Council Member Teresa Turk, Council Member Sloan Scroggin, Council Member
D'Andre Jones, Council Member Mike Wiederkehr
Copy to: Mayor Lioneld Jordan, Paul Becker, Kara Paxton, Susan Norton, Chris Brown,
Alan Pugh, Terry Gulley, Peter Nierengarten, Jeff Coles, Brian Pugh, Andrea
Foren, Mark Rogers, Corey Granderson, Aaron Watkins, Greg Weeks, Monty
Sedlak
From: Tim Nyander, Utilities Director
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
UPDATES
OLD BUSINESS:
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Introduction of Committee Member Mike Wiederkehr
Utilities Director Tim Nyander will give a brief overview of the jurisdiction and responsibilities
of the Utilities Department.
2. Damage Claim at Makeig Court Due to Water Leak
The Utilities Department has received two claims in an amount that is above the threshold
contained in the Water and Wastewater Damage Claim Ordinance. City staff will provide
further detail.
STAFF REQUESTS THIS BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL
1
3. Bid Results on Markham Hill Water Tank Refurbishment
The sealed competitive bids were opened today on refurbishing the Markham Hill Water
Storage Tank. While the successful bid has not been certified by the Purchasing
Department, we are confident which company is the lowest and best bid. Utilities Engineer
Corey Granderson will discuss the project. We would request that the committee consider
forwarding this item to the City Council, contingent on the winning bid being certified.
STAFF REQUESTS THIS BE FORWARDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR
CONSIDERATION FOR APPROVAL
4. Hill Avenue Cost Share Proposal
During the development of multifamily housing on Hill Street between W. Stone Street and
MLK Jr. Blvd., it was noted that a fire hydrant would be needed to conform to code. The
City's GIS indicated that there was a 6-inch water line available to install the needed fire
hydrant. When the line was exposed in preparation for a tapping connection, it was
discovered that the water line was a 4-inch pipe. The City will not permit a fire hydrant to be
connected to a 4-inch line, as the volume of water a hydrant can flow would damage the
undersized pipe. The engineer representing the project has requested that the City consider
participating in a cost -share for installation of a 6-inch water line. The line would connect at
Stone street and extend through the project boundary where a fire hydrant would be placed
to meet fire code for the development. This infill project razed two homes to create 15-units
and the proposed hydrant will improve fire protection for other residents on the street. A
50/50 cost split is proposed to share the cost of bringing the upsized waterline to the project
site. The city will pay 100% of the cost to tie -over existing customer service lines in the area
so that the existing 4-inch line can be abandoned, avoiding parallel waterlines in this street.
The final percentage will be based on contractor cost estimates and presented at the March
Water, Sewer and Solid Waste Committee meeting.
INFORMATION ONLY
5. Overview of WWTP Monthly Report
Discussion of December's Monthly WWTP Report
PRESENTATIONS
December WWTP Report
ATTACHMENTS
December WWTP Report
ADJOURN
Next Water, Sewer, Solid Waste Committee meets on
Tuesday, March 8, 2022, at 5:30 p.m.
.;acobs
Fayetteville
Client Monthly Report for December 2021
January 20, 2022
City of Fayetteville
CITY OF
WA FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
West Side Water Resource Recovery Facility
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
Contents
ExecutiveSummary..................................................................................................................................................ii
1.
Plant Operations.........................................................................................................................................4
1.1
Process Control...........................................................................................................................................................4
1.2
Biosolids Process........................................................................................................................................................4
1.3
Compliance..................................................................................................................................................................4
1.4
Successes...................................................................................................................................................................... 5
1.5
Issues/Resolutions.................................................................................................................................................... 5
1.6
Revenue.........................................................................................................................................................................8
Table 1-1:
Revenue generated from the BMS............................................................................................................... 8
Figure 1-1: Revenue generated from the BMS via hay, fertilizer, and WTR.......................................................8
2.
Maintenance................................................................................................................................................9
2.1 West Side....................................................................................................................................................................... 9
2.2 Noland............................................................................................................................................................................9
2.3 Lift Stations...............................................................................................................................................................
10
2.4 BMS Maintenance...................................................................................................................................................
10
2.5 Key Performance Indicators/Measures..........................................................................................................
11
Figure 2-1: Labor Hours by Work Order Type.............................................................................................................
11
Figure2-2: Work Order Count by Type..........................................................................................................................
11
2.6 Capital Improvement Projects(CIP)................................................................................................................
12
3. Laboratory/Industrial Pretreatment...................................................................................................13
Table 3-1: Revenue generated from the Industrial Pretreatment Program(IPP)........................................
14
Figure 3-1: IPP revenue total from surcharges, fees, and fines...........................................................................
14
Figure 3-2: Loads of hauled waste -by hauler and cumulative loads per month ..........................................
14
4. Woolsey Wet Prairie................................................................................................................................15
5. Community Outreach.............................................................................................................................16
6. Sustainability............................................................................................................................................17
7. Health & Safety/Training.......................................................................................................................18
Appendix A. Additional Information.................................................................................................................19
A.1 Effluent & Influent Data.......................................................................................................................................
19
A.2 White River Effluent Characteristics................................................................................................................
19
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
Executive Summary
Project year 2021 realized many challenges. We had several major equipment failures that were
demanding on both personnel and budget. Initially we were faced with issues on the emergency
standby generator and then we were met with extreme complications in the biosolids dryer. The
dryer was a double hit consisting of repair costs and landfill tip fees. The dryer had several
maintenance issues, finishing with catastrophic component failure.
We worked to provide fiscal accountability amidst these unexpected events. Our process was to
calculate all encumbered funds and remove them from the ledger through our forecasting tool.
We were expecting an overage from the unplanned repairs and landfill costs. However, we also
had some unplanned fiscal benefits. Our forecasting tool counted obligations outstanding. We did
not take delivery of every obligation before December 31, 2021. Some of the financial obligations
are still pending due to delivery delays and will be paid for in the 2022 budget year. Our current
projection places us approximately $5,000 under budget for 2021. After the reconciliation of
pending residual invoices, we will have a final number. In summary, we are pleased to provide a
positive fiscal end of year report, despite these unplanned equipment failures and tangential costs.
Budget Performance
$71,981
$58,102$60,101
$44,573 $32,123
$16,797 $7,957 $(5,074)
� o
P p49
$(27,204) �
$(113,194)
■ Labor ■ Non -Labor ■ Budget - Over (Under)
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
Labor
Non -Labor
Budget - Over (Under)
March
$
10,470
$
(123,664)
$
(113,194)
April
$
35,404
$
(62,608)
$
(27,204)
May
$
36,558
$
(19,761)
$
16,797
June
$
37,208
$
7,365
$
44,573
July
$
20,719
$
(12,762)
$
7,957
August
$
25,275
$
6,848
$
32,123
September
$
24,910
$
33,192
$
58,102
October
$
13,262
$
46,839
$
60,101
November
$
(20,233)
$
92,214
$
71,981
December
$
(26,049)
$
20,975
$
(5,074)
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
1. Plant Operations
The Noland and West Side Water Resource Recovery Facilities (WRRF's) effluent discharges were
100% in compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
Details of effluent quality and influent loadings are shown in Appendix A.
1.1 Process Control
Noland
The West Aeration Basin was taken offline to complete repairs on aerators and replace anaerobic
mixers. Keeping unnecessary equipment out of service during the winter season also allows lower
electrical costs and reduced wear on additional equipment. A brief interruption in nitrification was
experienced until the MLSS (Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids) target concentration was achieved.
The facility continued to maintain treatment well below permit limits during this time.
The Noland WRRF experienced high flow conditions brought on by a total of 3.16 inches of rainfall
within 24 hours on the 17th. Total influent flow peaked at 28 million gallons, making it the highest
influent flows experienced in 2021.
West Side
During the month of December, the West Side WRRF experienced a total of 6.50 inches of rain.
Elevated influent flows peaked at 39.7 million gallons on the 17th. All excess flow at both facilities
was treated within compliance of the NPDES permits.
1.2 Biosolids Process
During the month of December, the WRRF's produced 2,166 wet tons of biosolids with
approximately 696 wet tons processed directly through the thermal dryer and 1,470 wet tons of
biosolids applied into the solar houses.
A total of 937 tons of belt filter pressed, partially dried biosolids were transferred to area landfills
due to dryer downtime. Approximately 533 tons of water weight was removed prior to landfill
disposal. Total landfill costs were $45,166.57.
1.3 Compliance
An estimated 50 gallons of heat transfer fluid flowed from the thermal dryer building after the
dryer incident outlined below. The fluid pooled in a nearby ditch and the contaminated soil was
removed and properly classified for disposal at the landfill. The team also contacted a local
remediation group the night of the explosion to ensure no additional fluid reached the stormwater
collection area. The remediation group was able to extract approximately 110 gallons of heat
transfer fluid from the floor inside the building. Compliance experts were informed about the issue
and their advice was put into action immediately. A compliance report was prepared and sent to
ADEQ detailing the spill and disposal.
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
Heat Transfer Fluid
Remediation
1.4 Successes
Due to unforeseen thermal dryer circumstances, the need for additional CDL drivers arose. After
significant difficulty in locating experienced drivers, it was decided that current team members will
be trained. Two staff members have already passed their written test and have been permitted to
start driver training. When all CDL requirements have been completed, these staff members will
support the current CDL drivers to reduce overtime pay.
1.5 Issues/Resolutions
On December 13, the thermal dryer floating bearing experienced a condition defined as BLEVE, or
Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion. The cause of this event is still unknown. The new
thermal temperature sensors did not register an abnormality until the point of combustion.
Therefore, the sensors that were programmed to shut equipment down when temperature
setpoints were exceeded, never received the signal to power down equipment until after the
explosion.
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
As a result of the explosion, the thermal dryer and thermal dryer building were damaged
extensively. The entire floating bearing was destroyed and the 1-inch steel brace above and below
the bearing was warped due to forces from the explosion. The force also propelled shrapnel
through the thermal building wall and the fire after the event damaged the roof and rolling doors
on the west side of the building.
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021
The yellow line
drawn in the
photographs shows
the warping of the
thermal dryer brace
I; BONN IWOM& a I.. � -
Thermal Dryer event
results in extensive
destruction to building
,jacobs
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021
1.6 Revenue
Table 1-1: Revenue generated from the BMS
,jacobs
Product Tons Sold/Received Revenue Generated
Hay 43.39 $3,456.20
Fertilizer 109.58 $2,191.60
Water Treatment Residuals 131.31 $4,189.84
Figure 1-1: Revenue generated from the BMS via hay, fertilizer, and WTR
Revenue Generated
Biosolids Management Site
$180,000
$160,000
$140,000
$120,000 -
$100,000
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000 n m RI m �I
e�
4a�r J e��et O���
QQ �J Qp O
F P heQ` �o �e
O Monthly 2020 O Monthly 2021 Cumulative 2021
Jacobs - Fayetteville Project 8
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
2. Maintenance
2.1 West Side
New cameras were installed to record a better angle on the biosolids production steps of the belt
filter presses. The cameras also provide a better view of the truck loading process.
2.2 Noland
A leak was discovered in RAS pump 4 and was repaired with a new mechanical seal before being
returned to service.
A new mechanical
seal is installed on
RAS pump 4
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
An additional sludge feed pump drive was replaced after it began to malfunction.
Biosolids
sludge feed pump
receives a new drive
2.3 Lift Stations
Routine lift station maintenance and grounds upkeep continued through December.
2.4 BMS Maintenance
As a winter stewardship project, the BMS staff began repairing the fence along Wyman Road. Brush
and barbed wire were removed from the fence line and new wire was installed.
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project 10
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021
,jacobs
2.5 Key Performance Indicators/Measures
Figure 2-1: Labor Hours by Work Order Type
❑ 0.00, 0%
159.^� ""•
589.98, 34%
❑ 64.60, 4%
❑ administrative
❑ corrective maintenance
emergency
corrective maintenance non
emergency
corrective maintenance from
pm/pdm
preventive maintenance
project
❑ safety
❑ 104.26, 6%
❑ administrative
❑ corrective maintenance
emergency
corrective maintenance non
emergency
❑ corrective maintenance from
pm/pdm
❑ 763.31, 45")preventive maintenance
Figure 2-2: Work Order Count by Type
2, 0%
❑ 0, 0%
11
project
❑ safety
❑ 29, 2%
❑ 5, 0%
113, 6%
18. 1%
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project 11
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
2.6 Capital Improvement Projects (CIP)
A rebuild of Hamestring Lift Station pump no. 3 was added as a break-in project. This break-in
project was presented as a non -agenda item at the December Water & Sewer Committee meeting.
A total of 10 capital improvement projects were completed in 2021 including 7 encumbered
projects from 2020. All remaining approved 2021 projects will be moved to the 2022 agenda.
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project 12
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
3. Laboratory/Industrial Pretreatment
Quarterly 40 CFR 122 Appendix D Table 111 samples were collected at both facilities for the analysis
of cyanide, phenolics, and metals (antimony, arsenic, beryllium, cadmium, chromium, copper,
Lead, low level mercury, nickel, selenium, silver, thallium, and zinc). Samples were collected from
the Noland influent, White River effluent, West Side influent, and Goose Creek effluent and sent to
GTS for analysis. Data results were statistically within scope and exhibited no unusual trends. The
results are reported annually to ADEQ by the Industrial Pretreatment department. Arsenic results
are reported quarterly to ADEQ as required by the newest Noland permit.
Soil samples collected from Areas 5 and 6 were sent to Geotechnical & Testing Services (GTS) for
the following analyses: pH, electrical conductivity, cation -exchange capacity, total solids, sodium
absorption ratio (SAR), nitrate nitrogen, phosphorus, and metals (cadmium, copper, lead, nickel,
zinc, potassium, arsenic, mercury, molybdenum, selenium, aluminum, and iron). The SAR data is a
measure of the ability of the soil to allow proper water drainage and root growth. An SAR below
13 indicates a well aerated soil. Results were all statistically within scope and exhibited no unusual
trends. All BMS soil sampling is complete for 2021.
Jar testing was completed on a Tidal Clear chitosan product to evaluate floc. The product failed to
produce positive results.
West Side Goose Creek samples were collected to complete a Whole Effluent Toxicity Screening
test as outlined in the Toxicity Reduction Evaluation Plan. The test passed, showing no toxicity for
survival or growth to the fathead minnow, Pimephales promelas.
All permitted industries had shutdowns of various extents due to the Christmas and New Year's
Eve holidays.
Compliance sampling and an annual inspection was completed for Elkhart Products. They were
found in compliance with their industrial discharge permit, the City of Fayetteville Code, and 40
CFR 468.14.
Ecotech Consumer Products became the most recent categorical industrial user in Fayetteville
under the plastics molding and forming sub -category for new users (§463.26). This industry is
required to self -monitor for metals and cyanide monthly, with a weekly requirement for total
suspended solids. Once full production equipment is installed in the coming months, discharge is
estimated at 7,000 gallons per day.
Elkhart Products and Hiland Dairy were requested to perform calibration and maintenance on
effluent flow meters to ensure compliance with discharge permits. If calibration is found to be
deficient, the permittees may purchase a suitable flow meter.
Safe laboratory chemical waste disposal practices at Noland and West Side were recertified with
Heritage Environmental.
Monthly surcharge and waste hauler reports were completed and sent to the City for billing. For
revenue generated from the IPP, see Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1.
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021
,jacobs
Table 3-1: Revenue generated from the Industrial Pretreatment Program (IPP)
Revenue
$131,803.03
Surcharges on November data
$2,000.00
Fees from hauled waste accepted in December
$0.00
Other fees paid in December
$0.00
Fines assessed in December
Zero violations for all industrial users
Violations on November data
Figure 3-1: IPP revenue total from surcharges, fees, and fines
Revenue Generated
Industrial Pretreatment Program
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000 III
Cp-
❑ 2020 Monthly Surcharge Fees plus Hauled Waste Fees
❑ 2021 Monthly Surcharge Fees plus Hauled Waste Fees
Figure 3-2: Loads of hauled waste -by hauler and cumulative loads per month
Hauled Waste Summary
60
50
40
r
30
20
10 n
0 n n II
fl I
I
flll Ih
n1l
III
n1l
rh
flll
II
1'.11
1!,
n1l
�Qt
O°�9
gel
°�e�
�
sec
O
❑ 2020 Arkansas Portable Toilets
❑ 2020 Best Jet
2020 White River Enviro. Services
2020 TOTAL
2021 Arkansas Portable Toilets
❑ 2021 Best Jet
❑ 2021 White River Enviro. Services
❑ 2021 TOTAL
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
4. Woolsey Wet Prairie
Looking back over 2021 records, precipitation totals were just slightly lower than normal with an
estimated 45 inches, compared to a regional normal of 48.5 inches.
This provided the conditions for Woolsey's wetland cells to experience the desirable wet -prairie
cycle of retaining standing surface water through the winter, spring, and early summer while drying
up during the late summer and into the early fall period of August to November.
Following an especially dry August and September nearly all
surface water had dried up, even from the remnant farm ponds,
which rarely occurs. Limited periods of completely dry conditions
are desirable for promoting some of Woolsey's most rare wet -
prairie ecology, namely the Crayfish frog which thrives in habitats
with temporal water sources.
A final, year-end management activity will involve pulling all stop logs in early January to minimize
water retention heading into the new year and the prescribed burn season.
Year 2021 Woolsey Wet -Prairie Annual Surface Water Monitoring Table
Month
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
ANN
Precip.
ACT NRM DIFF
30 28 03
08 2830
36 60 0.3
59 db ]A
50 60 I
3J 501.3
50 35 f.5
15 a21.)
20 6829
18 03 3.5
16 <�26
5.3 32 1 2.0
<50 G85 -3,5
Surface H2O
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-
-
-
-
x
8 of 12
E5
WOF Ret.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0 of 12
12-
Log Combo
5:
7:
0:
0:
0:
0:
! 7:
7:
7:
7:
I 7:5
I 0:
—
Height (in.)
5
! 7
0
! 0
0
0
I 7
7
! 7
I 7
I 0
i 0
Pond Ret.
x
x
x
x
x
x
! x
x
I x
1 x
x
I x
! 12 of 12
E4
S. H2O
x
x
x
x
!` -
! -
!1 -
j -
i x
i 8 of 12
WOF Ret.
X
X
-
X
-
X
f -
-
-
I -
i -
i -
4 of 12
19-
L.C.
I 5:
7:
7:5
I 7:5
I 7:5
7:
I 0:
0:
0:
I 0:
I 0:
I 7:
H. (in.)
f 5
7
12
12
12
7
0
0
0
I 0
! 0
5
S. H2O
x
x
x
i x
x
x
-
-
-
-
-
x
7 of 12
E3
WOF Ret.
X
-
-
I X
X
3 of 12
21•
L.C.
5:
0:
7:5:5
I 7:5:5
7:5:5
7:S:5
7:5:S
7:5:5
5:5
5:5
S:5
5:
H. (in.)
5
0
17
I 17
17
17
17
17
10
10
10
S
S. H2O
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-
-
-
-
x
8 of 12
UE1
WOF Re,.
X
X
-
X
-
X
-
-
-
-
-
X
5 of 12
-c
21-
L.C.
I 5:
7:
7:7
i 7:7
7:7
7:7
7:7
7:7
7:5
7:5
7:5
` 7:
5
7
14
I 14
14
14
14
1 14
12
12
12
I 7
N
S. H2O
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
-
-
-
-
x
8 of 12
E2
WOF Ret.
X
X
X
I X
I -
X
I -
-
-
-
-
X
1
6 of 12
5:
! 7:
7:5:5
! 7:7
7:7
7:7
! 7:7
7:7
7:7
7:7
7:7
I 7:
!
5
7
17
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
7
S. H2O x
x
x
x
x
x x
-
-
-
- x 7 of 12
WI
WOF Ret. X
X
-
X
-
X -
-
-
-
- X 4 of 12
12-
L.C. S:
7:
7:7
7:S
7:5
7:5 7:5
7:S
7:5
7:5
7:5 7:
H. (in.) 5
7
14
12
12
12 12
12
12
12
12 7
Pond Ret. x
x
x
x
x
x x
x
x
x
x x 12 of 12
S. H2O x
x
x
x
x
x x
-
-
-
- x ! 8 of 12
W2
Max Ret. X
X
X
X
X
X I -
-
-
-
I - X 7 of 12
L.C. 1 NA
i NA
i NA
NA
NA
NA NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
H. (in.) j NA
! NA
I NA
NA
NA
I NA I NA
NA
NA
NA
NA I NA
JACOBS
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project 15
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021
5. Community Outreach
,jacobs
The Washington County Search and Rescue K9 team utilized the BMS site for training.
The Jacobs team collected gifts for a Toys for Tots event.
CHRISTMAS
Gift Collection
to benefit
Tcys for Tots
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project 16
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
6. Sustainability
Maintenance installed new motion sensors to reduce the consumption of electricity when the
Noland maintenance shop area is unoccupied.
Noland
Maintenance Shop
Motion sensors installed
to reduce unnecessary
electrical consumption
New LED lighting installation around the West Side operations office and biological units has
improved visibility at night with no negative impact on the surrounding wetlands. This has greatly
improved safety for the operators while doing nighttime equipment checks and truck changes.
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville Client Monthly Report for December 2021 Jacobs
7. Health & Safety/Training
The facility has developed initiatives heading into the 2022 year. The safety team will consist of a
chairman and four delegates. The plant will continue its focus on providing quality safety training
to the staff. More than 260 safety training events were complete throughout 2021. Jacobs is
committed to providing high quality safety training to its employees. The team will look for hazard
elimination opportunities going forward into 2022. This process starts with looking at existing
moderate to elevated level hazards. The next step is to implement the hierarchy of control matrix.
The matrix includes safety controls for hazards. The lowest control in protection is PPE (personal
protective equipment), while the next control is found in administrative actions. These may include
staff rotation and frequent breaks. The final, and best option is engineering a solution to eliminate
the hazard. This step is a primary initiative for the facility going forward. The safety team will
provide training during the plantwide meeting to address this emphasis in the site safety manual.
Jacobs associates attended the Northwest District AWEA meeting hosted by the City of
Fayetteville. Monty Sedlak, Project Manager, presented on The Fruits of Predictive Maintenance,
outlining the benefits of Artesis and other advances in technology. Jacobs' Scott Grieco, Principal
Technologist, visited to present on PFAS in Our Water Cycle — Pathways and Impacts Beyond
Drinking Water. Also given was a presentation by Wen Zhang reviewing the valuable study results
from tracing COVID-19 in Wastewater, for which the Noland and West Side facilities contributed
many samples.
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville - Client Monthly Report for December 2021
Appendix A. Additional Information
A.1 Effluent & Influent Data
A.2 White River Effluent Characteristics
.;acobs
2021 Monthly WR WR WR
Average CBOD CBOD TSS
Flow (mg/L) (lbs/d) (mg/L)
(MGD)
Permit 5.5 578 5.0
Limit
December
WR WR WR WR WR D.O. pH
TSS Phos Phos Ammonia Ammonia Avg Min
(lbs/d) (mg/L) (lbs/d) (mg/L) (lbs/d) Min (s.u.)
(mg/L)
525 1.00 105.0 2.4 252 7.5 6.0
pH Fecal
Max Coliform
(s.u.) (MPN/
loom[)
9.0 1,000
January
5.8
2.7
128
2.8
131
0.14
6.3
0.2
8
15.0
7.0
7.5
77
February
5.1
4.3
174
4.4
181
0.19
7.7
0.5
22
16.6
6.9
7.4
174
March
6.3
3.7
199
3.0
166
0.15
7.9
0.2
12
14.9
7.3
7.4
22
April
5.1
3.4
188
1.1
62
0.09
4.9
0.3
15
12.8
7.3
7.6
54
May
10.0
3.8
308
1.6
133
0.11
9.3
0.2
13
12.3
7.4
7.6
17
June
7.4
3.5
214
1.5
94
0.31
17.8
0.1
6
12.3
7.2
7.5
35
July
5.1
3.3
136
2.1
85
0.37
15.4
0.2
8
13.1
7.2
7.8
74
August
4.4
3.3
113
1.1
41
0.42
14.7
0.3
12
15.5
7.1
7.7
73
September
4.2
2.7
90
1.3
45
0.24
8.3
0.1
4
17.6
7.1
7.5
110
October
5.0
2.8
103
1.8
68
0.26
10.0
0.1
4
18.2
7.4
7.5
198
November
5.7
4.0
199
4.0
200
0.27
13.7
0.1
4
16.4
7.4
7.7
244
December
5.7
3.0
134
2.2
95
0.14
6.5
1.2
29
18.3
7.4
7.7
49
Average
5.8
3.4
166
2.2
108
0.22
10.2
0.3
11
15.2
7.2
7.6
94
White River Effluent Characteristics- Minerals
2021 WR WR WR
TDS TDS Sulfate
(mg/L) (lbs/d) (mg/L)
Permit 500 52,542 119
Limit
December
WR WR WR
Sulfate Nitrate Nitrate
(lbs/d) (mg/L) (lbs/d)
12,505 report report
January
342
15,871
62
3,154
4
204
February
351
14,818
67
3,392
5
253
March
347
18,845
72
3,741
6
291
April
335
18,124
72
3,609
3
135
May
320
26,059
56
3,167
4
221
June
338
20,861
50
4,391
6
483
July
347
15,391
61
2,478
7
292
August
400
14,214
66
2,064
10
310
September
378
12,889
47
1,740
12
444
October
380
13,820
55
1,738
10
316
November
375
18,470
53
2,794
11
580
December
357
16,352
68
2,013
5
154
Average
356
17,143
61
2,857
7
307
Jacobs - Fayetteville Project 19
MI
Jacobs Fayetteville - Client Monthly Report for December 2021 oaco S
Goose Creek Effluent Characteristics
2021
Monthly
Average
Flow
(MGD)
GC
CBOD
(mg/L)
GC
CBOD
(Lbs/d)
GC TSS
(mg/L)
GC TSS
(lbs/d)
GC Phos
(mg/L)
GC Phos
(lbs/d)
GC
Ammonia
(mg/L)
GC
Ammonia
(lbs/d)
D.O. Avg
Min
(mg/L)
pH
Min
(s.u.)
pH
Max
(s.u.)
Fecal Coliform
(MPN/100ml)
Permit Limit December
6.6
550.4
10.0
834
1.00
83.4
2.3
191.8
7.5
6.0
9.0
1,000
January
10.8
2.0
174.3
1.1
95
0.08
7.2
0.2
18.4
10.7
7.0
7.4
8
February
9.7
2.0
161.9
1.0
81
0.08
6.4
0.1
8.1
11.1
7.0
7.4
5
March
11.8
2.1
202.0
1.0
101
0.13
12.8
0.1
13.3
10.4
7.1
7.5
7
April
12.1
2.0
202.1
1.0
101
0.08
7.6
0.1
13.5
9.9
7.2
7.5
6
May
14.2
2.0
236.1
1.0
118
0.06
7.2
0.1
13.6
9.7
7.3
7.5
5
June
10.9
2.0
188.4
1.0
94
0.06
5.9
j 0.11
10.2
9.3
7.1
7.6
6
July
9.1
2.4
177.9
1.0
75
0.22
19.9
0.2
19
9.0
7.3
7.7
10
August
7.4
2.1
129
1.0
62
0.06
3.9
0.1
9
8.7
7.5
7.7
6
September
7.0
1.9
113.7
1.0
59
0.05
3.1
0.1
7.8
8.8
7.4
7.6
6
October
8.9
2.0
149.4
1.0
75
0.06
4.6
0.28
25.5
9.2
7.2
7.6
9
November
8.0
2.4
162.7
1.0
69
0.06
3.8
0.03
1.7
9.9
7.4
7.6
5
December
9.0
2.1
138.6
1.0
68
0.06
4.3
0.0
2.4
10.1
7.3
7.5
5
Average
9.9
2.1
169.7
1.0
83
0.08
7.2
0.1
11.8
9.7
7.2
7.5
6
Paul R. Noland Influent Characteristics
Noland I Monthly Hydraulic
WRRF Average Loadings
Flow Percent of
(MGD) Design
Designed 12.6
(Annual
Avg.)
BOD Organic TSS TSS
Loading Loading Loading Loading
(Lbs/d) Percent (lbs/d) Percent
of of
Design Design
29,666 23,198
PO4 PO4 NH3 NH3
Loading Loading Loading Loading
(lbs/d) Percent (Lbs/d) Percent of
of Design
Design
765 2,250
January
6.3
49.9%
16,471
55.5%
8,150
35.1%
192
25.1%
699
31.1%
February
5.1
40.1%
11,850
39.9%
7,368
31.8%
175
22.9%
720
32.0%
March
6.7
53.2%
14,260
48.1%
7,846
33.8%
196
25.6%
826
36.7%
April
7.1
56.6%
17,335
58.4%
9,693
41.8%
209
27.3%
939
41.7%
May
7.7
60.8%
15,173
51.1%
9,797
42.2%
222
29.0%
788
35.0%
June
5.7
45.1%
13,062
44.0%
8,110
35.0%
176
23.0%
543
24.1%
July
5.0
39.7%
13,984
47.1%
7,746
33.4%
207
27.1%
559
24.8%
August
4.1
32.5%
14,698
49.5%
9,221
39.7%
187
24.4%
789
35.0%
September
4.2
33.1%
16,082
54.2%
9,571
41.3%
215
28.1%
881
39.1%
October
5.3
42.1%
19,869
67.0%
12,089
52.1%
232
30.3%
956
42.5%
November
5.1
40.3%
17,970
60.6%
9,899
42.7%
220
28.8%
843
37.5%
December
6.0
47.5%
22,432
75.6%
13,615
58.7%
222
29.0%
869
38.6%
Average
5.7
45.1 %
16,099
54.3%
9,425
40.6%
204
26.7%
784
34.9%
Jacobs - Fayetteville Project 20
I
Jacobs Fayetteville - Client Monthly Report for December 2021 oaco S
West Side Influent Characteristics
West Side Monthly
WRRF Average
Flow
(MGD)
Hydraulic
Loadings
Percent
of Design
Boo Organic TSS TSS PO4 PO4 NH3 NH3
Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading Loading
(lbs/d) Percent of (lbs/d) Percent (lbs/d) Percent (lbs/d) Percent
Design of Design of Design of Design
14,595 14,595 584 1918
Designed
(Annual
Avg.)
10.0
January
10.8
107.6%
12,508
85.7%
12,331
84.5%
218
37.4%
1,605
83.7%
February
9.6
95.9%
13,110
89.8%
12,291
84.2%
160
27.4%
1,406
73.3%
March
11.8
118.1%
15,216
104.3%
12,918
88.5%
252
43.1%
1,850
96.4%
April
12.1
121.0%
12,799
87.7%
13,164
90.2%
219
37.5%
1,917
100.0%
May
14.1
141.2%
12,171
83.4%
14,193
97.2%
194
33.2%
1,448
75.5%
June
10.8
108.3%
11,669
80.0%
12,705
87.0%
195
33.4%
1,760
91.8%
July
9.1
91.1%
12,941
88.7%
15,103
103.5%
176
30.2%
1,443
75.2%
August
7.4
74.0%
16,394
112.3%
14,720
100.9%
153
26.2%
1,612
84.0%
September
7.0
69.8%
17,354
118.9%
18,155
124.4%
181
31.1%
1,626
84.8%
October
8.9
89.0%
13,940
95.5%
13,892
95.2%
188
32.2%
1,696
88.4%
November
8.1
80.7%
12,741
87.3%
11,814
80.9%
195
33.4%
1,509
78.7%
December
8.9
89.5%
10,879
74.5%
12,982
88.9%
220
37.7%
1,293
67.4%
Average
9.9
98.9%
13,477
92.3%
13,689
93.8%
196
33.6%
1,597
83.3%
Jacobs - Fayetteville Project 21
7
oaco S
Jacobs Fayetteville -
Client Monthly Report for December 2021
Labor Status
Department Job Title
Employee Name
Fayetteville
/o FTE
Admin
Project Manager
Monty Sedlak
95.00%
Admin
Assistant Project Manager
Leonides Moreno
100.00%
Admin - Operations
Operations Manager
Tim Luther
100.00%
Admin
Environmental Specialist
Jeff Hickle
100.00%
Admin
Health, Safety, Compliance Professional
Wes Cloud
70.00%
Admin
Project Coordinator
Brandi Miller-DeWeese
90.00%
Admin
Administrative Assistant
Christy Taylor
100.00%
Admin
Administrative Assistant
Kassandra Foster
100.00%
BMS
BMS Supervisor
Peter Burrow
100.00%
BMS
Lead Operator
Vacant
100.00%
BMS
Lead Operator
John Tenberge
100.00%
BMS
Equipment Operator
Charlie Boger
100.00%
BMS
Equipment Operator
Rick Witherspoon
100.00%
BMS
Equipment Operator
Vacant
100.00%
BMS
Operator I
David Dajani
100.00%
BMS
Operator In Training
Ben Shondelmyer
100.00%
BMS
Operator In Training
Vacant
100.00%
BMS
Operator In Training
Robert Donnell
100.00%
BMS
Operator In Training
Matthew Goud
100.00%
BMS
Mechanic
Mike Reed
100.00%
Admin
Admin-Ops Supervisor
Thom Vinson
90.00%
LAB
Laboratory Director
Donna McChristian
90.00%
LAB
Industrial Pretreatment Coordinator
John Byrd
100.00%
LAB
Lead Laboratory Analyst
Matt Benton
60.00%
LAB
Laboratory Analyst
Walter Choder
100.00%
Maint
Maintenance Supervisor
Joshua Apeman
100.00%
Maint
Lead Mechanic
Brian Daniels
95.00%
Maint
Lead Electrician
Tim Marr
70.00%
Maint
Mechanic
Robert Ingram
100.00%
Maint
Mechanic
Buddy Carter
100.00%
Maint
Mechanic
Steve Cook
100.00%
Maint
Mechanic
Michael Spohn
100.00%
Maint
Mechanic
Rick Dollarhide
100.00%
Maint
Mechanic in Training
Luke Haegele
100.00%
Maint
Mechanic in Training
Nathan Eastwood
100.00%
Operations
Operations Supervisor
Austin Ramsfield
100.00%
Operations
Operator II
Shawn Santellanes
100.00%
Operations
Operator I
Anthony Ramsfield
100.00%
Operations
Operator I
Travis Patton
100.00%
Operations
Operator
Justin Sweeney
100.00%
Operations
Operator In Training
Tom Meunier
100.00%
Operations
Operator In Training
Paul Goolsby
100.00%
Operations
Operator In Training
Chandler Smothers
100.00%
Operations
Operator In Training
Jeremy Johnson
100.00%
Operations
Operator In Training
Brittney Doyle
100.00%
SCADA
SCADA Supervisor
Mayo Miller
100.00%
Jacobs - Fayetteville Project
Jacobs Fayetteville — Client Monthly Report for December 2021
SCADA
SCADA
Instrument & Control Tech
Instrument & Control Tech
.;acobs
Pat Cooley 95.00%
Mark Gleber 100.00%
Authorized Positions = 48.0
Filled Positions = 45.0
Filled FTE's= 43.6
TEMPS
BMS Engineering Intern, U of A Vacant 100.00%
Admin Engineering Intern, U of A Sarah Garrison 100.00%
Maint Engineering Intern, U of A Vacant 100.00%
SPECIAL PROJECTS (Performed in
scope)
Area Reason Name Hours
SCADA
Maintenance
Maintenance
Network Upgrade Campos, Edgar 13.5
Asset Manager Support Bass, Edward Lee 0
Asset Manager Support Turley, Johnny D (JD) 66
Jacobs — Fayetteville Project 23