HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-12-30 - Agendas - FinalCITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
Subdivision Committee Meeting
December 30, 2021
9:00 AM
113 W. Mountain, Room 326
MEETING AGENDA
Members: Rob Sharp (Chairperson), Quintin Canada, & Mary Madden
City Staff: Jessie Masters, Development Review Manager
Call to Order
Consent:
No Items
Old Business:
1. LSD-2021-000045: Large Scale Development (NE OF N. MCCONNELL AVE. & W. DRAKE
ST./PRESIDENTIAL CONVERSIONS, 248): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC.
for property located NE OF N. MCCONNELL AVE. & W. DRAKE ST. The property is zoned C-2,
THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and contains approximately 3.55 acres. The request is for a
13,500 square foot commercial building and associated parking. Planner: Ryan Umberger
New Business:
2. CCP-2021-000019: Concurrent Plat (4148 N. HUNGATE LN./HUNGATE, 141): Submitted by
SATTERFIELD LAND SURVEYORS, INC. for property located at 4148 N. HUNGATE LN. The
property is in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA and contains approximately 5.48 acres. The
request is for the concurrent plat of 2 residential lots. Planner: Gretchen Harrison
3. PPL-2021-000021: Preliminary Plat (W. OF MARKHAM RD./MARKHAM HILL SD, PH. II,
480): Submitted by CEI for property located at the W. OF MARKHAM RD. The property is zoned
RI-U, RESIDENTIAL INTERMEDIATE -URBAN and contains approximately 7.40 acres. The
request is for the preliminary plat of 39 residential lots. Planner: Ryan Umberger
4. LSD-2021-000028: Large Scale Development (SW OF W. WEDINGTON DR. & N. 46T"
AVE./WEDINGTON LANDING TOWNHOMES, 438): Submitted by CIVIL DESIGN ENGINEERS,
INC. for property located SW OF W. WEDINGTON DR. & N. 46T" AVE. The property is zoned
RMF-12, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 12 UNITS PER ACRE, and RSF-18, RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY, 18 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 8.04 acres. The request is
for a 76-unit multi -family complex, 6 single-family units, and associated parking.
Planner: Jessie Masters
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Announcements
None
Adjourn
NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE
All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. If you wish to address the Planning
Commission on an agenda item please queue behind the podium when the Chair asks for public comment.
Once the Chair recognizes you, go to the podium and give your name and address. Address your comments
to the Chair, who is the presiding officer. The Chair will direct your comments to the appropriate appointed
official, staff, or others for response. Please keep your comments brief, to the point, and relevant to the
agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak.
Interpreters or TDD, Telecommunication Device for the Deaf, are available for all public hearings; 72 hour
notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter, please call 575-8330.
As a courtesy please turn off all cell phones and pagers.
A copy of the Planning Commission agenda and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection
in the office of City Planning (575-8267), 125 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. All interested
parties are invited to review the petitions.
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEMO
TO: Fayetteville Subdivision Committee
FROM: Ryan Umberger, Senior Planner
Josh Boccaccio, Staff Engineer
Melissa Evans, Urban Forester
MEETING: December 30, 2021
SUBJECT: LSD-2021-000045: Large Scale Development (NE OF N. MCCONNELL AVE. &
W. DRAKE ST./PRESIDENTIAL CONVERSIONS, 248): Submitted by
JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for property located NE OF N. MCCONNELL
AVE. & W. DRAKE ST. The property is zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE
COMMERCIAL and contains approximately 3.55 acres. The request is for a 13,500
square foot commercial building and associated parking.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends forwarding LSD-2021-000045 to the full Planning Commission with a
recommendation of approval, subject to conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to forward LSD-2021-000045 with conditions:
1. In favor of the recommended street improvements; and
2. All other conditions as recommended by staff. "
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is in west Fayetteville, roughly 500 feet west of the intersection of N. Garland
Avenue and W. Drake Street. The specific area under consideration is the northern half of a
property that is an undeveloped greenfield site. The site is relatively flat with a slope from the
southeast corner to the northwest corner with grades ranging from 0.5% to 4%. Surrounding land
uses and zoning is depicted in Table 1.
Table 1
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
North
1-49/Hw . 112 Interchange
ArDOT ROW
South
Arkansas Agricultural Research & Extension
Center
R-A, Residential Agricultural
East
Welso Inc./Liquor To -Go
C-2, Thoroughfare Commerical
West
United Rentals
C-2, Thoroughfare Commerical
Proposal: The applicant requests Large Scale Development approval to develop the subject
property with a 13,500 square foot commercial building and associated parking.
Right -of -Way to be Dedicated: The property has frontage along W. Drake Street, a Neighborhood
Link Street and N. McConnell Avenue, a Residential Link Street. W. Drake Street currently has
30 feet of right-of-way from centerline. Staff recommends right-of-way dedication to the typical
Neighborhood Link Street standard width of 33.5 feet from centerline. No right-of-way dedication
is recommended for N. McConnell Avenue.
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayAtPAiM10iV.�8Wmittee
Fayetteville, AR 72701 December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 1 of 14
Access Management/Connectivity: Staff has determined that the project meets access and
connectivity requirements. Access is proposed via a private driveway that extends north from the
N. McConnell Avenue right-of-way which dead ends at the southwest corner of the subject
property. A new curb cut is not proposed.
Street Improvements: Staff recommends improvements as proposed by the applicant at the
intersection of N. McConnell Avenue and W. Drake Street. In addition to the proposed
improvements staff recommends the intersection is striped for a right turn lane and adequate
right-of-way is dedicated to accommodate the feature. The Active Transportation Plan shows a
proposed trail bisecting the western half of the property. Staff recommends that a 25-foot-wide
multi -use trail easement is dedicated where a 12-foot concrete trail would be constructed. The
applicant and trails coordinator are currently working through the appropriate alignment of the
proposed easement.
Water and Sewer System: Water and sanitary sewer are available to the site. An 8-inch water
main is present along the western side of the subject area and a 12-inch sanitary sewer main runs
parallel to the north property line.
Parkland dedication or fee in -lieu: Non-residential uses are not subject to parkland dedication
requirements.
Tree Preservation: There is one existing tree in the W. Drake Street right-of-way and an easement
that is in poor condition and will be removed. No mitigation trees are required.
Public Comment: Staff has not received any public comment on the item to date.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding LSD-2021-000045 to the full Planning
Commission, with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. Subdivision Committee recommendation of street improvements. Staff recommends the
development construct the property's frontage as proposed by the applicant, including
dedication of an additional 3.5 feet of right-of-way along W. Drake Street and striping the
east leg of its intersection with N. McConnell Drive for a right turn lane and dedication of
adequate right-of-way to accommodate the turn lane or, alternatively, reducing the
intersection leg to 20-feet face -of -curb to face -of -curb and realignment of the driveway.
2. All comments from Planning staff must be addressed including:
a. Revise parking table as indicated on plat. Parking is the maximum number of
permitted spaces, not minimum. Please revise to "permitted" or "maximum" to
reflect the regulation more accurately.
3. The trash enclosures shall be constructed with material that is complimentary to and
compatible with the proposed building;
4. Conditions of approval from Engineering and Urban Forestry are included in the official
conditions of approval, attached hereto;
Standard conditions of approval:
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 2 of 14
1. Impact fees for fire, police, water, and sewer shall be paid in accordance with City
ordinance;
2. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the
applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives: Black Hills
Energy, AT&T, Ozarks Electric, SWEPCO, and Cox Communications);
3. All mechanical/utility equipment (roof and ground mounted) shall be screened using
materials that are compatible with and incorporated into the structure. A note shall be
clearly placed on the plat and all construction documents indicating this requirement;
4. Trash enclosures shall be screened on three sides with materials complimentary to and
compatible with the principle structure. Containers may also be screened from view of the
street by the principal structure or vegetation. Elevations of the proposed dumpster
enclosure shall be submitted to the Planning and Solid Waste Divisions for review prior to
building permit;
5. All existing utilities below 12kv shall be relocated underground. All proposed utilities shall
be located underground;
6. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for
grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks,
and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed
for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and
approval. All improvements shall comply with the City's current requirements;
7. All exterior lights shall comply with the City lighting ordinance. Manufacturer's cut -sheets
are required for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit;
8. All freestanding and wall signs shall comply with ordinance specifications for location, size,
type, number, etc. Any proposed signs shall be permitted by a separate sign permit
application prior to installation;
9. Large scale development shall be valid for one calendar year;
10. Contact the City's Emergency 911 Address Coordinator for addressing prior to building
permit. The coordinator has noted that a separate street name is required;
11. Prior to building permit, a cost estimate for all required landscaping is to be submitted to
the Landscape Administrator for review. Once approval is gained, a guarantee is to be
issued (bond/letter of credit/cash) for 150% of the cost of the materials and installation of
the plants. This guarantee will be held until the improvements are installed and inspected,
at the time of Certificate of Occupancy; and
12. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required:
a. Grading and drainage permits;
b. Separate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree preservation area
and all utility and access easements;
c. Exterior lighting package must be provided to the Planning Division;
d. An on -site inspection by the Landscape Administrator of all tree protection
measures prior to any land disturbance;
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 3 of 14
e. Project Disk with all final revisions; and
f. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City
(letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by Section 158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu
of Installed Improvements" to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further, all
improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be
completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
Subdivision Committee Action: O Forwarded O Tabled O Approved
Meeting Date: December 30, 2021
Motion:
Second:
Vote:
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
• Engineering Comments
• Urban Forestry Comments
• Request Letter
• Site Plan
• Elevations
• One Mile Map
• Close Up Map
• Current Land Use Map
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 4 of 14
1�
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
URBAN FORESTRY
LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS
To: Justin Jorgensen, PE, Jorgensen + Associates
From: Melissa Evans, and John Scott, Urban Forestry
CC: Ryan Umberger, Senior Planner
Meeting Date: December 27, 2021
Subject: LSD-2021-000045: Presidential Conversions: E of N. McConnell Ave. & W. Drake St.
1. General Landscape Plan Checklist
Yes No N/A
a. Irrigation (notes either automatic or hose bib 100' o.c.)
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C7g, 177.04B3a
b. Species of plant material identified
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C7d,e
c. Size of plant material (minimum size 2" caliper for trees and 3 gal. shrubs)
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C7b,c
d. Soil amendments notes include that soil is amended and sod removed
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C6b
e. Mulch notes indicate organic mulching around trees and within landscape beds
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C6c,d
f. LSD, LSIP, and Subdivisions (PPL & FPL) plans stamped by a licensed
X
Landscape Architect, others by Landscape Designer
UDC Chapter 177.03B
g. Planting bed contained by edging
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C6f
h. Planting details according to Fayetteville's Landscape Manual
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C6g
i. Provide information about 3-Year Maintenance plan. The owner shall deposit
X
with the City of Fayetteville a surety for approved landscape estimate.
UDC Chapter 177.05 A2g
2. Parking Lot Requirements 1 Tree : 12 Parking Spaces Yes No N/A
a. Wheel Stops/Curbs X
UDC Chapter 177.04B1
b. Narrow Tree Lawn (8' min. width, 37.5' length) X
UDC Chapter 177.04C
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 5 of 14
c. Tree Island (8' min. width, 18.7' min length OR 150 square feet) X
UDC Chapter 177.04C
d. Placement of Trees (either side at entrances and exits) X
UDC Chapter 177.04C2
3. Perimeter Landscaping Requirements
Yes No N/A
a. Front Property Line (15' wide landscape) and five on sides. X
UDC Chapter 177.04D2a
b. Side and Rear Property Lines (5' Wide Landscape Area) Yes
UDC Chapter 177D1
c. Shade trees planted on south and west sides of parking lots X
UDC Chapter 177.04D2e
d. Screening of parking lot from adjacent residential properties. X
4. Street Tree Planting Requirements
Yes No N/A
a. Residential Subdivisions
X
1 Large Shade Species Tree per Lot
UDC Chapter 177.0581 a
b. Non -Residential Subdivisions
X
1 Large Species Shade Tree every 30' (planted in greenspace)
UDC Chapter 177.0582a
c. Urban Tree Well — Urban Streetscapes
X
Trees every 30' (8' sidewalk)
UDC Chapter 177.0583a-f
d. Structural Soil — Urban Tree Wells
X
Include a note and/or detail of structural soil on Landscape Plan
UDC Chapter 177.0583a-f
e. Residential Subdivisions
X
Timing of planting indicated on plans
UDC Chapter 177.05A4
f. Residential Subdivisions
X
Written description for method of tracking planting
UDC Chapter 177.05A4e
2
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 6 of 14
5. Landscape Requirement Totals
Mitigation Trees
Parking Lot Trees
Detention Pond — Large Trees
(1 Tree/3,000 square feet)
Detention Pond — Small Tree/Large Shrub
(4 small trees or large shrubs/3,000 square feet)
Detention Pond — Small Shrubs/Large Grasses
(6 shrubs or grasses (1 gallon)/3,000 square feet)
6. Review Status (See Comments)
Conditionally Approved
Approved
Tabled
Denied
h Plat Subdivision
Committee
11-16-21 11-30-21
12-27-21
Amount
0
5 required,
6 provided
1
1
4
6
Planning
Commission
Comments
1. Address items above marked "No" and all Redlines provided.
2. Please choose another large species tree besides Maple as they are not doing well in our area
anymore.
3. Striped areas count as parking spaces in Urban Forestry parking counts since they are pavement. Please
provide another tree island along the west side of the building.
4. Does N. McConnell Ave. continue along the west side of the site? If so, street trees are required at 1/30 LF
along with a continuous row of shrubs. What ever the frontage is on this, street trees are required for this.
5. The southern portion of the project is a future phase, so street trees are not required along Drake St. at this
time.
3
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 7 of 14
��
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
To: Justin Jorgensen, PE, Jorgensen + Associates
From: Melissa Evans, and John Scott, Urban Forestry
URBAN FORESTRY
TREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS
CC: Ryan Umberger, Senior Planner
Meeting Date: December 2, 2021
Subject: LSD-2021-000045: Presidential Conversions: E of N. McConnell Ave. & W. Drake St.
1. Submittal Requirements Yes No N/A
Initial Review with the Urban Forester X
Site Analysis Map Submitted (if justification is needed) X
Site Analysis Written Report Submitted (justification is needed) X
Complete Tree Preservation Plan Submitted X
Tree Mitigation Table on Plans X
Tree Preservation Wavier Submitted (only use if no trees onsite or near P/L) X
2. Tree Preservation Calculations
There is one existing tree in the Drake Street ROW and an easement that is in poor condition and will
be removed.
3. Mitigation Requirements Canopy below
requirement
High Priority 0
Low Priority 0
Total Mitigation Trees Required 0
4. Mitigation Type
On -Site Mitigation
Off -Site Mitigation
Tree Escrow (See Conditions of Approval)
5. Tree Preservation Plan Checklist
UDC Chapter 167.04H1
a. 5 year Aerial Check on Existing Trees
b. Property Boundary
c. Natural Features (100ft beyond limits of disturbance)
Yes
Number of 2" caliper
trees to be planted
0
0
0
No N/A
X
X
X
Tech Subdivision Planning
Plat Committee Commission
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Yes Yes
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 8 of 14
d.
Existing Topography and Proposed Grading
Yes
Yes
e.
Soil Types
Yes
Yes
f.
Significant Trees
N/A
N/A
g.
Groupings of Trees
Yes
Yes
h.
Table Inventory List (species, size, health, priority)
Yes
Yes
i.
All Existing and Proposed Utilities
Yes
Yes
j.
All Existing and Proposed Utility Easements and ROW's
Yes
Yes
k.
All Streams (with approximate center line)
N/A
N/A
I.
Floodplains and floodways
N/A
N/A
m.
Existing Street, Sidewalk or Bike Path ROW
Yes
Yes
n.
Submitted Site Analysis Plan (if required)
N/A
N/A
o.
Shows ALL Proposed Site Improvements
Yes
Yes
p.
Delineates trees/canopy to be preserved and removed
Yes
Yes
Tree Protection Methods
a.
Tree Protection Fencing
N/A
N/A
b.
Limits of Root Pruning
N/A
N/A
c.
Traffic flow on work site
N/A
N/A
d.
Location of material storage
N/A
N/A
e.
Location of concrete wash out
N/A
N/A
f.
Location of construction entrance/exit
N/A
N/A
6. Site Analysis Report (if required) Yes No N/A
UDC Chapter 167.04H4
a. Provide graphic examples of multiple options used to X
minimize removal of existing canopy
b. Submitted Analysis Statement — Note the process, iterations, X
and approaches to preserve canopy.
7. Review Status (See Comments) Tech Plat Subdivision Planning
Committee Commission
Conditionally Approved 11-16-21 11-30-21
12-27-21
Approved
Tabled
Denied
Comments
1. Address items above marked "No" and all Redlines provided.
Subdivision Committee 2
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 9 of 14
y ! • rout srsxraar •an�nauaxva
� ,�� "�„""'®••®• aaaws aHrva asar stn � O
ITUMMONI
DIVA HOI2IddIIS N Q
god S3IJIMO d Y8N o 0
N
S
i >f
B
g36
TI
o
�
3 IS
e g
�o 0 000
00
00000
00000 00000aa
Subdivisi n Committee
Dece ber 30, 2021
Agenda Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 10 of 14
v o Q o
5 x a
= a
_IHQ
WH;
t3araoae xvN saovaa e �
--7IIIII__I
33
li pF.
tx
Il llpl�
do - _w
�P
=—
y 2 Era
Ih
I I
Fa
Q
6I
XIg
N
•
— Stl _
yy�
"+� P � �
a
ON
s
z —►
3A7 7aN�
€ s ® srrl-arzsr xi 'stllltla e i rc swwg2a a311Nl1
44
w E a3M01 'N tlla3„09
01
oon 3is'aa ,3oN lurl �d 3JNVa11N3
g"w
HIM JNI Sltl1N3a3 �x w
E 000-198r1-r9[ >aod �m 1 Cf1 7l17A /1!a!1laA
' I n Committee
ace ber 30, 2021
genda Item 1
Conversions
Page 11 of 14
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions A&
Current Land Use NORTH
1 - ;one
LIMIT OF.
I STUDY
�o
Subject Property
Commercial
Commercial
c
do ,�
DRAKE ST
DRAKE ST
LU
UAAgri.
V
_. ,yMlEfFll 1.9 _
Regional Link
Neighborhood Link
Freeway/Expressway
- - - Trail (Proposed)
_1 Planning Area
- -1 Fayetteville City Limits
Design Overlay District
Feet
0 112.5 225 450 675
1 inch = 300 feet
FEMA Flood Hazard Data
lo0-Year Floodplain
Floodway
Subdivision C mittee
December 0, 2021
Mjunua Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 12 of 14
LSD-2021-000045
Close Up View
EXIT-61 P'
- Regional Link
Neighborhood Link
Freeway/Expressway
Y
Planning Area
�- - -i Fayetteville City Limits
- - - Trail (Proposed)
L —: Design Overlay District
Presidential Conversions
61 Subject Property
r
I
I
I
01 C-z
a01
m yi
\ \ lov
Q DRAKE'ST DRAKE
ST
W
op
O
R-A t
I
I / �
I �
/
I
I
y NORTH
!I
Feet
0 75 150 300 450 600
1 inch = 200 feet
L Residential -Agricultural
RMF-24
C-2
Urban Thoroughfare
Subdivision Clmmittee
December 10, 2021
Item 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 13 of 14
LSD-2021-000045
One Mile View
Presidential Conversions
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles
RMF-12 LL
RI
Regional Link
Neighborhood Link
Institutional Master Plan
Freeway/Expressway
Planned Neighborhood Link
IM Planned Residential Link
Shared -Use Paved Trail
Trail (Proposed)
Design Overlay District
L I Fayetteville City Limits
L I Planning Area
� I
) �I
C-2
I
.I -
qg
O� Subject Property �' I
-r
N , ,
Planning Area
Fayetteville City Limits
NORTH
pal
Fv�=
FUL
VISE;ST
Zoning
42 Gen Ind -III
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
EXTRACTION
NSG
E-1
RI-U
COMMERCIAL
RI-12
Reaieaneal-0Mce
ii NSL
Reaieantlal-Agewlturel
C-2
RSF-.8
C-3
RSF-1
FORM BASED DISTRICTS
RSF-2
Downmwn core
RSF-4
UTen TM1emugMare
RSF-]
�MBin street Center
RSF-8
De.W. General
RSF-18
Cam h, services
RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY
Neighbemooe Services
-1
MN.ighb.tM1eoe Conservation
RMF-12
PLANNED ZONING DISTRICTS
RMF-18
Commercial, Induateal, R,ideneal
W14
INSTITUTIONAL
- F
-Subdivision C
INDUSTTRIAL R
41 HearyCemnarcialan,light lneusirlal December 0
�nittee
2021
tern 1
LSD-2021-000045 Presidential Conversions
Page 14 of 14
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
MEETING:
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEMO
ARKANSAS
Fayetteville Subdivision Committee
Jessie Masters, Development Review Manager
Gretchen Harrison, Planner
December 30, 2021
SUBJECT: CCP-2021-000019: Concurrent Plat (4148 N. HUNGATE LN./HUNGATE, 141):
Submitted by SATTERFIELD LAND SURVEYORS, INC. for property located at
4148 N. HUNGATE LN. The property is in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA
and contains approximately 10.46 acres. The request is for the concurrent plat of
3 residential lots.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends forwarding CCP-2021-000019 to the full Planning Commission with conditions
of approval.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to forward CCP-2021-000019 to the full Planning
Commission, recommending:
In favor of recommended street improvements;
In favor of a street frontage variance for lots in the County; and
All other conditions of approval."
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located in the northeast portion of the Fayetteville Planning Area, about a
quarter mile north of Gulley Road. The property contains two parent tracts totaling 4.99 acres and
5.47 acres. The applicant plans to adjust property lines and divide the larger tract to create one
new parcel. The applicant has not shared any plans to develop the property. Surrounding land
use and zoning is depicted in Table 1.
Table 1:
Surrounding Zoning and Land Use
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
North
Single -Family Residential
Washington County, Res/Ag, 1 unit/Acre
South
Single -Family Residential
Washington County, Res/A , 1 unit/Acre
East
Single -Family Residential
Washington County, Res/A , 1 unit/Acre
West
Single -Family Residential
Washington County, Res/Ag, 1 unit/Acre
Proposal. The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into three lots with 4.54, 2.46, and
3.01 acres. This concurrent plat would formally create one new lot without street frontage. The
applicant has requested to vary from UDC §166.05, in order to create a new lot in Washington
County that does not have direct frontage to a public street.
Mailing Address: Subdivision Committee
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteDdbefr&qM, 2021
Fayetteville, AR 72701 Agenda Item 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 1 of 11
Water and Sewer System: The subject property has access to a two-inch water main along
Hungate Lane. Since the property is outside of Fayetteville city limits, sewer connection is not
permitted.
Right-of-way to be dedicated: The subject property does not have access to public right-of-way.
Access and connectivity. All proposed lots have access to Hungate Lane which is a private road.
The applicant has requested a variance to the street frontage standards in order to create a new
lot without direct frontage to a public street. Staff is recommending in favor of this request since
the proposed lot configuration is consistent with other lots in the surrounding area and each lot
will retain access to Hungate Lane.
Street Improvements: Staff is not recommending any street improvements.
Tree Preservation: N/A; the City's Tree Preservation ordinance does not extend outside of the
City limits.
Parkland Fees: N/A; the City's Parkland Dedication ordinance does not extend outside of the City
limits.
Public Comment: Staff has received no public comment regarding this request.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding CCP-2021-000019 to the full Planning
Commission, with the following conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. Subdivision Committee recommendation of street improvements. Staff recommends no
additional street improvements.
2. Subdivision Committee recommendation of a variance from UDC 166.05(A)(3) to allow for
the creation of a new lot without direct frontage to a public street in Washington County.
Staff recommends in favor of this variance.
3. A 30-foot access easement shall be retained or dedicated in order to ensure that Tract 2
and Tract 3 are able to access Hungate Lane.
4. All remaining comments from Engineering shall be addressed prior to Planning
Commission.
5. Washington County approval of this plat is required prior to recordation.
Standard conditions of approval:
6. All lots shall be labeled with addresses as approved by the 911 Coordinator on the final
plat (if applicable).
7. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to
the applicant or his/her representative, and all comments from utility representative:
Black Hills Energy, AT&T, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communication).
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 2 of 11
8. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for
grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks,
parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process
was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional
review and approval. All improvements shall comply with the City's current requirements.
Subdivision Committee Action: O Tabled O Forwarded O Denied
Meeting Date: December 30, 2021
Motion:
Second:
Vote:
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
• §166.05 — Required Infrastructure Improvements and Subdivision Regulations —
Development In Planning Area
• Applicant Cover Letter
• Applicant Variance Request Letter
• Site Plan
• One Mile Map
• Close -Up Map
• Current Land Use Map
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 3 of 11
166.05 - Required Infrastructure Improvements and Subdivision Regulations - Development In Planning Area
(A) Required Infrastructure Improvements and Subdivision Regulations Outside the City.
(1) Within 1 Mile of City Limits. On and off -site improvements and subdivision regulations for development
outside the city limits and within one mile of the city are the same as for those developments within the
city limits, with the exception of park land dedication requirement which is not required.
(2) Beyond 1 Mile of City Limits. On- and off -site improvements and subdivision regulations for
development outside 1 mile of the city limits shall meet Washington County standards.
(3) All lots in the planning area shall have direct frontage to a public street, with the minimum frontage
required by Washington County pursuant to residential lot and block standards.
(B) Developments Outside City Developed to All Inside the City Standards. If the City Council grants access to the
City's sewer system pursuant to §51.115. (C) and the owner/developer agrees to petition for annexation as soon
as legally possible and develop the subdivision in accordance with all city development requirements including
payment of all impact fees, the bulk and area requirements for this subdivision shall conform to those within the
RSF-4 Zoning District or as otherwise designated by the City Council rather than those within the planning area.
(Code 1965, App. A., Art. 8(11), App. C., Art. IV; Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; 1750, 7-6-70; Ord. No. 1999, 5-7-74; Code
1991, §§159.54, 160.120; Ord. No. 3925, §6, 10-3-95; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4753, 9-6-05;
Ord. No. 5215, 1-20-09; Ord. No. 5270, 9-1-09; Ord. No. 5296, 12-15-09; Ord. No. 5546, 12-04-12)
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 4 of 11
CITY OF
._ FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
TO: Gretchen Harrison, Planner
FROM: Josh Boccaccio, Staff Engineer
DATE: December 28, 2021
SUBJECT: Subdivision Committee Engineering Comments for
CCP-2021-000019
STAFF MEMO
Plan Comments:
1. The water service line to Tract 3 will have to be relocated so that is does not cross other
property lines from the meter prior to the plat being recorded.
2. Show water service line to Tract 2. If a new line is needed, it must be installed prior to
the plat being recorded.
Standard Comments:
1. All designs are subject to the City's latest design criteria (water, sewer, streets and
drainage). Review for plat approval is not approval of public improvements, and all
proposed improvements are subject to further review at the time construction plans are
submitted.
2. Any damage to the existing public street due to construction shall be repaired/replaced
at the owner/developers expense
3. All public sidewalks, curb ramps, curb & gutter, and driveway aprons along this project
frontage must meet ADA guidelines and be free of damage. Any existing infrastructure
that does not conform to ADA guidelines or is otherwise damaged must be removed and
replaced to correct the issue. Coordinate with the engineering department for inspection
of existing facilities to determine compliance.
4. Water and sewer impact fees will apply for the additional impact to the system. The fees
will be based on the proposed meter size and will be charged at the time of meter set.
5. Note, the following portions of all projects will typically not be reviewed by the
Engineering Division until time of construction -level review (unless specifically requested
at plat review):
o Storm Sewer pipe/inlet sizing, gutter spread, profiles, or utility conflicts
o Sanitary Sewer pipe sizing, profiles, or utility conflicts
o Waterline fittings, callouts, or utility conflicts
o Street profiles
o Fine grading/spot elevations
Mailing Address: Subdivision Committee
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteDddeR*egM 2021
Fayetteville, AR 72701 Agenda Item 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 5 of 11
Cover Letter- Lot Split — Hungate Tracts 1 &2
To whom it may concern,
The intent of this split is to give each structure it's own land and description. The parent
parcel is 001-15241-001, being a tract of land 5.47 acres in size.
The resultant tracts will be: Tract 1 with 2.79 acres and Tract 2 with 2.68 acres.
Tract 1 will have access via a 30'access easement previously dedicated as document #
96009609.
Tract 2 will also have access via a 30' access easement previously dedicated as document
# 96009609, and an additional 30' easement dedicated via this plat.
Thank you,
Jazzmen
Assistant
Satterfield Land Surveyors
479-632-3565
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 6 of 11
S Satterfield Land Surveyors, . P. AESf*•F4, �•+
* ..
PS A
P.Q. Box 640 • Alma, Arkansas 72921
Office located at 1928 Highway 71 North
Member: ASPS—OSLS Alma 479-632-3565 • Fax 479-632-5002 • Fort Smith 479-648-3850
® Springdale 479-751-7909 • Web Site: www sleurve
ying. corn
To the planning commission or whom it may concern:
We are requesting a variance from 75' to 0' for creating a tract with less than 75 feet of
road frontage as per UDC 166.05(A)(3). According to Satterfield Land Surveyors job
#46326 for tracts 2 & 3.
This involves the following parcels of land: 001-15241-004, 001-15241-001
We request this on behalf of our clients, Gary & Elaine Hungate. Please see signed
authorization letter from 8/20/21,
Th you `� �
Ricky I�1, P.L.S.
Satterfield Land Surveyors
479-632-3565
ricky@slsurveying.com
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 7 of 11
4l EY]LZL 2'Y :7PG77LLTIYJ "J �
jk` < OM ffi[2C3/OM'MONNLSOY
—*'--x—'R—'ir��l iy4 •O E • /i$ e/ $ � -_ ��y� C � � � l3 � ���<� � e ,Q\ � O��
Or'L66 a./Y,6Y./ON 4 1,T♦x1 1v.`.'
� � 24i�i �� �� � N���N� 4 � I •goo®Q®®o I I i W~� U' V, � � M
is-�
2
OJ VLZd W n ypR�f
Z s %7i6f]60d'YA JY]N:Oii �` ° x � ♦ �° N v' N o V° o
Hill
V In &€
N u 'maoss�s wvAmr/ g
—Ltl OEEM./6,6Y./0 Sq
§'$� ri^i
I1r'
.Lb'Ll71,17
6F
_-___- a'°3� x soa"� 3 �v
4
�oe rr hN���� pp �� a—x— �~s i33Ci �� aav���•��o�R
1
O.i ran/nauatrJ o `E°ov4H tit$I^
b® A2'ffil NCbYT I°\
q zrooszs/_/av a�avJ c o o c "c° m�;
N
� � � 1{{.�� V� `. y��e� Npp I W •t.`D C N OC i 0.� v
°g`mcapooFQo
�o$S _ ° a o ¢;coNi
o
--------------
s N aNa�4°� N.ac O
I 3 10 m
WWWW8�gMx°�
22.b
2anxVeg/ar3W
—��. ON.Y/IMO�SZ 24 0l xv°<°nC "Om�o 0000......��®
Nl .. .. .. .. .....m'�.- h I $VN^c momocxo
4 Q n
�Orr �G1�9®79, eO/v--: ==: azassasr,.zezoN W I a� �= a s o a �
&'®G1%c v
r /asna',uun/aJ/I a a = Q� a z c v° bi
�N SbLZL aro 77/Mauslov 1� � t�.. 8 k $ m u=o3 �S
NI9/6'
NO7Y/N NAVa N009N6'
/RYrrZSI-/00l BJDYJ f," ^owa8�q �xa "aV �2 jh Dm 'Dc m O � °�
rz,.. t�$��$�'��yan� omi Fo`mq
Gg44.:Yr��BS��c�v 8.vn
U¢ I h"ii�Ea4C�b�
YiW 2 Lx QW I ^ry ,m'= J F jo°.x
Al
x<30x 2mW0� I a R
•� hW OO y>v�,W`= I W O1u �. W � j oy3i .xav
2WWWti UWGVOiOZW I p InS I U I 1 < I �oy,oi"4°
00�[0 UQ I I �2 I I 40 I I 1 1 � � voD
x ON��W<JI¢il0 I I M��,` �.�i`ou
2 Iry �� I t• <� I I I 1 � W I �c` h
1Zy <•�� S�,c WOON I I « �< vi� I = WO I 1 I 1 0 2 I oa O �C� vli; x O S< I W 2 W WO I `m Sy"ov„mv
o� ,,��'2�.���c�i t5 i i au Y 8W I woo i iW i� i ¢ mmt� ¢'N i � " aa�E`�c•� 8 Ys
�y2u���WU W�WV,O�W I I WS I I< N vOio IQ W W�F 10 10 10 10 >. ph<Qo pW j0 SO o.�vE 3.3��
yy�Wm�Op vpppplU 10I.� 1x �wW I h� I I 411' w �R� t �Ox�� W2l � o �Dtn c O
QNO�SS 44 _
Uq�qN<2RWv�i22 �¢O I li _ JW I I I I t 4ijH 2 WO I �c Cy Qy &..x°° 2
M cvx Q4Dy; g ff
24
2W ��" U�•R" W h1 I I
j,$in Comm tee
b oWo'S�i= i� iu¢Q i io $ �Q iW u$mv I iv i iS �20� i iz i i �� iW °g C
oouii��2�2w''O�Wg m�>oocvc3z amber 21
�ki152W xC3�W'lt°iWWOy�y I I= 3R 1> xlnQ I Iv, IW Im WU�Gm�° I}OY sg ,_�� j2 �c��i :,.uL g nit 2
y, g ON3C4S0SUWWW I� I< �Qyt 2h0 I I� IhWQ Iti 1yu 11uu 4¢ IW I¢ IW I< tayu 2WJ�0< IQh I¢ 6 O 1� °`x 9 ,gyp n ate
O<vi42'W� Itgi IW V �4U I IN V �¢ IU V 3QW IW IU Iti IU V �OVIRInW IQC< 10 UU IU �002 NR 4c �.c .o
Pam 11
CCP-2021-000019
Concurrent Plat
for Hungate
NORTH
One Mile View
RSF-4
0 0.125 0.25
0.5 Miles
W
G
G
-TERF
Subject Property
���� - ■ ■
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ MEN ■
Ov0
r<
■
0
z
O
a
0
z
Q
o�v
GUL D
---
z°nmg � 42 canarenna�amal
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY EXTRACTION
�NSG �E.,
_____
_ _ _ .
RI-U
RI-12
�NSL
COMMERCIAL
ReaiUentlal-OMce
Neighborhood Link
—
-
ReaiUentlal-AgiculWrel
RSF-.s
R. F-,
RSF-2
I♦ C-2
ii
FORM BASED DISTRICTS
Planned Neighborhood Link
g
RSF"°
RSF-1
Downtown Care
=UTaT"ar hare
Main 11, Center
..
R.
Da.W. Ga .I
■ Planned Residential Link
RSF-,8
RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY
CommunityS .
NaigM1barlwaa Se .
— —
• i
Fayetteville City Limits
�- Y Y
Q
r
,_____ -----1
� RMF-6
RMF-12
�RMF-,a
I♦ NeigM1b°rlw°E Cansanrelian
PLANNED ZONING DISTRICTS
� Cammertial, InEuaVial, Ra91UanYal
- -,
_ - +
Planning Area
Planning Area --- , _
Fayetteville City Limits
RMF-2°
=W14°
INDUSTRIAL
41 NaawCammamialandLight
INSTRUTXINAL
-Subdivision C
Ind.v 1 December
10,
I
mittee
2021
tem 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 9 of 11
CCP-2021-000019 Concurrent Plat for Hungate
Close Up View
2
w
■�.rZ�. ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
2
low
41
i
■ ■ i Planned Residential Link
' Planning Area
f
0 75 150
Subject Property
►]
Feet
300 450
1 inch = 200 feet
:11
i
NORTHa A&
Subdivision C mittee
December 0, 2021
Item 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 10 of 11
CCP-2021-000019 Concurrent Plat for Hungate A&
Current Land Use NORTH
1 '
T
Y pp. p
:t Single -Family Residential
Subject Property
Single -Family Residential ;
-„ Rm
Single -Family Residential06.
}
Single -Family Residential
9 Y
I,
FEMA Flood Hazard Data
100-Year Floodplain
Feet Floodway
0 112.5 225 450 675 900
■ ■ Planned Residential Link
1 inch = 300 feet
' ;Planning Area subdivision CcIn
— — - December to
Mqtnluct
n ittee
2021
tem 2
CCP-2021-000019 Hungate
Page 11 of 11
_ CITY OF
1WFAYETTEVILLE SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEMO
ARKANSAS
TO: Fayetteville Subdivision Committee
FROM: Ryan Umberger, Senior Planner
Jonathan Ely, Development and Construction Manager
Melissa Evans, Urban Forester
MEETING: December 30, 2021
SUBJECT: PPL-2021-000021: Preliminary Plat (W. OF MARKHAM RD./MARKHAM HILL
SD, PH. II, 480): Submitted by CEI for property located at the W. OF MARKHAM
RD. The property is zoned RI-U, RESIDENTIAL INTERMEDIATE -URBAN and
contains approximately 7.40 acres. The request is for the preliminary plat of 39
residential lots.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends forwarding PPL-2021-000021 to the full Planning Commission with a
recommendation of approval, with conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to forward PPL-2021-000021 to the full Planning Commission, recommending:
• In favor of the requested variance to §166.04(B) —Required Infrastructure Improvements
— Development in City Limits;
• In favor of the requested variance to §166.08(E) —Block Layout/Connectivity;
• In favor of the recommended street improvements;
In favor of all other conditions as recommended by staff."
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is roughly 500 feet west of the west end of W. Markham Road, where the
road transitions into a private drive serving the Pratt Place Inn and Barn. The subject application
involves Phase II of the larger Markham Hill Subdivision which received approval in January 2020
(PPL 19-6861). The property is zoned RI-U, Residential Intermediate -Urban which was approved
in 2018 with a bill of assurance that limits the density of the area to four units per acre across the
119.43-acre subdivision. The site is wholly within the Hillside -Hilltop Overlay District and under
mature tree canopy. The area is at the crest of Markham Hill, with the most significant
topographical contours falling from the hilltop to the northeast and southwest. Surrounding land
use and zoning is depicted in Table 1.
Paw 6 ittee
Mailing Address: December 30, 2021
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayettevi I I ePargclaltem 3
Fayetteville, AR 72701 PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 1 of 30
Table 1:
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
North
Undeveloped;
Single-family Residential
RSF-4, Residential Single-family, 4 Units per Acre;
RI-U, Residential Intermediate -Urban
South
Hotel and Event Venue
Pratt Place C-PZD; RI-U, Residential Intermediate -
Urban
East
Hotel and Event Venue
Pratt Place C-PZD; RI-U, Residential Intermediate -
Urban
West
Undeveloped
RI-U, Residential Intermediate, Urban
Proposal: The applicant is proposing a subdivision with 39 residential lots with 6 additional lots
proposed to be used for a sanitary sewer lift station, future development phases, and open
space/preserved areas. Of the 39 residential lots, 26 are proposed to be used for single-family
homes, 10 lots for attached townhomes, and two lots for a multifamily use. The remaining lot is
yet to be determined but will be either single- or multifamily.
The applicant requests two variances to the Unified Development Code in association with this
request.
• §166.04(B)(4)(c) — Streets. Widening the street adjacent to the project frontage and
construction of all interior streets to meet Master Street Plan standards. The
applicant is requesting to vary from the Master Street Plan standards for an Alternative
Link Street section. Further discussion of the request is in the "Street Improvements"
section of this report.
• §166.08(E)(1) — Block Length. Residential Link Streets are required to provide an
intersection at a minimum of 1 per 660 feet. The applicant is requesting a variance to
this standard for W. Markham Avenue and Street A. Further discussion of this request is
included in the "Access/Connectivity" section of this report.
Street Improvements:
External Streets: W. Markham Road, the nearest public right-of-way, is classified as a Residential
Link Street according to the 2040 Master Street Plan. The applicant proposes to dedicate public
right-of-way and connect to W. Markham Road at the final plat stage. Alternative Residential Link
Streets are typical in Hillside Hilltop Overlay areas with a maximum right-of-way dedication of 40
feet.
Internal Streets: The applicant proposes internal streets as Alternative Residential Link Streets.
Additionally, three private alleys are proposed to rear -load the lots. At a minimum, Alternative
Residential Link Streets typically require 33 feet of right-of-way dedication to include 19 feet of
paved drive lanes, curb and gutter, and 6-foot-wide greenspaces and sidewalks. The applicant's
plans deviate from the typical Master Street Plan section for W. Markham Road and Street A. A
variance to the Alternative Residential Link Street section was requested as follows:
• §166.04(B)(4)(c) — Streets. Widening the street adjacent to the project frontage and
construction of all interior streets to meet Master Street Plan standards. The
applicant proposes to deviate from the typical Master Street Plan section by providing 33
feet of right-of-way composed of two 10-foot travel lanes, 7 feet of alternating
greenspace/on-street parallel parking, curb and gutter, and a 5-foot sidewalk. To
supplement the street infrastructure in the public right-of-way the applicant proposes curb,
an additional 7 foot -wide on -street parking lane, a 1-foot ribbon curb, and 1.5 feet of
sidewalk within a public access easement.
o Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends in favor of the request, finding that the
proposal meets the intent behind the typical street section in a way that is sensitive
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 2 of 30
to the natural features of the property. The proposed ten -foot travel lanes match
the intent of the typical street section but include concrete gutter where the City
does not. Providing on -street parking on both sides of the street will help ensure
adequate parking for future developments, as well as potentially help calm traffic
throughout the site. The supplemental infrastructure proposed to be located in an
access easement will potentially serve to calm traffic while ensuring adequate
sidewalk widths and buffering to adequately maintain pedestrian comfort and
safety. The only place where sidewalk is at the back of curb is when it is adjacent
to on -street parking, therefore maintaining an appropriate buffer. Sidewalks are
proposed to be 6 % feet instead of 5 feet with a shy distance of 1 % feet where
adjacent to a curb. Staff finds the minimum effective width is met but may require
additional width depending on the development pattern of each lot. Finally, staff
finds the ribbon curb will provide sufficient demarcation between the adjacent
private on -street parking and the City right-of-way. As a condition of approval staff
recommends all private amenities, including alleys, shall be owned and maintained
by a property owner's association.
Block Length/Connectivity: The applicant proposes to dedicate public right-of-way and connect to
W. Markham Road prior to approval of the final plat. The applicant's letter suggests they will meet
the City's Master Street Plan requirements at that time. A fire safety emergency access road is
proposed to be constructed with gravel surfacing and connect from the W. Markham Road through
street to N. Sang Avenue, just south of the water tower. The applicant has requested one variance
to these standards, as outlined below. Should a variance be approved, staff finds the applicant is
meeting all other block length and connectivity requirements.
• §166.08(E)(1) — Block Length. Residential Link Streets are required to provide an
intersection at a minimum of 1 per 660 feet. The applicant requires a variance to this
standard for W. Markham Road (approximately 750') and Street A (approximately 1,015).
o Staff Recommendation: Staff supports the variance request, agreeing that the
topography of the site presents a burden that inhibits a more connected block
configuration. The proposed street network follows the contours of the hillside
which has an average grade of 9.5%. A required tree preservation area further
inhibits Street A from feasibly offering connectivity to the north. Alleys and a
proposed mid -block pedestrian access path offer options to preserve pedestrian
and vehicular connectivity throughout the site. In addition to better connectivity and
access, a tight, gridded network often contributes towards slower traffic speeds.
Given the limited opportunity for connectivity, limited traffic generation will occur
along this street segment and speeds are unlikely to exceed safe levels.
Water and Sewer System: Water and sewer is required to be extended throughout the site, and
the applicant is proposing an additional sanitary lift station on Lot 3 to connect to a gravity main
which serves the hospitality component of the development.
Tree Preservation:
Canopy minimum requirement: 20.0%
Existing canopy: 83.3%
Preserved canopy: 0.0%
Mitigation required: 571 2" caliper trees
Parks: A PRAB meeting was held on this proposal on November 1, 2021. PRAB recommended
land dedication for this development in the amount of 1.31 acres based on 36 single family and
24 multifamily residential units. PRAB also recommended the developer donate, at minimum, an
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 3 of 30
additional three acres. The final amount of fee in -lieu needed to satisfy parkland dedication will
be determined after approval of the final plat. Fees in -lieu must be paid prior to the issuance of
building permits.
Public Comment: Staff has not received any public comment on this item to date.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding PPL 2021-000021 to the full Planning
Commission with a recommendation of approval, with the following conditions.
Conditions of Approval:
Subdivision Committee recommendation of street improvements:
a. The connection to W. Markham Road shall be constructed in accordance with the
Master Street Plan for an Alternative Residential Link Street prior to approval of
the final plat.
o The internal streets shall be constructed as depicted on the proposed preliminary
plat and the applicant's street section exhibit including right-of-way dedication of
33 feet, 5-foot sidewalk, a 7-foot greenspace%n-street parking lane, curb and
gutter, and street trees. Infrastructure outside of the right-of-way, including alleys,
shall be owned and maintained by a property owner's association;
2. Subdivision Committee recommendation of requested variances:
a. §166.04(4)(c) — Streets. Widening the street adjacent to the project frontage and
construction of all interior streets to meet Master Street Plan standards. Staff
recommends in favor of this request, as outlined in comments above;
b. §166.08(E)(1) — Block Length. Residential Link Streets are required to provide an
intersection at a minimum of 1 per 660 feet. Staff recommends in favor of this
request, as outlined in comments above;
3. All plat comments shall be addressed as indicated and distributed through Energov portal
prior to Planning Commission submission.
4. Streetlights shall be installed in accordance with code at all street intersections and
spaced every 300 feet;
5. Conditions of approval from Engineering, Urban Forestry, and Parks Department are
included in the official conditions of approval;
6. Preliminary plat approval is valid for one year. All permits to complete construction for all
lots within this preliminary plat are required to be obtained within one (1) year, subject to
extensions in accordance with the Unified Development Code; and
Standard conditions of approval:
7. All existing overhead utility lines 12kV and under shall be relocated underground. All
proposed utilities shall be located underground;
8. Sidewalk along all commonly owned lots (detention ponds, etc.) shall be constructed prior
to final plat. All other sidewalks shall be constructed or guaranteed prior to final plat;
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 4 of 30
9. All street names shall be approved by the 911 Coordinator and indicated on the final
plat. All streets require naming for final addresses. Contact the addressing office at (479)
575-8380 for more details;
10. All lots shall be labeled with addresses as approved by the 911 Coordinator on the final
plat;
11. A floodplain development permit is required prior to construction for any grading or
structures in the flood zone;
12. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to
the applicant or his/her representative, and all comments from utility representative:
Black Hills Energy, AT&T, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communication);
13. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for
grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks,
parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process
was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional
review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements; and
14. Preliminary Plat approval shall be valid for one calendar year.
Subdivision Committee Action: O Tabled O Forwarded O Denied
Meeting Date: December 30, 2021
Motion:
Second:
Vote:
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
• Engineering comments
• Urban Forestry comments
• Fire comments
• Parks comments
• Request Letter
• Variance Request Letter
• Site Plan
• One Mile Map
• Close-up Map
• Current Land Use Map
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 5 of 30
CITY OF
._ FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
TO: Ryan Umberger, Senior Planner
FROM: Jonathan Ely, Development and Construction Manager
DATE: December 27, 2021
SUBJECT: Subdivision Committee Engineering Comments for
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill Subdivision Phase 2
Variance Requests:
STAFF MEMO
Variance #1 — Maximum Block Length
o Engineering has no recommendation regarding this request and will defer to the
Planning Division.
Variance #2 — Typical Street Section does not conform to Master Street Plan
0 10ft Travel lanes
■ Engineering is in support of this request, finding that it matches the intent
behind the typical master street plan sections, but just includes the
concrete gutter as part of the travel lane whereas the city standard
section does not in all instances.
0 33ft of Right of way, and removal of required 6ft greenspace.
■ Engineering is in support of this request. As shown on the site plan, the
only locations where sidewalk is at back of curb and greenspace is not
provided is when the sidewalk is adjacent to on street parking. Therefore,
a buffer is still provided between travel lanes and the sidewalk.
0 6'/2 ft wide sidewalks instead of 5ft wide sidewalks
■ Engineering is in support of this finding that it meets the requirements of
UDC 171.14, where the minimum effective width for all sidewalks is 5ft,
and when adjacent to a curb, a shy distance of 1 '/2 must be provided in
addition to the minimum effective width, which results in a 6ft wide
sidewalk. Depending on development pattern of each lot, and proximity
of buildings to the sidewalk, it could be necessary to expand the sidewalk
width further. If the applicant has questions about this, they can find
details in UDC 171.14.
o Ribbon Curb
■ Engineering is in support of this request, finding that the ribbon curb will
provide sufficient demarcation between the adjacent POA owned parallel
parking, and the City Right of Way. Engineering will review the
construction detail for the ribbon curb at the time of permit review.
o Road Cross Slope
■ Engineering is generally in support of this request as we do recognize the
complexity of development on a hillside, and additional requirements of a
street with a typical crown. However, this is typically a City Engineer
determination of design criteria from the Minimum Street Standards and
Mailing Address: Subdivision Committee
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteVWeR*egM 2021
Fayetteville, AR 72701 Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 6 of 30
the Drainage Criteria Manual and should be requested at the time of
permit review.
Waiver Requests from Minimum Street Standards and Drainage Criteria Manual
In General, these requests will be reviewed by the City Engineer at the time of permit
review. However, we can offer the following response at this time:
• Minimum K Value for vertical curves. Engineering is generally supportive of these
requests when needed to reduce the amount of cut and fill in sensitive areas.
• Detention pond setbacks from structures. Engineering is generally supportive of these
requests, when it can be shown that there are no risks of flooding to adjacent properties
and structures.
Plan Comments:
1. Grading plan will be reviewed in greater detail at time of permit review. Previous
comments regarding driveway grades still appear to have not been addressed in the
current submittal.
2. Sight Distance for driveways has been shown on the plans to accommodate a 15 mph
speed limit. This does not match the city standard for residential link streets. Therefore
additional considerations will need to be provided at the time of permit review to show
how this speed limit will be achieved.
Standard Comments:
1. All designs are subject to the City's latest design criteria (water, sewer, streets and
drainage). Review for plat approval is not approval of public improvements, and all
proposed improvements are subject to further review at the time construction plans are
submitted.
2. Any damage to the existing public street due to construction shall be repaired/replaced
at the owner/developers expense
3. All public sidewalks, curb ramps, curb & gutter, and driveway aprons along this project
frontage must meet ADA guidelines and be free of damage. Any existing infrastructure
that does not conform to ADA guidelines or is otherwise damaged must be removed and
replaced to correct the issue. Coordinate with the engineering department for inspection
of existing facilities to determine compliance.
4. Water and sewer impact fees will apply for the additional impact to the system. The fees
will be based on the proposed meter size and will be charged at the time of meter set.
5. Note, the following portions of all projects will typically not be reviewed by the
Engineering Division until time of construction -level review (unless specifically requested
at plat review):
o Storm Sewer pipe/inlet sizing, gutter spread, profiles, or utility conflicts
o Sanitary Sewer pipe sizing, profiles, or utility conflicts
o Waterline fittings, callouts, or utility conflicts
o Street profiles
o Fine grading/spot elevations
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
P4e7of30
1�
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
URBAN FORESTRY
LANDSCAPE PLAN COMMENTS
To: Ryan Evitts, PLA, LI, CEI Engineering
From: Melissa Evans, and John Scott, Urban Forestry
CC: Ryan Umberger, Senior Planner
Meeting Date: December 27, 2021
Subject: PPL-2021-000021: W. Markham Rd.: Markham Hill SD Phase II
1. General Landscape Plan Checklist
Yes No N/A
a. Irrigation (notes either automatic or hose bib 100' o.c.)
X
UDC Chapter 177.03A7g, 177.04B3a
b. Species of plant material identified
X
UDC Chapter 177.03A7d,e
c. Size of plant material (minimum size 2" caliper for trees and 3 gal. shrubs)
X
UDC Chapter 177.03A7b,c
d. Soil amendments notes include that soil is amended and sod removed
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C6b
e. Mulch notes indicate organic mulching around trees and within landscape beds
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C6c,d
f. LSD and Subdivisions plans stamped by a licensed Landscape Architect, others
X
by Landscape Designer
UDC Chapter 177.03B
g. Planting bed contained by edging
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C6f
h. Planting details according to Fayetteville's Landscape Manual
X
UDC Chapter 177.03C6g
i. Provide information about 3-Year Maintenance plan. The owner shall deposit
X
with the City of Fayetteville a surety for approved landscape estimate.
UDC Chapter 177.05 A2e
2. Parking Lot Requirements 1 Tree : 12 Parking Spaces
Yes No N/A
a. Wheel Stops/Curbs X
UDC Chapter 177.04B1
b. Narrow Tree Lawn (8' min. width, 37.5' length) X
UDC Chapter 177.04C
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 8 of 30
c. Tree Island (8' min. width, 18.7' min length OR 150 square feet) X
UDC Chapter 177.04C
d. Placement of Trees (either side at entrances and exits) X
UDC Chapter 177.04C2
3. Perimeter Landscaping Requirements
Yes No N/A
a. Side and Rear Property Lines (5' wide landscaped area)
X
UDC Chapter 177.04D2a
b. Front Property Line (15' wide landscape)
X
UDC Chapter 177.04C2a
c. Shade trees planted on south and west sides of parking lots
X
UDC Chapter 177.04D2e
d. 50% Evergreen shrubs if parking lot adjacent to ROW
X
UDC Chapter 177.04D4a
4. Street Tree Planting Requirements Yes No N/A
a. Residential Subdivisions X
1 Large Shade Species Tree per Lot
UDC Chapter 177.05
b. Non -Residential Subdivisions X
1 Large Species Shade Tree every 30' (planted in greenspace)
UDC Chapter 177.05
c. Urban Tree Well — Urban Streetscapes X
Trees every 30' (8' sidewalk)
UDC Chapter 177.0583a-f
d. Structured Soil — Urban Tree Wells X
Include a note and/or detail of structural soil on Landscape Plan
UDC Chapter 177.0583a-f
e. Residential Subdivisions X
Timing of planting indicated on plans
UDC Chapter 177.05A4
f. Residential Subdivisions X
Written description for method of tracking planting
UDC Chapter 177.05A4e
2
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 9 of 30
5. Landscape Requirement Totals
Mitigation Trees
Parking Lot Trees
Street Trees / Lot Trees
Detention Pond — Large Trees
(1 Tree/3,000 square feet)
Detention Pond — Small Tree/Large Shrub
(4 small trees or large shrubs/3,000 square feet)
Amount
0
0
46 Lot Trees,
12 Street Trees
7
26
Detention Pond — Small Shrubs/Large Grasses 38
(6 shrubs or grasses (1 gallon)/3,000 square feet)
6. Review Status (See Comments) ech Plat Subdivision Planning
_ Committee Commission
Conditionally Approved 11-15-2021 12-21-2021
12-13-2021
Approved
Tabled
Denied
Comments
1. Address items above marked "No" and all Redlines provided.
2. Please provide the City of Fayetteville planting details and landscape notes on the plan.
3. Please provide contact name and number of the person tracking the lot/street tree plantings.
4. An updated landscape plan was not provided with this submittal, so was not able to be reviewed at
this time. Staff feels confident that the landscape comments can be worked out as the project moves
forward.
5. There needs to be a landscape plan by Planning Commission.
6. Tree Preservation Easements need to be shown on FPL and dedicated at that time.
3
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 10 of 30
URBAN FORESTRY
IVTREE PRESERVATION COMMENTS
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
To: Ryan Evitts, PLA, LI and Tim A. Herndon, CEI Engineering
From: Melissa Evans & John Scott, Urban Forestry
CC: Ryan Umberger, Senior Planner
Meeting Date: December 27, 2021
Subject: PPL-2021-000021: W. Markham Rd.: Markham Hill SD Phase II
1. Submittal Requirements Yes
Initial Review with the Urban Forester X
Site Analysis Map Submitted (if justification is needed)
Site Analysis Written Report Submitted Qustification is needed)
Complete Tree Preservation Plan Submitted X
Tree Mitigation Table on Plans X
Tree Preservation Wavier Submitted (only use if no trees onsite or near P/L)
2. Tree Preservation Calculations
No N/A
X
X
X
Tree Preservation Calculations Acres
Acres
Percent of site
Total Site Area *Minus Right of Way and Easements
14.29
100%
Zoning Designation * Select Below with drop down arrow
RI-U, Residential Intermediate -Urban
2.14
15%
HHOD * Select Below with Drop Down Arrow
Yes
1
5
Total Canopy for Minimum Preservation Requirements
2.86
20.0%
Existing Tree Canopy * Minus Right of Way and Easements
11.90
83.3%
Tree Canopy Preserved
0.00
0.0%
Tree Canopy Removed *On Site
11.90
83.3%
Tree Canopy Removed *Off Site
0.00
Tree Canopy Removed Total
11.90
83.3%
Removed Below Minimum
2.86
Mitigation Requirements
2.86
Mitigation Requirements in Square Feet
124,494
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 11 of 30
3. Mitigation Requirements Canopy below
requirement
High Priority 124,494
Low Priority
Total Mitigation Trees Required 1241494
4. Mitigation Type Yes
On -Site Mitigation
Off -Site Mitigation
Tree Escrow (See Conditions of Approval)
Off -Site Preservation (125,154 SF Existing Canopy
Preservation)
5. Tree Preservation Plan Checklist
UDC Chapter 167.04H1
a. 5 year Aerial Check on Existing Trees
b. Property Boundary
c. Natural Features (100ft beyond limits of disturbance)
d. Existing Topography and Proposed Grading
e. Soil Types
f. Significant Trees
g. Groupings of Trees
h. Table Inventory List (species, size, health, priority)
i. All Existing and Proposed Utilities
j. All Existing and Proposed Utility Easements and ROW's
k. All Streams (with approximate center line)
I. Floodplains and floodways
m. Existing Street, Sidewalk or Bike Path ROW
n. Submitted Site Analysis Plan (if required)
o. Shows ALL Proposed Site Improvements
p. Delineates trees/canopy to be preserved and removed
Tree Protection Methods
a. Tree Protection Fencing
b. Limits of Root Pruning
c. Traffic flow on work site
d. Location of material storage
e. Location of concrete wash out
X
Number of 2" caliper
trees to be planted
571
571
No N/A
X
X
X
Tech
Subdivision
Planning
Plat
Committee
Commission
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
N/A
N/A
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Subdivision Committee 2
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021
Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 12 of 30
f. Location of construction entrance/exit Yes
Yes
6. Site Analysis Report (if required) Yes
No
N/A
UDC Chapter 167.04H4
a. Provide graphic examples of multiple options used to
X
minimize removal of existing canopy
b. Submitted Analysis Statement — Note the process, iterations,
X
and approaches to preserve canopy.
7. Review Status (See Comments) Tech Plat
Subdivision
Planning
Committee
Commission
Conditionally Approved 11-15-21
12-27-2021
12-13-21
Approved
Tabled
Denied
Comments
1. Address items above marked "No" and all Redlines provided on plan.
2. Please show what areas of Tree Preservation have been accounted for with Phase I development with square
footage (11,255 SF is needed for this).
3. Why did the Total Site Area and Mitigation numbers increase?
Subdivision Committee 3
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 13 of 30
n
rn U 00�01'
0 Ln
—J Ox
LU
Cr
U
V)
LLJ O cc)
0
LU CD
0 00
00 =
U
A0 <
0 00
CD
UO
LU
[If M
rN
<
0
—j
C)
-j
0
.7p
LU
rn of
LU
cc
CY) U
I-- <
000
LLJ
CD I Ln of
mu
F-- <
000
C:)
V)
< LLJ
0
C:) 0 Ln
Om
00
r) CD
z
o
00
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. 11
Page 14 of 30
N
ti U
r 0
N U Z N •— w U i
C14> O �a
LLJ
- 6 a) - d
M N — N O
� _ O N C-
0 O� N �_ � U U U a)`� +p a-- C C O M M- O
EL
LL 0 >
O.O :3 O O E O- O E
Q O O �+ M 0 0 0 E 0
O�Ew. EWQ
w
o Q — rs ,. =
oLr) 4�
O w 1
w , o0 1
U
Q
O op
+� -J Do
Ln o
N U
Y.. Q
Ln
1 0
w 1
U1
Ui
N U Q C=
0n �Q ,
o
of o
rn
Q
O u7
Uq
Uj a
O 00LL nu
/
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 15 of 30
N
N
N
CM
O
C
CO
N
N
L
(B
a
M
E
U
a)
N
>
>
O
O C
c -0
Q
N
U C
0
2 M
I
(0 O fn
WE
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 16 of 30
CITY OF
PIP'"
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
TO: Planning Division
FROM: Zach Foster, Parks Planning
DATE: November 17, 2021
SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Technical Plat Review Comments
*************************************************************************************************************
PRAB Meeting Date: November 1, 2021
Project Title: Markham Hill Subdivision (Phase 2)
Protect Number: PPL-2021-000021
Location: W Markham Rd & N Sang Ave
Plat Page: 480,481
Park Quadrant: SW
Billing Name & Address: Markham Residential Owner LLC
15 N Church Ave, STE 103, Fayetteville, AR 72701
®Land Dedication ❑ Fee -in -Lieu ❑ Both
Land Dedication
Single Family 36 @ 0.023 acre per unit = 0.828 acres
Multi Family 24 @ 0.020 acre per unit = 0.48 acres
Fee -in -Lieu
Single Family @ $1089 per unit = $
Multi Family @ $952 per unit = $
SUMMARY:
■ This application proposes 60 total units.
o 36 SF
0 24 MF (spanning lots 4, 24, 25)
o Unbuildable lots are lot 3, 5, and 45
■ The November 1, 2021 PRAB meeting approved 1.35 acres of land dedication for this
development. The developer will dedicate approximately 10.1 acres total and "bank" the
surplus of land to meet future parkland dedication requirements for this project
o Portions of PARCEL # 765-14532-000, 765-14535-000, 765-14525-000
■ The Developer will also donate an additional 3 minimum acres in the future
o Portions of Parcel # 765-14595-100 and 765-14594-000
■ The final fee -in -lieu and/or land dedication needed to satisfy Parkland Dedication
requirements will be determined after Planning Commission's approval of the Final Plat.
■ Land dedication and/or fee -in -lieu must be recorded prior to the issuance of building permits.
PROJECT HISTORY
Paw 6 ittee
Mailing Address: December 30, 2021
113 W. Mountain Street wwwwfayetteviIIeAsQgdvItem 3
Fayetteville, AR 72701 PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 17 of 30
IN FPL-2021-000007 (19 buildiable SF units)
Below is an exhibit from Specialized Real Estate Group depicting Parkland Dedication and
donation acreage as of 11/1/2021:
n,n,re r m iena mnnnnn
3 ac7es min. JR-At
Fz
Pr
` Na
& gamR
MARKHAM HILL
PAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
Park Lord Dedication Summary:
+7-10.1 acres for park land dedication
• Additional3 minimum acres of future
park land donation. Applicant will
coordinatewifh the City of Fayetteville
staff and other stakeholders to
provide easements necessary for
- - Fayetteville Traverse soft surface trail
If trail is constructed prior to donation
• Regpired dedication for cunent
development phase 1.354 noes
• 8.746 acres to be ll,—i.ned for
future development of Markham Hill
neighborhood
Total acreage far park land
dedication will Hale once the
Sang Avenue alig,1 nment and right-af-
wgy pre established
PROPOSED PARK LAND
SPECIALIZED....,
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 18 of 30
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture,
CEI
Solutions for
Land and Life
Planning Division
Development Services Building
113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
RE: Markham Hill Subdivision, Phase II
W. Markham Road, Fayetteville, AR
Staff and Commissioners,
Survey, Planning & Program Management
3108 SW Regency Parkway
Bentonville, AR 72712
November 3, 2021
Rev. December 1, 2021
Rev. December 22, 2021
Note: This cover letter is essentially the same as the November 3, 2021 initial submittal
cover letter, modified to address City of Fayetteville review questions and comments.
Plans and written information recently revised in response to City of Fayetteville review
comments accompany this letter, all submitted via the Permitting Portal.
On behalf of Markham Residential Owner, LLC, CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. hereby submits
an approximately 7.4-acre preliminary plat for residential development located within the current
RI-U zoning district near W. Markham Road and North Sang Avenue (parcel numbers 765-14532-
000, 765-14595-000, 765-14548-000 and 765-14617-000).
Concept
Markham Hill Phase II will continue to utilize conservation neighborhood principles, where homes
are situated amid larger areas of shared open space, promoting ecological and social wellbeing
throughout the Markham Hill neighborhood. Phase II is designed to limit disturbance and preserve
expansive amounts of tree covered hillside, incorporating existing Markham Hill community trails
and providing natural vegetative buffers and immersive nature experiences.
Conservation, Preservation, and Parkland
Phase II fulfills City of Fayetteville tree conservation policies by dedicating a 1.81-acre tree
"preservation easement' area in the southernmost of the parent parcel. Markham Hill tree
preservation and parkland dedication will help ensure preservation of an extensive portion of the
property and limit visual/natural/cultural impacts upon outlying areas and previously developed
neighborhoods. The proposed development incorporates street trees and other landscape
features in accordance with City of Fayetteville neighborhood development requirements.
On November 1, 2021, the nine -member Parks & Recreation Advisory Board voted unanimously
to approve a 10.10-acre Markham Hill parkland dedication, with no opposition from the public,
and the item will likely be forwarded for Planning Commission action yet in 2021. Furthermore,
Markham Hill ownership is presently coordinating with the Northwest Arkansas Land Trust to
place large portions of land in a conservation easement in the near future.
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
1-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 19 of 30
Zonina and Land Use
The existing RI-U zoning district within which Markham Hill Phase II is located will not change as
a result of the subject proposal. Said RI-U zoning (RZN 18-6317 and accompanying Bill of
Assurance, approved October 2, 2018) limits density to four (4) units per acre, applicable to
119.43 acres, and expressly allowing a total of 476 dwelling units.
Phase II proposes 39 residential lots (with additional outlying parcels/lots used for sanitary sewer
lift station, future development phases and/or open space/preserved areas, for a total of 45 lots.)
Of the 39 total residential lots, 26 lots are expressly reserved for single-family home sites. Ten
lots will be attached single-family townhomes (Lots 9 through 18). Two lots will be multi -family
sites (Lots 24 and 25). One lot will be either multi -family or single family (Lot 4).
Prior to any multi -family construction, Markham Hill owners will produce a Conditional Use Permit
application or applications for City approval as necessary for multi -family use.
Street and Infrastructure Improvements
Following Preliminary Plat approval, public rights -of -way will be dedicated via Final Plat to meet
City of Fayetteville standards for public streets. Two private alleys will be constructed, to be owned
and operated by a Home Owners or Property Owners Association. In most cases individual
residents' garages and service entries will be accessed via the alleyways to prevent streetscapes
otherwise encumbered by individual driveways, garage doors and refuse containers.
The above -described street and alleyway concept includes placement of defined parallel parking
spaces on the public streets. This Preliminary Plat application includes administrative waiver
requests pertaining to the proposed street sections and profiles.
A fire safety and emergency access road will be constructed with Phase II development. This
temporary gravel surfaced "loop road", from the northwest terminus of the proposed through -
street, will connect W. Markham Road and South Sang Avenue. (Also note, a public street
connection from W. Markham to W. Halsell Road, and improvements to Evangeline's Lane, are
to be completed be a separate consulting team.) Connections to the subject project will meet
minimum fire lane access standards including vehicle turning movements within the development
as shown in the "Overall Fire Truck Turn Exhibit" and "Overall Life Safety Exhibit" attached to this
submittal.
Water, gas, electric service will be extended westward from the adjacent Hospitality District area
to the subject development.
Gravity sewer serving residential lots will be routed to a sanitary lift station on the east side of the
development (Lot 3) and connect via force main to an approximately 3,000-foot off -site sewer
extension serving LSD 2020-000015.
A 20-year cost -benefit analysis, comparing three hypothetical gravity sewer connection
alternatives to the 20-year operation cost of the lift station, is included with this application.
Following evaluation of sanitary sewer alternatives by the development team, we conclude a lift
station and force main system (combined with the proposed 3,000-foot off -site gravity system to
the southwest) is the most practical and economical method to serve the proposed subdivision
wastewater demands. The applicant continues to work with Utilities and Engineering staff to
implement a mutually beneficial sanitary sewer configuration.
2 Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
SONVILLE I MINNEAPOLIS-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 20 of 30
CEI Engineering previously prepared sanitary sewer and stormwater drainage analyses as part
of a master planning consultant competition for the Markham Hill Development Masterplan
Project. While the developer/owner has engaged a separate consultant to engineer adjacent on -
site Hospitality District improvements, future coordination is anticipated for water and gravity
sewer connections to serve the Hospitality District. Accordingly, the 3,000-foot gravity sewer will
ultimately serve the Hospitality District and future Markham Hill residential development.
The subject property is located predominantly within the Hilltop/Hillside Overlay District (HHOD).
Existing and proposed grades for Markham Hill Phase II are depicted in the attached public
improvement plans, and depict topography falling from the hilltop to the northeast, as well as from
the hilltop to the southwest.
Conforming with conservation neighborhood principles, proposed Markham Hill Phase II streets,
underground utilities and proposed grades are designed to minimize earthwork and limit land
disturbance. Street and overland drainage will be conveyed via traditional curb inlets and directed
to dry -bottom natural turf stormwater detention basins whose design and discharge
characteristics are thoroughly reflected in the attached Subdivision Drainage Report, public
improvement plans and Preliminary Plat.
Submitted as an administrative waiver request as part of this application, four proposed residential
lots (Lots 4, 30, 33 and 34) lie within 50' of an adjacent detention pond.
We appreciate your consideration of this information and look forward to discussing any questions
or comments you may have. Please contact me by phone at (479)273-9472 or by email:
revitts(a_ceieng.com.
Respectfully Requested,
VAA�t2L_
Tim A. Herndon
for
Ryan Evitts, PLA, LI
Project Manager
3 Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
SONVILLE I MINNEAPOLIS• 2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 21 of 30
CEI
Solutions for
Land and Life
Planning Division
Development Services Building
113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
RE: Markham Hill Subdivision, Phase II
Block Length/Intersection Interval &
Planning Variance Request
Staff and Commissioners,
Civil Engineering, Landscape Architecture,
Survey, Planning & Program Management
3108 SW Regency Parkway
Bentonville, AR 72712
Office: 479.273.9472
Toll -free: 1.800.433.4173
ceieng.com
November 3, 2021
Rev. December 22, 2021
Typical "Neighborhood Link" Street Section
On behalf of Markham Residential Owner, LLC, CEI Engineering Associates, Inc. respectfully
requests the following variances to facilitate the proposed Markham Hill Subdivision, Phase II,
Fayetteville, AR, locally known as a portion of "Tract 4" per Plat Bk 24A, Page 237.
Variance Request #1 (Exhibit Attached)
Per UDC Section 166.08 (E)(1) Block lengths and street intersections are directly tied to the
functional hierarchy of the street pattern that exists or is proposed. Subsection (c) Residential
Link and Downtown/Urban Street. Intersections shall occur at a minimum of one (1) every 660
feet.
The subject request is to vary the typically required maximum intersection spacing of 660' to a
maximum of approximately 1,015' as proposed in the Preliminary Plat of Markham Hill
Subdivision, Phase II.
We offer the following noteworthy points for your consideration in the context of the above request:
1. The intersection to intersection interval of the "upper meadow" loop road is only 565' in
length, in conformance with Section 166.08. However, the centerline length of the "lower"
loop is 1,014 linear feet, exceeding the maximum block length requirement.
Due to steep existing topographic conditions which challenge minimum roadway design
standards (the average hillside gradient is 9.5% with isolated areas of 13% to 15%), large
street centerline arcs are proposed, resulting in this arguably longer intersection interval
along the "lower" loop road (northernmost road.)
2. Due to the Hilltop/Hillside Overlay District conditions (read: excessively steep existing
grades), producing another sufficiently flat north -south cross street to reduce the block
length at this location is not physically possible. The grade for a mid -point perpendicular
roadway would be 13-15%, requiring a significant deviation from the vertical roadway
design criteria.
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
1-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 22 of 30
3. An intermediate pedestrian path is proposed approximately mid -block along this
alignment. This pathway will provide pedestrian access to a central recreation area at the
hilltop meadow. The maximum pedestrian travel length will be approximately 285' from
the furthest single-family lot to the hilltop meadow, while the majority of these lots will lie
in very close proximity, if not directly accessible to, the hilltop meadow amenity.
4. The design includes a private alleyway running parallel with the existing grades and
proposed streets. All adjoining lots will have direct garage access to/from this alley, which
effectively shortens the vehicular access points, or effective block length, within this
portion of the development; this alley will reduce the number of cars along the lower loop
road and, with the intermediate pedestrian path, reduce vehicular/pedestrian conflicts.
5. No future street connection to the lower loop road are possible. No future traffic
generation to/from this street will occur. The 27 lots proposed along the subject roadway
is the maximum number to occur along this block length.
6. Proposed streetside parking along this lower loop road will effectively calm traffic and is
likely to reduce design speeds along this alignment.
Variance Request #2 (Exhibit Attached)
This request is to vary from UDC 166.04(B)(3)(c), pertaining to City of Fayetteville Street and Trail
Details/Typical Neighborhood Link Section.
Per the Master Streets Plan Alternative Residential Link Street plate, the intent of the street
section to be used in HHOD is to reduce the footprint of the residential streetscape while keeping
a safe environment for all transportation modes and abilities, and alternative design elements may
be approved to include: removal of parking and modifications to the minimum right-of-way width
of 33'.
In support of the use of the alternative Residential Link, the applicant proposes the following
modification to the typical street section:
Use of consistent 10' travel lanes
The proposed site design contemplates parallel parking will occur at irregular
intervals along both sides of the street. A consciously shifting pavement width from
10-feet when adjacent to parallel parking to 9-feet when parallel parking is not
present is not desired. A consistent vehicular lane width will provide the most
navigable and anticipated vehicular driving surface.
2. 33' Right -Of -Way and transition of 6' LID/green space
The alternative street section proposes a 33' right-of-way and includes parallel
parking. The alternative design proposes integration of street tree islands be
placed between parallel parking bays to comply with minimum street tree
requirements and reduce the overall developed width which will result in decrease
grading and tree removal impacts to the adjacent hillside.
3. 5' sidewalks with 6.5' effective width
The alternative street section proposes the use of 5' minimum sidewalk widths and
an increase in sidewalk width to accommodate a 1.5' shy distance requirement
where sidewalks are adjacent to parallel parking stalls for a total sidewalk width of
2 Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
L-2021- 9p ,Qp�1 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
�•�•y Page 23 of 30
6.5' when adjacent to parallel parking. The proposed street section composition
will allow for the greatest accessibility to sidewalk connectivity, adjacent
greenspace, and community amenity circulation. The revision from 5 feet to 6.5
feet does not limit connectivity and is a direct correlation to UDC Chapter 171.14
"Sidewalk, Driveway, and Trail Specifications minimum sidewalk width shy
distance" requirement. The shy distance will be achieved with a parallel access
easement to fulfill the shy distance width requirement.
4. Ribbon curb separation and adjacent LID gravel parking
The alternative street section proposes POA owned parallel parking be located at
the edge of the travel lane and separated with a flat, 12-inch wide ribbon curb. The
city's standard street section and curb details do not include a standard detail for
this curb type. While the curb will fall immediately outside of the right-of-way the
flat curb is proposed to stabilize the asphalt edge and facilitate transition from
asphalt to gravel parking area.
5. Road Cross Slope
The road cross section is proposed with a single continuous cross slope. Street
drainage design standards (spread and clear passage width) have been evaluated
and confirmed by this office. The short horizontal radius and vertical curvature of
the roads necessitate use of drainage structures at short intervals to accommodate
utilities within the right-of-way, and frequent curb inlet intervals aid in limiting
stormwater spread. This alternative roadway section will reduce storm and utility
crossing conflicts and promote stormwater infiltration to adjacent gravel paved
areas, enhancing the low impact design parking configuration. Gravel parking
areas are strategically proposed adjacent to the stormwater detention area to
promote alternative surface and sub -surface conveyance of stormwater to
detention pond A. The details for open graded base will be provided during the
grading permit review process.
We appreciate your consideration of this information and look forward to discussing any questions
or comments you may have. Please contact me by phone at (479)273-9472 or by email:
revitts(a)ceieng.com.
Respectfully Requested,
4im4�L_
Tim A. Herndon
for
Ryan Evitts, PLA, LI
Project Manager
3 Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
-2021- 9p ,Qp�1 Markham Hill SD Ph.11
�•�•y Page 24 of 30
�d
zo
SVSNVNV'3111A3J-i3AVJ
z-
clu NV HAUVVq IV\ -z-
# iDi rmid AiID a = (yj
NOISIAlcigns 11 3SVHd - 111H VVVHMM 0
2
-M A,
0 0 U -t 8
7Z
-H
VE
ENM
'U. HEN
5 -.M. LU
z
H MH
6 . W, N a z
z s ,. R W
A
M
5€SQE aye
z
U.— 9M.. M.
eSF
-------------
iww Sig
-1h
N
i; it I I ` 1 t � �s�n.
` i -ID. 1
------------------
0, ------ ------
6'
16,
N
----------- ------
------------- -------
--7Z ---- -- ------- - -------- -
----------
s
On Committee
fiber 30,2021
igenda Item 3
Hill SD Ph. 11
Page 25 of 30
w 0
Q�
w�
U
'
�l io
O U �
Q in
0
m
�Y
-Q)
g
O
as
u n
O
O
J
U
Q
lal
I
w
Q
w
z
w
O
= K ^
O
Q
I—
n U
U
z
w
w
g
ow°
cn
>
>
= Z
W
Q
o
Fm�
N
LLJ
w
a p p
J
Q
J
Q
z
3 g
<
U o
U
0
(D
M
m
N Q Q
Z
a
°
J
Q
° w w
w
az a
a
a a
w
Y
U a _
Z >j
O w o
U p
p
w cc
H w
m
�
Z
Z
w
p
<
I
w Z) w
w
U I
a
�
I
✓1
SVSNt/NW 1111A3LL3 l \
I
m
I�
� Y
a�
a a
� a
v
LL
Z)
Z
O
N
= N N
Q j
O
z
a
U
z
lfl
>
0
z
_
O
ma
K
m
m
a
ao
}�
�a
-
p
z
Q
� a
a
zZ
a
Y,
U a _
O>'w,o
U p
iB1HH]NN310 -A9 03AVS
07
,NOD'9N313J'1A9130'IOSVNNVdIAN9\\- N01iVJO1 9NIMVd0
Subdivision Committee
December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 26 of 30
R SVSNVMV'3111A3113AV3
3AV NVHMM M
TZ0000-TZ0Z-1dd :iDirodcl A11D
E, NOISIAlcions 11 3SVHd - 1111-1 MHAVIAl
.2
MIN Mi'k, a dint g
11
gn I
U-1
"N
Vp
�M
52
-Sp Ff�Br �j
4 z
if 19
2
29
o
it H
F— --1
L---j
ml
Eb,
ems" �i ���� ��— % - i� 0�`9� ,/l
Ox
A
IL
A
QJ
SubdK
De(
On Committee
fiber 30,2021
igenda Item 3
Hill SD Ph. 11
Page 27 of 30
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD PH II
One Mile View
0 0.125 0.25 0.5 Miles
LLJ
I
CS Z
I Q
l Iy
I
i
� — I
� I
� � I
t RSF-4 t
RI-U
� CPZD
Subject Property
R-A
T
\ RPZD \ RMF-24
\ N
�\ a
S � F-18 \ z \ <0 \
RSF-2 \ C-2
\A \ r
Neighborhood Link---
Institutional Master Plan
Freeway/Expressway
M Planned Residential Link
Shared -Use Paved Trail ❑
Trail (Proposed)
L j Design Overlay District a
+Fayetteville City Limits Planning Area - --
r� PlanningArea Fayetteville City Limits _
NORTH
sST
Zoning
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE-FAMILY
L2 General IMuateal
EXTRACTION
NSG
E-1
RI-U
COMMERCIAL
RI-12
Reaieaneal-0fiu
� NSL
Re.I ht.I-A,,r.h rel
C-2
RSF-.5
C-3
RSF-1
FORM BASED DISTRICTS
RSF-s
Do .—core
R.
UNen 11-911re
RSF-]
MeinS tCenter
RSF-fi
Davmtovm General
RSF-1fi
Community Sa ,c
RESIDENTIAL MULTIFAMILY
Neighbem S,
M Neighbmheod Conaervab,n
RMF-12
PLANNED ZONING DISTRICTS
� RMF-1fi
� Cammardal, Ineuateal, ReaieenYal
RMF-2°
INSTITUTIONAL
--Subdivision C
INDUSTRIAL
41 HearyCanmerdalandLight lnMahial
December
n ittee
2021
tern 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 28 of 30
PPL-2021-000021
Close Up View
Neighborhood Link
Hillside -Hilltop Overlay District
` Planning Area
— Fayetteville City Limits
— — — Trail (Proposed)
I Design Overlay District
Markham Hill SD PH II
Subject Property
�ALSELL,RD
RD
j
/ z j
/ Q
a)—HASKELL-HTS
RSF- I
Feet
0 137.5 275 550 825 1,100
1 inch = 375 feet
jjNORTH
Residential -Agricultural
RSF-4
RW
Commercial, Industrial, Residential
Subdivision C mittee
December 0, 2021
Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 29 of 30
PPL-2021-000021 Preliminary Plat for Markham Hill A&
Current Land Use Subdivision Phase II NORTH
, r ,
Subject Property
K
Undeveloped „..
s
f`
Single -Family Residential
Commercial
f\
Undeveloped and Single -Family Residential
..
'."
Neighborhood Link
Trail (Proposed)
Feet
_; Planning Area
0 180 360 720 1,080 1,440
- - -; Fayetteville City Limits
— — 1 inch = 500 feet
j — Design Overlay District
W■
FEMA Flood Hazard Data
too -Year Floodplain
Floodway
Subdivision C mittee
December 0, 2021
Item 3
PPL-2021-000021 Markham Hill SD Ph. II
Page 30 of 30
CITY OF
_ FAYETTEVILLE SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE MEMO
ARKANSAS
TO: Fayetteville Subdivision Committee
FROM: Jessie Masters, Development Review Manager
Jonathan Ely, Development and Construction Manager
Melissa Evans, Urban Forester
MEETING: December 30, 2021
SUBJECT: LSD-2021-000028: Large Scale Development (SW OF W. WEDINGTON DR. &
N. 46T" AVE./WEDINGTON LANDING TOWNHOMES, 438): Submitted by CIVIL
DESIGN ENGINEERS, INC. for property located SW OF W. WEDINGTON DR. &
N. 46T" AVE. The property is zoned RMF-12, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 12
UNITS PER ACRE, and RSF-18, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 18 UNITS PER
ACRE and contains approximately 8.04 acres. The request is for a 76-unit multi-
family complex, 6 single-family units, and associated parking.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends tabling LSD-2021-000028 to the next Subdivision Committee meeting, at the
applicant's request.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to table LSD-2021-000028 until the January 13, 2022
Subdivision Committee meeting."
Subdivision Committee Action
Meeting Date: December 30, 2021
Motion:
Second:
Vote:
O Forwarded O Tabled O Approved
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayA iiH�iT. 8BTmittee
Fayetteville, AR 72701 December 30, 2021
Agenda Item 4
LSD-2021-000028 Wedington Landing Townhomes
Page 1 of 1