HomeMy WebLinkAbout121-21 RESOLUTIONOF FAYErTF.
r
VR KANSP
113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Resolution: 121-21
File Number: 2021-0267
ADM-2021-028: (3275 N. OAKLAND ZION RD./PIEPENBROK):
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE MASTER STREET PLAN BY REMOVING _4 SECTION
OF A PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD LINK CONNECTION ALONG NORTH OAKLAND
ZION ROAD AND UPGRADING A SECTION OF EAST BRIDGEWATER LAND FROM A
RESIDENTIAL LINK STREET TO A NEIGHBORHOOD LINK STREET
WHEREAS, the owner of the property located at 3275 North Oakland Zion Road has requested an
amendment to the Master Street Plan to remove a 430 foot section of planned Neighborhood Link
Connection that bisects her property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, City staff, and the City Council Transportation Committee
have recommended removing the entire approximately 1,500 foot section of planned Neighborhood
Link Connection along North Oakland Zion Road and upgrading a section of East Bridgewater Lane
between its two intersection points with North Oakland Zion Road from a Residential Link Street to a
Neighborhood Link Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the Master
Street Plan by removing an approximately 1,500 foot section of a planned Neighborhood Link
Connection along North Oakland Zion Road as shown in Exhibit A to the Planning Division's agenda
memo.
Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the Master Street
Plan by upgrading the section of East Bridgewater Lane between the two intersection points with
Page 1 Printed on 4121121
Resolution: 121-21
File Number: 2021-0267
North Oakland Zion Road from a Residential Link Street to a Neighborhood Link Street as shown in
Exhibit A to the Planning Division's agenda memo.
PASSED and APPROVED on 4/20/2021
Attest:
*0
•G
FV�� •�=
Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treasurer=z: (E .
'14
c %ON ;o;
Page 2 Printed on 4121121
. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Text File
File Number: 2021-0267
Agenda Date: 4/20/2021 Version: 1 Status: Passed
In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Resolution
Agenda Number: C.2
ADM-2021-028: (3275 N. OAKLAND ZION RD./PIEPENBROK):
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE MASTER STREET PLAN BY REMOVING A SECTION OF A
PLANNED NEIGHBORHOOD LINK CONNECTION ALONG NORTH OAKLAND ?ION ROAD
AND UPGRADING A SECTION OF EAST BRIDGEWATER LANE FROM A RESIDENTIAL LINK
STREET TO A NEIGHBORHOOD LINK STREET
WHEREAS, the owner of the property located at 3275 North Oakland Zion Road has requested an
amendment to the Master Street Plan to remove a 430 foot section of planned Neighborhood Link Connection
that bisects her property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, City staff, and the City Council Transportation Committee have
recommended removing the entire approximately 1,500 foot section of planned Neighborhood Link
Connection along North Oakland Zion Road and upgrading a section of East Bridgewater Lane between its
two intersection points with North Oakland Zion Road from a Residential Link Street to a Neighborhood Link
Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the Master Street Plan by
removing an approximately 1,500 foot section of a planned Neighborhood Link Connection along North
Oakland Zion Road as shown in Exhibit A to the Planning Division's agenda memo.
Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the Master Street Plan by
upgrading the section of East Bridgewater Lane between the two intersection points with North Oakland Zion
Road from a Residential Link Street to a Neighborhood Link Street as shown in Exhibit A -o the Planning
Division's agenda memo.
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 Printed on 4/21/2021
Jonathan Curth
Submitted By
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form
2021-0267
Legistar File ID
4/20/2021
City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only
N/A for Non -Agenda Item
4/2/2021 CITY PLANNING (630)
Submitted Date Division / Department
Action Recommendation:
ADM-2021-000028: Administrative Item (3275 N. OAKLAND ZION RD./PIEPENBROK, 218): Submitted by KIM
PIEPENBROK for property located at 3275 N. OAKLAND ZION RD. The property is in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING
AREA and contains approximately 4.80 acres. The request is an amendment to the Master Street Plan.
Account Number
Project Number
Budgeted Item? NA
Does item have a cost? No
Budget Adjustment Attached? NA
Budget Impact:
Current Budget
Funds Obligated
Current Balance
Item Cost
Budget Adjustment
Remaining Budget
Fund
Project Title
$ -
0
V20180321
Purchase Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution #
Change Order Number:
Original Contract Number:
Comments:
Approval Date:
CITY OF
• FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MEETING OF APRIL 20, 2021
TO: Mayor; Fayetteville City Council
THRU: Susan Norton, Chief of Staff
Jonathan Curth, Development Services Director
FROM: Jessie Masters, Development Review Manager
DATE: April 2, 2021
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
SUBJECT: ADM-2021-000028: Administrative Item (3275 N. OAKLAND ZION
RD./PIEPENBROK, 218): Submitted by KIM PIEPENBROK for property located
at 3275 N. OAKLAND ZION RD. The property is in the FAYETTEVILLE
PLANNING AREA and contains approximately 4.80 acres. The request is an
amendment to the Master Street Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
Transportation Committee, Planning Commission, and City staff recommend approval of a
request to remove a planned Neighborhood Link Connection from the 2040 Master Street Plan
as depicted in Exhibits 'A' and 'B'.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is east of the city limits in Washington County, within the Fayetteville
Planning Area. The property is 4.8 acres and is developed with one single-family dwelling
constructed in 1987. The property owner intends to subdivide the property to sell the rear portion
of the lot through an administrative lot split (LSP-2020-000038). A lot split was previously
approved in 2019 on this property, but was never recorded. Plats are typically required to indicate
future Master Street Plan connections, though right-of-way dedication to meet those planned
connections is not always required depending on the rough proportionality of the proposal. In this
recent resubmission, staff asked the applicant to show the planned connection, but no right-of-
way dedication is required in association with the proposal.
Request: The applicant requests to have the proposed 2040 Master Street Plan Neighborhood
Link Street that bisects 3275 N. Oakland Zion Road in a north/south direction, approximately 430
linear feet, removed from the subject property.
Staff Findings: Staff is in support of this proposal, and further recommends to remove the entire
connection, approximately 1500 linear feet of proposed roadway. The portion in question was
originally adopted in 2007, and was intended to realign the intersection of N. Oakland Zion Road,
a Neighborhood Link Street, and E. Bridgewater Lane, a Residential Link Street. Both are
currently County right-of-way, though given their location within the Fayetteville Planning Area,
have the potential to become City right-of-way in the future. Given the property's current location
within Washington County, and lack of immediate adjacency to the City limits, staff does not
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
foresee any City -initiated, near -term realignment of this portion of road. Furt-ier, given the current
surrounding land uses of low -density, single-family residential and agricultural, and that future
development in the area would be subject to Washington County zoning standards, staff does not
find that further development along this proposed corridor would meet the trough proportionality
or rational nexus required for a developer to construct the proposed street section. For instance,
while recent development to the north of 3275 N. Oakland Zion Road was aligned to
accommodate this planned connection, no right-of-way was dedicated' with the associated
development since it did not meet the rough proportionality standard. Average daily traffic counts
along the existing segment of N. Oakland Zion Road were not readily available.
DISCUSSION:
At the March 8, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, Commissioners voted to forward the request
to the Transportation Committee for consideration with a vote of 7-1-0. Commissioner Hoffman
offered the dissenting vote. Commissioners recommended in favor of all conditions as indicated
by staff, and further added a condition that the portion of E. Bridgewater Lane between the two
intersection points of N. Oakland Zion Road be upgraded from a Residential Link Street to a
Neighborhood Link Street. Commissioner Hoffman, the dissenting vote, felt that the connection
should stay as is to help meet north/south connectivity concerns from a regional and long-term
perspective. Prior to the public hearing, staff received a phone call from a r:eighbor to the north
of 3275 N. Oakland Zion Road, who was in opposition to the request, but no other public comment
was heard at the meeting.
At the March 30, 2021 Transportation Committee meeting, members voted unanimously to
forward the item to City Council with a recommendation of approval, with a vote of 3-0-0. The
motion was made by Councilwoman Bunch, with a second from Councilwoman Hertzberg.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
N/A
Attachments:
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Planning Commission Staff Report
2
ADM-2021-000028 Pie pe,n b ro k DM-2021-00002
Close Up View EXHIBIT 'A'
Zo
a
Y}}�O
<!N
La RIDGEWATER-LN
Q
C]
o
m
Z
O
N
Z
Subject Property
o
L
Oy�O
�
r
o
— Neighborhood Link
Feet
C-=m Planned Neighborhood Link
C-Cm Planned Residential Link 0 112.5 225 450 675 900
1 - - - 1 inch = 300 feet
` - -� Planning Area
2 1
r
-a
�1
NORTH
ADM-2021-000028 P iepen b rok DM-2021-00002
Close Up View EXHIBIT 'A'
0o
z .,
J; z r 1
Y- r
<10 N
BRIDGEWATER LN
EXHIBIT
PROPOSED ?
CHANGE.
c
lx
Neighborhood Link Feet
G Planned Neighborhood Link
OcCo Planned Residential Link 0 112.5 225 450 675 900
�i Planning Area
1 inch = 300 feet
�° 1
D
;,NORTH
ADM-2021-000028
EXHIBITS',
A PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 17
NORTH, RANGE 29 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT WHICH IS LOCATED S02-42'00"W 665.71' FIOM A FOUND 2,
ALUMINUM MONUMENT MARKING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SAID FORT( ACRE TRACT, AND
RUNNING THENCE S02°42'00"W 302.11', THENCE N86°54'45"W 567.37' TO A FOUND Y2" REBAR,
THENCE N44°54'17"W 447.22'TO A FOUND Y." REBAR, THENCE S87-05'31"E 897.64' TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, CONTAINING IN ALL 5.07 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF
WAY OF RECORD.
CITY OF
,IW,, FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO
ARKANSAS
TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission
FROM: Jessie Masters, Development Review Manager
Josh Boccaccio, Staff Engineer
MEETING DATE: March 8, 2021 Updated with PC hearing results from 3/8/2021
SUBJECT: ADM-2021-000028: Administrative Item (3275 N. OAKLAND ZION
RD./PIEPENBROK, 218): Submitted by KIM PIEPENBROK for property
located at 3275 N. OAKLAND ZION RD. The property is in the
FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA and contains approximately 4.80
acres. The request is an amendment to the Master Street Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends forwarding ADM-2021-000028 to the Transportation Committee with a
recommendation of approval, with conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"I move to forward ADM-2021-000028 to the Transportation Committee with a recommendation
of approval, with conditions."
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is east of the city limits in Washington County, within the Fayetteville
Planning Area. The property is 4.8 acres and is developed with one single-family dwelling
constructed in 1987. The property owner intends to subdivide the property to sell the rear portion
of the lot through an administrative lot split (LSP-2020-000038). A lot split was previously
approved in 2019 on this property, but was never recorded. Plats are typically required to indicate
future Master Street Plan connections, though right-of-way dedication to meet those planned
connections is not always required depending on the rough proportionality of the proposal. In this
recent resubmission, staff asked the applicant to show the planned connection, but no right-of-
way dedication is required in association with the proposal. The surrounding land use and zoning
is depicted on Table 1.
Table 1:
Surroundina Land Use and Zonina
Direction
Land Use
Zoning
North
Undeveloped/Single-Family Residential
Washington County; A/SF Res I Unit per Acre
South
Single -Family Residential
Washington County; A/SF Res I Unit perAcre
West
Undeveloped/Single-Family Residential
Washington County; A/SF Res I Unit perAcre
East
Single -Family Residential/Agricultural
Washington County; A/SF Res I Unit perAcre
Proposal: The applicant requests to have the proposed 2040 Master Street Plan Neighborhood
Link Street that bisects 3275 N. Oakland Zion Road in a north/south direction, approximately 430
linear feet, removed from the subject property.
DISCUSSION:
Staff supports the applicant's request to remove the proposed 2040 Master Street Plan
Planning Commission
March 8, 2021
Agenda Item 6
ADM-21-000028 Piepenbrok
Page 1 of 12
Neighborhood Link Street from 3275 N Oakland Zion Road,. and would further recommend to
remove the entire connection, approximately 1500 linear feet of proposed roadway. The portion
in question was originally adopted in 2007, and was intended to realign the intersection of N.
Oakland Zion Road, a Neighborhood Link Street, and E. Bridgewater Lane, a Residential Link
Street. Both are currently County right-of-way, though given their location within the Fayetteville
Planning Area, have the potential to become City right-of-way in the future. Given the property's
current location within Washington County, and lack of immediate adjacency to the City limits,
staff does not foresee any City -initiated, near -term realignment of this portion of road. Further,
given the current surrounding land uses of low -density, single-family residential and agricultural,
and that future development in the area would be subject to Washington County zoning standards,
staff does not find that further development along this proposed corridor would meet the rough
proportionality or rational nexus required for a developer to construct the proposed street section.
For instance, while recent development to the north of 3275 N. Oakland Zion Road was aligned
to accommodate this planned connection, no right-of-way was dedicated with the associated
development since it did not meet the rough proportionality standard. Average daily traffic counts
along the existing segment of N. Oakland Zion Road were not readily available.
Public Comment: Staff received a phone call from a property owner to the north of 3275 N.
Oakland Zion Road expressing concerns with the request and was in opposition to the proposal.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM-2021-000028 to City Council,
with the following conditions.
1. Removal of the entire proposed Neighborhood Link Street connection, approximately
1500 linear feet;
2. Approval of the removal of this planned Master Street Plan connection does not reflect
approval of associated lot split or other planned development; associated lot split must be
resubmitted addressing any and all other outstanding comments from staff.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES
XD FORWARDED
Date: March 8. 2021 O Tabled O Approved O Denied
Forwarded to Transportation Committee with the following
Motion: Winston conditions
Second: Brown -All conditions as recommended by staff
-Bridgewater Lane be classified as a Neighborhood Link
vr0a, 7_1 _n Street between to the points of Oakland Zion Road.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
• Engineering Memo
• Applicant Request Letter
Applicant Proposed Lot Split
• 2030 Master Street Plan Exhibit
• 2040 Master Street Plan Exhibit
• One Mile Map
Planning Commission
March 8, 2021
Agenda Item 6
ADM-21-000028 Piepenbrok
Page 2 of 12
Masters, Jessica
From: Kim Piepenbrok <pieps@cox.net>
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 8:36 AM
To: Masters, Jessica
Subject: Letter for City Council and Planning Commission
Attachments: Tract Split with Proposed Road 2030-40.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Completed
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the City of Fayetteville. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize
the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Ms Masters -
Attached below is my request to the City Council & Planning Commission to remove the proposed road from my survey
and the certificate of ownership and dedication. Also, attached is a mocked up version of the proposed road on the
existing survey I had done in 2019 and a copy of the City Master Plan 2030-2040 showing this future proposal drawn in
red. I included the letter they approved in 2019 which did not require the proposed road drawn on the survey. If you can
forward this information to the appropriate people for their consideration I would be forever grateful. If I'm
overstepping my boundaries, please forgive me and if you have an address to forward this information, I would be more
than happy to send myself.
Dear Fayetteville City Council and Planning Commission,
I'm writing you today regarding the proposed road being shown on the Master Planning Calendar for
2030-2040 that is cutting directly through my property at 3275 Oakland Zion Road (72703). While I
would ultimately love to see it removed from the plan in general, my main request is to simply have it
and the certificate of ownership and dedication removed from the current property survey I need
completed.
When I had previously requested this survey in March 2019, the proposed road did not have to be
included on the survey. Now I am being forced by the Planning Commission to include said proposed
road on the survey, which is greatly and adversely affecting my ability to sell the property. To recap, I am
kindly requesting that City Council and the Planning Commission simply grant me an updated survey
without the proposed road and the certificate of ownership and dedication. My property is located
outside of city limits, although within the future planning zone and this road isn't even proposed until
sometime between 2030 and 2040, if ever even.
Out of my S-acre property, I have the back 2.8 acres for sale. It is difficult for me to admit that my
reason for selling the property is due -to financial hardship incurred by the loss of my husband and being
reduced to one income, with the added burden of taking care of my senior mother, but I am very
grateful to currently be under contract with new buyers. This is my second attempt to sell the property.
Unfortunately, the first contract was cancelled last month with one week to go before closing because
the buyers didn't want to move forward due to having the proposed road drawn on the survey. They
were well aware that this could potentially be a future project, but they thought it was too aggressive
1 Planning Commission
March 8, 2021
Agenda Item 6
ADM-21-000028 Piepenbrok
Page 5 of 12
for the Planning Commission to request that it be drawn on the survey. They terminated our $235K
contract one week before closing, and that was a devastating blow to my family.
As I mentioned, I now have new buyers under contract and will have to submit a survey for the tract
split approval with City Planning and do not want to have the proposed road on the survey. As
mentioned, I am selling these back 2.8 acres due to financial hardship, and this proposed road being
placed on the survey is greatly interfering with the right to sell my property and potentially devaluing
the appraisal value.
The new buyers have seen the Sellers Property Disclosure and have checked the public information on
the future proposed City Maps 2030-2040. They are still willing to move forward gut also do not want
that proposed road drawn on the survey.
I am humbly asking for your help, understanding, and compassion with this situation. I need to sell my
property and have multiple buyer's interested, but by putting that proposed road on the survey (even
though it may or may not happen in the future), it is causing a negative input and great stress on my
family (residents of Fayetteville for 20+ years now).
Thank you again for your time and attention to my situation. My family and I are praying for good news
and look forward to a favorable decision.
Best,
Kim Piepenbrok
Planning Commission
March 8, 2021
Agenda Item 6
ADM-21-000028 Piepenbrok
Page 6 of 12
{
w�
g
y'rcrcz
14
?°=oho=
z°
o�=moz'z<
m
=boy=
3g
^<�
m�SS
l
.l...oaa�idi...
3�§V
QQR ,•,.
&�� v1 •a O° �LLaa
-
oho �[v :'O<N �•. 6.
lip
g"`< %�d'•'••..... •Sgti°,�
�b PROFB , gva�n
�d=ia8
g°
m
a
z
`o
W
• �
o
N
w
Z
x
H
CC
yi
25 Z . n_n_n
PP O" NdW SZ-wlvmycy�y neM1 n 9.� —M/M 2
n (1Rudstl-'rMq w8it 99) n n—n n • �+n �RM.9n �A.2i¢
M.odzo.zos $: pDou u°tZ PuTMl p %J z
�R'+S of I-N �— 11 ZQC-3,Qo.Zpzo 4 3 n
.4L 999 M.9p,ip•iCS -0o5L
—LY,1 M®S o1 W1 �m
Zl
�zNg
z�imk'M
ai
3
a¢ uLL m 0 3 w° m c°i 3
I I
u I
o o g
k I I I i ISO♦ao®O
I
Iml; Im
�/
°'-
al//ice?a
el
ry
�
'� :•dd°� PI a^,oc�3�� ol-
k'<LL�oSi�w
dppm
ada °saw
I �
w rub �ew i- ^ m 1= <ow
wi / / • ¢� .ii ZryQW . <'.O �j tSi O<
w °z " n e� c j/ 1 g ° �Fg�w off° °w&3 wg aw° o
° yi3;mY�w I / "�=O��mN�$dw-
�a I ��5-`
z p 'mo w LL R'^' z€' �RIMPH
a a > `az�, �-< g3 5a �iaC
LLz 'o3u5 3$ w� y /- =���a € w .99HR- mb, yogiN
q ° *a< $ °g� iy u I91
°c zia qowz<�^$s
F3 CC "<$>oLL a w h Ec�: k �ww 6ur �'€°r< oi°>azw-oxzo
,,,�..o0 C L ggK=ww.w �Zn
i o a S� w OOna>Z QQ 0 8^w
N oaf Y <� �'°3°0
xF �$¢' z - o y �z g " SYzz�, 33 L54xzoRo o�mYzaoz-
pP g Iwo tl`^,w�_ ^ I./o {' 8N 4
OZ wm °6 llgl ��m§i¢'owm°�i¢�F+„w��
o�ms �oy3 zq v-�srz993_siz9.eo� w 3^°wjYa
° z<o _wuww`w m w
92 i;= 38 w i`ni k-Yn LL¢^¢ozWv;� g f. P9 s`O�hy =s F`°mO�w3 5yia .<.-ey°ice
- O°xm-X�syoz� _r=9i�z�3zgo^�uaa'J °3zn Oa°'u�zy
wJa ag3i�wyu4° F¢FW zo F°_^ �o
W w �`mwom Pla° I sion
a i ALL- �h
m w ma m " a;�<�n°=-= FON m�<'s�o "o=.
r w26mpW� ��z=za°a__�° F x� 2021
3 8" 2° °� s °a�a wSm82. a°yew: °sogQ pwaoz�po ao= 1 m 6
R operlbrok
Page 7 of 12
2030 Master Street Plan Exhibit
w
D
N
O p
O n
O n
O
Z3
FD00
(D -O c' ::r
oo (D W 3
7 —
O Q N N N
O
O N p'
N m 7
z
1
D
N
O_ pt
O J
O
ONODZ(Q
(0
7 n O
m a n�3
CDm v °D3
7 —
O Q N Ij
O 3 N
N - 0 '? B
2040 Master Street Plan Exhibit
�• ores
1
g € E• 1 1
r `1
i
*set, i f, e', M W o; i •Mae ♦�
53*0a0aa0aWa
T17
11n
Agenda Item 6
ADM-21-000028 Piepenbrok
Page 10 of 12
ADM-2021-000028 Piepenbrok
Close Up Vi�?vi
0 0
z�
Q
J Z
YO
ON
BRIDGEWATER LN
j__
z
O
f r�
0
z
Q
Subject Property —�
Y
_ a
i C
Neighborhood Link
Feet
Planned Neighborhood Link
w M Planned Residential Link 0 112.5 225 450 675 9C0
1- - . 1 inch = 300 feet
— —� Planning Area
A&
NORTH
Planring Co mission
8, 2021
Agenda Item 6
ADM-21-000028 Piepenbrok
Page 11 of 12