HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020-03-31 - Agendas - FinalRm�� CITY OF
IiFAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MEETING AGENDA
City Council Transportation Committee
Tuesday, March 31s', 2020
5:30 pm or Immediately Following Agenda Session
NOTICE: THE TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE WILL BE HELD VIRTUALLY WITH NO
PHYSICAL LOCATION TO ATTEND
VIDEO CONFERENCING BY ZOOM WILL BE USED FOR THIS MEETING. INSTRUCTIONS
FOR LOGGING INTO ZOOM ARE ON PAGE 3.
Members: Matthew Petty, Chairperson; Sarah Marsh; Sarah Bunch; Kyle Smith
City Staff: Chris Brown, City Engineer; Terry Gulley, Transportation Director
Agenda:
1. Old Business: None
2. New Business:
A. MAPLE STREET CYCLETRACK: Review of revised plans and request for approval to
apply for grant funding for construction. (Staff requests a recommendation from the
Committee to the City Council on this item)
B. WEDINGTON CORRIDOR SAFETY, WALKABILITY, AND TRANSIT: Discussion
regarding the existing and proposed Wedington Corridor related to walkability and transit
access. Presentation by Staff and Razorback Transit.
C. TRANSIT SHELTERS: Review of preliminary priority lists for transit shelter installation.
Staff has performed a preliminary review of more than 150 Ozark Regional Transit and
Razorback Transit stop locations for placement of shelters and other amenities. Staff
evaluated each stop location based on average number of boardings, the need for
easements or right-of-way acquisition, existing amenities, and the amount of site work
necessary for construction. After review of the locations and referencing the
recommendations from the Fayetteville Mobility Plan and the University of Arkansas
Transportation Plan, a list of the 26 most suitable and construction -ready locations was
compiled.
Staff has also researched options and pricing for commercially produced shelter and
seating products for committee feedback.
D. RUPPLE ROAD BIDS FOR CONSTRUCTION: Review of bids for construction of
Rupple Road, between Weir Road east and Weir Road west of Rupple. (Staff requests
a recommendation from the Committee to the City Council on this item)
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
E. TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM (TAP) GRANT: Review of a
request to apply for federal -aid funds and allow staff to submit an application of an 80%
federal 20% local matching grant through the Arkansas Department of Transportation -
Transportation Alternatives Program for an award of up to $500,000 and City match of
$125,000 to be used for the Clabber Creek Trail tunnel under Garland Ave. (Hwy 112) at
Van Asche Drive. Funding for the match has been budgeted through the 2019 Bond for
Trail Improvements.
F. RECREATIONAL TRAILS PROGRAM (RTP) GRANT: Review of a request to apply
for federal -aid funds and allow staff to submit an application of an 80% federal 20% local
matching grant through the Arkansas Department of Transportation — Recreational Trails
Program for an award of up to $440,000 and City match of $110,000 to be used for the
reconstruction and improvement to the section of the Lake Fayetteville shared -use
paved trail across the dam. Funding for the match has been budgeted through CIP trail
development program.
A. Transportation Bond Program Update
B. Transportation Division Workplan Update
3. Adjourn
Ii
CITY OF
FAETTEILL
ARKANSAS
City Council Transportation Committee
March 31, 2020
5:30 PM or Immediately Following City Council Agenda Session
Virtual Meeting Participation Opportunities
By PC, Mac, iOS Whone), or Android:
Join Zoom Meeting: https://zoom.us/a/753377721
Meeting ID: 753-377-721
Use full name as screen name
Join by phone only, toll-free:
+1 (877) 853-5257
+1 (888) 475-4499
When prompted for Meeting ID: 753-377-721#
If you do not have a Participant Number: press #
To comment:
Use "Raise hand" function when comment for an item is requested
For phone, raise hand to be recognized with *9
Phone numbers used to dial in to meeting will be masked for privacy
All participants will be muted automatically when joining the meeting
NEW TO ZOOM?
Watch tutorial videos at: https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us
Ii
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
March 25th, 2020 Transportation Committee Memo
Re: Maple Street Improvements
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff requests approval to apply for a grant through the Walton Family Foundation and authorize
the allocation of 2019 bond funds in the amount of $1.5 million for half of the grant matching
funds for the reconstruction of Maple Street from the Razorback Regional Greenway to Garland
Ave.
BACKGROUND:
The City of Fayetteville and the University of Arkansas have been working together toward a
common goal of improving the section of Maple Street from the Razorback Greenway west to
Garland Ave. In the Spring of 2018, the University of Arkansas contracted with Alta Planning +
Design to develop conceptual plans for Maple Street that include pedestrian improvements and
a protected bicycle cycle track.
On September 9th, 2018, resolution 198-18 was approved to share the cost for final design of
the Maple Street project between the City of Fayetteville and the University of Arkansas in the
amount of $103,500 each and to accept a grant from the Walton Family Foundation in the
amount of $207,000 to cover the $414,000 final design cost with Olsson Associates.
On June 41h, 2019, resolution 141-19 authorized an application for a grant through the Walton
Family Foundation in the maximum amount of $2,000,000 for the construction of the Maple
Street project. At that same time, University of Arkansas officials expressed concerns with the
design and requested changes for increased safety. The safety upgrades include a low
vegetation buffer between the cycle track and the road. In addition, enhanced mid -block
crosswalks are proposed with decorative pavement markings and passive detection bollards for
activation of beacons.
Funds allocated for construction were estimated during the early conceptual phases at $4
million to be split by the City and University at 1 million each with 2 million from the Walton
Family Foundation. As the design plans were more developed and the scope of the project
became more defined, the estimated cost grew to $5 million. With the proposed safety
upgrades and factoring in escalation, the updated cost estimate for project is now $6 million.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed improvements to Maple Street include 2,475 -linear feet of new roadway surface,
upgraded traffic signals, storm drainage, 8 -foot -wide sidewalks on the north and south sides and
a separated a two-way cycle track along the south side extending from the Razorback
Greenway to Garland Avenue. Maple Street has been identified as a catalyst project in the
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Northwest Arkansas Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. Currently bicycle access to
the University of Arkansas campus core and the surrounding neighborhoods is limited. The
addition of the Maple Street connection will greatly improve the accessibility from the trail
system to this major destination for city residents including the campus's faculty, staff, visitors
and students.
The next step for the Maple Street project is to finalize the design plans and establish the
funding for construction. The Walton Family Foundation has expressed interest in providing
funding the construction through a 50:50 matching grant. With approval from City Council, an
application will be submitted to the Walton Family Foundation requesting a maximum grant
amount of $3 million with the matching funds split between the University of Arkansas and the
City of Fayetteville in the estimated amount of $1,500,000 each.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
Funds have been identified in the first phase of the 2019 bond with $1 million from the
transportation portion and $500,000 from the trails portion of the 2019 bonds. If the Walton
Family Foundation Grant is approved in the maximum amount of $3 million then the City of
Fayetteville will be responsible for an estimated of $1,500,000 for the construction of the Maple
Street project.
Engineering staff has prepared the grant application and will be responsible for overseeing the
grant requirements. A construction manager at risk will be selected by the City to oversee the
construction and coordinate with Olsson on the final design and costs. The University of
Arkansas has also offered their facilities staff to be assist with the construction process.
IV C
71
12,
A -W
e.".14
t fi
t6
MAPLE STREET REDESIGN
i
PROJECT CHRONOLOGY
d UNIVERSITY OF
ARKANSAS
10 UNIVERSITY OF
ARKANSAS
2015
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS CAMPUS TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Figure Parking Permit Sales Decrease as Enrollment Increases
Permits Per Enrolled Student by Year
IAO
1A —
as,opp
Lai
tp,opo
W r.ro
a s
a �
am — i ss.poa
s
i
I
n 00
F sp.000
t
0.a6
am
Mpy RW FM Mpg Not M11 FN Fria nil
As enrollment has increased. so has the supply of
parking on campus. However, these figures are not
increasing at the Same rate. Since 2007, the rate of
inventory expansion has lagged that of enrollment.
In fact, the difference between the number of
enrolled students and parking spaces on campus
is at its largest in over 27 years.
UA underStandS that providing replacement
parking for every new affiliate at a 1:1 ratio is not
necessarily going to solve the parking crunch in
the Core of Campus- Instead, the University has
been working toward expanding travel options
and connections to remote parking, including
reliable transit service, convenient Scooter parking,
and bicycle parking.
sago
E�rapean
ee�prc:glmanvey
—wmeen �.r�p
—sweeer
—Tempa pl¢c W mparY
—rest
nxeraasro
awM6ab NA6
wa+vrexrexprry
naa�teerrwda
xasmvmmxw
dare
The gap between enrollment and parking supply
would commonly raise alarm about shortages of
parking supplies and future constraints on parking
availability for campus commuters. However. the
gap between current supply and demand is more
accurately assessed through observed parking
demand. which indicates that at the busiest time
of day, there are more than 3,500 unused parking
spaces on campus. Parking shortages are a matter
of perception and convenience. not actual supply.
14 University of Arkansas I Campus Transportation Plan
is manifested in the parking occupancy in the
residential streets surrounding campus during the
middle of a regular weekday. Spillover parking
has kept streets such as Douglas Street. Lafayette
Street, and Gregg Avenue full all day. It iS unlikely
that residents near campus are able to easily Park
on their block at certain times of day.
Bicycle Network: The Fayetteville region has an
extensive network of off-street multiuse pathways,
and the City has a growing network of dedicated
on -street bicycle infrastructure. However, there
are few dedicated connections between campus
and this expanding system of resources.Once
prr campus,
biking facilities aro not marked or
delineated. leaving the rider to judge where is best
to ride. The only area of campus that addresses
those biking explicitly forbids them in the Core
campus "Walk Only Zone" In order to increase
the likelihood that affiliates will bike, UA's policies
and infrastructure should create and support a
convenient and safe culture for people who bike.
LEAD STRATEGY: Build Partnerships
to Expand Transportation Options
On -Street parking Surrounding the Campus - par-
ticularly north of campus - is used liberally by UA
affiliates for all -day parking. This parking is owned
and managed by the City although it is almost an
extension of the UA on -campus parking system.
The University should work with the City to more
effeCtively manage the high demand in this area
by creating a University Parking District. This Dis-
trict could be primarily managed by the University
antlcreated as a Parking Benefit District, similar
to other campus -adjacent neighborhoods around
the country, where a partnership with the host city
has a mutually -beneficial management agreement
In a similar partnership, the City and region are
exploring implementation of a bikeshare program.
Many successful bikeshare programs are public-
private partnerships, often Including institutions
and universities. Similar to other transportation
programs, bikeshare is a campus amenity that
can help keep UA competitive with other schools
while reducing parking pressure on campus. An
impactful bikeshare program at UA would need
to be a coordinated partnership with the City and
others. However. the University's investment in
the program would allow for specifically -desired
station placement, as well as discounted member-
ships for affiliates.
Key strategies:
N BPI. Work with City to create a University
Parking District
N BP2. Collaborate on Private Razorback Transit
improvements
N BP3. Partner to create inter -city bus service
N BP4, Transform Razorbikes program to full
Bike Share
LEAD STRATEGY: Create "Last Mile"
Bicycle Network Connections
To take full advantage of the potential that
the region's extensive off-street path network
represents, the University should work with the
City to create a series of dedicated facilities to
connect people from nearby trails directly to
campus. To maximize the impact of these invest-
ments, a similar facility type is needed: one that is
continuous and fully -protected, separating bikes
from cars along all links. M&pie Avenue is the
most direct and grade -friendly corridor for a clear
connection to both the Frisco Trail and the Oak
Ridge Trail, and a two-way raised cycletrack can
also add a valuable aesthetic enhancement to this
important edge.
On campus. new amenities such as blkeshare sta-
tions. electric bike parking areas, and a bike fix -it
station would all provide support to people who
bicycle. A low-cost but high -impact improvement
is installation of gutters (at non -historic staircases)
so that people can walk their bike up the stairs
and create more direct connections -
Key strategies:
N BCI. Better connect to Frisco Trail at Douglas
N BC2, Install cycletrack on Maple Street
N BC3. Establish bike mute on Old Main
N Fli Accommodate bicycling on Garland Ave
to the Oak Ridge Trail
N BCS. Install gutters to aocommodate bikes at
(non -historic) stairs
N
Bi Create a prominent bike frx-it station on
campus
N BC7. Add game day valet bike parking
28 University of Arkansas I Campus Transportation Plan
The plan recommended Maple Street as the most direct and grade -friendly corridor"
to connect elements of the surrounding bike and pedestrian trail system.
2015
NWA REGIONAL BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN MASTER PLAN
WALK BIKE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS
OUniversity of Arkansas Loop
From: Razorback Regional
Greenway and Maple Street Recommendations
A. Cycle track on Maple Street from the Stadium Drive
To: Oak Ridge Trail intersection to the Razorback Regional Greenway
B. Extension of the Oak Ridge Trail to Maple Street
Distance: 1.4 miles
Speed limit: 25 mph
Why this project is important:
xi High level of bicycle, pedestrian,
and automotive traffic
» University of Arkansas
xi High density area including students
» City currently considering design
Options for Maple Street
» Connects to the Razorback Regional
Greenway
xi Provides an important east/west
route (few good ones in Fayetteville)
xi Part of the Heritage Trail
5-12 Implementation
Right: Current tveatern extent of the
Oak Ridge Tmii
Maple Street cmxsumlk
Garland Avenue d Maple
I iwersecho.
WALK Bi KE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS
MAP 5.1 University of Arkansas Loop
wrarr�s L
w,us,
—Ma le Street
---- _
---------------------------------
cy
wsEar„tasr
univer
®f ArMa--
nsas
FAYETTEVILLE
y W eiCxgpa
ga 1 [
� wmumnraT
wr:nnesroesr
SpP
i�
W.nrRV�EW ST
Z
w �
v w
o� ptp�,tt:\ble. See Chapfer6pages 6-2 to 6-4 orn drscriprii
f'„rnp legend items These are org r+ized per the
Deign Guidclinesfound in Appendix A.
etalyst I'rojcct Shp dUse Facilities Dicrcle Facilities Pedestrian Faciliti
osedaredes
PropShUse Paved Trail " ,•. Proposed Sepaieted Bikeway iL E wung Sidewalk
i'*yRegional Network �..`� Existing Shared Use Paved Trail 1—N— Existing Shared Roadway
Heritage Trail --S� NeighborhoodlPark Trails
Proposed Sidepath INr Fxistiag Shoulder
^E Razorback Regional Gwn—y
� NO Existing s depath u
• Regional Oeslination
Existing Natural Surface Trait 0 9.25 Miles
I
Implementation 5-13
The plan identified Maple Street as Fayetteville's highest- priority project for
extending and integrating the city and university's bike and pedestrian network.
' _ �9� _ •> 1 ate':, ,`1, .� ,.
- *•: S. Y 'iFE`S,
.. _
��
5 P", 4, 1
l •- � a-
��%11111111
FA
1 University and city staff toured Colorado State University0000* _-
' f h fI
-JOV and University o Co orado to see t e success u
integration of bike, pedestrian, and vehicular infrastructure.
! 1101z Dr
G
Nettleshp
Q
v
Z >
Douglas St
O >
Q
Taylor St
a
0
A
o c :
and
city
p
MAPLE CYCLE TRACK IN
T� `
1
to investigate
how
■
■
J ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
bike
network
idea
could
�6
•SF
w
W
F
■
■
■
U
O
■
2 •
a
♦:
Q
■
:Q
R
Q
0 ♦ ■
M
N W Lafayette'
ro
0
■ ■
c
■
.0 F
4
'
♦♦♦
♦♦
■ ■
■� • ■
1 al 1H 31 = :�
`� II
11
Sl
W
D
w
O� c d OAK RIDGE TRAIL
�Q U
c
ave C' a>
IN
Putman St+
FO -1
z
0
n
W llc
U
v
N
I z W Lafayette
W Watson St
2017
CAMPUS BIKE CIRCUIT MASTER PLAN
UNIVERSITY OF
ARKANSAS
CAMPUS BICYCLE
CIRCUIT
LEGEND
BUS ROUTES
L Blue Route
Purple Route
ff- Red Route
Green Route
Yellow Route
EXISTING TRAILS
Razorback Regional
Greenway
Oak Ridge Trail/
Existing Path
PROPOSED CONNECTIONS
■ I Oak Ridge
Connector
Garland Shared Street
Maple Cycle Track
■ I Bike Route
PREPARED BY:
alta
M
PLANNING + DESIGN
The university
and
city
hired consultants in concert with
the Walton Family Foundation
to investigate
how
Soong n St
W Dickson St
campus
bike
network
idea
could
y
be refined
to ♦ __ ■
f� ■
✓
and
implemented.
O
■
2 •
a
R` ♦ ■
William St
¢ W Whiteside St
Q
0 ♦ ■
�y
d
U Z
ro
■ ■
N
X
■ ■
■� • ■
i
'rview St m
Z p
1 al 1H 31 = :�
`� II
11
Sl
W
D
w
O� c d OAK RIDGE TRAIL
�Q U
c
ave C' a>
IN
Putman St+
FO -1
z
0
n
W llc
U
v
N
I z W Lafayette
W Watson St
2017
CAMPUS BIKE CIRCUIT MASTER PLAN
UNIVERSITY OF
ARKANSAS
CAMPUS BICYCLE
CIRCUIT
LEGEND
BUS ROUTES
L Blue Route
Purple Route
ff- Red Route
Green Route
Yellow Route
EXISTING TRAILS
Razorback Regional
Greenway
Oak Ridge Trail/
Existing Path
PROPOSED CONNECTIONS
■ I Oak Ridge
Connector
Garland Shared Street
Maple Cycle Track
■ I Bike Route
PREPARED BY:
alta
M
PLANNING + DESIGN
The university
and
city
hired consultants in concert with
the Walton Family Foundation
to investigate
how
the
campus
bike
network
idea
could
be refined
and
implemented.
Maple Str. & Lererett Ave. -TMC r� ,' jI GEWALT HAMILTON
Tue Oct 2, 2018
Full Length(6AMfiPtrt) l 1 s ASSOCIATES, INC.
All Classes (Lights, Articulated Trucks, Buses and Single -Unit Trucks, Provided by: Gewalt Hamilton Associates Inc.
Pedestrians, Bicycles on Road, Bicycles on Crosswalk) 625 Forest Edge Drive, Vernon Pfills, Il, 60061, US
All Movements
ID -585257, [location: 36.070211, -94.171086
[N] Leverett Ave
Total: 6247
In: 3579 Out: 2668
487
3458
6
N �m
Out: 17 In: 13
Total: 30
[S] South
2061
3071 E
10 m a
Co
W
8
am
�_
CITY OF
FAY ETT E V I L L E
ARKANSAS
November 151h, 2018
Fayetteville Active Transportation Advisory Committee
Re: Maple Street Cycle Track Recommendations
The Fayetteville Active Transportation Advisory Committee met on November 141h, 2018 and
the Maple Street Cycle Track conceptual design was presented by Brad Hammond with Olsson
and Mandy Bunch with Alta Planning. After detailed discussion of the project, the committee
voted unanimously to forward the following recommendations to the Transportation Committee
for their November 27m, 2018 meeting_
1.) 10 -foot -wide driving lanes with 2 feet of clear space behind the curb.
2.) Improve the buffers to better emphasis the split in modes.
Consider including a vertical grade difference between the sidewalk and cycle track.
• Consider widening the buffer between the cycle track and curb to 5 feet using the 2
feet from the lane reduction or reduce the green space on the north side.
• Include vertical elements in the buffer and consider the use of street trees within the
5 -foot buffer.
3.) Limit use of smooth cobble stones because they can be slippery.
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
www.fayetteville-ar.gov
2018-2019
MAPLE STREET DESIGN PROCESS
Olsson
MEETING MINUTES Hand
Hand Delivery
TRAFFIC STUDY REVIEW AND 50% DESIGN INTRODUCTION X Other. Email
NAME OF PROJECT: Maple Street Bike Circuit
PROJECT LOCATION: University of Arkansas; Fayetteville, Arkansas
MEETING LOCATION: University of Arkansas Facilities Management
DATE 8 TIME: February 5, 2019
PROJl 018-2393
PHASEITASK M 050
ATTENDEES
See Attached Attendance Record
The purpose of the meeting was to review and discuss the Draft Traffic Study as well as to
introduce the 50% design plans. The following summarizes major points of discussion.
Discussion of Draft Traffic Studv
The group had a general question and answer session with Tom Fulton of Olsson regarding the
Traffic Study. While not all of the questions and answers are documented herein, the following
summarizes points for further oonsideration.
• Tom Fulton discussed that the warrant analyses did not support signalization at any of the
studied intersections (Maple/Gregg, Leverett/Douglas, Leverettloakland.)
• The traffic counts for the study were taken on Tuesday, Octcber 2"a, 2018. This information
will be added to the report.
• The UA asked Olsson to add alleys to Fig. 5 of the report.
• The group discussed that flashing yellow arrows are a possibility for left tum movements.
The group discussed methods for protecting the left -turn bus movements at MaplelLeverett
Olsson discussed phasing options by time of day.
Olsson confirmed that the scope included signal timing optimization timing plans based on
projections, although actual implementation is not included in the current scope.
• Possible four-way stop controlled intersections at LeverettlOakland and Leverett/Douglas
intersections were discussed. These intersections would increase level of service (LOS) for
east(west movements but decrease LOS for north/south movements. The UA and City
indicated that there was interest in either a four-way stop or signal at Leverett/Douglas only
and not the LeverettlCleveland intersection. More discussion may be required.
Page 1 of 2
University and city staff managed the design process, which included a traffic
operations study, public committee oversight, and Walton Family Foundation guidance.
PROJECT OVERVIEW
transforming Maple Street into a "livable street"
A livable street changes the level of service in auto -dominated streets to better
accommodate the interests of pedestrians and bicyclists, creating a safe space for all
travel modes, where motorists are compelled to behave socially.
— highway design standards, in terms of excessive lane width and design speed have
currently been misapplied to the existing street design; local street design should
be jased on civility rather than simply traffic throughput
— holistic and context -sensitive street design enhances safety and manages
increased use; changing street optics and character will improve motorist behavior
(especially attentiveness)
— new street corridor is designed as an urban landscape rather than just a `traffic
facility' to knit the campus and neighborhood back together
1�n* ►� — tri - --- _-- -+'+s•r -� µ�F !; � ! Y jL
Or
FOUR-WAY STOPS IMPROVE
'~ �.' 3- FLOW AND SAFETY ON DOUGLAS
rr � !� C -� ,�►"�sr "�'� +ray � r • , — .0 �u � + . �' � ,` � � � -
WW
ONE—WAY STREETS REDUCE •: ;: k_ ��, _ .w
TRAFFIC TURNING ONTO MAPLE , ,! f. �• :,l� �,r m
_ ' P.. I'anr� � •ie�W e'r � r '.., _. = � � snd' fF� �- *�a. a
6 hlr
�1 iia •tr. I� l t ��,-' I J .
�, •. , ' — � * � ser- �, � f � � OJ
lad' .a/' ,•, � � ' - � % r . - .;� H� y__ . _ e
tI
SIGNAL ALLOWS GREGG
3 TO SERVE AS VIABLE
' r J
r'•` ,f //� 'H" "n° yh' _ .: - ALTERNATE VEHICLE ROUTE
7-V
� ` 'M' -'� ` ` \� / �. Ila♦' i In II�I'I,xl •, - � - ( �!. / t �` ^S 7 �r }, ✓S
>~� ;,�j l - ♦ r� } a' a al , ark Fr F _} �'$.r9�t 1� ,
�• r
1 of
I[ 1
l !
4 1
4
1
Or - if
FIT
Improvements to the overall street network will support traffic flows in concert with
redesign of Maple Street as a "livable street".
A -parking
Lent varies
arkings/signage
Too much underperforming asphalt can be put
to better uses to increase mobility, safety, and
appearance fitting of our town -gown interface.
1
3
2
3
4
• , o
.o
� 5co
4
i
5
6
cy�
1
�.
h,
— kl
1�
w ^f
a
A K�
' s V
x
j
7
Am
cy�
1
�.
h,
— kl
1�
a
7
Am
cy�
1
1 0 rf"UR 4 ILI
km
Best practices in Livable
Street design specify
landscaped strips
between walking/cycling
facilities
and
travel
lanes
like
those
shown
here
in Vancouver and
Kansas City.
Separating sidewalk from automobile travel
lanes enhances pedestrian safety.
y
u
_'I �MLq%boIo*_,7%
R \i
1.
A landscaped strip separates vehicles from the cycle track and pedestrian walk along the
campus edge. The strip also provides a pedestrian refuge at mid -block crossings.
--
7A,?- ". 11Z
t%16-
I 4=0 40 4W�40 00 4W 4W 40
dw dw 4W 4M 40 40 40 qb-. 40 40 40
4W 40 MW 4W 4W 40 4W 40 OW
40 zz MP 4P
do 4W 4W 4W 40 40 40
do 40 4P 40 4W AD 40 abo 410 M
40 4W
A -t
W-4
Surface materials and graphic strategies temper motorist and cyclist speed through the
optics of surprise—precisely the circumstances when we pay the greatest attention.
.
.
6
O
��
2
Ak
Ak
1
I
2
I
3
I
4
I
5
I
6
PF
Or �
i
4;
0
0
Ak
1�
7
I
8
I�
laiwilima:7.-
i
i%
The transformation of Maple Street
takes a holistic view of the corridor,
simultaneously addressing best design
practices for safety and adding new
mobility options, while enhancing the
character of the city and campus.
END
..�` �� dam. r A•' p' �1 ^...'.r I•t'• � l��� ��{ r �' "�'"•�' '� .... ..� I� 7 ���
phi
P /' j. C• i
` �'r err •��' �1ety, r F F r� + :.3:.¢f'•-rr3y ®' �.r. y.
1"t c 1 i�,'ll +� t ;`. h t~, Y f'� - �r.� ,- rr '' • ��N�' 100 50 0 X50 �t100
t i4' { .+ � ��'.. -rf' ' �•� .S :v` � - � y+ i r I; �_ ,r• .� ro p, I i F��■,� y • • 1 1tik+l' �yj� Ate,
'r r R+ r` r r��it.J Hj,ll
f Arm [ Sa 1 Y �''�,
•r+_ ; r +r •;.i'r \�1a'.+ 1 Llf'S �+�' � k Y �. �� i +3: + O° �;? rt� .� � (+ � •
Aot
w • i Y
'k _ .'t •? hy` t' V'r 1 ' x,.,�n-. t'.. r� .�+. v ' `' yr �+•-•� Q 1 per`• `• ; Q i �� '� O ,, !! :
.ly. iE� ,i ! •. 1•* .T fl i`, .O .1 .E��� i �r�' "5 O l \.j' '` • v ` ( 4�
r' �c�. rL- r` ^� r .V •� t r ` ! a .,. 1� �,--•' t. i V `�f�C {H• •fir. ' 14 / V4 f
•'i • yl � i '► Z 5 r ' + ] '.1.,- ' l =' w.,. . �.....r ._•- "'�.. •;, w+•.wµ' I (Fr-
�i .1� �� `•, ` '� 'L• � �' .' ''_ t 1 i 1' F `, � ..-. , .. - �. - �F s �� r '� �.,... rw 4Y'
16
— — --—-- -
-- . _. w .. �... � ••A'�"yAl" :OI.f�* a�r.,r-•^.•�;,1i1;,• . : f.� ; �--- � -- �=-�'l� � ,�� .�
- i y� P FRIGHT-OF-WAY `I
14
r Nii-
OL
1 i ' 1
a 1 *"r 4r� t_
t. � ��
MM S A ltt� 1 1 or 1 1
orL
, } t h - S � r? - - •--- - s� , qr,°' S.. yr ` + . Y.. . 7 ' _ ' C`'� � ,l � . ' .` M
lap
t .,-:.,.— �, � . ,� X4.0 •+� �* ,-� �{e � �'� ;� I � `,
- -' -_ i a.a � =mss= k �• _ '��, �"� ' . �• ' i�•'.; ! �• y - ' :.
I 1 r r r t
� 41 , ; 1. �. !' 'r• - 'r.�. 'ji�rV'4:r..�' �• } Y 'j,l, � �r - a -rel r
Jug fj
LEGEND # Job NO. BB0411 protect
D PROPOSED PAVEMENT --- EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY Highway 16/112 Spur 67500
RAISED MEDIAN PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION Interchange Improvements (S)
® BRIDGE RETAINING WALL
D SIDEWALK � TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW � FAP No. IM-540-1(80)64
Highway 16/ 112 Spur Improvements Figure 6-5
ERADICATION March 5, 2015 Steamboat Drive Signal &
South Shiloh Drive Relocation
\\trnsrv\trn\Projects\AHTD\67500_BB0410 411\Deliverables\Reports\Figures\411_042815-updates\Figure_Exit64_Conceptl_llxl7_Figure-4.dgn
01
fir" i ' }` o� - #is,.•$%'
iilkrya }I Q k f
4' -AROAD RICHT—C}F—W
lot
ki
i
1 -
s 1
A �r x
Ilk
es. A• Yt� ,
41
LEGEND
f
0 PROPOSED PAVEMENT EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
RAISED MEDIAN PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION
M BRIDGE RETAINING WALL TRAFFIC FLOW ARROW
F-1 SIDEWALK
EM ERADICATION
rnsrv\trn\Projects\AHTD\67500_BB0410_411\Deliverables\Reports\Figures\411_042615-updates\Figure_Exit64_Option_1_11x17_Figure-5 dgn
March 5, 2015
2
Job No. BB0411
Highway 16/112 Spur
Interchange Improvements (S)
FAP No. IM -540-1(80)64
Highway 16/ 112 Spur Improvements
Steamboat Drive Signal &
South Shiloh Drive Relocation
project
67500
Figure 6-6
tr . t"
Transit Stop Amenities
Fayetteville Transportation Committee Meeting
March 31St 2020
FAYETMVILLEMOBILITY
T#AARKANSAS
fFy° y� ARKANSAS
1
APPENDICES
UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS CAMPUS
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Irrprovge low stress nei ghboftod bike routes conned ng to y°
trail system
F11 in sidewalks Mare disoortirvious or nore)aslsrtt 51%
Add protecLad bike lanes aicng key corridors 49%
IrTpTare walking envimnrnert and infonat>ort to parking 420
within a 5 minute walk
Improve waking efivironfrrert to rernate parking 42%
Inprwe oomectiors to transit via multiple modes 1 39
real-fime information, shelters, and benches at #Tarsi# 38%
stops
I den*, replace or repair det rbrated sidewalks ign 38"A
pedesbian I fic locations
Add bike racks hn downtown, along reighborhood 37%
commercial corridors, and key points of interest
Widen existing sidewal ks and install crosswei ks to build 37%
oont ruous, safe retworks
0% 1 M 20% 3Tla 4011a 5 N 609!a
Percentageof Conwrtunity Members
#Biking a Driving 0 Parking 0 Transit ■YVaiking
LEAD STRATEGY: Standardize
Physical Amenities
The UNversity relies on guidance and standards
from several documents, including the Landscape
Master Plan, City resources. State design manuals,
and many uncoordinated orae -off resources. W<n
physical transportation improvements are made_
whether they may be a safer design
or a neer transit vehicle purchaser the University
should adhere to consistent guidance that is
functional, aesthetically pleasing, and accommo-
dating of movement by all forms of transportation.
The included Transportation Toolkit (Appendix
identifies appropriate technical guidance when
upgrading and introducing neer transportation -re-
lated facilities and amenities to ensure compliance
ith the latest Federal guidelines and multi -modal
best practice.
Key Strategies:
SAKI. Expand carpus wayfinding plan and
standards
SA2_ Create a standard for bus stop signs
-�A I Institute a "hierarchy" for bus stop irri-
proements
4. Rely on trie I ranspor a ion 6olkit
ART 73 =-- -
We need your help! Where would you
+ improve transportation in Fayetteville?
Click ADD POINT to add to the reap.
;�,
, _r
�y�..P.,
` w�ce�111y IF. a.. i f ■
® 4=F■: r j 1'� Fayetievi�1e� }■ #.
4
(iii 66
[ 1I rj of Anka i t +*
-4.,.
, A 11, A T.
f
Union Station
Leverett & Maple
South Cree"de
Garland& Holly
Weekday boardings and aIighti by stop
_ 100
s0
10 40 1
Garland ,% Sycamore
Colonial Arris
Noble Oaks
Garland Heights
North Cmekside Leverett9 Mel mar
800
700
800
500
400
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
A00
-500
-600
-700
-800
-900
Aligh#ings � Boardings Load
cn
�
7
Ln
c
-C3
E
Lo
CIO
4D
0
�
c�
J
cn
�
7
Ln
c
-C3
E
Lo
CIO
4D
0
�
J
800
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
-100
-200
-300
-400
-500
-600
-700
X00
-900
" Premium Shelter IN
Shelter
Interior Bench
Solar Lighting (optional)
Solar USB Port
(Optional)
Pad and Installation
Freight
Custom Powder Coat
Total
$7,445
$650
$1,475
$550
$2,000 (Est)
Included
Included
$12,150
—. � ivIv
Basic Shelter i
Shelter
Interior Bench
Solar Lighting
(optional)
Solar USB Port
(Optional)
Pad and Installation
Freight
Custom Powder Coat
Total
$5,250
$300
$1,475
$550
$2,000 (Est)
Included
Included
$7,550 to $9,525
OR
Pole
Seat Attachment
Solar Lighting
Pad and Installation
Freight
Custom Powder Coat
Tota
$1,500
$500
Included
$1,000 (Est)
Included
Included
$3,000
PRESS
FOR
LIGHT
-/ _27
1
Dickson Street Depot
2
Walton Arts Center (West Ave)
3
South Creekside East (Leverett)
4
South Creekside West (Leverett)
5
Colonial Arms (Leverett)
6
Noble Oaks (Leverett)
7
N. Creekside West (Leverett)
8
N. Creekside East (Leverett)
9
Porter Road & Lawson
10
Porter Road & Lawson
11
Lafayette & St. Charles
12
Huntsville & Erica
13
Curtis & Fairlane
14
N. College and Dickson
15
WRMC N. (Appleby)
16
WRMC S. (Appleby)
17
Persimmon & Betty Jo
18
Hill & MLK (West)
19
Hill & MLK (East)
20
S. School & 7th Street
21
Washington Plaza (Lewis)
22
Cottages Hollywood
23
15th & Horizon
24
Hill & Stone West
25
Hill & Stone East
26
S.School and 9th
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback/ORT
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Bench
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Bench
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback/ORT
Shelter
ORT
Shelter
ORT
Bench
ORT
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
ORT
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Shelter
Razorback
Bench
Razorback/ORT
Shelter
ORT
Shelter
Mobility Hubs
—� CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MEETING OF APRIL 7, 2020
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Susan Norton, Chief of Staff
Garner Stoll, Development Services Director
Chris Brown, City Engineer
FROM: Matt Casey, Engineering Design Manager
DATE: March 17, 2020
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
SUBJECT: Approval of a contract in the amount of $1,250,152.54 with Emery Sapp and
Sons, Inc. for the construction of the Rupple Rd. Extension (Tanyard to
Weir North) approval of a project contingency of $187,500 (15%) and
approval of a budget adjustment.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of a contract in the amount of $1,250,152.54 with Emery Sapp and Sons, Inc. for the
construction of the Rupple Rd. Extension (Tanyard to Weir North) approval of a project
contingency of $187,500 (15%) and approval of a budget adjustment.
BACKGROUND:
In October of 2018, the City Council approved a cost share agreement with Buffington Weir,
LLC for the construction of Rupple Road from just north of Tanyard Drive where it currently
ends, extending north to just south of the southern leg of Weir Road. The project ends at this
point because it is the northern property line of the development. In June of 2019, the City
Council approved a design contract with Crafton, Tull & Associates for the design of the next
section of this roadway which continues from the northern property line of the development to
the north section of Weir Road. This construction contract is for this northern section of the
roadway which will complete the loop of the Mayor's Box.
The project also includes a 12" water main that will extend along the roadway improvements.
This 12" main will continue the 12" grid that is shown in the City's Water Master Plan.
DISCUSSION:
On March 11, 2020, the City received six (6) construction bids for this project. Emery Sapp and
Sons, Inc. submitted the low bid which was approximately 22% below the Engineer's Estimate
of $1,601,239. Engineering staff recommends awarding this contract to Emery Sapp and Sons,
Inc. The contract time is 210 days (7 months) for final completion.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
The roadway and drainage improvements ($1,034,045.54) are funded by the 2019
Transportation Bond Program. The water and sewer relocations in this project ($216,107.00)
are funded by the Sales Tax Capital Improvements Water and Sewer Improvements Fund.
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
There was $3,000,000 allocated in the Transportation Bond Fund for the Rupple Road projects
from Tanyard to Weir Road. The construction cost of the cost share portion of this project is
$2,295,268.00. The design and land acquisition of this northern City project were $93,400.00
and $66,720.45 respectively. With this construction contract, it brings the current Rupple Road
project total to $3,489,233.99.
Attachments:
Section 0500 Agreement
Bid Submittal
Bid Tab
Vicinity Map
Aft CITY OF
JWM FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
Bid 20-31, Construction - Rupple Road Improvements
Official Bid Tabulation
Lioneld Jordan, Mayor
Dates of Advertisement: 02.05.2020 and 02.12.2020
Issue Date: 02.05.2020
Number of Addendums: 2
Certification of Funds: $ 1,700,000.00
Max Award Amount: $ 2,125,000.00
Bid No. 20-31
Date: 03.11.2020
Time: 2:00 PM
ITEM
NO
DESCRIPTION
UNIT
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
Beckham Contracting,
Inc.
Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc.
Diamond C. Construction
Emery Sapp & Sons
Goodwin & Goodwin, Inc.
Sweetser Construction,
Inc.
UNIT UNIT UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
UNIT UNIT UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE
AMOUNT
BID SCHEDULE 1(BASE BID)
1
Mobilization (Shall not exceed 5%
of Total Bid)
LS
1
$ 44,000.00 $
44,000.00
$ 88,500.00 $
88,500.00
$ 57,500.00 $
57,500.00
$ 25,775.00 $
25,775.00
$ 75,000.00 $
75,000.00
$ 40,400.00 $
40,400.00
2
Insurance and bonding
LS
1
$ 40,000.00 $
40,000.00
$ 30,000.00 $
30,000.00
$ 51,750.00 $
51,750.00
$ 17,593.00 $
17,593.00
$ 50,000.00 $
50,000.00
$ 16,900.00 $
16,900.00
3
Construction Control (Staking)
IS
1
$ 19,000.00 $
19,000.00
$ 35,476.00 $
35,476.00
$ 23,000.00 $
23,000.00
$ 9,800.00 $
9,800.00
$ 20,000.00 $
20,000.00
$ 10,000.00 $
10,000.00
4
Traffic Control & Maintenance
LS
1
$ 17,000.00 $
17,000.00
$ 37,604.00 $
37,604.00
$ 22,701.00 $
22,701.00
$ 8,462.70 $
8,462.70
$ 8,000.00 $
8,000.00
$ 33,000.00 $
33,000.00
5
ACT 291, 1993 Trench and
Excavation Safety System
LS
1
$ 2,500.00 $
2,500.00
$ 7,978.00 $
7,978.00
$ 1,150.00 $
1,150.00
$ 1,632.00 $
1,632.00
$ 1,000.00 $
1,000.00
$ 1,000.00 $
1,000.00
6
Clearing, Grubbing & Demolition
LS
1
$ 99,000.00 $
99,000.00
$ 46,987.00 $
46,987.00
$ 23,000.00 $
23,000.00
$ 22,405.00 $
22,405.00
$ 20,000.00 $
20,000.00
$ 13,500.00 $
13,500.00
7
4" Topsoil Placement
SY
5,435
$ 4.50 $
24,457.50
$ 7.00 $
38,045.00
$ 8.47 $
46,034.45
$ 3.00 $
16,305.00
$ 7.00 $
38,045.00
$ 3.02 $
16,413.70
8
Unclassifed Excavation
Cy
11,158
$ 11.50 $
128,317.00
$ 14.00 $
156,212.00
$ 14.01 $
156,323.58
$ 10.00 $
111,580.00
$ 16.00 $
178,528.00
$ 10.00 $
111,580.00
9
Embankment (Onsite Cut to Fill)
Cy
1,350
$ 22.00 $
29,700.00
$ 12.00 $
16,200.00
$ 11.33 $
15,295.50
$ 1.50 $
2,025.00
$ 16.00 $
21,600.00
$ 6.00 $
8,100.00
10
Rock Excavation
Cy
500
$ 250.00 $
125,000.00
$ 178.00 $
89,000.00
$ 100.00 $
50,000.00
$ 207.00 $
103,500.00
$ 0.01 $
5.00
$ 225.00 $
112,500.00
11
Select Embankment (Hillside)
CY
4,797
$ 13.00 $
62,361.00
$ 18.00 $
86,346.00
$ 15.43 $
74,017.71
$ 11.00 $
52,767.00
$ 23.00 $
110,331.00
$ 9.00 $
43,173.00
12
18" RCP Class III
LF
663
$ 40.00 $
26,520.00
$ 80.00 $
53,040.00
$ 45.80 $
30,365.40
$ 51.00 $
33,813.00
$ 45.00 $
29,835.00
$ 49.50 $
32,818.50
13
5' Dia. Curb Inlet
EA
1
$ 5,750.00 $
5,750.00
$ 7,184.00 $
7,184.00
$ 4,226.25 $
4,226.25
$ 5,429.00 $
5,429.00
$ 4,800.00 $
4,800.00
$ 4,000.00 $
4,000.00
14
4' Dia. Curb Inlet
EA
4
$ 5,000.00 $
20,000.00
$ 4,315.00 $
17,260.00
$ 3,536.25 $
14,145.00
$ 4,566.00 $
18,264.00
$ 4,500.00 $
18,000.00
$ 3,200.00 $
12,800.00
15
8' Curb Inlet Extension
EA
3
$ 950.00 $
2,850.00
$ 2,107.00 $
6,321.00
$ 1,610.00 $
4,830.00
$ 2,078.00 $
6,234.00
$ 2,300.00 $
6,900.00
$ 1,600.00 $
4,800.00
16
4' Curb Inlet Extension
EA
2
$ 550.00 $
1,100.00
$ 1,055.00 $
2,110.00
$ 805.00 $
1,610.00
$ 1,369.00 $
2,738.00
$ 1,500.00 $
3,000.00
$ 800.00 $
1,600.00
17
2" Cold Mill
SY
224
$ 27.00 $
6,048.00
$ 31.00 $
6,944.00
$ 17.97 $
4,025.28
$ 15.30 $
3,427.20
$ 20.00 $
4,480.00
$ 16.85 $
3,774.40
18
2" ACHM Surface Course
SY
294
$ 28.00 $
8,232.00
$ 32.00 $
9,408.00
$ 15.65 $
4,601.10
$ 13.82 $
4,063.08
$ 30.00 $
8,820.00
$ 15.20 $
4,468.80
19
3" ACHM Surface Course
SY
6,081
$ 18.00 $
109,458.00
$ 20.00 $
121,620.00
$ 19.12 $
116,268.72
$ 17.13 $
104,167.53
$ 25.00 $
152,025.00
$ 18.50 $
112,498.50
20
4.5" ACM Base Course
SY
5,148
$ 22.00 $
113,256.00
$ 26.00 $
133,848.00
$ 23.08 $
118,815.84
$ 21.29 $
109,600.92
$ 30.00 $
154,440.00
$ 23.40 $
120,463.20
21
7" Class 7 Aggregate Base Course
SY
5,918
$ 10.50 $
62,139.00
$ 13.00 $
76,934.00
$ 13.00 $
76,934.00
$ 10.00 $
59,180.00
$ 11.00 $
65,098.00
$ 10.50 $
62,139.00
22
8" Class 7 Aggregate Base Course
SY
1,278
$ 14.50 $
18,531.00
$ 18.00 $
23,004.00
$ 14.27 $
18,237.06
$ 12.00 $
15,336.00
$ 14.00 $
17,892.00
$ 12.00 $
15,336.00
23
6" Thick Concrete Driveway w/
Class 7 Base
SY
341
$ 9.00 $
3,069.00
$ 68.00 $
23,188.00
$ 61.13 $
20,845.33
$ 52.00 $
17,732.00
$ 80.00 $
27,280.00
$ 62.00 $
21,142.00
24
6" Gravel Driveway
SY
109
$ 10.00 $
1,090.00
$ 21.00 $
2,289.00
$ 10.66 $
1,161.94
$ 12.00 $
1,308.00
$ 15.00 $
1,635.00
$ 14.00 $
1,526.00
25
Curb & Gutter
LF
3,424
$ 17.50 $
59,920.00
$ 20.00 $
68,480.00
$ 20.71 $
70,911.04
$ 14.00 $
47,936.00
$ 26.00 $
89,024.00
$ 16.00 $
54,784.00
26
4" Class 7 Aggregate Base Course
(Trail)
SY
840
$ 11.75 $
9,870.00
$ 16.00 $
13,440.00
$ 18.62 $
15,640.80
$ 7.00 $
5,880.00
$ 9.00 $
7,560.00
$ 8.00 $
6,720.00
27
Concrete Sidewalk/Trail (4"
Thickness)
SY
1,381
$ 45.00 $
62,145.00
$ 55.00 $
75,955.00
$ 49.55 $
68,428.55
$ 35.00 $
48,335.00
$ 50.00 $
69,050.00
$ 54.00 $
74,574.00
28
4" Striping(Thermoplastic)
LF
795
$ 4.00 $
3,180.00
$ 3.00 $
2,385.00
$ 3.19 $
2,536.05
$ 3.00 $
2,385.00
$ 3.00 $
2,385.00
$ 2.75 $
2,186.25
29
6" Striping (Thermoplastic)
LF
926
$ 5.00 $
4,630.00
$ 5.00 $
4,630.00
$ 4.79 $
4,435.54
$ 4.00 $
3,704.00
$ 4.50 $
4,167.00
$ 4.15 $
3,842.90
30
8" Striping(Thermoplastic)
LF
277
$ 7.00 $
1,939.00
$ 6.00 $
1,662.00
$ 6.44 $
1,783.88
$ 5.00 $
1,385.00
$ 8.00 $
2,216.00
$ 5.50 $
1,523.50
31
24" Striping (Thermoplastic)
LF
200
$ 35.00 $
7,000.00
$ 37.00 $
7,400.00
$ 37.95 $
7,590.00
$ 30.00 $
6,000.00
$ 45.00 $
9,000.00
$ 33.00 $
6,600.00
32
Pavement Symbols
(Thermoplastic)
EA
8
$ 550.00 $
4,400.00
$ 545.00 $
4,360.00
$ 575.00 $
4,600.00
$ 450.00 $
3,600.00
$ 600.00 $
4,800.00
$ 495.00 $
3,960.00
33
Street Sign Installation
EA
25
$ 440.00 $
11,000.00
$ 454.00 $
11,350.00
$ 474.95 $
11,873.75
$ 375.00 $
9,375.00
$ 500.00 $
12,500.00
$ 415.00 $
10,375.00
34
Handicap Access Ramp
SY
53
$ 60.00 $
3,180.00
$ 59.00 $
3,127.00
$ 68.35 $
3,622.55
$ 94.00 $
4,982.00
$ 65.00 $
3,445.00
$ 900.00 $
47,700.00
35
Cast -in -Place Detectable Warning
SF
96
$ 35.00 $
3,360.00
$ 26.00 $
2,496.00
$ 41.93 $
4,025.28
$ 18.00 $
1,728.00
$ 20.00 $
1,920.00
$ 25.00 $
2,400.00
36
Streelights(Co mplete-in-Place)
EA
5
$ 9,000.00 $
45,000.00
$ 8,221.00 $
41,105.00
$ 14,547.50 $
72,737.50
$ 6,785.26 $
33,926.30
$ 4,500.00 $
22,500.00
$ 9,115.00 $
45,575.00
37
11/2" Electrical Conduit w/
LF
682
$ 12.00 $
8,184.00
$ 12.00 $8,184.00
$ 20.25 $
13,810.50
$ 9.81 $
6,690.42
$ 12.00 $
8,184.00
$ 10.80 $
7,365.60
38
Remove & Reset Mailbox
EA
3
$ 450.00 $
1,350.00
$ 181.00 $
543.00
$ 766.67 $
2,300.01
$ 150.00 $
450.00
$ 200.00 $
600.00
$ 165.00 $
495.00
ITEM
N
ULSCRIVIION
UNIT
ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
Beckham Contracting, Inc.
Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc.
UNIT UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
Diamond C. Construction
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
Emery Sapp &Sons
UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
Goodwin & Goodwin, Inc. Sweetser Construction, Inc.
UNIT UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
39
Solid Sod
SY
5,435
$ 3.50 $
19,022.50 $
4.00 $
21,740.00 $
5.29 $ 28,751.15 $
3.05 $ 16,576.75 $
6.00 $
32,610.00 $
3.35
$ 18,207.25
40
Street Trees
EA
32
$ 705.00 $
22,560.00 $
545.00 $
17,440.00 $
486.00
$ 15,552.00 $
385.00
$ 12,320.00 $
500.00 $
16,000.00 $
423.50
$ 13,552.00
41
Irrigation
LS
1
$ 42,000.00 $
42,000.00 $ 18,173.00 $
18,173.00 $ 40,480.00 $ 40,480.00 $ 12,750.00 $ 12,750.00 $ 32,000.00 $
32,000.00 $ 12,750.00 $ 12,750.00
42
Erosion Control
LS
1
$ 18,000.00 $
18,000.00 $ 12,236.00 $
12,236.00 $
8,855.00
$ 8,855.00 $
6,987.43
$ 6,987.43 $
18,000.00 $
18,000.00 $
9,500.00
$ 9,500.00
43
4" Schedule 40 PVC Conduit
LF
1,315
$ 7.00 $
9,205.00 $
8.00 $
10,520.00 $
22.66 $ 29,797.90 $
21.00 $ 27,615.00 $
22.00 $
28,930.00 $
28.00 $ 36,820.00
44
Site Photographs & Video
L.SUM
1
$ 1,500.00 $
1,500.00 $
7,267.00 $
7,267.00 $
1,725.00
$ 1,725.00 $
725.00
$ 725.00 $
3,000.00 $
3,000.00 $
3,000.00
$ 3,000.00
45
Remove & Relocate Wrought
LF
187
$ 75.00 $
14,025.00 $
121.00 $
22,627.00 $
46.13
S 8,626.31 S
72.83
$ 13,619.21 $
60.00 $
11,220.00 $
172.00
$ 32,164.00
46
Remove & Relocate Wood Fence
LF
218
$ 35.00 $
7,630.00 $
44.00 $
9,592.00 $
21.11
$ 4,601.98 $
41.00
$ 8,938.00 $
32.00 $
6,976.00 $
39.60
$ 8,632.80
47
Remove & Replace Monument
EA
1
$ 771.00 $
771.00 $ 9,086.00 $
9,086.00 $ 6,325.00 $ 6,325.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,600.00 $
5,600.00 $
1,800.00 $ 1,800.00
TOTAL AMOUNT BID (SCHEDULE I):
$
1,329,250.00 $
1,489,296.00 $
1,365,847.95 $
1,034,045.54 $
1,408,401.00 $
1,208,460.40
48
bm
12" PVC Class C900 DR14 Class
77-
LF
77817
$ 46.00 $
39,882.00 $
83.00 $
71,961.00 $
55.35
$ 47,988.45 $
49.00
$ 42,483.00 $
48.00 $
41,616.00 $
55.00 $ 47,685.00
49
8" PVC Class C900 DR14 Class
LF
860
$ 34.00 $
29,240.00 $
64.00 $
55,040.00 $
40.79
$ 35,079.40 $
30.00
$ 25,800.00 $
39.00 $
33,540.00 $
44.00
$ 37,840.00
50
4" PVC Class C900 DR14 Class
LF
40
$ 28.00 $
1,120.00 $
45.00 $
1,800.00 $
66.42
$ 2,656.80 $
23.00
$ 920.00
35.00 $
1,400.00
40.00
$ 1,600.00
51
12"x12" Cross
EA
1
$ 3,000.00 $
3,000.00 $
2,576.00 $
2,576.00 $
3,875.50
$ 3,875.50 $
1,915.00
$ 1,915.00
2,200.00 $
2,200.00
1,750.00
$ 1,750.00
52
8"x8"Tee
EA
1
$ 800.00 $
800.00 $
1,780.00 $
1,780.00 $
1,397.25
$ 139725 $
1,244.00
$ 1,244.00
1,300.00 $
1,300.00
1,295.00
$ 1,295.00
53
8"x4" Tee
EA
2
$ 750.00 $
1,500.00 $
1,480.00 $
2,960.00 $
862.50
$ 1,725.00 $
957.00
$ 1,914.00
900.00 $
1,800.00
1,050.00
$ 2,100.00
54
4"x4" Tapping Sleeve & Valve
EA
2
$ 4,500.00 $
9,000.00 $
3,869.00 $
7,738.00 $
2,702.50
$ 5,405.00 $
4,042.00
$ 8,084.00
4,000.00 $
8,000.00
3,500.00
$ 7,000.00
55
8"x12" Reducer
EA
2
$ 800.00 $
1,600.00 $
1,425.00 $
2,850.00 $
1,150.00
$ 2,300.00 $
905.00
$ 1,810.00
900.00 $
1,800.00
1,000.00 $ 2,000.00
56
4" Gate Valve
EA
1
$ 2,000.00 $
2,000.00 $
1,959.00 $
1,959.00 $
1,150.00
$ 1,150.00 $
1,356.00
$ 1,356.00
1,000.00 $
1,000.00
1,800.00
$ 1,800.00
57
8" Gate Valve
EA
6
$ 2,500.00 $
15,000.00 $
2,754.00 $
16,524.00 $
2,223.34
$ 13,340.04 $
2,115.00
$ 12,690.00
1,800.00 $
10,800.00
3,200.00
$ 19,200.00
58
12" Butterfly Valve
EA
6
$ 9,500.00 $
57,000.00 $
5,468.00 $
32,808.00 $
9,822.92
$ 58,937.52 $
4,126.00
$ 24,756.00
7,000.00 $
42,000.00
5,000.00
$ 30,000.00
59
8" Plug/Cap
EA
3
$ 600.00 $
1,800.00 $
1,393.00 $
4,179.00 $
805.00
$ 2,415.00 $
410.00
$ 1,230.00
875.00 $
2,625.00
525.00 $ 1,575.00
60
Fire Hydrant Assembly
EA
4
$ 6,500.00 $
26,000.00 $
6,279.00 $
25,116.00 $
5,707.00
$ 2282800 $
5,929.00
$ 23,716.00
5,500.00 $
22,000.00
5,995.00
$ 23,980.00
61
1" Air Release Valve
EA
2
$ 2,800.00 $
5,600.00 $
2,218.00 $
4,436.00 $
1,753.75
$ 3,507.50 $
2,116.00
$ 4,232.00
3,500.00 $
7,000.00
1,750.00
$ 3,500.00
62
8"x45° Bend
EA
6
$ 900.00 $
5,400.00 $
1,349.00 $
8,094.00 $
785.84
$ 4,715.04 $
833.00
$ 4,998.00
800.00 $
4,800.00
750.00
$ 4,500.00
63
12"x22.5"Bend
EA
4
$ 1,200.00 $
4,800.00 $
1,752.00 $
7,008.00 $
1,135.63
$ 454252 $
1,218.00
$ 4,872.00
1,000.00 $
4,000.00
1,075.00
$ 4,300.00
64
12"x11.25°
EA
2
$ 1,200.00 $
2,400.00 $
1,797.00 $
3,594.00 $
747.50
$ 1,495.00 $
1,260.00
$ 2,520.00
1,000.00 $
2,000.00
1,100.00
$ 2,200.00
65
Single Set Water Service
EA
7
$ 2,000.00 $
14,000.00 $
2,000.00 $
14,000.00 $
1,536.08
$ 10,752.56 $
3,121.00
$ 21,847.00
1,650.00 $
11,550.00
1,600.00
$ 11,200.00
66
2" Irrigation Meter w/ RPZ
EA
1
$ 2,000.00 $
2,000.00 $
7,875.00 $
7,875.00 $
7,245.00
$ 7,245.00 $
7,536.00
$ 7,536.00
6,250.00 $
6,250.00
7,800.00
$ 7,800.00
67
24" Steel Casing
LF
82
$ 150.00 $
12,300.00 $
237.00 $
19,434.00 $
130.43
$ 10,695.26 $
159.00
$ 13,038.00
150.00 $
12,300.00
190.00
$ 15,580.00
68
Inspection and Testing of Water
Lines & Service Lines
L5
1
$ 3,300.00 $
3,300.00 $
7,875.00 $
7,875.00 $
2,725.50
$ 2,725.50 $
9,146.00
$ 9,146.00 $
5,000.00 $
5,000.00 $
3,500.00
$ 3,500.00
TOTAL AMOUNT BID (SCHEDULE 2):
$
237,742.00 $
299,607.00 $
244,776.34 $
216,107.00 $
222,981.00 $
230,405.00
TOTAL BASE BID (SCHEDULES 1 & 2):
$
1,566,992.00 $
1,788,903.00 $
1,610,624.29 $
1,250,152.54 $
1,631,382.00 $
1,438,865.40
CTIVE ALTERN8MOM
7
4" Topsoil Placement
SY
1,432
$ 4.50 $
6,444.00 $
5.60 $
8,019.20 $
7.34 $ 10,510.88 $
4.00 $ 5,728.00 $
7.00 $
10,024.00 $
9.00
$ 12,888.00
8
Unclassified Excavation
CY
1,287
$ 11.50 $
14,800.50 $
11.20 $
14,414.40 $
12.00 $ 15,444.00 $
8.00 $ 10,296.00 $
16.00 $
20,592.00 $
9.00
$ 11,583.00
9
Embankment (Onsite Cut to Fill)
CY
590
$ 22.00 $
12,980.00 $
9.60 $
5,664.00 $
9.33
$ 5,504.70 $
2.00
$ 1,180.00 $
16.00 $
9,440.00 $
9.00
$ 5,310.00
11
Select Embankment (Hillside)
CY
430
$ 13.00 $
5,590.00 $
14.40 $
6,192.00 $
13.38 $ 5,753.40 $
11.00 $ 4,730.00 $
23.00 $
9,890.00 $
16.40
$ 7,052.00
19
3" ACHM Surface Course
SY
544
$ 18.00 $
9,792.00 $
16.00 $
8,704.00 $
16.55
$ 9,003.20 $
14.92
$ 8,116.48 $
25.00 $
13,600.00 $
12.00
$ 6,528.00
22
8"Class 7 Aggregate Base Course
SY
642
$ 14.50 $
9,309.00 $
14.40 $
9,244.80 $
12.31
$ 7,903.02 $
11.00
$ 7,062.00 $
14.00 $
8,988.00 $
16.00
$ 10,272.00
25
Curb & Gutter
LF
350
$ 17.50 $
6,125.00 $
16.00 $
5,600.00 $
17.86
$ 6,251.00 $
13.00
$ 4,550.00 $
26.00 $
9,100.00 $
3.35
$ 1,172.50
39
Sod
SY
1,512
$ 3.50 $
5,292.00 $
3.20 $
4,838.40 $
4.57
$ 6,909.84 $
3.05
$ 4,611.60 $
6.00 $
9,072.00 $
3.50
$ 5,292.00
`DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE
$
70,332.50 $
62,676.80 $
67,280.04 $
46,274.08 $
90,706.00 $
60,097.50
TOTAL BASE BID LESS DEDUCTIVE ALTERNATE gl
$
1,496,659.50 $
1,726,226.20 $
1,543,344.25 $
1,203,878.46 $
1,540,676.00 $
1,378,767.90
*Highlighting Notes Corrected Calculation Error 7
Andrea Foren, CPPB, CPPD, Purchasing Manager Witness, Les McGaugh Date
Beckham Contracting, Inc.
Crossland Heavy Contractors, Inc.
Diamond C. Construction Emery Sapp & Sons
Goodwin & Goodwin, Inc.
Sweetser Construction, Inc.
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
ITEM ESTIMATED
No DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY
PRICE AMOUNT
PRICE AMOUNT
PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT
PRICE AMOUNT
PRICE AMOUNT
- —
300 0
� ,Scale: 1" = 300'
I
\ PROPOSED
------
- — - — - — - — - — I \ DESIGN AREA
R
i
ROAD
'� ►�.
--
BLUEGRASS PLACE
0
0
•
o N�,�„eersp..,
m��
o
n
North Salem Road
North Rupple Road
CD
Cn
0)
3
0
o.
300
n
P"�
PROJECT
LOCATION
�
... ..
LL
_ Nene Rupee ROW
---___._..
NwV�RugNe RoaY
North Rupple Road
I -A IT
q
IV 47q,
N
O-
C
0
0
•
o N�,�„eersp..,
m��
o
n
North Salem Road
North Rupple Road
CD
Cn
0)
3
0
o.
300
Ii
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
March 25th, 2020 Transportation Committee Memo
Re: Razorback Greenway Improvements — Recreational Trails Program
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of a resolution expressing the willingness to apply for federal -aid
funds and allow staff to submit an application of an 80% federal 20% local matching grant
through the Arkansas Department of Transportation - Transportation Alternatives Program for
an award of up to $500,000 and City match of $125,000 to be used for the Clabber Creek Trail
tunnel under Garland Ave. (Hwy 112) at Van Asche Drive.
BACKGROUND:
The Arkansas Department of Transportation is in the design phase for the widening of Highway
112 from Truckers Drive to the north City limit line. In addition to widening the road to 4 vehicle
lanes, the City has requested a trail along the west and south sides of Hwy 112, part of which is
the Clabber Creek Trail. The project proposal includes two roundabouts and the one at the
intersection of Highway 112 and Van Asche Drive where currently there is a signalized
intersection is the proposed crossing of the Clabber Creek Trail.
The Clabber Creek Trail is constructed along the south side of Van Asche Drive and must cross
Highway 112 to continue west. The free-flowing roundabout presents a challenge for the
crossing of the Clabber Creek Trail. To provide safe passage for trail users, a box culvert tunnel
is proposed under Highway 112 and the City of Fayetteville would be responsible for the cost.
DISCUSSION:
The Arkansas Department of Transportation is currently accepting applications for funding
through the Transportation Alternatives Program. The proposed tunnel crossing under Highway
112 is eligible for funding through this grant program. In addition, since this is a projecting being
designed and constructed through the Arkansas Department of Transportation the funding can
be applied directly to the project with minimal staff time necessary to manage the grant.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
The total estimated cost for the tunnel installation at Highway 112 is $625,000. If the
Transportation Alternatives Program grant is approved and fully funded, the City will be
responsible for 20% of the total project cost, or $125,000. Funding for the match has been
budgeted through the 2019 Bond for Trail Improvements.
The Active Transportation Advisory Committee reviewed the project proposal during their March
11th meeting and voted unanimously to forward the request to apply.
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
W Hwy 112 -
....�......... 11 W HwY 112
Proposed 12' wide trail - Constructed with ARDOT Project
PROPOSED ROUNDABOUT
BY ARDOT
I I
a,
�A
– - - Fellowship
Bible Church
i
--ter—
i
F–
Y U
Q O
U a
TRAIL TUNNEL EXAMPLE a) p
-0 o
U Q
Q) £
� U >
Q) x
o 1Z
0
o U
;Ii2]
Clabber Creek Trail
....................................................... Late.2020 Construction......
Legend
Existing Shared -Use Paved Trail .
i I
49
I I
L _ _ _ _ _ Existing_ Clabber Creek Trail To Razorback Greenway
PROPOSED TRAIL TUNNEL
UNDER HIGHWAY 112
FOR THE CLABBER CREEK TRAIL
Fayetteville Vicinity Map
E
Proposed Trail Tunnel
„z
Z
W
CLABBER CREEK TRAIL TUNNEL
CITY OF TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM FAYETTEVILLE 0 125 250 500 750 1,000
ARKANSAS Feet HIGHWAY 112 & VAN ASCHE
r
Z ll -M ll -M
Zl- ZL-M Z
ro Z VAN-ASCHZ,.
� M W
s N
9f -M C -M
sTp �
QP $yam N
TO lRAZORBACK
GREENWAY
GvL
\ R FA
6.
RSo,
o
Z
O
°
a
m
o
�f
t~n
o
O 2
s
f
w
m
I
rn
3
, M
r
S 1
CITY OF Job 040746
�� ARKANSAS FAY E T T E V I L L E Highway 112 (Truckers Dr. to Howard Nickell) 0 40 80
Proposed Tunnel at Van Asche January 28th 2020
Ii
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
March 301h, 2020 Transportation Committee Memo
Re: Razorback Greenway Improvements — Recreational Trails Program
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of a resolution expressing the willingness to apply for federal -aid
funds and allow staff to submit an application of an 80% federal 20% local matching grant
through the Arkansas Department of Transportation — Recreational Trails Program for an award
of up to $440,000 and City match of $110,000 to be used for the reconstruction and
improvement to the section of the Lake Fayetteville shared -use paved trail across the dam.
BACKGROUND:
In 2004 the first section of the Lake Fayetteville paved trail opened to the public and connected
Veterans Park on the south side of the lake across spillway bridge and dam to tie to the marina
and softball on the north side of the dam. In subsequent phases over the next 9 years, the 5.5 -
mile paved loop trail around Lake Fayetteville was completed in 2013. In 2015, the section of
the Lake Fayetteville paved trail across the dam and north along the disc golf course to the
north City limit line was designated as part of the Razorback Greenway.
The 1/3 -mile section of trail across the dam is now 16 years old and much of the asphalt
pavement is in poor condition. Usage counts from this section of trail in the spring of 2019
showed an average of 1,376 users per day or 41,280 users per month. An intercept survey
from the same period showed that 43% of the users were on bike, 40% were walking and 13%
were running. This section of the Razorback Greenway is the highest used in our system and is
in need of improvements.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed improvements include widening of the 1,938 linear feet section of trail across the
dam from 12 feet to 16 feet in overall width. To accommodate the high use of different user
types, the proposed design would separate bicycles from pedestrians giving 8 feet of concrete
surface dedicated for two-way bike traffic and 8 feet of rubberized track surface for walkers and
runners.
The Arkansas Department of Transportation is currently accepting applications for funding
through the Recreational Trails Program. The proposed upgrades to the Lake Fayetteville trail
across the dam are eligible for funding through this grant program.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
The total estimated cost for the Lake Fayetteville greenway improvements is estimated to be
$550,000. If the Recreational Trails Program grant is approved and fully funded, the City will be
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
responsible for 20% of the total project cost, or $110,000. Funding for the match has been
budgeted through trail development CIP program.
The Active Transportation Advisory Committee reviewed the project proposal during their March
11th meeting and voted unanimously to forward the request to apply.
Attachments:
Project Map
051
Existing Trail Conditions Isar ('rrck
----
L o k o m 0 t i o n
Family Fun
Center
I
IQ \ I_j
Legend N
Existing Shared -Use Paved Trail
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
0 125 250 500 750 1,000
Feet
N 0 R T H
l�rt�
PROPOSED REPLACEMENT OF 1,938 LINEAR FEET OF
DAMAGED 12 FOOT WIDE ASPHALT TRAIL WITH 8 FOOT
WIDE CONCRETE TWO WAY BIKE TRAIL AND 8 FOOT WIDE
RUBBER SURFACE PEDESTRIAN TRAIL FOR A TOTAL OF 16
FEET WIDTH
Y 11; 1
Fayetteville Vicinity Map
I.IAI:
A
}
-- _
„z � "`\ �� Lake Fayetteville Dam
-- z
w
_ w
C7 -
O
O D 1. - - - -
Q \55\
19toh D/ 112:
Ma I St
-
112 La yette 5t u
Razorback Greenway Improvements
Lake Fayetteville Dam 1,938 LF or 0.36 Miles
tSTgR
Op�N
ORegCK GRED
1
I
PROPOSED 4 FEET
ADDITIONAL 24 INCH 111 q
DEEP RED DIRT HILLSIDE
COMPACT TO 95% S.P.D.
VAYXIA
0 PM ��vEE -
G
EX�S��N 8 FOOT WIDE
CONCRETE 8 FOOT WIDE
PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE
TRAIL BIKE LANES
WITH RUBBER
TRACK TOP
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
Ai2!{AN5A5
ENGINEERING DIVISION
113 W. MOUNTAIN STREET
PHONE: (479) 575-8206 FAX NO: (479) 575-8202
16 FEET
Fk�
EXISTING
24 INCHES
RED DIRT HILLSIDE
COMPACT TO 95% S.P.D.
I I I Lt: RAZORBACK GREENWAY IMPROVEMENTS
DESCRIPTION:
LAKE FAYETTEVILLE DAM
DRAWN BY: MPM ICHECKED BY: MPM IFILE NAME: Lake Fayetteville T,aii Coss Seatioa.dwg
Razorback Greenway Improvements
CITY p F Lake Fayetteville Dam
FAYETTEVILLE 1,938 LF (1/3 Mile)
ARKANSAS
Cost Estimate
March 30, 2020
Cost Estimate (Based on Centennial Park Bids)
ITEM #
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
UNIT
UNIT COST
TOTAL COST
1
Mobilization (Shall not exceed 5% of Total Bid)
1
L.S.
$27,000.00
$ 27,000.00
2
Insurance and Bonding
1
L.S.
$10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
3
Construction Control (Staking)
1
L.S.
$10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
4 ITrail
Traffic Control Detour
1
L.S.
$10,000.00
$ 10,000.00
5
Demolition (Removal of Asphalt Trail and Bench Pads)
1
L.S.
$20,000.00
$ 20,000.00
6
Erosion Control
1
L.S.
$5,000.00
$ 5,000.00
7
4" Concrete Trail (4,000 PSI w/fiber) (Class 7 Base)
3,318
S.Y.
$50.00
$ 165,900.00
8
Rubberized track surface (1/2" thick)(13mm)
13,102
S.F.
$5.00
$ 65,510.00
9
Class 7 Base (6" under trail w/12" sholder & bench pads
408
S.Y.
$10.00
$ 4,080.00
10
Select Fill (Red -Dirt) (4 foot expanded area& bench pad
1,096
C.Y. T.Y.
$30.00
$ 32,880.00
11
4" Topsoil and fine grading and seed/straw
359
C.Y. T.Y.
$14.00
$ 5,026.00
12
4" Concrete Bench pads
38
S.Y.
$100.00
$ 3,800.00
13
Benches
4
E.A.
$2,000.00
$ 8,000.00
14
Native Stone Wall Around Bench Pads
288
S.F. Face
$110.00
$ 31,680.00
15
Trail Center Line Striping (Paint)
2,038
L.F.
$1.00
$ 2,038.00
16
Bike Lane and Pedestrian Symbol Striping (Paint)
58
E.A.
$50.00
$ 2,900.00
17
Signs & Posts (MUTCD)
10
E.A.
$200.00
$ 2,000.00
18
1-1/4" PVC Conduit (Double Run) (For Future Lighting)
3,876
L.F.
$10.00
$ 38,760.00
19
Quazite Pull Boxes (12"x12"x12")
19
E.A.
$330.00
$ 6,270.00
20
Solid Slab Sod (5 feet each side of trail)
2,153
S.Y.
$3.50
$ 7,535.50
Estimated Contractor Cost $458,380
20% Contingency $91,676
Total Estimated Cost $550,056
Ii
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM
PROGRESS REPORT — MARCH 2020
The Transportation Bond Program consists of projects that will be designed, contracted, and
administered by City Staff or consultants/contractors working for the City. A summary of the
status of all projects in the program follows below.
Funding for the Bond Program includes $36 million in bonds for the first phase of the program.
1) RUPPLE ROAD (TANYARD DR. TO WEIR RD.)
Project Summary
• Completion of the last missing segment of Rupple Road.
• Improvements include 4 travel lanes, a center median, sidewalk on the east
side, a 12' wide multi -use trail on the west side, storm sewer, lighting and
street trees.
• This portion of the project is being constructed as a cost -share between the
City and the developer of the Magnolia Park Subdivision.
a. Phase 1 — Cost Share
This portion of the project is being constructed as a cost -share between the City
and the developer of the Magnolia Park Subdivision.
• Recent Actions:
1. Cost share in the amount of $2,295,267.72 was approved at the
10/18/18 City Council meeting.
2. Construction began in November 2019 and is scheduled to be completed
in July 2020.
• Upcoming Activities:
1. Rain has hampered the progress of construction, but the contractor will
continue working on the earthwork for the roadway.
b. Phase 2 — City Portion
This portion of the project is fully funded by the City and will be bid as a separate
project. This portion of the work will connect Phase 1 to both the east and west
sections of Weir Road.
• Recent Actions:
1. City Council approved the design contract with Crafton Tull and
Associates in July 2019.
2. Final design was submitted to the City at the end of January 2020.
3. Bid opening was March 11, 2020. Emery Sapp and Sons was the low
bidder.
• Upcoming Activities:
1. Construction contract will be presented at the April 7, 2020 City Council
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
www.fayetteville-ar.gov
meeting.
2) ZION ROAD PHASE II (VANTAGE DR TO CROSSOVER RD)
a. Project Summary/Status
• Improvements include 2 travel lanes, a center turn lane, sidewalk on the
south side, a 10' wide trail on the north side, storm sewer, lighting and street
trees.
b. Recent Actions:
• City Council approved the design contract amendment with McClelland
Consulting in July 2019.
• City Council approved a contract amendment to add lighting and street trees
to the project design on January 7, 2020.
• Plans are complete.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Property acquisitions continues. One property remains and will be
recommended to the City Council for condemnation.
• Project manual and specifications will be submitted to the City in late March.
• Schedule the bid date.
3) STEAMBOAT / DOROTHY JEANNE CONNNECTION
a. Project Summary/Status
• This project is being designed in-house by the City Engineering Division.
• Improvements include 2 travel lanes, sidewalk on the south/east side, a 10'
wide trail on the north/west side and street trees.
b. Recent Actions:
• Land acquisition is complete.
• Design is100% complete and has been submitted to Purchasing to bid.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Schedule a bid date.
4) SHILOH DR. / FULBRIGHT EXPRESSWAY INTERSECTION
a. Project Summary/Status
• Improvements include the construction of a roundabout at the intersection of
Steele and Shiloh with on and off ramps to the Fulbright Expressway. The
existing on and off ramps are proposed to be removed with this project.
b. Recent Actions:
• City Council approved the design contract with Garver Engineers in
September 2019.
• Surveys and the traffic study have been developed.
• Correspondence with ArDOT concerning the proposal.
• The conceptual design was submitted to the City for review along with the
traffic study.
• The traffic study, report and conceptual plans were submitted to ArDOT for
review.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Waiting on ArDOT review to be completed.
5) CENTER/ HARMON INTERSECTION
a. Project Summary/Status
0 Improvements include widening to accommodate turn lanes, sidewalks on the
south side, multi -use trail on the north and west sides, installation of a traffic
signal, and pedestrian accommodations.
b. Recent Actions:
• City council approved the design contract with McClelland Engineers in
November 2019.
• 30% conceptual plans were submitted and reviewed in January 2020.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Coordination with U of A Transit.
• Utility coordination.
• Development of the 60% plans.
6) PORTER / DEANE / SYCAMORE CORRIDOR
a. Project Summary/Status
• The corridor improvements include the evaluation of the on and off ramp
intersection of 149 at Porter Road, street , bicycle and pedestrian
improvements along Porter, Deane and Sycamore to the Razorback
Greenway, and the Mid -town Trail from the Razorback Greenway to College
Avenue. The specific cross sections will be determined in the conceptual
phase of the design.
b. Recent Actions:
• City council approved the design contract with Olsson in November 2019.
• Survey work has been underway.
• Design charette was held March 1111 and 12t1 at the Methodist Church at the
corner of Garland and Sycamore.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• The consultant will be developing the conceptual design based on input from
the charette process.
7) SAIN STREET EXTENSION (JOYCE BLVD TO FLYOVER)
a. Project Summary/Status
• This project was recently selected for federal STP -A funding. The funding is
for planning, design, and environmental review of a connection between
Vantage Drive and Sain Street, including a connection to the flyover bridge at
71 B and the Fulbright Expressway. Burns & McDonnell is the design
consultant.
b. Recent Actions:
• Received approval from ArDOT with authorization to acquire ROW.
• Received review comments from ArDOT to the resubmittal of the 100% plans
on 1/14/20.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Land acquisition continues. 7 of the 9 properties remain.
• Response to re -submittal comments on the 100% plans.
8) MAPLE ST. CYCLE TRACK
a. Project Summary/Status
• This project will create a bicycle corridor between the Razorback Greenway
and Garland Ave. along the south side of Maple St. Major project elements
include construction of a 2 -way cycle track along the south side of Maple St.,
signalization at Gregg Ave. and Maple St., and new sidewalks along both
sides of Maple St. between Gregg Ave. and Garland Ave.
b. Recent Actions:
• Meetings with the U of A to discuss the plan updates and funding.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Request additional grant funding from the Walton Family Foundation in April
2020.
9) 15th ST. / RAZORBACK RD. INTERSECTION
a. Project Summary/Status
• This project is being designed in-house by the City Engineering Division.
• Improvements include an additional lane on the eastern leg of the
intersection to provide a dedicated left-hand turn lane. The intersection will
be signalized with pedestrian accommodations. Sidewalks will be included on
both the north and south sides of 15th Street for the length of the project.
b. Recent Actions:
• Plans are at 90% design.
• Plans have been submitted to the railroad to coordinate the design of the
railroad modifications.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Submittal to ArDOT for review.
10) HIGHWAY 71 B CORRIDOR
a. Project Summary/Status
• Improvements to these corridors could include striping, widening and/or
narrowing of the roadway, utility relocation (including burial of overhead
utilities), sidewalk/trail installation, accommodations for transit systems,
elimination or reconfiguration of driveways, additional traffic signals, medians,
plazas, art installations, lighting, wayfinding, protected intersections, parking,
LID stormwater strategies and other corridor improvements to be identified in
the design process.
b. Recent Actions:
• Engineering selection committee was held on March 5, 2020. Consultants
were selected for the Archibald Yell Safety Improvements project and the
Appleby/Plainview/Rolling Hills Connection project. Two consultants were
selected to be interviewed for the remaining Highway 71B projects.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Interviews for the selection of the consultant for the College Avenue (North to
Township) and School Avenue (MLK to Cato Springs Road) projects.
11) APPLEBY/ PLAINVIEW / ROLLING HILLS CONNECTION
a. Project Summary/Status
• This project includes an extension of Rolling Hills Drive into the Fiesta Square
Shopping Center, a direct connection from Appleby Road to Rolling Hills and
an extension of Plainview Drive south into the Fiesta Square Shopping
Center. These streets will all intersect at a roundabout on the east side of the
shopping center.
b. Recent Actions:
• Engineering selection committee was held on March 5, 2020. Garver
Engineers was selected for the design of this project.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Development of a scope of work and fee for the project.
M
Submittal of engineering contract to the city council for approval.
12) ARCHIBALD YELL BLVD. SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
a. Project Summary/Status
• The goals of this project include providing safe pathways for pedestrians to
cross Archibald Yell Blvd., increasing safety at the College Ave./Rock
St./Archibald Yell Blvd. intersection, and providing space for pedestrian and
bicycle facilities along Archibald Yell Blvd.
b. Recent Actions:
• Engineering selection committee was held on March 5, 2020. Garver
Engineers was selected for the design of this project.
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Development of a scope of work and fee for the project.
• Submittal of engineering contract to the city council for approval.
13) ROLLING HILLS IMPROVEMENTS (COLLEGE TO OLD MISSOURI)
a. Project Summary/Status
• Improvements include street narrowing with new curb and gutter, storm
sewer, mini -roundabouts, and bicycle/pedestrian facilities.
b. Recent Actions:
c. Upcoming Activities:
• Engineering selection committee expected in June 2020.
14) JOYCE BLVD. SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS
a. Project Summary/Status
• Safety improvements to Joyce Blvd. between Vantage Dr. and Old Missouri
Rd. Specific improvements will be identified by a study of the corridor to
identify mechanisms and causes of crashes in the area. A turn lane will be
investigated as a solution, but other solutions will be considered as well.
b. Recent Actions:
c. Upcoming Activities:
15) NORTH ST. / MISSION BLVD. CORRIDOR STUDY
a. Project Summary/Status
• Garland Ave. to Gregg Ave. — Pedestrian improvements to connect retail and
restaurant areas on Garland Ave. to residential areas and the Razorback
Greenway. Pedestrian safety improvements at the Garland/North
intersection.
• Highway 71 B (College Ave) Intersection — Left turn lane for west bound traffic
east of 71 B and signalization upgrades to reduce congestion.
• Highway 71 B to Mission Blvd. — Pedestrian improvements and intersection
improvements at Hillcrest.
• Mission Blvd. to Old Wire Rd. — Additional lane for vehicles turning right on
North St. with pedestrian and bicycle accommodations.
b. Recent Actions:
c. Upcoming Activities:
16) OLD WIRE RD. CYCLE TRACK (EXTENSION)
a. Project Summary/Status
• An extension of the cycle track completed in 2019. This project will extend
from Gulley Park to the Old Wire/Old Missouri intersection where it will turn
north and continue to the intersection with Rolling Hills Drive.
• The design will include curb and gutter, a 4' stamped concrete median, a 9.5'
wide cycle track and an elevated 5' sidewalk adjacent to the cycle track.
b. Recent Actions:
• Field survey is underway.
c. Upcoming Activities: