Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout35-20 RESOLUTION113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Resolution: 35-20 File Number: 2019-0799 ADM 19-6649 (CITY PLAN 2040): A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT CITY PLAN 2040 AS THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE AND ITS PLANNING AREA WHEREAS, on July 5, 2011, the City Council approved Resolution ] ]6-11 approving and adopting City Plan 2030 and the Future Land Use Map as the comprehensive land use plan for the City of Fayetteville; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2018, the City Council approved Resolution 50-18 expressing its support for an update to the comprehensive land use plan, including a new future land use map, master street plan, and active transportation plan map, all of which have been developed by a wide-ranging, cross - departmental group of City staff with extensive input from the Planning Commission, City Council members, and residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves and adopts the City Plan 2040 document, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution. PASSED and APPROVED on 1/21/2020 Page 1 Printed on 1/22/20 File Number.' 2019-0799 Resolution 35-20 Attest: 0ER K j1,��ii � ' CITyO'�9�': � s� .• qy •C= Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treasu&E; NS .� ON C 00 Page 2 Printed on 1122120 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 t Text File File Number: 2019-0799 Agenda Date: 1/21/2020 Version: 1 Status: Passed In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Resolution Agenda Number: B. 1 ADM 19-6649 (CITY PLAN 2040): A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT CITY PLAN 2040 AS THE COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE AND ITS PLANNING AREA WHEREAS, on July 5, 2011, the City Council approved Resolution 116-11 approving and adopting City Plan 2030 and the Future Land Use Map as the comprehensive land use plan for the City of Fayetteville; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2018, the City Council approved Resolution 50-18 expressing its support for an update to the comprehensive land use plan, including a new future land use map, master street plan, and active transportation plan map, all of which have been developed by a wide-ranging, cross -departmental group of City staff with extensive input from the Planning Commission, City Council members, and residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves and adopts the City Plan 2040 document, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 Printed on 112212020 City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2019-0799 Legistar File ID 12/3/2019 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non -Agenda Item Garner Stoll 11/15/2019 CITY PLANNING (630) Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: ADM19-6649 Administrative Item (CITY PLAN 2040): Submitted by the CITY PLANNING DIVISION to update the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the Future Land Use Map, the Master Street Plan, and the Active Transportation Plan Map. Account Number Project Number Budgeted Item? NA Does item have a cost? No Budget Adjustment Attached? NA Budget Impact: Current Budget Funds Obligated Current Balance Item Cost Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget Fund Project Title 0 V20180321 Purchase Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Change Order Number: Original Contract Number: Comments: Approval Date: CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 2020 TO: Mayor; Fayetteville City Council CITY COUNCIL MEMO THRU: Susan Norton, Chief of Staff Garner Stoll, Development Services Director Andrew Garner, Long Range Planning/Special Projects Manager FROM: Jonathan Curth, Development Review Manager DATE: January 3, 2020 SUBJECT: Draft City Plan 2040 RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of a resolution adopting City Plan 2040 as the comprehensive land use plan for the City of Fayetteville and its Planning Area. BACKGROUND: City Council policy is to update the comprehensive land use plan every five years. City Plan 2030 was due to be updated in 2017. However, the Master Transportation Plan was a large city-wide community planning effort that took place in 2017. The decision was made to let the Master Transportation Plan move forward before the update to City Plan 2030, which has occurred. On November 27, 2018, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended in favor of a work program for an update to the comprehensive land use plan of the City. Subsequently, on February 6, 2018, the City Council passed Resolution 50-18 (Exhibit 'A') to approve the work program recommended by the Planning Commission Among the major focuses emphasized by the Planning Commission, including integration of the City's strategic plans, revising the Master Street plan, and updating charts, maps, statistics, and demographics, staff was directed to prioritize Goals 1 & 6 regarding appropriate infill and attainable housing respectively. In the lead -up to the City Plan update, a reoccurring theme at public meetings and during public input was the phenomenal growth Fayetteville is experiencing and the impacts this has on residents. Whether due to new, highly -visible, multi -family developments or single houses developed on a vacant property, infill development has impacted residents and prompted the question of what additional policies and standards the City can implement to ensure "appropriateness". Similarly, with the current growth cycle continuing, housing prices have exceeded the means of many existing and potential residents. Given this, the potential for the City to play a role in encouraging attainable housing is greater now than at almost any time in Fayetteville's history. Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 UPDATES: In addition to those updates outlined at the December 31d, 2019 City Council meeting, staff has incorporated the following additions, amendments, and alterations in response to councilmember comment: Page 5: Message from the Mayor • Language added incorporating climate change as an overall context of City Plan. Page 18: Infill Assessment Map • Language amended to further establish objectivity of the Infill Assessment Map tool, including a revised title. Page 21: Framework • Language added incorporating climate change as an overall context of City Plan. Page 25: Goal 1 Objective 3.1.7 • Language added to encourage protection of community character in established neighborhoods. Page 48: City Plan 2040 Benchmarks, Short Term 2019-2025 • Language added to short term benchmark #11 to reference missing middle housing. • Language added to short term benchmark #16 regarding development of zoning districts for growth management • Benchmark #23 added outlining development of a trailside development plan. Page 77: Housing Concerns • Table added from Fayetteville Housing Authority describing income levels as they relate to Area Median Income and being a housing cost burdened household. Page 89: Tree Canopy • Language added describing Fayetteville's past and current efforts towards tree preservation. Page 91: Watershed System • Language and figure added regarding the Illinois River watershed. Page 93: Flooding 0 Language added regarding the stormwater utility study currently being drafted. Page 97: Transportation • Language added regarding vehicle miles traveled, transportation and greenhouse gases, and a reference to the Energy Action Plan. Page 125: Fayetteville Public Schools • Language added regarding land use impacts of public school siting. Page 137: Master Transportation Plan, Active Transportation Plan • Language added outlining history of Fayetteville's train system and potential for a trailside development plan. Page 140: Master Street Plan Map and Street Cross-sections, Utilities • Language added recommending sensitive installation of ground -mounted utilities. DISCUSSION: On July 8, 2019, the Planning Commission forwarded the draft City Plan 2040, recommending adoption of the document with the attached Commissioner amendments (Exhibit `A'). No public comment was presented. On October 11, 2019, the draft City Plan 2040 was distributed to Councilmembers for review and staff requested one-on-one meetings with the Council to discuss any concerns. During October and November, staff had meetings and phone calls with Councilmembers who responded, and staff incorporated their feedback into the plan. At the December 3, 2019 meeting, the Council discussed and tabled City Plan to afford more time for review and incorporation of additional Council feedback. On December 17, 2019, staff presented revisions to City Plan in response to the Council's comments from the previous meeting. City Plan was tabled again for additional review time, and the Council directed the City Attorney to break the components of City Plan into multiple resolutions for easier adoption. At the January 7, 2020 City Council meeting, councilmembers adopted both the Active Transportation Plan and the Master Street Plan. The Master Street Plan was amended to remove a planned street connecting North and South Sang Avenue, west of the University of Arkansas Attachments: • Exhibit A The draft City Plan 2040, Future Land Use Map Alternatives, Master Street Plan, and Active Transportation Plan Map are available for review on the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas website at: hftps://www.fayetteville-ar.gov/1216/City-Plan- 2040 4 EXHIBIT 'A' CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Mayor and City Council THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner MEETING DATE: June 10, 2019 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendation for ADM 19-6649: Administrative Item (CITY PLAN 2040) BACKGROUND: Following several meetings in 2018 and 2019 in which the Planning Commission functioned as a steering committee for the update to City Plan 2030, the Future Land Use Map, and Master Street Plan, complete draft documents were presented to Commissioners on May 13, 2019. Commissioner feedback was requested on each of the three plan elements outlined above, with comments, recommendations, and critiques provided over the following four weeks. DISCUSSION: Below are comments and recommendations proposed by Commissioners for City Plan 2040: Infill Development Scoring Matrix: o At the Planning Commission Retreat held on May 18, 2019, Commissioners reviewed the proposed Infill Development Scoring Matrix and made recommendations on weighting of the criteria. In addition to providing weights to the proposed criteria, the Commission recommended substituting properties with greater than 15% slope to properties with 100 -year floodplain as a negative modifier. o Commissioner Brown recommends the following additions or modifications to the draft Infill Development Scoring Matrix: ■ Addition of the Enduring Green Network boundaries instead of Slopes Greater than 15 Percent or 100 -year Floodplain. These elements are encompassed within the Enduring Green Network and Commissioner Brown proposed this be assigned the weight previously -proposed by Commissioners for slope/floodplain; and ■ Incorporation of Growth Concept Map centers using a buffer of increasing Growth Concept Map: o Commissioner Brown recommends the following additions or modifications to the draft Growth Concept Map: ■ Addition of the Enduring Green Network; ■ Addition of the Mayor's Box; ■ Highlighting of the Arkansas & Missouri railroad track running north -south through Fayetteville; and ■ Reclassifying the Tier 3 center indicated above Evelyn Hills to a Tier 2 center. o The current Growth Concept Map indicates the Evelyn Hills shopping center area as a Tier 3 center. Commissioner Brown recommends this be revised to a Tier 2 center. Currently, all proposed iterations of the Future Land Use Map include a designation of Complete Neighborhood Plan for areas associated with an adopted, locally -targeted plan. Commissioner Brown recommends that this designation be kept as an outline of the existing neighborhood plan areas, but with appropriately delineated Future Land Use Map designations (Urban Center Area, City Neighborhood Area, etc.) applied to the parcels within. Chapter 3: Framework: o Commissioner Brown recommends assigning a responsible department, division, or committee to each of the proposed City Plan 2040 benchmarks. o Commissioner Hoffman recommends maintaining the current language for Goal #3: We will make traditional town form the standards, rather than re -write it as "We will make compact, complete, and connected development the standard." General Comment o Commissioner Hoffman recommends inclusion of additional language related to open space. Specifically, that shared public spaces ought to be more deliberate in design, encouraging natural surveillance through "eyes on the street" that ensure the safe use of parks, trails, and other spaces. Attachments: • Planning Commission Infill Development Scoring Matrix Weighting G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6649 ADM City Plan 2040\03 Planning Commission\06-10-2019 d� � t O O O O O M C e0 a O in T O. G i0 -1.1 m F- 2 A O ~ O pp a C = N N M O O N N O R M V 00 3 3a n - - F I I It -1-1 A a � v « N N M O O O N O O m a �3 v A u t- Wt m v a W L N N O O O N N O O O N al C a •g 3 m y q o 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 a v a) 03 o. v O — co f- O F a L 3 m 0 a E °1 E A d y c � v o v c — � � c N a a C O 0 2 .Q-1 V O a m a a o° 3 3 n m a m c O W 0 v « .� c m _ c v y n n a a CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS CITY COUNCIL MEMO TO: Mayor; Fayetteville City Council THRU: Susan Norton, Communications & Marketing Director, Interim Chief of Staff Garner Stoll, Development Services Director Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Chris Brown, City Engineer FROM: Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner Leif Olson, Long -Range Planner DATE: December 13, 2019 SUBJECT: ADM 19-6649: Administrative Item (CITY PLAN 2040): Submitted by the CITY PLANNING DIVISION to amend and update the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the Future Land Use Map, the Master Street Plan, and the Active Transportation Plan Map. BACKGROUND: On December 3rd, 2019, City staff presented the draft comprehensive plan, City Plan 2040, to the City Council. This included City Plan 2040 itself along with drafts of the Master Street Plan, Future Land Use Map alternatives, and Active Transportation Plan. DISCUSSION: Following staff's presentation at the meeting and in the days since, including at the December 10, 2019 Agenda Session, the Council shared several comments, which are summarized as follows: City Plan 2040 o Frame the plan in terms of climate change. o Growth Concept and Infill Development Scoring Maps ■ Incorporate elements of the Growth Concept Map in to the Infill Development Scoring map or provide staff reasoning as to why this is not recommended. ■ Inclusion of additional detail about the individual elements of the Infill Scoring map, possibly as an appendix. ■ Evaluate opportunities to ensure tools are objective in presentation and application. The Infill Development Scoring map is available for consideration here. o Inclusion of a trailside development plan to establish desired trailside land uses, create policies to encourage them, and action steps for implementation. o Evaluate development thresholds through the lens of promoting missing middle housing. o Adopt an open space or ecological services zoning district. o Inclusion of language and narrative about Fayetteville Public Schools and the impact of school capacity and construction on citywide development. Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, A€2 72701 o Inclusion of the City's tree canopy goals. o Inclusion of additional language to encourage protection of community character in established neighborhoods. o Incorporate a table illustrating housing cost burden as it relates to different income levels. o Evaluate the Future Land Use Map, annexation policy, and growth management tools in a workshop setting. o Include language regarding the current stormwater utility study and its potential impacts on land use. Inclusion of language linking the Master Street Plan with the Energy Action Plan regarding vehicle miles travelled. Master Street Plan o Inclusion of language about above -ground utility screening and/or coherent placement. Staff has responded to these comments in the attached Exhibit 'A'. Additionally, Council requested that staff provide a clear delineation of requested Council actions with staff recommendations, which includes the following: Adopt City Plan 2040 as recommended by staff: o Amending the document to include Planning Commission recommendations. Staff recommends in favor of Planning Commission amendments, excepting: ■ The proposal to incorporate elements of the Growth Concept Map in to the Infill Development Scoring Map. The Growth Concept Map is intended to serve as a policy tool that is not parcel based, which limits the effectiveness of its inclusion in the Infill Development Scoring Map. Additionally, staff has proposed the City Neighborhoods Area and Urban Center Areas of the future land use map as an element of the Infill Development Scoring Map, which aligns with many elements of the Growth Concept Map and is parcel - based. o Amending the document to include City Council recommendations as shown on Exhibit 'A'. • Adopt the Future Land Use Map Alternative #1 as recommended by the Planning Commission with amendments as recommended by City Council shown in Exhibit 'A'. • Adopt the Master Street Plan as recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. o Staff recommends adoption of language facilitating development of a parkway street section, but deferment of designating any existing streets as parkways. 0 Adopt the Active Transportation Plan Map as recommended by staff. ADM 19-6649 Exhibit `A' Proposed Amendments and Existing Text in Response to Councilmember Comment City Plan 2040: o Frame the plan in terms of climate change. ■ Page 5, Message from the Mayor • So why do we plan? Looking forward, the most daunting challenge that Fayetteville and cities across the globe will face is climate change and its disruptions to the existing order. Regionally, global climate change will result in increasingly extreme weather events such as severe and extended periods of drought, extreme heat waves, and increased storm and rainfall events that will produce unprecedented flooding. Globally climate change will result in rising sea levels, increasingly severe and more frequent hurricanes, rainfall events, droughts, heat waves and flooding. As these events become more frequent and intense large populations of people will ultimately migrate to areas that are less impacted by severe weather events. Fayetteville anticipates that we will be impacted by climate change in -migration as people leave coastal areas of the south and seek opportunities in areas that are more resilient to these changes. This type of in -migration is not unprecedented as many will remember the impacts from people dislocated due to Hurricane Katrina on the gulf coast in 2005. Therefore, we must anticipate, plan, design and construct our community in a sustainable and resilient manner. The City began these efforts when I signed on to the U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement in 2012. In May 2017, 1 joined 60 mayors across the nation to sign a statement to President Trump affirming Fayetteville's commitment to taking every possible action to realize the principles of the Paris Climate Agreement. On January 2nd, 2018 City Council adopted the Energy Action Plan which detailed many strategies for reducing the community's carbon footprint. For a detailed look at the goals, strategies and action steps included in the Energy Action Plan please visit the plan here: https://fayetteville- ar.gov/DocumentCenterNiew/14807/Energy-Action-Plan Final- Draft-?bidld= ■ Page 21, Framework, Goals • Fayetteville's land use policies intentionally combat climate change. The six goals in the Framework chapter lead to compact development patterns in the core of the city, attainable housing, and a robust and multi -modal transportation system; all of which reduce greenhouse gas emissions compared to more land consumptive development patterns and accommodate in - migration. The goals for natural resource preservation in floodplain and steep wooded areas reduce vulnerability to natural hazards. o Development Scoring Map ■ Staff recommends adopting the Development Scoring Map, deferring scoring of the elements to a later date should the Council elect to apply a weighting scheme. ■ Page 18, Infill Development Scoring • Retitle to "Infill Development Assessment Map" to align intent of tool as objective measure. • Revise language to emphasize objectivity of tool rather than discussing elements as positive or negative and awarding points. ■ Appendix • Include recommended Planning Commission weighting with examples of its application to specific properties. Staff recommends adopting the Infill Assessment Map, deferring weighting of the elements to a later date, if desired by the Counci;. • Include additional information including the following: o Element details including individual map and narrative: ■ Sewer Main within 300 feet ■ Water Main within 300 feet ■ Grocery Store within'/2 mile ■ Public School within % mile ■ UA Main Campus within '/2 mile ■ Park within 'h mile ■ Trail within '/2 mile ■ Ozark Transit within % mile ■ Razorback Transit within % mile ■ Future Lane Use Map Designation • Urban Center Area • City Neighborhood Area • Neighborhood/Corridor Master Plan ■ Intersection Density of Greater than 140/square mile ■ Slope of Greater than 15% ■ 100 -year Floodplain o Evaluate development thresholds through the lens of promoting more missing middle housing. ■ Page 47, City Plan 2040 Benchmarks • Evaluate development thresholds based on quantitative metrics such as impervious surface and building form, not building type, and the encouragement of missing middle housing. o Adopt an open space or ecological services zoning district. ■ Page 48, City Plan 2040 Benchmarks • Develop additional rural/agricultural and open space zoning districts that can be utilized to manage rural growth and maintain rural character on the City's outer edges, and limit development of sensitive areas throughout Fayetteville. o Inclusion of Illinois River watershed background. ■ Page 89, Watershed System • After "...drains in to Oklahoma." While The Beaver Lake watershed is particularly critical given its role as the primary drinking water source for Fayetteville, the Illinois watershed has been the subject of protracted litigation between the states of Oklahoma and Arkansas. Since 2003 however, the two states have sought to work cooperatively to improve water quality and reduce the negative impacts of nutrient pollution that have triggered large algal blooms downstream in Tenkiller Ferry Lake. • Include the map from the EPA below: er="xoDa oveA mraWr .i3cuckspg9 �+`3paa�. Dceiduous-Foresl' £aegt*en Forest. ..Urban Areas HyAA3,ac�it$1;G ,;o4e ZIII iplov 5 o Inclusion of the City's tree canopy goals. ■ Page 85, Natural Environment • Tree Canopy In light of the ongoing effects of climate change, trees and their associated canopy have innumerable benefits and an urban forest plays a role in carbon sequestration, mitigating stormwater issues, filtering pollutants, increasing property values, improving public health, and reducing the heat island impacts associated with urban areas. A healthy urban tree canopy can address the three major weather events that are anticipated to affect Northwest Arkansas: unpredictable but more impactful rain events, drought, and heat waves. Even before broad acknowledgement of climate change, Fayetteville and its residents placed a high value on the City's tree canopy, particularly with the formation of the Tree and Landscape Advisory Committee in 1993 and the subsequent adoption of a Tree Preservation ordinance regulating tree removal associated with development. In conjunction with enforcing the tree preservation ordinances, the City's urban foresters are also tasked with documenting Fayetteville's urban forest and tracking its citywide coverage. Various tools are utilized for this, including aerial imagery, development records, and Geographic Information System data for tree canopy, water, buildings, roads, and various classes of vegetation. The methodology of these analyses varies from year to year with the availability of new data and improved technology, providing increasingly precise estimates of canopy. Despite requirements for mitigation tree plantings alongside new development, there is concern that a gap remains between the projected tree canopy gained from plantings, and that lost. With recent access to imagery from the National Agricultural Imagery Program, the urban foresters have new tool, which may be used to identify areas in the City that will benefit from tree plantings. With many programs already existing and others are in the pilot stage, the City needs to continue pursuing additional tree planting on both public and private properties to address the known impacts of climate change. o Inclusion of additional language to encourage protection of community character in established neighborhoods. ■ Page 25, Framework, Goal 1 Objectives Many of Fayetteville's most vibrant and diverse neighborhoods do not meet the requirements for inclusion on the National Historic Register but are worthy of preservation efforts because they are stable and foster a sense of community among their residents. Many of Fayetteville's neighborhoods built in the 1940's, 50's and 60's in the City's core and in proximity to downtown and the University of Arkansas have seen significant development pressure in recent years. Much of this development has been positive with once vacant and overgrown lots being developed with infill housing, however, the City is now experiencing a significant amount of demolition of existing structures with replacement of structures that are out of scale and character. Zoning and development actions occurring in existing neighborhoods should be closely evaluated and development tools should be established to ensure that neighborhood cohesion and character is not sacrificed at the expense of new development. Zoning provisions, such as height, setbacks, and building mass remain the primary tools that policy makers can use to preserve these neighborhoods. o Incorporate a table illustrating housing cost burden as it relates to different income levels. Data provided by Fayetteville's Community Resources Department. ■ Page 76, Housing Concerns Area Median Income Percent 30% Housing Cost/Month 45% Housing Hourly Fayetteville -Springdale - (AMI) -1 person of AMI Classification ('Cost -Burdened') +Tranportation Rate Rogers MSA household (HH) Cost/Month Fair Market Rent 2019 $14,700 30% Extremely Low* $368 $551 $7.07 Efficiency - $547 1 Bedroom - $586 2 -Bedroom - $748 3 -Bedroom -$1,081 $24,500 50% Very Low $613 $919 $11.78 $39,150 80% Low $979 $1,468 $18.82 $69,900(4 -person HH) 100% Median r #VALUE! r #VALUE! $33.61 Effective April 24, 2019 € *The FY2014 Consolidated Appropriations Act changed the definition of extremely low-income. Consequently, the extremely low-income (30%) limits may equal the very low income (50%) limits. < t Future Land Use Map o Inclusion of language and narrative about Fayetteville Public Schools and the impact of school capacity and construction on citywide development. ■ Page 122, Introduction • Cities, policies, and priorities evolve between the adoption of new or updated comprehensive plans. Accordingly, plans and their associated future land use maps undergo periodic amendment to align the goals and policies of these documents with the vision of the community. In Fayetteville, as in many cities, one of the largest impacts on land use development is the construction of a new school. Just as the future land use map guides and informs land use policy, so should new schools inform the future land use map. Ongoing coordination between the Fayetteville Public School District and the City of Fayetteville is important to ensure school and land use planning are complimentary to the goals of all. o Evaluate the Future Land Use Map, annexation policy, and growth management tools in a workshop setting. ■ Staff recommends adopting the Future Land Use Map as recommended by the Planning Commission with amendment proposed by elected officials, deferring review, drafting, and adoption of additional annexation policy and growth management tools to a later date. o Include language regarding the current stormwater utility study and its potential impacts on land use. ■ Page 91, Flooding • Revise the final paragraph of 8.5 to read 'While these issues have solutions, most are extremely expensive. This is one reason that the City Council has begun investigating sustainable funding sources to deal with flooding and many challenges related to stormwater throughout the City. In 2018, Fayetteville contracted with Jacobs Engineering to study the City's existing stormwater infrastructure and the capital and operational needs to address shortfalls. Stemming from this, the consultant also addressed the costs associated with making stormwater improvements and the options for generating the necessary funding. More recently, in 2019, Council broadened the scope of the study to include an evaluation of a stormwater credit program and potential to amend existing ordinances to align the City's goal for attainable housing with development thresholds." • Master Street Plan o Inclusion of language about above -ground utility equipment screening and/or coherent placement. ■ Utilities • Where underground utilities are installed inside or outside of the City's rights-of-way, the City encourages above -ground utility equipment to be screened from public view where feasible or coherently organized to minimize visual impact on the streetscape. o Inclusion of language linking the Master Street Plan with the Energy Action Plan regarding vehicle miles travelled. ■ Page 94, Transportation Context and Street Network • One of the primary goals of the City's Energy Action Plan is to reduce annual per capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to reduce the community's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Currently transportation accounts for 27% of Fayetteville's GHG emissions. Reducing transportation related emissions is directly tied to making smart growth decisions and investments in our transportation systems. As we work towards the realization of the six goals in City Plan 2040, many of the actions identified will directly impact and reduce the community's VMT and future transportation -related GHG's. The two primary goals of the Energy Action Plan as it relates to transportation related GHG emissions are to: • Reduce the per capita vehicle miles traveled (VMT) to 2010 levels by the year 2030, and • Achieve a 25% walk/bike/transit mode share by the year 2030. For a more detailed analysis of how transportation is tied to greenhouse gas emission reductions and climate change initiatives please visit the City's Energy Action Plan located here: httos://favetteville-ar.aov/DocumentCenterNiew/14807/Enerav- Action-Plan Final-Draft-?bidld= o Trailside Development ■ Page 47, City Plan 2040 Benchmarks • Develop a trailside development plan. As part of the trailside development plan, gauge the feasibility of creating this plan with existing resources or through an external consultant, engage the public, assess land use and zoning adjacent to trails, and evaluate existing ordinances. ■ Page 134, Active Transportation Plan • Beginning in 1978, the City of Fayetteville began exploring the potential for a bikeway system. In the years between 1978 and 2000, a Bikeways Plan was adopted, signage was installed, routes were designated, grant funding was awarded, and Jim Lindsey constructed the first section of the trail, totaling 0.22 miles along Mud Creek. Since then, Fayetteville committed itself fully to the implementation of a trail network, with the formation of citizen committees and advisory groups, dedication of public funds, and ongoing pursuit of partnerships to realize the planning and construction of nearly 50 miles of shared -use, paved trail. These trails have created the foundation for a larger network that has prompted development along routes. Businesses and residents alike are attracted to the benefits of trail access, whether it be to reduce vehicle dependence, entice trail traffic, for the convinence of patrons, or any number of other reasons. Like many communities that have embraced shared -use, paved trail construction, Fayetteville has not formally assessed the benefits of a trail network to the local economy, connectivity, and resident equity, nor has it evaluated existing land uses along routes. We Despite a trail master plan existing in the form of the Active Transportation Plan, and despite regular and comprehensive reviews of the plan, this document does not aspire to guide, direct, or promote trailside development. Additionally, no concerted or deliberate effort to encourage trailside development through zoning actions or ordinance amendments has been explored. A trailside development plan can address this gap through a three- phase approach. Firstly, stakeholders, including residents at large, businesses, and property owners will be engaged to solicit input on their vision for development along the trail system and how the City can encourage its success. Secondly, a plan can identify areas of vacant or underutilized land near trails which may be rezoned to encourage development that compliments the City's public investment. In conjunction with this, the plan can identify areas that may be adjacent to a trail but are inappropriate for development, such as floodplains or sensitive ecosystems. Lastly, the plan will evaluate existing ordinances for opportunities to promote trail - facing businesses and residences that activate the trail system. Taken in concert, these findings can be used to establish coherent and coordinated steps for City staff and officials to implement the plan. 10 � cY ' ►ern s T i � Z� Iq Cl) N Lq O - CD CD'• "•i ',,5 1 ' � � '� r � � � f , �I � � �� + s_ �'rT � � j � r (' f r, � x.' .:fir a a = W 00 a> CL L R R. C Z 4-a W y 0 U U �' N ............s .G .� O }+ r ........................................... Z Q' Q' U: C U U U Z li LLQ U' x Q Q L a W" CITY OF Ir'AYETTEVILI.E Avg d ARKANSAS CITY COUNCIL: [MEMO TO: Mayor; Fayetteville City Council THRU: Susan Norton, Communications & Marketing Director, Interim Chief of Staff Garner Stoll, Development Services Director Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Chris Brown, City Engineer FROM: Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner Leif Olson, Long -Range Planner DATE: December 10, 2019 SUBJECT: ADM 19-6649: Administrative Item (CITY PLAN 2040): Submitted by the CITY PLANNING DIVISION to amend and update the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the Future Land Use Map, the Master Street Plan, and the Active Transportation Plan Map. BACKGROUND: On December 3rd, 2019, City staff presented the draft comprehensive plan, City Plan 2040, to the City Council. This included City Plan 2040 itself along with drafts of the Master Street Plan, Future Land Use Map alternatives, and Active Transportation Plan. DISCUSSION: Following staff's presentation at the meeting and in the days since, the Council shared several comments, which are summarized as follows: • City Plan 2040 o Frame the plan in terms of climate change. o Growth Concept and Infill Development Scoring Maps Incorporate elements of the Growth Concept Map in to the Infill Development Scoring map or provide staff reasoning as to why this is not recommended. Inclusion of additional detail about the individual elements of the Infill Scoring map, possibly as an appendix. Evaluate opportunities to ensure tools are objective in presentation and application. o Inclusion of language and narrative regarding promotion of trailside development and policies and action steps for implementation. o Evaluate development thresholds through the lens of promoting more modest housing. o Inclusion of language and narrative about Fayetteville Public Schools and the impact of school capacity and construction on citywide development. o Inclusion of the City's tree canopy goals. Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 o Inclusion of additional language to encourage protection of community character in established neighborhoods. o Incorporate a table illustrating housing cost burden as it relates to different income levels. o Evaluate the Future Land Use Map, annexation policy, and growth management tools in a workshop setting. Master Street Plan o Inclusion of language about above -ground utility screening and/or coherent placement. o Inclusion of language linking the Master Street Plan with the Energy Action Plan regarding vehicle miles travelled. Additionally, Council requested that staff provide a clear delineation of proposed Council actions with staff recommendations, which includes the following: Adopt City Plan 2040 as recommended by staff: o Amending the document to include Planning Commission recommendations o Staff recommends in favor of Planning Commission amendments, excluding the proposal to incorporate elements of the Growth Concept Map in to the Infill Development Scoring Map. o Amending the document to include City Council recommendations as shown on Exhibit 'A' (to be prepared prior to the council meeting). Adopt the Future Land Use Map Alternative #1 as recommended by the Planning Commission with amendments as recommended by City Council shown on Exhibit 'A'. • Adopt the Master Street Plan as recommended by staff and the Planning Commission. o Staff recommends adoption of language facilitating development of a parkway street section, but deferment of designating any existing streets as parkways. Adopt the Active Transportation Plan Map as recommended by staff. An 'Exhibit A' will be prepared listing the City Council amendments to the text, content, and map(s). The staff recommendation on December 95th will be to approve the Resolution adopting the plan, with revisions shown in 'Exhibit A'. CITY OF PollFAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 2019 TO: Mayor; Fayetteville City Council THRU: Don Marr, Chief of Staff Garner Stoll, Development Services Director Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Chris Brown, City Engineer FROM: Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner DATE: November 15, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEMO SUBJECT: ADM 19-6649: Administrative Item (CITY PLAN 2040): Submitted by the CITY PLANNING DIVISION to amend and update the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the Future Land Use Map, the Master Street Plan, and the Active Transportation Plan Map. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of a resolution adopting City Plan 2040 as the comprehensive land use plan for the City of Fayetteville and its Planning Area, including the Future Land Use Map, the Master Street Plan, and the Active Transportation Plan Map. BACKGROUND: City Council policy is to update the comprehensive land use plan every five years. City Plan 2030 was due to be updated in 2017. However, the Master Transportation Plan was a large city-wide community planning effort that took place in 2017. The decision was made to let the Master Transportation Plan move forward before the update to City Plan 2030, which has occurred. On November 27, 2018, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended in favor of a work program for an update to the comprehensive land use plan of the City. Subsequently, on February 6, 2018, the City Council passed Resolution 50-18 (Exhibit 'A') to approve the work program recommended by the Planning Commission. Among the major focuses emphasized by the Planning Commission, including integration of the City's strategic plans, revising the Master Street plan, and updating charts, maps, statistics, and demographics, staff was directed to prioritize Goals 1 & 6 regarding appropriate infill and attainable housing respectively. In the lead -up to the City Plan update, a reoccurring theme at public meetings and during public input was the phenomenal growth Fayetteville is experiencing and the impacts this has on residents. Whether due to new, highly -visible, multi -family developments or single houses developed on a vacant property, infill development has impacted residents and prompted the question of what additional policies and standards the City can implement to ensure "appropriateness". Similarly, with the current growth cycle continuing, housing prices have exceeded the means of many existing and potential residents. Given this, the potential for the City to play a role in encouraging attainable housing is greater now than at Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 almost any time in Fayetteville's history. PARTICIPATION: The project team for updating City Plan 2030 included a wide-ranging, cross -departmental group of City staff, including members of the Communications, Community Development, Development Services, Economic Vitality, Fire, Parks, Police, and Sustainability and Resilience Departments. Beyond staff, the Planning and Engineering Divisions engaged with the Planning Commission as the principal steering committee for the update. Feedback was also provided by City Councilmembers throughout the process, including at presentations in September of 2018 and April of 2019. In addition to input sessions with appointed and elected officials, City staff conducted an in- person and online survey from April to December of 2018. The purpose of this survey was two- fold. At the direction of the City Council and Planning Commission, the survey served as an education tool, conveying to residents the intent behind the City's prioritization of appropriate infill. Secondly, the survey sought to better understand the experience of residents with housing attainability and infill development, and how the City could address concerns through policy or ordinance. Ultimately, nearly 900 participants contributed online and at multiple in-person events including at the Fayetteville Farmer's Market, Gulley Park, the University of Arkansas, the Fayetteville Senior Center, CDBG in the Park, and First Thursday events. Efforts to increase participation and promote a greater demographic representation among participants included online invitations to University of Arkansas students, neighborhood groups, the development community, and through major local employers. Additionally, 1,500 invitations to participate in the survey were sent through a randomized mailer issued equitably among the four wards of the City. After documenting and reviewing input from the Council, Commission, and residents, the project team assembled a new framework that keeps intact the original goals and identifies concrete action steps that will advance the goals over the next five years. The project team then applied City Plan principles to the Future Land Use Map and, coupled with recommendations from consultant Nelson -Nygaard, to the Master Street Plan. These drafts were reviewed during several work sessions with the Planning Commission to solicit additional comments and critiques. Occurring concurrently with City Plan's outreach and update was the Active Transportation Advisory Committee's (ATAC) review of the Active Transportation Plan Map. This included an in-depth evaluation of existing and proposed trails and on -street linkages in each quadrant of the City. A review of the map involved a comprehensive four-month series of public ATAC meetings, followed by a hearing at the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, a final review by ATAC, and presentation to the Transportation Committee. UPDATES: City Plan 2040 In addition to updating the existing City Plan 2030 chapters with new data, demographics, and figures, staff focused particularly on supplementing the content of Chapter 6 Housing and Chapter 10 Historic and Cultural Resources. Although well -crafted, both chapters lacked the detail and clarity necessary to understand the full impacts, issues, and values they represent. Chapter 11 Economic Analysis was also revisited with an eye for integration with Fayetteville's Economic Development Plan. Where the chapter was previously focused on development patterns and the resulting economic trends, the current update expands upon these and includes a more in-depth examination provided by the Economic Vitality Department. Among the most prominent additions to the plan are two tools: The Growth Concept Map and the Infill Development Score. The Growth Concept Map is a conceptual map translating the vision of City Plan 2040 in to an outline for connected, compact development. The map identifies a series of Tier One, Tier Two, and Tier Three Centers that act as regional, community, and neighborhood focal points respectively. As a tool, the Growth Concept Map is intended to serve as a guiding document for staff, appointed and elected officials, and residents when making decisions or recommendations about public investment and economic development. The Infill Development Score is a map -based tool for objectively assessing and quantifying a specific property's appropriateness for infill. This is achieved through a matrix of values assigned to elements of the built and natural environment, ranging from proximity to water and sewer lines to the density of street intersections. Similarly to the Growth Concept Map, the Infill Development Score may act to advise staff, appointed and elected officials, and residents on a range of matters including but not limited to viability of a rezoning request, the constraints to a property's development priority for cost shares, or even the marketability of land. Adding further depth to the Infill Development Score is the potential to weight the elements, thereby adding to or subtracting from a property's score with consideration for policy goals. Taken together or reviewed separately, the Growth Concept Map and Infill Development Score are intended to both synthesize existing considerations and fill a gap in the array of maps, data, and plans that guide decision-making. Lastly, while many of City Plan's existing objectives and benchmarks remain and are considered ongoing, there are also numerous additions that staff believes will further each goal, with an emphasis on Goal 1, encouraging appropriate infill and revitalization, and Goal 6, creating opportunities for attainable housing. A complete list of the existing and proposed goal, objectives and action steps is attached (Exhibit'B'). Key action steps that the project team believes will advance the goals of City Plan 2040 are: Evaluation and recommendation of modifications to existing zoning to create context sensitive districts. This would include analyzing and amending permitted and conditional uses, building mass, setbacks, and lot area coverage requirements. Develop protocols for infill construction projects. Infill construction protocols are typically designed to outline "good neighbor best practices" and provide construction companies and neighbors with expectations for construction site and logistical issues. Evaluate development thresholds based on quantitative metrics such as the amount of impervious surface or building form, not building type. Create pre -approved building types for identified neighborhoods. Discuss "spot zoning" in the midst of established neighborhoods, and potential for large rezonings. Work with the City Council to develop a formal annexation policy to strategically and deliberately plan for controlled growth on the City's outer edges. Future Land Use Map The Future Land Use Map and land use designations as proposed herein are still based on the transect model, the SmartCode framework wherein habitats are ordered from the most natural to the most urban. Staff's goal with this update is to use the existing land use designations and provide multiple iterations of the Future Land Use Map as potential scenarios for growth management. Each alternative poses a different strategy for accommodating Fayetteville's anticipated population growth, from the current discouragement of annexation for urban or suburban development to growth moderated by zoning and annexation tools that moderate the City's expansion with respect to the goals and principals of City Plan 2030. Alternative #9 represents the existing Future Land Use Map as adopted with City Plan 2030, and will be updated to reflect changes in existing land use since the map's 2011 adoption. This iteration was created following the economic downturn of the late 2000s and included a reduction of Residential Neighborhood Area at the edge of the City to discourage urban sprawl and a reclassification of portions of north Fayetteville to Urban Center Area to reflect its new "regional" description. Alternative #2 incorporates those changes outlined in Alternative #1 along with reclassifying large areas within Fayetteville's Planning Area as Residential Neighborhood Area. This is intended to reflect and accommodate the anticipated population growth of Fayetteville in coming decades in a deliberate manner. Additionally, adoption, application, and implementation of this Future Land Use Map is predicated on the execution of several proposed action items within City Plan 2040. Foremost among these are the development of a formal annexation policy to strategically and deliberately plan for controlled growth and the adoption of zoning districts that can be utilized to manage rural growth and maintain rural character at the City's outeredges. Significant changes to the map include a broad expansion of land within the Planning Area designated as Residential Neighborhood Area. Alternative #3 acts as a middle road, to include those changes outlined in Alternative #1 within the City's boundaries and a more moderated expansion of Residential Neighborhood Area in to the Planning Area. While also predicated on adopting a formal annexation policy and rural zoning districts, the additional areas designated as Residential Neighborhood area are currently contiguous to City limits, adjacent to City infrastructure, complimentary to the efficient provision of City services, or a combination thereof. Master Street Plan The principle goal of this update is to incorporate the findings and recommendations of Nelson - Nygaard and their Fayetteville Mobility Plan in to the City's Master Street Plan. This involved parallel efforts, the first of which was a reclassification of street types or typologies. While most cities nationwide, including Fayetteville currently, utilize the Federal Highway Administration's "functional classification" system of Arterial, Collector, and Local streets, these categories provide limited information about the street, how it relates to surrounding land uses, and howit functions from block to block. These designations and associated functional classifications under the proposeds City Plan 2040 Master Street Plan are: • Regional Link — High Activity (Arterial Street) • Regional Link (Principal Arterial Street) • Neighborhood Link (Minor Arterial/Collector Street) • Residential Link (Local and Residential Streets) • Urban Center (sections adopted under the 2005 Downtown Master Plan) As it is not sufficient to simply rename these street classifications, the second major update to the plan was a full review of all streets classified within the Master Street Plan, whether within or without the Fayetteville's city limits. This was based on the two -fold understanding that some existing and future streets are "over -classified" and a build -out under the current Master Street Plan would not serve the mobility needs of residents city wide or compliment the needs of residents and property owners along these corridors. Accordingly, every street was vetted and many were re-classified. Examples of the most prominent changes include: Extension of the Urban Center street sections southward to Martin Luther King Boulevard Reclassification of the following from Major or Minor Arterials to Neighborhood Links: o North Street/Mission Boulevard from College Avenue/71 B to Crossover Road/Highway 265 o Gregg Avenue from North Street to Van Asche Drive o Deane Street and Mount Comfort Road from Garland Avenue/Highway 112 to Salem Road o Broyles Avenue o Double Springs Road o Deane Solomon Road o Persimmon Street o Oakland Zion Road Reclassification of the following from Collector Streets as Residential Links: o Stearns Street from Vantage Drive to Crossover Road/Highway 265 o Sunbridge/Reynolds/Strange from Gregg Avenue to Garland Avenue/Highway 112 o Raven Lane between Quail and Topaz Drives The final major update to the Master Street Plan includes further advancing the ability to create context sensitive streets through a flexibility of design. Each street includes an associated minimum standard based on classification, from which it may vary depending on surrounding land uses, proposed development, or relevant long-range plans. Among these options are the ability to increase lane widths to accommodate transit, removal of on -street parking facilities, reduction or increase in sidewalk widths, and modification of greenspace or parking for Fire Code compliance. Other notable additions to this flexibility include the potential for a required frontage and furniture zones. In urban settings, where buildings abut the right-of-way the addition of a frontage zone or furniture zone creates a buffer for pedestrians from opening doors and accommodate street elements such as benches without compromising the mobility of pedestrians. Active Transportation Plan Map As the illustration of existing and future trail facilities, the Active Transportation Plan Map serves as a tool for staff and City officials to prioritize infrastructure improvements. Accordingly, and in response to City Council's adoption of the Active Transportation Plan in 2015, staff worked with elected and appointed officials to incorporate current best practices for developing a multi -modal transportation system. Broadly, this effort revolved around increasing both inclusivity and connectivity. In endeavoring to create an inclusive multi -modal transportation system, the Active Transportation Plan Map proposes several off-street bicycle side paths where on -street facilities were previously planned. This effort is founded on the accepted convention that pedestrian and cyclist comfort and safety is essential for the greater part of any community to embrace alternatives to driving. The use of a side path removes cyclists from the street and the real or perceived threat of automotive traffic. Additionally, a side path also provides a separate sidewalk facility to preserve pedestrian safety by removing it from faster moving bicycle traffic. Proposed side paths include, but are not limited to: • Along Mount Comfort Road and Lewis Avenue from Garland Avenue to Deane Street • Along Joyce Boulevard and Steele Avenue from the Mud Creek Trail to Stearns Street • Along Garland Avenue from Sycamore Street to Interstate 49 • Along Markham Road from Razorback Road to Markham Hill • Along Huntsville Road from Morningside Drive to Crossover Road To address connectivity, the proposed Active Transportation Map includes several new or realigned trails. These links in the larger trail system are critical to achieving the Active Transportation Plan's goal of ultimately being within'/2-mile of every resident. The recommended additions to the Transportation Plan Map include: • Extension of the planned Mission Boulevard side path south from Rush Drive to Lafayette Street • Extension of the planned Braden Park Trails east of Crossover • New trail north of Mount Comfort Road from Salem Road to the Shiloh Trail • Realignment of the Clear Creek Trail to match Springdale's Dean's Trail • Realignment of College Avenue trails to correspond with the draft 71 B Corridor Plan • Connection across 15th Street near Duncan Avenue DISCUSSION: City Plan 2040 & Future Land Use Map On May 13 2019, the Planning Commission held a first public hearing for the draft City Plan 2040 document. The item was tabled at staff's request until the following meeting to allow the Commission and public sufficient opportunity to review the proposal and comment upon it. During discussion of the associated 71 B Corridor Plan, representation from the Fayetteville Housing Authority commented on the need for attainable housing and that the City ought to encourage its development. No additional public comment was presented. On May 28, 2019, staff again requested the Commission table the item to allow additional time for Commission and public comment, and incorporation of Commission feedback. No public comment was presented. On June 10, 2019, the Planning Commission forwarded the draft plan to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. As a part of this action, several amendments were recommended by the Commission (Exhibit 'C'), including a proposed weighting scheme for the infill development score. Among the Future Land Use Map alternatives, the Commission recommended Alternative #1, noting that adoption of Alternatives #2 or #3 that encourage annexation and peripheral development is not appropriate without an existing annexation policy or growth management tools. No public comment was presented. Master Street Plan At the May 13 and May 28, 2019 Planning Commission meetings, staff recommended the draft Master Street Plan be tabled to allow the Commission and public sufficient time to review the proposed plan and comment upon it. Some among the Commission expressed objection to the proposed street sections, commenting that they include lane widths that ought to be reduced. No public comment was presented. On June 10, 2019, the Planning Commission tabled the draft Master Street Plan. Several Commissioners expressed concerns forwarding the document with a Planning Commission recommendation rather than first addressing Commissioner comments about narrower streets, narrower lane widths, and other items. Staff advised that the Master Street plan would be advanced to the Transportation Committee. No public comment was presented. On June 25, 2019, the Transportation Committee conferred with staff and attending Commissioners, outlining several requested amendments to the Master Street Plan and referring the draft plan to the Planning Commission. Subsequently, on August 26, 2019, the revised, draft Master Street Plan was forwarded by the Planning Commission to the August 27, 2019 Transportation Committee, which, in turn, forwarded the plan to the City Council. Active Transportation Plan On July 8, 2019, the Planning Commission forwarded the draft Active Transportation Plan Map to the City Council with a recommendation of approval, including a text amendment to make reference to encouragement of facility construction consistent with the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) criteria for "All Ages and Abilities" in City Plan 2040. As with several earlier public hearings for the Active Transportation Plan, significant public comment was made in opposition to the ongoing inclusion of the planned Sublett Trail from the Lake Lucille area, through the Brooks -Hummel Nature Preserve, and, ultimately, to CollegeAvenue. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A Attachments: • Exhibit A Exhibit B Exhibit C Planning Commission Staff Reports o City Plan 2030 o Future Land Use Map o Master Street Plan o Active Transportation Plan Map The draft City Plan 2040, Future Land Use Map Alternatives, Master Street Plan, and Active Transportation Plan Map are available for review on the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas website at: https://www.fayetteville-ar.gov/1216/City-Plan-2040 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Resolution: 50-18 File Number: 2017-0774 CITY COUNCIL'S SUPPORT FOR CITY PLAN 2030 UPDATE: A RESOLUTION TO EXPRESS THE CITY COUNCIL'S SUPPORT FOR AN UPDATE TO CITY PLAN 2030 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby expresses its support for an update to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City (City Plan 2030) in 2018 to include study of Archibald Yell Boulevard and South School Avenue to Cato Springs Road and the associated work program described in the staff memo included in the agenda packet. PASSED and APPROVED on 2/6/2018 Attest: Sondra E. Smith, City Clerk Page i Printed on 217118 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479)575-8323 Text File File Number: 2017-0774 Agenda Date: 2/6/2018 Version: 1 Status: Passed In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Resolution Agenda Number: D. 9 CITY COUNCIL'S SUPPORT FOR CITY PLAN 2030 UPDATE: A RESOLUTION TO EXPRESS THE CITY COUNCIL'S SUPPORT FOR AN UPDATE TO CITY PLAN 2030 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section I.: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby expresses its support for an update to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City (City Plan 2030) in 2018 to include study of Archibald Yell Boulevard and South School Avenue to Cato Springs Road and the associated work program described in the staff memo included in the agenda packet. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 Printed on 21712018 u City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2017-0774 Le istar File ID 2/6/2018 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non -Agenda Item Garner Stoll 12/22/2017 City Planning/ Development Services Department Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: Resolution for the update to City Plan 2030: Submitted by City Planning Division to request City Council support for the update to City Plan 2030 in 2018 and its associated work program. Budget Impact: Account Number Fund ......... Project Number Project Title Budgeted Item? NA Current Budget $ Funds Obligated $ Current Balance $ - Does item have a cost? No Item Cost Budget Adjustment Attached? NA Budget Adjustment Remaining Budget— V20140710 Previous Ordinance or Resolution q Original Contract Number: Comments: Approval Date: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO CITY OF 1FAYETTEVIILLE ARKANSAS MEETING OF FEBRUARY 6, 2018 TO: Mayor; Fayetteville City Council THRU: Garner Stoll, Development Services Director Peter Nierengarten, Sustainability and Resilience Director FROM: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Leif Olson, Long Range Planner Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner Rachael Schaffner, Sustainability Project Coordinator DATE: December 22, 2017 SUBJECT:,, 2017-0774: Resolution to update City Plan 2030: Submitted by City Planning Division to request City Council support of a work program to update City Plan 2030 in 2018. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests City Council support the update to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan of the City (City Plan 2030) in 2018 and its associated work program. BACKGROUND: In 2006, the City hired Dover, Kohl and Partners to completely overhaul the comprehensive land use plan, then called General Plan 2020. This effort lead to the adoption of City Plan 2025. City Plan 2025 was a major shift in land use policy away from the continuation of suburban sprawl. The primary goals of City Plan 2025 discourage suburban sprawl and make compact, traditional town form patterns of infill and revitalization the highest priority. Over the past decade, the city's development codes followed suit and were substantially modified by in-house staff to be generally consistent with the land use plan. Significant code changes including form -based zoning districts and pedestrian oriented design standards were adopted and enforced. Denial of annexation and rezoning requests for suburban growth on the periphery of the city have become more common. City Plan 2025 was updated in 2011 by in-house staff and re -named City Plan 2030. City Plan 2030 continues to instill principals of new urbanism and smart growth, without major changes to the plan from 2006. City Council policy is to update the comprehensive land use plan every five years. City Plan 2030 was due to be updated in 2017. However, the Master Transportation Plan was a large city-wide community planning effort that took place in 2017. The decision was made to let the Master Transportation Plan move forward before the update to City Plan 2030, which Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 has occurred. Staff now proposes to update City Plan 2030 and has devised a work program to accomplish this update with direction and input from the Planning Commission. DISCUSSION: On November 27, 2017, the Planning Commission discussed the update to City Plan 2030. They discussed that the primary six goals of the plan are valid and should remain. These are: Goal 1- We will make appropriate infill and revitalization our highest priorities Goal 2 - We will discourage suburban sprawl Goal 3 - We will make traditional town form the standard Goal 4 - We will grow a livable transportation network Goal 5 - We will assemble an enduring green network Goal 6 - We will create opportunities for attainable housing The Commission provided direction and agreed with staff on major ideas to include in the work program for the plan update including: 1. Focus on education and implementation 2. Create a "Growth Concept/Targeted Infill Map" to compliment the "Future Land Use Map" 3. Integrate Mayor and City Council Strategic Plan, "Fayetteville Vision 2050" 4. Complete a corridor vision and regulating plan for College Avenue 5. Update the Master Street Plan Map and street cross sections 6. Integrate Economic Development Plan into update of City Plan 2030 7. Strengthen the historic resources section 8. Strengthen attainable housing definitions and goals 9. Update all charts and maps with current demographic and economic data BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: 2016 Capital Budget Project No. 16001 contains $100,000.00 for the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Update. These funds would be utilized to hire a consultant to facilitate the College Avenue Corridor component of the plan. Depending on the scope of work that is developed in response to the request for proposals, it is possible that staff may need to request additional funding for the College Avenue Corridor Plan. The primary update to City Plan 2030 will be done with an interdisciplinary team of in-house staff and existing operations budget to complete the project during 2018. Attachments: .= Draft Work Program for the update to City Plan 2030 a City Plan 2030 Update/City Plan 2035 Project Scope Project Goal —To update the City's Long Range Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Map, Master Street Plan, Street Cross-sections and develop a Growth Concept/Targeted Infill Map. Work Product Outcomes — City staff, in consultation with appointed and elected officials, have identified several work product outcomes that are critical to creating and implementing a successful long-range comprehensive plan. These outcomes include necessary updates for the various existing plan components, the development of new plan elements, and the integration of complementary plan elements from additional adopted plans, policies, and programs across all City Departments. Essential components and updates include: • Develop an education and outreach component to the plan that guides the visioning, consensus building and implementation processes. The education components long-term implementation should identify priorities, responsibilities, performance metrics and tools. • Update the core planning components of the plan based on objective analysis and community input including: community context, demographics, housing, employment and income, land use, transportation, historic and cultural resources, the planning process, framework, economic analysis and guiding policies. • Integrate and coordinate the inclusion of complimentary goals, objectives and actions from the many adopted plans and policies used by various City Departments and Divisions to guide their work programs. Identified plans include: The. City Council's Strategic Plan, Fayetteville's Mobility Master Plan, Fayetteville First Economic Development Plan, the Energy Action Plan, the Active Transportation Plan, The Master Water Plan, existing complete neighborhood plans and the Parks and Recreation Master Plan. • Strengthen plan components that have been identified as needing additional definition, investigation, analysis and refinement. Specific sections identified for strengthening include: the attainable housing goal area, the historic resources section and the economic development section. • Update the Future Land Use Map. Utilize geo-based data to analyze the nexus between the existing .land use and development patterns in relation to the optimal future land use and development patterns. * Update the Master Street Plan Map and Street Cross-sections utilizing analysis provided by the recently completed Fayetteville Mobility Plan and the Future Land Use Map update completed in the previous step. • Develop a Growth and Density Concept Map/Targeted Infill Map to compliment the Future Land Use Map. This component will rely heavily on stakeholder and public input to define boundaries, identify incentivizes and guide the implementation path. • Coordinate the inclusion of a College Ave. Corridor Study and Regulating Plan into the final City Plan 2030 Update document. Solicit continuous feedback from appointed and elected officials periodically throughout the plan update process. Public Input Process —A robust and inclusive public input process is critical to creating a successful plan. The public input process forthis plan update should employ outreach strategies designed to engage a very 1 large and diverse representative sample of residents in the most convenient and meaningful way possible. The advent of smart phones and targeted social media platforms provide new possibilities for the City to increase participation in the planning process. Currently, the public input process is envisioned in two phases: 1) Collect ideas and input, and 2) Public review of draft plan and maps. Public input work product flow has been ordered as follows: Create necessary branding, logos and web resources. • Develop an overarching vision for the comprehensive plan update depicted both graphically in the form of a map and in a narrative form — Vision 2050. • Develop public input activities, educational methods, surveys, and data collection methods. The public input process should be determined up front and designed holistically so that the data collected is consistent across collection methods and can be easily compiled, analyzed and summarized. The input activities should be designed to foster public understanding of the planning process, excite curiosity about City processes, and should build relationships across diverse community groups. Identify opportunities for community meetings distributed across the planning process timeline to collect continuous face-to-face input. Strive to schedule public input opportunities to align with existing events and locations that draw a diverse, representative sample of Fayetteville residents. • Determine dates and locations for both fixed and mobile public input opportunities. Establish a calendar for identified in-person input gathering events. • Review demographic data of public input as the team nears the end of each phase. Identify any missing segments of the population and conduct targeted outreach (in person or virtual) to attempt to achieve equitable reach of education and input opportunities. • Create an on-going web -based public input portal that can be widely distributed via traditional outreach methods and social media. • Hold at least one large public design workshop to explore a growth concept or infill boundary map. Market this through diverse methods and targeted approaches to ensure that a wide variety of citizens are aware of and invited to participate. Seek ongoing Planning Commission input throughout the plan development process with a monthly update and input session tied to the Planning Commissions agenda setting sessions. • Seek City Council input with four work/input sessions tied to the four phases of the planning process framework. These meetings should be conducted at regularly scheduled City Council agenda setting sessions as work product is completed during the planning process. Internal Work Product — This City Plan update will be accomplished through a team process that will assign work product and completion responsibilities to specific team members from numerous City Departments. Detail Work Program Phase I — Public Outreach Work Product Responsible Timeline or Department or Division completion date for deliverable Brief CC on CP 2030 Update work plan at agenda Development Services February 6 session and Resolution of support from the City Council blessing the CP 2015 work plan Economic Vitality March 31 Develop necessary branding, logos and Communications Create branding and Website Planning logos by Jan. 31. Planning Website Sustainability development completed by February 28. Draft and release a RFP to hire a consultant for the Planning February 28 College Ave. Corridor Plan ......... Interview, hire and approve a contract with the Planning March 15 College Ave. Corridor Study Consultant Develop public outreach strategy and materials.. Sustainability March 15 Planning Communications Information Technology Schedule and conduct one large public input session Planning March 31 Schedule and conduct multiple mobile workshops Communications April 31 Sustainability Planning Conduct City Council Work Session to review final Planning May 15 draft documents and maps and make final edits Phase II — Compilation of public input and draft documents. Work Product Responsible Timeline or Department or Division completion date for deliverable First draft of updated community background Sustainability March 31 chapters First draft of the economic development chapter Economic Vitality March 31 First draft of historic and cultural resources chapter Planning March 31 Public input session for the College Ave. Corridor Plan Consultant April 15 Planning Sustainability First draft of the Future Land Use Map update Planning May 31 Document Sustainability GIS First draft schematic design._of College Ave. Corridor Planning May 31 First draft of Growth Concept Map Planning May 31 Map, Master Street Plan Map and Street Cross- Sustainability sections GIS First draft of Master Street Plan update Planning May 31 Review, edit and finalize College Ave.. Corridor Study Engineering July 31 Conduct City Council work session to review final GIS ......_.__.. August 31 First draft of the Street Cross-section update Engineering Attainable housing goal update, definition and Community Resources May 31 strategy Planning Conduct City Council Work Session to review draft Planning May 31 documents and maps and make final edits Phase III — Review, edit and finalize draft document, maps and goal updates. Review, edit and finalize CP 2035 document — Word Planning July 31 Document Sustainability Communications Review, edit and finalize FLUM, Growth Concept Planning July 31 Map, Master Street Plan Map and Street Cross- Engineering sections Sustainability GIS Review, edit and finalize College Ave.. Corridor Study Planning July 31 Conduct City Council work session to review final Planning August 31 draft documents"and maps Create final document in In -Design format Planning August 31 ...................... Sustainability Phase IV — Public review and adoption Post final draft CP 2035 and College Ave. Corridor Planning 'September 31— Study documents and maps online and solicit public Communications October 31 feedback Sustainability Conduct City Council work session to review final CP Planning October 31 2035 and College Ave. Corridor Study draft documents and maps and make final edits Present final draft CP 2035 College Ave. Corridor Planning November— Study documents and maps to the City Council for December 2018 adoption Develop post -plan adoption web resources (maps, Planning February 2019 document, etc.) Communications Information..Technology::...'....... Budget —College Avenue Corridor Plan consultant will be paid with an existing CIP approved budget. Other preliminary items to cost out include: Mobile workshop vehicle rental. • Targeted social media add buys. • Outreach materials including graphic design, printing and display supplies. Refreshments for public input workshop(s). 9 ADM 19-6649 EXHIBITS' City Plan 2040 Benchmarks Short Term 2019-2025 Develop a conservation development ordinance, or other form for rural properties, or those with environmentally sensitive features. (Goal 2 & 5) Develop internal processes to align funding, development and planning of city infrastructure with the goals of City Plan 2030. (Goal 1 & 2) Identify existing properties that are vacant or prime for redevelopment and initiate form -based rezoning discussions with property owners. (Goal 1, 2, & 3) Use the Enduring Green Network boundary map as a tool when making decisions on parkland acceptance and acquisition, off-site tree preservation, and when updating the Master Trail Plan (Goal 4 & 5) Develop a system of metrics for the city to evaluate and prioritize properties for inclusion in the enduring green network. (Goal 5) Continue to develop and implement form -based codes that establish clear design standards and assure neighbors that new development will be desirable and compatible. (Goals 1,3,4 & 6) Determine the feasibility of a Local Housing Trust Fund and Land Bank. (Goal 6) Develop protocols for infill construction projects. Infill construction protocols are typically designed to outline "good neighbor best practices" and provide construction companies and neighbors with expectations for construction site and logistical issues such as; street or sidewalk closures, hours of construction activity, contact information for City Departments involved in the construction process, etc. Evaluate and recommended modifications to existing zoning districts to create context sensitive districts. This would include analyzing and amending permitted and conditional uses, building mass, setbacks and lot area coverage requirements. (Goal 1, 2, 3 and 6) Evaluate and modify standards for commercial, mixed-use and urban residential uses that are complementary to the existing context of the neighborhood and adjacent property. (Goal 1, 2, 3 and 6) Evaluate development thresholds based on quantitative metrics such as building form, and not building type. (Goal 1, 2, 3 and 6) Create pre -approved building types for identified neighborhoods. (Goal 1, 2, 3 & 6) Evaluate conditional use permit vs. use -by -right for appropriate infill. (Goal 1) Discuss "spot zoning" in the midst of established neighborhoods, and potential for large rezoning's. (Goal 1 & 3) Work with the City Council to develop a formal annexation policy to strategically and deliberately plan for controlled growth on the City's outer edges. (Goal 1, 2, 3 & 5) Develop additional rural/agricultural zoning districts that can be utilized to manage rural growth and maintain rural character on the City's outer edges. (Goal 2 & 5) Identify gaps in affordability throughout the city and set numerical targets for housing that is affordable to a variety of households, including workforce, supportive, low-income, families with children, and senior housing. (Goal 1, 3, 4 & 6) Promote long-term affordability by targeting the use of public funds for the lowest -income households, including those who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, or who have other special needs. (Goal 6) Identify new or expand existing dedicated revenue sources for affordable housing. (Goal 6) Examine potential regulatory barriers and policies that impede the provision of household affordability, including: infrastructure costs, the costs and benefits of development ordinances on housing development, and how the City's fees and requirements impact the cost of living for households in Fayetteville. (Goal 1 & 6) ' Develop a community educational campaign to address housing affordability such as; the loss of existing affordable housing, rising utility and transportation costs, and the need to maintain affordability as a part of Fayetteville's quality of life. (Goal 6) Identify opportunities for the creation of affordable housing on publicly -owned land and develop partnerships with developers to provide flexible, affordable work space and housing. (Goal 6) Long Term > 5 Years Utilize the Historic District Commission to educate the public on tax credits, appropriate design standards, neighborhood preservation tools. (Goals 1, 2 & 3) Evaluate the development and implementation of a tiered impact fee system. (Goals 1 & 2) Evaluate existing street design speed, operating speed and posted speed limits, to ensure that each is appropriate based on the roadway design and context of the surrounding environment. (Goal 4) Create a complete neighborhood or street corridor plan every other year utilizing a charrette process and analyze water and sewer capacity to identify opportunities or limitations for development. (Goal 1, 4, & 6) On -Going Support rezoning proposals that result in increased density around logical future transit stops, rail corridors and major transportation corridors. Recommendations should generally align with the Growth Concept Map. (Goal 4) Support development and redevelopment opportunities along the existing rail line. (Goal 4) Support and implement the goals, strategies and actions of the transformational 71 B Corridor plan. (Goal 1, 2, & 4) Include public transportation providers in the design phase of new, and retrofitted, street projects and determine if there is a current or future need for benches, shelters, or bus turn- offs. (Goal 4) Continue developing and implementing the Infill Scoring Matrix and Map with elected officials as a tool for understanding a parcels proximity to existing utilities, infrastructure and services. (Goal 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6) Implement and utilize the Growth Concept Map to strategically incentivize the development of Tier -1, Tier -2, and Tier -3 commercial and mixed-use nodes along major corridors and as neighborhood centers. (Goal 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6) Actively participate and engage in the regional dialogues and initiatives as outlined in the report completed by the Northwest Housing Regional Planning Commission entitled "Our Housing Future- A Call to Action for Northwest Arkansas". (Goal 6) Promote long-term affordability by supporting a local or regional community land trust and other shared equity approaches. (Goal 6) Support the creation of a "real-time" database of available affordable housing units, services, resources, and incentives to strengthen the process of connecting qualified buyers and renters with affordable housing to comprehensively lower monthly household expenses. (Goal 6) Promote long-term affordability by developing new goals, targets, and strategies to promote the distribution of affordable housing in all parts of the city, including incentives for affordable housing in new developments and for the preservation of existing rental units. (Goal 6) CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS MEETING OF DECEMBER 3, 2019 TO: Mayor; Fayetteville City Council THRU: Don Marr, Chief of Staff Garner Stoll, Development Services Director Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Chris Brown, City Engineer FROM: Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner DATE: November 15, 2019 CITY COUNCIL MEMO SUBJECT: EXHIBIT `C' - Planning Commission Recommendation for the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, the Future Land Use Map, and the Master Street Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Following several meetings in 2018 and 2019 in which the Planning Commission functioned as a steering committee for the update to City Plan 2030, the Future Land Use Map, and Master Street Plan, complete draft documents were presented to Commissioners on May 13, 2019. Commissioner feedback was requested on each of the three plan elements outlined above, with comments, recommendations, and critiques provided over the following four weeks. DISCUSSION: Although staff agreed with and incorporated many of the Planning Commission's recommended amendments to City Plan 2040, the Future Land Use Map, and the Master Street Plan, the following represent substantive changes that either represent significant staff time to implement or matters of policy upon which ultimate decision lay with the City Council. City Plan 2040 • Infill Development Scoring Matrix: o At the Planning Commission Retreat held on May 18, 2019, Commissioners reviewed the proposed Infill Development Scoring Matrix and made recommendations on weighting of the criteria. In addition to providing weights to the proposed criteria, the Commission recommended substituting properties with greater than 15% slope to properties with 100 -year floodplain as a negative modifier. o Commissioner Brown recommends the following additions or modifications to the draft Infill Development Scoring Matrix: ■ Addition of the Enduring Green Network boundaries instead of Slopes Greater than 15 Percent or 100 -year Floodplain. These elements are encompassed within the Enduring Green Network and Commissioner Brown proposed this be assigned the weight previously -proposed by Commissioners for slope/floodplain; and Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 ■ Incorporation of Growth Concept Map centers using a buffer of increasing Growth Concept Map: o Commissioner Brown recommends the following additions or modifications to the draft Growth Concept Map: ■ Addition of the Enduring Green Network; ■ Addition of the Mayor's Box; ■ Highlighting of the Arkansas & Missouri railroad track running north -south through Fayetteville; and ■ Reclassifying the Tier 3 center indicated above Evelyn Hills to a Tier 2 center. o The current Growth Concept Map indicates the Evelyn Hills shopping center area as a Tier 3 center. Commissioner Brown recommends this be revised to a Tier 2 center. Currently, all proposed iterations of the Future Land Use Map include a designation of Complete Neighborhood Plan for areas associated with an adopted, locally -targeted plan. Commissioner Brown recommends that this designation be kept as an outline of the existing neighborhood plan areas, but with appropriately delineated Future Land Use Map designations (Urban Center Area, City Neighborhood Area, etc.) applied to the parcels within. Chapter 3: Framework: o Commissioner Brown recommends assigning a responsible department, division, or committee to each of the proposed City Plan 2040 benchmarks. o Commissioner Hoffman recommends maintaining the current language for Goal #3: We will make traditional town form the standards, rather than re -write it as "We will make compact, complete, and connected development the standard." General Comment o Commissioner Hoffman recommends inclusion of additional language related to open space. Specifically, that shared public spaces ought to be more deliberate in design, encouraging natural surveillance through "eyes on the street" that ensure the safe use of parks, trails, and other spaces. Future Land Use Map • Currently, all proposed iterations of the Future Land Use Map include a designation of Complete Neighborhood Plan for areas associated with an adopted, locally -targeted plan. Commissioner Brown recommends that this designation be kept as an outline of the existing neighborhood plan areas, but with appropriately delineated Future Land Use Map designations (Urban Center Area, City Neighborhood Area, etc.) applied to the parcels within. Master Street Plan • Commissioner Sharp recommends inclusion of a Parkway Boulevard street section. Although a Parkway Boulevard street section does not exist among the streets in the Master Street Plan or designations in the Master Street Plan Map, it could be done voluntarily and would likely be a municipal project given the cost associated with a larger street. A further consideration is that this section is not currently applied within the Master Street Plan Map, and staff seeks guidance as to which existing or proposed streets, if any, the Parkway Boulevard designation ought to be applied. Attachments: • Planning Commission Infill Development Scoring Matrix Weighting `a R > G N � O � a N N m m 0 O O O O m � L C =� O a N A x m 0 c � o a pp a N N M O O N N O O M C L 'O 00 3 3a a A x o ., o 0 III ., —a a �- C V jai N N m o o o ry a e m a m `m a J 3 o - A A LL G F- ti 0 O O ti A a o 3 a a W L N m 'a N N O O O N N O O O -c •g 3 m y q a o N o 0 0 0 0 0 O a a a JO- m N N M m N N V V M O 0 3 n v O — m H 01-1 IT T 0 A O H C m ,3 0 n d a E a c o a E v u a a w j — c — a E E LL c ° w r N CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Chris Brown, City Engineer FROM: Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner Josh Bocaccio, Staff Engineer MEETING DATE: August 26, 2019 (Updated with Planning Commission Results) SUBJECT: ADM 19-6651: Administrative Item (MASTER STREET PLAN 2040): Submitted by the CITY PLANNING DIVISION to amend and update the Master Street Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM 19-6651 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to forward ADM 19-6651 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval, amending the proposed Master Street Plan as described in the attached memo." JUNE 10, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: At the June 10, 2019 Planning Commission meeting, this item was tabled by the Commission to allow staff time to amend the draft Master Street Plan to incorporate Commissioner comments regarding, but not limited to, lane widths, an attached sidewalk street section, and a parkway street section. Staff subsequently submitted the item to the City Council's Transportation Committee where direction was given to staff to coordinate with the Commission to incorporate Commission comments where appropriate and feasible. A draft reflecting these changes is attached. BACKGROUND: The current Master Street Plan was adopted by Resolution 146-11 on August 16, 2011. While its predecessor adopted with City Plan 2025 focused on standardizing the street cross sections, classifying streets in recently -annexed areas, and increasing the number of Collector Streets, the update with 2030 focused on classifying streets in Fayetteville's extra -jurisdictional Planning Area, addressing alley design and use, contextualizing Collector Streets, and reducing right-of-way requirements for both Minor and Major Arterials. More recently,. in February of 2016, the City of Fayetteville contracted with Nelson/Nygaard as a transportation planning consultant to develop a transportation master plan, entertainment district parking plan, and mobility report. Among the goals and objectives recommended in their 2018 Fayetteville Mobility Plan, Nelson/Nygaard emphasized the importance of contextual and complimentary street design that supports surrounding land uses, maintains reliable connections, and increases transportation options. Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 1 of 28 DISCUSSION: The principle goal of this update is to incorporate the findings and recommendations of Nelson - Nygaard and their Fayetteville Mobility Plan in to the City's Master Street Plan. This involved parallel efforts, the first of which was a reclassification of street types or typologies. While most cities nationwide, including Fayetteville currently, utilize the Federal Highway Administration's "functional classification" system of Arterial, Collector, and Local streets, these categories provide limited information about the street, how it relates to surrounding land uses, and how it functions from block to block. These designations and associated functional classifications under the current Master Street Plan are: • Regional Link — High Activity (Arterial Street) • Regional Link (Principal Arterial Street) • Neighborhood Link (Minor Arterial/Collector Street) • Residential Link (Local and Residential Streets) • Urban Center (sections adopted under the 2005 Downtown Master Plan) As it is not sufficient to simply rename these street classifications, the second major update to the plan was a full review of all streets classified within the Master Street Plan, whether within or without the Fayetteville's city limits. This was based on the two -fold understanding that some existing and future streets are "over -classified" and a build -out under the current Master Street Plan would not serve the mobility needs of residents city wide or compliment the needs of residents and property owners along these corridors. Accordingly, every street was vetted and many were re-classified. Examples of the most prominent changes include: Extension of the Urban Center street sections southward to Martin Luther King Boulevard Reclassification of the following from Major or Minor Arterials to Neighborhood Links: o North Street/Mission Boulevard from College Avenue/71 B to Crossover Road/Highway 265 o Gregg Avenue from North Street to Van Asche Drive o Deane Street and Mount Comfort Road from Garland Avenue/Highway 112 to Salem Road o Broyles Avenue o Double Springs Road o Deane Solomon Road o Persimmon Street o Oakland Zion Road Reclassification of the following from Collector Streets as Residential Links: o Stearns Street from Vantage Drive to Crossover Road/Highway 265 o Sunbridge/Reynolds/Strange from Gregg Avenue to Garland Avenue/Highway 112 o Raven Lane between Quail and Topaz Drives The final major update to the Master Street Plan includes further advancing the ability to create context sensitive streets through a flexibility of design. Each street includes an associated minimum standard based on classification, from which it may vary depending on surrounding land uses, proposed development, or relevant long-range plans. Among these options are the ability to increase lane widths to accommodate transit, removal of on -street parking facilities, reduction or increase in sidewalk widths, and modification of greenspace or parking for Fire Code compliance. Other notable additions to this flexibility include the potential for a required Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6651 ADM August 26, 2019 Master Street Plan Amendment\03 Planning Comm ission\08-26-2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 2 of 28 frontage and furniture zones. In urban settings, where buildings abut the right-of-way in particular the addition of a frontage zone or furniture zone creates a buffer for pedestrians from opening doors and accommodate street elements such as benches without compromising the mobility of pedestrians. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM 19-6651 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES Date: August 26, 2019 O Tabled ® Forwarded O Denied Motion: Brown, recommending approval Second: Sharp Vote: 7-0-0 BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Major changes to the plan would require dedicated staff time. A full plan revision would require contracting with an outside consultant. Attachments: • City Plan 12.2: Master Transportation Plan Draft — Presented at June 10, 2019 Planning Commission meeting • City Plan 12.2: Master Transportation Plan Revised Drafts o Redlines o Clean The draft Master Transportation Plan, Master Street Plan Map, and associated street sections are available for review on the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas website at http://www.fayetteville- ar.gov/1216/City-Plan-2040. Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6651 ADM August 26, 2019 Master Street Plan Amendment\03 Planning Commission\08-26-2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 3 of 28 c s -0 -0 O O U U O U O Y _ 'U 7 U Qi 14 'Cn 'rO E n 0 fl- cd 3 cz U o� � y II a 'U 4. -F U 0 O �� y C� fl Y bA U >, — _R bA .� C vUi cd V O- U 0 ,,,0 C" '; 'O U � ; 6 0 CS fl cd U cd O E O +' Cd U N CI. U U C '� fl 00 cd E bA C O bA bb 0.Y o L o -a ces v oN cz+S U bA C > O .L i U t ,z � L r N U cn cd O 0 U Y `� cd 3 OEn S L � U In CIS czY N �0• � U y C�i� 0 � O C N 1 O 4r G CA •= S N o o rA L x ^0 L cz cz t C/)N Q . p " YO fl O Q U C L O .� ';� cd ,U O L Y U bA U O U cd >Z U J U E -0 bA — U U C L L• C 0 ,•' U y cd .'-' O' U >, S U O f3 '•'s' Cd U to c � Ci U "0 O 1 Ca. id 0 O = 'N Y = .0 Q CV U o U rt wp 0= °3 -� 3 'C�Z3 � o cd U i-0 O Cil c U U bA c3 A U (n y 4- p `' 0 p O tn O cn c U U U .r— cn cA cz CL 03 C p.: cd U cd 03 En C O LnJ U Z N O cd a_ L Q Y L U L Y Q cz CL 9i al r a 0 Q. !n L Y Cd U '0 bU O '0 btA >_ U O CLd cq CL Y a 0 Y U U CG n .Qi U Cd N U � Q n. c U L S_ Cn c C O U C cd a C O O C- cz L ani S E- 0 U 0 L U U Er cd ' 03 +•� L bA cd O 4- y O 6 O O O 0 U � N � Y4 O v� c's O y bA y Y U Y r a cd L•, Cd Cd O. bA O U a• U CY U U S Y as CL Cd CL L fA V, sn53 �1 EU >Z a � •� o Ln ? b > 4- L y E 4. U to C O bA O cz a c L c L UM L = O En n +' 5 U CZ U = N .0 O .� s? E > U c y O Cn 0 C cn 0 L — '0 bA Cn Qcd W C Cn +� Q 'a • — "0 > U U MO cd CL U0- y! vii Y cn 10 c0 OL U Q U U L Cd cC'0 (n 0. V Ln Cd U '1•' N Y Y L 05 o C V cd n ) a N M ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 4 of 28 0 Planning Commission Q August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 5 of 28 rn O � •0 ' i M U E N SZ L 4•' M cdL bb cd 0 "OO + N CZ L.0N >> N O +L �, U N �' N CLS 'a Com+ �_/� ' 9 w , U N W 4� bb cC •- O^ C O �; S= o R3 `' cz p L O L .+".a CG L i cdN cd y�j by L" L O y b0 — > 4— a cn cd O o Y a� ° ,� Cd ' 0 4- ' �, p 0 U N E N y E 42 0 U .= ({ . 4;- >l L 6 yam, w , � tZ U 3 w N cd CL N y c w o (n L 3 .a Ca cz 4° o fl w zcd 3 E� ed' L 4— o in C6 c cl aUO -o bA •- 4r cd U 3 -0 4 c (ZQ. w -Q M E cd - o- NCA M L .� 2 � C� G' L .� E cacd L.y O ��+ 2 G C� w C L U N 0 y • r-. E w • U U O ,� Q O •1U+ C;3N a bn N c° 3cd O yca. p0 N M M , � vi a� � a� c rn ' j �_ r c0 . ° w . cd N U ,� N E w U N 4- N i 4••i U O -0 C E' p CE •� N U n. Sy L - p '> N> N O Q N O p O 0 C O C c -0 w 4.. Cn O iU.. 5+-3 N° rteQ. c�3 3N U`� (� •�— D ci1 }; cz oai }i c m o a ¢- `> o acd. o cd o c cd cd M 0 cd 0 ca U Q 'aa• L Q O 0 N �--� C 42 S 't7 O 0 Y ^ o wN ca c 00 co n U 1- Ea� Y .° N U O > N j ai -0 > IZIUNO �+•+ G N Rt yU « s�' ,0 O CW 5- EA EnU C Ca U a+Q y cn C `' cd L U C,3N U Q_a O w N C •� O y >- O 21 to C O y N C y C VI O y i C O L N O 4--. 4- U CC bA -- -_ N L >i (n L . U .- p- N CC r-+ C/) E/) .= v i i N O 3 i N C U N !n C S O 3 4. Q L O U� c. A •y N .- L > y '>✓ ,� Y O y O .4- cn�••� �+ CCS N 4- U i _ O .1 �'.• N N� O 3 "a U O S CL.1 0 o_ U Cc U L c iL.+ `-.. }+ U U L U C �_ 4- o .. U fZ U d N `}' s" U 4r O N O M U C N 3 = f U x `� Z++ '� V c 0 N o U— .� > o M bA -0 to O O- -o ,= C L GJ a L cn U U 3 0 C U 4° cd 00- a� = Cc cz a o U 4° -.6 c > Uo -v ccs � >, 0 o -a N N ; t G Y n o v >= w c bn a M r- w -a O E = Q, N r w C .� U -O s= U O C i •23 O bA U O 3 w L U > `G 'O L i 4) O C bA N U M + O� U O- cz r n U -O .t� 0 Y L c U 0 �Q O . cn C L I.� "S o >1 ti CL. 7 in �n Gam. Z cn n. to • 0- V') +��'. Planning Commission Q August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 5 of 28 00 Planning Commission August st 26. 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 6 of 26 N CIS V) o L 6" •'O N O > O cd cd . - - V7 N C -y !n C O cn s E cd C 3 z ^ -a 0 �; — o , y L cqCL C;3 O 3 4 >✓ O O (� i p "C U 4i: 0 40- 0 N M CCS Cd .� C c� cz E 3 v =•y ami E O E- -fl � y 0 —C,3 r- > 3 C w O '- O cd 40 N U) 0 O 3 Q. E17 -.0 cd ° v C G cd U >> O C O 0 U N L E V G) O �O ,ras _ bo � M Ca C ° U E _ bA y carn `n > p ( cz • U N O N cd Q 3 Gjj L Q cdcd to `� .� O O bn v cd •.^=• (I � En '> _ E ''r•• LCT N ,S' U N > > C U 'O ¢ O «S S O U C O > c U N cd 4✓ 0 L OV cz cd tj i3 L � bp n 03 L O N r 1 A '� •3 •E � 3 � a. V 3 -a -a O Y > -o bn dj a cd i •U O O O > C3 O U lLj -a '� N s y cj v > o3-^ o : U E —E/) > r� o E CZ o 1 J = L iZ C o u U C E ¢ C,3 VO)- 3 > ,r cd y 'O O C c N 'O ^ - c = Cd .E Mbn L C v Qj N U s aj V ' 'Cn Y . . F jE v � n LO M ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 7 of 28 L cd cd . - - V7 N C -y !n C cn s E cd — o 3 cqCL 3 � � r >✓ cd i i p Q CZ p L — En C133ca c� -Se -a ami 4' -fl � y r- 0 O O 3 Q. E17 >, cd O bA 0, v C ^ «i CZ bn �- � ca > 4)O _ L `n p ( cz C � CU bA Q 3 Gjj 03C `� .� C—d > •.^=• (I � •� N -04-+ 0 — LCT I- U L N >� '0 —8.d 'O ¢ O «S S Sr 4) N > N cd 4✓ 0 L c y +O C bn cd tj X,r' ' 4-. _ cd N 03 L O N C O r 4--,r cd L -o bn 3 a>� cn -a '� o 3 E °' � > ca > o3-^ o > M x0 3 Ca 0 4_ 'Z O v C E ¢ C,3 VO)- 3 UN v� .•C rL 3 d U TJ a40 > .E — rn Q N N . . . Q cid . rT, n LO M ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 7 of 28 cd a >cn , N + Nai -a Y O ca - i 0c 0 3 p -0 _� -a U i 'Ua c0S a >L y Y7 :0�U) 3aM O 4!- OO N O > p bA -a 4= bA 0- cC O 0 O i y: i bA L LZ^ cd iY - F O U L p = L L O M s•• C i 0 i O bA y L w .fl O Y N N fl U U C >, O A bA i t1 a >, v7 p GAJ .� > +�-+ ..s7 'L >> c� .0cz >> N i O fLS + CO >, N U c� ' 3 O N 0 3 y Y y N O ccs N p Q _ � a3 n bU � Y t� `�° c a a c c a N O LS L O O L 3 0 0 E z N w O x M 0 0 O:cz to >, ccu -cq L Ln c`S c v ° 3 y c i 3 a� i .� C." > y L CG t v7 ,LS •� •� .1: y �.:+ .a 0 'O MN 5Q 3E- ��.� °�' ¢c� 0 iQ n Rt U 0• QOL .c • • Q «S • • • • • 11-1i )t I 1 co M ■ 410F ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 8 of 28 fa O E O ;_ G N v� r 0 +- �' O 3C O o -0 "aa ca U w a' -ca OL YO �' s .� Y O U 4-^ V Y VI c;3U N ca w a� ° o -o a-• o � •3 a� c y a� 0 3 0 M US 0 O O L p i 0 O bo O O CC L U _ p « O L to 00 c� 'cn A-0 L •� �.a �-v 3 �. rA o .� O Q rA rA j v 3 N v c L ,a a 0 a� %- V) ct3 ;_ Y YO N cz .> z= � N •Y [n 3 O- — U „ O U 'a U = .D . 'a O i p p v O pU a a. A Q F O f1 cC c>C 11-1i )t I 1 co M ■ 410F ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 8 of 28 a cd N Y a�ca 3cq3 00 'O E O •O L :.�.. Ci �. S y i > v^ CCS - N U cd O N O Y 011 L. U cz a' to O N O cd O 01) Y := N O C c p- O+ U c c 7:$ U C L '_ CL_ O >' 1 N N C L O N > aL O O O . U +O .= cd O 1 cd N Y CCS .._. U N NU N to U "O 'O cd O O '0 ¢ N C vvii M N C O 4� Ln U• 1 -0 M N � C >7 '� C� = co C N i U C IS O O cid _ O i'Y � bn 'p -p O O co CC C U U ° U U—•cqj Cd Y C ¢ H � 44 U ¢ c� U Q 0 3 3 3 c a» L N Cd U ¢ OL .� • • cd•> y„ cd 4 • n M Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 9 of 28 N Y 'O Cd 0.. O L CdCd En ° O O U C 3 N O c N N N >> U U C> Cd O U M U C > O N O N O =y � N [] >l N C Y C 3 O L •� cO 'U•U o N N Y O O 4� Ln ca UO= 0 y _`1 O .--. > Y C In IS C O i'Y m L !? C U ¢U 3 U U U—•cqj Cd E .O cd•> y„ cd 4 O U N 3 C' v O, cd 0 LO L N O bA z- •0 C;3 'a r- 0 0 U ' L cd > Y Y • O -� 72 N Y O N U 3 O Y Uto • y,, J N > L U �D v cz 0 O CA •L O � C L O 'Y � Y N CCS • L„ T3 O � � C �a" -� _ O U Cd O ' > O O C C N Ci? ,4? C .0 0 U U cd E N U U O CA Cd c3 Gn L N O N on a� > Y L t?. n M Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 9 of 28 ,• RIM Ca O C ca s L _bD cz 3 C C O ca cd � N L• U O � G U � � Q) ,SJ � Ca o 4. Cn C L 0 Qj U 4- d crj Q, CC Q) cn 3 ° ° i L L O J L � fn VJ 3 L.0 O > 0 U . V) Co bA ,cn L C �- as o U 0 Ln L -�4 O •U 40. C cd .O -'0 E ca O N rn 'i7 0 s" E> E U C ca to (z > .y rA r E U C ca O V ct L i CA Q) N O ca Q� L•' Eca 9 yO C 4— _ cc Cn w = L- UUUU V Ca O 0-U ; O O N r .cz N Q) r Ca Q Q) N U O C C Qa ca za.. U &- CAL- M ca Ocz ±� •Y Cn .,z cYU6 Ca U O N O ca j U .a Q ._ U U 0� i ca ca cq -0 C 3 a O y Q 0. Q) cn > O U U d as 0 t D O E O bA J : YCa L "0 E O y M L � O U U N ca C Cn bA ca C ca CL Ca a' 0 'O Ca > L O N 0.ca. ca SS 3 O O r — ij cm: sar�rlY=d] Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 \ Page 10 of 28 a � L o cd O Y cz COO N O th L S O > O i O L C� M a, C U- O U • In 03 bJD U - .- V $ � cd .�+ y -�CC$ L N O i- .- O 'O C >, bA cd a .� -0 +� ca (� N Cr. 0 O r v •� > O U Y NC i, L bA cd O 1 U Ln N CISL U — L ca >' U U ca bA N vi tn i bA c= O U> U N M y0 L D C C ^O U U+ ^S C Y ca Q% M i ca Ca 1- > Y rn 'O C N > cd N N -0 cd co C L] aU+ N � Q U bA U a 'LScz L tU U > a •0 G U a •O d 3 Q) > O� n N o ti Fes-c�i -v C) C7 E CCS C.i cn cd U cd y y L' a] b n Q cn U Q >> -_ cC (n cn E ca v� •� • • cam 4- ccz ,� rn M ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 3-6651 MSP 2040 Page 11 of 28 rn N Or- O Y cz COO th L S O > O i '3 O cn M U- O U • In Y O ce N y L to c= U � y -�CC$ L O Oaoo=30 Ca 'Y N O +- U U CA Q' y CA � (� S5AyN,, C Y ti O r v •� > O U Y NC i, L bA cd O Ln CISL U — Q O N ca >' U U ca bA N Y O U N M y0 L M ca „0 N M .o J-- 'L Y Q% M i ca Ca 1- > Y rn 'O C N > cd bAt C r O rn as U > m a .,L = U C •L C O C j • bA •23 Y L Q) O U O Z Y L CCS C.i Q > N cd y y L' a] b U cn U Q >> -_ cC (n cn E ca v� b_A N N 0 C 4- ccz ,� CC' R O C • U C N C C r O U > ca to ca C bio O -O >> Z Q 0. CCZ W A ' > -0 CFO. Ca rn M ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 3-6651 MSP 2040 Page 11 of 28 y U L o E zs o U cd Ln �� r Q% o N V y M U � L > •L 0 � to 0 cd L � Q. ,1KL � r L 3 O o c y M s N •L bio M t:A cd N y O CLN O L U Q cd O O i-+ L L U V) N N U O C L .a cC � L R3 •> f_L O 0 O. O N y U i s a> a� L > c 3 s O 3 cd O C O p O V � � s v L cq >a� s > un s C;3 rn ti -O > rn >, — Q 0 o > Z' W U LLJ i J J Q Q W J W S — C) W F z w O w U } N Q J N U) z UJ LL, o� Of z Q. 0 W J J Q Q W Li J _J Q Q W ch 3 0 0 T -- �,..� ---- Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 y •. 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 12 of 28 0 V) > v� — _ N N "� C •ty N c N i "O N ��,, s .C.)v7 y ° c0i n. o Mbn fl, o 0> C O -0 s cd v C . >uo °O Q N M . ° M o xU U)r 'C �c a C O n ' O n mO O 0 •E � N 0 ca O 0 —> L 0nco =" U cd Cd «S N a II O C,3 O ar Q N L Z' W U LLJ i J J Q Q W J W S — C) W F z w O w U } N Q J N U) z UJ LL, o� Of z Q. 0 W J J Q Q W Li J _J Q Q W ch 3 0 0 T -- �,..� ---- Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 y •. 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 12 of 28 Oj c a� VLn En o 4 0 c3 y N O N CA C4 (nMN U i bA >' V) `n U ycd UEn te-0 0` U Cd !n U Cd (ll i y C3. c y O> y N U cn o b4i 0 O N y id N U Cd C > fC L 4=.2 3 U N W 4. bA M• cc3 0• O >_ +U+ v i bDo cd rn �� > (z 3 fl 0 +� r UO �' L cd U U b°n 793 > 0 3 a " 0 0 = '� cd �. L CO > E L Z y = = U °' -0 7G bA . r U 0 cn N cd 2 'A U yU 4✓ r1 L — cLd bA cn C a. U 3 N cL i � � L -a ° cd °j cd U .O En O L to O 4 c E cn cn a c= 3 p 0 3 „ 3 z7 bA • = 4- � U 3 i r+ c Cc c U bA Qct ° VI U L Cy.; cd UL.. cq N� U U Q cd C]. -O cn m En bA fl cn S y° 3 5 °y' � 0 C _ . O 2 - S �� �. Y y0 •'yyam,, E""' U � U V Cis N U y •ate Q.. N N O 4] 4--. i.�. N L 4-+ L 0 T� y E cd Q L E _ -0 >° 0 � O cn N S U O 0 Q t S > C �En 73 a- 0 C 'fl W U 4� E LL >, Q) C 0. = L .0 o E cd v a� C3 y bA a� 0- L c a� 3 3 _ >, D° •� D= ami o r 'O i1 C cn CL�> C U C y [n O ° � — ° '- s N E O _- cd N+ + 3 s i s w L 0 cn 0 a L 0 N N -O f]. 4, U �0 cl� � O cn +U+ O O V) % O cd U) C ° t3 cn u U L1 a y ti = �, CO _ t w a� Ell En o ami cid bQ Q) C a� s- E i C) 0 U C cd r_i N' j S 4•, cd cd 3 _ a� F- O U a� N N t7 •L cn cn w N f] C �•C �-+ N cn VJ C cd = N a, N U °= �U O L v = N U Y i CZ L _L a. U C V Q S. 00 w U ° N c o c c o a� E -� _ c� Y° Y °�� cd c .N VI 0 0 C a� �' 0 5 L U cn N a' T ° .0 U t4 -R3 OJ x- C L' U r y bA - `' L ° V ° Cd cn Y 1 U N L y N 3 L Cn O L cn H t = = r (d N _ O .Y. ° 0 3 U ,= o rn o s. ° s y a U -o U • E a� F- U U 0 aL o U i d V n �. L � • Cy' Q. (DLGl CZ � 0 O t C 0 .1.•+ y. Q �-•� ,1--� U cn Ef�� E i 3 O -� E W cn > .� U y y > . n om o Q E o 3? ° L a�'� � ca o �cz ° 0 cd bA M +0 � y 0 3� U r U 40 03 s cd O O cd N >> � > 0 n ti N O y` s L L' U bA L s a ai N Q c 5 V)� ° o '� o PLO 3° 0.) 'a S N O L O cn 03 cd CC to 'L3 cd y- C .1U, bA o cn - � 5... C Vi .- > 3 y U— w c E `d bA 2 E- .n co�Cti O N � rr C �� C bA U> .� 0 LS �O L U .0 � = bA N U N > U U C 0= L C ° U 0- cct ' V) Y B Cd r' 0 N p '+ C U C L U i]. Q 4) Y = 0 y CS y L U'O '4d U .� cd O s1 cn cd 0. ra -p v) R V) P. _ r/) i� s1 E � � +_' I E rA cn N M 0 Q ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 13 of 28 ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 14 of 28 .. ... ...... ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 14 of 28 ai cd o � � a c o v > O cd 3 R c O -o cd O y L V) �' U 4•+ 'O N Ncd y (U - cd .'O .-•� U Y C; F '= C O O O 4� cd 0 > y r O C c 3 o o N - 4° a � a� � o C's�, O C y Cd _V s N L L O O t s O tDA 3 0 � .0 C U E C y > U N O U "0 L Q En O h L3 Ri 1 _ L CC V7 C O V O aha E E .> 3 C-) i > > a� c � O CU O '�2 � N TS U �s iU. 0 W N V) -0 o O O 'in U N CA U N > C O vUi L = U U Y C,3 O N 'p O �p E O V cz IlG O 3 — O O C 0 CC 1 Ln Cn Q w Cd "6 O C y •_ C N UCC3 "' -0 .O cn 0- C-) 0 O U L a to s G F a n M O X ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 15 of 28 :.3 -o Q) L -g 03Ed N C N o U '� L > o E ct a ; 3 cd `'-C a a c � ,a > s '> o 4: t: D E 4cG bA 0 "i7 C N ai s too y rn "Q N O a C cd '�-.' N' L -C o '•y�am.. C C L i• ->l N aN+ L Z7A c o s o ami °>' `� ' U CC U a� ` N o CCS fl 0 c o i. a' oA ?� a O � C O O bA � E bA _ x L � N , C O aS O s N i nQ cl(n n V)cz Ln d ) . Q c . G F a n M O X ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 15 of 28 3 ` C) I � L ` r L O ' :C rte• i GA W - •r O C DA v A C r c 4 > G CD y Y v y V o C 0 Q 0 I Is r v, ice+ ice. o _^r• „ � r c r U o W L o a J cs i y C > ^ y Q) r r w ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 16 of 28 C2 '> U_ s ami 3 3 bA `n N Q- 'a vUi N y y C O bA U O d > cd .� bn N N Q. > �+ fl cCCS cz >, a L ca o +' E 1 03 ocq3 O d bA •� } N 03_ .� O. C v E o o �o 3 4) CCo N N �, O" M a N '�CCS Uj 'B X G i N to cu >.� cu 0 +- N .aj_ ME 0 cz.0 T3 rC i Y bA d -p > "CS N °LSA. 0 3 3 a� E (s. 3 a 3 cn Q� M D Q � . co M V 11—IY 11— I 1 0 r Md Ln N d Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 17 of 28 O N p ar C O E G rn O N cn c4� 0 31+ ° o o -o U O L N 0 LO 0 y C+ L- •> CCS SZ > 3 O 4-.-o °-O ° x «3 U N ca 0 a- 3 cdi EI) N .0 L N '3 p N C OU U y -� O C y N N -C3 p cn U O N O C > t++ cd U O r bA 00 � -0 Y 'v, 3 � O N N cS cn L N O N y y rn cC3 In cd M 'O N s 3 _ L 0 -10 i' rn C� C •�, O vj T Coe) a—+ cz w '03 S-- 3 L 2 O U rCS .N co C O y i i •t7 a ti p N o 0 cd F- ° 0- n co M V 11—IY 11— I 1 0 r Md Ln N d Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 17 of 28 -0 >, `� L 'O 0 0 c �� ccd v V — -0 N C 0 �O + O :^ 'O 043'. = o °' N 3 N N 3 bA -p •^ > CS 0 0 p U S i O N C -0 O N Q C N cd > Ucd O to s N bA rn p cd cn C ccz O N 0 .LIP) O N N 0 Q c�4•dL 0 ° o �, 'O U a 0 y H °- s `~ s o o " __ a� -0 ° cd s c E Ln ` Ln OU = 3 e7 a) t C �, '0 CL y T , bA U N bA U 'L3 -0 cd O O -0 ¢ = cd cd En 0 L cn to a UC C N 0 '0 •U c3 "0 0. cd L cd O L— N U C C Ln = F" � o cd O L �, Ncd N V -0 N E U E f1 cd ej U cd N N cd O U O '0 U cOC 0 U L vUi N 0 vii .0 3 Y � a'� 3 3 Cd O , i>> O 00) n \ v7 L U •N ..0 � d CZ u o . :+ _ O ccS ti O N 'b L 'O 0 0 �� c v V V N C 0 �O + O cd M O O > N U cn N ti N cd > Ucd O >ES r N 0 .LIP) >U7 L cd Q L- + O u7 +� L U U En p U a 0 y H cd bA LLi Ncd — Cd 3 L cn to "0 0. cd L cd O L— cd o cd O L �, L p QiL "a C bUA 70 -0 L U LU 'A S_ U 0 vii .0 3 u U L Cd O , i>> O \ v7 L U •N ..0 � Y i p '0 :+ _ O ccS cn -b cd LL • C !_ O 7 4O = i a . cd O 0 •0 L Y o > = p _ th zC) 0-03 O 1 V J o > O id 0' cs >' L cd O � ca s c � > C,3:x aci _o is •cQJ � oo 0. O cd 70 -0 cd � �' x E N ccs > y bA cd 0 V) U bA > > -0 O r- �e O O vi 0 > U C's O ca L.° Ix 3 ss. 0CZ . zZi � V ° cd A c� = v V V a + n v on c L fS Q LL Planning Commission C August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 18 of 28 Eli O T � L on v a C y o V 0 O arm. A a O C cd n cd c 3 Y w S O °�' >> s i o U _o 4. '> O N C C N cn >, C-0 > O N _-' cz O 'O CN p I �' a s L y N C «f ty C n M cn C ,�, b U to cz >, O `� 3 0 a o _ cts -03 E 0 c �, to :1 - a U cd o o _ L O y p= s N cd cn cd w 03 � 3� o N Y° a L U N bn U -0 -0 cdM En to 'O M O .LJ —cd C aS cd C N u) N L- •� C T Q Y N � to C O N >_ � C O G L C > C C E •� •� C p �C cd cd cq3 U C ti 'O cn.. U 4. > Lj C i7 >> cC L cd N +�+ N L 2 c> °L' o 0 U v y on > i LC,3 U cn M u i U U) c > C •N U S].. U o Eli O T on v 4: C rn v V 0 O arm. A y ti O ... o S � i O C n :+ ••cd i•+ L ± 07 M y a cd w .0 3 L V3 L W L o C y b O �+ O U d i -o O 0�0 r- 00 U L O y p= s N cd cn C6 U O U c0 c � 4L.+ c 0 `n ccs s 0 O a� L C O G L C > C C E •� •� C • 0 •Y �C cd cd cq3 U C ti 'O cn.. O U Q3 C N bo 'O N N L O v y on > i LC,3 U cn M u i U U) c > C •N U U o L N •L .-, fi U N U ++ O J C Qi p C 0 a cu > a cn L �I U O 4^ C. U or 0 :) 4' ¢ C cd 'r} •Y is to N 0 C O C L 0 C C to L C O .� cUii • _ o 0 L Q N —•r- 0-^ -= a 0- N U — C O OU C ce cG cd U (n O Eli O T SaI�I�Od o;r Y J Z3 C F" N •I LL Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 19 of 28 v rn v n r S � i O C n y a w .0 LQ d SaI�I�Od o;r Y J Z3 C F" N •I LL Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 19 of 28 s 0 O cd cd zs N p 3 0 N cq Ltb 3 cd CZ U L Liw�cd OY U v� U N "O toCIS U) � C -0 U = 1U A cd 'A C ¢ X L L cd ct En A7 ca 0 p L'. L • 00 T- n. v — � c v � O C C C4 O U O U ' cn co L U r_ ..... bq cd Id 0. s 0 L 0 p N L _p cd E � C � bA L U O > cd b�q L M o ; 3 > O O o L N cd �rL� CO C7 C C1. G1. Cd O to U cY U O 4+ p cd L bA N U U Ecdrs C a� cn '0 " cd O CL C U cd > '� U cd '•.+ U O +� U E U U Q ar cn N N cn C o > O o U U c s bq 3 c o O s C cd E V U L a. O '.O U cd cd O pU U L w cd R cn UC � L O -0 • � Cd cd .� s ' cd L •� ''•� cd 'O > EnM CO cn -L7 C cn cc bA s W i C O 0 U ,� O y ti 1 r U > C 'L cd C O G — c _c� bn -o S- s c o `� r U U > u U C ULt 2 s cU3 cz vi bA cn C C = O A O U > cd to cd O p y 6 �'� f1 c 0- p > G Ln cd t7 Q% i J r 00 T- n. v — � c v � O C C O U O U � a a C 7 O C ate-. � r_ ..... bq cd Id > U cd N L _p cd E � C � bA L U O > cd U cq v O bA N > O C> L N L OL �rL� CO C7 C C1. G1. Cd 00 T- n. v — � c v � O C C -Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 20 of 28 v y V -Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 20 of 28 0 C �n N S O N O Ycid O 'O a. Y td ' yr Y 0 .s !� L [n U U=cnouo "r - s L C t 0 L cd L Y U N cz N N NO Z L O N []rA O O Y L cd I3. s cd M UEn bb Cd cd y ti y >1 • L .> L 3 Y 3 W to cd . O= O °; C L 0. ca p czQ fl C cd N a iU cd ca -0 •y XU crd �N'c3' �3 � YO 0 O LN Yc�d YN bNA FN pUOU ti NnIMLcd>1 p E cz p> E Y cn s i-+ i "7 bo ' cd U>l i. N A Y U cd U Y O y j, ' L O Ri Ca V] O Q U 3 X Li N L O O N L U N L (d Y O s t,C E'n h C3., cd = _ 3 Cn N b bn o 3 c' E L to a� td v-. Q- 3 c s >= U L sU.. 3$ N U cd C O U U N � `� bb ' _ 4 cd cd U 3 t: -0 4� C cid U '% 0 0 3 cd to r; cd cd Y O bA d) cnC >a CL O Cd iL sUU tdrA G , Cd s i ¢ G Y O Ll p ti "•'�+ 40 O L O N C r - En CZ a, ° 3 O U 0 N p U'- Y N F" >' N y to i NcUU •�+�' Ya ¢�; NCc ,i •> CZ O U N y o o to o O to y' LN41 Y M N U .j c 1 O E Cl. 0.-> r ° N 7:3 to ca sNO Y bb LCj c L o 0 3 3 v ami aNi -v °' c to ca U cqj ^ Y a N S bbh O 'C7 N cz i N +� >� C 'A p C O O i YU tL . N y O cn cd =U E E ch ON In C cd C cd O V3 '0 CIS r.4 Ec . vUUi L -o N y U N O O .� to °' U U �. •^ N y •� N N U > N s' U .> Y td N U C ,� cn p, to to to >> E O t7 N O N N cn p to rn �, rn O N cn +- N to C O U U U N U a On to iU OC>'0C yL Qo e-) U -0 Lncd o U ° O E U = cO p y U O M O ti S+- d cd U t p C= N N L L a+ sY• '�L cC •OC ~ CZ N wY O i K, Ct�CL N y w o >O L] NC 'NOO. -U O 3 U c o _ o� a U o 4t -d U o n cd v cd N O ; ti cn v o O 2 45 ci -0 C scO O YOO U o OO vCcd c� >•- TS N C > "� O i L U • C U s i, 3- U w as O C U r— O EA N U N A C U ti C p ✓ Cn U. C O �" > cd O¢ C Y c O �, O C L Z3 n N U Fn O C— cd N cOd C i L N 3 to U C U U tll C C y Q) C U C L A y U O IL O �n c3 'a cd N cC _n C3 C cd C cd C cn c C to L i N cd a d' 3' >, = U E- U u tD 30 �= C � c to c 'on > .__ °- o c °L' y �'� T} 0 s N L to N U i U N U C U O yam„ ^ OI "d o f1 'Y Cd L U _ Y td O a � td a. ..� -° v) to to a _ ° cn a c/)0- M ° >ca y salad s s Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 21 of 28 ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 22 of 28 FL co .... -T ... ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 22 of 28 X17 Z9 bl)`e� H .-. bA °� ... ' 0 w- 8 b t I 4-1 ® i i r 1 ff -r =_=— ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 23 of 28 U v7 O ca U � OL aD U rn U ZS 'a CCS L o_�=°o y - 3 � N O O C � U .� y U U O O 20 � bA N y 'cG �U ok � 3 L �� 00 = L 'O I• 42 O 2 cd 4- U CCS "a -0 C5 !n V N N Cn "O c'- U . U + L -0 L bA C u" I �O r- Ct ' L O bA3 r C O U b,V� LO a U t4 p y Q N � c-- C's O O V N 4z! � E Q 0 O = 2 -O UO i U U L N bQ 3 U U U CD O in U U bA y dY V) s O D U O q Q ° �° 3 O +- > i) w 0 v E y V_ C U (1. 0 �' OL y = � t c, N - .� o V) G! B U ccz U U O • -0 '� cii U U -0 -aa 0 c., X17 Z9 bl)`e� H .-. bA °� ... ' 0 w- 8 b t I 4-1 ® i i r 1 ff -r =_=— ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 23 of 28 >11 ,b -:I v o Ol bA a. O �© Vol pbA U q4 -d 4 •U O.c�d� bl) v cd W U q -I 4 i cr ''' � � � ,� � � t$i �" r `y � ✓, G3. O � ��., � � c� `-' • � � � tip V p w � ^w O 0 o y E S •ape ``„ 0 E rn Op 3 `} 0 o 0 ° .� -0" o U TJ s.. O O toFE r 400 -O >v a 0 d N >1ca � cd w 0 O 0 a Q C -d o. b .3 ca c ' L 4) '05 Ca C 0 C'S .= 3 O aUi >C a> C C N 0 0 Y C N E 0 = U C C's .Ln C 0 0 cd +p r) +U cn -n C - U S= ; cd 0 3 M U 'a Vi '2 3 r- 0 N � O 0• N Cd j cg O'O'a cz > 0 U U cd cd 'p .O C ✓� s. cd _N t: Q CC dJ O > � O cd U y i, � � �•-� .� cd 4-. 0 w 0 3 O F}y y OU •`1 — U •C _p =cm En O 6_ C �-•� 0 z 'O p O F, 0 W f•"' Up 0. 0- O a. ca � Q l "" iz ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 25 of 28 N 47 t -i � ill 'C3 80 O�j p, co °' ate, 4"46 ++ © .� v -n oar. 0.• c "' yip � Q"� VD . ��� 4 -q00 © b1i U I • 111M io b F? M M r Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 26 of 28 b �C 0��' O 0 o L OU � (23 s O t y C > cd O U N O O 'O N cd cdbo 4 (j U to O C O � •�, N bn T3 ���._ U 3 a� s E !U N cd U O 0 N UO coli Q i' c cd CZ obnO cu C N d' ;>� �, � i a� Y ' •i. � iZs N � TO 0 C O bA O O CIS 2 i/l i3 0 y O ccj: �, N —sey •� r -O L0-40- � 0) L C cd 0 C5 U > 0— s b s L _ 0 O c •� v •N in U '� ,� Y zQ z�QM.E0-czM 0. I • 111M io b F? M M r Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 26 of 28 cu .25 . 1 a ° o o U ° cd o U�H r as 0 I ME ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 27 of 28 y cn L O y N fl. '015 O 'L cC 7 • •>� 6' cd ai 63 V 30 N cd N bLA 0 ? .c NC pp b C • L � -p G b y°N L N •'O O ..0 C �-•I ti cd W ca U c O `� 53 y 3 bq vJ ° v� `� v�A "d =9 > . �- ct cl r- L _• Ln CLC cisp}u7 ° ca O Y U y y0 r N 45 C] y l O c U U r- {=1 O O 0— O p. OU U cn N cC L O U c', O -1-- O Q. U N > O•`n .0 y • c -'L r..� �7 A 3i.,• N •Ld U Q � N � O cd N U U Q> En -0-0 i ° — L N ti cZ CL > ct O c j i U O p� c co > d > ° Z OL cn U a Q ce i CE cd 0c/3 O O N 0 I ME ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 27 of 28 0 49 0 a� ° Q ° rl ZO N) cat 44 �y'}} CLO9 � y y q dy aU LM .oEms+ t3 '�u�i �' d C.7' p i pr � O O 1 V i saiai��d Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 28 of 28 a� V] CCS L ��•' L iC N O O y �.. CLC r O � c4.ci�s O =os o >0238 O �• .� 0 «3 -3 N c� r E y r JC = U s'x.. cz o Q, o c"&... o °�' 03 3 > M— Q bV c� 3 cd c o bAcd -. O C c U O L �i cd E N U iC 'NO O � � � � `� N O t20 ca F=1 cd 6 c3 m C i t QN En ' 3 03 > y t'� vUi -O cn bA CCS s L �..• 61)= .--f C cc'sU O _ C -a > c bA -o s L > N U cC Q > U cVC •= ami ti O a> �+. -O N � +L tiL _ 7 s c cz O w E(Z w v o bA n s �, cC �..• N 0 N N O C•N C O y U > cd N bA C •> cC O -a .Y UEh t?. C S? L 0 bA L LEi CC N U as cq3 " CC > .O +O- CC -0 cC i pr � O O 1 V i saiai��d Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 28 of 28 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner MEETING DATE: SUBJECT: June 10, 2019 (Updated with Planning Commission Results) ADM 19-6650: Administrative Item (FUTURE LAND USE MAP 2040): Submitted by the CITY PLANNING DIVISION to amend and update the Future Land Use Map. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM 19-6650 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to forward ADM 19-6650 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval regarding Alternative #—, and amending the Future Land Use Map as described in the attached memo." BACKGROUND: The current Future Land Use map was adopted by Resolution 116-11 on July 5, 2011, following the adoption of City Plan 2030. This map was itself an update of the Future Land Use Map adopted in 2006 with City Plan 2025, which was developed to reflect the principles and goals of City Plan. The maps adopted with City Plan 2025 and 2030 represented a fundamental change in how the Future Land Use Map functioned. Where Future Land Use Map designations were previously broken down by land uses that reflected conventional zoning principals of separate areas for commercial, industrial, and residential activity, the new maps incorporated key elements of the SmartCode framework, a development ordinance template intended to create context - appropriate urban design that can meld varying uses and create compact, connected neighborhoods. Among these elements is the system of environments known as the Transect Zone, where habitats are ordered from the most natural to the most urban. City Plan 2025 and 2030 took these zones and translated them into appropriate development patterns as expressed in the comprehensive plan to reflect the unique character of Fayetteville. These Future Land Use Map designations are: • Natural Areas (Dark Green) T-1 • Rural Areas (Light Green) T-2 • Residential Neighborhood Areas (Yellow) T-3 • City Neighborhood Areas (Blue) T-4 • Urban Center Areas (Purple) T-5 • Industrial Areas (Light Blue) Planning Commission June 10, 2019 Agenda Item 7 19-6650 FLU Map 2040 Page 1 of 4 • Complete Neighborhood Plans (Red) • Civic and Private Open Space Areas/Parks (Olive) • Civic Institutional Areas (Brown) • Non -municipal Government Areas (Tan) • Industrial Areas (Light Blue) UPDATES: The Future Land Use Map and land use designations as proposed herein are still based on the transect model. Staff's goal with this update is to use the existing land use designations and provide multiple iterations of the Future Land Use Map as potential scenarios for growth management. Each alternative poses a different strategy for accommodating Fayetteville's anticipated population growth, from the current discouragement of annexation for urban or suburban development to growth moderated by zoning and annexation tools that moderate the City's expansion with respect to the goals and principals of City Plan 2030. Alternative #1 represents the existing Future Land Use Map as adopted with City Plan 2030, and will be updated to reflect changes in existing land use since the map's 2011 adoption. This iteration was created following the economic downturn of the late 2000s and included a reduction of Residential Neighborhood Area at the edge of the City to discourage urban sprawl and a reclassification of portions of north Fayetteville to Urban Center Area to reflect its new "regional" description. Alternative #2 incorporates those changes outlined in Alternative #1 along with reclassifying large areas within Fayetteville's Planning Area as Residential Neighborhood Area. This is intended to reflect and accommodate the anticipated population growth of Fayetteville in coming decades in a deliberate manner. Additionally, adoption, application, and implementation of this Future Land Use Map is predicated on the execution of several proposed action items within City Plan 2040. Foremost among these are the development of a formal annexation policy to strategically and deliberately plan for controlled growth and the adoption of zoning districts that can be utilized to manage rural growth and maintain rural character at the City's outer edges. Significant changes to the map include: Extension of the Residential Neighborhood Area designation in to the Planning Area with respect for areas of increasingly steep terrain and limited development potential. o North of Highway 45 and east of Crossover Road/Highway 265; o North and south of Huntsville Road/Highway 16; o Along Dead Horse Mountain Road; o West along Wedington Drive; and o Northwest of Clabber Creek. Alternative #3 acts as a middle road, to include those changes outlined in Alternative #1 within the City's boundaries and a more moderated expansion of Residential Neighborhood Area in to the Planning Area. While also predicated on adopting a formal annexation policy and rural zoning districts, the additional areas designated as Residential Neighborhood area are currently contiguous to City limits, adjacent to City infrastructure, complimentary to the efficient provision of City services, or a combination thereof. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM 19-6650 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6650 ADM June 10, 2019 Future Land Use Map Amendment\03 Planning Comm ission\06-10-2019 Agenda Item 7 19-6650 FLU Map 2040 Page 2 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES Date: June 10, 2019 O Tabled M Forwarded O Denied Motion: Belden, recommending approval of Alternative #1 Second: Sharp Vote: 9-0-0 BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Major changes to the plan would require dedicated staff time. A full plan revision would require contracting with an outside consultant. Attachments: • Planning Commissioner Recommendation • Future Land Use Plan Iterations: o Current Future Land Use Map (Alternative #1) Recommended by Commission o Major Expanded Boundaries Future Land Use Map (Alternative #2) o Moderate Expanded Boundaries Future Land Use Map (Alternative #3) The draft Future Land Use Map alternatives are available for review as supplemental documents on your tablet and on the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas website at http://www.fayetteville- ar.gov/1216/City-Plan-2040. Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6650 ADM June 10, 2019 Future Land Use Map Amendment\03 Planning Commission\06-10-2019 Agenda Item 7 19-6650 FLU Map 2040 Page 3 of 4 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: THRU: FROM: MEETING DATE: Mayor and City Council Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner June 10, 2019 SUBJECT: Planning Commission Recommendation for ADM 19-6650: Administrative Item (FUTURE LAND USE MAP 2040) BACKGROUND: Following several meetings in 2018 and 2019 in which the Planning Commission functioned as a steering committee for the update to City Plan 2030, the Future Land Use Map, and Master Street Plan, complete draft documents were presented to Commissioners on May 13, 2019. Commissioner feedback was requested on each of the three plan elements outlined above, with comments, recommendations, and critiques provided over the following four weeks. DISCUSSION: Below are comments and recommendations proposed by Commissioners for City Plan 2040's Future Land Use Map: Currently, all proposed iterations of the Future Land Use Map include a designation of Complete Neighborhood Plan for areas associated with an adopted, locally -targeted plan. Commissioner Brown recommends that this designation be kept as an outline of the existing neighborhood plan areas, but with appropriately delineated Future Land Use Map designations (Urban Center Area, City Neighborhood Area, etc.) applied to the parcels within. Planning Commission June 10, 2019 Agenda Item 7 19-6650 FLU Map 2040 Page 4 of 4 CL a -0 CL d N > 21 0 0 = J ' ! f t Q z M> •� Q Ka d a r c 01 Kv R aR+ d_ y r m > }� z of U a U U U Z ti � Q oo aao��o . qtr - � • � _ �i • I �— r L . n I rp Lf sm m LO n Iqf MI Y fC ec a_ t i 7 Ing i C 17-s _ n- CML _ Oy L •• O O t i y ! O Q a Q. d E N 00 is J O r Z o d" w Y fC ec a_ i C d n- CML _ Oy L •• O O = d i y O Q Q. d E N 00 is J O r Z o d" w Q U a>.0 is w Z n'— 3 u> Q ca d ` w L CD = d Cc :; -0— Q a� R Z N 0 a d Z0� w U S U U U Z LL DoVo CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Chris Brown, City Engineer FROM: Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner Josh Bocaccio, Staff Engineer MEETING DATE: August 26, 2019 (Updated with Planning Commission Results) SUBJECT: ADM 19-6651: Administrative Item (MASTER STREET PLAN 2040): Submitted by the CITY PLANNING DIVISION to amend and update the Master Street Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM 19-6651 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to forward ADM 19-6651 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval, amending the proposed Master Street Plan as described in the attached memo." JUNE 10, 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: At the June 10, 2019 Planning Commission meeting, this item was tabled by the Commission to allow staff time to amend the draft Master Street Plan to incorporate Commissioner comments regarding, but not limited to, lane widths, an attached sidewalk street section, and a parkway street section. Staff subsequently submitted the item to the City Council's Transportation Committee where direction was given to staff to coordinate with the Commission to incorporate Commission comments where appropriate and feasible. A draft reflecting these changes is attached. BACKGROUND: The current Master Street Plan was adopted by Resolution 146-11 on August 16, 2011. While its predecessor adopted with City Plan 2025 focused on standardizing the street cross sections, classifying streets in recently -annexed areas, and increasing the number of Collector Streets, the update with 2030 focused on classifying streets in Fayetteville's extra -jurisdictional Planning Area, addressing alley design and use, contextualizing Collector Streets, and reducing right-of-way requirements for both Minor and Major Arterials. More recently, in February of 2016, the City of Fayetteville contracted with Nelson/Nygaard as a transportation planning consultant to develop a transportation master plan, entertainment district parking plan, and mobility report. Among the goals and objectives recommended in their 2018 Fayetteville Mobility Plan, Nelson/Nygaard emphasized the importance of contextual and complimentary street design that supports surrounding land uses, maintains reliable connections, and increases transportation options. Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 1 of 28 DISCUSSION: The principle goal of this update is to incorporate the findings and recommendations of Nelson - Nygaard and their Fayetteville Mobility Plan in to the City's Master Street Plan. This involved parallel efforts, the first of which was a reclassification of street types or typologies. While most cities nationwide, including Fayetteville currently, utilize the Federal Highway Administration's "functional classification" system of Arterial, Collector, and Local streets, these categories provide limited information about the street, how it relates to surrounding land uses, and how it functions from block to block. These designations and associated functional classifications under the current Master Street Plan are: • Regional Link — High Activity (Arterial Street) • Regional Link (Principal Arterial Street) • Neighborhood Link (Minor Arterial/Collector Street) • Residential Link (Local and Residential Streets) • Urban Center (sections adopted under the 2005 Downtown Master Plan) As it is not sufficient to simply rename these street classifications, the second major update to the plan was a full review of all streets classified within the Master Street Plan, whether within or without the Fayetteville's city limits. This was based on the two -fold understanding that some existing and future streets are "over -classified" and a build -out under the current Master Street Plan would not serve the mobility needs of residents city wide or compliment the needs of residents and property owners along these corridors. Accordingly, every street was vetted and many were re-classified. Examples of the most prominent changes include: Extension of the Urban Center street sections southward to Martin Luther King Boulevard Reclassification of the following from Major or Minor Arterials to Neighborhood Links: o North Street/Mission Boulevard from College Avenue/71 B to Crossover Road/Highway 265 o Gregg Avenue from North Street to Van Asche Drive o Deane Street and Mount Comfort Road from Garland Avenue/Highway 112 to Salem Road o Broyles Avenue o Double Springs Road o Deane Solomon Road o Persimmon Street o Oakland Zion Road Reclassification of the following from Collector Streets as Residential Links: o Stearns Street from Vantage Drive to Crossover Road/Highway 265 o Sunbridge/Reynolds/Strange from Gregg Avenue to Garland Avenue/Highway 112 o Raven Lane between Quail and Topaz Drives The final major update to the Master Street Plan includes further advancing the ability to create context sensitive streets through a flexibility of design. Each street includes an associated minimum standard based on classification, from which it may vary depending on surrounding land uses, proposed development, or relevant long-range plans. Among these options are the ability to increase lane widths to accommodate transit, removal of on -street parking facilities, reduction or increase in sidewalk widths, and modification of greenspace or parking for Fire Code compliance. Other notable additions to this flexibility include the potential for a required Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6651 ADM August 26, 2019 Master Street Plan Amendment\03 Planning Commission\08-26-2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 2 of 28 frontage and furniture zones. In urban settings, where buildings abut the right-of-way in particular the addition of a frontage zone or furniture zone creates a buffer for pedestrians from opening doors and accommodate street elements such as benches without compromising the mobility of pedestrians. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM 19-6651 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Date: August 26, 2019 © Tabled Motion: Brown, recommending approval (Second: Sharp : 7-0-0 Required YES ® Forwarded O Denied BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: Major changes to the plan would require dedicated staff time. A full plan revision would require contracting with an outside consultant. Attachments: • City Plan 12.2: Master Transportation Plan Draft — Presented at June 10, 2019 Planning Commission meeting • City Plan 12.2: Master Transportation Plan Revised Drafts o Redlines o Clean The draft Master Transportation Plan, Master Street Plan Map, and associated street sections are available for review on the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas website at http://www.favetteville- ar.gov/1216/City-Plan-2040. Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6651 ADM August 26, 2019 Master Street Plan Amendment\03 Planning Commission\08-26-2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 3 of 28 c ) V) R cz R c_ .r E—> >, c c �, t:o —_ -0 cd 3 �, ' N O c. cd 3 R oo o :a r N c vUi R U a+ U c/) a cl Cf d o -d R A R cid o _ S N 00 Q bA bA bA — Ln -C� o 0 p N c (.. O 'a cLd N U E N yr 0. C rV CZ cd 0N N kn �� R N O R ti > N Y rn r- 04) E 0 N ) V! p" y E. 0 0. o Y - r- _ °L' O In � n i _ 0 4: Y R c 3 (U "O a -a ) O 4- O cd R O L bA UCZ M L) Ln Y O U» N c O R in oQ bD R covu y 4. L p >, = chi N a 0 Y O _ 'L a- Y Ca O D bA U bA U O -0 N cd R> L R O y > N > cd � CIO L7. ccc O M �, �_ ate.+ .Y > O• U R N ,� O N U R C rn E U bA L c ti U �' Li. y U o i1 0 CL R i O R 0 �� N O U '� cn y O N U s V) -'O � > c R N .fl O ..c N U N bn �' V y +� U i? O bb O oU N rn R 0. R 03 a Q C/) Y N a 5 Q R R o p - R U 0 i 0.. c/) s rA L ( rA c Y R ca U O bA cR o U c N R O ' R (D O Q R rn >= R U CZ +L p OJ to U R U Y U U Q CL L Q 0 27 N bA y Y = U 3 O U a' GJ 40 U Y f to cd 4 c0 c S O N O a- O U '+ QL R N O O YO U N Lf N R R 0 bA cn y � z co N cd 0. �3 L A i C R cd E i c U R a a N •cd o s_ y > 0 0 ,c N O c O R bA R �'3✓. .� . � R Y O i L c�i) cn Y w R R U N O U y - O E N R N Y 0. c c O .y a o> a� N � C a� O O ti C rn 3 — bA rn Q' c o c a > U v cz O M 3 0. cn Oj Q 4L L rA 0 O c0 OL U : ^ N N L R R R "a ice.+ Q. Y U cn R U U N NL U Y CL cd D N CZ li E U U ca >Z Ln R cz N M r Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 \ Page 4 of 28 � r H c cq N di> (D 0 O N 1 M CO �_ 1 L •� S u ems- N .li'1' ' I 1 `� c 9 0• L m i. c c ) V) R cz R c_ .r E—> >, c c �, t:o —_ -0 cd 3 �, ' N O c. cd 3 R oo o :a r N c vUi R U a+ U c/) a cl Cf d o -d R A R cid o _ S N 00 Q bA bA bA — Ln -C� o 0 p N c (.. O 'a cLd N U E N yr 0. C rV CZ cd 0N N kn �� R N O R ti > N Y rn r- 04) E 0 N ) V! p" y E. 0 0. o Y - r- _ °L' O In � n i _ 0 4: Y R c 3 (U "O a -a ) O 4- O cd R O L bA UCZ M L) Ln Y O U» N c O R in oQ bD R covu y 4. L p >, = chi N a 0 Y O _ 'L a- Y Ca O D bA U bA U O -0 N cd R> L R O y > N > cd � CIO L7. ccc O M �, �_ ate.+ .Y > O• U R N ,� O N U R C rn E U bA L c ti U �' Li. y U o i1 0 CL R i O R 0 �� N O U '� cn y O N U s V) -'O � > c R N .fl O ..c N U N bn �' V y +� U i? O bb O oU N rn R 0. R 03 a Q C/) Y N a 5 Q R R o p - R U 0 i 0.. c/) s rA L ( rA c Y R ca U O bA cR o U c N R O ' R (D O Q R rn >= R U CZ +L p OJ to U R U Y U U Q CL L Q 0 27 N bA y Y = U 3 O U a' GJ 40 U Y f to cd 4 c0 c S O N O a- O U '+ QL R N O O YO U N Lf N R R 0 bA cn y � z co N cd 0. �3 L A i C R cd E i c U R a a N •cd o s_ y > 0 0 ,c N O c O R bA R �'3✓. .� . � R Y O i L c�i) cn Y w R R U N O U y - O E N R N Y 0. c c O .y a o> a� N � C a� O O ti C rn 3 — bA rn Q' c o c a > U v cz O M 3 0. cn Oj Q 4L L rA 0 O c0 OL U : ^ N N L R R R "a ice.+ Q. Y U cn R U U N NL U Y CL cd D N CZ li E U U ca >Z Ln R cz N M r Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 \ Page 4 of 28 9 Y L � C i N 4- V) O y 'r- MN O bUA j, O c� C lz C�l v' ypCd L Y T U v U c ✓ O •Z pbA Cdu L' Y 3 U a% W 4 bA ca Cd o_ iL+ o En cd bD p 0 + Cd '7 >C4, L YCU aU _pC. C , 4. r- 40— `° p a E y,,, � ;>,'" O cLd cn C C. U 0— U cd 0 = 2 3 -o — „ cd C o ° v N °L' >. CZ' p y V) • L O V, O U L Q L •� E 12 ocj Ln U •C Q Y E di -p U mcn v s � 0Ld u � CA . 0 o a -o to 0 CA 3 0 ca. C :ti p a0i >, z 03 QO•� U +O . � I ca. i- > o Q cd E cn JZ N(n Cp O°d 7 y. U OL • r 03 U000 —r -V .0 = N �• E O i M U Y NYU'' .3 S t „� 42 ' E °' L >, L Y a to N L U bn -� a� M 3 t v� c c M" o 'L ° w Y 3 Q ° 4n � E M (n°' 0 En =+UCCN••� UC [Y UL UN U U3d dU•• Yt:A [n pC 0rU--� +O - U ,Z: cn U Ci 0 > •_ LC • "ZI UU OLd 6 Cd C4, cz ° �cr w En n � U L0-0Ln V) W C U "U U p-Sd UU n Oo LUL L. U M CAU UL sUL- .. Ln ° rA C o C c UO U C a= C LYn V o iN+ C Y U LEn ,L y U C cd O -p yUX•= y cn F -s o uc� i d C y t C L 4' C U C U U U 4.. O s = Cp p Vi L cd cz Ln L O E p Q E C U C L Ln U •L "p U p L ° Lcd .0U L2 Ld y C U C U � .p T 7 U -a cz C >> U t C ti to O U C p N L' C bA O L "O cd p U V) Ln Ln C C rte- Ld C (z+ '> O C U O Q O C i 'O (4)° U U O C � 6 to .2 LO L O Ln Ln C Ln ti EC cn C' bA u >. C a- O C C Y LUi� C ...� ' Y U cz r U 3 i UU. O + n00- .a O CCcz U C. _. U C L y U r° CU O *1 Cd ) UCd O C. Vcd ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 5 of 28 4-1 Ln Q; p Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 6 of 28 L U En 0 o = > ; 3 o = L � � Q 3� _ cd o cC� bA O. En G .. bA 0 0 c cj CLM 1 4. O a U O t3' -a > > "Y> cd O 'd cn a0i Q 0 . L a� Y Z7 N U c O C7 > O CZ xo E N •.� Q)N {.. cn C - 0 U O = cd O 'O +� U o U U -0 U E + "O N U 4- %r cz _+ O O � cd U 4- U E M — U ti +L• N � 3 a0i cC � 0�D in ow L ca — U U O M .0 c o 3 ca aj tMO E•0i� '0 N • L L O E y.., > ^� (a o > Y 34cd U C) N -0 C,3 ° ca cz y U i, U_ s N 0 0 O p0 s rnE O cdd L Q ^ t U N 0 cd O •_ bA 3 2- C L c s 0 ° U E 0,bA ED .O xrA fl. � E N n � U > O c 3 y U N O U ca o c 0 = L 0 U R$ N O { y O V O i. E •� s 3 � � U n. U > O N O Y U o ML - En En U v7 >� b bA •� � •3 •E � 3 x > CU a� .N 0 E > U to O O U ?� ca in E O Y 3 O U '0 E U E L 4Q U O M E oU O V1 d y O s0 0 ca +:+ U U U ca -• � -0 cn CJ �n •_ B y ca(403 s1 U U O •�yU U � L � � W Q �-• U U bA i ..D 'B 'O L U En 0 o = > ; 3 o = L � � Q 3� _ cd o cC� bA O. En G .. bA 0 0 c cj CLM 1 4. O a U O t3' -a > > "Y> cd O 'd cn a0i Q 0 . L Y Z7 N o N 0 O N xo E N •.� Q)N {.. cn N 'c U O = cd cd o o U U -0 cz a E cd 3 U ca cz _+ T cn > ca cd U 4- o -0 4' o � 3 a0i cC � 0�D in U O "C a U ca o -0 >, tMO '0 N • L L O E y.., > ^� (a Y U .O L 0' ca c U 0 0 O p0 s fl U n ca c«; Q ^ Cc — to E ' c 0 L ° ° C L c . o o cl 0,bA O 3 y a O E N n 'O i. U Ca O c 3 E U ca 0 = o c 0 = -o U '- L U En 0 o = > ; 3 o = L � � Q 3� _ cd o cC� bA O. En G .. bA 0 0 c cj CLM 1 4. O a U O t3' -a > > "Y> cd O 'd cn a0i Q 0 . saiai�od - Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 \19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 7 of 28 L Y Z7 N o N Q cd o O N xo C�3 N U •L U O cd cd cd >, > U U -0 -0 U 4_ -0 0En v, = ca o o cz _+ T cn > ca cd U 4- N O L .� 0 L E 0. U � 0�D in saiai�od - Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 \19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 7 of 28 a cd C M cd 3 U 0 o c 3 -5- 0 4:— O O N OI y -Z (i cam^ c to s cd 0 CZ 0 E O w O C ti U N q-0 cz 3 >, czca c�-s = U 0 N C a L O Ca O p C U tnT ON y CKS QJ -0 L S i a � Z < 3 E- °cn) cn o c Q L .� 03 c U c^ � o t7 U O j�i Com+ ca -a o w> n s n ami 3 3 C > O C B �O E-a C 'O Q« S p 0 O U vOi , �, S O ti 1 bAEn En U i CL a vUi U y N s C L U il. U to 0 ca ca U i >1 -0 t1 bA L 0 II. tT t•�• 10 0 MN ca r o s Q �? ` 3 �o N :oo L aci �O N ca N 'L3 U x L U to _O i Ci, cu EQ. U ca > A ca C ca G, C U ca O U O O C _ COCO •[cq^" = (� s •� .� Ri Lam. L 'd > a 0 3 3 U)Q"C:d, s D ca <1�7 Iii ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 8 of 28 cd o L E O G U cn '- on = O Y. ? C CL "a ca O cn C V L U Ca L iU.+ cd i r- 0 V 0 CZ 00 'O bA In h 3 U L c a+ L U cn o ° 3 03 O 'O p N U L O L O Y O > to y.l � bb7 C'S C S s U Uc"z V cn to C � +.•, � N L i U y LO M � V, U o U U cd c g EA CL En U v En s U •s. In Y In 1 N U .� U j w s 3= U c o 'v U i 'O V U aL.l ca to C U �•= vi LZ cc M O L Ca 3 Ca c� c- U > U 14 U C C p al O 'Y U ° p 3 bA N_ p U 0 oU a. a. a o ca cz <1�7 Iii ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 8 of 28 13 0 0 Q Sa1�I�Od] Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 9 of 28 o � Y a 4_ N O "a cd cr N Y TS bA N LbA L C •� C O O cd C YC Q. 00 N 'A c 03 ° = OL o t� v cd o O c (dcd ° Ca -aU V) aj U N U .a .a cd O O Q En cj C'S u7 C cC O a. a--' U C U •a N o.- O cd M '0 OD z7 o 0 • L ¢ o c C 1 E U 45 N ° °L' vUUi >1 cd Cd.> 0)C', O N L L O -a M C O L ,, bA 13 0 0 Q Sa1�I�Od] Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 9 of 28 � Y �O cd w o o Z s 3 UE a� U_ > L O c (dcd -aU V) U C> U cd O U cd E y L Y O > O U3 U r •� •N _ •!A L ¢ o c C 3 L :- . c. .0 U vUi O 'a 4.4 V) 1 O -a C O L ,, bA N L cd cd >�. 3 ca. N (D.Y N U Y cd En • 'a a. cC`•• cd ,n > 0 4'" O L N .a O U cd O 0 cd bA ca 'L a N L (D L y, N c—d .O O�... M .a m O v7 'a C) � � J U � 3 W cd O .> bb O U v c/) L N . v7 T} cn Ln E L c3 Y O C;3 Y U U L j p U C;3Up, 40-. c3 = N > O v� N L N O -i • 0 GJ U L � ,n N U U � O bA a s� Y > bA iA U a o L O N Z Q N Z U c3 .� 11 c¢ 13 0 0 Q Sa1�I�Od] Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 9 of 28 c cd cd > Y -v Q -0 c 3� 3-0 � 03fl i N 4, 3 O C y c N O O C�j CC bb O to c3 >,En O 3 >7 ° o- cz -v o o � i cl E cd pV, 0 •�, c 3 U) 6s o a ^ U N y C13 .fl pN � cacdQ CA V) c� cz i ti MO V O 4 > U y � .� C .� � .yO .i � •� y ,� U OU "d cn Lo - ca U ¢ 00 •� • • • 00 M V— ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 10 of 28 = c;3O L. Q O cn j.., 0 �O O r - O O czy ti M >, E bA bA p ca C 3 .-0 O v E M c C,3O ^AT a M c cu y � bA 0 O � c � •v 'Od 'O M O cd cn O bA O o > C > > o �" O > . s.. O " E L L c� U • L c ¢ ccd E > �,� O O O p O p L � U .�L O . U cO 1; cd L cdC cz p cn t7 M ..0 S y � o c E> � � c E o c c ca >cqjal .� E u -a , .c c _ O O U C O a? E C Qh O 0 c� Y _ t: " >> 0 > ct , C, =N L>•. O a. o 0 U O 3 > 0 Ln Ua. � y O C cn C cz O O i O L O U N cG Q +� i y O ' U 'cj U 75 1 O _ U vYi 110- O> x _ ft1 4- y Q p p > C c" C c) O p vi N O C) C% cG '�.:� > M > O N C r L p N OEj) cn C •O •O •O 72 Li cn O °� O v —C o O CL cC r U O 00 M V— ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 10 of 28 O U >, C O G cu O czy ti M >, E bA bA > Y t� o O C,3O ^AT cd cu bA O O > c� 'Od 'O Q. O M cn O bA O > C Z3 > 0� s.. O " E L L >Z� ¢ ccd • 00 M V— ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 10 of 28 saio��od i i -'- Planning -Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Pagel 1 of 28 � L 03 O cd y ice. E L C 3 b L o> o C 4-. o a jj "O = -0 cl E L Lyfl- to . 0 CAyA� >n L ycCn O cd y to s. . N cdC N C n cd N C U -0 O 4WN V, L O�C j yU ycd O• Ln cd U y "a. Ncc � r cd 'O sC bA = O N > cd T7 N O.- 0 C U N N C N C >' O C cd 0 a. ^O cd O al 1 N M. +- -o E u'" y V U�� > -O N bb U C C -a V cd y cz C > i O N �-v °C7 Q,`0. i Cn cd U y y E4 ¢2.� ` Qom. saio��od i i -'- Planning -Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Pagel 1 of 28 Cd ice. E L 03O O C 4-. L o L U N CZ3 —, N C n cd N C U U O •�—, V, L C cd C �••t;A N y U y C N V Cn Ln -0p cd RS Cn L N cd > U U ti Q y E4 ` O •� > C N 0 > RS bA O Y N cd N U cd 0_00 •t7 O U y L as cz N N C L C 6. •� > ,z .O v :d •L �• cd > En 3 `d C bA t cn cz O U > cd C � ,Y C N C• y:. C O n � ca "G O cz ca OCd •.N.1 Q) � L . U _ Q� > b_A N U 4 cz bA t cz , c >= C/) 7 O C •�' U C a� C C C O U > cd t:A cd bA O N -0 >,:y_ a C 31 cn bA 's.. vUi U C cd N CdO > —0 4� V)L 0 i.L. cz —a y saio��od i i -'- Planning -Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Pagel 1 of 28 (n U Q) s U U L > En n > L 0 „ o O O L U Q C U �_ ZS O N J � U U ' � L N � U L > N c L C,3 En -� 3 > U o .> L W OZ No �N w Ow Z d Z 0 w J J Q Q W w 30 c� i O T i i i Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 12 of 28 L • O 14. N �' Cn _ U L L Cd V] N c Cd C;3Zn L CA L O 'O cz > 4•-+ cd O U U L7.. O h C •� U V .�? " N= L N cz c�S Q O . !? foo .�Ycd�300(z X y A U U O O 4� O L V) M k O C U _' U Q fl U O 3 U w U o U cd Lam, Q 3 rs �_ s' � M U- N' N SU. C}., 4� U C L U O U U C C CdL OL y > L=r O O O i O '0 . 3 U `n U O vi TS O O U ti Md U n L. `' "0 O C c(is .� L y >1 U !n 'cn O 0. Q cd Cd cd Cd U CL II O (13 L L cd L U cd Li. Cd Li. Q U L W OZ No �N w Ow Z d Z 0 w J J Q Q W w 30 c� i O T i i i Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 12 of 28 Q 4-j U o) 0 Q Q Q a a 4- w QJ .{...i V) I. - QJ N V) Q /] MO[�"Od 0 a ►� rn Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 13 of 28 a) Y a) U) o y M N cn Y O AO cn (A 0 Yn °U � C3 -a C� V) ti pN L CCf Y 4; Q) cd Q) fn > >' cn Q) Cn cc Q) s cC Cn U L E N Cc Q E •� t > �' Q) k N Y N cC C _p U Q) CC> L Q) GC y Ll. . •.• Y , sem. Q) C Uca UJ cc Y O CZ Y CIS Es tn p a C U Q) L" L .a bb 3-Z s L c �, cr O _ cd >-, zt N 3 y o='� w cd CA Q) cd r Cn p 3 cc cC 4- 0 Cn o s C a. C c= 3 to ' s o F- cz Ln �, cC U L L 3 -p a) al C O D U cd L >' C n p y -U bA •- 4 . y 0 U 3 .°'� a 424 a CCS C1: o -a" Cn -a En 0 3 M ti G.tn cz M Y Y L ca E Y i SCa cn L Cl. p Y a 0 V).; ti Q)C,3.2 Y O -0 CC +� 4� `O O i- rn U � o ( a- a .3 O 0 � � C � L .�- � .yam, > ca CC E caO fl.. Q) 0 4- � Q) &- � � o O Q n Y Y Q) N .0 0 O Q) c: �] cC > 0. O C C N � O U 4"' ° a L 3 3 3 Q N Y `� 0 r _ °_' C o 3 U 0 cc C -0 -a a — c G s a 3 — cw. 'd0.am E .0 0 > °�;s •3 = Q) O 0rq. Lbb N p Y c s sV to c sU tsA cca . L-0. s, L s w cs, a i' 4 fl. 4- U ° 'a U O z +y+ fn o 'Y 4- Np Q) cc U CCi (n Q) cn %' > V U p- :3 cd 0 Q) (C y `n C -a Q) N Q)U. Q) p C U L L , a) L O - > .i. Q) L 0 N > N Q) L N U Y cCi Q) N .Y Q) N Q C Q) 0 -0 O LC1. En �-0� 0 'a Y C L CA cC E""'' W g o n n a •� N �' C -cn >' E Z c co a) aUi cYCi U C a) cA v, O Y cd o x a Y a) te-. a U CLU 4--+ y U Q .a O° Y Q) L O D cn C O C rN UO = -� C= � CCS p— Q) vn O cn En C N LO v� a N Ci" a O •+' ..t= ca t� a CaN 'A vai •� _ M 0 ' cn Y a c cc • V Qjcn 3 Q) c En 0 V O ; U CYC Q) L O rn i U O ' V U CCi _ %• o cC " Q) Q) C N O vi ,�., L = ctt x t t i C Y + t� U O a) i° �' p Q Co 'c 3 ° v, v o -c L o cn o -0 on Y -a L. ° 4° a3i _ = 3 a ' V LO,° r cc .0 ^y� a� a U T ?CS W a O r O Q) `+- a n'� fir CZC O C`n O' CC • i> U a cC CJ U U CC Y CC C tW ""' O Y wJ c0 L O �n cis..a ,nC n i i cn C r a U' C O= Q)CYC Y CA U> i 0. r-= C45 N C UO OcO ci U cc U L U C_ Ln a.G M cc (n O p o m. = U C K.,.. . MO[�"Od 0 a ►� rn Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 13 of 28 7 a CO M i a a o� V) i Qj a co N i ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 14 of 28 ai N Cd C7 i -Z3 -00 cqU O > 3 CL A -�—a O = c = O V) -o -0 a� c;3U ' N cd NN N N SIL. Q) O 42 Y cd _ C cz 3 U C E •O U ^ cu O O > N C —C,3 3 tp- O o i "0 ^p O cz U cd O 'r - cd Ccd U U O UN E L Q) i �O Y bl cd O bp U E b0 moi. X N CL U) U O > U U O U L to Cd N O L cz CA >= O bA O V (U Y LU cd OO a U U O +L, Ocz Y O U Ui L N U bA N Y X bD 3 0 3 • U Y O n U U bl) > C i o V s cp O � 3 � b r Ln 23 > cd N O V OO C U O. O oLi- U Y N 'Z cd y 'O o cS ,c= 'p .0 !?. � •� � LO tD L Y N N N F- bA LE -p a T I` M 0 5_ Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 15 of 28 .a b 0 v 3 N—_ s✓ c O N >> CCS UN N E cd L Y O N L �> , = c •� „O U 3 ca a c > •0 o E o 3 Qa = cd c-� cd 3 o 4: x'�xQ C > U `zS o M '> U b0 .0 N 1 Q d cc O bU Q. aso bio bA N N O c Q) N L 0 C;3 o s�� p 3 Y° Y > U U L N> -Z3 t7 Q O Mcd U v D U iC a O S=.� bn 4. -O C O O ^p > O ami o E N }, cz -a -O L U N C£ U Cd > M O N cs ..o N N C T I` M 0 5_ Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 15 of 28 I A I► ming -Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 16 of 28 L ao c v J Oj _ u d o � d T � G O r I O xbA + G p h o � b •� v C 7 v -td C O O t > 41 y v u u r O 3 O H yu J C3 N 0 v n cz a� y •y r O 3 i0 x O i O C .O O �O-1 It I A I► ming -Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 16 of 28 O cd "O O L ca 0 CA cd U E Ln � G v E C v a.s U r--• L O 0L E E o C c� C O -0 cc 0 O v 0 L 0 Y -0 ca ca U k M C y Cn L O '3 O 0 •X E O N v L �+ U v U L L y O \ C > c�U cd O yr O Vi .r cn cn o •� 0 3 v C O v �--U O L' L L n L 3 N a Eni fn O CA C � v CCS T L a-+ cz 4 C o i 0 a O 7:1 C O U y v F OU a 0- O 0- O y-+ a� O k-: 1 v "O U � •c ti CZ N � � L bA •� v 'C > c0 ca v > O a+ Ca. ca � sr O M O i- cd a O i 'd s v 0cz O > s r- 0 'O iZ v cd -p U v C 0 X bA C y L Q- O Q v c fl ii bA L fl a>1 4^ v C i +••C -- .D fit..M• C ca >, v N CC 0 C 00 caE CC N +5 G s -Z33 °�' D v c N o a°'i , 0 s i= c3 4– C 't3 S]. C E E .1E C O 1 a. 3 0 N N cn O L C v O �O � o EL O C _ > v ._ +. co .0 •� tC.. j C 'b N C4 0 3 3 U E rs, 3 a. 3 cn '� Q C C Ca tb M t 0 3 c J ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 17 of 28 M M U' r. r O O t � �A to z F � Q tb M t 0 3 c J ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 17 of 28 cz O a V U O cz N � L >' tj)O aL� a s O C fl E a r- 03 s 4 cc ca fl aN.+O U U E y0 ct bA U cd >; >, bA .. Lr- � .1 N p cG L Y U 00 d O ca U C bA = +�� O C c� O N > S= U O op •3 O U.ca aU U �b�5 cG > cG O. > i C3 > a O -, O> g O C O to >N a •� i O i1 U > >' c� c7 a. S cqs C1, ¢ cd • • • W? 4 O ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 18 of 28 c 3 -- se a :° 3 s O = G�' O 4U Y N .� COG ,� U O a N O I N N bA s: a� c>u w cG O (UA C Y 0= ti 0 v cd O U bA p O cOG > U •±j 20 E _ O y� C Lcz cn O O N 3 ..._ ' N to N O O ,O CJ = >U -OL tni cd' 44 N fC`1 U a aO O O NcG cd 0 D 0- 0 abCAt to U N atboA O . _ O czU O _ CG .Yr. L.aMU bA ^C) '6 U O Y L to y a U a i 4> E M� U/] i U U- CG >' '- cG V) (.,0 O > a O O cG O U cG O L -p bA OL to CG U U L U L CG cz O a V U O cz N � L >' tj)O aL� a s O C fl E a r- 03 s 4 cc ca fl aN.+O U U E y0 ct bA U cd >; >, bA .. Lr- � .1 N p cG L Y U 00 d O ca U C bA = +�� O C c� O N > S= U O op •3 O U.ca aU U �b�5 cG > cG O. > i C3 > a O -, O> g O C O to >N a •� i O i1 U > >' c� c7 a. S cqs C1, ¢ cd • • • W? 4 O ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 18 of 28 L �O O t O EU > w Y 0tin ti 0 v •� U U cOG > U •±j 20 E L > ..._ .N .r N O ( Q C0 'V U O 44 N Y > CG bA Q (n Q >cd Y Y L to y a L7 CG >' '- cG V) (.,0 O > a O O cG O U cG O L -p bA OL cd U L U L CG � bAcd "� T= O to � N O OL i 10 'tom a v U O O C C'3 Y O a N M Y Y O O U L U c3 CAi o c3 CJ U U cz L O •> ice. CA U •— > ,O O U z C 0. cd cz O a V U O cz N � L >' tj)O aL� a s O C fl E a r- 03 s 4 cc ca fl aN.+O U U E y0 ct bA U cd >; >, bA .. Lr- � .1 N p cG L Y U 00 d O ca U C bA = +�� O C c� O N > S= U O op •3 O U.ca aU U �b�5 cG > cG O. > i C3 > a O -, O> g O C O to >N a •� i O i1 U > >' c� c7 a. S cqs C1, ¢ cd • • • W? 4 O ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 18 of 28 ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 19 of 28 L Cp cd Ccd 7:1 3 -o U cy O p -o c 3 = y -In cd Z3 L O N O Oc C U d N O our +�- O c' cd 3 cz Ob V) L O c c av CZ U r E CS o 3 ii _ p N E '�' O 3 L .p N U� ti 3 �,cd o t c/)-0 U N ct p y C "O UL U i= +' � CS U O p cd t:: cd G N cd C �'U FL A cd O O C cn = c, L oC7 O S- U Z3 c O ¢����¢ C. cz L E O ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 19 of 28 Cp U .z L O U cy O cl [n cn L cd CL cd O N -v y v, 3 O s a. f- CA L � Ln 0 T3 TJ cd c 3 L (n cn O _ Wes c •- •b �N O $O Y C '—O 3 V U .> v v ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 19 of 28 N U N i y 0 cd cl [n cn L cd O • V y� cd N M c�U 4. N a. f- > � Ln 0 o -M s 0 O > c CA• 'E E E M y Y C '—O t y Q O cd U V)N hA C/) > O M s cd cd O O C cn = c, L oC7 O S- U Z3 c OL N i a. C. n. L E O ¢ a t:Cd 'O N CL > L cn ccpC N L G cd U •V N vUi O U cd O S U O a• U N N N " t` > C U N o YO .� (Cf Q cd 6) U O O > N cn Y cn — in � cd O •U � N U �_ . U �q .X i Gam•. �' ¢ r) > = C cd a C — N -O •_ vi _ C 1 O cz N tD w N a LQ _ Q) N C4U rr ^ CC cd cd U v4 ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 19 of 28 N U y > O U cl SJ O N cd CZO O Y ca N M t) a. f- > i cd o c CA• O N > M y Y C '—O t y Q O cd U V)N hA U > O r cG C "O L oC7 aU O OL N i 0. C. n. ¢ a . ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 19 of 28 N I cz v W i G � c nn y � r � W C � T Z ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 19 of 28 v y cA -yu _ N O cu a cS cd +�- y 'A � > O p0 U Y 3 LU ' c L° f— CN> U G y r L 0 3 0 >, c O c ^p s L O cCt `� Y u U a Q. a• u C cu ape cd; totp s >, ti a O to ° G u Y c. ..0 p — p• c3 --a C "O >, CZ -b E p c,3 .¢ N > 0 _p czcd " O 'Ut:> cu N CU cu L v 4 c W C U p Y cu -0 cn i tp -- O N > cu r J ° c > to cA 3 O N O C N C>, fL N cru A A N 3 H p d Q N -C3 sU.. G U L N U > -a C C� U N 'fl 'C C TJ C U N Z7 _SLC > cC N v F G ca .a • • Q c� • d 4i 3 n d I U d Y Q) N C N Q L p Y CA cu Y N O �••� Ln o G (} 0o°> C 3 b I o En L Ri _ i N y N , .4 .v. U O � y 3'•' � fes; � � �r 1 C N cn Y CI , p ' O cl' G u N cet i 00 O ,O C/ Y Y N O O M car Y Y N e O p c - c 3 cn?� a o _ L Q. W L _�) - \ I U (5 cu O O cu cu " I E O %J 4- _ L C cz 4) -v UFc'ses-_L Y t -u V) L a N > C Y > i vi 6 cd cu En cz I-- -a C U L C O a rz > v Y C U y0 cUu Cn y C vi .� ( \��� ^✓ ..._ , ¢moi GCiti O C •_� N C U C ��---.-•___ _ ___._ -- .__ __._ _._ -_._ 00 C C C O U> cu to al CA O -p >> Y Q. C Q_ = u N Fir iY > C� ft3 •" LA - n' O Q ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 20 of 28 V) O U 1p V) N O N Q a a a N -tea V) i QJ Q N Q ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 21 of 28 U E O O O cd cn &Ej ON0 (C1a) cn En cn U p U 4r=✓ V) p p �N as N N L> a U s 3}="'n d Vy-)y cn N O u. NCa co. (A ca 0 t: 3 c`di W to ca o i=. E y cn Rs o s L^ o cd L -0,rj cz U o �? � +' U L- bA E 3 y w 3 Q y p O U to 0 ca = y p cn = 3 3 p ca = 3 �, Y U x 0 b42 n • ° g = o N 4- 4r >, L' p cz cd c4 a' 0 V 3 N = a� N .S+cn O j C cz 42 O p vCi ?� _ c3 a _ 3 Gn • 4. cd Ca U cq a L O a Q � cd N E Obcn � ca ti ca E L Q L p sL. p o bA U J u) � c6= U Q = y a cu 4) Es cd C1 p N U -0 = Ca �' L 4� O CO Vi L 0 N •�, _ _ _ r-+ = E ^ N 'L 40 p (� N -0 N cd ti y O O _ U_ �j E a. a� o cu T c ] 03 0. o t- • _ O �,0 En s_ > ' O bA N -' N E = y V ~ "Cl. = cLd L- bncz 3 3 Q c Q c ca 0 °a p _ 3 U 4 cd U O O s bA N Q E o °' � y 3 o=° s L ani cA r.+ L N N• N bA L • >' �C_a 3�, UOE p = O+o c &- a 0 = Ld a Gn o c a-�� En� o cz °cd a`�i cid y c 0 0 � � y U 0 =o p cd � r In L -o > °' > L" -0 U> a Ca A= N° G i U yV a) l U bzlo vi O = Q O D ca cd O I U -0 cj 4. c4Ur o orA E ° y cz Q cn O =O = N " O C L V LI)N 6' cd 1C1 cd C}., Cn S .a a. (n L CC L• .? fn a>'a 4, Ca 4 • = = O L O=� �U � 0U O c O Oc N N O pYU `a En aL E W o (Am 045 -3°a '0�= -oU_ E ° i c � � ° °En c- cd bn = bA o -o Y _ u = 3 -° • U a ° �° Cn U c =�=a w cen v = O O En r >° _ •� C L N +-' = 4- O ° cn n _ Ca = LS . r bn • iO O -o o N y a .� ca R rr = ,� bn = bA �? U 3 s �+ , +' L .0 O C s. U o MU U O N >�. i? H to p 0 " C" Ca 7 O a+ S„ w, ' y r LL r —= pA O 7 ct o n. a -0 cn v W Z o v1 L a ' M . 'n ss .a ca u � .� � L N Q ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 21 of 28 ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 22 of 28 M N ° " R4 4 , 1 r'1 C cn o,A �n E. sa��i�od Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 \ Page 23 of 28 U � U � cd U U 0 L o a� O U Q. o 3 R -_ O -o cd cdL U O U U Y c3 U a. 4-„ -a N N L gEc-d�c8 U con O O -0 to � s cd M 3E C U •?� rn O N O > ^_ U . � tC v7 40- 0 CIS CF. 0 cd 0 yy Q C y U 00 0 bo L o to cd y' c" vii N > v D to C) V T >✓ y O U > > 00 U U O d7 O U U � O U U U t y b �G OA y ' "O 0 p CD 0 bA 0 U E v En s o 0 c� U L O += �CC 3 a [n 4 G N `Q -00-4Z- o 0 cd G pq u V L3 C O zi .ch IA U ti L N C U U bA i fl -.0 '0 C3 M N ° " R4 4 , 1 r'1 C cn o,A �n E. sa��i�od Planning Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 \ Page 23 of 28 CD o bA td cto±4 40, CD QJ vl © O ' v, as v y ,' �? G Gci m .� M' 1'"-17 -11 V 4� H O O to U R� (U rr�^ vl Planning ion Commiss [ jt��*� J►�,'�p� August m ion Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 24 of 28 o�o.o L � r V C O L �+ d Q 'O O V 15 7 U U O � 'a C ¢ O � E G O 'O SU O U ccri O 4 y E c o 0 U O C U 7 U > . !=Q sU. 0 ctt ) N > 0 cu,C� y U> 'D Ocl U N C�i d" LO E bA m t cO s cn N •�U Y a> N N U O bA ��s on�.N•3 O aoi <c s s L MO 13 1-0 U U) U U L s CA y _ cz U Q> L CC N o a Y '_ CA U) c13 0 0 . cq U In U L aU, _ > h L 't7 aL �s � O rr�^ vl Planning ion Commiss [ jt��*� J►�,'�p� August m ion Agenda Item 5 19-6651 MSP 2040 Page 24 of 28 C13 O N c L S E E ° c o -� 3 c E O o 0 O c O ,, 't} E V O i L N CCSL +�-. Y ,� >? C C0 a N Y y 30 U Cti cC B U vi u' N O cd N C11 'O CU Ln cn 3 Rs c = bA � is N p 3 GAy j pU .y U ,� C N U Y U Tf i O t C�3 L O U N '"' �] 'U•' _ U) cn • i � .Y �+ L � r-1 O y A-0 s y- 0 -103 c y En L o ami b id a� oE >= L on ami �' Rs vN, c c vO -a c :y V cS O in C3 + L [�t m�_, a. M c -.L E •- YC) C CZ_ aj p p O U ar C U GM L L 3 in p 0 A [-- UO Q, 0- O Cl ct M 0. p rl 00 M Mir ening Commission August 26. 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 25 of 28 0 ZI Q � L Nv) O S M O O P. OLE O C 0 M � V] .•i VJ U N y > N 3 a y LCSU o N `� O O r N L CD. �'O vU N U a > C vi +L- O >✓ L N bA '0 0 � CL 0 3 Y -.�' E � o O a� 0 o 0 N _O cz N L U N a ME '0.- to bA 6 N O U N 3 bA vi � C;3N O to.?:O = cd U,- U -O ,UL., N y on i O Loj y � s ° cn c >?. 40- Y L- Q O ° a� bA M E � `n 0 U U cC > L L O > 0 ~ L � > i O C n U Z7 y 0-ci a ening Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 26 of 28 o Q > C U N L OL N Ccd N � .ty CI) -c7 OLbA Q;: p > .� U 7 L C'd !n .Y > C •U 0 N i N .a .D Cd L � .,4 O •U cC -o p 00 'O l� c O N N L7 o v O . > >_ 0 v Y L o . ca > Y fl L N(� O C>, n N I cd O U C C bA Z7 N N ` C i Q p 10- cn cn N U n N -7z C', O -r- 0 U U O 0. U N v L > C cn U O N C C Ln -a O L C N N L � � — U "O •Y vi cz .Y > cz > C C p i- U p N cJ t p cL C R f"A 46 O � ,Now I- Ho M ming Commission August 26, 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 27 of 28 q►"'j � �„� b vi J an ? �' Wy .. w *d p *C � +� '' O Call OA 78 0 N°.moSbo o U ° zn to ad' � 0 �7 LUDE ening Commission August 26. 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 28 of 28 cdN '° o 0 0 O c 40-cn O s s �? y Q = L o '3 O 0 c- c sc +- C n cd 1 c U O CA cz bcACIS '� .= U c3 L c" p L c > 3 a d) EO i O '� a� OrA o �: 00 .00 U U 0 Q + 3 0 -00 -o bA E N N" N v' O N -o G o e. E 3 ace o a� . �c s c o G o s O C,3 E O 'O dj cC U OLA U ct2 i U cd L 4. O O N U 5 � «$ O L Ca . cn N U N c L L s •L i 5 T U F'• y "p �J j c�J aOi CZ N J N N CA t bA c .-� � c c c� O U C ..2 c� r cn -a c > A C'S c i O N 0 '> � ca � � cl--• r' N cl j U � N U O L cc3 CA 'c c/)N w w t4 in t '0 _� C23� � � O c A O V > M Gq c3 0 O ? CZ fl L lY > A —c) 'G !O= c3 ad' � 0 �7 LUDE ening Commission August 26. 2019 Agenda Item 5 9-6651 MSP 2040 Page 28 of 28 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS. TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Matt Mihalevich, Trails Coordinator MEETING DATE: July 8, 2019 (Updated with Planning Commission Results) SUBJECT: ADM 19-6745: Administrative Item (Fayetteville Active Transportation Plan Update): Submitted by the CITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT to amend and update the trail and on -street linkage Master Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM 19-6745 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to forward ADM 19-6745 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval, amending the proposed City Plan 2040 document as described in the attached memo." BACKGROUND: Through the end of 2018, the Fayetteville Active Transportation Advisory Committee (ATAC) dedicated 4 monthly meetings to review the trails and on - street linkages going through by each quadrant of the City. The recommended changes are reflected on the attached Active Transportation Master Plan map and notable changes are listed in the updates section below. On April 1St, 2019 the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) reviewed and approved of the three changes below that were proposed by Parks Department staff. • Remove the shared use paved trail shown through Wilson Park and use Prospect Ave. right of way as the bike route instead of cutting through the park. • Remove the section of Town Branch Trail from Morningside to Armstrong. The existing St. Paul Trail serves this connection and the removed section is duplicative. • Extend the Owl Creek Trail to the west City limit line. During the April 111, 2019 PRAB meeting, many citizens expressed their concerns about the Sublett Creek Trail and specifically the route through the Brooks -Hummel Nature Preserve and Lake Lucile Property Owners Association. After a detailed discussion the PRAB and made the following motion: Planning Commission July 8, 2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active Trans. Plan Page 1 of 12 For Brooks Hummel and Mt. Sequoyah Woods, consider using alternatives to concrete hard trails depending on the site, to help maintain the essence of the site. Also, looking to do the same in the future with sensitive areas. Motion passed 6-0-0. The Sublett Creek Trail has been on the Active Transportation Master Plan since first adopted in 2003. This trail is envisioned to provide connectivity for midtown from the intersection of Old Wire and Mission following Sublett Creek northwest to College Ave. where a new signal would provide safe crossing at Poplar St. and the trail would continue west in front of Woodland Junior High across Gregg Ave. and tie to the Razorback Regional Greenway. The 13.75 -acre Brooks -Hummel Property was purchased in 2007 for $495,000 of which $179,500 (36%) was provided by the Fayetteville Natural Heritage Association for a conservation easement. The conservation easement was placed on the property and the language specifically allows the City to construct trails on the property. A map is included showing 1,356 residences (estimated 2,739 people and 288 businesses (estimated 1,995 jobs) are within '/2 miles of the Sublett Creek Trail. Funding for the Sublett Creek Trail was approved in the 2019 bond referendum and is slated for the third funding phase which is estimated to be available in 2026. Due to the steep surrounding topography, alternative trail routes are challenging. A color -coded map showing the surrounding topography is included in the packet for review. A trail alignment study area is shown on the Active Transportation Plan for future evaluation of the trail route through this area. This alignment study including environmental impact would be completed prior to any detailed design or construction work on the trail. On April 101h, the Active Transportation Advisory Committee met again and approved of the three recommendations proposed by staff and PRAB. During this meeting the ATAC also had a detailed discussion about the Sublett Creek Trail. Representatives from the Fayetteville Natural Heritage Association and Parks and Recreation Board spoke of their concerns with the Sublett Creek Trail impact on the nature preserve. Staff presented trail pavement alternatives including an elevated boardwalk through the forest that would have minimal environmental impact. The ATAC had a 4-4 tie vote on the Sublett Creek Trail staying on the Active Transportation Master Plan. Since the vote was a tie no recommendation was provided, and the Sublett Creek Trail remained on the Active Transportation Master Plan. On May 14th the Transportation Committee reviewed the Active Transportation Master Plan and supported the updates listed below. The discussion again focused on the Sublett Creek Trail with over 30 citizens voicing their concerns about the proposed trail through the Brooks -Hummel. The Transportation Committee unanimously (3 members present) voted to forward the Active Transportation Master Plan to the Planning Commission with approval of the recommended updates and the inclusion of an "Alignment Study Area" over the area surrounding the Brooks -Hummel Nature Preserve as shown on the attached map. Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6649 ADM July 8, 2019 City Plan 2040 Documents\03 Planning Comm ission\06-10-2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active Trans. Plan Page 2 of 12 UPDATES: Notable recommended changes to the Active Transportation Master Plan are listed below working clockwise from the Northeast quadrant and are shown on the attached maps: • A side path added along Joyce Blvd. and Steele Ave. to meet the existing side path at Sterns Street. • Clear Creek Trail alignment adjusted to match Springdale's plan for the Dean's Trail. • Trail connectivity improved east of crossover from Old Wire Road to Mission Blvd using and existing the power line corridor. • A side path added along Mission Blvd. from Crossover Rd. to Starr Dr. • Adjustments to the trails east and west of College Avenue from Memorial Drive to Township to reflect recommendations to from the 71 B corridor plan. • Extension of side path along Mission Blvd. south from Rush Dr. to Lafayette St. • A side path added to Huntsville Rd. from Morningside Dr. to Crossover Rd. • Realignment of Saint Paul Trail east of Dead House Mountain Road to accommodate the existing golf course. • Adjustments to trail at the University of Arkansas including a side path on Stadium Drive from Tsa La Gi Trail to Oak Ridge Trail. • Improved trail connectivity across 15th Street near Duncan Ave. • Adjustments to the trail at the MLK (Hwy62) and 1-49 interchange to reflect proposed improvements by ARDOT. • A side path added on Markham Rd. from Razorback Rd. to Markham Hill. • A side path added along Wedington from West End Ave. to Sang Ave. • A side path added along Garland Ave. from Sycamore to 1-49. • A side path added along Mt. Comfort and Lewis Ave. from Garland Ave. to Deane St. • New trail added north of Mt. Comfort Road from Salem Rd. to Shiloh Trail. • Drake Trail added along an existing trail easement associated with the planned development on the property north of Drake between Garland Ave. and Gregg Ave. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends forwarding ADM 19-6745 to the City Council with a recommendation of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES Date: July 8, 2019 O Tabled M Fowarded O Denied Motion: Wintson, to forward the item to the City Council with the recommendation outlined below. Second:Johnson Vote: 9 -o -o Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6649 ADM July 8, 2019 City Plan 2040 Documents\03 Planning Commission\06-10-2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active Trans. Plan Page 3 of 12 Recommendation: That the Sublett Creek trail should require special consideration fof the sensitive habitat and nearby lake, and that the Council adopt a policy that active transportation facilities be constructed with the criteria for'AII Ages and All Abilities'. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: None Attachments: • Active Transportation Plan Map • Active Transportation Plan Map with changes shown • Sublett Creek Trail with residences and businesses • Sublett Creek Trail with topography • April 151 Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Minutes Planning Commission G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2019\Development Services\19-6649 ADM July 8, 2019 City Plan 2040 Documents\03 Planning Commission\06-10-2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active Trans. Plan Page 4 of 12 • i7 kAl iii - � .-_ � —f !_ i• ._ i'i _f.;../�_ � E cif all `" , 1� �-"rT`i�'�; j'...�� �1 �� •\ \ � , - ..-- _ _ f, Sit v !! +.. ✓'j�.i .s �t l� ii. ier i.i ` r i. � i .,, i__ � +` iii �i -ifi° r,. _'•_I -i iii-.� �: �`•\i?"i�_� 'r~ i-y�a3.�•\. `�__'�'�..- !� - iX' - r+ ii' t l i _=i x` .. �r I 1 ,,� - r 1 ! 1 _ -�, s_ 7 IC ) I � l• ' (" ` � i �. i a t - � - "� i .J 1' _ i 1`'-�. --�. .� `"�'� -Fi - �' I �'- ' �•` � , i 1 -� I r '1` a.t L �al f 11/ "�� "•.,�.^ r-�- IN � ,\• _Ima? '.�-. � \._:^1 � '1 i "'-�'`�"� �.Ih' y �. ;� !' ;� - -- . it, i h -'w 1i j _' __ 4j ro { a tTci N J� t _i t � ' Plan idg 0m Is: IJwAg n t2 19-6745 A Alm. • n!. F - - - - -- -- — -----P-a9=-5 0 Iii ! { E • F_ i c q � _ } r � .. � N ieg s C C LL €FES iIS 1, DO � I C> U tL 1\ i N m Q in O w w S to O I — r aa j 0 A m f O ILI O_ O_ a. > i O O O + • \/ il.� 1 rte'~-� ujj 1 _ . _ PO�1. �iy 1 1.1 -- ...1 i� I .1•. F - �--1.✓% ft i x. `} 9 ','• iY ,� fir- i `r+ ii � ��`�� ~(i �l� 41 - - ' ,i. - + � { �#•` �F - - `��`�''- ----ter,... / I _ ^ {. i LL IA - EJ LL N y t to Q. UL a ` �......,_..........._>-.. hCD j; FS,� `n r9��FF�iCjt�ija :ad }t;�Fa'al;tti{#f 4i,# S�t►F17 €tsJ:+f i {� PlanninaaC jj77����jjjjjjig,ion a r� •."."..f::1'•f[f• xC.: �xR•RR i11it+14. �l::P1�:0 lanY : a y! 8; 19 12 19-6745 Active T ns. •Ian 12 P Schon a ee a, PnturyO it, Es• =' Township; 5ttV �♦ r de a Nope St ; I Holly St . Terry 4L-" l • n `�Or Peel StLn Ln to g P ... a tia ro - b r W 0 Square Dr 2c 4 ra r i9 ar v ae CardYona ^ e w ®oma O 3 .3 j n y fr 3 Ya G Q icy ,' c Overcrest St �Ln" / > LA <t01 d e1` �ksocr, r Elm St � 11 O ¢ a m r Ct¢ � �O„ ; Q Elmwood Dr ?> ¢ Q � z n U r e ' o E U d Prospect St r: o a , 1 ;.17 �� 1 p O d Wtt$o4 ��-d > ¢ f ° f h� r Wnudran0 � Ilk.rV.yrTI N.gh j\'C %r In $F' uo "h Un+[CD Qom$ church Miller Q i ` ^ C N ±ha7rat � � _ > •`,�,••• d+ 7: N x t I ■ ��, 1•y 1►� 1 `�,CF r/ �:JS j pilso� n ro t ASb,,St fa ry:Prr ••.--- .--------- x- - ♦ o ,■ Edna StI r Charlee St . Gar rlrr+� r0 ••••• Proposed Alignment > a Sublett Creek Trail GRlGORY CK 'Q '`•^% ® FAYETTEVILLE PARA j ■, ., . ,�" ■ x c ys kl "°' O t t 1 Rarb U Calvin St > HUMHC4 Evelyn Hr:P , Mmft W 1h. Cly .1 F. ,:»vi G,ep»prc IN°i»a.sn . W —d- "a to Fuetr. ,i .zTURL"�' _ O . • Businesses: 288 (Totalling 1,995 Jobs) eµ(SERYt ? t ♦ 'Q Existing Trail .}U ,$,A girwin Std /Lrawson St". tr IPm cr Ur Oznrix M�'I)) � VI t yi•nrary Residences: 1,356 (2,739 Est. Population) / �♦ r a Nope St ; I Holly St Q q M1� ? o° v kwood St r.c,trt- f0a« Dr j ' V 4 ra r i9 ar v ae r,\ G ■ r e, O �j; .3 Lakeside � b n Adams St- v : ,� 6axter�Ln . 0 4 �Ln" / > _. QQCL a' Q f v <t01 �ksocr, CP Cleb�s 0. ,P r m vIn o v � z n U r e ' o E U _ Prospect St r: o 1 1 u Rockwood Trl Q. Wtt$o4 PARK Rebecca St %r G 11) Louise St ` ^ . � � _ > •`,�,••• d+ 7: / rj� Ila St > > - r r/ �:JS j pilso� n p - Maple ••.--- .--------- x- - ♦ o Ir.,,n:ngmn � p Q '/, o '/z Mile r0 ••••• Proposed Alignment Sublett Creek Trail CITY OF ® FAYETTEVILLE 1/2 Mile Buffer ---- Fayetteville, AR ® ARKANSAS 000nr: Other Planned Trail TM Mmft W 1h. Cly .1 F. ,:»vi G,ep»prc IN°i»a.sn . W —d- "a to Fuetr. • Businesses: 288 (Totalling 1,995 Jobs) A, :".;�.'r»t"'e :°'.�e :"'"""'e":;;�:'- aF h -hl Existing Trail ,P„Ia vWmn.y tM Cry I F,yW—%1a"°W N, Cr 0 Fly,,,v,MmM,a ,M w._' Residences: 1,356 (2,739 Est. Population) ^»-........ due T`M cry w F,rMe.,+. " . 20 Foot Contour >: a;<:,, .tom,„'m N Ie M1'e a. An,n „bw' Planning C r"' Planning Co Z10fy 8, 2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active Trans. Plan Page 7 of 12 <-- To Razorback Greenway e 'W1pb01j9h.L0 Poplar Street Trail I' 1 ren.o.,a�rsasriy.trrrr>iroerrti rR�rtir�E� � � v Q a s pG rZ W � ■r, 11 I l i I tE 7xSti 5t r 5, _ � • : rte,, «r . J �� � � a,r � a H i� s � ♦ 'rY GREGORY- 6Vi* PARK �; N i i.i... • ._ lt _ yr,yra, . zYvralTW,aYr. 1 � ti „ =r BRO,OKS- , d �I O r X♦ HUMMEL ' 1 t>r '1^itCd ? Evelyn Hills♦ NATURE . � 1_ . � pre"!-'. C', Shepp- 0}. r� y PRESERVE Center f t %1i �� � ��`'' ��'♦°''iia r r t h r' ♦�_ Qi� gg � �� � �'�.♦E. Bi•Y.arrL UAMs Northwest 71 B + R iya i T E`No th St I� t t t -, : i };�_ ._—` -- SCLir �T > a 4 ca r ro Elevation r--7 High: 1550 Low: 1250 —'\---- Ten Foot Contour Interval Sublett Creek Trail Fayetteville, AR Existing Trail cacao Proposed Trail CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS TM b1..—...d n.r.n w., -W'.. —, • .. ,a - .d. .0 .M Mwfit •1 IM Co of F.Y.It.M. G•opr.pb Irtormaoon &H,m .nd tM WW.p•ncn• 1 s.rv.a. .11 u,• of F. O,Y py.ny.w an.r IMn IM Cp N F•MYa.. at Yv s.b rn• .I IM wr •rW br x • e1 ..a b�, n .• dw• Mr.OY .p•. l..q. mn1Y IM Y of F,yM.4 d .rW ndd ne CM d F.Y•.•v1b Nm�bs• .M —.1 f W Iw . . l I n. 1 npWnp ..".o sl MI•nw . n.d k..1 a b by .pwriq .m IM 1 tna data, TM Cly of F.y.MnM m,•.a no -1— a .npWd r.rr,me,a �rebim IM d•1.. No •oN pMaM abw d mm� anN M .w..wdtp ,nlMtedmmnlYa.tt«n.;." PlanningC July 8, 2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active Trans. Plan Page 8 of 12 ` CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE ARKANSAS MEETING MINUTES Parks and Recreation Advisory Board April 1, 2019 5:30 p.m. City Administration Building Room 326 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR Members: Richie Lamb, Nicole Claesen, Wade Colwell, Will Dockery, Joel Freund, Jennifer Neill, Bill Putman, Dana Smith, Keith Tencleve City Staff: Connie Edmonston, Director; Byron Humphry, Parks Maintenance Superintendent; John Crow, Recreation Superintendent; Ted Jack, Park Planning Superintendent, Ken Eastin, Park Planner, Matt Mihalevich, Trails Coordinator, Darrell Shaw, Recreation Program Manager, and Sonya Morell, Operations Assistant 1. Call to Order: Lamb called the meeting to order at 5:31 p.m. 2. In Attendance: Lamb, Dockery, Neill, Freund, Putman, and Tencleve Absent: Colwell, Smith, and Claesen Staff: Edmonston, Humphry, Crow, Jack, Eastin, Mihalevich, Shaw, and Morell 3. Approval of Minutes: PRAB Motion: Freund moved to approve the minutes, Lamb seconded the motion. Motion passed 6-0-0 4. Park Land Dedication: Ken Eastin, Park Planner Development Name: Fairways at Fayetteville (The Links) Engineer: Blew and Associates, PA Owner: The Fairways at Fayetteville, LP (Lyndy Lindsey) Location: Rupple Rd, Congressional Rd, Golf Club Dr. Park Quadrant NW Units: 240 multi -family units Total Acres: 7.8 acres Land Dedication Requirement: 3.36 acres Money in Lieu Requirement: $134,400 Existing Parks: Bryce Davis, Clabber Creek Trail, Hamestring Creek Trail, Red Oak Park, Dale Clark Park Developer's Request: Money in -Lieu Staff Recommendation: Money in Lieu Justification: Proximity of Existing Park Land Eastin reviewed what has been done in the past with this Park Land Dedication. The Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayette'PI"ir"amission July 8, 2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active Trans. Plan Page 9 of 12 development is nearing the end of the project and their credit for park land was used so they are requesting to dedicate money in lieu. PRAB Motion: Tencleve moved to accept staff's recommendation to accept Money in lieu. Freund seconded the motion. Motion passed 7-0-0. 5. Active Transportation Plan Update: Matt Mihalevich, Trails Coordinator Matt Mihalevich presented the proposed Active Transportation Plan Update. This plan must also be reviewed and approved by the Transportation Committee and City Council for adoption. It is different than the Five -Year Plan. See attached maps. Please note on the ATP2019 Changes Map, the following legend is utilized: Red Trails are to be removed from the current Master Plan Thick Green Trails are the proposed new trails Green Trails are the existing Master Plan Trails Mihalevich stated there are three main changes after meeting with Park and Recreation Staff: a. Extending Owl Creek to the City Limit Line b. Trail going around Wilson Park instead of cutting through the park c. St. Paul Trail to continue to Comb's Park across the White River Mihalevich reviewed the new changes from the Active Transportation Advisory Committee (ATAC). ATAC has been updating the plan for the last 4 months. a. Proposed Trails and added trails b. Small sidewalk connections between neighborhoods c. Lake Fayetteville changes, working with the city of Springdale d. Some changes were made just to "clean up" existing trails Lamb read a letter from Dana Smith, vice -chair of PRAB. See attachment. Mihalevich said the trail called, Sublet Creek Trail, has been on the Master Plan since the creation of the plan. It is a flat way to get through town because it is very steep in that area. The trail scored high on their Scoring Matrix, because of its school connections and the population density in that area. Mihalevich agrees with Smith, we must be sensitive in this area and Active Transportation has worked closely with Fayetteville Natural Heritage and plans on doing an Environmental Assessment Study. Freund suggested not paving the trail to reduce the environmental impact. Mihalevich said Active Transportation prefers all weather trails because they require less maintenance. Planning Commission July 8, 2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active Tuns. Plan Page 10 of 12 Lamb said the board gets a lot of kickback when they propose a different type of soft surface trail. He gave the example of Gulley Park and the hard surface that is currently being installed. He has heard people say that they would prefer a softer trail to run on. He believes Brooks Hummel is a perfect example for something different and would also be a lot less invasive. Mihelevich said at Mt. Sequoyah Woods, no changes are being proposed. He wants to connect trails and one of the proposed trails are in utility easements. The trails will be paved trails. Eastin said he is currently working with the Fayetteville Natural Heritage Association and Ozark Off -Road Cyclists, trying to make a more sustainable soft surface trail system at Mt. Sequoyah Woods. He also said it is difficult to build a granular surface trail on uneven, sloping trails. He has not seen much success in the past. Lamb wanted the board to know that tonight they are to make recommendations to the Active Transportation Advisory Committee, which will meet next Wednesday, April 10tH Mihelevich said that is correct, he would bring any recommendations to the Active Transportation Board, it would then go to Transportation Committee and finally to City Council. Dockery would like the committee to consider not putting trails through the middle of parks, but to stay around the perimeter. The board further discussed the Plan Updates. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the proposed plan. PRAB Motion: Lamb moved to approve Active Transportation Committee's Plan Update, with the following changes: For Brooks Hummel and Mt. Sequoyah Woods, consider using alternatives to concrete hard trails depending on the site, to help maintain the essence of the site. Also, looking to do the same in the future with sensitive areas. Freund seconded the motion. Motion passed 6-0-0. 6. Wilson Pool Fee Proposal: Darrell Shaw, Recreation Program Manager Shaw presented proposed changes to party rental fees at the Wilson Park Pool for approval by the board. Staff also discussed improvements and additions to amenities that will enhance customer experience while generating additional revenue. Shaw reviewed: a. The new umbrellas, called "Funbrellas" can be used to increase revenue, especially for private parties. They are 20 foot umbrellas. b. Reviewed the 2019 Summer Schedule. c. Presented the Pool Reservation Cost Increase: Planning Commission July 8, 2019 Agenda Item 12 U 19-6745 Active ans. Plan Page 11 of 12 • Increase in expenses due to increase in minimum wage. • Increasing rental opportunities. • Budget based on minimum guards needed per shift. • Increase in pool rental fees. • Umbrella Party Rental Pods — going to City Council tomorrow because Park Land Dedication is being used • Pool Reservation Cost Increase Proposal will include 3 tiers: o Tier 1 — Normal Operating Hour Rental Fee (Max 2) and limited to 25 people o Tier 2 — Private '/z Pool Rental (Max 2) with max of 400 people o Tier 3 — Private Full Pool Rental Staff Recommendation: Approval of the proposed fee changes. See attached proposal. PRAB Motion: Freund moved to approve the proposed fee changes. Tencleve seconded the motion. Motion passed, 5-0-0. (Neil left early) 7. Neighborhood Parks Presentation: Ted Jack, Planning Superintendent Jack reviewed Planning considerations and PLD information for Neighborhood Parks. 8. Announcements: Richie Lamb read the announcements. April 1St Summer Adult Kickball & Softball Registration Begins 9th 2019 Bond Vote 12th -14th Hogville Showcase Baseball Tournament 13th Cow Paddy Run 5:30pm 15th Spring Adult Softball Begins 19th -20th Woo Pig Softball Tournament 20th YRCC Easter Egg Hunt Ilam 22"d Youth Softball Games Begin 27th Youth Soccer Ends (Makeup Days) 9. Adjournment Time: Lamb adjourned the meeting at 7:31 p.m. 10. Submitted by: Sonya Morell, Operations Assistant PRAB minutes provides the basic discussions and motions of the PRAB meeting for more information, please refer to the PRAB meeting video provided on the city's website. Planning Commission July 8, 2019 Agenda Item 12 19-6745 Active flans. Plan Page 12 of 12 CityClerk From: Lisa Orton <lisa_m_orton@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 16, 2019 9:23 PM To: Lisa Orton; CityClerk Cc: University Heights Neighbors Subject: Concerning 2040 Plan and Markham Hill Dear Planning Commission and City Counsel members, I don't believe Fayetteville's top priority should have anything to do with development, infill, and upzoning. believe the top priority should be tree preservation, preserving Fayetteville's intact forests and natural habitat, and limiting addition of impervious surfaces. We would then have a healthier environment. We need clean air, water, and watersheds more than we need development. More people means we need more trees in order to maintain and even increase their health benefits. So, the City's highest priority should be preserving Fayetteville's intact forests and natural habitats. This mitigates climate change and keeps us healthier physically and mentally. Another priority over development should be listening to what the people in neighborhoods want. It is clear that your ordinances and codes favor developers and development rather than the residents of Fayetteville, people who live in the neighborhoods. It looks like money makers and developers have control over our City government. Out-of-state people with money, like Robert M Dant who is hiding behind Specialized Real Estate Group (SREG) and who corrently owns the historic Markham Hill intact urban forest and natural habitat, are controlling City policy, convincing people to believe urbanization is the answer, and donating to causes to gain support for their development projects. Not because they care about Fayetteville but because they want to make as much money as possible from their development projects no matter the pain they cause. So, the City's next highest priority should be listening to and following through on what people in neighborhoods want more than what developers messing with our neighborhoods want. Please change the City's priorities, goals, codes, and ordinances to favor Fayetteville's urban forests and natural habitats and to favor what the people in neighborhoods want rather than the developer. More and more people in Fayetteville are getting more and more angry at the City for favoring developers and development. Urbanization, infill, and forced upzonings and tree removal in neighborhoods that don't want that are not the answer. Sincerely, Lisa Orton 1663 Halsell Rd 410-674-8440 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android Populations Contributing to "Global Warming" (nka "Climate Change") (Internet World Stats data updated October 31, 2019) [x7/D20] %Total UN Data World Population 18.5% 17.7% 4.3% 3.5% 2.7% 2.8% 2.6% 2.1% 1.9% 1.7% 57.8% 57.8% 42.2% 100.0% Internet World Stats.com [x7/D20] 2000 2019 2050 Pop Growth % %of 2019 Total data.un.org Country Population Population Expected Pop 2000-2019 World Population Population 1 China- 1,268,301,605 420,062,022 1,301,627,048 12.0% 18.4% 1,433,783,686 2 India 1,006,300,297 1,368,737,513 1,656,553,632 17_7% 1,366,417,754 3 �nited States j 282,162,411 329,093,110 398,328,349 _36.0% 16.6% 4.3% 329,_064,917 4 Indonesia 214,090,575 269,536,482 300,183,166 25.9% 3.5% 270,625,568 5 Brazil 174,315,386 212,392,717 232,304,177 21.8% 2.8% 211,049,527 6 Pakistan 152,429,036 204,596,442 290,847,790 34.2% 2.7% 216,565,318 7 Nigeria 123,945,463 200,962,417 391,296,754 62.1% 2.6% 200,963,5_99 _ 8 Bangladesh 128,734,672 168,065,920 193,0_92,763 30.6% _ 2.2% 163,046,1_61 9 Russia 147,053,966 143,895,551 129,908,086 -2.1% 1.9% 14!5Ci2,256 10 Mexico 99,775,434 132,328,035 150,567,503 32.6% 1.7% 127,575,529 57.7% TOP TEN Countries 3,597,108,845 4,449,670,209 5,044,709,268 23.7% r 57.7% 4,464,964,315 Rest of the World 2.547,898,144 3,266.553,0004,329.774.957 28.2% 42.3% 3.266,553.000 TOTAL World Population 6,145,006,989 17,716,223,209-9,374,484,225] _ . 25.6% 100.0% 7,731,517,315 99.8% 7,731,517,315 [x7/D20] %Total UN Data World Population 18.5% 17.7% 4.3% 3.5% 2.7% 2.8% 2.6% 2.1% 1.9% 1.7% 57.8% 57.8% 42.2% 100.0% Question 11 A As a follow-up to the previous question, please help the City understand which of the following amenities, characteristics, or public improvments should be prioritized in association with infill. Existing residents continue to find the neighborhood a place they want to live in and can afford. Very important O.O(YA 10.0004 20.0004 30.00% 40.000,6 50.0046 60.00% MOO % 80.0046 90.0096 100.00% Very important 70.51% Answered: 780 Important 23.97% Skipped: 117 Neither important or unimportant Very unimportant I Unimportant Unimportant I Very unimportant 0.77% 6 Nefther important or unimportantCID' C. C Q important Very important O.O(YA 10.0004 20.0004 30.00% 40.000,6 50.0046 60.00% MOO % 80.0046 90.0096 100.00% Very important 70.51% 550 Important 23.97% 187 Neither important or unimportant 3.97% 31 Unimportant 0.77% 6 Very unimportant 0.77% 6 IMF 201