HomeMy WebLinkAbout38-20 RESOLUTION113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Resolution: 38-20
File Number: 2019-0897
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE AN APPLICATION FOR AN 80/20 MATCHING GRANT FROM
THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,225,268.00 FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD FROM INDUSTRIAL DRIVE TO CITY LAKE ROAD, AND
TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR JORDAN TO SIGN A FUNDING COMMITMENT LETTER
CONFIRMING THAT THE CITY HAS MATCHING FUNDS AVAILABLE IN THE AMOUNT OF
$556,317.00
WHEREAS, the construction of a road from Industrial Drive to City Lake Road, at a total estimated
cost of $2,781,585.00, would allow a significant amount of landlocked City property in the Commerce
District to be developed; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce, working with the Northwest Arkansas Economic
Development District, has identified an 80/20 matching Economic Development Administration grant for
which the City can apply; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends utilizing Economic Development Bond funds approved by Fayetteville
voters for the City's 20% match in the estimated amount of $556,317.00; and
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Administration requires a funding commitment letter to be
included in the grant application stating the City's matching funds are available, unencumbered, and
dedicated to this project in the event the City is awarded the grant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Page 1 Printed on 1/22/20
File Number.' 2019-0897
Resolution 38-20
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes an application
for an 80/20 matching Economic Development Administration grant application for $2,225,268.00 for the
construction of a road and sidewalk from Industrial Drive to City Lake Road with the 20% match to
be funded by City of Fayetteville economic development bond funds.
Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes the Mayor to
sign a funding commitment letter that will be included in the grant application stating that the City's
matching funds in the amount of $556,317.00 are available, unencumbered, and dedicated to this project
in the event the City is awarded the grant.
PASSED and APPROVED on 1/21/2020
Attest:
.�. cJY0
L/
,� •. G
Kara Paxton, City Clerk Treas r' FAYE�fV�<<E; v
Ul C
Page 2 Printed on 1/22/20
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Text File
File Number: 2019-0897
Agenda Date: 1/21/2020 Version: 1 Status: Passed
In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Resolution
Agenda Number: C. 3
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION:
A RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE AN APPLICATION FOR AN 80/20 MATCHING GRANT FROM
THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,225,268.00 FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF A ROAD FROM INDUSTRIAL DRIVE TO CITY LAKE ROAD, AND TO
AUTHORIZE MAYOR JORDAN TO SIGN A FUNDING COMMITMENT LETTER CONFIRMING
THAT THE CITY HAS MATCHING FUNDS AVAILABLE IN THE AMOUNT OF $556,317.00
WHEREAS, the construction of a road from Industrial Drive to City Lake Road, at a total estimated cost of
$2,781,585.00, would allow a significant amount of landlocked City property in the Commerce District to be
developed; and
WHEREAS, the Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce, working with the Northwest Arkansas Economic
Development District, has identified an 80/20 matching Economic Development Administration grant for which
the City can apply; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends utilizing Economic Development Bond funds approved by Fayetteville voters
for the City's 20% match in the estimated amount of $556,317.00; and
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Administration requires a funding commitment letter to be included in
the grant application stating the City's matching funds are available, unencumbered, and dedicated to this
project in the event the City is awarded the grant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes an application for an
80/20 matching Economic Development Administration grant application for $2,225,268.00 for the
construction of a road and sidewalk from Industrial Drive to City Lake Road with the 20% match to be funded
by City of Fayetteville economic development bond funds.
Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby authorizes the Mayor to sign a
funding commitment letter that will be included in the grant application stating that the City's matching funds in
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 Printed on 1/22/2020
File Number. 2019-0897
the amount of $556,317.00 are available, unencumbered, and dedicated to this project in the event the City is
awarded the grant.
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Paye 2 Printed on 112212020
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
January 22, 2020
l
Mr. Jorge Ayala, Regional Director
Economic Development Administration
Austin Regional Office
903 San Jacinto Blvd, Suite 206
Austin, TX 78701-4037
Dear Mr. Ayala:
Re: Availability of Local Matching Funds
I am writing to affirm that the City of Fayetteville has $556,317.00 in matching funds available,
unencumbered, and dedicated for the grant in which we are applying for through the Economic
Development Administration.
These funds will be utilized as detailed in the grant proposal. Should you have any further
questions regarding the matching funds, please do not hesitate to contact me.
SinI—
Lio-neld
bly,
Jo
Mayor X
City of Fayetteville 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form
2019-0897
Legistar File ID
1/21/2020
City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only
N/A for Non -Agenda Item
Devin Howland 12/31/2019 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (050)
Submitted By Submitted Date Division / Department
Action Recommendation:
APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING MAYOR JORDAN TO APPLY FOR AN 80/20 MATCHING GRANT WITH
THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION FOR $2,084,720 AND SIGN A FUNDING COMMITMENT LETTER
FOR QUESTION SIX BOND FUNDS.
Account Number
Project Number
Budgeted Item? No
Does item have a cost?
Budget Adjustment Attached?
Budget Impact:
Current Budget
Funds Obligated
Current Balance
No Item Cost
NA Budget Adjustment
Remaining Budget
Fund
Project Title
0
V20180321
Purchase Order Number: Previous Ordinance or Resolution #
Change Order Number: Approval Date:
Original Contract Number:
Comments:
CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MEETING OF JANUARY 21, 2020
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Don Marr, Chief of Staff
FROM: Devin Howland, Director of Economic Vitality
DATE: December 30, 2019
CITY COUNCIL MEMO
SUBJECT: A Resolution authorizing Mayor Jordan to apply for an 80/20 matching
grant with the Economic Development Administration and sign a funding commitment
letter for question six bond funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff is recommending approval of a resolution authorizing Mayor Jordan to apply for an 80/20
matching grant with the Economic Development Administration (EDA) and sign a funding
commitment letter.
BACKGROUND:
The Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce, as the City's economic development contractor, has
identified the lack of "shovel ready" parcels as a key challenge for the past several years,
particularly within our Commerce District. Staff concurs with the challenge, as many other
shovel ready parcels exist and continue to be developed throughout the region in other
municipalities, available City owned sites in the commerce district have become increasingly
limited.
City -owned land in the Commerce District is reserved for the purpose of economic
development. This land is for sale at $20,000 an acre to existing businesses looking to expand
in Fayetteville or new businesses considering locating here. One major benefit of municipally
owned land within the commerce park, is the ability to reserve this land for projects which offer
employment opportunities that meet a living wage and align with our targeted industry sectors,
outlined in the Fayetteville First Economic Development Plan.
In the past, staff reviewed several requests to extend Borick Drive between S. City Lake Road
and S. Armstrong, two challenges were identified:
1. Cost: the 4,004 L.F. road would have cost an estimated $3.5M
2. Environmentally Sensitive areas: Parcel: 765-16578-000 (13.1 acres) and Parcel: 765-
15271-000 (10.5 acres)
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
However, the Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce and City staff have identified a unique
opportunity to open a significant amount of land locked City -owned commerce park land and
negate both previously identified concerns.
DISCUSSION:
The Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce, working with the Northwest Arkansas Economic
Development District, has identified a pool of Economic Development Administration funding
which Fayetteville can apply for. Traditionally, EDA grants are not eligible in Fayetteville given
the City not meeting guidelines given job totals and income ranges.
The grant request is to construct 2,472 L.F. of road from Industrial Drive to City Lake Road at
the following cost breakdown:
ITEM
COST
Construction
$2,200,000
Engineering
$330,000
NWAEDD Administrative Fee
$75,900
Total Grant Ask
$2,605,900
City of Fayetteville 20% Contribution
$521,180
EDA 80% Contribution
$2,084,720
City of Fa etteville's cost per foot
$210.83
The City of Fayetteville's cost is $521,180, representing 20% of the project cost. Staff is
recommending utilizing Question 6 "Economic Development" Bond funding to cover the City's
portion for the match. The amount represents 16% of the total Question 6 funds, ensuring the
remaining 84% of the funds can be utilized for workforce development and job skill training
opportunities, as outlined in the ordinance. If the grant is awarded, the City would receive
$2,084,720 from the Economic Development Administration.
As depicted in Exhibit A (attached) the proposed road would travel south off the cul-de-sac on
Industrial drive for roughly 1,250 feet, then turns west and goes roughly 1,100 feet connecting
with S. City Lake Road. Staff reviewed eight different alignment options and chose the proposed
alignment for the following reasons:
1. Primarily benefits City -owned Commerce Park Land;
2. Does not go near environmentally sensitive areas to the east;
3. Opens roughly 46 acres of City -owned Commerce Park Land.
The City of Fayetteville will also be conducting an environmental impact analysis before
applying for the grant- given the proximity to environmentally sensitive areas and to meet
guidelines set forth by the Economic Development Administration.
The Economic Development Administration also requires a funding commitment letter to be
included in the grant application (Exhibit B) stating funds are available in the event of being
awarded the grant.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
If the grant is awarded the City of Fayetteville will be responsible for $521,180 in Question 6
"Economic Development" Bond Funds.
The Environmental assessment which will be conducted as part of the grant submission will cost
$12,000. In the event of the grant not being awarded, staff feels there is a great deal of value in
having this environmental assessment completed given on-going efforts to recruit new
employers to our commerce district.
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Road Alignment Map
Exhibit B: Draft Funding Commitment Letter
Exhibit C: Environmental Narrative Requirements
Exhibit D: Preliminary Engineering Report Requirements
Exhibit E: Chamber of Commerce Letter of Support
Exhibit F: Flood Plain Map
V
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
January 21, 2020
Mr. Jorge Ayala, Regional Director
Economic Development Administration
Austin Regional Office
903 San Jacinto Blvd, Suite 206
Austin, TX 78701-4037
Re: Availability of Local Matching Funds
Dear Mr. Ayala:
I am writing to affirm that the City of Fayetteville has $521,180 in matching funds available,
unencumbered, and dedicated for the grant in which we are applying for through the Economic
Development Administration.
These funds will be utilized as detailed in the grant proposal. Should you have any further
questions regarding the matching funds, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely,
Lioneld Jordan
Mayor
City of Fayetteville 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
Narrative Requirement
Environmental Narrative Requirements
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to assess the expected
environmental impacts associated with proposed federal actions. Per EDA Directive 17.02-2; EDA must
ensure that "proper environmental review of program activities takes place, that there is a proper balance
between the goals of economic development and environmental enhancement, and that adverse
environmental impacts are mitigated or avoided to the extent possible".
In order to comply with NEPA requirements, the applicant must submit, in its application package,
information detailing the present environmental condition of the project area and how the project will
impact environmental resources in and around the project area.
The Applicant must provide detailed, comprehensive information for the:
1. site(s) where the proposed project facilities will be constructed and the surrounding areas affected
by its operation; and
2. areas to be affected by any primary beneficiaries of the project.
The information submitted must be sufficient to evaluate allreasonable alternatives to the proposed
project, the direct and indirect environmental impacts, as well as the cumulative impacts on the
environment as defined in the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing
NEPA set out at 40 C.F.R. 1500-1508. The level of detail should be commensurate with the complexity
and size of the project, and the magnitude of the expected impact. Relevant, recently completed
environmental impact documentation (assessments, impact statements, etc.) for activities in the region in
which the proposed project will be located may be included along with the environmental narrative.
Applicants must provide information on all the items identified below in their application for EDA
assistance. Applicants must provide a detailed explanation for any area in which the applicant asserts that
an item is not applicable to a project. Applicants are encouraged to contact their designated Economic
Development Representative or the applicable EDA Regional Environmental Officer with questions
(please see the EDA website for contact information).
Several issues discussed in the environmental narrative below may require consultation with other State
or Federal agencies before EDA's final approval of an award (for example, the State Historic
Preservation Agency or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). While EDA does not require that
applicants complete such consultations before submitting an application, applicants should be
aware that in the event their project is selected for funding, the applicant will be expected to
proceed with consultations in an expeditious manner. EDA expects applicants to be prepared to
submit all required information to the appropriate agencies upon receipt of a Non -Binding
Commitment letter.
APLLICANTS MUST PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE FOLLOWING ITEMS IN THE
ENVIRONMENTAL NARRATIVE:
Note.• Applicants mustprotide all if formation requested below. Although T DA strongly recommends following the format
of this template, other formats will be accepted provided that the narrative contains all required information.
1
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
Narrative Requirement
A. BENEFICIARIES.
Identify any existing businesses or major developments that will benefit from the proposed
project, and those that will expand or locate in the area because of the project.
B. PPRO.JECT.:DESCR.IPTION
1. Proposed Construction
Describe the project construction components in detailed, quantifiable terms. Describe the
project location, proposed construction methods, and schedule. Summarize the environmental
resources that would be impacted by the project. See the mock example below for the level of
specificity expected by EDA:
The City of is proposing to construct a 30 -inch (in) water line which would be
constructed within an earstiog 50 foot City of right-of-way (ROW) and measure 1,220
linearfeet (0. The project it located within Townshp 39N, Range IOE, Section 24 in the City of
County, [ fStale ]]. The project would be constructed over a three-month period
from April June 2011. Constmefxon of this project would entail trenching a 1 ft wide by 3 fl. deep ditch
and itistdlliq the 30 -in. p pe within the exislin ROW. Total land disturbance will be 2.1 acres.
The construction slagitsg area would be located entirely within the exisrling ROW. Best Management
Praclices'(BMP) would be implemented inclu&nthe inslallation of straw bales and silt fences to
minimi.Ze impacts to storm water. Consit'r elion would only occur from 7 am -5 pm to minimise noise
impacts in the project arras. Minor maintenance would occur during the operation of the waterline, but
would not entail anygmund disturbing activities: The waterline would bisect a palsEmiire emergent
wetland in two places and result in the impact of 0.10 acre of wetland.
As an exhibit to this Narrative, provide a topographical map of the project area and a site map
(with legends) displaying the project location and boundaries, existing and proposed project
components and location of all sites and/or companies benefiting from the proposed project.
The documents should be of sufficient clarity for adequate interpretation of the Applicant's
intentions.
2. Alternative to the Proposed Project
Provide a detailed description of alternative actions that were considered during the project
planning but were not selected (e.g., alternative locations, designs, other projects having similar
benefits, or a "no project" alternative). Explain why this project/site was selected as the preferred
alternative with respect to other choices. Provide detail on why others alternatives were rejected
(e.g. did not meet the purpose and need of the project, implicated more environmental impacts
than the proposed action).
3. Mitigation
Describe methods to be employed to reduce adverse impacts from construction, such as noise,
dust generation, soil erosion, and siltation. List all mitigation measures that would be
implemented to minimize impacts to environmental resources from project implementation.
C. HISTORIC/ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Identify any known historic/ archeological resources within the project site(s) or area of potential
effect that are either listed on the National Register of Historic Places or considered to be of local
or State significance and perhaps eligible for listing on the National Register. Discuss the
potential impacts of the project on culturally significant resources and provide a determination as
2
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
Narrative Requirement.
to whether there will be: no historical properties/culture resources present; no historical
properties/culture resources adversely affected; or historical properties/culture resources
adversely impacted.
Provide a list of Tribal Historic Preservation Officers (THPO), Tribal Leaders, and other
interested parties to be consulted with, as well as any comments already obtained from these
parties. This can be obtained from the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), Native
American organizations, or online. The National Association of Tribal Historic Preservation
Officers maintains a database of currently recognized THPOs. In addition, the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation (ACHP) and the National Park Service both has information on
THPOs.
Applicants will be required to provide the relevant SHPO with information about the project and
request that the SHPO submit comments on the proposed project to the appropriate EDA
Regional Office prior to final approval of any award. Note that the applicant is not required
to contact the SHPO until directed to do so by EDA. If comments from the SHPO have
already been received, they should be attached along with copies of the information provided to
the SHPO, The following information will be required for the SHPO to review the project:
a. a narrative description of the project's elements and its location;
b. a map of the area surrounding the project, which identifies the project site,
adjacent streets and other identifiable objects, and the Area of Potential Effect;
c. line drawings or sketches of the project;
d. photographs of the affected properties if building demolition or renovation is
involved; and
e. an archeological survey and report if one has been prepared.
D. AFFECTED E"RO NIVMENT
For the resource areas identified below, indicate potential direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts
from proposed project activities and specify proposed measures to mitigate probable impacts.
1. Affected Area
Describe the general project area, including topography, historic land usages, unique geological
features, and economic history. Provide site photographs if available.
2. Shorelines, Estuaries, Beaches and Dunes
Identify any shorelines, beaches, dunes, or estuaries within or adjacent to the project site(s).
Indicate whether the project is located within a designated coastal zone subject to the Coastal
Zone Management Act. Information on coastal zone boundaries is available on the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's (NOAA) website at www.noaa.ggy. Also indicate if
there are any proposed overwater structures that could impact navigable waters.
3. Wetlands
Identify any wetlands within or adjacent to the project site(s). If available, provide an on-site
wetland/waters delineation performed in accordance with the 1987 (or current version) U.S.
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
........................:.... Narrative Requirement
Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, as amended. If the delineation has
received a preliminary or final Jurisdictional Determination from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE), please provide the determination. Provide a determination of effects
including the amount of jurisdictional waters affected by type (e.g. 1.1 acres of palustrine
emergent wetlands would be impacted by the proposed project).
If wetlands, streams, or navigable waters may be impacted, it is recommended that Applicants
contact USACE concerning any jurisdictional waters resources. Include any correspondence or
comments from USACE related to the project's impacts as an exhibit to the environmental
narrative as part of the application for EDA assistance.
4. Floodplains
Provide a FEMA floodplain map (with the map number and effective date) displaying the project
location and boundaries, existing' and proposed project components, and location of all sites
and/or companies benefiting from the proposed project. The document should be of sufficient
clarity for adequate interpretation of the applicant's intentions. Floodplain maps can be viewed
and printed from FEMA's website at rvww fetha:00v If FEMA floodplain maps do not exist in
the project area, provide a letter from a Professional Engineer regarding the presence or absence
of a 100 -year flood plain. The narrative should also indicate whether the Applicant's community
participates in the National Flood Plain Insurance Program.
S. Vegetation and Wildlife Resources
Identify native vegetation and wildlife found in the project area or its immediate vicinity.
Describe the amount and type of vegetation in the project area and indicate the impact to
vegetation if removed (e.g., 1.2 acres of early successional native hardwood forest).
Identify any designated State and National Parks, National Wildlife Refuges, or National Game
Preserves located on or in the vicinity of the proposed project activities.
Identify any Wilderness Areas, as designated or proposed under the Wilderness Act, or wild or
scenic rivers, as designated or proposed under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, that are located on
or in the vicinity of the proposed project activities.
6. Endangered Species
Provide a list of all threatened, endangered, and candidate species located in the project area and
its immediate vicinity. Identify these species' potential or existing habitat, and critical habitat
designations in the project area. Critical habitat designations and lists of protected species by
county are generally available on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services (USFWS) website. If an
Effect Determination or Biological Assessment has been completed for any of the species listed,
please provide them. Applicants may refer to the most recent USFWW Endangered Species
Consultation Handbook for effect determination definitions.
Applicants should include any correspondence with the USFWS that exists related to their
proposal for EDA investment assistance as an exhibit to the Environmental Narrative. For
projects with possible impacts to marine/coastal species, provide and correspondence with the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS).
7. Land Use and Zoning
Describe the present formal zoning designation and current land use of the specific project site
and adjacent land parcels. The areas include: the site of construction activities, adjacent areas,
4
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
Narrative Requirement
and areas affected by the primary beneficiaries. Land uses to be considered include, but are not
limited to, industrial, commercial, residential, agriculture, recreational, woodlands, mines/quarries,
and open spaces. Please indicate if the project is located entirely within a city limit.
Identify agriculture land parcels designated as "prime/unique agriculture lands" by the U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA) under the Federal Farmlands Protection Act or a local
equivalent. Additional information may be found at the USDA's Natural Resources
Conservation Service website.
8. Solid Waste Management
Indicate the types and quantities of solid wastes to be produced by the project facilities and
primary beneficiary. Describe local solid waste collection and disposal methods and the expected
useful life of the disposal facility.
Indicate if recycling or resource recovery programs are currently being use or will be used in the
future.
9. Hazardous or Toxic Substances
Describe any toxic, hazardous, or radioactive substances that will be utilized or produced by the
proposed project facilities and primary beneficiaries.
Describe the manner in which these substances will be stored, used, or disposed.
Complete and sign one "Applicant Certification Clause" for each co -applicant (see Appendix A).
If a recent Phase I o� Phase II Environmental Site Assessment has been performed, please
provide a copy.
10. Water Resources
Describe surface and underground water resources at or near the project site(s) and any impacts
of the project to these. If groundwater will be used, is the aquifer in overdraft and /or
adjudicated? I£ there will be discharges to surface water, is the receiving surface water body listed
on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Section 303(d) list of impaired waters? Is
a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit required for any discharges
to surface waters? Indicate if the proposed project is located within an area mapped by the EPA
as sole source aquifer recharge area (maps and further information are available on EPA's website
at www&pa.- — Describe any induced changes in local surface water runoff patterns, and the
status of storm water discharge permit processes (if applicable).
11. Water Supply and Distribution System
Indicate the source, quality, and supply capacity of local domestic and industrial/commercial
water resources, and the amount of water that project facilities and primary beneficiaries are
expected to utilize. Applicants should note whether the water that is being supplied is in
compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act, and if not, what steps are being taken to ensure
compliance.
12. Wastewater Collection and Treatment Facilities
Describe all domestic class or process wastewater or other discharges associated with the project
facilities and its primary beneficiaries, and the expected composition and quantities to be
discharged either to a municipal system or to the local environment.
Describe the wastewater treatment facilities available for processing the additional effluent and
indicate their design capacities and current loading (both daily average and peak), and their
adequacy in terms of degree and type of treatment required. Indicate all discharges that will
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
Narrative Requirement
require" on-site pre-treatment. Applicants should note whether the wastewater treatment plant is
in violation of the Clean Water Act, and if so, what steps are being taken to ensure compliance.
If local treatment and sewer systems are or will be inadequate or overloaded, describe the steps
being taken for necessary improvements and their completion dates.
13. Environmental Justice (Executive Order 12898)
Applicants should describe whether the proposed project will result in disproportionate adverse
human health or environmental impacts relative to minority and low income populations.
Sufficient detail should be provided to enable EDA to determine whether the project will comply
with Executive Order 12898.
14. Transportation (Streets, Traffic and Parking)
Briefly describe the local street/road system serving the project site(s) and describe any new
traffic patterns that may arise because of the project. Indicate if land use in the vicinity, such as
residential, hospital, school, or recreational, will be affected by these new traffic patterns.
Indicate if any existing capacities of these transportation facilities will be exceeded as a direct or
indirect result of this project implementation, particularly in terms of car and truck traffic, and
what the new Level of Service designation will be.
15. Air Quality
Indicate types and quantities of air emissions (including odors) to be produced by the project
facilities and its primary beneficiaries, and any measures proposed to mitigate adverse impacts.
Indicate the impact that the project would have on greenhouse gas emissions.
Is the proposed project site classified as a "non -attainment" area for any criteria pollutants? If so,
what are those pollutants? Indicate any local topographical or meteorological conditions that
hinder the dispersal of air emissions.
16. Noise Pollution
Will operation of project facilities or primary beneficiaries' facilities increase local ambient noise
levels? If yes, indicate the estimated levels of increase, and the areas and sensitive receptors (e.g.,
residences) to be affected.
17. Permits
Identify any Federal, State, or local permits of an environmental nature needed for the project
(e.g., USACE, US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Coastal Zone
Management/Shoreline Management, Air Quality, State Environmental Policy Act, NPDES, etc.)
and the status of any such permits. Attach copies of any such permits and all associated
correspondence, including the permit applications.
18: Public Notification/ Controversy
Provide evidence of the community's awareness of the project, such as newspaper articles or
public notification and/or public meetings, as applicable.
If a formal public hearing has been held, attach a copy of the transcript.
Fully describe any public controversy or objections which have been made concerning this
proposed project and discuss steps taken to resolve such objections.
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
Narrative Requirement
19. Direct, Indirect, and Cumulative Effects
Please list projects (public and private) that have occurred or will occur in the past, present, and
future in and around the project area that could result in significant cumulative or indirect
impacts when considered in aggregate with the proposed EDA project. Cumulative impacts
result from the incremental impacts of a proposed action when added to other past, present and
reasonable foreseeable future actions (40 C.F.R. Section 1508.7). Indirect impacts are those that
are caused by a proposed action, but that may occur later in time or farther removed in distance,
relative to the primary impacts of the proposed action (40 C.F.R. Section 1508.7)
Applicants should identify the direct and indirect effects of the proposed action; which resources,
ecosystems, and human communities are affected; and which effects on these resources are
important from a cumulative effects perspective.
7
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
Narrative Requirement
E. LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
The following checklist is a list of required and optional attachments to the Environmental
Narrative as described in the sections above. The items listed in the optional section may be
required by EDA at a later date to complete the project review and selection process, so it is
recommended that you provide them now if they are currently available to expedite decision-
making. While the documents listed below are the most common required to make
determinations of compliance with all environmental requirements, EDA reserves the right to
request additional items that are not listed below when necessary.
Applicants are not required to contact other governmental agencies for environmental or
historical resources consultation until directed by EDA, though any interagency coordination
letters that may be currently available should be provided. EDA expects that all Applicants
whose projects are selected for a Non -Binding Commitment letter will proceed with
consultations in an expeditious manner. As such, Applicants should have the required
information prepared for submission immediately upon notification of selection by EDA.
If you determine that your project may affect environmental or historical resources, you may
contact the appropriate Regional Environmental Officer to determine if early interagency
consultation is appropriate.
C becklist. f I e uired EnviropmenW Documents that must be submitted with A1212licationt
oUSGS topographic map(s) and site map(s) (see Section B1)
o FEMA floodplain map with map number (see D4)
oAppendix A: Applicant Certification Clause (See D9)
Checklist of Optional Environthental Docutiient` that should be submit d. with A�Vltcation if
available (willexpedite review and selwion nx,� ocess)
o SHPO/THPO and Tribal leader comments and copy of submittals (see Section C)
o Site photographs (see Section D1)
o Coastal Zone consistency determination (see D2)
o Wetland delineation and/or Jurisdictional Determination (see 133)
o Preliminary wetland info (see 133)
o U.S. Army Corps of Engineers comments, Section 404 Permit, Section 10 Permit, and/or
Water Quality Certification (401 approval) (see 133)
o Biological Assessment and/or survey for federally protected species (see 136)
o Correspondence with US Fish and Wildlife Service and/or National Marine Fisheries
Service (see 136)
o Natural Resources Conservation Service determination of Prime Farmland, Form AD -
1006, if applicable (see D7)
o Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessment (see 139)
o Sole Source Aquifer review by US Environmental Protection Agency, if applicable (see
D10)
o Other federal, state and local environmental permits (see D17)
o Copies of public notices, public hearing minutes, etc. (see D18)
Last Updated January 23, 2014 EDA Environmental
Narrative Requirement
All References refer to applicable Environmental Compliance section of Form ED -900, App/tctton for
EDA Assistance. Applicants should carefully review the applicable FFO for unique requirements for each
individual grant competition.
4
Last Updated Mairb 3, 2013 _ EDA Preliminary �ngi ieeiiir�g. R on Requirements
Overview
EDA is required to complete an engineering review for all construction and design projects before
making an award. FDA's Application Form (Form ED -900, AppficpAipn for EDA Assistance) and
related forms require Applicants to provide key information about the proposed construction and
design projects to enable EDA to compete its requisite reviews.
All applications for construction and design assistance must complete the Preliminary
Engineering Report (PER). The following outline provides more detailed information on these
requirements in order to assist Applicants in preparing their application.
Preliminary Engineering Report Requirements
In order to be considered for assistance, all construction and design applications must include a PER
that at a minimum provides the following information:
2.
3.
Description o�,-Pr tect'CornpobLe-yn= Provide a general description of all project components
involved in the project. Indicate where the project involves the construction of new facilities or
the renovation or replacement of existing ones. Describe each of the project components in
terms of dimensions, quantities, capacities, square footage, etc..
Engineering reports that describe project components that are inconsistent with the EDA
investment project description in Section A.2 of Form ED -900 will not be considered valid.
n:5'ot storm t�ll `7(iUattiat provide eccinomic justificabon fortbe any: Rough
dimensions and quantities for major project components should be shown and labeled on the
drawings. Drawings should clearly identify the project components that are being proposed.
Applicants are encouraged to clarify such drawings, for example, through color coding, labeling,
and other appropriate methods.
4. .A feasibilihJ ai�alvsis for°the eonstruetabilxt of the�roject, including a review of the existing
conditions and noting particular features, alignments, and events affecting construction of
project components.
5. The 12roposed`method -ofconstruction Indicate whether construction procurement shall be
done through competitive bid or other method. Indicate if any portion of the project is to be
done by design/build, construction management at risk, by the applicant's own forces, or
whether a third party construction,manager will be used. If an alternate construction
procurement method (other than traditional design/bid/build with sealed competitive bid
process) is proposed, a construction services procurement plan must be provided to EDA for
approval in accordance with EDA's regulation at 13 C.F.R. 305.6(a).
6. The number of constiuction contracts anticipated. If multiple contracts are proposed, provide a
description of the project components included in each contract. If separate contracts are
Last Updated March 3, 2013 EDA Preliminary Engineering Keporr Requirements
anticipated for demolition or site work, the budget information cost classification should reflect
the estimated costs for these components. If project phasing is proposed, a project phasing
request must be provided to EDA for approval per FDA's regulation at 13 C.F.K. 305.9(a).
7. A current detailed construction cast estimate:for each of the Vtdect components, showing
quantities, unit prices, and total costs. Provide a basis for the determination of construction
contingencies.
8. If the Budget itcludes casts for teal prbliedy ac4uis tton the Ap lican"t hoW include a current
fair market value appraisal completed by a certified appraiser for the property to be purchased.
9. A list of aIl netmts xenuisred for the »r`onosedrojet and their current status,. Identify all
permits required; include the timeline to obtain the permits and discuss how the permitting
relates to the overall project schedule. If the project crosses a railroad right-of-way or is within a
railroad right-of-way, provide an explanation of any permitting or approvals that may be
required from the railroad or other authority and the timeframe for obtaining these permits or
approvals.
10. Ah overall estimatedtolect schedule, including the number of months for each of the
following:
i. design period;
ii. period of time to obtain required permits;
iii. period of time to obtain any required easements of rights-of-way;
iv. solicitation of bids and awarding of contracts, and
V. construction period.
December 31, 2019
Mayor Lioneld Jordan
Fayetteville City Council
113 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Dear Mayor Jordan and Council Aldermen,
strongly support the submission of the Federal Grant application through the Northwest Arkansas
Economic Development District for a road extension in the Commerce District. This grant for $2,605,900
will only require a 20% match by the City or $521,180. The Economic Development bond's first use will
generate an immediate 500% return and open over40 acres for small to medium scale light manufacturing
facilities in Fayetteville.
The Chamber requests approval of the resolution to
• Apply for the grant
• Mayor Jordan to sign a funding commitment letter
• Conduct Environmental Study
The estimated costs are listed below
• Construction: $2,200,000
• Engineering (15%): $330,000
• Administrative/NWAEDD (3% of Construction and Engineering): $75,900
• Total Grant Ask: $2,605,900
• City of Fayetteville 20% Match: $521,180
This project supports the City's economic development goals as outlined in our contract. The type jobs
typical of the Commerce District pay well above the City average and therefore improves the standard of
living for all Fayetteville and Northwest Arkansas residents. By creating the opportunity for expansion in
the Commerce District, we also create access to higher paying jobs for our citizens who live nearby. This
project contributes to the sustainability of a manufacturer base in Fayetteville.
Thank you for your consideration,
Steve Clark
President and Chief Exectutive Officer
Fayetteville Chamber of Commerce
21 W. Mountain St., Ste. 300 72701
CFa=VetI=eViIIe3r.c3r