HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018-10-30 - Agendas - Final
City Council Transportation Committee
October 30, 2018
5:30 pm or Immediately following City Council Agenda Session
City Hall Room 326
Members: Matthew Petty, Chairman; Adella Gray, Kyle Smith, Justin Tennant
City Staff: Chris Brown, City Engineer
1. Old Business:
A. 2019 TRANSPORTATION BOND PROGRAM: Presentation of the draft list of
transportation and trails priority projects, review of project scoring metrics, and
review of preliminary concept drawings for selected projects.
2. New Business:
A. TRAFFIC CALMING PROGRAM AND POLICY: Presentation of draft policy;
review of proposed pilot project designs and estimated pricing.
B. PARKING MASTER PLAN: Review of Parking Master Plan findings and
recommendations and update of implementation status. Information on the
parking implementation plan may be found at: https://www.fayetteville-
ar.gov/3304/Parking-Master-Plan. The Parking Strategies report can be found at
the bottom of the website page, or go to it directly by clicking here.
3. Announcements: Next Meeting November 27, 2018.
4. Adjourn
TO: City Council Transportation Committee
THRU: Mayor Jordan
Don Marr, Chief of Staff
Garner Stoll, Development Services Director
FROM: Chris Brown, City Engineer
DATE: October 26, 2018
SUBJECT: 2019 Bond Program-Draft Transportation Project Priorities
Attached for Transportation Committee review is information on transportation project priorities to be
considered for inclusion in the proposed 2019 bond program. The information attached the same as
that presented at the September Committee, and includes:
1. Summary priority sheet for on street projects, that includes top priorities and secondary
priorities. The list of top priorities equals $70 million, the expected available funding from the
bond issue. Secondary priority projects are additional projects that could be completed if
anticipated grant funding is realized. Note that the secondary priority list includes an
unallocated amount of $7.3 million could be used as contingency for projects that cost more
than estimated, to respond to cost sharing opportunities, or for additional project priorities.
2. Project scoring sheets for corridors, new locations, intersections, and on-street bicycle
facilities. The scoring mechanism was established during the Mobility Plan development, and
reflects the community values what were identified during the planning process.
3. Maps showing:
a. All projects considered and scored
b. Priority projects, based on project scoring and other factors as summarized on the
priority list.
The total of all projects, including secondary priority projects, and assuming grant funding of $16.8
million, is $86.8 million. The chart following this page shows the breakdown by project type.
While we have not made any changes to the project priority spreadsheet, staff has received
feedback and updated information on certain projects, including:
• A recommendation to consider the extension of Salem Road instead of/in addition to the
extension of Shiloh Drive. Both projects would provide a north-south connection between
Wedington Drive and Mount Comfort Road west of I-49.
• A recommendation to review the downtown master plan, relative to the Archibald Yell
Corridor, and relative to downtown street configurations and improvements.
• Updated costs on the North Street Corridor, Old Wire Road cycle track, and Sain Street
extension.
2
• The Rupple Road extension may potentially be constructed as part of a cost share, that will
reduce the cost to the City for that project.
This feedback and any other comments received from Committee will be considered as the final
priorities are developed.
Attachments:
Summary Priority Spreadsheet-On Street Projects
Project Scoring Sheets for On Street Projects
Priority Maps
$6,800,000
(9%)
$32,920,000
(41%)
$9,560,000
(12%)
$6,000,000
(8%)
$4,000,000
(5%)
$1,750,000
(2%)
$18,470,000
23%
TOTALS
BY PROJECT TYPE
On-Street Bike Facilities Corridor Improvements
Intersection/Signalization System Maintenance
Sidewalk/Streetscape Transit
New Location
City of Fayetteville
2019 Bond Program
Draft List of Transportation Projects
A: Top Priorities
Project Name Ward Type/Mode Est. Cost Anticipated Grant E
s City Cost Reason For Priority
Maple Street Cycle Track 2 RRG/Gregg Ave. to Stadium Dr.Bike/Pedestrian Improvements 4,000,000$ 3,000,000$ 1,000,000$ Priority Score; Funding Partners
Hwy 62/I-49 Int. Bike/Ped Connections 1 Tsa La Gi Trail to One Mile Road Bike/Pedestrian Improvements 2,000,000$ 1,000,000$ 1,000,000$ Priority Score; Funding Partners; Response to ArDOT Project
Old Wire Road Cycle Track (Extension)3 Gulley Park to Rolling Hills Bike/Pedestrian Improvements 800,000$ 400,000$ 400,000$ Priority Score; Funding Partner
Highway 112 (Howard Nickell Rd.) 4 Howard Nickell Rd. to Van Asche Corridor Improvements 4,700,000$ 4,230,000$ 470,000$ ArDOT Funding Opportunity
Archibald Yell Blvd. Safety Improvements 1/2 MLK Blvd. to Rock St.Corridor Improvements 700,000$ -$ 700,000$ Priority Score
Rolling Hills Improvements 3 Appleby-Old Missouri Road Corridor Improvements 3,500,000$ -$ 3,500,000$ Priority Score
Zion Road Improvements 3 Vantage-Crossover Corridor Improvements 4,900,000$ -$ 4,900,000$ Priority Score; Holdover from 2006 Bond Program
Porter Road/Deane St./Sycamore St. Corridor 2 Mt. Comfort-College Ave.Corridor Improvements 4,200,000$ 1,050,000$ 3,150,000$ Priority Score; Funding Partners
Highway 71B Corridor 1/2/3 Cato Springs Rd. to Zion Road Corridor Improvements 10,000,000$ -$ 10,000,000$ Priority Score (Placeholder amount pending Study completion)
North/Mission Blvd. Corridor 2/3 Garland Ave. to Old Wire Rd.Corridor Improvements 3,420,000$ -$ 3,420,000$ Priority Score
Other Signalization (4-5 Locations TBD)1/2/3/4 From List Above-Actual TBD Int./Signalization 1,000,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ TBD based on scoring, funding, and approval by ArDOT
Millsap St/College Ave Intersection Impts 3 College Ave/Millsap St.Intersection Impts.1,200,000$ -$ 1,200,000$ Priority Score
15th/Razorback Intersection 1 15th St. and Razorback Road Intersection Impts.1,100,000$ -$ 1,100,000$ Priority Score
Hwy 112/Howard Nickell Road Improvements 4 112/Howard Nickell Intersection Impts.4,100,000$ 3,280,000$ 820,000$ Current Federal Aid Project
Shiloh Dr./Fulbright Expressway Intersection 3 Shiloh Drive and Fulbright Expwy Intersection Impts.860,000$ -$ 860,000$ Priority Score
Center/Harmon Intersection 2 Center and Harmon Intersection Impts.1,300,000$ -$ 1,300,000$ Priority Score
Steamboat/Dorothy Jeanne St. Connection 4 Steamboat to Dorothy Jeanne New Location 670,000$ -$ 670,000$ Necessary to Coordinate with Wedington Interchange Project
Rupple Road Extension 4 Tanyard Drive to Weir Road New Location 5,000,000$ -$ 5,000,000$ Final Missing Link of Arterial Loop
Sain Street Extension 3 Front to Joyce New Location 4,800,000$ 3,840,000$ 960,000$ Priority Score; Current Federal Aid Project
Signal Hardware/Software Upgrades 1/2/3/4 Citywide Maintenance 1,000,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ Allows for remote connections; more options for ped/bike phases
Pavement Maintenance/Overlays 1/2/3/4 Citywide Maintenance 5,000,000$ -$ 5,000,000$ Mobility Plan identified maintenance as a priority
Downtown Sidewalk/Walkability Impts.2 Various in Downtown Area Sidewalk/ADA Ramp Const./Replacement 3,000,000$ -$ 3,000,000$ Identified High Priority Area in Mobility Plan
MLK Area Walkability Impts.1 School Avenue-College Avenue Sidewalk/ADA Ramp Const./Replacement 1,000,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ Identified High Priority Area in Mobility Plan
BRT Corridor Improvements 2/3 College Ave. Corridor Transit Infrastructure 1,000,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ Improvements Identified in Bus Rapid Transit Study
Transit Route Int./Striping/Stop Amenities 1/2/3/4 Various Transit Infrastructure 750,000$ -$ 750,000$ Amenities along BRT and other routes
TOTALS FOR TOP PRIORITIES 70,000,000$ 16,800,000$ 53,200,000$
B. Secondary Priorities
Shiloh Drive Connection 4 Mt. Comfort-Wedington New Location 6,600,000$ -$ 6,600,000$ Priority Score
Extend Wood Ave to 15th St.1 0 New Location 1,400,000$ -$ 1,400,000$ Priority Score
Mall Avenue Access Impts 3 Mall Avenue Near Joyce Blvd Corridor Improvements 1,500,000$ -$ 1,500,000$ Priority Score; Transit Improvement
Unallocated/Contingency/Cost Shares 1/2/3/4 0 Various 7,300,000$ -$ 7,300,000$
TOTALS FOR SECONDARY PRIORITIES 16,800,000$ -$ 16,800,000$
GRAND TOTALS 86,800,000$ 16,800,000$ 70,000,000$
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NumberProject Description Ward Location DrivingWalkingBikingTransitMaintenanceHealth and SafetyHigh-Injury Corridor/IntersectionTrail Gap Closure (missing/dysfunctional connection)Sidewalk Gap ClosureSidewalk Condition (pavement, dimensions, lighting)Health and Safety Total ScoreEconomyCityPlan Future Land-Use Centers and Corridors ImplementationCorridor Vehicle DelayCorridor Person DelayEconomic DevelopmentEconomy Total ScoreEnvironmentTree Canopy on Major Walk/Bike RoutesStormwater - Mapped Service Request AlignmentReduced Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT/capita)Environment Total ScoreEquityFree and Reduced-Price Lunch School ProximitySchool-Aged Children in PovertySchool Walk Accessibility Gap AnalysisTransit Access to High-Density EmploymentTransit Service and Walk Access to Low-Income PopulationsAccess for Older Adults or Persons with DisabilitiesEquity Total ScoreDeliverability and FundingProject ReadinessFunding Partnership OpportunityOther RepavingDeliverability and Funding Total ScoreCost/BenefitTotal Aggregate Score4 Archibald Yell Blvd. Safety Improvements 1/2 MLK Blvd. to Rock St.
x 3 1 4 5 3.3 4 4 4 4 4.0 2 1 1 1.3 5 5 5 5 5 4 4.8 4 2 1 2.3 15.8
11 Porter Road/Deane St./Sycamore St. Corridor 2 Mt. Comfort-College Ave.
x x x x 3 5 5 4 4.3 3 3 3 1 2.5 3 4 2 3.0 0 0 2 3 3 0 1.3 2 3 0 1.7 12.8
12 Highway 71B Corridor 1/2/3 Cato Springs Rd. to Zion Road
x x x x 0 5 5 5 3.8 5 -3 2 5 2.3 5 3 5 4.3 1 1 3 5 5 1 2.7 -3 1 0 -0.7 12.3
13 North/Mission Blvd. Corridor 2/3 Garland Ave. to Old Wire Rd.
x x x x 5 4 4 4 4.3 3 3 3 1 2.5 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 3 2 0 0 0.8 0 0 2 0.7 8.3
8 Zion Road Improvements 3 Vantage-Crossover
x x x 0 0 5 5 2.5 4 3 2 1 2.5 2 0 0 0.7 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 5 0 0 1.7 7.8
7 Rolling Hills Improvements 3 Appleby-Old Missouri Road
x x x 0 0 3 0 0.8 2 2 2 1 1.8 2 5 0 2.3 0 0 5 0 0 0 0.8 3 0 0 1.0 6.7
6 Howard Nickell Road Impts.4 Rupple Road-Hwy 112
x x x 0 3 3 3 2.3 1 5 1 2 2.3 2 0 -4 -0.7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 2 5 0 2.3 6.3
9 Mall Avenue Access Impts 3 Mall Avenue Near Joyce Blvd
x 0 0 4 0 1.0 0 3 3 3 2.3 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0.7 2 0 0 0.7 4.6
10 MLK Blvd. Safety Improvements 1 Stadium Drive-Razorback Road
x x x 4 0 0 4 2.0 2 0 2 0 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 0 4 0 0 0 1 0.8 2 0 0 0.7 4.5
1 Highway 112 (Howard Nickell Rd.) 4 Howard Nickell Rd. to Van Asche
x x x 0 3 3 3 0.0 1 5 1 2 2.3 2 0 -4 -0.7 0 0 0 0 0 1 0.2 2 5 0 2.3 4.1
2 Rupple Road Widening 4 Weir Rd.-Howard Nickell
x x x 0 0 2 1 0.0 0 4 0 0 1.0 1 0 0 0.3 1 0 0 0 0 1 0.3 1 0 0 0.3 2.0
3 Rupple Road Widening 4 Mt. Comfort-Tanyard
x 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 2 -1 0 0.3 0 0 -4 -1.3 -1 -1 -1 0 0 0 -0.5 0 0 0 0.0 -1.6
Weighting
Primary Mode/Function
Weighting Weighting Weighting
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NumberProject Description Location DrivingWalkingBikingTransitMaintenanceHealth and SafetyHigh-Injury Corridor/IntersectionTrail Gap Closure (missing/dysfunctional connection)Sidewalk Gap ClosureSidewalk Condition (pavement, dimensions, lighting)Health and Safety Total ScoreEconomyCityPlan Future Land-Use Centers and Corridors ImplementationCorridor Vehicle DelayCorridor Person DelayEconomic DevelopmentEconomy Total ScoreEnvironmentTree Canopy on Major Walk/Bike RoutesStormwater - Mapped Service Request AlignmentReduced Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT/capita)Environment Total ScoreEquityFree and Reduced-Price Lunch School ProximitySchool-Aged Children in PovertySchool Walk Accessibility Gap AnalysisTransit Access to High-Density EmploymentTransit Service and Walk Access to Low-Income PopulationsAccess for Older Adults or Persons with DisabilitiesEquity Total ScoreDeliverability and FundingProject ReadinessFunding Partnership OpportunityOther RepavingDeliverability and Funding Total ScoreCost/BenefitTotal Aggregate Score37 Sain Street Extension Front to Joyce 0 0 3 0 0.8 3 4 4 2 2.5 -1 0 1 0.3 0 0 0 5 2 3 1.7 5 5 0 1.7 6.9
29 Extend Wood Ave to 15th St.x x x x 0 0 1 0 0.3 2 1 3 3 2.3 0 5 1 2.0 0 3 0 3 3 5 2.3 0 0 0 0.0 6.8
30 Shiloh Drive Connection Mt. Comfort-Wedington x x x x 3 5 5 0 3.3 3 2 2 4 2.8 1 0 0 0.3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.0 6.8
31 Salem Road Extension Mount Comfort to Fairfax x x x 0 0 4 0 1.0 2 4 2 3 2.8 2 0 1 1.0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0.5 0 0 0 0.0 5.3
33 Longview Extension West of Plainview Ave.0 0 3 0 0.8 1 2 2 4 2.3 0 0 1 0.3 0 3 0 0 0 3 1.0 1 0 0 0.3 4.7
32 Steamboat/Dorothy Jeanne St. Connection Steamboat to Dorothy Jeanne
x x x 0 0 5 0 1.3 4 1 1 2 2.0 0 0 1 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0.3 1 0 0 0.3 4.3
34 Plainview Ave Extension South to Fiesta Square x x x 0 1 1 0 0.5 2 1 1 4 2.0 1 0 1 0.7 0 3 0 0 0 3 1.0 -1 1 0 0.0 4.2
69 15th St Ext.-Shiloh to Farmer's Drive S. of MLK-Shiloh to WM Entrance 2 0 0 0 0.5 2 2 2 4 2.0 0 0 0 0.0 1 1 0 3 3 0 1.2 0.0 3.7
35 Plainview/Whole Foods connection Plainview to Whole Foods x x 0 0 2 0 0.5 1 1 1 4 1.8 0 0 0 0.0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0.5 2 0 0 0.7 3.4
36 Rupple Road Extension Tanyard Drive to Weir Road x x x x 0 2 2 0 1.0 2 2 0 2 1.5 2 0 -3 -0.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 2 0 0.7 2.8
Weighting
Primary Mode/Function
Weighting Weighting Weighting
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
NumberProject Description Location DrivingWalkingBikingTransitMaintenanceHealth and SafetyHigh-Injury Corridor/IntersectionTrail Gap Closure (missing/dysfunctional connection)Sidewalk Gap ClosureSidewalk Condition (pavement, dimensions, lighting)Health and Safety Total ScoreEconomyCityPlan Future Land-Use Centers and Corridors ImplementationCorridor Vehicle DelayCorridor Person DelayEconomic DevelopmentEconomy Total ScoreEnvironmentTree Canopy on Major Walk/Bike RoutesStormwater - Mapped Service Request AlignmentReduced Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT/capita)Environment Total ScoreEquityFree and Reduced-Price Lunch School ProximitySchool-Aged Children in PovertySchool Walk Accessibility Gap AnalysisTransit Access to High-Density EmploymentTransit Service and Walk Access to Low-Income PopulationsAccess for Older Adults or Persons with DisabilitiesEquity Total ScoreDeliverability and FundingProject ReadinessFunding Partnership OpportunityOther RepavingDeliverability and Funding Total ScoreCost/BenefitTotal Aggregate Score14 Millsap St/College Ave Intersection Impts College Ave/Millsap St.
x x x 5 3 5 3 4.0 3 4 4 3 3.5 0 0 0 0.0 0 2 0 5 5 1 2.2 1 1 0 0.7 10.3
15 15th/Razorback Intersection 15th St. and Razorback Road x x x 3 -1 3 3 2.0 -2 3 5 0 1.5 5 2 -1 2.0 3 -3 4 0 5 1 1.7 4 4 -2 2.0 9.2
20 Center/Harmon Intersection Center and Harmon x x x 0 4 4 4 3.0 0 3 3 0 1.5 0 0 0 0.0 0 3 2 1 0 1 1.2 2 2 1 1.7 7.3
16 Hwy 112/Howard Nickell Road Improvements 112/Howard Nickell
x 0 3 3 3 2.3 1 5 1 2 2.3 2 0 -4 -0.7 0 1 0 0 0 1 0.3 4 5 0 3.0 7.2
21 Morningside Drive Signalization Morninside/Huntsville x x 0 3 3 1 1.8 1 2 2 1 1.5 0 0 -1 -0.3 0 2 0 2 2 2 1.3 3 2 0 1.7 5.9
22 Beechwood/MLK Signalization Beechwood/MLK Intersection x x 0 0 5 4 2.3 1 0 1 2 1.0 0 0 2 0.7 0 1 1 4 4 1 1.8 0 0 0 0.0 5.8
17 Shiloh Dr./Fulbright Expressway Intersection Shiloh Drive and Fulbright Expwy
x 2 0 5 0 1.8 4 4 0 2 2.5 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0.5 0 0 0 0.0 4.8
24 Wedington Rd./Porter Road Signaliation Wedington/Porter
x x x 0 0 4 4 2.0 1 -2 2 0 0.3 0 0 0 0.0 4 4 2 0 3 2 2.5 0 0 0 0.0 4.8
23 Wedington/Golf Club Drive Signalization Wedington and Golf Club Dr.
x x x 2 0 4 1 1.8 3 0 1 3 1.8 0 0 1 0.3 1 1 1 0 0 1 0.7 0 0 0 0.0 4.5
25 Poplar Street Signalization Poplar/College Avenue x x 0 2 1 0 0.8 2 1 1 4 2.0 0 0 1 0.3 0 2 1 0 0 2 0.8 0 0 0 0.0 3.9
18 Shiloh Drive/Steele Blvd. Intersection ImprovementsShiloh Drive/Steele Blvd Int.x 3 0 0 1 1.0 2 3 0 2 1.8 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 1 0 0 0.3 3.1
19 Gregg Ave-Left turn lanes at Sycamore and PoplarSycamore and Poplar x 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 3 3 0 1.5 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 3 0 0 1.0 2.5
26 Spring Street and College Ave. Signalization Spring/Collge 2 0 3 1 1.5 3 -2 2 1 1.0 0 0 0 0.0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0.7 0 0 -2 -0.7 2.5
27 Government/MLK Signalization Government/MLK Intersection 0 0 3 0 0.8 1 -1 0 2 0.5 0 0 1 0.3 0 3 1 2 2 0 1.3 -3 0 0 -1.0 1.9
70 15th Street/Duncan Avenue x 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
71 Mission Blvd/Maple St.x 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0.0 0.0
72 Joyce Blvd/Front Street x 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
73 Wal-Mart Drive/Oak Rd./MLK Blvd.x 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
74 Other Signalization (4-5 Locations TBD) From List Above-Actual TBD
x 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
28 River Meadows Dr. Signalization River Meadows and Hwy 16 x 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 -3 0 1 -0.5 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 -0.5
Weighting
Primary Mode/Function
Weighting Weighting Weighting
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Project Description Ward LF Location DrivingWalkingBikingTransitMaintenanceHealth and SafetyHigh-Injury Corridor/IntersectionTrail Gap Closure (missing/dysfunctional connection)Sidewalk Gap ClosureSidewalk Condition (pavement, dimensions, lighting)Health and Safety Total ScoreEconomyCityPlan Future Land-Use Centers and Corridors ImplementationCorridor Vehicle DelayCorridor Person DelayEconomic DevelopmentEconomy Total ScoreEnvironmentTree Canopy on Major Walk/Bike RoutesStormwater - Mapped Service Request AlignmentReduced Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT/capita)Environment Total ScoreEquityFree and Reduced-Price Lunch School ProximitySchool-Aged Children in PovertySchool Walk Accessibility Gap AnalysisTransit Access to High-Density EmploymentTransit Service and Walk Access to Low-Income PopulationsAccess for Older Adults or Persons with DisabilitiesEquity Total ScoreDeliverability and FundingProject ReadinessFunding Partnership OpportunityOther RepavingDeliverability and Funding Total ScoreCost/BenefitTotal Aggregate ScoreMaple Street Cycle Track 2 3220 RRG/Gregg Ave. to Stadium Dr.x x 5 4 2 5 0.0 5 0 5 5 3.8 0 5 5 3.3 5 5 0 5 5 1 3.5 5 5 0 3.3 13.9
Spring Street Bikeway 2 2577 West Ave-Downtown Square x x 4 2 0 5 0.0 5 0 5 5 3.8 0 5 5 3.3 3 3 1 5 4 5 3.5 3 5 0 2.7 13.3
Hwy 62/I-49 Int. Bike/Ped Connections 1 3500 Tsa La Gi Trail to One Mile Road x x 5 4 5 5 0.0 5 0 5 5 3.8 3 0 5 2.7 5 2 5 5 5 4 4.3 2 5 0 2.3 13.1
Mission Blvd. Trail 2/3 5289 Viewpoint to Rush x x 5 5 5 5 0.0 5 0 5 5 3.8 0 4 5 3.0 4 2 4 2 0 5 2.8 4 5 0 3.0 12.6
Mission/Lafayette Bicycle Impts 1/2/3 5358 North St. to College Ave.x x 5 5 5 5 0.0 5 0 5 5 3.8 2 3 5 3.3 5 2 3 5 0 5 3.3 3 3 0 2.0 12.4
Old Wire Road Cycle Track (Extension) 3 3526 Gulley Park to Rolling Hills x x 0 5 5 0 2.5 5 0 5 1 2.8 3 0 5 2.7 1 2 5 0 0 4 2.0 2 5 0 2.3 12.3
Drake Street Cycle Track and Trail 3 4358 College Ave. to Gordon Long Park x x 5 5 5 5 0.0 5 0 5 5 3.8 0 0 5 1.7 3 4 3 4 5 5 4.0 2 3 0 1.7 11.1
Centennial Park Connections 1 4622 One Mile and Old Farmington Rd.x 0 2 2 0 1.0 4 0 5 3 3.0 2 0 2 1.3 5 2 3 2 4 2 3.0 2 5 0 2.3 10.7
Shiloh Trail 1/4 14079 Moore Ln. to MLK (Hwy 62)x x 3 3 3 1 2.5 5 0 5 3 3.3 0 0 3 1.0 4 3 3 2 2 3 2.8 2 0 0 0.7 10.3
Rupple Road Trail 4 3600 Wedington to Hamestring Creek x x 5 5 5 0 0.0 3 0 5 3 2.8 1 0 4 1.7 4 4 4 2 5 2 3.5 4 2 0 2.0 9.9
Crossover Road (Expand Sidewalk East Side) 3 20554 Hwy 16 to Mission x 3 0 0 5 2.0 3 0 0 0 0.8 1 0 2 1.0 2 2 0 0 0 4 1.3 1 0 0 0.3 5.4
Crossover Road (Expand Sidewalk West Side) 1 13973 Mission to Lake Fayetteville x 3 0 0 5 2.0 3 0 0 0 0.8 1 0 2 1.0 1 2 0 0 0 4 1.2 1 0 0 0.3 5.3
Weighting
Primary Mode/Function
Weighting Weighting Weighting
GG
GG
GG
GG
GG
¬«14
¬«15
¬«16
¬«17
¬«20
¬«11
¬«53
¬«11
¬«13
¬«32
¬«12
¬«12
¬«53
¬«29
¬«7
¬«9
¬«36
¬«37
¬«30
¬«4
¬«52
¬«53
¬«77
¬«1
¬«12
¬«7
¬«8
¬«13
¬«12
¬«11
¬«62
¬«63
¬«62
City of Fayetteville, AR
Legend
Mobility Project
GG Intersection Improvement
Corridor, Funded
Corridor, Unfunded
New Location, Funded
New Location, Unfunded
On-Street Bicycle, Funded
On-Street Bicycle, Unfunded
Walkability Improvement Area
Transportation Bond IssuePriority Projects Map(Draft)
1 Highway 112 (Howard Nickell Rd.) 4 Archibald Yell Blvd. Safety Improvements7 Rolling Hills Improvements8 Zion Road Improvements11 Porter Road/Deane St./Sycamore St. Corridor12 Highway 71B Corridor13 North/Mission Blvd. Corridor14 College Avenue/Millsap Intersection Improvements15 15th/Razorback Intersection16 Hwy 112/Howard Nickell Road Improvements17 Shiloh Dr./Fulbright Expressway Intersection20 Center/Harmon Intersection32 Steamboat/Dorothy Jeanne St. Connection36 Rupple Road Extension 37 Sain Street Extension52 Maple Street Cycle Track 53 Hwy 62/I-49 Interchange57 Signal Hardware/Software Upgrades58 Pavement Maintenance/Overlays62 Downtown Sidewalk/Walkability Impts.63 MLK Area Walkability Impts.67 BRT Corridor Improvements68 Transit Route Int./Striping/Stop Amenities Impts.74 Other Signalization (4-5 Locations TBD)77 Old Wire Road Cycle Track (Extension)
Project List - Top Priorities
9 Mall Ave Access Improvements29 Extend Wood Ave. to 15th Street30 Shiloh Drive Connection
Project List - Secondary Priorities
4
¬«14
¬«15
¬«16
¬«17 ¬«18
¬«19
¬«19
¬«20
¬«21
¬«22
¬«24¬«23
¬«25
¬«26
¬«27
¬«28
¬«70
¬«71
¬«72
¬«73
¬«11
¬«53
¬«11
¬«13
¬«32
¬«12
¬«12
¬«53
¬«35
¬«29
¬«59
¬«7
¬«34
¬«9
¬«10
¬«60
¬«31
¬«2
¬«36
¬«37
¬«76
¬«69
¬«30
¬«4
¬«52
¬«53
¬«77
¬«1
¬«12
¬«7
¬«75
¬«3
¬«79
¬«78
¬«78
¬«8
¬«6
¬«13
¬«12
¬«11
¬«64
¬«62
¬«63
¬«62
City of Fayetteville, AR
Legend
Mobility Project
GG Intersection Improvement
Signal
Corridor
Maintenance/Overlay
New Location
On-Street Bicycle
Walkability Improvement Area
1 Highway 112 (Howard Nickell Rd.) 2 Rupple Road Widening3 Rupple Road Widening4 Archibald Yell Blvd. Safety Improvements6 Howard Nickell Road Impts.7 Rolling Hills Improvements8 Zion Road Improvements9 Mall Avenue Access Impts10 MLK Blvd. Safety Improvements11 Porter Road/Deane St./Sycamore St. Corridor12 Highway 71B Corridor13 North/Mission Blvd. Corridor14 College Avenue/Millsap Intersection Improvements15 15th/Razorback Intersection16 Hwy 112/Howard Nickell Road Improvements17 Shiloh Dr./Fulbright Expressway Intersection18 Shiloh Drive/Steele Blvd. Intersection Improvements19 Gregg Ave-Left turn lanes at Sycamore and Poplar20 Center/Harmon Intersection21 Morningside Drive Signalization22 Beechwood/MLK Signalization23 Wedington/Golf Club Drive Signalization24 Wedington Rd./Porter Road Signaliation25 Poplar Street Signalization26 Spring Street and College Ave. Signalization27 Government/MLK Signalization28 River Meadows Dr. Signalization29 Extend Wood Ave to 15th St.30 Shiloh Drive Connection31 Salem Road Extension32 Steamboat/Dorothy Jeanne St. Connection33 Longview Extension 34 Plainview Ave Extension35 Plainview/Whole Foods connection36 Rupple Road Extension 37 Sain Street Extension38 Hamestring Trail Bridge40 Tsa La Gi Trail - Close the Gap41 Morningside Trail (Park Meadows)42 Alberta Trail Segments43 Regional Park Loop44 Sublet Creek45 Shiloh Trail MLK South46 Clabber Creek Trail47 Owl Creek Trail48 St. Paul Trail (Includes replacement of Existing)50 Hamestring Creek Trail & Bryce Davis Connection51 Mission/Lafayette Bicycle Impts52 Maple Street Cycle Track 53 Hwy 62/I-49 Interchange54 Shiloh Trail57 Signal Hardware/Software Upgrades58 Pavement Maintenance/Overlays59 Frisco Avenue60 Lake Sequoyah Bridge Rehab62 Downtown Sidewalk/Walkability Impts.63 MLK Area Walkability Impts.64 Cleveland Street Area Walkability66 Citywide Sidewalk Improvements67 BRT Corridor Improvements68 Transit Route Int./Striping/Stop Amenities Impts.69 15th St Ext.-Shiloh to Farmer's Drive70 15th Street/Duncan Avenue71 Mission Blvd/Maple St.72 Joyce Blvd/Front Street73 Wal-Mart Drive/Oak Rd./MLK Blvd.74 Other Signalization (4-5 Locations TBD)75 Rupple Road Trail76 Spring Street Bikeway77 Old Wire Road Cycle Track (Extension)78 Mission Blvd. Trail79 Drake Street Cycle Track and Trail
Initial Project List
Transportation Bond IssueMap of All Projects Considered
4
TO: Transportation Committee
THRU: Chris Brown, City Engineer
FROM: Matt Mihalevich, Trails Coordinator
DATE: September 20th, 2018
SUBJECT: Trail Priority Project Selection for the 2019 Bond Program
BACKGROUND:
The trail priority projects listed below and in the attached spreadsheet were chosen based on
detailed evaluation by a committee of five City staff members using the Mobility Toolkit. This
tool developed by the consultants of the Mobility plan uses the six categories of Health & Safety,
Economy, Environment, Equity, Deliverability and funding, and Cost Benefit. Each of these
categories have specific sub categories including most notably trail gap closure, high-injury
corridor, access to schools especially for low income and senior residents, and funding
partnership opportunities.
DISCUSSION:
Based on this detailed evaluation, the following trail projects received the highest scores and
are therefore being recommended for inclusion in the 2019 transportation bond program. The
selected projects are also listed on the 5-year trail priority plan that is currently in the process of
being finalized by the Active Transportation Advisory Committee.
Trail Project Location Score
1 Tsa La Gi – Close the gap Razorback Road 14.9
2 Sublet Creek Trail Mission & North to Poplar at College 14.9
3 Shiloh Trail South MLK south to Regional Park 14.2
4 Hamestring Trail Bridge Woodridge Dr.13.8
5 St. Paul Trail (Industrial Park &
Neighborhoods)
Razorback Greenway to Dead
Horse Mtn.
12.7
6 Shiloh Trail Mid-section Moore Ln. to Centennial Park 12.2
7 Shiloh trail (Centennial Park Connections) Centennial Park to MLK & Old
Farmington
12.2
8 Clabber Creek Trail Holcomb School to Van Asche 11.1
Attachments:
2019 Bond Program Trail Priority Projects List
2019 Bond Program Trail Priority Projects Map
NumberProject DescriptionWard LF LocationTotal Aggregate ScoreEstimated CostCostCumulative CostAnticipated Grant FundingPotential Cost After Grant FundingCumulative Cost After Grant Funding40Tsa La Gi Trail - Close the Gap1 1,174 Razorback Road. 14.91150,000$ 150,000$ -$ 150,000$ 150,000$ 44Sublet Creek2 5,665 Mission & North to Poplar14.92900,000$ 1,050,000$ -$ 900,000$ 1,050,000$ 45Shiloh Trail MLK South (Regional Park Connection)1 8,840 MLK/Hwy 62 to Regional Park14.22750,000$ 1,800,000$ 750,000$ 1,800,000$ 38Hamestring Trail Bridge4 480 Woodridge Dr. 13.81150,000$ 1,950,000$ 120,000$ 30,000$ 1,830,000$ 48St. Paul Trail (Industrial Park & Neighborhoods)1 17,939 Razorback Gwy. To Dead House Mtn.12.742,845,000$ 4,795,000$ -$ 2,845,000$ 4,675,000$ 54Shiloh Trail 4 13063 Moore Ln. to Centennial Park12.231,000,000$ 5,795,000$ 275,000$ 725,000$ 5,400,000$ 54Shiloh Trail (Centennial Park Connections)1 4880 Centennial Park to MLK & Old Farmington12.21200,000$ 5,995,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ 5,500,000$ 46Clabber Creek Trail4 10,789 Holcomb School to Van Asche11.131,000,000$ 6,795,000$ -$ 1,000,000$ 6,500,000$ Trail Priority Projects for the 2019 Bond
¬«54
¬«54
¬«54
¬«48
¬«38
¬«54
¬«40
¬«48
¬«54
¬«54
¬«54¬«54
¬«54
¬«54
¬«54
¬«54 ¬«54
¬«44
¬«48
¬«45
¬«46
¬«48
City of Fayetteville, AR
Legend
Trail
Existing Trail
4
Transportation Bond IssuePriority Trails Projects Map(Draft)Razorback Greenway38 Hamestring Trail Bridge40 Tsa La Gi Trail (Close the Gap)44 Sublet Creek45 Shiloh Trail MLK South (Regional Park Connection)46 Clabber Creek Trail48 St. Paul Trail (Industrial Park & Neighborhoods)54 Shiloh Trail (Includes Centennial Park Connections)
Trail Project List
Page 1 of 4
A Policy for the Prioritization and Selection of Traffic Calming Projects
City of Fayetteville
Engineering Division
Policy & Procedures
A Policy for the Prioritization and Selection of Traffic Calming Projects
EFFECTIVE DATE
TBD
PURPOSE
To promote consistent and equitable formulation of city-initiated traffic
calming installations within existing residential neighborhoods.
PROCEDURE
1. Collection of traffic calming requests and potential projects.
a. A backlog of historic traffic calming requests exists from approximately
2006 to present.
b. Additional requests should be added to this list; spreadsheet kept on
Engineering shared drive at \\city\dfs\Divs\Engineering\Engineering
Coordinator\Speed Table Requests
c. When a request is made by a citizen, engineering should also explain the
Tactical Urbanism process and point them to the city website.
d. If a citizen requests police patrol enforcement or if they mention it is life -
threatening, forward the request to Anthony Murphy (Tony) or Greg
Dawson in the police department. They may choose to implement a speed
radar sign or dispatch officers to patrol.
e. If a citizen makes a request directly to the police department, PD will
forward the information to engineering@fayetteville-ar.gov so that it can
be added to the engineering spreadsheet.
f. Additional requests may be added to this list without direct citizen input at
the discretion of the City Engineer.
Page 2 of 4
A Policy for the Prioritization and Selection of Traffic Calming Projects
2. Prioritization of traffic calming requests.
Note: Previous methods of prioritization were based on laborious traffic counts and detailed
studies without sensitivity to context and obvious need. The intent of this policy is to streamline
projects that are obvious candidates and allow for installation of traffic calming features that could
be easily removed if found to be unsatisfactory.
a. The city GIS department has created an interactive map to investigate
traffic calming requests. Available here: https://maps.fayetteville-
ar.gov/temp/trafficcalmingrequests_edit/
1. You can login with your city credentials:
2. Example: CITY\cgranderson as the username
3. Whatever password you have for your city account as the
password
b. Traffic calming requests should be mapped (section ‘b’ above) and
categorized. Three priority-tiers have been identified, listed from highest to
lowest priority:
Tier 1: Proximity to Schools or other significant Points of Interest
(1/2-mile walkshed is recommended from Fay. Mobility Plan
literature)
Tier 2: Obvious cut-through opportunities (Based on engineering
best judgement, could be supplemented with traffic count study)
Tier 3: Dead-end or disconnected areas of the transportation
network.
c. City ward boundaries should be considered so that projects affecting each
ward can be implemented (geographic and political equity).
i. Project areas will be chosen using engineering best judgement as
well as city council input.
ii. Project candidates will:
1. Be nearby points of interest and have obvious cut-through
traffic potential.
2. Avoid diversion of cut-through traffic onto nearby streets,
thereby moving a problem from one street to another.
3. Level 1 actions: Police Department enforcement.
a. Speed-radar signage
i. City PD currently has (1) sign-mounted digital speed-radar sign
which collects traffic count and speed data, displays vehicle speed,
and flashes vehicle speeds over the set limit.
ii. Several other speed-radar signs are owned and implemented
periodically by Fayetteville Public Schools.
iii. Sign installation effectiveness can be measured by comparing the
collected data against traffic speed data collected through in-street
count tubes. A follow-up speed study (without the sign) may be
Page 3 of 4
A Policy for the Prioritization and Selection of Traffic Calming Projects
performed by contacting Brad Anderson in the Transportation
Division.
b. Officer Dispatch
i. If the speed-radar sign indicates significant speeding, or if
additional complaints arise, the PD may choose to dispatch officers
for speed enforcement.
4. Level 2 actions: Implementation of traffic calming measures in residential
neighborhoods.
a. In-house Design
i. City Engineering staff will design custom layouts, striping, feature
selection, signage, etc.
ii. This design will be presented to the transportation committee for
discussion, input, and concurrence.
b. Neighborhood Input
i. The project plan should be presented to the immediately affected
neighborhood.
Note: Neighborhood input as discussed in this section could be performed by
residents of the neighborhood or by city staff. City staff may choose to place this
burden on the neighborhood when appropriate.
1. The adjacent property owners (‘affected area’) to be
contacted will be determined by City Engineering staff based
on best practices used nationwide, described within the US
Traffic Calming Manual.
2. Door hangers or mailers will be developed & distributed
toward this end.
3. Input from the neighborhood should be collected by
residents of the neighborhood. Materials mentioned herein
can be generated in-part by city staff.
ii. The project will be considered favorable from neighbors if:
1. A simple majority of respondents favor project
implementation; AND
2. (If applicable) Landscape features are “championed” by
specific residents for watering, upkeep, etc.
iii. A neighborhood ‘champion’ or ‘champions’ should be identified to
care and maintain the planter boxes along the corridor.
1. If this cannot be achieved, the installation should not occur.
2. Alternatively, other features may be considered that do not
require tending and maintenance.
iv. If favorable, a second door hanger or mailer should be sent
notifying neighbors when a project is to be installed.
c. Existing Conditions Data Collection
Page 4 of 4
A Policy for the Prioritization and Selection of Traffic Calming Projects
i. The Engineering Division should locate appropriate locations for
measuring traffic operating speeds, counts, etc.
ii. Coordinate with Brad Anderson (Transportation Division) to
schedule data collection prior to installation of traffic calming
features.
d. Purchasing and Installation
i. Detailed pricing will be obtained by the Engineering Division
ii. Transportation division will install procured materials per plans and
direction of City Engineering.
5. Post-installation analysis
a. All feedback from the public will be logged on new installations by the
Engineering Division.
b. Neighborhood door hangers or mailers will be sent out again to determine
neighborhood level of satisfaction and felt impact of the traffic calming
features.
i. This feedback should be requested no sooner than 90 -days to
avoid skewed negative feedback solely due to change.
c. Data Collection
i. The Engineering Division should locate appropriate locations for
measuring traffic operating speeds, counts, etc.
ii. Coordinate with Brad Anderson (Transportation Division) to
schedule data collection after installation of traffic calming features.
iii. As with feedback in ‘b’ above, wait 90-days before data collection to
improve accuracy.
iv. Compare previous speeds and vehicle counts to those collected
after installation.
1. Consider interval spacing of data-collection and traffic
calming elements.
P
AASHTO 2011 (US)
P
AASHTO 2011 (US)
P
AASHTO 2011 (US)
PAASHTO 2011 (US)