HomeMy WebLinkAbout109-18 RESOLUTION113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Resolution: 109-18
File Number: 2018-0195
ADM 18-6098: ROLLING HILLS DR./SKILLERN RD. CORRIDOR MASTER STREET PLAN
AMENDMENT):
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE MASTER STREET PLAN BY DOWNGRADING THE ROLLING
HILLS DRIVE/SKILLERN ROAD CORRIDOR FROM PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL TO COLLECTOR
STATUS AND BY SHIFTING THE ALIGNMENT OF THE CORRIDOR TO CONNECT ALONG OAK
BAILEY DRIVE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the Master Street Plan
by downgrading the Rolling Hills Drive/Skillern Road corridor between College Avenue and Oakland Zion
Road from principal arterial to collector status and by shifting the alignment of the corridor to connect
along Oak Bailey Drive as shown in Exhibit A to the Planning Division's agenda memo.
PASSED and APPROVED on 5/1/2018
Attest:
" (� 4L&
Sondra E. Smith, City Clerk Treasurer `%�%111111rjtrr�
•
o C.]
q� r
r,4�1r f�f�(�Yt�41ti`t`w.
illlllF,1
Page 1 Printed on 512118
i � _ � ' � I � a I fi � ✓� 1�IMI� � OPI' I`!' �II� . � It. �1�;•ry�
4 1
�; �• V "' i..��r — 3 is ''1 - 'Iu"-+.v\ � +. •L_rII :,
IV
JOYCE LiLvD.-
IN
10 see details on pg 2
w r • p .+ �_
K .rSoo, BRlnrFrn�3n o .t
' 't
tr, corn• •mak.
I
to a Co ec or and dr
shift the alignment as
shown on pg. 2
"�t�1VfS Fl1l_!.5 C]EZ / * *ryyjlfj/Jr Y
�°4
lip
7
q�^ e
VIC-
,
4f f rsr
r
k
T1vCf1 5}�If� k
I
fid. f
i
r -
��� en tr
r
CX
—ENE
;
4,j 1 8 1
ASii 5 ip
� II
fwd t*! — • �`:r� t 6 r �T
+
P{ is
Realign the
connection of LU
_V. Rolling Hills and
reclassify thew
section • 7
DriveOak Bailey
`
i
-� • •
/ N.■ ■ N ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ �■i - tjy JJj 11r II1
.,, -. -_ � •N�! `.:-i�.,C e�� l � I.. `-lY� rll nrnrf.; .- __ � �.
�* City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Text File
File Number: 2018-0195
Agenda Date: 5/1/2018 Version: 1 Status: Passed
In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Resolution
Agenda Number: B. 2
ADM 18-6098: ROLLING HILLS DR./SKILLERN RD. CORRIDOR MASTER STREET PLAN
AMENDMENT):
A RESOLUTION TO AMEND THE MASTER STREET PLAN BY DOWNGRADING THE ROLLING
HILLS DRIVE/SKILLERN ROAD CORRIDOR FROM PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL TO COLLECTOR
STATUS AND BY SHIFTING THE ALIGNMENT OF THE CORRIDOR TO CONNECT ALONG
OAK BAILEY DRIVE
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the Master Street Plan by
downgrading the Rolling Hills Drive/Skillern Road corridor between College Avenue and Oakland Zion Road
from principal arterial to collector status and by shifting the alignment of the corridor to connect along Oak
Bailey Drive as shown in Exhibit A to the Planning Division's agenda memo.
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 Printed on 51212018
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form
2018-0195
Legistar File ID
4/17/2018
City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only
N/A for Non -Agenda Item
Garner Stoll 3/23/2018
City Planning /
Development Services Department
Submitted By Submitted Date Division/ Department
Action Recommendation:
ADM 18-6098: ROLLING HILLS DR./SKILLERN RD. CORRIDOR MASTER STREET PLAN AMENDMENT, 252-253):
Submitted by the PLANNING DIVISION to amend the Master Street Plan classification of the Rolling Hills Drive/
Skillern Road corridor.
Budget Impact:
Account Number
Fund
Project Number Project Title
Budgeted Item? NA Current Budget $
Funds Obligated $
Current Balance $ -
Does item have a cost? No Item Cost
Budget Adjustment Attached? NA Budget Adjustment
Remaining Budget $ -
V20140710
Previous Ordinance or Resolution #
Original Contract Number: Approval Date:
Comments:
WA
CITY OF
EAYETTEVILLE
ARKANSAS
MEETING OF APRIL 17, 2018
TO: Mayor and City Council
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
THRU: Garner Stoll, Development Services Director
FROM: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director
Chris Brown, City Engineer
DATE: March 22, 2018
SUBJECT: ADM 18-6098: ROLLING HILLS DR./SKILLERN RD. CORRIDOR MASTER
STREET PLAN AMENDMENT, 252-253): Submitted by the DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES DEPARTMENT to amend the Master Street Plan classification of the
Rolling Hills Drive/Skillern Road corridor.
RECOMMENDATION:
Development Services Department staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval
of a resolution to amend the Master Street Plan to downgrade the Rolling Hills Drive/Skillern
Road corridor.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is a 2.5 -mile east -west street corridor between Oakland Zion Road in the
Planning Area and College Avenue in the core of Fayetteville. The corridor follows the existing
alignment of Skillern Road and Rolling Hills Drive, including an unbuilt section through wooded
land south of Butterfield Elementary School. The Master Street Plan designates this corridor as a
Principal Arterial. After discussing development potential in the area with property owners, it was
discussed that a Principal Arterial is excessive and that a two-lane Collector will adequately
accommodate desired connectivity in the future.
Proposed Master Street Amendment
Staff proposes to downgrade the Rolling Hills Drive/Skillern Road Principal Arterial corridor to a
Collector. The amendment would also result in a slight shift in the future road alignment near Oak
Bailey Drive for traffic calming and to reduce undeveloped land disturbance. An exhibit showing
the extent of the amendment and the road alignment is attached.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends the amendment finding that while east -west connectivity is needed in this
region of the City and the Planning Area, it is not necessary for Rolling Hills or Skillern Road be
classified as an arterial. Collector Street connectivity between College Avenue, Crossover Road,
and Oakland Zion Road will be adequate for traffic flow and safety. The recommendation is based
on the long-term public safety and quality life improvements gained by maintaining a smaller, well
connected street network. The context of the existing developed two-lane street corridor can
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
adequately accommodate traffic flow. Much of this corridor is largely developed in the immediate
vicinity and road widening is not desired or necessary. The proximity of other east -west Collector
Streets including Old Wire Road, Township Street, and Joyce Boulevard, in combination with the
subject corridor, will provide vehicular and pedestrian connectivity needed to accommodate future
growth. The Citywide Mobility Plan recently completed by transportation consultants, Nelson
Nygaard confirms this recommendation. Chapter 5 of the Mobility Plan includes a brief analysis
of the benefits of the Rolling Hills connection.
Public Comment
Staff held two neighborhood meetings to discuss the Master Street Plan classification: one in fall
2017 and one in winter 2018. The meetings focused on the unbuilt Rolling Hills portion of the
corridor. There have been numerous public comments concerned with traffic speeds, pedestrian
safety, and cut -through traffic. Many residents in the area request Rolling Hills and the unbuilt
connection be removed off the Master Street Plan. A copy of written public comment has been
attached to this report.
DISCUSSION:
On March 12, 2018, the Planning Commission forwarded the proposal to the City Council with a
recommendation to downgrade the subject Master Street Plan corridor to a Collector by a vote of
7-1-0 (Brown voted `no'). The commission also made a separate motion on the future street
alignment, agreeing with staff's recommendation by a vote of 6-2-0 (Belden and Brown voted
`no'). A large number residents spoke at the meeting recommending the Rolling Hills connection
be removed from the Master Street Plan.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
• Proposed Master Street Plan Amendment
• Public Comment
Reference:
Fayetteville Mobility Plan
http://www.fayetteville-ar.gov/3081/FaVgtteville-Mobility-Plan
see details on pg. 2 BE
i
EXHIBIT 'A'
PROPOSED MASTER STREET
PLAN AMENDMENT
,
i (per j Rt. tnpLi yk� cue �R. � f .r
' L>Realign
rc
connection • Rolling Hills andr
reclassify the
Oak Bailey 4M,
small section of
ppb •��� Drive r i
Collector
��'�� � , S ,
a
ca
Remove
• portion • k
x +
marked with an Y
�t
I
•
•• T street corridorto a Collector asshown on pg. 1
.q� n, �kr �• r+'•f tri. r^ _I •�� I � L �,.. '�. � ,ig r
Streets Planned
MSP Class
GYM PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
Streets Existing
MSP Class
COLLECTOR
� PRINARTERIAL PKWY
PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL
1 1 ® Trail (Proposed)
Planning Area
L i Fayetteville City Limits
Feet
0 245 490 980 1,470 1,960
1 inch = 667 feet
FEMA Flood Hazard Data
1O0 -'i Fdf F1f3OL43lain
FlvacEway
Garner, Andrew
From: Cash Acrey <cash.acrey@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2018 5:10 PM
To: rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com; zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com;
atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net; matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com;
Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew
Subject: Fwd: Rolling Hills Extension
Members of the Planning Commission,
wanted to weigh in on the petition going around to remove the Rolling Hills extension from the master plan.
https://www.cliange. org/p/city-of-fayetteviII e- city- council-...
I live on Oak Bailey, right in the path of the road, so I'm perhaps one of the people with the most to lose from the
extension. But, I understand that city plans are about more than my needs, and that workable infrastructure is critical to
the smooth growth of the city.
So, here are my thoughts as a person who drives this neighborhood daily.
From Crossover, the time savings of going directly to Rolling Hills, as opposed to Old Wire -> Old Missouri -> Rolling Hills
are marginal at best, as this is not a long detour. Existing traffic concerns on this route would be pretty easily addressed
with two stoplights at those corners. The extension would not be a game -changer for anyone's commute.
The extension of Rolling Hills to Crossover would fundamentally change the safety and character of several established
neighborhoods and adversely impact neighborhood character, property values, and school safety... for a very minimal
infrastructure upgrade. Shaving off a few seconds of transit time between College and Crossover isn't a dramatic
improvement to anyone's life or commute. We moved here because this is a friendly, quiet, nice neighborhood. Our
neighbors agree, and the outpouring of support for removing this extension testifies to this fact.
Developers of the properties being infilled around the proposed road don't seem to be clamoring for the change, but
removing it from the master plan could hasten development of the Keenan Property and the two large properties
between Oak Bailey and Crossover, as the uncertainty around the road makes long-term investment more risky. So, the
proposed extension adds very little, costs a lot, and currently inhibits infill.
As you drive South on Crossover, think of how far you have to go to connect back to College once you pass Mission. And
there are no plans to put an East-West corridor across Mount Sequoyah for easy access to Downtown and the
University... for good reason: everyone recognizes and values the vital significance of these neighborhoods and the
character they impart to our city. We value and cherish our neighborhoods in Ward 3, also!
Crossover already has large East-West corridors with Joyce, Township, and Mission. Cutting through a very special
neighborhood to add heavy traffic near an elementary school, when there are already very workable commuter paths on
existing streets, is not a necessary or helpful addition.
I hope that you will support the petition to remove the Rolling Hills extension from the Master Plan. Thank you!
Best,
Cash Acrey
3024 N Oak Bailey Dr.
From: Ryan Billingsley
To: darnUn A
Subject: Rolling Hills Extension
Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 10:01:16 PM
Mr. Harrison,
My name is Ryan Billingsley. 1 have lived in Fayetteville my entire life, grew up in northeast Fayetteville on Summerhill, and
attended Butterfield Elementary School. Now I am raising two children with my wife in the Huntingdon subdivision. This is
the oldest neighborhood association in the entire city, and right behind the woods where I went to elementary school. As you
know well, Northeast Fayetteville is a special place with quiet neighborhoods full of character and giant trees. We have
amazing green space in Huntingdon and a neighborhood pond right across the street. We have deer walk through our
backyard. Northeast Fayetteville is my home and the only one I've ever known, as is the case for many other families in the
area. This corner of the world is the only home I have ever known.
I am writing because the proposed punch -through of Rolling Hills would cut straight through our neighborhood. Right
through it. The oldest neighborhood association in Fayetteville. Beautiful and quiet. Remarkable green space. I can't even
fathom it. How could that be real? How could anyone suggest it? How could anyone go along with it? A stone's throw from
our house. A stone's throw from the pond. It would go straight through our neighbor's yards and homes.
To me, the proposed extension of Rolling Hills sounds not only ludicrous and unnecessary, but flat-out immoral. That's just
my honest opinion. I live here. I've lived here my entire life. This road is not needed. I can and do drive up Old Missouri and
down Old Wire all the time. Never once have I wished to drive through people's backyards and the woods to save a few
minutes. Joyce is right there. It feels crazy. It would be an absolute shame and break my heart, only compounded by the fact
that it is an entirely unnecessary harm that is being proposed. I would be deeply ashamed of my city for making that decision,
and I would be heartbroken. It's inconceivable to me that our city would do it. l think so highly of Fayetteville, so much so
that when I heard the idea I thought it sounded like a bad joke someone was playing on me. No way could this happen in
Fayetteville.
Quite frankly if the landowner of the beautiful woods between Old Missouri and Huntingdon neighborhood wants to sell his
land for private family lots, that is his decision. That alone would be heartbreaking and a shame for our beautiful city, but it
would unfortunately be his decision.
But having the city step in and rezone it and plow through with a road and absolutely devastate multiple quiet neighborhoods
is just heartless. These are the neighborhoods with character that make our town what it is. And these changes are irreversible.
It is not who we are. It will not make our city a better place. And quite frankly it's just so unbelievably unnecessary.
I beg you to drive into Huntingdon subdivision for a short look. Drive down Oak Bailey and Warwick. Look at our
neighborhood pond and our woods. Take a look where the road will come through the woods and the houses it will go straight
through. Imagine yourself living in the homes nearby. It's just wrong.
Every house on Rolling Hills has a sign in their yard. This little corner of the world does not want this done to us. Please listen
to us. Please shoot straight with me and tell me what we can do. And please fight for us with any influence over this matter
you may have.
thank you for your time,
Ryan Billingsley
Garner, Andrew
From: Emily J. Brickman <emjhollingsworth@yahoo.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 4, 2018 9:20 PM
To: dog13gregg@aol.com; rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com;
zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com; atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net;
matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew;
CityClerk
Subject: Fwd: Community Position on Rezoning & Rolling Hills Drive Expansion
Attachments: Attachment 1 - 20170706_City Council Agenda Memo_pdf.pdf; Attachment 2-2RZN17-6052_
20180220_Agenda Memo.pdf; Attachment 3 - Geology -King, M.E. Bedrock Geology of Fayetteville
Quadrangle.pdf; Attachment 4- Topography_20140626_AR_Fayetteville_20140626
_TM_geo_Topo_pdf.pdf, Attachment 5 - National Wetlands Inventory.pdf; Attachment 6 - 20180130
_22102210858_228_Soil_Map.pdf; Attachment 7 - Corrosion_20180130_22202210451_16
_Corrosion_of_Concrete.pdf, Attachment 8 - Warwick Listing.pdf
Please see my emails below sent to city council and others. I graciously hope you take into consideration my
positions and the information below prior to making decision regarding Rolling Hills and the potential proposed
rezoning.
Sincerely,
Emily Brickman
M
Hello,
I am contacting you in relation to ADM-] 8-6098 Rolling Hills Dr. MSP Amend, 252-253: Submitted by the
planning division to amend the master street plan to downgrade Rolling Hills Drive from a Principal Arterial to
a Collector. Although I appreciate the consideration to downgrade RH, I disagree with this proposed
amendment. The existing RH should be downgrade to a Collector, but the proposed extension area for RH
should be removed altogether from the plan. My proposed recommendation is in line with conclusions reached
in the neighborhood meeting held on February 22, 2018.
Thanks for your consideration,
Emily J. Brickman
Professional Geologist, AR, TX, MO
3183 North Katherine Avenue
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703
Begin forwarded message:
From: Emily Hollingsworth <emjliolfi_nasworth@)yahoo.com>
Date: February H, 2018 at 4:06:46 PM CST
To: "mtiyor@fayetteville-at•.rov" <ii7a orcr.fayetteville-ar.gov>, "chztarrnfayretteVille-ar. )ov"
dmarr(icifayetteville-ar.eov>, "city auornevici�favetteville-aY, t v" �ciEu attorney�t�favetteville-
a o>,
"wai•d4Jicisi� fa4'ette:ville-ai-.°cty" <ward4
poslk-avetteville-
angov>,
"ward I ipos I nfa. etteviIle-ar.goy" <watrd I
pos I (r�fayetteyille-
a_ L.guv>,
"ward l_pus2r_)Favetteyllle_al!�" <wardl
pos2{c fttyettevillc-
ar.gov>,
"warc42 iosl(i sf`avettevi[le-ar. Yov" <warc[2
. os1 c :fa etteville-
ai- goy>
"war(13 post@favetteville-ar. Dov" <ward3
post@fa retteville-
al" goy>
"ward3�pos I d Fayetteville-ar.,gov" <ward3 pos
I (u7falyetteville-
ar gny>
"%yard2))os2 zfavetteville-ar.+ov" <ward2
pos2(aUgyetteville-
aiy>
"icurthLehfayecteville-ar.L,t)v"<icuith,tlafayetteville-ar.,ov>, "agarner fayetteville-
ar. Dov" <agaiitertc la Lttcville-tu.gc�v>
Subject:
Community Position on Rezoning & Rolling Hills Drive Expansion
Reply -To: Emily Hollingsworth <einjhollingsworthtc
yahoo.com>
Dear Mayor, City Council, and City Planners,
I have spoken with many of you about the possible rezoning of the 22.59 acre parcel east of
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri and the possible extension of Rolling Hills Drive
(RH). Since we have spoken, community members have collected over 1,000 signatures on
change.org and over 50 on -paper signatures for the petition titled "Permanently Remove the
Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover/265 Extension From Any Master Plan". In addition, we created
a logo "We Love Rolling Hills, Keep Our Streets Small and Our Trees Tall", set up a Facebook
group, and have had approximately 50 people contribute more than $1,450 to purchase yard
signs which just arrived.
Many, or all of you have said and official city documentation indicate that the rezoning is not
related to the expansion of RH. I would like to beg to differ. If you would kindly reference the
City Staff Review Form dated July 26, 2017 (2017-0335, Attachment 1), you will see that the
rezoning from RSF-4 to NS -G of an approximately 1 1 -acre portion of the 50 -acre property is
referenced in relation to the "Planned Principal Arterial link connecting Rolling Hills Drive in
the west with Old Wire and Crossover Roads to the east". Reference to the RH expansion is
included seven times throughout this 27 page document and is used for justification of the
rezoning. In addition, the 2/20/2018 Staff Review on the rezoning from RSF-4 to NC (2018-
00085, Attachment 2) mentions the RH extension six times. In the eyes of a citizen and based on
a cursory review of city planning documentation, zoning classification and RH expansion are
combined items as they both have significant impacts on the future use of the property.
The following is information which should be considered prior to developing the 50 -acre parcel
located to the east of Old Missouri Road, north of Oldwire Road and North Strawberry Drive to
the south, to the west of Oak Bailey Drive and North Katherine Ave to the east, and to the south
of Farr Land and Raven Trail to the north.
Site Background Information
Both the larger 50 acre parcel and the 22.59 acres proposed for rezoning (the site) are located
within the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Fayetteville Quadrangle. As seen on the
Bedrock Geology of Fayetteville Quadrangle included as Attachment 3, the site is bisected by
the southwest -to -northeast trending Fayetteville Fault and shales and sandstones of the
Fayetteville Shale and the Cain Hill Member of the Hale Formation outcrop at the surface. As
shown on the geologic map, a dramatic change in surface elevation occurs along the fault trace
bisecting the property. The topographic contours on the geologic map and the USGS
topographic map for Fayetteville quadrangle (Attachment 4) indicate approximately 100 to 120 ft
of elevation change occurs from Raven Trail (Farr Lane) in the north to Strawberry Drive to the
southeast. Although the Staff Review mentions numerous times throughout the document the
property's "significant downward grade", none of the figures provided in documentation include
surface elevation contours. Hopefully, the visuals included as part of this email will help you to
better understand the relevance of geology and topography to the site.
Additionally and as shown on the topographic map included as Attachment 4, none of the maps
or text included in either Staff Review mentions the tributary to Mud Creek which is mapped as
originating near the northeast corner of the Butterfield Trail Elementary School property. This
tributary flows to the north towards Raven Trail and through residential property, then flows to
the northwest to the confluence with an unnamed tributary to Mud Creek. Surface water from
the vast majority of the site, upgradient from North Strawberry Drive, North Katherine Avenue,
Warwick Drive, and even the elementary school, flows into this surface water drainage.
My son and I have walked this terrain many times on our way to kindergarten drop off and
pickup; we have observed a large depression near the northeast corner of the elementary school
property, large volumes of surface water within this depression, and surface water inundation of
downgradient properties. In addition, I have listened to the concerns of these downgradient
property owners related to historical flooding of their properties and concerns for how upgradient
development could cause negative impacts.
Additionally, I will ask you to refer to Attachment 5, documentation provided by the National
Wetlands Inventory for surface waters and wetlands
(11itp.s:Hw\.x,w.f\vs.gov/\\,etlaiids"/D,tta/MaLipei'.litiii1). iper.litml). As shown on thisfgure, a freshwater pond
and the associated downgradient riverine system are mapped in areas in or associated with the
rezoning request. Undoubtedly, dense development of the site and the proposed rezoning area
will result in increased surface water impacts on downgradient residents and should be taken into
consideration when evaluating this rezoning request.
Attachment 6 is the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation
Service Web Soil Survey Map for the site. Soil type corresponds to surface geology. The
majority of the property is mapped as Enders -Leesburg Complex (8 to 20% slopes), a clayey
residuum weathered from acid shale with a landform position of mountain flank. Enders -
Leesburg Complex soils are described as having very limiting capacity to transmit water and a
high capacity to induce surface water runoff. Attachment 7 is again provided by the USDA, and
shows the Enders -Leesburg Complex soils located onsite as having a high risk of corrosion to
concrete. This high risk indicates the potential for soil -induced electrochemical or chemical
actions to cause corrosion and weakness to concrete. Other limiting factors identified from the
USDA soil survey include poor suitability for roads, very limited septic tank absorption capacity,
and very limited subsurface water management system performance.
Zoning Requests in Relation to Zoning of the Area
The proposal to modify portions of the site from RSF-4 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4
UNITS PER ACRE) to Neighborhood Conservation (10 units per acre) is a very high density for
this area of Fayetteville. Residential lots in Huntingdon (located to the east and north),
Strawberry Drive (located to the east-southeast), and Rolling Hills (located to the west) average
'/4 to'/z acre or more in size. In addition, the rezoning would allow for potential 2, 3, and 4 family
units, which there are few within the area.
No matter what your City of Fayetteville Staff Review conclude, this rezoning request does not
protect the character and integrity of the existing residential areas. Speaking as a property owner
in this neighborhood (Huntingdon — 3183 North Katherine Avenue), this rezoning request is not
in-line with the area, specifically citing:
• inclusion of three and four family dwellings,
• potential for offices, studios, and related services,
• 10 units per acre,
• lot with minimum of 40 ft,
• lot area minimum of 4,000 square feet, and
• diminished setbacks.
Besides a very small portion of property located along the current Rolling Hills Drive, none of
the aforementioned NC attributes are currently existing in our neighborhood. This rezoning
request is not in line with the character and inte ri of the existing area.
Zoning Requests in Relation to Zoning Near Fayetteville Elementary Schools
As you know, this zoning request is adjacent to an elementary school (Butterfield Elementary
School) where children from five to nine years of age attend school. Land use near other
elementary schools located outside of downtown Fayetteville includes:
• VandergriffElementary School is adjacent to civic and private open space, parks, and
RSF-4, with the front of the school adjacent to a road and offices.
• Root Elementary school is surrounded on all sides by RSF-4 land use.
• Approximately 85% of Happy Hollow Elementary School is bordered by residential, with
a small portions adjoined by Main Street Center.
• Owl Creek Elementary is adjoined by RSF-4, Institutional, Residential -Agricultural, and
Community Services.
If approved, the zoning request would allow for'/4 of the Butterfield property boundary to adjoin
NC zoning. This would set a precedence, as no other elementary school located outside of
downtown has adjacent land with up to 10 units per acre. Not to mention the RH expansion
would also put'/4 of the Butterfield property boundary adjacent to a 4, and up to 5 lane, major
road, while the western property boundary would also be adjacent to a road. The request to
change the zoning for a property adjacent to Butterfield Trail Elementary School is not in line
with existing land use patters for other Fayetteville Elementary schools. The staff review did not
discuss or evaluate land use scenarios or potential risks related to zoning near an elementary
school and, in my opinion, is a misstep and shows lack of understanding of the true nature of our
neighborhood as most residents either went to or chose to live in this neighborhood because of
Butterfield Trail Elementary School.
This zoning request has little respect for the surrounding environment.
Other Issues of Importance
• See Attachment 8. This property listing and acreage is only accessible from Warwick
Drive. The planning commission memo (Attachment 2) Infrastructure section has no
mention of connecting to Warwick; however, this listing indicate otherwise. Either the
developer or city is not being forthright with their plans and have not provided citizens
with adequate information and notification.
• Documentation included in the zoning application indicates Raven Trail will be removed
from the city parks and trails system. This is not in-line with the 2030 Master Plan,
Section 10. Framework. Goal 4.i. Expand and interconnect the sidewalk and trail system
at the neighborhood, citywide, and regional levels. Removing Raven Trail and turning it
into a Farr Lane isn't what you would call encouragement of pedestrian mobility.
• The zoning request does not adequately plan, provide information on, or address road
planning, construction requirements, and future traffic movement which could negatively
impact our neighborhoods.
• The Fayetteville 2030 Master Plan Future Land Use Map indicates the site land use as
residential. It has been noted by many, that the NS zoning goes against the 2030 plan and
that going against the 2030 plan creates a "very slippery slope".
• There has been poor communication and discussion with and from the city on the vision
for this project. Recent documentation indicates that the city has
o Many of the city council or planning group have said that there is no funding for
the RH expansion project and that a bond would likely be necessary. Only one of
you has been forthright and mentioned the possibility for a 2020 bond covering
parks and transportation which this project could be funded under. In my opinion,
there has been misdirection and a lack of truth from many in the city related
towards funding of this project.
o Specific questions asked at the January 22, 2018 planning meeting by citizens
were not addressed by the board; instead, the citizens were matter-a-factly told
that this was infill. The applicant was not called up by the board to answer any
questions.
o Many living on or adjacent to Rolling Hills Drive did not received notification
related to past city meetings, such as the one held on October 26, 2017; however,
after increased community interest, people living on Rolling Hills Drive received
notification (letter dated February 5, 2018 from the City of Fayetteville Arkansas
RE: Rolling Hills Drive Master Street Plan Meetings).
o As documented in information gained from the Freedom of Information Act
request, it appears that the council, planning board, and the property
realtor/developer have a relationship exclusive of each other, which excludes
actual members of the community. I ask, why is there a need for meetings
between city officials and the developer?
These are not all of my concerns; however, please consider this information while considering
next steps related to the rezoning of the aforementioned property and the expansion of Rolling
Hills Drive. We community members care and wish to be involved in this process.
Sincerely,
Emily J. Brickman
Professional Geologist, AR, TX, MO
3183 North Katherine Avenue
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703
Garner, Andrew
From: AMBER BROWN <amber.brown@fayar.net>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 6:29 PM
To: Garner, Andrew
Subject: Rolling Hills
Dear Mr. Garner and the Members of the Fayetteville Planning Commission,
I attended the Public Meeting regarding the continuation of Rolling Hills to Crossover Road. I have lived on Blueberry
Lane, which is a cul-de-sac off of Strawberry Lane for 10 years. I wanted to share my concerns over proposed Master
Street Plan Drawing 'A' that was shared at that public meeting.
Proposed Master Street Plan Drawing 'A' connects Crossover directly across from Strawberry Lane. I assume, due to the
amount of traffic that will be coming from Crossover, that a minimum of a stop sign, more likely a traffic signal, will be
installed at the intersection of Strawberry and Oak Bailey. I am concerned that with this configuration Strawberry Lane
will unintentionally become a through street, especially to daily commuters. Locals, wanting to avoid waiting to make a
left turn onto Oak Bailey in order to get to Old Wire will quickly discover that instead of taking a left at the new
intersection at Oak Bailey, they could instead go straight through Strawberry Lane, which would allow them to only have
to make a right onto Old Wire. preventing any left turns. This would significantly increase the traffic on the neighborhood
street of Strawberry Lane, which is not intended to be a main roadway.
In addition, both exits of Strawberry Lane are hills. In the past ten years, every time Fayetteville has received ice or snow,
these hills are the last to melt in our area. They aren't treated by the city and are still icy/slushy when the rest of the roads
are clear. During the last, very light, ice event a couple weekends ago, my car slid down Strawberry Lane into the
intersection with Oak Bailey. I was unable to stop at the stop sign due to the ice. This is typical in winter weather. Using
the other exit of Strawberry Lane isn't any safer, as it is icy, too. I am concerned there will be a significant number of
accidents for residents of the Strawberry Hill subdivision at this proposed intersection with Strawberry Lane.
Ultimately, I would agree with proposed Master Street Plan Drawing 'D'. Instead of spending large amounts of money to
afire land, spending less money to improve Old Wire, as both drawings "B" and "C" would require the destruction of 1-2
homes, as shown on the maps.
Thank you for your time,
A mbe r 13 row VV
Special Education Instructional Specialist K-5
Washington Elementary
Fayetteville Public Schools
Fayetteville City Council & City Planning Commission
I., : Greetings,
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension from
any master plan
Cox"'1'1x"1'1entS
Name
Location
Date
Emily Brickman
Waxahachie, TX
2018-01-25
Ashley Lind
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Sarah Denison
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Heather Gomez
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Laura Camargo Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
Beth Bryan Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
Kim Warren Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
Renee Batara Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
Dane Munstermann Fart Smith, AR 2018-01-25
Michael Bollero
Elizabeth Burns
Fayetteville, AR
us
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
James Price Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
Comment
I can't thank you enough for giving the people and neighborhoods
of Fayetteville to a united voice.
I live behind Butterfield Elementary and have a child and do not
want the extra traffic in our area. People already drive through the
streets fast enough!
I live in the Huntingdon neighborhood, and I am very invested in
preserving the current state of our area. We do not want more
traffic or multi -family housing.
I and my family live in Huntingdon. I can see no benefit to this
extension at all. It would cut a huge swath through one of the
quietest neighborhoods in Fayetteville, adding traffic noise and
danger for our kids.
I live in Huntington neighborhood and do not want to see an
increase of noise and traffic in our peaceful neighborhood.
As a mother of 3, I am opposed to Rolling Hills being extended
to Highway 265. We already have heavy traffic that has created
safety issues for our children. More traffic would create more
hazards for my children and all of the children and families in our
neighborhood.
We live behind Butterfield and have a child that goes to Butterfield,
An extension to Rolling Hills/265 would bring an abundance of
traffic through an area heavily populated by children between the
elementary school and the neighborhoods behind it. We moved
into this neighborhood because it was quiet and we felt safe letting
our kids play in the neighborhood. An extension to the road would
change this completely.
I do not want a busy road next to my children's school
My wife and I specifically chose Huntingdon so we could raise our
family in a peaceful and quiet neighborhood. This extension would
not only increase the noise and traffic significantly but also destroy
much of the natural beauty this part of town has to offer.
I do not support this expansion,
I reside near Rolling Hills and frequently walk with my children to
Butterfield Elementary. The proposed expansion increases safety
risks for my family and hundreds of others. I am proud to live in
an established Fayetteville community and I would hate to see that
community diminished because of poor planning.
This would negatively impact many neighborhoods from College
to Oakland Zion Road and place demands on other parts of our
infrastructure.
Name Location Date Comment
David Loudon Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25 What the City of Fayetteville call a road, I call home, It's my home
they are driving a road through. My yard. My boys touch football
field. Their swing set, their trampoline. My morning coffee view and
quiet evenings on the deck. It's your road. It's OUR life.
Wendi Lawless Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25 1 live in this neighborhood. One of the best things about this area
is the number of people who walk, run, skate and ride bikes in this
neighborhood. More traffic makes it more dangerous for families.
Amanda Andrews Fayetteville, US 2018-01-25 Noise, traffic, and difficulty accessing/leaving my driveway on Old
Missouri is already difficult enough during peak hours.
Kristin Hammett Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25 I see no need to dlsrupta wonderful peaceful neighborhood with
a busy road expansion. There are too many children that walk
through these neighborhoods to get to school to add traffic.
Chris Franke Little Rock, AR 2018-01-25 The proposed extension for Rolling Hills would literally run through
my backyard (I live at the end of the Quainton Ct cul-de-sac). My
familyjust moved here in March 2017 specifically for the scenic
beauty our neighborhood provides, in particular the farmland
directly behind our home where this extension is planned. Had
I known about this proposed development, I absolutely would
have reconsidered living here. I do not care to have another
thoroughfare from College to Crossover - there are more than
sufficient connections as it is (Township and Joyce are right next
door). Additionally, this would significantly impact the large number
of kids walking around this area, both playing in the neighborhood
and commuting to Butterfield Elementary.
Katherine Beebe Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25 I live off Stanton. One of the reasons I bought a house in this area is
because of how quiet this place is ... and in the middle of town The
last thing I want is for the value of my home to go down all while
getting more traffic and buildings through a beautiful wooded area
by Butterfield. It's a lose/lose for me and the entire neighborhood.
Deanna Ford Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25 I have a child at Butterfield and younger children who will go to
Butterfield in the coming years. We walk to and from school and it
is already dangerous. I don't want their recess and outdoor learning
environment to back up to a street and the noise. I don't want
more traffic through my street and neighborhood. We love our
neighborhood and wildlife, please don't ruin it.
Chris Clanton Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25 We bought a house on Rolling Hills Dr. 4 years ago and never
would have done so had we known about this plan. RHD is busy
enough already, with west -bound traffic getting backed up to Loxley
during morning rush hour, and drivers speeding dangerously down
the wide street when it is empty at night. This is an established
residential neighborhood with lots of pedestrians and pets and
not at all appropriate for a thoroughfare. Instead of this plan that
will harm the citizens of this neighborhood in exchange for a small
benefit to out-of-town drivers, the city should be considering how to
treat RHD like the street it is --a residential street in an established
neighborhood— by adding a sidewalk to the south side of the street,
narrowing the street to discourage speeding, and adding crosswalks
so our pedestrians can safely cross the road.
Name Location Date
Comment
Jenny Karsten Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
I do not want to see a dramatic increase in traffic on Rolling Hills. I
think such an increase would greatly overload the stretch of College
Ave from Rolling Hills to the light by Whole Foods daily. I also would
not want to see that increase in traffic right next to our elementary
school where kids play, walk, and ride their bikes.
Tyrel Denison Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
I want to keep my neighborhood and the those around us safe
for families and not overrun with traffic. A new extension would
just bring more people driving quickly through established
neighborhoods.
Maureen Grace us 2018-01-25
1 am concerned about the amount of traffic that this change would
cause to flow through an area that is already very congested during
the morning and evening high traffic periods. This area goes right
through neighborhoods on either side and borders an elementary
school. It doesn't seem like a great plan to increase the traffic
through this established neighborhood.
Heather Lee Holaway Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
1 specifically chose this area when I bought my first home in 2011
because of how quiet and accessible this neighborhood was. Having
the ability to walk my daughter to Butterfield was a key reason that
we relocated from our home near Holt/Holcomb. An increase of
traffic would make this area just as congested as the one I left to
avoid, and will negatively impact property values in this area.
Corey Keen Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
If the only benefit is easing traffic congestion, I'm curious why the
Rolling Hills Boulevard Extension is still on the master plan as the
benefits do not outweigh the negative ramifications of a project like
this.
TaylorJohnson us 2018-01-25
I live by butterfield elementary and this will severely negatively
affect our neighborhood!
Angie Leek Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25 1 love N this area and don'twant to see a major thoroughfare
dissecting our natural land and peaceful neighborhood. I have
young kids and we are one of the walker/bike riding families who's
kids go to Butterfield.
Jeremy Burns us 2018-01-25 The RHD extension will add unnecessary traffic in close proximity
to Butterfield Trail Elementary, potentially increasing both safety
and health risks for the children who learn and play there. Through
streets to Crossover are already available in the northern part
of the city, including Joyce and Township. Please reconsider the
current plans for expansion. Any potential benefits to people who
live outside the city will be outweighed by the inconvenience and
potential harm done to the families who live (and learn) near Rolling
Hills.
Lori Rogers Alabama 2018-01-25 We chose to live in this area because our children would be able
to safely walk to school and ride their bikes with their friends. This
proposal will negatively impact our neighborhoods and make the
area less safe for our children.
Amy Field FAyetteville, AR 2018-01-25 It is a waste of resources to solve a problem that does not exist. It
will remove needed green space, make homeless countless deer,
fox, rabbits, etc and plow through people's homes In order to
Name
Kaitlin Cox
Randy Green
jason mcgill
Christine Myres
Anna Nelson
Wilma Bonds
Megan Porter
Corinna Dranow
Lisa Hackert
Michael Carey
Heidi Loften
Claire Bullard
Location Date
Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-25
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
us
Fayetteville, AR
Albany, NY
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Bentonville, AR
2018-01-25
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
us
2018-01-26
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Autumn Tolbert Winchendon, MA 2018-01-26
Comment
parallel b by only a few hundred feet, a road that already exists.
Anyone who cares about a "carbon footprint" should be ashamed to
consider this.
For the sake of the children's lives and wellbeing, please do not
consider this expansion.
Horrible idea. Joyce and township do just fine. If anything get a
thoroughfare from college to the west side of town besides north st
This seems to be a project where the benefits do not outweigh the
harm and is not worth disrupting or damaging the residents lives
and property.
If there is still a valid reason for this proposal, someone please say
what it might be. Don't build something just because it was on a
plan.
I'm signing because my kids walk to Butterfield. I already have cut
through traffic on my street and this would just increase it. I love the
character of east Fayetteville and purchased a home here because
of the values. If a road goes through here it will decrease my home
value and leave a poor taste of fayetteville Leadership in my mouth..
Please do not let this extension go through.
Thanks for adding me.
I live in this area and my child attends Butterfield Elementary.
Butterfield is a neighborhood school where children are able to walk
to and from school. We are always out on our bikes cruising around
the neighborhood. The extension would negatively affect this area
and its homeowners.
I'm concerned for the safety and character of our neighborhood.
For Renee Newman and her sons. Renee is a widow and raising her
young sons. Please do not uproot this family.
Township and Zion are enough East/West options
Traffic is already a concern near Butterfield Elementary, and it
seems this would add to the problem.
The Rolling Hills neighborhood is a hidden gem full of families. I
don't live in the neighborhood but I know many people who do. I
use the roads in and around the neighborhood almost daily and
have never thought there needed to be any kind of road expansion.
Absolutely unnecessary. Very few Fayetteville tax payers would find
this beneficial.
This would put a major street awfully close to the school. We need
to promote walkability in our neighborhoods. Many children walk
through this area.Joyce is already moving traffic East and West.
Please do not put a major street through this neighborhood.
Name
Location
Date
Sharon Franke
Little Rock, AR
2018-01-26
Jennifer Ward
Malvern, AR
2018.01-26
Kimberly Harper US 2018-01-26
Russ Hutchison Troy, NY 2018-01-26
Brad Wallace Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
R L Gray Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Tracy Servy Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Robin Atkinson Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
LacieJones
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Suzanne Sanford
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Wendy Peters
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
J Mayo
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Mary Moore
Us
2018-01-26
Lisa Schilling
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Chelsea Brewer
Fayettevi I I e, A R
2018-01-26
Sidney Burris
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Regina Eilerts US 2018-01-26
Georgia Lance Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Tracy Nelson Springdale, US 2018-01-26
Comment
Our son's house backs up to this road. It will destroy his property
value among many other things.
My sister and her family live in the neighborhood around Rolling
Hills and are opposed to the cut through because it would
negatively impact the family with increased traffic and lower
property values.
Kimberly Harper
Thanks, but not in my backyard.
Listen or litigate. Your choice Council Members.
For the safety of our school children, congestion and the
devaluation of property values.
Keep our neighborhoods safe and quiet for our valued community
memebers.
This extension would mostly likely demolish our house on Oak
Bailey. We have only lived here two years, have poured thousands of
dollars and hundreds of hours of sweat equity into making it home.
We would be devastated if they decide to demolish our first home.
I live in this area
We live in this neighborhood, and my children attend school there.
We love the neighborhood as is, and do not want this disruption.
Family
Don't need this! Invading ppl property too go back to drawing
board city of fay!
I'm signing this petition because I grew up in the area, went to
Butterfield Elementary, and this is a terrible idea.
This will damage my neighborhood and negatively impact
Butterfield Trail Elementary School.
I understand the reason of increasing it, but do not agree to the
proposed size.
I do not feel that a responsible feasibility study for this project has
been undertaken. This will affect large segments of our community
that haven't even yet voiced their opinion on this development.
I grew up in Fayetteville, We have been sold and destroyed. Stop
Destroying neighborhoods to move traffic is bad planning. Don't do
this
I'm signing because my children grew up on rolling hills and their
elementary school just down the street is where my grandchildren
Name Location Date
Bill Ragan Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Debbie Fauria Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Sarah E. Krauft Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Keith Broyles Murfreesboro, TN 2018-01-26
Ellen We!ntraut
Anna Fielder
Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Comment
go to school and there is already a lot of traffic and this would
devastate the cozy family subdivision. Please don't do thislIM
Don't make a highway through their neighborhood.
Terrible plan. Go back to the drawing board. Put a little more
thought to this plan and it would not havevto destroy a
neighborhood.
The City's plan to "box in" Fayetteville isn't a bad one. What's bad
about this plan, is that it proposes an extension of Rolling Hills as
the northern section of the "box". Joyce Avenue already exists as
the northern edge. Let's keep it that way. Further, this plan would
decimate an entire neighborhood, and place a busy 4lane road
right next to a school (that my youngest is about to start attending).
I'd rather see a stoplight installed at the intersection of Rolling Hills
+ Old Wire instead. Eminent domain is unjust, especially in this
case. I urge everyone in Fayetteville to sign this petition. Maybe it
doesn't affect you personally this time, but next time It could be
your neighborhood in the crosshairs.
I live off of Rolling Hills. More traffic would be result of extension.
That we don't want or need.
I live near the proposed project and my son will soon start school at
Butterfield. We moved here with the hope that we could walk to and
from his school safely. I am afraid this project would make it more
dangerous for the children of this area to walk or bike. Surely there
are safer alternatives to this plan.
The homeowners should be compensated generously if forced
to move. I grew up in this neighborhood and went to butterfield.
Fayetteville is growing and that's great but if we grow so fast we
can't take care of our people it won't be much of a place to live in the
end.
Leslie Bandy
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Our neighborhood and Butterfied school deserves to be preserved.
This change in zoning will result in a litany of problems and dangers
with no positive results.
Sharon Akers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Unnecessary and would ruin our quiet neighborhood. Access to
265/Crossover is already available via Joyce and Zion. A waste of
money, would destroy green space and lower our property values.
Gavin Baleto
Fort Smith, AR
2018-01-26
Just trying to keep a nice neighborhood in tact so people live a
peaceful life
Ashley Carter
Denver, CO
2018-01-26
I'm originally from Fayetteville, AR. The town has changed enough.
Please don't effect people's homes and the beauty,
ERICA GRASER
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
1 know how it feels!
Ciavash Zaifi
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Grew up here. Don't ruin the surrounding neighborhoods with thisl!!
Name Location Date
Comment
Lisa Woods Springdale, AR 2018-01-26
As a native of Fayetteville I believe this is not an improvement for
the city.
tonya landrum fayetteville, AR 2018-01-26
Widening Rolling Hills would and bisecting the city to Crossover
would be the destruction of some of the best and oldest
neighborhoods in Fayetteville. We do not want our city to become
one of five lane highways and cookie -cutter homes.
Linda Jones u5 2018-01-26
MARTIN tried to comment on the petition and got the message
try again later. My backyard is adjacent to the proposed street
and in fact would be part of any acquisition if the current planning
proposal is used. The plan has existed for at least 10 years but
certain activity recently has caused concern. The meeting at city
hall lastjuly 17, was the beginning of a series of actions that will
support the master plan in the future. Next came a meeting on Oct
26th at the Rolling Hills Baptist Church sponsored by the city (to
review and discuss the "unfunded" project. At this time I learned
that what I had thought would be a street on property behind me
would potentially take 45 ft. of my back yard. This was followed by
a Planning Commision meeting Jan 22 to approve re -zoning from
RSF-4 to NC . Residential to higher densety residential, the request
was approved and the planning members were vocal on voicing
their approval, This appears to be a "done deal" now and it went
through the appr
Linda Connor Bridgeville, PA 2018-01-26
This expansion would have a negative impact on the neighborhood,
the school, and the traffic.
David Higgins Arkansas 2018-01-27
I agree that'traffic backups happen twice daily at two intersections.
Put in roundabouts at these two intersections. This would be much
more cost effective and not ruin three neighborhoods plus.
Leslie Ray Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-27
I do not wish to have this road come through my neighborhood.
Suzanne Owens Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-27
Please do not destroy our quiet, residential neighborhood. There
are many elderly homeowners in this area. The proposal would
destroy their homes.
Sue Payton Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-27
This is an unnecessary disruption,
Zachary Hutchison Jonesboro, AR 2018-01-27
1 have friends and family that would be deeply affected by this
disruption
David Johnston Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-27
I am s local resident with children in that school.
EDWARD MIKAN De Motte, IN 2018-01-27
NO CROSSOVER NEEDEDM! U S ARMY VETERAN
Justine McDuffie US 2018-01-27
I live on Rolling Hills. There is already a traffic problem, not only
because of the number of cars but also because of the number of
drivers who speed. The extension will only make things worse.
Lindsey Iversen US 2018-01-27
I'm signing because you can'tjust decide you're going to build a
fucking road where houses that people LIVE IN are..
Leo Vighetti Pittsburgh, PA 2018-01-27
I am in. Leo Vighetti
Name
Location
Date
Donna Daniels
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Rebecca Harrison
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Susan Bendure
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
CI a riss
Us
2018-01-27
Goodwin -Harrison
Tammye Dighero
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
jerri Ann Tindle Elkins, AR 2018-01-27
Terry Smyers Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-27
Brooks Mathias Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-28
Kelly Buckley Fayetteville, US 2018-01-28
Lisa Spurlin Tucson, AZ 2018-01-28
Debra Stendel Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-28
David Means Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-28
Brian Wilmeth Springfield, MO 2018-01-28
Raymond Plack Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-28
Comment
We need protect our neighborhoods
We need to preserve our neighborhoods. This would create too
much traffic in an already overly crowded area and it's too near
butterfield school. If we change Fayetteville too much, we will lose all
the things that make it so special. This is a change I feel is too much.
Why ruin the best neighborhood in Fayetteville? Fayetteville has
other ways of expanding!
This Rolling Hills expansion is a terrible ideal With Butterfield Trail
Elementary School rightthere and the residential peacefulness,
a big connector is justtoo much and risky for our children and
neighbors
I'm signing because we will lose what is unique to Fayetteville- quiet
, safe , mature neighborhoods, located in walking distance of the
elementary school. Many of us walk our children to school, or allow
them to do so on their own. We will lose this if this goes as planned.
Please protect one of Fayetteville 's older beautiful neighborhoods.
Let's not turn into another city with sprawl and strip malls. I believe
in growth, but let's plan smartly.
No to extension of Rolling Hills Dr to 2651
This proposal is not in the best interest of current residents of this
area. Our city needs to be more creative in management of traffic
and stop encroaching upon our quality of life. Multiple unit housing
brings a host of issues, problems that create a reduction in the
quality of life and safety.
This will bring too much traffic and take land.
I believe that our town deserves natural sanctuaries and green
spaces not encumbered by additional traffic. While I certainly
understand the desire to grow and get from point A to B
more speedily, it might be more beneficial to invest in public
transportation to reduce the negative impacts of automobiles. In
keeping with the ideal of Fayetteville striving to be more "green,"
this seems an antithesis of those goals.
I own a house only 2 blocks from Rolling Hills and I know this would
adversely affect the property value. As I plan to move back to
Fayetteville I certainly don't want to have that expansion in my back
yard!
It's hard to believe the city is even thinking about such a destructive
plan!
I like that area of Fayetteville, leave it alone
I do not think this expansion will have a positive impact on the
residents in and around the proposed area
Will add to much traffic to Rolling Hills Dr.
Name
Location
Date
Debra Walker
Heber Springs, AR
2018-01-28
Sandra Tedder
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Sue Garland
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Elijah Arnette
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Elijah Arnette
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Laura Ferrier
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Renee Tobin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Brianna Warren
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Sarah McKenna
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Brady Brooks
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Mike Brown Springdale, AR 2018-01-29
Comment
I don't know what they are thinking. It's next to an elementary
school and run through a beautiful established neighborhood!
Please do not do this!
I agree that extending Rolling Hills eastward would be disruptive to
the neighborhoods between its current boundary and Crossover.
Property values will decrease. More importantly, the house my
fiance and Ijust purchased to raise our soon to be born daughter
will be a few hundred yards from a major artery(if this goes
through). Instead of nestled in the neighborhood. People will lose
their homes. For what?
A stoplight at old wire and old missouri would be more efficacious
than this absurd plan.
I live in Huntingdon and do not support this expansion,
Thank you neighbors for creating and signing this petition. There
is strength in numbers. Write your alderman, cc the mayor and
write the entire City Council. One of our Ward 3 alderman, Sara
Bunch, supports this catastrophe. Their new god Is'infill.' There
has to be a limit. If the landowner wants to sell his land it should
be for single family housing. They've already made a dent in that
with a rezone. They want to make a bigger dent by rezoning more
acreage. Then they will tell us 'they need that extension' to handle
the traffic. Remember the Planning committee and the City Council
allowed Whole Foods to be put in that spot. With one entrance and
exit. They are responsible for the traffic back up on College. They
are responsible for making Wedington a mess. We were told at the
first rezoning meeting that the Strawberry Hills neighborhood was a
'classic example of suburban sprawl." Most homes were built
in the 70's so no kidding. But what about MCMansion land being
built off Hwy 45? What
This will affect someone in the area, would build right through their
house
This impacts my neighborhood.
This is so dumb!!!So much more traffic by the school and mud
creek trail!I have 1 brother that goes there he's in first grade
and I don't want him hearing busy traffic at recess.There are
some safety concerns also.I also love to ride down by butterfield
additionally walk dogs there also.When I go to school at McNair I
see kids walking to butterfield, with this parents are not going to
let them walk because it's so busy.There is also a very big car line
for butterfield car pickup at 3.Adding this would make it harder for
students to get home.
The infrastructure is already clogged. Bad plan. I am strongly
against it.
Name Location Date Comment
Mary Reilly Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-29 This idea of an extension would do serious damage to this area
of northeast Fayetteville from adding safety to our children to
changing traffic patterns, to the value of homes, and the peaceful
nature of our neighborhoods. PLEASE remove it from the master
plan!
Lori Kelsey Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-29 Please .... No.
Connie Brooks Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-29 I have li bed in Huntingdon for 23 years. I know we all value the
beauty of the natural surroindings. Visitors from many states have
commented about the beauty. I am already alarmed by the new
concrete look of my city. When did we decide development and tall
buildings override the benefits of trees and neighborhoods? I'm
deeply concerned how this!will impasct one of the most desirable
neighborhoods in Faayetteville... more traffic, less ability to control
run -oft, risks to children playing and walking to school, loss of
property value, more congestion...
Connie Brooks Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-29 I have lived in Huntingdon for 23 years. I know we all value the
beauty of the natural surroundings. Visitors from many states have
commented about the beauty. I am already alarmed by the new
concrete look of my city. When did we decide development and tall
buildings override the benefits of trees and neighborhoods? I'm
deeply concerned how this.will impact one of the most desirable
neighborhoods in Faayetteville... more traffic, less ability to control
run-off, risks to children playing and walking to school, loss of
property value, more congestion...
Joan Reynolds Rogers, AR 2018-01-29 Maintaining the neighborhood's integrity should be the number
one priority for the city, not blazing new street shortcuts through
existing neighborhoods.
J.A. Griffith Berryville, AR 2018-01-29 Instead of more highways and noise, the children and residents of
Fayetteville deserve some quiet neighborhoods, birds, and natural
areas.
Tyrel Denison Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-30 I want my family neighborhood to remain that. We don't need
another fast way through town at the expense of having people
drive quickly through where my children play!
Samantha Foresee u5 2018-01-30 My parents amd sister live directly on Rolling Hills on 2 different
properties and this would directly impact both their front lawns and
likely decrease their home values. The traffic along the road is heavy
enough as is and widening it seems completely absurd. It's actually
a pretty wide road with big shoulders as is and it needs to stay that
way! My dad loves to run through the neighborhoods and my sister
walks with her baby in a stroller up and down that street all the
time. With increased traffic it would become a dangerous activity
especially as my nephew gets older and wants to play outside. This
is the street in Fayetteville that LEAST needs widening. I can think
of higher priorities! Like Joyce Blvdl From College to Old Missouri
so you can add a turn lane all the way down! That would be a much
better use of tax money!
Joshua LeMasters Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-30 I live and own a home on Rolling Hills. We recently moved to the
neighborhood and we love it here. Talk of expanding and extending
Name Location Date Comment
Rolling Hills has us thinking about moving. Extending and widening
Rolling Hills is a bad idea for this well established neighborhood and
ultimately a very bad idea for the city.
Joe Neal Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-30 Changes like the proposed extension are usually cut throughs
requested by those who do not live in the impacted areas. In other
words, homeowners are asked to get out of the way so others
can have a faster commute. However, protecting the integrity
of a neighborhood is a lot more important than speeding up
someone's desire for a faster cut through. People who choose to live
in northeast Fayetteville must recognize that older neighborhoods
are not required to accept devastation to facilitate their travel.
Improve the existing thoroughfares as possible, but otherwise leave
the neighborhoods alone. It will not hurt us to go a little slower. Will
help, in fact.
Mark Keeran Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-30 We have lived on Strawberry for almost ten years now and we
frequently walk through the Huntingdon neighborhood as well. This
will cut our neighborhoods in two. We are strongly opposed to this
extension because, as Joe pointed out, it is just for the convenience
of others who DO NOT LIVE in our neighborhoods.
Linda Jones Us 2018-01-31 Already submitted my thoughts. And signed the petition. please
don't destroy our neighborhoods
Kerry Couch Summers, AR 2018-01-31 We are already college enough in the titles don't take away the
quiet and peacefulness that property Owners barely have As it is
Airie Kazery Fayetteville, AR 2018-01-31 I live in the Rolling Hills neighborhood, I was initially attracted to this
area because itfelt like a settled, quiet, well established, and family
oriented area. Kids play in the streets in these neighborhoods.
Wildlife roam freely. There are many large century+ old trees
throughout. It's a lovely place to live. We will lose that if this road is
built. I had hoped my daughter would inherite this home, but I fear
that the updates will depreciate the value and destroy the home
town feel of the area. Likely, we would sell and move if this is built.
Jacob Green Us 2018-02-01 It's not an improvement
Diane Aday Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-01 Established neighborhoods, especially in a school zone, need to be
protected and not threatened.
Deborah Meng St. Louis, MO 2018-02.01 I know this neighborhood and went to school in ARI
Katy Sager Fayetteville, US 2018-02-01 As a local real estate attorney in Fayetteville the current plan doesn't
seem to benefit near the amount of public service that it would cost
so many homeowners. I fully support the need for an additional
East/West corridor in Fayetteville but I can't agree that this is the
solution.
Mary Sheridan Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-02 Not worth it for what it would cost ... that includes the price tag and
what it would do to the existing neighborhoods and school. It's
just a terrible, terrible idea and I do not live in any of the affected
neighborhoods.
Name Location Date
Comment
Eliana Martinez Escazu, Costa Rica 2018-02-04
Don't put 600 children in risk. Don't destroy forest and wild life.
Shapasnikoff
Think in green. A traffic light in Old Missouri and Old Wire will be
much better for improving traffic in the area.
Jeff Potter Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-04
This is a terrible and destructive idea. The traffic is not so heavy that
we need this expense.
Denise Airola US 2018.02-09
A recent article in the NWA Times on the city planning commission's
retreat on infill planning provides some good support for not doing
the rezoning that is planned and support for permanently removing
the Rolling Hills extension. Specifically, the article talks about infill as
a way to provide neighborhoods that have emerged from suburban
sprawl closer amenities. When I spoke with our Alderman Marsh,
she indicated that she considered Rolling Hills suburban sprawl.
That is no longer the case. Rolling Hills neighborhood is already
closely connected to amenities in Fiesta Square, Whole Foods, the
Steele Bbd development and the mall. The only reason to put more
amenities on Rolling Hills drive is to allow the landowner selling the
land to make more money by allowing development of duplexes
rather than single family homes. The other reason they would do
this is to getthat Rolling Hills extension so the current suburban
sprawl in east Fayetteville (on the other side of 265) can access the
amenities close to our
Ryan Billingsley Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-12
This idea is absurd and I can't believe it's even an option in
Fayetteville to do something so heartless like this. The wonderful
city I've lived in my entire life and the very area of Fayetteville I grew
up in. It is unfathomable that we are considering plowing through
the woods and disturbing two very established neighborhoods
for absolutely no legitimate purpose. Using Old Missouri and Old
Wire to get to Crossover always has been and always will be fine.
Using the word "need"a to describe this road is more
than simply incorrect - it is borderline immoral the way it affects
lives. Changes like this are irreversible. It is tragic. Fayetteville does
not need it. It is wrong to do it. It's not like our city to do something
like this. Please don't let this happen. Please write the Mayor and
City Council. If you are voting on rezoning please vote no. It breaks
my heart to think of this destruction. And if you know more than I,
please let me know what I can do to help.
James Martin Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-14
Efficiency is good, but not at the expense of long-standing
neighborhoods.
Stacy Boone US 2018-02-20
I vote yes to permanently remove this.
Jon Willett Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-20
This has to stop
Brian Abel Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-20
Keep our town beautiful.
Kimberly Canova Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-21
This area of Fayetteville is one of the few where trees are treasured,
deer are in your backyard in the morning and displays a diverse
group of people who still walk on the sidewalks with their children.
Much more "Norman Rockwell" than the cookie cutter, treeless
McMansions too common on the Northeast side of Fayetteville,
Name Location Date Comment
This project would have a permanent, negative effect on one of
Fayetteville's iconic areas,
chrange.org
Recipient, Fayetteville City Council & City Planning Commission
Letter: Greetings,
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension from
any master plan
Signatures
Name
Location
Date
Nicole Claesen
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Robert Stinson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Emily Brickman
Alabama
2018-01-25
Helen Hamlin
Selkirk, NY
2018-01-25
Rebecca Roark
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Lori Leichner
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Patrick Snodgrass
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Chris Clanton
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
William Claesen
Texas
2018-01-25
Lisa Snyder
Alabama
2018-01-25
Christina Sutton
Alabama
2018-01-25
Mallory Britt
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Emily Field
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jennifer Clayton
Alabama
2018-01-25
Alexander Ha
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Ashley Lind
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Sarah Denison
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Heather Gomez
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Ben Owen
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Laura Camargo
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
n
Name
Location
Date
Stephen Ironside
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
H. Nicole Ledbetter
Dallas, TX
2018-01-25
Amy Guthrie
Alabama
2018-01-25
Cash Acrey
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Deanna Ford
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Justin Adamd
Wheat Ridge, CO
2018-01-25
Shannon Servoss
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jamie Frala
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Katherine Beebe
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Sarah Munstermann
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jessica Robertson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
David Johnson
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Peggy Rogers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Dane Munstermann
Fort Smith, AR
2018-01-25
David Loudon
Shawnee, OK
2018-01-25
Angel Vinson
Alabama
2018-01-25
Marty Sutton
California
2018-01-25
Bree Waymack
Branch, AR
2018-01-25
Beth Bryan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Amy Loudon
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Denise Roark
u5
2018-01-25
Kim Warren
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Date
jason ayers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Renee Batara
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Adam Hedman
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Matt Pope
Oklahoma
2018-01-25
Chris Hargis
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Michael Bollero
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Candace Scamardo-Green
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Christena Devlin
us
2018-01-25
Bryan Meesey
Rogers, AR
2018-01-25
Elizabeth Burns
u5
2018-01-25
Randy Wilburn
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jessica Newcomb
Texas
2018-01-25
John Waymack
Alabama
2018-01-25
Julie Renee Newman
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Derek Van Lynn
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Timothy Klinedinst
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Kim Krummel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
John Torres
u5
2018-01-25
Claire Reed
Chicago, AR
2018-01-25
Angela Barbour
Alabama
2018-01-25
Daniel Quin
Texas
2018-01-25
Jennifer Condron
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Date
Elizabeth Prenger
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
James Price
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Scharrelle Easley
Arkansas
2018-01-25
Wendy Cathey
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Denis Dean
us
2018-01-25
Chris Frala
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Amanda Grell
North Little Rock, AR
2018-01-25
Lily Fretueg
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Sabrina's Snell
Alabama
2018-01-25
Rebekah Litzinger
Alabama
2018-01-25
Lori Rogers
Alabama
2018-01-25
Jenna Evans
Austell, GA
2018-01-25
catherine snyder
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Justin Beavers
Alabama
2018-01-25
Sarah Maland
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Carleigh Phillips
Alabama
2018-01-25
Eric Kvello
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Tommi Perkins
Troy, NY
2018-01-25
Laura Kryzanowsky
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Sarah Miller
Oklahoma City, OK
2018-01-25
Howard funkhouser
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
William Reed
Durham, NC
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Date
Wendi Lawless
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Abigail Myers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Mike Ford
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Chris Franke
San Antonio, TX
2018-01-25
Annie Coker
Great Barrington, MA
2018-01-25
Jamie Mondal
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Kristin Hammett
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Ryan Hickey
US
2018-01-25
Jessica sneed
US
2018-01-25
Amanda Andrews
Fayetteville, US
2018-01-25
Adam Romero
US
2018-01-25
Stefanie Kelley
US
2018-01-25
maria cruz lopez
US
2018-01-25
Yadira Talavera
US
2018-01-25
Gilberto Gonzalez
US
2018-01-25
Victoria Bruton
US
2018-01-25
Jonathan Phillips
Alabama
2018-01-25
Kelsey Felix
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Lindly Mikesch
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Amy Buff
Conway, AR
2018-01-25
Todd Barbour
Greenville, SC
2018-01-25
Ann Gearity
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Carolyn Williamson
Fayetteville, AR
Julie Wise
Fayetteville, AR
Brandi ALEXANDER
Fayetteville, AR
Brooke Russell
Alabama
Mark Kryzanowsky
u5
Dustin Hillyer
Fayetteville, AR
Jenny Karsten
Fayetteville, AR
Melissa Mitchell
Fayetteville, AR
Lisa McClure
Fayetteville, AR
Kristen Beavers
Fayetteville, AR
Corey Keen
Fayetteville, AR
William Bailey
Alabama
Mary Lack
Fayetteville, AR
Tyrel Denison
Fayetteville, AR
Sherri Watson
North Little Rock, AR
Anne Gresham
Fayetteville, AR
Michelle Cartmill
Edmond, OK
Chelsea Cooper
Lee's Summit, MO
Maureen Grace
u5
Jeffery Dean
Fayetteville, AR
Heather Lee Holaway
Fayetteville, AR
Patricia Leach
Fayetteville, AR
Date
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Date
Larry Phelps
Siloam Springs, AR
2018-01-25
Missi Walker
Alabama
2018-01-25
Taylor Johnson
us
2018-01-25
Amber Shepherd
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Angie Leek
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jennifer Shepard
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Morgan Gray
us
2018-01-25
Erin Cohen
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jeremy Burns
u5
2018-01-25
Amy Clark
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Brittni Gunn
Dedham, MA
2018-01-25
rosemary tacker
North Little Rock, AR
2018-01-25
Sarah Jones
us
2018-01-25
Chelsea Knox
Alabama
2018 -01 -25 -
Amy Field
FAyetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Ashely Joyner
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Aaron Weegens
u5
2018-01-25
Kaitlin Cox
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Laura SANDLIN
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Randy Green
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Alex Woods
Alabama
2018-01-25
Matthew Bourdon
Lowell, AR
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Date
jason mcgill
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jesse Smyers
Oklahoma
2018-01-25
Melissa Atkinson
Alabama
2018-01-25
Brenda Denton
Miami, FL
2018-01-25
Ashley Hodson
Bartlesville, OK
2018-01-25
Steffanie Delgado
Alabama
2018-01-25
Amanda Gambill
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Kathy Hopson
u5
2018-01-25
Michelle Scouten
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Christine Myres
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Brad Nabors
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Alex Nichols
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Anna Nelson
u5
2018-01-25
Courtney Barton
fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Ashley Neumeier
Dallas, TX
2018-01-25
Debra Holt
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Stephen DeNoon
Alabama
2018-01-25
Michelle Musial
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Elissa Lenox
Livingston, TX
2018-01-25
Wilma Bonds
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Leana Houston
Groton, NY
2018-01-25
Kelly Mahan
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Date
Amanda Tieaskie
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Mary Wolf
Dallas, TX
2018-01-25
Brittney Duke
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Mary Boyett
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Lucinda Summerlin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Megan Smyers
Texas
2018-01-25
Kathleen King
Texas
2018-01-25
Megan Porter
Albany, NY
2018-01-25
Henry Rankin
Alabama
2018-01-25
Linda Mirphy
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Adrienne Kvello
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Breyanne Hoover
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Holly Karnes
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Lauren Sterling
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
James Vawter
Miami, FL
2018-01-25
Corinna Dranow
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Lisa Hackert
Bentonville, AR
2018-01-25
Candace Starling
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Katelin Whiddon
Alabama
2018-01-25
Kevin Murphy
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Chris Lee
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Robert Eldridge
Alabama
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Date
Becky Babb
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
lynne michelle price
North Little Rock, AR
2018-01-25
Mary Bollero
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Lucas Ardemagni
Dedham, MA
2018-01-25
Jenny Lee
Spokane, WA
2018-01-25
Kathryn Burgess
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Susan Jones
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Angie Burge
Birmingham, AL
2018-01-25
Joanna Sites
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Lisa Mohney
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jennifer McKeown
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Kelli Heflin
u5
2018-01-25
Meline Schaffer
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Rebecca Sites
Springdale, AR
2018-01-25
Stephanie Whitcomb
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
gary weeks
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Benjamin Houston
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Leslie Poynter
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Bronwen Henderson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
David Young
Groton, NY
2018-01-25
Joyce Stanford
Lexa, AR
2018-01-25
Jonathan Durham
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Name
Location
Date
Michael Carey
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Julie Brannon
u5
2018-01-25
Katie Jackson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-25
Jim Ragland
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Heidi Loften
u5
2018-01-26
Claire Bullard
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Autumn Tolbert
Winchendon, MA
2018-01-26
Nick Musial
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Leisa Gebhart
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Linda Rogers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Laura Blaur
Topeka, KS
2018-01-26
Sharon Franke
Little Rock, AR
2018-01-26
Matthew Krauft
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Virginia Reed
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Sharon Valentin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Miranda Weilert
u5
2018-01-26
Heather Tyler
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jennifer Ward
Malvern, AR
2018-01-26
James M u rie
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Nancy Klimczak
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kimberly Harper
us
2018-01-26
Penny Belt
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Russ Hutchison
Troy, NY
2018-01-26
Kimberlee Harrison
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Brad Roberts
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Ellen Caveness
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Bradley Wallace
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Ruben Paulino
Spokane, WA
2018-01-26
R L Gray
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Tracy Servy
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Anna Regnier
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Demetra Salisbury
Overland Park, KS
2018-01-26
Bethany Hunt
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Laura Favorite
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Thomas Burger
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Shelby Heflin
Texas
2018-01-26
Shannon Keever
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Tara Farlow
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Melinda Wallace
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lauren Stuart
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Caryn Caire
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Niki Reed
Alabama
2018-01-26
Jennifer Paxton
Alabama
2018-01-26
Sharla Grammer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Lindsay Brown
Alabama
2018-01-26
Michele Holloway
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jacob Beers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kelly Bullington
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Donna Guy
us
2018-01-26
Lisa Hearne
Alabama
2018-01-26
Jimmy Ledbetter
Bartlesville, OK
2018-01-26
Holland Durham
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Savannah Hurley
conway, AR
2018-01-26
Matt Mccutcheon
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Sarah Cox
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lisa Johnson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jacob Brickman
Alabama
2018-01-26
Mark Holaway
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jerry Penny
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Teresa Goad Kolb
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Matthew Hickman
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kyle Estes
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Patty Harris
Alabama
2018-01-26
Chelsea Smythe
Spokane, WA
2018-01-26
Erica Powell
u5
2018-01-26
Robin Atkinson
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Nancy Smith
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Denny Kolb
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Wendy Roark
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Eleanor Townsley
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lucas Regnier
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lacie Jones
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Heather Paul
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Steve Petit
Belfair, WA
2018-01-26
Patrick Geels
Alabama
2018-01-26
Melissa Zabecki
Alabama
2018-01-26
Katherine Petit
Pittsfield, MA
2018-01-26
James Cox
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Sarah Keen
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kelley Carey
us
2018-01-26
Andrea Garcia
Bentonville, AR
2018-01-26
Kevin White
Rogers, AR
2018-01-26
Rebekah Phelan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kate Akins
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Nathan Bowers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Suzanne Sanford
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Shannon Bowers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Amy Weis
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Sally Davis
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Wendy Peters
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
J Mayo
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Carrie Rye
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lee Stewart
Alabama
2018-01-26
Jennifer Braden
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Houston Files
Cave Springs, AR
2018-01-26
Craig Stuard
Bentonville, AR
2018-01-26
Elizabeth Vanzant
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Andrea Patitz
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kristin Dietrich
Glen Iris, Australia
2018-01-26
Jenny England
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Christi Daniels
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Mary Moore
us
2018-01-26
Robert Strange
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Thomas Phillips
Selkirk, NY
2018-01-26
casey Barkin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Craig Curzon
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jessica Foreman
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Alma Schwartz
Stillwater, OK
2018-01-26
Shelly Perry
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Diana Frieberg
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Harry Harris
Alabama
2018-01-26
Hope Wages
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Anna Hutchison
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Suzanne Lewis
US
2018-01-26
Sam King
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Elizabeth Patterson
Farmington, AR
2018-01-26
Suzanne Wasiluk
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Rainey Lirette
Bartlesville, OK
2018-01-26
Jennifer Mason
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Marie Riley
Alabama
2018-01-26
Whitney Lloyd
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Carolyn Smith
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Bailey Payne
Folsom, PA
2018-01-26
Anna Moore
Springdale, US
2018-01-26
Robert Florida
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lisa Schilling
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Stefanie Hunt
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Regina Gentry
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Chandra brown
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Tamera Taft
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Tom Houston
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Joanne Patterson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Kristin Rossi
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Nathan Bell
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Cassie Walker
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Rachel Sherin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Chris Farnet
Alabama
2018-01-26
Chelsea Brewer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Shauna Taylor
Texas
2018-01-26
Katie Daniel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Barbara McCleland
Alabama
2018-01-26
Bryan Carr
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Delia Gorder
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lisabeth miller
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kelly Williams
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Nicole Sizemore
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Tobi Walker
Antioch, TN
2018-01-26
Kyle Frank
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Melissa Griggs
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Brent Houser
Texas
2018-01-26
Ann Justiss
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lesa Moyer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Angie Maxwell
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Josh Knight
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Rosie Rose
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jessica McClard
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Amy Johnson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
William Wright
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
JoAnn D'Alisera
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Allison Tritt
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Stacey Hague
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Caitlin Krantz
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
David Lobb
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kristin jones
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Tristan Myers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Beth McAnally
Nashville, TN
2018-01-26
Jordan Workman
Fayetteville, US
2018-01-26
Romy Wallace
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Chelsea Miller
US
2018-01-26
Mischia Johnston
Bethal Hieghts, AR
2018-01-26
Corinne Power
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Mitch Weigel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Megan Baureis
Alabama
2018-01-26
Terri Dover
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jessica Sexton
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Brittany Glidewell
Farmington, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Melissa Pruss
Alabama
2018-01-26
Harris Nancy
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Aaron Randall
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kristin Sexton
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Sidney Burris
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Regina Eilerts
US
2018-01-26
Bruce Schlegel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Samantha Thurman
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Paige Crockett
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Georgia Lance
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Nestor Camargo
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lisa Hinrichsen
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Abigail Bridges
Prairie Grove, AR
2018-01-26
Lisa Summerford-
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Tracy Nelson
Springdale, US
2018-01-26
Stacey Robinson
Alabama
2018-01-26
Bill Ragan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jonathan Webb
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Liliana Carballal
Argentina
2018-01-26
Cami English
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Bill Bartholomew
Spokane, AR
2018-01-26
Keisha Richardson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Amanda Bernal
u5
2018-01-26
Kenny Dover
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Jean Thompson
Tulsa, OK
2018-01-26
Debbie Fauria
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jonathan Atha
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Chelsea Smythe
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Sarah E. Krauft
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Rebecca Ivey
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
cathy dalisera
darien, CT
2018-01-26
Joshua Haliburton
Alabama
2018-01-26
Claire Gist
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Drew Devenport
Arkansas
2018-01-26
Mike Haney
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Rachel Eikenberry
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
annie lorton
fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Keith Broyles
Murfreesboro, TN
2018-01-26
Jon Moores
Benton, AR
2018-01-26
Ben Holderby
Wichita, KS
2018-01-26
Zachary Collins
Alabama
2018-01-26
Kristin McDill
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Bonnie Faitak
Alabama
2018-01-26
Lauren Perkins
Wichita, KS
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Audra Ogden
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Kelly Alexander
Lowell, AR
2018-01-26
Jim Coker
Auburn, WA
2018-01-26
Ellen Weintraut
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Staci Smith
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Allison Weiss
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Laura Goodwin
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Jacqueline Nagel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Mandy Sams
Little Rock, AR
2018-01-26
Kimberly Covington
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Robert Bridewell
Alabama
2018-01-26
Sandra Lasey
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Anna Fielder
Oklahoma
2018-01-26
Zephan Berg
Rogers, AR
2018-01-26
Robin Nordin
Fort Smith, AR
2018-01-26
Anna VanHorn
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jennifer Schwartz
Arkansas
2018-01-26
Martin Jones
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Nicholas McKeown
Alabama
2018-01-26
BJ Elkins
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Cindy Lewis
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Larry Ashley
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Hannah Moll
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
TIFFANY Meeks
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Sara Sawyer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
crystal woodham
Van Buren, AR
2018-01-26
Sharon Akers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Ann Vines
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Alexandria Peterson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Melissa Davis
Alabama
2018-01-26
Jennifer Vaughn
North Little Rock, AR
2018-01-26
Angela McCallie
Alabama
2018-01-26
David Vandermark
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Mattie Boyett
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Mary Tune
Texas
2018-01-26
Becky McCain
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Leslie Bandy
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lexi Kastner
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Gavin Baleto
Fort Smith, AR
2018-01-26
Rhonda Moore
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Chris Francis
Corpus Christi, TX
2018-01-26
John Bass
Little Rock, AR
2018-01-26
Dustin Edmonston
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Marilyn Kay Peterson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Jeff Starling
Alabama
2018-01-26
Tim Henderson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Maria Grace
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Pam Kugel
Alabama
2018-01-26
Ashley Carter
Denver, CO
2018-01-26
Kathy Benton
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Bob Moses
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
ERICA GRASER
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Valerie Lynch
Alabama
2018-01-26
Darrell Crow
Paragould, AR
2018-01-26
Arlene Urquizu
US
2018-01-26
Jandy Maher
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
misty simpson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Ciavash Zaifi
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lisa Woods
Springdale, AR
2018-01-26
Molly Staeheli
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jeremy Gregory
Alabama
2018-01-26
Jeff Boyett
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Grace Anne Odom
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Shanthi Steddum
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Julianne DeLong
Corpus Christi, TX
2018-01-26
Matt Baxter
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Name
Location
Date
Linda Jones
us
2018-01-26
tonya landrum
fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Coy Fagras
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Jack Avery
Southbridge, MA
2018-01-26
alina kelley
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Ember Lanuti
Prairie Grove, AR
2018-01-26
JoAnna Young
Albany, NY
2018-01-26
Linda Connor
Bridgeville, PA
2018-01-26
Julianne Brown
Alabama
2018-01-26
Mary Alice Serafini
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Christie Summerford
Alabama
2018-01-26
Ramie Parsons
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Lance Leder
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-26
Cheryl Scott
Springdale, AR
2018-01-27
Trista Millar
Alabama
2018-01-27
Carole Burgin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Archibald Schaffer N
Alabama
2018-01-27
Lauren Crawley
Bartlesville, OK
2018-01-27
Sarah Moore
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Stacey Banks
Mcallen, TX
2018-01-27
Lisa Spears
Oklahoma
2018-01-27
Kari Files
Cave Springs, AR
2018-01-27
Name
Location
Date
Betty McDowell
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Tracy Rogers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
David Higgins
Texas
2018-01-27
Jacqueline Lobb
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Melinda Kisor
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Eddie Phillips
Little Rock, AR
2018-01-27
Max Moore
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Kim Honchell
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Denise Airola
u5
2018-01-27
Leslie Ray
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Daniel Dickey
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Anna Gentry
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Payton Bridewell
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Marsha Sosa
Paragould, AR
2018-01-27
EMILY SLEDGE
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Elaine Fischer
Roanoke, VA
2018-01-27
Michael Walker
Springdale, AR
2018-01-27
Suzanne Watson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Sarah Williamson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Suzanne Owens
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Amber Scott
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Carolyn Stephens
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Name
Location
Date
adam buescher
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Zachary Hutchison
Alabama
2018-01-27
Sue Payton
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
David Johnston
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
EDWARD MIKAN
US
2018-01-27
Milton Caraballo
US
2018-01-27
Rebecca Paquette
US
2018-01-27
Jennifer Pacheco
US
2018-01-27
Monica M
US
2018-01-27
Justine McDuffie
US
2018-01-27
Susann Crowell
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Sarah Paul
Fayetteville, US
2018-01-27
Becky Shofner
Antioch, TN
2018-01-27
Stephannie Baker
Bentonville, AR
2018-01-27
Lee Kendrick
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Amanda Mhoon
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
JoHannah Goss
Albany, NY
2018-01-27
sarah farnet
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
William Burch
Alabama
2018-01-27
Betty Bartholomew
Spokane, WA
2018-01-27
Alexandra Stanfill
US
2018-01-27
jacob wilson
US
2018-01-27
Name
Location
Date
Kyle Temple
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Cody Cochran
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Anne Gibbs
Murfreesboro, TN
2018-01-27
Lindsey Iversen
us
2018-01-27
Cassandra Linton
us
2018-01-27
Jenny Vanhook
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Betty Lou Hamlin
Little Rock, AR
2018-01-27
Leo Vighetti
Pittsburgh, PA
2018-01-27
Christina Gibson
Edgewood, TX
2018-01-27
Robert Campbell
Dansville, NY
2018-01-27
Jessica Bagsby
Alabama
2018-01-27
Leigh Anne Yeargan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Christian Randell
us
2018-01-27
Patricia Kittell.
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Fiona Nieve
us
2018-01-27
Twana r Cisse
us
2018-01-27
Amanda Gonzales
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Jolt The Wolf
us
2018-01-27
Roberta Helling
us
2018-01-27
Imani Woods
us
2018-01-27
Thao Nguyen
us
2018-01-27
kelly roulhac
us
2018-01-27
Name
Location
Date
chantal mullen
u5
2018-01-27
Jodie Kendall
us
2018-01-27
Wanda Cornelius
us
2018-01-27
Tulen Antrican
u5
2018-01-27
Amanda Stokes
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Stacy Keenan
Alabama
2018-01-27
Adrienne Spurlock
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Katie Papasan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Donna Daniels
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Rebecca Harrison
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Colton Knittig
Alabama
2018-01-27
Steve Stephens
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Vida Jong
Alabama
2018-01-27
Susan Bendure
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Clariss Goodwin -Harrison
u5
2018-01-27
Regina Bennett
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Tristen Wylde
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Brooke Cluck
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Tammye Dighero
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Mark Summerlin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Julie Keys
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Jerri Ann Tindle
Elkins, AR
2018-01-27
Name
Location
Date
Courtney Cline
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Camille Gollon
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Rob Keys
Troy, NY
2018-01-27
Terri Winfield -Story
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Jim Withrow
Schwenksville, PA
2018-01-27
James Wardein
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Ashlynne Young
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Anna Pope
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Dana Thompson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Terry Smyers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
roman biernacki
US
2018-01-27
barbara mcgrath
US
2018-01-27
AMRUTA MESHRAM
US
2018-01-27
Georgiana Wright
US
2018-01-27
Adam Hoskins
US
2018-01-27
Linda Brady
US
2018-01-27
Katy Phelan
US
2018-01-27
Martha Perry
US
2018-01-27
brittany simms
US
2018-01-27
Gail Findley
US
2018-01-27
david taggart
Woodbridge, VA
2018-01-27
Jesus Hernandez
US
2018-01-27
Name
Location
Date
Crystal Ecker
u5
2018-01-27
Raymond Gradecki
Woodstock, IL
2018-01-27
dorinda kelley
us
2018-01-27
Karen Russell
u5
2018-01-27
Kasey Hadd
u5
2018-01-27
Daniel Salguero
u5
2018-01-27
Ramone Mccrary
us
2018-01-27
Martha Obando
Hammond, LA
2018-01-27
Nancy Alonge
u5
2018-01-27
Danielle Davis
us
2018-01-27
Jake Paul
u5
2018-01-27
Montu Singh
us
2018-01-27
Gus Jokinen
us
2018-01-27
Jennifer Jennings
us
2018-01-27
Samuel Inabinet
u5
2018-01-27
Courtney Smith
Mountain View, CA
2018-01-27
Tina Wrobel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Alahna Blakeman
Kansas City, KS
2018-01-27
Kaye Cox
u5
2018-01-27
NATHan Broome
Springdale, AR
2018-01-27
Tasha Nelson
u5
2018-01-27
Elizabeth Wilson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Name
Location
Date
Tammi Harris
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Shaun Adams
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Benjamin Sexton
Dedham, MA
2018-01-27
Daniel Robertson
Alabama
2018-01-27
Chloe Harris
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Timothy Humphries
Fayetteville, TN
2018-01-27
Carla Torrijos
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Gregory Thomas
Elkins, AR
2018-01-27
Helga Coleman
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Madison Forbes
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-27
Forest Denger
Springdale, AR
2018-01-27
Charis Lykins
Alabama
2018-01-28
Bria Mounce
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
David Nicol
Winslow, AR
2018-01-28
Sydney Trumbo
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Brooks Mathias
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Kelly Buckley
Fayetteville, US
2018-01-28
Lisa Spurlin
Tucson, AZ
2018-01-28
Ryan Coon
Alabama
2018-01-28
adrienne shaunfield
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Hang Truong
US
2018-01-28
Fadia Hassanain
US
2018-01-28
Name
Location
Date
Joseph Kiesznoski
us
2018-01-28
Rhonda Harrill
u5
2018-01-28
Janice Luecke
u5
2018-01-28
Lauren Lawes
us
2018-01-28
Raul Jaquez
u5
2018-01-28
yousif almontaser
us
2018-01-28
Brian De Reza
u5
2018-01-28
Troy Doughty
u5
2018-01-28
Michael Swarts
us
2018-01-28
Donna Burkett
us
2018-01-28
Ryan Anderson
u5
2018-01-28
Debra Stendel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Lauren Hogan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
latasha kirkland
fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Donald Harp
Tucson, AZ
2018-01-28
David Means
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Brian Wilmeth
Springfield, MO
2018-01-28
Kelle Wilkins
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Bobby Michael Middlebrook
Alabama
2018-01-28
Kristi Owens
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Lisa Shelby
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
John Harris
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Name
Location
Date
Chandra Means
Alabama
2018-01-28
Alisa Corke
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Sheri Trimis
Alabama
2018-01-28
Barbara Means
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Brooke Sisney
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Nicki Thornton
Worcester, MA
2018-01-28
Ryan Mcanarney
Alabama
2018-01-28
Malia Putman
Bella Vista, US
2018-01-28
Kellie Lehr
Los Angeles, CA
2018-01-28
Megan Chapman
Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
2018-01-28
Brandon miller
Macomb, MI
2018-01-28
Amanda Koopmam
Rogers, AR
2018-01-28
Irene Adams
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Sandra Thompson
Fayetteville,. AR
2018-01-28
Raymond Plack
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
John Williams
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Michael Nygren
Houston, TX
2018-01-28
Cinthia Sotelo
Springdale, AR
2018-01-28
Isaac Turner
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Joann Moore
Alabama
2018-01-28
Morgan Gramling
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Jill Gunderman
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Name
Location
Date
Debra Walker
Heber Springs, AR
2018-01-28
Melissa Young
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Alex Miller
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Katrina Younkin
Lowell, AR
2018-01-28
Paul Lazenby
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Sandra Tedder
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Margaret Elkins
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Tracy Miller
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Sue Garland
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Debra DeGiso
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Cheyenne Shoup
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Terry Criner
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Jacqueline Lozano
u5
2018-01-28
Carlos ramirez
u5
2018-01-28
Victor Fields
us
2018-01-28
Ryan Petty
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Sidney Swonger
Dansville, NY
2018-01-28
Erin Scott
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Mary Anne Reilly
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Paula Cox
Pearcy, AR
2018-01-28
Judie Kaczoroski
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-28
Kaylee Smith
Ann Arbor, MI
2018-01-28
Name
Location
Date
Adam Schaffer
Bentonville, AR
2018-01-28
Laura Rodgers
Dansville, NY
2018-01-29
Elijah Arnette
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Julie Linzay
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Lee Linzay
Alabama
2018-01-29
Kelly Hoist
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Lea Anne Clayton
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Baylee White
us
2018-01-29
Jessica Garcia
Southbridge, MA
2018-01-29
Maureen McClung
Conway, AR
2018-01-29
Christy Dean
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Donna Mclaughlin
Springdale, AR
2018-01-29
Merrisa Purnomo
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Suzanne Hobbs
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
James Cohea
Rogers, AR
2018-01-29
Kristina Watson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Melinda McIlroy
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Sarah Gentry
Leawood, KS
2018-01-29
Caroline Deckerjohnson
California
2018-01-29
Laura Ferrier
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Howard williams
Springdale, AR
2018-01-29
Misty Ozturk
Oakland, MD
2018-01-29
Name
Location
Date
Martin Schoppmeyer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Cosmo Denger
Alabama
2018-01-29
Helen Chase
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
John Rodgers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Renee Tobin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Sheryl Potter
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Christine Jordan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Kelsey Ferguson
Alabama
2018-01-29
Susan Samuels
Alabama
2018-01-29
Brianna Warren
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
McDowell Karen
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Eric Pace
Springdale, AR
2018-01-29
Sue McAlexander
Texas
2018-01-29
William J. Etges
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Shawn House
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Joleen Torgerson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Judy Boyd
Murfreesboro, TN
2018-01-29
Sherrill Johnson
Fort smith, AR
2018-01-29
Sarah McKenna
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Brady Brooks
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Michael Brown
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Erin Hughes
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Name
Location
Date
Gavin Braswell
Springdale, AR
2018-01-29
Lori Kelsey
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Connie Brooks
Alabama
2018-01-29
Hayley Hall
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Tiffany Yee
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
Justin Suggs
US
2018-01-29
Colleen Whitman
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
lewis randall
watford, England, UK
2018-01-29
Steve Cox
Bentonville, AR
2018-01-29
lexie rice
Alabama
2018-01-29
Joan Reynolds
Rogers, AR
2018-01-29
Terri Lane
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-29
J.A. Griffith
Berryville, AR
2018-01-29
Allison Hammond
Alabama
2018-01-29
Lavonne Polk
Lewisville, TX
2018-01-30
anna Sills
fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Burnetta Hinterthuer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Andrew Hubbard
Springdale, AR
2018-01-30
Samantha Foresee
US
2018-01-30
Gregg Bryett
US
2018-01-30
Elijah Wilbur
US
2018-01-30
Nicole Laird
US
2018-01-30
Name
Location
Date
BARBARA NOFFKE
US
2018-01-30
Chris Scholl
Neptune, NJ
2018-01-30
Mary Forbes
US
2018-01-30
Jonathan Boyne
US
2018-01-30
Elizabeth Davis
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Craig Honchell
Spokane, WA
2018-01-30
Sherry Melvin
Rogers, AR
2018-01-30
Pauline Allen
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Cheryl Gilbert
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Courtney Hattabaugh
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Maxinne Palicio
Russellville, AR
2018-01-30
Debi Lambeth
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Marie Erickson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Chad Clayton
Alabama
2018-01-30
Joshua LeMasters
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Jan Phillips
Gentry, US
2018-01-30
Abby Wise
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Kenny George
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Andrew Eaton
Spiro, OK
2018-01-30
Joe Neal
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Erin Helf
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Dylan Ogden
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Name
Location
Date
Amy Weaver
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Dollie McCratic
Farmington, AR
2018-01-30
Ammen Jordan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Kelly Linn
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Whitney Love
Newport News, VA
2018-01-30
Debbie Nelson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Denice Nelson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Susan White
Nassau, Bahamas
2018-01-30
sabrina Sutton
us
2018-01-30
Shannon Mason
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Tyler Martin
Alabama
2018-01-30
Clint Daniels
Millington, TN
2018-01-30
Drew Baledge
Alabama
2018-01-30
David Randle
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Mary Hicks
Kingston, AR
2018-01-30
PeggyJames
Fatetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Jack Williams
West Fork, AR
2018-01-30
kerry hudson
Harrison, AR
2018-01-30
Jeff Hodges
Alabama
2018-01-30
Jennifer Minard
Springdale, AR
2018-01-30
Larry Stout
Springdale, AR
2018-01-30
Jennifer Keene
Alabama
2018-01-30
Name
Location
Date
Kate Reilly -Phillips
Bentonville, AR
2018-01-30
Jason Christy
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Kristy Ray
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Meredith Hornberger
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Rachel Holt
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Christin Jones
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Emily Rappe Fisher
Springdale, AR
2018-01-30
Amy Pi g
us
2018-01-30
Beth Cowen
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Jesse Roberts
Alabama
2018-01-30
David Kienzle
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Mark Keeran
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Madison Lineberger
Oklahoma
2018-01-30
Kelli VanPelt
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Pamela Gudger
u5
2018-01-30
Necia Parker -Gibson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Don Cumbie
Alabama
2018-01-30
Salvatore Grinceri
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Christopher Daily
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Nick Caccavo
Paola, KS
2018-01-30
Mack Ivey
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Jessamyn Goodwin
FAYETTEVILLE, AR
2018-01-30
Name
Location
Date
Ginny Herrmann
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Curtis Cumbie
Oklahoma
2018-01-30
Carla Hodges
Springdale, AR
2018-01-30
Lindsay Ramsey
Dansville, NY
2018-01-30
Audrey Briggs
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Tamara Ridout
Alabama
2018-01-30
Donna Miller
Alabama
2018-01-30
Rebekag Mathis
Alabama
2018-01-30
Keely Spicer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Chris Selby
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Amy Griffin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Routh Ann Yarbrough
Springdale, AR
2018-01-30
Julie Keeran
Groton, NY
2018-01-30
Karen McClard
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Matt Ronan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Glenn Siegel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Kevin Chase
us
2018-01-30
Gertrude Banahene
us
2018-01-30
Janis Sakellis
u5
2018-01-30
Diana Helgert
us
2018-01-30
Jacqueline Adames
us
2018-01-30
teresa penix
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Name
Location
Date
Brandy Wingo
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-30
Nathan Trucks
New York, NY
2018-01-30
Tiffany Griffin
Alabama
2018-01-31
Max Mahler
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Lynette Curzon
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Samantha Manso
u5
2018-01-31
Chris Pena
u5
2018-01-31
Becky Wilhoite
u5
2018-01-31
Julia Reid
u5
2018-01-31
Nicole Benavides
u5
2018-01-31
Norman Nelson
u5
2018-01-31
Elizabeth Freer
us
2018-01-31
Jasmine Bruns
us
2018-01-31
Brenda Sinchi
us
2018-01-31
Joy Treacy
u5
2018-01-31
Pat Ridenhour
u5
2018-01-31
Theresa Shore
u5
2018-01-31
Orla McClure
us
2018-01-31
Kerry Little
u5
2018-01-31
Asia Ford
u5
2018-01-31
Preston Smith
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Todd Hollywood
u5
2018-01-31
Name
Location
Date
Kaycee Zelkovsky
US
2018-01-31
Gary Thaler
US
2018-01-31
Cheryle Krause
US
2018-01-31
Megan James
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
cathy hooper
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Jill Bivens
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Cheryl Yarber
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Jessica Kamilos
Fayetteville, US
2018-01-31
Jim Giczkowski
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
John Hackmann
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Julie Moody
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
MaryJo Myers
Springdale, AR
2018-01-31
Genoa Norris
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Andrew Hackmann
Rogers, AR
2018-01-31
Elaine Becker
Roanoke, VA
2018-01-31
Cindy Caudle
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Amber Stults
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Kerry Couch
Summers, AR
2018-01-31
William Hellard
Rogers, AR
2018-01-31
Steve West
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Maren Anderson
Yukon, OK
2018-01-31
Brenda Smith
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Name
Location
Date
Airie Kazery
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Melanie Murphy
Alabama
2018-01-31
MICHAELLE JARNAGAN
Winslow, AR
2018-01-31
Jodi Stengle
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Warren Robinette
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
WES BRADSHAW
fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Sally Acosta
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Mary Sheridan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Jennifer Shepard
Fayetteville, AR
2018-01-31
Jesse Munoz
Alabama
2018-01-31
Joan Holdorf
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-01
Kennth G Kitts
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-01
Melody Moubarak
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-01
Bradley Giczkowski
Alabama
2018-02-01
Dusty Pate
Oakland, AR
2018-02-01
Jacob Green
u5
2018-02-01
Bilbo Baggins
us
2018-02-01
Marie Teague
Alabama
2018-02-01
Brittney Robison
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-01
Janet Morgan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-01
Diane Aday
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-01
melissa gross
Springdale, AR
2018-02-01
Name
Location
Date
RUTH JOHNSTON
Benton, AR
2018-02-01
Ricky Hanna
Alabama
2018-02-01
Deborah Meng
St. Louis, MO
2018-02-01
Katy Sager
Fayetteville, US
2018-02-01
John Thorn
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-01
Zach Miller
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-02
Alexander Lopez
Alabama
2018-02-02
Karen Ervin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-02
Kelsey Johnson
US
2018-02-02
Hannah Pasquinzo
Alabama
2018-02-02
Jacob Smalley
US
2018-02-02
Chad Fisher
Tontitown, AR
2018-02-02
Carol Williamson
US
2018-02-02
Trendel Herndon
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-02
Patricia Storey
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-02
Brittney Mohr
Spokane, WA
2018-02-03
Jennie Thompson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-03
Emily McWilliams
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-03
Ann Belt
Alabama
2018-02-03
Haven Herndon
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-03
Artie Herndon
Texas
2018-02-03
Cheryl Lindly
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-03
Name
Location
Date
Katherine Schaffer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-03
John Smith
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-03
Lindsay Watt
Elkins, AR
2018-02-03
Tommie Hively
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-03
Candy Clark
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-03
Collin Wooten
Bentonville, AR
2018-02-03
Starlyn Bote
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-04
Kyle Dupont
Rogers, AR
2018-02-04
Kimberly Carnahan
Bentonville, AR
2018-02-04
Eliana Martinez Shapasnikoff
Escazu, Costa Rica
2018-02-04
Brian Berry
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-04
Jeff Potter
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-04
Joshua Rapp
us
2018-02-04
Elizabeth Reagan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-04
Edgar Aleman
us
2018-02-05
Tommy Saul
us
2018-02-06
Kelsie McLeod
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-06
Sarah Dean
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-06
Nancy Martinez
Springdale, AR
2018-02-06
Bridget Penrose
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-06
James Greenwood
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-06
Benjamin Cotter
us
2018-02-06
Name
Location
Date
Anthony Tenner
us
2018-02-06
Kaylee Berggren
us
2018-02-06
Casey Davitt
Mount Holly, NJ
2018-02-06
Kyle Carrion
us
2018-02-06
Lorry Clark
us
2018-02-06
Mark Penrose
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-06
Wade Winn
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-06
Vernon Tarver
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-07
Brian Garner
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-07
Noelle Danylchuk
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-07
Jacob Brimer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-07
Abel Tomlinson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-07
James Burke
West Fork, AR
2018-02-07
Missey Lewis
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-07
Jan Townsley
Mountain View, AR
2018-02-08
Bette Arnold
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-08
Lauren Nicodemus
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-09
Molly Johnson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-09
Keep Northern Dane County
us
2018-02-09
Rural
Emily Parker
Boulder, CO
2018-02-09
Ellen Parker
springdale, AR
2018-02-09
Name
Location
Date
Nicole Curry
Elkins, AR
2018-02-09
Dustin Wardlow
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-10
Alyce Moore
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-11
Savannah Seals
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-11
Sunnie Barylski
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-11
Kathleen Nobel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-12
Debbie Key
us
2018-02-12
steven nelson
fayetteville, AR
2018-02-12
Marlene Colmer
us
2018-02-12
Matthew Dickhut
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-12
Brooks Swanquist
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-12
Lauren Bogan
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-12
Megan Scott
Champaign, IL
2018-02-12
Ryan Billingsley
Fayetteville, AR
20118-02-12
William Quinn
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-12
Jessica Billingsley
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-13
Sara Taylor
Arlington, VA
2018-02-13
Daniel Wells
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-13
Kimberly Moore
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-13
Angelia Istre
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-13
Kenneth Istre
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-13
Suzanne Billings
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-13
Name
Location
Date
Shay Hopper
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-13
John Warren
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-13
Wendy Ryver
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-14
Lori Keathley
Tulsa, OK
2018-02-14
Tabitha Thompson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-14
Candace McCabe
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-14
James Martin
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-14
Worth Sparkman
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-14
Kelsy Litchenburg
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-14
Ronie Sparkman
Centerton, AR
2018-02-14
Susan McDonald
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-14
Matthew Owens
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-15
Fayetteville Ellis
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-15
Gaving Nelson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-15
Judith Larsen
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-15
Dann Nobel
us
2018-02-15
Charles Larsen
Brownwood, TX
2018-02-15
Gerald Davis
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-16
Michelle Mason
Arvada, CO
2018-02-17
Bobbie Hackler
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-17
Karen Byers
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-17
Krystal Faircloth
Choctaw, OK
2018-02-17
Name
Location
Date
Julie Huynh
US
2018-02-18
Sarah Smith
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-18
Zack Asbury
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-18
Bonnie Johnson
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-18
Abra Morgan
Fayetteville, US
2018-02-18
Louis Miller
OLD MO RD. Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-19
Matthew Freeman
Tahlequah, OK
2018-02-19
Iiz dyer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-19
Billy Dyer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-19
Marilyn Schoppmeyer
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-19
Bendure Robert
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-19
Gary Darnell
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-20
Robin Marsh
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-20
Stacy Boone
US
2018-02-20
Kim Glenn
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-20
Terry Lawson
Choctaw, OK
2018-02-20
Joyce Stafford
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-20
Joshua Campbell
US
2018-02-20
Jon Willett
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-20
Brian Abel
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-20
Lorinda Church
Bella Vista, AR
2018-02-20
Kimberly Canova
Fayetteville, AR
2018-02-21
Name Location Date
Jesse Jarvis Us 2018-02-21
Dennis Cozine Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-21
Andy York Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-21
Jennifer O'Neal Fayetteville, AR 2018-02-22
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills D.vas: would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neige:: orhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see -and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Sicinature -- Printed Name Address
J
M
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
�tlL_ 21 (r.17oc�uC JZ, 7G 3
ti r4.-1 r (Jf,-k X-
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
J
S I>r
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature
Printed Name
w)l b6lotow
Address
4JL
0 L
L 1
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars—some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
�, 3-573 I✓. Y4&OrL ", '
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
-' negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Printed Name
A44 ka,,„ A- o-, 1
-/11116VUr
Qi -1 dvj(�-'
Address
306 S�Owv I L' aua, IC✓ee� i�✓ ���
., 2.Z?0.3
15� P( -o s
-r-f a_,/o /i L, A
i'4x- 4*t V
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will -see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
11, EA S Tvy OO.DD VZ
--
�! 1 1
14
Vkr)
J
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
mature Printed Name Address
/ ,Lt4 le,, -4. La,%IC S. L�,<<;,sr Ove.
t, �Eg ot/E- PA" j
Jwl i &e - r—
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our Heighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
r ff xx
M11 4 -Q // e -J ume s
( Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
�y families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars—some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Sgnatrure Printed Name Address
Ly- k S -'
,..�'_ C L Aye
J
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Nam_ _ e Address
KV2
.5 v ( 227.7 I)
kn
en e(2 -L . ,, Fey Pe ia+Q3,
J
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling- Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Addres
ite
)3
`} Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
IZ\ )Lufa\ --L51 Avd—
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Si nature Printed Name Address
�ee N o lq iT Xc�-T6 '2
{
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Printed Name Address
-:52f- A 3 o " ,firs L �Ki7 /
('C, & ce, L -)6a3 Oadc
3-21-1 r 6'1 � 6,li (Kr'
-"' Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
J negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Si mature Printed Name Address
MW LL LcL Cher l _ l •I�C�,�}%-� t.
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature Printed Name Address
2e 70 5_.
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
qtqnature Printed Name Address
•,.tCLI Lf"Ck("n .�"I�l VCl+Vtx4(v1i� c_
ky6N N ��
� LA L� v; u. Yi L )<_s" 5) b I K0+1' ruf fi e .
s
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Rolling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
re,,,�j /,�� Printed Name Address
, ))1J��lJ./..�I�,,, Z16 411,11 1 A/A1)1,1P1J1, `
4,
//3�- L7 &4-,V, / ."Vel,
Permanently remove the Rolling Hills Dr. to Crossover/265 extension
from any master plan
We request the City of Fayetteville revise the Master Street Plan to remove Rolling Hills
Drive as a proposed arterial street and designate it as a local street. We oppose any
extension of Rolling Hills from Old Missouri to Highway 265/Crossover. We further
oppose any widening of Rolling Hills Drive.
An extension of Roiling Hills Drive from Old Missouri Rod to Highway 265/Crossover
would devastate large portions of the Huntingdon subdivision. The extension would run
through yards, some homes, and negatively impact this quiet, well established
neighborhood with noise and heavy traffic.
The homeowners along Rolling Hills Drive would be negatively impacted by a dramatic -
increase in traffic and noise. Both neighborhoods would no doubt see a dramatic
decrease in property values, quality of living, and an increase in safety issues.
This proposed extension/expansion is unique as Butterfield Trail Elementary is located
adjacent to the proposed extension. Approximately 600 children attend Butterfield Trail
Elementary and many children and families walk or ride their bikes to school along
Rolling Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road. The heavy traffic would put our students and
families at risk each and every day. Our quiet neighborhood school would be
negatively impacted with 100s, possibly 1000s, more vehicles speeding through its
crosswalks. Instead of birds and deer, our students will see and hear cars and trucks at
recess.
The proposed project would cost taxpayers millions of dollars ... some of the very
taxpayers whose established neighborhoods this would destroy. This proposed project
would add more traffic to Rolling- Hills Drive, more traffic directly onto College Avenue
and the intersection at Whole Foods; there is simply no gain, yet an enormous cost.
Our neighborhoods deserve better than that. We demand better than that.
Signature- Printed Name Address
toy f,� c ,
�-bne rr�3� r
From: William Claesen
To: Brown. _Chrls; Stoll, Garner; Curth. Jonathan; Harrison. Andy; Mayor; Gray. Adella; Marsh�sarah; Kinion, Mark;
Petty. Mattheuv; Tennant. Tustin; Bunch. Sarah; LTqur John; smith Kyr
Subject: Public Commentary on Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover / 265 Extension
Date: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:25:26 AM
Mayor Jordan, City Council / City Planning Members,
Good morning and I hope that this note finds you well. Over the course of the past several weeks,
you have each received significant correspondence from various citizens relative to the planned
extension of Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover / 265. Although there is a firmly related issue of the
potential re -zoning of multiple acres at the eastern terminus of Rolling Hills Drive (from RSF4 to
NC) before the City Council presently, this particular note focuses solely upon the planned
extension of Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover / 265 and the reasons as to why such an
extension s}tool rem{��from am ettr�ent ar fittttre Gi fI hrta r F1T .
Further—Q1.Vui&-Uills Drives l tet Ll c9st �s_t 7�ky nsidP ed for c5ieitatintt as An_ttt ter(a
conngctiosi just the same. As I compose this email, please note that there are in excess of t,ioo
signatures (in less than 4 weeks) to a petition which is opposed to such an extension of Rolling
Hills Drive to Crossover / 265.
Since February 2015 (and as a matter of public record), there have been 1,476 traffic warnings or
citations issued along Rolling Hills Drive, as well as, go accidents (including a fatality) which have
been recorded along a street which is approximately 1 mile in length. Across 2017 alone, there
were 429 traffic warnings or citations issued, as well as, 26 accidents. Just through January 2018,
there have been 45 traffic warnings or citations issued along Rolling Hills Drive. While our
neighborhood certainly appreciates the vigilance and professionalism ortheFayetteville Police
Department, this amount of traffic citations, as well as, accidents speaks to a significant and
present traffic management issue. To point, this amount of traffic citations and accidents is plainly
indicative of the manner in which Rolling Hills Drive is presently treated by the general driving
public. Across multiple years, our neighborhood has also requested elevated cross -walks at various
points along Rolling Hills Drive to not only curtail speeding, but to reduce the potential for
accidents with such requests subsequently (and repeatedly) being denied (or ignored) by the city.
If Rolling Hills Drive is presently witnessing this vast amount of traffic citations, warnings and
accidents, I shudder to fathom the amount of such citations, warnings and accidents which might
arise in the fitture with a significantly higher traffic volume if an extension were completed to
Crossover/265. Keep in mind that the Fayetteville Police Department could very likely double, if
not quadruple, the present amount of issued citations and warnings on Rolling Hills Drive.
Frankly, it is not an uncommon event for a neighbor to witness a vehicle traversing East or West on
Rolling Hills Drive at speeds in excess of 50mph+. It is also not a rare occurrence for our citizens to
be accosted by other drivers when we are attempting to simply exit our driveways onto Rolling
Hills Drive or attempting to enter our driveways from Rolling Hills Drive.
Should the Fayetteville City Council decide to approve such an ill-conceived and poorly planned
extension of Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover/265, said extension will also closely traverse or touch
upon the present playground area of Butterfield Trail Elementary. In addition, the physical
connection point between an envisioned extension and Rolling Hills Drive will also be at or near an
area significantly utilized by children to access Butterfield Trail Elementary. Quite frankly, the
potential for vehicular accidents involving our neighborhood's children (and adults) will increase,
and likely exponentially, should the Fayetteville City Council decide to approve such an extension
of Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover / 265.
At worst, Rolling Hills Drive should be treated as a true residential street with elevated crosswalks
and reduced speed limits given the sheer amount of neighborhood children who access Butterfield
Trail Elementary a significant portion of the year, as well as, families and individuals who
frequently utilize the area for general activities.
Please keep in mind that a vehicle travelling at the posted speed of 3omph along the preponderance
of Rolling Hills Drive will traverse over 40' in just one second. The fact that there have not been
more accidents invol-%ring pedestrians (children or adult) has been a very fortunate development
given the current traffic volume of Rolling Hills Drive in conjunction with the amount of
pedestrians in close proximity to the road and in light of the vast amount of traffic infractions
which have been recorded across just the last year alone (429 traffic infractions in 2017).
If walkability is indeed a priority for Fayetteville as stated within multiple publications,
constructing such a road extension from Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover/ 265 will do anything but
encourage walkability in existing and well-established neighborhoods such as Rolling Hills,
Huntingdon and Brookhaven.
'I'hg rxlepls'oi� i of R i14 ling Hills Drive to Crossover / 265 vJ11 Destroy Neighborhomis. Neg t� ivelk
1 i111ac1L U(Ilile and Destroy Long 'Xisting GreQlrspace
A quick inspection of the 2030 Master Plan plainly reveals the anticipated path of the Rolling Hills
Drive to Crossover/265 extension and that such a path would not only destroy several homes, but
significantly alter the property of other homes just the same. Presuming that the route of the
aforementioned extension has remain unchanged, one home in particular is that of a widow and her
two sons that would indeed be destroyed. Other homes maintain beautiful backyards which would
effectively and completely be bisected by such an extension. Several other homes would also be
negatively impacted by the proposed extension and very likely reduce their home valuations
significantly due to the close proximity of the envisioned extension. Given the significant acreage
which would be altered by the proposed extension, not only would a significant amount of wildlife
(e.g. deer, etc.) be displaced, but a significant amount of tree canopy would also literally be up-
rooted (which is seemingly anathema to the city of Fayetteville's own stated desire to remain
"green," as well as, in stark contrast to Fayetteville's designation as a "Tree City USA" for the past
20+ years via the National Arbor Day Foundation).
While the city seems to have relented upon the idea of Rolling Hills Drive someday being
designated as an arterial street, to even consider Rolling Hills Drive for such a designation in the
future would be a significant disservice (if not illegal) to the respective homeowners who are in
close proximity to the road. To point, adding additional lanes to Rolling Hills as an arterial street
(plus buffer zones, sidewalks, etc.) would do nothing other than to further destroy a long existing
neighborhood as such a road would not only be intrusive, but also be within an absolutely unsafe
proximity to homes.
y1B / North College Avenue is Presently Inadequate
Any person who has actually driven upon 71B / North College at various times throughout the day
(specifically from the intersection of Rolling Hills Drive and North College, as well as, North
towards Millsap and beyond) can testify that this area is a quagmire on most occasions. While a
listing of accidents alone along this aforementioned portion of North College has not been formally
examined, any person who has driven this section of 71B / North College has been a witness to
multiple accidents across just 2017 alone (with a preponderance of such accidents in the vicinity of
the Whole Foods Market).
Extending Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover / 265 would only serve to effectively "dump" even more
traffic onto an area of North College which is, at most times, woefully inadequate to
handle present traffic volumes.
Kelm, Uffaml; M + s
Contrary to popular belief, building bigger roads (e.g. extending Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover /
265 as an example) actually makes traffic congestion worse due to a phenomenon
entitled induced demand. Further, large foreign cities such as Paris and Seoul ( as well as San
Francisco from a domestic perspective) have actually downgraded and/or reduced roadways across
several years in a successful fashion.
[tolling I I ills Drive 4riIl become an Arterial Street if an Extension to Crossover / 265 is Com111eted
Despite any of the city's alternative plans to ensure that Rolling Hills Drive would remain a
"collector" street in designation, any completed extension connecting to Crossover / 265 will
undoubtedly turn Rolling Hills Drive into an absolute and unsafe "racetrack."
While I am not a road engineer by training, I do traverse these respective roadways on a daily
basis. In my humble opinion, there are much more feasible and effective (as well as palatable)
considerations than for the city to seriously consider a Rolling Hills Drive to Crossover / 265
extension. Further, the city has much more pressing needs relative to such items as underground
utilities (e.g. aging water pipes), as well as, rising crime rates as two brief examples which more
greatly impact the daily livability of our respective citizens. To extend Rolling Hills Drive to
Crossover / 265 is simply neither reasonable nor prudent.
In closing, I would like to take the time to express my appreciation to our Mayor, our present
Council leaders, as well as, the members of our City Planning staff for their continued and tireless
efforts on behalf of the city. While we may indeed disagree on tactical considerations at times, I do
not doubt that we share a common goal, as well as, an overall strategy to ensure Fayetteville's
continued success and positive recognition from a local, regional and national perspective.
If you would also ensure that this respective communication becomes a matter of the public record
concerning this issue, I would greatly appreciate such inclusion.
Yours Very Respectfully and Sincerely,
William Claesen
293g North I..oxle►Loxley Aveime
Fayette vi11e. Arkansas 72?03
P: d-M,871.1.35�1
E: Nviliiam.claese:iCgmail.com.
Garner, Andrew
From: CityClerk
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 8:09 AM
To: Garner, Andrew; Stoll, Garner; Harrison, Andy
Cc: peggyrjames@prodigy.net; Bolinger, Bonnie; Pennington, Blake; Broyles, Lana;
citycouncil@matthewpetty.org; Marr, Don; Eads, Gail; Roberts, Gina; Henson, Pam; Johnson, Kimberly;
Williams, Kit; Branson, Lisa; Jordan, Lioneld; Lynch, Rhonda; Mulford, Patti; Norton, Susan; Ramos,
Eduardo; Smith, Lorinda; Smith, Sondra; Gray, Adella; Marsh, Sarah; Kinion, Mark; Tennant, Justin;
Bunch, Sarah; La Tour, John; Smith, Kyle
Subject: FW: Rolling Hills Rezoning and Extension
Please see email below regarding Rolling Hills Subdivision.
From: Peggy James [mailto:peggyrjames@prodigy.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 04, 2018 3:57 PM
To: CityClerk <cityclerk@fayetteville-ar.gov>
Subject: Rolling Hills Rezoning and Extension
Dear City Clerk,
Please make this letter part of the permanent record for this issue.
Peggy
Dear Members of the Planning Commission,
I am a 25 year resident of the Rolling Hills Subdivision. My husband and I raised our family here, so we can
reflect on the many changes in the area. I'm a retired FPS teacher and my husband is retired from AT&T. The
following are some of our thoughts about the items before your commission. (RH = Rolling Hills)
*** waiting to get on College from Rolling Hills can take a wait through several light changes. Putting more
traffic on RH will just increase those issues.
*** Our WONDERFUL flyover and the addition of the traffic light and Whole Foods (yay) has made this area
of College a traffic mess. Cars start waiting to go north near Hobby Lobby at certain times of the day. Pouring
more cars into this section, instead of the Joyce or Township junctions seems more veasonable to me. Those
roads have more options for where drivers can go.
*** With no access to Gregg from this intersection (RH and College - without multiple jogs through
neighborhoods) it seems like an unwise decision. Get that access first so people can have choices on how to get
out of the College area easily.
*** if you're ultimately going to connect to Old Wire, why don't you vastly improve the Old Wire and Old
Missouri intersection as well as the section of Old Missouri from Rolling Hills up to Old Wire. (Similar to the
Old Wire /Mission junction.) You'll be funneling the traffic in a very similar fashion without disrupting
existing neighborhoods. The cars will all end up in the same intersection at Crossover regardless of your path.
*** as we leave our neighborhood on Loxley onto RH, there can be so much congestion that we are stuck
waiting for quite a while. The intersection in question has that funny little jog and it confuses everyone.
***speed is a huge issue on RH now. This is one of the reasons it is hard to get out onto RH
**** Butterfield is a great school. The traffic in the area has increased exponentially since our son went there.
He was a bike rider. Today I would not allow that. As an adult who bikes, we won't ride that way because of the
speed and narrow passage. Allowing zoning in the area to be more dense than the current designation will cause
so many issues for the school and neighborhoods.
*** Butterfield is crowded now. Where will all of the area kids forced out of Butterfield be bussed to make
room for the new children? The current zoning will also bring new children, but the higher density in the zoning
could quadruple the number of children who would come with the lower density zoning.
***
Please come drive the roads in the morning and afternoon. Put your kid on a bicycle at 3:30 each day. RH is
only a few blocks long, yet is fed by multiple neighborhoods, shopping centers, at least 4 churches and other
businesses. Deciding we need those additional changes without seeing the real issues we face is not great city
planning.
Is this area of town ready for the changes the zone change and road extension will make? We do not think so!
We believe you need to take a long look at what is REALLY here and only move forward once you've solved
the problems you are going to create. There are other solutions. More brainstorming is needed before you jump
on the changes you're currently considering.
We obviously have plenty of people interested in the issues, so finding volunteers to help find a compromise
doesn't seem out of the question.
Sincerely,
Peggy and Pat James
2620 N. Stanton Ave.
Sent from my iPad
Garner, Andrew
From: Adrienne Kvello <adriennekvello@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2018 9:04 AM
To: dog13gregg@aol.com; rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com;
zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com; atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net;
matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Gray, Adella;
Petty, Matthew; Bunch, Sarah; Kinion, Mark; Garner, Andrew; Curth, Jonathan; Tennant, Justin; Mayor;
City -Attorney; Marsh, Sarah; La Tour, John; Marr, Don
Subject: Rolling Hills Extension
Hello,
I am writing to comment on the City of Fayetteville's proposed change to the 2030 Master Street Plan regarding
Rolling Hills Drive.
I live in the Huntingdon subdivision, the neighborhood that would be cut through and changed forever if the
extension goes through. My daughter walks to school at Butterfield. Huntingdon is a quiet, family oriented
subdivision that has been around a long time. it has mature trees and abundant wildlife. We all know each
other. Our kids walk to the neighborhood pond and ride their bikes to each other's houses. We all walk to the
neighborhood pool. This walkability would be completely destroyed if the extension goes through. Regardless
of whether the road is arterial or a collector, if it connects College and Crossover, it will be have heavy traffic
and people will speed through it. i would not feel safe letting my children walk or ride their bikes in our
neighborhood. It will also put the children who attend Butterfield in danger as there will be a high traffic road
running beside it, a lot of traffic noise, and construction for years to come.
Furthermore, there does not seem to be much of an upside to the extension. In the recent public input meeting,
no one could give a clear answer as to what the benefit of this extension would be. The only answer given was
that it had been on the plan for many years. At best, this might save people trying to get to College a couple of
minutes. But then they would bottle neck on College anyway since the design of our City lends itself to
everyone trying to get on 49 at the same point from Joyce or the Flyover. This would only exacerbate that
problem. We need more ways for people to get on 49 at different points. We do not need to make it easier for
everyone to get to the same spot and back up traffic on College --often past Rolling Hills Drive. Moreover, I do
not believe we should be planning our City on the sole premise of people commuting to other cities instead of
working here in Fayetteville.
I believe in this City's desire to have a walkable, bicycle friendly community where people live and work
nearby. This extension is not in keeping with that goal.
Please consider removing the Rolling Hills Drive extension from the Master Street plan downgrade the existing
Rolling Hills to a collector street.
Thank you for your time,
Adrienne Kvello
3140 N Tartan Way
Fayetteville, AR 72703
Adrienne Kvello
Garner, Andrew
From: Tonya Landrum <travel.teach.transform@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 5:36 PM
To: Garner, Andrew
Subject: Please Oppose Rezoning
I am writing to ask that you oppose the rezoning of the land on the east side of Rolling Hills. Additionally, we are very interested
in that land being protected rather than developed and ask that you do all in your power to see that the area does not become a
mass of cookie -cutter housing. If any rezoning happens, it needs to be to ensure protection of that green space, fewer houses
and safety for our school children.
While I understand that this is an overlapping of several issues, I am extremely concerned about the future of our
neighborhood. The rezoning and development of the many acres south of Butterfield seems contrary to what the City of
Fayetteville says it represents. Our city needs its trees, its wooded areas and its wildlife habitat. The citizens do not want large
tracts of land clear cut in order to have developers put up subdivisions. While I understand there is a need for housing, the city
must be intentional and proactive in order to maintain the character and small town feel of Fayetteville. Clear cutting trees and
flattening large green spaces in the heart of Fayetteville is not in our best interest. We must find the best approach for ensuring
that some of that green space be protected.
As the city works diligently to address population growth, a conscientious effort must be continuously renewed in order to
prioritize the quality of life of local citizens rather than the wishes and whims of wealthy, self-interested developers and
businessmen. We deserve better, our environment deserves better, and this great city deserves better.
I sincerely appreciate your time and efforts regarding the matter of the rezoning. I firmly believe that the far majority want what
is best for our wonderful community. Please, when you consider that matter of rezoning, prioritize the needs of the majority and
oppose this unacceptable proposal.
Warm regards,
Tonya Landrum
From: Jennifer O'Neal
To: Brown. Chris; Stoll, Fuarnl'r; Harrison Andy; Cufth. Jonathan; Mayor; T 2nant_ Lison; Bunch. Sarah
Subject: Proposed Extension of Rolling Hills
Date: Wednesday, February 21, 2018 7:10:34 PM
Fayetteville City Government:
My name is Jennifer O'Neal, and I live on N Katherine Avenue. I returned to NWA after
being away for almost 10 years and chose this neighborhood in Fayetteville because it was on
the East Side, the streets were safe and quiet, and the neighborhood was established and still
maintained it's original character.
The thought of extending rolling hills to knock a second or two off of someone's commute or
for any other reason honestly makes me a little sick. This is a terrible idea. It will irreparably
alter the neighborhood not to mention those homes and families most near or in it's path.
Property values will plummet as well. We have worked hard to build our financial stability
and want to pay taxes to a city that respects that.
It also seems like a colossal waste of city funding.
Additionally, the rezoning of the area behind Butterfield to accommodate 920 families instead
of 92 will cause even more issues.
I look forward to both of these ideas being rescinded! I do not want to move. Neither do
many of my neighbors, but it would seem you aim to lower my property value and turn our
area of town into a much lower rent area with too many roads, not enough trees, and far too
many people living there not to mention passing through.
With sadness,
Jennifer O'Neal
Garner, Andrew
From: Ben Owen <benoweninc@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 5, 2018 9:36 AM
To: dog13gregg@aol.com; rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com;
zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com; atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net;
matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew
Subject: Rezoning of 22 acres and Rolling Hills extension
Thank you for all that you do to make our city such a great place to live. I know that managing all of the competing
interests is not easy and helping our area grow in a responsible way is very complex.
I would like to express my opposition to the application to rezone the 22 acres near Butterfield Elementary from
RSF4 to NC and extend Rolling Hills Drive.
I understand the necessary growth that we will see in our city. But this application is irresponsible.
The schools, the utilities and the roads in this area are already over capacity. If the owner of this property wants to
develop it, they need to address all of the issues that the development will cause.
My first choice would be for you to deny the rezoning and remove the Rolling Hills Extension to 265. My second
choice would be for you to downgrade Rolling Hills Drive from an arterial to a collector on the city plan.
Thank you,
Ben Owen
2427 N Warwick Dr
Fayetteville, AR 72703
479-582-4990
Garner, Andrew
From: Anna McClard Pope <aemcclard@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 3:13 PM
To: dog13gregg@aol.com; rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com;
zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com; atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net;
matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew;
CityClerk
Subject: Rolling Hills Rezoning Request
Dear Planning Commission Officials,
As a citizen of Fayetteville and member of the Rolling Hills Community, I would like to express my opposition to the
rezoning request put forth by Jorgenson and Associates. The impact to the current infrastructure, schools, and
environment has not been studied to a degree to provide sufficient evidence that this will not negatively impact the
area.
In addition, I am concerned for the wildlife that resides in the Wetlands area that would be destroyed as the result of
this potential development.
I would like to add my statement to the public record.
Thank you,
Anna
Garner, Andrew
From: Ryan Billingsley <ryan.billingsley@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 10:16 PM
To: dog13gregg@aol.com; rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com;
zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com; atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net;
matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew;
CityClerk
Cc: Mayor
Subject: Planning Commission Meeting tomorrow for Rolling Hills
To the members of the planning commission,
I hope this e-mail may become part of the official record pertaining to this entire issue of Rolling Hills and the
city master plan.
My name is Ryan Billingsley and I live in the Huntingdon neighborhood right off of Oak Bailey.
I have e-mailed some of you before, but in light of the new recommendation trom the planning commission I
wanted to write again before tomorrow's meeting on March 12th. I sincerely hope you can read it to the end
because it means a lot to me.
I have lived in Fayetteville my entire life. This is the oldest neighborhood association in the entire city. As I hope you all know well,
northeast Fayetteville is a special place with quiet neighborhoods Rill of character and giant trees. We have amazing green space in
Huntingdon and a neighborhood pond right across the street from my house. We have deer walk through our backyard all the time. Northeast
Fayetteville is my home and the only one I've ever known, as is the case for many other families in the area.
The entire concept of the city recommending that Rolling Hills he built through the woods and dump traffic onto Oak Bailey is incredibly
disturbing to me. By law the owner of the land in question can develop his land to zoning specifications and build entrances to his
development where his property borders. The city has absolutely no need to step in and insist one of those roads be a cut -through of land not
owned by the developer. It is simply unnecessary and, quite frankly, a little disturbing_
We were presented with an "Option D" at the meeting on Rolling Hills last month. It was OVERWHELMINGLY the most popular option
from those in attendance. This option removed Rolling Hills as a cut -through from the master plan and would allow the developer to develop
his property with winding neighborhood roads without suggesting to other traffic that this is a place to drive through if you don't live here.
Old Wire has worked my entire life as a way to get to Rolling Hills (while conveniently avoiding speeding through family -filled
neighborhoods).
I must point out that the latest disclosure of the planning commission's recommendation on the city website begins with a highly problematic
point, suggesting that how we described Rolling Hills in 1965 should dictate how we ruin well-established and beautiful neighborhoods in
2018. If Rolling Hills was once described as a thoroughfare connecting College Ave. to several neighborhoods it is of absolutely no concern
to us today and it is extremely incorrect to suggest this is why we should push traffic through those beautiful neighborhoods to a previously
non-existent part of the city.
To claim that something is "needed" is a strong claim and should be examined with all considerations. What effect does it have on wildlife,
what effect does it have on the families who live in these neighborhoods. and the children that attend Butterfield elementary?
I have driven up Old Missouri and down Old Wire to get to Crossover my entire life, AND I live in a neighborhood that necessitates driving
on these roads daily; and I have NEVER considered it a need for Rolling Hills to be extended. Never once have I wished to drive through
those woods to literally save perhaps 3 minutes at most. To claim that these two projects are separate is disingenuous. There is absolutely no
need for our city master plan to contain this recommendation. The need does not exist. This is the definition of a want, and we do not have
the moral right to do things that we want at the expense of others happiness. This is by definition morally wrong to carry out and I am
ashamed of our city for recommending it.
I am extremely sad that this is how our local government works. I am extremely sad that I've been TOLD by city planners that the planning
commission isn't supposed to consider the effect on families and neighborhoods (otherwise known as political complaints apparently).
I completely understand that you are doing your job. Somebody drew a line through the woods and called it a master plan. Now unfortunately
it is your job to figure out a way to make it happen. You are just doing yourjob but the job is wrong. We don't need it.
This is where we live. Please understand that.
I sincerely hope you hear the message coming from the people who actually live here during tomorrow's meeting.
Thank you very much for your time,
Ryan Billingsley
Garner, Andrew
From: Mary Bollero <marybollero@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 2:53 PM
To: rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com; zniederman.planningcommission @gmail.com;
atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net; matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com;
Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew; dog13gregg@aol.com; CityClerk
Subject: Rolling Hills Collector Downgrade and Extension Removal
To the city of Fayetteville planning commission and to whom else it may concern,
With the exception of a few years between the ages of 4 and 7, I have lived in Fayetteville my entire life. I love
this city and I have always been proud to call it my home. i grew up on Zion road, attended Butterfield
Elementary, and in the summer of 2007, before my sophomore year of high school, my parents bought a house
on Rolling Hills Dr, where they still live now. In 2015, a couple years after I married, my husband and I bought
a house on the corner of Rolling Hills Dr. and Sheryl Ave. We loved the location in regards to being near my
parents as we started a family, but also its general location in Fayetteville, the beautiful established trees of the
neighborhood, the wonderful neighbors and top rated school for our future children to attend. It has been the
perfect first home for us.
Imagine this is your scenario, your life, and now your property value, your child's safety and overall
neighborhood livelihood are being threatened by an unnecessary plan to widen and extend Rolling Hills Dr to
Crossover.
The children attending Butterfield school do not need a 4 lane road next to their learning environment. The
noise from traffic will surely inhibit their concentration, the traffic volume and speeds will heighten the
potential for pedestrian involved traffic accidents. We do not want this for our children. Would you want this
for your children who walk to school everyday?
My husband and I have a house situated right behind ours resulting in only having a small back and side yard.
We recently added a fence to the east side of our house, which sits on the corner of Rolling Hills. We created a
much needed safe space for our two year old son to play and added to our overall fenced yard space. If as a
planning commission you decide to keep Rolling Hills as an arterial road and not downgrade to a collector, our
fence and new yard space will be obliterated either now or in the future when it is widened to 4 lanes, even
further hurting our property's value. We already have the fact that our house is on the corner of Rolling Hills
going against us if a road widening happens, but if our yard is made smaller we will recieves something close to
peanuts when and if we decide to sell our house.
Who wants to live in a house with no yard on the corner of a 4 lane street?? Would you pay your hard earned
money for a home like that?
Please downgrade Rolling Hills from an arterial to a collector at tonight's meeting.
Please remove the proposed Rolling Hills extension to Crossover from the Master City Plan.
Two entire neighborhoods livlihoods are at stake.
Our children's safety is at stake.
Is a developers profitable interests more important than your city's residents and children's safety and
livl ihood????
If it is, then I am very disappointed in the city I have lived and loved for my entire life. Please don't make this
about money and profit, don't insult us by moving forward with this plan, raising our taxes to pay for something
we do not want and cannot afford, especially when our homes and the neighborhood we love are the price we
will have to pay.
Thank you for your time in reading my concerns.
Respectfully,
Mary Bollero
3007 N Sheryl Ave
Fayetteville, AR
Garner, Andrew
From: Forest <fdenger@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 8:43 AM
To: Garner, Andrew
Subject: Rolling hills extension
Dear city planner,
live in Huntingdon neighborhood on 3240 E Charing Cross, Fayetteville. As a concerned citizen,
believe it would be detrimental to our neighborhood and our children residing in the neighborhood to
install a cut through that divides our neighborhood. This includes arterial or collector streets, as both
will cut our neighborhood in 2, and cause bike and pedestrian hazards. We regularly have children
riding bicycles on these streets and bringing increased non -neighborhood traffic would be a disaster
for our children.
There are several alternatives to this cut -through plan:
1: Improve the intersection of Rolling Hills and Old Missouri and Old Missouri and Old Wire to make
the existing eastbound route more efficient. Give eastbound traffic right of way, decreasing travel
time for east -west bound traffic. This would only be a few hundred yards of length to the cut -through
option, and would not displace any residents or divide neighborhoods. It would also be as effective or
more effective than putting a collector straight through, due to the amount of construction needed for
each.
2: Improve traffic lights on Joyce and add a center lane. The lights are set to allow minimal side traffic
to obtain right of way access to Joyce even during rush hour. You should not be stopping at all 3 red
lights during rush hour when traveling East and west. It does not make sense that these.lights are not
synchronized, and it would be a nearly free option (outside the cost of a traffic study and timing
design). If Joyce light timing were set properly, you would get significantly more bandwidth out of the
street.
3: Manage Township a little better. As it exists today, during rush hour, Township and College lights
do not allow enough cars through during heavy utilization, causing backups in all directions and in
turn lanes. The light should not be only letting a few cars through each time during heavy traffic, but it
should allow substantial traffic through, mostly clearing the lanes for each green signal. This would
double or more the capacity of this intersection. Improving and lengthening the eastbound township
turn lanes would also be beneficial.
In closing, please consider completely removing any cut -through road through our neighborhood by
removing the plan to extend rolling hills. Also, through the savings.on this project, please consider the
above 3 concepts that would substantially improve east -west traffic on this half of the city.
Thank you,
Forest Denger
Garner, Andrew
From: Bruce Johanson <brucejohanson@johansongroup.net>
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2018 5:26 PM
To: dog13gregg@aol.com; rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com;
zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com; atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net;
matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew
Subject: Rolling Hills Drive
Dear Planning Commission Committee Members:
First of all, thank you for the time, effort and expertise that you all have provided as members of the Fayetteville
Planning Commission.
My wife, Debbie and I, have been residents one block off of Rolling Hills Drive since 1986. Both our boys attended
Butterfield Trail Elementary from Kindergarten through 6th Grade. We have enjoyed our home and our neighbors on
both sides of Rolling Hills Drive the past 32 years. We have observed the increased traffic the last several years to where
it has been increasing hard to get through the intersection at College Avenue and Rolling Hills Drive and the intersection
of Old Missouri Road and Rolling Hills Drive with the morning and evening commuter traffic. Lately, the traffic has
increased to the point now that both intersections are busy off and on throughout the day. Given that most of Rolling
Hills Drive is residential and the extension to Crossover Road would be mostly residential, a four -lane boulevard would
increase the traffic count such as Joyce Street which is a highly commercialized street and create a dangerous road for
walking and biking traffic as well as for students heading to and from Butterfield Trail Elementary.
We do favor the recent recommendation to downgrade Rolling Hills Drive from an arterial to a collector and also feel
that the Rolling Hills extension to Crossover Road is not a necessary expense with the existing Old Missouri Road and Old
Wire Road to Crossover and the Old Missouri Road to Joyce Street to Crossover street structure. Signal lights at Rolling
Hills Drive and Old Missouri Road intersection and Old Missouri Road and Old Wire Road intersection would be
beneficial and assist with regulating the current and future traffic flow.
Thank you for your time and hope that you will help us to keep our current residential area as one of the highly
appreciated and long-time residential neighborhoods in the City of Fayetteville.
With kind regards,
Bruce and Debbie Johanson
1100 E. Glenn Lane
Garner, Andrew
From: Liz Krauft <Ikrauft@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 6, 2018 12:02 PM
To: dog13gregg@aol.com; rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com;
zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com; atq@flintlocklab.com; matthewjohnson@mercy.net;
matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew;
CityClerk
Subject: Rezoning near Rolling Hills neighborhood
Hello all,
My name is Liz Krauft
Today, I'm writing to you as a citizen of Fayetteville and resident of the Rolling Hills neighborhood. I'm very concerned about the
fate of our neighborhood. I've been studying maps, plans, proposals, rezoning applications, and numerous documents I've
acquired via the Freedom of Information Act.
I know that Jorgenson and Associates have resubmitted their application to rezone a portion of property owned by James
Keenan, due to glaring deficiencies in the previous application. It's shocking that it was approved in its incomplete state.
If the planning commission approves that application a second time, it will get sent on to the City Council whom I believe will
approve it based on various master plans. I cannot properly convey via email how I am adamantly against this rezoning. I have
many concerns:
1. This is a wildlife habitat full of gorgeous deer, foxes, bats, songbirds, and many other species. It is also an established
wetland that is at times used as an outdoor classroom. All of this will go away as a consequence of the rezoning.
2. The intersection of Rolling Hills and Old Missouri is already dangerous for pedestrians. Children are basically playing frogger
going to and from Butterfield Elementary. Traffic will increase dramatically as a consequence of the rezoning.
3. The soil on the 50 undeveloped acres is actually very unsuitable for building. A geologist has educated me enough that I know
the soil is conducive to nun off, and literally corrosive to concrete. Can you imagine what would happen to the properties of
adjacent homeowners after a heavy ran if there was suddenly a lot of pavement in that area? Flooded properties and faulty
construction would be a consequence of the rezoning.
4. This is probably the most disturbing and insulting: I have come to understand that if Rolling Hills were to be extended, it would
later be connected across Crossover road to Skillern, and eventually pushed through to the Brookwater subdivision. Am I to be
at peace knowing that my neighbors homes are to be destroyed, my school age children's safety is to be compromised, wildlife
habitats are to be destroyed, all to create a shortcut for the wealthy people (i.e. some Razorback coaches) on the East Side of
town? It's a disgrace to the hardworking people that live in our neighborhood. The favoritism of the wealthy would be an obvious
consequence of the rezoning.
I'm urging you to vote against this rezoning. It will have impacts and consequences beyond the immediate area proposed. I'm
looking at the big picture, and I hope you will too. Please consider the wishes of hundreds of families that are proud to live in the
heart of Fayetteville, and not the desires of a few.
I appreciate your time,
Liz Krauft
Garner, Andrew
From: CityClerk
Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 10:56 AM
To: Bolinger, Bonnie; Pennington, Blake; Broyles, Lana; citycouncil@matthewpetty.org; Marr, Don; Eads,
Gail; Roberts, Gina; Henson, Pam; Johnson, Kimberly; Williams, Kit; Branson, Lisa; Jordan, Lioneld;
Lynch, Rhonda; Mulford, Patti; Norton, Susan; Ramos, Eduardo; Smith, Lorinda; Smith, Sondra; Gray,
Adella; Marsh, Sarah; Kinion, Mark; Tennant, Justin; Bunch, Sarah; La Tour, John; Smith, Kyle
Cc: Garner, Andrew; Stoll, Garner; Harrison, Andy; abigailmmyers@gmail.com
Subject: FW: Rolling Hills Drive expansion and extension
Please see email below regarding Rolling Hills Drive
From: Abigail Myers [mailto:abigailmmyers@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2018 10:47 AM
To: CityClerk <cityclerk@fayetteville-ar.gov>
Subject: Rolling Hills Drive expansion and extension
We are writing to express our concern about the current proposal to widen Rolling Hills Drive and extend it to Hwy
265. We are current residents of Huntingdon Neighborhood and our children attend Butterfield Trail Elementary and
McNair Middle School, so we travel Rolling Hills, Old Wire, and Highway 265 daily. Extending Rolling Hills through the
Keenan Property and the Strawberry/Huntingdon Subdivisions will destroy wildlife, destroy homes and private land, and
create a main thoroughfare of traffic through an established neighborhood and next to an elementary school. The
amount of time saved by cutting through this area appears to be negligible and at the risk of increasing safety and traffic
problems and decreasing home values.
Wider streets with long stretches of road have been shown to affect driver behavior, causing them to increase speed. It
is our concern that widening and extending Rolling Hills will have this affect next to our elementary school and in our
neighborhood. Have studies been done to see what impact a principal arterial road will have on me and my neighbors
as we walk our children to school each day? Has consideration been given to improve the existing infrastructure to
address the traffic issues without the destructive measures being proposed?
We also have concerns about the topography of the land that will be used in the building of this road. Members of your
own committee have acknowledged the presence of soil, terrain, and drainage issues with the land of the proposed road
extension site. Have studies been done to address and approach these issues prudently?
Overall, we have many concerns and we feel that they have not been addressed. We have been seeking data driven
statements from members of your committee and other city staff without receiving any. What data suggests that the
Rolling Hills expansion and extension will increase safety in our neighborhood and around Butterfield elementary,
preserve wildlife and local water sources, and improve traffic flow?
Thank you,
Tristan and Abigail Myers
Garner, Andrew
From: Glenn Siegel <gslizard@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 10:32 PM
To: dog13gregg@aol.com; rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com;
zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com; atq@flintlocklab.com; matthew Johnson@mercy.net;
matt@mbl-arch.com; rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; Garner, Andrew;
CityClerk; Mayor
Subject: Rolling Hills extension plus idea of re -zoning
Planning Commission:
As a citizen of Fayetteville and member of the Rolling Hills community, I am opposed to extending Rolling
Hills to Crossover. I realize that Fayetteville continues to grow but all the more reason for judicious decisions
when it come to eradicating the natural environments that are already diminishing all over the city. Limits to
where the growth of population and density must always be made in order to preserve these natural treasures
and the wildlife within them. Our children and grandchildren need these areas for their own connection to
nature and balance against the spread of urban density. There are numerous ways to travel from College to
Crossover already.
I want to make my opinion known as you proceed with this serious decision that can have destructive
consequences to the quality of life in this part of Fayetteville. It would be much more enriching for that area to
be preserved in its wild, nature condition.
Furthermore, the idea of re -zoning that area, which may arise on another agenda is even more disturbing since
it clearly serves the interest of the few who are interested in profiting at the expense of the rest of us in this
neighborhood. Greed of few regarding packing in more dwellings for greater profit should not drive decisions
when the overall environment and neighborhood quality of life is at stake.
I would like to add this statement to the public record,
Glenn Siegel
2167 E. Wolf Geek Dr.
Fayetteville, AR 72703
From: CityClerk
To: Haml Qn.Andy; 2oILGar ; Gsarner. Andrew
Cc: Legal] Anne; Bolinger. Bones; Pennington. Blake; Brovlgs. Lana; cftvcoun flQmatthewMttv.ora; Marr, Don; Eads.
CIL; %Js Gina; Henson, Pam; 1 i rl ;'iVflli ,.KIG; [3ran2on. Lisa; Jordan, Lioneld; Lunch,
Rhonda; Mulford—P_attl: fdorton. Susan; Ramos. Eduardo; h L rin ; Smith. Sondra; Gray. Adella; Marsh.
Sarah;Ki
r�[orL_Mark; Tennant, Justin; Bunch -Sarah; La IQur, John; Smith, Kyl
Subject: FW: Downgrade of Rolling Hills and Removal of Rolling Hills Extension
Date: Monday, March 12, 2018 9:52:11 AM
From: Leigh Anne Yeargan [mailto:leighanneyeargan@yahoo.comj
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2018 1:27 PM
To: rautry333@gmail.com; lesliebeld@aol.com; zniederman.planningcommission@gmail.com;
atq@flintlocklab.com; matthew.johnson@mercy.net; matt@mbl-arch.com;
rnoble@crcrawford.com; Sloanscroggin.planning@gmail.com; CityClerk <cityclerk@fayetteville-
ar.gov>; Mayor <Mayor@fayetteville-ar.gov>; Pennington, Blake <bpennington@fayetteville-
ar.gov>; dogl3gregg@aol.com
Subject: Downgrade of Rolling Hills and Removal of Rolling Hills Extension
Dear Commission Members:
I am writing to request that the Planning Commission accept the staffs proposal to downgrade Rolling
Hills Drive from an arterial road to a collector street on the Master Street Plan Map. I am also requesting
that the Planning Commission remove the Rolling Hills extension to Oak Baily/Old Wire from the Master
Street Plan Map.
The current arterial designation and proposed extension are completely contrary to the City's second
development goal - to discourage urban sprawl. The Master Street Plan Map currently shows Rolling
Hills connecting all the way to Highway 265 (Mission) via Skillern as an arterial road. The only
presumable reason for this proposed corridor is to allow for further development east of Fayetteville.
Currently, there is not much development North of N. Oakland Zion Road. In fact, the Fayetteville city
limits end South of N. Oakland Zion Road. If the City is truly concerned with preventing urban sprawl,
why create a corridor which would make it easier for people to build homes in areas that have yet to be
developed and are not even in the City limits? This is completely opposite to "maxim[izing] City influence
over development and preservation in outlying unincorporated areas."
The current map and staff proposal are also contrary to the City's fourth development goal - to grow a
1v bi transportation network. The City has stated that major thoroughfares should be created "with
respect to the surrounding environment." Rolling Hills Drive is 53 years old. The land on which the
proposed extension would run has been undeveloped for over 53 years. Homes on Strawberry Lane
were built approximately 44 years ago. Yet, the extension would run right through the yards - and in some
cases homes - of this well established neighborhood. As an arterial road - and even as a collector - it
would create a speedway through a historic neighborhood which would also be directly next to Butterfield
Trail Elementary School. The property is also home to various wildlife including deer and foxes not to
mention trees. The proposed extension and street designation do not respect the "surrounding
environment."
Zion Road - which already connects College to Crossover Road (Highway 45) - is listed as a collector on
the Master Street Plan Map. The majority of the property on Zion Road is either commercial or
undeveloped. If another arterial road is needed because of traffic from East Fayetteville to College, the
logical choice is Zion Road which will not result in families losing their homes or jeopardizing the safety of
our school children. If the City is frnly committed to its goals and to the safety and health of its citizens,
why does the city resist considering Zion Road as an alternative to Rolling Hllls Drive? What harm would
it do to ask the staff to investigate whether Zion Road is a viable option?
The current Mobility Plan indicates that only 2.2% commute trips would save time if Rolling Hills is
extended. The current Mobility Plan also recognizes that nearly 25% of traffic collisions in 2015 took
place within a 15 minute walk of a school, library or recreational center. The City's own data evidences
that Rolling Hllls is not necessary and will only further jeopardize the safety of our children.
The purpose of municipal master plans is to "promote ... the safety, morals, order, convenience,
prosperity and general welfare of its citizens." Ark. Code Ann. 14-56-403. The over two hundred
residents who attended the February 22, 2018 public meeting, the approximately 2,000 citizens who have
signed a petition to remove the Rolling Hllls extension off the Master Street Plan Map, and the numerous
citizens who have emailed or called the staff, Planning Commission, and City Counsel have clearly
indicated that the current extension of Rolling Hills on the Master Street Plan Map does not accomplish
the aforementioned goals.
Thank you for your consideration.
Leigh Anne Yeargan