Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout44-17 RESOLUTIONAS. FAY€l/, r 4 r� 0 ur. a,t M �'RkhNS�'S 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Resolution: 44-17 File Number: 2017-0034 WALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION MATCHING GRANT: A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT A WALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION MATCHING GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $210,000.00 FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PORTION OF THE KESSLER MOUNTAIN MASTER TRAILS PLAN, TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR JORDAN TO SIGN THE GRANT AGREEMENT, AND TO APPROVE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT WHEREAS, the Walton Family Foundation has proven to be a strong supporter of Fayetteville's trail systems including the Mount Kessler acquisition; and WHEREAS, the Walton Family Foundation has offered a 50/50 grant in the amount of $210,000.00 for the implementation of a portion of the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby thanks and expresses its gratitude to the Walton Family Foundation for its generous $210,000.00 matching grant for the implementation of a portion of the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan, approves the attached Grant Agreement, authorizes Mayor Jordan to sign this Grant Agreement and agrees to match the grant using the Kessler Mountain Acquisition Fund and the Natural Surface Trail Development Fund. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves a budget adjustment, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution. PASSED and APPROVED on 2/7/2017 Page 1 Printed on 218117 Resolution: 44-17 File Number 2017-0034 A nnrnvpd Attest: 6LX� S'.Z4�- P1i Sondra E. Smith, City Clerk Tr l {� 1I11Tf �t�'r/ FAYETTEVILLEE ; :+moi • �.y • ``.,: l�i10 w+ °`�`�'4 Page 2 Printed on 218117 ax. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street 4 Fayetteville, AR 72701 `^ �l (479) 575-8323 Text File -- File Number: 2017-0034 Agenda Date: 2/7/2017 Version: 1 Status: Passed In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Resolution Agenda Number: C. 1 WALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION MATCHING GRANT: A RESOLUTION TO ACCEPT A WALTON FAMILY FOUNDATION MATCHING GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $210,000.00 FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PORTION OF THE KESSLER MOUNTAIN MASTER TRAILS PLAN, TO AUTHORIZE MAYOR JORDAN TO SIGN THE GRANT AGREEMENT, AND TO APPROVE A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT WHEREAS, the Walton Family Foundation has proven to be a strong supporter of Fayetteville's trail systems including the Mount Kessler acquisition; and WHEREAS, the Walton Family Foundation has offered a 50150 grant in the amount of $210,000.00 for the implementation of a portion of the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby thanks and expresses its gratitude to the Walton Family Foundation for its generous $210,000.00 matching grant for the implementation of a portion of the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan, approves the attached Grant Agreement, authorizes Mayor Jordan to sign this Grant Agreement and agrees to match the grant using the Kessler Mountain Acquisition Fund and the Natural Surface Trail Development Fund. Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves a budget adjustment, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 Printed on 21812017 Ken Eastin Submitted By CI City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form 2017-0034 Legistar File ID 2/7/201.7 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non -Agenda Item 1/18/2017 Parks & Recreation / _ Parks & Recreation Department Submitted Date Division / Department Action Recommendation: Parks and Recreation staff recommends City Council approval of a resolution to accept a Walton Family Foundation Grant in the amount up to $210,000 for the purpose of implementing a portion of the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan and approval of a budget adjustment. 4470.900.9470.5814.05 2250.520.9255.5806.00 Account Number 14013.1 16010.1 Project Number Budget Impact: Sales Tax Parks Development Fund Fund Kessler Mountain Acquisition & Natural Surface Trail Development Project Title Budgeted Item? Yes Current Budget $ 210,349.00 Funds Obligated $ - Current Balance Does item have a cost? No Item Cost Budget Adjustment Attached? Yes Budget Adjustment $ 210,000.00 Remaining Budget V20140710 Previous Ordinance or Resolution # 95-16 Original Contract Number: Comments: Approval Date: CITY OF TayTl�ke NSAS TO: Mayor Lioneld Jordan THRU: Don Marr, Chief of Staff Connie Edmonston, Parks and Recreation Director Alison Jumper, Park Planning Superintendent FROM: Ken Eastin, Park Planner II DATE: January 18, 2017 STAFF MEMO SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Walton Family Foundation Grant in the amount of $210,000 in matching funds for initial implementation of the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan RECOMMENDATION: Parks and Recreation staff recommends City Council approval of a resolution to accept a Walton Family Foundation Grant in the amount up to $210,000 for the purpose of implementing a portion of the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan and approval of a budget adjustment. BACKGROUND: Through the authorization of Resolution 40-14, the City of Fayetteville purchased and preserved over 350 acres on Kessler Mountain in a partnership with the -Walton Family Foundation, Chambers Bank and the Fayetteville Natural Heritage Association in 2014. Located in the southwest corner of Fayetteville, Kessler Mountain reaches 1,856 feet above sea level and consists of steep bluffs and rock -covered woodlands with about 8 miles of existing trails that traverse through stands of old-growth forest and rock outcroppings, showcasing many native flora and fauna species. Resolution 40-14 also directed Parks and Recreation to establish a public trailhead at the Regional Park in order to provide public access for the approximately 8 miles of existing nature, hiking, biking, and recreational trails previously established on Kessler Mountain. Furthermore, it was determined that a master plan be prepared to assess the condition of the existing trails and make recommendations on new trails to be established on Kessler Mountain. A Request for Proposal (RFP 15-02) was drafted and advertised on March 16, 2015 and opened April 10, 2015. Two proposals were received. Through review by a selections committee, Progressive Trail Design, LLC was selected to prepare the master trails plan at a cost of $26,320. Development Services Director Jeremy Pate noted in his February 4, 2014 memo to the City Council for the purchase of the land that the city's vision was to utilize already forged partnerships with groups to develop programs at Kessler Mountain that emphasize and expand upon established outdoor recreation in the form of mountain biking, hiking, and nature study. To meet this advisory need, various group representatives formed a stakeholder/ steering committee to aide in the preparation of a Master Trails Plan that will guide natural surface trail development within the forested mountain property. The active stakeholder group consists of representatives from the Walton Family Foundation, Beaver Watershed Alliance, Fayetteville Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.tayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 Natural Heritage Association, Fayetteville Public Schools, Illinois River Watershed Partnership, International Mountain Bicycling Association, Kessler Greenways, NWA Audubon Society, NWA Land Trust, Ozark Off -Road Cyclists, Ozark Regional Land Trust, as well as the City of Fayetteville's Active Transportation Committee, Development Services, Parks and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Professional consultants on the project consists of Progressive Trail Design, Alta Planning and Design, Ozark Ecological Restoration, Inc. and Amy Reeves Robinson, group facilitator. This stakeholder group initially met on August 3, 2015 and began an extended process for preparation of the master plan. An initial public meeting was held on August 31 to gather input from the general public on the content of the plan to be developed. From this beginning, the consultant and team of stakeholders met a total of five times and ultimately came to consensus on improvements to the existing trails system and recommendations for new trails to meet the user needs of Fayetteville. This concensus resulted in a final draft of the plan. This draft was presented back to the general public in an open meeting held on December 14, 2015. Following, the stakeholders met one final time to review public comments. From this meeting, final revisions were made which culminated in the draft plan presented to the Fayetteville Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) at a special meeting held on April 12, 2016. Following a presentation of the plan by the consultant, PRAB opened the floor to public comment on the plan. After comment and discussion, the PRAB unanimously approved and made recommendation to the City Council for official adoption of the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan by the City of Fayetteville. On May 3rd, 2016, the Kessler Mountain Master Trails Plan was presented to the City Council for review and discussion. After this discussion, the Council unanimously voted to accept and adopt the plan for implementation and authorized Resolution 95-16 for this purpose. With the Mayor's approval, Parks and Recreation applied for a matching grant from the Walton Family Foundation in November 2016. The Foundation is awarding the City the full amount of $210,000 requested in the grant application for the project. DISCUSSION: With the preparation and adoption of the Master Trails Plan complete, Parks and Recreation will now focus on Plan implementation efforts. As indicated in the Plan, the majority of trail work of immediate concern at Kessler Mountain is repairing existing trails to ensure their sustainability and providing informational, regulatory, and educational signage for use of the trails. Each of these needs take priority over the construction of any new trails; however, there is new trail consisting of 3.4 miles along the Lower Bluff Trail that will be built to provide improved access to the existing trails, and also to provide some gentler trail options for visitors to the newly constructed Regional Park. In addition, this grant will create and install comprehensive signage along the trails that will enhance the trail user's experience. Currently, Fayetteville Parks and Recreation has a budget dedicated for implemention of the Plan. In order to address recommendations from the Plan that will have immediate benefit on the trails facility, it is advisable to maximize the budget through a trails grant opportunity available through the Walton Family Foundation. With the benefit of this $210,000 matching grant, staff will be able to implement a large portion of the Master Plan recommendations. Without this grant, a portion of the major maintenance needs of the existing trails will not be addressed, as well as the construction of new trail for improved access. If approve, an RFP will be advertised in February with trail construction anticipated to be complete by the Fall of 2017. The terms of the grant are attached. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: This successful grant request was for $210,000. Matching funds in the amount of $210,000 are available in project 14013.1, Kessler Mountain Acquisition and project 16010.1, Natural Surface Trail Development. The grant will be issued in two installments consisting of the first payment upon approval of a construction contract in the amount of $105,000 and the second installment of $105,000 upon receipt of documentation that at least fifty percent of the project is complete. All installment requests need to be received by June 30, 2017 to be eligible for payment. Attachments: Kessler Mountain Trails Plan Walton Family Foundation Grant Award Letter n DocuSign Envelope ID: 96FC2822-6CF6-4301-8DCC-863580806896 WALTON FA.MILY F 0 UJ IN D A T 1 0 N January 4, 2017 Lioneld Jordan Mayor City of Fayetteville 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 RE: Grant #2016-1465 Dear Mayor Lioneld Jordan, It is my pleasure to inform you that The Walton Family Foundation, Inc. ("Foundation") has approved a 12 -month grant in the amount of up to $210,000.00 to the City of Fayetteville ("Grantee"). The project term will be January 01, 2017 to December 31, 2017. This grant is subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. Purpose: The purpose of the grant is for the following purposes: • Repair and general maintenance of the existing trails at Mt. Kessler and re-routing them onto City property. • Creation and installation of a comprehensive signage package that enhances the user experience on the preserve. _ • Construction of the proposed 3.4 mile Lower Bluff Trail which will allow users to easily access the existing trails from the Kessler Mountain regional park. This grant is more fully described in Grantee's proposal dated October 19, 2016. Grantee agrees to use all grant funds exclusively for the grant's purposes. Any changes in these purposes must be authorized in advance by the Foundation in writing. 2. Amount: Up to Two Hundred Ten Thousand Dollars ($210,000.00). Grant payments will be made as follows: Installment Amount Date #1 Up to $105,000.00 See Initial Installment #2 Up to $105,000.00 See Second Installment 3. Payable: Initial installment of up to $105,000.00 shall be initiated upon receipt of this completed letter from Grantee acknowledging the terms and conditions set forth herein as well as evidence that all required permits and approvals (City and NWA Land Trust) have been secured, evidence that match funding in the amount of no less than $210,000 has been approved, a construction contract with a qualified and experienced contractor must be executed, and a commitment from the City to maintain all aspects of project. When all requirements have Cy. [s •.x 1.!J'iu. zt�n�:• ,iii•. i.fr ? I= � ia�l. r.�x: . '''t.�G�"i.l`w}: www.waltonfamilyfouiidation.org DocuSign Envelope ID: 96FC2822-6CF6-43C1-8DCC-863580806896 been met WFF will prefund up to 50% of the cost of design and construction (not including contingency). Grantee should receive the initial installment electronically within 14 days of completion of these documents. Second installment of up to $105,000.00 shall be contingent upon the Foundation's approval of the Grantee's activities of the grant as evidenced by the reports described in paragraph 5 below and other information the Foundation may gather, as well as receipt and approval of the following: documentation showing that no less than 50% of the project is complete, upon inspection and approval WFF will fund the remaining costs of construction not to exceed remaining grant amount, and at each payment request, the City will submit a financial and narrative report outlining work completed and expenses paid to date related to the construction of the identified sections of trail. All payment requests need to be received by June 30, 2017 to be eligible for payment. 4. Accounting: (a) The Foundation encourages, whenever feasible, the deposit of grant funds in an interest-bearing account. For purposes of this letter, the term "grant funds" includes the grant and any income earned thereon. (b) Grantee will maintain records of receipts and expenditures made in connection with the grant funds and will keep these records during the period covered by the Grantee's reporting obligations specified in paragraph 5 and for at least four years thereafter ("Maintenance Period"). Grantee will make its books and records in connection with the grant funds available for inspection by the Foundation during normal business hours as the Foundation may request at any time during the Maintenance Period. 5. Reporting and Evaluation: Grantee will provide the Foundation with financial and narrative reports by the due dates listed in the report schedule below. Each report shall include an account of expenditures of grant funds, and a brief narrative of what was accomplished (including a description of progress made in fulfilling the purposes of the grant and a confirmation of Grantee's compliance with the terms of the grant). Report Date Report Type 6/30/2017 Interim Financial and Narrative 1/15/2018 Final Financial and Narrative Success will be measured against the outputs and outcomes described in Appendix A. All reports will be sent electronically to HomeRegion@wffmail.com. Please reference Grant #2016-1465 on all reports submitted. Grantee payments are always contingent upon the Foundation's approval of Grantee's operations based on the above reports and the Foundation's satisfaction with such information as it chooses to obtain from other sources. Representations: Grantee represents and warrants to the Foundation that: (a) Grantee is an organization in good standing, is either an organization described in section 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code ("Code") or a governmental unit, and is not a "private foundation" described in section 509(a) of the Code. Grantee will promptly notify the Foundation of any change in Grantee's tax status under the Code. DocuSign Envelope ID: 96FC2822-6CF6-43C1-8DCC-863580806896 (b) In no event will Grantee use any grant funds: (i) to carry on propaganda, or otherwise to attempt, to influence legislation; (ii) to influence the outcome of any specific public election or to carry on, directly or indirectly, any voter registration drive; or (iii) to undertake any activity other than for a charitable, educational or other exempt purpose specified in section 170(c)(2)(B) of the Code. (c) Grantee will comply with all applicable laws and regulations. 7. Repayment: Grantee agrees to repay to the Foundation any portion of the grant funds not used for the grant's purposes. In addition, the Foundation may discontinue any further payments to Grantee, and may direct Grantee to repay any unexpended grant funds to the Foundation, if any of the following events occurs: (a) Grantee ceases to maintain its tax-exempt status as described in paragraph 6(a) above; (b) Grantee fails to comply with the terms of this letter; or (c) There is a material change in Grantee's key personnel that in the sole opinion of the Foundation adversely affects Grantee's management of the grant. 8. Release and Indemnity: Unless prohibited by law, Grantee shall release, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Foundation and its directors, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, actions, suits, demands, damages, losses, expenses and liabilities, arising out of or related in any way to the actions or omissions of Grantee (or its directors, officers, employees, agents or contractors) in connection with the Grant and the project funded by the Grant, except to the extent caused by the Foundation's (or its directors', officers', employees' or agents') negligent actions or omissions Grantee further agrees to carry insurance in such forms and amounts as are commercially reasonable and appropriate to cover Grantee's operations and to enable Grantee to indemnify and defend the Foundation as provided hereunder. 9. Grant Publicity: Grant publicity related to this grant consistent with Grantee's normal practice is permitted, subject to the following provisions. The Foundation expects any announcements and other publicity to focus on Grantee's work and the project or issue funded by the grant. Recognition of the Foundation's role in funding the project is permitted, provided that the timing, content and strategic focus of such publicity should be approved by the Foundation contact listed in paragraph 11. Publicizing the grant and the Foundation in Grantee's publications and communications in a manner consistent with similar grants obtained by Grantee is permitted. The Foundation may ask Grantee to provide illustrations, photographs, videos, recordings, information or other materials related to the grant (collectively "Grant Work Product") for use in Foundation communications including the Foundation's website, annual report, newsletters, board materials, presentations, communications and other publications. Grantee agrees to DocuSign Envelope ID: 96FC2822-6CF6-43C1-8DCC-863580806896 provide the Foundation with such items upon the Foundation's reasonable request and hereby grants to the Foundation and anyone acting under the authority of the Foundation a fully paid- up, world-wide, right and license to use, reproduce, display and distribute the Grant Work Product in connection with the Foundation's charitable operations and activities. In connection therewith, Grantee shall be responsible for obtaining all necessary rights and permissions from third parties for the Foundation to use the Grant Work Product for these purposes. By signing this Agreement, Grantee also acknowledges and agrees to use by the Foundation of historical, programmatic and other information relating to Grantee and the grant hereunder. 10. Gratuities: The Foundation desires that all of Grantee's resources be dedicated to accomplishing its philanthropic purposes. Therefore, Grantee agrees that it will not furnish the Foundation or its Board of Directors, officers, staff or affiliates with any type of benefit related to this grant including tickets, tables, memberships, commemorative items, recognition items, or any other benefit or gratuity of any kind. 11. Contact: For all communications regarding this grant, please contact the Foundation by email at HomeRegion@wffmail.com. Please reference Grant #2016-1465 in your communication. We have enclosed the grant letter. By electronically signing this item the Grantee acknowledges and agrees to the terms and conditions herein. A copy of the completed document. will be emailed to the Grantee through DocuSign. If the electronic signing of this item is not completed by January 16, 2017 the Foundation will consider the Grantee to have declined the grant. On behalf of the Foundation, I extend every good wish for the success of your organization's endeavors. - Sincerely, Ev 6ocu5gnad by, 5(; 9.FCN?03'492 Kyle J. Peterson Executive Director (Date) DocuSign Envelope ID: 96FC2822-6CF6-4301-8DCC-863580806896 Appendix A: City of Fayetteville Kessler Mountain Trails Construction Project Outputs And Outcomes Who will do what and how much? By when? Measured or evaluated by? r Outputs The City will execute a contract with a qualified and experienced contractor to design and construct the -3.4 miles of proposed new trails as well as the trails that will require repair and or 3/7/2017 Submission of reconstruction. Contractor will also develop a sign location plan executed contract and will be responsible for the installation of signs per approved plan. The City of Fayetteville will oversee the construction of a 3.4 mile trail from the parking area near the baseball fields at Kessler Mountain Regional Park to the existing trail near the water towers Inspection by WFF and a connecting trail from the southern section of the proposed 12/31/17 consultant. Lower Bluff Trail up through the bluff line, along a portion of the planned East Bluff Trail to Crazy Mary Trail The City of Fayetteville will oversee the repair and/or re -construct existing trails identified as needing repair in the Kessler Trails 12/31/17 Inspection by WFF Master Plan that have deteriorated through use and erosion. consultant. The City will re-route existing trails identified in the Kessler Mountain Trail Master Plan as needing to be removed from 12/31/17 Inspection by WFF environmentally sensitive areas and/or to locate them on City consultant owned property. The City of Fayetteville will oversee the installation of the signage package on the trails and or trail head areas of the Kessler Mountain Regional Park. The signage package will consist of the following; 1. Two kiosks 12/31/17 Inspection by WFF 2. Twenty-seven directional signs consultant. 3. Four interpretive signs 4. Four Intersection signs Outcomes The City will agree to maintain and operate all sections of trail associated with project trail to the same standards as outlined in the Razorback Regional Greenway operations and management Letter signed by plan as well as the guidelines listed in the IMBA "Trail Solutions" 1/1/2017 Mayor and "Managing Mountain Biking" handbooks by July 31, 2014, as evidenced by a letter from the Mayor. The City will commit to match funding in the amount of no less than $210,000 to be used specifically for the scope of work as outlined 12/31/17 Letter signed by in grant application dated 10/16/2016. Mayor ` •,; 'r •'acs . ��.. . Clint" Tiq,��ILS 1,TrT�t5TF=R P1, W� FINAL PLAN 2016 4"A,1_r Si t { Cr CIT or emalta Prepared jar ilie City of Fayeaevilie rRA3LDESICM Prepared by Progressive Trail Design vic,$ "IAlta Planning + Design ARKANSAS PAR kR Ah r) kP[.RFATIr, ! � PLANNING + DESIGN Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Acknowledge m ents Thanks to the 300+ local residents, business leaders, and government staff that participated In the development of this plan through meetings, events, volunteering, Interviews, online surveying, comment forms, and plan review. Special thanks to those who participated as stakeholders, staff and advisors, listed below.. ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED Walton Family Foundation Alta Planning + Design Beaver watershed Alliance City of Fayetteville Active Transportation Committee City of Fayetteville Development Services City of Fayetteville Parks and Recreation City of Fayetteville Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Fayetteville Natural Heritage Association Fayetteville Public Schools Illinois River Watershed Partnership International Mountain Bicycling Association Kessler Greenways NWA Audubon Society f Arkansas Audubon NWA Land Trust Ozark Ecological Restoration Inc. Ozark Off -Road Cyclists Ozark Regional Land Trust Progressive Trail Design CITY OF I Y4ARKAINSAS PROGRESS] VE TR ILIGNI r43ra(R�runF2ECF2FF4Fk�ri PROJECT STAFF & ADVISORS Nathan Woodruff Progressive Trail Design Clayton Woodruff Progressive Trail Design Brett Budolfson Progressive Trail Design Jon Bryan Progressive Trail Design PROJECT CONSULTANTS Joe Woolbright, Ozark Ecological Restoration, Inc. Kent Laughlin, Alta Planning+ Design Erin Rushing, Alta Planning+ Design Amy Reeves Robinson - Stakeholder Meeting Facilitator PROJECT CONTACT' Ken Eastin, Park Planner City of Fayetteville Parks & Recreation Department 479-444.3472 1 keostin@fayettevllle•or.gov altaPrepared for the City of Fayetteville Prepared by Progressive iron Design Alto Planning + Design PLANNING + fIESIGIIS Table of Contents CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION ProjectOverview.....................................................................5 Background..............................................................................6 CHAPTER TWO: HISTORY Settlement................................................. ....._....... ............... 9 Kessler's Winery ......................... .......... ............................ .,.,10 Modern Development..... ........ __ ........... ___ ... __ ............. _11 CHAPTER THREE: EXISTING CONDITIONS November 2013 - Mount Kessler Reserve byFrank Sharp...................................................................... 14 February 2015 -A Rapid Terrestrial Ecological Assessment of Kessler Mountain Reserve byTheo Witsell.....................................................................15 August 2013 - An Analysis of Old Growth Forest Parcels on Kessler Mountain by Alan Edmonston ....................... 16 February 2012 - City of Fayetteville Regional Park Plan by Lose & Associates, Inc . ...................... _......... ................. 7 CHAPTER FOUR, OBJECTIVES Project Objectives...............................:...............................19 Project Scope of Work. ....................................................... 2.0 CHAPTER FIVE: THE PLANNING PROCESS CHAPTER SIX, THE TRAIL PLAN DesignApproach.................................................................2.7 Concept.................................................................................. 28 Sustainable Trail Guidelines.............................................28 The Trail Plan.........................................................................30 CHAPTER SEVEN: EXISTING TRAILS Condition/Prescription Survey Map...............................34 Condition/Prescription Survey Assessment ........ ....... 36 Trail Closures...,..,..................................................................44 Private Trail ........ ........................... .....I.... .....,.45 Former Roadbeds / Trent Trail...................:.........:............46 n ie� Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan w CHAPTER EIGHT: PROPOSED TRAILS Beginner Loop (1.5 miles)..................................................56 Lower Bluff Trail (3.4 miles) ............... .......... ........ ........... ,..50 East Bluff Trail (1,7 miles) ............................ ................ ....... 52 Paved Active Transportation Trail and Regional Park Trail Loop....................................................53 Trailheads............................................................................... 54 CHAPTER NINE: ADDITIONAL OPPORTUNITIES Interpretive Nature (Hiking Only) Accessible Trail...... 57 BikePark....,..........................................................................:.58 Purpose -Built Downhill Mountain Bike Trail ......... ....... 58 CHAPTER TEN: SIGNAGE, RISK MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE Risk Management and Emergency Access Map .........64 NWA Soft -Surface Signage Plan. ................. .......... .......... 66 Risk Management Guidelines ............................. ............... 68 Trail Difficulty and Signage.. ............. . .. . ................ 69 Emergency Access...........a.....................................::..:....72 Developing an Emergency Response Plan ................... 72 Maintenance and Inspection...........................................73 CHAPTER ELEVEN* PHASING PLAN & BUDGET PhasingPlan., ........................................................................ 75 Construction Budget..........................................................77 APPENDIX A: KESSLER ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION CONNECTIONS APPENDIX B. PUBLIC INPUT APPENDIX C: SPECIES OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Table of Contents 1 3 6 rr �r A, Introduction 144 ., r � f h (}ISI_ • i4 � ^'4� T f dI r. Av- _ :wr•v �1�'JwK ., "•' ~ r 1.. +a � ^ �` .,,��rrr i. -e } � �.� ���'� ��`�+.�3"}#f ^µ� ,] + .r 1 s Z. OSO {/��l At. .r R„•ty r. :, ^i' ��.�.. r�. !i y,-. �-w 1 .may_ $,���.,��"�I!��gL4.. a•X � :JY Z.t �� f. ^•. -- htl 14, 7n 4 -• y t .. n jL, 4 1 �T • / "�!" � M1 -•, s" by yy q Fyc •- � e 4 Chapter 1: Introduction y` ti y ♦"F f A4 k 46 r a. OVERVIEW This chapter provides a brief overview of the project, in terms of how this plan came to be, as well as some general background information about Kessler Mountain as it is today. PROJECT OVERVIEW Kessler Mountain is a 387 acre natural area located in southeast Fayetteville adjacent to the 232 -acre Regional Park with easy access to 1-49 and the rest of the Northwest Arkansas Region. Kessler Mountain exemplifies the quintessential natural features that make the Ozarks region such a beautiful place to live, work and play. Over the years, mountain bike enthusiasts constructed approximately eight miles of natural surface trails on Kessler Mountain. Ultimately, these trails provided access for citizens and community leaders to experience this special property to determine that Kessler Mountain had intrinsic value as a preserved open space. In 2014, the City of Fayetteville, in partnership with the Walton Family Foundation, was fortunate to be able to purchase this property and permanently preserve Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan ,_ r these natural assets for the citizens of the City of Fayetteville. One of the first tasks identified by the City of Fayetteville was the need to create a Trail Master Plan for this property. The intent of this Plan is to identify, design and prioritize improvements to existing and future shared -use -trails on Kessler Mountain. Through a request for proposals process, the City of Fayetteville selected Progressive Trail Design (PTD) in collaboration with Alta Planning and Design and Ozark Ecological Restoration to develop this Kessler Mountain Trail Master Plan. The implementation of the recommendations contained in this Plan will ultimately result in an improved network of varied and functional trails that will be accessible to hikers and bicyclists of all abilities. Chapter 1: ;..r.j:r:;_-: 1 5 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan 'r'Iv-.l0 i' � I+ Dl� BACKGROUND Kessler Mountain is in fact a plateau. As such, it is The Atoka sandstone formation caps Kessler above an ideal place within our urban environment to see the Boyd formation with exposed Trace Creek the natural forces that provide the basis for living shale and outcroppings of Kessler Limestone. The in our area. Fossils associated with marine animals complex geology weathers the parent material �ras1 into many soil types allowing for great biodiversity. n1+r1.a..� � i1� � ^-+1+ ♦4 �zi-0il i13a� 6`.d.td taY America recognized the ecological importance the season, making interesting repeat visits to ` Kessler. "Naturalist Guide to the Americas". 116 /}61 5 i s. 5 lzs� Itrii� r. W. •f 1547 eS5 �i_aidl lfn,w rrilf! of arFa++s:i;•. �bdh� Fayetteville fa W CIO Farrrs,npton y�fi in 3 m,l E6 NMI a s Aavrcasy 9, 57i F°r3MrUfCeSY �H+Fr'iiPfvrtrl 85t^r _ vd_ rir4„it@Aai11 S+air u L i�"r�rric Grave K ' ' Kessler Mountain and the Regional Park are nestled into a central location with access to recreational, cultural, historical and educational ,points cf interest Adjacent destinations include the University of Arkansas, the Razorback Regonol Greenway, and Prone Grove Battlefield. BACKGROUND Kessler Mountain is in fact a plateau. As such, it is The Atoka sandstone formation caps Kessler above an ideal place within our urban environment to see the Boyd formation with exposed Trace Creek the natural forces that provide the basis for living shale and outcroppings of Kessler Limestone. The in our area. Fossils associated with marine animals complex geology weathers the parent material are visible. Soils resulting from the breakdown of into many soil types allowing for great biodiversity. the ancient plateaus provide for the diverse flora, The area receives an average of 46 inches of as well as many species of birds and other living precipitation annually. The Ecological Society of creatures such as butterflies, These change with America recognized the ecological importance the season, making interesting repeat visits to of Kessler Mountain in their 1926 publication Kessler. "Naturalist Guide to the Americas". Kessler Mountain is located in the southwest corner of Fayetteville, Arkansas (Washington County). The elevation reaches 1,856 feet above sea level allowing both northern and southern biota. 6 1 Chapter 1: ti Kessler Mountain has a rich history of settlement from the mid -1800's and has a unique advantage of being a property that exists today without much change from that time period. Blessed with an abundance of native Flora and Fauna, stands of native old-growth Ozark tree species, rock outcroppings, significant view sheds, and changes in topography and ecosystem, the property is a perfect opportunity for citizens from the region and beyond to engage in discovery of the Ozark forest, for both recreational and educational opportunities. lk , 111"N Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan ;fir Chapter 1:,...,..__ or, 1 7 i FSS'! r. Chapter 1:,...,..__ or, 1 7 Of History 11 OVERVIEW .e'N Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan This chapter summarizes the history of Kessler Mountain from the roots of the John and Hannah Rieff Family to the strong-willed property owners of today, like Frank Sharp, who fought for the preservation of this local and special natural amenity. INTRODUCTION In 1951, after a hike atop Kessler Mountain, Miss Jobelle Holcombe wrote: 'As 1 looked out over the surrounding picturesque hills at the distant mountains against the blue sKy with its gray clouds, and at the valleys between the rolling hills, 1 could well understand whyjohn and Hannah Rieff, would settle here to hew out of the wilderness an abiding place for the generations to come." Miss jobelle Holcombe SETTLEMENT Modern settlement of Kessler Mountain began in 1838 when John and Hannah Rieff bought twenty acres on the mountain for $35.00. Resettling from Wilson County, Tennessee, the couple began to carve a homestead. This modest beginning led to the establishment of a new and prosperous family in the City of Fayetteville. An hnoge of the originol winery found of Kessler Mountoin. There ore no r eo-inonts of the Kessler Winery todoy, other thon the stone wine cellar, which con be accessed wo the Wino Troll, Chapter 2: 9 % Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan KESSLER'S WINERY Phillip Kessler was born to a wine making family in Germany and brought to Springfield, Missouri at a young age. He married Kate, who was also born in Germany, and they soon had a daughter, Clara Elizabeth. The Kessler's arrived in Fayetteville in 1866 "in a brand new surrey with four beautiful horses and $11,000 in gold". The Kessler's purchased thirteen acres on top of the mountain, because it reminded them of stories they were told about Germany. They built a house, dug a well and wine cellar and established probably the first vineyard and winery V. in the State of Arkansas. The wine business was in Full operation by 1869. Between 1869 and 1873, notices in local papers advertised a "full supply of native grape wines and celebrated Champagne Cider. The trade supplied for sale at Dorman's Bakery." Kessler's Wine Hall opened, on West Center Street in Fayetteville, featuring "Kessler's celebrated wines and peach and apple brandies... drinks ten cents or three for twenty-five cents:" The local paper described the Wine Hall as "where bad little boys of town congregate at nights and shove billiards." The lost remaining remnant of the Kessler' Winery. This is a very intnguing or6de frorn the pas: [hot stands even after years and years of e�gosure to the noturoi e/emenis and the threot ofdeveloprneot. The noturol stone of mokes this feel like o natural wonder. 10 1 Chapter 2: ` -,kiv Today, nothing remains of the Kessler house and winery except the hand -dug well and wine cellar adjacent to the beautiful, two-story, stone Mount Kessler Inn. And still today, Kessler Mountain continues to support many private homes and acreage. It is still largely forested, providing habitat for a wide variety of wildlife. ���.►lnr,�atit•� � , rr �irw,sr.. 7'ltr I+.rTr.TFf)ry!�'..l TF na,.lr !rlwl�IRrr.1+•'p.il ��fa9+• V1unWwf+l /l!'.. usl ar•a Hsrw R}r�wl if ,•ywli...•,•11.•. w...l Irs{F nll Me.li' ■ IM�1tes Native Grape Wine, "NViIkt- �.r�. �r,.u•nFamr.atiw-�r,..p _�O'rkx JA -Lis LV1J&.1Vft �%; i 1,'.rtu �r.. M.'1 xi•• _ 4ai„ 1...1.3)••-.�. r . Fnxfl iul:xul rrtlr Ik Baan ill, Seyx<lrltc: � i� ! tb{+''3 The i; note above is o clipping from the newpaper around the time the Kessler Minery was of its peok in popularity. The local paper described the IMine Hall as "where bad little boys of town cont regore or nights and shove billiards." MODERN DEVELOPMENT Beginning in 2002, Fayetteville began looking for a possible location for a Regional Park. An initial list of 18 potential sites was eventually narrowed down to four sites, ultimately resulting in the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board's recommendation of the 800 -acre Cummings property on the east slope of Kessler Mountain as the most suitable Regional Park site in August 2003. The Board recognized the site's potential to meet a variety of > Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan developed and natural recreation needs through its unique character, existing forest land, and topography varying from gentle grades to rugged mountainside. These were all recognized as assets in offering diverse recreational opportunities. The site provided ample developable topography for active sports fields, as well as an adjacent rugged landscape For Forest -based recreation. Moreover, other attributes of the site such as visibility, an accessible location, and available adjacent property contributed to the selection. As a potential public/private partnership, this 800 acre property was purchased by SouthPass Development Company for a proposed large mixed-use development, which called for new neighborhoods interspersed with greenspace and parkland. This development, known as SouthPass, included a proposed donation of 200 acres to the City for the Regional Park, Although SouthPass was never realized, Chambers Bank, which held the property, donated the land for the Regional Park to the City in 2010, The groundbreaking for phase one of the new Regional Park was held on March 18, 2015. Meanwhile, numerous individuals and groups, led by the tireless efforts of Kessler Mountain resident Frank Sharp, promoted the acquisition, preservation, and public enjoyment of much of this forested mountain. This effort was very popular and generated a great deal of interest in this acquisition. Chambers Bank agreed to the sale of much of the remaining Cummings property to the City, resulting in the acquisition of 387 acres of Kessler Mountain in March 2014. This acquisition was made possible with a generous grant of 1.5 million dollars from the Walton Family Foundation, an agreement with the Fayetteville Natural Heritage Association to assist in raising a portion of the remaining funds, and to create a conservation easernent to assist with the protection and management of the property. Chapter 2: Hisu:!- 11 57A 0 0 Existing Condidons 4;7 �4 &M X4 A ILI fb�z- IcAk AIX - 7 e, 1W V, 44 .4 f *Q I A, 12 -,1 'Chaptei ExIstipg Conditions S Nv vVr- 'o, OVERVIEW This chapter describes documents and studies used for guidance in the master planning process for the sensitive development of Kessler Mountain. INTRODUCTION Existing documents and studies related to Kessler Mountain have been a driving force behind the plan. These documents and studies have served as a guide and reference for planning with natural systems, wildlife habitats, cultural and tourism attractions, land use and access easements, and positive and negative control points. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan ,tip,/ The studies provided valuable information regarding the feasibility of new trails in particular areas, where existing trails could be improved, and also served as a guide for ecologically sensitive areas and associated restrictions. This plan has acknowledged and utilized the existing studies, which are summarized below. Chapter 3: Eyi501)� ori t o is j 13 'e .." Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan 2093, NOVEMBER - MOUNT KESSLER RESERVE BY FRANK SHARP Frank Sharp, Kessler land owner and champion for its protection, compiled a document advocating the acquisition and protection of Kessler Mountain in 2013 while the land was still privately owned. The document includes history of the mountain, the current state, ecological & geological studies, many letters from users, and trail use data. Full report can be downloaded from the FNHA website: h ttp://www. fayettevill enatural. org/. Fronk Sharp, I<essie()and owner and chonipion;,Ior its prosection, cornpised o document advocating the ocquisi tion and protection KessIer Mdounioin in 2013. 14 Chapter 3: 1. • 'erw, rr . �' S a •,«.� -r, �.•. n'�+..� -E .ns roa-ay � s� sM+y:.y ^+ Fte. �. -ref ,c.� cm '.0 \'xt��-t i" � r. ",r rwrl.fi3'v 'r ..:^ ha'Y .+Affi r..we'i " •r=ffi'%•�me �<'i^" .zr rr r. we +.+r y�.T. r� �ic-�+: �^a rr a.•r^e�+a :: ra rr�a+m�aez uzrosr.es 9^k f�L'awef fit r+ m�aor r! n. ��^u ��-. ror az.�+-n x a !.e rran � :�.r. •.i -.a •;•r ., s:.s .z." -•sy •.-c:t>•,r: .smawk !.cs' c. �. ,. .� ,�crsi s'-='r'r.-4w.rs-b 11 2015, FEBRUARY -A RAPID TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF KESSLER MOUNTAIN RESERVE BY THEO WITSELL The Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission (ANHC), under contract with the Fayetteville Natural Heritage Association (FNHA), conducted a rapid ecological assessment of the Kessler Mountain Reserve from April through October, 2014, This report summarizes findings based on six separate inventory trips to the reserve (15 days total) by Theo W itsell, Botanist and Ecologist with the ANHC. This inventory documented 11 natural communities or habitats and 544 plant species present in the study area. Five areas or habitats were identified as being especially ecologically significant to the site, Populations of at least nine plant and animal species of state conservation concern (rare species) were documented and at least two of them are considered to be of f VVw ta'�aaanal Rxrl�e�+wn r.r re..ae� rNwnr�ln�.s�ne a[rdsnetueiwa, wxnar�eaa[a.ncr,iva•w K�MsrrMratiw�e.r .inu'" -r r.n.�+.pa�Pw+ 'xa'f+%•e►�+�r++�: •ia/crlN•Mr•a"Art1a4.1v A�=.�ar•f�a aefa�.wa+�w. weq r.r-++.•. pv-ry aer+wv wn�a. aw7vir-:.w �urr.��s r.a,:frrW �.A�'M-�a+a F.n K.+T+nr�w• �Y�-Kwan i6rrvr�� +�sR awray Pa/ W a�nr�aeara P�rawa ,e"� Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan z, global concern. One globally rare plant species, Missouri groundcherry, had not been documented in Arkansas in more than 60 years. A second, Church's wild rye, was not previously known in Washington County. This report presents an ecological overview of the site, descriptions of the natural communities present, maps and brief descriptions of ecologically significant areas, maps of known occurrences of species of conservation concern, and an annotated list of plant species documented from the study area. It also makes recommendations for ecological management and provides an annotated list of those non- native invasive plant species present that are considered to be a threat to the integrity of natural communities on the reserve. Ecologically sensitive areas and habitats shown on the graphic plan maps were determined from this study. Full report can be downloaded from the FNHA website: http:// www.fayettevillenatural.org/. _ Chapter 3: Xis?i:' , _ r,. _. ,; s 15 . Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan 2093, AUGUST -AN ANALYSIS OF OLD GROWTH FOREST PARCELS ON KESSLER MOUNTAIN BYALAN EDMONDSON "The forest on Kessler Mountain is mixed oak -hickory hardwoods. There are sorne areas on Kessler Mountain where remnants of old growth forests have escaped logging. These stands of ancient post oak (Quercus stelloto) and chinkopin oak (Quercus rnuehlenbergil) were not cut because they were not fit for commercial timber"- /flan Edmondson Full report can be downloaded from the FNHA website: http://www.fayettevillenatural.org/. I Cverstory Relative Frequency Site A w&r-.. lacx Crl4 • { aria+• M@ 4+P+r fq� /iule�akirt7anrtF�iY �rne�+: Darr rJrcysury Undentory Relative FrequencySite A • Mc +laA • feiSu 4v6 . D4r+racxSi+n s'k'im s V{�Y t W:aem VS{t t � i'uZul• a. �a'4R4a+Y filum 7b, AV orm rr"4aa PbaT �t2i f'aile s,+ e:v.% ,• 16 1 Chapter 3: L>.7 >r rr; i.�; it2jlj(; S � kilLx+i 9ua;.aF,+»+c hens }�i a A-ilv Mree .til k�Ii d.a ssva nr�rx, oe�.li ew.a 3(YF;.+ aJStre aewaH pttnrc ]. overstoryr Relative Frequency Site 8 I I Flry.t ftft lacht FrequerKy 0"ket" 00 Fxrp�t Comm(Aey H -5,4.04zk r owkiun L3tl r F+.+rtr'� Axe Cra+: tt *.,zat L+Jc w.rWrt s s+mc9:rnrc aar•y-a � Md �+ri.ury e St.aa7t yneF UnderstorVRetative Frequency Site 8 is Z% zx s F,*R t UV ro" ■ Nwv +, nae CA* ■ kYX �WR+s :Zm 1 %C.pap i -N or" • SWI 4K.11 nyok++<.oy x ir�inup- �k i�rc9t6,4�cun.c F"fi3ut�Cy [Tlnir�rr.ankEscazcw�ercu�rxa�y il 2012 FEBRUARY — CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE REGIONAL PARK PLAN The Regional Park consists of 232 acres immediately adjacent to and on the east side of the Kessler Mountain property. The Regional Park will provide an area for developed, active recreation while Kessler Mountain provides a natural, backcountry complement largely preserved in its natural condition. This will provide a park setting with a wide, diverse range of both active and passive, natural and developed recreation opportunities. The first phase of the Regional Park is under construction and will open in the fall of 2016. This initial development consists of four baseball fields, six soccer fields, two concession/ restroom/ storage facilities for both baseball and soccer, as ff % Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan well as roads, parking, and utilities necessary for operation. When fully completed, the park will have seven soccer fields, eight baseball fields, four softball fields, trails, playgrounds, a great lawn, pavilions, tennis courts, basketball courts, volleyball courts, water features, an amphitheater, and park maintenance and office facilities. The Regional Park will serve as the gateway and primary trailhead for trail activities on Kessler Mountain. The park will be connected to the City's paved transportation trail system and will contain a paved loop for fully accessible trail use within the park. Trails immediately adjacent to the trailhead will be relatively easy, yet the trails will become progressively more challenging as users travel farther away from the park development. FAYETTEVI LE REGIONAL. ARK MASNK PIAN � ` .ccan end FAYE1 EVILLE, ARKAN mY . Chapter 1- v stir Core:;... _ ns1 17 /-N �,v Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan 2013, AUGUST - KESSLER MOUNTAIN TRAILHEAD LOG DATA: BASELINE TRAIL USAGE AND USAGE FROM 07/14/14 TO 05/12/15 The effor�s by Frank Sharp and the City of Fayetteville to document the amount and type of users frequenting Kessler Mountain have resulted in the information outlined in the section of the plan. The baseline data was collected from Frank Sharp's trail use log and was collected from August 12; 2013 until July 13, 2014. The most recent data was collected from July 14, 2014 until May 15, 2015, wich coincides with the opening date of the public tralhead located along Judge Cummings Road. Kessler Mountain Trailhead Log Data Baseline Trail Usage 09/12/2013 - 07/13/2014 I— t Monthly Unique Group Logs Unique Logs 1975 2770 4745 Public Trailhead Private Trailhead Totals 12 -Sep -13 288 288 October -15 349 349 November -13 852 852 December -13 207 1 207 January -14 503 503 February -14 284 284 March -14 710 710 April -14 745 745 May -14 745 745 June -14375 February -15 146 237 383 375' 13 -Jul -141290 12 -May -15 69 135 204 290 D 5348 5348 Kessler Mountain Trailhead Log Data 07/14/2014-05/12/2015 I— t Public Trailhead Private Trailhead Totals Unique Logs 1975 2770 4745 Total Users 4178 6604 10782 Baseline Trod Users: 5348 -- TYPES OF USERS _ Dthei" 60� Vkp 12% – - •• _____._.__.. 121 �•, t J' 38.70% 61.30% 100% Groups with 10+ 12 31 43 - Typesof User Groups HPke 2942, 5615 8557 Bike 513 451 964 Run 487 455 942 Other 236 83 319 4178 6604 11 10782 Monthly Unique Group Logs Total Monthly Unique Logs 4 u a Ia] – ..... July -14 173 143 316 August -14 142 236 378 September -14 159 287 446 October44 228 350 578 November -14 203 320 523 December -14 132 185 317 January -15 319 341 1 660 February -15 146 237 383 March -15 167 244 411 April -15 237 292 529 12 -May -15 69 135 204 1975 2770 4745 18 l Chapter 3: L! Kessler Mountain Trailhead Log Data Total Users July -14 3011 312 August -14 2391 517 rtember-14 2581 680 nrtnhar-74 qOF;l 791 November -14 5071_86511 147211 December -141 289 452 741 January -15 629 811 1440 February -15 320 565 885 March -15 382 546 April -15 503 808 1311 12-Mav-151 1441 2571 1 4011 1 Kessler Mountain Trallhead Log Data Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan . r : 10<ai Monthly Users ,JIM $�9 i Ion , llh, 5W AWNO 20 i QdF D �4. �'�.+`' ,�`� �4. �4 � • ria "y� �L PQ° .�5+1 tgr laCi y P! va'.e Chapter 3: LYc,ti! 'xl_o 19 NI- 7 .g r A Sil Objectives -. lip YA low � F r �.,. -� r ,,! """777 _K,. _ /• { . 7r. . � 1 %� Ir ... � - AC_.. .. _ « 41• �f i s win, � � of - .. 4 0; .— •-"."_"`'..• _ � .. _ 1 07- A'o t � + ice.! ' yw_- rt � •'�- �. _ - r1F � yam~ � v..: E � , � �� - •- ��, `. ��-+�"_. �r i 46, ff t i rIf y •. low F �r 7.••, �„±,���”.-_ _ `� t _ INS ' r r 1 A r Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan OVERVIEW This chapter outlines the objectives, which were developed in the stakeholder meetings through the consensus building efforts of the facilitator. These objectives were used to create a comprehensive trails plan that will serve as another set of guidelines for the development of the Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan. INTRODUCTION This comprehensive trails plan serves as a foundation for creating new trails, improving existing trails and adding trail amenities to provide a wide range of users with a variety of trail experiences, as well as expand outdoor recreation and education opportunities on the mountain. The proposed trails will be purposefully designed to allow trail users to experience the beauty of Kessler on foot or bicycle while minimizing user conflict and environmental impact. The plan focuses on soft -surface trails, however it does include some conceptual paved trails that are in line with the City of Fayetteville's Active Transportation Master Plan. Through a request for proposal, the City of Fayetteville selected Progressive Trail Design, with Alta Planning + Design, and Ozark Ecological Restoration Inc. (OERI) to assist with the development of this comprehensive trails plan. Chapter 4: 10h; jec,- %✓es 1 21 PROGRESSIVE TRAIL DESIGN (PTD): A highly skilled Trail building/Bike Park Development company based in the rugged Ozark Mountains of Northwest Arkansas with an office in Che foothills of the Colorado Rockies. PTD is a member of the Professional Trail Builders Association (PTEA) and specializes in the development of "progressive recreational facilities'; mountain bike parks, municipal park renovations and enhancements, and a wide variety of purpose-built trails (i.e. equine trails, motorized trails, bike trails, interpretive hiking trails, etc...). SCOPE OF WORK: lµ Overall Site Assessment - Inventory the entire site, determine property boundaries, analyze and identify opportunities and constraints, identify environmentally sensitive areas (through the assistance of OERI and referencing Witsell's Report), identify positive and negative control points, and identify a preliminary concept of trail expansion feasibility. a Existing Trail Assessment - Assess all eight miles of existing trail. Identify any poorly aligned segments, drainage issues, and/or flaw issues. Make recommendations for improvements and GPS the recommendations to be shown on the overall map. a' Conceptual Layout - Through input from the public and stakeholder meetings, determine the desired amount and type of new trail that is appropriate for Kessler Mountain and begin to layout conceptual alignments. k Final Layout - Once a consensus has been established regarding which of the new trails, reroutes and additions are acceptable, PTD will begin to ground truth the trails and GPS their general alignment. These alignments will go on the first draft for review and comment. This is a conceptual layout and does not include final flagging and alignment. Deliverables - Master Plan Proposal - After comments and revisions, PTD staff will compile the map, all field notes, proposed trails with descriptions and support images, and a budget for construction into one comprehensive document along with a separate map/plan. llisplayed are examples ot work trom Progressive I rail lesign (PTD) throughout Northwest Arkansas: i"r t; tr 40 V7 zo r ^ y, � • r� I „�.�r-moi �++.ia.r^""�" _ .i af✓ w i � � h j ♦: r, ?.r_ 4 a r "mo=w•. - - ^^.. ., *� " � t . i4W Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Nanning Process AV J6 NEW- 24 Chapter 5: Planning Process n OVERVIEW This chapter describes the process performed to gather input involving the general public and stakeholder groups. Public input was gathered in variety of ways, ranging from conversational feedback to different forms of media. INTRODUCTION - The trails plan was developed through the input of the city, the public, private organizations and professionals. The process began in mid -2015 and continued over the course of six months. The biggest challenge in developing this plan was to find the balance between preservation and recreation.. Through the input of the public and the collaboration of the diverse group of stakeholders, a compromise was reached which resulted in the plan presented in this document. The Rapid Terrestrial Ecological Assessment Plan by Theo Witsell and the Analysis of Old Growth Forest Parcels by Alan Edmonson were utilized as a basis for proposing new trails and improving existing trails. A�' `fv. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan,, A stakeholder _group comprised of over 20 individuals representing various user groups and organizations was formed to guide the direction of the plan throughout the process. In total, there were six stakeholder meetings and four public input sessions. In addition, Alta Planning + Design created a public survey in which 150 respondents provided their feedback. This data was also critical in the development of the plan. Chapter 5:',-,.e . ' ; ?r ir,; . _:.e _ I 25 -,, Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan • Walton Family Foundation • Alta Planning + Design • Beaver Watershed Alliance • City of Fayetteville Active Transportation Committee • City of Fayetteville Development Services City of Fayetteville Parks and Recreation • City of Fayetteville Parks and Recreation Advisory Board • Fayetteville Natural Heritage Association • Fayetteville Public Schools • Illinois River Watershed Partnership • International Mountain Bicycling Association • Kessler Greenways • NWA Audubon Society / Arkansas Audubon • NWA Land Trust PUBLIC INPUT SUMMARY: Survey results and a summary of comments receiver from the public input sessions are included in Appendix B: Public Input from the two public input sessions. Below are general statements from different user groups that highlight common desires and concerns. Two main categories emerged from the public and stakeholder comments: Preservation and Recreation. The biggest challenge of this plan was to find the balance between these two opposing viewpoints. The end goal was to respect the natural environment and key sensitive areas outlined in the ecological assessment, while still providing access to new areas and proposing new trails to build skill level progression into the trail system. Given that an existing eight -mile trail system has been on the mountain since the early 2000's, users have already grown to love it for 26 1 Chapter 5: ..._ r. • Ozark Ecological Restoration Inc. Ozark Off -Road Cyclists • Ozark Regional Land Trust • Progressive Trail Design its natural beauty and remote back country feel; Almost all users unanimously agreed that they wish to keep that experience intact. Differences are primarily centered on the amount of new trail appropriate for the mountain and where proposed trails should be located. Through the use of existing studies and the feedback of different user groups, this plan was developed to address this balance of users' needs. The two primary user groups are hikers and mountain bikers. The hiker group includes anyone on foot: trail runners, birdwatchers, photographers, backpackers, etc. The mountain biker group includes anyone on a bike; however, this group also falls into the hiker group, because many who bike also hike and run. Based on the feedback gathered during the public input process, hikers are linked to enjoying short loops and destinations, such as a bluff, overlook, or spring. Their focus is not so much on the trail itself, but the efficiency of finding a unique location and the experience of getting there. Mountain bikers, on the other hand, are linked to longer, exciting, flowing trail loops. They desire a unique experience with a focus on a variety of trail types and challenges. In order to meet the desires of these two groups, it was equally important to provide new trails as well as improve the existing trail system. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan W FIR l 0 Chapter 5:'� ss I 27 '. lr ; OVERVIEW This chapter provides a brief overview of the project, in terms of how this plan came to be, as well as some general background information about Kessler Mountain as it is today. INTRODUCTION The overall trail master plan map for Kessler Mountain includes three primary components. Each of these will be detailed in the following pages. DESIGN APPROACH When developing a trail system, the primary goal is to build sustainable trails and protect environmentally sensitive areas. Supplementing this goal with trail experiences that appeal to a variety of user groups and minimize user conflict, maximizes the overall experience. In order to create this experience, user group are typically either segregated or integrated depending on the size of the site and the type and volume or users. ' t l 1t Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan For Kessler Mountain, the goal was to create a shared -use trail system that would work well For the widest variety of use. Through strategic and sustainable design, this plan has been created to address the needs of all users; hikers, bikers, nature enthusiasts, trail runners, groups, and users with special needs. Another critical component that drives design is positive and negative control points. The positive control points are the places you want to take the trail to, such as an overlook or a waterfall. The negative control points are those areas you want to stay away from, such as a sensitive ecological habitat, or a wet area. To put it simply, the goal is to identify all the positive control points and connect Chapter 6:l Y:— Pan 1 29 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan the dots in a sustainable fashion while avoiding the negative control points. CONCEPT Input from both the stakeholder group and the public raised a concern about user conflict, specifically between pedestrians and cyclists, This is a common concern and one that has been addressed in the design of the trail system. There are a number of solutions to mitigate user conflict. First and foremost, it is important to create a well -organized progressive -based trail system. This is achieved by providing a variety of trails at varying levels of difficulty: beginner, intermediate, and expert. This applies to all user groups and is signified by the character of the trail itself. Steeper, rocky trails are considered expert while smooth trails on gentle grades are considered beginner. This helps to provide an opportunity for beginner level cyclists, less ambitious hikers or less mobile users to enjoy nature in a more comfortable fashion. Given that almost all of the existing trails on Kessler are considered difficult ai a expert eve:, it is important to integrate some beginner and intermediate level trails into the plan. The area below the bluff line on the east side of the mountain provides the perfect terrain for these types of trails and is immediately accessible to the developed Regional Park. The new trails will create a "stacked -loop trail system," This means that one loop is connected to the previous loop in a stacked formation. This allows the system to develop with the easier trails near the trailhead and each connected loop becoming progressively more challenging as they advance in distance. This helps to segregate users and disperse traffic. The topography of Kessler caters well to this progressive -based, stacked - loop trail system because the bluff line circling the perimeter of the mountain acts as a natural separation between the more distant, rugged 30 I Chapter 6:'?"t< trails and the more accessible, easier trails, The more advanced cyclists and adventurous hikers/ runners will use more of the system and travel to the remote areas; whereas, the beginners and less ambitious will generally stay closer to the trailhead on these more accessible trails. This also provides for a variety of loop configurations. SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES There are two documents established for trailbuilding and are referred to as the industry standard: United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook as well as the International Mountain Bicycling Association's (IMBA) Sustainable Trail Design Standards. Though IMBA is a mountain bike trail advocacy organization, these trail guidelines are commonly accepted by all trail builders as the standard for sustainable trail design. There ore many voluoble resources to refer to re ording noturol suooeee'roil design. F� Hp21a1 NATURAL SURFACE TRAIL DEFINITION: A natural surface trail is any type of trail utilizing native mineral soils as the primary final tread surface. Comprised of a "full bench cut", these trails commonly follow the land contours and pass by or incorporate terrain features. Developing these trails with moderate grades, mild undulation and limited surface variation delivers a very sustainable resource. However, grades and surface may be adjusted to provide a variety of textures and experiences. Tread can range from eighteen (18) inch wide single track to five (5) foot wide double track. This kind of trail can be produced to accommodate any type of user group. The "full bench cut" simply means that the tread is completely carved out of undisturbed soil with none of the excavated fill used as a part of the tread. This provides a more durable, sustainable trail. TWO CRITICAL TRAILBUILDING TIPS: AVOID THE FALL LINE. Fall -line trails usually follow the shortest route down a hill - the same path that water flows. The problem with fall -line trails is that they focus water down their length. The speeding water strips the trail of soil, exposing roots, creating gullies, and scarring the environment. 2 AVOID FLAT AREAS. Flat terrain lures many trailbuilders with the initial ease of trail construction. However, if a trail is not located on a slope, there is the potential for the trail to become a collection basin for water. The trail tread must always be slightly higher than the ground on at least one side of it so that water can drain properly. FIVE SUSTAINABLE TRAIL PRINCIPLES: Ideally, a trail would simultaneously incorporate all of these principles. i THE HALF RULE 2 THE 30 -PERCENT AVERAGE GUIDELINE 3 MAXIM SUSTAINABLE GRADE 4 GRADE REVERSALS 5 OUTSLOPE. SUSTAINABLE TRAIL DESIGN GUIDELINES: Keep water off the tread and users on it. -; Build with the contour of the land and use frequent grade reversals. El Follow the half -rule: A trail's grade should not exceed half the grade of the cross slope. Maximum grade should be i5 percent (except for natural or built rock structures). 5 Average grade should stay under 10 percent (with grade reversals). 6 Route trails to positive control points (viewpoints, water, and other attractions). 7M Use bench -cut construction and excavate soil from the hillside. Provide an tread out -slope of three to five percent in order to encourage rapid water removal from the tread. ®For reroutes, reclaim the old trail thoroughly, both the visual corridor as well as the trail tread. For highly technical trails where grade will sometimes exceed 15 percent, use natural rock, rock armoring or other rock features to add challenge and improve sustainability. . Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan t� 6 v o c] .. d I � _ I 32 1 Chapter 7::r:>ir a Y J � _ Y - PROPERTY BOUNDARY" KESS LER MOUNTAIN ROAD I I I t 1 ! ,',N Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan 44.,,,r ECOLOGICALLY (CANT (f' f AREAS AND HABITATS AREAS s J EGIONAL PA r Potential Secondary Parking &Trailhead o0 JUDGE CUMMINGS ROAD aP SHALEBARRENS LEGENDNOTE: ALLTRAIL LENGTHS AND ALIGNMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE OLD GROWTH POST �J OAK WOODLAND EXISTING TRAILS Information taken BIKING ALLOWED{' Heritane Commission- Ecolooical Assessment 6 Miles (Within Park Boundary) ©0000 ©o BEGINNER LOOP f l RESTROOMS p o®© 1.5 Miles (4'WIDE) l PARKING AREA LOWER BLUFF TRAIL o° "raga 3.4 Miles (2'-3'WIDE) ABANDONEDTRAILS EASTBLUFFTRAIL 1.7 Miles (18"-2'WIDE) V FUTURE PAVEDTRAILS Proposed by the City of Fayetteville 000 00000o TRAIL REROUTES 00 1 Mile PAVED TRAILS- PROPOSED Proposed by City of Fayetteville ECOLOGICALLY (CANT (f' f AREAS AND HABITATS AREAS s J EGIONAL PA r Potential Secondary Parking &Trailhead o0 JUDGE CUMMINGS ROAD aP SHALEBARRENS KESSLER MOUNTAIN TRAILS MASTER PLAN The plan presented on this page represents the Kessler Mountain public area integrated with the planned development of the Regional Park. The plan proposed by Prgressive Trail Design highlights the concept of a stacked loop trail system integrating the existing trail system wtih a range of difficulty for all trail users to experience. The plan used to illustrate the City of Fayetteville's Regional Park plan can be viewed in entriety in Appendix D: City of Fayetteville Regional Park Plan. Chapter 7: . -. ` .> ..:,i_; 33 BLUFFS OLD GROWTH POST �J OAK WOODLAND RIPARIAN HABITAT Information taken from Arkansas Natural Heritane Commission- Ecolooical Assessment KESSLER MOUNTAIN TRAILS MASTER PLAN The plan presented on this page represents the Kessler Mountain public area integrated with the planned development of the Regional Park. The plan proposed by Prgressive Trail Design highlights the concept of a stacked loop trail system integrating the existing trail system wtih a range of difficulty for all trail users to experience. The plan used to illustrate the City of Fayetteville's Regional Park plan can be viewed in entriety in Appendix D: City of Fayetteville Regional Park Plan. Chapter 7: . -. ` .> ..:,i_; 33 4 ,S y. .t Existing Trails k X4* r ' 1,'�.`M� ti +• riR„ M t y _ mow• y t �:. • yr a t a .. '� �..�� XN��: �yf. ",,.". �•. - ad 4' ANW I; . ..rttmpter 7: xisti .. g �s _ �•� _ L�:ii+` -; .b,rF r �: �; '� �. •. .yam. l � 4 _ i�Y' wi F .�r _ ` 's(Y R`- ;—f� _ _ �nF' c -1r �. Ar y t •' 1 B K. 11 OVERVIEW This chapter outlines the current conditions and the recommendations from Progressive Trail Design for the six miles of public use trail at Kessler Mountain. INTRODUCTION The existing trail system on Kessler Mountain is approximately eight miles, Six miles of this system are on city property, while the remaining two are on private property. The two miles on private - property were assessed in this report and are discussed in more detail in the following pages. As previously mentioned, all existing trails were built by volunteers, primarily Ozark Off -Road Cyclists, over the last 15 years with the permission of previous and existing landowners. There was no master plan For these trails. It was simply a group of volunteers building trails slowly over time. Al' the trails were built by hand to maximize the trail experience in the best terrain for mountain biking. It is important to note that all existing trails are considered "expert" level according to IMBA Guidelines. These trails are all one to two feet wide singletrack that are very rocky and technically challenging in nature. For most hikers this is not a problem, but a mountain biker must be an advanced rider to navigate these trails comfortably. Therefore, beginner and intermediate level trails for all users are one of the most critical needs of the trail system. I •1 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Most of the existing trails today have stayed in relatively good shape, however, as expected, there are some design and sustainability issues that must be addressed. This report will result in recommendations to resolve some of these issues and problem areas_ As such, Progressive Trail Design conducted a full assessment of all existing trails. The assessment identified problem areas and poorly aligned trail segments and prescribes solutions to these areas. This has resulted in a condition/prescription survey in order to make the trail system sustainable in accordance with the industry accepted guidelines for building sustainable trails. The intention of this trails improvement plan was to maintain the alignment and character of the existing, trail system. Recommendations for reroutes in areas where the trail is either too steep, located in perpetually wet zones, or have alignment issues that hinder traffic flow (aka "trail flow"), All problem spots, including small reroutes, are indicated on the Existing Trail pian with recommended solutions and are expanded upon later in this chapter. Any reroutes that were significant are indicated on the plan as a separate, proposed trail. Chapter 7: E%isl <,l;p 11 rams 1 35 ,t Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan M s W, hese exisring t,a =a,e o Private pro e,ty c ROCK r Q1� f ECOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS AND HABITATS # �d r Senior Citizens ADA � rking &Trail Hub �E P r. ,i J`a� `',➢ + �� Parku19 &Trail Hub I SHALE BARRENS 2nn' The pot t I -u-, ,. rBLUFFS m t ig A asi.,gess[ P t �'! I OLD GROWTH POST OAKWOODLAND�v.,FioFEtt"fYSDUr+CsRRtT_-_ •-:J --�.� ' 55tERMOUNTAINROAD RIPARIAN HABITAT `xr KE Information taken from Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission. Ecological Assessment prepared byTheo Witsell on February 2015 36 1 Chapter 7:.== Trent Trail Repairs .� CONDITION: P a n1 T N li ii Frear. PRESCRIPTION: JfAT aurew ffi O of lock nThis's'I: pr,r: uf Fn ' najnr reT un .od t€ -Sh le6.—1 h 1.. n1 rhe Irar= Rock City Trail Repairs RE'I CONDITION,Tum; ccetdv mammnm l.adefnr el�mbnl! PRESCRIPTION: A f Kfid 'N d , u.�s'dc of ., Burnt ra""-� rom road Hrg ae lrel bet+re �e + ...,rn _ CONDITION ''- b tnr _ ro.,3 r.ea..s1,1111 . RESCRIPTION: k I Id 2lea-a c'_rra c .n1 enlllde CONDITIONS'_. �1 a PRT3CREPTION: ,_+arge dould and lee,raM h _ ._ _ �.. ., CONDITION X1111 . r f I'll' ay _• 1 PRESCRIPTION: 6P1:Liar nr —W., h-1 a:,grn ,n Inry nraaa r,-.o,Is fo, ..m= managea�m_ CONDITION: "I'll" ;3 - 1 ' g t I� Ocf PRESCRIPTION: O01, --1'1 + +..- fa..0 u 3J!rerourc ds.yn slUUr ®CONDITION: Old I 1 (t.n chit i:ead PRESCRIPTION: CO NDIT1ON:d'c mu.yr pnldy 1,10 1— w PRESCRIPTION: ,It:- t E) CONDITION:(`ngmudovo:,ll.;r:ah PRESCRIPTION: 3IT,U1 ®CO NOITION,ieco cauvng n,..ddy Rail rtead.. PRESCRIPTION: 1 OR Ilk annnrine RC1 CONDITION. c. Y Rt l PN ESCRIPTION: - Icnmcr I 4r --roll I nb�v.n•he --gym .eel ..r_ Ci CONDITION: I)cd .n carne -'ung allghl ;11— PR6TiHIbTIOii: til y'IM1f 4n11fiTRtO Cpclnli0' FGl d/arRII' C9 CONOITION: Scep-.Img rnuddq ball tread. PRESCRIPTION: 100 rock anndiy+g, RG7. CONDITION: I'll dd d!!" s 1 Ied1 61,11rvsn 1n I. PRESCRIPTION. OL nd n n -r + nljetl y _ mb� g.ura. ,v 13n'af1 iyPaf'I+.P TfI Ij,1 rcv'T wBl:fliahMp[h rsnlfal lRe,rlN'dsM liNYriTlgf hlk- CMce'lid W. Ci EONDITION.R.y1{hLN {rinefia riUlghl tAusirlef., Pi .,errl5r ' a N+rj PfEV5+:77FIf rao ri; allalw rl. b rbtd wn 'I dNijl7ro44Iw IueRT: PRESCnIPTION: DRen rad- of —land along 0,rh a Su re=pule do:vnniu I •rent corner. CONDITID!le.NC.em Wuv CNV&a t'C!Tr,11 VA NIpt vntm frl.n'[t+ lV 901Ir. Sha-eB-xren. rREsc111,Pow RJ UvImn'twth ID CTRdtN SSSFT!!11 MAPF!In;•all;Nly UO IW,VIOL C:94x uz9.N tray Spellbound Repairs CONDITION: Ai100 IRTMCO, cyi1h-AfPSVNri IV1`1 d* rildlllptfp 5$1 d cao Spelt --I. PRESCRIPTION: t01p fw6ulr to IIIFow blr 4Dtiar lft1mKHnn lOrAWn :,od dl.alnay,. 56,2 CONDITION: P1-�.mrk rirop l.T a PRESCRIPTIO 11-- -1tei 111eand SIl 06,1r.n y. B'3 CONDITION: - .)Oghr. r .slcell c"I'll - - I g PRESCRIPTION: n re....Lr n II c 9,a.le..; nn lmp'eone nraln�le, CONDITION: �_ k Iy'day tlnil rrFad PRESCRIPTION: r - -k nal. 65 CONDITIONi PRESCRIPTION: 1,A.,rugiupN for mor ad dr. n CONDITION: 1 h h' - PRESCRIPTION: m ler autc .f corn,.r fur k.I rve: .i "nig B O+7NDITION: PDFTrdmJrKgrcal th wisrrfaakun 04PP wn NlyN1 PRESCRIPTION; 5' em I7 f rhelre rseaiodlnrxlun CONDITION: ® 1 - PRESCRIPTION: 361Y,ero.— ith,, r'mMnp I—*o reduce Frad yr.,des "'joeu" A- —I ,'d'., ,l flu— CONDITION: Mnr i.,.-arlon ann allynmenc ni 1,116. I'nsFrrecMn '.+hh Fygbeanrc. PRESCRIPTION: 2un-re.oule ir„ 11cer inlnrsechnn laceuon n' �ngavr, n C"u.—le RT C(INDITION: l 11-IIMIl O lull, - PRESCRIPTION: 75 beniRrl rklfrerelocalmr. 'r to "duce gla0 .. gT1 CONDfTIOM 'nage .ld road bed. PRESCRIPYION: BA01.1dI I1R?III.}RI "diyT4 tolffllMbiMtf1i5Invor. Trent Trail Repairs .� CONDITION: P a n1 T N li ii Frear. PRESCRIPTION: JfAT aurew ffi O of lock nThis's'I: pr,r: uf Fn ' najnr reT un .od t€ -Sh le6.—1 h 1.. n1 rhe Irar= Rock City Trail Repairs RE'I CONDITION,Tum; ccetdv mammnm l.adefnr el�mbnl! PRESCRIPTION: A f Kfid 'N d , u.�s'dc of ., Burnt ra""-� rom road Hrg ae lrel bet+re �e + ...,rn _ CONDITION ''- b tnr _ ro.,3 r.ea..s1,1111 . RESCRIPTION: k I Id 2lea-a c'_rra c .n1 enlllde CONDITIONS'_. �1 a PRT3CREPTION: ,_+arge dould and lee,raM h _ ._ _ �.. ., CONDITION X1111 . r f I'll' ay _• 1 PRESCRIPTION: 6P1:Liar nr —W., h-1 a:,grn ,n Inry nraaa r,-.o,Is fo, ..m= managea�m_ CONDITION: "I'll" ;3 - 1 ' g t I� Ocf PRESCRIPTION: O01, --1'1 + +..- fa..0 u 3J!rerourc ds.yn slUUr ®CONDITION: Old I 1 (t.n chit i:ead PRESCRIPTION: CO NDIT1ON:d'c mu.yr pnldy 1,10 1— w PRESCRIPTION: ,It:- t E) CONDITION:(`ngmudovo:,ll.;r:ah PRESCRIPTION: 3IT,U1 ®CO NOITION,ieco cauvng n,..ddy Rail rtead.. PRESCRIPTION: 1 OR Ilk annnrine RC1 CONDITION. c. Y Rt l PN ESCRIPTION: - Icnmcr I 4r --roll I nb�v.n•he --gym .eel ..r_ Ci CONDITION: I)cd .n carne -'ung allghl ;11— PR6TiHIbTIOii: til y'IM1f 4n11fiTRtO Cpclnli0' FGl d/arRII' C9 CONOITION: Scep-.Img rnuddq ball tread. PRESCRIPTION: 100 rock anndiy+g, RG7. CONDITION: I'll dd d!!" s 1 Ied1 61,11rvsn 1n I. PRESCRIPTION. OL nd n n -r + nljetl y _ mb� g.ura. ,v 13n'af1 iyPaf'I+.P TfI Ij,1 rcv'T wBl:fliahMp[h rsnlfal lRe,rlN'dsM liNYriTlgf hlk- CMce'lid W. Ci EONDITION.R.y1{hLN {rinefia riUlghl tAusirlef., Pi .,errl5r ' a N+rj PfEV5+:77FIf rao ri; allalw rl. b rbtd wn 'I dNijl7ro44Iw IueRT: PRESCnIPTION: DRen rad- of —land along 0,rh a Su re=pule do:vnniu I •rent corner. CONDITID!le.NC.em Wuv CNV&a t'C!Tr,11 VA NIpt vntm frl.n'[t+ lV 901Ir. Sha-eB-xren. rREsc111,Pow RJ UvImn'twth ID CTRdtN SSSFT!!11 MAPF!In;•all;Nly UO IW,VIOL C:94x uz9.N tray 0 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan S,deskpe ffoo floe slopes-.P.s,t :at tKrrcTta u�-. .ins• ^� A- Wr Ins ther .. -61 (! rrrdd c.ddes. Tread dip <'C I,PA Gran " ; YE,F 1. Trcdd trert "+ .Y CENM,i Va a ti M'[trJcncd t` ad rl, S+rsRalssdbdevUsro[ a Ora�p� rircesln� %, to wVv1;o - - -•R1 ,itt!� ,ihr :arc S[r' ...- W-.:dt- CA: :'recTWin;: PRESCRIPTION TREATMENTS This section is to familiarize the reader with terms and types of treatment proposed in the Kessler Mountain Existing Trails Condition/Prescription Survey. The terms discussed in this section are: rock armoring, inline drainage features, climbing turns, rolling crown switchback, knick construction. Rock Armoring Rock armoring can be used for ;drainage crossings, trail approaches, and steep trail sections that need additional protection from erosion. Rock armoring tends to be relatively low maintenance and visually appealing, while also stabilizing challenging trail sections. Inline Drainage Inline drainage features are typically used on existing treads where the tread has already been established and there is little space for a large, wide, relatively clog -proof dip and outlet formed through alignment. Please refer to the image on page 47 for more information. 38 1 Chapter 7: r: Climbing Turns A turn where the grade of the trail as it passes through the fall line is exactly the same as the grade of the slope being traversed. Rolling Crown Switchbacks Rolling crown switchbacks are sustainable turns 'on a hillside engineered For drainage. The trail is* routed onto a crowned deck --• . --- y +' where it makes --'-.— t a transition to - �. } the opposite .... . direction, The 4V� upper approach` v is insloped to ` drain water out tine back of the landing, while the lower approach is outsloped. AIM � v Knicks ore construcied into existing trail tread in order to drain p!fiddles;rorn flot areos. fdIre bu//er, rNi 10i►40l >* :moi f�i�` f•. .r w�[�:4' - � � PRESCRIPTION TREATMENTS This section is to familiarize the reader with terms and types of treatment proposed in the Kessler Mountain Existing Trails Condition/Prescription Survey. The terms discussed in this section are: rock armoring, inline drainage features, climbing turns, rolling crown switchback, knick construction. Rock Armoring Rock armoring can be used for ;drainage crossings, trail approaches, and steep trail sections that need additional protection from erosion. Rock armoring tends to be relatively low maintenance and visually appealing, while also stabilizing challenging trail sections. Inline Drainage Inline drainage features are typically used on existing treads where the tread has already been established and there is little space for a large, wide, relatively clog -proof dip and outlet formed through alignment. Please refer to the image on page 47 for more information. 38 1 Chapter 7: r: Climbing Turns A turn where the grade of the trail as it passes through the fall line is exactly the same as the grade of the slope being traversed. Rolling Crown Switchbacks Rolling crown switchbacks are sustainable turns 'on a hillside engineered For drainage. The trail is* routed onto a crowned deck --• . --- y +' where it makes --'-.— t a transition to - �. } the opposite .... . direction, The 4V� upper approach` v is insloped to ` drain water out tine back of the landing, while the lower approach is outsloped. AIM � v Knicks ore construcied into existing trail tread in order to drain p!fiddles;rorn flot areos. a Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Knick Construction water has a place to drain. A knick is a shaved down A knick is an effective outsloped drain constructed semicircle about ten -feet long that is outsloped into existing trails. For a knick to be effective, the about fifteen percent in the center. Knicks should trail tread must have lower ground next to it so the be unnoticeable to users ROCK CITY TRAIL 0 Rock City Trail Rock City Trail Recommendation #1 Recommendation #3 • Latitidue: N36 02.394 Uslef—UNOW Latitidue: N36 02.382 Longitude: W9413.248 Longitude: W9413.185 + ■ $6,500.00 g +� $500.00 s s ■ ■ i ■ Turns exceed maximum grade for climbing turns. Large boulder fell onto trail blocking the tread causing users to go off trail to avoid. CEEi Corner 1 - Rebuild as a rolling crown switchback A ■ Corner 2 - Rebuild as a rolling crown switchback Move large boulder and reestablish original trail with 5'Hx30'L crib wall retaining backside of turn to alignment. maintain existing drainage from road. Regrade trail between turns to improve drainage 0 Rock City Trail Recommendation #4 Rock City Trail MIKESINEXIEV Latitidue: N36 02,442 Recommendation #2 Longitude: W9413,175 + . + Latitidue: N36 02.384 + + $3,400.00 Longitude: W94 13.215 • ++ $800.00 Steep rocky fall -line trail for approx 200' causing poor drainage and difficult navigation For some users ! f 4 Large boulder blocking trail causing narrow unsafe route around. Option 1: Stay on existing trail alignment. Repair emmsm using rolling grade dips and rock armoring. Build a 2'Hx10'L crib wall to create a safe a Option 2 (preferred): 300' reroute upslope from sustainable route around boulder. existing trail alignment using grade reversals for water management. Chapter 7: ; ra: - 39 j"—% Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Rock City Trail Recommendation #5 + + Latitidue: N36 02.336 Longitude: W9413.032 +M 5200.00 Narrow tree gate for mountain bikers specifically, causing users to go around. NIVITTIMM Opt.1: Remove the Silver Maple. Opt.2: 30' reroute down slope. Rock City Trail Recommendation #6 ME= Latitidue: N36 02.324 Longitude: W9413,027 ► • $200.00 Old tree stump in trail tread Remove scum: Rock City Trail Recommendation #7 Latitidue: N36 02.221 Longitude: W94 13.007 $2,250.00 Seep causing muddy trail tread. 50' rock armoring. 40 1 Chapter 7::,,_- Rock City Trail Recommendation #8 I++Latitidue: N36 02.159 Longitude: W9413.029 0 +� $1,350.00 Seep causing muddy trail tread. 30' rock armoring. Rock City Trail Recommendation #9 � ; -`' ' Latitidue: N36 02.150 L Longitude: W94 13.065 ITMIRMIfYl $800.00 + r Y Seep causing muddy trail tread. 100' rock armoring Rock City Trail I Recommendation #10 + + Latitidue: N36 02.159 Longitude: W9413-114 + M $1,800.00 Radius of corner is too tight causing users, primarily mountain bikers to stray off trail Relocate corner with a 75' reroute to allow for better turn radius. U Rock City Trail Recommendation #11 ME= Latitidue: N36 02.131 Longitude: W94 13.114 $200.00 Dead tree in corner, causing a tight radius. Remove dead tree to open radius of corner. Rock City Trail Recommendation #12 + + Latitidue: N36 02.090 Longitude: W9413.093 $4,500.00 Seep causing muddy trail tread. 100' rock armoring (a Rock City Trail Recommendation #13 is= Latitidue: N36 02.026 Longitude: W9413.112 $7,000.00 Seep drains down trail and the trail is located too close to a barbed wire fence, making it dangerous for users. 500' reroute including 2 climbing turns and 30' of rock armoring to span seep. This reroute will also help to control the speeds of mountain bikers. Close old trail. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan (2Rock City Trail 1 Recommendation #14 ME= Latitidue: N36 02.006 Longitude: W94 13.111 $1,500.00 Radius of corner is too tight causing users, primarily mountain bikers to stray off trail. The corner is also too close to a barbed wire fence, making it dangerous for users. Open radius of corner and along with a 50' reroute downhill from corner. Rock City Trail Recommendation #15 + t R4 Latitidue: N36 01.921 Longitude: W9413.080 $800.00 Hikers have created a social trail that creates a direct route to the Shale Barren.. Reroute turn north to create separation and install "stay on trail" signs. Close social trail. Chapter 7: <at . `" 41 Z-1, Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan EGGBEATER TRAIL Eggbeater Trail Recommendation #1 m,„l ■ Latitidue: N36 01.924 Longitude: W9413.049 $800,00 50' fall line trail. 100' reroute to mellow grades. Eggbeater Trail Recommendation #2 Latitidue: N36 01 903 Longitude: W94 13 061 $3,375.00 Seep causing muddy trail tread. 75' of rock armoring. 42 1 Chapter WESTERN MYTH TRAIL Western Myth Trail Recommendation #1 + +"' Latitidue: N36 01.814 Longitude: W9413.094 + $3,200.00 +w ► r At the intersection with the Eggbeater trail the drainage runs directly down the Western Myth trail paired with steep grades and poor drainage for an extended distances. ■ 400' reroute to the north to allow for a better intersection location and reduce the trail grades. Western Myth Trail Recommendation #2 3 Latitidue: N36 01.721 Longitude: W94 13.148 $1,600.00 Trail grade is too steep for an extended distance. 200' reroute to reduce the trails grade. I 0 SPELLBOUND TRAIL 0 Spellbound Trail Recommendation #1 • • Latitidue: N36 01.615 Longitude: W9413.184 $800.00 At the Intersection with Western Myth the drainage runs directly down Spellbound Trail. 100' reroute to allow for better intersection location and drainage. Spellbound Trail Recommendation #2 t • Latitidue: N36 01.821 Longitude: W94 13.-212 5900.00 Poor drainage on rock drop landing Create better drainage and 50' rock armoring Spellbound Trail Recommendation #3 • • Latitidue: N36 01.863 Longitude: W94 13.214 51,600.00 Corner is too tight and trail grade too steep causing poor drainage. 200' reroute to the north reduce grades, open turn radius, and improve drainage. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan , Spellbound Trail Recommendation #4 • • Latitidue: N36 01.734 Longitude: W9413.214 $2,250.00 Seep causing muddy trail tread. 50' rock armoring. Spellbound Trail Recommendation #5 REEM Latitidue: N36 01.384 Longitude: W94 13 265 $1,000.00 Steep trail grades, tight Turn radius, and poor drainage in and out of turn. Realign corner upslope and to south for improved drainage. Spellbound Trail Recommendation #6 + I •' Latitidue: N36 01.340 Longitude: W94 13.257 $1,500.00 Poor drainage before turn. 60' reroute of turn for improved drainage. Chapter 7: E : Si":g Tr.ai 1 43 %,r Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Spellbound Trail Recommendation #7 5141aftVIM Latitidue: N36 01.358 Longitude: W9413.237 • • $1,200.00 Poor drainage at the intersection of Western Myth. 150' reroute to the north for better intersection location and improved drainage. .0 Spellbound Trail Recommendation #8 Latitidue: N36 01.348 Longitude: W94 13.212 $4,000.00 Trail grade exceeds the maximum grade of 15% for an extended distance. 500' reroute with a climbing turn to reduce trail grades and better align trail and trail flow.. Spellbound Trail Recommendation #9 Latitidue: N36 01.411 Longitude: W94 13.147 $1,600.00 Poor location and alignment of trails at intersection with Eggbeater. 200' reroute for better intersection location and. improved drainage. 44 1 Chapter 7: L:,, s it Tr6 is n Spellbound Trail + Recommendation #10 • Latitidue: N36 01.434 Longitude: W94 13.121 $3,200.00 Two turns exceed maximum grade for climbing turns. Relocate both turns approx. 75' behind current location in order to reduce grades. (a Spellbound Trail Recommendation #11 Latitidue: N36 01.341 Longitude: W94 13.095 $50000 Poor drainage on old road b -ed. Build in-line grade dips to improve drainage, TRENT TRAIL 0 Trent Trail Recommendation #1 Latitidue: N36 01.820 Longitude: W94 13 040 > $+ $9;600,00 Seep causing muddy trail tread. 400' reroute with 100' of rock armoring. This is also part of the major reroute around the Shale Barren shown on the map CRAZY MARY TRAIL Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #1 • + Latitidue: N36 01.314 Longitude: W9413.054 $1,600.00 Steep grade with poor drainage. 200' Reroute to reduce grade and improve drainage. Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #2 • • Latitidue: N3601.31S Longitude: W94 13.026 • $800.00 Seep causing muddy trail tread. 100' Reroute above seep. 0 Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #3 • • Latitidue: N36 01,398 Longitude: W94 12 967 $400.00 Bad trail alignment causing poor drainage. ; • 50' Reroute to improve drainage. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan ,, • r Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #4 r +� Latitidue: N36 01.425 Longitude: W94 12.943 $800.00 KKONWHENI Seep and bad trail alignment causing poor drainage and wet trail tread. 100' Reroute to improve drainage. Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #5 Latitidue: N36 01.466 Longitude: W94 12.901 $1,350.00 2 seeps causing wet trail tread. 30' Rock Armoring. Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #6 8.R Latitidue: N36 01.532 Longitude: W94 12.878 4>V $500 00 Poor drainage. Inline drainage feature. Chapter 7: +Ex,�: �'':"-IIl s 1 45 m %,�V, Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Crazy Mary Trail Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #7 Recommendation #10 Ladddue:N36O1.564 Lahtidue:N3b[D775 Longitude: YY9412,845 Longitude: VV9412,B73 EMMEM $1.200.00 $800D0 Bad trail alignment causing poor drainage- Bad trail alignment causing poor drainage ' 15[/Reroute toimprove drainage. 1OO'Remutetoimprove drainage, Crazy Mary Trail Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #8 Recommendation #11 Lacicigue:N30Ol.6O2 Lat|tigueN3601.847 Longitude: W94 12.852 Longitude: YV941I890 $1.20000 ` $800.00 _ ' Bad trail alignment causing poor drainage. Bad trail alignment causing poor drainage. r,m������� .7Y�� 15JReroute mimprnvedrainage. | 100'Reroute mimprove drainage. Crazy Mary Trail � ! Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #9 Recommendation #12 Lac|ridue: N36 01.672 Lacitidue: N36 01.945 Longitude: W94 12,855 Longitude: W94 12,832 ! Bad trail alignment causing poor drainage, Bad trail separation. The trail comes close mitself as |rsnakes down the slope. 20O^Reroute oo improve drainage. 8O0'Remu,eMove upper leg updnpeand taper down mthe double rock drop. After drop, middle leg will traverse slope instead of climbing. Move lower leg downslope then traverse slope back tocrai|This is ( shown onthe map asone ofthe main nemuues 46 1 Chapter rsJcu,�nai� CRAZY MARY TRAIL CONTT, Crazy Mary Trail Recommendation #13 • =' Latitidue: N36 01.973 Longitude: W9412.680 $500.00 Poor drainage & meandering trail around sinkhole. Inline drainage features & 200' Reroute to connect overlooks REROUTES The most significant reroutes are primarily to avoid ecologically sensitive areas, avoid private property, or realign trails to be sustainable and have better separation. There are three significant reroutes: Spellbound Reroute - As part of the two miles of trail located on private property, the section of the Spellbound Trail in the southwest corner of the property has been identified for rerouting due to the need for public access. This reroute will serve as an alternative to the current alignment, but could become the permanent trail especially if the City is unable to attain an easement or acquire this piece of private property to publically accommodate the existing trails. This reroute is not ideal because it shortens the trail system and makes this area more congested, but this reroute will be considered as an alternative. a Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan -w SEE BUDGET ON PAGE 63 FOR TOTALS ON ALL EXISTING TRAIL REPAIRS Shale Barren Reroute - As identified by Theo Witsell's ecological assessment, the shale barren is a rare and sensitive ecological amenity and unique to Kessler Mountain. To accommodate this ecologically -sensitive area, reroutes around -this area are proposed in order to avoid damaging the delicate fauna and flora. To enhance this reroute recommendation, educational signage will be required in order to Keep users from accessing this sensitive area as well as informing the importance of this ecological amenity. More information regarding the shale barren can be viewed in Appendix 3: A Raoid Terrestrial Ecological Assessment of Kessler Mountain Reserve by Theo Witsell, Chapter 7: E%i°,t i ': o!.s 1 47 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Crazy Mary Reroute — To support the primary goal of building sustainable trails and protecting environmentally sensitive areas, two sections of the Crazy Mary Trail are in need of rerouting. One of these areas is located at the Crazy Mary and Trent Trail intersection near the top of the mountain, while the other is located near the northern end of the Crazy Mary Trail above the bluff line. This proposed reroute is needed in order to reach sustainable grades and to provide better trail separation where turns are condensed and limited in maneuverability. TRAIL CLOSURES Abandoned trails and corridors are generally closed by eliminating the existing tread while disguising the open corridor. Existing tread can be removed by scarifying the compacted soil to encourage new vegetation growth, placing organic atter and debris in the tread, and breaking the orefous tread's continuity with logs, stones or otherr material. T1 ie open corridor can be more diffICUlt to disguise. Vertical elenenm such as the placement of a fallen tree, especially ceclar, is helpful to visually remove the open corridor line which attracts the eye. These vertical elements will ideally last through a couple of growing seasons until natural growth can be established. In some cases, this is even accomplished with the planting of We trees and shrubs. Again, the intent is to completely camouflage the corridor. If people can see it, they will reopen it, especially if it's a short- cut for hikers. 48 I Chapter 7: s-.>::!nF. 7.; PRIVATE TRAIL There are approximately two miles of trail on private property. These trails have existed for many years and are considered to be an integral to the existing system. In order for these trails to be open for public use, the City must gain access through an easement or land acquisition. Appropriate alternate solutions have been provided assuming that the City is unable to gain access, However, these trails have been included in the assessment should they become part of the public trail system. There are three trails located on private property: Rock City Trail - This trail Is approximately one mile and crosses a few different property owners, one of which has been a champion for Kessler Mountain and has gone as far as providing access to the trail and creating a small trailhead and sign-in.sheet, This has been one of the main access points to the trail system for years and holds some of tl -- most beautiful terrain on the mountain, Spellbound Trail - This is a one mile segment of trail on the far southwest end that climbs up the mountain. It is. the connection between all west side trails Wino Trail - This is a spur trail to the historic stone wine cellar. clow Wile im�7gr;S of i,ow trod Con be nosed{7f/fpr public use. Pravidirng an obvious obsuur_tior) is the easiest >vay, but blending the forme r corridor info the iondscone is t%; e most sustainable. FORMER ROADBEDS - TRENT TRAIL The Trent Trail is actually a historic road bed that served as the main road over the mountain during the late 1800's when Kessler was being used as a winery (please refer to Chapter 2: History for more information). Today, the trail functions as the primary north -south connector trail that is situated as the main spine of the trail system. The trail starts near the water towers on the northeast end of the property and continues west to the shale barren and then turns south along the top of the ridge to the radio towers at the far south end of the property. For purposes of analysis, the trail can be broken into two segments: Water Towers to Shale Barren - The trail/old roadbed is approximately eight feet wide and continues directly up the mountain along the fall -line (prevailing slope), therefore exceeding maximum grades for sustainable trail. However, given that this segment of the trail is already established and provides the only motorized access on the mountain, it is recommended that the existing path be improved and remain as an emergency access and maintenance route for the City. This path should remain open as a public use trail for those preferring a more direct route or climbing challenge. Also recommended is to i L Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan regrade and install inline grade dips to mitigate erosion due to the steep alignment of the trail. A minimum of six feet width should be established to accommodate utility vehicles for emergencies and maintenance. This does not mean that the trail tread width must be six feet, rather the corridor must be cleared of any trees, downfall, rocks. or other obstacles that would impede a UTV from traveling down the trail. The tread itself would more likely become four feet wide like it is today. Shale Barren to Radio Towers - There are a few places where the trail has been routed around dead Fall that have caused some steeper grades and trail flow issues. Progressive Trail Design recommends these areas be addressed with the installation of inline drainage features in any place where the trail is straight down the fall. line for extended periods- Again, a minimum of six feet width should be established to accommodate utility vehicles for emergencies and maintenance. The drogmm belay is on example o,` it eine grade dips, vihich ore o proposed solution to erosion issues on steep grades for the Kessler Mountoin troil system. CONSTRUCTED TREAD DIP COWGURATEONS '_� � _ fes- a.-� � . 9 1 4 ��--�' i� P ••; •r^ :w - '�re GJ ❑1rw/lu!: tx to tt•+�`- Y•w Ttv +YAC tr-c; am Fhr C if tv'vef. .sei the Chapter 7: r:.,, a::; ! 49 .. -A,► J �Y; •,sY Y }�•• ,•M I{h. +' i " r ♦r Y 'r`"a Y ` 7' •* -\�1 0 T i R v �i , Y ..`q� y ,A,. !.fN s k k `4 9.* Y` rf ��'�•r +{y -�, i"'!i� s � �Y 5rry !,. 1, � I'F+ a'0• it + Y 25 Proposed Trails S ' : ' �µNRqLM` e ' rr.� � �+xi- ``' �:. •.r y '1+ 1 _ ♦ � fit _ r ' � a. \ • �' �'� � ' R � � a �•• 0%; f� a ,i^� ,�.•¢ ? �"� {' .w ".�.�'`:.�' r� .,� 1 y ase lip _ r u �!►:,rr �. 1. � . - .. - •`fry _5 • C �1'4 �+ T fa t v 4 ^� r l ?c '�r"Lg�/ - �" •i..��. 1 {�,�', � .�. 3rd ..y ....'r1y �l�Y ..-tiC t+ _ . - 12 ,�. .�, .,rte F ' y� !_ �� v .'"r"' x `'" r �^� '4:.R • � Nw Ir V IJ Chapter S-. Pmposed Trails #, �. I OVERVIEW Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan M ,� This chapter outlines the proposed trail system from Progressive Trail Design for an additional 6.6 miles of public use trails at Kessler Mountain. INTRODUCTION There are a total of four proposed trails: - These trails total approximately 6.6 miles, excluding the paved•or hard surface paths. The focus of this master plan is primarily on the soft surface trail. The shared -use, paved paths were not included in the scope of this plan; however, high-level concepts based on the City's Regional Park Plan and Active Transportation Plan were included. V It is important to note that all proposed trails in this plan -are conceptual alignments Eased on field work and the public input process. They are all subject to be further refined on the ground during the pre -construction final design phase. Much thought, debate -arid field study has gone into •the proposed locations. This plan is meant to be used as a guide for the future development of the Kessler Mountain Trail System. All of the proposed soft surface trails are intended to be "natural surface trails" (see definition below) that will range in width and character. They are proposed to address the need of providing more diverse experiences for a variety of users, introducing difficulty level progression by adding beginner and intermediate options, and accessing key attractions. The following pages are a description with support images of the different types of proposed trails. Chapter 8: f oposeit;lbails 1 51 /"N Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan BEGINNER LOOP (9.5 MILES) This trail, designated by the green color in the image below, would be an approximately four- to five-foot wide natural surface trail that serves as a hiking or beginner level mountain biking loop. With proximity near the main trailhead at the Regional Park, this loop offers an easily accessible recreational opportunity for a variety of users. The trail is aligned at the base of the mountain and skirts the edge of the recently capped landfill, which will soon be restored to prairie -like conditions. It begins and ends at the main trailhead and navigates through the woods along gentle slopes. This trail type is needed in order to provide better access to the mountain for all users and skill progression in the trail system. As previously mentioned, all of the existing trails on the mountain are considered advanced, therefore it is important to also offer beginner and intermediate level trails. Additional loop configurations branching off of this loop offer expanded hiking and biking options. Pia, 03 0 08 P `00 Beginner Loop Iiiii e7 t� x it C? a , G r'' aav��ac�ac��sa 01 � a 0+~�# Landfill Atte X001 t e IQ" `U ? , Parking &Trail Nub p - � 52 1 Chapter 8: 'c; p. 1s.t' ..i. ,,i 0 LOWER BLUFF TRAIL (3.4 MILES) This trail, designated by the blue color, would be a two -foot wide intermediate level trail that generally follows the contour of the land and skirts the base of the bluff line, The trail serves multiple purposes. First, this trail provides access to the existing trail system and ties into the E=ast Bluff Trail, proposed to run along the upper portion of the bluff line, Second, it connects the trail system to Iwo proposed secondary t ailhead/parking areas: ADA Hilltop Trailhead and Kessler Mountain Road Trailhead. In addition, the trail provides a much- needed intermediate level trail experience, adding to the diversity of use, challenge, and experience. This trail can be accessed from the main parking area near the former landfill and provides loop configurations and educational opportunities along the base of the bluff showcasing geology, springs, and wildlife. The upper leg -[this trail follows the contours along a natural bench at the base of the, east bluff line, There are many big boulders, sheer bluff walls, springs and o0her ecologically rich zones to vievv. The goal of this "Tad is to take users to these loc.itions in a responsibly designed way creating a unique natural experience end inrroducing visitors to the wonders of Kessler Mountain and Ozark ecology. It will be very :rnpo rant to provide tra l etiquette, educational, and interpretive signs to direct people to stay on the trail and illustrate the mportance of this natural arnenity. This may be one of the most frequented areas due its proximity to the Regional Park, making it of paramount importance to contain users on the proposed trail. However, providing the opportunity to experience this terrain without having to travel deep into the trail system targets the goal of providing unique and educational opportunities at an accessible distance For a varlet`/ of trail users. Leaving the upper leg of this trail and ascending through breaks in the bluff line are two connector trails that, will provide access to the proposed East Bluff Trail. Both of these connector trails utilize existing roadbeds that, offer direct routes up the mountain. Unfortunately, the grades of these roadbeds are too steep (exceed 20% grade for the acceptable maximum length) to establish a sustainable trail. Therefore, switchbacks must be integrated to reduce the grades and make the trail more comfortable to navigate. Through strategic design, the majority of the road bed can be used. This is the preferred option because the corridor has already been impacted and minimizing any further disruption should be considered a top priority during the final design phase. r , Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan N,-0 -e From a recreational standpoint, the Lower Bluff Trail offers a great place for mountain bikers, trail runners and hikers to exercise, challenge themselves, and experience a moderate trail that gently flows along the contour of this open wooded terrain. This will serve as the next level of skill progression from the Beginner Loop as well as a gateway trail to the more advanced and challenging trails located 'nigher on the mountain. R o a o ♦ - P a 0 a°�°f'" , t o a � f 6 00 a 4R t O 6O 1`00 g J V rtf„• Landfill Area 0 4� R fT �1i Parking &TraiIHub c o a ►.�_ noas+a p�12 t 9 REGIONAL Pj a � oa 01 Lower Bluff Trail W0.00 ctntb jo"aa- VO 7 M t p94�7 � R E � KESSLER MitJ€�rVTilahl RQAi3 P Chapter 8: 'rri>xaf—d 7r.+ is 1 53 1 Y •'t Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan EAST BLUFF TRAIL (1.7 MILES) Designated by the magenta color, the East Bluff Trail will be an eighteen -inch to two -foot wide backcountry single-track trail similar to the existing trails. This trail will run along the top of the east bluff line offering outstanding views to the east and overlooks of the Regional Park and the City of Fayetteville. This trail has the potential to become one of the most popular trails in the park due to its natural beauty and. proximity to the C' trailhead. The trail can 26, be accessed from the V 0 main trailhead utilizing r! v ° two trail connections by way of the Lower Bluff Trail as well as from a connection to Crazy Mary Trail. 54 1 Chapter 8:1 These connections offer a variety of short and long distance loop options. They, also serve as a link to the southern and more remote western portions of the existing trail system through a series of switchbacks on the south end that connect to Crazy Mary Trail, taking users to the highest point on Kessler Mountain. Q 1 40 .001 0 $c�vrac�o rf {,U 04000 00 it ()000000C3C7 " 4 r r pC I Landfill Area East Bluff Trail � �Otfn[90d s� a a O 0000000 800QO0 - t]00000000 OOO C' O'.}{?slK�Ot7A PAVED ACTIVE TRANSPORATION TRAIL AND REGIONAL PARK TRAIL LOOP Though the alignment of many of the paved paths are not finalized, a trail concept to make a north - south connection over the mountain has been illustrated in this plan. This trail is currently included in the Active Transportation Master Plan and would serve as part of the Rupple Road extension from the Ozark Smokehouse to the Regional Park. There is also a concept for a paved path around the Regional Park, which is shown on this plan. This path will be fully accessible and provide a trail opportunity within the Regional Park development_ An overlook on the hillside above the baseball fields was identified as a desirable destination for access by this trail. In conjunction with the Regional Park development, plans for an extension of Fayetteville's paved trails system to the park are currently being prepared and construction is expected to be completed by Fall 2016_ This will be identified as the Cato Springs Trail and will access the park by trail from the northeast, providing connections to the Town Branch Trail and the Razorback Greenway. Reference Appendix A: Existing Condition Studies and Plans for more information. } Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan %4.kl Chapter 8: Pr pos . '.:.._ 55 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan TRAILHEADS There are a total of five proposed and future trailheads to access the trail system. Tempoary Trailhead Phase I construction of the Regional Park features the construction of four baseball Fields and a large parking lot facility. This parking facility will serve as a temporary trailhead for public access until the main trailhead is constructed in later phases of the Regional Park development. Main Trailhead This is the primary trailhead positioned on the far ,,•vestern end of the Regional Park at the base or t' old landfall area 000 0 r 6 c) 56 1 Chapter 8: This will be a large parking area with restrooms and a trail kiosk. This facility is anticipated to be constructed in a later phase orthe Regional Park development. Parking &Trail Hub I Judge Cummings Road Trailhead Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan ; Currently serving as existing access to the Kessler It is approximately 0,4 miles east of the Main Mountain trails, this will continue to serve as Trailhead and the soft surface trails. secondary trailhead to the mountain or a main trailhead for greenway users. Kessler Moutain Road Trailhead - This is a Future concept to provide a small parking area on the south end of the trail system off Kessler Mountain Road. This could eventually connect to future trail development to the south, ADA Trailhead Located at the top of]udge Cummings Road near the water towers, this trailhead would be reserved for users with special needs to provide access to key overlooks and trails. JUDGE CUAAMINCS ROAD i a0��Q� r 00000 0 r ■ r 00 r YU UNTAIN ROACH . Potential Secondary Parking & Trailhead Chapter 8: rr;;, _; 57 ° Senior Citizens ADA Parking & Trail Nub r d. ti r t39 ?(� -'� {)fit,��• Chapter 8: rr;;, _; 57 c i r iVl inta6n Trair-ct 0, 5' Additional Trail Opportunities i +e. i 1 s I -A r N k i ..—_fir. r r� _78 Chapter 9: Additional Trail OpportL{nities I "' n Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan OVERVIEW This chapter identifies additional opportunities for bikers and hikers. These opportunities are considered to be future considerations for the development of Kessler Mountain in conjunction with the Regional Park. INTRODUCTION Additional opportunities for trail and bike amenities are proposed in this section and address requests made by CiLy and public during np_it periods, as well as trends and potential future needs. A few of these concepts are outlined below. Note: These are only meant to be conceptual ideas to meet future recreational needs based on current trends, BIKE PARK A bike park is a purpose-built skills park for bicyclists. It is meant to provide fun and challenge for all skill levels, The former landfill is a perfect canvas for a world-class bike park. The grades are perfect for this use and its placement at the main trailhead makes it ideal for skills -building amenities. The landfill has strict management restrictions limiting its use and development to activities that will not penetrate the newly installed clay cap. This makes the area ideal for use of a bike skills park since this is best accomplished by importing more fill dirt to construct the Features and that will further buffer the new cap. A bike park would bring a lie inndfill of Kessler Mountain has smu n atingemen; tesr; icriens limiting its use and development to octivities, but acts os the perfect convos for o world -doss bike pork. Chapter 9: A (!i `cr... 'r:,.. :r v 59 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan unique recreational asset to the Regional Park and the City of Fayetteville. INTERPRETIVE NATURE (HIKING ONLY) ACCESSIBLE TRAIL This type of trail is designed for education and accessibility. It is typically located in gentle terrain and preferably surfaced with a crushed stone. There are a few locations that could work for this type of trail. One is the area around the Regional Park, specifically around the strearns. This trail could replace the concrete path in places or work in conunction, as an alternate trail winding back and forth over the stream with boardwalks. Another opportunity is near the water towers on the north end, leaving the ADA parking area and accessing the overlooks. PURPOSE-BUILT DOWNHILL MOUNTAIN BIKE TRAIL These types of trails are extremely popular among mountain bikers. They are directional downhill trails designed for challenge and fun, Kessler provides an especially unique opportunity in Northwest Arkansas due to its elevation change and natural technical features. There is a great opportunity for one of these types of trails coming off the high point (near radio towers) on the south end dropping down to either the western or eastern sides of the mountain. This could become more Feasible if the private land to the southwest, where the existing Spellbound Trail is located, were officially acquired. Should this be a possibility, it would be especially important to separate this trail from other trails as much as possible, as well as conduct an ecological study within the trail corridor to avoid impact to any high value natural resources. 60 1 Chapter U Above ore exompies of intrcpretive norure accessible troi!s. These troils can present opportunities ie iypicolly Unoccessible areas ood provide users with the unique experience of learning about something about thier local lot-, dscope. d Opposite Poge bottom 3 noges ore eromples of intrepretive signage along soft surface troils. The bottom two images ore examples of o purpose -but!, downhill mounroin bi!<e lroil� and hike porks h-ldf*d VP"'* - '001 Am RAtkh TAT 427 7 .r -11N Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan %,t., I � ,V W7, ta �,' J, Chapter 9:,'.- � "'. [ - ; -,1';J;,! , , 61 FA � f ILI 'j, Af rid `fi! �• — '+i -r .0 • •s ' Fr 4 Signage, Riser Management & Maintenance �ft 44 ov gow Y� i r. ►ym ..r + 1 .� `"�• may. /f. •_ NO .:.. � _. �'.' ,airy.;, .,�y � • '' —� 71 T ' N. rte• �fi "� 7 w+. -�, •_fir _ ��,� - r f -�._ - � "> �. � 5 • �-Y ro mar:, � -.~ • - ^.e, ^ S.. '. - -.'�', �� '• ,fir _ a .,�. - .� .. rY 62. Chap(er i fS.Srgnage aril Ry ktaIV�De lPt - ♦ , , tea► r� * , 11 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan �. OVERVIEW This chapter provides guidelines to be used in providing signage for wayfinding and emergency access. This chapter also outlines considerations for maintenance and inspection following the development of the trail network. INTRODUCTION Signs are the most important communication mechanism between users and land management agencies. A well -implemented and maintained sign program can enhance the user experience, allowing users to navigate through the trail network and customize their trail experience, Signs also play a critical role in managing risk and the rapid deployment of emergency services. A strategic and frequent sign program meets the needs of all trail users, from the savvy, daily trail user to a first-time visitor. Because signs sometimes intrude on the natural outdoor experience, balancing these competing interests is the key to developing a successful sign program. The Northwest Arkansas Soft Surface Signage Plan was developed by Alta Planning + Design and , Progressive Trail Design and is being imp lemented in all the soft -surface trail systems throughout Northwest Arkansas in an effort to standardize signage and organize the systems. These signs can be adapted to fit the needs of each system, though some will require custom signs.- For example, Kessler will need educational signs For ecologically sensitive areas and "stay on trail" signs throughout. Chapter 10: e, 'Ma a2- ';1 ..:arnc.: 63 .?I'— % I%,v Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan I r� ° n � n itspFd rrRr+ng trails s are cooling to to priprivate properlroper[ y J n 0 Q Oo 57 ! p v ROCKCTY U • �i q . •Q go4ir e CS a 6 4 PRpResrvBgtlNb Senior Citizens ADA n a p o 01 TD Parking &Trail Hui 1 a s 10,�A f a o oa oI a suLYP� cal d° °°l. 00 p 5: �.�rQda �y`Y�� Vd G 6 1 ry- 0 0 000apq, ¢'a/ t3 a r)Y v d a ddo olo " ea ?e k1_1 °w4 it —c+ Landfill Area �a i d � 11% pr Dda D \ ���••QQQ I7`'w Z 4 wa.e�x j mp i, 9 "_° 'Parking &Trail Hub ° s rt _• _� _ _. _ ». «. __ °a'o b ' rryy�rj °e,t 1 iI><f a cQ ¢a� 1 nib �o al �`�°o • 1 � u 'do- Odp.p 4 u. u n � � i Y'G �d ly. �° •e e � p n ogbd �i�� d tY d° �caoq act ""dS capaaoraaaComo" o J,,�cvn a acaaoo�a0 o 1 E% ._1 [� _1 a' e If I as gp 0 p 0_41..� oat w Q aaa a L$ �J N11, d d r �w air °---------------- .dQb,. Q The potential reroute of these 1 �_ Tl a 8 ! - xislingtrailismnlingenlon cce', to nr:v.iln n+nlre�ry JI 1 ! 1 1 PROPERTY BOUND RY W "` `- -J 7 1tFSSL ER MOUN VAIN ROAD L 64 1 Chapter 10: Ll /IN Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan %_1 It, LEGENDNOTE: ALLTRAIL LENGTHS AND ALIGNMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE EXISTING TRAILS BIKING ALLOWED ` 6 Miles (Within Park Boundary) d�~ 9 `Ii� RESTROOMS BEGINNER LOOP ll 1.5 Miles (4'WIDE) .0 inPARKING AREA Y LOWER BLUFF TRAIL 3.4 Miles (2'-3'WIDE) ABANDONEDTRAILS ®@®'b ® EAST BLUFFTRAIL PAVED TRAILS -PROPOSED a °®® 1.7 Miles (18"-2' WIDE) L rf Proposed by City of Fayetteville TRAIL REROUTES p 'FUTUREPAVEDTRAILS. 1 Mile t `ti`{ Proposed by the City of Fayetteville 4* TRAILHEAD KIOSK EMERGENCY ACCESS ROUTE fififf■ INTERSECTING TRAIL SIGNS EMERENCY PICKUP 0 ❑ TRAIL MARKERS LOCATION (NUMBER) 3 TRAIL CLASSIFICATIONS REGIONAL PARK M r f r r r r Potential Secondary Parking &Trailhead JUDGE CUMMINGS ROAD 111111011111111M � ___ O e y DC7 ,a E� a` 0 KESSLER MOUNTAIN RISK MANAGEMENT AND EMERGENCY ACCESS PLAN The recommendations for emergency access and wayfinding signage are shown on this graphic. There are three proposed types of wayfinding signage: trail ead kiosk, intersection trail signs, and trail markers. Emergency access routes are identified with the yellow buffer line with emergency pickup locations marked with the red circle. Chapter 10: .. -. R ' ....a,= -,e:r. „ rt: 65 %,v- Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan NORTHWEST ARKANSAS SOFT- SURFACE SIGNAGE PLAN FronflVack ("-tion 2 for (2) 4"x 6 " Pos t 'Double Foce Option' is Pelf, r. 4*A M, Nm "" to ow.Alf 66 1 Chapter 10: R'-,k;7vI.,,I!)-c, Profoe 11 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Intersecting Trail Signs Sid X73 Iq "max, (pl? 4f]O rroW sy5wii. ,,Vtss� o�-*, —A j r A, .0 75 A': u4mt! I PA-.- e,( j - W Chapter 10: 67 % ,,kr Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan RISK MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES Below are some principles of trail design, construction techniques and management strategies for managing risk: Warnings • Signs play a vital role in managing risk. • Consider a perimeter (fence, vegetation - every user is warned of potential risk no matter how they enter the trail system). • The main traHhead kioslk could describe trail difficulty using a trail rating system. • Provide signage that alerts users to elements of increased risk. • Use language that appeals to users;. • Include warnings about natural outdoor hazards (such as deadfall, weather, animals, etc.), P' Filters * A trail filter, sometimes referred to as a gateway or qualifier, is a high -skill -level, low - consequence obstacle that demonstrates the difficulty of the upcoming trail or trail feature_. • Consider using filters at the beginning of each advanced trail and just before technical Features. • By making the entrances to technical trails and features difficult, you prevent unprepared riders from overstepping their abilities. • Build with low consequence, easy exit. Filter must be path of least resistance.. Provide Option Lines • Consider offering an easier, alternate route around a mountain biking technical feature to accommodate other trail users. • Allow liferent ability -level riders to ride together. • Make easier trail longer, more difficult trail shorter. It 6 Alternative trails can potentially be in the same corridor as the main trail; for example, a drop-off could vary in height from one side of the trail to the other. rr?ara c3k^IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIN ''rMs may''"' ,� twiNa•«, Jim IMBA RULES OF THE iRAtL ..:.�H.'-'C �-.��•+•«.�.• O RIDE ON OPEN TRAILS U?SLY –�— r fJ "VE NO TRADE _ •� '`'�✓�= El CONTRUL YOUR BICYCLE 0 AL'VJAYS YIELD THE TRAIL 14 NEVER SCARE ANIMALS 1�^t:�r.,l+ f7 Pi AN NEAO UMP '�"rW W 1FNs �01•/Y , ,Ti . Nlf+k RLSN+fN4 Nl, 68 1 Chapter 10:: Introduce challenges to users sequentially so they can enhance their skills in a managed environment. Provide good sight lines • Create sight lines at intersections and bi-directional trails. Communicate to emergency responders about how to locate users on trail systems - create an incident response plan • Include waypoint signage link to GIS map. • Provide access to locked areas. • Familiarize EMS with relevant maps. Self -extraction is ideal - use signage • Provide users with address for emergency services. • Provide directions to nearest health care facilities and hours of operation. • Place signs along the trail to facilitate location communication to EMS. l Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan TRAIL DIFFICULTYAND SIGNAGE Mountain Bikers: The International Mountain Bicycling Association (IMBA) developed a standard method for categorizing the relative technical difficulty of recreational bicycle trails, known as the IMBA Trail Difficulty Rating System. This standard rating system was adapted from the International Trail Marking System used at ski areas throughout the world. Many trail networks use this type of system, most notably resort -based mountain biking trail networks. Hikers: The Universal Trail Assessment Process (UTAP) is an objective measurement system for documenting the conditions on any outdoor path of travel (e.g., sidewalk, recreation trail, shared use path, etc). It is a series of measurement procedures that enable information,about trail conditions (e.g., grade, cross slope, surface, width, obstructions) to be collected in an accurate and repeatable manner. It is solely a system intended to provide objective information to a prospective user allowing them to determine their ability in relation to the trail's difficulty. This system can: • Help trail users make informed decisions • Encourage visitors to use trails that match their skill level • Manage risk and minimize injuries • Improve the outdoor experience for a wide variety ofvisitors • Aid in the planning of trails and trail systems The criteria to rate a trail is as follows: Rate Technical Challenge Only The system focuses on rating the technical challenge of trails, not the physical exertion_ It is not practical to rate both types of difficulty with one system. Consider, for example, a smooth, wide trail that is 20 miles long. Chapter 10: _ „ :, I' ,:k i.'�-.l ne:lt ter_...... ! 69 11 Y1 '1 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan The technical challenge of this trail is easy, yet the distance would make the physical exertion difficult, The solution is to independently rate technical challenge, and indicate physical exertion by posting trail length, and possibly even elevation change. Collect Trail Measurements Use the accompanying table and collect trail measurements for each criteria. There is no prescribed method for tallying a "score" for each trail. Evaluate the trail against the table and combine with judgment to reach the final rating. It is unlikely that any particular trail will measure at the same difficulty level For every criteria, For example, a certain trail may rate as a green circle in three criteria, but a blue square in two different criteria. Include Difficulty and Trail Length on Signs and Maps Trail length is not a criterion or the system. Instead, trail length should be posted on signs in addition to the difficulty symbol. A sign displaying both length and difficulty provides lots or inforrnation, yet it is simple to create and easy to understand, Likewise, elevation change is not a criterion. Evaluate Difficulty Relative to local Trails Trails should be rated relative to other trails in the region. Do not evaluate each trail in isolation. Consider ail the trails in a region and hog, they compare to one another. This will help rank the relative difficulty of each trail and will help trail users select an appropriate route. Use Good Judgment Rating a trail is not entirely objective. it's best to combine tangible data with subjective judgment to reach the final rating. For example, a trail may have a wide range of tread surfaces - most of the 70 1 Chapter 10::, .., trail is easy, but some sections are more difficult. Hew would it be rated? Use personal experience to consider all elements and select a rating that best matches the style of trail. Consider Other Trail qualities Do not forget to consider trail qualities beyond the objective criteria. A wide variety of features could contribute to a trail's difficulty. For example, exposure - the feeling of empty space next to and below the trail tread - provides an added psychological challenge beyond the steepness or roughness of the trail. Other qualities to think about are corridor clearance and turn radius. Use Common Sense and Seek Input No rating system can be totally objective or valid for every situation. This system is a tool to be combined with common sense, Look at trails with a discerning eye, and seek input from trail users before selecting the rating. Remember, a diverse trail network with a variety of trail styles is a great ,Nay to ensure content users. Provide both easy and difficult (-ails to spread users and meet a range of needs. By indicating the length and difficulty of trails o.,,ith a clear signage system, users will be able to locate their preferred type of trail easily. CRITERIA TO CONSIDER Tread Width: The average width of the active tread or beaten path of the trail. For the existing Kessler Mountain trail system, tread width ranges from one to two feet wide.. Tire implementation or proposed trails will conform and be consistent with the standards established by the existing trail system. Tread Surface: The material and stability of the tread surface is a determining factor in the difficulty of travel on the trail. Some descriptive terms include: hardened (paved or surfaced), firm, stable, variable, widely variable, loose and unpredictable. Typical tread surfaces in the existing Kessler Mountain trail systems range from firm to loose soils as well as feature areas of native stone tread at steep grades or areas prone to erosion. Trail Grade (maximum and average): Maximum grade is defined as the steepest section of trail that is more than approximately ten feet in length and is measured in percent with a clinometer. Average grade is the steepness of the trail over its entire length. Average grade can be calculated by taking the total elevation gain of the trail, divided by the total distance, multiplied by 100 to equal a percent grace. Grades for the proposed Kessler Mountain trail system will be subject to the terrain of the landscape, but will contain a variety of difficulties for a wide range of users. Natural Obstacles and Technical Trail Features: Objects introduced along the trail can add challenge by impeding travel. Examples include: rocks, roots, logs, holes, ledges, drop -orfs, etc The height of each obstacle is measured from the tread surface to the top of the obstacle. If the obstacle is uneven in height, measure to the point over which it is most easily ridden, Technical trail features are objects that have been introduced to the trail to add technical challenge. Examples include: rocks, logs, elevated bridges, teeter-totters, jumps, drop-offs, etc Both the height and the width of the technical trail feature are measured. il Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan ,, r The proposed Kessler Mountain trail system will contain a variety of both natural and technical trail features. These features and their difficulty can range for different types of trail users, These features can progressively become more difficult in remote sections of the proposed trail system, while also providing obstacles and features at a more accessible distance for less experienced users. Cross Slope For some trail users, the degree of cross slope (or out -slope) in the tread also contributes to the difficulty rating. Generally, a tread should be constructed with two to five percent degree of out - slope to positively shed water. However, an out - slope of five percent or greater becomes difficult to easily navigate, particularly for users with impaired mobility or confined to a wheelchair. A particular trail's tread width, grade, out -slope, surface, and obstacles are all considerations to be provided at the trailhead to offer information on a trail's universal accessibility. TRAIL DIFFICULTYAND SIGNAGE The proposed Kessler Mountain trail system can feature a variety of signage types signifying wayfinding, trail difficulty and length, access points, educational purposes, and obstacle or feature designation. Each type of signage is outlined below for the purposes of this plan: Trail Access Points: • Trail map / kiosk • Difficulty rating system Trail Name Markers: • Featured at all trail intersections • Distance markers on shared -use, paved trail systems Chapter 10: ` r:ar,:. � r;� ° ..,_ „�n:�_.., ..... _.... enc: 1 71 c %, ,�F Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Educational Signage: Historic features • Natural features r Wildlife and wetland area Technical Trail Features (TTF): • Difficulty level signs at approaches and exists to all technical features Signage to be placed at five to ten foot distances before the feature, in some cases even further away to account for sight distances and design speeds, Trail Dtfficufty Rating System PAnv nitflyulI LtA Scwm M' rn maar EA[nS �1' ' f af>rr a'i m EMERGENCY ACCESS Implementing emergency access points that are marked and maintained throughout a trail system is crucial. Along with these access points, there should also be an Emergency Rescue Plan in place that land managers and rescue departments can Implement in case of an emergency, The graphic below displays the proposed locations for emergency access points in the proposed Kessler Mountain trail system, DEVELOPING AN EMERGENCY RESCUE PLAN: Install "Safety Point" signs at proposed locations throughout the trail system featuring good access (e.g. ATV/Jeep roads), Each "Safety Point" sign should display a corresponding access point "u{Ilkul4 :-Lk"f Fa%y =0 Lliamema %vhlra tlttk Grrvrn cunt! 'm°" 151,' n= well as identify all access point r Taal WidiA `7' n• ^ 36" n• -nnr,- Tsmd Surface I—do—o n' „r„Ana locations and conduct training Iraf:urtl i, nu• Ave�rag� d -k, ii, t— than conducted on-site to discuss Trail Grad. .iia Ilr.ui rl `. Spit Vaxh—m V,t, 30". AA.X !V! Trail Gratia I431 utal 0 b"W" `.nnr. ,In,,fyrnldalllr nne iRMr1r.V Aua�zi�lr elw:rifarx 'Rail F.aiuraf n.r..ler r-. may 7' fell m icsl MF) I- he yarexFnt k,rnirEaill.l csnyt:Itirrn m.-ly 1Jn�Vraii,lkdu play :nr l;r r Ile ff ~.t 4i Ra'lAld3hda vehicle equipped with medical �rid3rs ' PAnv nitflyulI LtA Scwm M' rn maar EA[nS �1' ' f af>rr a'i m EMERGENCY ACCESS Implementing emergency access points that are marked and maintained throughout a trail system is crucial. Along with these access points, there should also be an Emergency Rescue Plan in place that land managers and rescue departments can Implement in case of an emergency, The graphic below displays the proposed locations for emergency access points in the proposed Kessler Mountain trail system, DEVELOPING AN EMERGENCY RESCUE PLAN: Install "Safety Point" signs at proposed locations throughout the trail system featuring good access (e.g. ATV/Jeep roads), Each "Safety Point" sign should display a corresponding access point "u{Ilkul4 !O—Mf Aifilruf4 Doi . ur rnnr:+ =0 Lliamema OW hilt!Bl,"m%l number. 'm°" 151,' n= well as identify all access point Collaboration between City greater gr—, Parks and Recreation: staff and ,A'd! v -rra>•.,, 41 HHy emergency response staff (Fire, locations and conduct training nrd :thin-,�dn�tn nlr Police and EMS) should be Lna�.rdzehln d -k, ii, t— than conducted on-site to discuss *, -r lav, Is 1:a nr ;— Doi . ur rnnr:+ the Emergency Rescue Plan, as Max tsA' ` M." ,, 'm°" 151,' n= well as identify all access point g -cater greater gr—, hAlytl -Trkq h>;;h nr TTS%A'ht.h-„ locations and conduct training UnAraitinhEr llnaealdahla Lna�.rdzehln d -k, ii, t— than AMEX M, ,bkt..r:rt nintattr. runs. Special products can be 6- t:Hr W rM, 1S" Wi - "m IV tail o• gcratm, purchased, such as a wheeled Avc,:Erl.•Ir ,Aoc. dr. ule Aua�zi�lr nmr.m .n»rap n.r..ler r-. may nh,.Iw,, .r -ay back board for back Country trail I- he yarexFnt rescue, In addilian to a utility 1Jn�Vraii,lkdu play :nr l;r r AM1.ay �nclin+.a vehicle equipped with medical 2d• ne IVlifr' ' gear. 'TT't . 4-.ryh nr Li—aldahl5 bna:. A.bl, k+4t midir ryl b-19"+ h;idjr d*rt k i”. g"rmfs: 24" m Zvi z -a JA' or narre.~-, 41,a+` f': flit hAlytl -Trkq h>;;h nr TTS%A'ht.h-„ I—, +; idllq of grvatnr, `n dtn al d -k, ii, t— than Berk i, 1!? Ihr —ighr unfsndirtahlc Sf+-arfanrfir.nt M1lSrtn.ytirrrinna ,61r,ia "ill"ia 72 1 Chapter 10: M Dispatch is informed of the Emergency Rescue Plan and has a reference map in case of emergency. Users are to be informed of the Emergency Rescue Plan at all trailheads, MAINTENANCEAND INSPECTION Maintenance and Inspection (M&I) will vary depending on the facility being maintained. A typical single-track trail, for instance, will vary in maintenance needs depending on the landscape supporting the trail. Therefore, there is no single plan that can fit all facilities. It will be the land manager's responsibility to determine the best plan of action relative to the trail's accessibility, amount of use, and intended level of difficulty. Maintenance Overview: For general maintenance needs, the best approach is adoption of the park or facility by a volunteer group, such as a local cycling club, hiking organization, nature club, etc. This is the primary policy of IMBA and should be encouraged by every community. This type of community buy -in is priceless and integral to the success of the facility through increase user involvement. However, it j11 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan General Trail Maintenance Recommendations: • Create a Comprehensive Maintenance/Risk Management Plan. • Designate one land manager/city employee as - "Trails Supervisor". He/She will be responsible for executing the maintenance and risk management plan. This is not a full-time position. They will primarily perform routine inspections (weekly) on all trails, conduct simple maintenance tasks; help facilitate events, and communicate with the local volunteer group. • Keep maintenance and inspection log with routine inspections of all features. * Create a partnership with the local club. Most local clubs become stewards of the park, performing the overall maintenance of the facility under the guidance of the "Trails Supervisor". A well -organized club should be able to perform 90% of minor maintenance needs before they advance into a major maintenance need. is important that the stewards of the facility -are • well organized and trained. They must be directed by at least one knowledgeable trail builder in order to properly maintain the facility. It is also recommended that a maintenance log be kept in order to keep track of volunteer hours. Inspection Overview: Inspection is to be conducted by the managers of the facility (i.e. city staff) since it is ultimately their responsibility. Inspectors should be trained by a professional trail builder and required to keep an inspection log. This is particularly important for the inspection of Technical Trail Features. Inspectors need to know what safety hazards to look for and how to repair them. Some major maintenance and inspection needs for the trail system can be beyond the expertise of the land manager or local volunteer groups, therefore professional services can be sought. All wooden trail features should have a life span of approximately twenty years if built. using the proper materials and techniques, and maintained properly (i.e. sealed annually). All wooden features should be inspected routinely and TTF's should be given extra care, specifically fall zones and approaches. • Trail tread should be groomed to ensure that it maintains 5% outslope. The most common problem is cupping of the tread due to displacement and compaction, in which case, you must de -berm the downside of the trail to ensure that water sheet flows across, Also, knick (open Fan-like drainage) the troughs of all grade reversals. • Trim corridor regularly. Sight lines are especially important. • Estimated Maintenance Budget-. $5-20k annually (depending on the need for trail), Professional maintenance services could range from $.25 per foot to $1.00 per foot for an overhaul. Chapter 10: -. , Msl, «; ', .,.. t , ., .... 73 Kessler. MOUntain.Tr ifs Mister Pf e� la ' 7� h qyy�3 °y. ,•�% SC,, n �". f'"'7e� tea' :it�i� �- .�jP �tL X;�a�� ,:""��f yT-o"7 g r ;jnasing Pian a _ I gudgp't Y _ t .� _ I Y _ t .� S �7 3 OVERVIEW This chapter outlines the phasing plan for the improvements to the existing trail system, proposed additions, and a construction budget, PHASING PLAN The implementation of this plan and the proceeding recommendations are contingent upon funding and other approvals. All construction could be implemented at once or could take place over the course of years. Below are the recommendations in , order of priority from Progressive Trail Design. Initial Efforts Private Property-. Since use of existing trails on private property are critical to the design of the overall trail system, a primary recommendation of this plan is for the City to initiate contact with affected property owners to begin discussions on approved use of these corridors. This effort will be required before other alternative connections are further developed. Final use of private corridors will be based on acquisitions or agreements approved through the City Attorney's Office. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Connector Trail: see following page for description Chapter 11: F ,s_ ar,! 3u s;r 75 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Existing Trail: Aside from approved use of private property, the highest priority is to improve the existing trail system by implementing the recommendations outlined in Chapter Seven: Existing Trails. Since the opening of Kessler Mountain as a public park, there has been a substantial increase in the volume of trail traffic. Because of this increase in use, much damage has been caused to the trail and adjacent area. Additionally, the trails were not designed for the high-level of use they are receiving now, Many segments of the trail are poorly aligned, have bad sight lines, or intersect in poor locations. It is important to address these areas as soon as possible to mitigate user conflict and ensure safety and sustainability. Finally, many parts of the trail system need sustainable standards reapplied with the consideration of "trail flow". This plan recommends doing this in a way that enhances the system and in no way detracts from the natural character and technicality of the trail tread and the backcountry trail experience that Kessler Mountain is known for. Signage: Due to the high traffic and the fact that Kessler Mountain is now a public park, it is important that a good signage and wayfinding system is put in place. Signage is needed to easily interpret location, manage risk, and educate the public on the ecologically sensitive areas of Kessler Mountain, Existing signs have been recently nstalled by volunteers. It is recommended that the Northwest Arkansas Soft Surface Signage Plan be implemented, as this is the new standard for all !oca' soft surface trail systems in Northwest Arkansas. In addition, trail etiquette and educational signage should be installed as soon as oossible. Please refer to Chapter 10: Signage and Risk Management for more information. Connector Trail: There is one connector trail recommended for immediate construction. This trail is necessary to connect the baseball parking lot (acting as the temporary trailhead until the main trailhead is constructed) to the top of the mountain near the water towers. This trail would likely consist of segments of the blue and green trails, 76 1 Chapter 11: 1'' .gig & r. Final Design: Final GPS and flagged trail alignment on all new proposed trails will be necessary in order to plan and prepare future trails to be constructed. Please refer to the section, later in this chapter, entitled Implementation of New Trails for more information. Beginner Loop & Lower Bluff Trails (Green & Blue) These trails would add an element of skill progression in the system and provide access for a variety of users, therefore they should be constructed as soon as possible. Please refer to Chapter 8: Proposed Trails to see a description of these trails and for more information about the purpose of these trails_ East Bluff Trail As mentioned in the previous chapter, this trail has the potential to be one of the most popular trails on the mountain due to its location along the top of the bluff line and proximity to the trailhead. However, due to similarity in style to the eight miles of existing trail, this is not a trail -type that is as much of a priority as the other new proposed trails. Paved Active Transportation Trail and Regional Park Trail Loop These trails will be developed in conjunction with the Regional Park development. IMPLEMENTATION OF NEW TRAILS As previously mentioned, all new trails are conceptual in alignment. Prior to the construction of any trail, tf e proposed final route would be center -line flagged with some allowable deviation for adjustment during construction. All trail alignments will be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department to ensure that they are aligned in a sustainable fashion and avoid any sensitive areas. Final trail designs may change in character or alignment at the time of development in order to address current user needs or unforeseen factors. x■6�s5j�r Mountain Trails Master Plan 110. Ott - r s f. Kessler Active Transportation Connections R a•r - Chapter 11:-5igoage and Risk Management Mt. Kessler Trail Connections .re_N� Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan To Bentonville Drake St par v m Olt -Me $I C*R!4 Mt. Kessler Future Regional Park Legend Proposed Mt. Kessler Multi -use Trail Connections Razorback Regional Greenway Existing Multi -use Trail 4` % Walker Par fiu� 5-1 g S ii. IT— i Miles 2 Appendix A: Exist o n o idfie,, a nd Ria r 79 3 104 APA 0 0 %4.- Town h Traj,l 0 0 Cato 46 Mt. Kessler Future Regional Park Legend Proposed Mt. Kessler Multi -use Trail Connections Razorback Regional Greenway Existing Multi -use Trail 4` % Walker Par fiu� 5-1 g S ii. IT— i Miles 2 Appendix A: Exist o n o idfie,, a nd Ria r 79 *r Movptaln Trails. Master Plan Ott, 4!� x IN) Appendix Public input W M. ai A& slur,.- .�"f JNI P Chapferll-, Si&oqe and Risk Management It - . re, C. 7 Ast,.,, P Chapferll-, Si&oqe and Risk Management It - . re, C. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan �y�r Kessler Mountain Trail Master Plan Public Meeting Comment Sheet Summary The most common opinion of the public, that left comment sheets, is to not disturb or add construction to the preserve area where the exiting trails are. All the comments had different focuses, but most all stated that there should be no paved trail near the existing trails and to protect and preserve the natural area. The following are reoccurring public opinions from the Kessler Mountain Trail Master Plan Meeting held on August 31St, 2015. • No paved trails in the Kessler Mountain natural preserve area. • Identify and preserve the unique geographical habitat in the natural preserve area. • Adopt a comprehensive maintenance plan for the existing trails. • Address problem sections of trail and reroute with foot traffic in mind. ■ Information on trails condition/skill level and system to control wet weather trail traffic. • No new trails in preserve area. • Keep existing trails as is. • Add new beginner/intermediate level trails and build them away from the preserve area. Appendix B: Duk,hr i. ,.1-: 1 81 je-N Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan r BiteKESSILFR MOUNTAIN TRAILS 0 AJUG�AT 201 ImeT c � y,.} ., ."" 0 ARKANSAS 44(i .w, 82 1 Appendix B: } PUBLIC INPUT MEETING #1 To find a creative and fun for gather public input, Alta Planning + Design put together a photo booth where indivivuals could display the type of user group they identified with in regards le'N Kessler Mountain Trails Master Planer to activity at Kessler Mountain. Options users could choose from were hiking, ,mountain biking, nature watching, photographing, educational user, mountain climbing, ad people watching. H �r Appendix B; P_,; 83 ` Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan ` 84 1 Appendix B:.' /`�^ n Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Kessler Mountain Trail Master Plan Public Meeting Comment Sheet Summary There were only a few public comment forms received from the Kessler Mountain Public Meeting. In most of the forms there was repeated appreciation of protecting the sensitive areas and ability to accommodate to city and public input. The following are reoccurring public opinions from the Kessler Mountain Trail Master Plan Meeting held on December 14th, 2015. • Approval of varying skill level of new proposed trails. • Approval of protecting and rerouting current trails to avoid sensitive areas. • No paved trail. • Reroute current trails or design new trails more hiker friendly. • Concerns of maintaining current and new trails. Who will do it and how much will it cost... • Approval of proposed reroutes of existing trails and new trails. • Kessler Mountain needing directional downhill mountain bike technical trail. • The need for the City of Fayetteville to embrace the progressive movement and encourage mountain biking/outdoor recreation. • Protect the current trails and become more aggressive in developing outdoor recreation. The following are reoccurring public questions from the Kessler Mountain Trail Master Plan: • How will the signage be done? • Will there be signage on the trails difficultly levels? • Who and how will the trails be maintained? • How will the sensitive areas be protected? • How will safety concerns be addressed? n Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan PUBLIC INPUT SURVEY Q7: The City is rurr+entiyInthe process of constructing a new Reg tonal Park, which is to be located direcilly east of Kessler Mountain, would you combine youractivities at Kessler Mountain with those offered at the new Regional Park? ,Answvm& Ilii SR)ped; i v- an 1W %W r - Cil; The City is currently in the process of constructing a new Regional mark, which is to be located directly eastof Kessler Mountain, would you combine youractivities at Kessler Mountain with th ase offered at the new Regional Park? AnFwi'red, 151 Skovvet 1 ` RIta FTt�v. it - � Aihwre S PwvK.► Rr�Pjx�4+s . rrsr. Prr��1 #S1 86 1 Appendix 8; Public Input H Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan, Q8: Of the following examples, what Bio you feel is important to maintain/create In terms of space for activities at Kessler Mountain? Ans*ered: 15E Upped:1 r alt Very !#1 %1at%*M NUU40 fW tats wl-w ., {�+I'�4� �fd 1 �-- 1lYet,M lath ft"POWUM Aaal "�iK'w a...•,. i��x� till i', iSt`. 9-atr'$ tiz l pwhinl Area,* t rA.l :#raaa t`9E A`NE, 0 Cllft** Com"WICIA rYa+n,J , -A.V. Wo nes A", lot alMl LsAlN4,y P44kve afore 1 %Upp441 CarEtplIV ftallVtf IMafMH untoft-O W4 appoltwa welkin_. A"d— Open— lyerd_ DOW, .210168., Iglitytae» ': at4 e,144ttaf!! � 2 r*c�etora tie.t� Yf I� I'M 1'w' rs Q8. Of the fallowing examples, what Cho you feet is important to maintain/create in terms of space for activities at Kessler Mountain? Arr.n;3red 151 SkjppodX Very !#1 %1at%*M NUU40 fW tats wl-w ., {�+I'�4� �fd 1 �-- 1lYet,M lath ft"POWUM Aaal "�iK'w a...•,. i��x� till i', iSt`. 9-atr'$ 1-fx, rYa+n,J , -A.V. Wo Alt" (4 tsf."r l Will 'ffy17`i ?#-�l`.1 14 -ice• 72,J"a '.•u.. r.,:Y Tudi,'5. ,.. 5,CJ0'• t:-44% ,•tn,tr .r.: cNrz..aYfr.t�i . .aa a. •-.. •rt�r ;,moo: r/4iiY� W,"al,+p +suW fri , , J/,�1 :J1 iSat IRYJ•f.J, L.J��i t=ti`` Wa:#'w VIV s•:!f.i'J^�?7•'/ tiaras.. .�„racsc ev.ns J.JJti #cr- t'"M •raauaw ea.^r� tai ' Appendix B:: ,, ,I c Ir:p It 1 87 13 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan C19: What activity would encourage you to visit Kessler Mountain? Please select all that apply. Answemd 151 Skipped I -e�N alta T1,17VIrevi Ile 14 Q9: Whatactivity would encourage you to visit Kessler Mountain? Please select all that apply. AnsmrveO: 151 Skippea I low ur. A-54. :�9rRMwndtNl; 1S1 88 1 Appendix B: Pi,k Ir -...pr;:! 11 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan +QIO: in your opinion, what are the most important benefits and uses of a natural surface trail system? Please select all that apply. Ansrvred t,kperrt;I's'', alta N—1"kn Lv*tu*. MMj Md NrOAw W MSA" clNdflksl,.,tr: 11MN .0 'rn—rv4-0. N,rrK/ILr[,fr 1 r1inMi,N� irnl l yffjr r.AFnlM. WOP �Vwl �Ir! QIO: In your opinion, what are the most important benefits and uses of a natural surface trail system? Please select all that apply. ,,r��aV�, An�� m,,w 951 Skipped 1 '` �' _ `"F a p , . , BitIT Appendix B: PtUlbic _. 89 r,� r,_33.5 � •rw. P113'9 ..•rn,s�, 1'.,•tirt, s •-.••Yi IVH/+fY {'-L Nlrn Jr'=f+I L+4k!'+4�:AT' ��4•`a Fr:...�:.. sprt.aerr.+ur•-n ?1.4A`: 7 ur. =Y.m Azo r�flr(+Ar►n `� 1: ��� TSrl�1 !:r F{,undrsri. - 141 Appendix B: PtUlbic _. 89 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Q11: Would a unique natural environment attract you to Kessler Mountain? An?,wered: 151 SWpped I fA,"N, alta if.. Q1' - Would a unique natural environment attract you to Kessler Mountain? An%wvrd,J:161 site 90 1 Appendix B: PtAliic Inpl-i I. Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan Q12: What type of trails would you like to see more of at Kessler Mountain? Please select all that apply. An,,wemd, 151 Skipped I I ltjtva* "Al%ft-v W"OL*n4 1111tonj matiorm RiIIUHi bro-ow NOMId lit .1jo"04 Q12: What type of trails would you like to see -more of at Kessler Mountain? Please select all that apply. Ans"md W Skipped. I tile 4 V. k . , ft-workedv —We Appendix B: Irqrl:-;' 1 91 13 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan QU: When using Pressler Mountain as ,a recreational amenity, which user group do you most identify with? Please select only one. lAASWOFM 151 %opea 1 alae tiy MA R't. . rNMor [= WA 014 When using Kessler fountain as a recreational amenity, which user group do you most identify with? Please select only one. an:;3,, .•d: 159 s►paa 1 1.4.d 92 1 Appendix B: }alalic Lr:wt rsr essier Mountain Trails Master PlanAV 14 14-1 �r Appendix C: Species o Conservation Concern e. ti• i� ti , t �r �1 Chapter 11. Signage and Risk Management l f � %>y,.1 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan m� Ira is are c mingsw on access to private property 94 1 Appendix C:' FB.tfA1fiNIW1E iRdVf 3ll,Y —.F -—INUAHY KE55LFR341[]UN'rp,r�.ry7 r - r r fS � Q r rr 0 o•d o a r 94 1 Appendix C:' FB.tfA1fiNIW1E iRdVf 3ll,Y —.F -—INUAHY KE55LFR341[]UN'rp,r�.ry7 } f „ •1 Kessler Mountain Trails Master Plan ,„„, LEGENDNOTE: ALLTRAIL LENGTHS AND ALIGNMENTS ARE APPROXIMATE ,A%aY f EXISTING TRAILS BIKING ALLOWED 6 Miles (Within Park Boundary) © BEGINNER LOOP �EI RESTROOMS 999 11000%600 1.5 Miles (4'WIDE) �# PARKING AREA ,; C7 LOWER BLUFFTRAIL `e0N.Je 3.4 Miles (2'-3'WIDE) ABANDONEDTRAILS ®®® EAST BLUFF TRAIL ®® ® 1.7 Miles (1 8"-2'WIDE) �] FUTURE PAVEDTRAILS \ Proposed by the City of Fayetteville 0000„ � TRAIL REROUTES 0 1 Mile PAVED TRAILS -PROPOSED Proposed by City of Fayetteville ECOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT r AREAS AND HABITATS r r I I SHALEBARRENS BLUFFS \, OLD GROWTH POST OAK WOODLAND RIPARIAN HABITAT Information taken from Arkansas Natural rr Heritage Commission. Ecological Assessment prepared by Theo Witsell on February 2015 REGIONAL PARK KESSLER MOUNTAIN SPECIES OF - JUDGE CUMMINGS ROAD CONSERVATION CONCERN PLAN o The areas noted on the plan .are species of « - conservation concern at Kessler Mountain. �� oR These species are located per the Arkansas — Natural Heritage Commission and the Ecological Vn h Assessment prepared bt Theo Witsell on February 1 f R4 6 2015. Special care will be administer When flagging, laying -out, and constructing trail near these areas. Potential Secondary Parking &Trailhead !�Ilk Appendix C: _c es ow--”' c 95 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas - Budget Adjustment Form (Legistar) Budget Year Division /0rg2 PARKS & RECREATION (520) 2017 Adjustment Number I Requestor: Alan Bearden I BUDGET ADJUSTMENT DESCRIPTION / JUSTIFICATION: . The Walton Family Foundation approved the City's application for a grant (2016-1465) in the amount of $210,000 for the construction of Kessler Mountain Nature Trails. This grant requires a 50:50 match. The City's portion of the project (equal $210,000 match) will utilize the funds in projects 14031.1 ($60,349 - Sales Tax) and 16010.1 ($150,000 - Parks Development). C:\Users\Ismifh\AppData\Roaming\L5\Temp\eO23c716-901d-4831-9fOf-d847e4402958 1 of 1 COUNCIL DATE: 2/7/2017 LEGISTAR FILE ID#: 2017-0034 Li,kHutdvew 1/20/2017 2:34 PM Budget Director Date TYPE.- YPE:DESCRIPTION: DESCRIPTION: GLDATE: RESOLUTION/ORDINANCE POSTED: TOTAL 210,000 210,000 v.20161220 Increase / (Decrease) Project.Sub# Account Number Expense Revenue Project Sub AT Account Name 2250.520.9255-4305.00 210,000 16010 1701 RE Commercial Grants - Commercial Grants 2250.520.9255-5210.00 5,000 - 16010 1701 EX Minor Equipment -: 2250.520.9255-5301.00 500 - 16010 1701 EX Public Notification - 2250.520.9255-5315.00 198,500 - 16010 1701 EX Contract Services - : 2250.520.9255-5806.00 6,000 16010 1701 EX Park Improvements - Park Improvements C:\Users\Ismifh\AppData\Roaming\L5\Temp\eO23c716-901d-4831-9fOf-d847e4402958 1 of 1