Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORDINANCE 58980, caxF rrE 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Ordinance: 5898 File Number: 2016-0375 RZN 16-5501 (1030 S. COLLEGE AVE./K. SMITH): 1111�111111111 III 1111111111111111111111111111111111191N111111111i1111114II11111 Doc ID: 017054230003 Type: REL Kind: ORDINANCE Recorded: 09/09/2016 at 09:20:5$ AM Fee Amt: $25.00 page 1 of 3 Washington County, AR Kyle }Sylvester Circuit Clerk File2016-00026315 AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 16- 5501 FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES LOCATED AT 1030 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE FROM NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO NS, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby changes the zone classification of the property shown on the map (Exhibit A) and the legal description (Exhibit B) both attached to the Planning Department's Agenda Memo from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to NS, Neighborhood Services. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1. PASSED and APPROVED on 8/16/2016 Approved: rRF�l i', mac'; FAYETTEVILLE; Attest: +% `'�• `�: fNG T ON Sondra E. Smith, City Clerk Treasurer Page 1 Printed on 8117116 16-5501 EXHIBIT 'A' RZN 16-5501 Close Up View P-1 Legend Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Trail (Proposed) Building Footprint K. SMITH 9TiH ST IU u c� a 11 TH ST 12TH ST Feet 0 75 150 300 450 600 1 inch = 200 feet NORTH Rs]. -Ix RSF-18 Downtown General Neighborhood Conservation P-1 16-5501 EXHIBIT 'B' 1030 S College Ave Property Legal Description Lot 23 and 24 in Block 2 of Glenwood Park Addition to the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, as per plat on record in the office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex-Officio Recorder of Washington County, Arkansas. Washington County, AR I certify this instrument was filed on 09/09/2016 09:20, M and recorded in Real E tate File Number 1,6-000 5 Kyle 5ylvest r ircui rk- by City of Fayetteville Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street - - Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Text File File Number: 2016-0375 Agenda Date: 8/16/2016 Version: 1 Status: Passed In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Ordinance Agenda Number: C. 4 RZN 16-5501 (1030 S. COLLEGE AVE./K. SMITH): AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 16-5501 FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES LOCATED AT 1030 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE FROM NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO NS, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby changes the zone classification of the property shown on the map (Exhibit A) and the legal description (Exhibit B) both attached to the Planning Department's Agenda Memo from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to NS, Neighborhood Services. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 Printed on 8/1712016 Legistar ID No.: .2JI & - D _? 7 5 AGENDA REQUEST FORM FOR: Council Meeting of August 16, 2016 FROM: City Council Member Sarah Marsh ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION TITLE AND SUBJECT: AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 16-5501 FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES LOCATED AT 1030 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE FROM NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO NS, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES APPROVED FOR AGENDA: _ v i City C ncii Me r arsh Date Yb VI� � {fie/fM City Attorney Kit Williams Date (as to form) Mulford, Patti From: Smith, Sondra Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 12:14 PM To: Mulford, Patti; Williams, Kit; Pennington, Blake Cc: Branson, Lisa; Smith, Lorinda; Smith, Sondra; Pate, Jeremy; Garner, Andrew Subject: FW: Request Attachments: 1030_Rezone_Checklist.pdf Agenda Request for today from Sarah Marsh. From: Marsh, Sarah Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 11:48 AM To: Smith, Sondra <ssmith@fayetteville-ar.gov> Subject: Fw: Request Sondra, I would like to walk on this rezoning request at our Agenda Session tonight due to a time crunch on the part of the applicant. What do I need to do to make this happen? Thanks, Sarah Marsh, bARCH, LEED AP BD+C Vice Mayor I City Council Member, Ward 1, Position 2 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas wardl pos2@favetteville-ar.gov 1479.799.0393 From: Sarah Marsh <sarahemarsh@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 9, 2016 11:43 AM To: Marsh, Sarah Subject: Fwd: Request ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Keaton Smith <kwsnnith1200@gmail.conn> Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:20 PM Subject: Request To: Sarah Marsh <sarahemarsh@gmail.com> Sarah, Tonight, our rezone request for 1030 S College passed the Planning Commission 7-1. Due to time constraints, I'm writing to request that you "walk on" our rezone request to the City Council agenda session tomorrow night, August 9th. Our office tenant, Artist Laboratory Theatre, would like to move in September 1st. This date coincides with the beginning of their FY 17 budget. In addition. Artist Laboratory Theatre plans to have two yoga studios as sub- tenants, and both sub -tenants would like to move in on September 1st. For these reasons, I respectfully request that you consider walking our rezone request on to tomorrow night's agenda session. I've attached our rezone request checklist that was submitted to City Planning. We feel the rezone from Neighborhood Conservation to Neighborhood Services is appropriate for several reasons: • It is consistent with the historical use of the property (it has always been a church) • It does not increase the intensity of the use • An informal Facebook survey showed overwhelming demand for small-scale commercial use of the building • The adjacent property owners are comfortable with the proposed zoning district and proposed use • The building has never been residential, and would require substantial renovation to make it residential • Changing the site to residential would reduce diversity of the neighborhood and sacrifice the historic character and charm of the building • The Walker Park Neighborhood Master Plan calls for a diversity of uses • City Plan 2030 calls for infill, revitalization and the promotion of traditional town form, such as mid - block commercial use If I can provide any additional information, please do not hesitate to call or email me. I appreciate your service and your consideration of this request. Keaton 479-879-7922 Sarah Marsh, bArch, LEED AP Tanglewood Fashion & Lifestyle Custom Apparel I Design Services 479.799.0393 1 sarahCd)studioTanalewood.com CITY OF Ta v yvetteville CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO ARKANSAS MEETING OF AUGUST 16, 2016 TO: Mayor, Fayetteville City Council THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Harry Davis, Planner DATE: August 9, 2016 SUBJECT: RZN 16-5501: Rezone (1030 S. COLLEGE AVE./K. SMITH, 563): Submitted by KEATON SMITH for property at 1030 S. COLLEGE AVE. The property is zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains approximately 0.17 acres. The request is to rezone the property to NS, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of an ordinance to rezone the properties from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to NS, Neighborhood Services as shown in the attached Exhibits 'A' and 'B'. Staff has recommended against said ordinance. BACKGROUND: The subject property of 0.17 acres is located at 1030 S. College Ave. The parcel is zoned NC, Neighborhood Conservation. The property is currently developed with a 1,400 sq. ft. building with a gravel drive and parking lot in the back. The property has historically been used as a site for various churches and the building was last occupied by Fayetteville Christadelphia Ecclesia. Request: The applicant's request is to rezone the parcel from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to NS, Neighborhood Services to allow for a flexible office and studio space. Public Comment: Two long-time residents of the neighborhood called the Planning Division on August 8 to speak against the rezoning. They explained to staff that that commercial uses in a residential neighborhood were incompatible to their homes and would create problems based on intensity inherent in commercial properties and uses. They attended the previous church at this address and discussed that it was a very small, local congregation that primarily walked to the building on Sundays with little impact to the neighborhood. Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is consistent in terms of form -based development to the north, east, and south. The immediately surrounding properties are single-family, detached residences, which could coexist with a greater range of housing types and some limited business permitted by -right in NS. A rezoning to NS could allow the subject property to be redeveloped with higher densities and in a form -based pattern that fits development in adjacent Downtown and Walker Park neighborhoods. The kind of uses permitted in NS, such as single-, two-, and three- family; limited business; and home occupations, are relatively compatible with current uses in the surrounding neighborhood. Limited business ensures that developing large commercial buildings Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 could not happen under this rezone. However, non-residential uses and more intense development patterns within a predominantly single-family neighborhood should generally be encouraged in corner locations and edges of the neighborhood. Proposing to insert a commercial use mid -block and surrounded by single-family homes on three sides introduces the potential for incompatible land uses due to noise, light, traffic, and solid waste disposal that are more intense than the abutting properties. Land Use Plan Analysis: The proposed zoning is generally incompatible with the Walker Park Neighborhood Master Plan, which calls for preservation of single-family homes for this particular area of Walker Park. Allowing businesses to be located in the middle of this residential block, disconnected and outside the proximity of other commercial or office uses, could be seen as compromising the integrity of the Walker Park Neighborhood Plan goals. The plan particularly notes places at Southgate Commercial Center, the intersection of School & 15th, Jefferson Square, and along Huntsville Rd. as places to grow commercial nodes and streets. The rest of the neighborhood was primarily rezoned and intended to encourage a range and mix of housing types. Planning Division believes that the applicant's intention of developing this site for non-residential use could be better addressed in a Conditional Use Permit under current NC zoning. Furthermore, the site can be practically and appropriately used under said zoning. DISCUSSION: On August 8, 2016, Planning Division staff recommended against a rezone, stating that the rezone would not be in line with the Walker Park Neighborhood Plan and would be incompatible to adjoining properties. Planning Commission disagreed, stating that such development would be traditional in town -form and within the historical character of Walker Park neighborhoods. Planning Commission ultimately forwarded the applicant's request for a rezoning to NS on the subject property. A motion by Commissioner Autry, seconded by Commissioner Quinlan, to forward the proposal to the City Council with a recommendation for approval was made with a vote of 8-1-0. Commissioner Brown dissented, agreeing with Planning Division staff on their recommendation. BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: N/A Attachments: ■ Exhibit A ■ Exhibit B ■ Application ■ Planning Commission Staff Report CITY UFO FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS REZONING FOR STAFF USE ONLY 4 FEE: $325.00 Date Application Submitted: Sign: Fee: $5.00 Date Accepted as Complete: S-T-R: Case / Appeal Number: PP#: Public Hearing Date: Zone: Please fill out this form completely, supplying all necessary information and documentation to support your request. Your application will not be placed on the Planning Commission agenda until this information is furnished. Application Indicate one contact person for this request: �< Applicant Representative Applicant (person making request): Representative (engineer, surveyor, realtor, etc.): Name: I66 OY-� !yn,f� Name: Address: -1 + �y Phone: (q79) q76l - 7gzz Fax: Address: Phone: Fax: Site Address / Location: 1030 s� tA/l gA e �Gtil� 172 � ' ,I �{ Ak i2 741 Current Zoning District: e j ✓k("Qt-e,n9equested Zoning District: i � t't" efs Assessor's Parcel Number(s) for subject property: 6 s ��Z — i�co FINANCIAL INTERESTS The following entities and I or p ple have Financial interest in this project: March 2014 Page I APPLICANT/REPRESENTATIVE: I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements and answers herein made all data, information, and evidence herewith submitted are in all respects, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true and correct. I understand that submittal of incorrect or false information is grounds for invalidation of application completeness, determination, or approval. i understand that the City might not approve what I am applying for, or might set conditions on approval. PROPERTY OWNER(S) /AUTHORIZED AGENT: I/we certify under penalty of perjury that] am/we are the owner(s) of the property that is the subject of this application and that I/we have read this application and consent to its filing. (If signed by the authorized agent, a letter from each property owner must be provided indicating that the agent is authorized to act on his/her behalf) Property Owners of Record (attach additional info if necessary): Name (printed): h Pi Address: f> Si tn.alirc: 1 / 'phone: Date: Namc ( rimed): r ell,_ f Address: S Signature: t V,,-wL- Phone: Mile: i VOID Rezoning Checklist: Attach the following items to this application: (1) Payment in full of applicable fees for processing the application: $325.00 application fee $5.00 public notification sign fee (2) A legal description of the property to be rezoned. A survey may be required if the property description can not accurately be platted or if it is described by referring to other deeds. (3) CD containing a copy of the legal description in MS Word and all required submittal items should be also included on the CD in PDF format. (4) A copy of the county parcel map from the Washington County Assessor's office or from the Washington County website (wwwxo.washington.ae, . The subject property and all adjacent parcels should be identified on this parcel map. The owner's name, official mailing address, and the parcel number for every adjacent property shall be shown on this map. Murch 2014 Page 2 CITY OF Ta%ym I I e ARKANSAS TO: THRU: FROM: MEETING DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO City of Fayetteville Planning Commission Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Harry Davis, Planner August 8, 2016 UPDATED FOR PC RESULTS SUBJECT: RZN 16-5501: Rezone (1030 S. College Ave./K. Smith, 563): Submitted by KEATON SMITH for property at 1030 S. COLLEGE AVE. The property is zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION, containing approximately 0.17 acres total. The request is to rezone the properties to NS, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of RZN 16-5501. BACKGROUND: The subject property of 0.17 acres is located at 1030 S. College Ave. The parcel is zoned NC, Neighborhood Conservation. The property is currently developed with a 1,400 sq. ft. building. The property has historically been used as a site for various churches and the building was last occupied by Fayetteville Christadelphia Ecclesia. Surrounding land use and zoning is depicted on Table 1. Table 1 Surroundin Land Use and Zoning Direction from Site Land Use Zoning North Single-family Residential NC, Neighborhood Conservation South I Single-family Residential NC, Neighborhood Conservation East Single-family Residential NC, Neighborhood Conservation West Fayetteville Senior Center P-1, Institutional Request: The request is to rezone the parcel from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to NS, Neighborhood Services to allow for a flexible office and studio space. Public Comment: No public comment has been received. Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: The subject parcel has access to S. College Ave, a partially improved two-lane Collector street with sidewalk on the west side. Street improvements would be determined at time of development. Water: Public water is available to the site. A 6" water main runs along South College. Sewer: Public sewer is available to the site. A 6" sewer main runs along South College. Drainage: Any additional improvements or requirements for drainage would be determined at time of development. Fire: The Fire Department did not express any concerns with the request. Police: The Police Department did not express any concerns with this request. CITY PLAN 2030 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: City Plan 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates this site as a Complete Neighborhood Plan: Walker Park Neighborhood. A central goal of the plan was to preserve single-family neighborhoods while encouraging additional housing types and a mix of uses. A digital copy of select pages from the plan has been provided separately. Walker Park neighborhood adopted a plan in 2008. That plan states that the neighborhood should have a balance of non-residential uses and housing. Stakeholders wanted zoning and other city regulations to reflect and encourage that balance while conserving the existing single-family fabric where it is intact. This means the neighborhood will retain and develop a variety of housing types for different income levels and retain and develop neighborhood commercial nodes that serve the neighborhood residents as well as the nearby employment centers. There is also an emphasis on connectivity and walkability. Connection of the street grid and improved pedestrian mobility between key destinations will unify the neighborhood, making it sustainable over time. Third, creating Jefferson Square as a core of the neighborhood will help to preserve some of the rich history embedded in the Jefferson Building and create a neighborhood center. Last, accessible greenspace in the form of community gardens throughout the neighborhood and additional uses and access points to Walker Park will capitalize on existing resources within the neighborhood and provide function and beauty for both residents and visitors. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF 1. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is consistent in terms of form - based development to the north, east, and south. The immediately surrounding properties are single-family, detached residences, which could coexist with a greater range of housing types and some limited business permitted by -right in NS. A rezoning to NS could allow the subject property to be redeveloped with higher densities and in a form -based pattern that fits development in adjacent Downtown and Walker Park neighborhoods. The kind of uses permitted in NS, such as single-, two-, and three-family; limited business; and home occupations, are relatively compatible with current uses in the surrounding neighborhood. Limited business ensures that developing large commercial buildings could not happen under this rezone. However, 2 G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2016\Development Review\16- 5501 RZN 1030 S. College Ave. (K. Smith) 563 non-residential uses and more intense development patterns within a predominantly single-family neighborhood should generally be encouraged in corner locations and edges of the neighborhood. Proposing to insert a commercial use mid -block and surrounded by single-family homes on three sides introduces the potential for incompatible land uses due to noise, light, traffic, and solid waste disposal that are more intense than the abutting properties. Land Use Plan Analysis: The proposed zoning is generally incompatible with the Walker Park Neighborhood Master Plan, which calls for preservation of single-family homes for this particular area of Walker Park. Allowing businesses to be located in the middle of this residential block, disconnected and outside the proximity of other commercial or office uses, could be seen as compromising the integrity of the Walker Park Neighborhood Plan goals. The plan particularly notes places at Southgate Commercial Center, the intersection of School & 1511, Jefferson Square, and along Huntsville Rd. as places to grow commercial nodes and streets. The rest of the neighborhood was primarily rezoned and intended to encourage a range and mix of housing types. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The applicant's intentions to create a flexible space for offices and studios using the existing building could be granted under the current NC zoning as a conditional use. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: The site has access to South College Avenue, so retail, commercial, or offices could appreciably increase traffic and congestion along South College. The parking lot for this parcel will likely be required to be improved with new development, as it is inadequate for substantial numbers of visitors and workers. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: Rezoning the property from NC to NS would not increase the load on public services as the property is too small to have a significant -enough number of units. The density allowance of 10 units per acre does not change between NC and NS. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; 3 G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2016\Development Review\16- 5501 RZN 1030 S. College Ave. (K. Smith) 563 b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: Staff believes that the applicant's intention of developing this site for non- residential use could be better addressed in a Conditional Use Permit under current zoning. Furthermore, the site can be practically and appropriately used under the current NC zoning. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of RZN 16-5501 based on the findings discussed throughout this report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES (Date: August 8.2016 O Tabled )q Forwarded O Denied Motion: Autry MOTION TO FORWARD REZONE TO CITY COUNCIL, BROWN DISSENTING Second: Quinlan BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: None Attachments: ■ Unified Development Code sections 161.26 & 161.16 ■ Request letter ■ Rezone exhibit ■ One Mile Map ■ Close -Up Map ■ Current Land Use Map ■ Future Land Use Map ■ Walker Park Neighborhood Plan 4 G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2016\Development Review\16- 5501 RZN 1030 S. College Ave. (K. Smith) 563 CITY OF Fay% 711c ARKANSAS 161.26 Neighborhood Conservation PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO (A) Purpose The Neighborhood Conservation zone has the least activity and a lower density than the other zones. Although Neighborhood Conservation is the most purely residential zone, it can have some mix of uses, such as civic buildings. Neighborhood Conservation serves to promote and protect neighborhood character. For the purposes of Chapter 96: Noise Control, the Neighborhood Conservation district is a residential zone. (B) Uses. (1) Permitted uses Unit 1 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 41 Accessory dwellings (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 9 Two-family dwellin s Unit 10 Three-family dwellings Unit 12 Limited Business' Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 25 Offices. studios, and related services Unit 28 Center for collecting recyclable materials Unit 36 Wireless communication facilities Unit 44 Cottage Housing Development (C) Density. 10 Units Per Acre (D) Bulk and area regulations. (1) Lot width minimum. single Family 40 ft. Two Family 80 ft. Three Family 90 ft. (2) Lot area minimum. 4,000 Sq. Ft. (E) Setback regulations. Front A build -to zone that is located between the front property line and a line 25 ft. from the front property line. Side 5 ft Rear 5 ft Rear, from center line of 12 ft. an alley (F) Building height regulations. Buildin Hei ht Maximum 45 ft. (Ord. 5128, 4-15-08; Ord 5312, 4-20-10; Ord. 5462, 12-6-11; Ord. 5592, 6-18-13; Ord. 5664, 2-18-14) Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov Fayetteville, AR 72701 161.16 Neighborhood Services (A) Purpose. The Neighborhood Services district is designed to serve as a mixed use area of low intensity. Neighborhood Services promotes a walkable, pedestrian -oriented neighborhood development form with sustainable and complementary neighborhood businesses that are compatible in scale, aesthetics, and use with surrounding land uses. For the purpose of Chapter 96: Noise Control, the Neighborhood Services district is a residential zone. (B) Uses (1) Permitled uses Unit t City-wide uses by right Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 9 Two-fami!y dwellings Unit 10 Three-family dwellings Unit 12 Limited Business Unit 24 Home occu ations Unit 41 Accessory dwelling units Unit 44 Cottage Housing Development Note: Any combination of above uses is permitted upon any lot within this zone Conditional uses shall need approval when combined with pre -approved uses. (2) Conditional uses Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 5 Government Facilities Unit 13 Ealing laces Unit 15 Neighborhood shopping oods Unit 19 Commercial recreation, small sites Unit 25 Offices, studios and related services Unit 26 Multi -family dwellings Unit 36 Wireless communication facilities' Unit 40 Sidewalk cafes Unit 45 Small scale production (C) Density. 11 Units per acre 10 or less (D) Bulk and Area (1) Lot width minimum Sin le-fami) 35 feet Two-family 70 feet Three or more 90 feet All other uses None (2) Lot area minimum Sin le -family 4,000 s . ft. Two -tamely or more 3,000 sq. ft of lot area per dwellin2 unit All other permitted and conditional uses None (E) Setback regulations Front: A build -to zone that is located between 10 and 25 feet from the front ro ert line. Side 5 feet Rear 15 feet (F) Buildin h2i ht regulations. [Building Height Maximum 45 ft. (G) Building area On any lot, the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total area of the lot (Ord. 5312, 4-20-10; Ord. 5462, 12-6-11; Ord. 5592, 6-18-13; Ord. 5664, 2-18-14; Ord. 5735, 1-20-15) G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2015\Development Review\15-5240 RZN 2514 W. Lori Rd (Razorback Golf Course) \03 Planning Commission\01-25-2016\Comments and Redlines (5) Complete Written Description: 1030 S College (across the street from the City's new disc golf course in the Walker Park Neighborhood) was recently purchased by Keaton and Megan Smith (a). We are requesting a zoning change from Neighborhood Conservation to Neighborhood Services. As our economy evolves and more and more individuals are self-employed as "freelancers", the need for small, flexible, affordable office space is increasing. To meet this need, we propose a small-scale office and studio space for professionals. We are in discussions with several sole proprietors and non-profit organizations to lease space, including an architect, an artist, a graphic designer, a small non- profit with 2 staff members, and a real estate professional. The rezone request is needed for this commercial use (b). Public water and sewer lines are already tied to the existing building (d), and no construction projects are anticipated on the site that would significantly increase water or sewer impact. The proposed zoning would have no impact on schools, traffic danger, or congestion. (h) It would slightly increase density, which helps advance the City's goal to grow a livable transportation network. (c) The scale of the existing building is consistent with surrounding properties, and we have no plans to alter the scale of the building or add signage at this time. Parking is already arranged to the rear of the building. The nature of the proposed commercial use is not anticipated to increase traffic significantly. (g) Commercial and institutional use is not rare in the Walker Park neighborhood, or on South College. The closest example is the Fayetteville Senior Center, which is across the street and just north of the subject property. There are several other churches and commercial uses (the Metro Marketing Realty office and an auto shop, for example) in otherwise residential, midblock areas of South College. (e) The Walker Park Neighborhood Master Plan and City Plan 2030 both call for form -based zoning that allows for a variety of uses. The Walker Park Neighborhood Master Plan states that "maintaining and enhancing a balance of uses and housing in the Walker Park Neighborhood is a benefit to the neighborhood and to the City.... ensuring a balance of uses and housing contributes to the overall sustainability of the community by reducing the number of vehicle trips residents have to make in order to buy groceries or seek entertainment ... the existing infrastructure within the neighborhood such as streets, water and sewer lines as well as the area's proximity to Downtown creates an opportunity for residential and non-residential infill." (page 17) (f) The construction of the existing building makes it impractical for residential use. (i) We would like to preserve the building and it's historic character, while adding a light commercial use to the neighborhood. RZN 16-5501 Close Up View P-1 Legend Planning Area Fayetteville City Limits Trail (Proposed) Building Footprint K. SMITH 97H ST w 4 au 11TH 5T 12TH ST Feet 0 75 150 300 450 600 1 inch = 200 feet NORTH RSF-18 RSF-18 Downtown General Neighborhood Conservation P-1 RZN 16-5501 K. SMITH One Mile View NORTH n DT u ' IV�JII Cl 0 0.125 0.25 a.5 Miles R0 4b RS -a 1 Subject Property RSF-ts r ['s 6I E RACrKW t+EB1AENT9iL ff+41E•FgMILY �E-r Legend --- ��.. COWM1IER9I�L nv.] ]EMI c•,. f •• •• �N _ ara � cs Planning Area .NG] FARM f11sEp peaE1fC75 +s. as nt Fayetteville City Limits"� =a ;nf. � REBtOFdITIAL Id4LTFTMIILY �V 1wrn Cr.-.v rNl-�'] Wawniiw w.Mtq•s. �Afn ems. G'r. • • • • • Shared Use Paved Trail ❑ A ++I{++ Trail (Proposed) ����.� FuwrFaxawxupBTwcta Planning Area r leur.o I, .T+tlRI INBTRLiIIOM✓SL Building Footprint - a. = Fayetteville City Lirnits -_ _.Q ] awa y RZN 16-5501 Future Land Use Legend Planning Area �- - - Fayetteville City Limits Trail (Proposed) Building Footprint K. SMITH IV Subject. Property Feet 0 75 150 300 450 600 1 inch = 200 feet J a �i N N 13TH PL, FUTURE LAND USE 2030 Complete Neighborhood Plan Rezone the neighborhood to encourage an appropriate mix of uses and protect established neighborhoods. Adopting the alternative zoning will ensure that the area preserves established single-family neighborhoods while encouraging additional housing types and a mix of uses. The proposed rezoning will change the vision for the neighborhood as demonstrated in the maps (below), reflecting the community's desires. See the Appendix for definitions of the proposed zoning. % ' •% ; 1�� l� lll, r IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 41 Iwo tlO` v:+Y r--�u-rq.-.� � �r�. +rl G.roa�. rr.,� -_ .,a'..� `w..d 1"..�u.rar '� Y ' ++__ `� � © ,yr.w rr �✓° ... ... .. aµ #i •GiaL31`PVr �M � y 9. a ''�. ji sir .Ia yr,J iy �r, J4V� Alo Ardi + ! '.. • _ y �' J '.. + .� 4 i • • s � . ; 1 r Via: Via a .7 3 p .-. - �'• , d'-_o a-.. r :f Ay' µ ■ y 7"�� Y ,' ■ Y y "' r a � .+a f7Ijr J aa"}P}n _�• 13k+ J as •D.,.1. M - pf . _. - . . ,7�� r -_ .. -J- � " ,} r�� a _-. w Ron r a I e r a `� J7.� �.. � a9'' � •r .y r n.., y , �P - - 'l. 'r M 17 - _ r" ] r ''�' y�.iga • 3' ! � �'� ✓� r. ` I •, _ �fft e (r J L � 'Y1° 1 ___ �p L1 .� _ •{, 1• � 1 .. • � +. Imo, -'-.+' - _. I � � '.��"i i./, � f 'i'1 � _ t` J' , i +�,. • EMI is � � � v t, u College w �: , I • '' r.,r J , �"�' � air � y ' _ ,. � � ..r , y � Y. M ^� `�'- � y �' � 'Ills• A41, a r . Ij Y r t ,� � ,. ♦ 'ice f .. ' r 'a ry r. - -1 ..aa���y�9��i4'r`O.¢_ .. ,cru.r � a � -'� ._ t!Y E_ A r r .ti Y h 6 rr t_ j P a W '" ➢.,li ,,fir .. a 3 r- � W,, c's�r sti sib la i . ,-_. v .__ ._ � W • =, � J. J- � C� � Ir�'�'�� al���^.- ` Y. ' _-. a r __ ' I r■riYrja � .r � :r I � [l«.ii��.. •6 , -.. V Jc2-i'ar L irEil+W V as ar.; - - .. }-- .... r.. f b�tiern►�bls a.r.•b� fir 3 we BLOWS 4YP- a r�61 1F , r y� ., .. � .Lti� ��f{:rYLJ •.. .............- NORTHWESTARKANsAs Democrat IF azc#e 1'..,. FhY la_..0,7. art ��C. 6.E .ri F:, r.2„J2 r -11 ._. lIC!(, Fail. ,.,'b i-1 V, AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION I Cathy Wiles, do solemnly swear that I am the Legal Clerk of the Northwest Arkansas Democrat -Gazette, printed and published in Washington County and Benton County, Arkansas, and of bona fide circulation, that from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files of said publication, the advertisement of: CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE Ord. 5898 Was inserted in the Regular Edition on: :August 25, 2016 Public tion Charges $ 63.10 Cathy Wiles Subscribed and sworn to before me This 21oday of 4�4 (?, 2016. Noary Public My Commission Expires: (olAPIXi NOTARY •.'P� Q v,PUSUC _ "\#12401379, Q S• �p'�?s 'v. � **NOTE** Please do not pay from Affidavit. Invoice will be sent. Ordinance: 5898 File Number: 2016-0375 RZN 16-5501 (1030 S. COLLEGE AVE./K, SMITH): AN ORDINANCE TO REZONE THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 16-5501 FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.17 ACRES LOCATED AT 1030 SOUTH COLLEGE AVENUE FROM NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO NS, NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section I. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby changes the zone classification of the property shown on the map (Exhibit A) and the legal description (Exhibit B) both attached to the Planning Department's Agenda Memo from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to NS, Neighborhood Services. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1. PASSED and APPROVED on 8/16/2016 Approved: Attest: Lioneld Jordan, Mayor Sondra E. Smith, City Clerk Treasurer 73821965 Aug. 25, 2016