Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-10-10 - Agendas - Final CITY OF Fay -y� l'I'l� AGENDA ARKNSAS Final Agenda Planning Commission Meeting October 10, 2016 5:30 PM 113 W. Mountain, Room 219 Members: Kyle Cook (Chair), Ron Autry (Vice Chair), Matthew Hoffman (Secretary), Tracy Hoskins, Janet Selby, Ryan Noble, Tom Brown, Leslie Belden, and Allison Thurmond Quinlan City Staff: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director; Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner; Quin Thompson, Planner; Harry Davis, Planner City Attorney: Kit Williams Call to Order Roll Call Consent 1. Approval of the minutes from the September 26, 2016 meeting. 2. ADM 16-5616: Administrative Item (SOUTH OF 3203 N. WARWICK DR./HUNTINGDON APTS., 216): Submitted by COMMUNITY BY DESIGN for property located SOUTH OF 3203 N. WARWICK DR. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE, and contains approximately 1.13 acres. The request is for an extension to the original approval of LSD 15-5074. Planner: Andrew Garner 3. VAR 16-5611: Variance (603 N. VINSON AVE./SKOCH-BURCH, 447): Submitted by PARKCO ARCHITECTS, INC. for properties located at 603 N. VINSON AVE. The properties are zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 0.33 acres. The request is a variance for reduced driveway length. Planner: Quin Thompson Old Business 4. CUP 16-5558: Conditional Use(3250 N. FUTRALL DR./FUTRALL DR. CELL TOWER, 211): Submitted by SMITH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. for property located at 3250 N. FUTRALL DR. The property is zoned P-1, INSTITUTIONAL and contains approximately 5.56 acres. The request is for a wireless communication facility. Planner: Harry Davis Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gav Fayetteville, AR 72701 5. RZN 16-5589: Rezone (714 W. MLK BLVD. & 511 HILL AVENUE/UARK CREDIT UNION, 522): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties at 714 W. MLK BLVD. and 511 HILL AVENUE. The property is zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE, AND RMF-40, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 40 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.37 acres. The request is to rezone the property to C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. Planner: Andrew Garner New Business 6. ADM 16-5614: Administrative Item (612 S. WILLOW AVE./NIEDERMAN, 445): Submitted by ZARA NIEDERMAN for property located at 612 S. WILLOW AVE. The property is zoned DG, DOWNTOWN GENERAL and contains approximately 0.14 acres. The request is an appeal of the City Engineer's refusal to grant a waiver for construction of public sidewalk for a new home pursuant to UDC Ch. 171.13. Engineer: Jonathan Ely 7. VAR 16-5593: Variance (NW OF MLK BLVD & HILL AVENUE/UARK CREDIT UNION, 522): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties NW OF MLK BLVD. & HILL AVE. The properties are zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE, RMF-40, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 40 UNITS PER ACRE and C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL and contain approximately 0.82 acres. The request is for a variance of the access management code for a new driveway. Planner: Andrew Garner 8. RZN 16-5588: Rezone (407 N. MTN. RANCH BLVD./STRIKER DEVELOPMENT, 479): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties at 407 N. MTN. RANCH BLVD. The properties are zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 3.65 acres. The request is to rezone the properties to NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION. Planner: Quin Thompson 9. RZN 16-5590: Rezone (NE OF MCGUIRE ST. & VAN ASCHE DR./WG LAND COMPANY, 171): Submitted by JORGENSEN &ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties at NE OF MCGUIRE ST. & VAN ASCHE DR. The properties are zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL & C-3, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL and contain approximately 23 acres. The request is to rezone the property to C-3, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL. Planner: Andrew Garner 10. RZN 16-5594: Rezone (15 S. WEST AVE./KOLBERG, 523): Submitted by MARK KOLBERG for property at 15 S.WEST AVE. The property is zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains approximately 0.37 acres. The request is to rezone the property to MSC, MAIN/STREET CENTER. Planner: Jonathan Curth The following items have been approved administratively by staff: • FPL 16-5591: Final Plat (SE OF PERSIMMON ST. & BROYLES DR./VILLAGES AT SLOANBROOKE, 477): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for property located SE OF PERSIMMON ST. & BROYLES DR. The property is zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains approximately 29.39 acres. The request is for final plat approval of a single family subdivision with 98 lots. Planner: Andrew Garner 2 • LSP 16-5530: Lot Split (50 N. GARVIN DR./DAVIDSON, 481): Submitted by BATES & ASSOCIATES, INC. for property located at 50 N. GARVIN DR. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.42 acres. The request is to split the parcel into 2 lots containing approximately 0.21 acres each. Planner: Jonathan Curth • LSP 16-5603: Lot Split (3641 W. MT. KESSLER RD./GALE-REYNOLDS, 751): Submitted by ATLAS LAND SURVEYING, INC. for properties located at 3641 W. MT. KESSLER RD. The properties are in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA and contain approximately 60.19 and 41.37 acres. The request is to split the parcels into 3 lots containing approximately 31.85, 33.85, and 35.85 acres. Planner: Harry Davis • LSP 16-5466: Lot Split (WEST OF 50 E. SEVENTH ST./CGJ VENTURES, 523): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for property located WEST OF 50 E. SEVENTH ST. The property is zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains approximately 0.46 acres. The request is to split the parcel into 2 lots containing approximately 0.30 and 0.16 acres. Planner: Quin Thompson Announcements Adjourn NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE: All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. If you wish to address the Planning Commission on an agenda item please queue behind the podium when the Chair asks for public comment. Once the Chair recognizes you, go to the podium and give your name and address.Address your comments to the Chair, who is the presiding officer. The Chair will direct your comments to the appropriate appointed official, staff, or others for response. Please keep your comments brief, to the point, and relevant to the agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak. Interpreters or TDD, Telecommunication Device for the Deaf, are available for all public hearings; 72 hour notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter, please call 575-8330. As a courtesy please turn off all cell phones and pagers. A copy of the Planning Commission agenda and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the office of City Planning (575-8267), 125 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. 3 CITY OF Fa Y i'1'1� MINUTES ARKANSAS Planning Commission September 26, 2016 5:30 PM 113 W. Mountain, Room 219 Members: Kyle Cook (Chair), Ron Autry (Vice Chair), Matthew Hoffman (Secretary), Tracy Hoskins, Janet Selby, Ryan Noble, Tom Brown, Leslie Belden, and Allison Thurmond Quinlan. Call to Order: 5:30 PM, Kyle Cook In Attendance: Members: Kyle Cook (Chair), Ron Autry (Vice Chair), Matthew Hoffman (Secretary), Tracy Hoskins, Janet Selby, Tom Brown, Leslie Belden, Ryan Noble, and Allison Thurmond Quinlan. Staff: Andrew Garner, Jonathan Curth, Quin Thompson, Harry Davis, and Ken Eastin City Attorney: Kit Williams Consent Agenda: 1. Approval of the minutes from the September 12, 2016 meeting. 2. ADM 16-5597: Administrative Item (2903 E. ZION RD./SOUP SHACK-1 YR. MOBILE VENDOR, 138): Submitted by LEE EVANS for property located at 2903 E. ZION RD. The property is zoned C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL and contains approximately 1.17 acres. The request is for a one year mobile food vendor permit. 3. ADM 16-5595: Administrative Item (S. END OF POWDERHORN DR./MTN. RANCH PH. III PPL AMENDMENT, 478): Submitted by CITY STAFF for property located at the S. END OF POWDERHORN DR. The property is zoned R-A, RESIDENTIAL-AGRICULTURAL, RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE, RSF-2, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 2 UNITS PER ACRE, CS, COMMUNITY SERVICES, AND NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains approximately 101.70 acres. The request is to amend PPL 15- 5236 to remove the condition of approval requiring payment for the Persimmon St./I-49 overpass. Motion: Commissioner Hoffman made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner Autry seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 9-0-0. Mailing Address: Planning Commission 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayettevilletober 10,em 1 Fayetteville, AR 72701 A2016 Minutes 1 Y 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 1 of 10 Old Business: 4. PPL 16-5447: Preliminary Plat (NW OF WEDINGTON DR. & HERITAGE AVE./WOODRIDGE HOLLOW SD, 397): Submitted by ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. for properties located NW OF WEDINGTON DR. & HERITAGE AVE. The properties are zoned RSF- 4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 60.24 acres. The request is for 163 single-family lots. Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner: Gave the staff report. Ken Eastin, Parks Planner II: Provides an overview of the modified parkland proposal. Notes that the new proposal does not have street frontage, and still largely consists of areas of significant slope. Moves on to outline the most pertinent parkland dedication criteria adopted by the Parks Department, including that parkland shall have street frontage and not require significant maintenance. Jason Appel, Engineering Services, Inc., Applicant's Representative: The intent of the new proposal was to incorporate the proposed 30-foot access easement in to the proposed parkland. Public Comment: Wade Colwell, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Member: Goes in to the background of the adjacent Bundrick Park and how the Parks Department was striving to move away from pocket parks because of their difficulty to maintain. Notes that despite the goal to add on to Bundrick Park, the terrain and nature of the neighboring land makes that largely unfeasible. The Parks Board hoped that some of the POA land not intended for dedication be dedicated to facilitate the construction of a trail. Also comments that the land will likely remain unused no matter what, and will remain in its natural state. Understands that there is not currently a lot of parkland on the west side of Fayetteville at the time of Bundrick Park's creation, but that has since changed. No more public comment was presented. Matthew Hoffman, Commissioner: Appreciates the mention of the parkland dedication criteria by staff, and agrees that any parkland accepted needs street frontage. Cannot support the dedication of the proposed parkland without there being any street frontage. With regards to the southern of the two dean-end cul-de-sacs, questions staff as to what options the developer has, and would it just create a long, winding road. Andrew Garner, Planning Director: Confirms that this may be the case although other design options could have been pursued. A stub-out to the west is an option and would likely meet the code. Hoffman: States that he would support this as an alternative to a dead-end cul-de-sac. Tracy Hoskins, Commissioner: Seeks clarification from staff regarding the specifics of a potential stub-out cul-de-sac that would allow a similar lot layout, but could tie in to the west at a later date. Requests that staff brings up the proposed alternatives. Questions the need and specifics about street frontage requirements for parkland dedication. Eastin: Notes that there are no requirements in that regards. Planning Commission October210,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 2 of 10 Hoskins: Notes that frontage is being required, but without a minimum requirement, any may suffice. Eastin: What is shown is an access easement, which may or may not be considered park frontage on the street. Hoskins: Questions whether the access easement would be acceptable and whether it needs to be deeded. Eastin: A deeded access is preferred, but a narrow one is uninviting. Hoskins: Request to speak to the applicant for clarification on the proposed alternatives. Appel: Describes the modifications made for both alternatives with one having a private lot for development. Hoskins: Questions what is the intent of the proposed POA property. Appel: It is meant to be maintained area by the POA with access from the south. Hoskins: Questions whether it is better to keep the land private as POA land and pay the parkland in-lieu fee, or dedicate the POA land as parkland. Notes that it may be more palatable for the Parks Department and may result in Parks credits. Appel: Requests clarification on what the Parks credit is. Eastin: Anything above and beyond the required dedication can be given as a credit towards future development. Appel: Asks whether Commissioner Hoskins is proposing a dedication of all the land. Hoskins: Clarifies that he is not proposing it, but is suggesting the applicant may propose this to their client. Appel: Notes that the developer could not attend the meeting, and that their current proposal is what they would like to move forward with. Ron Autry, Commissioner: Requests the dollar amount of the payment in-lieu. Eastin: Provides the dollar amount of approximately$140,000 calculated at the time of the Parks and Recreation Board, but notes that this may change. Autry: Notes that this is not the first time that a subdivision has been proposed here, and that he would prefer not to table the item again over a parkland dedication that may or may not be viable. Is comfortable with moving forward to a vote. Kit Williams, City Attorney: Clarifies that the only reason to not accept parkland is that it is not usable. There is a lot of evidence to support a decision if the Commissioners want to vote. Tom Brown, Commissioner: Brings up the guiding principles of the Parks Master Plan to preserve open space, and queries what the Parks Department feels about using this sort of Planning Commission OctobejO,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 3 of 10 opportunity to gain open space for preservation that is adjacent to an existing park. Seeks guidance in understanding whether preserving open space and areas in the Enduring Green Network are part of the parkland dedication acceptance process. Eastin: Notes that open space is highly valuable, but the consideration here is that the active needs of the Parks system has increased parallel to Fayetteville's growth. Also, the Parks Master Plan is considered out-of-date, and needs revision. Goes on to note that this part of Fayetteville is underserved by Parks and that any money in-lieu would go towards active Parks. Hoskins: Inquires when the last time the City used Parkland money in-lieu to purchase parkland. Eastin: It was [2015] in south Fayetteville. Hoskins: Believes in passive parks, and feels that natural area parks are appealing. Is disappointed that adjustments were not made to make a dedication more palatable. Leslie Belden, Commissioner: Queries whether there has been discussion among staff about the parkland dedication alternative. Eastin: Confirms that it was discussed. Williams: Brings up Mt. Kessler, and asks staff whether this does or does not compare given its large areas of unusable land. Eastin: The topography is the fundamental part of the decision, with Mount Kessler being larger, with the significantly-sloped areas less as a proportion of the total. Notes also that even if payment in-lieu is determined, the proposed parkland's development is limited and will keep much of it as open space. Williams: Questions whether there are invasive species on Mount Kessler. Eastin: Responds that invasive species are present on Kessler, but on the subject property it is more significant and in areas that are difficult to access. It is a year-on-year effort to cut back invasive species. Further, parkland that touches the back of private lots, similar to what is proposed, creates challenging maintenance issues. Allison Thurmond-Quinlan: Agrees that passive parks are appropriate in some places, but her support hinged on increased access to the park, which she does not see. Notes that street frontage and access are integral in parkland being usable. Motion: Commissioner Hoffman made a motion to approve PPL 16-5447 with the following findings. Condition#1: Finding in favor of the variances except requiring the south cul-de-sac be modified to provide a full street stub-out. Condition #2: Determine in favor of street improvements as recommended. Condition #3: Determine that the proposed land for a park is not suitable for a park and requiring payment in lieu of land dedication. Commissioner Selby seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 9-0-0. Planning Commission October 10,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 4 of 10 5. CUP 16-5558: Conditional Use(3250 N. FUTRALL DR./FUTRALL DR. CELL TOWER, 211): Submitted by SMITH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. for property located at 3250 N. FUTRALL DR. The property is zoned P-1, INSTITUTIONAL and contains approximately 5.56 acres. The request is for a wireless communication facility. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THIS ITEM BE TABLED UNTIL OCTOBER 10 MEETING No staff report or public comment was provided. Motion: Commissioner Hoffman made a motion to table CUP 16-5558 for two weeks. Commissioner Selby seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 9-0-0. New Business: 6. VAC 16-5571: Vacation (WEST JUPITER DR./JUPITER DRIVE, 171): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties located SE OF JUPITER ST. & MCGUIRE ST. The properties are zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and C-3, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL and contain approximately 1.79 acres. The request is to vacate a portion of Jupiter Street. Andrew Garner, City Planning Director: Gave the staff report. Justin Jorgensen, Jorgensen and Associates, applicant: Present for questions. No public comment was presented. Matthew Hoffman, Commissioner: Discussed concerns with vacating the street because of a lack of connectivity. He discussed a preference that if the street is vacated another public street connection that serves the function of Jupiter Street's east west connectivity be provided. Tom Brown, Commissioner: Agreed with Commissioner Hoffman's concerns with street connectivity that can be reviewed at the time of preliminary plat review. Tracy Hoskins, Commissioner: Discussed that this road used to be in Johnson and it is not a good road. If we want to promote this to develop it Jupiter needs to be removed. We all know when it is reviewed at the time of Large Scale Development cross connection will be provided. I don't have any problem vacating this. I think the street needs to be gone to put together development plans. I will support the vacation. Hoffman: Discussed that connection through parking lots is not the same as connection through streets. Simply having a commercial arterial with a lot of parking lots connected does not do what we would like in terms of decreasing connection. I think it would be a mistake to eliminate the right-of-way at this point. I would be in favor of vacating the right-of-way when we see the future plan for connectivity. Hoskins: Asked about future connections on the development plan. Jorgensen: Discussed that connectivity will be provided with the development. Planning Commission October510,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 5 of 10 Leslie Belden, Commissioner: Discussed the conditions of approval and asked about another condition of approval. Garner: Discussed another condition of approval regarding future street construction as a condition of approval of the vacation. Kit Williams, City Attorney: Discussed concerns with the timing of a vacation of Jupiter being approved but it not being officially vacated until something else happens. Brown: Stated that this vacation needs to take place at the time of preliminary plat. It is hard for me to fathom why this would stop any development. Hoskins: Asked about property owners signing off on this? Garner: Responded that, yes, all adjoining property owners have approved the vacation of the street. Hoskins: Discussed that this portion of vacated street is not being used by other people that's the abutting property owners and they have all given permission. Cook: Asked the City Attorney about a condition of approval to require connectivity in the future. Williams: Stated concerns that if a condition is added as mentioned, the vacation of the street is not final. I don't think we need to do that. I don't see use agreeing to some development with not street north of Van Asche between McGuire and Ball Street. I don't think it will be a problem. Sometimes we have to have a little faith that the developer will do what is good for them and what is good for the city. Cross connection acceptable to the city will be required between Ball and McGuire Street at the time of development. Motion: Commissioner Hoskins made a motion to forward VAC 16-5571 recommending in favor with all conditions except adding condition #4. Condition #4: A public street connection north of Van Asche, connecting Ball Street and McGuire Street, shall be provided at the time of development. Commissioner Autry seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 8-1-0. Commissioner Quinlan voted 'no'. 7. CUP 16-5563: Conditional Use (85 W. 15TH ST./ALLIED STORAGE ADDITION, 601): Submitted by SAND CREEK ENGINEERING, INC. for property located at 85 W. 15TH ST. The property is zoned 1-1, HEAVY COMMERCIAL & LIGHT INDUSTRIAL and contains approximately 14.98 acres. The request is to expand the existing mini-storage. Andrew Garner, City Planning Director: Gave the staff report. Joey Ingle, Sand Creek Engineering, applicant: Stated agreement with the conditions of approval. No public comment was presented. Matthew Hoffman, Commissioner: Stated that he was in favor of the request. Planning Commission October610,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 6 of 10 Motion: Commissioner Hoffman made a motion to approve CUP 16-5563 with conditions and determinations as recommended by staff. Commissioner Autry seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 9-0-0. 8. CUP 16-5568: Conditional Use (2631 N. GREGG AVE./SOURCES INDEPENDENT LIVING, 289): Submitted by ELISE ALEXANDER for property located at 2631 N. GREGG AVE. The property is zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 3.05 acres. The request is for an office building in an RMF-24 zoned district. Quin Thompson, Planner: Gave the staff report. Jim Mather, Applicant: Discussed the project and said that he understood and agreed with all Conditions of Approval. No public comment was presented. Tom Brown, Commissioner: Said that it was clear to him that this project would be a benefit to the clients of Sources, and to the City as a whole. Matthew Hoffman: Commissioner: Asked the applicant if it would be helpful if hours of operation were expanded slightly, saying that he felt the hours were unnecessarily strict. Mather: Said that the business typically closes at 4, but that the additional flexibility would be welcome. Leslie Belden, Commissioner: Said that she appreciated seeing the building located close to the street, and that she would support the request. Motion: Commissioner Hoffman made a motion to approve CUP 16-5568 with conditions as recommended by staff except modifying #3 to extend the hours of operation until 5:30pm. Commissioner Hoskins seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 9-0-0. 9. RZN 16-5566: Rezone (1615 E. HUNTSVILLE RD./HARRISON, 565): Submitted by BETTY HARRISON for property at 1615 E. HUNTSVILLE RD. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 1.53 acres. The request is to rezone the property to CS, COMMUNITY SERVICES. Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner: Gave the staff report. Debbie Harrison, Applicant: Speaks as the property owner, but defers to her daughter for questions. Amanda Robinson, Applicant: States that she is available for questions. No public comment was presented. Planning Commission OctoberJ10,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 7 of 10 Tracy Hoskins, Commissioner: Queries staff as to how wide the subject property is. Curth: States that staff does not have that information immediately available. Hoskins: Inquires whether the applicant is familiar with the requirements of this zoning request. Robinson: States that she has discussed it with staff. Motion: Commissioner Hoskins made a motion to forward RZN 16-5566 with recommended approval. Commissioner Autry seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 9-0-0. 10. RZN 16-5589: Rezone (714 W. MILK BLVD. & 511 HILL AVENUE/DARK CREDIT UNION, 522): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties at 714 W. MLK BLVD. and 511 HILL AVENUE. The property is zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE, AND RMF-40, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 40 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.37 acres. The request is to rezone the property to C-1, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL. Andrew Garner, Planning Director: Read the staff report. Justin Jorgensen, Jorgensen and Associates, applicant: Was present for questions. No public comment was presented. Matthew Hoffman, Commissioner. Against the request because a form-based district is preferred, even though council has made previous decision. Tracy Hoskins, Commissioner. On the fence about this proposal. Allison Quinlan, Commissioner. Discussed that she would be in favor of any form-based zone that would be appropriate on this corner. I cannot vote for this C-1 zoning tonight. Hoffman: Asked about the property ownership and the proposed zoning, and asked if the applicant would be amenable to tabling the item to consider a form-based zoning district. Jorgensen: Discussed the ownership and indicated that he would like everyone to be on the same page if possible. Hoskins: Said he would be in favor of tabling. Jorgensen: Stated agreement with tabling. Motion: Commissioner Hoffman made a motion to table RZN 16-5589 until the next Planning Commission meeting. Commissioner Hoskins seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 8-0-1 (Commissioner Cook recused). Planning Commission Octobergl0,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 8 of 10 11. RZN 16-5576: Rezone (1160 S. HAPPY HOLLOW RD./PROMOLIFE, 565): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties at 1160 S. HAPPY HOLLOW RD. The properties are zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 3.65 acres. The request is to rezone the properties to 1-1, HEAVY COMMERCIAL & LIGHT INDUSTRIAL and R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL. Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner: Gave the staff report. Justin Jorgensen, Jorgensen &Associates, Applicant's Representative: Has nothing to add to staff's report but is available for questions. If needed the owners are also present for questions. No public comment was presented. Leslie Belden, Commissioner: Queries whether the owner intends to connect to the residential street to the east. Jorgensen: Responds that currently there is no intent to provide this connection given the terrain and the creek. Tracy Hoskins, Commissioner: Feels that Fayetteville needs more of 1-1 zoning in the City. Kyle Cook, Commissioner: Asks if the applicant would be willing to clarify the purpose of their business. Yvonne Segal, Applicant: Clarifies the function of her business as light manufacturing of health and beauty products with predominantly online sales and shipping. Motion: Commissioner Hoskins made a motion to forward RZN 16-5576 with recommended approval. Commissioner Hoffman seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 8-0-1. Commissioner Noble recused. 12. RZN 16-5573: Rezone (1030 N. COLLEGE AVE./LAZENBY, 445/446): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for properties at 1031 N. COLLEGE AVE. The properties are zoned R-O, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE and contain approximately 0.72 acres. The request is to rezone the property to UT, URBAN THOROUGHFARE. Harry Davis, Planner: Read the staff report. Justin Jorgensen, Applicant: States the developer is looking to do mixed-use at this property. Public Comment: Andrea Fournet, Neighbor: Concerned about the lighting of new development and is not opposed to the rezone. No further public comment. Andrew Garner, Planning Director: Explains the dark-sky compliant ordinances. Planning Commission October910,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 9 of 10 Tracy Hoskins, Commissioner: States that this property is the perfect place for Urban Thoroughfare. Matthew Hoffman, Commissioner: States they are in support of this rezone and appeals to staff to provide a comprehensive plan for the area to make it in compliant with the 2030 Plan. Tom Brown, Commissioner: Expresses agreement with Hoffman. Motion: Commissioner Hoskins made a motion to forward RZN 16-5573 with recommended approval. Commissioner Hoffman seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 9-0-0. 1. Reports: None 2. Announcements: None 3. Adjournment Time: 7:28 PM 4. Submitted by: City Planning Division Planning Commission Octobeyd 0,2016 Agenda Item 1 9-26-2016 Minutes Page 10 of 10 CITY OF Fay �-Ile PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director MEETING DATE: October 10, 2416 SUBJECT: ADM 16-5616: Administrative Item (SOUTH OF 3203 N. WARWICK DR.IHUNTINGDON APTS., 216):Submitted by COMMUNITY BY DESIGN for property located SOUTH OF 3203 N. WARWICK DR. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE, and contains approximately 1.13 acres. The request is for an extension to the original approval of LSD 15-5074. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ADM 16-5616 with conditions. BACKGROUND: This site is Lot 25 of the Huntingdon Subdivision north of Old Wire Road and west of Crossover Road. The subdivision was created in the late 1970's under the Planned Unit Development(PUD) ordinance which created a zoning overlay. The overlay allows multi-family buildings and townhomes on some of the lots within the underlying single family zoning district, which is RSF- 4. The subject property is located on the west side of Warwick Drive and permits multi-family units with a density of up to 12 units per acre. The surrounding zoning and land use is listed in Table 1. Table 1 Surrounding Land Use and tonin Direction Land Use Zoning North Two-family residential RSF-4, Residential Single Family Four Unit per Acre(Huntingdon PUD South Multi-family residential RSF-4, Residential Single Family Four Unit per Acre(Huntingdon PUD East Single family residential RSF-4, Residential Single Family Four Unit per Acre(Huntingdon PUD) West Neighborhood pool; greenspace;two-family residential RSF-4, Residential Single Family Four Unit per Acre(Huntingdon Pi b Planning Commission Approval: On June 22, 2015, the Planning Commission approved LSD 15- 5074 allowing development of a 12-unit apartment complex on this property. The applicant has not obtained all permits necessary to construct the project within the required one-year timeframe, therefore the Large Scale Development approval has expired. Planning Commission Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayettevilleOA�ober a I em 2 Fayetteville, AR 72701 AtinXdo Item 2 Y 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 1 of 16 DISCUSSION: Proposal: The applicant requests a one-year extension to receive building permits for the proposed apartment complex. If permits to construct the project have not been obtained within the extension period, the Large Scale Development approval shall be rendered null and void in accordance with City development code. The City of Fayetteville Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 166.20 gives the applicant one year within which they are required to obtain all permits necessary to construct the project. If permits have not been obtained, the Planning Commission has authority to extend the Large Scale Development approval for one year. In order to extend this approval, city code requires the following: 166.20(6)(3) Request the extension within the 18 months from the Large Scale Development approval. Finding: The applicant submitted the extension request to the Planning Division on October 3, 2076, prior to the 78 months ending on December 22, 2016. 166.20(6)(2) Show good cause why the tasks could not reasonably be completed within the one year limit. Finding: As described in the applicant's letter, the project has made progress: grading permits have been issued and building permits have been submitted. However, building permits have not yet been issued. Recommended Motion: Planning Staff recommends approval of ADM 16-5616, the requested one year extension for LSD 15-5074 with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: 1. The applicant shall be allowed until June 22, 2017 to obtain all permits necessary to complete the project, otherwise all entitlement approvals for the project shall be rendered null and void, subject to one more potential extension. 2. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable zoning and development regulations that may have been adopted subsequent to the original project approval. 3. All other conditions of approval for the project shall remain applicable. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required Date: October 10, 2016 O Approved ❑ Forwarded O Denied Motion: Second: Vote: Notes: Planning Commission October 10,2016 G:\ETMDevelopment Services Review120161Development Review115-5616 ADM S.of 3203 N.Warwick(Huntingdon Apts LSD Agenda Item 2 Ext.)216103 Planning Commission110-10-20161Comments and Redlines 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 2 of 16 BUDGETISTAFF IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: • Chapter 166.20 • LSD 15-5074 Planning Commission approval • Request letter ■ One Mile Map ■ Close Up Map Planning Commission G-TTC\Deveiopment Services Reviewl20161Development Review116-5616 ADM S.of 3203 N.Warwick(Huntingdon Apts LSD October 10,2016 i Ext.)216103 Planning Commissio00-10-20161Comments and Redlines Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 3 of 16 UDC Section 166.20 166.20 Expiration Of Approved Plans And Permits (A) Applicability. The provisions of this section apply to all of the following plans and permits: (1) Preliminary plats; (2) Planned zoning district developments; (3) Conditional uses; (4) Large-scale developments; (5) Lot splits; (5) Physical alteration of land permits; (7) Storm water,drainage,and erosion control permits; (8) Tree preservation plans; and (9) Floodplain development permits. (B) Time limit. (2) Administrative Extension Within One Year. Prior to the expiration of the one(1)year time limit, an applicant may request the Zoning and Development Administrator to extend the period to accomplish the tasks by up to one (1) additional year. The applicant has the burden to show good cause why the tasks could not reasonably be completed within the normal one (1) year limit. Extensions that are not permitted administratively may be requested of the Planning Commission within ten days of the final administrative decision. (3) Planning Commission Extension Within 18 months. Should an applicant miss the deadline to request an administrative extension, within eighteen months of the date of approval the applicant may request the Planning Commission to extend the period up to one (1)additional year from the original date of approval, subject to the burden of showing good cause as described in this section. (4) Planning Commission Extension. Prior to the expiration of any allowed extension period (maximum of two years from the date of original approval), an applicant may request the Planning Commission to extend the period to accomplish the tasks by up to one(1)additional year, if the plans and permits are substantially the same as those originally approved.The applicant has the burden to show good cause why the tasks could not reasonably be completed within the normal one(1)year limit and the permitted extension period. Extensions beyond three(3)years from the original date of approval shall not be permitted. (5) Ordinance Amendments. To receive approval of an extension, the applicant shall comply with all applicable zoning and development requirements that have been adopted subsequent to the original project approval. Projects that must be substantially modified to meet new code requirements are subject to Ch. 166.05 (F) Modifications. (6) Variances. Variances from applicable zoning and development requirements that have been adopted subsequent to the original project approval shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to approval of the extension. (7) Expiration. If the required task(s)are not completed within one(1)year from the date of approval or during an allowed extension period,all of the above-enumerated plans and permits shall be rendered null and void. Planning Commission G:IETC0evelopment Services Review120161Development Reviewl16-5616 ADM S.of 3203 N.Warwick(Huntingdon Apts LSD October 10,2016 Ext.)216103 Planning Commission110-10-20161Ccmments and Redlines Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 4 of 16 CITY OF syfti -Ile e PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director Jonathan Ely, Development and Construction Manager MEETING: June 22, 2015 Updated with Planning Commission results SUBJECT: LSD 15-5074: Large Scale Development (SOUTH OF 3203 N. WARWICK DR.IHUNTINGDON APTS., 216): Submitted by COMMUNITY BY DESIGN for property located at SOUTH OF 3203 N. WARWICK DR. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE, and contains approximately 1.13 acres. The request is for construction of a 12 unit apartment complex with associated parking. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of LSD 15-5074, BACKGROUND: Site Description: This site is Lot 25 of the Huntingdon Subdivision north of Old Wire Road and west of Crossover Road. The subdivision was created in the late 1970`s under the Planned Unit Development {PUD} ordinance which created a zoning overtay. The overlay allows multi-family buildings and townhomes on some of the lots within the underlying single family zoning district, which is RSF-4. The subject property is located on the west side of Warwick Drive and permits multi-family units with a density of up to 12 units per acre. The surrounding zoning and land use is listed in Table 1. Table 1 Surrounding Land Use and ning Direction Land Use Zoning North Two-family residential RSF-4, Residential Single Family Four Unit _ per Acre(Huntingdon PUD) South Multi-family residential RSF-4, Residential Single Family Four Unit er Acre Huntin don PUD East Single family residential RSF-4,Residential Single Family Four Unit _ per Acre(Huntingdon PUD West Neighborhood pool;greenspace;two-family residential RSFA, Residential Single Family Four Unit per Acre(Huntingdon PU❑ Proposal The applicant is proposing to develop two multi-family buildings containing a total of 12 dwellings. Building A would be accessed off Warwick Drive and Building B would be accessed off of an existing parking lot drive named Barnsbury Terrace, connecting back. to Warwick Drive through an existing multi-family development. The development would include a 0.30-acre tree preservation area on the northern portion of the site. Right-of-way to be dedicated: Adequate right-of-way was dedicated with development of this neighborhood. Mailing Address: Planning Commission 113 W. Mountain Street www.fap Y t ?#1l 09 ov Agenda Fayetteville,AR 72701 15-50740 ,i 50AqRkgssion Page t of 27 October 10,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 5 of 16 Water and Sewer System: Public water and sewer lines will be extended through the development. Parks: On May 4, 2015 the Parks Recreation and Advisory Board reviewed the project and recommended accepting a money in lieu to satisfy the park land dedication ordinance due to the development's proximity to Gulley Park, Sweetbriar Park, Rocky Branch, Raven Trail and Mud Creek Trail. Fees in the amount of$6,720,40 are due prior to building permit. Access ManagementlConnectivity: The Building A will be accessed off of Warwick Street and Building B will be accessed through a parking lot driveway (Bamsbury Terrace) in compliance with the access management requirements. White it would be desired for the two parking lots in this development to be connected, steep terrain makes 4 infeasible. Prior to building permit an access easement will need to be dedicated through Barnsbury Terrace providing access into the parking lot for Building B. Parking: The development meets the minimum parking requirements as listed in the following parking chart. PARKING RATIO classification Ratio #bedrooms Min.Re aired Proposed multi-family 1 per bedroom 16 16 Reduction 10% reduction(additional bike racks)" 1.60 Min.Car Spaces" 14.4 15 Min. Bike Racks 3 3 'bike racks: 1 required plus 2 additional for the 2 space reduction —15 total car spaces 7 spaces in Lot 8(one space is not counted because it is a relocated ADA space resermd for the adjacent development) 6 spaces in Lot A 2 on-street spaces adjacent to Building A Street Improvements: Warwick Drive is an improved street with sidewalk on the east side of the street. Because this neighborhood is almost entirely tmilt-out and sidewalk is not located on the project's side of the street sidewalk is not recommended. No street improvements are recommended. Public Comment: Staff received has received an inquiry from an attorney representing the Huntingdon Property Owner's Association; several members of the public were present at the May 2B and .lune 11, 2015 Subdivision Committee meetings discussing numerous concerns with the previous multi-family development adjacent to this site, stormwater run-off, tree preservation, and traffic. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of LSD 15-5074 with the following conditions of approval: Conditions of Approval: 1. Planning Commission determination of compliance with architectural design standards. Staff recommends that both buildings meet and exceed the minimum requirements of the code. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED IN FAVOR OF THE ELVATIONS AS PRESNTED AT THE 06-11-15 MEETING PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION {06-22-95} Planning Commission G,%ETCIDeveiopment Services Rev iewl2015OeveIopment Rev iew115-5074 LSC 3203 N.Warwick pr June 22,2015 [Huntingdon Apts.]103 Planning CommissionL06-22-20151Ccmments and Redlines Agendam 9 15-5074�� &P ssion Page 2 of 2700 ober f 0,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 6 of 16 2. Planning Commission determination of street improvements. Staff does not recommend street improvements as Warwick Drive is an improved street and sidewalk is not located on the project's side of the street. Any damage to existing public or private infrastructure caused by this development shall be repaired prior to certificate of occupancy. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION CANNING COMMISSION DETERMINED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION (06-22-15) 3. Planning Commission determination of parkland dedication or payment of fees in lieu. The Parks Recreation and Advisory Board recommends accepting money in lieu to satisfy the park land dedication ordinance. Fees in the amount of$6,720.00 are due prior to building permit. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION(06-22-15 4. Planning Commission determination of off-site ADA parking. The applicant proposes to relocate the ADA parking space in front of 3191 Barnsbury Terrace to the subject property which is a different parcel. Staff recommends in favor of the proposal given that the new space will still be in close proximity to the ADA ramp into 3191 Barnsbury Terrace with the following condition:the two parcels should be combined into one lot or a parking easement dedicated for this space for use by Lot 28 shall be completed prior to building permit. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION 06-22-15 5. Planning Commission determination of a variance of UDC Section 172.04(B)that requires pedestrian access from the street to the structure. Building A has direct pedestrian access to Warwick Drive but building Building B does not. The applicant has indicated that pedestrian access to Building B via a designated pedestrian path is not feasible because of steep terrain and that access is available through the concrete driveway. Staff recommends in favor of the request agreeing with the justification provided by the applicant. SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINED IN FAVOR OF THIS CONDITION 06-22-15 6. To minimize adverse impacts during construction the applicant shall comply with list of building permit requirements provided from the City Engineering Division (attached). 7. Because of the steep terrain, guardrails or other requirements shall be installed to ensure public safety as determined by the City Engineering Division prior to certificate of occupancy. This note shall be added to the site pian and all construction documents. 8. Conditions of approval from Engineering, Urban Forestry, and Parks Department are included in the official conditions of approval, attached hereto. Standard conditions of approval: 9 Trash enclosures shall be screened on three sides with materials complimentary to and compatible with the principal structure. An elevation depicting the materials and colors of the screen to be submitted prior to building permit. 10 All new utilities shall be placed underground and all existing utilities under 12 kV shall be relocated underground. Planning Commission G-lETCOevelopment Services Review120150eveiopment Review115-5074 LSD 3203 N WarMck or June 22.2015 (Huntingdon Apts.)103 Planning Commissionl06-22-20151Comments and Redlines Agenda qrn 9. 15-5074 BR9h° ssion Page 3 of 27 c o~P 1 2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 7 of 16 11. All mechanical and utility equipment shall be screened from visibility from the public street by incorporating screening into the structure utilizing materials compatible with the supporting building. 12. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives:AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications). 13. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations(where applicable}for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s)and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 14. Prior to issuance of a building permit the following is required: a. Grading and drainage permits b. An on-site inspection by the Urban Forester of all tree protection measures prior to any land disturbance. c. Separate easement plat for this project that shall include the tree preservation area and all utility easements. d. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City as required by Section 158,01 to guarantee all incomplete. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 15. Large Scale Development approval shall be valid for one calendar year. Planning Commission Action: ® Approved ❑ Forwarded ❑ Tabled Meeting Date: June 22, 2015 Motion: Hoskins Second: Selby _ Vote: 9-9-0 BUDGETISTAFF IMPACT: None Attachments: ■ GIS Division comments • Parks Department comments • City Engineering Division comments and construction practices • Urban Forestry comments and redlines • Engineering Division comments • Applicant's letter • Site plan; landscape pian • Elevations for Building A and Building B • Close up map • One mile map Planning Commission G:IE TCOevelop men t Services Review120151Development Review115-5074 LSD 3203 N.Warwick Dr June 22.2015 {Huntingdon Apts.)W Planning CommissioMQ6-22-20151Comments and Redlines Agenda i an9'n CO ission 15.5074x1 lungq �er'r 2016 Page 4 of 27 cto Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 8 of 16 CD Z LJ c�5 a It Ok 0. E I T er'n z w • xCa r I a , I a se 3 a" Planning Commission June 22.215 a Agenda g nF �Co�nr fission 15 507un o er% s2016 Page 5 of 27 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 9 of 16 NVR5;L�NVIII Nvcj H 1.)1 3 14 NO U N I i N F)1-1 X A 6' 4- 4. x 0 z eu Ui CL Ix tu LU 701 lu CO z Ix M .=F 2 Uj LU M Ice — -- - - - - - --- Planning Commission June 22,2015 Agenda Copmission 15-5074 un�il -2016 c Page 22 If 2 oWer F1 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 10 of 16 Rau if.+•eVN'LL�rM w�a CAi 71 L'1�1�413ii-�Yd 331�ii�05N0/rB IAsC `.. U I ,•. NwfSafVyOHMIISiJYO 51 HV13H NOGONIiNnM x3�d•ia -iA c x aj ti W J I' m I x J -- W a' a x &6 x egg I 2 Planning Commission June 22,2015 Agendain Co�??r�pfission 15-5074 un��gc,.,O x'2016 Page 23 of 2 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 11 of 16 ' .i GSF-:ur t,��Snw:s ov0+nm p:IrK . E0.21 an 7'ILA3;L-,AV 7:11rd113w AW%E, 411V9 &t:-to LL - rvwsi�+roa-Htl3aNdo SJ.H01-9H N000NIJ.NOH X97d-XIS t - 77 III ,;II I I � I� ---.--J ,i . I IL I, - f I a III r I I U L rc, 4 a U) Y Ix MI S ��uu WW L IJ LI LU F �.. in a Planning Commission June 22.2015 Agenda a�If�in Co Ission - 15-5074�un�,jg�$r� s.2016 Page 24 of 2 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 12 of 16 •C�I' �y�i:.er.N'-"s'.GM 1��m]n-�+n 4:= EpLZL W 7111A3ll3Ayf'37'diRi31 AMM1OS!dkl i�B LS:i'F:I[ r NVNSJ-i11be WOONtiq �S1H013H l+f0[S f]TJ i S hinH ?(��d•x 15 �I I i �# :5s W y i 2 w� LU a J w r w °l fpa� �a ,I -• . 'tom ti •�bL Jy rn7x -• a�a©;� m� ~7 v x Uu•_ Planning Commission June 22,2015 Agenda q n Co ? lssion 15 5074 un ge1"ti7''2016 Page 25 of 2 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 13 of 16 community.by.des'ign •r, I Cm 01I ANNING URBAN ENO INEE RING October 3,2016 Via Email Mr.Andrew Garner Senior Planner City of Fayetteville 125 West Mountain Street Fayetteville,Arkansas 72701 RE: Large Scale Development 15-5074 Huntingdon Apartments Request For Extension of Planning Commission Approval Mr.Garner, The owner of the above referenced property requests an extension of the.lune 22,2015 Planning Commission Large Scale Development 15-5074 approval for another year. A grading permit has been issued and significant work has been completed however the work is not final. Please let me know if you need additional information or have questions. Sincerely, X-lr� . Brian Teague Community By Design Darrell Riddell Property Owner 100 West Center Street Suite 300 Fayetteville, AR 72701 479,790.6775 Planning Commission October 10,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 14 of 16 ADM 16-5616 HUNTINGDON APTS LSD EXT. �& One Mile View NORTH i 0 0 125 025 0.5 Miles I I I I i f I / H-:% Subject Property P-I i 1 I I .s.Iii2Lslr+>r �f,r����s�a ���,•aErlr�s���a�- i +w1 RS ItNLU V r H-0 Yo�•y EXTRACTION RE SID EN TIAL SINGLE-FAMILY IIIIIIIIE-i Legend -__-_ -- - .aA.�.�.',,�,v. COMMERCIAL RSF.3 RSF _ RRSF•2 C.2 1 Planning Area FORM BASED DISTRICTS RSF-0 / + Fayetteville City Limits RESIDENTIAL MIILTI.FAMILY IIIIIII 5..nt x.r• IIIIIIII M-1 2 Rl 'Tie hr6 Th'W 0, W-.—G— ...... w••••• Shared Use Paved Trail �j > :�:.F Trail{Proposed} -- PLANNED ZONING 013TRICTS Planning Area Building Footprint I"DtlSTR1A1 0 Fayetteville Ci Limits a�i•x a�:. d�.i ljnnwKHa,rRi Y tY Planning Co mission 0,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 15 of 16 ADM 16-5616 HUNTINGDON APTS LSD EXT. A& Close Up view NORTH 7Z rrti Subject Property r s� � I I RSF-4 ti o � r- d z Y 0 70 Legend Planning Area Feet RSF-4 Fayetteville City Limits 0 75 150 300 450 600 Trail (Proposed) Building Footprint 1 inch = 200 feet Planning Co mission 0,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5616 Huntingdon Apts. Page 16 of 16 CITY OF FayLIi'I 'l L Y a PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Harry Davis, Planner MEETING DATE: October 10, 2016 SUBJECT: CUP 16-5558: Conditional Use (3250 N. FUTRALL DR./FUTRALL DR. CELL TOWER, 211): Submitted by SMITH COMMUNICATIONS, INC. for property located at 3250 N. FUTRALL DR. The property is zoned P-1, INSTITUTIONAL and contains approximately 5.56 acres. The request is for a wireless communication facility. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of CUP 16-5558 based on the findings contained within this report. SEPTEMBER 12, 2016 MEETING: At the September 12, 2016 Planning Commission meeting, this proposal for a cell tower on the WRMC campus was tabled. For the September 26, 2016 Planning Commission, the applicant asked to be tabled until the October 10,, 2016 meeting. The applicant has not submitted anything new at the time of writing this report, but is expected to have further information for the Planning Commission at the public meeting BACKGROUND: The subject property is located adjacent to the Washington Regional Medical Center (WRMC) parking lot at the southeast corner of Futrall Dr. and Gregg Ave. The property is zoned P-1, Institutional and contains approximately 5.56 acres. The surrounding land use and zoning is listed in Table 1. Table 1 Surrounding Land Use and Zoning Direction Land Use Zoning North Fulbright Expressway None South Parkin lot P-1, Institutional East WRMC P-1, Institutional West Undeveloped C-3, Central Commercial; UT, Urban Thoroughfare FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Civic Institutional Request:The applicant requests Conditional Use Permit approval to erect a 150-foot tall flagpole tower with an area at the base for equipment shelters and wireless equipment. The site area is approximately 4,550 square feet and is currently proposed for Verizon Wireless to be the "anchor" tenant.