HomeMy WebLinkAbout211-12 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. 211-12
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE FROM THE TREE
PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION CHAPTER OF THE UDC FOR LSD
12-4215 TO ALLOW ON AND OFF-SITE MITIGATION TREE PLANTING
AND ELIMINATING ANY FURTHER PENALTY FOR THE REMOVAL OF
SOME CANOPY IN 2008
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves a
variance from the Tree Preservation and Protection Chapter of the UDC for LSD 12-4215 to
allow on and off-site mitigation tree planting and eliminating any further penalty for the removal
of some canopy in 2008.
PASSED and APPROVED this 8th day of November, 2012.
APPROVED:
By:
ATTEST:
By: 6,1444 '/t.ta f
SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
Megan Dale
W
Su
mined By
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form
City Council Agenda Items
and
Contracts, Leases or Agreements
11/6/2012
City Council Meeting Date
Agenda Items Only
Park Planning / Urban Forestry Parks and Recreation
Division
Action Required:
Department
Staff recommends approving a variance of Chapter 167 that allows off-site preservation and off-site mitigation to
satisfy the requirements for prior tree removal. Staff recommends approving LSD 12-4215 with on-site mitigation (20
trees), off-site tree preservation (6,976sf within the general vicinity of the application — location to be determined by
City Council), and off-site mitigation (5 trees location 765-15513-011). Off-site tree preservation area shall be
reviewed and approved by Urban Forester to confirm trees are desirable and in good condition.
Cost of this request
Account Number
Project Number
$
Category / Project Budget
Program Category / Project Name
Funds Used to Date Program / Project Category Name
Remaining Balance Fund Name
Budgeted Item 11 Budget Adjustment Attached l
_ t
timt Jvip'r'
Department Director Dat
t./tvl.0.t_.S Abet.Y4,;: )
City Attorney
Finance and Internal Services Director
Date
(0.___14..-1 'L-Z
Date
Previous Ordinance or Resolution #
Original Contract Date:
Original Contract Number:
Received in -City
Clerk's Office
Comments:
Revised January 15, 2009
a'�Itrville
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE
ARKAN5A5
www.accessfayetteville.ory
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor Lioneld Jordan and City Council
Thru: Don Marr, Chief of Staff
Connie Edmonston, Parks and Recreation Director
Alison Jumper, Park Planning Superintendent ao
From: Megan Dale, Urban Forester CtiD
Date: 6 November 2012
Subject: LSD 12-4215 Culls II Tree Preservation
PROPOSAL
Culls II development was originally approved in 2009 as LSD 08-3167 by the Planning Commission but was
never built. Staff recommended the original development to plat 27,251 sf of off-site tree preservation to meet
requirements for trees that were removed prior to development approval; however, the tree preservation area
was never filed at the County Courthouse. Development approval has since expired, and a new application is
required. The current applicant must meet the penalty requirements for prior tree removal since the application
is still within 5 years of prior tree removal period.
Trees were removed without approval sometime in 2008. The City of Fayetteville GIS aerial imagery is taken
January 1st each year. Without proof of the removal date, the applicant would be held to the January 1, 2009
imagery. The applicant may wait until January 2014 to submit LSD application to avoid 5 year prior tree
removal penalty. The applicant is requesting the date for the penalty to be changed from January 2014 to July
2013. Staff recommends that evidence be provided regarding the tree removal date if the Council approves
changing the 5 year time period.
The applicant is requesting a variance from the Chapter 167 with regard to penalty for prior tree removal. As
noted below, the ordinance specifically states the site must be reforested.
§167.04(D)(1) Prior tree removal. If trees have been removed below the required minimum within the
five (5) years preceding application for development approval, the site must be forested to meet the
Percent Minimum Canopy requirements set forth in Table 1, plus an additional ten percent (10%) of the
total area of the property for which the Applicant is seeking approval. The number of trees required to
be planted shall be calculated using the Base Density for High Priority trees.
Staff recommends approval of a variance to allow the applicant to dedicate off-site areas for tree preservation in
addition to planting as many mitigation trees as possible on and off-site. The applicant is requesting to mitigate
on-site (20 trees) and off-site (5 trees), and requesting the Council to waive the remaining penalty (6,976 sf or
32 trees).
Telecommunications Device for the Deaf TDD (479) 521-1316 113 West Mountain - Fayetteville, AR 72701
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
Staff recommends off-site preservation instead of waiving the penalty because preserved trees provide
substantial ecological benefits. Waiving the requirement would leave the City with less canopy and eliminate
the benefits of established trees. The option of payment into tree escrow places the responsibility of planting
and maintaining trees on the City, and only provides 2" caliper trees that will take years to provide the same
benefit as mature canopy.
The ordinance states the following:
§ 167.01(B) Principles. This chapter shall be enforced according to the following principles:
(1) Preservation shall be the first, best, and standard approach.
(2) If preservation cannot be achieved, on-site mitigation shall next be pursued.
(3) If on-site mitigation cannot be achieved, off-site preservation shall be pursued.
(4) If off-site preservation cannot be achieved, off-site forestation shall be pursued.
(5) If none of the above approaches can be achieved, payment shall be made to the tree escrow
account.
This project is recommended for approval with the following mitigation requirements:
On-site mitigation: 20 trees
Off-site preservation: 6,976 sf / 0.16 ac within the general vicinity of the application — Location
to be determined by City Council
Off-site mitigation: 5 trees — Location 765-15513-011, 585 W Willoughby Rd shown on Site
Plan Lot 3, owner Joe Maynard and Joe Terminella
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approving a variance of Chapter 167 that allows off-site preservation and off-site mitigation
to satisfy the requirements for prior tree removal. Staff recommends approving LSD 12-4215 with on-site
mitigation (20 trees), off-site tree preservation (6,976sf within the general vicinity of the application — location
to be determined by City Council), and off-site mitigation (5 trees location 765-15513-011). Off-site tree
preservation area shall be reviewed and approved by Urban Forester to confirm trees are desirable and in good
condition.
BUDGET IMPACT:
There is no impact to the budget.
Attachments:
Planning Memo
Terminella Tree Preservation Variance Request
2007 aerial
2008 aerial
2009 aerial
2012 aerial
12-4215 Tree Preservation Plan Submitted Planning Commission 24 September 2012
12-4215 Landscape Plan Submitted Planning Commission 24 September 2012
Chapter 167 Tree Preservation and Protection
Wtvt1e
.1. -r , p, tam
Departmental Correspondence
ARKANSAS
www.accessfayetteviile.org
LEGAL
DEPARTMENT
TO: Mayor Jordan
Don Marr, Chief of Staff
Connie Edmonston, Parks & Recreation Director
Alison Jumper, Park Planning Superintendent
Megan Dale, Urban Forester
� _ r
FROM: Kit Williams, City Attorney
DATE: October 19, 2012
RE: Prior tree removal penalty
Kit Williams
City Attorney
Jason B. Kelley
Assistant City Attorney
§167.04(D)(1) Prior tree removal states:
"If trees have been removed below the required minimum within five (5) years
preceding application for development approval, the site must be forested to meet the
percent minimum canopy requirements set forth in Table 1, plus an additional ten percent
(10%) ..."
This is a penalty provision of the Tree Ordinance to punish persons for removing
trees below the minimum canopy requirements before development. As a penalty
provision it is not only strictly construed against the City, but the burden is on the City
to prove that a violation justifying the punishment has occurred.
As Megan's memo stated our January fly -over photos establish some tree canopy
is missing on January 1, 2009 that we saw on January 1, 2008. I believe that Megan is
correct when she says "Trees were removed without approval sometime in 2008." If the
trees were removed on January 2, 2008, the five year penalty period would be January 2,
2008 through January 2, 2013.
If the City could prove the trees were improperly removed on December 31, 2008,
the penalty period would be December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2013. Unless the
City can prove a later date than January 2, 2008 for the removal of the trees, the penalty
period must end on January 2, 2013. The City cannot assume the worst and basically
extend the penalty period to six years when the ordinance states five years.
The applicant should not be informed that the correct penalty period does not
expire until January 1, 2014.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE A VARIANCE FROM THE TREE
PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION CHAPTER OF THE UDC FOR
LSD 12-4215 TO ALLOW OFF-SITE TREE PRESERVATION, ON AND OFF-
SITE MITIGATION TREE PLANTING AND ELIMINATING ANY FURTHER
PENALTY FOR THE REMOVAL OF SOME CANOPY IN 2008
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves a
variance from the Tree Preservation and Protection Chapter of the UDC for LSD 12-4215 to
allow off-site tree preservation, on and off-site mitigation tree planting and eliminating any
further penalty for the removal of some canopy in 2008.
PASSED and APPROVED this 6th day of November, 2012.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
By: By:
LIONELD JORDAN, Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
a�F ve�vi�le
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
DEPARTMENT CORRESPONDENCE
ARKANSAS
www.accessfayetteville.org
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor Jordan, City Council
Thru: Don Marr, Chief of Staff
Jeremy Pate, Development Services Director
From: Quin Thompson, Current Planner
Date: October 1, 2012
Subject: Variance from Chapter 167.04(D) Prior Tree Removal for LSD 12-4215 (585 W WILLOUGHBY
ROAD/CULLS II)
BACKGROUND
Property: The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Willoughby Road, Hwy 156, and
McCollum Road. The Property contains 2.69 acres, is zoned I-1, and is used for warehousing.
On May 17, 2006, the Planning Division approved a building permit for the construction of a 9,960 square foot
industrial use structure with associated parking. The subject property and the two adjacent lots are under
common ownership, but development was only proposed on one of the lots less than 1 -acre, so large scale
development approval was not required. The applicant submitted a large scale development proposal in
October 2006 for two additional structures and associated parking; however, the large scale development
application was later withdrawn prior to Planning Commission approval.
On January 12, 2009, the Planning Commission approved, with conditions, a Large Scale Development (LSD
08-3167) that was never constructed.
On September 24, 2012, the Planning Commission approved, with conditions, LSD 12-4215.
Request: The applicant requests a variance from Unified Development Code Chapter 167.04(D), Prior Tree
Removal, allowing a combination of as much on-site mitigation as possible, and the planting of an additional 5
mitigation trees on the adjacent parcel to the west.
RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission and Urban Forester recommend a combination of on-site mitigation, off-site
mitigation, and off-site tree preservation.
DISCUSSION
On September 24, 2012, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the LSD, pending City Council
determination of a variance to UDC Chapter 167.04(D), Prior Tree Removal, with a vote of 7-1-0.
TERMINELLA
ENGINEERING
CORP.
INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATORS
September 25, 2012
City Council
113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
4-30 W N;n I duct-IBY RU
FIYE-TTEvuJJ AR 72701
(479) 2002712
�oelelrnineII( Cjniail.com
Re: Culls 11 LLC — Tree Preservation Variance Request
Dear Members of City Council,
1 have resided in Fayetteville for 38 years. I graduated from Fayetteville High School
and was successfully employed for 34 years. 1 now have my own business and am the
owner for the project known as Culls II_ I intend to expand my business at 525 West
Willoughby Road, by adding a new office and shop building on existing tracts. 1 intend
to add 23,862 square feet of additional mixed use office and warehouse space in the
future. The property is located in the Industrial Zoning District 1-1.
A project, very similar in nature, was approved in January, 2009, by the previous owner.
The project was never constructed, and the property was later sold to me. I purchased
the property sometime at the beginning of the year. 1 recently hired Clay Grote, P.E., to
resubmit the previously approved project after finding that the time had expired on the
original plan.
During the re -submittal process, it was discovered by aerial photographs, provided by
the Urban Forrester, that in 2008, approximately 1850 square feet of tree canopy was
removed from the site by the previous owner. This put the subject property in violation
of Section D of the Tree Preservation Code, which says that if any tree removal takes
place five years prior, the owner will be penalized to provide 15 percent canopy plus an
additional 10 percent, which equates to 25 percent canopy to be reforested. According
to the calculations required by the Urban Forrester, this equates to 12,423 square feet
or 57 trees to be planted.
We have been working with the Urban Forrester through the Large Scale Development
process to forest the site the best we can. However, once you subtract the right-of-
way and utility easements, there is only 1.48 acres of buildable property on this site,
We have added 21 trees to the site as required by the Landscaping Code and another
25 trees as mitigation trees for the tree preservation penalty. That is a total of 46 trees
that 1 am foresting my site with. I have no other room to add any more trees. Since the
21 trees required by Landscaping does not count toward my 57 required trees to be
planted, 1 am told that I still have 32 trees remaining, which equates to $21,600 in fees.
I feel that this penalty is too severe and unreasonable, all because the previous owner
removed one tree in 2008. I am asking you to consider waiving the fee of $21,600.
The amount of money to plant 46 trees is already a $31,050 burden (using the City's
calculation of $675 per tree).
I do have the option of holding on to this project and resubmitting January 2014 and
receiving no penalty. The Urban Forrester set this date based on the fact that the
aerials show the trees being removed somewhere between January 2008 and January
2009. I feel as though the City should meet me half way with the date, so I am also
requesting the date for tree preservation penalty to be changed from January, 2014, to
July, 2013, particularly if you deny my first request.
Thank you for your consideration of these two items.
Sincerely,
'Joe Temiinella
Culls II 2007 Aerial
Feet
0 15 30 60 90 120
NORTH
Culls II 2008 Aerial
Feet
0 15 30 60 90 120
NORTH
Culls II 2009 Aerial
Feet
0 15 30 60 90 120
NORTH
Culls II 2012 Aerial
0
NORTH
15 30
60
90
IFeet
120
OWNER/DEVELOPER
CULLS!!
Joe Terminella (owner representative)ineccHr.r.l. =lad __
585 W Wlloughhy Rd I
Fayetteville, AR 72701 6n"yi°'vW'"pyFre v"
1-(479)-648-4480
SIDEWALK NOTE:
CIVIL ENGINEER ACRES
A Clay Grote P E LOT 1 1 67 ACRES
10585 Thunder Rd LOT 2066 ACRES
Fayetteville, AR 72701 TOTAL 2 53 01-
1-(479)-409-6406
ZONING
I-1
RETAINING WALL NOTE:
am wen ur e.n�erv.m.ve�w<
.ter. Omen F.wm...
mdzsrva.,ms„em�
fi
CULLS II LLC
OFFICE AND MANUFATURING
EXPANSION
585 WLLOUGHBY
FAYETTE... AMA..
NORTH
/
L.
TREE PRESERVATION REPORT
*a, 6'I FEES
M
0.5 tint
S5 IT
3utl'.tinLr1LC
▪ ,
2)552 ro'41.I uV
%1r11151E rtCau 6C L
. NI', E01 fl .2.x18 .418,
t,I.C1G r:
LS:a,I
O81
29oq'a10
.54 TREE01YESTOPT
ASS 65 P SOm STATUS COMMENTS
SITE PERCEPT Ma CANOPY P[GU.5E- re'.�HGII I<aE Y RETWNE0 MOP 202A WAGE
PENILYI
5 Y.8 SF 05\1.0 I0%A PEW.- 2CE5IR 590 RENOIEO NE STORMDAWGE AO PENALTY
955 SF+616611OL ABOVE IONBG PENALTYI=12121 12 40 31 355585525550531343 REMO. ICE
1218 BASE M06621012 CALM 1 CEBMLWLABf5511862 LE STOWOU.6UTAOS WI PENALTY
CANOPY BELOW PRIERITYIYPE FRESTA MAWRJAGS 01 5CEW11 1E0 RENMEO ICE STRM OAWLE AO PENALTY
RESUMED AL
ITS
. SAYE
PUNTED NAMED RIGA SI SEEM 1650 FI NINEO MOP2000DAMAGE
423SO
161 MP
N 1216 100 SENU54D OLE BTORM DAWGE IA PENALtt
12 TOM SO FOOTAGE 6916
^nFe u!u>aN t.SCA�C.
-rtiLf+FL430 VFEMME._ .EPP ESP BEY EP
LEGEND
BALK Or CLAD,
BOUTDAW PPE
TPITP 3.0 PATHS M[�Y�YP1UYUWU_VU�h 4'^0
EMMEEME11== T11.3 REMY. .2009 ICE sTONY1-'<L+arAl -E n
SUL O-533371.111351.,
GENERAL NOTES
E
aNsruLE,Ett i,
A,s E
UFFER
•
7;A'1; Jl •
WILLGUGHBr ROAD (STATE HIGHWAY 1E,6
A NEI p44
ns mi veewnre. s.E•o . -. .r • 'r;
1
GA-
Y
•
ma I Ir
%:in•141.1$
-S.��LfWG L'VcigC M'IVL !*GQCOw
CI I
•
1 Wi--
rn.y MO iiE1r KAPI'.'V•M4 •a,4,r y: CR .14 ,.....„...._=,,,,,,,,,,
. �r.rR p.n �.... S Sv quo rcu rte'-
�iTn a•, ...lea.. t•� a
',.a...‘,F e
.-,,,,,,-....3[KM u, c•c•.•u•nrxru n Ka v., ton -'
IEWArge
24
PLAN I LIS'
•
j
.z.�._ —
GENERAL NOTES
I ALL MAMMA, C01.61 RUCTION.MLL
LOWLY MTH TRE 0£ FAVFilrEVALESN
REOUUIFJAEHIS IN Re CASE OF TUC,
VIITS GOVERN
AREA
3 SiZE FOR RAYING AN EVERGREEN 15 5
5 ALL STREET !REES RANTED 1411-1-1
DEVEIOMENT WSJ BE BONI:EDF. 'NEAR
QUESTED 1-0 PUNT TREES.
0
TITLE UNIFIED DE ELOPMENT CODE
C APTER 167 TREE PRESER ATION AND PROTECTION
167.01 PURPOSE 3
167.02 CIT OF FA ETTE ILLE TREE PRESER ATION, PROTECTION, AND LANDSCAPE
MANUAL 3
167.03 TREE REGISTR AND URBAN FOREST ANAL SIS 3
167.0 TREE PRESER ATION AND PROTECTION DURING DE ELOPMENT
167.05 TREE PROTECTION MEASURES AND CONSTRUCTION 13
167.06 TREE PLANTING, MAINTENANCE AND REMO AL ON STREET RIG TS OF WA
AND OT ER PUBLIC GROUNDS 13
167.07 COMMERCIAL TREE PRUNER SER ICE CERTIFICATE AND INSURANCE
REQUIRED 1
167.08 A ARDOUS TREES 1
167.09 LOCAL DISASTER EMERGENC 15
167.10 167.99 RESER ED 15
CD1 67:1
Fayetteville Code of Ordinances
CD167:2
TITLE XV UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
C APTER 167 TREE PRESER
167.01 P
It is the purpose of this chapter to preserve and
protect the health, safety, and general welfare, and
preserve and enhance the natural beauty of
Fayetteville by providing for regulations of the
preservation, planting, maintenance, and removal of
trees within the city, in order to accomplish the
following objectives:
(A) Objectives.
(1) To preserve existing tree canopy;
(2) To create a healthful environment for
Fayetteville residents, businesses, and
industries;
(3)
(4) To buffer noise, air and visual pollution;
(5)
(6) To reduce storm water runoff and the
potential damage it may create;
To moderate the harmful effects of sun,
wind, and temperature changes;
To filter pollutants from the air that assist in
the generation of oxygen;
(7)
(8)
(9)
To stabilize soil and prevent erosion, with an
emphasis on maintaining tree canopy on
hillsides defined as canopied slopes in
Chapter 151;
To provide habitat for birds and other wildlife;
To preserve riparian banks and beds, and
prevent sedimentation;
(10) To screen incompatible land;
(11) To promote energy conservation; and
(12) To protect and enhance property values.
(B) Principles. This chapter shall be enforced
according to the following principles:
(1) Preservation shall be the first, best, and
standard approach.
(2) If preservation cannot be achieved, on-site
mitigation shall next be pursued.
If on-site mitigation cannot be achieved, off-
site preservation shall be pursued.
(3)
(4) If off-site preservation cannot be achieved,
off-site forestation shall be pursued.
ATION AND PROTECTION
CD167:3
(5) If none of the above approaches can be
achieved, payment shall be made to the tree
escrow account.
(Code 1991, §162.01; Ord. No. 3699, §1 4-20-93; Ord. No.
4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4340, 10-2-01)
167.02C 0 F T
P P ,A L
M
The urban forester, in cooperation with other
members of city staff, shall promulgate and
periodically revise forms, procedures and regulations
to implement this chapter and publish this information
in the City of Fayetteville, Tree Preservation,
Protection, and Landscape Manual.
(A) Copies of the Tree Preservation, Protection, and
Landscape Manual are to be made readily
available to the public and shall include, but need
not be limited to:
(1) Specific criteria for gaining city approval of
tree preservation plans;
(2) The format and content of reports and plans
the applicant must submit to the city
pursuant to this chapter;
(3)
Tree protection during construction;
(4) A glossary of important terms used in this
chapter;
(5)
Size and species requirements for trees
planted for on-site mitigation or off-site
forestation;
(6) Maintenance of trees (including but not
limited to pruning, irrigation, and protection
from disease).
(B) The Tree and Landscape Advisory Committee
shall review and may recommend revisions to the
Tree Preservation, Protection, and Landscape
Manual at least every three years to reflect
changes in arboricultural and horticultural
practices, lists of preferred tree species, city
policies, or the content of this chapter.
(Ord. No. 4340, 10-2-01)
167.03 T R A U F
A
(A) Tree Registry. Trees and groups of trees which
are documented to be of historic merit, of an
uncommon or endangered species, or are of
extraordinary value due to their age, size, or type,
Fayetteville Code of Ordinances
may be registered in the City of Fayetteville's tree
registry. It shall be the duty of the urban forester
to maintain and keep this registry on file in the
urban forester's office.
(B) Voluntary registration. Registration of trees shall
be voluntary and may be done by the owner(s) of
the property on which the tree is located.
Registration shall not run with the land unless the
property owner wishes to use an express trust to
transfer a benefit in the tree or groups of trees to
the city. Registered tree owners are entitled to
consultation with the Tree and Landscape
Advisory Committee and/or the urban forester
concerning proper care and protection of the tree,
as well as an evaluation of the tree's condition.
(C) Urban Forest Analysis. The city shall initiate a
tree canopy analysis and an Urban Forestry
Effects Model study or their current equivalent
studies within the current geographical
boundaries of the city by December 31, 2012.
Thereafter, the city should conduct these studies
every ten (10) years.
(Ord. No. 4340, 10-02-01; Ord. 5427, 8-2-11)
167.0 T P
D D
A P
(A) Applicability. The provisions of this section shall
apply to proposed subdivisions, and large scale
developments required by other chapters of the
Unified Development Code to go through the
city's permitting process. Persons seeking to
build one single-family dwelling unit, or duplex,
are specifically exempt from the provisions of this
section except when the land is located within the
Hillside/Hilltop Overlay District; then all the
provisions of this ordinance shall apply. Planned
Zoning Districts should meet the percent
minimum tree canopy based upon their primary
use, but may be allowed a lesser tree canopy
requirement as part of the overall Master Plan
approved by the City Council.
(1) Subdivisions and large scale developments.
Applicants seeking approval of proposed
subdivisions and large scale developments
shall submit a site analysis plan, analysis
report, and tree preservation plan with the
preliminary plat or site plan. There shall be
no land disturbance, grading, or tree removal
until a tree preservation plan has been
submitted and approved, and the tree
protection measures at the site inspected
and approved.
(2) Grading permit. An abbreviated tree
preservation plan, as set forth in
§167.04(H)(3), shall be submitted with the
application for grading permits on projects
CD 167:4
that are not required to go through
subdivision or large scale development
process. There shall be no land disturbance,
grading, or tree removal until an abbreviated
tree preservation plan has been submitted
and approved, and the tree protection
measures at the site inspected and
approved.
(3) Building permits. Tree preservation require-
ments apply to all permit applications for
nonresidential construction, and the
construction of multi -family residential
buildings composed of three or more
dwelling units. An abbreviated tree
preservation plan, as set forth in § 167.04
(H)(3), shall be submitted with the
application for building permits on projects
that are not required to go through the
subdivision or large scale development
process. There shall be no land disturbance,
grading, or tree removal until an abbreviated
tree preservation plan has been submitted
and approved, and the tree protection
measures at the site inspected and
approved.
(4) Parking lots. Tree preservation require-
ments apply to all permit applications for the
construction of parking lots with five or more
spaces. An abbreviated tree preservation
plan, as set forth in §167.04 (H)(3), shall be
submitted with the application for permits on
projects that are required to go through the
subdivision or large scale development
process. There shall be no land disturbance,
grading, or tree removal until an abbreviated
tree preservation plan has been submitted
and approved, and the tree protection
measures at the site inspected and
approved.
(5)
Hillside/Hilltop Overlay District. Undeveloped
land located within the Hillside/Hilltop
Overlay District shall submit a site analysis
plan, analysis report, and tree preservation
plan with the preliminary plat or site plan.
Single and two family residential
development shall submit an abbreviated
tree preservation and site plan at the time of
obtaining a building permit. Structural
changes to buildings located in the
Hillside/Hilltop Overlay District that do not
result in an enlargement of the building
footprint or roof dripline shall not require an
abbreviated tree preservation plan. There
shall be no land disturbance, grading, or tree
removal until a tree preservation plan has
been submitted and approved, and the tree
protection measures at the site inspected
and approved.
TITLE XV UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE
(B) Tree preservation criteria. The urban forester
shall consider the following factors, and any other
relevant information, when evaluating tree
preservation plans:
(1) The desirability of preserving a tree or group
of trees by reason of age, location, size, or
species.
(2) Whether the design incorporates the
required tree preservation priorities.
(3)
The extent to which the area would be
subject to environmental degradation due to
removal of the tree or group of trees.
(4) The impact of the reduction in tree cover on
adjacent properties, the surrounding
neighborhood and the property on which the
tree or group of trees is located.
(5)
Whether alternative construction methods
have been proposed to reduce the impact of
development on existing trees.
(6) Whether the size or shape of the lot reduces
the flexibility of the design.
(7)
The general health and condition of the tree
or group of trees, or the presence of any
disease, injury, or hazard.
(8) The placement of the tree or group of trees
in relation to utilities, structures, and the use
of the property.
The need to remove the tree or group of
trees for the purpose of installing, repairing,
replacing, or maintaining essential public
utilities.
(9)
(10) Whether roads and utilities are designed in
relation to the existing topography, and
routed, where possible, to avoid damage to
existing canopy.
(11) Construction requirements of on-site and off-
site drainage.
(12) The effects of proposed on-site mitigation or
off-site alternatives.
(13) The effect other chapters of the UDC, or city
policies have on the development design.
(14) The extent to which development of the site
and the enforcement of this chapter are
impacted by state and federal regulations.
(15)The impact a substantial modification or
rejection of the application would have on
the applicant.
N --The above items are not presented in any particular
order of importance. The weight each is given will depend in
large part on the individual characteristics of each project
(C) Canopy area. In all new Subdivisions, Large
Scale Developments, Industrial and Commercial
Developments, and all other improvements listed
above, trees shall be preserved as outlined in
Table 1 under Percent Minimum Canopy, unless
the Applicant has been approved for On -Site
Mitigation or Off -Site Alternatives as set forth in
subsections I. & J. below. The square foot
percentage of canopy area required for
preservation in new development is based on the
total area of the property for which the Applicant
is seeking approval, less the right-of-way and
park land dedications. An Applicant shall not be
required to plant trees in order to reach the
Percent Minimum Canopy requirement on land
where less than the minimum exists prior to
development, unless trees have been removed.
T 1
M C R
ZONING DESIGNATIONS
PERCENT
MINIMUM
CANOPY I.
R -A, Residential - Agricultural
(nonagricultural uses)
25%
RSF-.5, Single-family Residential — One
Half Unit per Acre
25%
RSF-1, Single-family Residential — One
Unit per Acre
25%
RSF-2, Single-family Residential — Two
Units per Acre
20%
RSF-4, Single-family Residential — Four
Units per Acre
25%
RSF-7, Single-family Residential —
Seven Units per Acre
20%
RSF-8, Single-family Residential — Eight
Units per Acre
20%
R -O, Residential —Office
20%
RT -12, Two and Three-family
Residential
20%
RMF -6, Multi -family Residential — Six
Units per Acre
20%
RMF -12, Multi -family Residential —
Twelve Units per Acre
20%
RMF -18, Multi -family Residential —
Eighteen Units per Acre
20%
RMF -24, Multi -family Residential —
Twenty -Four Units per Acre
20%
RMF-40,Multi-family Residential — Forty
Units per Acre
20%
NS, Nei hborhood Services
20%
C-1, Neighborhood Commercial
20%
CS, Community Services
20%
C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial
15%
UT, Urban Thoroughfare
15%
C-3, Central Business Commercial
15%
CD167:5