HomeMy WebLinkAbout213-09 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. 213-09
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE OF §166.18 MASTER STREET
PLAN SETBACKS OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW
THE EXISTING STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 1121 N. MISSION
BOULEVARD TO REMAIN WITHIN THE MASTER STREET PLAN RIGHT-
OF-WAY SETBACK AND TO BE IMPROVED GREATER THAN THE 10%
REPLACEMENT COST ALLOWED BY CODE.
WHEREAS, Section 166.18 of the Unified Development Code does not permit
improvements to buildings that lie within the Master Street Plan right-of-way setback; and
WHEREAS, a Master Street Plan right-of-way setback of 48.5 feet from centerline is
required for this portion of North Mission Boulevard, a Principal Arterial; and
WHEREAS, the established setback line results in a building that partially encroaches
into the setback and the nonconforming structure therefore may not be improved; and
WHEREAS, the existing structure on the subject property would have to be removed or
substantially altered for redevelopment or improvements if required to comply with the current
Master Street Plan; and
WHEREAS, the property owner wishes to improve the dilapidated structure and faces a
unique and difficult hardship imposed by the Master Street Plan right-of-way setback and the
limits on repairs on a nonconforming structure; and
WHEREAS, this section of N. Mission Boulevard is not currently anticipated to be
needed for expansion; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the unique and undue hardship on the property
owner and finds that a variance from these requirements will not have the effect of nullifying the
intent and purpose of the development regulations;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, in accordance
with § 156.03 Development variances, hereby approves a variance of Section 164.12(H) of the
Unified Development Code, permitting the structure to be improved as needed so long as the
structure does not extend further into the right-of-way than it exists today.
Page 2
Resolution No. 213-09
Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, in accordance
with §156.03 Development variances, hereby approves a variance of Section 166.18 Master
Street Plan Setbacks, permitting the existing structure to remain in its current location as
depicted on Exhibit "A", provided that said approval in no way prohibits the City from obtaining
right-of-way pursuant to the Master Street Plan in the future for widening of adjacent streets.
PASSED and APPROVED this 6'h day of October, 2009.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
By:
By:l/J
SO RA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer
.....1VT......,.
tU •A
FAYETTEVILLE:
•
��..,, ' ,ON11' ".�.
Jesse Fulcher
Submitted By
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form
City Council Agenda Items
and
Contracts, Leases or Agreements
10/6/2009
City Council Meeting Date
Agenda Items Only
Planning
Division
Action Required:
Development Services
Department
ADM 09-3435: (1121 N. Mission Boulevard ROW Variance) Submitted by Colby Salazar for property located at
1121 N. Mission Boulevard, requesting a variance of the Master Street Plan setback in the manner indicated -to
allow the existing building footprint to remain in its current location and be improved.
Cost of this request
Account Number
Project Number
Budgeted Item
$
Category / Project Budget
Program Category / Project Name
Funds Used to Date Program / Project Category Name
Remaining Balance Fund Name
Budget Adjustment Attached
Depanmennt iiII3tor
City Attorney
403,11 a. L
Finance and Internal Services Director
Date
q-j8-oq
Date
`�-1$-2cn
Date
9—/9-05
Date
"AA,
Date
Previous Ordinance or Resolution #
Original Contract Date:
Original Contract Number:
Received in
Mayor's Office
Comments:
Revised January 15, 2009
City Council Meeting of October 6, 2009
Agenda Item Number
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
To: Mayor and City Council
Thru: Don Marr, Chief of Staff �Q
From: Jeremy C. Pate, Development Services Director O`
Date: September 17, 2009
Subject: Right-of-way setback variance at 1121 N. Mission Boulevard (ADM 09-3435)
RECOMMENDATION
Planning Staff recommends approval of a resolution allowing a variance of Unified
Development Code Chapter 166.18 Master Street Plan setbacks for 812 W. Cleveland
Street in the manner indicated to allow the existing building footprint that encroaches into
the Master Street Plan right-of-way to remain and be improved.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Mission Boulevard and North
Street. According to County records, the subject property was developed with a single-
family home in approximately 1921. The southeast corner of the existing rock home is
located outside of the Master Street Plan right-of-way; however, the front porch
encroaches approximately 6' into the right-of-way.
The Board of Adjustment on Monday, September 14, 2009 voted to approve a proposal to
bring the non -conforming building into compliance In addition to Board of Adjustment
approval, a variance of the Master Street Plan setback ordinance is required to be
approved by the Fayetteville City Council in order to permit the nonconforming structure
that is located within the Mission Boulevard Master Street Plan right-of-way to be
reconstructed or structurally altered to an extent exceeding 25% of the square footage of
the structure as it existed on the date it became nonconforming. Chapter 166.18 of the
Unified Development Code does not permit the establishment of new structures or
improvements within the Master Street Plan right-of-way. However, strict compliance
with Ch. 166.18 would cause undue hardship to the applicant, in that the structure would
have to removed or substantially altered to improve it. This situation is unique to this
property, and the variation will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of
the development regulations, in accordance with Ch. 156.03 Development variances.
BUDGET IMPACT
None.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE OF §166.18
MASTER STREET PLAN SETBACKS OF THE UNIFIED
DEVELOPMENT CODE TO ALLOW THE EXISTING
STRUCTURE LOCATED AT 1121 N. MISSION BOULEVARD
TO REMAIN WITHIN THE MASTER STREET PLAN RIGHT-
OF-WAY SETBACK AND TO BE IMPROVED GREATER
THAN THE 10% REPLACEMENT COST ALLOWED BY
CODE.
WHEREAS, Section 166.18 of the Unified Development Code does not permit
improvements to buildings that lie within the Master Street Plan right-of-way setback; and
WHEREAS, a Master Street Plan right-of-way setback of 48.5 feet from. centerline is
required for this portion of North Mission Boulevard, a Principal Arterial; and
WHEREAS, the established setback line results in a building that partially, encroaches
into the setback and the nonconforming structure therefore may not be improved; and
WHEREAS, the existing structure on the subject property would have to be removed or
substantially altered for redevelopment or improvements if required to comply with the current
Master Street Plan; and
WHEREAS, the property owner wishes to improve the •dilapidated structure and faces a
unique and difficult hardship imposed by the Master Street Plan right-of-way setback and the
limits on repairs on a nonconforming structure; and
WHEREAS, this section of N. Mission Boulevard is not currently anticipated to be
needed for expansion; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the unique and undue hardship on the property
owner and finds that a variance from these requirements will not have the effect of nullifying the
intent and purpose of the development regulations;
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, in accordance with
§ 156.03 Development variances, hereby approves a variance of Section 164.12(H) of the Unified
Development Code, permitting the structure to be improved as needed so long as the structure
does not extend further into the right-of-way than it exists today.
Section 2: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, in accordance
with §156.03 Development variances, hereby approves a variance of Section 166.18 Master
Street Plan Setbacks, permitting the existing structure to remain in its current location as
depicted on Exhibit "A", provided that said approval in no way prohibits the City from obtaining
right-of-way pursuant to the Master Street Plan in the future for widening of adjacent streets.
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 2009.
APPROVED: ATTEST:
By: By:
LIONELD JORDAN, Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasure
EXHIBIT "A"
cxIsTIIV: Sial
NE MIL
EM/44. NCI/.
SECTION 10
i -14X. P30 -V
SB 09513 134.6!
8
SI144'23
29.09
l
N
1
VI , ` o
s
RUTER: SUSTAINABLE. DEVELOPMENT. LICS13192219MEMKEVIN MAI.ONE
101.2E / ADDRESS' 1101 MISSION BOULEVARD
FAYETTEVIIE ARKANSAS
TOTAL AREA
0.549 ACRES
23.499.5! SO... FT.
SUR TTY DEscuPT10M
A PART OF TUE SOUTHWEST QUARTET (SW I/4) OF THE NORTHEAST
S21'35'z7w QUARTER(NEI/4) AND A PART OP THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (5E1/4)
85.OB' / 10OF WNSOSIX, FNT o6) NORTH, RANIGC ATHIRTY(SPO WEST. NBE(IIND
EING
/ MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COFAfiNCINO AT
-,7///
TIE SOUTHWEST CORNEA OP THE SOUIUME.ST QUARTER (SWI/41 OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NBI/4)OF SAID SF/'ITON TVJ (10);
THENCE NORTH 51.00 FEET AIONO THE WEST UNE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW 1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NEI/4)
/ OF SAID SECTION TEN (10) TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING:
THENCE N89.11'01•9/ 10.00 FEET TOA BET K" IRON REBAK MINCE
NORTH252 O FEET TO A SET W" IRON RPBAR THENCE S89'01'56.0
134.63 FEET TO AN MISTING ETON ON TIE WEST RIGHT -0F -WAY OF
ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY 45 (MISSION BOIILL'VARD7. THENCE
ve ALONG THE WEST RIGHTAO) P.WAY OF SAID MONWAY TE
�J,/ FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES:
ttatr N. SI I•N'23"W 29.05 FEET: SI8•I6'22"W 10127 FEET;
v. S21•3517W 65.06 FERE': 523.56.35"W 11.33 FEET;
SSTl6.54•W 421 R
2 FEET TO A SET IRON REBATIENCE
LEAVING SAIDRIGHT-OF.WAY N89'11.01791 13.04 FEET TO 1141: POINT
OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 0.54 ACRES (2)4993 SQ. FTX MORE OR
/ LESS. WASHINGTON COUNTY. ARKANSAS.
2954-1:1
4292'
NSG11.01w
20.00•
-1-
se cw.
SVI/4. KI/4
SECTION I9
-x. N -LTV
1489'11H 1-9/
11
NORTH STREET
(NSM1MLTI
BASIS OFDR4RINGT: ASSUME)
STATEIND. SURVEYOR'S FILE CODE:
500 -16N -30W -0-10-401-72-14S6
■ STONE MARKER
O SET I/2• IRON REBAR
• EXISTING IRON P114
+ COMPUTED CORNER
-X- FENCE LINE
0' pp 40
BRONSON ABSTRACT
DRAIN
JCC
Dar
12/15/0.1
EAR RIND 4 ASSOC.
118 S. COUSC)?
FAYITTR%Nd. AR.
(479) 444-8784
APPDOTTD
INT!
SCSLI
1• zo•
WIT
PROJICs NO.
0360.
NOV
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
PLANNING
TO:
FROM:
THRU:
DATE:
BOA Meeting of September 14, 2009
DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE
Board of Adjustment
Jesse Fulcher, Current Planner
Jeremy Pate, Development Services Director
September -9 809 Updated September 17, 2009
125 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Telephone: (479) 575-8267
BOA 09-3422 (SALAZAR / 1121 N. MISSION BLVD.): Submitted by COLBY SALAZAR for
property located at 1121 N. MISSION BLVD. The property is zoned RSF-4, SINGLE FAMILY - 4
UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 0.54 acres. The request is for setback variances to bring
an existing non -conforming structure into compliance. Planner: Jesse Fulcher
BACKGROUND:
Property Description: The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Mission Boulevard
and North Street. According to County records, the subject property was developed with a single-
family home in approximately 1921. The southeast corner of the existing rock home is located
outside of the Master Street Plan right-of-way; however, the front porch encroaches into the right-of-
way.
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
Direction from
Site
Land Use
Zoning
North
Single -Family Residential
RSF-4, Single -Family Res., 4 units/acre
South
Single -Family Residential
RSF-4, Single -Family Res., 4 units/acre
East
Single -Family Residential
RSF-4, Single -Family Res., 4 units/acre
West
Single -Family Residential
RSF-4, Single -Family Res., 4 units/acre
Proposal: The applicant is requesting a variance from the front setback requirement of 15' to bring
the existing home into compliance with current setback requirements.
Variance Issue
Ordinance Requirement
Applicant's
Request
Front Setback (Mission Blvd.)
15'
0' (a 15' variance)
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested setback variance as listed herein and as shown on
the attached drawing with the following conditions:
1. A building permit shall not be granted for an expansion to the structure, or for
improvements that exceed 25% of the current replacement cost of the structure
K:IReports11009180A Reponsl09-14-091BOA 09-3422 (Salazar 1121 Alission).dac
unless and until the City Council approves a reduction of the Master Street Plan
right-of-way for Mission Boulevard.
2. Future alterations or additions to the existing structures shall meet required
building setback regulations, unless otherwise approved by the Board of
Adjustments.
Additional Conditions/Comments:
BOARD OF ADJUSTMEMT ACTION: '1 Approved 0 Denied
Date: September 14, 2009
The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" listedin this report are accepted in total without exception by the
entity requesting approval of this>variance.
Name:
Date:
CITY PLAN 2025 LAND USE DESIGNATION: Residential Neighborhood Area
FINDINGS:
City of Fayetteville Unified Development Code
Section 156.02 Zoning Regulations
Certain variances of the zoning regulations may be applied for as follows:
A. General Regulations/Application. A variance shall not be granted unless and
until an application demonstrates:
1. Special Conditions. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are
peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to
other lands, structures or buildings in the same district.
Finding: There are special conditions and circumstances that exist for this building. The
existing structure was constructed in 1921, well prior to the adoption of the
City's zoning ordinance and Master Street Plan. Consequently, the structure is
located within the required building setback, necessitating a setback variance to
bring the building into compliance.
2. Deprivation of Rights. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning
regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other
properties in the same district under the terms of the zoning regulations.
K:1 Reports120091BOA Reports109-14-091BOA 09-3422 (Sabzar 1121 Miission).doc
• •
Finding: Literal interpretation of zoning regulations would greatly reduce the applicant's
ability to improve or expand the existing structure on the property. The existing
building could be retained on the property, but without a variance the applicant
could only make ordinary repairs not exceeding 25% of the replacement value
of the structure. As stated by the applicant, the existing structure requires
significant repairs and reconstruction, which will easily exceed the 25%
replacement cost. Thus, literal interpretation would deprive the applicant of
rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district.
3. Resulting Actions. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from
the actions of the applicant.
Finding: Special conditions or circumstances are not the result of the actions of applicant.
The location of the existing structure was determined when the property was
developed in 1914, prior to the adoption of the City's zoning regulations and
prior to Mission Boulevard being classified as a Principal Arterial requiring
48.5' of right-of-way from centerline.
4. No Special Privileges. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the
applicant any special privilege that is denied by Zoning, Chapters 160-165, to other
lands, structures, or buildings in the same district.
Finding: Granting the requested setback variance will not confer special privileges on the
applicant. The applicant is requesting approval for improvements to a historic
structure that was built prior to adoption of the zoning regulations.
5. Nonconforming Uses. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or
buildings in the same district, and no permitted or nonconforming use of lands,
structures, or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for the issuance
of a variance.
Finding: No other nonconformities were considered as a basis of the findings stated in
this staff report.
Section 156.02 C. Consideration by the Board of Adjustment.
1. Bulk and Area.
Applications for variances of bulk and area requirements shall be considered by
and may be approved by the Board of Adjustment.
2. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be held.
Finding: A public hearing is scheduled for Monday, September 14, 2009.
3. Findings. The Board of Adjustment shall make the following findings:
a. Minimum Variance. That the reasons set forth in the application justify the
K: IReportr120091BOA Reporu109-14-09IBOA 09-3422 (Saizar 1121 AOssian).dot
• •
granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that
will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure.
Finding: The requested setback variance is the minimum variance necessary to
accommodate the existing structure on the subject property.
b. Harmony with General Purpose. The Board of Adjustment shall further
make a finding that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the
general purpose and intent of Zoning, Chapters 160-165, and will not be
injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Finding: Granting the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of
zoning regulations, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood. The house
has existed in its current condition for almost 100 years, but is now boarded up,
in poor condition and in need of significant repairs. Granting the variance will
allow the historic structure to be retained on the property and for improvements
to occur, benefiting the public welfare and the surrounding community.
c. Conditions and Safeguards. In granting any variance, the Board of
Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in
conformity with the zoning regulations.
Finding: Staff has recommended conditions for this request which are stated on page one
of this report.
d. No Variance Allowed. Under no circumstances shall the Board of
Adjustment grant a variance to allow a use not permissible under Zoning
in the district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited
by the terms of the zoning regulations in said district.
Finding: The use is permitted in the zoning district.
A:IRepor[s120091BOA Repores109-14-091BOA 09-3422 (Sakzar 1121 Mrssion).doc
• •
8/17/2009
Chair of the Board of Adjustment
113 West Mountain St
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Chair of the Board of Adjustment:
The property of 1121 N Mission Blvd (formerly 1101) is currently a nonconforming residence as a
portion of the east side of home falls within the current setback requirements. As a result I'm only
permitted to improve 25% of the property's value before an adjustment variance is required. The
purpose of this request is to allow me to completely finish out the existing dwelling on property.
This historic stone dwelling, built in 1921, has beautiful stone exterior walls however the inside is in
need of a complete build out. The dwelling is currently uninhabitable. It has no flooring, walls,
electrical or plumbing. This is a complete new construction build -out for the interior. The build -out will
create no additional encroachments on the current setback requirements.
Below I have addressed the information requested on the adjustment variance application:
• Existing building size: 1490 sq/ft ; Proposed building size 2420 sq/ft
The additional square footage will be created by finishing out the interior with two levels as
opposed to the one level (as it currently stands). This finish out will produce the additional
square footage without expanding the footprint of the dwelling.
• Home will have drive way which will provide up to 4 parking spaces
• Existing dwelling on property falls within the current building setback requirements. I am
requesting building set back variance to allow to me to finish out the existing structure.
A) This historic stone dwelling was built in 1921 and has been abandon for many years. Many
roads were established creating setbacks after the dwelling was built. New developments
with raw land are able to give consideration and adhere to existing setback requirements
where as this dwelling was built prior to the establishment of current setback requirements.
B) A portion of this historic stone dwelling is located in an easement (within the setback
requirements) which would require the home to be torn down and rebuilt according to
current setback requirements OR improve the home up to 25% of the current property
value which would not be sufficient to finish out the structure ultimately leaving it
uninhabitable as it currently stands.
C) The historic stone dwelling was built in 1921. The infrastructure has changed over the years
through Fayetteville's growth and expansion causing the dwelling to fall within an
easement.
• •
D) Granting this variance would allow me to complete this historic stone dwelling as would any
other home owner be permitted to complete their home. This dwelling is in need of total
interior restoration which would require more improvements than the current code allows.
I have included a warranty deed for the purpose of providing the complete legal description of the
property. In addition you will find a copy of the survey and an enlarged plat of the property from that
survey which is to scale.
If you have questions regarding this information please contact me.
Sincerely,
Colby Salazar
2248 Hummingbird Ln
Fayetteville, AR 72703
479.871.6364
Colby.salazar@gmail.com
ISTI14 STEW
NT fa
Sv1/4, I4E114
SUI Iw 10
58708'58'E 134.63'
PT. S6'1/4. NEI/4
TOTAL AREA
0.54* ACRES
23.499.5* SO. FT.
5
9
29.05'
S1S1612Y//
1
521'3514/"
65.06'
UO%
«Nµ
tioe
S3
42S2' / 28'8417/
6c/
N89'11.0119
J20.00'
NES -11.01
TCR
SVI/4. 1.61.04
SUTTON 10
NORTH
(A STREET
(KVW{P
101.27
'T
53'
4'
ROPER: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC
ER/APR' KEVIN MALONE
ADDR6.T5• 1101 MISSION BOULEVARD
FAYETTEVOI$ ARKANSAS
VIM Mr DESCRIPTION
A PART OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SWI/4) OF THE NORTHEAST
QUARTFA(NEI/4) ANDA PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SEI/4)
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4), ALL IN SECTION TEN (10).
TOWNSHIP FKLEFN (16) NORTH, RANGE THIRTY (30) WEST, BEING
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT
TIE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TNESOUITIWEST QUARTER (SWIM) OF
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NEI/4) OF SAID SECTION TEN (10);
THENCE NORTH 5100 FEET ARANO THE WEST LINE OF THE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SWI/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (14131/4)
OF SAID SECTION TEN (10) TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCEN/19I I'OI"W 20.00 FEET TO A SET 4" IRON REDAR; THENCE
NORTH 252.00 FEET TO A SET K" IRON MBAR; THENCE S3P0F'51(E
134.63 NISI TO AN 13KISTNO IRON ON TOE WEST RIGHT -0F WAY OF
ARKANSAS STAR: HIGHWAY 45 (MISSION BOULEVARD); THENCE
ALONG TIFF WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SND HOHWAY THE
FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES:
SI IV423w 29.05 FEEL; SI8•16'22-0/ 10117 FEET;
S210512T'W 65.06 FEET; 523656'35'W 34.33FEE1;
S37126.54"W 42.12 PEET TO A SEI' W. IRON MBAR; THENCE
LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY NBPI1'01"W 1304 FEES' TO THE POINT
OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.54 ACRES (234993 SQ. FT.L MORE OR
LESS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS.
(ASIS OFRLNRI.YGV ASSUMED
.STATE LAEVO SER PA FUR'S FILE CODS
500 -16N -30W-0.10-401.72-1486
■ STONE MARKER
O SET 1/2' IRON RE BAR
• EXISTIN5 IRON PIN
+ COMPUTED CORNER
—%— FENCE LINO
tl 20' 40' 60'
BRONSON ABSTRACT
DRSJW
JCC
D4ft
II/EB/08
ALN ROD 14S50C.
Tu S. COLLEGE
P4 YElTEVLFlX. AA
(489) 444-1I84
APPROVIO
DAPI
SCALE
r• 20
SHEET
PROJECT N0.
08804
Uri.
°,R,
0
0
N
PT. SW1/4. NE1/4
SECTION 10
T -16-N, R -30-W
0.42± ACRES
TOTAL AREA
0.541 ACRES
23,499.5± SQ. FT.
2 -STORY
• ROCK HOUSE
W/ BASEMENT .
& GARAGE
#1101
• /
S21'35'27"W
65.06' /
S23'56'3/
34.33'
X
20
S37'26'54"W
42.82'
N89'11'01"W
20.00'
N89'11'0114
13.04/
S4 COR.
541/4, NEI/4
SECTION 10
1T -16-N, R-30-4
-F
NORTH STREET
(ASPHALT)
/
/
Si 1'44'23'
29.05'
S18'16'22"W
101.27' /
/
/
BUYER: SUSTATN#V
SELLER: KEVIN M/
ADDRESS: 1101 MTh
FAYF ET
SURVEY DESCRIPTION
A PART OF TIME SOUTHWEST QUARTER
QUARTER (NE1/4) AND A PART OF THE S
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW I /4),
TOWNSHIP SIXTEEN (16) NORTH, RANGE
MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS F.
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TFIE SOUT
THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NEI/4) OF S
THENCE NORTH 51.00 FEET ALONG TFIE
SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SWI/4) OF TILE i
OF SAID SECTION FEN (10) TO THE TRUE
THENCE N89°11'01"W 20.00 FEET TO A SE
NORTH 252.00 FEET' 1'0 A SET 'A" IRON RE
134.63 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON ON TI
ARKANSAS STATE HIGHWAY 45 (MISSIO
ALONG THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SA
FOLLOWING BEARINGS AND DISTANCES
S1I°44'23"W 29.05 FEET; 518°I.
S21 °35'2T'W 65.06 FEET; S23°5.
S37°26'54"W 42.82 FEET TO A SET /-
LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY N89°11'01
OF BEGINNING, CONTAINING 0.54 ACRES
LESS, WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSA
•
0
•
—X-
0'
DRAWN
• •
BOA09-3422
Close Up View
SALAZAR/ 1121 MISSION
RSF-4
LAKE LUCILLE
RSF-4
RSF-4
0
w
0
K
oeCz
-
RSF-4
SUBJECT PROPERTY
v
RYAN,
RSF-4
r�
R$be
RUSH DR
J,
El
3 0
RSF-4
r _I
RSF-4
RSF-4
LAKESIDEDR
EITJ
R
Overview
0 75 150 300 450 600
Feet
•
•
BOA09-3422
One Mile View
SALAZAR/ 1121 MISSION
H A j 14
RMF•24
I-1
MF -40
Al D:
Alm
ASH ST Fd
P2D
RPZD
s
iUF
4
1lMF�
kMF-2
RMF.2
1
•
•
11
24
ILLER
•J RSF
RSFJ
RSF4
RAF -24
CA
RSFJ
RE ST
t1C: S,r RSF-4'
R
WsQN Sy
SF ”--‘5F4
HOLLY
HOLLY ST
4
CIA LH RSF
RJSFJ
4
G2
RSF-4
ELM ST
RSFJ
m G2 p
R-0
RSF-4 rn
rn
R-0 Z
R-0 m
co
R ST m
P-1
sF1111
ASH ST
11 RSF-4 RSFJ
ATI 1AR
Rt -1l2-
C-2
C-2 N
P -I
C -2I
P•1
MEMOR'
RSF4 RSF }J w RSFJRSFJW R-0
ADAMS ST co w R
Q 0 RSF-4
Y..
RSFJ RSF-4
HORN ST
SFJ
SP,• RSF4 RSF-4 RSF-4? RSF4
ROSPECT STS=RI.fPR4O55PECT
RSFJ
•
Thick
TpN woe.
LOUISE ST M.F$L
C-2
1
RO
RSF4
1-.
C-2 +�
RSFJ$
C-2 J
3•
RSF� INUY HILL ST
� • RSF-4RSF4 RSF-4 RSF4
RSF4
ST ST -
2
RSF4
CO ▪ RSFJ RSF4 RSF
I ELM ST
RJ Z
2 R RSFJ
ww
H
DEBRA DR ;
Q RSF-4 w
zcC
w ASH ST 23
r) w RSF-4
ill\ EDNA ST
URAL WAY
r
C-2 ZJI�, �I R
•�' RP 4
I.
SHI
C-2
RSF4 41 I
RSFJ
QO
09'
RSF4 7
BROAD / isn
RSF4 / •R
RSFJ
P1
RSFJ
RSF-4
EL
RSF-4
PRIVATE 1927
AMeeRIR -4R
RSFJ
>-
>-
w
R-4
VIEW
R -A
RSF-4
SUSAN DR,
.•
RSFJce
-
CO 00
N
O RSFJ
U
CZ
-
O
RSF4
RSF-4 %-
nit QR
RSF-4
44+
P1 ZN
z n Q
J FFr-ii Y
h
Jcdiw..
cit
RPZD
-15
0 1
¢ HAMMOND ST_.
2 RSA -4 I RSF
N
v1 Z
RSFJ N AP eeURY O' Rf RSF4
1t 0 OPE /LL$SF4 1.
SUBJECT PROPERTY
R Kl. E'/C
=-4,1 t•
RS RSF4Rr. F
'RSFJ gSFJRSFd
I�r
R-0
YAN:LN// NGf.
1 ,� RSFaJ / RSFJ 7
J LAKESIDE DR /
R-0
URN ST ‘`,,..„.yr 0 ‘991'WRSFJ
sAxTEt�tN- RSFJ
RSF4 OR JAO -�
RSF-4 RSF4' R9-4'9
PROSPECT ST RSFJ f2
CC
\\a \
•
G2 RSF4 RSFJ RSFJ) RSF4 t RO(!`KWDDDTRL
REBECCA ST -- j RSFJw 0 a -Ili
C-2 RSFJ RSFJ W RS"
: J RSFJ ' Iy12 ! •2' RSFJ S/:_;
RSF-4 RSFJ> 2 - k1�Sj
O
RSF-1
.�
RSF JViri �
R5F (� I
11
ILA SRSFJ RSFJ SDA IDSON ST J \.Rsv N m
�EY 519 RSF-4 < Y'"N
G2 F RSFJ J
w
O O
RSFJ
RSF.4 RSF4 1J /
dw RSFJ Z 6 ON
RSF
NC
MSC MSC
'I Q M
USC
sci
M
MSC MSC
letSC
P4
-0
NC
NC
en G F 'yam 7O / : \
F4 ✓
00
MAPLE ST 7 RSRSF4 RSF
C
2 hi
C RSF4 14$4•4< RSFJRM1F14 1-1J v ,
= 3� �Vtis
AYETTE ST RMF -13,"-6
RSFJ+P-1Mb .RSFJ I-1 RSFJ ;_a•4`,�O�R, •ORitsqispsF.e SUTTON ST asF, _ WOQOyN'Qe1'DRl1 I RSF4 RSFJ f QRSFJ _ _ _ _�\c1�RSFJ� RSFJ.MSC I. R-0 R7 I4 21 7��
CONNERrST t'-1 240 ' g1�
_-AMF.2aR1.F-2F
P4
RMF -24 Q RSJt
.zaRMF-z•� '
W M RMFZ.RAF-=. S �
J1ldPR//
nIgGMSC
•I SON
CMSCrir MS
slw
SPRING•
C DC
;
s"FYb QUI•¢
• ,Ilei rjl,l
eemegis c :•
r _ ioc
Da-7_6E11
,I7t1
e 't1F
I
RAF-zR.1
O
DL RAF -2•
.37 �y•
y�_' RAF -24 ' _-
4R•0P-1RMF- RAF -24R
R is
rv, _ RAF -34
RSFJ
�RODGERyO�\`- 7
RSF-4
RPZD
P-1
03 SPINEL LNK
O
('7 Qi (li
+ RPZD
RSF-4
-0� JPHIREOR
RSPJr/OOT PL
- CLIFFS of .... 'aSFJ
RSFJ
RPZD
P4
MSC
Overview
Legend
Subject Property
80A09-3422
Boundary
0 0.25 0.5
1M
iles
• •
BOA09-3422
Close Up View
SALAZAR/ 1121 MISSION
LAKE LUCILLE
RSF-4
RSF-4
NORTH ST
RSF-4
RSF-4
LAKERIDGE DR
RUSH DR
RSF-4
SUBJECT PROPERTY
R SF -4
BRYAN LN
RSF-.
EMERsoN LN
RSF-4
JACKSON DR
RSF -4
LAKESIDE DR
R
cr
cn0
2
RGF-4
Overview
75
150
300
45ij
600
Fi!ut
BOA09-3422
One Mile View
R -A
rc
•
•
SALAZAR/ 1121 MISSION
C-2
RSF-4 WINDY HILL ST
RSF-0RSF-0 RSF-4 RSF-4
RSF-4 RSF-4
o C-2
R-0 ;til _
RSF-0 RSF-0 m EST ST RSF-4 act
Z RSF-4
RMF -24 ELM ST R O Z RSF-4 RSF-4 RSF RSF-4 O� fn O ��
RMF -240
Q ELM ST EL p0 O RS"
P
RSF-4 R-0 r11 j RSF 4 0 RSF-4 W 3 Z
N 0 0
Q R-0 Z RSF-4 PRIVATE 1927 Z ? rn Y
PO 'LAR ST o
W W (r Q N
'RMF -40 RMF -24 RSFd W ~ A Mei R O/? � • w
1 1 MILER R -OC-? r Q Q O RSF-4 J Q
I-1 ap w RSF 4 p DEBRA DR Q.
ASH ST I.,RMF as RSF P-, U 123F-4�
RSF-1 wAciEE
RPZD z � a.
RSF •t Q W ASH ST -�j
-..r R -A
SF.4 ASH sr C 2
RPZD R tRMF-24 RSF RSF-0 C-2 IS W = EDNA ST RSF-4 RSF-4 R';F •t
RPZD
SYCAh ARE STRT-12R-0 RSFdz RSF••1
RT -17 c-2 AEWPOINTO
R
Kb?' -4
')r v
SUSAN DR
i
RSF-1
RMF -4n RSF-4
RMF -40
SPRUC: ST RSF-4
RMF -40 k4 r-24
C-2
C-2 NATURAL WA it
P-1 C-2 RSF-4
C2 OQ` RPZ°> SUBJECT PROPERTY 1 HAMMOND ST S RSF-0
WSON ST P 1 MEMO�\P� fQ 1 �`� O� RSF-4 RSF-1 /1g00Co `Z
1 SF 1 RSF-4 t%) RSF-4 m P 1 RSF 13Z
RMF -Y4 ABSHIER �R� RSFd qPP
LLI
HOLLY ST v _: LpC NCC � CE�'UR y P 1 G�
iL = f RSF-4 -4 RSF OR RSF-4m
sFd '4TE1205 = �QL��Ge RSFd Gp RSF-0 ONOPES� RSF-4 0
Pte' ICIA IN R RSF-0 Q RSF-4
RSF Y Y N KIN Ce
K2MFJ40 -SF 4 70
; C,4 RSF�RSF-0RSFdQ li / A CN G O
3 RSF-4 RSF-4 JJ P P 1
RMF-:'. �� ORTH ST RSF-4
RMF-.,. RSF 4 -5-RSF-4 R 4RSF aW R-0 R
ADAMS ST > Q RSF-0R�f R-0 LAKESIDE DR RSF-4 RIDGE
RSF 4 RSF-4 O Q O C- RSFdBAXTER Lt• RSF-1 �O
HAW HORN ST O x Z R -o C-2R_o
RMF 2• .fid EBUR N ST RSF-0 20 JAC�Sp RSF-4 RSF-0�
1 a = RSF-0 RSF-4 �/ SF -4 Q�RSF-3 Q�
SF -4
RSF -4 RSF-0 RSF-0= RSF-0R-0C 2 RSFd RSF RSF-4cc rr
On m
ROSPECT ST RMF -24 ST RSFd PROSPECT ST RSF-0
g e
RSF-4 1 PR LU
RSF-4 RSF-4 RSF-4 RSF-4 W
R-0 c-2 ROCKWOOD TRL a a
Q r: -:,...
RENT R.,0:02
°c-2 R-0REBECCA ST > RSF-4 X
N c
0z LOUISE ST RMF -?4 BCVOC-2 RSF-4 RSFdQ RSF-4 Q RSF-4 2 RSF-4 C-2 C-2 RSF-4 WRSF-4 --
Z. CJ(
Lo R RSF-4 RSF-4 R 4 w DAVIDSON ST RSF-4J Z RSF 4 N o W PCtK
-J RS ILA ST ¢ c'2 04 O RSF-4 y O = U & -c
5 RMF 4. RSF-0 RSF- RSF-4 ALLEY 519 RSF-4 Q Q tP Z S
RMF -24 R -40 W RSF-4C-2 C-2 ~ RSF-4 R 4 RSF-4 RSF-4
>.-
<
P�ON
I
NC x MSC
MAPLE ST z ?i0 m D
O RSF-4
NO
^ MSC RSF-4 RSF-0Q RSF dRMF-24 1 1 RSF-4 ` O
g NC LAFAYETTE ST RSF-4 Rtif-ORMF-6
r NCNc MSCZ MSC RSF-4 RPZD RSFd RSF-4 RW -6
RSFd
ON INC = MSC SUTTON ST RSF RSFa OCw RF RPM)
MSC MSC MSCMSC MSC (� MSC RSF 4 W OOD LN 'rDR
> DICKSON S = RSF-4 RSF-4 Q RSF-4 RSF-4
Q MSC Q RSF-4 RSF-4
MS MSC
ai Ms ticASC Msc Ms. +sc Dc �� CONNER ST Rti,F .4 �� SC R -0m
MSC ° Rtv+F•241-IL
Q (A P-1
MSC SPRINGS DC RMF-Z4RMF-24 W W Q 5 frit P-1
Q P1 L
MS .GMSC 1.1SC OC >
M=- 1,..• W RMF -24 Q RSF 45 _ 13 9
MW MSC OC RMF -2 RMF -24) Q
I _ 4c Q 2 RMF-24RMF-24 Y
6:11-"(
'/, ,- O R
Y SPINEL LNK
MSCY H DC -p �, RSF-4 LINE O O
el
lascp Q M Dc pDC iRMF-24 RSF-4 LIGHTON TRL J
m ti CW �cpC RMF -24 O Q•sE 5, RODGERSO RSF-4
••KST —. J RMF -24 R RPZD a
a
lit
RMF -24 cv" RSF-4 Q
IR.-.oP-IRMF-24 RMF-24RsF-0R';F-8 = RPZD
RMF -24
RSF-4
sRpAD Vje DR P-1
RSF-4
RSF-4
au, ...�
w
}
RSF.4 W
RSF 4
LAI
RSF-4 RSF-4
P-1
Z
0
A SAPPHIRE
RSF4��'OQT
CLIFFS BPLLVD RSF-4
OR
NC
P-1
R -O
RPZD
Legend
Subject Property
BOA09-3422
Boundary
1
iM
iles
RPZD
P-1
RSF-4
MSC