Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout147-07 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. 147-07 A RESOLUTION APPROVING TASK ORDER #1 WITH MCCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000.00 TO CONDUCT AN OBSTRUCTION SURVEY OF THE DRAKE FIELD RUNWAY APPROACHES; ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,250.00; AND APPROVING A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000.00. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby approves Task Order #1 with McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $45,000.00 to conduct an Obstruction Survey of the Drake Field runway approaches. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby accepts a grant from the Arkansas Department of Aeronautics in the amount of $2,250.00. Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby approves a budget adjustment in the amount of $45,000.00. PASSED and APPROVED this 7th day of August, 2007. APPROVED: By: ATTEST: By: 472dec.k SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer C% • •,kA N5..7„3 ",roN%% �/llllllillll% TASK ORDER NO. 1 APPROACH OBSTRUCTION SURVEYS RUNWAYS 16 & 34 FAYETTEVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT STATE OF ARKANSAS COUNTY OF WASHINGTON This Task Order is written pursuant to the basic agreement entitled CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES, executed on June 6, 2006, as amended. The referenced basic agreement pertains to proposed improvements to Drake Field, Fayetteville`s Municipal Airport. This Task Order entered into and executed on the date indicated below the signature block, by and between the City of Fayetteville and McClelland Consulting Engineers (MCE) sets forth the project description, project schedule, and engineering fees related to the necessary surveys to identify any obstructions within the approaches to Runways 16 & 34 at the Fayetteville Municipal Airport. The surveys will be conducted for a Class "D" 3/ mile Non -Precision Instrument Runway Approach for a distance of 10,000 feet from each runway end, in accordance with FAA Publication No. 405 and NGS requirements. SECTION I - PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project is to consist of: assistance in applying for state and federal funding for the project; establishment of Primary and Secondary Airport Control Stations (Pacs & Sacs); field surveys to determine the geodetic location of each Pacs and Sacs; field W:IDRAKE FlELD1CONTRACTS12006-20081Task Order 1.doc surveys to establish control points for the aerial photo obstruction data; field surveys to determine the location and height of any object on the airport not identified by the aerial survey; project administration; submission of the data to NGS and the FAA; meetings with the City's Airport Department and Airport Board to review various aspects of the project; and any engineering services associated with this obstruction survey project. SECTION II - PROJECT SCHEDULE From the time the City of Fayetteville issues the Notice To Proceed (NTP), MCE will endeavor to execute the project as expeditiously as possible within an estimated approximate three (3) months period. SECTION III - SCOPE OF SERVICES MCE shall, generally, provide those services listed in the basic agreement which are applicable to this specific Task Order. Specifically, this project is likely to include: A. Establish Pacs & Sacs with control. B. Field Control Surveys. C. Aerial Obstruction Mapping. D. Project Administration W:IDRAKE FIELDICONTRACTS12006-20081Task Order 1.doc 2 SECTION IV - FEES AND PAYMENTS The following fees are to be paid to MCE as compensation for his services: A. Establish Pacs & Sacs: estimated to be $ 15,500. B. Control Surveys: estimated to be $ 5,000. C. Aerial Obstruction Mapping: estimated to be $ 22,000. D. Project Administration: estimated to be $ 2,500. The engineering cost for this project will not -exceed a total fee of $ 45,000.00. Appendices A, & B presents hourly rates for personnel anticipated to be assigned to this project and the unit prices as well as the basis of payments to be made to the MCE. SECTON V - BASIC AGREEMENT IN EFFECT: Except as amended specifically herein, the basic AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES shall remain in full force as originally approved and executed. W:IDRAKE FIELDICONTRACTS12006-20081Task Order 1.doc 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be duly executed as of the date and year first herein written. FOR THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE: By: Attest: Date: 91)L1I0-1 May ......... rrrllryl ;a: •fo •,= :FAYETTEVILLE: FOR McCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.: By: 1 '%ticraN �,,••. ���lll111111iiti��1 Pre ident Attest: Vice Pre W:IDRAKE FIELDICONTRACTS12006-20081Task Order 1.doc 4 W:IDRAKE FIELDICONTRACT512006-20081fee sheets\TO 1 Fee.wb3 o 0 Co a r z m (GRAND TOTAL, ENGINEERING SERVICES PROJECT ADMINISTRATION AERIAL OBSTRUCTION MAPPING !CONTROL SURVEYS 'ESTABLISH PACS & SACS WITH CONTROL TASK DESCRIPTION CLAS!IPoCA70N> HOURLY RATE> W 0) - °' PROJECT DIRECTOR $147.00 0 PROJECT MGR.IENGR. $125.00 cd V 0 CO ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN $78.00 0 om °a o73 a o N 0 A 35 LICENSED SURVEYOR $90.00 Off! 0 0 40 0 0 Cr CO M C i2* rn CO CO CLERK TYPIST MILEAGE $48.00 $0.42 N J 0 126 CO 0 40 IV PO 0 "' o 0 CO C CO m m n m y 40 N ao N N at DIRECT Il EXPENSE M 4. al O o N cr.N p O N N p O M Ui I 8 r NN 8 EXTENDED TOTAL APPENDIX B Hourly Rates for Personnel Drake Field, Fayetteville Municipal Airport CATEGORY BILLABLE HOURLY RATE RANGE Principal Engineer Sr. Project Manager Project Manager Project Engineer II Project Engineer I Design Engineer Landscape Architect Engineering Technician III Engineering Technician II Engineering Technician I Construction Observer III Construction Observer II Construction Observer I Chief Draftsman Draftsman II Draftsman I Computer Technician Survey Technician Registered Land Surveyor 2 -Man or Robotic Survey Party Chief Soils Lab Supervisor Soils Lab Technician II Soils Lab Technician I $ 147.00 $ 137.00 $ 126.00 $ 105.00 $ 84.00 $ 86.00 $ 79.00 $ 63.00 $ 48.00 $ 79.00 $ 58.00 $ 42.00 $ 68.00 $ 53.00 $ 48.00 $ 74.00 $ 74.00 $ 90.00 $ 137.00 $ 63.00 $ 55.00 $ 42.00 $ 37.00 ClerklTypist $ 48.00 Mileage $ 0.42 * Subject to Annual Adjustment Mid -Year. W:IDRAKE FIELDICONTRACTS12006-2008\APPENDIX B TO 1.DOC City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Budget Adjustment Form Budget Year 2007 Department: General Government Division: Aviation & Economic Development Program: Airport Capital Expenditures Date Requested 8/7/2007 Adjustment Number Project or Item Added/Increased: $45,000 in the Professional Services account Project or Item Deleted/Reduced: $ 2,250 in the State Grants on Federal Projects account $42,750 in the Federal Cost Share account Justification of this Increase: Will provide for a Runway Approach Obstruction Location Survey. Justification of this Decrease: The funding will offset 100% of the expenses for the project. Increase Expense Budget (Decrease Revenue Budget) Account Name Account Number Amount Project Number Professional services 5550 3960 5314 00 45,000 07024 1 Account Name Decrease Expense Budget (Increase Revenue Budget) Account Number Amount Project Number State grants on Fed proj 5550 0955 6803 00 Federal Cost Share 2,250 07024 1 y3o`f 5550 0955 MP 0P 42,750 07024 1 Approval Signatures Reques Department ri irector Finance & Intern rvices D. tor Mayor eploi Date D to 7(0/07 Date Date Da e Budget Office Use Only Type: A B C Posted to General Ledger Posted to Project Accounting Entered in Category Log E Initial Date Initial Date Initial Date Ray M. Boudreaux Submitted By ka 1 ef5 City of Fayetteville r113� 1City Council Agenda Items ` j 1419 ��'6� Staff Review Form _ _ ;15 I'� crdJr 1 or Contracts 8/7/2007 City Council Meeting Date Aviation & Economic Development General Government Division Action Required: Department Action Required: Approve Task Order #1 with McClelland Consulting Engineers, Enc. Contact: Wayne Jones, P.E., PO Box 1229, Fayetteville AR 72702-1229, 479-443-2377, Fax 479-443-9241, in the amount of $45,000 to conduct an Obstruction Survey of the Drake Field Runway approaches. Approve the acceptance of a grant from the Arkansas Dept of Aeronautics for $2,250 / $42,750 (FAA pass-through funding). Approve a Budget Adjustment. 45,000.00 Cost of this request 5550.3960.5314.00 $ Account Number 07024 1 Project Number Budgeted Item Department 'rector City Attorne Budget Obstruction Survey Program Category / Project Name AviIED Imp Funds Used to Date Program / Project Category Name Airport Remaining Balance Fund Name Budget Adjustment Attached Q. )i,,,` 7- 11-o7 Finance ar)d Internal Service Director Date Ma r / F ate X Previous Ordinance or Resolution # Original Contract Date: Original Contract Number: Comments: The project is 100% funded by grants. City Council Meeting of: August 7, 2007 Agenda Item Number: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO/STAFF CONTRACT REVIEW MEMO TO: Mayor and members of the City Council THRU: Staff/Contract Review Committee FROM: Ray M. Boudreaux, Director, Aviation and Economic a pment DATE: July 18, 2007 SUBJECT: Approval of Task Order #1 July 18, 2007 with McClell : nd Consulting Engineers for Runway Obstruction Surveys and a Budget Adjustment recognizing $45,000.00 in Grant revenues. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Task Order #1 July 18, 2007 with McClelland Consulting Engineers for runway obstruction surveys of both approaches to the runway at Drake Field and a Budget adjustment recognizing the grant revenue of 45,000.00 through the State of Arkansas Department of Aeronautics FAA System Planning Grant #3-05-0000-006-2007 and a 5% match from the State Aeronautics Commission. BACKGROUND: The first step in implementing the Fayetteville Municipal Airport five year improvement plan to improve the Runway Safety Area on the north end of the airport is to conduct a Runway Obstruction Survey. This project will provide updated survey information for both ends of the runway and will be conducted TAW guidance provided by the FAA. The survey is necessary to insure that the project we have proposed will adequately remove the obstructions currently affecting approaches from the north. Members of the Airport Board and staff presented the project to improve the Runway 16 RSA and received assurance of funding over the next few years. This project is the first of several and is the necessary first step. DISCUSSION: Airport staff presented application for this project to the State Aeronautics Commission July 11, 2007 in Searcy, Arkansas. The project was approved and a grant letter is part of this package. The State grant is for the 5% match to the Federal AIP funding which is being provided by the FAA to the State as part of the FAA System Planning Grant #3-05-0000-006-2007 "to develop Obstruction Surveys for proposed instrument approaches at multiple General Aviation Airports as specified by the State of Arkansas Department of Aeronautics." Fayetteville Municipal Airport, Drake Field is one of the airports included in the FAA grant. BUDGET IMPACT: This project is 100% funded by the FAA State System Planning Grant to the State of Arkansas ($42,750) and the State of Arkansas Aeronautics Commission ($2,250). Attachments: Task Order #1 Grant Letter from Department of Aeronautics Staff Review Form Budget Adjustment Aviation and Economic Development Department Fayetteville Municipal Airport, Drake Field 4500 South School Avenue, Suite F Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Ray M. Boudreaux, Director RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING TASK ORDER #1 WITH MCCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000.00 TO CONDUCT AN OBSTRUCTION SURVEY OF THE DRAKE FIELD RUNWAY APPROACHES; ACCEPTING A GRANT FROM THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,250.00; AND APPROVING A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $45,000.00. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby approves Task Order #1 with McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $45,000.00 to conduct an Obstruction Survey of the Drake Field runway approaches. Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby accepts a grant from the Arkansas Department of Aeronautics in the amount of $2,250.00. Section 3. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, hereby approves a budget adjustment in the amount of $45,000.00. PASSED and APPROVED this 17th day of August, 2007. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: By: DAN COODY, Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer MIKE BEEBE GOVERNOR Commissioners Marion Burton Little Rock Dr. Gene lines Little Rock Charles Simmons Rogers Don Ruggles Texarkana Lindley Smith Jonesboro Ken Johnson Pine Bluff Dr. William Morgan Paragould STATE OF ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AERONAUTICS Little Rock National Airport • One Airport Drive • 3rd Floor Little Rock, Arkansas 72202-4402 Telepho (501) 376-6781 • Fax: (501) 378-0820 July 11, 2007 Mr. Ray M. i udreaux, Director Aviation & * nomic Development Fayettevi e Municipal Airport 4500 South School Avenue, Suite F Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Dear Mr. Boudreaux: RE An 13 ZUUI F � JOHN K. KNIGHT DIRECTOR The Arkansas Aeronautics Commission in their meeting of July 11, 2007 approved a State Airport Aid Grant in the amount of $2,250.00 for obstruction survey at the Fayetteville Municipal Airport. (A1P-5%) Your grant has been assigned a number for identification purposes. Please use 2481-07 as your grant number when corresponding with our office concerning your project. You should advise the Director of this office if you find you will not be able to complete the project for the amount approved. An amendment request for the project may then be acted on at the next Commission meeting. The Commission will not be responsible for any additional project costs unless the sponsor has received notification in advance. The Commission has asked that we call your attention to Page Three (3) of your application for State Airport Aid. You agreed, when the application was submitted to start the project within three months after approval or the grant would be null and void. The next to the last paragraph requires that the project be completed within one year unless it is partially funded by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Please advise if circumstances beyond your control prevent the completion within the allotted time, otherwise, the grant may be canceled. Payment of this grant may be made on completion of the project. Please request payment of this grant in writing and include your documentation for the project at that time. Sincerely, John K. Knight Director JKJcb i McCLEL ND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. I DESIGNED TO SERVE 1 P.O. Box 7229 Fayetteville, Arkansas 72702-1229 479-443-2377 FAX 479-443-9241 July 18, 2007 Mr. Ray Boudreaux Airport Manager, Fayetteville Municipal Airport 4500 S. School Suite F Fayetteville, AR 72701 Re: Task Order No 1 Approach Surveys Fayetteville Municipal Airport Dear Mr. Boudreaux: RECEIVED JUL 1 8 2001 AIRPORT In response to your request, please find three (3) copies of Task Order No 1 for the obstruction surveys for runways 16 & 34. Please advise if you need further information regarding this Task Order. Sincerely, McCLELLAND' a NSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. l/ -t___-• Way e J% -s, P.E. Vice P•-sident Enclosure: Task Order No 1 (3 copies) W:IDRAKE FIELDICONTRACTS12006-20081BOUDREAUX-0718-TO 1.DOC: (7/25/2007) Paul Becker - Fwd: Notice to Proceed/Aeronautics/FAA From: Ray Boudreaux To: Becker, Paul Date: 7/25/2007 3:43 PM Subject: Fwd: Notice to Proceed/Aeronautics/FAA Hi Paul, Here is the information you requested. Cheers, Ray Ray M. Boudreaux, Col. USAF (ret) Director, Aviation & Economic Development 4500 S. School Ave., Suite F Fayetteville, AR 72701 ph. 479.718.7642 fax. 479.718.7646 email: rboudreaux@ci.fayetteville.ar.us »> <FearlessMl@o aol.com> 7/25/2007 3:10 PM »> Mr. Boudreaux: Please be advised that a "Notice to Proceed" is approved for the obstruction survey project at the Fayetteville Municipal Airport. FAA Airport Improvement Program Grant #3-05-0000-006-2007 in the amount of $42,750.00 will provide 95% funding for the study. A 5% state airport aid grant in the amount of $2,250.00 was approved by the Arkansas Aeronautics Commission on July 11,2007. Total project cost not to exceed $45,000.00. Please call our office at (501) 376-6781 if you have questions concerning this matter. Sincerely, John K. Knight Director JK/cb ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom3Otour 8,14.07 Clarice Pearman - Res. 147-07 From: Clarice Pearman To: Boudreaux, Ray Date: 8.14.07 5:14 PM Subject: Res. 147-07 Attachments: Res147-07 McClelland Consulting Engineers Inc TO1.doc CC: Audit; Fell, Barbara Ray: Attached is a copy of the above resolution passed by Council, August 7, 2007 approving the McClelland Task Order #1 for the obstruction study. I will forward to you via interoffice mail two of the three original agreements and forward the budget adjustment to Budget & Research. Please let me know if there is anything else needed for this item. Have a good day. Thanks. Clarice Clarice Buffalohead-Pearman, C.A.M.C., C.M.C. City Clerk/Treasurer Division 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 479-575-8309 coearmaneci.favetteville.ar.us whL11-0/ U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Southwest Region FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Runway Safety Area Improvements Fayetteville Executive Airport/Drake Field Fayetteville, AR April 17, 2009 I. INTRODUCTION P ECE VED waN APR 2 9 2009 FaVsl AIRrURT 0. bipt The purpose of this Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is to briefly present the reasons why the Federal action(s) supporting development of the proposed improvements to the Runway Safety Area (RSA) at Drake Field will not have a significant effect on the human environment. This airport is located in Washington County, Fayetteville, AR, and serves the citizens in the Fayetteville -Springdale -Rogers area. It has a single grooved - asphalt runway, Runway 16/34, that is 6,006 feet in length and 100 feet in width. The City of Fayetteville, the owner of the airport, requested Federal actions, including: A. Approval of acquisition of approximately 11.5 acres of additional property. B. Relocation of approximately 2,500 linear feet of US Highway 71 to the west. C. Relocation of Earnest Lancaster Drive to the north. D. Approval of realignment of approximately 400 feet of a channel of Airport Branch. E. Construction of drainage and earthwork to meet FAA dimensional standards. F. Approval of the Airport Layout Plan for the improved airport. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the lead agency for the proposed project; the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is a cooperating agency. All environmental issues have been reviewed by both federal agencies, as well as by the Arkansas Highway and Transportation Department (AHTD), acting on behalf of FHWA. Attached to this FONSI is the environmental assessment (EA) on which this finding is made. II. SUMMARY In 2006, the City of Fayetteville completed a Master Plan Update for Drake Field which contained a recommendation to correct the deficiencies of the RSA for Runway 16. This runway end does not comply with FAA standards due to its proximity to US Highway 71 on the north end of the Airport. This EA offers a hard look at the environmental consequences of bringing the Runway 16 RSA into compliance with federal standards. Appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies provided input on the draft EA. Local citizens were also encouraged to provide comments on the document. It has been coordinated with FHWA and AHTD, and has been made available to the public for review. For the draft EA, a notice of public hearing was published in the local newspaper, The Arkansas Democrat Gazette, on February 27 and March 1, 2009. In addition, a copy of the draft EA was provided to the United Keetowah Band of Cherokee Indians as they have a historical interest in northwest Arkansas. The public comment period was open from February 27 through April 13, 2009, and a public hearing was held on March 30, 2009, at Drake Field. Approximately 26 people, including an official from the FAA and the City of Fayetteville, attended the hearing where both oral and written comments were submitted. The final EA was prepared pursuant to the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations (40 C.F.R. Parts 1500-1508). Additionally, the final EA meets the guidelines identified in FAA Orders 1050.1E, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures and 5050.4B, NEPA Implementing Instructions for Airport Actions. No thresholds of significance were found to be exceeded in the final EA. After review of. the final EA and letters received during the intergovernmental coordination process, the public review process, and other supporting documentation, the FAA has determined that a FONSI is justified for the design and development of the proposed RSA improvement project at Drake Field. M. PURPOSE AND NEED The need for the proposed action is described in Chapter A of the EA, page A2. An RSA is a defined area surrounding the runway that enhances the safety of aircraft should one undershoot, overshoot, or veer off the runway, and provides greater accessibility for firefighting and rescue equipment. The area is required to be cleared of most objects and graded with no potentially hazardous surface variations. The area must be capable of supporting snow removal equipment, rescue and firefighting equipment, and allow for the passage of aircraft without risk of structural damage. The purpose of FAA's Runway Safety Area Program (see Order 4200.08) is to ensure all federally -obligated and certificated airports conform to the RSA standards published in FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5300-13, Airport Design, to the extent practicable. The appropriate dimensions for the Runway 16 RSA are a width of 500 feet and a length of 1,000 feet. Because US Highway 71 and Earnest Lancaster Drive converge with the extended runway centerline north of the Airport, the Runway 16 RSA does not meet this 2 standard. The RSA of Runway 16 is only 902 feet in length and tapers to a width of only 325 feet. Past grading and drainage improvements have maximized the RSA as much as possible within the current constraints. The City of Fayetteville desires to comply with FAA standards for RSAs and to be able to accommodate the requirements of the aviation community by providing a safe operating environment for all aircraft, including business and executive aircraft. The City desires to safely accommodate current demand and expected growth in aviation activity in the area, and to allow for a more flexible fleet of aircraft. IV. ALTERNATIVES The FAA explored and objectively evaluated reasonable alternatives that were considered practical and feasible in meeting the purpose and need. Chapter B of the initial EA describes the alternatives considered and the evaluation of each. FAA Order 5200.08, Runway Safety Area Program, provides guidelines for evaluating various alternatives to rectify non-standard RSAs. In accordance with this and other guidance, several alternatives were considered. However, most of these alternatives were considered impractical and unreasonable and thus were removed from further consideration. Two alternatives, including the "no action" alternative required by NEPA, were considered in detail. The alternatives evaluated but eliminated from detailed study in the EA include: Construct New Airport: rejected primarily because the cost of building a new airport, including land acquisition and design, is not justified given the financial investment in the existing airport. • Construct New Runway: rejected primarily because Drake Field does not have the aviation demand to justify the expense of an additional runway. • Relocate Existing Runway: rejected primarily due to the cost of acquiring additional property and because of limitations of the existing terrain within the approaches to the Airport. • Reducing Runway Length: rejected because the existing runway length does not exceed that required by existing and projected design aircraft. Any reduction of runway length would adversely affect the functional utility of the Airport. • Shift Runway 800 Feet South: This alternative was evaluated in detail in the 2006 Master Plan Update. While it would eliminate the non-standard RSA for Runway 16 and preserve most of the runway's functional length, it would entail extensive earthwork and paving and require the relocation of navigational aids and runway lights. This alternative was rejected primarily due to the cost associated with it. • Declared Distances: This would involve displacing the Runway 16 threshold to the south by 800 feet resulting in an unacceptable reduction in Landing Distance Available (LDA) for Runway 34 and so was rejected on functional utility grounds. • Runway Extension and Declared Distances: This alternative was also considered in detail in the 2006 Master Plan Update. It involved extending the runway 1000 3 feet to the south, displacing the Runway 16 threshold 800 feet to the south and using declared distances to eliminate the Runway 16 non-standard RSA. However, this alternative results in the loss of 800 feet of functional pavement for the Runway 24 LDA, extensive earthwork and paving, relocation of lights and navigational aides, and is cost -prohibitive. • Engineered Materials Arresting System (EMAS): A standard EMAS provides an equivalent level of safety to an RSA by providing high -energy -absorbing material that will reliably stop an overrunning aircraft by exerting deceleration forces on its landing gear. However, in order to implement an EMAS in compliance with FAA AC 150/5220-22A, Engineered Materials Arresting Systems for Aircraft Overruns, the Runway 16 threshold would still need to be displaced by 400 feet to the south resulting in an unacceptable reduction in functional utility of the runway. • Runway Extension and EMAS: This alternative was evaluated in the 2006 Master Plan Update and requires a minimum runway extension of 400 feet, extensive earthwork and paving, relocation of navigational aides and runway lights, and is cost -prohibitive. It was rejected on these grounds. The two alternatives evaluated in detail in the EA include: • Alternative One — No Action Alternative: In this approach, the airfield would remain essentially configured as it is today subject to routine maintenance. This alternative is the least expensive to implement but does not meet the purpose of bringing the Runway 16 RSA into compliance with FAA standards. • Alternative Two — Relocate Highway 71 and Earnest Lancaster Road: This approach involves relocated approximately 2500 linear feet of US Highway 71 to the west and Earnest Lancaster Drive to the north of the approach end of Runway 16. After acquisition of approximately 11.5 acres of additional land, this would provide the necessary land area to accommodate a compliant Runway 16 RSA. In addition, approximately 400 feet of Airport Branch creek must be realigned to remove the channel from the Runway 16 RSA. The realigned portion of the highway will replace the existing configuration of fieve 10 -foot wide lanes with four 12 -foot wide lanes and one 11 -foot wide center turn lane. The alternatives were evaluated based on environmental impacts and cost considerations. After a complete consideration of all alternatives studied in the EA, Alternative Two, Relocate Highway, was selected as the preferred alternative by the City of Fayetteville, and FAA concurred in this recommendation. Therefore, the FAA in this FONSI has determined that Alternative Two, relocating Relocate US Highway 71 and Earnest Lancaster Road, is the FAA's preferred and selected alternative. In arriving at this decision, the FAA considered all pertinent factors, including the environmental impacts as well as the FAA statutory charter in the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as amended, to encourage and foster the development of civil aeronautics (49 U.S.C. § 40101). 4