HomeMy WebLinkAbout106-06 RESOLUTION•
RESOLUTION NO. 106-06
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF LOCAL TELEVISION
CABLE FRANCHISING AUTHORITY AND IN OPPOSITION
TO FEDERAL LEGISLATION REDUCING LOCAL
AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, bills have been introduced into the 109th Congress of the United States that
would prevent the City of Fayetteville from requiring providers of cable and video services that
use City rights-of-way from having to obtain a franchise from the City and thus prevent the City
from meeting local community needs; and
WHEREAS, under the guise of public choice and increased competition, these bills
would nationalize franchising, setting a course toward preemption of all local authority over the
provision of cable and video services within the community; and
WHEREAS, these bills would reduce or eliminate financial and technical support that is
critical to the City of Fayetteville for the creation of local programs through public, educational
and governmental access; and
WHEREAS, these bills eliminate any build -out requirements for any video service
provider, thereby allowing providers to discriminate based on the wealth of the local
neighborhoods they choose to serve; and
WHEREAS, these bills would deprive Fayetteville residents of the ability to address
issues locally by removing to the state and federal government all customer service issues,
transferring local enforcement of franchise issues to the federal bureaucracies and courts; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville supports competition, diversity and localism in
media with a level playing field where everyone plays by the same rules to accomplish those
goals; and
WHEREAS, local cable franchising allows for cities and towns around the country to
exercise local authority, decision-making and consumer protection, to establish and support
commercial -free community television, and to receive franchise fees that private companies pay
as compensation for their use of local public rights-of-way; and
WHEREAS, under existing law telephone companies are free to enter the video market
today as common carriers, as open video service providers, or under the same local franchising
framework as cable companies; and
•
WHEREAS, the City objects to legislation that creates a subsidy to the
telecommunications industry at the expense of the City's taxpayers;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS.
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby urges the
Arkansas Congressional Delegation and all other members of Congress to oppose Senate Bill
S. 2686 and House Bill H.R. 5252.
PASSED and APPROVED this 6th day of June, 2006.
APPROVED.
By:
DAN COOD , Mayor
ATTEST:
By
,r`•��R <111.9 JTREA /,
oc F9SG.
`c�A •. •G\S Y OE% 4:0
U •
• •A
E :FAYETTEVILLE;
"si•, :`
,-- 9iQkANs>co w
i cisigTipult000
S 1 NDRA SMITH, City Clerk
ALDERMAN AGENDA REQUEST FORM
•
FOR: COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 6, 2006
/04
In gppor V
Local Cablt
-rat ill (514 j
FROM: ALDERMAN BRENDA THIEL
ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION TITLE AND SUBJECT:
A Resolution In Support Of Local Television Cable Franchising Authority And In Opposition
To Federal Legislation Reducing Local Authority
APPROVED FO . GENDA:
Bren
Alderman
a
hie!
/,
City Attorney (as to form)
,
D to
06-66-06
Date
a
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF LOCAL TELEVISION
CABLE FRANCHISING AUTHORITY AND IN OPPOSITION
TO FEDERAL LEGISLATION REDUCING LOCAL AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, bills have been introduced into the 109th Congress of the United States that
would prevent the City of Fayetteville from requiring providers of cable and video services that
use City rights-of-way from having to obtain a franchise from the City and thus prevent the City
from meeting local community needs; and
WHEREAS, under the guise of public choice and increased competition, these bills
would nationalize franchising, setting a course toward preemption of all local authority over the
provision of cable and video services within the community; and
WHEREAS, these bills would reduce or eliminate financial and technical support that is
critical to the City of Fayetteville for the creation of local programs through public, educational
and governmental access, and
WHEREAS, these bills eliminate any build -out requirements for any video service
provider, thereby allowing providers to discriminate based on the wealth of the local
neighborhoods they choose to serve, and
WHEREAS, these bills would deprive Fayetteville residents of the ability to address
issues locally by removing to the state and federal government all customer service issues,
transferring local enforcement of franchise issues to the federal bureaucracies and courts; and
WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville supports competition, diversity and localism in
media with a level playing field where everyone plays by the same rules to accomplish those
goals; and
WHEREAS, local cable franchising allows for cities and towns around the country to
exercise local authority, decision-making and consumer protection, to establish and support
commercial -free community television, and to receive franchise fees that private companies pay
as compensation for their use of local public rights-of-way; and
WHEREAS, under existing law telephone companies are free to enter the video market
today as common carriers, as open video service providers, or under the same local franchising
framework as cable companies; and
WHEREAS, the City objects to legislation that creates a subsidy to the
telecommunications industry at the expense of the City's taxpayers;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS.
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby urges the
Arkansas Congressional Delegation and all other members of Congress to oppose Senate Bill
S. 2686 and House Bill H.R. 5252.
PASSED and APPROVED this 6th day of June, 2006.
ATTEST:
By:
SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk
APPROVED:
By:
DAN COODY, Mayor
Clarice Pearman - Re: resolution. s - Page 1
From: Sondra Smith
To: Thomas, Susan
Date: 6.13.06 11:40AM
Subject: Re: resolution.
I do not think the Mayor has signed the Resolutions and Ordinances. When we get it signed we will
forward a copy to you to send to our Congressional delegation.
Sondra Smith
City Clerk
City of Fayetteville
113 West Mountain
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
(479) 718-7695 (Fax)
ssm ith@ci.fayetteville. ar. us
»> Susan Thomas 06/13/06 10:57 AM >»
the resolution that Brenda added to the agenda last week on Franchise fees which passed included a
clause that it be forwarded to our Congressional delegation. Do we have a final signed copy of that yet?
Will your office forward that, or should I? Thanks for your help.
Susan
CC: Pearman, Clarice
•
4
Clarice Pearman - Res. 106-06 Page 1
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Thomas, Susan
Date: 6.15.06 11:45AM
Subject: Res. 106-06
Susan:
Attached is a copy of the resolution passed by City Council regarding the support of franchising authority.
Thanks. Have a good day.
Clarice
•
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Brenda
Date: 6.15.06 6:09PM
Subject: Res. 106-06
Alderman Thiel,
Attached is a copy of the above resolution. I have forwarded it to Susan Thomas for passing on to the
appropriate person.
Thanks.
Clarice
rClarice Pearman - Res. 106-06
Page 1
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Brenda
Date: 6.15.06 6:09PM
Subject: Res. 106-06
Alderman Thiel,
Attached is a copy of the above resolution. I have forwarded it to Susan Thomas for passing on to the
appropriate person.
Thanks.
Clarice
ta)TtVile
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
June 19,2006
The Hon. John Boozman
United States Representative
213 W. Monroe Suite K
Lowell, AR 72745
Dear Representative Boozman,
•
On June 6, 2006 the City of Fayetteville Council passed Resolution 106-06 in opposition
of Federal legislation that limits municipal control of local franchise agreements.
I strongly encourage you to not support S 2686, Communications Consumer's Chore &
Broadband Deployment Act of 2006 or HR 5252, Communications Opportunity
Promotion and Enhancement Act of 2006.
The citizens of Fayetteville are grateful to have a Representative who is committed to
protecting the best interests of our state and our communities.
As always, I thank you for your service and hope that you will call on me if I can ever be
of assistance to you or your staff.
Sincerely,
Dan Coody
Mayor
•
113 WEST MOUNTAIN 72701 479-575-8330
FAX 479-575-8257
HntertilIe
THE CITY OF FAVETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
June 19, 2006
The Hon. Blanche Lincoln
Senator
912 W. Fourth Street
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Senator Lincoln,
•
On June 6, 2006 the City of Fayetteville Council passed Resolution 106-06 in opposition
of Federal legislation that limits municipal control of local franchise agreements.
I strongly encourage you to not support S 2686, Communications Consumer's Chore &
Broadband Deployment Act of 2006 or HR 5252, Communications Opportunity
Promotion and Enhancement Act of 2006.
The citizens of Fayetteville are grateful to have a Senator who is committed to protecting
the best interests of our state and our communities.
As always, I thank you for your service and hope that you will call on me if I can ever be
of assistance to you or your staff.
Sine
an Coody
Mayor
113 WEST MOUNTAIN 72701 479576-6330
FAX 479.676-8257
•
•
•
•
connyeesr
tete
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
June 19, 2006
The Hon. Mark Pryor
Senator
700 W. Capitol
Federal Building Room 2527
Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Senator Pryor,
On June 6, 2006 the City of Fayetteville Council passed Resolution 106-06 in opposition
of Federal legislation that limits municipal control of local franchise agreements.
I strongly encourage you to not support S 2686, Communications Consumer's Chore &
Broadband Deployment Act of 2006 or HR 5252, Communications Opportunity
Promotion and Enhancement Act of 2006.
The citizens of Fayetteville are grateful to have a Senator who is committed to protecting
the best interests of our state and our communities.
As always, I thank you for your service and hope that you will call on me if I can ever be
of assistance to you or your staff.
Sincerely,
an Coody
Mayor
t
113 WEST MOUNTAIN 72701 479-5754330
FAX 479-576-8257
•