HomeMy WebLinkAbout51-05 RESOLUTION•
RESOLUTION NO. 51 - 05
A RESOLUTION AWARDING BIDS FOR AND APPROVING THE
PURCHASE OF BULK MATERIALS AND SERVICES UTILIZED
BY VARIOUS DIVISIONS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $1,156,000.00.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
hereby awards bids for and approves the purchase of bulk materials and services
utilized by various divisions of the City of Fayetteville in the amount of
$1,156,000.00.
PASSED and APPROVED this 15th day of March 2005.
ATTEST:
si) Zit-)
By: Mtzetal
A
SO DRA SMITH, City Clerk
oCV:‘"13.4"
4:41:;11,
.‘-‘ac'••c.,' \•iCt c5; -••.&-it
tic. • • (I‘S.
to. • "0";
-..
E :FAYETFEVILLE:
.0.s. i
‘32.15.,.1.4:01:1s,:cps S
n. . A...."
' .........
• iiiiii
APPRO D
By:
DAN COODY, Mayor
•ARKANSAS
City Council Agenda Item
•
'2.65
3101°5
g, -o5
13.4ig rArcito4 I
stic ulat6 ?Ad givath3
To: Mayor and City Council
Thru: Gary Dumas, Director of Operations
From: Terry Gulley, Transportation Manager
Date: February 25, 2005
Subject: A resolution approving the 2005 bids for construction materials and
services utilized by various divisions of the City of Fayetteville.
Recommendation: Transportation Division staff recommends a resolution approving the
2005 bids for the purchase of various bulk materials and services in the amount of One
Million One Hundred Fifty -Six Thousand Dollars ($1,156,000.00).
Background: The purchase of various bulk materials and services is necessary to
maintain current infrastructure and implement the capital improvement projects outlined
in the annual 2005 Budget & Work Program.
Discussion: Sealed formal bids for asphalt and aggregate materials, curb and gutter,
street repair, hillside gravel, reflectorized paint marking, thermal striping, and topsoil
were publicly read and results are attached to this memo. Staff recommends awarding the
asphalt bid to Gilbert Central, the aggregate bid to NWA Quarries, the curb and gutter bid
to Sweetser Construction, Inc., the hillside gravel bid to Sweetser Construction, Inc., the
reflectorized paint marking bid to Time Striping, Inc., the thermal striping bid to Time
Striping, Inc., and the topsoil bid to Central Redi-Mix.
Budget Impact: Funds for the acquisition of these materials and services have been
budgeted city-wide and sufficient funds are available for the 2005 purchases.
Attached: Bid 05-10 Curb and Gutter
Bid 05-11 Hillside Gravel
Bid 05-12 Thermal Striping
Bid 05-13 Asphalt and Aggregate Materials
Bid 05-14 Topsoil
Bid 05-15 Reflectorized Paint Markings
Advanced Wamings Request to Decline Partial Award of Bid 05-15
5_/- o
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AWARDING BIDS FOR AND APPROVING THE
PURCHASE OF BULK MATERIALS AND SERVICES UTILIZED
BY VARIOUS DIVISIONS OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE IN
THE AMOUNT OF $1,156,000.00.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteviller-Alkans s
hereby awards bids for and approves the purchase of bulk materiaiged ervices
utilized by various divisions of the City of Favetteviijnj the am unt of
$1,156,000.00.
PASSED and APPROVED this 15th day of arch 2005
APPROVE
ATT4
DRA SMITH, City Clerk
moozE
ocsFo
o <m>o
mEmDC
xozcz
O 0(15-30
mzinxiz
o -z->
czaz
mPrno
0
00000
mmmom
mm -4.4w
mmooa
In in 14 14 14
NWWWW
MNmmW
.11h 4). N in
cn cn cn V
Sp000 10 4S03
Cost of City Transportation
Cost of Contract Hauling
mesa
-4..00mm-44
m-qmow
mmtopm o
then-haa-a C
WMOWW
ONmCOV
O iniaWin
wmoom
COMPLETE COST TO CITY INCLUDING TRANSPORTATION
0
11
—4
0
co
7.1-0/1(006)7!fl
1.2m.ml.CUrtalrm
tta 3 LI 14 mg 0ij
0 -0-I.
X)7Xxill -40 ozin
E033%03=0007
co000005=0,
=etc 0 0 e•
manm0d,3
a Ile 0
O corr4,74>g
0001:00...
n CO
0.
O 12,1111
@ m
X0
CD fg.
0
CL
0
tl la 44 44 44 Oc
0 TKIJ6Jr,
'--0.
(0 "IC w
0
= m a
wNI 0 W 0 in g g
ao,,,o▪ w-hmo w
IgggEtzlgt2m00 000,
0 004041—h3-11.0404,
(1.71_-;Eg 9Tt-7.'r
CA C) '" 0 0 44 in 0 cn o
10
000001 C)
4•04icn0W,
a-.13-
0•• v
"w"°:04t1
mWIE.2-400-E
m000
mo 006 0 = 0
=cc e 0
• 4•41°C CPI a
CL I I CI1
ti) r- r: 4. u) 3>
wwwwm,
olos-
asteraild
0 a
:to
00l
0
MOOZ*
00=C005
C < E 0 7,CO 3"
a) en
a 0 aoS
gi
—
0 Sanc-1
41,03r).
.=3><>
< <
m• clooto. 9
4444
WW
in44
OCA
001
WW
:a in
CA 0
CA 0
X‘40
7'
7-7
0
0
llneH locilun0
40
As 40 44 44
.1. hj ..a.
*
m WC1f-u 0
• 0A -u
.." -1 -g "1.4 -01 i. a; .4.; ic. a
in C) CD CD )10 IP Y. 20. -n
0 CA 0 w a 0
b g: 0 0 in
000
4e*
miate*
22222:.:Poow>
0 0 0 0 0 •a• 1/0 0
cc Cal •J to c
MIMEO oh).
EE EE Et a a 0 44 0 0 ,
cn o
0
0
C.11
0
CD
0
Zocomzzzzi;
0;1414-00000,
O U;&-4WWW(00
comPEEEE;
4L.121 re
00
AO 44
KD
WM412°ZZZZZ
-,0P1000000
WamWWWWW0
E F0 EE 2E E 2E 2E 3
1P..)
0 cm
0
m44411400
MMZZZ6N-L-1
O 0000.71
MCDMMEONUIWCW
.a1310
EE EE 2E Et EL •p -.3g?
mh4 i
mOC/102
Cost of Goods for 2005 Based Off 2004 Totals
•
•
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE COST TO HAUL BULK MATERIALS
Number
of
Hauls
Made
by City
Cost of
Vehicle
Operation Per Hour
$ 17.07
Total Tons of Material. 32,465.00
Cost of Labor Per Hour $ 17.49
Average Tons Per Load 19
Trips Made 1,708.68
Total Cost Per Hour
$ 34.56
McClinton Anchor (Sharps Plan
Average Trip Time (Minutes)
52
Number of Trips 569.56
Average Wait Time (Minutes)
30
Trip Time 1.37
Total Time (Hours)
1.37
Total Transport Cost $26,901.52
McClinton
Anchor (West Fork
Plant)
Average Trip Time (Minutes)
49
Number of Trips 569.56
Average Wait Time (Minutes)
30
Trip Time 1.32
Total Time (Hours)
1.32
Total Transport Cost $ 25,917.32
McClinton
Anchor
(Hindsville
Plant)
Average Trip Time (Minutes)
66
Number of Trips 569.56
Average Wait Time (Minutes)
30
Trip Time 1.60
Total Time
(Hours)
1.60
Total Transport Cost
$ 31,494.47
Total Cost
McClinton Anchor Plants
$84,313.31
NWA
Quarries
LLC.
Average Trip Time (Minutes)
60
Number of Trips 1,708.68
Average Wait Time (Minutes)
12
Trip Time 1.20
Total Time (Hours)
1.20
Total Transport Cost $70,862.55
Gilbert Central
Average Trip Time (Minutes)
60
Number of Trips 1,708.68
Average Wait Time (Minutes)
12
Trip Time 1.20
Total Time (Hours)
1.20
Total Transport Cost $70,862.55
Rogers Group Plant
Average Trip Time (Minutes)
72
Number of Trips 1,708.68
Average Wait Time (Minutes)
15
Trip Time 1.45
Total Time
(Hours)
1.45
Total Transport Cost
$ 85,625.58
Covington Enterprises Inc.
Average Trip Time (Minutes)
80
Number of Trips 1,708.68
Average Wait Time (Minutes)
15
Trip Time 1.58
Total Time (Hours)
1.58
Total Transport Cost
$ 93,499.20
CONTRACT HAULING PRICE COMPARISON
Tons to Be
MULTIPLIER Total Price
Hauled
McClinton Anchor (All Plants)
5,626.00
$3.55 $19,944.17
NWA Quarries LLC.
5,626.00
$3.25 $18,284.50
Gilbert Central
5,626.00
$3.75 $21,097.50
Rogers Group Plant
5,626.00
$3.00 $16,878.00
Covington Enterprises Inc.
5,626.00
$3.50
$19,691.00
Terry Gulley
Submitted By
City of Fayetteville
Staff Review Form
City Council Agenda Items
Contracts
March 15, 2005
City Council Meeting Date
Transportation
Division
Action Required:
Operations
Department
A resolution approving the 2005 bids for construction materials and services utilized by various divisions of the City of
Fayetteville.
1,156,000.00
Cost of this request
4470.9470.5417.00
Account Number
02052 / 1
Project Number
Budgeted Item
X
1,603,804.82
Category/Project Budget
187,600.73
Funds Used to Date
1,416,204.09
Remaining Balance
Budget Adjustment Attached
In -House Pavement Improvements
Program Category / Project Name
In -House Pavement Improvements
Program/ Project Category Name
Capital Improvement Const
Fund Name
1epartment>ector
CD 2 ti I City Attorney
Attorney
1-2S-a_s
Date
Date
42.12/0,54
Mayor Date
Previous Ordinance or Resolution #
Original Contract Date:
Origin& Contract Number:
Received in City Clerk's Office
4)1
Received in Mayor' Office
iQS> 64-- Wi
Comments:
HOW H32Irld 33IA 'd
0
rn
:031d1.11:133
•
2. BOWMAN CONCRETE CURBING INC.
°NOS GIB ON
1. SWEETSER CONSTRUCTION INC.
•
Na.u.no aNv mina
HOW 1-10aild 30IA 'd
:031311430
•
4. SWEETSER CONSTRUCTION INC.
xiw-laaa 1V21.1.N30 't
NolionaisNoo =vs 7
'3NI SN300021 931 '1
4/14, 4/, 4*
" " M a
in k
o
4, 4* 40 4/3
14 41 CFI *3
in k io
o us o tn
-C
1T1 m 111 m
cn Ch
Z Z Z Z
00 00
•
1
13AVItIO 3019111H
?IOW HONIld 331A md
:331ALLe133
•
V 01 IA C43 hi -3
64 63 444 Al
40 -• V -3 63
4ft -‘ 4.3 0 CA IQ 0 0
01 IV 0 0 0 01 0 b
bOanObborda
0 o o 0 0 o o a
'3NI ONIdIaLS 31N11
ONIdIaLS1VIAIN3H1
NOW HOMIld 33IA 'd
0
- t
:031d1la33
•
431 C. Ca NI -•
4,1 4R 4ft 40 4.0
.Cfl01Cn. .
b b b 00
ol000m°
44 4.9
ca, 14 40
RI4
K)opp
03 PI
0 0 o• ei 0 0
0 cn cn
SONINeJVM 033NVACIV
4,4,44
4f. -• 4/3 411 re
ONIVO 00 -I-I
b 511 01 b b
E
oobbcncn
0 0 0 gni rn
(/)
4/1 4l• 411
IA 40 4/1
Ota 1.▪ 3000
b fm in ° b b co= p
a o b b -4 -4
000 ET
I'3
•
0
REFLECTORIZED PAINT MARKINGS
•
PerryFranklin-Bid Number 05-15 Bid_D*2-02-2005
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
Mr. Franklin:
"Alma McIntosh" <amcintosh@aw-inc.com>
<pfranklin@cilayetteville.ar.us>
2/25/05 11:36AM
Bid Number 05-15 Bid Date 02-02-2005
• Page 1 I
Thank you for providing the bid tab information for the Reflectorized Paint
Marking bid. As discussed with Brad Bickle, our estimator, based on our bid
prices, we are not in a position to perform only the pavement markings
requiring hand -work. However, we will be more than happy to supply all
markings, including the long -line markings, at the prices submitted in our
bid. You will be extremely impressed with our work should you choose to
award the entire bid to Advanced Warnings
Thank you for your consideration.
Alma McIntosh
Advanced Warnings
P 918/682-0039 F 918/682-5436
amcintosh@aw-inc.com
Clarice Pearman - Res. 51-05 Page 1
From: Clarice Pearman
To: Gulley, Terry
Subject: Res. 51-05
Attached is a copy of the resolution passed by City Council, March 15, 2005 Please see that I get a copy
of the Bid 05-13. It was not attached in the backup.
Thanks.
Clarice