Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout136-04 RESOLUTION• RESOLUTION NO.13 6- 0 4 A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT LESSER DEDICATION OF PARK LAND FROM OLD TOWNE LLC IN LIEU OF ITS DEVELOPMENT OF ITS DEDICATED THREE ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK WHEREAS, §166.03 (K) allows a lesser dedication of park land for a neighborhood park if approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Old Towne LLC desires to develop its three acre dedicated neighborhood park to Fayetteville park standards in lieu of the amount it would normally have to contribute to the park land fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves the Agreement To Accept Lesser Dedication of Park Land From Old Towne LLC In Lieu Of Its Development Of Dedicated Neighborhood Park attached as Exhibit "A" as full satisfaction of Old Towne LLC's normal contribution in lieu of a portion of its park land requirement and authorizes the Mayor to sign said Agreement. PASSED and APPROVED this 7th day of September, 2004. ATTEST: By: �a+-% 6 SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk By: APPROVED: DAN COODY, Mayor • • AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT LESSER DEDICATION OF PARKLAND FROM OLD TOWNE LLC IN LIEU OF ITS DEVELOPMENT OF DEDICATED NEIGHBORHOOD PARK WHEREAS, Old Towne LLC seeks to create a large residential subdivision to be known as "Laureate Fields" which would require dedication of parkland sufficient to create a neighborhood park; and WHEREAS, Old Towne LLC seeks to dedicate three acres to create this neighborhood park and develop this neighborhood park as shown on the attached concept plat in lieu of contributing the remaining amount of money that would have been required by U.D.O § 166.03 (K) into the parkland development fund; and WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville's principal purpose when enacting the Parkland Ordinance was for developers to create and develop parks for their new residents which will be satisfied by this agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Fayetteville and Old Towne LLC agree to the following commitments to satisfy the development requirements of Fayetteville Unified Development Code §166.03 (K) Park land dedication. 1. Location: Old Towne LLC shall provide a minimum 3 acre neighborhood park at a location approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Fayetteville Planning Commission. 2. Term: This Agreement shall become effective upon the issuance of final plat for Laureate Fields Subdivision. 3. Construction of Park: Old Towne LLC shall design and construct the park in conformance with the City of Fayetteville park standards and shall include the following amenities typically found within a neighborhood park: grass fields, trees, walking trails, picnic tables, benches, stone or brick cooking grills and water hydrants. All designs shall be reviewed and approved by Parks and Recreation Staff and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. The Park shall be fully developed pursuant to the approved design within one year of final plat. 4. Park Land Fees: The value of the improvements shall total at least the amount of money which would have been required by U.D.O. § 166.03 (K). 5. Maintenance: The Laureate Fields Property Owner's Association (POA) shall maintain the neighborhood park for ten years from the date of issuance of the final plat. Maintenance shall be to park standards. After this ten year period, the City shall assume normal park maintenance. • 6. Not an Agent: It is understood that Old Towne LLC is not acting as an agent for the City of Fayetteville. 7. ADA• It is the policy of the City of Fayetteville that no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of that disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, program or activities of the City of Fayetteville or be subjected to discrimination by the City of Fayetteville. Old Towne LLC agrees to comply with this policy regarding construction and use of this park. OLD TOWNE LLC 1 : �•� By: TRAC vir HOS'' S DAN COODY Managing Member of Mayor Old Towne LLC CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Attest: Sondra Smith, City Clerk Sondra Smith - Laureate Fields/Schlegel Property Page 1 • • From: Rebecca Ohman To: Smith, Sondra Date: 8/27/04 9:33AM Subject: Laureate Fields/Schlegel Property Sondra, We've made a change to the articles of agreement for the Laureate Fields Subdivision project. Would you please strike through "15 years" for the POA to maintain the park and change it to "ten years?" This change is reflected in the contract and we would like them to be consistent. Thank you, Becca NAME OF FILE: CROSS REFERENCE: Item # Date • Resolution No. 136-04 wlagreement Document • 1 08/16/04 memo to mayor & City Council 2 draft resolution 3 letter to Rebecca Ohman from Milholland Company 4 copy of preliminary plat 5 copy of PRAB minutes 6 Staff Review Form 7 memo to Planning Commission 8 memo to Jeremy Pate g memo to Subdivision Committee 10 letter to Jeremy Pate from Milholland Company 11 memo to Planning Commission 12 copy of Close Up View 13 copy of One Mile View 14 memo to Rebecca Ohmann 15 copy of letter from Milholland Company 16 Conceptual Park Layout map NOTES: • • 9/7/6 City Council Meeting of September 7, 2004 / 36, Agenda Item Number CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO K Card To: Mayor Coody and City Council bP-thcdon Thru: Gary Dumas, Director of Operations Connie Edmonston, Parks and Recreation Director From: Rebecca Ohman, Park Planner gra Date: August 16, 2004 Subject: Resolution to accept the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommendation to accept a waiver of the Park Land Dedication Ordianance and accept a combination of land and park development for Laureate Fields Subdivsion (Schlegel Property); approval of a Cost Share Agreement with Paradigm Development; and a waiver of the Competitive Bidding Process. RECOMMENDATION Parks and Recreation Staff recommends accepting the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recornmendation to accept a combination land and park development for Laureate Fields Subdivision Schlegel Property; acceptance of the Cost Share Agreement with Paradigm Development and a waiver of the Competitive Bidding Process for the design and construction of the Laureate Fields Subdivision neighborhood park. BACKGROUND The Laureate Fields Subdivision, also known as the Schlegel property is located on Salem Road, west of Deane Soloman Road and the Springwoods Development. The owner is Tracy Hoskins of Paradigm Development and the engineering firm is Milholland Company. The development contains 176 single family units on 73.39 acres. The requirement for park land is 4.22 acres and money in lieu is $97,560. The Park Land Dedication Ordinance states if a major development is over 40 acres or 100 units, the requirement is land. ':..However, if the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board determines that a neighborhood park is not feasible or advisable, it may recommend to the City Council that a cash contribution pursuant to our ordinance be accepted in lieu of land dedication. The City Council will either accept the recommendation for a cash contribution or return the subdivision plat to the Parks Board with instructions or further study." (Unified Development Ordinance No. 166.03K) Parks and Recreation Staff met with the owner and Milholland Company to evaluate the site. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan indicates a need for a neighborhood park in this area, as no parks are located within a half -mile of this development. The development was approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board (PRAB) on June 7, 2004 and approved again on August 10, 2004 with this final proposal. City Council Meeting of September 7, 2004 Agenda Item Number DISCUSSION Tracy Hoskins proposes to provide 3.26 acres for a neighborhood park development for the Laureate Fields Subdivision. As part of this agreement, the developer will design and construct the park to the City of Fayetteville Park Standards and shall include amenities found within a neighborhood park. All designs shall be reviewed and approved by Parks and Recreation Staff and the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. All construction documents and practices shall be reviewed by Parks and Recreation Staff prior to start of construction, during construction and followed by a final approval. All improvements shall total at least the money in lieu of requirement which is approximately $22,200. The developer, Tracy Hoskins has stated he would expend funds to the maximum necessary to improve the park to the standards of a typically improved Fayetteville neighborhood park. This cost may exceed $150,000. All improvements by the developer shall be completed one year after issuance of the final plat. In addition, the Neig borhood's Property Owner's Association shall maintain the neighborhood park forars from the date of issuance of the final plat. A Cost Share Agreement between the City of Fayetteville and Paradigm Development has been created and outlines the articles above. Please see attached. To allow Paradigm Development to design and construct the neighborhood park in conjunction with the design and development of Laureate Fields Subdivision, Parks and Recreation Staff request waiving the competitive bid process. BUDGET IMPACT As outlined in the attached Cost Share Agreement, the City will make available the remaining money in lieu fees, approximately $22,200, for the development of the Laureate Fields Neighborhood Park. Although this money will never be received or paid out of the Northwest Park Quadrant account, it will be expended in the development of amenities at the neighborhood park as outlined in the agreement. Attachments: PRAB Meeting Minutes Laureate Fields Proximity Map Laureate Fields Plans Laureate Fields Letter Agreement RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AN AGREEMENT TO ACCEPT LESSER DEDICATION OF PARK LAND FROM OLD TOWNE LLC IN LIEU OF ITS DEVELOPMENT OF ITS DEDICATED THREE ACRE NEIGHBORHOOD PARK WHEREAS, § 166.03 (K) allows a lesser dedication of park land for a neighborhood park if approved by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Old Towne LLC desires to develop its three acre dedicated neighborhood park to Fayetteville park standards in lieu of the amount it would normally have to contribute to the park land fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS• Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves the Agreement To Accept Lesser Dedication of Park Land From Old Towne LLC In Lieu Of Its Development Of Dedicated Neighborhood Park attached as Exhibit "A" as full satisfaction of Old Towne LLC's normal contribution in lieu of a portion of its park land requirement and authorizes the Mayor to sign said Agreement. PASSED and APPROVED this 7th day of September, 2004. APPROVED:�S b. DAN COODY, Mayor By: ATTEST: By: SONDRA SMITH, City Clerk ///iLiolLJ any., engineering Er Surveying MeMn L. Milholland, PE, PLS • REGISTRATIONS: PE: AR, MO PLS: AR August 18, 2004 Project E-689 FAYETTEVILLE 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR. 72703 ATTN: Rebecca Ohman RE: Schlegal Subdivision Dear Rebecca, Attached is a revised plat for the above referenced project showing the park land dedication requested by the Parks staff. It is our understanding that the developer must meet the following conditions for Final Plat approval: • Dedication of 3.26 acres of land for use as a neighborhood park. • Design and construction of the park to City of Fayetteville standards. • h„ }movements to the dedicated park land must total at least the money -in -lieu of requirements as set forth by the City. • Park construction must be complete within one (1) year of Final Plat approval • Subdivision POA must maintain the park for a period of.Ik5 years from time of construction completion. /0 • Park land must be deeded to the City at the time of Final Plat. Our client is fully aware that the design and construction of the aforementioned park must meet the City of Fayetteville specifications including amenities typical of a neighborhood park In addition, it is our understanding that the costs for these improvements could exceed $150,000. If you have any questions or if MCO can be of further service, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Christopher Suneson Tom M. Jefcoat, ASLA Project Assistant Projects Manager cc: Tracy Hoskins attachment: one paper copy of proposed layout one CD with electronic file 205 West Center Street Fayetteville, Arlmnsas 72701; Phone: (479) 443-4724; Fax: (479) 443-4707; E-mail: MCOengrPswbell.net 3 !m� :0338 cl \-11 _ . _ __ _-t MI %l M�:�__ƒ 2 0 rn NJ 0 NJ 03 XI 0 ta rn ca rn ul rl rn rn 0 0100 000 \ 2 emrri ciz •Zi ;r: j:Fr ny..rmnZ C 00 17.12 V& ~ `° PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD Meeting Minutes August 10, 2004 Opening: The regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board was called to order at 7:38 p.m. on August 10, 2004 at the Parks and Recreation Offices located at 1445 South Happy Hollow Road, Fayetteville, Arkansas by Vice Chairperson Gail Eads. Present: Parks and Recreation Advisory Board members Eads, Hill, Mauritson, Pawlik Holmes and Shoulders; City staff Ohman, Jumper, Weber, Hatfield; and Audience. 1. Park Land Dedication Development Name. Engineer: Owner: Location: Park District: Units• Total Acres: Land Dedication Requirement: Money in Lieu Requirement: Existing Parks: Staff Recommendation: The Schlegel Property Tom Jefcoat, Milholland Company Tracy Hoskins West of Deane Solomon Road and Wilson Springs, near Crystal Springs Subdivision and Gary Hampton Softball Complex NW 176 Single Family Units 73.39 acres 4.22 acres $97,680 None developer will dedicate a minimum of a 3 acre neighborhood park. The park will be designed and constructed by the developer to the City of Fayetteville Park Standards and shall include amenities found within a neighborhood park All improvements shall total at least the money in lieu of requirement to the maximum necessary to improve the neighborhood park to the standards of a typical fully improved Fayetteville neighborhood park. This cost may exceed $150,000. All improvements shall July 12, 2004 / 1 • • Developer's Request: Justification: Please note: • be completed one year after issuance of the final plat POA will maintain the neighborhood park. Same as above Parks Master Plan shows this area in need of a neighborhood park. Park would serve this development and proposed developments in the surrounding area. If a combination of money and land is recommended by PRAB, this project will require a waiver to Ordinance 59.05 (K) because it contains more than 100 housing units and is over 40 acres. Ohman stated that Parks will work with the developer on design and approval of design must be granted by Parks. Tracy Hoskins stated his concern is to have the park built immediately. In effort to do this he is proposing to reduce the size of the park to approximately 3 acres and use the balance (money in lieu) for the development of the park. The developer will probably construct the park at the same time as the subdivision. Mauritson asked if he understood correctly that the park will be reduced by an acre and the balance of the fees will be applied to park development. Tracy Hoskins affirmed yes. Hoskins added that he anticipates spending more than the remaining approximately $28,000 for development and he feels this will be good for the City and the developer. Mauritson added that he doesn't want to be surprised with having to finish the park development if the balance doesn't go very far. MOTION: Hill moved to accept a combination of parkland and Money in Lieu (park development) to satisfy the Park Land Dedication Ordinance for the proposed development. Pawlik Holmes seconded the motion. July 12, 2004 / 2 • to • Upon roll call, the motion was approved 4-0-0 with Eads, Hill, Shoulders, Mauritson, and Pawlik Holmes voting 'yes' with Bailey, Colewell, and Marley absent for the vote. July 12, 2004 / 3 i _A X For the STAFF�VIEW FORM - FINANCIAL OBLIGATION AGENDA REQUEST CONTRACT REVIEW GRANT REVIEW Fayetteville City Council Meeting of: September 7, 2004 FROM: Rebecca Ohman Name Itffrr f4uchito; Parks and Recreation Operations Division Department ACTION REQUICiED: Resolution to accept the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommendation to accept a S1 of the Park Land Dedication Ordianance and accept a combination of land and park development for Laureate Fields Subdivsion (Schlegel Property); pnrnriinm rintmlryimnn4• anrltuni‘Inr of 4kn C` COST TO CITY: $22,200.00 Cost of this request 9 304,696.38 Category/Project Budget Program Category / Project Name 1010.1505.00 S 10,800.00 Northwest Park Quadrant Account Number Project Number Funds Used to Date Program / Project Category Name $ 293,896.38 Northwest Park Quadrant Remaining Balance Fund Name BUDGET REVIEW: Budget Manager k Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached Date CONTRACT/GRANT/LEASE REVIEW: J%(/fit s(a Accounting Managed D-� City Atteri T t Date IGe� u.JLX.i.da‘621. Internal Audi r Date Purchasing Manager Date AFF RECOMEND•� ION: ///// 3i/_t ivision Head g- pp -Oki Date Department Director ancede s Internal Services Date z Chief p'&ministrative Officer Dir. Mayor Date Date Received in Mayor's Office Cross Reference: Previous Ord/Res#: Orig. Contract Date: Orig. Contract Number: F3-GLO41,._ Date New Item: / Yes No .4ivsuutlibarna. d alts xs:= aselnttm►'.:u:.v stbes.rsr r pn:n•rozaYw4s,lice :1c a.ru+aycauasewiwarx-e FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE • PC Meeting of August 23, 2004 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: 501-575-8264 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Jeremy Pate, Senior Planner Matt Casey, Staff Engineer THRU: Dawn Warrick, A.I.C.P., Zoning & Development Administrator DATE: August 18, 2004 PPL 04-1141: Preliminary Plat (SCHLEGEL SUBDIVISION): Submitted by MEL MILHOLLAND for property located at THE SW CORNER OF DEANE SOLOMON AND SALEM. The property is zoned RSF-4, SINGLE FAMILY - 4 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 73.39 acres. The request is to approve a residential subdivision with 176 single family lots proposed. Property Owner: TRACY K. & LORI C. HOSKINS Planner: JEREMY PATE Findings: Property Characteristics: The subject property is 73 39 acres of vacant property located west of Deane Solomon Road and south of W. Salem Road. Single family residences are located north of the subject property along W. Salem Road Areas to the west and south are vacant. Crystal Springs Subdivision, Phase III is under construction south of the subject property. Lot #4 of springwoods C-PZD is adjacent to the east, the intervening property between Deane Solomon Road and the Schlegel site. The property's only existing frontage is 271 feet along W. Salem Road, to the north. Gypsum Dr., a Collector Street, is shown on the Master Street Plan as an east and west connection through the property. Proposal: The applicant proposes a residential subdivision containing approximately 176 lots on 73.39 acres within an RSF-4 zoning district. A street stub -out is proposed to the west and to the east, as well as a connection to the south, which is currently under construction as part of Crystal Springs III S/D. The primary entrance from the north is from W. Salem Road, currently an unimproved street. The applicant will be required to improve W. Salem Road frontage, as well as widen and pave W. Salem Road a minimum width of 20 feet to Deane Solomon Road. The applicant and staff have had ongoing meetings to determine a suitable solution to issues of concern surrounding this subdivision, primarily the existence of a Collector Street on the Master Street Plan running east and west and the best, suitable location of the neighborhood park. Elements of the forwarded site plan reflect the Parks and Recreation Board recommendation to work with the developer in coordinating a smaller park, to be constructed at the cost of the developer. The subdivision also utilizes a round -a -bout feature at its eastern entry, indicated by the applicant to be located directly across from the approved entry to springwoods Lot #5 entrance, with one intervening property. The preliminary plat does contain a street designated as K: IReports120041PC Reports108-23-041PPL 04-1141 (SCHLEGEL SURD/V/S/ON).doc • )• a Collector Street, with 70 feet of right-of-way, stubbing out to the west for future connectivity, as well as the recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Board. The Collector Street runs east and west, from the round -a -bout south on Longfellow Parkway, then west on Thoreau Fare. Background: An annexation and rezoning request to RSF-4 was approved by City Council for the 73.39 acres in April of 2004. As part of the annexation and rezoning request, the major concerns cited were fire response time (ameloriated with the current construction of Fire Station #7), wastewater system capacity (the study was released and indicated capacity is available for this development), and traffic/access. As stated at the time, without improvements to W. Salem Road to the north, a narrow gravel road, and additional alternate means of access, the proposed number of units would create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion in this location. The Subdivision Committee voted to table this item at its regular meeting of July 30, 2004. Concerns cited included connectivity, the Master Street Plan (Gypsum Drive), the round -a -bout design, and public comment concerning the existence of ponds and wetland areas. The applicant submitted revisions to meet the deadline and be heard on the current Subdivision Committee. The Parks and Recreation Board met with the applicant again on August 10, after revisions were submitted for Subdivision Committee, and a compromise was agreed upon by the developer and the Parks board, thus altering the site plan for review. The Subdivision Committee voted to forward this item to the full Planning Commission on August 12, 2004. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Direction Land Use Zoning North Single family residential In county, no zoning. South Planned residential subdivision (Crystal Springs, Phase III) RSF-4, Res. Single Family, 4 DU/Acre East Undeveloped - Springwoods C-PZD, Lot #4 C-PZD West Undeveloped In county, no zoning Right-of-way to be dedicated: 50' for all interior streets, a minimum of 35 feet from centerline along W. Salem Road to meet Master Street Plan requirements for a Collector Street, and 70 feet of right -df -way a Collector Street traversing east -west through the property. Planning Commission determination of Master Street Plan compliance, given the submitted alignment. Street Improvements: 14 feet from centerline including pavement, curb, gutter, storm drains and 6 -foot sidewalks along the property's frontage onto W. Salem Road. The north side of the street will be required to be improved to Washington County Standards. W. Salem Road is also required to be widened to a minimum width of 20 feet of pavement from the project to the intersection with Deane Solomon. All interior streets shall be constructed to city specifications. Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: W. Salem Road and Gypsum Drive, both Collectors Parkland Dedication: A neighborhood parkland dedication is recommended by the Parks and K: IReports120041PC Reports108-23-04IPPL 04-1141 (SCHLEGEL SUBDIVISIONJ.doc Recreation Board for this development. The Parks and Recreation Board on August 10 voted to recommend a modified proposal to accept no less than 3 acres of parkland. The park will be designed and constructed by the developer to City of Fayetteville park standards and shall include amenities found within a typical neighborhood park. All improvements shall total at least the money -in -lieu of requirement necessary to improve the park to the standards of a typically fully improved Fayetteville neighborhood park, a cost which may exceed $150,000. Additionally, the developer is to completely build the park within one (1) year of Final Plat approval The. POA established for the subject subdivision will be responsible for maintenance of the park for a period of 15 years The City of Fayetteville will own the parkland, to be deeded at the time of Final Plat. Tree Preservation: Existing canopy: 2.4 % Preserved canopy: 0.0 % Mitigation: $72,600 payment into the City's Tree Fund prior to final plat approval. Connectivity: North: Currently W. Salem Road to the north is the only constructed street for accessing this property. The applicant is proposing a connection to W. Salem Road to the north. South: Crystal Springs III is constructing the street to the south. The applicant proposes to connect to this future street to the Crystal Springs Phase III development to the south. East: An intervening property, Lot #4 of springwoods C-PZD, a lot designated for multifamily use, is to the east. The applicant proposes a stub -out for future connection to Deane Solomon Road to the east, once Lot #4 develops. This stub -out is indicated to be directly across from the approved entrance of springwoods Lot #5, a residential subdivision east of Deane Solomon. West: Currently vacant, agricultural land exists to the west. This property is not within the City limits. A street stub -out is proposed to the west, at the north portion of the property. A Collector Street right-of-way is proposed to stub -out to the west, as well, to fulfill the Master Street Plan goals. Staff recommends a Collector Street right-of-way be dedicated, and a primary east -west street be constructed, in keeping with the Master Street Plan. The applicant has prepared several alternatives, and in meeting with various levels of city staff and divisions, requests Planning Commission consideration of the submitted street alignment as meeting the intent of the Master Street Plan. Portions of Gypsum Drive have been removed from the Master Street Plan by City Council. Both of the streets traversing the springwoods development to the east were removed from the Master Street Plan, due to concerns with potential impact to the existing wetlands and Clabber Creek. To the west, a portion of Gypsum Dr. was constructed when the Crystal Springs, Phase I subdivision was developed, connecting to Salem Road. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of PPL 04-1141 with the following conditions of approval: K: IReports110041PC Repons108-13-041PPL 04-1141 (SCHLEGEL SUBDIVISION).doc Conditions of Approval: • 1. Planning Commission determination of Master Street Plan compliance, with regard to Gypsum Drive, an east -west Collector Street. This street is shown as an east -west 28 foot street constructed from the eastern property line, through the round -a -bout, south on Longfellow Parkway and west on Thoreau Fare to the west properly line. 2: Planning Commission determination of parkland dedication .. .. .. r • • • • la • • • • • OD • • • REVISED PER PLANNING COMMISSION. Parkland dedication to be accepted per the approved City Council contract and resolution (a copy of which was submitted by the City Attorney). 3. Sidewalks shall be constructed on both sides of all proposed streets. Along Collector Streets, 6 -foot sidewalks are required. Along Local Streets, 4 -foot sidewalks are required. Sidewalks are considered a part of the public improvements within a street section, and are to be constructed at the right-of-way line. Landscape islands within the public right-of-way shall conform to City of Fayetteville minimum design standards and allow for emergency access clearance (20 feet clear). 5. The proposed round -a -bout to the east shall be designed to conform to established standards and submitted for approval by the Engineering Division. 6. Street improvements shall includel4 feet from centerline including pavement, curb, gutter, storm drains and 6 -foot sidewalks along the property's frontage onto W. Salem Road. The north side of the street shall be improved to Washington County Standards. W. Salem Road shall also be widened to a minimum width of 20 feet of pavement from the project to the intersection with Deane Solomon. 7. Interior streets shall be constructed to city specifications a full 28 feet in width, including curb, gutter, pavement, storm drains and sidewalks on both sides. 8. The developer shall provide a payment in the amount of $72,600 to be deposited into the City's Tree Fund or shall submit a residential street tree planting plan pursuant to city code for tree canopy mitigation prior to Final Plat approval REVISED PER PLANNING COMMISSION. 9. Street lights shall be installed with a maximum separation of 300 feet prior to final plat. K:IReports120041PC Reports108-23-041PPL 04-1141 (SCHLEGEL SUBDIVISION).doc Standard Conditions of Approval: 10. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) 11. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 12. All street names shall be approved by the 911 coordinator. 13. All overhead electric lines 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. All proposed utilities shall be located underground. 14. Preliminary Plat approval shall be valid for one calendar year. 15. Additional conditions: a. b. c. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: yes/Required Approved Denied Date: August 23, 2004 The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", stated in this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. By Title Date K: IReports120041PC Reports108-23-041PPL 04-1/41 (SCHLEGEL SUBDIVISION).doc PARKS AND RECREATION THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: 479-444-3469 TO: Jeremy Pate, Associate Planner FROM: Alison Jumper, Park Planner DATE: August 11, 2004 SUBJECT: Parks & Recreation Subdivision Committee Comments Meeting Date: August 13, 2004 Item: PPL 04-1141 Schlegel Subdivision Park District: NW Zoned: RSF-4 Billing Name & Address: Tracy Hoskins Fay AR Land Dedication Requirement Money in Lieu Single Family 176@ .024 acre per unit = 4.22 acres @ $555 per unit = $ Multi Family @ .017 acre per unit = acres @ $393 per unit = $ Mobile Home @ .024 acre per unit = acres @ $555 per unit = $ Lot Split @ $555 per unit = $ COMMENTS: PRAB reviewed this project on June 7, 2604 and recommended to accept a land dedication in the amount of 4.15 acres to meet the Park Land Dedication requirements. PRAB reviewed this project again on August 10, 2004 and recommended to accept a combination land dedication and money in lieu in the amount to be applied to the park's development to meet the Park Land Dedication requirements. In addition, the following agreements were made: The developer will dedicate a minimum of a 3 acre neighborhood park. The park will be designed and constructed by the developer to the City of Fayetteville Park Standards and shall include amenities found within a neighborhood park. All improvements shall total at least the money in lieu of requirement to the maximum necessary to improve the neighborhood park to the standards of a PPL 04-1141 typical fully improved Fayetteville neighborhood park. This cost may exceed $150,000. • All improvements shall be completed one year after issuance of the final plat. POA will maintain the neighborhood park for 15 years. PPL 04-1141 FAYETTEVILLE Sc Meeting of July 30, 2004 THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 575-8264 TREE PRESERVATION and PROTECTION REPORT To: Fayetteville Subdivision Committee From: Jeremy Pate, Landscape Administrator Date: July 29, 2004 ITEM #: PPL 04-1141 (Schlegel S/D) BACKGROUND: Requirements Submitted: Initial Review with the Landscape Administrator ✓ Site Analysis Map Submitted ✓ Site Analysis Written Report Submitted Complete Tree Preservation Plan Submitted Canopy Measurements: Total Si'teTArea' acres 73.39 square feet 3,196,912 �E I in Tree C+ano ; acres square feet 76,726 percent of site area 2.4% Existin Tree Cano . Pr served acres square feet - 0 percent of total site area 0 [Per nt Min tflQ!ntano . e, uued' : = 20% FINDINGS: The desirability of preserving a tree or group of trees by reason of age, location, size or species. The general assessment of trees finds trees in fair to good condition, with the majority being located along the existing fence rows and property lines surrounding the project boundaries. Whether the design incorporates the required Tree Preservation Priorities. The design does not incorporate the minimum requirements for tree preservation. Though 1.7% of the existing trees are indicated to be preserved, no tree protection measures are shown, nor are the trees identified to be preserved. The extent to which the area would be subject to environmental degradation due to removal of the tree or group of trees. Minimal environmental degradation will occur here due to the removal of trees surrounding this property, due to the nature of their existence. The impact of the reduction in tree cover on adjacent properties, the surrounding neighborhood and the property on which the tree or group of trees is located. Reduction in the tree canopy along the existing property lines around the property will not have a detrimental impact upon adjacent properties. Whether alternative construction methods have been proposed to reduce the impact of development on existing trees. Alternative construction methods have not been proposed. Whether the size or shape of the lot reduces the flexibility of the design. The size and or shape of this site does not hinder design flexibility to a great degree. The general health and condition of the tree or group of trees, or the presence of any disease, injury or hazard. Most trees are in fair to good condition. The placement of the tree or group of trees in relation to utilities, structures, and use of the property. The trees shown for removal are primarily located within proposed utility easements, along the back of lots or within right-of-way. Those not removed during initial construction have the best chance of survival by the proposed lot layout, however may not be counted as preserved if within utilityeasements or right-of- way. The need to remove the tree or group of trees for the purpose of installing, repairing, replacing, or maintaining essential public utilities. The majority of existing trees fall along the backs of lots surrounding the property. This is an ideal location, outside of the building setback, however the installation of utilities to serve the lots may necessitate their removal. Whether roads and utilities are designed in relation to the existing topography, and routed, where possible, to avoid damage to existing canopy. No significant obstructions exist to the routing of roads and utilities. Construction requirements for On -Site and Off -Site Alternatives. N/A The effects ofproposed On -Site Mitigation or Off -Site Alternatives. Should On -site Mitigation be pursued, a detailed street tree planting plan will be required, and all ordinance requirements adhered to for Residential On -site Mitigation. The effect other chapters of the UDO, and departmental regulations have on the development design. N/A. The extent to which development of the site and the enforcement of this chapter are impacted by 1• • stale and federal regulations: N/A The impact a substantial modification or rejection of the application would have on the Applicant Staff recommends this plan be forwarded to the Planning Commission. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of this Tree Preservation Plan, with conditions as listed below: Mitigation Method Approved: On -site Mitigation, for the removal of 76,726 SF of tree canopy OR Payment into the Tree Fund of $72,600, prior to Final Plat Conditions of Approval: mmLI&J C1,,,,,119, y REGISTRATIONS: &ffineering &Surucr�iny PE: AR, MO Melvin L. Milholland, PE, PLS PLS: AR July 20, 2004 FAYETTEVILLE 125 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 ATTN: Jeremy Pate, Planning Division RE: Cricket Hollow, Schlegel property Dear Jeremy: Project No. E-689 The following responses are provided to comments received at Tech Plat review, July 13, 2004. Planning Division: l.g. Tree Preservation Plan/Info - Please indicate existing tree canopy tines on the Tree Preservation Plan, as well as Tree Data (percentage of existing, preserved, removed canopy) The existing tree canopy line layer has been turned on to show on the plat, and the percentages of existing, preserved, removed canopy have been added. 3.a. Adjacent Zoning - Please include adjacent property's zoning designations on the Page 1 plat. The current zoning designations of adjacent properties have been added to the plat. Revise the zoning classification in the title -block to reflect the correct RSF-4 The zoning classification has been corrected. 3.k. Easement Dimensions - Please include all utility easements as requested by utility representatives. The requested utility easements and conduit crossings have been added to the plat. 4.a Master Street Plan Conformance - The Master Street Plan calls for a Collector Street (Gypsum Drive) to cross this property east and west. Crystal Springs S/D has constructed a portion of said planned street, which is shown on the MSP to connect east to Dean Solomon Road. Please revise the plat to indicate this connection; revisions may necessitate a meeting with staff to determine feasibility of continuing on this review cycle. This project has been discussed and reviewed with staff and City officials from its initial concept through this point with obvious indication that traffic control and connectivity were the primary issues. The Planning Commission and City Co straight-line through streets increase vehicular speeds in residentia nei h 205 West Center Street; Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701; Phone: (479) 443-4724; Far (479) rn/LIL Company &ineeriny &Sareeying Melvin L. Milholland, PE, PLS REGISTRATIONS: PE: AR, MO PLS: AR that the dispersion of traffic flow rather than concentrated within residential subdivisions should be strived for. The decision to eliminate Trucker Drive as the connecting through street, strengthened this direction and our coordination of design with both developing land owners to the east and west. The connecting streets shown are at desired locations by both adjoining landowners and achieve the goal of connecting Gypsum Dr. with that of Dean Soloman. Crystal Springs Drive, to Raven Lane (major north -south street), connecting by way of Tiger Eye Drive and/or Topaz Drive with Vanike Drive to Dean Soloman is exactly the approach taken during the design process of this subdivision. MCO has been assured that it will be engineer of choice in the development of lands to the west and feels the connection of Gypsum Dr. as indicated by this proposed development provides for a balance development distributing flow between the north -south streets of Raven Lane, Dean Soloman, and North Salem. It is important in recognizing that our Client, Tracy Hoskins, is proposing a major east -west coordinator connection -adjoining this project site's north boundary of West Salem Road (improved with other developments) connecting North Salem Road to Hwy 112 near Interstate 540 and Shiloh Drive (frontage road). The proposed future development -of the Vawter/Graves property also provides for the improvement, upgrading, of a large section of Dean Soloman Road link Hwy 112 to Vanike Drive. This is a major circulation improvement. In the bigger picture, proper traffic flow and circulation will be achieved, than simply saying (being incorrect) that because the street is shown on an altered, inconsistent Master Street Plan it has to be there. Our Client and the adjoining property owners are opposed to reverting back to the direct connection of through streets. Our Client is asking that this project continue in review and that the Master Street Plan be amended to remove the through street connection. 4.c. Curb Cuts (number & location) - Include a note on the plans stating that residential curb cuts are to be a maximum of 24 -feet in width, measured at the right-of-way. A note so indicating has been added to the plat. 4.d. Compliance with Design Standards - Staff recommends removal of the landscape island to the south, as this acts as through street for connectivity. This island serves as a speed control and traffic coming devise. It remains on the plat at this time as a desired design element. The island has been presented -in the past and recommended by various members of City Staff and Officials. The island can be removed if determined detrimental. . , .. .._ See Engineering comments regarding the round -a -bout desig criteria. Acknowledged. Final design will be based on agreed design crit4ria, 4tandlUhs.2 1 2004 205 West Center Street; Fayetteville, Arkansas 12701; Phone: (479) 443-4724; Fax: (479) n/y a /7 . Mi&& • Company REGISTRATIONS: tineering &S.i,€1 PE: AR, MO Melvin L. Milholland, PE, PLS PLS: AR Access to lots 111-113 is unclear (access from north prohibited?). Please address. Entrance islands at these location have been shorten to clearly provide access and not shared drives as was a consideration. 6.g. Underground Utilities - All new utilities shall be place underground; all existing utilities 12kv and under shall be relocated underground. Acknowledged. Engineering Division: Remove the detention from the proposed roundabout. Detention is not allowed within the ROW. Acknowledged. The area of detention will be removed and included in those designed along the site's east boundary. 2. The roundabout will have to meet all current design criteria. The City of Fayetteville Minimum Street Standards do not currently address roundabout design, but it will have to meet design standards used by other municipalities in the area (Little Rock has some). The final design of the roundabout or intersecting configuration, will meet design standards agreed to with the Engineering Division. Roundabout design criteria from the. City of Little Rock is being obtained, considered. 3. Remove the island in the street between lots 19 and 20. This is a desire design element that remains at this time. It can be eliminated if it is determined detrimental and/or unsafe. 4. Will lot 111 have enough room to access a driveway if entering from the north? Modification to the proposed landscape island is made to provide proper driveway access. 5. Check the profile grade for the street at lots 158-160. It appears to be very flat. The grade is very flat in this area. However, the minimum street grade is/will be met. 6. All local streets shall have a 4' sidewalk on both sides of the street located at the ROW. Sidewalk will need to be shown for the park area. Our Client, Tracy Hoskins, does not feel sidewalks should be required. MCO has indicated the required - potential sidewalk located as dashed, and agree with our Client in that such locations may not meet with the park design when developed. The dedicated_ park land should/does not include improvements. P F C F I VP I JUL21 1 2004 205 West Center Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas 72101; Phone: (419) 443-4724; Far (479) MiUla ` Company REGISTRATIONS: ineering Jurvey' PE: AR, MO Melvin L. Milholland, PE, PLS PLS: AR 7. The collector streets (Gypsom Drive and W. Salem) will need to have a 6' sidewalk located at the ROW. Six-foot wide sidewalks are now indicated along these ROWs. 8. Street improvements are required for W. Salem Road a minimum of 14' from the centerline including pavement, curb & gutter, storm drainage, and sidewalk. The north side of the street will need to be improved to Washington County standards. Acknowledged. Improvements will be made and are indicated by note for inclusion as part of construction plans. 9. West Salem Road will need to be widened to a minimum of 20' of pavement from the project to the intersection with Dean Soloman. Acknowledged. A pavement width of 20 -feet is indicated by note for inclusion as part of construction plans. 10. Sanitary sewer services can only enter the manholes if the manhole is at the end of the line. Acknowledged. Corrections have been made to the plat. 11. The sewer line will need to be extended to serve lots 133 and 51. Acknowledged. The sewer main is extended to serve these lots with shorter services. 12. Sanitary sewer will need to be extended to the north project boundary for future extension. Acknowledged. The line is now shown extended. 13. Provide easements a minimum of 10' from the proposed water and sewer mains across the park area. The required easement have been added to the plat. 14. Are you showing an off -site water main extension to loop to the north? The plan is unclear on this matter. Yes. A looped connection to an existing 2" line is intended. Parks and Recreation Division: PRAB reviewed this project on June 7, 2004 and recommended to accept a land dedication to meet the Park Land Dedication requirements. Changes to the parkland location willneed to be coordinated with parks staff. Acknowledged. Any increase in required park lands due to the addition determined and the difference paid as in -lieu of fees. I R F CE I\ 205 West Center Street; Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701; Phone: (419) 443-4124; Fax: (479) /// LLJ ampant) REGISTRATIONS: &ineering &s', PE: AR, MO Melvin L. Milholland, PE, PLS PLS: AR Tree Preservation: 1. Show on this plan the existing tree canopy, along with that proposed to be preserved. These layers are now shown on the plat. 2. Include the Tree Canopy Table as required by ordinance on the Tree Preservation Plan, indication existing, total preserved, total to be removed, and mitigation required (the same information submitted with the exhibit and application). This information has been added to the plat, Tree Preservation Plan. Mitigation will occur in landscaped tree islands and the roundabout. 3. If no "significant" trees exist on the site, as noted in your application submittal, a statement confirming this fact•must be included on. the plan. This plan, as part of - the Construction Plans and Final Plat, will bear the seal of the Engineer of record affirming the information presented thereon is true and correct. Acknowledged. A statement is added to the plat and will bear the seal of the Engineer of record as part of the Construction Plans and Final Plat. MCO's survey crew chief, Sam Hampton, has made field determinations and identification as to existing tree canopy and trees of significance. 4. All preserved trees need tree protection fencing shown on plan. Include a specification drawing to show the method and materials used for preservation fencing. (See Landscape Manual p. 107). Acknowledged. Tree protection fence locations are added to the plat. Standard details for tree protection will be shown as part of Construction Plans. Should you have any question or require additional information, please call. Should you desire to meet and discuss any part of the design decisions made, MCO and our Client, Tracy Hoskins, are available at your convenience. As always, your assistance and understanding are appreciated and welcomed. MCO, on behalf of our Client, look forward to the approval of this project and to it construction. Sincerely, EIV Thomas M. Jefco Projects Manager cc: Tracy Hoskins JUL 2 1 2004 205 West Center Street; Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701; Phone: (479) 443-4724; Fax: (479) 443-4107; E-mail: MC0engr(E swbell.net 11• FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 125 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 575-8267 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE PC Meeting of March 08, 2004 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Jeremy Pate, Associate Planner THRU: Dawn Warrick, AICP, Zoning & Development Administrator DATE: February24, 2004 RZN 03-34.00: Rezoning (Schlegel, pp207/246) was submitted by Milholland Company on behalf of Tracy Hoskins for property located north of the proposed Crystal Springs Phase III subdivision, west of Deane Solomon Road. The property is in the Planning Area and contains approximately 72.5 acres. The request is to rezone the property RSF-4, Residential Single- family,.4 units per acre. Planner: Jeremy Pate RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning based on the findings herein. BACKGROUND: Please reference the associated ANX 03-06.00 staff report for additional background information. Property Characteristics: The subject property is 72.5 acres of vacant property located west of Deane Solomon Road and south of Salem Road. Salem Road at this location is a dirt road and does not meet city street standards. Deane Solomon Road also does not meet city street standards. Single family residences are located north of the subject property along Salem Road. Areas to the west and south are vacant. Crystal Springs Subdivision, Phase III is proposed south of the subject property. Gypsum Dr., a Collector Street, is shown on the Master Street Plan as an east and west connection through the subject property. A portion of Gypsum Dr. was constructed when the Crystal Springs, Phase I subdivision was developed. An annexation and rezoning request was previously petitioned for the subject property in December of 2002. At the time, staff recommended denial for both the annexation and rezoning requests, citing concerns for Fire response times and increased loading onto existing infrastructure, particularly the wastewater system. The recommendation for denial was based on the inability of the city to provide adequate services to this particular area. Actions are being taken to remedy both situations: The Large Scale Development for Fire Station #7, to be located on Rupple Road, has been approved by Planning Commission and awaits final construction documents and permitting; a report from a system -wide wastewater study has been submitted and adequate capacity has been identified to serve this area for existing and proposed development (see attached). The proposal to rezone was tabled in November, 2003, pending results from the wastewater capacity analysis Proposal: The applicant would like to develop a single family residential subdivision. Request: The applicant is requesting the property be rezoned from R -A', Residential Agricultural, to RSF-4, Residential Single Family, 4 Dwelling Units per Acre, should the preceding Annexation request be approved. Related Issues: When property is annexed into the City, it is annexed as R -A Residential Agricultural. If the annexation is recommended for approval to City Council, the applicant would like to rezone the 72.5 acres to RSF-4, Residential Single Family, 4 Units per Acre. The annexation request, ANX 03-06.00, is an accompanying item to this rezoning request. Recommendation: Based on the information provided from the wastewater capacity study and the findings included in the staff report, staff recommends approval of the rezoning request. Future changes or additional development on this site will be regulated by the city allowing for a more uniform and consistent development pattern. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Direction Land Use Zoning North Single family residential In county, no zoning.. South Planned residential subdivision RSF-4, Res. Single Family, 4 DU/Acre (Crystal Springs, Phase III East Undeveloped - C-PZD Springwoods woods C-PZD West Undeveloped In county, no zoning INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: North: East Salem Road (Collector) — Does not meet City street standards South: Proposed connections through Crystal Springs 11 subdivision East: Deane Solomon Road (Collector) — Does not meet City street standards West: Master Street Plan shows Raven extended north (Collector) Further west is Salem Road (Collector) Gypsum Dr., a Collector, is shown on the Master Street Plan as an east and west )• NV connection through the subject property. A portion of Gypsum Dr. was constructed when the Crystal Springs, Phase I subdivision was developed. At the time of development, Staff will recommend improvements to the roadway from the subject property to Deane Solomon Road, to City standards, as well as other street improvements to serve the development. Water: The property currently has access to an 8" water line that will be stubbed out from the proposed Crystal Springs 3 subdivision. An extension of the water main will be required to provide water supply within any development on this property. The main will also have to be looped to the north to connect with the 2" line along East Salem Road to provide dual feed for the development. Sewer: The site currently has access to an 8" sewer main that will be stubbed out from the proposed Crystal Springs III subdivision. Sewer will need to be extended within the development. Fire: The subject property is located 3.5 miles from the proposed Fire Station #7 on Rupple Road. Normal driving time is 5 min. 42 seconds. Water supply will be necessary for this property to develop. Access roads and street improvements to allow for necessary fire apparatus ingress/egress will also be required. LAND USE PLAN: General Plan 2020 designates this site Residential. Rezoning this property to RSF-4 is consistent with the land use plan and. compatible with surrounding land uses in the area FINDINGS OF THE STAFF A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: The proposed zoning for a Single Family residential subdivision is compatible with adjacent and nearby single family residential and agricultural uses. The general plan designates this area for residential uses, which is compatible with the proposed RSF-4 zoning. Access and provision of adequate services must be considered as this site is at the outskirts of the city and located on streets which need improvement. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The proposed zoning is justified in order to promote orderly and consistent development patterns making use of existing infrastructure. The rezoning is needed for the development of a single family subdivision as proposed by the applicant. A subdivision with this density in the R -A district could not be developed as it is currently zoned. A higher density than the R -A zoning district allows is appropriate in this area, and would provide compatibility with adjoining developments that are zoned and developed similarly. In order to develop a residential subdivision on this property in a manner that is consistent with the future land use plan, a residential zoning district is needed. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: The proposed zoning will provide additional traffic on Salem Road, Dean Solomon Road and other streets in the area. Several of the streets in the area are unimproved and inadequate for emergency vehicle access, therefore off - site improvements would likely be necessary in order to provide safe access to this site. 4. A determination as to. whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: The proposed zoning would increase population density. The 72.5 acre tract under an R -A, Residential Agricultural designation would allow for a maximum of 36 dwelling units (1 per 2 acres). With the proposed RSF-4 designation, 290 dwelling units would be permitted. This increases the possible number of residential units substantially, but is consistent with land use and zoning in. the immediate vicinity. Engineering - The property currently has access to an 8" water line that will be stubbed out from the proposed Crystal Springs 3 subdivision. An extension of the water main will be required to provide water supply within any development on this property. The main will also have to be looped to the north to connect with the 2" line along East Salem Road to provide dual feed forthe development. The site currently has access to an 8" sewer main that will be stubbed out from the proposed Crystal Springs III subdivision. Sewer will need to be extended within the development. Access will be provided through street connections to the south through the proposed Crystal Springs 2 subdivision. Access will also be provided at East Salem Road. East Salem Road at this location is an unimproved gravel road. At the time of development, it will be recommended that the roadway from the development to Deane Solomon Road be improved to current City standards. Fire - Water supply with fire hydrants is needed to serve development on this site, as will access roads. The new fire station on Rupple Rd. will serve this site once it is constructed. Response time from the new station (#7) will be 5 minutes 42 seconds (3.5 miles). Police - Projects existing in. this area already receive police services. The same level of service will be provided to this site as is currently applied to the existing city subdivisions to in the vicinity. It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that this rezoning will not substantially alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on police services. The proposed access, however, is a concern. West Salem Road is unimproved at this . location. This road is rough gravel and narrow. Without improvements or the addition of alternate access, 290. potential units would create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and congestion at this location. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (l) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A PPseeUpView SCHLEGEL SUBDIVISION �•• a •! 1' [f.�l r ♦ ; r : t`• r^fsl ..F 4♦ S. rL T.. -a � • .. a -• i•vl , . 1 t'a • •. ,•.. aX IfF' i k •.ii ; f {'• ;a L Ari( `' ` h •n .. __�• lie ^ . - L• �n •,'.. ull.y • S r e e• I rt S. ..�� 1i 5 -. .e» -.L' •-. a '�` y .lam 9` • dbz 1�' r 4� 1 .i (;v�Fr# <I 'o ff n t � .{ , o , • 1 n RSF-4 " I Q ajp. J 2i lize 7 it PI �' �a r• _ ` a(p �s t9 r` R -A I,p a M l.0J .n •.n f'F /t c"1_ f. 'v..'Sn .'v' ry�;I —u raF.un--Jwmu m.........1 IM .F . Yrten ] _ r J. j.• ..................................................... . V w ♦ a t a :I .........................................:::::6..... • _______ -' _______ -._ i• d .y` - •) J / ..........e ..................... N......................................:..:::::::::::: • IF _____ 1 - &IjW4I le ... J� •. lF • f __. v r1 4j:9999... I� • • PPL04-1141 One Mile View t fr e SCHLEGEL SUBDIVISION RSF-4 R1 Rrk II I 1s I ] rR�7 RA I u RJ, R -A P1 P -t t r➢ r 2{tl �_^r7 Y. .i__l p, �J _..Q _Q r F`- rLt TT I Overview Legend Subject Property .�Master Street Plan t� --❑ PPL04-1141 Boundary - a FroawayExlxessway 4!.rmbPmMalal Streets v—iPlanning Area &00000 4'% Miwr Maul � �F"svng 00000000 Overlay District i,•C ya -_. 4tPIaraed .?..'wr Outside City N�� rtstoncCouoctor 1 , 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.@ FAYETTEVICLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS City Clerk Division DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE To: Rebecca Ohman Park Planner From: Clarice Buffalohead-Pearman City Clerk Division Date: September 13, 2004 Re: Res. 136-04 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 575-8323 Attached is the resolution passed by City Council on September 7, 2004 approving an agreement with Old Towne LLC for the lesser park land dedication. I have attached a copy of the signed agreement. These items will be recorded in the city clerk's office and microfilmed. If anything else is needed please let the clerk's office know. Thanks. /cbp attachments cc: Nancy Smith, Internal Auditor /fliftwCland Company �ncineeriug &Surveying Melvin L. Milholland, PE, PLS Thomas M. Jefcoat, RLA, REM, CPESC Re: Laureate Fields (Schlegal subdivision) September 3, 2004 To Whom It May Concern: REGISTRATIONS: PE: AR, MO PLS: AR RLA: AR Attached is the proposed neighbor park development for the above referenced subdivision. The design includes the following elements as outlined in the Agreement Letter between our client and the City of Fayetteville: open grass fields, trees, walking trails, picnic tables, benches, stone or brick cooking grills, and water hydrants. Additional, proposed features have been included in the park design to demonstrate the overall cohesiveness of the entire subdivision. We look forward to any questions or comments that you and others might have concerning the park design. Kindest regards, R Christopher Suneson PManager Project Assistant Projec 205 West Center Street; Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701; Phone: (479) 443-4724; Fax: (479) 443-4707; E-mail: MC0engr(a?swbell.net I I I Iz Ix 8S8 ,8 _ _ �I I .1 Y fir 9 A F I I I I I/ T — al \It..iiiiIiia.I