Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout41-02 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. 41-02 A RESOLUTION TO DENY THE APPEAL OF EARL AND CAROLYN FARRELL FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S REFUSAL TO APPROVE A LESSER DEDICATION FOR DOUBLE TREE ROAD WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is empowered pursuant to §I56.03 d. (3) to "approve a lesser dedication (of right-of-way for a street on the Master Street Plan) in the event of undue hardship or practical difficulties," but refused to do so; and WHEREAS, "such lesser dedication shall be subject to approval by the City Council," so that it is equitable to allow appeal to the City Council if the Planning Commission also refuses to recommend such "lesser dedication." WHEREAS, even though the initial request by the owners/developers is only for a lot split of this 183 -acre parcel, the future development as shown to the Planning Department is for an extremely large residential subdivision with an impact justifying the collector street dedications. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby agrees with and affirms the refusal by the Planning Commission to approve a lesser dedication of the portion of Double Tree Road that runs through the development of Mr. and Mrs. Earl Farrell, and directs the Planning Department to continue to work with the owners and developers to locate this street in the most advantageous place possible (avoiding the floodway and flood plain where possible). PASSED and APPROVED this the 5th day of March, 2002. APPROVED: I3y .0 r Woodru City C rk DAN COODY, Ma NAME OF FILE: CROSS REFERENCE• Resolution No. 41-02 • 03/05/02 Resolution No. 41-02 02/14/02 Letter to Heather Woodruff, City Clerk, from Mike Bender, Project Manager, Northstar Engineering Consultants, Inc., on behalf of Mr. And Mrs. Earl Farrell, regarding an appeal of the Fayetteville Planning Commission Ruling about Double Trcc Road Right -of -Way (Farrell Tract Split, Fayetteville, AR)(NEC Project No. 245-004) 02/07/00 Memo to Fayetteville Planning Commission Members thru Tim Conklin, City Planner, from Sara Edwards, Ron Petrie, P.E. (Pages 1-3) 02/11/02 Planning Commission Minutes (Pages 7-13) 03/07/02 Memo to Tim Conklin, City Planner, from Heather Woodruff, City Clerk NOTES: ANORTHSTAR ENGINEERING Al%L CONSULTANTS, INC. Civil & Environmental Engineering Landscape Architecture Geological Services Land Surveying Planning February 14, 2002 Ms, Heather Woodruff, City Clerk City of Fayetteville 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Re Appeal of Fayetteville Planning Commission Ruling Double Tree Road Right -of -Way Farrell Tract Split, Fayetteville, Arkansas NEC Project No, 245-004 Dear Ms. Woodruff: Off‘ On behalf of Mr. Earl Farrell, I respectfully request to be placed on the March 5, 2002 Fayetteville City Council agenda to appeal the decision of the Fayetteville Planning Commission conceming a waiver for the right-of-way for Double Tree Road in reference to the Farrell Lot Split (LSP 02-6.00). The Fayetteville Planning Commission approved the Farrell Lot Split at the February 11, 2002 Planning Commission meeting, but denied the owners request to waive the requirement of the 70 foot right-of-way for Double Tree Road as shown on the City of Fayetteville Master Street Plan. Mr. Farrell is dividing his property near Holt Middle School north of Mount Comfort Road and accordingly submitted a tract split per the City of Fayetteville requirements. The City of Fayetteville has requested Mr. Farrell dedicate a seventy-foot (70') wide right-of-way for Double Tree Road per the requirements of the City of Fayetteville Master Street Plan. However, Mr. Farrell is requesting the City of Fayetteville waive the requirements for the described right-of-way. The City of Fayetteville Master Street Plan depicts Double Tree Road as a proposed collector street running east -west across the central portion of Mr. Farrell's property. As proposed, over sixty percent (60%) of Double Tree Road crossing Mr. Farrell's property will be located within the 100 -year floodplain of Clabber Creek with approximately thirty percent (30%) located within the floodway. The majority of Double Tree Road is shown south of Clabber Creek. If the right-of- way is relocated to meander south of Clabber Creek, Double Tree Road will be directed in a southwestern direction intersecting with Mount Comfort Road just west of the Farrell property yielding an inadequate collector corridor. The right-of-way may be relocated north of Clabber Creek to align with the northern boundary of Salem Village which is adjacent to the east property boundary. Finally, the proposed route of Double Tree Road (as a collector street) should be relocated to ensure that a collector street is in the ideal location to best serve the needs of future development in the area. C IData.RDATMWORD245Cialabef Cieek PlaceI.Dcaalle Tree Waiver acc 211 South Main Street Bentonville. Arkansas 72712 Phone (501) 271-0906 Fax (501) 271-8144 Email nseng©swhell.net Ms Heather Woodruff City Council Agenda Farrell Tract Split February 14, 2002 Page 2 of 2 The above described waiver will allow a more suitable location of a collector street to adequately serve the immediate area. I appreciate your consideration of this request. Please call me at 479-271-0906 if you have any questions or need additional information. Best Regards, Mike Bender, El Project Manager Cc: Mr. Earl Farrell, Owner Mr. Sam Mathias, BMW Investments, LLC File 245-004 C kData-FICIATAMORCA245Clabbet Creek PlacekDouble Tree Waive. doe 211 South Main Street Bentonville, Arkansas 72712 Phone (501) 271-0906 Fax (501) 271-8144 Email nseng©sviebell.net htu uu euue 1:sorn anOC.M.../ i ••• 1 L. ll ••• • LS1112-13 al One Mlle Wow LOTS 6 & 7 FARRELL LEIRLY LANE SALEM VILLAGE CLABBER CREEK PROPOSED DOUBLE TREE ROAD HOLT MIDDLE SCHOOL • rapiltir 7 rill Pm, ••._I ,aa MOUNT CO/AFORT ROAD alb 1 Inn' • re = =ft, Kir :.---•/.41PAL 4Z7 =mit, II We o • o •fliti49; 2,••••• =• . r` 1 -- - MIP -t -..4-1A..-gliON•disollik•Uallai," r.1.1•••• et 711,!: II.• .0 ..:•• ea..- .-II••• . - - _ • is•;. -1:21.E.=.2=0=•'::121! tttttttt 000000 0000ii: ao• aa .4,t.i..,%......ea. twee._ pi pill: 3 it • 4 a IV 6_ OVA •• • •,•• • •R:". a s 1 4 -• • .71mii /Aire 000000 1:- weed 00000 000 ;:enit• • -, • 110 afilcS, glar,fr Iter•K4 stA ZPI.OrCi.7 • sae- canal Z • • 087-111.1:::e' 1: 4:: —r • .11.6.4688.8 I I Fiki‘71 ta:%":21 1:11 f 1 I a . nI• 7:77- 1:1:14;1:;:-1-";:m. L; „47Tallie-rili Lagged usuurrsi P0 IRO:WM 108 YEAR Osa OMNI maraist Pine •••• CC= 441/4••••••••• •••• 1•4•0•Pal• atm nest mp •Oulla • • • leirocases puska E_D zaWs ClOrLimin I Snot amp Rata OVICRIMON FLoa, "Warta wady LinHatte UN Lan 0 0.125 0.25 c.a.• 05 075 1 Mee At.1 • 1•3,4 a FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 113W. Mountain St Fayetteville, AR 72701 LSP 02-06.00 Pagel PC Meeting of Feb 11.2002 Farrell Lot Split TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Tim Conklin, City Planner FROM: Sara Edwards, Ron Petrie P.E. DATE: February 7,2000 Project: LSP 02-6.00 Lot Split (Farrell, pp 283 & 322) was submitted by Shawki Al- Madoun of Northstar Engineering Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Earl and Carolyn Farrell. for property located north of Mount Comfort Road and north and west of Holt Middle School. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 183.05 acres. The request is to split into two tracts of 145.88 acres and 39.19 acres. Findings: This lot split is being requested in order to facilitate a future subdivision on Tract A. There are four Master Street Plan Streets which affect this property. The applicant is dedicating 45 feet from centerline along Mount Comfort Road, 90 feet of right-of-way for Rupple Road along the eastern boundary of this property and 35 feet from centerline along Lierly Lane to the north. The fourth master street plan, Double Tree Road runs east -west through this property and is a collector street which requires 70 feet of right of way. Recommendation: Approval subject to the conditions listed below. Conditions of Approval: 1. A 70 foot right of way shall be dedicated to the city pursuant to the Master Street Plan for Double Tree Road. The requirement is for the right of way to be dedicated through both tracts at this time. The applicant is requesting a waiver of this right-of-way requirement entirely. Please see letter from applicant attached. Staff' is reconunending that the right of way be dedicated through Tract A as a condition of this lot split and is in support of a waiver of the requirement for Tract B until further development occurs. City Council must approve this waiver. CHAPTER 156: VARIANCES §156.03 DEVELOPMENT. D. Consideration by the City Planner 1. Subdivisions creating only one new lot (lot splits). a. Interference with Future Subdivision. (3). Dedication of Right -of -Way The City Planner shall not waive the preliminary and final plat requirements of this LSP 02-06.00 Page 2 chapter for a proposed subdivision until the subdivider dedicates sufficient right-of-way to bring those streets which the Master Street Plan shows to abut or intersect the proposed subdivision into conformance with the right-of- way requirements of the Master Street Plan for said streets; provided, the Planning Corrunission may approve a lessor dedication in the event of undue hardship or practical difficulties. Such lessor dedication shall be subject to approval by the City Council. 2. A 30 foot sewer easement shall be dedicated for the future construction of a sewer line along the Clabber Creek. Payment of parks fees in the amount of $470 for one additional R-1 parcel. Applicant is requesting a waiver of the parks fees until further development. The expectation is that land will be dedicated with a future subdivision. Please see letter from applicant requesting this waiver. 4. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) 5. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review Background: process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. The proposed Lot Split was reviewed at the December 31, 2001 Technical Plat Review and the January 17, 2002 Subdivision Committee meeting. Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included background information of the property and the Parks Division requirement. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Large Scale Development to the full Planning Commission subject to all staff comments. INFRASTRUCTURE: a) Water. Existing • b) Sanitary sewer. Existing. c) Streets. Not applicable. d) Grading and Drainage. Not applicable. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ves Required Approved Denied Date: Comments: LSP 02-06.00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required Approved Denied Date: Page 3 The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. by title date . • • Planning Commissida February 11,2002 Page 7 LSP 02-6.00: Lot Split (Farrell, pp 283 and 322) was submitted by Shawki Al- Madoun, PE of Northstar Engineering Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Earl and Carolyn Farrell for property located north of Mount Comfort Road and north and west of Holt Middle School. The property is zoned R -I, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 182.22 acres. The request is to split into two tracts of 143.03 acres and 39.19 acres. Estes: The next item on the agenda is a lot split request. This is submitted by Northstar Engineering Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Earl and Carolyn Farrell for property located north of Mount Comfort Road and north and west of Holt Middle School. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 183.05 acres. The request is to split into two tracts of 145.88 acres and 39.19 acres. Staff recommends approval subject to certain conditions of approval. Are there signed conditions of approval Mr. Conklin? Conklin: No there are not. Estes: Condition 1) A 70' right-of-way shall be dedicated to the city pursuant to the Master Street Plan for Double Tree Road. The requirement is for the right-of-way to be dedicated through both tracts at this time. The applicant is requesting a waiver of this right-of-way requirement. There is a letter in your packet from the applicant. Staff is recommending that the right-of-way be dedicated through tract A as a condition of this lot split and is in support of a waiver of the requirement for tract B until further development occurs. City Council must approve this waiver. Condition 2) A 30' sewer easement shall be dedicated for future construction of a sewer line along Clabber Creek. 3) Payment of Park fees in the amount of $470 for one additional R-1 parcel. rhe applicant is requesting a waiver of the park fees until further development. The expectation is that land will be dedicated with a future subdivision. You have a letter in your packet, from the applicant, requesting this waiver. Condition 4) Plat Review and Subdivision Committee comments to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative and all comments from utility representatives. 5) Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable), for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lots and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. Is the applicant present? Bender: 1 am Mike Bender with Northstar Engineering. I am representing Mr. Farrell for the split of this property. I will briefly address the conditions of approval. The 70' right-of-way for Double Tree will need to be relocated due to this proposed route, a large majority of it is within the floodway of 0 Planning Commissioall February 11,2002 Page 8 Estes: • Clabber Creek so we will need to relocate the road. In doing so, we feel if we push the road to the south it is not an ideal location because Clabber Creek flows to the south and we are getting in real close proximity with Mount Comfort Road. Also, if we go to the north of Clabber Creek, the thoroughfare is really not there due to development to the east. We do have another collector, Lierly, at the north end of the property. We just feel at this time that we are taking this to City Council. We feel that at this time that platting the right-of-way would be real limiting to the property. Also, on the 30' easement, we are showing a 30' easement for the sanitary sewer. The parks fees, we are requesting a waiver at this time. Mr. Farrell and the Parks Department are working together on a large park corridor along Clabber Creek. The Plat Review and Subdivision comments have been addressed. The utility comments at this time, they reserve their comments until the development. I will obtain letters to that effect for city files and then staff approval of final details, we will submit detailed plans with each development coming through. The 39 acres on the southeast part of the property is where the first subdivision will go in. Right now there is no development planned for the rest of the property. I would be glad to answer any of your questions at this time. Thank you. Is there any member of the audience who would like to provide public comment on this requested lot split? Seeing none, I will bring it back to the Commission for discussions, questions of the applicant or motions. Mr. Conklin? Conklin: Mr. Chairman and members of the Commission, I would like you to refer to page 3.8 and that shows the location of the Master Street Plan and the proposed collector street. You will note on that page the proposed collector street for Double Tree Road, which is what is at issue this evening. The applicant and the dedication of this right-of-way, it is south of Salem Village P.U.D., south of Clabber Creek. Previously when Serenity Place subdivision was considered and approved as a preliminary plat south of Salem Village, Double Tree Road connected over to Salem Road which would provide access between the middle school and the elementary school. I believe that the best location for that road is south of Clabber Creek in this location and not north. Regardless, the city ordinance, the Unified Development Ordinance, requires that in order to waive the preliminary and final plat requirements and not treat this as a subdivision that right-of-way must be dedicated. I just wanted to bring that to your attention this evening, thank you. Estes: Thank you Mr. Conklin. Is there any other discussion or any questions? Planning Commissia February 11,2002 Page 9 Hoffman: 1 have a procedural question. Is the waiver of the Master Street Plan something that the Planning Commission normally recommends to City Council or is that something that requires Council action only? Conklin: The ordinance reads, and I have included it in your staff report under 156 Variances and Development, page 3.1, dedication of right-of-way... I will just read it. "The City Planner shall not waive the preliminary and final plat requirements of this chapter for a proposed subdivision until the subdivider dedicates sufficient right-of-way to bring those streets, which the Master Street Plan shows to abut or intersect the proposed subdivision and to conformance with the right-of-way requirements of the Master Street Plan where it says streets. Provided that the Planning Commission may approve a lesser dedication in the event of undue hardship or practical difficulties. Such a lesser dedication shall be subject to approval by the City Council." You may approve a lesser dedication if you believe there is undue hardship or practical difficulties and that is subject to approval by the City Council. Hoffman: Thanks Tim. 1 still don't understand where the alternate location for the road that you said is not on this plat. Conklin: It is not shown on the plat. The Master Street Plan does show up on page 3.7 and 3.8. Bender: At this time we don't have an alternate for the 70' corridor for Double Tree or for a collector street. fhat would come with the future development. Hoffman: You're saying that it would be south of Clabber Creek, not Hamstring Creek? Conklin: 1 apologize, I did use the wrong creek name, it is Clabber Creek. The idea, at one time, was that children on school buses all go on the same bus no matter if it is middle school or elementary and that at one time the bus wouldn't have to go all the way down to Mount Comfort, there would be connectivity and access within these areas. I think it is important that we look at where that future collector street is located because of the school and future development. This engineer is working with the applicant on a preliminary plat south of Clabber Creek. Just as we saw in Bridgeport Subdivision, they can incorporate those Master Street Plan streets within their subdivisions. Especially a collector street, which is a two lane street. That is why I am making that recommendation that this engineer before you this evening is working on a preliminary plat that could incorporate the Master Street Plan street within that subdivision and plan it. I will let the engineer answer any questions of why that can't be done or if he wants Planning Commissice February 11,2002 Page 10 Motion: • to express his comments to you about why that can't be done. It is just that he has been working with staff on where those streets need to go. Hoffman: Now that it is crystal clear to me that it is Clabber Creek and not Hamstring, I would like to move for approval of LSP 02-6.00, the lot split with the variance for which requires the 70' of right-of-way with the understanding that an alternate method is being proposed. Estes: Commissioner Hoffman, does your motion include the requirement of the right-of-way dedication through both tracts at this time? Hoffman: I am going to need some help from Tim on that. Is that what they are standing on? Conklin: Staff made a recommendation that the right-of-way be dedicated for the smaller acreage that is being split out and to wait until the rest of the remaining tract is developed to determine where that right-of-way is. Hoffman: Is that going to be 70' or is it going to be a lesser amount? Conklin: It would be 70'. Hoffman: Ok, I think that my motion should be just as it is that the alternate location be. Conklin: I would like some direction. They have asked two things, they have asked to completely waive any right-of-way from being dedicated, that is what the applicant is requesting. Hoffman: On tract B? Conklin: On both. Bender: Everything. Right now basically we've got a collector on the north end of the property, Lierly Lane. We've got the arterial, Mount Comfort on the south. Due to the location and direction of Clabber Creek itself and the floodplain and floodway associated with it we would like to waive the Double Tree requirement especially since very little of Double Tree exists now. Hoffman: I understand that but we are very big on connectivity and from what Mr. Conklin was saying it does sound to me like it would be a better idea to use one of your subdivision streets to carry the school bus children from Planning Commissidall February 11,2002 Page 11 • one side of the tract to the other. My motion would then include a 70' right-of-way requirement and I guess that was going to be south of Clabber Creek at some location to be determined during preliminary plat. Bender: At this time, if there is a requirement, we would prefer it to be north. That is our request. Hoffman: Since I am not looking at a very clear map here I am having trouble crafting this motion now. Ward: Tim, why would that Double Tree Road on the north boundary line of this property, the 100+ acres on Alley Road or something would that not be a better location for that road? Along the north line of most of this property? Conklin: That is an alley that was platted as part of the Salem Village Planned Unit Development. There is no direct access through that. Ward: Well, putting it down through Clabber Creek doesn't make sense, that is all floodway. fhat would require a bridge across there. Conklin: Thank you for making that statement because I did not clarify what staff was looking at. We are looking at keeping the street on the south side of Clabber Creek. However, we would be willing to work with the developers/applicant to minimize the creek crossings and bring that out over to Mount Comfort/Wheeler Road at some point. We are not asking to go down the center of the creek as it is currently shown. There is some flexibility with our Master Street Plan. I do think it is important that as we go further back to the east through what used to be Serenity Place, that that is the preferred location of that collector street. Estes: Mr. Conklin, do I understand correctly that staff recommends, as the first condition of approval, that there be a 70' right-of-way dedicated pursuant to the Master Street Plan for Double Tree and that we are not considering siting Double Tree at this time but that the only matter before us is the 70' right-of-way dedication? Conklin: That is correct. Staff would work with the applicant and his engineer to get the exact location avoiding going through the center of Clabber Creek and being south of Clabber Creek at some point. Hoffman: Ok, the engineer was pointing out on his map that if you needed to put the road at some point that it might better suit the layout of the lot to put it on the north side of Clabber Creek. Have you looked at that possibility? Planning Commissie February 11, 2002 Page 12 • Conklin: It currently lines up as a Master Street Plan, if you will look at page 3.7, through Crystal Springs. h would change the entire dynamics, the function of that street if you move it to the north. We have a softball complex there, a playground, and this collector street would not be able to continue further to the east. Yes, we have looked at that and I think it is important in this location. Bender: With Double Tree, the portion east of Salem Road is not a very large portion. If we went just north of the Salem Village from Salem Road to the west along the northern portion of this property, that is the location that we would prefer. Motion: Hoffman: I will give this a try again. I would like to recommend approval of LSP 02-6.00 subject to all conditions of approval. Estes: We have a motion by Commissioner Hoffman to approve LSP 02-6.00 subject to the conditions of approval, is there a second? Marr. I will second. Bunch: Just one little housekeeping note. On our drawings showing 35.19 acres, then in our packet it says 39.19, is there any reason that there is a four acre discrepancy? Bender: There was an error in the acreage on the tract split The correct is 182.22 acres, splitting it into 143.03 and 39.19 acres. Bunch: Ok, so the drawing should show 39.19 acres? Bender: Yes, and we have corrected that also. Estes: We have a motion by Commissioner Hoffman and a second by Commissioner Marr to approve LSP 02-6.00 subject to all conditions of approval. Is there any further discussion? Ward: On the payment of this park fee, the $470, would they get a credit for that when they bring in the subdivision? Conklin: We discussed this internally on how to deal with this issue. The ordinance reads that any new lot created that is zoned R-1 needs to pay additional parks fee. That is something that we would like to consider is when they do bring a subdivision in to give them credit for that $470. Planning Commissicell February 11, 2002 Page 13 Hoffman: I can specifically say that on the preliminary plat that either the $470 per lot be paid or that a park land dedication be accepted. Item number four would then read "The payment of parks fees in the amount of $470 for one additional R-1 parcel. . ." or at the end of the last sentence "or that park land dedication be accepted as shown on the preliminary plat." Estes: Mr. Marr, does the second accept the amendment? Marr: Yes. Estes: We have a motion by Commissioner Hoffman and a second by Commissioner Marr to approve LSP 02-6.00 is there any other discussion? Renee, would you call the roll please? Roll Call: Upon the completion of roll call the motion to approve LSP 02-6.00 was approved by a vote of 8-0-0. Estes: The motion passes unanimously by a vote of eight to zero. F, lamming. 1. -.S111.101ti ts.1 lllll C201111b511 sr Li sm 'mar neer •II4.1.11482.799-11/111 irgi " 111" C C as alpi.:.1•1•,•11...- .01 • ci4L14111110I Ili sae am =poi aluirll ! llll um pra lll It l Slit i.jo s.. A In:Weii!fiii: is• Le p. vol. llllll :11, krOdhAdi %Illik- --Row Si& ./.:LTIps. foi..a lllll et Wm ohm IL. • - Wall. bete — --12 gi..!..,,rtrLoisioroppol llllll •Le 2.111ili"suirfig ar. sum v.= it-.. - l de l i_ ll piaji.,‘...... a 4. == vil • 4. E. Ati. . ' . . nitsigt,Eki on llll 1. llllllllllllll ; 2 4 Leh ...am a . igki =6" • i = no apee• . llllll \ in • W * Inn I: .A.I. jor „metros Mr 4;.....9.42 llllll a llllllll e"smos"assiermseallaNt -- ss -, s _ -,_ 4... do 0,•••• 8,..4„ m ....et - 1 ass scan. lll „Sr 4 •••••' ammilm.-n11•4•••• !s - 1:7:•, aSp ..,1.1at.s1v0riem1E..dm.rsi\.ii4t,:.1-r.a..,, i:j1r111,•7,k44t4i:1.474.,,44•••,..„44•.‘.••.41.!;.:i..;7. 1i1v14g14. .4 1.141 r/ MB .ar:rsaas.r 4..fis • ss. • • • I; it ? • rain lllll sit: : L -L, - - '4 .s• - AO 4. • •je_•.1_ rus is crave sum\ ; • . F.", .to lllll ts %Iv lila! 2.%1Sa Z: srmaa•%ciaus11:it/VA illa a llll lllllll .?.:8 t11411110.* ,41 ie .. _ iitiraterniP .P• a fir al i•I ... . . 'kir/ 414 sissaat:-..:saas ,••":" iliii••• 111/ sag Its ;kg an i .47 4.! :4: , ; ‘...f li !. it , I 1 it II apiaskce a •frilitrir. .a:,,,,-,•;• :M.. • :rent 4,42.:151:::. nosZ,Sonia...mas •• mi pm. - - -- laraw Sawa Mal = •••••••14.••••0•1 Posecee fresistii =IN lar••••••••11 Casrib• • • • 1•••••Cal••• .... IN TIM asereg NO TIM — NM" aril HMI "w". — MU 'WOO 114,69MON — imi• inj MOWS) 1I "Ire FAYETTEVIILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. ARKANSAS DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE To: Tim Conklin, City Planner From: Heather Woodruff, City Clerk Date: March 7, 2002 Please find attached a copy of Resolution No. 41-02 denying the appeal of Earl and Carolyn Farrell from the Planning Commission's refusal to approve a lesser dedication for Double Tree Road. The original will be microfilmed and filed with the City Clerk 010 03 Update Document Reference RES Date 3052002 City of Fayetteville Index Maintenance 'ter Action Ref. Taken Brief Description 41-02 • 3/12/2002 8:43:21 DENY APPEAL OF EARL/CAROLYN FARRELL Enter Keywords • File Reference # Security Class Expiration Date Date for Cont/Referred: Name Referred to • • RES. 41-02 DENY APPEAL FARRELL. EARL & CAROLYN PLANNING COMMISSION REFUSAL APPROVE LESSER DEDICATION DOUBLE TREE RAOD MICROFILM Cmdl-Return Cmd8-Retention Cmd5-Abstract Yes No Retention Type: **** Active **** Cmd4-Delete Cmd3-End Press 'ENTER' to Continue (c) 1986-1992 Munimetrix Systems Corp.