HomeMy WebLinkAbout165-01 RESOLUTION• 1
RESOLUTION NO. 165-01
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE FIVE
YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR 2002-2006
WHEREAS, the City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas has examined the
future capital needs of the citizens and city of Fayetteville, Arkansas; and
WHEREAS, working with City Staff, the City Council has determined the
most pressing Capital improvement needs of the City of Fayetteville, which are
now incorporated into the City of Fayetteville Five Year Capital Improvement
Program 2002-2006 as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
hereby approves and adopts the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Five Year Capital
Improvements Program 2002-2006 as amended as a planning guide for future
capital expenditures. A copy of this document is attached as Exhibit "A".
PASSED and APPROVED this the 4th day of December, 2001.
By:. ate -en
eather Woodruff, City erk
APPROVED:
By
DAN COODY, May
•
NAME OF FILE:
CROSS REFERENCE:
Resolution No. 165-01
•
12/04/01
Resolution No. 165-01
2002-2006
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, Five Year Capital Improvements Program
09/21/01
Departmental Correspondence to Fay. City Council thru Mayor Coody
and Ted Webber, Admin. Services Director, from Budget & Research,
regarding 2002-2006 Capital Improvements Program
10/16/01
Staff Review Form
12/06/01
Memo to Stephen Davis, Budget & Research, from Heather Woodruff,
City Clerk
NOTES:
Heather Woodruff
City Clerks Office
WIC OEFELAMIIID
n
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas pit— as
Five Year
Capital Improvements Program
2002 - 2006
FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
MICROFILMED
DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
TO:
THRU: Dan Coody, Mayor hz
FROM: Ted H. Webber, Administrative Se
DATE. April 5, 2002
SUBJECT: 2002 Adopted Capital Improvements Program
Department Directors and Division Heads
The enclosed 2002-2006 Adopted Capital Improvements Program (CIP) document is presented for
your use and reference. The CIP is a five-year planning tool for infrastructure and other capital
improvements, which prioritizes projects and schedules them for completion as soon as practical.
The funding requests for the projects planned in 2002 were incorporated into the 2002 Adopted
Budget & Work Program. In addition, the 2003 projects listed in the CIP will be reviewed by City
Staff and will be incorporated in the 2003 Proposed Budget & Work Program.
If you have any comments, suggestions for improvement, or questions concerning the City's CIP
please contact either Ted Webber, Administrative Services Director or Steve Davis, Budget
Manager.
Finally, I would like to thank each of you for your efforts in preparing the project submissions for
review. The material enclosed in this document is an essential source of information describing the
infrastructure needs of the City of Fayetteville. This document would not be possible without your
time and support.
MICROFir AtFO
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
2002 - 2006
Capital Improvements Program
Compiled by:
Ted H. Webber, Administrative Services Director
Stephen Davis, Budget Manager
Kevin Springer, Senior Financial Analyst
Barbara Fell, Research Analyst
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
2002-2006 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION/SUMMARY
PAGE(S)
Letter of Transmittal I-V
Program Directional Information VI -IX
CIP Project Cost Table X
Resolution to Adopt 2002-2006 CIP XI
Summary of Project Requests 1-3
Comprehensive Detail 4-7
AIRPORT FUND PROJECTS
Airport Improvements:
Priority Rankings 8
Project Details 9-15
PARKS DEVELOPMENT FUND PROJECTS
Parks & Recreation Improvements:
Priority Rankings 16
Project Details 17-22
SALES TAX CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND PROJECTS
Fire Safety Improvements:
Priority Rankings 24
Project Details 25-30
Police Safety Improvements:
Priority Rankings 31
Project Details 32-40
Library Material Purchases & Improvements:
Priority Rankings 41
Project Details 42-44
Parks & Recreation Improvements:
Priority Rankings 45
Project Details 46-57
Bridge and Drainage Improvements:
Priority Rankings 58
Project Details 59-65
PAGES)
In -House Street & Sidewalk Improvements:
Priority Rankings 66
Project Details 67-68
Street Improvements:
Priority Rankings 69
Project Details 70-83
Transportation Improvements:
Priority Rankings 84
Project Details 85-88
Water & Sewer Improvements:
Priority Rankings 89
Project Details 90-91
Other Capital Improvements:
Priority Rankings 92-93
Project Details 94-110
SHOP FUND PROJECTS
Vehicles & Equipment:
Priority Rankings 112
Project Details 113-120
WATER & SEWER FUND PROJECTS
Wastewater Treatment Improvements:
Priority Rankings 122
Project Details 123-127
Water & Sewer Improvements:
Priority Rankings 128
Project Details 129-135
Water & Sewer Services Improvements:
Priority Rankings 136
Project Details 137-139
PAGE(S)
OTHER FUND PROJECTS
W.W.T.P. Bond Fund - Water & Sewer Improvements:
Priority Rankings 140
Project Details 141-143
Library Construction Fund - Library Material Purchases & Improvements:
Priority Rankings 144
Project Details 145
Off -Street Parking Fund - Off -Street Parking Improvements:'
Priority Rankings 146
Project Details 147-148
Parking Deck Bond Fund - Off -Street Parking Improvements:
Priority Rankings 149
Project Details 150
Solid Waste Fund - Solid Waste Improvements:
Priority Rankings 151
Project Details 152-162
UNFUNDED PROJECTS 164-174
LISTING OF ACRONYMS 175
PROJECT INDEX 176-178
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
December 5, 2001
Members of the City Council and
Citizens of Fayetteville
It is my pleasure to present the Adopted 2002-2006 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for the City
of Fayetteville. The CIP was formally adopted by the City Council on December 4, 2001. The City
began this very important and successful annual CIP process in 1988 to provide a focused plan
identifying the City's infrastructure and capital needs and identifying the funding to meet those needs.
Below is a table that lists both the planned expenditures by project category for the 2002-2006 CIP
and the actual funds expended for the past five years (1996-2000). It is significant to note that with
all the challenges faced by the City over the past few years, we have fulfilled approximately $92.9
million in capital and infrastructure needs. These completed improvements coupled with those
currently planned for the next five years, will help meet the needs of our current and future citizens
as more demand is placed on the City's infrastructure and capital assets in the future.
Project Category
Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements/Expansion
Library Material Purchases & Improvements
Water & Sewer Improvements
Street & Transportation Improvements
Vehicles & Equipment Replacement/Expansion
In -House Street & Sidewalk Improvements
Off -Street Parking Improvements
Parks & Recreation Improvements
Airport Improvements
Bridge & Drainage Improvements
Solid Waste Improvements
Fire Safety Improvements
Police Improvements
Other Capital Improvements
Town Center Construction
Total
113 WEST MOUNTAIN 72701 501-521-7700
FAX 501-575-8257
Adopted
2002-2006
$ 120,000,000
22,018,000
15,128,000
13,030,000
7,569,000
6,818,000
6,752,000
6,513,000
5,009,000
3,813,000
2,491,000
2,130,000
1,331,000
3,408,000
0
Actual
1996-2000
$ 8,306,000
892,000
22,524,000
15,376,000
8,507,000
4,426,000
94,000
4,870,000
7,535,000
2,037,000
2,693,000
2,342,000
1,362,000
6,153,000
5,792,000
$ 216,010,000 $ 92,909,000
The 2002-2006 CIP includes $216 million in planned capital improvements over the next five years
or approximately $23 8 million more in projects than the 2000-2004 CIP contained. Most of the
project additions are due to the new central library ($21 0 million) and increased funding for a new
wastewater treatment plant and improvements to the City's wastewater collection system ($14.0
million). In addition, there is increased funding in Airport Improvements ($1.4 million) and Bridge
& Drainage Improvements ($0.8 million). Other significant project category changes include reduced
funding for Water & Sewer Improvements ($10 6 million), Vehicle & Equipment
Replacement/Expansion ($1 1 million) and Parks & Recreation Improvements ($0.7 million)
Community Development (CD) projects were not included in the 2002-2006 Capital Improvements
Program because the CD projects benefit specific not-for-profit service agencies or individual
homeowners.
Finally, improvements proposed in this CIP for the Airport, Parks & Recreation, Water & Sewer,
Street, Bridge & Drainage, and Vehicles & Equipment Replacement/Expansion improvements have
been reviewed and recommended by the Airport Board, the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board, and
the City Council Street, Water & Sewer, and Equipment Committees respectively.
Changes Made to the Proposed 2002-2006 CIP
The Proposed 2002-2006 CIP was presented to City Council on October 23, 2001. During
subsequent City Council reviews, the document was amended to include funding for the Lights of
the Ozarks project in the Parks Development Fund at $73,000 for five years and an L.E.D. Traffic
Signal Lens Replacement project for $164,000 in 2002 that is funded in the Sales Tax Capital
Improvements Fund.
Other changes made during City Council review include: reducing the Gregg Avenue - Hwy. 71 to
Mud Creek Bridge Street Improvement project by $149,000 in 2002 to provide funding for the L.E.D.
project; the funding for Fire Station #7 and the expansion pumper was reallocated with the fire
station being brought forward and the expansion pumper being postponed; the New Central Library -
Site Improvements project's funding was reallocated to the Sales Tax Capital Improvements Fund
from the Library Construction Fund; and the Town Center - Utility Line project to bury the utility
lines underground for $200,000 was proposed. City Council placed this project on the unfunded list.
Several Street Improvement projects had funding dollars adjusted to reflect the estimated costs
previously misreported. Actual dollars for Street Improvements remained constant. Additionally,
the City Council, when adopting the 2002-2006 CIP on December 4, 2001, issued a policy statement
to incorporate energy efficient improvements when possible and cost effective. Staff is developing
plans to implement City Council's directive into project plans as the projects come forth.
Funding for Capital Improvements
The projects in this CIP are generally funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. Exceptions exist for the
Wastewater System Improvements Project (WSIP) and two parking garage construction projects. The
WSIP costs will be funded by bonds supported by a special 3/4 percent sales tax passed by Fayetteville
citizens on November 6, 2001. The parking garage bonds are proposed to be funded by off street
parking revenues.
Il
The majority of projects listed in this adopted CIP are funded with a discretionary city sales tax
originally approved in 1993. The CIP sales tax was authorized for ten (10) years and must be re-
authorized, by public vote, prior to June 30, 2003 This CIP is prepared assuming the sales tax is re-
authorized and that fifty percent (50%) will be dedicated for capital. If the sales tax is not re-
authorized, then the projects planned for 2003 through 2006 will have to be reevaluated The project
ranking within project categories is very important for this CIP because of the sales tax re-
authorization.
Status of Projects Budgeted for 2001
The City has approximately $47.8 million in capital projects budgeted for 2001. The current status
of the major projects budgeted for 2001 are listed below:
Street, Drainage, and Transportation Improvements $ 12.6 million
• Dickson Street Enhancements ($2.2 Million). The project is currently awaiting the acquisition
of a few parcels of rights-of-way prior to submitting to the Arkansas Highway & Transportation
Department (AHTD) for final approval prior to letting the project for bid. The project estimate
is currently $3.1 million. The budget shortfall is proposed to be made up from project savings
from the 6th Street Extension ($0.3 million), utilizing a portion of the In -House Sidewalk project
($0.3 million) and project savings from various other completed street projects ($0.3 million).
• Old Missouri Road Improvements ($1.5 Million). The Street Committee has chosen a street
design option.
• Cleveland Street Improvements ($0.8 Million). The project is essentially designed and has been
delayed pending improvements along Garland Street. The Garland Street improvements are
being designed and constructed by the AHTD.
• In -House Pavement Improvements ($1.1 Million). Approximately 131,350 square yards of
asphalt were laid this season.
• In -House Sidewalk Improvements ($0.8 Million). Project focus for 2001 is to complete the
sidewalk segments nearest schools and then begin to fill in sidewalk segments around City parks.
Additionally, the project budget is being used to fund two other projects that are currently in
progress and in need of additional funding: Dickson Street Enhancement Project ($285,000) and
Fayetteville Multi -Use Trails ($175,000). Finally, an enhancement grant was applied for that,
if approved, will require a local match of 20% or approximately $90,000. The enhancement grant
will address up to three significant sidewalk segments within the City.
• Steele Property - Street Improvements ($0.6 million). The project is complete.
• Fayetteville Multi -Use Trails ($0.8 Million). Two trail segments have been bid and construction
contracts have been awarded. The total project is estimated to cost approximately $1.4 million.
The City applied for an additional enhancement grant that, if approved, will provide the
additional funding needed to complete the original project scope. The grant requires a 20% local
III
match that is expected to be funded from the project savings from completed sidewalk projects
and a portion of the In -House Sidewalk Project.
• Hollywood Street - 6th & Sang Avenue Intersection ($0.4 million). The project is essentially
designed and is expected to be advertised for bid early in the first quarter of 2002.
Water & Sewer Improvements $10.8 million
• Wastewater System Improvements Project ($0.4 Million) The preliminary engineering contracts
are essentially complete and a project funding referendum was approved on November 6, 2001.
The Soil & Water Conservation Commission Revolving Loan Fund application is scheduled to
be submitted in January 2002.
• Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation ($2.6 Million). The engineering and construction contracts for
sanitary sewer system rehabilitation planned for 2001 have been awarded.
• Water & Sewer Operations Building ($2.0 million). This project is currently in design and is
anticipated to be ready for bid in the first quarter of 2002.
Other significant projects:
• Town Center/Parking Garage ($3.3 Million). The project is complete.
• Drake Field Pavement Maintenance & Rehabilitation ($2.8 Million) McClinton -Anchor was
awarded the construction contract at the September 4, 2001 City Council meeting. Construction
is underway with completion estimated in the first quarter 2002.
• New Central Library Building ($1.5 Million) The project is in design and is expected to be bid
in April 2002. Land acquisition is expected to be completed in the first quarter of 2002.
• Research & Technology Park ($1.5 million). The City, the Chamber of Commerce, and the
University of Arkansas are currently evaluating partial development options for the property
fronting I-540 and expansion of the Genesis site fronting South School.
• Walker Park Senior Center ($2.0 million). The project is under construction. The City was
notified late in the fourth quarter that completion is expected in the third quarter of 2002.
• Radio System Upgrade ($2.1 million). The City has accepted phase one of the project and phase
two is in progress.
Unfunded Projects
The unfunded projects list contains projects that have been identified as needed without an identified
funding source. The value of the unfunded projects list has increased from $72 2 million in the 2000-
2004 CIP to $106.1 million for the 2002-2006 CIP. The increase in unfunded projects is primarily
attributed to the inclusion of water system improvements identified in the 1996 Water System Study
to be performed over the next five to fifteen years.
IV
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Conclusion
The CIP is a planning tool for infrastructure and other capital improvements, which prioritizes
projects and schedules them for completion as soon as practical. The City advocates a primarily pay-
as-you-go policy. This policy requires difficult decisions to be made regarding the timing and scope
of capital improvements. Some projects simply have to wait.
The CIP is a five-year plan that may be updated and/or revised on an annual basis to reflect changing
priorities, to renew existing priorities, and to revise cost estimates. The funding requests for the
projects planned for 2002 were incorporated in the 2002 budget submitted to Council for approval
in November 2001.
Finally, let me express my sincere thanks to the members of City staff, the City Council, various
committees, and the community for the significant effort and input that has helped to shape this
document.
Respectfully submitted,
/AK_
Dan Coody
Mayor
V
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DIRECTIONAL INFORMATION
Introduction
The Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for the City of Fayetteville examines the infrastructure
and capital needs of the City for the next five years The CIP may be reviewed and updated on an
annual basis to reflect the changing needs of the community and changes in available monies for
financing capital projects. The City's philosophy concerning the use of the CIP is that it should be
considered as a financial planning tool that lists the City's capital improvement project, places the
projects in a priority order, and schedules the projects for funding and implementation. The CIP
should be further considered as a major policy tool for the Mayor and City Council.
Financing
The City finances capital improvements on essentially a pay-as-you-go basis utilizing revenue from
the 1% City sales tax adopted in 1993, the 1% Parks Development (Hotel, Motel, Restaurant) sales
tax adopted in 1996, and operating revenues from the Airport, Shop, Water & Sewer, and Solid
Waste funds. Based on a resolution approved by the City Council, prior to the passage of the sales
tax, a minimum of 75% of the sales tax revenues will be used to assist in funding capital projects.
In addition, long-term debt is considered and utilized only when the City faces a project that is of
such importance and sufficient financial magnitude as to warrant a bond issue.
The CIP is not a financing document in and of itself. Rather, the CIP is utilized as a planning
document that places projects in the annual budget whereby funds are appropriated for them by the
City Council. Prior to actual initiation of project work, required contracts are presented to the Mayor
or City Council, as appropriate, for final approval of expending funds.
What Projects Are in the CIP
Projects and their cumulative component areas totaling $10,000 or more should be included in the
CIP. Projects costing less than $5,000 are not considered capital and are funded through program
operating budgets. Projects that cost between $5,000-10,000 are handled through the budget process.
Attempts will be made to fund these capital items through operating funds.
Projects in the CIP can include:
• obligations for labor and materials and contractors involved in completing a project,
• acquisition of land or structures,
• engineering or architectural services, professional studies, or other administrative costs,
• expenses for City vehicles and equipment, and
• renovating or expanding City facilities, grounds, or equipment.
VI
Project Cost Determination
All projects are first costed in current or 2001 dollars. Then a determination of the year the project
is expected to start is made. Finally, determination of the projected cost of the improvement is made
by referring to the "Project Cost Table" that provides the inflation multiplier to be used for the
project in the anticipated year.
Pnonty Selection of Projects
The adopted CIP will rely on priorities defined by the Mayor, City Council, Community, and City
staff. As always, criteria such as government imposed mandates, usefulness to the community, and
impact on operational expenses will be reviewed in establishing priorities. A priority ranking is
assigned to each project by year and by funding source. Projects for which no funding is projected
to be available will be placed on an "Unfunded Projects List," which will identify the cost of the
project in 2001 dollars. This list identifies the project as being viable, but one for which no funding
is presently available. Unfunded projects may be funded if actual revenue is above projected
revenue, if costs on funded projects are below budget, or if another funding source is identified.
The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Airport Board, City Council Street Committee, City
Council Water & Sewer Committee, and City Council Equipment Committee meetings have been
held to obtain committee and public input and guidance regarding parks, streets, bridge and drainage
improvements, water and sewer improvements, and equipment purchases planned for the next five
years.
Impact on Operations Cost
The majority of the projects planned in the CIP will have a minor impact on operational budgets.
Most of the projects planned over the next five years replace high maintenance water lines, sewer
lines, and street segments. Performing reconstruction of these items will free up maintenance
budgets to address areas that currently have a lesser priority. There are a few projects that will have
a significant impact on operational budgets. The most significant of these projects are listed below:
• Vehicles & Equipment: The vehicles and equipment planned for 2002 in the Shop Fund will
cost user divisions approximately $150,000 annually. The user divisions are charged monthly
replacement and maintenance charges. These charges help to escrow funds for replacement units
when the vehicle has become obsolete or is no longer suited for service.
• The In -House Pavement hnprovements Project will reduce maintenance costs for each street that
is overlaid. In addition, this project is projected to save the City more than $100,000 annually
over contract pricing for the same work.
• The L.E.D. Traffic Signal Lens Replacement Project will reduce utility and maintenance costs.
Utility savings is projected to be $42,000 annually.
VII
Organization of the Capital Improvements Program Document
The document is organized into three (3) primary sections as follows:
Introduction/Summary
This section contains the transmittal letter from the Mayor, a CIP overview, and several
summary schedules, which explain the resources and uses for the CIP. The most detailed
schedule is the Comprehensive Detail, which lists the individual projects, their funding
sources, and the year in which they are planned to be initiated.
II. Project Details by Funding Source
This section of the document is actually found in six separate tabs, which are broken into the
primary sources for the projects. The six tabs are as follows: (1) Airport Fund, (2) Parks
Development Fund, (3) Sales Tax Capital Improvements Fund, (4) Shop Fund, (5) Water &
Sewer Fund, and (6) Other Funds. Each section includes a priority listing of projects by
project type and by year. The priority listing for each year will be denoted with an asterisk
(*) if the project is a continuing project from the prior year. In addition, a project detail is
included for all projects. This detail will provide specific information about each project
including: the project title, funding source(s), year(s) the project is scheduled, a project
description and justification, project status, and the impact of the project on operations A
visual aid is included for the project if appropriate and available.
III. Unfunded Projects
This section of the document contains all of the projects which are outside of the five-year
plan. The CIP document compilation process involves a review of all projects and resources
during each update. Every attempt is made to identify as many current and anticipated
projects as possible. Resources available are then matched up with as many project requests
as possible Unfortunately, there continues to be significantly more project requests than
resources available. This has resulted in an extensive Unfunded Projects List totaling almost
$106.1 million. All projects on this list are considered to be viable projects for which no
current funding exists.
Capital Improvement Policy
The CIP is approached as a valuable tool to be used in the development of responsible and
progressive financial planning. The program is developed in accordance with the financial policies
of the City. The policies and the CIP form the basis for making various annual capital budget
decisions and support the City's continued commitment to sound, long range financial planning, and
direction. The City's official Capital Improvements Policy is as follows:
VIII
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
• The City will prepare a biennial update of a five-year CIP which will provide for the orderly
maintenance, replacement, and expansion of capital assets.
• The CIP will identify long range capital projects and capital improvements of all types, which
will be coordinated with the annual operating budget to maintain full utilization of available
sources.
• When preparing the CIP, the City will seek to identify all viable capital projects and capital
improvements required during the subsequent five-year period. These projects and
improvements will be prioritized by year and by funding source. Every attempt will be made to
match projects and improvements with available funding sources. Future operating costs
associated with a project or an improvement will also be given consideration in the establishment
of priorities.
• The City will seek Federal, State, and other funding to assist in financing capital projects and
capital improvements.
• The City will incorporate the reasonable findings and recommendations of the City's Boards,
Commissions, Committees, and Citizens' task forces as they relate to capital projects and
improvements.
• The City will seek input on the establishment of projects and project priorities from the public
by public hearings.
IX
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
CIP PROJECT COST TABLE
2002-2006
All capital project requests are first costed in 2001 dollars. Then, a determination is made as to the
year in which the project should be initiated. Once this information is decided, the information in
the table below is used to obtain the future year cost of the project.
6% factor
Inflation Recommendations
This factor should be used in calculating all project categories.
2002
1.060
2003
1.124
2004
1.191
2005
1.262
2006
1.338
Example: A street project that costs $1,000,000 in 2001 dollars, which is expected to be done
in 2004, would use the inflation factor of 1.191. To get the expected cost of the
project in 2004 dollars, multiply $1,000,000 by 1.191, which equals $1,191,000.
X
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
RESOLUTION NO. 165-01
A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE AND ADOPT THE FIVE
YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR 2002-2006
WHEREAS, the City Council of Fayetteville, Arkansas has examined the future capital needs
of the citizens and city of Fayetteville, Arkansas; and
WHEREAS, working with City Staff, the City Council has determined the most pressing Capital
improvement needs of the City of Fayetteville, which are now incorporated into the City of
Fayetteville Five Year Capital Improvement Program 2002-2006 as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby approves and
adopts City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Five Year Capital Improvements Program 2002-2006 as
amended as a planning guide for future capital expenditures. A copy of this document is attached
as Exhibit "A."
PASSED AND APPROVED this 4 th day of December, 2001.
ATTEST.
By:
eather Woodruff, City Clerk
XI
APPROVED:
By:
Dan Coody, Mayor
Project Requests
Airport Fund
Parks Development Fund
Sales Tax Capital Improvements Fund
Shop Fund
Water & Sewer Fund
W.W.T.P. Bond Fund
Library Construction Fund
Off -Street Parking Fund
Parking Deck Bond Fund
Solid Waste Fund
Unfunded Projects
Resources Available
Airport Fund
Parks Development Fund
Sales Tax Capital Improvements Fund
Shop Fund
Water & Sewer Fund
W.W.T.P. Bond Fund
Library Construction Fund
Oil -Street Parking Fund
Parking Deck Bond Fund
Solid Waste Fund
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
2002.2006 Capital Improvements Program
Summary of Project Requests & Project Resources
By Fund - All Sources
2002
$ 3,030,000
549,000
10,108,000
2,452,000
2,926,000
25,000,000
20,417,000
38,000
2,500,000
1,940,000
2003 2004
$ 971,000
544,000
7,780,000
627,000
2,692,000
35,000,000
2005
$ 205,000
539,000
6,318,000
1,846,000
2,275,000
30,000,000
35,000 23,000
4,115,000
135,000 116,000
$ 511,000
546,000
6,762,000
1,532,000
2,401,000
30,000,000
18,000
150,000
2006
Total
$ 292,000 $
530,000
7,527,000
1,112,000
2,275,000
23,000
150,000
5,009,000
2,708,000
38,495,000
7,569,000
12,569,000
120,000,000
20,417,000
137,000
6,615,000
2,491,000
106,068,000
$ 68,960,000 $ 47,784,000 $ 45 437,000 $ 41 920 000 $ 11,909,000 $ 322,078,000
2002
$ 3,030,000
549,000
10,108,000
2,452,000
2,926,000
25,000,000
20,417,000
38,000
2,500,000
1,940,000
2003 2004
$ 971,000
544,000
7,780,000
627,000
2,692,000
35,000,000
$ 205,000
539,000
6,318,000
1,846,000
2,275,000
30,000,000
35,000 23,000
4,115,000
135,000 116,000
$ 68,960,000 $ 47,784,000 $ 45 437 000
1
2005
$ 511,000
546,000
6,762,000
1,532,000
2,401,000
30,000,000
18,000
150,000
2006
$ 292,000
530,000
7,527,000
1,112,000
2,275,000
23,000
150,000
$ 41 920,000 $ 11,909,000
Total
$ 5,009,000
2,708,000
38,495,000
7,569,000
12,569,000
120,000,000
20 417 000
137,000
6,615,000
2,491,000
$ 216,010,000