Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout86-00 RESOLUTION• • FILED '00 JUN 26 Pig 3 38 MARILYN EOAARDS PROLATE tLER.K IYA;tfis-!iGTdN 04. /MK,: RESOLUTION NO, 86-00 MICROFILMED A RESOLUTION APPROVING BASE YEAR MILLAGE ROLLBACK COMPUTATION AND CERTIFICATION FORM REGARDING THE ROLLBACK CASE, HICKS, ET AL V CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, CIV 97-500; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID FORMS.. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That—the City Council hereby approves Base Year Millage Rollback Computation and Certification Form regarding the rollback case, Hicks, et al v. City of Fayetteville, CIV97-500; and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said forms. A copy of the form is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. plsE AND APPROVED this 20th day of June , 2000. I APPROVED( • r 1��� .:.., e 4 By: Fre Hanna, Mayor 1, ATTEST: By/%C atde, Heather Woodruff, City Cl NAME OF FILE: CROSS REFERENCE: Date Contents of File Initials D/o-7i/JGt %y /4 ��n-DlJ fait%,. itti, hat`" if , ,,11) 4612-00 - �y/� /1?`t1 N,_ -'//laze S ete 1G NA_ /�./ -- �.l9fl. �, Zr/ .Z� S ��.r �G ry 97- G6) �J ll • • COUNTY: TAXING UNIT: DATE: • ASSESSMENT OF TAXES • Base Year Millage Rollback Computation and Certification Form Washington city of Fayetteville June 21,2000 EXHIBIT A (1997 payable in 1998) 1. Compute the following to discover total of reassessed property: a. Total base year assessments b. Less newly discovered, new construction properties c. Equals total reassessed properties 2. Compute the following to find the zero -increasing millage adjustment: a. Base -year taxes certified for collection b. Divide by reassessed properties c. Equals zero -increase millage 3. Compute the following to find the percentage of newly discovered property: a. Newly discovered, new construction properties b. Divided by total assessed properties c. Equals percent newly discovered 4. Millage adjustment option: a. Maximum increase option b. Minus newly discovered property percentage c. Allowable optional millage increase 5. To compute millage adjustment options if applicable: a. Rolled back zero -based millage b. Times allowed optional millage increased percent c. Equals indicated overall millage of 6. Each tax source or levy shall be adjusted by applying the following computed multipliers and adjusting to the next highest one/tenth (1/10) mill: a. Overall millage from 5.c. above b. Divided by previous millage prior to base year c. Equals multiplier D:\DATA\ROLLB97.WK4 $382,798,143 19,210,941 363,587,202 $364,176.32 363,587,202 0.0010 19,210,941 363,587,202 5.28% 10.00% 5.28% 4.72% 0.0010 4.72% 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 1.05 x �C jlidetr Kollbet m X 2 W_ • • • ASSESSMENT OF TAXES • Base Year MiIlage Rollback Computation and Certification Form - (continued). 7. Compute each tax source or levied millage in the following table: Previous Adjusted Rounded Tax Source Millage x Multiplier = Millage / Millage Fire Pension 0.5000 x 1.05 = 0.5244 / 0.5000 Police Pension 0.5000 x 1.05 = 0.5244 / 0.5000 x = / x = / x = / x = / x = / Total Millage Minimum Millage Required by Amendment 74 Minimum Millage to be Levied (Greater of above) 1.0000 = N/A 1.0000 CERTIFICATION Signatures 8. Proration of minimum millage by tax source if applicable: a. Millage to be levied b. Divided by total previourmillage c. Equals multiplier d. Compute each tax source or levied millage in the following table: 0.0010 0.0010 1.0489 Previous Adjusted Rounded Tax Source Millage x Multiplier = Millage / Millage Fire Pension 0.5000 x 1.05 = 0.5244 / 0.5000 Police Pension 0.5000 x 1.05 = 0.5244 / 0.5000 x = / x = / x = / x = / x 9. TOTAL MILLAGE TO BE LEVIED CERTIFICATION Signatures D:\DATA\ROLLB97.WK4 Total Millage 1.0000 1.0000 Any millage increase requires a public vote, therefore, rounded millage can not exceed .5 mils for Police Pension and Fire Pension. COUNTY: TAXING UNIT: DATE: ASSESSMENT OF TAXES i Base le a Rollback Computation and Certificate/ Washington city of Fayetteville June 16, 2000 (1997 payable in 1998) 1. Compute the following to discover total of reassessed property: a. Total base year assessments b. Less newly discovered, new construction properties c. Equals total reassessed properties 2. Compute the following to find the zero -increasing millage adjustment: a. Base -year taxes certified for collection b. Divide by reassessed properties c. Equals zero -increase millage 3. Compute the following to find the percentage of newly discovered property: a. Newly discovered, new construction properties b. Divided by total assessed properties c. Equals percent newly discovered 4. Miliage adjustment option: a. Maximum increase option b. Minus newly discovered property percentage c. Allowable optional millage increase 5. To compute millage adjustment options if applicable: a. Rolled back zero -based millage b. Times allowed optional millage increased percent c. Equals indicated overall millage of 6. Each tax source or levy shall be adjusted by applying the following computed multipliers and adjusting to the next highest one/tenth (1/10) mill: a. Overall millage from 5.c. above b. Divided by previous millage prior to base year c. Equals multiplier H:IBUDGETIPROJECTSIMILLAGEIROLLB_97. WK4 $382,798,143 19,210,941 363,587,202 $364,176.32 363,587,202 0.0010 19,210,941 363,587,202 5.28% 10.00% 5.28% 4.72% 0.0010 4.72% 0.0010 0.0010 0.0010 1.05 4a ASSESSMENT OF TAXES Base Year Millage Rollback Computation and Certification Form - (continued) 7. Compute each tax source or levied millage in the following table: Previous Adjusted Rounded Tax Source Millage x Multiplier = Millage / Millage Fire Pension 0.5000 x 1.05 = 0.5244 / 0.5000 Police Pension 0.5000 x 1.05 = 0.5244 / 0.5000 x = / x = / x = / x = / x = / Minimum Millage Required by Amendment 74 Minimum Millage to be Levied (Greater of above) CERTIFICATION Signatures Total Millage 1.0000 N/A MMI 11 1.0000 8. Proration of minimum millage by tax source if applicable: a. Millage to be levied b. Divided by total previous millage c. Equals multiplier d. Compute each tax source or levied millage in the following table: 0.0010 0.0010 1.0489 Previous Adjusted Rounded Tax Source Millage x Multiplier = Millage / Millage Fire Pension 0.5000 x 1.05 = 0.5244 / 0.5000 Police Pension 0.5000 x 1.05 = 0.5244 / 0.5000 x = / x = / x = / x = / x = / Total Millage 9. TOTAL MILLAGE TO BE LEVIED 1.0000 CERTIFICATION Signatures OEM diem 1.0000 H:\BUDGET\PROJECTSWIILLAGE\ROLLB_97.W K4 RECE4 MAY 24 2000 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE MAYOR'S OFFICE COUNTY: TAXING UNIT: DATE Base Year Certification of Assessment Data on Real Estate WASHINGTON FILED '00 PM 23 AP? 11 21 MARILYN EDWARDS co & PROBATE CLERK 61.4SHINGTO;1 OOTARK. Fayetteville City 1997 payable in 1998 1 Total Assessment 382,798,143 - 2 Total Newly Discovered Property List 19,210,941 3 Total Taxes Certified For Collection $364,176.32 4 Millage Levy for General 0.0000 5 Millage Levy for Fire and Police Pension 0.0010 Collector Certification nt./e. s.Zffro tgnature • Prepared by Lee Ann Kraar, Chief Deputy, Washington County Assessor COUNTY: TAXING UNIT: DATE: 1 personal Property Interim Millane Adiustm 1 Base Year Revenues 2 Previous Year Assessment Base 3 New Assessment Base 4 Current Millage By Tax Source Police Pension Firefighter Pension • WASHINGTON rlL[D Fayetteville City, nor 23 Afl 11 29 1997 payable in 199AARILYf< EDWARDS CO. & PROBATE CLERK pata Needed For Calculation WASHINGTON CO. ARK. Total Millage Determination Of Assessment Base Growth Factor. Previous Year divided by Assessment Base 113 157 365 divided by 2 Millage Adjustments By Tax Source: 113,157.37 113,157,365 120,0641627 / 0.0005 0.0005 0.0010 New Assessment Base 120,064,627 Current multiplied Growth Millage by Factor Pol. Pension 0.0005 x Fire. Pension 0.0005 3 Verification: 0.0000 x 0.0000 x 0.942470 0.942470 0 942470 0.942470 0.0000 x 0.942470 Total Interim multiplied Millage by 0.0010 x equals Total Interim Millage New Assessment Base 120,064,627 equals equals Interim Millage 0.000471 0.000471 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 Millage Level For Personal Property Collector Certification Quorum Court Finance Committee Chair County Judge Growth Factor 0.942470 Rounded To 0.0005 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0010 equals Revenue 120,064.63 0.0010 Signature $- 22- 0 0 ?y,ti Signature Signature Prepared by Lee Ann Kram, CNN Deputy, Washington Canty Assessor .5- 19 -n 1 1 AIS FA! iE T TE VALE LEGAL DEPARTMENT CITY ATTORNEY DIVISION DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE 4 f�i2a S•unw i 1,/&al JERRY E. ROSE, CRY ATTORNEY LAGAYLE D.MCCARTY, ASST. CRY AITOR.\EY To: Fred Hanna, Mayor Fayetteville City Council From: Jerry E Rose, City Attorney 1 ,' Date: June 12, 2000 Re: Rollback - Hicks, et al vs. City of Fayetteville, et al, CIV 97-500, Washington County Circuit Court Case Judge Danielson in the Hicks case (commonly referred to as the Rollback case) issued a Writ of Mandamus requiring the County to famish the City certain figures in order for the City to fill out forms that are required by statute and are necessary to detemune the amount, if any, of the City's rollback. These figures have only recently been made available to the City, and Steve Davis, the Budget Coordinator for the City, is in the process of completing the forms required to be completed by the fudge's order. The judge has ordered the forms to be completed, approved by the City Council and filed with the court no later than June 30, 2000. Accordingly, I am asking that you place the approval of these forms on your June 20th City Council meeting. If for any reason these forms are not ready for your approval I will ask that you have a special meeting following the June 27th agenda meeting for their approval. /cbp •{_o r. IN 'fl IN CIRCUIT COURT OF WASI IINGTON COUNTY. ARKANSAS e. d -/o/oo JEANNE M. HICKS. of al. PLAINTIFFS CONSOLIDATED NO. CIV 97-500 THE CITY OF FAYETI'EVILLIE. ct al. I)ITENDANTS WRIT OF MANDAMUS Now on this 25111 day of February, 2000, comes on for consideration of Plaintiffs' mo- tion for writ of mandamus and from the arguments of counsel presented and other matters be- fore the Court, the Court finds: I . For the reasons previously stated in the Court's findings of fact and amended findings of fact, this Court finds that the writ of mandamus should issue compelling each tax unit to perform the tasks enumerated herein consistent with the statutes discussed herein. 2. That pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 26 26-403, the county clerk shall report to the governing body of each taxing unit listing the required data on each line of the form found in § 26-26-403. For purposes of filling out the form contemplated by § 26 26-403, the total assessment listed on line 1 shall be for the base year of 1997. This certification may be per- formed by the official of Washington County being deemed appropriate by the County; how- ever, the failure of any other official to provide the named certification shall not relieve the county clerk of her statutory duty as required by this writ. WRIT "tlfietJa 3. That the governing body of each taxing unit shall complete the form contained in Ark. Code Ann. § 26-26-404 and lile it with the county clerk. The governing bodies shall use the certified data provided by the county clerk. This certification may be performed by the of- ficial of Washington County being deemed appropriate by the County; however. the failure of any other official to provide the named certification shall not relieve the county clerk of her statutory duty as required by this writ. 4. The form described in Ark. Code Ann. § 2626-404 shall be signed by the offi- cers of the governing body of each taxing unit. 5. The completed form shall be filed with the county clerk and a copy of the record of the completed form shall be forwarded to the Assessment Coordination Department (for- merly the Assessment Coordination Division of the Arkansas Public Service Commission.) 6. The governing bodies of the taxing units shall also complete the forms contained in Ark. Code Ann. § 26-26-405. Upon the completion of the forms so mentioned, the taxing units shall deliver the completed forms to the county clerk for filing and a copy of the record of the completed form shall be forwarded to the Assessment Coordination Department. THEREFORE, IT IS THE ORDER OF THIS COURT, that this writ of mandamus is is- sued compelling the defendants as enumerated heretn to perform the specific tasks as provided herein. IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered this day of March, 2000. 2 Honorable Paul Danielson Circuit Judge on Assignment 1 • • • • • 9.4• • • RILED '00 JUN 26 Pf9 3 38 MA•R@1LYN. !MWAR6& *'i'. k P$9DATE EL00R.I( RESOLUTION NO. 86-00 A RESOLUTION APPROVING BASE YEAR MILLAGE'• ROLLBACK COMPUTATION AND CERTIFICATION FORM REGARDING THE ROLLBACK1CASE, HICKS, ET, AL V4 CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, CIV 97-500; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID FORMS.. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS* Section 1. That the City Council hereby approves Base Year Millage Rollback Computation and Certification Form regarding the rollback case, Hicks, et al v, City of Fayetteville, CIV97-500; and authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said forms. A copy of the form is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. ; ; ? $➢,AAND APPROVED this 2Oth day of June • 2000. a .C•s• j APPROVED: to r By Fre Hanna, Mayor . s �,� 1• s �•. ATTEST: By: Gt/ia edx, Heather Woodruff, City CI /J