The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About120-99 RESOLUTION• RESOLUTION NO 120-99 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF THE PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES FOR APPROVED PROJECTS IN APPLICATION NO. 99-03-C-00-FYV; AMENDING AND CLOSING APPLICATION NO. 95-01-C-00-FYV; AND AMENDING APPLICATION NO. 98-02-C-00-FYV. WHEREAS, it would be in the public interest to perform the below listed projects at Drake Field Airport; and, WHEREAS, funding these projects through Passenger Facility Charges would be in the public interest; and, WHEREAS, Resolution No. 96-95, Section 4.1, provides that Passenger Facility Charges shall be expended for projects approved by resolution of the City Council and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS* Section 1 That the Passenger Facility Charges collected pursuant to Resolution 96-95 are hereby authorized to be expended on the following projects: 1. Localizer-Type Directional Aid and Glide Slope; 2. Taxiway Rehabilitation, 3. PFC Application and Administrative Costs. Section 2. That Application No. 95-01-C-00-FYV is hereby amended and closed. A copy of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. Section i That Application No. 98-02-C-00-FYV is hereby amended. A copy of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof. • PASSED AND APPROVED this 2L day of September , 1999. j ' ? �4i .��\ \ APPROVED: • • t.:. w; f ' ' rs 1. By. ^;t. ° ` ,,.:° Fred Hanna, Mayor r ,i3S.n; Heather Woodruff, City Clerk �r CNN FAYETTEVILLE EXHIBIT A AIRPORT DEPARTMENT THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE Application #3 October, 1999 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521-4750 • FAX 501-521-1735 FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS September 30, 1999 Mr. Ben Guttery Federal Aviation Administration Planning and Programming Branch ASW -610D, Airports Division Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0610 Re: Passenger Facility Charge Drake Field- Application #3 to Impose and Use PFC Revenue Dear Mr. Guttery: The City of Fayetteville is pleased to submit this Fayetteville Municipal Airport- Drake Field PFC Application #3 to Impose and Use PFC's. Respectfully Submitted, Mr. Fred B. Hanna, Jr. Mayor 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-718-7640 Ext.5 • FAX 501-718-7646 • rtmont of Transportation e Avlatlon Administration MAR Annrnven 7190-n557 Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application 1. Application Type (Check all that apply) e 0 a. Impose PFC Charges b. Use PFC Revenue c. Amend PFC No.: • Date Received Action PART 1 0.11FAA USE ONLY Approved Oats of Approved in Part Action: Disapproved PFC No.: 2. Public Agency Name, Address, and Contact Person Agency Name City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Address 4500 South School Ave, Suite F City, State, ZIP Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Contact Person Dale Frederick. Airport Manager 3. Airport(s) to Use: Fayetteville Municipal Airport- Drake Field PART 11 4. Charges a. Airport to Impose: Fayetteville Municipal Airport Drake Field h. Total Estimated Net PFC Revenue: $ 960,303 c. Level 0 $1.00 ❑ $2.00 $3.00 d. Proposed Effective Date: April 1, 2000 e. Estimated Expiration Date: December 31, 2000 PART 111 5. Attachments (Check all that Apply) a. b. c. d. e. f. Attached e ■ ■ Submitted with Application Dated: 1 . n/a n/a Airport Capital Improvement Plan Project Information Air Cartier Consultation Information Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers Alternative Uses / Projects Additional Information 6a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers: July 29, 1999 6b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air Carriers: August 31, 1999 PART IV 7.With respect to this PFC application I hereby certify as follows: To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct; This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency; The public agencygwill comply pwiith the attached assurances if the application is approved; and For thused by the isNafor ichnapprovaat Pusey PFC Neve been cequested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and environmental reviews reqa. Typed Name of Authorized Representative b. Title (50Telephone )1718 7640 umber Mr. Fred B. Hanna, Jr. Mayor, City of Fayetteville, AR (501) 718-7646 e. Signature of Authorized Representative f. Date Signed September 30, 1999 Agency Display of Estimated Burden Public reporting burden of this collection of informatiolt is estimated to average 5-160 hours per, response dependinn on the complexity. Send comments regarding the accura&tyV of thisburden estimate or any other aspect of rms Inrporrnation Collection tothe Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Paperwork Red%rtIOn Pfm oiect 22rt 0-0557. WasARP in119 o8n Independence 03 and toAthe eDepai Department of Transportation, ranspDC or 2t on, Federal Aviation Administration, FAA Form 5500-1 (6-94) NSN: 0052-00-915-9000 • Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas • PFC ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION STATEMENT • • • The undersigned Mayor for the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, assures and certifies, with respect to the PFC application and projects including each individual project work element submitted in its application to impose a PFC at FYV Airport: I) Responsibility and authority of the public agency. It has legal authority to impose a PFC and to finance and carry out the proposed projects. A resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas authorizing the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person or persons holding the position of Mayor as the official representative of the public agency to act in connection with the application. 2) Compliance with regulation. It will comply with all legal provisions of 14 CFR Part 158 not inconsistent with the provisions of the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (enacted November 5, 1990) and the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations implementing Section 9110 of the Act. 3) Compliance with state and local laws and regulations. It has complied, or will comply, with all applicable state and local laws and regulations. 4) Environmental, airspace and airport layout plan (ALP) requirements. It will not use PFC revenue on a project until the FAA has notified the public agency that: a) Any actions required under the National Environmental Policy act of 1969 have been completed; b) The appropriate airspace finding required by FAA regulations has been made; and c) The FAA Airport Layout Plan (ALP) with respect to the project or project work element has been approved to the extent such approval authority of the FAA is required by regulation of the FAA for such project or an individual project work element, and the regulation or related guidelines requiring ALP approval is available to the public agency at the time of submission of a PFC application for approval to use PFC revenues. 5) Nonexclusivity of contractual agreements. It will not enter into an exclusive long term lease or use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for the use of projects funded with PFC revenue. Such lease or use agreements will not preclude the public agency from funding or developing new capacity at the airport using PFC and other sources of airport revenues or funds, and reserving and assigning such new capacity for the use of new entry carriers or expanding competitive carriers. • 6) Carryover provisions. It will not enter into any lease or use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for the use of any airport facilities financed in whole or in part with revenue derived from a PFC if such agreement for such facility contains a carryover provision regarding a renewal option which, upon expiration of the original lease, would operate to automatically extend the term of such agreement with such carrier in preference over any potentially completing air carrier or foreign air carrier seeking to negotiate a lease or use agreement for such facilities. 7) Competitive access. It agrees that any lease or use agreements between the public agency and any air carrier or foreign air carrier for any facility financed in whole or in part with revenue derived from a PFC will contain a provision that permits a public agency to terminate the lease or agreement if - a) The air carrier or foreign air carrier has an exclusive lease or use agreement for existing facilities at such airport; and b) Any portion of its existing exclusive use facilities is not fully utilized and is not made available for use by potential competing air carriers or foreign air carriers at compensatory rates not exceeding the rates paid for such similar facilities to the public agency. 8) Rates, fees and charges. • a) It will not treat PFC revenue as airport revenue for the purpose of establishing a rate, • fee or charge pursuant to a contract with an air carrier or foreign air carrier. b) It will not include in its rate base by means of depreciation, amortization or any other method, that portion of the capital costs of a project paid for by PFC revenue for the purpose of establishing a rate, fee or charge pursuant to a contract with an air carrier or foreign air carrier. c) Notwithstanding the limitation provided in subparagraph (b) , with respect to a project for terminal development, gates and related areas, or a facility occupied or used by one or more air carriers or foreign air carriers on an exclusive or preferential basis, the rates, fees and charges payable by such carriers that use such facilities will be no less than the rates, fees, and charges paid by such carriers using similar facilities at the airport that were not financed by PFC revenue. 9) Standards and specifications. It will carry out the project in accordance with FAA airport design, construction and equipment standards and specifications contained in advisory circulars current on the date of project approval with the understanding that such standards are minimum standards of compliance. • • • • • 10) Record keeping and audit. It will maintain an accounting record for audit purposes for a period of 3 years after completion of the project All records will satisfy the requirement of 14 CFR Part 158 and will contain documentary evidence for all items of project costs. 11) Reports. It will submit reports in accordance with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 158, Subpart D, and as the Administrator may reasonably request. 12) Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990. I understand that sections 9304 and 9307 of the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 require the authority to impose a PFC be terminated if the Administrator determines the public agency has failed to comply with that act or with the implementing regulations promulgated thereunder. e Fred B. Hanna, Jr. Mayor • • • Filename: C:\APP\DATA\123DATA\CIPPFC.WK4 4. CO CO V W (T AWN -+ 4166 -ZZ -8 PasiAaa DtE�3IU'm 3<a2cu.0oa3 N N <. Ol J : 1p N N_ K n d d N O O O r N J d= w N ( 0 CO J CO m 0 7:1 0 K m m°1xacEd no y N N N O m =-. � m CO = x =0 = . o 0 o O o 1 1 0 i 1 7 D tit r O 01 N CO CO CO o to00AC O f O CO O O CO V OO CJOO-co 0 O O W 0 0 0 0 004./0000 I Fiscal Year 2000 1,076,8331 CO a W V CO N W 0 s O tJ O Cn o co O O o co O O [ Fiscal Year 2001 IW .Vt i CO A -4 01 W O V ONJ b W 14 O O i 0 a 0 0 '1 N N O O m 0 N 5.0 rt 45 541,000 COO CO o 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 r Fiscal Year l 2003 193,000 co co O O O Fiscal Year 2004 a —Lon07"co -4A' Five Tot _a 0 c-n0000YD-1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IO 000000000000000000000000000000 _ n 0 O O w y I • CO O co 0 O 0 A 0 O 0 0 DepartmentGeneral Govemment RtaanoS SwpunJ City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Capital Improvements Program 2000-2004 SUMMARY OF CIP PROJECT REQUESTS • ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** PFC Application number: ******************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): I. Localizer- Type Directional Aid with Glide Slope 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This PFC project consists of purchase and installation of a localizer-Type Directional Aid (LDA) with Glide Slope on Runway 34 at Fayetteville Municipal Airport. The instrument landing system is being funded with PFCs due to lack of FAA funding. The City of Fayetteville entered into a transfer agreement in which the FAA operates and maintains the equipment. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Is description adequate to allow a person, unfamiliar with the airport, to determine the project scope? YES [ ] NO ] ]. • b. Is this a USE project with a change in the description? YES[ ] NO ] 1. If YES, does this change constitute "materially altering the project scope"? YES [ ] NO j. If NO, the project must be submitted as a new IMPOSE and USE project. • Note: "materially altering the project scope" includes quantitative changes such as increasing the length of a taxiway. However, changing a taxiway project to extension of a runway is not a "material" change. Such changes require the submittal of the project as a new IMPOSE and USE project. c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 5. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: This localizer provides a precision approach to the airport enhancing airfield safety. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO [ ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 6. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project preserves and enhances safety of the national air transportation system. The Localizer- Type Directional Aid improves pilot safety at the airport. *****FOR FAA USE**************************************•*********************************** • a. Does the RO/ADO agree with the public agency's determination? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 b. Comments. c. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. [ Development eligible under AIP criteria; 1 Planning eligible under AIP criteria; 1 Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2212(b); [ Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2103(b); 1 Gates and related areas; or, 1 Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. App. 2104(c). Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ 1; or, project included in a local study[ 1? Include Title & Date of local study: 2) For development projects, indicate eligibility paragraph in Order 5100.38A or Program Guidance Letter: 3) Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 7. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): July 1995 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): July 1998 • *****FOR FAA USE***********a**********************************a*************aa******a****• a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ 1 NO 1 1 b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date? YES[ ] NO 1 1 c. Comments: *******,*********************************************************************************** 8. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): n/a *****FOR FAA USE*****a*****************************.*************s.**************,t********** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date? YES 1 1 NO 1 1. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 9. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, is the project shown on an approved airport layout plan (ALP)? YES[X) NO[ 1. If yes, provide the FAA approval date: July 14, 1999 *****FOR FAA USE***************a************a****************************************a**** a. Project required to be shown on an approved ALP? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 • 2 b. Public agency information confirmed? YES! 1 NO [ c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 10. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project been reviewed under the guidelines contained in the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969? YES[X] NO[ I. If yes, provide the date of the FAA's final environmental determination: Categorically excluded *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Check the appropriate finding below. [ ] Project determined to be categorically excluded from the requirement for formal environmental review under FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, paragraph 23 (1985). [ 1 All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to this project was approved on the date cited above. [ ] All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA environmental record of decision with respect to this project was approved on the date cited above. Finding by : Date of Finding: b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 111. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project received an FAA airspace determination? YES[X] NO[ ]. If YES, provide the date and airspace number of the FAA's final airspace determination: 95 -ASW -1050 -NRA, 95 -ASW -1051 -NRA January 24, 1996 *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Project requires an airspace determination? YES [ ] NO [ ] b. Public agency's information confirmed? YES [ ] NO [ 1 c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: None 13. CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: none Recap of Disagreements and Reasons for Proceeding: none *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** 3 a. Does the ADO/RO agree with the public agency's response to the disagreements? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $780,303 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest * ** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $780,303 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ * ** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $0 ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Yr. Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement Discretionary $ Total $0 * ** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $41,069 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ * * * * * * SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $41,069 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $821,372 * ****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 If YES, does the Region support9 YES 1 1 NO 1 1. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary, does the Region intend to support ? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES 11NO11 d. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: If costs exceed the current budget, and additional PFCs are needed, a PFC amendment application will be submitted to the FAA. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** 4 a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes J J No J J. b. Comments: ***************************************************************************************** *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve 1 1 Partially Approve 1 1 Disapprove 1 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** • • • • • • • ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** PFC Application number: ******************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): II. Taxiway Rehabilitation 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This project consists of rehabilitation of the public use taxiways located on the airfield. Specifically, Taxiways T-2, TD - 2, TE -1, TF -1, D and TB -3 will be reconstructed or repaired. These taxiways are needed due to asphalt deterioration. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Is description adequate to allow a person, unfamiliar with the airport, to determine the project scope? YES J 1 NO[ 1. b. Is this a USE project with a change in the description? YES[ ] NO J J. If YES, does this change constitute "materially altering the project scope"? YES [ ] NO J. If NO, the project must be submitted as a new IMPOSE and USE project. Note: "materially altering the project scope" includes quantitative changes such as increasing the length of a taxiway. However, changing a taxiway project to extension of a runway is not a "material" change. Such changes require the submittal of the project as a new IMPOSE and USE project. c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 5. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: These public use taxiways need to be repaired due to deterioration of the asphalt. The existing pavement is more than 20 years old and has deteriorated due to age. This project is PFC eligible as defined in Paragraph 158.15(b)(1), airport development eligible under AAIA. ****FOR FAA USE*************************************************************************** a. Is justification adequate? YES[ 1 NO [ 1. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 6 • • • 6. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: This project preserves and enhances safety of the national air transportation system. The rehabilitated taxiway system will improve safety at the airport by increasing pilot ground operations. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Does the RO/ADO agree with the public agency's determination? YES 1 ] NO 1 1 b. Comments. c. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. Development eligible under AIP criteria; Planning eligible under AIP criteria; Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2212(b); Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2103(b); Gates and related areas; or, Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. App. 2104(c). Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ 1; or, project included in a local study[ 1? Include Title & Date of local study: 2) For development projects, indicate eligibility paragraph in Order 5100.38A or Program Guidance Letter: 3) Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 7. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): June 2000 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): December 2002 *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES 1 1 NO [ 1 b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date? YES( ] NO 1 1 c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 8. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): N/A *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date? YES 1 1 NO 1 1. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 9. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, is the project shown on an 7 • • • • approved airport layout plan (ALP)? YES[X] NO[ 1. If yes, provide the FAA approval date: July 14, 1999 *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Project required to be shown on an approved ALP? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 b. Public agency information confirmed? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 10. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project been reviewed under the guidelines contained in the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969? YES[X] NO[ 1. If yes, provide the date of the FAA's final environmental determination: Categorically excluded *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Check the appropriate finding below. 1 1 Project determined to be categorically excluded from the requirement for formal environmental review under FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, paragraph 23 (1985). 1 1 All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to this project was approved on the date cited above. 1 All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA environmental record of decision with respect to this project was approved on the date cited above. Finding by : Date of Finding: 1 b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 11. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project received an FAA airspace determination? YES[X] NO[ 1. If YES, provide the date and airspace number of the FAA's final airspace determination: July 14, 1999, 99 -ASW -1034 -NRA *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Project requires an airspace determination? YES( 1 NO 1 1 b. Public agency's information confirmed? YES 1 ] NO 1 1 c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 12. CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: None 7 8 • • • • 1 13. CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: none Recap of Disagreements and Reasons for Proceeding: none *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Does the ADO/RO agree with the public agency's response to the disagreements? YES 1 1 NO ( 1 b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $150,000 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest * ** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $150,000 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ * * * SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $ ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Yr. Separately): FiscalYear:2000 Entitlement $750,000 Discretionary$OTotal$750,000 2001 750,000 $750,000 * ** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $1,500,000 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $150,000 Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ * ** * * * SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $150,000 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $1,800,000 *****FOR FAA USE******************************************************************** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES 1 ] NO 1 1 If YES, does the Region support? YES] 1 NO 1 1. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary, does the Region intend to support ? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES LINOII d. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: 9 If costs exceed the current budget, and additional PFCs are needed, a PFC amendment application will be submitted to the FAA. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************a• a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes 1 1 No 1 1. b. Comments: ****************************************************************•*************************** *****FOR FAA USE*•**a***********************a*******ax************************************ ADO/R0 RECOMMENDATION: Approve 1 1 Partially Approve 1 1 Disapprove ( 1 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (0 appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** 10 • ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** PFC Application number: ******************************************************************************************** 1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED: Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas 2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ] 3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If Appropriate): III. PFC Administrative Costs 4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: PFC-eligible general formation costs included in this project are the necessary expenditures to develop and implement the capital plan, project information, application requirements, the related financial plan, and the determination of the required PFC amount. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Is description adequate to allow a person, unfamiliar with the airport, to determine the project scope? YES [ 1 NO [ 1. b. Is this a USE project with a change in the description? YES[ 1 NO 1 1. If YES, does this change constitute "materially altering the project scope"? YES 1 1 NO] J. If NO, the project must be submitted as a new IMPOSE and USE project. Note: "materially altering the project scope" includes quantitative changes such as increasing the length of a taxiway. However, changing a taxiway project to extension of a runway is not a "material" change. Such changes require the submittal of the project as a new IMPOSE and USE project. c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 5. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION: The application and administrative costs are PFC eligible under 158.13 and development associated with the approved projects in this PFC application will preserve and enhance safety, competition, security and capacity at Drake Field. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************* a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO] ]. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 6. PROJECT OBJECTIVE: Development resulting from this project will enhance capacity, security and safety at the Airport. *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** 11 • a. Does the RO/ADO agree with the public agency's determination? YES! J NO [ b. Comments. c. Project Eligibility: 1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below. 1 Development eligible under AIP criteria; 1 Planning eligible under AIP criteria; [ Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2212(b); [ Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2103(b); [ Gates and related areas; or, 1 Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. App. 2104(c). Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility plan [ J; or, project included in a local study[ ]? Include Title & Date of local study: 2) For development projects, indicate eligibility paragraph in Order 5100.38A or Program Guidance Letter: 3) Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 7. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year): June, 2000 ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year): December, 2002 *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval date? YES [ J NO 1 1 b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date? YES[. 1 NO 1 1 c. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 8. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year): n/a *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date? YES 1 1 NO 1 1. b. Comments: ******************************************************************************************** 9. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, is the project shown on an approved airport layout plan (ALP)? YES[ ] NO[X]. If yes, provide the FAA approval date: N/A *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** a. Project required to be shown on an approved ALP? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 b. Public agency information confirmed? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 12 c. Comments: •**#*k*k#*****k*k**k***#k#k#kkk***k*k**###kkk****#kkk****##k*****#k*k***kk*k**k****k*******## 10. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project been reviewed under the guidelines contained in the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969? YES[ I NO[X]. If yes, provide the date of the FAA's final environmental determination: n/a *****FOR FAA USE##kkkk*kk***kkk*#**###kk***k#####kk***##k#k***##kkkkk*k*******k#k*k*k*kk*# a. Check the appropriate finding below. I [ Project determined to be categorically excluded from the requirement for formal environmental review under FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, paragraph 23 (1985). [ [ All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to this project was approved on the date cited above. [ j All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA environmental record of decision with respect to this project was approved on the date cited above. Finding by : Date of Finding: • b. Comments: ************+***********************************************************************#******* 11. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project received an FAA airspace determination? YES[ ] NO[X]. If YES, provide the date and airspace number of the FAA's final airspace determination: n/a *****FOR FAA USE*****#**************k*kk**#**************************#***+**#***********kk a. Project requires an airspace determination? YES [ I NO I [ b. Public agency's information confirmed? YES I [ NO I I c. Comments: ++*++++++++++++++*+++++++++++++++++++++****+*#++++++*++++*+++****#************************** 12. CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT: none 13. CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT: List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement: None Recap of Disagreements and Reasons for Proceeding: N/A ****FOR FAA USE+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ a. Does the ADO/RO agree with the public agency's response to the disagreements? YES I I NO [ . 13 b. Comments: . * *** ** ***** * * * * * * ** * * * * *** * * * * * ** * ** * ** * * * * * * * ******* * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * *** * * * * * * * ** 14. FINANCING PLAN: PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $30,000 Bond Capital $ Bond Financing & Interest $ *** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $30,000 EXISTING AIP FUNDS: Grant # Grant Funds in Project $ *** SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $0 ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Yr. Separately): Fiscal Year: Entitlement $ Discretionary $ Total $ *** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0 OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $ Local Funds $ Other (please specify) $ *** SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $0 • *** TOTAL PROJECT COST: $30,000 *****FOR FAA USE**x**********xx**************x***x************x***x************x**** a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES [ J NO I I If YES, does the Region support? YES I NO [ I. If YES, list the schedule for implementation: b. For any proposed AIP discretionary, does the Region intend to support ? YES I I NO I I c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES IINO[I d. Comments. ******************************************************************************************** 15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN: If costs exceed the current budget, and additional PFCs are needed, a PFC amendment application will be submitted to the FAA. *****FOR FAA USE************xx*x****x***x*******xx******************x**********xx********* a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes I I No I I. • 14 b. Comments: *****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************** ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve I I Partially Approve I I Disapprove! I ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional interest, pertinent background, etc.): ******************************************************************************************** • • 15 i Attached is the summary of the consultation with the air carriers operating at the Airport, including: (I) A list of all carriers operating at the Airport and a list of those notified (ii) A list of carriers that acknowledged receipt of the notice. (iii) A copy of the information provided to the carriers before and after the consultation meeting. (iv) Lists of carriers that certified agreement and disagreement with the proposed projects. (v) A summary of substantive comments by carriers contained in the certificates of disagreement with the proposed projects, and the Airport's reasons for proceeding. • (also attached is a copy of the Airline Notice, the consultation meeting agenda, and sign -in sheet) IJO • (I) The carriers listed below operated at least one flight into Fayetteville Municipal Airport or appeared on the latest official FAA publication of the Air Carrier Activity Information System and therefore were sent a PFC notice of proposed application certified mail on July 29, 1999: Bullfrog, Inc. Express Flight, Inc. Great Lakes Aviation, LTD. Premier Air Center, Inc. Air Midwest, Inc. ERA Aviation, Inc. Express Airlines I, Inc. Wings West Airlines, Inc. Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Grand Holdings Miami Air International Pace Aviation Panagra Airways Renown Aviation, Inc. Ryan International Airlines Simmons Airlines, Inc. • Trans States Airlines, Inc. (ii) Certified mail receipts (of the notice) were returned to the City of Fayetteville by all the air carriers who received a notice certified mail except Ryan International Airlines. Their notice was returned to the City of Fayetteville as undeliverable. The City of Fayetteville believes they no longer fly into our Airport. (iii) Copies of all information provided to the carriers before and after the consultation meeting. (iv) The City of Fayetteville did not receive any letters of Certification of Agreement or Disagreement to the proposed projects. (v) The City of Fayetteville did not receive any certifications of disagreement with any of our proposed PFC projects. CI FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT • THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. ARKANSAS July 29, 1999 NOTICE TO ALL AIR CARRIERS SERVING DRAKE FIELD RE: Proposed PFC Application #3 for Drake Field, Fayetteville Arkansas This information package outlines the proposed Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application #3 for Drake Field (FYV) as specified in the PFC legislation. The legislation requires airline notification of potential PFC funded projects 30 to 45 days prior to the PFC meeting. In addition, the legislation requires that information on the program be conveyed to the airlines and that the airlines respond to the Airport, in writing, acknowledging receipt of the required notice. The PFC meeting is scheduled for August 31, 1999, at 2:00 pm local time, in the Drake • Field Airport Terminal Building- Conference Room located in the Airport Managers Office, 4500 S. School Ave., Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701. The City of Fayetteville plans to continue the maximum PFC allowable of $3.00 per enplaned passenger. We anticipate collection to begin on April 1, 1999, with a total revenue impact of $ 960,303. The PFC expiration date for these projects is estimated to be December 1, 2000. The 3 projects described on the following pages are the proposed projects for PFC funding. We look forward to seeing you at the PFC airline consultation meeting on August 31, 1999. Sincerely, Dale Frederick Airport Manager • 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521-4750 Ext. 6 • FAX 501-521-1735 4 DRAKE FIELD - FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION #3 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS I. Localizer-Type Directional Aid with Glide Slope This PFC project consists of purchase and installation of a Localizer- Type Directional Aid (LDA) with Glide Slope (GS) on Runway 34 at Fayetteville Municipal Airport. The instrument landing system is being funded with PFCs due to the lack of FAA funding. The City of Fayetteville entered into a transfer agreement in which the FAA operates and maintains the equipment. The total cost of this project is $821,372. Of this amount, PFCs will reimburse the City of Fayetteville for their up -front funding of $780,303 and the State of Arkansas provided $41,069. This project started in July 1995 and was completed in July 1998. II. Taxiway Rehabilitation This project consists of rehabilitation of the public use taxiways located on the airfield. Specifically, Taxiways T-2, TD -2, TB -I, TF-1, D and TB -2 will be reconstructed or repaired. These taxiway improvements are needed due to asphalt deterioration. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,800,000. Of this amount 2000 and 2001 entitlement funds are anticipated to provide $1,500,000. PFCs will fund $150,000 and the state will provide $150,000 • (half the local match). This project is scheduled to start in June 2000 and be complete by December 2002. III. PFC Application and Administrative Costs PFC-eligible general formation costs for Application #3 are the necessary expenditures to develop and implement the capital plan, project information, application requirements, the related financial plan and to determine the required amount of the PFC. The application and administrative costs are PFC eligible under 158.13 and development associated with the approved projects in this PFC application will preserve and enhance safety, competition, security and capacity at Drake Field. The total budget is $30,000 to be funded with PFCs. This project started in July 1999 and will be complete no later than December 2001. • S ° P 7 © Oo ° P w '_ [7 W o o 0020 Q ovw°H , W Q 3 Ph -F O h O Q 7 ° tit t m 0 F-tq P h C. Nat Q ° •G 0 H U mXQGO F t 7wQ ¢O h mw FH PLF-O L Ho1O0 h Z3HH Q Q 0 O "Q H03MCE C Q iy 0.J V] Q n 00 3a00 rC, cU01 Two._ Ir S. .0 I p o - a a i/ • a ,Q( M C T m y � ii OQ' ��-• �7 HI r_, W zZ dam= !7� - g r�1 Y J a,1 oa c muS Ott, 9ro� 0 LLS V < .0 m �1 J w m Y O, -u,- or m ≥ m m m a F v5i Q If OCt 'L O 1T1L W 7 `o m �c� 7 Z O N a ¢ 5¢ $661 IVdv'OOBE WJOd Sd g v 1 M1 w I r F Q LL I C1 • 0311U0S 3dieOOS LuMOH 6ujsn io; noA,tuegl ` m - QC W C m m n v W 2 o m ¢ > p D > w mV U r Q m w 4 (L m z 'I. m` o m r , m ` U O O m J ` m �m C- "U¢i E `J - Q a Q so ❑ r, ❑D❑ z � v m m Q- r� m — > C 3 c Z� ~ m o $ m L O .r m m _ m -mm G mr, O Y Da v O C E e Q p i o� O � E1 (� S(C o . _ 1AYJ o Y 3O V g n . CC E s RV m 9 ` Cn C s m a M ( OTf ; W49 C' H e OOe m O�O L r p m C m 0 EE€ V Y i-4'-4 __ ..-s` ceGEd tC oa LUUU y��p>'ra(0 LLO ...s.o.. inoAs� ZOPIs eSJOAOJ eyl uo pe$epwoo SS3SQGY NHf113S V. _aC O� x'8 6 a 0 io3hiIf. Li .L MO . W m { It N.. . �. o°. •a b m Rl .. S tepla OBJOAB] eyi UO peleld WOO SS3HOOtl NHf113tl )noAol • ` eoln)eS IdleoeH W11ietl Bulsn JOJ noA „ueyl b ` m cc 0 r ti JD E ow mU E C-_$ —'' m r r E Q ¢ i 0 3 ` ❑ ❑ ' , o m 0 •- a`p —� U E m 9≥ b O S Z f C mC _N m E C 0 U C fl m a� E En¢wQC am cs 0 'a ❑ ❑ ❑ z c6 b m @E Q 00 om 0 m m m a a m ≥ m w 0.- r .r b O w O b m 0 b a U r 0 b p m 'r 0 0 E o ° o c Q DD Co O m _ 3 m ^ fV � C w mr U j i 0 Z • q9' e m S. W n_ a ma cc m ¢ Ei f e oJi 0 '• u ¢5 O� U r ❑ ❑ ❑ E Z S n F a M a — m m « ft a • b Y Q 11 vb m'm-a•0 (O¢ a U. W jepIs 66)eAOJ eyl UO peleldwoo SS]H vo$AJOS Idpoetl wnletl Oupn loj ncA )Iueyl w w y x O m m v m W 0 v > 'r 020 N p .0 V N 0 o m r - N U N .9w w m 0 r N E S N 9 w a ¢ O w ❑ ❑ O 0 v EO w J 0r N—=0 c 2vp 00 U 0 C a C- • V o o a ° C 'w m - o9 c - of Ir a. 1N W cc 8•Y > . S +�3 z e 3 � .i Or 6 i•o N pr NILGC 1 o Y W Cu. N •g0 a rap c o; m _E ~-e og + E- 3 v • ¢ 0 H •-1 - m a g • •ei �`•QE .mo oe` 1-40 Oa a EEE2€ v 4H '.00 on ao�.e EQ a pWy m o 0 02 • w o o o a 8. Y Q RC M 04 C c Q En a Yt uY gsoC SS ppS.Gy� $g m D Z E6e cE�guiou.az gg>a H \Q O G+ N CD IL W .. . E. o .. O N y U W p 16 16 Jepls GSJOAGJ 044 uO peleldWOO SS3uaav N1l1113i! JnoA sl •031A19S Jdj0Dey Wnyeu �6ulsn io; lost ilueyl m m r f' L r « a. x wN W m W e m m o uW v > 1m+ m 0 m K U r Q m m y my OF m Ow- d• ¢C T - 2 O m m v m r « m ..... «� _ !-Fd- = v ¢ _ W 3 m v m w 0 ❑❑❑ o` :...._ OC a� Q? 0.Z Z �i • _ C Z E • 00 V m >mw �• wNm w raw r 'tom m.p m. CC o E? Q fn2 U.w 0 Qm ....._ 0 H N O W '0 OQH W £ aF 1-414 cn A4.1 R w w r d Y M N O N 0x 0 i`�^J M w m r �' Q C1 w > `^ U r Q m ` V, 00 00 m O° 1 •T 2 Ow 0w v m 0 rL O ..J 0 m E c v¢i w 3 0 V 0 0 r� 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ o m Cl ❑ „t� m <..=� a3 wE�p•Fv '^ > 'Nmn N m r N J o Zo v p, W x W OW U m l em m q o wm 0 8$ ° m $ • E 9 ¢ U w pA Q 0 . I- a up Y 7 V❑ ❑ 1� a .. y — Y C SSj3j{,} u g e I ayc ° so t' e • E , C ap ^a S ; o v m _ a C'..!8 v a o w m g• s e N m C of cc uu N'U D4 U) i O. $ o e € m c' C W E c .c W UuyE`g3 ≥ a W U N tepls OWOABJ 044 uO peleldwoc SS38OaV N11111311 JnDfll sogmJ9S ;dleoey wnz08 6ulsn Jo; noA Mama 0 Ow a ' m W m w v` m m Ca a W > c v > 0 V w Q a- Q m r m6 !t-, o.- - ¢c T w v 4 w CL O o m w 2 v` o 5 a c ❑� 0 ] S❑❑❑ r <m Q ¢ w p N ZaFv m 0 a m U 0 ,0 0 C m p o a e y oD Y a S vv u p E• Q N¢ U u1S G Cc O❑.�❑' 1� a7 r oi ;7ian Sy H e y o u 4 e H § E E o e cE E H u `o SE Nye ` en Sg V QQ ra Y p .°n 0 OH i > • - v D7 W 4 v y O U ..a 3¢ Q [U� H O woe `•u2`LE o H sCO H • Qao Saeacc µa' uUR ° aF`> flaae of IG ;eDls BSJOAOJ GUI Uo DeleldwoD 3R;F Pc Ow L Y + • m ≥ o m c a m m pm u 0 m 00 N p m a l/� 2w N y to to U 'N ` "Cc E a m 0 ¢ 0 y Sc ❑ ❑E ;v m f J J .N m .m. ' CI O Z Q OW U 0'— .- .r — C o T\ am m a o m c L m - r q •- my U c V m O m nn m Y o_ g m ° W V 0 W ma Z V m 0 �L C 1e O 00 SU¢i ( - m F=" ❑❑❑ r T� a ( W v g N O o m m wt m m mf 0 &t a m vv _ a o ❑.!J ❑ n y _ _10 In s 19 i! o e E O Ci e. H H'. r r ; H s aae e; a W m E • vg Y W O m era o s. m H 0 U) vg m r- m zoo c-0 r l•1e T r U G m H D H 'S e « c o C a m . �.oe�tgm� O Y E a a :. EEE•' oc c oo /Y O U) fn yZjUUc.a o3�On W a' N. . .: • o • • a - Lepls eSJGABI 041 uo peieldwo3 SS3NOOV NHn13U incAsl -�---- -- ..ay ulsn�o;mil .. t m a r a c o `m m C'r 'm m m W u m Q m- my ES m Ow v cc \ c ''' u Yo a oO mm o 3a v m o`�T cU¢� m 1 DOD,. 'vy v n 0 Ow 0 C $ m t x a cc m y ¢ W p <0 to C. /may) r I ' Q Wy/am0s tk i! . icCE e c .q £$ o E �F Noup- cc - y Sa e CO ✓• N a 3 0 m ,Li v H �� • .w y a m m -« m 0 Z rt c p .e 0 OP -� s e o E ¢ u v H H W Q r CC oval Ea a FC rC U' m Coo o"L'oc2 u7 O-tc �E6o:Ecc ELma !Q rl z N N• yuudoau3�mm WwW fO Z •.. �u to Is.. • • o • • o - )qs esJOAoi eyi uo peieldwoo SS3 OOtl NHn131i inoasl 4 02 ~ % m ≥ m m I- a m U r Q ill 3 w a m° N C a a •m 3 .. o m .-r - IJ - m W 0. LU ,. mm m • W. ow y C lC EL a U ¢f ❑ ❑ ❑ vo . f.) > a'm H • • me 16 0 p c mN y LU m m 0 0 mm y 0 m 0 • c of mar a vV __o fl W¢Uw O • ep❑1�a••= 82 j a41 r e o �Q� ; o b 0 C' E 2 2II/ V N t c �m ri .e ms (o. evee 1- g1i o o 5 e w z '' eaa3« o; to €E o0 aI V HQiH _5 e U Y.o..d a Q y z to O b. sn cE aK}gE -ul�IE .9[u[��1]]2H �3nhu8 ea�� P: 01x W uun2a oo .um W.-4 y... C•a. •0 to Lepls OBJOAQJ 041 uo pe1epwoo sS3daav Nanl3N inod31 �aolnieS idleoey monied Bulsn i� ; noA ilueg1 i mm ` O nm � o W m m o ≥• m Yo ° W ≥ m v > w u Q m o ¢ ES m O v m m a m m E o o E c tOO¢ 3 : a Q ; o i ❑ ❑ ❑ Z, l •a`m � V m 3 •; ❑ p E O �v i o l $ W Oar. (y CC Z m m 9 m -0 ou Om m m a c m w O vV C� 0 `�"t ' e t m mL a m vg o E a W OmC U U m 6 O Q \� s ='� a e❑ ❑ ^ S$pjJg32 _ mg i m y Q G e v E {1 CF y E o 4llcn ca O W o rc �e V W rj0 O O 2.6: c e; H' H� W ^ e E Z l4 ; a .O oo m gg: 5 m m o e o o .2 o H o m r eoY ¢o v W Ui W g g ppr_ a ••== Ca m m 2c m N 14 Y m QCC U E ea• V �` ]! I` O m m Q uc �'�y Y•'o¢ a Q- ^ N/ y m yZiou iota �a a H U) W (y_p y ... erxe eelceml am uo oeleidWOO S 3aaOV Nafl138 inoc 1 I. .+ L mr p •• LU •m a a �' x m W 0 ≥' m •C y Cp N V ≥ c v > wm- V I o m W m e OW e a) m m'a = i 00 Ow 4 • 0 2 m E O ¢ N 2 a m E 0 K s G Q a C N 3 umi Q❑ ¢ o l Cl❑ <_ Q Fm o_ ci�Ha O ma We m O m ' N U E \\ N m m O w0- N U m Y« m b O N p N r 0 0... - -O 3 N m C G 9 m `a 4 o g m i ❑ ❑ ❑ _ m y ee a 2LA e e + S s;4 / .14 rt '. _ 4T2 :j I. a W E H �Lfl d. �'.• H m $ ...' _ II yE _ $e 5 R) HZH `�- 0 ` . e �s �- E♦i' Q O. w S US F2 N E+ ZEozE £pa WC1 R; Q fNK U. W VO.i< e� H01N LL!cg BeS3Fo 10 m 4 (A ! v o 10 tC M P � s� uo Jim el — legs eweweJ Out uo pejepwoo SSasaav Ntl �+noA q �piNeS idNaetl wnNtl Bohn �oj noA ��nll •ewNeS idleaea wnistl . Bugsn-ioj noA ijuvu j, ._ . $ -I % m o W •0≥•6 2So v i mm 0 zg o t3 w< o U ov « m< o m O Q- N❑ ❑ C f m G '� r a? orE g0 m r c eyM.. a C N « r- ❑ c m •_ I m ❑ ❑ Z 8 g ❑ O 3 m ❑ N r. a U Et,1 m a≥ -°=w' m .: r _ a~ C. E s Er m a e. = m O a` e, 1 e 0 Q FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT •THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PFC Airline Consultation Meeting August 31, 1999 I. Introductions H. Status of PFC Application #1 III. Proposed Amendment to Application #2 IV. PFC Application # 3 Project Descriptions/Justifications V. PFC Financial Plan Application # 3 VI. Questions and Comments VIL Next Steps in the PFC process I 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F - AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521-4750 • FAX 501-521-1735 FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT • THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS --t July 29, 1999 Official Notice of Drake Field Airport Estimated PFC Expiration Date Change and Revised PFC Amount for Application #95-01-C-00-FYV. The Passenger Facility Charge application #95-01-C-00-FYV (#1) for Drake Field Airport was approved on October 24, 1995. The total amount approved for collection was $2,584,339. These projects have all now been completed and we have updated total costs and funding sources. The revised PFC amount for the first application is now anticipated to be $1,149,945. See attached PFC project spreadsheet for updated costs and funding sources for the first PFC Application. Additionally, attached as a separate notice of proposed amendment, Application #98-02-00-FYV (#2) is anticipated to decrease from $2,726,590 to $118,887. ( See the PFC Amendment Notice for Application #2 attached.). Also attached as a separate notice of proposed "impose and use" PFC application #3 in the amount of 960,303. Based on the changes in the total PFC funds needed and enplanement information now available, Fayetteville Airports currently estimates the charge expiration date for all three applications to be December 1, 2000. In accordance with the requirements of section 158.37(a) of the Federal Aviation Regulations • (14CFR Part 158) this letter is intended to serve as official notice by the City of Fayetteville, of the new PFC amounts required in Applications #1 and the new estimated expiration date. The proposed effective date of this change in the estimated PFC charge expiration date is April 1, 2000 ( after FAA approval of the proposed Application #3). We will be discussing this notice and the proposed amendment to PFC Application #2, along with the new Application #3 at our air carrier consultation meeting scheduled for August 31, 1999 at 2:00 p.m. local time, in the Drake Field Airport Terminal Building- Conference Room located in the Airport Managers Office, 4500 S. School Ave., Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions about these proposed changes prior to our presentation on August 31, 1999. Sincerely, to aSz �l1-�c�C Dale Frederick Airport Manager CC: Donald Harris, FAA Tom Brown, ATA • 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE. SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521-4750 Ext. 6 • FAX 501-521-1735 • CJ v fa n m v n r c m ti c m p 3 T 0 mn v pD c P p 5 m s c 0 n n m N D Z S @ _vg �_ v �n d gQg p3 N 9 ' ?' nm � y y -c N Iii m +3 > N 75 D v b2 v + NN1 N am+ qp mp�(y�1 N.+py - n p -fl 8N N 8 V Np ON `NP Wy 8O pyNpylI OVN 88 O O O V U1 0 N ION N O A 0 0 g .Q SI y mV+�QN N (aJ 3 1lfDpl and t�N1� i;SQi rn �N O p -fJ NlJ fl J bJ + X00 V V M a V l �cl Y 4 5p o oSfl 0 0 0000 000 0 000 0 00 aoa + N N N' N T �1 2 :� 3 8 § + N N + + taral ' tu o oid �iX LS bt o+Wlo ��' a OQp am tai; Jp8 '�fi _mom 88_m� pq 8� O O O fill N O W O W O fll V m i m g m 0l mm+Sm SN €0 o O m0 V Y O O 0000 0 O •i tsJt a (p3�a � ii 25 m+ �Sr�0 S 8 v t$K 7K my t� 5 N �1 T g I l a 8 R C Q Y ZwDs t UtA m h3 a le 0 ] ] 0 S § § , k � § § S § Ca § ■ k 0 § § k � o ■ o.k k | , § C k k § 11 e !�! k k ) %fl ■& i- A § E ■§ DRAKE FIELD - FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS • PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION #3 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS I. Localizer-Type Directional Aid with Glide Slope This PFC project consists of purchase and installation of a Localizer- Type Directional Aid (LDA) with Glide Slope (GS) on Runway 34 at Fayetteville Municipal Airport. The instrument landing system is being funded with PFCs due to the lack of FAA funding. The City of Fayetteville entered into a transfer agreement in which the FAA operates and maintains the equipment. The total cost of this project is $821,372. Of this amount, PFCs will reimburse the City of Fayetteville for their up -front funding of $780,303 and the State of Arkansas provided $41,069. This project started in July 1995 and was completed in July 1998. II. Taxiway Rehabilitation This project consists of rehabilitation of the public use taxiways located on the airfield. Specifically, Taxiways T-2, TD -2, TE-1, IF -1, D and TB -2 will be reconstructed or repaired. These taxiway improvements are needed due to asphalt deterioration. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,800,000. Of this amount 2000 and 2001 entitlement funds are • anticipated to provide $1,500,000. PFCs will fund $150,000 and the state will provide $150,000 (half the local match). This project is scheduled to start in June 2000 and be complete by December 2002. III. PFC Application and Administrative Costs PFC-eligible general formation costs for Application #3 are the necessary expenditures to develop and implement the capital plan, project information, application requirements, the related financial plan and to determine the required amount of the PFC. The application and administrative costs are PFC eligible under 158.13 and development associated with the approved projects in this PFC application will preserve and enhance safety, competition, security and capacity at Drake Field. The total budget is $30,000 to be funded with PFCs. This project started in July 1999 and will be complete no later than December 2001. CI FYVPFW.123 I. • J DRAKE FIELD - FAYETTEVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Fayetteville, Arkansas Passenger Facility Charges Application #3 Project Costs and Funding Sources August 31, 1999 Estimated Estimated Estimated Funding Sources Project Project Project FAA State PFC Total Capital Improvement Projects Start Complete Costs Grants Funds Revenues Funding I. Localizer-Type Directional Aid with Glide Slope Jul -95 Jul -98 $821,372 $0 $41,069 $780,303 $821,372 II. Taxiway Rehabilitation III. PFC Application and Administrative Costs Total Project Costs Jun -00 Dec -02 1,800,000 1,500,000 150,000 150,000 1,800,000 Jul -99 Dec -01 30,000 0 0 30,000 30,000 $2,651,372 $1,500,000 $191069 $960,303 $2,651,372 • DRAKE FIELD - FAYETTEVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Fayetteville, Arkansas FYVPFC3.123 Passenger Facility Charges Application #3 Project Financial Plan August 31, 1999 Funding and CIP Cost Projections Thru 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Total Funds Available for PFC Eligible Projects FAA Grants - Current $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 - Entitlement - 0 0 750,000 750,000 0 1,500,000 -Discretionary 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total FAA Grants 0 0 750,000 750,000 0 1,500,000 PFC Revenues 838,809 111,494 10,000 0 0 960,303 State Funds 41,069 0 0 150,000 0 191,069 AirportRevenues 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Other Funds 879,878 111,494 10,000 150,000 0 1,151,372 Advance Funding Carryover 0 58,506 155,000 81,667 133,334 Total Funds Available $879878 $170000 $915,000 $981,667 $133,334 $2,651,372 Capital Improvement Projects I. Localizer-Type Directional Aid with $821,372 $0 $0 $0 $0 $821,372 • Glide Slope II. Taxiway Rehabilitation 0 0 833,333 833,333 133,334 1,800,000 Ill. PFC Application and Administrative Costs 0 15,000 0 15,000 0 30,000 Total Project Costs $821372 $15,000 $833,333 $848333 $133,334 $2,651,372 Funding Collected in Advance of Project Expenditures $58,506 $155,000 $81,667 $133,334 $0 NOTE: Column and row totals may include addition errors due to rounding of calculated values. • Pagel of t FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Fayetteville Municipal Airport- Drake Field PFC Airline Consultation Meeting August 31, 1999 Name Company Phone / Fax 76T4 3 -67O9 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521.4750 • FAX 501-521-1735 RESOLUTION NO. S A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF THE PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES FOR APPROVED PROJECTS WHEREAS, it would be in the public interest to perform the below listed projects at Drake Field Airport; and WHEREAS, funding these projects through Passenger Facility Charges would be in the public interest; and WHEREAS, City Resolution No. 96-95, Section 4.1, provides that Passenger Facility Charges shall be expended for projects approved by resolution of the City Council and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That the Passenger Facility Charges collected pursuant to Resolution 96- 95 are hereby authorized to be expended on the following projects: • 1. Localizer-Type Directional Aid and Glide Slope; 2. Taxiway Rehabilitation; 3. PFC Application and Administrative Costs. Section 2. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1999. APPROVED: By: Fred Hanna, Mayor ATTEST: By: Heather Woodruff, City Clerk • Fayetteville Municipal Airport • Pavement Management System Implementation Engineer's Report Table 3. Recommended 1998 Maintenance and Rehabilitation Procedures Branch Runway Taxiway yp Section RW TI 12 jfiy High Med Med PCI 1997 87 93 42 PCI min. 85 75 75 Recommended 1998 Maintenance/Rehabilitation Minor Maintenance Minor Maintenance Replace Section TA! High 84 75 Minor Maintenance TBl High 88 75 Minor Maintenance TB2 High 87 75 Minor Maintenance y} TB3 High 67 75 Minor to Heavy Maintenance TB4 High 90 75 Minor Maintenance TCI High 93 75 Minor Maintenance TC2 High 89 75 Minor Maintenance TDl High 89 75 Minor Maintenance TD2 High 47 75 Replace Section TEl High 51 75 Heavy Maintenance TFl High 54 75 Heavy Maintenance General Aviation GAL Low 78 70 Minor to Heavy Maintenance GA2 Low 33 70 Replace Section GA3 Med 87 70 Minor Maintenance GA4 Med 82 70 Minor Maintenance GAS Low 57 70 Heavy Maintenance GA6 Low 41 70 Replace Section GA7 Low 71 70 Minor to Heavy Maintenance • GAS Med 73 70 Minor to Heavy Maintenance GA9 Med 79 70 Minor Maintenance Fuel Tank Area Ll Low 69 70 Minor to Heavy Maintenance Terminal Terml High 51 75 Heavy Maintenance Term2 High 70 75 Minor to Heavy Maintenance Term3 High 63 75 Heavy Maintenance Run-up RU! Low 48 70 Replace Section Refer to Appendix A and D for various failure descriptions and repair methods, respectively • JUL-09-99 FRI 10:21 All FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT FAX W, 5017187646 P,U3 •/��Fr• •�VT iTVV1v YL�Y YT Y�YYM `YVY •.Y T�F S L � 7 1996 ( FTV K1nrO1t 1 1 1 1 CRAKE FIELD FATETTEVILLE, AR 1 SOURCE : FAA DCT/.TSC CY1998 ACAIS OATA?ASE DATE : 05/18/1999 ENPLANEM-cNTS 8T INDIVIDUAL CARRIERS FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1998 CARRIER NAME TOTAL ENPLANEMENTS sec ------- -- ATCJ - Air Taxi/Commercial Operators filing FAA form 1800-31. SULLFR3G. TNC. 4 5XPRESS PLIGHT, INC. 2 SREAT LAKES AVIATION, LTD. 25 PREMIER AIR CENTER, INC. 2 ATCO TOTAL....................•..•....•............................33 CAC - Coeeuters or Small Certificated Air Carriers filing DOT form 298-C TI or Ei- •AIR MIDWEST. INC. ERA AVIITIJN♦ INC. EXPAiSS AIRLINES It INC. WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC. • 16.614 184 38.823 8,731 CAC TOTAL..,.,............ CRAC - Large Certificated Rout* Air Carriers filing RSPA tar■ T-103. ATLANTIC S3UTHEAST AIRLINES. INC. 33.307 GRAND H9LOINGS 115 MIAMI AIR INTERNATIONAL ST8 PACE. AVIATION 43 PAN.GRA AIRWAYS 365 REN3W AVIATION, INC. 30 RYAN INTERN4TIUNAL AIRLINES 18 SIMMONS AIRLINES, INC. 93.558 TIANS STATIS AIRLINES, INC. 58.743 CRAG �C7A1...............................•.•...................187.2ST TOTAL FOR THIS A11PCRT (PTV)...................................251.544 V"i YYY T 3�XII 4 ue�s a oetau�a$a*#aar..ac s n�LtC 4� � r FAYETTEVILLE EXHIBIT a AIRPORT DEPARTMENT THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE Amendment Application to PFC #98-02-C-00-FYV October, 1999 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING - FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521-4750 • FAX 501-521-1735 FAY ETTEV ILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS October 1, 1999 Mr. Ben Guttery Federal Aviation Administration Planning and Programming Branch ASW-610D, Airports Division Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0610 Re: Passenger Facility Charge Amendment Application Dear Mr. Guttery: The City of Fayetteville is pleased to submit this proposed amendment to Passenger Facility Charge Application # 98-02-C-00-FYV. Attached with the proposed amendment application form are justification for the proposed amendment and evidence of further consultation with air carriers. There is no air carrier disagreement with the proposed amendment. As the responsible official for the City of Fayetteville I, Fred B. Hanna, Jr., certify that this application is true and correct and that the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas has duly authorized the submission of this PFC amendment application. Resp ctfully Submitted, Mr. Fred B. Hanna, Jr. Mayor 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-718-7640 Ext. 5 • FAX 501-718-7646 • �1 Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application rMent of Trans rtatbn Fe Aviation Administration > Jy $G. ,��0.,n'@OV,j� SiW: �%<y 4C:'MO:� "J(: <Av 4F.0.�4S•14,2'<.}n4'IR?n(4'::42i04t 14Y4(Jry$>i 1. Application Type (Check all that apply) i�iJ°.. 1�4p?.'z?� : ss�;;. �a:?.,eJ@o?�o,.„�. FAA USE ONLY � o ❑ a. Impose PFC Charges ?'i. Date Received Action Approved Dpi. or p ❑ b. Use PFC Revenue ? Approved in Part Action: X� c. Amend PFC No.: 98-02-C-00-FYV Disapproved PFC No.: ^ 4 Ii4 n 4::Ji.. }� }T.F. ,VD,W�R,,B:r�'.' i /O 1, ,. A, IJ i ' 4•' J•:.,i,:4 ♦ ' .t,:n @ 'f<} ,rye O.4SY.: �}: <}iv.4 J4',pi�uJ�!i4 PART I me, Address, and Contact Person 3. Alrport(s) to Use: rAgencyNameCity of Fayetteville, Arkansas Fayetteville Municipal Airport- Drake Field 4500 South School Ave, Suite F Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Contact Person Dale Frederick, Airport Manager PART II 4. Charges a. Airport to Impose: b. Total Estimated Net c. Level: d. Proposed Effective Date: e. Estimated Expiration Date: PFC Revenue: ❑ $1.00 Fayetteville Municipal Airport $ 118,887 revised $2.00 April 1, 2000 April 1, 2000 Drake Field x $3.00 PART III 5. Attachments (Check all that Apply) Attached Submitted with Application Dated: a. ❑ ❑x December 18, 1997 Airport Capital Improvement Plan b. �x December 18, 1997 Project Information C. Air Carrier Consultation Information d. nla Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers e. �x Justification t, x� Additional Information 6a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers: 6b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air Carriers: July 29, 1999 August 31, 1999 PART IV 7.With respect to this PFC application I hereby certify as follows: To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct; This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency; The public agency will comply with the attached assurances if the application is approved; and For those projects for which approval to uae PFC revenue is requested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and environmental reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act have been completed. a. Typed Name of Authorized Representative b. Title e Number (301) I��B one (301) 71 BU76�46 Mr. Fred B. Hanna, Jr. Mayor, City of Fayetteville, AR e. Signature of Authorized Re sent ve . f. Date Signed October 1, 1999 Agency Display of Estimated Burden Public reporting burden of this collection of information is stimated to average 5-16hours0 per response,dependinagp the complexity. Send comm¢nts regarding the accuracy of this burden es9timate or any other aspect anon collection to the ce of Manage ent • • FAA Form 5500-1 (6-94) NSN: 0052-00-915-9000 and • Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas PFC ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION STATEMENT The undersigned Mayor for the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, assures and certifies, with respect to the PFC application and projects including each individual project work element submitted in its application to impose a PFC at FYV Airport: 1) Responsibility and authority of the public agency. It has legal authority to impose a PFC and to finance and carry out the proposed projects. A resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas authorizing the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person or persons holding the position of Mayor as the official representative of the public agency to act in connection with the application. 2) Compliance with regulation. It will comply with all legal provisions of 14 CFR Part 158 not inconsistent with the provisions of the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (enacted November 5, 1990) and the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations implementing Section 9110 of the Act. 3) Compliance with state and local laws and regulations. It has complied, or will comply, with all applicable state and local laws and regulations. • 4) Environmental, airspace and airport layout plan (ALP) requirements. It will not use PFC revenue on a project until the FAA has notified the public agency that: a) Any actions required under the National Environmental Policy act of 1969 have been completed; b) The appropriate airspace finding required by FAA regulations has been made; and c) The FAA Airport Layout Plan (ALP) with respect to the project or project work element has been approved to the extent such approval authority of the FAA is required by regulation of the FAA for such project or an individual project work element, and the regulation or related guidelines requiring ALP approval is available to the public agency at the time of submission of a PFC application for approval to use PFC revenues. 5) Nonexclusivity of contractual agreements. It will not enter into an exclusive long term lease or use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for the use of projects funded with PFC revenue. Such lease or use agreements will not preclude the public agency from funding or developing new capacity at the airport using PFC and other sources of airport revenues or funds, and reserving and assigning such new capacity for the use of new entry carriers or expanding competitive carriers. • • 6) Carryover provisions. It will not enter into any lease or use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for the use of any airport facilities financed in whole or in part with revenue derived from a PFC if such agreement for such facility contains a carryover provision regarding a renewal option which, upon expiration of the original lease, would operate to automatically extend the term of such agreement with such carrier in preference over any potentially completing air carrier or foreign air carrier seeking to negotiate a lease or use agreement for such facilities. 7) Competitive access. It agrees that any lease or use agreements between the public agency and any air carrier or foreign air carrier for any facility financed in whole or in part with revenue derived from a PFC will contain a provision that permits a public agency to terminate the lease or agreement if - a) The air carrier or foreign air carrier has an exclusive lease or use agreement for existing facilities at such airport; and b) Any portion of its existing exclusive use facilities is not fully utilized and is not made available for use by potential competing air carriers or foreign air carriers at compensatory rates not exceeding the rates paid for such similar facilities to the public agency. 8) Rates, fees and charges. • a) It will not treat PFC revenue as airport revenue for the purpose of establishing a rate, fee or charge pursuant to a contract with an air carrier or foreign air carrier. b) It will not include in its rate base by means of depreciation, amortization or any other method, that portion of the capital costs of a project paid for by PFC revenue for the purpose of establishing a rate, fee or charge pursuant to a contract with an air carrier or foreign air carrier. c) Notwithstanding the limitation provided in subparagraph (b) , with respect to a project for terminal development, gates and related areas, or a facility occupied or used by one or more air carriers or foreign air carriers on an exclusive or preferential basis, the rates, fees and charges payable by such carriers that use such facilities will be no less than the rates, fees, and charges paid by such carriers using similar facilities at the airport that were not financed by PFC revenue. 9) Standards and specifications. It will carry out the project in accordance with FAA airport design, construction and equipment standards and specifications contained in advisory circulars current on the date of project approval with the understanding that such standards are minimum standards of compliance. L • 10) Record keeping and audit. It will maintain an accounting record for audit purposes for a period of 3 years after completion of the project. All records will satisfy the requirement of 14 CFR Part 158 and will contain documentary evidence for all items of project costs. 11) Reports. It will submit reports in accordance with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 158, Subpart D, and as the Administrator may reasonably request. 12) Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990. I understand that sections 9304 and 9307 of the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 require the authority to impose a PFC be terminated if the Administrator determines the public agency has failed to comply with that act or with the implementing regulations promulgated thereunder. Fre B. Hanna, Jr. Mayor • • JUSTIFICATION FOR THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT The City of Fayetteville received approval from the FAA to "impose and use" PFCs for six proposed projects at Drake Field Airport on August 20, 1998. The FAA approved $2,412,750 in PFCs to be collected and used on Project III- Terminal Area Improvements, and $5,500 in PFCs to be collected and used on Project V- Part 107 Access Control System. These two projects have been postponed due to changes in air service levels and lack of availability of funding. The City proposes that these two projects be deleted as approved PFC projects from Application #2. Additionally, Projects #I, II, and IV have updated budgets. As depicted in the Updated Project Cost Schedule attached, some of the approved projects have a quantitative change in the project cost and PFC funding. The above changes result in "materially altering the scope of an approved project" as defined in the PFC regulations. There are no new projects in this proposed amendment. There are no disagreements with any project changes in this proposed amendment from the air carriers. • fl , < z • _ } !\ « k 7 / ! ! ' { k ( cia - / - a � { 7 ( 3 -1 - � PC | r 0 / \ k UI k � , k k hi k UI k It k hi o k I ■ 0 k 4 § 2 !|� k || § $ ! rn m ||k ||! § Attached is the summary of the consultation with the air carriers operating at the Airport, including: (i) A list of all carriers operating at the Airport and a list of those notified (ii) A list of carriers that acknowledged receipt of the notice. (iii) A copy of the information provided to the carriers before and after the consultation meeting. (iv) Lists of carriers that certified agreement and disagreement with the proposed amendment. (v) A summary of substantive comments by carriers contained in the certificates of disagreement with the proposed amendment, and the Airport's reasons for proceeding. CJ (also attached is a copy of the Airline Notice, the consultation meeting agenda, and sign -in sheet) • • (I) The carriers listed below operated at least one flight into Fayetteville Municipal Airport or appeared on the latest official FAA publication of the Air Carrier Activity Information System and therefore were sent a PFC notice of proposed application certified mail on July 29, 1999: Bullfrog, Inc. Express Flight, Inc. Great Lakes Aviation, LTD. Premier Air Center, Inc. Air Midwest, Inc. ERA Aviation, Inc. Express Airlines I, Inc. Wings West Airlines, Inc. Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. Grand Holdings Miami Air International Pace Aviation Panagra Airways Renown Aviation, Inc. Ryan International Airlines Simmons Airlines, Inc. Trans States Airlines, Inc. • (ii) Certified mail receipts (of the notice) were returned to the City of Fayetteville by all the air carriers who received a notice certified mail except Ryan International Airlines. Their notice was returned to the City of Fayetteville as undeliverable. The City of Fayetteville believes they no longer fly into our Airport. (iii) Copies of all information provided to the carriers before and after the consultation meeting. (iv) The City of Fayetteville did not receive any letters of Certification of Agreement or Disagreement to the proposed amendment. (v) The City of Fayetteville did not receive any certifications of disagreement with the proposed amendment. • 'FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS July 29, 1999 Re: Drake Field Airport Proposed Amendment to approved PFC Application #2 The City of Fayetteville received approval from the FAA to " impose and use" PFCs for six proposed projects at Drake Field Airport on April 20, 1998. This approved FYV Passenger Facility Charge application #98-02-C-00-FYV is the subject of this notice of proposed amendment. The FAA approved $2,412,750 in PFCs to be collected and used on Project III- Terminal Area Improvements, and $ 5,500 in PFCs to be collected and used on Project V -Part 107 Access Control System. These two projects have been postponed due to changes in air carrier service levels and lack of availability of funding. The City of Fayetteville proposes that these projects be deleted as approved PFC projects from Application #2. Additionally, Projects # I, II, and IV have updated budgets. Attached is a revised PFC Project Spreadsheet with updated project costs and funding sources. These proposed changes result in a revised estimated expiration date of December 1, 2000 due to • the decrease in PFC collections for application #2 to $118,887. The total PFC amount for proposed PFC application #3 is $960,303. The City of Fayetteville is also proposing an Amendment to Applications #1. ( See the PFC Amendment Notice for Application #1 attached.) In accordance with Federal Aviation Regulation 49 CFR Part 158.37 Passenger Facility Charges, the City of Fayetteville will hold a consultation meeting with air carriers on Tuesday, August 31, 1999 at 2:00 p.m. local time, regarding this proposed amendment. The meeting will be held in the Drake Field Airport Terminal Building -Conference Room located in the Airport Managers Office, 4500 S. School Ave., Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701. The City of Fayetteville plans to submit a proposal to amend the FYV PFC #2 as described above to the FAA for review and approval on October 1, 1999. We solicit your certifications of agreement or disagreement with the proposed changes prior to the submission of the amendment to the FAA. We propose this amendment to be effective on April 1, 2000 concurrently with the effective date of the amendment to Applications #1 and the new "impose and use" Application #3. If you have any questions prior to our presentation on August 31, 1999 of this proposal, please contact me. SSiincerreely, • lla el Fredck Airport Manager 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521-4750 Exc.6 • FAX 501-521-1735 I U 0 § � � � k � k � , k k § P4 III Mal §� o a o � & !! o § ■ 2 P.) k ■ 7 'I 9 § § � , | I �! ` C i ! ■ ■ m ■# 2i ,§ I i T•' 0 (7 • W onto • ::�� RPWO in OH C COW 'l ( PFE O 4 C Q 7 ( (ZI m i FN P V NEW Y N Z a O H U a maJ I mxaaO OWHOa : 7 Q N ( mw FH < PEF-(Cm 1 • HNOO ( I-Wa ( z ( flu) m • ma NH ai O Cro J "CJ ozz Q ¢ ZOCHWz ru 4 , HO3ma LI d Q ( 31�•CN 3 o . N w W 3W Q n aav�= .a a `A l 2 966( IPdV oo8 WJOd sd V W In • eo,AJeS JdlOOOH wn$eH Bugsn Jo; noA9ueta { m E t o o. o w o v ≥ f u.— so m p . 6 Cm 2 I. 9 C L Q o m mm 3 a a to O me E. n — ❑ ❑ > 'm o %� ni 3 z� ~ m m p - o$ U m _ m o mm O m m •C v O $ • E9 Q p • 3 o s V ❑ I^ r = y Y� U ci I 0 SS • S « o •o= O1 • G $ n1 S E g "� ID -mss $; el e I/b • E$ : m _y� m C y y VI� $� o Z y —. • ≥' m n H .•1 Q Tj N o m e y m ` . e € s E? .t a Q c b E o O W Qo I'•y •� W W 2 0_ Q o m g.¢. Q !� O ZootE t.f �≥ CJ' uJ Wuudgag3r_co W W O N m_ a... ��JnoA ZepIs OSJQAGJ og; uo poweidwoo SS3HOOV N80i3H • S1 I.- 00 r a x m `° m W m • o m > m a V - m o j m O a >w-. h 0 w •U r ¢ m r ma • 00• N ❑ 1 Q C T Z • ow m a m r U Q 0Q0 mm ,n 3 N G ¢ W ' ❑D❑ p'] t m 3 0 j. T w WLD ma• V1 m r c Z m° W W w 2 COO C C °iW •O `o a Ea -¢ um¢ O w 0 ¢c V J O W t tea -o ` q 9 0 Ir - C� • iy v r E F L N N - .. ,cao g Ln — o £ c' n e - 3 r a o o -° • n a '-' c S « rn 04 O e E via M En 2 m a Z Q • cCn y ¢_ OH m « g -o q ?3 Z^ o o e ae.°•.e E° ¢ _4J� sC ce.€YG Y FA C 7-.• QeE5U:E E u [m M « {{m e • O o? is .Z U t° 200 c�C-•F LL°>•C7.Am O`1-5 <3F_ ur UU6 tepIs esmenem sip uo pele1dWOO SS3HUOtl NNf113W mnoxal .- -- ,%Mmes ldleaeu wnled Bulan mot noA ,ueyl a n m mc '° a 2` moO so z w i� "❑ - E m m Vl s N o m y l J m$ m •c E a Q L w •• a m W U W Wm <¢ 8 7 m m o"� ° ;DD ` o - o m$ m n a r ❑ �� = E Z rn o 2 0 0 Q (° 0 p W 2 0 Q `�� a 'e ❑ ❑ ❑ n m m � y3 ^ r+4' r4 ,' o N M r P M q / F M a V U D r:J z w m^ •41; N 2 E 3 S. 'UI H41n m M r a 5 � y W()Q ZS3F$ ¢ a r- p+ ¢ �m (flee • e • • Ci N CO a f. m W to m LU ❑ �a z w iY I! '(85U m9 W We 2 mm < C 0 ¢m =dog E 1- I 7 O ^ q; OU) 4gCC iy r O' S a a O H Cm ova - g- a > N 1 'i m CeV p,; m Q Out -— rl V o r1] ..rt 2:=€z` E. ]MU WOu P<a 3:JEl O pp� m f tepis esmeaa ey1 uo pelepiwoo ss3u0av NUPI tl8 iflo [s, voW" ldpoey wn7etl Bupn mol not ,ayy i' a 4)0 y - m m . G. L .`. N 0 N L N N O y v m . Q1 c U m m m o a a ° a mm a > . $ __ m mm a >w 00 a UI u Q m `o mo 07 = m Q m r ma O N m m« ` m C D: m a `y ` �L C N u m C ] 0 m. •� O J « m m N N p «m _ '` '-E v¢iC q on W b2 0 E scu m w Q K O `J ❑❑❑ ,a`Oa a 3 Q ¢ O m 1 ❑❑❑ �a �m 3 m — m dG •m a N w 3 m >' i° m y a W ?om ci OZvp mmv�p m°' cWc?m.: N OZ.mm O m m m 00 03 m m m to y a m G • 0'CA C a m a` Q �O'(� 1 m m` Q C n e Q N m m X m aC C B i w m m y m r'Cc - 0 ,^, E a ¢ y w p <C U m E ¢ 0w p Q m ze m a J1 AA C CL d 3 ; So a a❑ ❑ r C m mD 3 g o g a a❑ ❑ r� ai .: L ° r ° e I u a • z • a •`•- u .. %IE • > IL , M o u) nee o o -g « na E. c « U o r m Ye • a y 'm^ •vm v C C7 'b' m m°ggoto m O to a•gt H S m1J W V m H r -I Ci -^ ^ mi e r u y Y N a at - •C € o Ez EQ Q ! 2�rj wJ:s`e!Ea.E ee u<e• u Z7i OH « .. Q e`:Z aeE b�CH 4L 10. Wts �•c m¢ey '� sO R in FC c c _«" twin•r8� .i' H m omm «°e o¢0Q Ly Or m- .a Br?i3 g•e e:aQ m S P 0' Zo o cE C ric s. O PG O y3 N il) LL Zoo•CcEL•xr S� O U •: uJou e.aa.3'-_rj CO U C w uucHg [per t° Bv�' U).. •!• w..O Vl U W iL Q 10 wm 1L co. •t•9•. o �i N ^ 1° 0 Zep!s BSJBABJ ey1 uo pelepwoo SS3aOOtl N1lf113a JnoA SI tepIs BSJBABJ 041 uO po;o dwoo SS3UCOV NHIU.3a J S1 :1 •BocAJeS 1d,eooa wnleu �Bui,n io; -noA ifuegj •eolwueS 1dieoea wnlea Bugsn Jo; noA Jlusuy1 00 x to I- 3 m m m = o 0. m w a Q m > f m- u.. m ,« m m• p.m. 5 ¢ c -0 t o r m p r L ummi 'm E 5 vQi 3 m Q ¢ o ❑ ❑ ❑ m .Q' m 1 N O Z� •O 2 C � .m m �. `• LCD m'a -(a U : E • •Q am¢ U I p 3 m Q O❑'❑ ^.. r m o dI e QeS 7;o: e V Z e V e • cE H M N •£ °g �• e : 63 C. � 6 m 0 00 C m 3 O �rJ H o o -.'•• a U p H agE F =E y m O m _mor ¢0 0 q H Z •z c � € E ¢ Q Q yyH aE wee :c€ m 0 E r r e r BQ a 2 l ZbE c'mc Em•Q H Coo' JBOIS BSJBABJ GUI Un nainid WOO Cr "9 S cc tt W C O mI SW m c x m 0 o > s m m Q _ w'" m p 0C «m 0 m E C p in m 0V DOD • E O¢ Po m at.-. N U m u« 0 w o 018 u Z m m o• c H 3 f! E a y w a uw O <C 3 9ooe v 'a❑�❑' ad p ate u - ^ s H : S 411i E r • 6 « o Bgg Is inca CO In 4E SAS m ei€ear E• Q U HO m EEEH C' W Q. Y -1 m •Q Gm•f�V BC L' C C pp E °'E e Q OH wuu a`g3 e01 gODE. N N H• • • e•m • eo 0. r -I VJ s1,' r0 r0 .1005 BSJBABJ BUJ u0 nBJBNIWO'J RC7Nf1f1 NHf117N G F Co mm p I -C. z W `. H a UI v ≥ c o m m mm m W. m w o≥ f Illu e W0- oS I a a > �,^_ my t Z m Q N O N o ¢ A T Z o Er OwJN r Q i Y m N Y N 5 0 Y O a O m m F m m o f C N U¢ f y _ W E k ) 6 N m ~ y C ❑ ❑ `IP0. J E 0. ry i N a r .m o Y oZ p, ~ m cC ;: ci o Z m m v i o m•- — LLJ UI C ¢ tom 0X a o 5 E m M m mx v c Em ¢ u w O am u o e ¢ U w O am a e a o « a 'a❑Y9 ❑ n rp 3 g a❑ ❑ 14 u c b . u e a) x u Ce O e w E_ L L O • O Y e E e _' a ;v 3v Jw E �Bo O.. ti;'": Y ° c e � g :. w (oe f'1•u o s O 3' e ::: ::': 60.6, o L E - m e C[ .. I oy o a N e O O Y Y v S T.1 O a ° Is �M• r 1 .. 1 ` L ii 0 0 a we m H e U) Y I e V v m•¢= w Z JC O m « i 0 gga H z m (7 c c ggF a H ria on m H 100 M eia Y Yq aq �.•� O F .. O O EEE ?s c& a HEN. m._ .r` €a �w oCflE yOfA o r� W o_uwi Z a H[Q yH a E W.EgEEflP e..• eye SEE EE t: a cr `m a O tC N f0 '. 2Ede °cE rg3w a M 100 W N tlJ. WUUM1ea o3fo H H y I Wuuo.aaO O)... a40 '_R `I C0.'..Eio. eo H Yf td legs OSJOAOJ 0(4* uo poleidWOO SS3HUUtl N1if .138 Jn°A sl I lepIs OSJOA0J 041 UO peieidWOO SS3UUGV NHAJSU J 9AM �•- ' --'" -- ..ay'BigsiJJ°i e41 F oN9S tdIeoey wn;ou 61gsn Jo; noA )Iueyy o 3 00 `o m C —. Tc w r o W mm v m m L o W mm m Z m o. c u ¢ m 0'0'e m a m 0 m m I. v c \ 'T Z m 1111 m_= U ❑ ❑ m 3 Q m N me w cm. m E. m. c 0 v ¢. S ❑ ❑ ❑ C a m� u ¢ ae`1%J. m y❑ , �„ a a _ u a' 7 -e, a � �/ ad-iyyt p E E c E v 2 r o- N y O 3 ao 0 0o a 1n °ap E o; o UOm ova a gg a H a 5 _ N o t- m O W m3 v` H e u V H H W E E E• o E m 9E ac-'€ c a H .. ` au 2 m E m 'J N _t O eE ¢oQ a0• 200 aECc.cte 1° V n...E.v - an. SSJe11eJ oui UO noieldwon c OC l 'm m E c S O = S 0 = 0 m 9 Ofd E riJ I u o '�-�'E T au¢ a- v ; m a� o. 0 ❑❑❑ t t a � u •F. j j ❑ ❑_Sly g m F O o^ W m 3 m E O v m m( W U— m m •r o Z m O • o Q9 m v ��ryy O m c . n m. • 3 : sg₹� a a❑ ❑ n e 2 S t 7I' o; Ea g ! aO. us .E 4e, c E L — o -o Va tn v. c Z Q C ^ ' a Ji o o o H H 1p \ La a ! a «:a $ 3g o Oto G ��g� e -= m N b v .. m . 4 0E m r . .. SaP'YCe_Y ac m m gc W S' s 7 e c • pp ^ N 41 1210 co °yl. : WuSIi<S3Fo,i' W `Wi OJ td. td - iaaav NTinl3a,noX"s� J I•In ... En. . o .. uw maVlmM____ I JOOlfI auy ww+-n .....i-u .... ..._J_ m m m a .. .t. ; N w m W ji m$ $ m m m m 2 m J V f v` mm m W me c m•m m'w0 m N mm Q U' mo = R c U o v DQTQ C m` m o w �t o mN m m / I\ '�'yn r «N y m« y0Jm m 0« p R V m �—J 0 r C m .. m m m b c t'> m E U¢i vi 02 m c E .�` �c O m N o m« ❑❑❑ m Q •r m v` m_ �C H o 3 ¢ ¢ o 1 .. w Nis Q CC a (--- ` Q m@ v 0 N m E m ^ N Cg E r o N p .22U m u r ✓ m Oa C p« 9O 5 v Z w m mm Q 3 `u Em Q y¢ U w Qm jilL i � A •_ • _ , W g U (•'1 m • jai rl H 6 o Q p a U 2 E a E « jii s �s m > v a m Y o rn H 6: 9 ,u ::: a Og$i a¢ Q Ny O I — ¢8 P4 r 0 W 2 c Z N )C a WE E o� I1didh 2 to • • • • • �i td ro a teple eswAeU ayt uo peieldwoo SS3SOOV Ntlf11.3M inoA s1 eWea W1 uo powdum b�36CGPRHIV39+nnA s1 • — — — — — beoW*S idleaey unuey. 6ulsn ioj noA )1ue41 •eJln+e3 IdlneN wnley BUlen loj IIO/I �1us41 sa FF ! o m 3. d $ a o W rm o 0 a m m m m v g ti J o '~ o r E c S c— >° 7 O Q y IIYY r £ V v 3: Q 2 0. N p m <¢ m m N I ..= - N OZ ~Eve - W ! m w m E o m j �O. m m nX v9 G. I v o 'o e = .J v i Q N¢ W m o a O . R ne 9^ Y • FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT •THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PFC Airline Consultation Meeting August 31, 1999 L Introductions IL Status of PFC Application #1 III. Proposed Amendment to Application #2 • IV. PFC Application # 3 Project Descriptions/Justifications V. PFC Financial Plan Application # 3 VI. Questions and Comments VII. Next Steps in the PFC process CI 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521-4750 • FAX 501-521-1735 FAY ETTEV ILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT • THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE. ARKANSAS July 29, 1999 Official Notice of Drake Field Airport Estimated PFC Expiration Date Change and Revised PFC Amount for Application #95-01-C-00-FYV. The Passenger Facility Charge application #95-01-C-00-FYV (#1) for Drake Field Airport was approved on October 24, 1995. The total amount approved for collection was $2,584,339. These projects have all now been completed and we have updated total costs and funding sources. The revised PFC amount for the first application is now anticipated to be $1,149,945. See attached PFC project spreadsheet for updated costs and funding sources for the first PFC Application. Additionally, attached as a separate notice of proposed amendment, Application #98-02-00-FYV (#2) is anticipated to decrease from $2,726,590 to $118,887. ( See the PFC Amendment Notice for Application #2 attached.). Also attached as a separate notice of proposed "impose and use" PFC application #3 in the amount of 960,303. Based on the changes in the total PFC funds needed and enplanement information now available, Fayetteville Airports currently estimates the charge expiration date for all three applications to be December 1, 2000. In accordance with the requirements of section 158.37(a) of the Federal Aviation Regulations • (14CFR Part 158) this letter is intended to serve as official notice by the City of Fayetteville, of the new PFC amounts required in Applications #1 and the new estimated expiration date. The proposed effective date of this change in the estimated PFC charge expiration date is April 1, 2000 (after FAA approval of the proposed Application #3). We will be discussing this notice and the proposed amendment to PFC Application #2, along with the new Application #3 at our air carrier consultation meeting scheduled for August 31, 1999 at 2:00 p.m. local time, in the Drake Field Airport Terminal Building- Conference Room located in the Airport Managers Office, 4500 S. School Ave., Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions about these proposed changes prior to our presentation on August 31, 1999. Sincerely, Dale Frederick Airport Manager CC: Donald Harris, FAA Tom Brown, ATA • 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE. SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501.521.4750 Ext.6 • FAX 501-521-1735 r Q G < _ m a n n c m p p r n m c m r 0 p �i1 ^ _ 3 in rD o, titim� E c n n ^ e n c nA'��iy p n�� 9 c u San c� a Na m n I a as PteN T 5oopp III 0 v + r� In y� p�J yNm pp �p -pp � $ Da a S. NAN O VVJ O �O N A 4i �i o0 (i O N O N m y c3 i 0 0 V V a a Mp CS o + 0fl 9 � nS o 00000 000 0 000 000 y8� oN OO �yAy INNPp ANm ((Nyy fV� A D O + O A O V --4 N N + + M D8i gyp g8mv (�yp AN_ q- -a - 8 8b �. J O O O V I T 0 f! I O N O o,. O O IIn 1 Di ^� jai flMY $ • fl ii o fF o73X - 00 {i Istr — 3 � TfyQ&Qyi y , � a hi 3X Pq h� Q y� + o kY o?SE( i4 0 000 § Ro § x� t ^ y! A {� a i1Sa `6'�Wn ID -so 1 o Y y A3M Oa y S a y 1 s r h� a� , < ! - _ 2 o m3 ( / it ` ( 0 ii2 « | , " r m ! | | ! § ! \ a ! | ! | \ % ! ( . # III " - ! ! § |k k k ! ! § / k f \E | § UI ! k , \ .d ,| K f § 0 / | . _!| \ ! § |! ) ■ mn | k § § § k - t ! §$ ■ E | U, 'I ||. § | § 1.1 8 § § 0A A 44 ; 1 § f i$| 2 8 24. ■ k � k , `| } k 1.3 � 7 k o § ■ § ! |. � ~ k S k k2 k 'a g � t. DRAKE FIELD - FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS • PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION #3 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS I. Localizer-Type Directional Aid with Glide Slope This PFC project consists of purchase and installation of a Localizer- Type Directional Aid (LDA) with Glide Slope (GS) on Runway 34 at Fayetteville Municipal Airport. The instrument landing system is being funded with PFCs due to the lack of FAA funding. The City of Fayetteville entered into a transfer agreement in which the FAA operates and maintains the equipment. The total cost of this project is $821,372. Of this amount, PFCs will reimburse the City of Fayetteville for their up -front funding of $780,303 and the State of Arkansas provided $41,069. This project started in July 1995 and was completed in July 1998. II. Taxiway Rehabilitation This project consists of rehabilitation of the public use taxiways located on the airfield. Specifically, Taxiways T-2, TD -2, TE-1, TF-1, D and TB -2 will be reconstructed or repaired. These taxiway improvements are needed due to asphalt deterioration. The total cost of this project is estimated to be $1,800,000. Of this amount 2000 and 2001 entitlement funds are • anticipated to provide $1,500,000. PFCs will fund $150,000 and the state will provide $150,000 (half the local match). This project is scheduled to start in June 2000 and be complete by December 2002. III. PFC Application and Administrative Costs PFC-eligible general formation costs for Application #3 are the necessary expenditures to develop and implement the capital plan, project information, application requirements, the related financial plan and to determine the required amount of the PFC. The application and administrative costs are PFC eligible under 158.13 and development associated with the approved projects in this PFC application will preserve and enhance safety, competition, security and capacity at Drake Field. The total budget is $30,000 to be funded with PFCs. This project started in July 1999 and will be complete no later than December 2001. CI FYVPFC3.123 • DRAKE FIELD - FAYETTEVILLE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT Fayetteville, Arkansas Passenger Facility Charges Application #3 Project Costs and Funding Sources August 31, 1999 Estimated Estimated Estimated Funding Sources Project Project Project FAA State PFC Total Capital Improvement Projects Start Complete Costs Grants Funds Revenues Funding I. Localizer-Type Directional Aid with Glide Slope Jul -95 Jul -98 $821,372 $0 $41,069 $780,303 $821,372 II. Taxiway Rehabilitation III. PFC Application and Administrative Costs Total Project Costs • • Jun -00 Dec -02 1,800,000 1,500,000 150,000 150,000 1,800,000 Jul -99 Dec -01 30,000 0 0 30,000 30,000 $2,651,372 $1,500,000 $191,069 $960,303 $2,651,372 FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS Fayetteville Municipal Airport- Drake Field PFC Airline Consultation Meeting August 31, 1999 Name Company Phone / Fax 3 -€7O9 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F - AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING - FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 PHONE 501-521-4750 • FAX 501-521-1735 JUL-09-99 FRI 10:23 AM FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT FAX NO, 5017181646 P.03 i.Y YNTY Ys!µ ♦ A0..yAM1A• a ... J.AM1.y\A. a.Y4-aJ. a-.:... 1UL v 7 99 YTSYY.Y YYNTYTr'-YY..-- - YV,.. `v'1- 1 19, 8 I DRAKZ FIELD I -- --^---'- FAIETTEYIL'= SOURCE : FAA OCT/TSC CY1998 ACAIS D4TA?ASc )ATE 05/18/1999 EN?LANEM'!NTS Sr INDIVIDUAL CARRIERS FIR CALENDAR YEAR 1998 CARRIER NAME TOTAL ENPLANEMENTS ATCJ - Air Taxi/Commercial 3perators filing FAA fora 1800-31, BULLFROG, INC. ZKPREESS FLIGHT, INC. 4 GREAT LAKES AVIATION, LTA, 2 25' PEMIR AIR CENTER, INC. 2 ATCO TOTAL..... •e.e.,,.... .,,•,. . •. • • •.•..••• •. , . -. ., •ee. •• ..e. ..33 OTAL.........................................................33 CAC - Comiuters or Small Certificated Air Carriers filing DOT form 298-C TI or €1. •FIR MIDWEST, INC. ERA AVI4T1314, INC. EXP.QESS AIRLINES I. INC. WINGS WEST AIRLINES, INC. 16.614 184 38.825 8.731 CAC -TOTAL., . ''I.. sea...... . .... •. . .. •e.... .. .. •.. ......64,354 TOTAL....................................................64,354 CRAC - Large Certificated Route Air Carriers filing RSPA f)r■ ATLANTIC S3UTHEAST AIRLINES, INC. GRANO HfLOINGS 33@807 MIAMI AIR INTERNATIONAL 115 PACE AVIATION 573 PAN:G%A AIRWAYS 43 REKJN'4 AVIATION, INC, 365 RYAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES 30 SIMMONS AIRLINES, INC. 18 TRANS STAT?S AIRLINES, INC. 93,158 58,743 CRAt, �CT4L.............. 18T,257 TOTAL FOR THIS AI'PCR((FTY)•••'.......251,344 Y Y YYYw . Tl �.YY^Y YTLY Y T-_,. Y - MIS - Y Y T T ---Y STAFF REVIEW FORM XX AGENDA REQUEST CONTRACT REVIEW _ GRANT REVIEW For the Fayetteville City Council meeting of September 21. 1999 FROM: Dale Frederick Airport Name Division General GMT. Department ACTION REQUIRED: The Airport staff requests approval of a Resolution to implement and collect Passenger Facility Charge application #3 from eligible passengers at Drake Field, amend the existing applications #1 and #2, and close application #1. The Resolution is an FAA FAR Part 158 requirement for the application process. As with application #1 and #2, a $3.00 PFC charge is being requested in application #3. The airport board was advised and did approve this PFC application and amendments at their August meeting. COST TO CITY: $ .00 Cost of this Request N/A Account Number Project Number BUDGET REVIEW: Budget Coordinator $ .00 Category/Project Budget Funds used to date $ .00 Remaining Balance N/A Budgeted Item Administrative Services Director CONTRACT/GRANT/LEASE REVIEW: LPit/ 9 -/O 99 A ounting�F4ana` DDte p ordina r D te/ ttomey Date 11t al Auditor Date 10-Q Purchasing Officer Date N/A Category/Project Name N/A Program Name Fund Budget Adjustment Attached GRANTING AGENCY: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution. Head Department Director •e i / i.I ✓.I vv L,15S5 Date Date Date ` Date Cross Reference New Item: Yes Pre. Ord/Res#: Orig Cont. Date:_ Description: STAFF REVIEW FORM Meeting Date: September 21. 1999 Page 2 Resolution to impose and use PFC application #3, amend applications #1 and #2, and close application #1. Comments: Budget Coordinator Reference Comments: Accounting Manager Reference Comments: City Attorney Reference Comments: Ca SC- Ct1v-L •(Y/IQ - r1.6'a'LmfC.Qo r C&4MS(,.. • 42 ce-i -' - ck t" Purchasing Officer V Reference Comments: ADA Coordinator Reference Comments: Internal Auditor Reference Comments: II IfflLi lrJuiJjyA1 frpfl!iUJJ 'I'll Jtffl$JjUIJ!yjJ FAYETTEVILLE AIRPORT DEPARTMENT THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS TO: THE FAYETTEVILLE CITY COUNCIL THRU: FRED HANNA, MAYOR FROM: DALE FREDERICK, AIRPORT MANAGER DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 1999 SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION TO IMPLEMENT PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE APPLICATION #3, AMEND APPLICATIONS #1 AND #2, AND CLOSE APPLICATION #1. The Airport staff requests approval of a Resolution to implement and collect Passenger Facility Charge application #3 from eligible passengers at Drake Field, amend the existing applications #1 and #2, and close application #1. The Resolution must be approved by the City Council and submitted to the Federal Aviation Administration as a part of the application process. As in application #1 and #2, a $3.00 PFC charge is being requested in application #3. Modifications to applications #1 and #2 are generated from the completion and changes in funding and the scope of the approved PFC Projects. The PFC program allows reimbursement to the airport for costs paid with airport funds toward eligible Airport Improvement Projects. Resolution No. 96-95 authorized the implementation of the collection of PFCs on October 25, 1995, with application #1. Projects previously completed and future grant projects shall be reimbursed with the approval of Application #3 in the estimated amount of $960,303.00. Projects included in application #3 are: Localizer-Type Directional Aid (LDA), Taxiway Rehabilitation, and PFC Application and Administrative Costs. As soon as this process has been completed most of the funds will be reimbursed to the airport for use in much needed industrial and general aviation projects. The Airport Board and Airport staff recommends approval of this PFC application and amendments. Attachments: Agenda Request Form Copies of Application #3 Application #1 and #2 Amendments Closeout Application #1 Copy of Original Resolution #96-95 and #109-97 4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING PHONE 501-718-7640 Ext.5 • FAX 501-718-7646 FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701 RESOLUTION NO. 109-97 MICROFr ' LMED A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF THE PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES FOR APPROVED PROJECTS. WHEREAS, it would be in the public interest to perform the below the listed projects at Drakr Filed Airport; and WHEREAS, funding these projects through Passenger Facility Charges would be in the public interest; and WHEREAS, City Resolution No. 96-95, Section 4.1, provides that Passenger Facility Charges shall be expended for projects approved by resolution of the City Council and approved by the Federal Aviation Administration. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That the Passenger Facility Charges collected pursuant to Resolution 96-95 are hereby authorized to be expended on the following projects: I. Snow Removal Equipment; 2. ARFF Building and ARFF Truck; 3. Terminal Area Improvements; 4. Commercial Ramp Rehabilitation and Extension; 5. Part 107 Access Control System; 6. PFC Application and Administrative Costs. Section 2. That this resolution shall become effective immediately upon adoption. fAt- icJUt Traci Paul, City Clerk PASSED AND APPROVED this I day of November , 1997. �i.Yt lip 4.� APPROVED: By: red Hanna, Mayor RECEIVED aui. 1 0 1995 RESOLUTION NO. 96-95 A RESOLUTION TO IMPLEMENT AND COLLECT A PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE ON ELIGIBLE PASSENGERS AT DRAKE FIELD. WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville has investigated the feasibility of implementing and collecting a Passenger Facility Charge ("PFC") on eligible enplaned passengers at Drake Field ("Airport") in accordance with the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 as approved by the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") and desires to impose and collect a Passenger Facility Charge upon eligible enplaned passengers at Drake Field, under terms and conditions that are consistent with said Act as approved by the FAA and to expend such funds on FAA approved eligible projects; and WHEREAS, the City operates, maintains and develops the Airport with federal grants and user fees; and WHEREAS, a PFC is a user fee authorized by Federal Law and imposed only on eligible enplaned passengers utilizing the Airport; and WHEREAS, the Airport Division after thorough investigation has determined that the funds generated by adopting and collecting a PFC are needed to accomplish projects designed to enhance capacity, safety and development of the Airport. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. The Council hereby adopts and implements the Passenger Facility charge under the following: Section 1. DEFINITIONS. As used in this resolution, the following definitions apply: 1.1 "Airport" shall mean the estimated 600 acre area of Drake Field. 1.2 "Charge Effective Date" shall mean the date on which the Passenger Facility Charge is effective as provided in §3.1 of this Resolution. 1.3 "Enplaned Passenger" means a domestic, territorial or international revenue passenger enplaned at the Airport in a scheduled or nonscheduled aircraft in interstate, intrastate, or foreign commerce, provided that Enplaned Passenger shall not include a passenger enplaning to a destination receiving essential air service (compensation) as provided by 14 C.P.R. 158.9 or a passenger both enplaning and deplaning at the Airport. Page 2 Resolution No. 96-95 1.4 "Manager" shall mean the Airport Manager for the City of Fayetteville. 1.5 "FAA" shall mean the Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation, United States of America. 1.6 "Passenger Facility Charge" shall mean the charge imposed on Enplaned Passengers pursuant to §3.1 of this resolution. Section 11. FINDINGS AND PURPOSE. 2.1 The Cityfinds that: 2.1.1 The City owns and controls that certain Airport and air navigation facility located in Washington County, State of Arkansas, and known as Drake Field ("Airport"); and 2.1.2 The Airport promotes a strong economic base for the community, assists and encourages world trade opportunities , and is of vital importance to the health, safety, and welfare of the State of Arkansas; and 2.1.3 The Airport is a commercial service airport as that phase is defined in 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 158, as adopted•by FAA, being a public airport enplaning 2,500 or more scheduled air passengers per year; and 2.1.4 The deregulation of the airline industry, the restructuring of airline ownerships, and fluctuating market changes in the field of commercial aviation have placed new financial challenges on the City; and 2.1.5 The operation of Drake Field as a public facility attracting scheduled airline passenger service by airline carriers at the Airport imposes financial responsibility on the City for airport facilities and operations; and 2.1.6 The City will require substantial expenditure for capital investment, operation, maintenance, and development of the Airport facilities to meet the demand for passenger air travel; and Page 3 Resolution No. 96-95 2.1.7 The Congress of the United States has authorized the adoption of a Passenger Facility Charge program by local airports pursuant to the Aviation Safety and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Pub.L. 101-508, Title IX Subtitle B, November 5, 1990)(hereinafter the "Act"); and 2.1.8 It is in the City's best economic interest to adopt and in the interest of airline passengers that the City adopt a Passenger Facility Charge program as identified in this Resolution to maintain and further expand the transportation facilities of the City; and 2.1.9 In establishing and implementing the Passenger Facility Charge program, the passengers using the Airport should contribute to a greater degree toward the development of Airport Facilities used by passengers and continued development thereof; and 2.1.10 The fees implemented by this Resolution are reasonable for the use of the Airport and aviation facilities by the general public. 2.2. The purpose of this Resolution is to enact a Passenger Facility Charge program consistent with the above findings and this Resolution and the regulations published pursuant thereto shall be liberally construed to effectuate the purposes expressed. Section III. PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGE. 3.1 Commencing not later than the first day of the second month thirty days after the approval by the FAA of the City's Passenger Facility Charge program authorized by this Resolution, or on such date thereafter as the Passenger Facility Charge can be collected as determined by the Manager ("Charge Effective Date"), thereafter shall be imposed at Drake Field, a Passenger Facility Charge of three dollars ($3.00) (Passenger Facility Charge"). 3.2 The Passenger Facility Charge authorized by this Resolution shall expire on the date determined pursuant to regulations adopted by FAA. 3.3 The Airport Manager or designee is authorized to execute the FAA application for authorization of the City's PFC program including the assurances contained therein and other documents necessary for implementation of the PFC program on behalf of the City. r Page 4 Resolution No. 96-95 .!1 Section IV. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS. 4.1 The Passenger Facility Charge collected pursuant to this program shall be expended only for projects approved by the City Council and determined by the FAA to be eligible under the Act and rules and regulations adopted by FAA pursuant to such statute. Section V. COMPLIANCE WITH FAA REQUIREMENTS. 5.1 The Passenger Facility Charge authorized by this Resolution shall be collected and distributed pursuant to the rules and regulations adopted by FAA pursuant to such statute. Section VI.; VIOLATIONS. 6.1 Sanctions. In the event any airline violates any term or condition of this Resolution, the City may exercise any rights or remedies allowed by law or equity. Section VII. SAVINGS CLAUSE. 7.1 In the event any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or paragraphs of this Resolution is declared invalid for any reason, the remainder of this Resolution shall not be invalidated, but shall remain in full force and effect, all parts of this Resolution being declared separable and independent of all others. PASSED AND APPROVED this ith day of _July, 1995. APPROVED: By: Fred Hanna, Mayor ATTES : By: Traci Paul, City Clerk FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDEN To: Dale Frederick, Airport Manager From: Theresa Johnson, Deputy City Clerk Date: September 28, 1999 Re: PFC Application Attached please find the two applications referenced above and Resolution 120-99. A copy of the applications will be microfilmed and filed in the City Clerk's office. cc: Yolanda Fields, Internal Audit