HomeMy WebLinkAbout120-99 RESOLUTION•
RESOLUTION NO 120-99
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXPENDITURE OF THE
PASSENGER FACILITY CHARGES FOR APPROVED
PROJECTS IN APPLICATION NO. 99-03-C-00-FYV; AMENDING
AND CLOSING APPLICATION NO. 95-01-C-00-FYV; AND
AMENDING APPLICATION NO. 98-02-C-00-FYV.
WHEREAS, it would be in the public interest to perform the below listed projects at Drake
Field Airport; and,
WHEREAS, funding these projects through Passenger Facility Charges would be in the
public interest; and,
WHEREAS, Resolution No. 96-95, Section 4.1, provides that Passenger Facility Charges
shall be expended for projects approved by resolution of the City Council and approved by the
Federal Aviation Administration.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS*
Section 1 That the Passenger Facility Charges collected pursuant to Resolution 96-95
are hereby authorized to be expended on the following projects:
1. Localizer-Type Directional Aid and Glide Slope;
2. Taxiway Rehabilitation,
3. PFC Application and Administrative Costs.
Section 2. That Application No. 95-01-C-00-FYV is hereby amended and closed. A
copy of the amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.
Section i That Application No. 98-02-C-00-FYV is hereby amended. A copy of the
amendment is attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and made a part hereof.
• PASSED AND APPROVED this 2L day of September , 1999.
j ' ? �4i .��\ \ APPROVED:
• • t.:.
w; f
' ' rs 1. By.
^;t. ° ` ,,.:° Fred Hanna, Mayor
r ,i3S.n;
Heather Woodruff, City Clerk
�r
CNN
FAYETTEVILLE EXHIBIT A
AIRPORT DEPARTMENT
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
PASSENGER FACILITY
CHARGE
Application #3
October, 1999
4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701
PHONE 501-521-4750 • FAX 501-521-1735
FAYETTEVILLE
AIRPORT DEPARTMENT
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
September 30, 1999
Mr. Ben Guttery
Federal Aviation Administration
Planning and Programming Branch
ASW -610D, Airports Division
Fort Worth, Texas 76193-0610
Re: Passenger Facility Charge
Drake Field- Application #3 to Impose and Use PFC Revenue
Dear Mr. Guttery:
The City of Fayetteville is pleased to submit this Fayetteville Municipal Airport- Drake Field
PFC Application #3 to Impose and Use PFC's.
Respectfully Submitted,
Mr. Fred B. Hanna, Jr.
Mayor
4500 SOUTH SCHOOL AVENUE, SUITE F • AIRPORT TERMINAL BUILDING • FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72701
PHONE 501-718-7640 Ext.5 • FAX 501-718-7646
•
rtmont of Transportation
e Avlatlon Administration
MAR Annrnven 7190-n557
Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Application
1. Application Type (Check all that apply)
e
0
a. Impose PFC Charges
b. Use PFC Revenue
c. Amend PFC No.:
•
Date Received Action
PART 1
0.11FAA USE ONLY
Approved Oats of
Approved in Part Action:
Disapproved PFC No.:
2. Public Agency Name, Address, and Contact Person
Agency Name City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Address 4500 South School Ave, Suite F
City, State, ZIP Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
Contact Person Dale Frederick. Airport Manager
3. Airport(s) to Use:
Fayetteville Municipal Airport- Drake Field
PART 11
4. Charges
a. Airport to Impose:
Fayetteville Municipal Airport
Drake Field
h. Total Estimated Net
PFC Revenue:
$ 960,303
c. Level
0 $1.00
❑ $2.00
$3.00
d. Proposed Effective Date:
April 1, 2000
e. Estimated Expiration Date:
December 31, 2000
PART 111
5. Attachments (Check all that Apply)
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Attached
e
■
■
Submitted with Application Dated:
1
. n/a
n/a
Airport Capital Improvement Plan
Project Information
Air Cartier Consultation Information
Request to Exclude Class(es) of Carriers
Alternative Uses / Projects
Additional Information
6a. Date of Written Notice to Air Carriers:
July 29, 1999
6b. Date of Consultation Meeting with Air Carriers:
August 31, 1999
PART IV
7.With respect to this PFC application I hereby certify as follows:
To the best of my knowledge and belief, all data in this application are true and correct;
This application has been duly authorized by the governing body of the public agency;
The public agencygwill comply pwiith the attached assurances if the application is approved; and
For thused by the isNafor ichnapprovaat Pusey PFC Neve been cequested, all applicable ALP approvals, airspace determinations, and environmental reviews
reqa. Typed Name of Authorized Representative b. Title (50Telephone
)1718 7640 umber
Mr. Fred B. Hanna, Jr.
Mayor, City of Fayetteville, AR
(501) 718-7646
e. Signature of Authorized Representative
f. Date Signed
September 30, 1999
Agency Display of Estimated Burden
Public reporting burden of this collection of informatiolt is estimated to average 5-160 hours per, response dependinn on the complexity. Send
comments regarding the accura&tyV of thisburden estimate or any other aspect of rms Inrporrnation Collection tothe Office of Management and
Budget (OMB), Paperwork Red%rtIOn Pfm oiect 22rt 0-0557. WasARP in119 o8n Independence 03 and toAthe
eDepai Department of Transportation,
ranspDC or 2t on, Federal Aviation Administration,
FAA Form 5500-1 (6-94)
NSN: 0052-00-915-9000
•
Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas
• PFC ASSURANCES CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
•
•
•
The undersigned Mayor for the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, assures and certifies, with respect
to the PFC application and projects including each individual project work element submitted in
its application to impose a PFC at FYV Airport:
I) Responsibility and authority of the public agency. It has legal authority to impose a PFC and to
finance and carry out the proposed projects. A resolution, motion or similar action has been duly
adopted or passed as an official act of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas authorizing the
application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and
authorizing the person or persons holding the position of Mayor as the official representative of
the public agency to act in connection with the application.
2) Compliance with regulation. It will comply with all legal provisions of 14 CFR Part 158 not
inconsistent with the provisions of the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (enacted
November 5, 1990) and the authority of the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations
implementing Section 9110 of the Act.
3) Compliance with state and local laws and regulations. It has complied, or will comply, with all
applicable state and local laws and regulations.
4) Environmental, airspace and airport layout plan (ALP) requirements. It will not use PFC
revenue on a project until the FAA has notified the public agency that:
a) Any actions required under the National Environmental Policy act of 1969 have been
completed;
b) The appropriate airspace finding required by FAA regulations has been made; and
c) The FAA Airport Layout Plan (ALP) with respect to the project or project work
element has been approved to the extent such approval authority of the FAA is required
by regulation of the FAA for such project or an individual project work element, and the
regulation or related guidelines requiring ALP approval is available to the public agency
at the time of submission of a PFC application for approval to use PFC revenues.
5) Nonexclusivity of contractual agreements. It will not enter into an exclusive long term lease or
use agreement with an air carrier or foreign air carrier for the use of projects funded with PFC
revenue. Such lease or use agreements will not preclude the public agency from funding or
developing new capacity at the airport using PFC and other sources of airport revenues or funds,
and reserving and assigning such new capacity for the use of new entry carriers or expanding
competitive carriers.
•
6) Carryover provisions. It will not enter into any lease or use agreement with an air carrier or
foreign air carrier for the use of any airport facilities financed in whole or in part with revenue
derived from a PFC if such agreement for such facility contains a carryover provision regarding a
renewal option which, upon expiration of the original lease, would operate to automatically
extend the term of such agreement with such carrier in preference over any potentially
completing air carrier or foreign air carrier seeking to negotiate a lease or use agreement for such
facilities.
7) Competitive access. It agrees that any lease or use agreements between the public agency and
any air carrier or foreign air carrier for any facility financed in whole or in part with revenue
derived from a PFC will contain a provision that permits a public agency to terminate the lease or
agreement if -
a) The air carrier or foreign air carrier has an exclusive lease or use agreement for existing
facilities at such airport; and
b) Any portion of its existing exclusive use facilities is not fully utilized and is not made
available for use by potential competing air carriers or foreign air carriers at
compensatory rates not exceeding the rates paid for such similar facilities to the public
agency.
8) Rates, fees and charges.
• a) It will not treat PFC revenue as airport revenue for the purpose of establishing a rate,
•
fee or charge pursuant to a contract with an air carrier or foreign air carrier.
b) It will not include in its rate base by means of depreciation, amortization or any other
method, that portion of the capital costs of a project paid for by PFC revenue for the
purpose of establishing a rate, fee or charge pursuant to a contract with an air carrier or
foreign air carrier.
c) Notwithstanding the limitation provided in subparagraph (b) , with respect to a project
for terminal development, gates and related areas, or a facility occupied or used by one or
more air carriers or foreign air carriers on an exclusive or preferential basis, the rates, fees
and charges payable by such carriers that use such facilities will be no less than the rates,
fees, and charges paid by such carriers using similar facilities at the airport that were not
financed by PFC revenue.
9) Standards and specifications. It will carry out the project in accordance with FAA airport
design, construction and equipment standards and specifications contained in advisory circulars
current on the date of project approval with the understanding that such standards are minimum
standards of compliance.
•
•
•
•
•
10) Record keeping and audit. It will maintain an accounting record for audit purposes for a
period of 3 years after completion of the project All records will satisfy the requirement of 14
CFR Part 158 and will contain documentary evidence for all items of project costs.
11) Reports. It will submit reports in accordance with the requirements of 14 CFR Part 158,
Subpart D, and as the Administrator may reasonably request.
12) Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990. I understand that sections 9304 and 9307 of the
Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 require the authority to impose a PFC be terminated if
the Administrator determines the public agency has failed to comply with that act or with the
implementing regulations promulgated thereunder.
e
Fred B. Hanna, Jr.
Mayor
•
•
•
Filename: C:\APP\DATA\123DATA\CIPPFC.WK4
4.
CO CO V W (T AWN -+
4166 -ZZ -8 PasiAaa
DtE�3IU'm
3<a2cu.0oa3
N N <. Ol J : 1p N N_
K n d d N O O O r
N
J d= w N ( 0
CO J CO m 0 7:1 0 K m
m°1xacEd
no y N N N O
m =-. � m
CO
= x
=0 = .
o 0 o
O
o
1
1
0
i 1
7
D tit
r
O
01
N
CO
CO
CO
o to00AC
O f O CO O O CO V
OO CJOO-co 0
O O W 0 0 0 0
004./0000
I Fiscal Year
2000
1,076,8331
CO
a W V CO
N W 0 s
O tJ O Cn
o co O O
o co O O
[ Fiscal Year
2001
IW
.Vt
i CO A
-4
01 W O V ONJ
b
W 14 O O
i 0 a 0 0
'1
N
N O
O m
0
N 5.0
rt
45
541,000
COO CO
o 0
00 0
00 0
00 0
r Fiscal Year
l 2003
193,000
co
co
O
O
O
Fiscal Year
2004
a
—Lon07"co
-4A'
Five
Tot
_a 0 c-n0000YD-1
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IO 000000000000000000000000000000
_ n
0
O
O w
y
I • CO
O co
0
O 0
A 0
O
0
0
DepartmentGeneral Govemment
RtaanoS SwpunJ
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Capital Improvements Program 2000-2004
SUMMARY OF CIP PROJECT REQUESTS
•
ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
PFC Application number:
********************************************************************************************
1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED:
Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas
2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ]
3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If
Appropriate):
I. Localizer- Type Directional Aid with Glide Slope
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This PFC project consists of purchase and installation
of a localizer-Type Directional Aid (LDA) with Glide Slope on
Runway 34 at Fayetteville Municipal Airport. The instrument
landing system is being funded with PFCs due to lack of FAA
funding. The City of Fayetteville entered into a transfer
agreement in which the FAA operates and maintains the equipment.
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Is description adequate to allow a person, unfamiliar with the airport, to determine the project scope?
YES [ ] NO ] ].
• b. Is this a USE project with a change in the description? YES[ ] NO ] 1. If YES, does this change
constitute "materially altering the project scope"? YES [ ] NO j. If NO, the project must be submitted
as a new IMPOSE and USE project.
•
Note: "materially altering the project scope" includes quantitative changes such as increasing the length of a
taxiway. However, changing a taxiway project to extension of a runway is not a "material" change. Such
changes require the submittal of the project as a new IMPOSE and USE project.
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
5. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
This localizer provides a precision approach to
the airport enhancing airfield safety.
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO [ ].
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
6. PROJECT OBJECTIVE:
This project preserves and enhances safety of the
national air transportation system. The Localizer- Type
Directional Aid improves pilot safety at the airport.
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************•***********************************
• a. Does the RO/ADO agree with the public agency's determination? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
b. Comments.
c. Project Eligibility:
1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below.
[ Development eligible under AIP criteria;
1 Planning eligible under AIP criteria;
1 Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2212(b);
[ Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2103(b);
1 Gates and related areas; or,
1 Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. App. 2104(c).
Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility
plan [ 1; or, project included in a local study[ 1? Include Title & Date of local study:
2) For development projects, indicate eligibility paragraph in Order 5100.38A or Program Guidance
Letter:
3) Comments:
********************************************************************************************
7. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year):
July 1995
ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year):
July 1998
• *****FOR FAA USE***********a**********************************a*************aa******a****•
a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval
date? YES [ 1 NO 1 1
b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date? YES[ ] NO 1
1
c. Comments:
*******,***********************************************************************************
8. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application
will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year):
n/a
*****FOR FAA USE*****a*****************************.*************s.**************,t**********
a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date? YES 1 1 NO 1 1.
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
9. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, is the project shown on an
approved airport layout plan (ALP)? YES[X) NO[ 1. If yes,
provide the FAA approval date:
July 14, 1999
*****FOR FAA USE***************a************a****************************************a****
a. Project required to be shown on an approved ALP? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
•
2
b. Public agency information confirmed? YES! 1 NO [
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
10. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project been
reviewed under the guidelines contained in the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969? YES[X] NO[ I. If yes,
provide the date of the FAA's final environmental
determination:
Categorically excluded
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Check the appropriate finding below.
[ ] Project determined to be categorically excluded from the requirement for formal environmental
review under FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, paragraph 23 (1985).
[
1 All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact
statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental
Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA Finding of No Significant Impact with
respect to this project was approved on the date cited above.
[ ] All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact
statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental
Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA environmental record of decision with
respect to this project was approved on the date cited above.
Finding by : Date of Finding:
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
111. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project received
an FAA airspace determination? YES[X] NO[ ]. If YES, provide
the date and airspace number of the FAA's final airspace
determination: 95 -ASW -1050 -NRA, 95 -ASW -1051 -NRA
January 24, 1996
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Project requires an airspace determination? YES [ ] NO [ ]
b. Public agency's information confirmed? YES [ ] NO [ 1
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
12. CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT:
None
13. CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT:
List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement:
none
Recap of Disagreements and Reasons for Proceeding:
none
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
3
a. Does the ADO/RO agree with the public agency's response to the disagreements? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
14. FINANCING PLAN:
PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $780,303
Bond Capital $
Bond Financing & Interest
* ** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $780,303
EXISTING AIP FUNDS:
Grant # Grant Funds in Project $
* **
SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $0
ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Yr. Separately):
Fiscal Year: Entitlement Discretionary $
Total $0
* ** SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $0
OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $41,069
Local Funds $
Other (please specify) $
* * *
* * *
SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $41,069
TOTAL PROJECT COST: $821,372
* ****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************
a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES 1 1 NO 1 1 If YES, does the Region support9 YES 1 1
NO 1 1. If YES, list the schedule for implementation:
b. For any proposed AIP discretionary, does the Region intend to support ? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES
11NO11
d. Comments.
********************************************************************************************
15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN:
If costs exceed the current budget, and additional PFCs
are needed, a PFC amendment application will be submitted to the
FAA.
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
4
a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes J J No J J.
b. Comments:
*****************************************************************************************
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
ADO/RO RECOMMENDATION: Approve 1 1 Partially Approve 1 1 Disapprove 1 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (If appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional
interest, pertinent background, etc.):
********************************************************************************************
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
PFC Application number:
********************************************************************************************
1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED:
Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas
2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ]
3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If
Appropriate):
II. Taxiway Rehabilitation
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This project consists of rehabilitation of the public use
taxiways located on the airfield. Specifically, Taxiways T-2, TD -
2, TE -1, TF -1, D and TB -3 will be reconstructed or repaired.
These taxiways are needed due to asphalt deterioration.
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Is description adequate to allow a person, unfamiliar with the airport, to determine the project scope?
YES J 1 NO[ 1.
b. Is this a USE project with a change in the description? YES[ ] NO J J. If YES, does this change
constitute "materially altering the project scope"? YES [ ] NO J. If NO, the project must be submitted
as a new IMPOSE and USE project.
Note: "materially altering the project scope" includes quantitative changes such as increasing the length of a
taxiway. However, changing a taxiway project to extension of a runway is not a "material" change. Such
changes require the submittal of the project as a new IMPOSE and USE project.
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
5. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
These public use taxiways need to be repaired due to
deterioration of the asphalt. The existing pavement is more than
20 years old and has deteriorated due to age. This project is PFC
eligible as defined in Paragraph 158.15(b)(1), airport
development eligible under AAIA.
****FOR FAA USE***************************************************************************
a. Is justification adequate? YES[ 1 NO [ 1.
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
6
•
•
•
6. PROJECT OBJECTIVE:
This project preserves and enhances safety of the
national air transportation system. The rehabilitated taxiway
system will improve safety at the airport by increasing pilot
ground operations.
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Does the RO/ADO agree with the public agency's determination? YES 1 ] NO 1 1
b. Comments.
c. Project Eligibility:
1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below.
Development eligible under AIP criteria;
Planning eligible under AIP criteria;
Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2212(b);
Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2103(b);
Gates and related areas; or,
Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. App. 2104(c).
Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility
plan [ 1; or, project included in a local study[ 1? Include Title & Date of local study:
2) For development projects, indicate eligibility paragraph in Order 5100.38A or Program Guidance
Letter:
3) Comments:
********************************************************************************************
7. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year):
June 2000
ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year):
December 2002
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval
date? YES 1 1 NO [ 1
b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date? YES( ] NO 1
1
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
8. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application
will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year):
N/A
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date? YES 1 1 NO 1 1.
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
9. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, is the project shown on an
7
•
•
•
•
approved airport layout plan (ALP)? YES[X] NO[ 1. If yes,
provide the FAA approval date:
July 14, 1999
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Project required to be shown on an approved ALP? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
b. Public agency information confirmed? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
10. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project been
reviewed under the guidelines contained in the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969? YES[X] NO[ 1. If yes,
provide the date of the FAA's final environmental
determination:
Categorically excluded
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Check the appropriate finding below.
1 1 Project determined to be categorically excluded from the requirement for formal environmental
review under FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental Handbook, paragraph 23 (1985).
1 1 All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact
statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental
Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA Finding of No Significant Impact with
respect to this project was approved on the date cited above.
1 All environmental reviews of this project, including the environmental impact
statement/environmental assessment, required by FAA Order 5050.4A, Airport Environmental
Handbook, have been completed and the final FAA environmental record of decision with
respect to this project was approved on the date cited above.
Finding by : Date of Finding:
1
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
11. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, has the project received
an FAA airspace determination? YES[X] NO[ 1. If YES, provide
the date and airspace number of the FAA's final airspace
determination:
July 14, 1999, 99 -ASW -1034 -NRA
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Project requires an airspace determination? YES( 1 NO 1 1
b. Public agency's information confirmed? YES 1 ] NO 1 1
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
12. CARRIERS CERTIFYING AGREEMENT:
None
7
8
•
•
•
•
1
13. CARRIERS CERTIFYING DISAGREEMENT:
List of Carriers Certifying Disagreement:
none
Recap of Disagreements and Reasons for Proceeding:
none
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Does the ADO/RO agree with the public agency's response to the disagreements? YES 1 1 NO ( 1
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
14. FINANCING PLAN:
PFC FUNDS: Pay-as-you-go $150,000
Bond Capital $
Bond Financing & Interest
* ** SUBTOTAL PFC FUNDS: $150,000
EXISTING AIP FUNDS:
Grant # Grant Funds in Project $
* * *
SUBTOTAL EXISTING AIP FUNDS: $
ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS (List Each Yr. Separately):
FiscalYear:2000 Entitlement $750,000 Discretionary$OTotal$750,000
2001 750,000 $750,000
* **
SUBTOTAL ANTICIPATED AIP FUNDS: $1,500,000
OTHER FUNDS: State Grants $150,000
Local Funds $
Other (please specify) $
* **
* * *
SUBTOTAL OTHER FUNDS: $150,000
TOTAL PROJECT COST: $1,800,000
*****FOR FAA USE********************************************************************
a. Does the project include a proposed LOI? YES 1 ] NO 1 1 If YES, does the Region support? YES] 1
NO 1 1. If YES, list the schedule for implementation:
b. For any proposed AIP discretionary, does the Region intend to support ? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
c. For any proposed AIP funds, is the request within the planning levels for the Region's five year CIP? YES
LINOII
d. Comments.
********************************************************************************************
15. BACK-UP FINANCING PLAN:
9
If costs exceed the current budget, and additional PFCs
are needed, a PFC amendment application will be submitted to the
FAA.
*****FOR FAA USE************************************************************************a•
a. Is the back-up financing/phasing plan viable? Yes 1 1 No 1 1.
b. Comments:
****************************************************************•***************************
*****FOR FAA USE*•**a***********************a*******ax************************************
ADO/R0 RECOMMENDATION: Approve 1 1 Partially Approve 1 1 Disapprove ( 1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (0 appropriate, include explanation of recommendation, congressional
interest, pertinent background, etc.):
********************************************************************************************
10
•
ATTACHMENT B: PROJECT INFORMATION
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
PFC Application number:
********************************************************************************************
1. AIRPORT WHERE PROJECT IS LOCATED:
Drake Field, Fayetteville, Arkansas
2. CHECK ONE: IMPOSE[ ] IMPOSE AND USE[X] USE[ ]
3. PROJECT TITLE (And Public Agency Project Number, If
Appropriate):
III. PFC Administrative Costs
4. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
PFC-eligible general formation costs included in this
project are the necessary expenditures to develop and implement
the capital plan, project information, application requirements,
the related financial plan, and the determination of the required
PFC amount.
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Is description adequate to allow a person, unfamiliar with the airport, to determine the project scope?
YES [ 1 NO [ 1.
b. Is this a USE project with a change in the description? YES[ 1 NO 1 1. If YES, does this change
constitute "materially altering the project scope"? YES 1 1 NO] J. If NO, the project must be submitted
as a new IMPOSE and USE project.
Note: "materially altering the project scope" includes quantitative changes such as increasing the length of a
taxiway. However, changing a taxiway project to extension of a runway is not a "material" change. Such
changes require the submittal of the project as a new IMPOSE and USE project.
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
5. PROJECT JUSTIFICATION:
The application and administrative costs are PFC eligible
under 158.13 and development associated with the approved
projects in this PFC application will preserve and enhance
safety, competition, security and capacity at Drake Field.
*****FOR FAA USE*************************************************************************
a. Is justification adequate? YES[ ] NO] ].
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
6. PROJECT OBJECTIVE:
Development resulting from this project will enhance
capacity, security and safety at the Airport.
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
11
•
a. Does the RO/ADO agree with the public agency's determination? YES! J NO [
b. Comments.
c. Project Eligibility:
1) Indicate project eligibility by checking the appropriate category below.
1 Development eligible under AIP criteria;
1 Planning eligible under AIP criteria;
[ Terminal development as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2212(b);
[ Noise compatibility planning as described in 49 U.S.C. App. 2103(b);
[ Gates and related areas; or,
1 Noise compatibility measures eligible under 49 U.S.C. App. 2104(c).
Check one of the following - project approved in an approved Part 150 noise compatibility
plan [ J; or, project included in a local study[ ]? Include Title & Date of local study:
2) For development projects, indicate eligibility paragraph in Order 5100.38A or Program Guidance
Letter:
3) Comments:
********************************************************************************************
7. ESTIMATED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION DATE (Month and Year):
June, 2000
ESTIMATED PROJECT COMPLETION DATE (Month and Year):
December, 2002
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE -ONLY project, project will begin within 2 years of 120 -day approval
date? YES [ J NO 1 1
b. For IMPOSE ONLY project, project will begin within 5 years of the charge effective date? YES[. 1 NO 1
1
c. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
8. For an IMPOSE ONLY project, estimated date USE application
will be submitted to the FAA (Month and Year):
n/a
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Is the date within 3 years of the estimated charge effective date? YES 1 1 NO 1 1.
b. Comments:
********************************************************************************************
9. For IMPOSE AND USE or USE project, is the project shown on an
approved airport layout plan (ALP)? YES[ ] NO[X]. If yes,
provide the FAA approval date:
N/A
*****FOR FAA USE**************************************************************************
a. Project required to be shown on an approved ALP? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
b. Public agency information confirmed? YES 1 1 NO 1 1
12