Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-98 RESOLUTION• • RESOLUTION NO. 9- 98 ASCAN t EDrS_. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PROPOSED METHOD CHANGE IN COLLECTING RECYCLABLE MATERIALS IN THE RESIDENTIAL SECTOR. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1 That the City Council hereby approves the proposed method change in collecting recyclable materials in the residential sector. A copy of the proposal is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. tla$”4D4AND APPROVED this 20th day of January , 1998. o . r /.. `;. 1`�'� APPROVED: '`r; ATTEST: By:/62,,e. ,4/ raci Smith, City Clerk 0epy><y By: /44/1/14'7---- F ed Hanna, Mayor a • ITHE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE TO: Environmental Concems Committee THRU• Kevin Crosson, Public Works Director FROM: r Cheryl Zotti, Environmental Affairs Administrato DATE: October 31, 1997 SUBJECT: CURBSIDE BIN RECYCLING VOLUME BASED RATES INCREASING SOLID WASTE RATES We are proposing to change the method in which we collect recyclable materials in our residential program. We are also proposing two different methods to generate the additional revenue required to operate a new collection program. These changes are prompted by Fulton Sanitation announcing that they would no longer process recyclable materials delivered in recycling bags. In the attached proposal, we are proposing to change our current residential recycling program from a blue bag program to a curbside bin program. The proposal will also include two recommendations to generate additional revenue: 1) change our waste collection and billing system from an unlimited disposal service to a volume based disposal service or 2) raise residential rates by $1 per month per resident. The $1 rate increase would be in addition to the Council approved, increases scheduled for the years 1998, 1999 and 2000. Please refer to the attached proposal for detailed information. Should you need additional information or have questions, please do not hesitate to call me. Thank you. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 .1 1 1 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS History 1 The Cost to Recycle 1 Curbside Bin Recycling 1 Two Different Collection Methods 2 A Blue Bag Program 2 A Curbside Bin Program 2 Operational Plan for a Curbside Bin Program 2 About the Bin 2 About Collections 3 Recycling Center Operations 4 About Costs 7 Volume Based Rates 7 Current Solid Waste Collection Method (Current Method) 7 What is Volume Based Benefits of Volume Based Systems Different Methods for Volume Based Systems (Different Methods) Bag System Why 104 Bags About the Bag Accounting for All Those Bags How Residents Get Extra Bags What About Revenue and Costs of a Bag System Costs What About Illegal Dumping Summary Increasing Residential Rates Conclusion 8 8 8 9 10 11 11 12 12 12 13 13 14 15, PROPOSAL HISTORY The Cost to Recycle Our current residential recycling program cost $350,787 per year. The revenue needed to support this cost is generated through the monthly fee we charge our residents for solid waste services ($8.50/month). It is often assumed that our recycling program pays for itself through the sale of the materials we collect. This is not factual. We do avoid landfill tipping fees; however, that savings is not substantial enough to support the cost of the program. The reasons that we offer recycling opportunities at such highcosts are greater than the economics of our operations. There are numerous environmental impacts that we address through recycling. We are educating our public to reduce the amount of waste they generate and to recognize theneed to re -use products and purchase products made of recycled material. If we were to terminate our recycling program, we would save approximately $182,696 per year. This number is less than the $350,787 because we would be required to expand our solid waste collection services to collect the additional volume of material and pay a tipping fee at the landfill to dispose of the material. These calculations are detailed below. Cost of Recycling Program $ 350,787 Cost of Adding (back) One Residential Route $(106,256) Cost of Disposing of Materials in Landfill $( 61,835) Savings Recognized by not Recycling $ 182,696 When comparing this savings to the monthly solid waste fees charged to the residents, it amounts to approximately $1.00 per month. In essence, the residents pay approximately $1.00 per month through their $8.50 solid waste fee for curbside recycling options. CURBSIDE BIN RECYCLING We have experienced tremendous success with our residential recycling program since it was implemented in 1995, maintaining a city-wide participation rate of 68%. We have enjoyed a program that is successful, efficient and cost effective. One of the elements which has allowed us to operate a cost effective program has been utilizing Fulton Sanitation to process the materials collected in our residential recycling program. Fulton processes our materials for a fee of $17 per ton, after a recent rate increase from $10 per ton. The processing fee of $17 per ton is still a very economical fee for this service. At the July 2 Council meeting, Fulton announced that they would be giving the City twelve months to stop bringing recyclables in blue bags Fulton has elected to stop operating a picking line and only process source separated materials. Staff has maintained a contingency plan should our processing contract with Fulton be terminated or dramatically interrupted, as has been done. Part of the planning has included allocating funding 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �1 in our 1997 Capital Improvements Program for curbside recycling bins; conducting pilot projects on different types of collection methods; visiting other cities and evaluating their recycling programs; conducting cost analysis of different collection methods; and.: researching different collection methods. Two Different Collection Methods We narrowed our research to seeking a method which would be cost effective; convenient for the residents, and allow us to process the materials in our recycling center, while avoiding systems which would greatly increase our operational costs. Two methods of collection. were most prevalent as applicable to our City: a Blue Bag System and a Curbside Bin System. 1. A Blue Bag Program A blue bag, system involves collecting the materials in the same manner as we do in our existing blue bag program. The only change would be. that we would process the materials ourselves, at our recycling center. It would cost approximately $191 per ton to process the materials ourselves, which includes an investment of approximately $350,000 to purchase processing equipment, a picking line and associated storage equipment. Appendix A details these capital costs. Trends across the country are showing that entities are moving away from picking lines and blue bag programs. This is largely due to the expense of operating a picking line. Please see Appendix A for a cost analysts of a picking line system. A blue bag program would require hiring a minimum of eight:employees to pick materials from a conveying system. These types of jobs have high tumover rates and workers compensation claims. With extremely high processing costs and operating challenges, we do not believe that installing a picking line and continuing to operate a blue bag program is the best option for the City at this time. 2. A Curbside Bin Program We believe that a curbside bin recycling program is the best option for the City. We are proposing to implement a curbside bin program which provides sorting of recyclable materials before reaching the recycling center. With a curbside bin program, residents would place their recyclables in one or more recycling bins and place their materials at their curb for collection. There are numerous different levels of separation and aspects to consider when establishing a curbside bin program. The most beneficial aspect of this system is that it requires a separation of materials before they reach the recycling center, which reduces processing costs. One of the biggest decisions to make is who is going to do the separation. We can require the resident to do all of the separation or we can do the separation with the routesman. We are proposing a combination of both. We are proposing that the resident perform two primary sorts in their home and our routesman will provide the remaining sorts on the curb. Operational Plan About The Bins We are proposing to provide each resident with an 18 gallon bin. See Appendix B for a picture of the bin. We will ask each resident to place all of their recyclable materials in the bin, except 2 newsprint and cardboard. We will ask that residents place their newsprint either in a bag (brown paper or plastic) or bundle it and place on top of the bin. We will continue collecting cardboard boxes placed next to the bin. During inclement weather, they canplace their newsprint on top of the recyclable materials in the bin and place the lid on it. With this method of sorting, they have performed two sorts before their bin reaches the curb. Appendix B(1) shows a transfer of materials from a blue bag to a recycling bin. As proposed, residents will commingle their recyclables in one bin instead of a blue bag. The bin will still be placed at the curb for collection on the same day as always. Once on the curb, the routesman will finish the sorting process. There is another option of requiring residents to sort their materials into numerous bins in their home, so that they do all of the sorting themselves. With this type of bin program; a resident would have at least five bins in their home. All five of the bins would be placed at the curb, by the resident, on their collection day. This option would seem to make it easier on the routesman by reducing his sorting time. However, it takes close to the same amount of time for a routesman to pick-up each bin and dump it and place it back at the curb as it does to sort from one bin. This option was not chosen because of the number of bins that would be placed in the household. It would also require a larger investment to purchase the additional bins. We elected to combine some sorting in the home and some sorting on the curb. We believe that this will be a successful combination._ Newsprint constitutes 45% of the total volume of materials being recycled by households Byrequiring that residents sort this material from thecontainers, the routesman will save a significant amount of time. Using only one bin will keep the program convenient for our residents which increases participation rates. The bins will be competitively bid. We estimate that the bins will cost approximately $6 per bin, which will require that we spend $114,000 to supply bins to all our residents. We currently have $100,000 in our budget allocated for this expense. We will require the bin to be made of post and pre -consumer recycled materials. The bin will have the City logo and will have a lid which will be used in inclement weather. The bins have an estimated life of 5 to 7 years. If a resident produces more recyclable material than one bin per week will contain, we are proposing to sell the extra bin to the resident at our cost. We will get more accurate data on the number of households needing multiple bins after the first year of the program. About Collections Once a bin is placed at the curb, city crews will sort the materials into a compartmentalized vehicle. The vehicle will have a separate compartment for each type of material collected. The routesman will then sort the materials by type into the correct compartment. Please refer to Appendix C for a picture of a compartmentalized vehicle. This is similar to the type of vehicle we would use in the proposed program. 3 We do not currently have compartmentalized vehicles as part of our fleet. We would be required to purchase this type of specialized equipment. We have perfoitned a time -motion study on similar equipment in Manchester, Connecticut. We went to Manchester and timed an employee as he collected and sorted materials from the curb into a compartmentalized vehicle. We also worked on the route to get experience using the vehicle. They used the vehicle identified in Appendix C. The residents of Manchester use a 14 gallon bin and they commingled their materials into the bin. We also performed a time -motion study in Fayetteville, using Solid Waste employees and Washington County's recycling trailers. We performed the time -motion study for one week. Two solid waste employees collected the recyclable materials by emptying the contents of the blue bag into an 18 gallon bin and then sorted the materials into the trailers The employees were timed to see how long it took to sort the materials into different compartments. This method was not as reflective as the Manchester study because of using a trailer instead of a compartmentalized vehicle. When applying the data collected in both time -motion studies to our operation (population, households, participation), we concluded it will require five routes to collect our recyclable materials. We are proposing to purchase six vehicles, five for daily routes and one as a spare. We would operate five, -.one-man, routes each day, four days per week... Curbside sort programs are - . usually designed to use oneman routes, instead of two men. We currently have four employees that work on our recycling routes. We would .be required to -add one additional position in order to •_operate five routes.. Please see Appendix C(1) for data used to calculate number of routes needed for a curbside bin program. Recycling Center Operations In the future, materials collected in either a curbside bin program or a blue bag program will be processed in our recycling center. This will be a significant change from the current operation. Our recycling center is currently being used to process the materials collected in our commercial recycling programs. This volume of material itself absorbs most of the floor space in the center. With a curbside bin program, utilizing compartmentalized vehicles, the planned operation of the recycling center will be as follows: Personnel: Weare requesting three additional positions with the implementation of a curbside bin program. All three positions will be used to move materials, bale materials, load materials into trailers and provide general operational duties of the recycling center. We recommend a minimum of three people to maintain an efficient operation. It will be absolutely essential that we maintain control of the flow of materials on a daily basis, given our limited storage capacity. Unloading materials: Each compartmentalized vehicle will unload materials at the recycling center when they have completed their route, their vehicle is full, or one compartment of their vehicle has reached capacity. The vehicle will back into the inside of the center and unload, one material at a time. The vehicles are designed to unload each 4 compartment independently. A recycling center operator will move each material into a storage area as it is unloaded. For example, as steel cans are unloaded, they will be pushed (using the skid -steer loader) into a storage bunker or bin._ Storing and baling materials: All materials will be moved into storage areas as the vehicles unload Most materials, with the exception of newsprint and cardboard, will be stored for a length of time before being baled. This storing process occurs because it takes a larger volume than we collect in one day to make a bale of material. We also like to bale a volume of material which produces several bales. This provides for more efficient operation of the baler. We store the baled material for a length of time as well. We sell each material in a quantity of approximately 45 bales. This amounts to a semi -trailer load. The mills that purchase the material require that they receive materials by the semi -trailer load. We will store steel cans in an existing indoor storage bunker, which is currently being used to store newsprint Newsprint will be baled daily. The baled steel cans will be stored in one of our existing outdoor bunkers until we get approximately 45 bales (a semi -trailer load). It will take approximately 3 months to accumulate that quantity. We will store our aluminum cans in a semi trailer parked on the outside of our recycling center. The broker or mill which. purchases aluminum from recycling centers will place a semi -trailer and a machine which blows the cans into the trailer at no cost. This allows for outdoor storage as well as eliminates the baling process. We will empty the glass collected into containers (which hold 20 cubic yards) located outdoors. The glass will be transported in the same containers to the glass recycling mill. This allows for outdoor storage as well as eliminates double -handling this material. We will transport glass approximately once every two months. The paperboard that we collect will be added to cardboard when baled. Therefore, it will be baled on a daily basis. We collect larger volumes of newsprint and cardboard than any other material. It is our operational plan to bale this material on a daily basis. We do not have space in our center to store this material for more than one day. If we are baling newsprint when a collection vehicle arrives at the recycling center, we will move the newsprint unloaded from the vehicle onto the conveyor. We would then move cardboard to a designated area to be baled later in the day or first thing the next morning. The same process would occur if we were baling cardboard when the collection vehicle arrives at the center, except it would be newsprint that would be stored for baling later in the day and cardboard that would be baled immediately. The bales of newsprint and cardboard will be stored inside the recycling center in two different areas. We currently store this material until we accumulate approximately 45 bales. The only difference in this storing process will be that we will sell the materials to a broker 5 weekly instead of monthly. Storage areas: The most challenging aspect of the recycling center will be storage capacity. It will be essential that we maximize the space we have for storage and that we also have additional storage capacity in place before we start a curbside bin program. We will need additional storage capacity (beyond our existing floor or outdoor space) for plastics. It takes approximately 35 cubic yards of plastic to make one bale. It takes a large area to store 35 cubic yards of loose plastic containers. We will need an area that will hold a minimum of 70 cubic yards of each type of plastic to make two bales. We will collect approximately 150 cubic yards of plastics each week from our residential program. As you can visualize, we will need a large storage area for plastics. We will sort the plastic into two classifications, separate #1 plastics from #2 plastics. Therefore, we will need two large areas. We are proposing to modify two outdoor storage areas at the recycling center. We have two, small outdoor storage areas which have overhead doors, making them accessible from inside the recycling center. These modifications will require extending large concrete walls and extending the roofing system over each area. We estimate that this will cost approximately $85,000 for construction and engineering costs. We have placed $100,000 in our 1998 Capital Improvements Program requests to fund these modifications. Once the plastics are baled, they will be stored in two existing outdoor bunkers until we accumulate a semi -trailer load. We will accumulate at load every three months. Marketing baled material: We currently market all of our commercial materials. We take price quotes when we have 45 bales of a material. A semi -trailer will hold approximately 45 bales of material. The broker which we sell our material to will fumish a semi -trailer to transport our material (that cost is included in all quotes). When the semi arrives at our recycling center, we immediately load the trailer and it then proceeds on to the recycling mill. The entire process takes approximately 2 hours. We sell the material to the broker which quotes the highest per ton price. All brokers quote and buy based on a semi -load of material. We sell approximately 2 semi -trailer loads of material per month. Our marketing plan will change when we increase our volume of materials. We would release a bid for purchase of our materials prior to beginning the curbside bin program. We would then negotiate with the selected broker to enter into a 12 to 24 month contract for the handling of our materials. We would like for the contract to be for at least 12 months to ensure a guaranteed price but not more than 24 months because the markets for recyclable materials fluctuate regularly. For example, in November of 1996 cardboard was selling for $72.50 per ton and in August (1997) it was selling for $125 per ton. 6 We will have over a year of working history with brokers of recyclable materials prior to implementing a curbside bin program. That history wi11 be very useful when selecting a broker to enter into a long term contract with for all of our materials. Processing and marketing our commercial materials has provided us with good experience that will be very beneficial in our management of the volume of materials from the residential sector. We refer to this experience as getting our feet wet before jumping in. About Costs Our financial analysis has indicated that it would cost approximately an additional $162,000 each year in operational costs to switch to a curbside bin program, as proposed. This extra cost is largely due to requiring additional equipment and personnel. We currently use three vehicles for blue bag collection. .With this new program, we would require six vehicles and would necessitate four additional positions.. See Appendix D for a detailed financial analysis. Compartmentalized vehicles cost approximately $85,000 per vehicle, depending on the specifications. The equipment will be purchased by the Fleet Maintenance Division, using the shop fund. Funds are allocated in the shop fund for this expenditure. The Fleet Maintenance Division would charge the solid waste fund monthly replacement and maintenance charges for each vehicle, as detailed in Appendix D. We would use one man to operate each vehicle (run each route). We currently have four people that collect our blue bags. We would need one new position to work as a fifth routesman. Due to the .increase in volume of materials to be processed, we would also need three new positions to work in our recycling center. One employee would operate the baler, while the other two employees would move the materials as they are Unloaded on the conveying system or in the storage areas. They would also be required to keep baled material moved to storage areas. Compared to similar operations, our recycling center is relatively small, and because of this, we will need to control the flow of materials at all times. Our current rate structure will not support additional operational costs in the amount of $162,000 per year. We are proposing two options to generate the required revenue: 1) volume based rates or 2) increasing current solid waste rates. We will need approval of one of these two options before implementing the curbside bin recycling program. VOLUME BASED RATES Current Method Currently, residents pay a monthly sanitation fee of $8.50 per month. Every resident pays this amount regardless of waste generation habits. There is no limit on the bags of waste any household can place out for collection. For $8.50 per month, one household can dispose of 5 bags of waste each week while their neighbor who also pays $8.50 per month only disposes of 2 bags of waste each week. This obviously is not equitable. 7 1 1 1 1 1 1. 1. 1. 1 1 1: 1, 1 1., 1_. 1_. 1 1. • What Is Volume Based Volume based, also known as variable rate pricing or pay -as -you -throw, is a system which requires residents to pay for municipal waste management services by the unit of waste collected rather than through a fixed fee. Unit pricing takes into account variations in waste generation rates by charging households or residents based on the amount of trash they place at the curb, thereby offering individuals an incentive to reduce the amount of waste they generate and dispose of each week. Benefits Of Volume Based Systems Waste reduction. Volume based systems reduce the amount of waste disposed of by residents. Because residents pay more if they generate more, they learn to generate less. Some communities with volume based pricing report that they reduced their waste disposed of by 25 to 45 percent. Reduced waste disposal costs. When the amount of waste is reduced, the amount of funds expended in waste disposal fees reduces. The amount paid to waste disposal facilities (landfills, incinerators, etc..) decreases. The revenue previously spent on disposal fees can then be allocated to recycling, composting or other diversion activities. Increased waste prevention. Residents will typically modify their traditional purchasing and consumption patterns to reduce the amount of waste they produce .These behavioral changes have beneficial environmental effects beyond reduced waste generation, often including reduced energy usage and materials conservation. Increased participation in composting and recycling programs. Under volume based pricing, recycling and composting programs become opportunities for residents to divert wastes for which they otherwise would pay. Participation in recycling and yard waste programs usually increase substantially. More equitable waste management fee structure. With the current flat fee rates, residents who generate a small amount of waste subsidize the greater generation rates of their neighbors. Under volume based pricing, waste removal charges are based on waste generation.. This is similar to the way residents pay for their other utilities, like water, gas and electric. Different Methods Volume based systems have two basic forms. Residents can be charged by: 1. Weight of waste, with the municipality measuring at the curbside the weight of waste set out for collection. 2. Volume of wastes, using bags, tags or stickers, or prescribed sizes of waste cans. We have analyzed different methods and ways of implementing a volume based system. We narrowed our research to a system that would fit into Fayetteville's environment. We evaluated 8 1 1. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 programs which would bring equity to our system but not require Targe increases in the fees that we charge our residents. The elements Which Would require Targe fee increases are increasing personnel and purchasing different collection equipment. We, therefore,:eliminated systems which would require replacement of current equipment, like weight based systems which requires equipment that weighs the cans as they mechanically dump it. We evaluated different volume based methods using cans, stickers or tags, or bags: CANS: Volume based systems often use a can program. With a can program, residents are issued different sized cans, ranging from 20 to 95 gallon cans or carts. They pay a fee based on the size of container. This type of system requires automated equipment which dumps the containers. Implementing this type of system also requires expending a significant amount of funds to purchase the cans or carts. Experience has also shown that this type of system does not work well in cities with hilly terrain, ditches or on -street parking. This is largely due to the type of equipment used. This type of system makes billing systems more complex. With this type of system, residents would not have a real incentive to not fill the can or cart. STICKERS OR TAGS: Volume based systems often use stickers or tags to identify their units for disposal. With a sticker system, residents are issued and/or sold stickers which they must place on their trash bags. Trash bags which do not have stickers will not be collected. We evaluated this option carefully. Stickers would be cheaper for us to purchase than cans or bags and residents usually understand a sticker system. However, stickers often do not adhere in rainy or cold weather; retailers are more hesitant to stock stickers; sticker systems make it difficult to enforce size limitations of the bags; stickers are easily duplicated by counterfeiters; stickers are easily stolen off of bags at the curb; and stickers are easily lost by the resident. We believe that a bag program is a better option for the City. BAGS: Volume based systems often use a bag system. With a bag system, residents are required to place their waste in designated bags. They can no longer place waste in any bag other than the one required to be used by the City. Waste that is not placed in the designated bags will not be collected. Most cities select a distinguishable color for their bag with some type of identification (city logo, city name, etc..). Residents usually find a bag system easy to understand. They can purchase the designated bags from the municipal offices or various retail outlets within the city. We found a bag system most applicable to our City and the remainder of this report recommends and explains a bag system for Fayetteville, if we elect to go to a volume based system. BAG SYSTEM We propose that we maintain our base solid waste rate of $8.50 per month, with the originally scheduled rate increases. We are further recommending that we issue residents 104 waste bags every 12 months. The residents will be required to place their waste in these designated bags, and we will 9 not collect any waste from the residential sector that is not in the designated bags. If a resident needs more than 104 bags in 12 months, they will be required to buy the additional bags for $1.50 per bag. The bags will be available at the City's Solid Waste Division and in area grocery stores. Why 104 Bags There are some cities which implement volume based systems which charge the residents a base rate and then require that they purchase the quantity of bags they need or just charge for the bags. Staff chose to issue bags for several reasons: Rate Study. The rate study which was approved by Council in 1995 provided for rate increases over a five year period. The rates that were established included a disposal fee for the solid waste we dispose of each year. The study included taking our yearly volume of waste disposed of and calculating an average volume of waste produced for each household. This was fiirther reduced to the amount of waste collected each week from each household. The rates established through the study includes collecting and disposing of .33 cubic yards of waste each week from each household. This translates into approximately two, 30 gallon bags of waste each week. The importance of this information is that our current rates allow for the disposal of two, 30 gallon bags of waste per household each week. We are finding - through audits that some household put one (small) bag of trash out for collection and other households place 5 (large) bags of waste out for collection, as indicated in waste audit below. Waste Audit. We have been performing waste audits for several years. During our waste audits, we record waste generation habits for each household in the audit area (number of bags of waste, blue recycling bags, and cardboard boxes they place at curb each week, etc..). Our audit has shown that households are placing 5-6 bags of waste out for collection each week, on an average basis. Again, this is an average. There are homes that regularly place 8-10 bags out for collection, and homes that regularly place 2 bags of waste out for collection each week. The bags range from 13 to 30 gallons in size. We concluded the majority of households place at least two bags of waste out for collection each week and the households that placed more out could reduce their generation habits by recycling and purchasing, differently. Familiarity. Residents are familiar with being issued bags because of our current curbside recycling program. It would not be a totally new concept to deliver bags to a household once per year. A bag program is easy to understand and if properly educated, a resident will quickly learn to manage their waste so that they can make the 104 bags last over twelve months. The Solid Waste Division is also familiar with distributing bags. Reasonable. Most people also understand reasonable quantities. If we properly reach and educate our public, we can present them with a program that we believe is reasonable. For $8.50 per month, we believe that two bags per week is reasonable. If they want to generate more, then they pay more It especially becomes reasonable when we educate the public about other programs available like our recycling programs, bulk pick-up program, yard waste program, and household hazardous waste round -ups. 10 Consensus. It is important to staff that we build a community consensus which favors or at least understands why we are implementing this program. Often, a community automatically perceives a volume based system as a negative program or as a program to further regulate the public. By giving the resident a supply of bags, we make the program more convenient and user friendly. We know this works because of the feedback and success with our blue bag recycling program. While some may not like the idea of quantity limitations, they will have the bags, start using them, and over time they will adjust. If they are required to purchase bags, fail to do so and we do not collect their waste, their frustration and opposition levels will increase. By supplying the resident with a yearly supply (104 bags); they may place one bag out for collection one week and three bags out the next. This becomes especially equitable during times when households are on vacation or away from their home. They can utilize their bags at a later date, like holidays. We calculated 104 bags per year based on there being 52 weeks in a year and allowing each resident two bags per week. About The Bag We are recommending a 30 gallon bag which is a distinguishable color and displays the "The City of Fayetteville" and logo on each bag. We will specify that the bag be high quality (capable of holding 50 lbs.) and have a draw string. Please refer to Appendix E for an example of the bag . The example displays the size and thickness of the bag, not color and logo. The bags will be distributed in two rolls of 52. Accounting For All Those Bags We will distribute the waste bags once per year. We will distribute them in the same manner that we do our blue recycling bags. We will distribute the first supply of bags at the same time that we distribute the initial installment of recycling bins. This will allow for only one distribution cost for the City and one day for the resident to remember to collect their materials. We will distribute the bins and bags with solid waste crews. The solid waste crews are best to use because they know the routes and where every house is in Fayetteville. We will utilize our current billing system to account for new citizens and people that move from one location to another. The billing system retains information for at least three years. We will have the capability to look up a residents' name or an address to find out if that person has received bags within the last twelve months. If a resident moves from one address to another mid -year and calls to ask for another supply of bags, we will be able to look up their name in the computer database and find -out if they received bags during distribution. We will also be able to get a history on addresses from the computer database. This will hopefully help us account for who has and has not received bags. We will also educate our citizens that if they move from one location in the city to another, they should take their bags with them. We may also give a reimbursement to those residents that move out of our city and turn their remaining bags back into our office. 11 How Residents Get Extra Bags When a resident needs additional bags, they will have two options: Solid Waste Offices The bags will be available at the solid waste offices. We will sell the bags for $1.50 per bag in rolls of twenty. Our office hours for bag sales will be 7 00 am until 5:00 pm. The cost of the bag, $1.50, is detailed in the Revenue section of this proposal. Grocery Outlets The bags will also be available at grocery supplying outlets. In our area this will be at grocery stores and WalMart Superstores. We have only made contact with WalMart and IGA Superstore at this time. They were agreeable. The grocery outlets may, however, charge more than $1.50 per bag. They mayadd a profit margin on the bag. Because this is only a proposal, we have not started any negotiations with the outlets. If residents want to buy the bags at these outlets, they should be willing to pay for the convenience. We will, however, try to negotiate with outlets to sell the bags for $1.50 each. We will also request that the outlets supply rolls of 20 bags. What About Revenue And Costs Revenue:. We estimate that if volumetric rates are implemented, the amount of waste disposed of in the residential sector will be reduced by 10% the first year and 25% by the third year. The amount of waste generated by residents will reduce because they will be financially penalized for producing more waste. An example If a household currently generates five 30 gallon bags of waste each week and were to continue this pattern after we implement a volume based system, they would pay an extra $234 per year in waste disposal. This would amount to an extra $19.50 per month or a total monthly sanitation bill in the amount of $28 ($8.50 base fee plus $19.50)! A 10% reduction in our waste disposal costs, in the residential sector, results in a savings of approximately $36,000 per year. We estimate that 30% of the residents will buy at least one roll (20 bags) of extra bags during the first twelve months of the program. This will generate approximately $153,000 per year. This figure combined with the savings in waste disposal will generate the additional revenue needed to support a curbside bin recycling program. The per bag cost ($1.50) that we are reconunending was calculated by applying actual disposal costs that will be incurred by collecting each bag. It costs the City $1.32 to dispose of 30 gallons of waste (that is what Sunray/USA Waste will charge to dispose of that bag of waste). We then added $.07 to the figure for the actual cost of the bag. The remaining $.11 will allow for administrative costs and allowance for increases in disposal fees over time. COSTS The majority of the additional costs for implementing a volume based waste collection program will be the purchase of the waste bags. 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 We will release a bid for manufacturing the bags. We have been in contact with vendors of bags and they have given us an approximate cost of $.07 per bag. We would order 36,000 rolls with 52 bags in each roll. This would allow us to distribute to approximately 17,000 homes and maintain an inventory to distribute to people that move into our city. We will also order 3,000 rolls with 20 bags in each roll, which will be used to sell to residents. We estimate that it will cost $131,040 to distribute bags and maintain an inventory for new residents. We allocate $60,000 each year in our operational budget to be used to purchase blue recycling bags. Because we will be replacing the blue bag program, we can now allocate that funding to purchasing waste bags. The $71,040 ($131,040 - $60,000) difference will be funded through use of solid waste fund balance. What About Illegal Dumping One of the biggest concerns when implementing a volume based system is illegal dumping. Rather than purchase the additional bags, will residents illegally dump their extra waste? Some communities have faced increases in illegal dumping. We believe that our illegal dumping will not increase significantly for three different reasons: 1. Commercial dumpsters often become the target for dumping extra waste. We have ordered container locks for dumpsters in our City. We have worked several years with different companies to develop a reliable container lock system which allows our routesman to dump the container without unlocking it. We have found a system which works well with our containers. The locks are also very economical, costing approximately $35 per locking system. We plan to place a locking system on all of our newly leased containers and also sell the locks to our business community at our cost. This will include the Solid Waste Division installing the Locks for the business. Trends show that locking systems greatly reduce dumping problems. 2. By charging residents a base fee, giving them 104 waste bags and free recycling options, we believe that our residents will find it easy to make our proposed program work for their household. They will be paying for the service regardless, so they will most likely take advantage of curbside collection. 3. Data from other cities indicated that bulky items represent the majority of illegal dumping problems, not bags of trash. We will continue offering our residents collection services for bulky items (furniture, appliances, metal items, ..) for no additional charge. We will include information about this service in our education program. SUMMARY Staff has been working on building an integrated solid waste management program for the City of Fayetteville over the past four years. This has involved many changes. We have brought security to not only our waste disposal programs but also our recycling programs. We believed that we had 13 to implement a curbside recycling program and allow it to become stable before implementing volume based rates. Residents must have the option or means to reduce their household garbage before they are introduced to a volume based billing system. With the volume based program we are proposing, residents will learn to do several things to prevent using more than 104 waste bags per year: 1. Residents will take advantage of our free recycling program. We will supply information about our recycling program and how it can be used to reduce the amount of waste a household disposes of as trash. We collect a wide variety of materials in our recycling program. As a result, we will see participation in our recycling program increase It would not be unrealistic to anticipate a participation rate of 85% by 1999. We will also see an Increase in the amount of materials we collect, which makes collection and processing costs, on a per ton basis, decline. 2. People that participate in our recycling program will learn to carefully examine all items they dispose of to see if they are recyclable. We conducted an audit of households which place 4 or more trash bags and one recycling bag out each week for collection. We wondered why a household had that many bags of trash if they were recycling. We found that people still throw away a lot of items that are recyclable. One big item found was plastic containers. Residents are not examining all their plastic containers to see if they are recyclable. They were recycling soda bottles and milk jugs but they were not recycling their colored plastics. Paperboard was another item which was often missed. We found that once we removed the recyclable items from the waste bags, the household could reduce from 5 bags to 2 bags, even less in some instances. 3. People will learn to change some of their habits. They will look for items that are sold in recyclable containers. They will consider buying in bulk. This is a change that will have effects reaching much further than Fayetteville's recycling program. This is often referred to as closing the loop, when people buy with recycling in -mind and recycle the item when it is discarded. We want our educational program to not only teach diversion of materials but also reduction of materials. Therefore, we will educate on reduction. By implementing volume based rates with our new recycling system, residents will be able to see how to put it together. INCREASING RESIDENTIAL RATES The other option to raise the additional revenue required for a bin based recycling program is to 14 1 1 1 1 d1111 1 1 1 1 1 increase our residential rates. This would only be needed if the Council elects not to implement a volume based system. We estimate that rates will need to increase by $1.00 per month, to generate at least an additional $162,000 per year. Increasing rates in the residential sector by $1.00 generates an additional $204,000 in revenue each year. This revenue would allow for the additional operational costs of a curbside bin program, and it would also allow for additional funds for capital improvements to our recycling center. Rather than increasing rates to generate exactly $162,000 each year and the next year we actually need $175,000, we would propose that we increase rates by $1.00. See Appendix F for a table which shows how revenue generation is calculated. When rates were approved in 1995, the Council approved a solid waste rate study which increases rates over the next five year period, as detailed below. Residential rates are scheduled to increase as follows: 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 $8.50 $8.75 $9.00 $9.25 $9.25 f increasing rates is selected over volume based rates, staff recommends increasing rates in 1998 by $1.00 more than the scheduled increase, raising the rate to $9.75. We recommend future increases to $10.00 in 1999 and $10.25 in 2000. Increasing rates would be the easiest method to generate the needed revenue. We would still, however, have a rate system which is not equitable and does not reward residents for reducing their waste generation and disposal habits. CONCLUSION Staff recommends approval of a conversion of our existing recycling program to a curbside bin program. We have no other alternative but to change our recycling program, because of Fulton Sanitation's decision to no longer accept our recyclables in blue bags.. If you refer to Appendix G, you will find a financial comparison of a blue bag program and a curbside bin program. Both; options include processing all materials at our recycling center. Our financial analysis indicates that a curbside bin program is the most economical method to collect and process our materials. With implementation of a new recycling program, our operational costs will increase. We will be required to generate additional revenue to fund the additional costs In this proposal, we propose one of two options: 1) implementing volume based rates or 2) increasing residential rates. Staff believes that implementing volume based rates would bring equity to our solid waste collection program. Volume based rates would also encourage recycling efforts. Implementing volume based rates would be a difficult transition for our residents. It would also be more difficult to administer for the Solid Waste Division. However, staff recommends this option over increasing rates. Regardless of the option chosen, we will be required to do extensive education on both the change to a curbside bin recycling program and a new rate structure. Education will be critical to the success of our recycling program. We would like nine months for this educational period. We will also need 15 that amount of time to order equipment. Appendix H educate the public on a curbside bin system and a new Please refer to the additional appendices for additional identifies some of our planned methods to rate sttucture. information related to this proposal. 16 APPENDICES APPENDIX A COST ANALYSIS FOR A PICKING LINE APPENDIX B PICTURE OF A BIN APPENDIX B(1) PICTURE OF BLUE BAG AND BIN WITH MATERIALS APPENDIX C PICTURE OF COMPARTMENTALIZED VEHICLE APPENDIX C(1) CALCULATION OF NUMBER OF ROUTES APPENDIX D COST ANALYSIS ON A CURBSIDE BIN PROGRAM APPENDIX E EXAMPLE OF TRASH BAG APPENDIX F REVENUE GENERATION TABLE APPENDIX G COMPARISON OF BLUE BAG AND CURBSIDE BIN PROGRAM APPENDIX H EDUCATION PLAN APPENDIX I OTHER CITIES APPENDIX J EPA FACT SHEETS • Appendix A Picking Line Cost Analysis Picking Line Program Cost of Picking Line Program $719,178 Collection Cost of Picking Line Program —315,187 Processing Costs of Picking Line Program $403,991 less Potential Revenue 78,777 Total $325,214 w/o Revenue w/Revenue Collection & Processing Cost/Ton $339.61 Collection Costs/Ton $148.84 Processing Costs/Ton $190.77 $153.57 1 * Revenue projected for 2,117.65 tons that will be collected in 1997 based on previous 3 year market lows ($37.20/ton of commingled recyclables). ** See last page in this appendix for details on capital expenditures I I•. I Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Picking Line Program Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Estimated Budgeted 1997 1998 I' Program Staff _ Full -Time Equivalent Positions 16.00 16.00 • Program Expenditures Personnel Services $ 374,695 $ 376,874 .1 Materials and Supplies 77,000 77,000 Services and Charges 130,625 130,625 Maintenance 18,658 18,658 Capital 118,200 81,200 • $ 719,178 $ 684,357 1 1 I • 1 1 • 1 1 1 1 T+ 1 . I Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Picking Line Program Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Budgeted Budgeted 1997 1998 Personnel Services 5100 00 Salaries and Wages $ 261,368 $ 263,017 5103 00 Overtime 0 0 5105 00 Social Security Taxes 20,125 20,252 5107 00 Insurance - Life 1,788 1,799 5108 00 Insurance - Health 28,750 28,750 5108 01 Insurance - LTD 1,202 1,210 5108 02 Insurance - AD&D 720 720 5109 06 Retirement Savings Plan 23,523 23,672 5111 00 Worker's Compensation 37,219 37,454 Total Personnel Services 374,695 376,874 Materials and Supplies 5200 00 Office Supplies & Printing 2,000 2,000 5203 00 Cleaning Supplies .. 2,000 2,000 5217 00 Safety Equipment 200 200 5225 00 Recycling Materials 72,800 72,800 Total Materials and Supplies 77,000 77,000 Services and Charges 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equipment 4,411 4,411 5314 00 Professional Services 11,000 11,000 5316 04 Residual Disposal Cost 6,184 6,184 5331 00 Motor Pool Charges 42,634 42,634 5331 01 Replacement Charges 66.396 66,396 Total Services and Charges 130,625 130,625 Maintenance 5402 00 Radio Maintenance 250 250 5403 00 Vehicle & Machine Maint. 18,408 18,408 Total Maintenance 18,658 18,658 Total Operations Before Capital and Depreciation 600,978 603,157 Capital xxxx xx Picking Line 70,000 70,000 xxxx xx Sorting Containers 30,000 5,000 xxxx xx Roll -off Containers 18,000 6,000 5890 00 Minor Equipment 200 200 Total Capital 118,200 81,200 Total I 1. $ 719.178 $ 684.357 Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Explanation of Accounts Code Account Name. Item Description Cost — — -- — — — — — — — -- --------- 5200 00 Office Supplies/Printing Printed Recycling Handouts 2,000 2,000 5203 00 Cleaning Supplies Cleaning Supplies for MRF — — 2,000 2,000 5225 00 Recycling Supplies Recycling Bags 63,000 Baling Wire 7,200 Gaylord Boxes --_000 Storage Bunkers 2,000 72,800 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equip Uniforms 2,341 Boots (Steel -toe) 1,200 Raingear 270 Winte r wear 600 4,411 5314 00 Professional Services Educational Material 3,000 Freight for Shipping Glass 8,000 11,000 5890 00 Minor Equipment Hand Tools 250 Misc. Equipment 350 600 I . . I. I�VNGGGG�=--XNIm N V fD 9 Q U ((//�� yyyy•-(/-� yV d J fJ • 8≥ N a O C 0 0 0 D a m' ^ m i •g. 3.c o m m n; 3 m m m m m m m m 0 3 Fan 9 0 mo m� m-"� �m.a m 1 v m 3 CD m m - Il II Hi I1 N NNNm0 Nw NNG f N71zx m m m m a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m m 0 0 0 o m yryr" X3:3 a N v O m o00000000000000o m$ 0000000000000000 3�� o de dE 2e d°3e bE 2e a'a'a'�ve aae≥2 0 p�m+ ofl o00000000000000o mn I 0000000000000000 I3"X 0 tde ee a d°tee T' o 0 r — a N a a a a a i a a a N N N V V+ A N N N N N N N N m W W W �1 �� oafl0000000000000 f0 00 mi J MM N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m N m G N 0 + F • ? OJAANNN[Tpt [li (I,NNNN m O Op Op O Op op O O G O O O O O O O N m O a TOpTTo oTTTTaa ^ - o Co N {«<{<K{{{K<K<K< o — -m Z� r rrrrrrrrrrrrrrr �3�u ti 1 7 i 11 I II 1 1 1_i II I# Ii 1 1 ,I3 d g<�-mmmmmmmm000 a o O O O O O O O 0 m d S -- m m m m m m 1p O3� d y 3 d j m 0 6 -' O O Z d CD m m o — 1 mmmmmmmmmmmmmI d m m d a o O O O O O O o c0m 0 m Om m m m m a m mom mom,, 0 0 0 0 0 • -4r-1r' 2 d 2 d m n9.nm 0 G O < << < .O aoO m o o rig 3 `m mf rm� m 1°m v 9�0 3 ' C, 0 v a OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO d n Y OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 3 o aE ee oeo ee�eea e��a �>f��af O L N I + + + N J + + J + + + + + + N N d + Im _m _m N m W W W W W W W W Y A W W N A A Y N++++++!! A N N miumN��gggagaaNm H + IJP P00000000 V N • mm_m V mmmtCOfCOfCOfpcb(J11Om C Cr m J V J J J J J J!! p, m + N N m O m m m m m O m m N m m 0 m Wmmmm00000000pmm Co to m J ! ! J + J + ! ! ! ! ! l l J V O m N N m m m m m m m m m m m N N N N m m N N N N N N N N N N N O O O O N N O O O O O O O O O O O N a o YmmoVmmmmmmmmm+O N m m Oa U o o o o o o o o o o N Y N A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A O m m m m N N m m m m OIN N N m m m to !+ a N!! J J+ a J+++ N N N A m m O W i i i i i i i N J p j to CO m W m O 0 O O O fO m m N m O O V m NNNWN++++++++NlJ 4f N W m m N+ m m m m m m m m A A W 9 Z a N N W A V V m m m m m m m m m m O Co @u1 -' m m m m m m m m m m m V II m MNmPx<<C<x.I m wvso ?NTNNNNNNfl3�≥ Nj0O g a o 0 0 0 0 0 mm �o M M m m m mmmTm� oV'�pQ o• O m omm :•Z m�� z 3�3 a o P RI 3 = _ m m m m w w w o m O 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m m o ? 2 6i mm m m a m m -D m -D o 0 o m . M > > > yr,mO 2 m 2 m v O 0 .0 M. 3 O 0 « < 0 m m m m 1 0 v 0 0 C,1 0000000000000000 N n m 0000000000000000 O dE 2E deo of - --3e 2°be 2e a'eee eP de O' N m (m ! ! ! N ! J J J J ! ! ! ! ! N N W OI m N N W W W W t. W V A P O N A o O V N++a ++!!-a !! A N N W U W U m m O O O O O O O O V W W C V V W O.0 m A A A A A A A A N V V 06 m n O b O Imam � m wN _______________ . _ m T J J J! J!!! l a a a a J J! m N A A V! O O O O O O O O W U 01 'o' N I qaoqi.-.j0000O0ooau.1 N I o,w NAVoot0ot0w00UOO I N Cr p� J N W U 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 w co N m U m Cot° Wrno mtn000000000 mm C m O ! ! ! J ! J ! ! J a ! ! ! J a a = _ V f0 t0 N IJ t0 f0 (O .O (O (O t0 t0 0 !O 0 N O . 00tUl,ttl100000000000N C � + m p N O o O O O O O O N N 0 O OVi W U O O • A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A no d O N U U N N U N U U U N N U U N N !! N a J!!!! J!!! N N a A A OI J O N!! p V tO U+ U V V V V V V V V V U N Jt00eJ U(O tO fO fO tO W 10 tONoU O 0 m VN NNW N++++++++ N W W 3 A WUVN+mmmmtOUtOAA 9R In tfi UN+AV0I000UUUUUUU a COU1O1UV000)00000UUN. c m N a •OO rw O ) 1CJ L+' 8i 'fifi Ol tJVfJ -m �11OdC wmoI m n m O dB odn1 o a9& P r S S m 3 3 An D 3 O Ole n _Ouon n c� Oil7L i-I ci I I -4 W Oil I O NNg Z H p I Ngo S V P g VI It S N N S d �y y N O y� V A P O O N N O + 03 + I 1O ' -. 11 I • m m S N N S I O P A O( O N N O O I I yp N S tl� S 3 I N N S S( F O � mzI 3 l S S N N S cooll I I I 2< a c Hvm(Aaurn -� ma mmow-Jw fm -mn i �-n m 00.tnnw Ia O d fi''r O A 0zz� �% w J o d !1 5 3 m f 0 $ @3@ YiD 9 + O O J J O C m ONN+b•0 a + N N V+ WS N O m A m m V m 2 8 CD + N d m W m m O W V+ m O m O m P m m V + N SJ m Wm0O a V &00 m o O m P m V + N y m W m m m V+ m S m O m P m V b m m N L V m + NUI 0 p w J+,m0m m O Om w O m P m m V S1' _ L � m m mWmmO `< 0 W O m A W m V in O W U.1 -0O0 O m A m W V UI m W m 0 O O m mmV w P W + N O w omammv ( La o V W Om a m l( N N H O m m a V N a+ I m S+ m N m mw W N W N Y UI UI Y N W Y N Y S N U Y N S U w S N Y G2 N w a c ry __----{!� 9 O C awwaaN � — WCCa-1W m OTT11p CM SNo��.C1 mN�. N N d d A y 0 d 0 C v ((yy NApp11 {{J/�� 00 ' P3c O1A D +J 3 A (ONNco+ N J i O O OOOOO� 12 A(OcONO+ II I I ��NAWAI21 'Z I CO I COAIdI a fP (OInaw m d m I I o PN W O L A •I d O0 + + R O bN W m AtOJA O� d II C) r+. C m py� NASA d ' N fP (O I I + I _V D d _O' O��AtiA iii + + �w aNwmmi 1I I I a 001D N N Public Works Department Solid Waste Division 1 Picking Line Collection Only Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Estimated Budgeted ' 1997 1998 Program Staff Full -Time Equivalent Positions 4.80 4.80 1 Program Expenditures Personnel Services $ 133,694 $ 135,031 Materials and Supplies 65,200 65,200 Services and Charges 97,435 105,435 Maintenance 18,658 18,658 1 Capital 200 200 $ 315,187 $ 324,524 1 i 1 i 1 1 1 i 1 I I I I I I i I I Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Picking Line Collection Only Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Budgeted Budgeted 1997 1998 Personnel Services 5100 00 Salaries and Wages $ 95,269 $ 96,281 5103 00 Overtime 0 0 5105 00 Social Security Taxes 7,336 7,414 5107 00 Insurance - Life 652 659 5108 00 Insurance - Health 7,643 7,643 5108 01 Insurance - LTD 438 443 5108 02 Insurance - AD&D 216 216 5109 06 Retirement Savings Plan 8,574 8,665 5111 00 Worker's Compensation 13,566 13,710 Total Personnel Services 133,694 135,031 Materials and Supplies 5200 00 Office Supplies & Printing 2,000 2,000 5203 00 Cleaning Supplies 0 0 5217 00 Safety Equipment 200 200 5225 00 Recycling Materials 63,000 63,000 Total Materials and Supplies 65,200 65,200 Services and Charges 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equipment 4,411 4,411 5314 00 Professional Services 3,000 11,000 5316 05 Recycling Disposal Cost 0 0 5331 00 Motor Pool Charges 35,505 35,505 5331 01 Replacement Charges 54,519 54,519 Total Services and Charges 97,435 105,435 Maintenance 5402 00 Radio Maintenance 250 250 5403 00 Vehicle & Machine Maint, 18,408 18,408 Total Maintenance 18,658 18,658 Total Operations Before Capital and Depreciation 314,987 324,324 Capital xxxx xx Picking Line 0 0 xxxx xx Sorting Containers 0 0 xxxx xx Roll -off Containers 0 0 5890 00 Minor Equipment 200 200 Total Capital - 200 200 Total $ 315,187 $_324,524 I Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Explanation of Accounts Code Account Name Item Description Cost 5200 00 Office Supplies/Printing Printed Recycling Handouts 2,000 2,000 5203 00 Cleaning Supplies Cleaning Supplies for MRF 0 --------------- 0 5225 00 Recycling Supplies Recycling Bags 63,000 Baling Wire 0 Gaylord Boxes 0 Storage Bunkers 0 63,000 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equip Uniforms 2,341 Boots (Steel -toe) 1,200 Raingear 270 Winter wear 600 --------------- 4,411 5314 00 Professional Services Educational Material 3,000 Freight for Shipping Glass 0 - ^ 3,000 5890 00 Minor Equipment Hand Tools 250 Misc. Equipment 350 r 1 • ' I v�m 13 — 9T g < 3 may?32 ��v SS z d v OJ'J.Z OW a O a C N N N N A A d d d d N '22 ddd�--!eB. 5555 -1r-1r . 2d2d .o c. m r rn iT d + n I 000000 O 3�`VFv o ee e�a�ee� O in ' m + + + + 0ry my 111111111 cocoa. d p aF ' o a'DeXXX: • +++ N N N y N V V+ W W d pT i wv m7o++ - V i oa�moo R � N N N N N N J N 0 J N 0 A A N N N r 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 N A _TT � 1 y�yy�y Trn i T y .� T T T O it { N �. I Irrrrrr 3m� Ia v O a C V N V A + itO G V W CO iV 3 O � Baal • __ _—_ 3 P Q 3 ` ' U'5• 3 O m 3 m mo m'^.v ad'^ o 3 m 0 , m m ≤ dcc m�< -Ir-4r 3e 9. QFd C OIL ao .O �m.tc 0 N_ v O O ao ++++ ' J o O O o A A y p 000000 3 a'e ae a`ae ae 0 T cc 03 �VOGN+ CO 9 V T V a+++ W N.. J J V W V+N d,,+ J N Cr m N to ONiTNOO) iA N = go d J + + + + j a A (O PD N N N NN0T0O W O O N N m N C � J 0 W V o Ol O A A m O1NNNN W J D J O + A AAA + W NNNNOI V. CD N O) +++N N A Ol O V W co (.f0 +� AWO) a 3 3 W N N N W+ N W O OI N W W V - Of N N W A D7 N 0 (ON+NWW m m m Q • 000000 aF 30 Co 9, mmmNmm N U a o V V V m mwmm++ + Cr m m +NWNmm (fl (O w m O m m m C o a N N m m m O Co w O O N N m Co O A V m m aA A( w mUmUNN 111 N D 0 O + > A Y A + + m N U U U m a 7 a m 4QI V Omm j +(UmmIYIAA N �m (0 3t0aS O mNN Nf.(f.( '-'--------------------------------------------------. rAJ (AJ (Aam 3 ... O m fJ VfJ �m VEC tO0 i rr 00a d 0 -' g ' 3TSa S I ' '--------------------------------------- N p p -to O a 3 `a 1 O O flfl O ae ae o don a i 03 O A O I Z i OO1O1O A C- 2 i OO1O1O Otto d • a-. oaag IC N N—• oaac O N N O 1 1O 9 r O a a O d J• N I. to a O N N O C- 1 V N c' S N N S iV lAJ •C OO1O1O iCoO a a O O O N N O I` I I gwooi $ lI 1 I o�° $I --------------------------------------- .. . O •OO1O1O 9 • • II. ----------------------------------- N g g . I. . • m J V 0 C 0aao OOO 1 - --------------------------------------- ti ----------(/1-. ZG 90C O 3 Np Q w1u o m v bFF d¢¢ 0 0 < ? n2 r Rs MM a o o d o a00& g g d e o c m m a 0< 0 93 ++moo �S3 +4141+ 0+1 w +-• W a .--------------------------------------- . — OAS a 8 O�P1r T + NN 0 2 AAA 0�0 V Q W P + N d W O m O J G ry S rL y @ n m J 9n O O J N A _pq+�N N t0 ` C JJ a A O O W O b W J a ^ m mN N m S J d t0 ommcc-wl oCa oocn-.1 I l A Nm�0f a W 0 0 0 O 3 0a OO O J m m V OOO {W� A 01 NOA O UI p011 p+p11 O N D ----- — — — — — — — -- — -- — -- — — --- — 5� - | Ml, t ;» a 2, #» •— — -- — -- — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — {b EIE2 go( r F r w (§�} ( : /0 CD CD § § Co Cii Co Co CD m ) o Co Co k PU CD Cii Co § \| •{ ' Picking Line Program Supplement for Capital Expenditure Staff has budgeted $350,000, amortized over five years, for the purchase and installation of a picking ' line to accommodate the sorting of our recyclable stream within our recycling center. The $350,000 amount resulted from obtaining budgetary estimates from various equipment suppliers. Exact • designs have not been generated; however, the total length of the conveyor would be approximately eighty (80) feet. The sorting conveyor will be four feet wide with eight to ten sorting stations elevated approximately fifteen feet above floor level with walkways on both sides. The conveyor will house a suspended magnetic separator to remove all steel items from the conveyor and an eddy current for the removal of aluminum cans. The following is an itemization of expenditures anticipated for the purchase and installation of a picking line for our recycling center. Attached, please find a sketch of a picking line similar to what would be required for our operations Item Expenditure • Picking Line $148,000 Magnetic Separator 21,000 Eddy Current 55,000 Freight 22,000 Installation 51,000 - Pit for Feed Conveyor 20.000 Subtotal $317,000 10% Contingency 32.000 ' Total $349.000 I I I I SUPPLE.PCK c I I FS 1w yd ti Y W i Z ., 0 1 U c r_ J 1 E oil aH c s o e c ' 6 o• :J •4A 1u f: L33 b II Il an h 'a a II n a 7 6 iq3 3+s' W U f I yy F �e N£yy _____ _____ I(D a 5 £ 2 H._ 1 M1 M1 6 J O \\ 6 V i / Q LX W3 3$a b �a W W M1 Z O �Z �Wm ya pN s6$ b Cost Analysis Collection and Processing of Curbside Recyclables Existing Blue Bag Program Cost of Blue Bag Program Collection Cost of Blue Bag Program Processing Costs of Blue Bag Program less Potential Revenue Total Collection & Processing Cost/Ton Collection Costs/Ton Processing Costs/lon Curbside Bin Program Cost of Curbside Bin Program Collection Cost of Curbside Bin Program Processing Costs of Curbside Bin Program less Potential Revenue Total Collection & Processing Cost/Ton Collection Costs/Ton Processing Costs/fon Picking Line Program Cost of Picking Line Program Collection Cost of Picking Line Program Processing Costs of Picking Line Program less Potential Revenue Total Collection & Processing.Cost/Ton Collection Costs/Ton Processing Costs/Ton $350,787 314,787 " $36,000 0 w/o Reven tie $165.65 $148.65 $17.00 $512,403 ••• 361,361 '•• $36,000 $151,042 78,777 $72,265 w/o Revenue $241.97 $170.64 $71.33 $719,178 •••• 315,187 w/o Revenue $339.61 $148.84 $190.77 $403,991 78,777 ' $325,214 * Revenue projected for 2,117.65 tons that will be collected in 1997 based on previous 3 year market lows ($37.20/ton of commingled recyclables). " Gross cost of blue bag program less Processing Costs ($36,000) "' Curbside collection bins are amortized over five years ($175,000/5 years). •'•• Picking Line is amortized over five years ($350,000/5 years). Yid I • a I LI I 71 _ D o ra o n A 3 0 G O N ��"ao�o�<(Qm O- Ci D - Q Q DO �_A O Ci n 5 N T3_'o03oo.c° o C O /� B CD Q" C) 0 0 n • Z) v w O O< Q V/ V) m 0 3 c p O m (p 5 o a 3 m ^ 3 c oo a� ao O m O O m m 3 O N 0 v C/) m 2> C Z* zi® m o S a'a c ° ; o Q N G7 � + ^ m Nom Q -'-'�•0 03 Q •°a� m =c • C m c n 0o ZA •c`v3 OD ODD r �rrnnm { 00 wv a Q > O m oc Z - 3 0 N 0 _J m N S N S T C)m O c • G) U1 G - • 0 N CV SoO (] N N n 6 W O (I, N 0 n N m -o m. v N • 2° N 7 N a O N n v a° m W 0 H a m• ° 1 n 0 �. 0 N m 03 �soo �o�>> /O\ m 0 V p N y (o :< , (4 a O. A N o-,1 Appendix C(1) Required Routes for Curbside Bin Program ' Through our time -motion study in Manchester, CT, we concluded that a one-man route can average 53.3 seconds per curbside sort, including drive time, using a compartmentalized collection vehicle. • Using 53.3 seconds per curbside sort, we can calculate the required number of recycling routes needed to implement the bin based program by applying our total number of households and residential set out rate to that number. Currently, the Solid Waste Division services 16,049 homes • in our curbside recycling program. We currently have a 68% citywide participation rate. We estimate our participation rate will increase to 75% with a bin based system. Using 75% participation rate will produce a conservative number for budgetary purposes. ' The following will detail the calculations used to determine the required number of curbside recycling routes per day. ' Dividing 16,049 total homes by 4 collection days per week indicates the number of homes serviced per day. Multiplying the number of homes serviced per day by the 75% residential set out rate gives the required number of sorts per day. Each route contains 36,000 seconds per day. By dividing the seconds per day by the seconds per sort, we arrive at the number of sorts each route can perform per day. Finally, by dividing the required number of sorts per day by the number of sorts each route can perform per day, we obtain the required number of routes per day. I. 16,049 homes _ 4 collection days per week = 4,012 homes per day 4,012 homes per day x 75% set out rate = 3,009 sorts per day 10 hours x 60 minutes x 60 seconds = 36,000 seconds per route ' 36, 000 seconds per route - 53.3 seconds per sort = 6_75 average sorts per route 3,009 sorts per day _ 675 sorts per route = 4.46 routes per day As you can see, the results indicate that we will be required to maintain five recycling routes in order to implement a curbside bin collection program. This is a conservative calculation which uses a higher participation rate. Based upon 4.46 routes per day, we can add another 1,951 households ' citywide prior to needing a sixth route. In 1996, the City issued 525 residential building permits. Projecting these numbers, we would need a sixth route in the first quarter of 2002. I I A Appendix D Curbside Bin Cost Analysis Curbside Bin Program Cost of Curbside Bin Program $512,403 Collection Cost of Curbside Bin Program 361,361 Processing Costs of Curbside Bin Program $151,042 less Potential Revenue 78,777 Total $72,265 w/o Revenue w/Revenue Collection & Processing Cost/Ton $241.97 Collection Costs/Ton $170.64 Processing Costs/Ton $71.33 $34.13 Revenue projected for 2,117.65 tons that will be collected in 1997 based on previous 3 year market lows ($37.20/ton of commingled recyclables). Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Curbside Bin Program Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Budgeted Budgeted 1997 1998 Program Staff Full -Time Equivalent Positions 10.00 10.00 Program Expenditures Personnel Services $ 266,925 $ 270,589 Materials and Supplies 14,000 14,000 Services and Charges 180,761 180,761 Maintenance 15,117 15,117 Capital 35,600 . 35,600 $ 512,403 $ 516,067 c Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Curbside Bin Program Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 • Budgeted Budgeted 1997 1998 Personnel Services 5100 00 Salaries and Wages $ 188,700 $ 191,474 5103 00 Overtime 0 0 5105 00 Social Security Taxes 14,530 14,743 • 5107 00 Insurance - Life 1,291 1,310 5108 00 Insurance - Health 17,232 17,232 5108 01 Insurance - LTD 868 881 5108 02 Insurance - AD&D 450 450 5109 06 Retirement Savings Plan 16,983 17,233 5111 00 Worker's Compensation 26,871 27,266 Total Personnel Services 266,925 270,589 Materials and Supplies 5200 00 Office Supplies & Printing 2,000 2,000 5203 00 Cleaning Supplies 2,000 2,000 5217 00 Safety Equipment 200 200 5225 00 Recycling Materials 9,800 9,800 Total Materials and Supplies 14,000 14,000 Services and Charges 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equipment 3,611 3,611 5310 00 Utilities 1,000 1,000 5314 00 Professional Services 11,000 11,000 5331 00 Motor Pool Charges 65,185 65,185 5331 01 Replacement Charges 99,965 99,965 Total Services and Charges 180,761 180,761 Maintenance 5402 00 Radio Maintenance 250 250 5403 00 Vehicle & Machine Maint. 14,867 14,867 Total Maintenance 15,117 15,117 Total Operations Before Capital and Depreciation 476,803 480,467 Capital xxxx xx Curbside Collection Bins 35,000 35,000 5890 00 Minor Equipment 600 600 Total Capital 35,600 35,600 r Total $ 512,403 $ 516,067 4 11 iI I Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Code Account Name - ---------------- 5200 00 Office Supplies/Printing 5203 00 Cleaning Supplies 5225 00 Recycling Supplies 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equip 5314 00 Professional Services 5890 00 Minor Equipment Explanation of Accounts Item Description Printed Recycling Handouts Cleaning supplies for MRF Baling Wire Gaylord Boxes Storage Bunkers Uniforms Boots (Steel -toe) Raingear Winter wear Educational Material Freight for Shipping Glass Hand Tools Misc. Equipment Cost 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 7,200 600 2,000 9,800 1,841 900 270 600 3,611 3,000 8.000 11,000 250 350 600 II oZ CN } ----------- m c =0 LL LLLL LL- LL- LL LL v mLL aeaea"a';e;eaee fl q 00000000001 I I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 meeeviviemem � w5 .rrN (O NN ...3z m d'$r N N N N N N N N N N 5 C r oa II C o a3 000000meea mr bt0w Cln ONNN - rCI .- .- '- N N N - O I E2"n o 'I 0000000000 01 0000000000 j er O 0000000000lo ocoocoocco m�$I U 0 .a m E E •- m Y c W m o 6 y C, ❑ ? a o m — C b 0dmy m m m 33„A a v a E I l l o 0000 0 0 0 0 n n m m m_A m O O w J J J J y 0 o�c c o C o. E 0 and c ddmo O E 3'�93'J3 LL J C C C C C O' o V m m d O d m m m m �W WfnKKVl fn N4J S m m m m n m N N N C NNNNONQQI N r r r l7 p N 10 N m F lV lV N N M (h (7 N N N UI Anmmomrooc c rmmmmmNnoa O r r r r N N N r r - C a 40 in Co •8 N YINNNNNNNN O Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Quim II cc' In m a C 0 O O OA N N N N m m n n n o o m m m r m I I O O O o N O N N O O C? N N N N m N m m N N in SC oaoo,No,o N ' d d r r r r_.r r r r r _d C d y p y mumNNN e-. m I.(f d r _ J ml I C yy m m m W C O fl C O U 00 (?rrrnml`Qm V N LL 1 ma R C 1 41 m E N F o ^ O ___ m •• m-NNNCANrt7o E A Q Q Q N m m N m 6 mr rrNNAnAa m ANN N1lQ NmAC W m r r r r N N N 1 r � N O C TTTTees Tee a" E o 0 0 0 0 o c r r- r - r r r - o00000000c r r r. rn < a V 1 r _r_. d WWWC Y o 0 0 o o i `o aaA3DDW7 yy C C C pp�� QCCC( C< p m d O p C a 0 0 O 6 6 UT- m m< LL>> C V u C cc i W WCO CO CO CO 1orz d mm c c c c- V m e Z'v.�: S' o �' o a ca "t7 a m o oa`o o_&&c E • 5 '' , c co w 3 3 d c g' 't mal uoi mm - o�mE 2zzzQ3v s. 33„0 a �(%% m me aD� `. E I 57o'mNor -------------------- % x %-' to N wn w N b r y d O P N O NNNNCI CINNNN N 0 rbbbbb 1NbN C', C (G l'1171'f rrOhbh N NNNrrr 1.. C r a N 10 10 1!1 10 10 N N b b O P P P P P P P Q Q Q ❑ QIn I I e, O O O N N b m N b C) m n n n -- r O b m b r r r b C C C 0 0 0 0 b 0 0 0 N q N N N N b N b b N N N 50 m m m m N m N N m m N r r r r r r r r r r N. m m m r = C y y y O C) NbbNlhNM OOO tO U r r r r r r -I r r fl m W r - J r :l to C C b b b 0 0 P P m P C1 (h r r r m b r V Q P- U - r r r r r r r r r - LL Nfl li:R5Pv(: O eeeeeae egeegg 0 e"v E 0000000000 O 0000000000 0 W W r r r r r r r r r r m C U 0 O a ) 1. L w e) 2w I9-- mm I9-- J J J J J mcc 0O,000cc n m m o c c 0 0 0 0 LL J C D O C C C C LL.Wwwm WGO K) 00 0) C E N Fm N O mICCc5 r Y Y L'c NOI Z 03aJ1 m aN 0 N N YIYl c m a m d 031.. 0 0 0 0 d (9 d °ao aaaa'�Sd� �m-o �im�i�a-Ecg≥ dE zzzz¢3m M Qm tt �$ �$ �$ �$ m b b �• I ii Si iZ i r c O m .c-�iP.'��a.: ... ,1.T?.l�l�(JF• . wT ..lCq:.. 1 - - ---0000-g ---= a------------- ------ g Re Q O l • O ------------------------------- I I IE g • • C m --------------------------------------- . O S rn n Q • T N 4 CLii ' I p 1 m @ S - d = � @ s .--------g----0000----0000-- --0000—. . y I , • W a o ml $ E a"ae ae ae fl ae fl n. o oo-' -.--' pi m n. r r r r r r r r 'OOOOOO --------------------------------------- . . Y Y Y Y Y Y a o .222222 _ na_0000_ 0) CCCCCC0- Eo • o�� o T = N E E E E E E� • coo- 2EEEE� o O O O O c o r �ym umUUUU°UU ---------------------- p10 jEE z omvaavoo� o . 00000000-- .--------------------------------------- . _ . ' _ ' a N m n n n n n n EN Min n mnnng' �mm�nnnnn $' �oNmmmmmm �i E mNnrnnnn I> Z 2I- 0) mHm mmm w mud y thNnnnnnn m l•� N n n n n n n W IC a O W �WNTTOi OiO)O) Nn N.W O f'l n n N. N. A a' v {pNmmammm�A a '. q W Nnnnnn n� m W () y t n p y W M N n n n n n r N JE o a � � a W � c LL N C Ct m t 'L I' I WNnnn0)nn I� It7NAnnArN r (WNOOO)0)i Ori OniTN {")NArAnrn LL Z' 0NOioo,mo,O,N I, M N n n r n r r C O O G W W W W W W O v OC W W WV E � m m t�l t�I Cl t7 t7 t7 '_` m0eeevaeo ainrnnnnr - N m m m m m m o m •EO.C NNnnnnnn' � A U tan j eq N C, N m U, m N N N N eq N N 3In 000000 a 222222 c c c c c c c o PEEEEEE 02000000.C EE W w0000000 NaZy .N000UUUm 'KKKCKCN E Ovaaaev >z- - ----------------------------- . ~ Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Curbside Bin Collection Only Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program Staff Full -Time Equivalent Positions Program Expenditures Personnel Services Materials and Supplies Services and Charges Maintenance Capital Program 5060 Budgeted Budgeted 1997 1998 5.80 5.80 $ 155,689 $ 158,512 2,200 2,200 152,755 152,755 15,117 15,117 35,600 35,600 $ 361,361 $ 364,184 -- - - --------------------------------------- - m wvevv e� 0 9l p n O O v V V O V . y ------------`-------------------------- . tp tnlNNNNNNm m wE I ` v)mnnnnnnn . .- eroom000m E E (pMNNNNNN z y 2 8 ^' m v mrnrnrnn E NNNNNm WON C S m N WONNNNNNm m a m rN N N N N III ) 2 [ WO N m m 9 N t r! r r . V -r-OOOOOO0, m N N N N tO - N m 11 m I • r . • m W O N N N N N N I m E ice q p 6'H m .S Doc c 1 3 o o 0 hM Uu mrrrrrrr .-r-0000000 E m{nNNNNNN n N C NNNNC ONNN Wt0 C N N •r m WONNNNNNm C) 2 ILL ��- r- m W • _I-OOOOOO0, pi N N N NN m m It C mho Edo oowwwwwwO IOOwwwwwwO vU� E ,nnrnmmmmm m )O O N N N N N N nL Em �i yE E 8O3 .-n000000 •Cm )O t7NNNNNN_ Y a Y Y Y 2 2 2 2 2 0 0Ff FI-F-F t 0553'3532 $ 3 c c c c c c a E E E E E E m O Y O O O O O O L w NUUUUUUU m ` �NUUUUUU)n LEF lnrwwwwwwm '? mmUUUUUUN z vvvvvv p ---------------------------- >z Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Curbside Bin Collection Only Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060. ' Budgeted Budgeted 1997 1998 Personnel Services • 510000 Salaries and Wages $ 112,082 $ 114,219 • 5103 00 Overtime 0 0 ' 5105 00 Social Security Taxes 8,630 8,795 5107 00 Insurance - Life 767 781 5108 00 Insurance - Health 9,563 9,563 5108 01 Insurance - LTD 516 525 ' 5108 02 Insurance - AD&D 261 261 5109 06 Retirement Savings Plan 10,087 10,280 5111 00 Worker's Compensation 13,783 14,088 ' Total Personnel Services 155,689 158,512 Materials and Supplies 5200 00 Office Supplies & Printing 2,000 2,000 5203 00 Cleaning Supplies 0 0 5217 00 Safety Equipment 200 200 5225 00 Recycling Materials 0 0 Total Materials and Supplies 2,200 2,200 ' Services and Charges 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equipment 3,611 3,611 5310 00 Utilities 0 0 ' 5314 00 Professional Services 3,000 3,000 5331 00 Motor Pool Charges 58,056 58,056 5331 01 Replacement Charges 88,088 88,088 Total Services and Charges 152,755 152,755 Maintenance 5402 00 Radio Maintenance 250 250 5403 00 Vehicle & Machine Maint. 14,867 14,867 Total Maintenance 15,117 15,117 Total Operations Before Capital and Depreciation 325,761 328,584 ' Capital 5801 00 Fixed Assets 0 0 xxxx xx Curbside Collection Bins 35,000 35,000 5890 00 Minor Equipment 600 600 Total Capital. 35,600 35,600 Total $ 361,361 $ 364,184 4 I L_ I I Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Code Account Name 5200 00 Office Supplies/Printing 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equip 5314 00 Professional Services 5890 00 Minor Equipment Explanation of Accounts Item Description Printed Recycling Handouts Uniforms Boots (Steel -toe) Raingear Winter wear Educational Material Hand Tools Misc. Equipment Cost 2,000 2,000 1,841 900 270 •600 3,611 3,000 3,000 250 350 600 -S. . -------g------------------------------ -------------------------------------. E S Z-------------------------------------. xl s N -------------------------------------. E ^ 0. SN ------------------------------------- . . n< • • 8 2 a LL m I S • — • — •------------------------------- . � a d) t E• 7 O W Z max sisi�ii E 1 0000000 cm OOOOOO1n L Y Y Y Y Y Y U U 000 T ' c a rr���� c O @ �-mm�-2 ` 0 ' c a e 2 o Ep (WI E EE E E E' m S m 2 6 6 6 C m ooa EEEEEEE •Z?m 0000000 (33N 1. agI0000002 • p OpCE C U o i Z P P V V Y O ------- - -------- F I .area a`�r" 10000000 N(V NNNN $ 0000000) E N NNNN N y I r r I I. O y` 0 0 0 0 0 0 OI p N NNNN N O r r r r r r II I II rn II I N N N N N N rn p N 0000000' NP -NP -NP -N- I m IrI • 151 NNNNNN° m �ou Ir-I'INNNNNrrn r t A n n A r n n m I I I N N N N N N rn rn m r r r r a E o ¢ ICINNNNNN°' V V o L • C, I> I I � is I NNOO Noo(DO IaINNNNNN° ' I I�Irrrr NNrn c KCKKCKrn ' EonJ a'a'KK a'a'r EaO wwwwwwo N m W yU� ' mrnrnmrnmOO E rm N NNNNNtI EE 00000n E' o0) — !C m m N N N N N N r y U r r r r r r 2' O 0 -. O m P 'O�U N C �mm m N m • 3� o D0U cE 22 2 00000 22222 1 -F/ -I -1 -F - c c c c c c d EEEEE E E EE E E E O m 000000-c 0000000 UODUUUO 000000 eav vv 0 ci S mma.mmm-- F- IElnnnnnn� 2 mmmmmm �i E nnnnnn > I oI. lng nnnnn ' r nnnnnn . $' mmmmmm �i E nnnnnn 5 10)1 c y mmmmmmx IIa Annn" V St nnnnnn nnnnnn U I�. nnnnnn q I' nnnnnn QEp th C''I� nnnnnntn a a • I I` nnnnnn A n A n A A t = nnnnnn ' ( I I?Innnnnn� II m minnnNNNNN- nnn '0m K CO:KC 6'� pao o wwwwwwo m z � U ' -F--NEL'=m rrrr m Ecam nnnnnn- oSU Y Y Y Y U O U O U y, C C C C C C a m m m m q mN o m Y C CE1 L L L p E E E E E E c, ' 000000= i�min UUUUUUU a y IaE� cE KCKKU2MN aNUS >IOOOO00 cc In In 3 CI, aen _IIIen ..c N 1 I 01 II ri N 7 II 01 II t a ymm ��'�n JJJJJJJ cm Z '------- m C L LL— LL LL LL — NLL Zr "a�a• .tm e m m 100000001 10 0 00 0 0 00000001 0 a, m N N d 0 d m W Z N m N r r m —C Wo • , -- N N N , S C - II 5o1, 0 f0 0 N N f nVI N _ mr meqeqmnrr N N N o E �a 0000000 0 • 000 ddo � I I U de e�'e�'o O V O O O O O N rnm vm lon I0. m ^G U 0 dO C c C CM m y C, m - ma Co mmC o 33«� « E m m a �Ua z C GNII U m C y •'"o«(jam d a�� t m m z avEidi �d a mmnmm OD mdnOOO I W C1 C'I NyNyNN t7 >� I N-IC)NICNr0 I c, >mE .-rCNNN f7 ) C' m m N o coo I a ' 1 YI OJ OJ Yf YINN r C d d d d d N °em a C 'I�ddOOJ m tO J N C IocoIn=m NOO Iof cMNow(O w 1mNN'Co tC NNOf V1hOo Yf ' J C� I O(O tO N^ ^N I co N I INWdm1at O h C d NI p rNI�I�I�d C.wC)l7 Cd CC Cm U ao L LL m 0,5 Nm I I � LL o J ' O m E W Im V1 CJ 01 N 001-atY N,Nhl41ml:--CD W 'a a 'idRdN O0 • e�Eloo*40000 ° a m O d oO OO_ __ __ o0 . O� . m m m E a a o 0 C ;≥• ≥3333 o33'mmmm d JC J J ccc p>. U C C C c 8" fn f/1N r C0 c fl m o y Z Oat nN- o»am0 V' oa amE �mm ' mcw m• .° Nrr E=8m flmE ' -. n I�mov^in� p L' E - a Soo W a (,nmmmmlm y m m Q N N N m L MC')Nhmh O tE--t`YNNN r 38 •mQQr(nmN• o 0 h h h m N N N m m o(mm Ohm- N m r N r r r O d p n m m m m m m ,- 0 O r r Q Q Q Q Co a C 01nNNmNm N m h Q Q O m m m 0 N C CC m NO((o((ooONN (NO L m N h N N m Ol m r r r r r OI 10000-0— r Omm Nf7N(7 r r r r r h w C N J J C C hmmvfmf m hQQ hrh m Q.-hhNQQQ h r m 8 �48tlflY fi p _ r___ I a E 0000000 C, O Q O O O O N r rrrr U 0 0 p • C ' c0 m ma m cm E =C m FF ny= m0y(�pm0 OjUo pCmcymN mmo� E S2m 33N� mmm L OH mh �mQnornl p m U p W r 1 I Cost Analysis Collection and Processing of Curbside Recyclables • 'ExistingBlue Bag Program Cost of Blue Bag Program Collection Cost of Blue Bag Program ' Processing Costs of Blue Bag Program less Potential Revenue Total $350,787 314.787 ** $36,000 0 $36,000 ■ w/o Revenue w/Revenue Collection & Processing Cost/Ton $165.65 Collection Costs/Ton $148.65 Processing Costs/Ton $17.00 $17.00 Curbside Bi _ r ram • Cost of Curbside Bin Program $512,403 •** Collection Cost of Curbside Bin Program 361,361 ••• Processing Costs of Curbside Bin Program $151,042 less Potential Revenue 78,777 Total $72,265 w/o Revenue w/Revenue I Collection & Processing Cost/Ton $241.97 Collection Costs/Ton $170.64 Processing Costs/Ton $71.33 $34.13 '• Picking Line Program Cost of Picking Line Program $719,178 ** Collection Cost of Picking Line Program 315,187 Processing Costs of Picking Line Program $403,991 less Potential Revenue 78,777 * 1' Total $325,214 ' w/o Revenue w/Revenue Collection & Processing Cost/Ton $339.61 I. Collection Costs/Ton $148.84 Processing Costs/Ton $190.77 $153.57 * Revenue projected for 2,117.65 tons that will be collected in 1997 based on previous 3 year market lows ($37.20/ton of commingled recyclables). *• Gross cost of blue bag program less Processing Costs ($36,000) ••• Curbside collection bins are amortized over five years ($175,000/5 years). **** Picking Line is amortized over five years ($350,000/5 years). 1 APPENDIX F REVENUE GENERATED BY RESIDENTIAL RATES STEP 1 Revenue Generated By One Penny Increase Residential 12 Number One Dollars Customers X Months = of Bills X Cent = Generated By One Penny Increase 17,204 X 12 = 206,448 X $0.01 $ 2,064 STEP 2 Revenue Generated By 1% Increase Number of Bills From Monthly Step 1 X Bill = 206,448 X $8.50 = Annual One Dollars Revenue Percent Generated Generated X Increase = by 1% Increase $1,754,808 X 1% _ $ 17,548 STEP 3 Calculate Number of Pennies Needed to achieve 1% annual increase Dollars Generated Dollars Generated Number of Pennies by 1% Increase by 1 Penny added added to monthly from Step 2 to rates from Step 1 rate to equal 1% increase $ 17,548 $ 2,064 = 8.5 Appendix G Curbside Bin vs. Picking Line Cost Comparison Curbside Bin Program Cost of Curbside Bin Program $512,403 Collection Cost of Curbside Bin Program 361,361 Processing Costs of Curbside Bin Program less Potential Revenue Total Collection & Processing Cost/Ton Collection Costs/Ton Processing Costs/Ton Picking Line Program Cost of Picking Line Program Collection Cost of Picking Line Program Processing Costs of Picking Line Program less Potential Revenue Total I w/o Revenue $241.97 $170.64 $71.33 $719,178 315,187 $151,042 78,777 * $72,265 w/Revenue $34.13 $403,991 78,777 * $325,214 w/o Revenue wlRevenue Collection & Processing Cost/Ton $339.61 Collection Costs/Ton $148.84 Processing Costs/Ton $190.77 $153.57 * Revenue projected for 2,117.65 tons that will be collected in 1997 based on previous 3 year market lows ($37.20/ton of commingled recyclables). I 1 I I I 1 I 1 Total Costs Program Staff Full -Time Equivalent Positions Category Expenditures Personnel Services Materials and Supplies Services and Charges Maintenance Capital Category Explanation Personnel Services Detailed Cost Comparison Curbside Bin vs. Picking Line Y' Existing Blue Bag '1 $133,694 65,200 132,635 18,658 600 $350,787 Curbside Bin 10.00 $266,925 14,000 180,761 15,117 35,600 $512,403 Picking Line 16.00 $374,695 77,000 130,625 18,658 118,200 $719,178 Difference (Bin -Pick) (6.00) ($107,770) (63,000) 50,136 (3,541) (82,600) ($206,775) The picking line program contains six additional position which with salary plus benefits approximately equals the difference. Materials and Supplies $63,000 is the budgeted sum for the annual purchase of blue recycling bags. Services and Charges Motor pool and replacements charges increased $22,551 and $33,569 respectively within the bin based program. Two factors to note: compartmentalized vehicles cost less than trash trucks which provide lower monthly replacement charges and we would trade-in two trash trucks and eliminate the other 50% charge for a trash truck if we went to bin based collection. Point: we are only expanding our fleet by 3.5 vehicles at lower replacement and motor pool charges. Maintenance Capital Within the bin based program, total miles and fuel consumption reduced significantly without daily travel to Fulton. The difference between the cost of the picking line and the purchase of recycling bins both amortized over five years. CATAGORY.WK4 Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Commingled Blue Bag Program Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program Staff Full -Time Equivalent Positions Program 5060 Estimated Budgeted 1997 1998 4.80 4.80 Program Expenditures Personnel Services $ 133,694 $ 135,031 Materials and Supplies 65,200 65,200 Services and Charges 132,635 135,635 Maintenance 18,658 18,658 Capital 600 600 $ 350,787 $ 355,124 I Public Works Department Solid Waste Division Commingled Blue Bag Program I I I I Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Personnel Services 5100 00 Salaries and Wages 5103 00 Overtime 5105 00 Social Security Taxes 5107 00 Insurance - Life 5108 00 Insurance - Health 5108 01 Insurance - LTD 5108 02 Insurance - AD&D 510906 Retirement Savings Plan 5111 00 Worker's Compensation Total Personnel Services Materials and Supplies 5200 00 Office Supplies & Printing 5217 00 Safety Equipment 5225 00 Recycling Materials Total Materials and Supplies Services and Charges 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equipment 5314 00 Professional Services 5316 05 Recycling Disposal Cost ' 5331 00 Motor Pool Charges 5331 01 Replacement Charges Total Services and Charges ' Maintenance 5402 00 Radio Maintenance 5403 00 Vehicle & Machine Maint. Total Maintenance I Total Operations Before Capital and Depreciation ' Capital 5890 00 Minor Equipment Total Capital ' Total I I I.] I Program 5060. Budgeted Budgeted 1997 1998 _ 95,269 0 7,336 652 7,643 438 216 8,574 13,566 133,694 2,000 200 63,000 65,200 3,611 3,000 36,000 35,505 54,519 132,635 96,281 0 7,414 659 7,643 443 216 8,665 13,710 135,031 2,000 200 63,000 65,200 3,611 3,000 39,000 35,505 54,519 135,635 250 250 18,408 18,408 18,658 18,658 350,187 354,524 600 600 600 600 $ 350,787 $ 355124 Fund 5500 - Solid Waste Program 5060 Explanation of Accounts ' Code Account Name Item Description Cost --------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- --------- ----------- 5200 00 Office Supplies/Printing Printed Recycling Handouts 2,000 ' -- 2,000 5225 00 Recycling Supplies Recycling Bags — 63,000 63,000 ---------------- ' 5302 00 Uniforms & Personal Equip Uniforms 1,841 Boots (Steel -toe) 900 ' e 270 Winte r wear 600 • 3,611 5314 00 Professional Services Educational Material 3,000 ' - -- 3.000 5316 05 Recycling Disposal Cost Processing of Recycables 36,000 5890 00 Minor Equipment Hand Tools 250 Misc. Equipment 350 - -----600 1 1 1 1 1 •- mx O mo at U U, ti o, m �'E� i c4 JJJJJ_! oZ v Co r»r>r > am C - �LL II I o 0 O L mt- LL 0 d 10000001 004000 y wsl L C C m N N N N N N o° u3 F- 2• 00ofl0I --aoncpi =° riri-=nrui N N N N CI I �$m aaoo04 n O U o a m O O 0 0 0 oe0000 W ( I U 0 � N a0 y 33v2dC ° 0 c992.Q 0 0 G a m maoCccc m m m m m m LL amNNm m m �y OEOC � c y m m a E m m g poi a. E O I- 1 O n N m mmin Ino m yI NmQmNN CO m m N m m m N ..fNNN m o3 cO-nO,- Q N IOmNO, h 0 m O m m Q N O N N m a ImwIOIOmm CD rrtfl Q Q Q C N a C mm In In lnm m QQOmmN U e -'C , J N C NNOOSCo NNTTN `C L:::V mf O OOO INNr N 0, J 7 'r CD a Ui r N NNNe ^ Q,N m • N LL 0 t- IONmmN O) mom N m CO m N N N Q Q N N Z' OlmNmmm N m m e O a flfl de oe E OOOOOO �m QOOOO N- O1 m ` era U o O= J H J f g c.2992 w0 C C C C CKmNmm N N 10 N EE 0 O _ � m Z r N m o »(7a cm d A d N m ' W �r* N.NSi ---------'------ INNNNNOI y m m d r N N td (")MNrmCI E 7 N N N 3ci C rrNrNw) w m m o r m d C., --- C w a 0 m ' m m m N NN m o l r r d d d d N ' • NNNCcOONm t? m o d d O m m r dQ mm mwNNOOC., N ' I = U A N N " 1 m m m o mm m o 1 -'3 m m r r r m yy ' 'Cta U r r nWN d O N r O LL w 01 Ito 0 N i m O • C iNNNmt')r rr m0 V Ym] N 0 0 N m m N m w w C''' m W 1 . N .------. 2 000000 E aw ddoomo ' r r m A r r etc. ' Z E E ≥ o' o' o • 33v2mw c c Q o 0 0 6 6 m m m w w w w w w K K N N m N ' w Am E m ci z m o m 2 w C amO 08 a w C N m 3• 1°SaE • !S'onN!. -- - - -------------------------------------- -- - 88 --------------------------------------- II--- ------------------------------------------. g 'a, E o I ------------------------------------------ . . . . _—y—y--------------------------------------- . . oo O C I L 0) C p 8 p p V C O n m rr = p 8 QN pN V Q n v I 11� • . LfluO y w -. m . - ' ountno 8-ppyy-------------------------------------- BVV_ T r r : S • p p V V r r U. u E aeaeaen OFF 8888 a L L O0 - a2 QN o IC n — ItE atfl co m • 0 .5 ❑am ' u 3 E — �{ 9_ E L c E a'ii 0! >z' ttrc ClC'4 a t L L a000 y y y U f 2i nnmm N m m N N V O C -- - - ------------------------------------------ - 01 �c.1e0.n m 0€' ' m N (In II F N E m O m 0 E NN- mSmN fl E • Cl'- Z C,, O O m N N yd N w I n mE m O m N . 5 -------------------------------------- .. n m m o m g m umItt a N I-NmO C., mOmN (tj T - n � 1 m 00 C) 0100%t T( N a N d ----------------------- O 0000N 00.a N r F N O OO 0 m C, O O N uJ C II{ C'.- I €5 w----------------------------------- aoro Eo E o - 0--- c v N N S yV� C m E C m e' m coon ----- E I I I Cost Analysis Collection and Processing of Curbside Recyclables ' EtiLingEi a Program Cost of Blue Bag Program Collection Cost of Blue Bag Program ' Processing Costs of Blue Bag Program less Potential Revenue Total Collection & Processing Cost/Ton Collection Costs/Ton Processing Costs/Ton $350,787 314,787 ** w/o Revenue $165.65 $148.65 $17.00 $36,000 0 $36,000 w/Revenue $17.00 Curbside Bin Program Cost of Curbside Bin Program $512,403 *** Collection Cost of Curbside Bin Program 361,361 **+ Processing Costs of Curbside Bin Program $151,042 less Potential Revenue 78,777 Total $72,265 ' Collection & Processing Cost/Ton Collection Costs/Ton Processing Costs/Ton '• Picking Line Program Cost of Picking Line Program Collection Cost of Picking Line Program Processing Costs of Picking Line Program less Potential Revenue Total I I Collection & Processing Cost/Ton Collection Costs/Ton Processing Costs/Ton w/o Revenue wlRevenue $241.97 $170.64 $71.33 $34.13 $719,178 **** 315,187 $403,991 78,777 * w/o Revenue $339.61 $148.84 $190.77 $325,214 w/Revenue $153.57 * Revenue projected for 2,117.65 tons that will be collected in 1997 based on previous 3 year market lows ($37.20/ton of commingled recyclables). ** Gross cost of blue bag program less Processing Costs ($36,000) +++ Curbside collection bins are amortized over five years ($175,00015 years). **** Picking Line is amortized over five years ($350,000/5 years). I I I APPENDIX H EDUCATION PLAN Video: We will be producing a video which details how residents can participate in our • recycling program. The video give details about the program and visually demonstrate how the • program will work in a household. We will produce the video using our Cable Access Department. We produced the same type of video for our current program, which proved to be very educational. Public Announcements: We will work with our Cable Access Department to produce public announcements about our new programs. Education Clips: We will work with our Cable Access Department to produce short, informative educational clips which explain our programs. Brochure: We will design and print a brochure which explains our new program. The brochure will be similar to our current brochure. I have attached a copy of our current brochure. Newsletter: We will mail newsletters to our residents periodically. Similar to the one that we mail once per year. We will mail the newsletters more often during the first two years of the new program. I have attached a copy of our last newsletter. Newspaper: We will be doing advertisement in our local newspapers. Radio: We will be advertising on local radio stations. Civic Groups: We will visit civic groups and present our new program. Water Bill Inserts: We will place inserts in water bills to announce our changes and new programs. We will also place educational material in the water bills. I S f1 APPENDIXI OTHER CITIES ' South Kingstown, Rhode Island Eureka Springs, Arkansas Vancouver, Washington Newton County, Arkansas Poquoson, Virginia Rogers, Arkansas Mount Vernon. Iowa Alachua County, Florida Dover, New Hampshire Athens - Clark County, Georgia Gainesville, Florida Coweta County, Georgia Falmouth, Maine Douglasville, Georgia Fort Collins, Colorado Wilmington, North Carolina Downers Grove, Illinois Glendale, California • Grand Rapids. Michigan Hoffman Estates, Illinois Lansing, Michigan • Pasadena, California San Jose, California Santa Monica, California Woodstock, Illinois I. Fremont, California Oakland, California San Francisco, California ' Colorado Springs, Colorado Plantation, Florida St Paul, Minnesota ' Portland, Oregon Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania Spokane, Washington Tacoma, Washington Austin, Texas Deluth, Georgia Jackson, Georgia Marietta, Georgia Oconee County, Georgia Thomasville, Georgia Tiff County, Georgia Tifton, Georgia West Point, Georgia Aberdeen, Maryland I. Buncombe County, North Carolina New Bern, North Carolina Craven County, North Carolina ' Chester County, South Carolina Poquoson, Virginia Berryville, Arkansas I I 1 1 I I I I The success of both the volume -based disposal system and the enhanced cycling facility has exceeded all pre -operational expectations. Tc1 .$)I.73)4))1 EPA530-F-97.007e PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES South Kingstown, Rhode Island 30,000 With pay-asyou-throw, the average family Suburban of four has reduced its solid waste stream Drop-off, Tags to one tagged bag of waste and one bag August 1994 of recyclables per week. Getting Started: Why Pay -As -You -Throw? Solid waste for South Kingstown and its regional partner Narragansett is processed at the town's Rose Hill Regional Transfer Station (RHRTS). Given the community's oceanfront shoreline, the approximate year- round population of 22,000 residents swells to an estimated 30,000 persons in the sum- mer months. Residents of both communities can dispose of solid waste by either con- tracting with a private refuse hauler or by directly accessing the transfer station. After facility operations began at RHRTS in 1983, the disposal cost to "direct access" resi- dential users continued to escalate. This increase $n disposal costs was due in part to increasing tipping fees, higher processing costs, and abuse of a flat -rate annual vehicle pass program, which provided unlimited disposal with little or no incentive to recycle materials. Because of these concerns, South Kingstown and Narragansett initiated a volume -based tag solid waste disposal system and a voluntary source reduction recycling program for RHRTS residential users. How Does It Work? Under the tag solid waste disposal system, each residential user directly accessing,the transfer station is required to purchase refuse tags ($10.00 for10 tags) for solid waste disposal. Residential RHRTS customers place a tag on each garbage bag Town o£ South Singstownt Rhode Islane P.O. Box 31 Wate11e1E, ft 07280-0031 July 18,1998 TOWN OF SOUTH KINGSTON PAY-AS-YOU-TY.ROV! TESTIM011tRt (a5-pound/33-gallon limit) prior to dispos- al. Refuse tags were chosen in lieu of bags to provide residents free choice with regard to the size and type of refuse bag they were accustomed to using. Some residents continue to use trash cans for refuse disposal. The RI-IRTS operates as a solid waste enterprise fund, and operational costs are covered by the cost of the refuse tags. Utilization of the recycling center by residential RHRTS users continues to remain a voluntary decision. Residents who maximize their recycling efforts can minimize tag purchases and reduce their overall solid waste disposal costs. RHRTS residential users with wasteful disposal habits who choose not to recycle must consequently purchase additional tags. Complementary Programs Residential users can dispose of bulky waste and yard waste at a rate of 5 cents and 3.5 cents per pound, respectively. Residents may also elect to purchase yard waste bags at a cost of 75 cents each (which includes the disposal fee) for dis- posal of grass clippings and leaves. In addition, the town constructed new recycling disposal facilities for direct access residential users that became operational on August 1, 1994. The enhanced recycling center accepts a wide variety of materials that can be recycled by residents at no cost. includ- ing aluminum, steel, plastic, newspaper, glass, and many others. Yard waste. uncontaminated wood demolition, and ferrous and nonferrous scrap metals are. also recycled, but are assessed a tip fee due to associated processing costs. Success: Saving Money and Reducing Waste The success of both the volume -based disposal system and enhanced recycling facility has exceeded all pre -operational expectations. The capture ratio of recy- clables from direct access residential users has consistently reached approxi- mately 40 percent, with levels as high as 51 percent (not including bulky or recyclable yard waste). Recycling cap- ture ratios approach 60 percent if yard waste and bulky recycled waste esti- mates are included, Under the PAYT program, RHRTS resi- dential users discharged approximately 2,175 tons during fiscal year 1994-95, as compared with 7,608 tons in fiscal year 1991-92 under the former vehicle sticker program. The average family of four has reduced its solid waste stream to one tagged bag and one bag of recyclables per week. This equates to a total yearly refuse disposal cost of $52 per year, which is a $40 savings from the previous years average cost of $92. Elderly and single residents have reported a reduc- tion in solid waste disposal to as low as one refuse bag every two weeks, for a total yearly refuse disposal cost of $26. South Kingstowns success story was compiled by Ton R. Schock, Utilities Director, (401) 789-9331. i .1 •I ,! I 'I I 1 I 1, LI I !, I El • Two years into our program, residents had significantly increased their recycling and many had also quested services that could help them reduce waste even more! EPA530-F-97-007f PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES ancouver, Washington 69,000 An.: excellent public information and Urban education program is imperative. Cans January 1990 Getting Started: Why Pay -As -You -Throw? The city of Vancouver is located in Clark County, the southernmost county in the state of Washington, along the north shore of the Columbia River. Garbage collection service in the city is mandatory and has been a contracted service since 1937. In 1939, the state of Washington passed the Waste Not Washington Act, which required cities and counties to implement programs aimed at reaching a statewide goal of 50 percent waste reduction and recycling by 1995. In an effort to reduce our reliance on landfill dis- posal and to meet local and statewide goals, the city adopted the philosophy. "The more you use, the more you pay." How Does It Work? basic service and a corresponding decrease in customers choosing the two -can service. In 1992, the city implemented a weekly mini - can option. and within five months nearly 500 residents had switched to the mini -can. By the end of the following year, this number had doubled and the city was receiving num- merous customer requests for more service choices. Three new residential garbage service level options were implemented: every - other -week 32 -gallon can, every -other -week mini -can, and monthly 32 -gallon can service. These options are increasingly being utilized as customers learn how waste reduction and avid recycling can help them reduce their monthly garbage output and bill. Linear rates were introduced in 1990 when the city coup- Cl y E F.- cil approved a rate y A N increase that made } y y 0 4 the second can rate N E 84 percent greater than the first can. is After 15 months, our data showed a 13 per- 1 cent increase in the .KPAPeY- number of customers��, choosing the one -can `Mbewoo * 0'k c�a d*lops Y 3.: ,[ollow`nKsti�s ue voeKo"'R Conoq',sfitr Complementary Programs In 1992, in cooperation with Clark County the city implemented a curb- side recycling program. The program is mandatory for single-family households, and all households are billed $3.10 per month for weekly recycling as part of their garbage service. A similar program is also available to all multifamily_ com- plexes within the city limits. The city's contracted hauler also offers a voluntary yard debris collection pro- gram. For a monthly fee ($5.55), cus- tomers can set out up to 96 gallons of material. Since the program is voluntary, it does not conflict with citizens who choose to compost their organic wastes at home or self -haul to local compost- ing facilities. Meeting the Challenges: for Other Communities Vancouver has encountered a variety of challenges throughout the past several years, and we hope that otherjurisdic- tions may benefit from our experiences. A significant concern has been whether we are receiving accurate and up-to- date data from our garbage and recy- cling program service providers. It is important to select providers who have excellent computer tracking and report- ing systems and adequate staffing in place to accomplish these needs. All solid waste programs require the con- tractor to provide monthly reports that enable the city to track the program's activities and monitor progress. An excellent public information and education program is imperative. Although our experiences with new program campaigns have been very positive, it has been a challenge to ensure that all citizens are informed about new and existing programs and the different service levels available to them. Our ongoing challenge has been finding sufficient time and resources to dedicate to frequent, targeted public relations campaigns. When the city first attempted to imple- ment our once -a -month collection option, it was not approved. The city council, along with the local health dis- trict had concerns about its potential negative impact on health and safety. Monthly service was eventually approved due to the pressure from recently annexed citizens, namely avid recyclers and senior citizens who were used to handling recycling and garbage on their own. The variety of service options, although positive from a waste reduction and customer standpoint increases the instability of the revenue stream for the service providers and makes enforcement of mandatory col- lection more difficult. Program Success We have found volume -based linear rates to be an effective tool for encour- aging residents and businesses to exam- ine their disposal habits, to recycle more, and to decrease their garbage service levels. The city exceeded its 50 percent recycling goal by the end of 1995. Based on available data sources, it was determined that 51 percent of the city's wastes were recycled and 49 per- cent were disposed of in the landfill that year. While some residents are motivat- ed by environmental stewardship, others are encouraged to change habits based on their pocketbooks. Although volume - based linear rates pose challenges, we believe that they are the driving force behind our success in meeting our waste reduction and recycling goals. Vancouver's success story was compiled by Andrea Friedrichsen and Tamera I Kites, Solid Waste Program Manager, (360) 6%-6186. 1. I ' Two years after the program started, a city councilman who had voted against the new program came up to me in a local store with a ''smile on his face and simply said 'You know, you were ight.' Then I knew ', the program was agreed -upon goal. really working. After discussing all I EPAS30-F-97-007a PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES Poquoson Virginia 11,500 Wit hr pay -as -you -throw, we've had the Suburban largest amount of recyclables collected Bags in our nine -community regional July 1992 recycling program for four years. Getting Started: Why Pay -As -You -Throw? In the fall of 1991, we decided to shut down a very successful drop-off recycling center and join a regional curbside program the next spring. Our main reason for going with the curbside program was that we knew we could get better citizen participation and further increase recycling. Because of the success of the drop-off program, we were asked by the city council to review the city trash program and develop a plan to improve it. Our group was made up of about a dozen interested citizens, two city employees, and two city councilmen. One of the first things we did etas to develop the following mission statement: "To review every aspect of waste management in Poquoson to maximize REDUCTION, REUSE, and RECYCLING, and to recommend ways to accomplish this with the minimum cost _,__.�' to the taxpayer.' This statement was read at the "" G'PfiQR�1 ae� m. wr M.r�w� mE p�{weeP the `M o: Sla r .hiy�l'W�.:... ll"o, Zt,e [.:n7 °f Pa?� It t»'hmm?t � c tl+e G1xhi ,� L.'Y ti th21 e'r, +F. srd `x�e oCaFF +anT •:ra�. start of every meeting to make sure we stayed focused on our types of different programs, we decided to focus on a fairly new system that was volume - based and where people paid for the amount of trash they discarded, rather than a flat -fee system. Bringing the Opposition on Board We called and talked to people involved with these different programs and found out what problems and successes they were having. We eventually ended up with two three-inch binders full of information. After many meetings arid sometimes heated discussions, we were ready to submit our basic recommendations to the city council and the public. At the public hearing, seven people talked against the. • _-.Y.i1YI. plan, and the city council seemed split on the issue. The word "change" is usually not well accepted in Poquoson. We invited the seven speakers against our plan to join our committee and work with us to develop a final recom- mendation. In the end, the six that joined us supported the final plan. Bags, Tags, or Cans? Another big question was: Do we use bags, stickers, or containers? Our research showed that stickers are being counterfeited in one city and that there is no effective way to control bag size. Containers required a large, upfront capital cost, and we wanted to develop a program that required no additional cost to the city. Furthermore, we are a very windy city —and typically after a trash pickup empty traTh cans roll all over the neighborhoods! Since all of our trash was being sent to a waste -to - energy (WTE) plant and not a landfill, plastic bags were not a negative as far as disposal was concerned. We decid- ed to use plastic bags. .How Best To Distribute the, Bags? Although many cities sell their bags from city office locations, this puts a big bur- den on city personnel and can be incon- venient for citizens. We talked with all our grocery, drug. and convenience stores and set up a program in which they would sell the bags and turn over all the proceeds to the city after they were sold. In other words, they would make no profit on selling the bags, but also would have no investment in them. It was pointed out to them that this would be a community service. Spreading the Word The next step was informing the public of the new program, how it would work, and when it would start. We pre- pared news releases for our local papers, wrote articles for the city newsletter, and made a videotape -of the program using local talent that was then shown on the city public access channel. We also trained speakers about the subject and made them available to any groups that were interested. "We're number one every time" We are part of a regional recycling pro- gram with nine other cities and counties. Because of the way our trash program encourages recycling, our city has had the largest amount of recyclables collect- ed per house, per month for the entire four years we have been in the program. We're not number one most of the time, we're number one every time. •1 I U 1 1 I I. I I. Poquoson's success story was compiled by Bob Keriinger, Recycling Committee Chair, (804) 868-3779. 1 I I. "We have not only /reduced the amount of trash sent to the landfill, but also generated an normous amount of civic pride in our efforts to do -omething positive for our community environment." Rick Elliot, Mayor EPAS30-F-97-007g PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES Mount Vernon, Iowa 3,700 Paying for -one's waste has brought home to Suburban each of us a growing awareness of the full Tags lifecycle costs of "throwing it out." July 1991 Getting Started: Why Pay -As -You -Throw? Mount Vernon is a small, attractive college community in eastern Iowa, home to profes- sional commuters as well as college staff. The city's income level ranks above average for the state. In July 1991, thp. city began to charge directly for the collection of residen- tial trash, bulky items, grass clippings, and garden waste. At the same time, bins were distributed to begin curbside collection of materials for recycling. We expected these two steps to work together. Charging for each container of trash provided the finan- cial incentive to move material from trash containers into recycling bins —the city would ttlen contract to collect this recycling material free of direct charge. How Does It Work? The city's pay -as -you -throw system works quite simply Households purchase $1.75 tags at city hall or one of several . crry OF MOUNT VERr ON, IO«A stores. Asa public Rkf P1l1oMMaya service, stores sell the tags with no markup. CoUU- MldisitR seimv-C. The price for collet- Djene Hoffmann Fr.nk "u lcba McOi5 tion is one tag for wa.aeaeo ASM S..enax _ µcone Vernon ice codl OOll�cenb m Iowl��"'u Iu popo0ulouo®camia� o[ 1'1 [euarol eom.'m , must be no more than each container, which tome S .emu w„�acl.eecmmav SM�r��rne. 30 gallons or 40 uedleln July 9i. lux ry u oehn ten untie, roe:tn vlk tiT t- " r Imte. irA Cu Al Jte ,an , .':.. .,�.. b..wa P,11>Ci pp - .._-C....✓etchfC pounds, and multiple tags for bulky items. Homeowners also receive a $7 solid waste bill monthly. The city discounts the monthly fee for households defined as love income under the school lunch program. While the revenue from tag sales roughly cov- ers the cost of trash collection and landfill fees, the monthly billing finances the "free of charge" collection of recycling material, leaves, and brush. Residents say tags are a fair way to pay for trash disposal, and the combination of tags and monthly fees provides a steady rev- enue to the city. Why Tags? The city council appointed the Reduction and Recycling Committee to develop a solid waste program. We spent over a year researching the experiences of other communities and consulting experts, and eventually recommended tags for waste collection to accompany curbside recycling. Tags cost little to print1 permit residences to continue using their con- tainers within the volume and weight limits, adhere securely at all tempera- tures, are convenient for participating merchants to handle, and can easily be removed when the trash is collected. Stealing of tags has not been a problem in this residential community. Success: Increased Waste Reduction and Recycling Pay -as -you -throw played a major role in motivating waste reduction and nearly doubling recyling. The city estimates that the trash the typical resident sent to the landfill decreased by nearly 40 percent. from 45 pounds per week in 1990 to 27 pounds in 1995. In addition, requiring a tag for each container of grass clippings and garden waste has nearly eliminated the collection of these materials. The total reduction of residential trash and all yard waste per household exceeds the goal of 50 percent waste reduction the state leg- islature has established for the year 2000. Dumping, subject to a $1000 fine in Mount Vernon, has not been a problem. Altogether, by recycling and reducing trash, and by leaving grass cuttings on the lawn or composting it, the average household saved $47 last year in fewer tags purchased, a total saving of some $46,000 for our 980 households. At 9 pounds per household per week. Mount Vernon leads all 17 cities in Linn County in recycling. In addition to putting more into recy- cling bins, residents of Mount Vernon have reduced waste in various ways: 1) recycling appliances; 2) recycling materi- als the city does not accept at drop-off facilities in Cedar Rapids and places of employment that recycle these items; 3) backyard composting of organic wastes; 4) purchase of reuseable rather than dis- posable materials: and 5) more yard sales, Much of this additional recycling and reduction is doubtless motivated by the tags that residents must purchase to send trash to the landfill. We believe that such incentives would also work with less expensive drop-off recycling programs in other cities. As Mount Vernon's mayor, Rick Elliot, says:"Our program has been very suc- cessful due to the initial involvement of a large number of citizens, continued expansion of recycling opportunities, community education and ownership of the program, and a very civic -minded, cooperative recycling and refuse vendor. This program works and it works well." How Mount Vernon's Program Could Be Even Better The major challenge inherent in any reduction and recycling program is informing the public. The city needs to do better at keeping households cur- rent on changes in the recycling pro- gram. One successful example is an information packet prepared by the Recycling and Reduction Committee that explained to households how, with reasonably frequent mowing, grass cut- tings left to decompose produce a healthier lawn. Informing households about alternative ways to deal with wastes goes hand in hand with pay -as - you -throw to maximize the effective- ness of the financial and environmental incentives. I. U I 1 I_] Mount Vernon's success story was compiled by Don Cell, Chair of the Reduction and Recycling Committee. For more information on Mount Vernon's pay -as -you -throw program, call Bluestern Solid Waste Agency at (319) 398-1278. ' I I! We argued that the 'costs for producing wastes should be borne by the user and the costs of recycling, because of Iits social and environmental benefits, should be borne by the city. EPAS30-F-97-007b PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES Dover New.Hampshi re 26,000 Pay -as -you -throw has proven to be Rural a very effective means of managing Bag and Tag Dover's solid waste. October 1991 Getting Started: Why Pay -As -You -Throw? The City of Dover is a community of approximately 26,000 people on New Hampshire's seacoast. Our municipal landfill was closed in 1979, and at that time the city entered into a relationship vyith a private hauler for collection and disposal at a pri- vately owned and operated landfill. The city collected approximately 24,000 tons of trash each year, of which approximately 11.000 tons were residential refuse. Before 1989. Dover had no recycling pro- gram. Any and all trash residents wished to discard was left at the curb, and 35'2 truck routes were needed to collect the refuse daily. The cost of refuse collection and disposal was escalating rapidly. Responding to citizen pressure, the. Dover city council created an ad back to the council 4 months later with 10 recommendations. The committee urged the immediate estab- lishment of a drop off recycling center designed to collect a wide range of materials. The recycling center opened in May 1990. It quickly became very popular and a source of civic pride. The recycling center was run initially as an all -volunteer effort. After a few months, the city hired a solid waste coordinator, who began working in conjunction with the'ad hoc committee and several city councilors to urge the establishment of curbside recycling Fax 10. hoc committee on recycling in `APE •- the fall of 1989.uwaa The committee, chaired by Gary (Jt {{�Z of�IIk�t' Ce, Gilmore, city cT5 coun- cilor, consisted of aw i[emtnbire s OIL%ffi Tegpr�Rr'm eight interested res- Ctty otDa�er, �. idents and a council tioWe l: Gari' .Li' u�,kr r•'nn<� representative. The committee reported and the bag and tag program, which was then unknown in northern New England. Overcoming Public Dissent The three public meetings we held were filled with heated vocal dissent. However; we soon convinced the public to accept these programs with a couple of basic premises. The first premise was that recyclable materials are a commod- ity, and anything that is disposed of in the landfill is waste. We argued that the costs for producing wastes should be borne by the user and that the costs of recycling, because of its social and envi- ronmental benefits, should be borne by the city. In September 1991. the city began curb- side collection of recyclables, and a month later the bag and tag program was implemented. In conjunction with the establishment of these programs, the city council created a Citizen's Solid Waste Advisory Committee responsible for overseeing these programs. Since the program was initiated we have had annual public meetings and have raised the price once. We have noLhad any significant public dissent at any meetings since the program's incep- tion. Overall, the program has been well received by the community and has proven to be a very effective means of managing Dover's solid waste. How Does It Work? The city no longer provides for the col- lection and disposal of private dump- sters. Commercial generators pay the fees associated with the collection and disposal. For the residents, payment of the collection and •disposal of wastes is accomplished through the purchase of bags and/or adhesive tags. A special revenue fund was established to pay for the collection, disposal, and administrative costs associated with our residential solid waste. The fees generat- ed by the sale of the bags and tags go into this fund as revenue. The goal is to maintain a neutral fund balance that can sustain the program, but not to build a large balance. 1 I I 1 I I Success: Saving Money and ' Reducing Waste As mentioned earlier. Dover used to produce approximately 71,000 tons per year of residential solid waste. Last year, we produced approximately 3,900 tons. In 1990 our budget for solid waste was approximately $1.2 million. Next year's budget (including trash and recycling) is approximately $878.000. Our current recycling rate is well over 50 percent for our residential waste stream — despite it being strictly voluntary. I I I I1 I Dover's success story was compiled by Gary Gilmore, City Councilor, and Carl Quiram, P.E., Environmental Projects Manager, (603) 743-6094. ' I I I Gainesville's move to pay -as -you -throw did more than ' reduce waste and increase recycling -it ' created a more uitable system for 1 residents. EPA530-F-97-007c PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES Gainesville, riorida 96,000 The results of the first year of our Suburban program were amazing. After Cart -based Cans implementing pay -as -you -throw we October 1994 watched our recycling rates soar! Why Pay -As -You -Throw? How Does It Work? Before variable -rate pricing, the cost to indi- viduals for service was hidden. Residential users did not have an apparent reason to limit their disposal habits. Now, Gainesville's variable -rate pricing generates a visible monthly charge that has resulted in a sub- stantial reduction in both solid waste and the costs associated with its disposal. MY 1a. 10% ham t. caveny,ry . MC EPA US �A x 401 n Sa,a 5^wmrt.talSofia WsucDiv. Wa"Semz DC 2040 In July 1994, the city of Gainesville entered into a contract with Waste Management of Central Florida, Inc.., for the collection of residential solid waste and commingled recyclables and into another contract with Boone Waste Industries, Inc., for the collec- tion of yard trash for recycling. The new contract for solid waste service included a variable rate for residential collections: Devl,n. mi a oo4JeSQ7umrfeeummmim�, ,;m wave Ifaq ,n.resm,y m"a nlloddt r ki u ""'bll°'yt°m'pt ,�7mWe mien' a�Raa s. wfa..nennke lsluQy IJc'�4,W! YWk ., DW Sauu U.W, he AW d xise ee epeib tdk,,,. e, m ttW a cwwio . The ter the nubfnr vamlme p� �"t Wii1m4 W a bt en''t1 ' 1arfla,eD them,,. yr�bhe tloce l9Af, the � 1, .usa, Vim, �aot Nit ah n,'°�'�°" 9 tSdcrds diekael Rsvb6* tba '=Iwtwm loft 9�e ¢ TLL rua st Aawv ' buQlc LrdSOLed m` �w-niz oat bie,ky, b7bis c8?RA diepg47 baleoticn hat rtww'& a ffijoamt"�tek 1Qjrgalu. C... �tM r residents pay $13.50, $15.96, or $19.75 per month according to whether they place 35, 64, or 96 gallons of solid waste at the curb for collectioh. Recycling service is unlimited. While residents have had curbside collection of recyclables since 1989. the imple- mentation of this program added brown paper bags, corrugated card- board, and phone books to the list of items recycled. Planning Ahead Planning ahead was critical to the suc- cess of Gainesville's program. It was cru- cial for us to order our carts and public outreach publications far in advance of program implementation. Success: Saving Money and Reducing Waste The results of the first year of our pro- gram were amazing. The amount of solid waste collected decreased 18 percent, and the recyclables recovered increased 25 percent! The total dispos- al tonnage decreased from 22,120 to 18,116. This resulted in a savings of $186,200 to the residential sector, or $7.95 per home. Gainesville's move to a cart -based. vari- able -rate residential collection system did more than just increase the rate of recovery and minimize disposal needs. The distribution of system costs is more equitable. Residents make the choice of service delivery based on individual waste -generation habits. This reduces the level of subsidy that unlimited, flat - rate collection systems encounter. I ., I I ,I I I I I I I 1 I I Gainesville's success story was compiled by Gina Hawkins, Recycling Coordinator, (352) 334-5040, 1 I The success and cceptance of pay- s -you -throw in our community has been remarkable. Our recycling rate immediately jumped by more ithan 50 percent and trash disposal volumes decreased by about 35 percent. EPA530-F-97-007h PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES Falmouth,- Maine 8,500 --By recycling and reducing waste, Suburban citizens not only save money, but also Bags reduce costs for our community, September 1992 Getting Started: Why Pay -As -You -Throw? In 1991, the Town Council directed the Falmouth Recycling Committee to explore options available for solid waste collection. After reviewing several systems. including traditional municipal collection, franchise contractor, and volume -based systems. the committee developed a report recommend- ing a modified pay -per -bag system. In this sys- tem, the collection cost is paid through the tax system and the disposal cost is reflected in the cost of the special bag used in the town. The benefits of this system include a fair allocation of disposal and collection costs, tax-deductible collection cost components, lower collection costs than a traditional non - fee system, incentives for recycling and waste reduction, a favorable cash flow structure (bag revenues are received before disposal expense is incurred), and elimination of trash "mixing" by unscrupulous haulers. A unani- mous vote of the council in the spring of 1992 directed the town to implement the program in September 1992. How Does It Work? The town buys about 175,000 large bags (33 - gallon) and 75.000 small bags (20 -gallon) each year. About a dozen local stores', including Shaw's Supermarkets. retail the bags. Bags cost the town 12 and 9 cents respectively and the store is allowed a 4*' rrt (Douln of 3fgilnuutll. mulne xrt .. Jofe JIt Mo ii, �tehd 0410! 'In t1. his:! m'1 �Iarari i.+af} r�1•!E!! . ydrrlr Cr TAUx Vra, KLMM - rr,A•s+td pil0oaax tCtvacleor $199 matt aa.U,CS>rr 4o "%%X"a L33Ctar CITY Cr 70"Lslr� <Lia camnitte9 In 19)1 the 7o.' ns oVal dble t d the id %;*$thd rocl hf is to explore of=lane an•eilahte to soZ-aditlttal otIec lDal coittee revirdir.7 eeverat syttI=C.C1Udin4 t. the CacoL LCC a modified 1+ Y-Por-Led ''/stem tiro. Lra.•tel'.iso eoatractor aid v1�-•e beset al'st a -s ten and fl' develahed a report tecoxris paid h the tax 1 .,here the col_K:[on Cost is pald thrat9 t. • ?%11 cent -• rof le:Cad in the cost oL the sfecla• bos '"� int:ib.m.. TRe D.'°Lica cf this aYstae. Ltticda: 1 di sy.:c e" A!R C,.:e: t+oa <VSt-- 2 -cent per bag markup. The retail prices of the bags are 91 and 64 cents, respec- tively. In addition, a 91 -cent sticker is available for bulky items under 35 pounds, and a $4.80 tag is used for large items such as mattresses and sofas. Stores are invoiced for the bags at the time of delivery and have 30 days to pay. This system works well for the citi- zens, because they buy bags and simply use them the way they had before this program was implemented. By recycling and reducing waste, citizens not only save money, but also reduce costs for our community. The burden on the town is minimal because its only responsibilities are bag delivery, billing, and recordkeeping. Also, cash flow is positive for the town because the bags are paid for before use. There is no concern with unpaid and uncollectible charges that can occur with post -use billing. Success: Saving Money and Reducing Waste The success and acceptance of the program in the community has been remarkable. Our recycling rate (always among the highest in the region) immediately jumped by more than 50 percent, and trash disposal volumes decreased by about 35 percent. Combined, these two statistics resulted in_ a jump of our recycling rates from 12 percent before the program to 21 per- cent currently. The average rate for local towns is 7 percent. These statistics have meant a great deal to the economics of our waste pro- gram: The bid price for collection the first year was $116,000, compared to a bid of $146,000 for a traditional collec- tion contract. Our current contract is for $125,500 despite over 10 percent growth in the community. At $55 per Falmouth's success story was compiled by Tony Hayes, (207) 781-3919. ' ton, a reduction of 900 tons of waste disposal per year meant a savings of about $50,000. The current $98 per ton tip fee calculates to $88,000 per year savings. In addition, during the old franchise system, residents paid the col- lection cost directly to the hauler, Now residents pay for collection through their taxes, bringing the community over $30,000 per year. I Tips for Other Communities 1 Some towns have bought large quanti- ties of bags and have 'been dissatisfied with size or quality. It may be prudent to buy a smaller quantity to start with so that changes can be made if desired. When you "force" citizens to buy your bag, it has to be of acceptable quality. Educate prior to implementation! The town conducted a citizen survey, devel- oped a brochure, published a newslet- ter, and passed out two free bags to each household prior to implementing the program. We also conducted a logo contest in the schools that generated a great deal of interest and media atten- tion. The local Lions Club donated money for the prizes. Contact other communities and learn! During our review, we read many arti- cles published about other towns' pro grams. This is useful, but following up with phone calls can be even more helpful. We got copies of several towns' brochures that alerted us to some details that otherwise may have been overlooked. Involve the collection team! The con- tractor or municipal crew can help or hurt the program, so they need to be on board. We developed a small tag for collection workers to leave at the curb if there was a reason to not pick up trash (i.e., not in proper bag or too heavy). I I I I I I I 1 1 U IPay -as -you -throw Ihas helped us to reach our recycling goals —a real challenge, since there are six private trash haulers that )rk in Fort Collins. I EPA530-F-97-0071 PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES Fort Collinst`Colorado 100,000 Start planning for implementation at least Urban six months in advance. This means both Varies working with your private haulers and January 1996 educating the public. Getting Started: Why Pay -As -You -Throw? Fort Collins is located on the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains in Colorado. Last year its population passed the 100.000 mark, but the community still takes pride in a small- town self-image, and residegts are deter- mined to manage growth well. The natural environment is highly valued, and solid waste reduction is a strong environmental program in Fort Collins. The city conducted outreach and sponsored a recycling drop-off site for nearly 10 years, but without a municipal trash collection ser- vice, increased participation depended on haulers' efforts. A 1991 ordinance required haulers to provide curbside recycling, but because they included this service as an addi- tional cost, most customers were unwilling to pay for the service. Construction of a county recycling center in 1992 also had little effect on residents' recycling levels. �uuJ b" �ptiis The city council adopted goals in 1994 to reduce the total waste stream by 20 percent by the year 2000. despite the city's growth, and to reduce landfilled waste by 20 percent. A specific target was set for increasing par- ticipation in curbside recycling by 80 to 90 percent. Reaching these goals has been challenging, because six private trash haulers work in Fort Collins, ranging from corporate players like BFI and Waste Management to locally run family operations that have been in business for 40 years. Disappointed in a slow rate of progress for recycling, the city council adopted two ordi- nances in May 1995 that apply to single-family and duplex residences. The first ordinance called for haulers to "bundle" costs for recy- cling and provide curbside recycling to cus- tomers upon request at no extra charge. It became effective in October 1995. The sec- ond ordinance called for volume -based rates to be charged for solid waste starting in January 1996. al t°" least Coton: Fort Co YaY�You'rbvOwwtesR�worldnY�� .0 n�0{5'1 and �q�IbcFi°&rya ,t"t CI" A+Cfl._. %tan „u¢c 1 .._ a Lessons Learned Start planning for implementation of the rate structure change at least six months in advance. We didn't start working with the haulers until September to implement the system in January. Then, after meeting together several times, the city agreed to.- amend the ordinance to respond to haulers' concerns about charging strictly by volume, but this process was time- consuming and difficult. Make sure to publicize the changes to remind the public and their elected offi- cials about what will occur in the next 2 to 3 months. Use news articles, adver- tisements, and haulers' billings. Don't underestimate the difficulty peo- ple will have understanding how new trash collection rates work, and plan for the extra work it creates for staff. Be prepared for it to take 3, 6. or even 9 months for people to realize that they can save money by generating less trash with a PAYT system. Expect private trash haulers to take the opportunity to increase collection rates at the same time the volume -based rates take effect The public assumed tha hike in collection rates was a result of the ordinance. Haulers helped spread the misunderstanding —it deflected criti- cism from them! Make sure the transition between billing systems is smooth. Because we had some program overlap, both our haulers and the city staff got a new round of calls from angry, confused people who had received two different bills. However, the city has been adamant about reimbursing customers for cans/bags of trash that they didn't I generate —the most important feature of the system to reward people with cost savings. Success: Increased Recycling I Participation As of July 1996, recycling has increased to 79 percent participation in single- family and duplex households, up from 53.5 percent the previous year. With only 6 monthsworth of data to analyze trends, it is hard to specify what is hap- pening with solid waste reduction goals, but we have clearly found a way to accomplish our goal for 80 to 90 per- cent participation in curbside recycling. Now that the residents of Fort Collins are so much more conscious of reducing their waste stream, they have demanded opportunities to recycle new materials, including cardboard, office paper, and compostable items. The bundling ordinance and PAYT system have significantly increased households' recycling efforts, so the experience, although sometimes difficult was certainly worthwhile. Now that we're 6 months into the new system, the city council is already looking ahead to the feasibility of districting Fort Collins into trash collection zones! We know that Fort Collins is not com- pletely out of:the woods yet. We are anticipating, for instance, that this fall's leaf -raking and bagging will add to peoples' trash bills —and that they are going to demand that the city do something about it. Still, we feel confi- dent that Fort Collins made the right choice by adopting the pay -as -you - throw ordinance. Li 'I I I Li I I I Fort Collins's success story was compiled by Susie Gordon, Environmental Planner, (970) 221-E265. , I 1 DOWNERS GROVE, ILLINOIS ' DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: I I I I Population: Population: Population Density (individuals per square mile): Number of Households: Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: Earned Bachelor's Degree: Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African -American: Asian: Hispanic: Native American: Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: Median Household Income: Median Housing Value: Brief Description: ,+ Downers Grove, Illinois - I Village of Downers Grove 47,883 3,521 17,660 90.30 33.50 1.69 4.12 2.38 0.09 $20,891 $48,266 $143,900 Downers Grove is located in Dupage County in the southwest suburbs of Chicago. Spiegel, Inc., Service MASTER Industries, Magnetrol International, and Swift-Eckrich maintain their corporate headquarters in Downers Grove. Pepperidge Farm and Arrow Gear operate manufacturing facilities in the area. The Park District manages over 500 acres of park land operated by the Park District in the municipality. t All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census , except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: G.P.O . Demographics I Downers Grove, Illinois -1 �. WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection In response to increases in waste generation and speculation concerning the impending closure of local landfills, Downers Grove decided to adopt a unit pricing program to decrease the amount of waste landfilled. The municipality requires households to place refuse stickers on bags left out for collection. Stickers may be purchased at local grocery stores, hardware stores, through the hauler, or at the Village Hall. Residents pay $1.50 per sticker. Households must attach a sticker to each standard, 30 -gallon waste bag set out for collection. Only single family dwellings participate in the program. The municipality awards hauler contracts through a bidding process. Downers Grove presently contracts with Browning -Ferris Industries (BFI). The city considers fluctuations in sticker sales, the costs of waste collection, and the costs of the curbside recycling program in formulating the unit price. Households may also purchase or lease 60- and 90 - gallon toters. Monthly flat fees apply to households who use toters. Large household items, such as appliances and furniture, require one refuse sticker. A household may only dispose one large household item per weekly pick-up. The household must notify the hauler in advance regarding appliances collection. BFI will arrange to recycle appliances. Automotive parts and construction waste require a refuse sticker for every part or for every bundle of construction material. Households may also arrange for special pick-ups of large quantities of waste from the hauler at a cost of $7.50 per cubic yard of material. New residents may also arrange for a one-time collection of corrugated cardboard boxes used during a move. I 11 I In Unit Pricing Program Adopted: 1990 Container Type: sticker Collection Frequency: weekly ' Households Served: 13,300 Fee Structure: Year Fee 1990 $1.25 1991 $1.55 1992 $1.60 1993 $1.50 1994 $1.50 I [_I ,IVaste Management System , ;; Downers Grove, Illinois -3 Fee Structure: Downers Grove 2.00 1.50 m c 1.00 —Bag F<t 0.50 0.00 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Year Disposal Downers Grove disposes of its waste at Mallard Lake and Green Valley landfills. The tipping fees at the two landfills amount to $9.70 per cubic yard (about $32 per ton). These landfills opened in 1974 and will close in 1998, leaving Downers Grove with limited possibilities for waste disposal. In 1994, Browning -Ferris Industries hauled the waste for single-family homes in Downers Grove. The average haul distance for refuse is approximately 20 miles. Landfill: Mallard Lake Landfill, Green Valley Landfill, pre-RCRA Tipping Fee: $32 per ton Hauler Type: •• private Waste Management System Downers Grove, Illinois - 4 Recycling Curbside recycling is included in the unit price for waste collection and therefore does not require a sticker. BFI collects recyclables weekly on the same day as refuse collection. Each single-family household receives an 18 -gallon recycling bin free of charge, and may purchase tipto two more bins at $4.25 each. For $6.50, a household may purchase a recycling bin with wheels and a pull cord. The bins are considered property of the Village, and residents must replace lost, stolen or damaged bins. Residents must simply place recyclables commingled in their bins for collection. If a household generates recyclables in excess of their bin capacity, they may place additional recyclables in paper or plastic grocery bags. BFI sells its processed recyclables to various vendors in the region. The Chicago area markets for recyclable materials are strong. Curbside Program Adopted Collection Frequency: Hauler Type: Recycled Materials: Recycling Destination: Drop-off Centers: M 1991, . weekly private glass (brown, clear, green) plastic (coded 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) metal cans (aluminum, steel, tin) aluminum foil newspaper mixed paper polystyrene foam products private processing facility yes Waste Management System I Downers Grove, Illinois -S S ' Yard Waste Collection BFI collects yard waste on the same day as refuse if residents attach the appropriate sticker. Yard waste ' stickers cost $1.50 and may be purchased at the same places as the refuse stickers. Despite the fact that they cost the same amount, yard waste and refuse stickers are notiinterchangeable. Residents may attach yard waste stickers to any 33 -gallon container (biodegradable paper bag or can) that weighs less than 60 pounds when full or to a bundle of yard waste weighing less than 60 pounds. The hauler collects yard waste between April I and December 15 with two "no -charge" pickup days for Christmas tree collection after the holidays. The village pays $9.00 per cubic yard (about $27 per ton) to the compost facility which accepts its yard ' wastes. The average haul distance for yard waste is approximately 8 miles. While the city encourages backyard composting in its educational materials, residents may only compost certain organic wastes. City ordinance prohibits the composting of kitchen wastes and pet waste for fly, roach, and rodent control. ' Households with large quantities of yard waste should schedule a special pick-up through the hauler. Downers Grove residents may pick up wood chips free of charge at the Village's transfer station. The village and the county provide information on backyard composting. Curbside Collection Program Adopted: 1991 ' Container: sticker Fee: $1.50 per sticker Collection Frequency: weekly Yard Waste Destination: private compost facility Backyard Program: information only .. I I I {Paste Management System I Downers Grove, Illinois -6 , Education I Prior to the implementation of the unit pricing program, the municipality advertised in the local newspaper and mailed information to residents describing the program. The Recycling Coordinator visits community meetings to keep citizens updated, as well as to educate new residents about the program. DuPage County publishes a recycling newsletter, the Recycling Yellow Pages, twice a year. This newsletter describes various • waste diversion and source reduction options for households, as well as tips for better household waste management. Administration and Enforcement From 1991 to the present, Downers Grove budget for the waste management program runs about $80,000 per year. The first year of the program cost the village approximately $100,000 because of education efforts such as a mailing of information and local newspaper advertisements. The remainder of the budget covers the Recycling Coordinator's salary, one-half of a secretary's salary, and replacement of recycling bins. The private hauler, BFI manages the collection and disposal of the waste stream and the distribution of refuse and yard waste stickers. BFI does not collect any bags of refuse or yard waste without the appropriate sticker. Further, BFI does not collect any refuse and yard waste commingled bags: The hauler does not collect yard waste or refuse bags weighing in excess of 60 pounds. Further, BFI does not collect earth, rocks, concrete, construction debris, car parts and hazardous wastes except through a special pick up. The hauler does not collect contaminated recyclables as well. If the hauler does not collect refuse, yard waste or recyclables on the specified collection day, the hauler leaves a notice indicating the rationale for not collecting the waste. The Village established a minimum fine of $100 for stealing recyclables, theft of stickers, and theft of recycling bins. The police department and the village and county health departments all respond to complaints involving illegal dumping. The first offense carries a fine of $75 and the second offense carries a fine of $200. Waste Management System I ' OUTCOMES Waste Stream (tons) Fiscal Year 1991 1992 ' 1993 I I. Downers Grove, Illinois - 7 Waste Landfilled Waste Recycled Yard Waste Collected Total 10,400.3 4,147.2 1,864.0 16,411.5 10,051.2 4,725.5 1,871.0 16,647.7 7,930.9 5,940.6 1,986.3 15,857.8 20000 15000 10000 F- 5000 0 1991 Waste Stream: Downers Grove 1992 1993 Year 9 Yard Waste Collected B Waste Recycled ■ Waste Landfilled Undesirable Diversion While not significant, dumpingtin commercial dumpsters does exist. The Downers Grove Police Department reported 105 illegal dumping and littering violations between May 1990 and May 1991. The number of violations fell to 23 for the period between May 1993 and May 1994. Since the surrounding municipalities and villages employ unit pricing programs, Downers Grove residents probably do not carry their waste to friends and relatives outside of the village for disposal. I. Outcomes Downers Grove, Illinois -8 Total Waste Generated 0 Since 1991, Downers Grove has generated less landfilled waste while increasing the amount of recyclables and yard waste collected. While landfilled waste dropped more than 23% between 1991 and 1993, recycling and yard waste jumped 43% and 6%, respectively. The totalionnage of waste generated over this period decreased, indicating that Downers Grove residents actively. source reduce or participate in undesirable diversion activities. The undesirable diversion evidence supports the assessment that the unit pricing program in Downers Grove encourages source reduction. Outcomes Glendale, California -! I. GLENDALE, CALIFORNIA DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: City of Glendale Population: Population: 177,671 Population Density (individuals per square mile) 5,806 Number of Households: 68,604 ' Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: 77.20 Earned Bachelor's Degree: 28.60 Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African -American: 1.31 Asian: 14.33 '• Hispanic: 21.24 Native American: 0.35 Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: $17,966 Median Household Income: $34,372 Median Housing Value: 1 $341,700 Brief Description: The City of Glendale lays approximately eight miles northeast of Los Angeles in the foothills of the Verdugo Mountains. Predominantly a residential community, Glendale covers 30.6 square miles. Most residents of Glendale commute to either Los Angeles or to manufacturing facilities in the San Fernando Valley. The city does provide for some light manufacturing industries. ' All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census , except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: GP.O . Demographics Glendale, California -2 WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection The city collects refuse from all single family residences. The -city contracts service for multi -family residential, commercial and industrial customers to licensed private haulers. Between 1990 and 1992, Glendale implemented an automated collection system and variable rate pricing for its residents. Single family residences may subscribe to either one 65 -gallon cart or one 100 -gallon cart. Households may request additional carts, but must pay a one-time, non-refundable fee of $66 and applicable monthly collection fees. Glendale offers Christmas tree collection through its yard waste collection program in January. Residents may rent one to three cubic yard bins for special collection of bulk waste. The city also provides residents with collection of white goods for a minimum fee of $25. Unit Pricing Program Adopted: 1992 Container Type: cart Collection Frequency: weekly Households Served: 32,251 Fee Structure: Cart Volume Fee (per month) 65 -gallon container $6.45 100 -gallon container $10.10 Waste Management System Glendale, California -3 Fee Structure: Glendale 12.00 10.00 8.00 0 6.00 Monthly Fee a 4.00 2.00 0.00 65 l00 Gallons Disposa Glendale disposes of its solid waste at the Scholl Canyon Landfill located in the southeastern section of the city. The City of Glendale and Los Angeles County jointly own the facility, and the Sanitation Districts of Los Angeles County jointly operate it. Prior to 1987, the landfill permitted unlimited access to cities in the area to dispose of their garbage there. In 1987, citing its desire to prolong the service life of Scholl Canyon Landfill, Glendale restricted access to six cities: Glendale, La Canada Flintridge, Pasadena, San Marino, Sierra Madre and South Pasadena. Landfill: Scholl Canyon Landfill, pre-RCRA Tipping Fee: $21.35 per ton Hauler Type: public {Paste Management System Glendale, Catifornia -4 Recycling Glendale began operating a voluntary curbside collection program for recyclables in December of 1988. The program originally served 27,000 single-family households and 8,200 duplex/fourplex units. In 1990, the city phased in multi -family unit curbside collection, adding 35,000 residential units to the program. While Glendale owns the collection vehicles, the city contracts out. laborers from the private sector. Residents must separate their recyclables by placing glass in a green bucket, metals in a white bucket and all paper -based recyclables in a paper bag or bound by twine. Households may pick up recycling buckets free of charge from the Glendale Recycling Center. The regional markets for recyclable materials are strong. Curbside Program Adopted: Collection Frequency: Hauler Type: Recycled Materials: Recycling Destination: Drop-off Centers: 1988 bi-weekly public glass (brown, clear, green) plastics (coded 1, 2) metal cans (aluminum, tin) newspaper telephone books mixed paper cardboard public processing facility yes Waste Management System i._. Glendale, California - S Yard Waste Collection Glendale collects yard waste trimmings on a weekly basis on the same day as refuse collection. The yard trimmings are shredded and used as cover material and mulch at the landfill. An educational brochure encourages residents to separate yard waste from regular waste. Households must place their yard waste in old refuse containers or they must bundle the trimmings and place the yard waste on the curb. Glendale provides a limited number of free compost bins to residents who attend a composting workshop. In addition, on Saturdays, the city offers free brush and tree limb chipping and shredding for residents. 1 Curbside Collection Program Adopted: 1992 Container: can or bundle Fee: none Collection Frequency: weekly Yard Waste Destination: public processing facility Backyard Program: yes 1 S i • Waste Management System • I Glendale, California -6 1 Education Glendale spends approximately $200,000 per year to educate its citizens about solid waste management. At the Educational Resource Lab of the Glendale Recycling Center, individuals can access information and attend workshops on waste management and recycling. Glendale offers workshops to individuals interested in using a backyard composting bin. The city also provides brochures on grasscycling and xeriscaping. Administration and Enforcement Glendale bills households for waste collection bi-monthly through the city utility bill. This utility bill includes the households' water, electricity and solid waste bills. By consolidating the city billing system, Glendale more efficiently serves its residents. The city provides a customer service office to respond to residents' complaints, questions, and requests for information. Waste collectors refuse to accept waste carts with waste stacked on top of the cart lids. They collect carts with ajar lids so long as the automated collection system does not spill trash when depositing the waste into the truck. Glendale often collects contaminated recyclables. The city would rather address the contamination at the processing facility than to leave behind a bin full of recyclables. It is illegal for any unauthorized individual to collect recyclables from curb set -outs. City collectors leave behind contaminated yard waste. If the collectors leave behind waste or yard waste, they place a non -collection notice indicating the violation on the cart, can or bundle. Glendale rarely assesses fines for littering and illegal dumping. Instead, the city attempts to make the responsible party dispose of the waste properly. . 11 I 1 1J 11 1J Waste Management System 1 1 Glendale, California - 7 OUTCOMES Waste Stream (tons) Fiscal Year* Waste Landfilled Waste Recycled_. Yard Waste Collected Total 1990 54,190 2,970 0 57,160 1992 34,834 4,824 14,634 54,292 1993 36,360 5,221 14,914 56,495 1994 36,801 4,742 13,695 55,238 * Glendale could not provide data for 1991. Waste Stream: Glendale 60,000 50,000 40,000 ..F 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 1990 1992 1993 1994 Year ■Yard Waste Collected ■Waste Recycled ■Waste Landfilled Undesirable Diversion City officials do not consider undesirable diversion behavior a serious problem. Residents do not burn waste, and dumping of waste at commercial dumpsters is rare. Glendale does report that dumping of bulky waste, such as old furniture and broken appliances, does occur. In 1994, Glendale reported that city employees collected 134.5 tons of dumped waste, litter and bulky waste. Outcomes Glendale, California - 8 Total Waste Generated The annual amount of total waste generated (landfilled waste, recycling, and yard waste) by Glendale has not changed significantly over the past five years. Since 1990, residents have paid $10.10 per month for a 100 - gallon cart, which is equivalent to Glendale's flat -fee rate prior to the implementation of the unit -pricing program. The low unit prices do not convey the necessary economic incentives to households to source reduce. However, the provision of recycling and yard waste collection have allowed for residents to divert some waste. . M1 Outcomes Grand Rapids, Michigan - I GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: Population: Population: Population Density (individuals per square mile) Number of Households: Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: Earned Bachelor's Degree: Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African -American: Asian: Hispanic: Native American: Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: Median Household Income: Median Housing Value: City of Grand Rapids 189,126 4,317 69,452 76.45 20.85 18.58 1.04 4.47 0.79 $12,070 $26,809 $57,600 Brief Description: Grand Rapids is the seat of Kent County and is located on the Grand River 25 miles east of Lake Michigan in the southwestern part of the lower peninsula. The city produces furniture, automobile parts, seating for religious and educational institutions and wallboard. In addition, gypsum mining is a significant component of Grand Rapids' economy. The city is also a wholesale distribution center for much of Michigan's agricultural production. t All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census ,except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: G.P.O . Demographics I Grand Rapids, Michigan -2 WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection The city of Grand Rapids adopted its fee-per-bag/tag pricing system in 1972. The price of the city bags/tags started off very low, and remained low throughout most of the 1980's. In the late 1980's, in response to increases in the costs of waste collection and disposal, the city began to increase the price steadily up to its present rate of $0.85 per bag/tag. Grand Rapids operates an open garbage collection system. Residents may select their collection service from among the city government and 23 licensed private hauling firms. The city serves approximately two-thirds of all single-family dwellings. The city does not offer collection service to the 11,000 households in multi -unit complexes. The city offers three options to its residential waste customers. Residents may purchase special 30 -gallon city bags at fire stations, the City Treasurer's office, supermarkets, and convenience stores. A package of ten costs $8.50. Residents may also purchase $0.85 city refuse tags at the same locations and attach these tags to regular 30 -gallon garbage bags, a 30 -gallon cardboard box or bundled waste not exceeding 30 pounds. In addition, residents may purchase 30 -gallon refuse containers from the city for $10 and $44.20 annual refuse license sticker for the container (which equates to $0.85 per week). The city collects bulk items, such as bundled branches and boards, tires, small appliances, furniture 2nd Christmas trees, provided that residents attach the $0.85 city refuse tags. The city only collects major appliances, such as refrigerators, stoves, dishwashers, washer/dryers, and water heaters, if residents attach a $10 appliance sticker to each item. Unit Pricing Program Adopted: Container Type: Collection Frequency: Households Served: 1972 bag weekly 40,000 Fee Structure: Dates Fee (city bag/tag) 7/86-6/87 $0.35/$0.25 7/89-6/90 $0.45/$0.35 1/93-6/94 $0.85/$0.75 8/94-1/95 $0.85/$0.85 Waste Management System I I I I I I I I Li I Li I I 1..00 0.80 0.60 a 0.40 0.20 0.00 Jul -86 Jul -89 Jan -93 Aug -94 Date Fee Structure: Grand Rapids Grand Rapids, Michigan - 3 Bag Fee — _ — Tag Fee Disposal The city sends all of the garbage it collects to the Kent County Mass Bum Incinerator, a waste -to -energy facility. The county owns and operates the incinerator. Incinerator: Kent County Mass Bum Incinerator, post-RCRA Tipping Fee: $59.51 per ton Hauler Type: public Waste Management System I Grand Rapids, Michigan - 4 I Recycling Kent County operated a number of recycling drop-off centers within Grand Rapids for many years. Curbside recycling is now available to any city resident upon request. The city provides an 18 -gallon bin to all participating residents. Residents place newspapers, magazines and catalogs as well as household batteries in a separate paper bag. Recycling collection occurs on the same day as refuse collection. The city contracts with Waste Management of Michigan to collect and process recyclables, and to bill participating households every four months. According to company officials, the revenue it collects from residents, the city, and the sale of recyclables just covers the operating expenses of the collection program. The city currently subsidizes part of the monthly recycling charge, but that subsidy will be phased out by fiscal year 1998. In fiscal year 1995, households pay $1.75 per month for recycling service, and the city pays $1.63 per month for each household receiving recycling service. Waste Management processes the recyclables it collects at its own facility on the southern edge of the city, and sells the material to regional buyers. The regional markets are, for the most part, stable, and prices are good. They sell almost all of their material within a 500 -mile radius of Grand Rapids. Curbside Program Adopted: Collection Frequency: Hauler Type: Recycled Materials: Recycling Destination: Drop-off Centers: 1994 weekly private glass (brown, clear, green) plastic (coded 1, 2) metal cans (aluminum, steel, tin) newspaper magazines catalogs household batteries private processing facility yes I I L I II I I I I I I C C Waste Management System I C I I I .1 I I • Grand Rapids, Michigan - 5 Yard Waste Collection In March of 1995, Grand Rapids began a curbside yard waste collection program through a contract with Waste Management. Residents may place leaves, grass clippings, brush, small twigs and garden plants in clear city yard waste bags. They may also bundle together larger branches and brush and mark them with a city yard waste tag. Bags cost $7.50 for a package of ten, and tags are $0.75 each. Both are available at city fire stations, the Treasurer's office, supermarkets, and convenience stores. Yard waste collection occurs on the same day as refuse and recycling pick-up. Waste Management delivers the yard waste it collects to a facility owned by Compost Soil Technology, an independent firm. This facility charges a tipping fee of $2 per cubic yard, or approximately $6 per ton. The city does not sponsor a backyard composting program. Curbside Collection Program Adopted: 1995 Container: bag Fee: $0.75 per bag Collection Frequency: weekly Yard Waste Destination: private composting facility Backyard Program: no - it Waste Management System I Grand Rapids, Michigan - 6 Education Grand Rapids only engages in significant citizen education efforts when it implements a change in the city's waste collection service, such as the start of curbside recycling or yard waste collection. Before each of these programs, the city sent mass mailings to every resident explaining the system and encouraging them to participate. The city also ran television, radio, and newspaper public service announcements. Grand Rapids' regular educational expenses, however, are minimal. The city provides informational brochures available upon request. Administration and Enforcement 1! The Grand Rapids City Manager, who reports to the Mayor and the City Commission, oversees the seven city offices, of which Public Works is one. Public Works contains six departments and maintains responsibility for snow removal, city water, street maintenance, sanitation, traffic safety, the city motor pool and refuse collection. The administrative staff of Public Works employs about a dozen individuals. Since the city uses refuse bags and tags, it does not need a billing department. The Purchasing Office, which is in another service area, handles the purchase and distribution of the bags and tags to retail outlets. The city only collects garbage in a city refuse bag or can, or marked with a city refuse tag. City refuse bags and cans, or tagged refuse containers, may not exceed 30 pounds or the city does not collect them. Collection personnel are lenient on the weight limits, but if the receptacle is clearly over 30 pounds, they leave it behind. Residents must tag bulky items or attach a city appliance sticker. Solid waste personnel sort recyclables at the curb and leave behind any contaminants. Yard waste bags and bundled brush may not exceed 30 pounds. Clear bags enable drivers to visually inspect for contaminants. Contaminated yard waste bags are left behind. Officials tag any receptacles in violation of the above restrictions with a city refuse violation. The violation I indicates the exact nature of the offense and instructs the resident to correct the problem within seven days. The city distributed more than 4,100 of these notices annually in 1993 and 1994. According to city officials, residents properly dispose of most tagged waste within seven days. If the resident does not take care of the tagged refuse by the following collection day, the city removes the refuse and bills the property owner for the cost of removal. The bill amounts to $40 for administrative costs, and $20 for collection and disposal, plus $10 for each appliance. Only about 390 violations in 1993 and 1994 resulted in subsequent action. 4 I I Waste Management System I I 1 I I I Grand Rapids, Michigan - 7 OUTCOMES Waste Stream (tons) Fiscal Year Waste Landfilled Waste Recycled Yard Waste Collected Total 1987 51,000 0 0 51,000 1990 53,000 0 0 53,000 1993• 45,000 0 0 45,000 1994 45,700 0 0 45,700 1995 45,400 6,000 0 51,400 a Data for FY 1993 and FY 1995 are based on 6 months of data, and are extrapolated for a full fiscal year. Waste Stream: Grand Rapids 54,000 52,000 50,000 48,000 i3Wastc Recycled f—° 46,000 ■waste Londfilled 44,000 42,000 40,000 1987% 1990 1993 1994 1995 Fiscal Year Undesirable Diversion City officials report a noticeable amount of illegally dumped waste and litter in Grand Rapids, particularly in the poorer sections of the city. Despite this, the total amount of litter collected by the city is fairly low. Grand Rapids collects 30 tons of illegally dumped waste annually, at a cost of $15,000. Much of the refuse it. collects includes large items, such as furniture and appliances. The city also collects about 60 tons of garbage per year in neighborhood cleanups. Some of this waste is probably dumped refuse. Officials estimate that the amount of dumped waste has doubled since 1990. Outcomes 1 4. Grand Rapids, Michigan -8 Grand Rapids' commercial haulers report that some of their customers complain about people dumping garbage in their dumpsters. Several haulers offer dumpster locks to their customers. Charitable organizations also report some problems with people leaving junk or actual household garbage at their drop- off locations. The Salvation Army disposes 25% of its donations and Goodwill disposes 50%. Total Waste Generated The steep and steady bag and tag price increases during the late 1980's and early 1990's illustrate waste generation behavior of households receiving city collection service. The price increases have affected the level of household waste generation. In its first six months, the curbside recycling program has not significantly affected total household waste generation. The city estimates that it will collect about 8,000 tons of yard waste per year, or 22 pounds per household per month. Outcomes I 1 1 I. 1 1 Hoffman Estates, Illinois - / I II HOFFMAN ESTATES, ILLINOIS DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: Population: Population: Population Density (individuals per square mile) : Number of Households: Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: Earned Bachelor's Degree: .r Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African-Americah: Asian: Hispanic: Native American: Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: Median Household Income: Median Housing Value: Brief Description Village of Hoffman Estates 47,266 2,528 15,924 89.70 40.00 2.82 7.89 5.38 0.18 $19,072 $49,475 $133,800 Hoffman Estates is located about 30 miles northwest of Chicago in Cook County. Sears, Roebuck and Company, one of the largest employers in the area, employs approximately 4,000 people, followed by Ameritech, which employs about 2,500, and Siemens Gammasonics, which employs 950 people. The community manages 4,000 acres of forest preserves, parks and golf courses. All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census ,except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: G.P.O . Demographics iI Hoffman Estates, Illinois -2 WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection Hoffman Estates adopted a variable rate program in May of 1992 in response to anticipated increases in tipping fees and waste production. Residents may purchase stickers at the Village Hall or order them through the hauler. Residents must attach the stickers to bags for weekly collection. Residents pay only for the amount of waste they set out: there is no additional flat fee. Only single-family dwellings participate in the program. In addition to waste collection, white goods may be collected and disposed for a charge of $25 per item. The Salvation Army provides a reusable household goods collection program at no charge. Residents place goods for the Salvation Army in specially marked bags and leave the bags on the curb for pickup during a specified collection day once a month. Large goods donated to the Salvation Army require a scheduled appointment. The village also provides for special bulk waste collection, for a fee which varies with the amount of waste collected. Unit Pricing Program Adopted: 1992 Container Type: sticker Collection Frequency: weekly Households Served: 12,500 Fee Structure: Year Fee 1992 $1.37 1993 $1.45 1994 $1.45 Waste Management System 1I I Hoffman Estates, Illinois -3 Fee Structure: Hoffman Estates I.50 1.45 1.40 n 1.35 - —Bag Fee 0 1.30 1.25 1.20 1992 1993 1994 Year Disposa The municipal government contracts with a hauler through a bidding process. The municipality is serviced by Laidlaw Waste Systems. The hauler accounts for fluctuations in sticker sales when formulating its unit price. Laidlaw Waste Systems currently uses a pre-RCRA landfill, Mallard Lake. A federal court mandated the closure of this facility by 1998 due to its location on a forest preserve. The municipality joined the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County (SWANCC) which seeks solutions for the landfill crisis. SWANCC plans to operate three transfer stations by the beginning of 1996 to handle the waste generated by its members. Hoffman Estates anticipates a dramatic increase in tipping fees once Mallard Lake landfill closes. Laidlaw Waste Systems expects to use either Woodland Landfill or Settlers Hill Landfill when Mallard Lake closes. Both of these latter landfills have a long life -expectancy. Landfill: Mallard Lake Landfill, pre-RCRA Tipping Fee: $32 per ton Hauler Type: private Waste Management System 1 Hoffman Estates, Illinois - 4 Recycling Hoffman Estates residents receive curbside recycling free of charge. The private hauler collects recyclables once a week on the same day as refuse collection. The city requests residents place clean and dry recyclables in a city -provided recycling bin. Residents place all recyclable paper goods in a separate paper bag and leave them beside the recycling bin on the appropriate collection day. Residents may purchase additional recycling bins from the Village Hall at a cost of $5.00 each. All recyclables are processed at the Laidlaw Material Recovery Facility. The recycled materials are then sold to vendors, and the markets have been strong for these materials over the past two years. The village provides several recycling drop-off centers. These centers accept newspaper, aluminum, glass (brown, clear, and green), used motor oil, used antifreeze, household batteries, office paper, and cardboard. The private hauler responsible for curbside recyclables pick-up is also responsible for all recyclables in the drop-off center except for the oil and antifreeze. Curbside Program Adopted: 1990 Collection Frequency: weekly Hauler Type: private Recycled Materials: glass (brown, clear, green) plastic (coded 1, 2, 3, 4) metal cans (aluminum, steel, tin) newspaper mixed paper cardboard Recycling Destination: private processing facility Drop-off Centers: , yes Waste Management System ti I I I 11 I I I I II I I Hoffman Estates, Illinois - S Yard Waste Collection Residents attach the same unit price stickers to yard waste for collection. Yard waste, however, must be placed in 30 -gallon biodegradable kraft paper bags or bundled. The contracted hauler collects yard waste on a weekly basis between April 1 and November 30 of each year. The village also schedules a two-week collection period for Christmas trees and other holiday greenery. Residents with unusually large amounts of yard waste may schedule a special pick-up with the private hauler. Laidlaw takes collected yard waste to one of three private composting facilities, although the company is in the process of constructing its own facility. The village also provides information on mulching mowers, leaf shredders and backyard compost piles. Curbside Collection Program Adopted: Container: Fee: Collection Frequency: Yard Waste Destination: Backyard Program: 1990 30 -gallon kraft bag same as refuse collection fee weekly 3 private composting facilities information only Waste Management System I Hoffman Estates, Illinois - 6 Education Preceding the implementation of the unit pricing program, all residents received a mailing describing the program. This mailing cost the village $7,080, or $0.14 per capita. In addition, the recycling coordinator -, informed residents about the program at public meetings six months before the program began. The hauler maintains responsibility for educating residents about any additional changes in the program's design. Residents may receive information about backyard composting, leaf shredders and mulching mowers from the Village's Recycling Coordinator. A public education brochure was developed and mailed to all residents upon the extension of the Village's contract with Laidlaw Waste Systems in 1995. Laidlaw Waste Systems provides informational briefings on recycling to school and civic groups .at its materials recovery facility. The Village of Hoffman Estates newsletter is another avenue for education and information provision to the general public. Administration and Enforcement During the first year of the program, the Village budgeted $60,080 for the program. The first -year costs included the Recycling Coordinator's salary as well as expenditures on education efforts. Each year thereafter, the municipality budgeted approximately. $55,000 to cover salary costs. The program is basically administered by the private hauler through a contract with the city. The hauler maintains responsibility for providing a customer service center, collecting all refuse, yard waste and recyclables, distributing refuse stickers to retailers, collecting and managing revenues and providing some education and information to residents. Illegal dumping carries a minimum fine of $50. Theft of stickers, recyclables and recycling bins are illegal by village ordinance. The Hoffman Estates Police Department investigates illegal dumping complaints and the Division of Code Enforcement prosecutes such cases. An individual issued a citation for illegal dumping must pay a $50 fine or contest the citation in court. Illegal dumping in commercial dumpsters carries a fine of up to $500 and may be prosecuted on the basis of mail found in the refuse. The private hauler only collectsrefuse in a tagged bag. The hauler does not collect refuse in cans or other containers except for those cans set -out for back -door collection service. Recycling collectors do not pick-up unacceptable or contaminated recyclables. Plastic containers coded 5, 6, 7 or do not have a code cannot be recycled and the collectors do not pick these up. The village does not accept the following in its yard waste collection: garden vegetables and fruits; tree trunks, stumps and large limbs; fence posts,.railroad ties and fire wood; or sod and rocks. Yard waste collectors do not pick up yard waste in plastic bags or unbundled branches. Every bag and bundle must have a refuse sticker affixed to it. I I lVaste Management System j I Hoffman Estates, Illinois - 7 - OUTCOMES Waste Stream Fiscal Year Waste Landfilled Waste Recycled Yard Waste Collected Total 1991 15,101 6,305 not available 21,406* 1992 10,924 7,065 1,538 19,527 1993 9,418 8,896 1,896 20,210 * The total waste generated for Hoffman Estates for 1991 does not include collected yard waste. Waste Stream: Hoffman Estates 25,000 20,000 ■Yard Waste Collected 2 15,000 Waste Recycled F 10,000 ■ Waste Landfilled 5,000 0 1991 1992 1993 Year Undesirable Diversion ; - During the first six months of the pay -per -bag program, Hoffman Estates issued 103 citations to residents for illegal dumping and refuse sticker theft. Of these 103, the Circuit Court Judge dismissed 30 and fined 73 residents. The fines ranged from $25 to $500. After the first six months, illegal dumping and refuse sticker theft declined. For the period between January 1993 and November 1994, the village issued 71 citations. Several interviewed businesses believe that illegal dumping remains a problem for the village. Total Waste Generated From the year preceding the program to the first year of the program, there was a 27% decrease in waste landfilled. Recyclables increased by 12% during this period. This leaves an unexplained decrease of 6.9% reduction accounted for by source reduction, composting or undesirable diversion. Landfilled waste dropped Outcomes Lansing, Michigan -1 LANSING, MICHIGAN DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: Population: Population: Population Density (individuals per square mile) Number of Households: Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: Earned Bachelor's Degree: '2 Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African -American: Asian: Hispanic: Native American: Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: Median Household Income: t Median Housing Value: City of Lansing 127,321 3,738 50,835 78.31 18.32 18.57 1.69 7.98 1.25 $12,232 $26,398 $48,100 Brief Description: Lansing, the capital of the state of Michigan, is located at the junction of the Red Cedar, Sycamore, and Grand Rivers in Ingham County. The city is approximately 80 miles northwest of Detroit. Lansing's economy is dominated by the automobile industry and state government operations. Manufacturing facilities associated with the automobile industry, such as fabricated metal plants, are also found in Lansing. All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census, except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: G.P.O . Demographics I Lansing, Michigan -2 WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection Lansing began a voluntary fee -per -bag residential waste collection system in 1975. At that time, a household could subscribe to the city's unit pricing program, or subscribe to private service. The city continued this program virtually unchanged until 1991, when it increased the fee -per -bag from $1 to $1.50 and implemented city-wide curbside recycling and yard waste collection. Households that subscribe to the city service must purchase 30 -gallon refuse bags. The bags cost $7.50 for a. package of five, and are available at several supermarket chains, Quality Dairy stores and local convenience stores. The city currently collects garbage from approximately 50% of the city's single-family dwellings (approximately 19,000 households). Waste Management of Midwest Michigan and Granger Container Service serve most of the other single-family households. For bulk waste, such as furniture and white goods, the city sells $20 bulk collection stickers. Lansing also collects Christmas trees during the first two weeks of January. Unit Pricing Program Adopted: 1975 Container Type; bag Collection Frequency: weekly Households Served: 19,000 '1 Fee Structure: Year Fee 1990 $1.00 I 1991 $1.50 1992 $1.50 1993 $1.50 1994 $1.50 I I u 1. Waste Management System I I S a. Lansing, Michigan -3 Fee Structure: Lansing 2.00 1.50 0 1.00 —Bag Fee O 0.50 0.00 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 •.Year Disposal All refuse collected by the city is taken to the Wood Street Landfill and the Grand River Avenue Landfill. Both landfills conform to the Subtitle D requirements of RCRA. Granger owns both facilities and currently charges a tipping fee of $10.86 per cubic yard, or approximately $36 per ton, at each. • Landfill: Wood Street Landfill, Grand River Avenue Landfill, post-RCRA Tipping Fee: $36 per ton Hauler Type: public l A I 'i I 1.. Waste Management System ,1 Lansing, Michigan -4 Recycling Lansing implemented its recycling program in November, 1991. The city collects recyclables on the same day as refuse collection. Unlike the open waste collection system, the city is the exclusive provider of recycling service. All 38,000 single-family households automatically receive an 18 -gallon recycling bin in which they place their recyclables. Residents may commingle all materials in the bin, except newspapers, which they package separately in a brown paper grocery bag, and magazines, which they bundle together with twine or string. Collection personnel separate the materials at the curb. The city processes recyclables at its own transfer station, and then sells to buyers within the state. The regional markets for all of the materials the city collects are good. The city finances recycling and yard waste collection programs through a special $55 annual fee assessed to residents along with their regular city taxes: $25 of the fee goes towards recycling; $18 goes towards yard waste collection; and the remaining $12 goes towards education and promotion for the two programs. The recycling and yard waste collection programs also received $2.3 million in start-up funds from Michigan's Department of Natural Resources. The city also receives some revenue from the sale of recyclables. Curbside Program Adopted: Collection Frequency: Hauler Type: Recycled Materials: Recycling Destination: Drop-off Centers: 1991 weekly X" public glass (brown, clear, green) plastic (coded 2) metal cans (aluminum, steel) newspaper magazines catalogs municipal transfer station t LI I I 1I I. Waste Management System I I Lansing, Michigan - S Yard Waste Collection Lansing runs a weekly yard waste collection program available to all single-family households. From late March through November, the city collects leaves, grass, garden clippings, weeds and bundled brush. Residents may place yard waste at the curb in an ordinary 30 -gallon bag. The collection occurs on the same day as recycling and refuse pick-up. Lansing provides this service to all single-family households. The city delivers yard waste to the Great Lakes Compost facility, located just outside the city. Granger owns the Great Lakes compost facility. The city pays a tipping fee scaled to the volume of yard waste it brings in. On any day the city drops off yard waste, it pays $6.15 per cubic yard for the first 5,000 cubic yards, $5.40 per cubic yard for the next 5,000 cubic yards and about $4.00 per cubic yard for all yard waste in excess of 10,000 cubic yards. Great Lakes composts the yard waste it receives and distributes it to local buyers. The city also has a contract with Urban Options Consultants, a non-profit organization, to provide citywide education on backyard yard waste composting and grasscycling. City residents may purchase compost bins at a reduced price ($20 instead of $30) from Lansing. Curbside Collection Program Adopted: 1992 Container: bag Fee: $18 per year Collection Frequency: weekly Yard Waste Destination: private composting facility Backyard Program: yes S - Waste Management System ,1 Lansing, Michigan - 6 1 Education 1 Each package of bags contains a brochure explaining the different materials that the city collects and how residents should prepare their garbage, recycling, and yard waste for collection. The city distributes additional information upon request and operates a hotline that residents may call for answers to their questions. The city conducted a mass mailing to every household explaining the curbside recycling and yard waste collection programs when they began. Lansing also uses billboards, television, radio and local newspapers to inform residents about the city's waste collection services. Solid waste officials make presentations in local public schools, and the city hired a consultant to help with the public outreach. Overall, the city spends approximately $370,000 on promotion and education annually. The city directs efforts primarily at recycling and yard waste rather than source reduction education. Residents may also receive education on backyard yard waste composting and grasscycling. The city does very little to explain the fee - per -bag system to residents because that system has been in place so long. Also, the City Council is very , wary of allowing the city garbage service to promote itself. Urban Options informs residents about backyard composting and grasscycling. Administration and Enforcement The Operations Maintenance Division of the Publir`Service Department of Lansing administers the refuse, 1 recycling, and yard waste collection programs. Operations and Maintenance employs 142 people and — operates under an annual budget of $19 million. In addition to refuse collection, the division maintains responsibilities for street, curb and sidewalk maintenance, street cleaning, debris and litter removal, sewer and storm drain maintenance, flood control, city building maintenance, and one of the three city vehicle garages. - Lansing's garbage collection program is financially self-sufficient. The city covers the $1.4 million it costs to operate the program each year with city refuse bag and bulk sticker sales. i The city only collects authorized green city refuse bags. Waste not placed in a green city bag receives red solid waste violation stickers. The city tags ripped bags or overstuffed bags (greater than 30 pounds) with these same violation stickers. The city does not collect human or animal waste, dirt, stones, rocks, dead animals, or hazardous wastes, including gasoline and other explosive materials, wet paint, herbicides, pesticides, and hot ashes or coals. Residents must properly dispose of any refuse tagged with a red solid waste violation sticker. According to'solid waste officials, the city tags a couple of bags each day. A city I - refuse collection inspector visits residents who do not take care of tagged waste or who repeatedly violate collection rules. If the city collects any tagged garbage, it bills the resident a minimum of $225 for all of the costs incurred in the process: administration, inspector's time and the cost of collection and disposal. _.w:,. The city leaves behind any nonrecyclable materials placed in the city's recycling bins. The city' leaves an "Oops" flyer explaining the eligible materials for the city's recycling program. The city also leaves these "Oops" flyers on overstuffed yard waste bags. p I Waste Management System I 1 I I I I Ii OUTCOMES Waste Stream (tons) Fiscal Year 1991 1992 1993 1994 Lansing, Michigan - 7 Waste Landfilled Waste Recycled Yard Waste Collected 16,000 0 0 10,000 1,600 1,300 7,600 3,500 5,200 8,000 3,400 5,800 Waste Stream: Lansing 20,000 15,000 ®yard Waste Collected N Waste Recycled Fo 10,000 ■Waste Landfilled 5,000 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 Year It Undesirable Diversion Total 16,000 12,900 16,300 17,200 The Solid Waste Section of the Operations and Maintenance Division receives approximately 500 telephone calls annually regarding illegally dumped garbage. The city estimates that residents illegally dump 300 tons of solid waste annually, which costs the city $52,500 for cleanup and disposal. Much of the dumped material includes bulk waste, such as furniture and large appliances. Officials from Allied, one of the three major commercial hauling firms in Lansing, report that about 10% of their customers have complained about people disposing refuse in their dumpsters. The city does not have a problem with recycling contamination, since collectors sort recyclables at the curb and leave behind nonrecyclables. The city does not consider yard waste contamination a serious problem. The city collects approximately two to three bags of yard waste containing some garbage each day. This translates to about seven to ten tons of contaminated material annually. Outcomes Lansing, Michigan -8 I Total Waste Generated The large increase in the price of refuse bags in 1991, coupled with the implementation of the recycling and , yard waste collection programs in 1991 and 1992, illustrate the effectiveness of unit pricing and complementary programs in managing the residential solid waste stream. The city halved its landfilled waste over a four year period while experiencing significant growth in recycling and yard waste collection. In addition to the significant waste diversion Lansing achieved, the city likely encouraged source reduction. The total waste generated (landfilled waste, recycled waste and yard waste collected) increased over the past four years, but some of this is attributable to the 19,000 city residents who participate in the recycling and yard waste programs but do not participate in the city refuse collection program. 1 Outcomes I 1 PASADENA, CALIFORNIA DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: Population: Population: Population Density (individuals per square mile) : Number of Households: Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: Earned Bachelor's Degree: Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African -American: Asian: Hispanic: Native American: Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: Median Household Income: Median Housing Value: City of Pasadena 132,605 5,765 50,199 77.50 36.30 18.82 8.05 27.08 0.45 $19,588 $35,103 $281,500 Pasadena, California -) Brief Description: Pasadena sits in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains in Los Angeles County approximately ten miles from Los Angeles and thirty miles from the Pacific Ocean. The city's economy depends primarily on research and development in aerospace, electronics, and military industries. Pasadena hosts the California Institute of Technology and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory. The Rose Bowl, site of a New Year's Day collegiate bowl game, is located in Pasadena as well. r All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census ,except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: G.P.0 . Demographics . .li-I• •....1.-i... .1-. V..-. . .�:JIi..._.IP NI:.. M1. .-, Pasadena, California -2 WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection Pasadena provides collection services for single-family homes and multi -family residences with four or fewer units. For multi -unit properties with greater than four units, the municipality competes with 38 licensed private haulers for contracts to service these residences. The city phased in the unit pricing program over the five-year period between 1987 and 1992. Unlike most southern California cities, Pasadena continues to offer backyard collection of solid waste, although at a higher rate. Since the implementation of the unit pricing program most residents have requested curbside automated trash collection. Estate property owners may contract services with private haulers, and many do. Pasadena provides an Annual Neighborhood Clean-up once per year to collect white goods and scrap metal free of charge. In addition, residents may request special collection of large and bulky items for a fee. Residents who occasionally produce a large amount of waste may rent a 3 -cubic yard bin for a one time collection fee. The city collects Christmas trees during the first couple of weeks of January. Unit Pricing Program Adopted: Container Type: Collection Frequency: Households Served: Fee Structure: s 1992 cart weekly 28,000 Cart Volume 60 -gallon 100 -gallon two 60 -gallon one 60 -gallon, one 100 -gallon two 100 -gallon Fee (per month) $10.41 $16.23 $19.01 $22.40 $28.62 Waste Management System I i I I I ,1. ii I I r Pasadena, California -3 Fee Structure: Pasadena 30 25 20 — Monthly Fee e IS TO 5- 0- 60 100 120 160 200 Gallons i Disposal Pasadena delivers its waste to the Scholl Canyon Landfill. The city pays a higher tipping fee than does Glendale because Glendale is co-owner of the Scholl Canyon landfill. I Landfill: Scholl Canyon Landfill, pre-RCRA Tipping Fee: $24.1I Hauler Type: public I I I Waste Management System Pasadena, California -4 Recycling Pasadena implemented curbside recycling in March of 1990. For single-family residential recycling, the city contracts service to private recycling companies. These private firms bid for a specific day of the week. Currently one recycling firm is responsible for Monday through Thursday and another is responsible for Friday collection. These recycling firms pick up recyclables on a weekly basis on the same day as refuse collection. For recycling collection, all residents must place their recyclables into a 14 -gallon box. The regional markets for all of the recyclable materials the city collects are strong. Curbside Program Adopted: Collection Frequency: Hauler Type: Recycled Materials: Recycling Destination: Drop-off Centers: t 1990 weekly' private glass (brown, clear and green) plastic (coded 1, 2) metal cans newspaper used motor oil private processing facility yes Waste Management System Pasadena, California - S Yard Waste Collection Pasadena implemented a pilot yard waste collection program in 1991, and began city-wide service in 1993. The city offers residents the option to select a 100 -gallon "yard waste only" container to be used on a weekly basis. The residents pay a $5 fee for this yard waste only container. The city takes the yard waste it collects Ito the grinder/landfill operation at the Scholl Canyon Landfill where the yard waste is used in mulching and composting activities. Since 1987, Pasadena has encouraged backyard composting by providing a "How to Compost" brochure along with additional technical assistance for residents upon request. The city has updated the original brochure and operates a composting demonstration site in a local park. ' Curbside Collection Program Adopted: Container: Fee: Collection Frequency: Yard Waste Destination: Backyard Program: 1 iH I I. I ', 1993 100 -gallon can $5.00 weekly public processing facility information only Waste Management System I Pasadena, California -6 Education , When Pasadena implemented its unit pricing program, it provided residents information and education through a variety of outreach methods. Every household received a brochure describing the new system with a follow-up postcard. City officials attended public meetings to explain the system and answer residents' questions. The city also publicized the unit pricing system in newspaper articles. After the start-up program, Pasadena now employs two programs to encourage source reduction. The City ., provides residents with a waste reduction checklist which contains helpful hints on measures to be taken to reduce waste at the source. The City also developed a "Do Buy" and "Don't Buy" product display which uses name brands in different forms of packaging. This display provides consumers with information regarding the volume of packaging and its recyclability in order to affect their purchasing decisions. The city provides brochures to residents regarding Christmas tree collection, backyard composting, curbside recycling, and the annual neighborhood clean-up. The city also undertakes outreach activities with the public libraries and schools. Administration and Enforcement The Pasadena Solid Waste Division administers the residential solid waste management program. The Division maintains responsibility for all single-family households and all dwellings with four or fewer households. For commercial businesses and multi -family dwellings with five or more households, the Division competes with 38 licensed private haulers for the right to serve them. The Solid Waste Division must recover all of its operating costs through collection rates, surcharges, grants and awards. It does not receive any subsidy from Pasadena's general fund. The city received seven grants totaling in excess of $200,000 between 1990 and 1994 for such programs as a multi -family recycling pilot program, a used motor oil recycling program, household hazardous waste education, and bar/restaurant recycling promotions. The city bills households once every two months for refuse collection. The households receive their refuse collection bill as a part of their utility bill (which includes water and electricity). By integrating all three utilities under one billing office, the city is able to more efficiently administer these services. Pasadena provides a customer service office to respond to residents' complaints, questions and requests for information. Pasadena collects waste from overstuffed carts so long as the waste fits in the truck. The city places the following restrictions on the recyclable goods it collects: cardboard must be flattened, glass cannot be broken, newspaper must be flattened, and only two gallons of used motor oil allowed per week. Recycling collectors leave behind any non -recyclable materials in the recycling bins. Pasadena employed a yard waste inspection program when it implemented yard waste collection. An inspector would randomly check yard waste set -outs for contamination and tag carts for non -collection if the inspector found contaminants. The city abandoned the program when the rate of contamination fell to a low level, but recent increases in the contamination rate 2 have forced Pasadena to reinstate the inspection program. I Waste Management System I 11 I $� OUTCOMES Waste Stream (tons) I Fiscal Year Waste Landfilled Waste Recycled 1989 56,275 0 I 1990 50,748 1,796 1991 48,706 2,514 1992 54,197 - 2,931 1993 53,234 3,004 1 Waste Stream: Pasadena }s.S Pasadena, California - 7 Yard Waste Collected Total 0 56,275 0 52,517 0 51,220 0 57,228 6,030 62,268 1991 1992 1993 Year m=LandfC111 ®Waste * I Undesirable Diversion Pasadena does not consider undesirable diversion activity a serious problem in Pasadena. City officials do not believe that illegal dumping, dumping in commercial dumpsters or burning of waste are problems. The ' Salvation Army does have to make several trips to the landfill weekly, and some of this results from illegally dumped waste at night. Total Waste Generated The amount of waste landfilled by Pasadena decreased soon after implementing its unit pricing program. At • the same time, the amount of waste recycled increased. In recent years, however, the amount of waste landfilled has increased again, while recycling has begun to level off. ,: Outcomes I 1 1 I I EPA530-F•97.007d PAY -AS -YOU -THROW SUCCESS STORIES San Jose, California 850,000 We worked to educate residents away Urban from the concept of unlimited garbage Four -sort toward the idea of unlimited recycling. July 1993 Getting Started: Why Pay -As -You -Throw? San Jose is the nation's eleventh largest city. Our residents are among the most educated and affluent in the country and represent a diverse community, with the two largest minority groups being Latino (27 percent) -,- and Asian (14 percent). Before July 1993, San lose provided unlimited • weekly garbage collection service at a flat • monthly rate of $12.50 per household. Residents set out an average of three 32 - gallon garbage cans per week. The city fully implemented its Recycle Plus (RP) residential integrated waste management program for 186,000 single-family dwellings on July 1. 1993. This program was designed to permit the city to reach its California Integrated Waste Management Act goal of 50 percent waste • reduction by 2000. In the three years since our program began, an average of 87 percent of residents have '. equested 32 -gallon cans —the smallest size we offer. The new RP program result- ed from over 3 years of planning that included extensive research on all major policy changes. This program includes a fully automated garbage collection system. an aggressive PAYT rate structure, a four -sort recycling system, and a contractor payment mechanisrmwhich provided financial incen- tives that encourage contractors to promote recycling. Educating the Public The public was involved in the design of the RP program through a questionnaire mailed to all 186,000 households; community meet- ings throughout the city; pilot projects in 17 neighborhoods for collection of yard trim- mings and mixed papers; and the use of a public review committee to select the firms that would be given 6 -year collection contracts for the collection of garbage and recyclables and for recyclables processing. A comprehensive public outreach camoaign, aimed at single= family households.expla,ined the new variable rates being introduced, the new categories of recyclables being added to the services �wrsa provided, ;.➢ask •�"7' eyi. e'met 6'Y a 2glu� i h-n➢2�•eam m., ai64 E V �.Y (y➢,.. ? R.:.g� y- 7.n�, bitty/,n,. S `�-wild. Y '-.:_. .. 'v 4:"t.4�.�i`i I, }..-q .. and the benefits of participating. All materials were produced in three lan- guages (English, Spanish, and Vietnamese). The campaign was guided by the infor- mation received during a series of focus groups in the three languages, baseline and follow-up telephone surveys, and shopping mall intercept surveys. More than 250 community meetings were held in 1993, and a block leader program and school education program were organized. Getting the Prices Right Staff began researching unit -pricing structures for the new RP program in the spring of 1992 through surveys and interviews with successful PAYT com- munities nationwide. Residents were offered 32-, 64-, 96-. and 128 -gallon carts with an "aggressive" unit -pricing structure. This structure provided a slight price break for each additional 32 gallons of capacity at the 64- and 96 -gal - Ion level, which the council considered important to help residents make the transition from flat rate to unit pricing. We had to ensure that we had suffi- cient quantities of wheeled -garbage carts in the sizes the residents would request. We sent out a return -reply cart to all single-family households in January 1993 with our estimated rates, and let residents know that no reply would result in delivery of the default 32 -gallon cart. Staff was able to work out a compro- mise with the city council, which included offering one of the most com- prehensive low-income rate assistance programs for garbage service in the state. Criteria were based solely on household size and income and permit- ted eligible residents to receive a 30 percent discount on their bill. About 3.400 households currently participate_ in this program. Managing the Program Costs The challenge faced by the program is to both continue and expand its multi - pronged recycling efforts to meet diver- sion goals, while reducing costs to close the projected $5 million cost -to -revenue gap in five years. The city already has reduced costs by over $4 million annu- ally through contract renegotiations that resulted in extending the term of the RP and yard -trimming collection contracts from June 1999 to June 2002. I I I - Ii I Success: Waste Reduction and Increased Recycling , Staff did not anticipate how quickly resi- dents would change their recycling par- ticipation to accommodate the 32 -gallon size cart, especially since prior to RP the average set -out was three garbage cans. Since RP implementation, an average of 87 percent of residents have requested the 32 -gallon size. The difference between the "before and after" garbage set -out volume could readily be found in the quantity of recy- clables collected in the new RP program. The volume of recyclables and yard trimmings being collected more than doubled the levels recorded prior to RP. Most importantly, residents reported wide satisfaction with the program and its results (80 percent in 1993 to 90 per- cent in 1996. Figures are based on a ran- dom sample telephone survey). LI 1 I I I I San Jose's success story was compiled by to Zientek. Supervising Environmental Services Specialist. (408) 277-5533. 1 San Jose, California - I SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: Population: Population: Population Density (individuals per square mile) : Number of Households: Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: Earned Bachelors Degree: Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African-Americati: Asian: Hispanic: Native American: Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: Median Household Income: Median Housing Value: City of San Jose 'V . 782,225 4,678 251,050 77.16 25.33 4.65 19.55 26.08 0.68 $16,905 $46,206 $257,500 Brief Description: San Jose is the seat of Santa Clara County. The city lies in the Santa Clara Valley seven miles to the south of San Francisco Bay and 50 miles from San Francisco. San Jose is a major processing and distribution center for the region's agricultural production as well as a major producer of computers, electronic components and motor vehicles. The city's population has grown significantly since 1940, when 68,457 people resided within the city limits. t All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census , except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: G.P.O . Demographics II San Jose, California - 2 WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection San Jose named its waste collection system RECYCLE PLUS! The program consists of weekly curbside pick-up of garbage, recycling, and yard waste from every single-family household. Residents subscribe to a specific cart size and pay a monthly fee based on the volume of that cart. The rates have not changed since the implementation of the program in 1993. Residents may purchase additional waste stickers whenever they have more garbage than their carts will hold. The stickers cost $3.50 each, and may be attached to standard 32 -gallon plastic garbage bags. The stickers are sold at city libraries, supermarkets and convenience stores. The city also provides waste collection to all multi -family dwellings, but these dwellings pay a flat fee for refuse collection. San Jose contracts with private waste hauling firms to provide its RECYCLING PLUS! services. Two firms collect refuse and recyclables. One serves approximately 80,000 single-family households in the northern half of the city as well as all of the multi -family complexes, and the other serves about 105,000 single-family households in the southern half of the city. Two different firms are responsible for yard waste collection along the same north -south boundary. Residents may call the Customer Service section of the Environmental Services Department to arrange for special collection of bulky items, such as furniture and appliances. This service costs $18 for up to three items. The city collects Christmas trees and holidaycgreenery through its year-round yard waste collection program. Unit Pricing Program Adopted: 1993 Container Type: cart/sticker Collection Frequency: weekly Households Served: 186,000 Fee Structure: Cart Size Fee 32 -gallon $13.95 64 -gallon $24.95 96 -gallon $37.50 128 -gallon $55.80 11 I I Waste Management System I n Jose, California -3 Fee Structure: San Jose 60 50 40 — 30 --Mon[hly Fee t] 20 10 0 32 64 96 128 Gallons Disposal ' San Jose sends all of its garbage to the Newby Island landfill facility, located about 15 minutes north of the city center on the'southeastem edge of San Francisco Bay. Browning -Ferris Industries owns this post-RCRA landfill. The city has a 30 -year contract with BFI and substantial capacity remains at the Newby Island landfill. Landfill: Tipping Fee: Hauler Type: 1 Newby Island, post-RCRA $26.11 ` private Waste Management System San Jose, California - 4 Recycling Residents receive three 18 -gallon recycling bins: one for glass; one for junk mail, magazines and mixed paper; and one for newspaper. Each bin sports a written notice on its side in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese, indicating acceptable materials for recycling pick-up. Residents use a fourth container, typically their old garbage cans, for commingled aluminum, tin and metal cans, juice boxes and milk cartons, plastic bags, bottles and jugs, scrap metals, and'textiles. Residents flatten and stack corrugated cardboard alongside the four containers and the city provides special jugs for used motor oil upon request. The private haulers responsible for recyclable pick-up operate their own recycled materials processing facilities where they sort and bundle the material they collect and sell it to buyers. City officials report that regional markets for recyclable materials are good. Curbside Program Adopted: Collection Frequency: Hauler Type: Recycled Materials: Recycling Destination: Drop-off Centers: 1987 weekly private glass (brown, clear, green) plastic (coded 1) metal cans (aluminum, tin) newspaper mixed paper cardboard motor oil private processing facilities yes Waste Management System i 11 .1 I I I ,i 1 I I I IT I San Jose, California - S Yard Waste Collection San Jose provides weekly yard waste collection. Residents pile their grass.clippings, leaves, and small branches in the street, one foot from the curb. If residents live on narrow or busy streets, streets with posted "No Parking" signs, or streets with bike lanes contiguous to the curb, then they place their waste on city - issued tarps on the edge of their lawns. The collected yard waste goes to three composting facilities: Newby Island (35%); Zanker Road landfill, a local, privately -owned facility (15%); and Guadalupe landfill, also a local, privately -owned facility (50%). The city pays $22 per ton for these three facilities to accept, process ' and compost the material. Each facility produces a variety of products, tailored to a strong market among the region's farmers. The city does not have a formal backyard composting program, but Santa Clara County does have a Master Composter program. The program makes composting kits available to any county resident wishing to purchase them, and provides information and training. Curbside Collection Program Adopted: 1989 Container: none a+ Fee: none Collection Freggency: Yard Waste Destination: Backyard Program: I r, weekly three private composting facilities Santa Clara County provides a voluntary program I Waste Management System IT San Jose, California - 6 Education The city of San Jose runs an extensive public education program. The Environmental Services Department maintains an array of literature that can be picked up or mailed to residents upon request. The city prints all of its literature in English, Spanish, and Vietnamese. The Department also includes informational notices in residential bills throughout the year. The city operates a multi -media advertising campaign, consisting of local television, radio, and newspaper announcements. Current community relations efforts cost the city about $1 million per year. The city spent $1.5 million in start-up education during 1993. The Environmental Services Department sent out letters to every residential household informing them of the new pricing system. City officials also attended numerous neighborhood meetings to explain the new system to residents and to answer questions. In addition, the city ran public service announcements in local newspapers and on radio and television. San Jose University's Center for Development of Recycling plays an important role in city-wide citizen education efforts. The Center acts as a clearinghouse of information on recycling in San Jose and Santa Clara County: The Center's activities include: radio and television announcements; hotlines for source reduction campaigns, phone book recycling, and other special events; education material for city and county libraries; displays at local conventions and fairs; workshops and topics such as the disposal of construction and demolition debris; and a series of ongoing projects, including directories of San Jose recyclers, reuse opportunities in the area and used -appliance collectors. 1 I I I I I Waste Management System I1 I - _• San Jose, California- 7 Administration and Enforcement The Integrated Waste Management Division of the city's Environmental Services Department administers the waste collection and recycling programs. The Customer Service division employs 20 customer service representatives who respond to inquiries from city residents. The division receives approximately 1,500 calls • daily, most of which concern service and billing issues. Customer Service also oversees the Utility Billing Service, which bills residents for their collection service. The Billing Service coordinates with the contracted haulers and charges each household according to its level of service. At present, the Billing Service only covers waste collection, but it will eventually bill for all city services, including water and sewer. The contracted haulers only collect garbage located within a city cart or in a bag with a city extra waste tag. The top of the cart must close completely. If it is ajar, or if garbage is piled on top of the cart, the haulers do ' not collect it. They only collect bulky waste for:which residents have made special arrangements with the city's Utility Billing Service. The haulers visually inspect recycling and yard waste set -outs, and do not collect material containing contaminants. Since a hydraulic arm lifts the carts onto the collection trucks, no ' enforceable weight limit on the carts exists. However, if drivers feel that a cart is too heavy (e.g., it is filled with dirt or concrete), they may choose not to collect it. Extra waste bags must not exceed 40 pounds, a loosely enforced restriction. The weight limit for yard waste is 60 pounds, and the piles may be no greater ' than five feet wide and five feet high. The haulers must be able to pick up the recycling containers easily. In the event of a violation of any of the above restrictions, the hauler leaves a non -collection notice indicating the specific nature of the offense. Any resident receiving such a notice must take care of the problem before ' the next collection date. Repeated violations result in an on -site visit from a representative of the city's Environmental Services Department. These measures usually resolve the problem. In the event of extreme abuse of the systein, the city may levy fines. Li P1 I 1 Waste Management System I San Jose, California -8 OUTCOMES Waste Stream (tons) I Fiscal Year Waste Landfilled Waste Recycled Yard Waste Collected Total 1993 250,000 30,800 66,500 347,300 1994 197,900 75,700 96800 370,400 , 1995' 158,400 78,400 96,400 333,200 • Data for FY 1995 are based on 6 months of data, and are extrapolated for a full fiscal year. ', 400,000 350.000 300.000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 1993 Undesirable Diversion ' _ Waste Stream: San Jose 1994 1995 Year ■Yard Waste Collected ®Waste Recycled •Waste Landfilled San Jose reports 170 tons of illegal dumping costing the city $500,000 for clean-up annually. Of this amount, 70% includes yard waste in quantities of one ton or greater, indicating that professional landscaping operations dump illegally. Construction debris or bulk items compose much of the rest otthe collected waste, suggesting that households dump very little residential waste. Anecdotal evidence indicates that dumping increased after the city adopted variable collection rates in 1993. Officials speculate that much of the attention illegal dumping receives results from an increased sensitivity to the issue rather than an actual increase in dumping. Further, higher levels of reported dumping may result from better reporting methods rather than actual increases. The three largest commercial haulers report that only a small fraction of their customers complain about ppeople throwing waste in their dumpsters (between 0.1% and 1.0%). Two charitable organizations indicate that illegal dumping is a serious problem for them. Outcomes .1 I I I i I .r San Jose, California - 9 Total Waste Generated The introduction of variable rates in July of 1993 made a significant impact on single-family residential waste diversion. Between fiscal year.1993 and fiscal year 1994, landfilled waste decreased by more than 20%, recycling increased 150% and yard waste set -outs jumped 45%. The overall diversion rate, from both recycling and yard waste collection, increased from 27% to nearly 50%. Overall waste generation, garbage, recycling and yard waste, increased by 7% in fiscal year 1994, but it is on pace to fall 10% in fiscal year 1995. outcomes I 1 1 1 1 1 1 t Santa Monica, California- I SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: City of Santa Monica Population: Population: 87,064 Population Density (individuals per square mile) : 10,490 Number of Households: 44,860 Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: 87.50 Earned Bachelor's Degree: 43.40 Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African -American: r 4.50 Asian: 6.37 Hispanic: _•:.. 14.02 Native American: 0.44 Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: $29,134 Median Household Income: $35,997. Median Housing Value: $500,001 Brief Description: Santa Monica resides in Los Angeles County on Santa Monica Bay, approximately fifteen miles from the center of Los Angeles proper. The city's economy depends primarily on the aircraft and aerospace industries, plastic components, and laser devices and systems. Electronics research and development also occurs in Santa Monica The city's beaches attract tourists and local residents as well. t All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census , except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: G.P.O . Demographics Santa Monica, California -2 WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection Santa Monica implemented a unit pricing program in conjunction with the implementation of an automated collection system for its single-family dwellings. Through this program, residents subscribe to a,specific cart volume for weekly collection. The city charges residents based on the type and number of containers set out for collection. If residents occasionally have extra trash that will not fit into their cart, they may purchase special collection bags from the city. Each bag holds up to 40 pounds of refuse and can be set out on any regular collection day. Residents may purchase bags in sets of five for $14.50. The city will only collect city - provided carts or bags. Residents may drop off Christmas trees at one of four parks each year. Residents receive a tree seedling in exchange for bringing in a tree. The program began in 1988. Santa Monica collects white goods for a minimum fee of $25. In addition, residents may rent a 2 -cubic yard bin for a special collection of bulk waste. Unit Pricing Program Adopted: Container Type: Collection Frequency: Households Served: Fee Structure: 1992 cart/bag x. weekly 8,000 Cart Volume 40 -gallon 68 -gallon 95 -gallon 95 -gallon & 68 -gallon Fee (per month) $14.84 $17.76 $21.07 $37.27 Waste Management System .1 1 I I L I Santa Monica, California -3 • • Fee Structure: Santa Monica ' 40 35 ' 30 25 Monthly Fee t] IS IO 5 0 40 68 95 163 Gallons Disposal Santa Monica takes all collected waste to the Santa Monica Transfer Station.. From there, the city transfers • the waste to the Puente Hills Landfill located in Los Angeles County. Landfill: Puente Hills Landfill, pre-RCRA ; H Tipping Fee: $48 ' Hauler Type: public 1 1 Waste Management System Santa Monica, California - 4 Recycling Santa Monica began a curbside recycling program in January 1981. The city currently services 7,500 single- family homes and 5,000 low -density multi -family households. The city collects recyclables weekly on the same day as refuse pick-up. Residents use two five -gallon buckets for glass, metals and plastics and a 14 - gallon bin for newspaper. One -hundred drop-off recycling zones serve 34,000 high -density, multi -family units. Each recycling zone consists of at least three, 2 -cubic yard bins. One bin is for newspaper; one is for glass bottles and jars; and one is for tin and aluminum cans and plastics (coded I through 5). While the city collects curbside recycling put-outs, the private sector processes the recyclable goods. Recycle America and Waste Management Incorporated maintain responsibility for processing recyclables and selling them to vendors on secondary materials markets. The regional markets for recyclable materials are strong. Curbside Program Adopted: Collection Frequency: Hauler Type: Recycled Materials: Recycling Destination: Drop-off Centers: 1981 weekly public glass (brown, clear, green) plastic (coded 1, 2, 3, 4, 5) metal cans newspaper mixed paper private processing facilities yes Waste Management System Santa Monica, California - S Yard Waste Collection Santa Monica does not provide a separate yard waste collection service. According to city officials, Santa Monica households' waste stream includes only about 13% yard waste. A separate collection program for yard waste would not be cost-effective for the city given this low percentage. The city sells backyard composting bins and holds periodic workshops on composting for city residents. Santa Monica collects all city park landscape trimmings and sends them to a facility for shredding. Curbside Collection Program Adopted: n/a Container: n/a Fee: n/a Collection Frequency: n/a Yard Waste Destination: n/a Backyard Program: yes N. Waste Management System Santa Monica provides information brochures on source reduction and reuse, grasscycling, and household hazardous wastes. The city prints brochures in English and Spanish. The city also provides informational workshops on backyard composting. The city provides informational presentations to local neighborhood associations, businesses and community groups. In addition, Santa Monica employs local newspaper advertisements, newspaper articles, targeted direct mail, press releases and press conferences. The city produced a video entitled "Untrashing Santa Monica" for Santa Monica City -TV. This video explains the city's solid waste management program and the concept of source reduction. Administration The Santa Monica Recycling Division employs seven recycling workers, one crew leader and one waste reduction coordinator. The budget for fiscal year 1994-1995 was $899,000. The unit pricing program revenues fully support trash collection and disposal; year round street sweeping services; litter collection containers throughout business districts; and comprehensive recycling services for the residential sector. The city bills residents bi-monthly. Santa Monica also provides a customer service office to respond to residents' complaints, requests for information and questions about the unit pricing program. City waste collectors only pick up waste from city carts or city bags. The city does not collect waste from carts which are more than twelve inches ajar. Residents must separate recycled goods and place them in the appropriate bins. The city does not collect contaminated recyclables. If the collectors leave behind waste or recyclables, they place a non -collection notice indicating the violation on the cart or bin. Santa Monica has implemented an anti -scavenging ordinance preventing people from taking recyclable goods from bins set out for collection. I I I I I Ii OUTCOMES Santa Alonica, California - 7 Waste Stream (tons) Fiscal Year 1991 1992' 1993 Waste Land filled Waste Recycled Total 66,960 5,334 72,294 64,368 6,636 71,004 63,240 6,924 70,164 Waste Stream: Santa Monica 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 S Waste Recycled 60,000 50,000 ■Waste Landtilled l0 40,000 30,000 20,000 10.000 0 1991 1992 1993 Year Undesirable Diversion ' City officials do not consider undesirable diversion behavior a serious problem in Santa Monica. Occasionally, residents illegally dump white goods and furniture, however, city officials believe that their white goods collection and bulk waste collection alternatives minimize this behavior. Santa Monica has ' banned waste burning, and burning is not a problem. Most dumping of waste in commercial dumpsters results from illegal dumping by nearby businesses and not from the residential sector. Total Waste Generated •' Since Santa Monica implemented its unit pricing program in 1992, the city has experienced marginal decreases in its total waste generated and in its waste landfilled. Landfilled waste dropped about 5% and total waste generated dropped about 3% between the year preceding implementation of unit pricing, 1991, and the second year of the program, 1993. Outcomes 1 I1 .1 1 I Woodstock, Illinois -1 WOODSTOCK, ILLINOIS DEMOGRAPHICS' Jurisdiction: Population: Population: Population Density (individuals per square mile) Number of Households: Education (percent): Earned High School Diploma: Earned Bachelor's Degree: Village of Woodstock 14,353 291 5,411 32.40 11.60 Ethnic Breakdown (percent): African -American: 0.56 Asian: 1.40 Hispanic: 7.43 Native American: 0.18 Economic Characteristics: Mean Per Capita Income: $17,302 Median Household Income: $31,458 Median Housing Value: ` $99,777 Brief Description: Woodstock is located about 6miles northwest of Chicago in McHenry County. Once considered a remote, rural area, Woodstock has become more suburban as Chicago's urban sprawl overtakes it. Its population presently grows faster than any other municipality's in the area. Some of the manufacturing industries in Woodstock include Automatic Liquid Packaging, Claussen Pickle Company and Guardian Electric. The McHenry County government, the largest employer in Woodstock, employs 895 people. t All demographic data are based on the 1990 U.S. Census ,except for population density which is derived from the U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1994. County and City Data Book: 1994. Washington, DC: GP.O . Demographics I Woodstock, Illinois -2 WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Collection Woodstock was the first municipality in Illinois to implement a volume -based fee when it switched to a pay - per -bag system in 1988. As local landfills neared capacity, the area searched for an alternative to curb the increasing waste generation. Under the unit pricing program, residents may purchase bags at City Hall and several retail establishments. Woodstock has a pure unit pricing program: there is no flat fee which the residents must pay. The city collects refuse bags on a weekly basis on two different days throughout the municipal limits. Only single household units participate in the program. Every three years the village awards the collection program to a private firm through a bidding process. The city sets the unit fees in order to guarantee a stable hauler revenue stream. Marengo Disposal presently services Woodstock. In addition to waste collection, recyclable materials pick-up and composting, Woodstock also collects Christmas trees in January and bagged leaves in Autumn, free of charge. The Salvation Army collects appliances in working order free of charge for all residents in McHenry County. Through the McHenry County Spring Clean -Up, Woodstock residents may donate old clothes to several charitable organizations which will resale them. The village does not provide for special collection of bulk waste. Unit Pricing Program Adopted: Container Type:; Collection Frequency: Households Served: 1988 bag weekly 3,500 Fee Structure: Year Fee 1988 $1.12 1989 $1.22 1990 $1.56 1991 $1.83 1992 $1.98 1993 $2.13 1994 $1.56 Waste Management System I. WVoodstock, Illinois -3 Fcc Structure: Woodstock 2.50 2.00 1.50 —Bag Fee G 1.00 0.50 0.00 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 Year Disposal Na Marengo Disposal disposes Woodstock's waste at the Winnebago Reclamation Landfill, a post-RCRA facility, in Wisconsin. Landfill: Winnebago Reclamation Landfill, post-RCRA Tipping Fee: $35 per ton Hauler Type: private rVasle Management System I Woodstock, Illinois -4 Recycling McHenry County is the first area to introduce a mandatory recycling ordinance in Illinois. Woodstock expanded its recycling program in 1987. The waste hauler maintains responsibility for curbside pick-up of recyclables on the same day as refuse collection. If a household generates recyclables in excess of the space in their recycling bin, they should place the excess in paper grocery bags. In addition, households must separate their recyclables into one of three categories: newspaper; other fibers (e.g., chipboard, magazines, office paper, junk mail, paper grocery bags); and plastic, glass and metal containers. In addition to curbside pick-up, the McHenry County Defenders operates three recycling drop-off sites that handle some materials not collected at the curb, such as lead acid batteries and used motor oil. The recycling markets in the Chicago area are strong, although the price for fibers does fluctuate through time. Curbside Program Adopted: Collection Frequency: Hauler Type: Recycled Materials: Recycling Destination: Drop-off Centers: ti 1987 (expanded) weekly private glass (brown, clear, green) plastic (coded 1, 2, 3, 4) metal cans (aluminum, steel, tin) newspapers paper goods three private processing facilities I Ti I I I I 11 C 11 I Waste Management System I Woodstock, Illinois .5 Yard Waste Collection Residents must place yard waste in Kraft paper bags, bundles or in open 30 -gallon garbage cans. Residents must affix a yard waste sticker to each bag, bundle or can. Households may purchase yard waste stickers at the Woodstock City Hall. Marengo Disposal collects yard wastes weekly on the same day as refuse and recyclables collection. The hauler takes yard waste to the Laidlaw Compost facility in Rockridge. Woodstock provides informational brochures on composting from the county health department and the state government. In addition, the city has begun a backyard composting pilot program. Curbside Collection Program Adopted: Container; Fee: Collection Frequency: Yard Waste Destination: Backyard Program: 1994 biodegradable bag or can with sticker $1.15 per sticker weekly private compost facility pilot program (100 households) t.. Waste Management System I Woodstock, Illinois - 6 1 Education Woodstock's education programs include outreach efforts at local schools, distribution of pamphlets which describe alternatives for disposing of waste, and information on backyard composting. Woodstock also makes available state and county informational brochures on solid waste issues, such as composting options, alternatives to burning wastes, and paints disposal among others. McHenry County publishes a quarterly newsletter, Solid Waste Matters, to inform residents of the County's Total Solid Waste Management Plan. I Administration and Enforcement Since the village contracts out its waste management services, Marengo Disposal maintains most of the administrative responsibilities for the program. ._ Through a state law, McHenry County must recycle 15% to 25% of its waste stream over the next several I years. The McHenry County Department of Solid Waste Management enforces the county recycling ordinance which ensures the County's compliance with the state law. The Department addresses all household complaints and conducts monitoring for compliance. Under the county ordinance, households must separate their waste stream, and either place recyclables on the street for curbside pick-up or take them to a drop-off center. If a household does not separate its waste, then the waste collectors do not pick-up any of that household's trash. The recycling law appliefr.to single-family residences as well as multi -family buildings. In addition to the. monitoring and compliance conducted by McHenry County, the Woodstock Police 'I Department and the Woodstock Public Health Department receive and address complaints regarding illegal dumping. Village fines for illegal dumping range from $5 to $500. The village does not have an ordinance prohibiting the burning of yard waste. I I • 1 a� I I I Waste Management System I I Woodstock, Illinois - 7 OUTCOMES Waste Stream (tons) Waste Landfilled Waste Recycled Yard Waste Collected 14,829 623 0 12,604 755 0 10,874 956 0 9,886 1,112 0 10,710 1,238 0 Waste Stream: Woodstock 16,000 14,000 12,000 10.000 $ 8,000 6,000 4,000 2.000 0 1989 Undesirable Diversion 4 Burning refuse has become a particular problem in Woodstock since the implementation of the unit pricing program. In addition to burning yard waste, some residents bum refuse. The low population density facilitates the incineration of large piles of refuse and yard waste without detection. County health officials claim that this is the worst side effect attributable to Woodstock's unit pricing program. Littering has also become a problem on isolated roads and lots. Many residents claim that the littering problem predates the implementation of the unit pricing program. Total Waste Generated Since the implementation of the unit pricing program, the number of refuse bags used by a household per week has decreased 28%. At the same time, recycling ton nages have increased by 50%. Woodstock could not provide iI Fremont, California Fremont has an exclusive franchise agreement with Browning -Ferris Industries (BF[) to provide all of its residential and commercial waste collection services. Residents may choose one of four different city can sizes: a 20 -gallon trash container for $16.73 per month; a 32 -gallon container for $16.99 per month; a 64 -gallon container for $18.20 per month; or a 96 -gallon container for $25.22 per month. The cost includes curbside recycling and yard waste collection. Residents are given three recycling bins: one ' for mixed paper, including junk mail, magazines, catalogs, paperboard, and telephone books; one for newspapers; and one for glass, tin, aluminum, steel, plastic (coded I and 2), and milk and juice cartons. In addition, they may stack corrugated cardboard alongside their bins. Residents also receive a 96 -gallon yard waste cart. Collection for garbage, recycling and yard waste is on the same day each week. Two times each year, residents may arrange for free pick-up of bulky goods, such as furniture and appliances. Multi -unit complexes commonly use dumpsters, and collection fees vary with the size of the container and the frequency of collection. Those that participate in the recycling program have large toters for recyclables. The impact of garbage collection fees on low-income or special needs residents is sometimes an ' issue in Fremont, and the city offers a 15% discount to residents that qualify -for similar lifeline rates from other utilities. Illegal dumping is not much of a problem, and city officials feel that mandatory service cuts down on dumping-- if residents have to receivd'at least the basic level of trash service, they might as ,well use it. Otherwise, some people might try to avoid collection fees altogether.bydumping all of their , garbage. Officials also report that few bulky goods are dumped, and credit that to the two free annual pickups offered by the city. The city does not spend very much on education, although it does have a community outreach employee. It also sends out a newsletter every few months to every resident, and places periodic public information notices in local newspapers. Finally, the city has experienced little added administrative cost due to its variable rate program because the contractor handles billing and many other administrative responsibilities. Oakland, California '/j Oakland has an exclusive franchise agreement with Oakland Scavenger, which is owned by Waste Management of Alameda County, to provide residential and commercial garbage collection service. Oakland Scavenger serves all of Oakland's 145,000 households. Residents rent city garbage cans from Oakland Scavenger, and pay $10.08 per month for a 20 -gallon can, or $13.74 for a 32 -gallon can. Each additional 32 -gallon can costs $16.49 per month. Collection is weekly. The fees include weekly curbside recycling collection. Three small recycling contractors each serve one-third of the city. They collect newspaper, mixed paper, corrugated cardboard, glass, aluminum, tin, plastic (coded I and 2), and used motor oil. The city does not have a yard waste collection program, although Waste Management has a compost facility that is used by professional landscapers. The facility received 21,000 tons of material in 1994. Multi -unit complexes either have city cans or dumpsters. The dumpsters cost $10.76 per month for each unit in the complex, regardless of the size of the container. 1 33 I I • The city does not currently make any provisions for special needs residents. However, the lack of special rates has been an issue, and the City Council is considering adopting them. Also, elderly and disabled residents have been expressing their dissatisfaction with the elimination of back door collection service. Low-income residents do receive a $l per month discount on the recycling portion of their fees. Oakland has made a concerted effort to eliminate illegal dumping. The city used to be a virtual dumping ground for residents of neighboring cities, but some high profile arrests have significantly reduced the level of commuter dumping. In addition, the city has set up security cameras and stakeouts to try to catch dumpers, and enacted harsh penalties, including high fines and jail time. City maintenance crews are now collecting about 1,000 tons of material per month, but that includes tree trimmings, rubbish from city refuse cans, and other waste that is not illegally dumped garbage. They report that the waste that is dumped tends to be bulky goods, like furniture and major appliances. The City Council continues to be concerned about the problem because of its impact on Oakland's image in the region. The city spends about $300,000 on education each year, plus another $100,000 from various grants. There is a quarterly newsletter, plus an additional I to 2 mailings per year. The city also places periodic public information notices in the local newspapers. Oakland Scavenger handles all of the administrative responsibilities, including billing for garbage collection and other utilities, so the city bears no administrative costs. Of the 65,000 single-family households that the city serves, 8% use the 20 -gallon can, 81% use one 32 -gallon can, 11% use two 32 -gallon cans, and less than 1% use three or more 32 -gallon cans. Some 11,000 households in multi -unit complexes use city cans, and the other 42,000 have dumpster service. Oakland Scavenger uses three different types of garbage trucks. Rear end loaders (REL) currently pick up all of the city cans, although a few years ago they also collected from some dumpsters. Front end loaders (FEL) collect from all of the dumpsters in the city, and roll off vehicles (R/O) pick up debris boxes, which are used largely by industrial or construction operations. In 1992, Oakland Scavenger collected 147,000 REL tons, 43,000.FEL tons, and 65,700 R/O tons. In 1993, when the city's curbside recycling program started, the REL tons dropped to 133,000, while the FEL and R/O tonnages each jumped by about 6,000. In 1994, REL tonnages dropped again to 120,000 tons, while FEL tons climbed to 63,600 and R/O fell to 64,000. The drop in REL tonnages from 1992 to 1994 could indicate a reduction in residential waste through increased recycling, or could be accounted for by increased dumpster dumping, which would explain the increase in FEL and R/O tonnages. However, the drop could also be due to the shift of some of dumpsters from REL to FEL service. The city produced a total of 467,000 tons of waste in 1992, 417,000 in 1993, and 489,000 in 1994. It collected 19,500 tons of recyclables in 1993, or 22 pounds per household per month, and 23,000 tons in 1994, or 26 pounds per household per month. San Francisco, California San Francisco has a population of 724,000. The 305,000 households in the city (106,000 in single-family dwellings and 199,000 in multi -unit complexes) are served by two private waste hauling firms. The two firms, Golden Gate Disposal and Sunset Scavenger, which are both owned by Norcal Waste Systems, are licensed by the city and they each serve half of the city. The rates for garbage collection are set by a rate board. Currently, residents may choose a 20 -gallon can for $9.17 per month or a 32 -gallon can for $10.66 per month. Additional 32 -gallon cans are each $6.51 per month. Multi -unit complexes may choose to receive dumpster service. The cost of the service is based on a combination of factors, including room count, the frequency of collection service, and'the volume of the container. The city's weekly recycling collection program is run by the same two private hauling firms under a seven-year contract that expires September 30, 1997. The program is financed by waste collection 34 I I revenues and the sale of recyclables. Curbside service is available to single-family dwellings and multi- family complexes with up to 5 units. About 170,000 households fall into this category, and they all receive curbside service. Complexes with 6 or more units may receive apartment service, and about 86,000 of the roughly 136,000 apartment households are in buildings with recycling collection. The city collects newspaper, junk mail, magazines and catalogs, cardboard, dry food boxes, telephone books, office paper, paper bags, glass, aluminum, tin, steel, and plastic (coded 1). The city's recycling contract has a unique feature: a revenue floor ($1.6 million in 1992). If revenues from the sale of recyclables fall below the floor, the contractors absorb the loss. Any revenues above the floor are rebated to the residents. The rebate in 1992 was almost $1 million, and it was $778,000 in 1993. Besides an annual Christmas tree collection program, the city has no yard waste collection program. San Francisco does offer a lifeline rate for elderly residents, $8.23 per month for the 20 -gallon container, regardless of income. The city does not offer any other special rates. -According to city solid waste officials, the impact of the city's rate structure on low-income residents has never really been an '�. issue. Illegal dumping, on the other hand, has been a serious problem. Dumping takes place in streets, alleys, and dumpsters, and can be any material from common household garbage to large bulky items. However, city officials do not perceive the problem as being any worse in San Francisco than it is in any other dense urban area, and they have not observed any correlation between the quantity of illegally dumped material and periodic garbage rate increases. The city spends about $400,000 on citizen education each year, consisting of mailings, informational campaigns, radio spots, displays at local fairs and events, advertisements in bus shelters and train stations, and presentations at area schools. It bears no administrative cost from the system because the contractors handle all of the billing and other administrative responsibilities.. In 1990,'city residents generated 308,000 tons of garbage, or about 170 pounds per household per month. Residents.diverted 39% of their waste, or 66 pounds per household permonth; through curbside •. recycling, recycling drop-offs, and buy-back programs for certain materials. In 1993,72% of city residents regularly recycled, and they recycled 20% of their garbage, or 56,000 tons. Of the 170,000 households that are served, each household recycled roughly 55 pounds of material each month. The city • also estimates that residents reduced their garbage by 12,000 tons from the previous year through source reduction efforts. Colorado Springs, Colorado Colorado Springs is anexample of a completely privately run waste collection system. The city plays no role in residential waste collection. It does not even license haulers. Residents may choose between many hauling firms for their garbage service, but most use one of four companies: Waste Management, Browning -Ferris Industries, Bestway, and Western Disposal. Waste Management gives residents several service options. They may rent Waste Management containers, and set out for weekly collection: one 34 -gallon can plus one standard 30 -gallon trash bag for $9.50 per month; two cans and two bags for $11.00 per month; or three cans and three bags for $13.00 per month. Residents may also supply. their own cans and pay $10.50 per month for a 35 -gallon can and bag, $13.50 for a 65 -gallon can and two bags, or $15 for a 95 -gallon can and three bags. The rates include biweekly curbside recycling collection of cans, glass, newspaper, and plastic (coded I and 2). Because the city does not oversee or coordinate residential waste collection in Colorado Springs, • there are no aggregate waste figures available for the city, and there is no information on any problems 35 I with the collection system. 1 Plantation, Florida I Plantation has an exclusive franchise agreement with Southern Sanitation, a subsidiary of Waste I Management, to provide collection service to all 67,000 city residents, as well as businesses. Single- — family households are served twice per week, and Southern Sanitation will only collect garbage that is in city refuse bags. Residents must purchase the bags from local supermarkets at a cost of $27.94 for a box of 18. Each box also contains 4 clear bags for recyclables. Southern Sanitation also collects recycling. Residents commingle glass, aluminum, steel, tin, plastic (coded 1, 2, and 3), and waxed juice and milk cartons in the clear recycling bags, and put out bundled newspapers separately. The contractor's policy is that it will only pick up recyclables that are in the city's recycling bags, but this rule is not strictly enforced. Collection is once per week, on the same day as one of the garbage collection days. All of the city's single-family dwellings receive curbside recycling service. Plantation has no yard waste collection program. Most multi -unit complexes have common dumpsters, and the service rate depends on the size of the container and the frequency of collection. They also have 90 -gallon toters for recyclables. Some 80% of the city's multi -unit residents live in complexes with recycling service. The city does not have any provisions for low-income or special needs residents, and that has never been an issue of concern. Furthermore, despite having no preventive measures, there is very little illegal dumping in Plantation, and the city spends less than $500 per year to clean up dumped garbage. Businesses and multi -unit complexes are responsible for policing their own dumpsters, and the city has received very few complaints of "dumpster dumping." The city does spend $6,000 to $7,000 per year on community education, which consists of brochures that are available upon request, and informational packets for new residents that include 12 free recycling bags. Finally, the city's fee -per -bag program eliminates the need for a billing system, and unit pricing has not been administratively difficult or costly. Between October 1, 1993 and September 30, 1994, Southern Sanitation collected 5,800 tons of recyclables, or about 32 pounds per household per month. About 85% of that material, or 4,900 tons, came from the 22,000 single-family households, while the rest was collected from the 8000 multi -unit households that live in complexes with recycling service. Therefore, single-family residents diverted 37 pounds per household per month, while multi -unit residents only recycled 19 pounds per household per month. Over the same period, the city produced 32,000 tons of residential and commercial waste. A I break -down was not available. St. Paul, Minnesota The city of St. Paul does not operate a refuse collection service. Instead, it licenses private hauling firms, and each of the city's 115,000 households chooses one of the firms. There are 28 firms currently operating in the city and they each have a significant market share. No one firm has more than 10% to 15% of the households. A 1990 city ordinance required haulers to use variable collection fees, but most already had variable rate pricing structures in place at the time. I 36 I Since 1987, the city has run a curbside and apartment recycling program through its contractor, the St. Paul Neighborhood Energy Consortium. The program serves all households, including 29,000 apartments in 960 buildings. The contractor collects newspaper, cardboard, magazines, junk mail, phone books, glass, aluminum, steel, tin, textiles, and small reusable goods. Curbside collection is twice per month, and apartment complexes each arrange their own collection schedule. The city has no yard waste collection program, but the licensed refuse haulers are required to provide separate weekly yard waste service between April and November. There are also seven Ramsey County yard waste drop-off sites. The city does not offer any reduced rates for low-income or special needs residents, and officials do not believe that it is an issue because poor and elderly residents tend to produce less waste, anyway. Illegal dumping is also not much of a problem, although it does occur. The city does not have any estimate of the quantity of dumping per year. It receives a few complaints each year from businesses and apartment complexes. The.city annually spends $200,000 on public education; Each year, it mails two brochures to every resident, as well as a waste reduction guide. The city does not advertise very -much in local papers, or on the television or radio. Finally; the private haulers handle all of their own administration and billing, so the city's administrative costs are essentially zero. Because residential collection is scattered among so many private haulers, the city does not have total waste generation figures. It estimates that households produce around 115,000 tons of waste each year. The city does know that it collected 21,000 tons of recyclables in 1994. Therefore, it estimates that 94,000 tons of residential garbage, or 136 pounds per household per month, were landfilled last year. Portland, Oregon Portland has an open franchise system for residential waste collection: Some 55 private haulers are currently licensed by the city to collect residential garbage from the 125,000 households in single • family dwellings, or multi -unit complexes with four units or less. The number of haulers has steadily decreased by about 10% each year over the past several years. Residents are fairly well distributed among all of the haulers, and no single operation has more than 10,000 customers. The city sets the rates that waste haulers may charge for weekly residential service: a 20 -gallon can is $14.60 per month; a 32 - gallon can is $17.60; a 35 -gallon wheeled cart is $19.30; a 60 -gallon cart is $24.05; and a 90 -gallon cart is $27.10. Residents may choose can combinations with greater total volumes, and they may also choose to have garbage picked up only once per month for a monthly fee of $9.90. The different haulers may distribute their own cans, but they must meet the volume specifications that the city has established. Some 6% of the city's residents'choose the once -per -month service, 19% use the 20 -gallon can, 49% use the 32 -gallon can, 9% use the 35 -gallon can, 7% use the 60 -gallon can, 5% use the 90 -gallon can, and the remaining 5% use multiple cans. Multi -unit complexes with more than four units are considered commercial establishments, and their collection rates are not set by the city. They tend to be served by common dumpsters. The city.acknowledges that multi -unit residents do not receive the same pricing incentives that single-family households do, so it has made a considerable capital investment in recycling shelters for multi -unit complexes. Officials feel that multi -unit diversion rates would be even lower without these shelters. I Weekly recycling collection and biweekly yard waste collection are included in the residential I rates. The 17 haulers with 3,000 or more customers each collect their own materials, while the rest have = an agreement that designates one company with the collection responsibility for all of their customers. Every resident receives a standard yellow city recycling bin, and the haulers collect newspaper, glass, used motor oil, corrugated cardboard, tin, aluminum, non-ferrous and ferrous metals, magazines, plastic (coded 2), scrap paper, steel aerosol cans, milk and juice containers, and aseptic juice boxes. For yard waste collection, residents put their trimmings in a 30 -gallon bag or can. The cost of the first yard waste I container is included in the residents' garbage bill, but additional containers are $1 for each. The city does not offer any special rates to low-income, elderly, or disabled residents, but solid waste officials are concerned about the impact of variable rates on disadvantaged households. They have observed a tendency among low-income residents to select the larger cart sizes, rather than lowering their garbage bills by recycling more and switching to a smaller container. Officials are attempting to encourage these residents to take advantage of this cost savings opportunity through education aimed at large cart users. Illegal dumping does not appear to be a serious problem in terms of the quantity of material dumped, but it does receive a lot of attention from the city. The solid waste division pays the Bureau of Buildings $287,000 to cover the cost of nuisance cleanups, although solid waste officials believe that figure overstates the true cost of cleanup. Officials believe that because residents may choose to have no garbage collection service, illegal dumping is increased -- some people may try to save money by dumping their garbage rather than paying to have it collected. The city does not have any annual estimates of the amount of dumped garbage. Portland spends a little over $100,000 per year on public education. The city distributes quarterly brochures to every resident, and a survey postcard once each year. The city sponsors public service announcements on local radio stations, and performs public outreach programs in city neighborhoods. Finally, the city coordinates some area -wide education efforts with Metro, the Portland Metropolitan regional authority. Each hauler has its own billing system, so the city does not incu any billing costs. The city spends a total of $1.5 million on oversight of the residential waste collection system, and most of those costs are covered by franchise fees that the city collects from licensed private waste haulers. The city's budget includes funding for a citizen hotline, which receives about 15,000 calls per year, ranging from complaints to questions about the collection system. In Fiscal Year 1994, city residents diverted 34% of their garbage through curbside recycling and yard waste collection programs. The city collected 35,300 tons of recyclables, or 47 pounds per J participating household per month, and 12,800 tons of yard waste, or 17 pounds per household per month. Since Portland began its current recycling and yard waste collection programs in 1992, residential waste generation has consistently decreased. In Fiscal Year 1992, city residents produced 106,000 tons of I garbage, or 140 pounds per household per month. That figure fell to 98,700 tons, or 132 pounds per household per month, in Fiscal Year 1993, and by Fiscal Year 1994, the amount of residential garbage had fallen again to 95,700 tons, or 128 pounds per household per month. I Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania Wilkes-Barre has an open residential garbage collection system. Residents may choose to receive 1. their service from the city or from one of several private haulers. Once per week, the city picks up city - refuse bags, which are sold in supermarkets and local convenience stores for $1.25 each. The city provides service to almost 13,000 of the 15,000 households in single-family dwellings or multi -unit buildings with up to four units. Building managers of housing complexes with 5 to 19 units individually decide whether they will have their complex participate in the city program, or whether they will contract 1 P 38 1 I with a private hauler for dumpster service.. Residents in complexes on the city service, like single-family residents, must purchase city refuse bags and put them out on the street for weekly collection. Some 3,700 households in 5 -to -19 -unit complexes are on the city service. Complexes with 20 or more units may only receive collection service from private haulers. Wilkes-Barre's curbside recycling program is mandatory. Residents pay a$10 annual fee, and over 80% participate regularly. On the same day as garbage collection, the city collects newspaper, steel, tin, aluminum, plastic (coded I and 2), glass, and corrugated cardboard..in addition, between October and December the city collects leaves weekly. Residents rake them into the street on collection day, -and suction vehicles pick them up. There.are drop-off locations for other yard debris that opened in 1994. The city does not offer any special rates to low-income, elderly, or disabled residents. Officials feel that disadvantaged households can actually save money -under the fee -per -bag system by:reducing - their weekly garbage set -outs.: The -issue has arisen from time to time, but has:never. been very significant. Illegal dumping has actually improved under the fee -per -bag system. The biggest problem the city had been experiencing was with residents of neighboring variable rate localities coming into Wilkes -Bane and taking advantage of the flat fee collection system by leaving their garbage in front of peoples' homes. When the city switched to unit pricing, it began searching dumped garbage for some form of identification and fining identified dumpers $500. There is now 50% less out-of-town garbage dumped on Wilkes -Bane streets, and the.city is saving about $250,000 on reduced collection and disposal costs. The city ' conducted 9 months of intensive education immediately before and after it switched to variable.rates, but it does not do any continuous education now. The city currently receives 2 to 3 calls each month from residents needing information: Wilkes-Barre has also not experienced any.administrative cost increases; and the fee -per -bag system alleviates the need for a billing service. The fee -per -bag system. started city-wide in January of 1994. Residential waste fell from 20,000 tons, or 202 pounds per household per month, in 1993 to 15,000 tons; or 152 pounds per household per month, in 1994. Interestingly, recycling tonnages actually dropped between 1993 and 1994. In 1993, the city collected 2,400 tons of recyclables, or 24 pounds per household per month, while in 1994, it only collected 2,200 tons, or 22 pounds per household per month. However, in 1994 the city had to suspend • collection for 9 weeks because of severe weather. It would have collected, on average, another 460 tons of material during those 9 weeks, which would have brought the yearly total up to almost 2,700 tons, or 27 pounds per household per month. In 1994, the city also collected 3,200 tons of leaves and 2,200 tons of dropped -off yard debris. Spokane, Washington • The weekly residential garbage collection program in Spokane is run by the city, and it serves all 177,000 residents. Residents provide their own receptacles (can, box, or bag) and are assessed a collection fee based on the size and number of containers they use. A 20 -gallon container is $8.56 per • month, one 30 -gallon container is $11.07, and each additional 30 -gallon container is $6.01 per month. Collection personnel will not pick up a receptacle that is clearly too big. They also have a computer routing slip every day that lists each address and the number of receptacles for which the household is signed up. If a household puts out more garbage than it is supposed to, it is assessed a $2.25 charge. The city also provides weekly curbside recycling collection on the same day as garbage collection. The cost of the program is included in the garbage collection fees. Residents may set out newspaper, glass, plastic (coded I and 2), aluminum, tin, cardboard, magazines, brown paper bags, and used batteries in city - 1 -1W39 I issued recycling bins. The city does not have a yard waste collection program, but residents may drop off 1 their yard waste at the city's compost facility. The first 400 pounds of material is free, and the fee for amounts greater than 400 pounds is $20 per ton. Multi -unit complexes are generally served by common dumpsters. The service rate depends on the size of the receptacle and the frequency of collection. They also have large recycling carts, and pay a premium equal to 10% of their garbage collection fee for recycling service. Although it is sometimes an issue, the city does not offer special rates for low-income households or back door service for elderly and handicapped residents. Illegal dumping has been a problem. The city employs four nuisance abatement officers that attempt to trace dumped garbage to its owners and bill them for the cleanup costs. The city spends very little on regular public education, but it did spend $200,000 on promotional activities at the start of the curbside recycling program. The waste -to -energy plant offers tours, and the city does make regular presentations in schools. It operates a recycling hotline, and will 1 send out informational brochures on request. Finally, billing for garbage collection costs $600,000 per year and is handled by a central city utility billing service. The computer routing system was complicated to set up, but works well now with 95% to 99% accuracy. I Tacoma, Washington The city runs its own garbage collection service in Tacoma for all 70,000 households, as well as businesses. It is an exclusive system, and no private haulers operate in the city. Residents may choose two different sized city cans: a 60 -gallon container for $17.00 per month, or a 90 -gallon container for $25.50 per month. Collection is weekly. The city also provides weekly curbside recycling collection of glass, aluminum, steel, plastic and newspaper. Yard waste is collected curbside once every two weeks. Residents put grass, leaves, and other trimmings in 32 -gallon containers. They may set out as many containers as they want. Multi -unit complexes are served by a common receptacle, typically a dumpster. The fee is based on the size of the container and the frequency of collection. The city offers a reduced garbage rate to anyone that qualifies for the electric utility's discount. I The discount is about 50% off the basic level of service. The city has not experienced significant levels of illegal dumping. The dumping that does occur tends to be concentrated in blighted areas, like abandoned or run-down property. The city has a "btightmobile" that responds to complaints about dumping in such areas, and the property owners are billed for the cost of cleanup. Residents may bring their garbage to the city's landfill for a minimum charge ($3 regardless of the amount), and officials believe that this policy cuts dosVn on dumping. The city spends about $50,000 per year on educational efforts, including periodic advertisements in local newspapers, and on the television and radio, a biannual mailing to every resident, and support for environmental curriculum development in the schools. Its administrative costs are not exorbitant, but the refuse portion of the city's combined utilitybilling system does cost $200,000 per year.? Some 63% of Tacoma's single-family households and 30% of its commercial clients, which include multi -unit complexes, are signed up for recycling service. In February of 1995, the city collected a total of 520 tons of yard waste, 614 tons of recyclables, and 13,000 tons of garbage, so the city-wide diversion rate for the month was 8%. 1 40 1 I Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South • Southern States Waste Management Coalition _ 1 Duluth, Georgia Population: 9,029 Contact: Larry Rubenstein Inception: 1979 • City Administrator City of Duluth Type: Bag 3578 West Lawrence Street Duluth, GA 30136 (770) 476-3434 Latest Update: Rates Residential Garbage DisposallCollection: I $1 for 32 gallon bags Results Collections Costs :I, Waste Landfilled: - Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: 1, Other Collections: Total: Duluth is just north of metropolitan Atlanta and is experiencing growth from the northern expansion of the Atlanta area. With approximately 10,000 residents Duluth is still a relatively small city yet is an innovator in waste management having adopted a PAYT program in 1979. The program has grown and now includes an extensive recycling and composting program. , - Officially marked bags are available at grocery stores and city hall in boxes of twenty. Special provisions are made for senior citizens, the disabled and low income families with proper documentation. They may purchase bags at a reduced rate but are limited to six boxes per year. A one-time fee of $5 is charged for recycling bins. Backyard composters and countertop containers are available for free to city residents. Once a month, the city operates a drop-off site for oversized articles free of charge. Although most of the cost of the program is paid from the sale of ,' bags, some general revenue funds used to defray expenses. Garbage is collected once per week as are recyclables. A wide variety of recyclables are accepted commingled in 1 bins and are collected by the same private hauler contracted by the city. residents pay no direct extra charge for recycling. As with any program, there are still a few complaints, especially from large families, but most residents are pleased • with the program. The city has experienced significant decreases in the amount of waste being landfilled. • I I 1 Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Jackson County, Georgia Population: 30,005 1 Contact: Tommy Page Inception: 1994 Solid Waste Department Type: Bag P.O. Box 434 Drop-off Jefferson, GA 30549 (706) 367-6303 (706) 367-9083 fax Latest Update: Rates Residential Garbage DisposallCollection: $.75 for 16 gallon bags $1.50 for 38 gallon bags Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: Jackson County is located in the northeast portion of the statejust north of Athens, Georgia. The county is mainly rural. Before implementing the PAYT system, garbage disposal had been "free" to residents. Now, county residents must either take their garbage directly to the landfill or transfer station or, utilizing the PAYT system, to one of two compactor sites. Garbage taken to these two compactor sites must be in official bags. The sites are fenced and staffed by retirees open from lam - 7pm, Monday through Saturday. The sites cost approximately $20,000 to run annually. Recyclables may be disposed of free at the compactor sites where they are collected and transferred to the transfer stations for further separation. Contamination has been a problem causing more than half of the material collected to be landfilled. Most residents have not chosen to use the PAYT program and instead take their garbage directly to the landfill where five bags can be disposed of for only $?:00. There has been a great deal of resistance to the program and the county is planning to contract the compactor sites out to a private company and perhaps end the PAYT program altogether. I I1 I Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Marietta, Georgia Population: 44,129 ' Contact: Joan Ellars Inception: March 1995 Director Marietta Clean City Commission P.O. Box 609 Type: Can Marietta, GA 30061 Curbside (Backdoor) (770) 528-0629 (770) 528-0439 fax Latest Update: Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Transfer Station Tipping Fee: 510/month for one 20 gallon can S27.50/ton 512/month for one 32 gallon can $16/month for two 32 gallon cans S5/month for each additional 32 gallon can Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: down 30% Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: \Vaste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: ' Other Collections: Total: Marietta is located in Cobb County northwest of Atlanta and part of the metropolitan Atlanta region. The city has experienced tremendous growth in recent years but still retains much of its "old South" character. Largely populated by professionals, the average income is over $42,000. ' Marietta's PAYT program began as a pilot project in 1994 partly funded by EPA Region IV. The city tested both a can and a sticker program. Ultimately, the residents demonstrated a preference for the can system and the program was implemented city-wide in 1995 and serves nearly 11,000 single family, duplex and quadraplex households. Residents must subscribe to their preferred level of service by purchasing special stickers that affix to their own • garbage cans. These cans must not exceed 32 gallons and there is a weight limit of 60 pounds allowable in each can. Overflow garbage may be placed in official bags that sell for three for $5.00. Special and oversize items are picked 'I up for a charge of from $52o $30 depending on the item. Garbage is collected twice per week with backdoor pickup. Recyclables are collected curbside twice per week. Some property tax revenue is used to fund the program. Although there was initial resistance, the program is running smoothly now with fewer complaints. The city considers education the most important component for success. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Oconee County, Georgia Population: 21,000 Contact: Peter Mallory - County Administrator Inception: May 1994 John McNally - Oconee County Clean & Beautiful P.O. Box 145 Type: Base fee + Bag Watkinsville, GA 30677 Drop -of (706)769-5120 (706) 769-0705 fax Latest Update: Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Landfill Tipping Fee: Base Fee: $31.50/ton $19.50 (charged on tax bill) Bag fees: S 1.00 for 20 gallon bags $1.50 for 32 gallon bags Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: down 30% Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: Oconee County is adjacent to Athens -Clarke County, which also has a PAYT program, and is home to many professionals associated with the University of Georgia. Much of the county is still rural although the county is growing at a rapid rate. In May of 1994, the county removed its 119 green boxes from 39 sites and replaced them with four strategically located convenience centers. The convenience centers are fenced, lighted and three are staffed. They are open from lam - 7pm Monday through Saturday and 1pm - 4pm on Sundays. Official bags can be purchased at various retail outlets or the commissioners office. Retailers pay S1.40 per 32 gallon bag which gives them $.10 •profit from each bag sold. A wide variety of recyclables are accepted free at the convenience centers. Once collected, recyclables are taken to the county's closed inert landfill for further separation and baling, then sold. There has been no noticeable increase in illegal dumping. Some of the decrease in waste landfilled by the county may be attributed to less waste entering the county from neighboring county residents and from licensed private haulers who can contract with residents for curbside collection. A scrap tire elimination grant allowed hiring of code enforcement officers to deter illegal dumping, although few citations have been issued. a Residents may take yard trimmings to the inert landfill for disposal at S 19 per ton. I I 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 1 Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Thomasville, Georgia Contact: Veon Williams ThomasviilelThomas County Clean and Beautiful P.O. Box 1540 Thomasville, GA 31799 (912) 225-4300 Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: S8/month for one 32 gallon can S5/month for each additional 32 gallon can S8/month voluntary yard trimmings pickup Results Collections Waste Landfilled: Recyclable Collections: Yard Waste Collections: Other Collections: Population: 17,457 Inception: 1992 Type: Can (sticker) Curbside Latest Update: Waste Collections: Waste Disposal: Administration: Total: Costs Thomasville is in the extreme southern part of the state in a rural county. Recycling is available at three unstaffed drop-off sites in the city. The program is set up as an enterprise fund so all costs are covered by the revenue collected from the program. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Tift County, Georgia Population: 19,292 Contact: Sherrie Sumner Inception: October 1992 Executive Director Tiftonrfift County Clean Community Commission The Myron Complex Type: Bag P.O. Box 229 Drop-off Tifton, GA 31793 (912) 382-6231 ext. 129 or 133 (912) 386-9694 fax Latest Update: Rates Residential Garbage DisposaUCollection: Landfill Tipping Fee: $1.50 for 32 gallon bags $25/ton $.75 for 16 gallon bags $.45 for 8 gallon bags Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: Waste Collections: I Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: Tift County and the major city in the county, Tifton. are located in the southern part of the state off 1.75. Both the city and the county have a PAYT program administered by the Tiftonifift County Clean Community Commission and are usually grouped together but are in fact different systems. The Tifton/Tift County PAYT program has been a model program from inception and has received much publicity. Before PAYT, the county operated 23 dumpster sites subsidized through tax revenue. The county now operates eight staffed collection centers for garbage disposal and recycling drop-off. Each site is fenced, landscaped and well lit with operating hours from 30 to 80 hours per week. Recyclables accepted include aluminum and steel cans, all colors of glass, # I and $2 plastics, OCC and ONP. Recyclables are transported to the Tifton/Tift County Recycling Plant where prison laborers bale the materials for transport to markets. Bags, colored according to size, are purchased at the county commission office or at grocery and convenience stores. I The stores purchase the bags from the county at a discounted price for a S. 10 profit per bag. I I Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Tifton, Georgia - Population: 14,215 Contact: Sherrie Sumner Inception: January 1992 Executive Director Tiftonfrift County Clean Community Commission The Myron Complex Type: Can ' P.O. Box 229 Curbside Tifton, GA 31793 (912) 382-6231 ext. 129 or 133 (912) 386-9694 fax Latest Update: Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Landfill Tipping Fee: $9/month for one 32 gallon can $25/ton $15/month for two 32 gallon cans • $21/month for three 32 gallon cans I, Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: Tifton is the county seat for lift County, a rural county in the southern part of the state. The city and the county both have PAYT programs which operate somewhat differently but are administered by the same entity and are usually considered together as the Titon/Tift County program. In fact, city residents with overflow garbage may use the bags sold by the county for that purpose. The main difference between the city and the county program is that city residents have curbside collection and use cans rather than bags. City residents must choose one of the pricing options and supply their own 32 gallon cans to which a sticker is affixed. Residents are supplied with an I8 gallon recycling container for curbside collection of aluminum and steel cans, all colors of glass, fit PET and #2 HOPE plastics, OCC and ONP. Additional recycling containers may be purchased for $5. Garbage and recyclables are collected once per week using separate vehicles. Recyclables are transported to the Tifton/rift County Recycling Plant where prison laborers bale the materials for ' transport to markets. • The program has been a model in the state and region and is widely acclaimed as very successful. Preliminary results have indicated a 33 percent decrease in Landfilled materials. I I I .I�Ewn7T.. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition West Point, Georgia Population: 3,571 Contact: Joel Wood Inception: August 1994 ' City Manager P.O. Box 487 Type: Can West Point, GA 31833 Curbside (706) 645.3522 Latest Update: Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: $8/month for one 40 gallon can $4/month for each additional 40 gallon can (up to three total) Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: West Point is in the central part of the state on the Alabama border. ' The city implemented the PAYT program after a one year educational campaign. Residents are given a numbered tag for one can up to 40 gallons which the residents supply. The tags are registered at city hall in case of theft. Residents may have up to two additional cans, each no larger than 40 gallons, for an extra $4 per month per can. Overflow garbage can be put in authorized bags purchased at city hall for $2 each. Yard trimmings up to 5 cubic yards are collected weekly at no additional charge. There is no curbside collection of recyclables. The city built a drop-off location, which they call the recycling park. The city contracts for operation of the drop-off site. Revenue from the recyclables serves as compensation for the contractor. The program is not self supportive and funds from the general revenue are used to offset the difference. The city considers the program a success and has received few complaints from residents. II I I I Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition I Aberdeen, Maryland Population: 13,500 Contact: Jim Litke Inception: March 1993 Recycling Coordinator ' P.O. Box 70 Type: Base fee + can or bag Aberdeen, MD 21001 Curbside (410)272-1600 (410) 273-7402 fax Latest Update: Rates • Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Landfill & Incinerator Tipping Fees: Base Fee: $35/ton $5/month (charged on tax bill) Bag fees: $.40 for 20 gallon can or 13 gallon bag $.80 for 32 gallon can or 30 gallon bag Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: ' Aberdeen is located 30 miles northeast of Baltimore on the Chesapeake Bay. The PAYT program serves some 3,600 • households and is unique in that the fees collected from the PAYT program are used to cover the cost of the tipping fees only. The base fee charged to everyone covers garbage collection, recycling, collection of yard waste and bulk items. Garbage is collected curbside once per week with the correct official sticker attached. Residents may use either their ' own bags or cans. If cans are used, stickers are to be placed on the top piece of trash in the can, not on the can. Residents also may use larger 60 and 90 gallon cans with the appropriate corresponding number of stickers attached. The City chose the sticker program because of the ease of distribution to retail outlets, the flexibility of allowing a large light -weight bag to be covered by a small bag sticker and the immediate impact of disposing of less garbage. The stickers may be purchased at supermarkets, convenience stores and the city office in any amount. Recyclables are collected curbside commingled alternating between containers one week and paper items the next ' week. Newspaper, mixed paper, cardboard, glass, metal containers and PETE and HDPE plastic containers are accepted in the "blue bag" program. A staffed drop-off site accepts the above recyclables in addition to scrap metals, all other plastic containers and polystyrene, textiles, oil and antifreeze and nickel -cadmium batteries on the first and third Saturday of the month. ' Yard waste is collected curbside twice per month for ten months of the year at no additional charge. Other bulk items are collected curbside by appointment also for no additional charge. Free compost is given away to residents at the recycling drop-off site. Additionally, free compost workshops are periodically given and compost bins are available to residents for $3 each. Although total tonnage figures are unavailable since they were not recorded until approximately nine months before. ' implementing the PAYT program, the average pounds of garbage collected per household has decreased by 36 percent since the program began. Recyclables collected has nearly doubled and landfill disposal fees have decreased by 19 percent. Illegal dumping has not been a problem with only minor occurrences noted. The greatest concerns before implementing PAYT were the public's perception of increased costs and political uncertainties. Neither is 1 I 1 Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in ti:c Southern States Waste Management Coalitic7: considered much of a problem now some four years into the program. As with :;.. made sure that all residents were educated about the program and continue to do s. all residents were polled as to the type of system preferred. Residents chose theic..' c by 70 percent to 30 percent. Not only does this show the residents' preference marketing tool and may have contributed to the success of the program. I I II 'I I I I II I Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Buncombe County, North Carolina Contact: Don Yelton Waste Reduction Specialist Buncombe County General Services Department 30 Valley Street Asheville, NC 28801 (704) 255-5066 (704) 251-4936 fax Rates Residential Garbage DisposaUCollection: Curbside St 1.50/month for four 33 gallon bags per week if recyclables separated $13.50/month for four 33 gallon bags per week if recyclables not separated Drop-off S.75 per 32 gallon bag or $28/ton Population: 174,821 Inception: 1988 Type: Bag Curbside and Drop-off Latest Update: Results Landfill Tipping Fee: $31/ton Wood Waste Mulching Fee: St5/ton Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: 1 Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: Buncombe County is in western North Carolina amid the Blue Ridge Mountains. The county seat of Asheville is best known for the Biltmore Estates park and one of the most scenic portions of the Blue Ridge Parkway. Municipalities in Buncombe County have the option of participating in the county PAYT program or contracting with private haulers. Private haulers operating outside municipal districts must charge according to the rates set by • the county. The Buncombe County program is primarily geared toward encouraging recycling. Each hauler operates. their own recycling program but most of the common items are accepted in the blue (or clear) bag program. Residents pay the higher rate if they do not set out a bag of recyclables. Recyclables are accepted for free at the landfill for residents hauling their own garbage thus enabling them to reduce the cost of disposal. r ,t Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Joplin, Missouri Contact: Matt Matthews P.O. Box 1423 Joplin, MO 64802 Rates Results Collections Waste Landfilled: Recyclable Collections: Yard Waste Collections: Other Collections: Population: Inception: Type: Latest Update: Waste Collections: Waste Disposal: Administration: Total: Costs Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition I I I I I New Bern, North Carolina Contact: Tim Lee American Refuse Systems, Inc. P.O. Box 3455 New Bern, NC 28564 (919) 633-6330 (919) 633-9707 fax Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Base fee: S for 64 gallon can Sticker fees: $1.25 per sticker for 33 gallon bags Results Collections Waste Landfilled: Recyclable Collections: Yard Waste Collections: Other Collections: Population: 17,363 Inception: November 1991 Type: Can + Sticker overflow Curbside Latest Update: Waste Collections: Waste Disposal: Administration: Total: Costs The system implemented in New Bern is a variation of Craven County's program where residents pay a monthly fee for a 64 gallon cart and any overflow must be placed in a bag with an official Craven County sticker affixed. The city performs bulk waste and yard waste collections while allowing the county to serve city curbside garbage and recycling customers through the hauler contracted for the county. As with the Craven County system, New Bern residents are provided an IS gallon recycling bin and are not charged an additional fee for recycling. The curbside recycling program accepts plastic, glass and metal containers and newspapers. In addition, mixed papers are collected once per week when placed in a paper bag. Also, cardboard is collected the third week of each month. The city provides curbside yard waste and white, brown and bulky goods collection. Loose leaves are collected from November through February. Bagged leaves are collected year round. Mulch from yard waste collections is available free to residents. New Bern residents have access to the seven staffed convenience centers operated by the county and must follow the same guidelines. - Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Craven County, North Carolina Population: 86,789 Contact: Bobbi Waters Inception: November :991 Clean Sweep Coordinator, Craven County 406 Craven Street Type: Sticker New Bern, NC 28560 Curbside & Drop-off (919)636-6659 (919) 636-6638 fax Latest Update: June 1997 Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: $2 per sticker for 33 gallon bags Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: down 45% since 1991 Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: Craven County is located in eastern North Carolina near the Atlantic shore. It is a fairly rural county with , approximately 32,000 households. There are several small municipalities in the county, some of which offer services in addition to the county. The Craven County program is a unique blend of services that gives county residents a number of options. All county residents have access to curbside garbage collection through one of six haulers operating in separate franchised areas. Residents contract individually with licensed haulers in their area for curbside pick-up of garbage placed in bags with approved stickers or they can opt for 33, 64 or 90 gallon carts. The county sets a maximum price that the haulers can charge for each cart size. However, the majority of people use the sticker program. Curbside recycling collections are contracted out to a single hauler which serves every household in the county. County residents are charged $27 per year on their property tax for recycling services, down from $36 a year ago. Qualifying elderly, low income and handicapped residents are offered back door garbage and recyclable collections at no additional cost and pay only $12 per year for recyclable collections. The county also operates seven staffed convenience centers for garbage disposal (garbage must be in bags with sticker attached) and other items. These items include yard waste, cardboard, mixed paper, used motor oil, batteries, white, brown and bulky goods, construction and demolition debris and agri-chemical containers. Except for regular garbage disposal, the drop-off sites are free. The sites are open four days per week. All county residents have access to the convenience centers although some municipalities, New Bent, Havelock and Bridgeton, have modified versions of the county program and offer some different services. At the time of implementation, the county removed all the green boxes which had served county residents. At that time the county determined that 69 percent of residents were served by private haulers and the rest used the green boxes. The county was divided into franchised areas and the existing haulers were awarded franchises based on the previous percentage. Franchised haulers are required to operate under the terms of the PAYT program and accept any waste with approved stickers attached. Stickers are purchased at a number of retail outlets throughout the county. Retailers receive 8.75 cents per sticker as commission for the sale of stickers. The Craven County program has been quite successful as well as accepted. Residents were given the option of using , cans in place of stickers and paying a flat fee based on the size of the can 5 years after the program was initiated. It is interesting to note that most have opted to stay with the stickers underlining the popularity of the program. I G I I I CI Li I I I I Pay -As -You Throt wProgrrame Management � in the South Southern Chester County, South Carolina Contact: R. Carlisle Roddey Bob Corcoran Chester County Supervisor Recycling Consultant P.O. Drawer 580 P.O. Box 1957 Chester, SC 29706 Chester, SC 29706 (803)385-5133 (803)377-1717 (803) 385-2022 fax Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: S I for large bags 5.50 for small bags Results Collections Waste Landfilled: down 50% in first year Recyclable Collections: up 50% in first year Yard Waste Collections: Other Collections: Population: 40,000 Inception: October 1995 Type: Bag Curbside and Drop-off Latest Update: Costs Waste Collections: up 14% in first year Waste Disposal: down 27% in first year Administration: down 7% in first year Total: down 7% in first year Chester County is located in the north central portion of the state about equidistant from Charlotte, North Carolina and Columbia, South Carolina. The county is mainly rural with only a few small municipalities. Before implementing PAYT, Chester County residents were served by green boxes located throughout the county. Residents paid a flat fee of $90 per year for unlimited disposal. Additional revenues were collected from property taxes. Commercial customers were charged only S 135 per year for unlimited green box pick-up and disposal. Residential customers are now served by the PAYT bag program and commercial customers are charged according to the number of pick-ups requested. Now, residents within city limits (Chester, Richburg. Great Falls and Fort Lawn) have once per week curbside garbage collection and must use the county's official bags. Recyclables also are collected once per week curbside at no additional charge. Residents outside city limits must take their garbage to the staffed drop-off sites open 78 hours per week. Garbage must still be in official bags. The drop-off sites accept a variety of recyclables including newspaper, cardboard (including cereal boxes, etc.), plastic, glass and metal containers, used motor oil and filters, auto batteries and appliances. Certain bulky or problem items can be taken to the county transfer station. These items include tree limbs -and other yard waste, paint cans, tires and small amounts of C&D waste. Yard waste is collected once per week curbside for a fee of S 10 per year for residents within the city limits. The yellow official county bags are available for purchase from a variety of retail outlets throughout the county. The larger size bags come in.packages of five for $5 and the smaller bags in packages of 10 for $5. Some of the cities in the county provide their own curbside collection while others contract with private haulers, who must also use the program. Since implementing the program, waste disposal has decreased considerably and recycling has subsequently increased. Although there were objections to the program at first, most people have accepted it as evidenced by the reinstatement of the County Supervisor shortly after PAYT was implemented. The County Supervisor is an elected official! Before implementing the program, about 50 presentations were made for school groups and luncheons. Enforcement takes the form of two litter officers authorized to issue citations. The first offense carries a $50 fine and the second an $80 fine. Although illegal dumping was a concern prior to the program it has not been a problem. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South , Southern States Waste Management Coalition Chester County officials believe the success of their program correlates to the simplicity of the bag system. Residents can easily obtain the bags at grocery and hardware stores and the size of the bag reflects the cost of the bag. The type of bag also is important. It must be of sufficient quality to handle the amount of garbage authorized for the size of the bag. The County sees itself as just another vendor to the retail outlets and is careful to insure adequate stock of bags. County officials stress the importance of obtaining the support of town administrators and council members prior to implementation. They believe the county -wide program is more effective than if it were for a municipality only. Most programs cannot boast the remarkable results of the Chester County program and the decrease in waste generation is not completely accounted for by the corresponding increase in recycling. However, since illegal dumping has not increased significantly since the program was put in place, county officials are very pleased with the results. In fact, the program has become a model demonstrating the effectiveness of PAYT in areas often thought to be too rural or not progressive enough for such a system. Chester County has proved that these antiquated ideas are incorrect. UI I I I I I I I. I 1" I I 1 I 1 i 1 1 1 i I I. 1 Pay -As -Yoh Throrn States W tPe MogemerntCoan the South Sout Poquoson, Virginia Contact: Bob Kerlinger Local Volunteer 20 Roberts Landing Drive Poquoson, VA 23662 (757)868-3779 (757) 868.3805 fax Population: 11,500 Inception: June 1992 Type: Bag Curbside Latest Update: Rates Residential Garbage DisposaVCollectian: I Incinerator n finer for Tipping Fee: S 1.50 for 32 gallon bags Results Collections Waste Landfilled: down 25% since inception Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: up 10% since inception R Waste Disposal: nearly a 50% rate Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: Costs Poquoson is located between the City of Hampton and York County on the Chesapeake Bay. It is a bedroom community of Newport News and Hampton with a long history dating back to the early 1600s. The City already had a successful recycling drop-off program that was the recipient of a national recycling award from the US EPA. At the time of implementing PAYT, the City joined a regional curbside recycling program. The City is charged an amount per household as part of the recycling cooperative. Because of the success of the recycling drop-off program, a committee was setup to determine if garbage collection could be improved as recycling had been. Before implementing PAYT, garbage collection fees were shown as a line item tax of $19 per quarter so customers knew that garbage disposal was a separate fee. After eight months and 25 meetings, the City decided on the PAYT system implemented in 1992. The City decided to eliminate, its successful drop-off recycling program and join the curbside cooperative to further increase recycling participation. The bag system was adopted forPAYT because it required little capitol to implement, was easy to control (especially bag size) and required few administrative changes. The bag size was determined by the size that would best fit the best selling garbage cans on the market. To prevent over -stuffing, the bags are intentionally designed to burst at 50 pounds. The bags are collected curbside once per week. One particularly favorable aspect of the bag system is that streets are kept clear of empty cans after collection. This was especially a problem due to the normally windy conditions of the region that scattered empty cans. Bags are purchased at local grocery, convenience and drug stores in packs of five bags for $7.50. All proceeds are turned over to the City after sale. The stores make no profit but they make no investment in pre -paid bags either. Proceeds from the sale of bags pays all costs of the program including collection, disposal and recycling costs. Recyclables are now collected curbside once per week. Mixed paper, OCC and newsprint are collected together and glass. PETE and HDPE plastics and metal containers are also collected commingled. The regional recycling cooperative operates a MRF where the recyclable streams arc further separated and processed. The city has a 5 year contract with the hauler for recycling services and all recycling revenues are kept by the contracted hauler. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition I 1 Yard waste is not collected curbside except by appointment only for a S 12 prepaid fee. Otherwise, residents may take yard waste to a nearby composting facility at no additional charge. White goods and oversized items are collected twice per year by appointment only at no additional charge. Funding for this service comes from the City's general fund and is not a part of the PAYT program. Low income citizens may apply for free official garbage disposal bags if they can show a need. The city stresses that education is very important to the success of the program and has set up a speakers bureau to present the program to community groups. In addition, TV commercial were shown on the local cable access channel, news stories and editorials ran in the local newspaper and information was printed in the City newsletter prior to implementing the program. During talks concerning implementing PAYT, opponents were invited to join the committee set up to investigate possible changes to the waste management system. Nearly all the opponents eventually ended up supporting PAYT and a City Councilman who voted against the program would later admit that the program was good! The system is not mandatory but there is a 95 percent participation rate and the recycling rate is expected to top 50 percent soon. A few residents still haul their own garbage. Although illegal dumping was a concern before PAYT has not been a problem even though no enforcement was ever put in place. The City consistently leads the other seven communities participating in the regional recycling cooperative. In fact, the average pounds of recyclables collected per household in Poquoson is nearly a third more than the regional average. That coupled with the 25 percent decrease in waste disposed attests not only to the success of the PAYT program but to the hard work, dedication and pride of the citizens of Poquoson. J I I I Lip 7 Li I I I I I I I I I I I I I • Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Berryville, Arkansas Population: 3,250 Contact: Brian Ukena Inception: January 1996 Director Carroll County Solid Waste Authority III Public Square Berryville, AR 72616 (870) 423-7156 (870) 423-3866 fax Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Base fee: $6.83/month Bag fee: S I for 33 gallon bag Results Collections Waste Landfilled: Recyclable Collections: Yard Waste Collections: Other Collections: Type: Base fee + Sticker (Bag) Curbside and Drop-off Latest Update: Landfill Tipping Fee: S13.75/ton Waste Collections: Waste Disposal: Administration: Total: Costs Berryville is located in the northwest comer of the state in Carroll County. Eureka Springs is in the same county and also has a PAYT program that has been in place since 1992. Before implementing PAYT, there were no franchise agreements with the city and at least three haulers operated in the area. Billing was handled by the haulers and there was no routing and no limit on the amount of waste that could be disposed. There was no recycling program either. At the time PAYT was implemented, curbside recycling was begun. PETE and HDPE plastic containers, metal containers, glass containers and newspapers are collected commingled curbside once per week. The staffed drop-off centers, open 80 hours per week, collect the same materials plus office paper, cardboard, packing peanuts, cooking oil, motor oil and scrap metal. Garbage can be brought to the drop-off centers if bagged with an authorized sticker as well. Garbage is collected curbside once per week. The first 30 gallon bag is "free" covered by the base fee charged monthly on the water bill. Each 33 gallon bag after that must have an authorized tag attached. The tags are purchased at city hall. Yard waste is collected curbside only once per year but drop-off centers accept yard waste year round. There is no additional charge for yard waste disposal. Bulk items are also collected once per year curbside. In addition, the City offers a clean up "amnesty" for residents moving in or out whereby any type and amount of waste will be collected at no charge. Low income residents are charged only $6 per month base fee. The - base fee and tag sales cover all costs of the Berryville program. City officials believe the base rate disposal amount is a contributing factor limiting illegal dumping. Illegal dumping has not been a problem and is a bigger problem in communities in the county that do not have franchise agreements with haulers or mandatory collection of waste. Some illegal dumping into commercial dumpsters did occur at first but this problem was overcome by putting locks on the dumpsters. Fluctuations in fees and revenues is an ongoing Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition problem as is customer confusion, especially among new residents. Educating the residents and political leaders is a constant challenge overcome only by continuous education efforts. The Berryville program is very similar to the Eureka Springs program and probably benefited from their experience. Unlike Eureka Springs, Berryville officials decided on a tag (or sticker) system rather than bags. They believe the tags are more convenient than the bags but concede that haulers prefer the bags because no judgment is needed regarding size of bags and bags are easier to see. City officials stress the importance of offering a "free" level of service to residents. Without this free bag, they believe illegal dumping would have been significant. They also stress working closely with contracted haulers since they will have to implement the program and deal with the problems. Still, the biggest challenge was convincing people that solid waste service is a utility that should be billed and controlled as such. In this regard, Berryville has been successful. I C P I I I [1 I 1 1 I 1 I. i Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Eureka Springs, Arkansas Population: 2,000 Contact: Brian Ukena Inception: February 1993 Director Carroll County Solid Waste Authority 111 Public Square Berryville, AR 72616 (870) 423-7156 (870)423-3866 fax Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Base Fee: $7.75/month (no waste covered) Bag Fees: 5.75 for 32 gallon bag 5.35 for I5 gallon bag Results Collections Waste Landfilled: Recyclable Collections: Yard Waste Collections: Other Collections: Landfill Tipping Fee: $9.75/cubic yard Type: Base fee + bag Curbside Latest Update: Costs Waste Collections: Waste Disposal: Administration: Total: down 14% since 1993 Eureka Springs is a small scenic resort community in northwest Arkansas. Since implementing PAYT, a neighboring community. Berryville, in the same county also has implemented PAYT. Official city bags are available at city hall, the recycling center and grocery stores. Twice a year, the city holds a Clean -Sweep event where, for $8, bulk items, C&D debris, household hazardous waste, etc. is collected. A drop-off site is available for the disposal of white goods for a fee of$10 10 for non -refrigerant containing devices and St 5 for those with refrigerants at other times of the year. Other scrap metals may be taken to the drop-off site for free. Hardship cases are charges only $4.35 per month for the base fee and garbage is collected at the front door. Regular customers receive once per week curbside garbage and commingled recyclables collection. The city accepts a wide variety of recyclables including newspaper, plastic, glass and metal containers and cardboard. In addition to these, the drop-off site accepts mixed paper and office paper. Curbside cardboard collection is made twice per month. Yard waste is collected monthly, for no additional charge, from the 640 residents served by the system. —. The biggest challenge, according to city officials, was getting people to accept that they had to pay for garbage disposal. Before PAYT, some citizens would pile their garbage at one neighbor's house thus dodging collection fees. The equity of PAYT was stressed which brought about opposition to the base fee. Eureka Springs decided not to include any "free" disposal with the base fee. Berryville chose the opposite and allows a certain amount in association with the base rate. Apparently, residents are now used to paying for waste disposal since the program has been operating successfully for several years. Another measure of the success of the program is that the neighboring city of Berryville used the Eureka Springs program as a guide. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Newton County, Arkansas Contact: Eugene Villines Judge Court Street Jasper, AR 72641 (501) 446-5127 Rates $ I for 32 gallon bag Results Collections Waste Landfilled: Recyclable Collections: Yard Waste Collections: Other Collections: Population: 7,666 Inception: Type: Bag Curbside (Mailbox) Latest Update: Waste Collections: Waste Disposal: Administration: Total: Costs Newton County is in the northwest portion of the state in a scenic area of the Ozark National Forest. The county is very rural. The county provides mailbox pickup of garbage for all residents. Garbage must be in official county bags. Recyclables are collected mailbox using a blue bag system. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Rogers, Arkansas Population: Contact: LuAnn Diffin Inception: Water Department Type: sticker P.O. Box 338 Rogers, AR 72757 Latest Update: (501)321-1142 Rates Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: The City bills residents for Fulton Sanitation, a private hauler. Residents put a sticker on one bag which allows them to throw out three 32 gallon bags per week. Overflow stickers must be purchased from Fulton Sanitation for SI per sticker for one bag. • I. 1 1 1 ✓1l.'t .. 1• li:i ..• T,1' {: ( .['.l) 4 • Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Alachua County, Florida Contact: Ms. Karen Deeter Waste Collection Manager Alachua County Public Works P.O. Box 1188 Gainesville, FL 32602-1188 (352) 338-3233 (352)491-4680 fax Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Landfill Tipping Fee: $155.28/year for 35 gallon cart S50/ton $178.25/year for 64 gallon cart $234.41 /year for 96 gallon cart Results Collections Waste Landfilled: down 14% in first 2 years Recyclable Collections: up 25% during same period Yard Waste Collections: down 20% during same period Other Collections: Population: 88,091 inception: October 1994 Type: Can Curbside & Drop-off Latest Update: June 1997 Costs Waste Collections: down over 13% since program inception Waste Disposal: down 11% during same period Administration: Total: up 5% since program inception Alachua County is located in the north central portion of the peninsula of Florida. Gainesville is the major city in the county, home to the University of Florida. Prior to the PAYT program, county residents received once per week garbage, recyclables and yard waste collections. Residents paid for waste services through a non -ad valorem assessment on their property tax bills. The city of Gainesville also has a PAYT program in place and participated in a joint bid with Alachua County. The two programs are virtually' identical and both use the same contractor. However, the contracts are approved separately. The above results for collections represent both the Alachua County and City of Gainesville programs. The cost results are for the county curbside program only. The county program serves approximately 16,000 households in the unincorporated portion of Alachua County. Curbside collection is in the urbanized areas of the unincorporated portions of the county. Drop-off centers are provided for rural residents. Multi -family dwellings of nine units or less are treated the same as single family residents. Once per week garbage, recycling and yard waste collections are provided for curbside customers. Overflow garbage must be in official yellow bags used by both the county and city programs. The 30 gallon bags are sold through local retailers at a cost of S 10 for five bags. Yard waste disposal is limited to the equivalent of five bags or bundles per week. Excess yard waste is collected through special pick-ups and charged directly to the customer or prepaid stickers can be purchased from the contract hauler. Stickers are sold in packs of five for $7.50. Bulk items such as appliances. furniture and remodeling debris generated by the resident are collected at no additional charge with prior pick-up arrangement. Low income homeowners (150% of Federal poverty level) are provided garbage collection at no charge. The disabled and frail elderly are offered back door service at no additional charge. I C I I I I I I LI IPay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition A wide variety of recyclables are accepted at no additional charge. The county already had an extensive recycling ' program before implementing PAYT and now accepts newspapers, glass, metal containers, PETE and HDPE plastic containers, magazines and catalogues, cardboard, paper bags, phone books and household batteries. Recyclables are collected curbside commingled (papers separated from other materials at the truck) and separated at a MRF utilized ' by the city and county. Five years before implementing the program and at the time full scale curbside recycling was introduced, public education began with radio and TV spots as well as newspaper advertisements, pamphlets and public service announcements (PSA's). The city and county cooperate on education and promotion efforts and the two programs are very similar. The county and city distribute a well -written brochure explaining the PAYT program that gives tips Ion reducing waste. The public education campaign is ongoing and currently stresses ways to reduce yard waste disposal. In addition, Earth Machine composters are periodically sold to residents for $15 and wire composters are always free. A state grant helps off -set the cost of the composters. Although a concern before implementing PAYT, illegal dumping has not been a significant problem. The County passed an ordinance that provides that identifying information found in illegally dumped garbage is considered prima facie evidence of the person who dumped the garbage. In only a few incidents has garbage been dumped on someone else's property. A County Waste Inspector finds identifying evidence and contacts the Sheriffs Office. A specific time is given for the offender to clean up the garbage and, so far, every offender has done so without incident. There has been some illegal dumping of yard waste but identifying the offender is very difficult. Some ' bulk items are illegally dumped but since these items are collected at no additional charge, County officials do not believe the problem to be a result of the PAYT program. ' Some of the obstacles that had to be overcome include opposition to reducing the frequency of garbage collections, • limiting the amount of wasted disposed, distribution of carts during the short time period between contract award and program implementation and the new hauler's unfamiliarity with the geographical area. Given these, County officials stated the following as recommendations to those considering a similar program. • In writing bid specifications, allow the bidders enough flexibility to determine the best and most cost-effective means of providing the required service. At the same time, be very specific as to performance standards and use appropriate incentives and disincentives to ensure performance. • Allow sufficient time for the process: at least six months between bid award and implementation. �• • Consider implementing all major changes at once. You can expect your customers to take four to six months to adapt to any major change or combination of changes. • Give special attention to contract length, as the hauler's ability to amortize the equipment costs will be reflected in the bid price. The Alachua County (and the City of Gainesville) program has been very successful in reducing waste disposal and increasing recycling. Although administration costs have increased a good bit, overall costs have increased only 5 percent since implementing PAYT. All other costs, except education, have decreased. Yard waste expenses have decreased by nearly 27 percent and recycling expenses have decreased by 16 percent. All of the obstacles stated above were resolved within the first six months of the program. The joint bidding process between the County and City produced substantial savings over separate contracts. Also, the new joint contract encourages waste reduction by providing the haulers with payment only for collection of garbage and recyclables. Landfill disposal charges are paid directly by the County and City. There are now fewer collection vehicles on the streets and residents commend ,. the more aesthetic appearance of standardized carts at the curb. In all, the Alachua County and City of Gainesville PAYT program has generated significant waste reductions, an efficient collection system and the intergovernmental cooperation has resulted in lower rates for the citizens. I Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition Lauderhill, Florida Contact: Ray Sanders Utility Billing Supervisor City of Lauderhill 2000 City Hall Drive Lauderhill, FL 33313 (954) 730-4239 Rates Results Collections Waste Landfilled: Recyclable Collections: Yard Waste Collections: Other Collections: Population: Inception: Type: Latest Update: Waste Collections: Waste Disposal: Administration: Total: Costs Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South • Southern States Waste Management Coalition Athens - Clarke County, Georgia Population: 90,000 Contact: Melissa Tw&edell Inception: September 1995 P.O. Box 1868 Type: Can Athens, GA 30603 Curbside (backyard) ' (706) 613-3512 (706) 613-3513 fax Latest Update: Rates ' Residential Garbage DisposaVCollection: Landfill Tipping Fee: $10.24/month for one 20 gallon can (minimum service available) S34/ton $11.06/month for one 32 gallon can $13.1 I/month for two 32 gallon cans (basic service level) $18.22/month for three 32 gallon cans $25.39/month for four 32 gallon cans S34.60/month for five 32 gallon cans (maximum service available) $2 per bag sticker for overflow service Results Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: down over 10% since inception Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: nearly doubled since Waste Disposal: - inception Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: ' Home to the University of Georgia, the Athens -Clarke County (ACC) is a consolidated government in the northeast ' portion of the state. Athens is a classic "college town" where the population increases dramatically when classes are in session. The area is growing rapidly as the university grows and the Georgia economy expands. The county to the south of ACC, Oconee County, also has a PAYT program in place. However, the two programs are quite ' different. The program serves approximately 9,000 single family households in the Urban. Service District (former Athens City limits) of the county. The General Service District, the former county areas of ACC, are served by private haulers. The private haulers are regulated by ACC and must offer PAYT and collect certain recyclables in order to operate. However, they may set pricing on their own. The information given here is for the Urban Service ' District only, unless otherwise stated. Small businesses such as retail shops, restaurants and bars/coffee shops also have a PAYT program. They pay a base fee determined by the number of pick-ups per week, ranging from $12.85 per month for twice per week collection to $128.47 per month for three times per day plus twice on Sunday, plus $1.00 for each 38 gallon bag. Recycling also is free to small businesses. Larger businesses use traditional dumpster services. The small businesses, therefore, have two ways to decrease their garbage bill. They can reduce the number of bags needed and/or the number of pick-ups needed. ' Garbage collection is once per week back yard or side yard and residents must provide their own cans as outlined in the pricing structure. Residents may change their level of service for free once per year. There is a $10 fee for each additional change. Overflow must be placed in a bag and have an official sticker attached. The stickers can be ordered by mail and charged to the utility bill. Garbage fees also are charged on the resident's utility bill. Yard waste collections are financed in the traditional method of property taxes giving customers the right to throw out approximately a pick-up truck load at no additional charge. Collections are made every two months to all of Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South 1 Southern States Waste Management Coalition , ACC, including the General Service District. Residents may take yard waste to the ACC landfill mulch processing facility at no charge as well. White goods and other scrap metals are accepted free at a recycling center located at the landfill. White goods, oversized items and additional yard waste can be collected curbside for an additional fee which can be charged to the resident's utility bill. The fees usually start at $35. In conjunction with the PAYT system, Athens -Clarke County contracted for amaterials recovery facility (MRF) that handles a wide array of items collected curbside commingled once per week, paper and containers separate, or at one of the six unstaffed drop-off centers located throughout the county. The facility is guaranteed 775 tons per month through a put -or -pay system and all recycling revenue goes to the county. Business customers commingle plastic, glass and metal containers in clear bags and mixed paper in separate clear bags. Businesses recycling large quantities of containers, such as glass, may use roll -out carts. Residential customers are given two recycling containers, one for plastic, glass, metal and aseptic containers and the other for mixed papers. There is no additional charge for recycling. The elderly and handicapped are offered front door pick-up of recyclables at no additional charge. ' As part of its ongoing education efforts, waste reduction workshops and audits are offered to businesses to help them reduce waste generation. In addition to the brochures, presentations, etc., compost workshops are offered to residents and compost bins are sometimes given away for free. Compost bins with education material are regularly offered to residents for $10 each. Eight months prior to implementing PAYT, mailers, public service announcements, presentations and press coverage was used to educate residents about the ensuing program. Press coverage, in particular, was quite extensive with articles appearing in Atlanta papers, widely read throughout the state. In fact, the education proved so successful that the program begin with very few problems, much to the surprise of ACC officials. They now believe they should have concentrated more on the businesses, both large and small. Their recycling programs have been more difficult to implement and there has been more resistance to PAYT from businesses then residents. ACC officials believe more education is needed for their business clients especially since they produce such a large quantity of solid waste. Overall, ACC officials stress that education is the key to a ' successful program. I I I I S. I L You -Throw Programs in t Southern States Waste Management Coalition Coweta County, Georgia Contact: Judy Holdaway Director of Environmental Management 22 East Broad Street Newnan, GA 30263 (770) 254-3705 (770) 254-2606 fax Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: $.40 for 8 gallon bags $.75 for 16 gallon bags S 1.50 for 32 gallon bags S. 10 for any bags for seniors and low income citizens (limited to a maximum equivalent of one 16 gallon bag per week) Recyclable Collections: Population: 38,302 Inception: October 1993 Coweta County is located in west central Georgia off 1.85. The county is experiencing growth from the southern expansion of Atlanta and surrounding communities. . Residents of the county have the option of either curbside collection through franchised private haulers or self-service at one of 16 drop-off convenience centers. Garbage taken to the convenience centers must be in approved bags purchased at fire stations, the Solid Waste Department and grocery stores. Recycling is free to all county residents at 12 of the 16 convenience centers. The other four sites are strictly compactor sites staffed by community service workers. Recyclables are collected in roll -off containers that, when full, are taken to a local recycler. Operation and maintenance of the 12 convenience centers offering recycling is contracted out to a private company. Two of the sites are open 80 hours per week, ten are open 60 hours per week and the four sites serviced by community workers are open at limited times. The cost to staff the sites is approximately $300,000 per year. Nearly all costs are paid by the program with some general revenue fund appropriations. Eventually the county hopes for the program to become an enterprise fund. Large and bulk items must be taken to the county's transfer station and disposed at S 1.48 per 100 pounds. Recyclables but not garbage is accepted at the transfer station. The private haulers operating in the county must register with the county and are required to utilize the transfer station. Other than that, private haulers are free to operate independently and contract with individual households. Most of the private haulers offer curbside recycling of select materials. The county has no records of the number of residents utilizing curbside service. Before implementing PAYT, the county offered curbside service to all residents and operated its own landfill. unique change has been accepted well and there has been no significant illegal dumping problem. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition ' Douglasville, Georgia Population: 15,000 Contact: Keith L. Williams Inception: June 1995 Public Services Director Buddy Allison, Street & Sanitation Superintendent P.O. Box 219 Type: Base fee + Bag 6695 Church Street Curbside Douglasville, GA 30133 Latest Update: (770)920-3000 Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: Base Fee: $8/month Bag Fees: 5.70 for 20 gallon bags $1.20 for 40 gallon bags Results ' Collections Costs Waste Landfilled: down 40% Waste Collections: Recyclable Collections: Waste Disposal: Yard Waste Collections: Administration: Other Collections: Total: Douglasville is in Douglas County just west of Atlanta. Like many communities surrounding Atlanta, the city and county are experiencing rapid growth from urban expansion. After implementing a pilot recycling program, the city decided to utilize PAYT to increase recycling and decrease waste generation. The bag system chosen by the city serves the 4,200 households in the city. The specially imprinted bags are purchased at local grocery stores and must be placed in 90 gallon carts provided by the city. The base fee covers approximately 60 percent of the collection and disposal costs for the solid waste and recycling programs. Recycling is contracted through a private hauler. With the additional revenues from bag sales, all costs are covered by the program. The city also purchased a grinder for yard trimmings and provides the mulch free to the public. The combination of PAYT, recycling and yard waste mulching has reduced landfilled wastes by nearly 40 percent. 51 I. Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South • Southern States Waste Management Coalition Wilmington, North Carolina Population: 60,000 Contact: Bill Reed Inception: November 1992 Superintendent of Solid Waste Management P.O. Box 1810 Type: Can Wilmington, NC 28402 Curbside (910) 341-7875 Latest Update: June 1997 (910) 341-4619 fax I I. I The City of Wilmington is located on the coast of southeastern North Carolina with a population of 60,000. The community is growing with many of the new citizens being retirees from the Northeast. Being located near the beach, the population of the surrounding area swells during the summer. These tourists not only add to the trash ' collected but also to the traffic in which the trash collectors must work. There are several sections of \Vilmington which add to the difficulties of providing trash services; a central business located within the historic district with on -street parking and little or no place to store trash and many service alleys extremely difficult in which to maneuver. ' In 1992 the tipping fee for Wilmington stood at $25 per ton. In just a short period the rate jumped 150 percent to $60 per ton. This increase had to be passed on to customers who became confused by the increase since they were I. recycling more and thus sending less to the landfill yet their garbage bill increased. The garbage bill was beginning to be a major expense for some people prompting a grass roots effort for a more equitable method of charging for solid waste services. The solid waste staff analyzed the waste generation characteristics of the community and found that one-third of all residents set out their garbage only once per week and that the average weight of the garbage per household for the twice a week collection in place at the time was 50 pounds. I. With this information, the city began a pilot PAYT program in several communities offering customers the fee structure listed above. After the pilot program, the PAYT program was initiated for the city at large. Wilmington changed from a twice per week collection to a once per week collection at the time of implementing the PAYT program. With this change, the city renegotiated its contract with a private hauler saving S400,000 in the first year. Although the second collection per week is still available, only 2 percent of the population has chosen this I. option. Staff originally planned to charge extra for yard waste and bulky item collection but citizens wanted these services tied to the price of the carts. Citizens did like the idea of the overflow bags since this allowed them to opt for the lower rate even if they occasionally set out more garbage than their subscription allows. In fact, excess waste after Christmas and moving -in is collected free. Rates Residential Garbage Disposal/Collection: $ 12.10/month for one 40 gallon can collected once per week $14.10/month for one 90 gallon can collected once per week S25.70/month for one 90 gallon can collected twice per week SI for 33 gallon bags for overflow garbage Results Collections Waste Landfilled: down 10% Recyclable Collections: up 15% Yard Waste Collections: up 36% Other Collections: Landfill Tipping Fee: $60/ton Costs Waste Collections: down 8% Waste Disposal: down 25% Administration: no change Total: down 10% Pay -As -You -Throw Programs in the South Southern States Waste Management Coalition ' From the results of the pilot program, the city purchased the 40 and 90 gallon cans. An immediate problem was that more people chose the 40 gallon cans in the city at large than in the pilot program prompting the city to allow some people to pay the 40 gallon subscription price even though they were using a 90 gallon can. Then, after more 40 gallon cans had been purchased and switched out with the 90 gallon cans, they had to be switched out again as residents discovered that they could not get by with the smaller cans. Staff believes this problem could have been minimized with a third intermediate sized can. Other problems associated with the PAYT program are that illegal dumping has increased by 5 percent although much of this is attributed to the county not requiring garbage collection services. Some people attempt to subscribe to lower service levels by over -stuffing the carts requiring more time to empty them. Also, the administrative workload has increased, due in part to the problem of residents switching can sizes at an unacceptable rate. The city may impose a limit on the number of times a customer may switch subscription levels. Revenue: planning also is less predictable. There are still some problems with people piling bags on top of the cans expecting all of it to be collected because it is not on the ground. Collection employees have been accused of being lazy because they will not pickup the extra garbage. Convincing employees not to pick up unauthorized garbage was a problem at first since, before the PAYT ' program, they would have been disciplined for leaving any garbage at the curb. Over time the problems have been solved and the program is considered a success. Most people understand the relationship between garbage generation and their garbage bill. Less waste goes to the landfill and incinerator. More people are recycling more and most people's garbage bill has decreased with the more equitable billing system of the PAYT program. Other communities interested in can systems are now looking to the Wilmington program for ' guidance. Through their experience, the solid waste staff recommend that a community already have a recycling and yard waste program in place before implementing PAYT. Furthermore, a cost analysis should be made for pricing the levels of service offered to customers. Also, support from receptive community groups should be sought and utilized to help sell the program to the rest of the community. And finally, customer education is critical throughout the program. .1 .1 I I F-As-You-Throw—MSW Planners http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/paytJplanners.htm I. I Pay -As -You -Throw A Fact Sheet for MSW Planners n fl MSW programs today need to offer more than reliable waste collection services. In some communities, the issue is rising collection and disposal costs. Other communities are looking for ways to extend landfill capacity. As an MSW planner, you know how important it is to reduce the amount of waste residents put out for collection (or bring to the landfill). In fact, your community probably started a recycling program to help divert some of this waste from disposal. Even with a strong recycling program, however, it's likely that your residents are steadily throwing away more each year —pointing to the need for not only more recycling, but getting residents to generate less waste in the first place. ' For MSW planners in nearly 2,000 communities, a program called "pay -as -you -throw" is helping them meet this challenge. What is pay -as -you -throw? Pay -as -you -throw programs, also known as unit -based pricing or variable -rate pricing, provide a direct economic incentive for your residents to reduce the amount of waste they generate. Under pay -as -you -throw, households are charged for waste collection based on the amount of waste they throw away —in the same way that they are charged for electricity, gas, and other utilities. As a result, residents are motivated not only to increase the amount they recycle but to think about ways to generate less waste in the first place. L I I Li I I weigh the waste and record the amount for billing purposes, common. What are the benefits of pay -as -you -throw? Pay -as -you -throw programs can be structured in several different ways. Some communities charge residents based on the volume of waste they generate. Under volume -based programs, residents are charged a fee for each bag or can they fill up. Communities also can require that residents purchase tags or stickers and affix them to their own containers. Other communities bill residents based on the weight of their trash —although, because of the cost of the equipment needed to weight -based programs are far less However it is structured, pay -as -you -throw has the potential to improve MSW programs in several important ways. First, there are significant economic benefits. Because of the incentive to generate less, communities with programs in place have reported reductions in waste amounts ranging from 25 to 45 I l of2 0725/97 09:30:59 Pay-As-You-Throw—MSW Planners http:/hvww.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/payt/p Ian ners. htri percent, on average. For many communities, this can lead to lower disposal costs, savings in waste transportation expenses, and other cost savings. Pay -as -you -throw communities also typically report significant increases in recycling. In some cases, this can yield increased revenues from the sale of collected materials. In addition, pay -as -you -throw programs can be designed to cover the cost not only of waste collection and disposal, but also some or all of the community's complementary MSW programs (such as recycling, composting, and bulky waste collections). Of course, there often are new costs for the community when a pay -as -you -throw program is adopted, including expenditures for education and enforcement. These costs usually are not significant, however —and they can be built into a pay -as -you -throw rate structure to ensure that they will be covered. Another advantage of pay -as -you -throw programs is the greater control over costs they offer to residents. While they may not realize it, your residents pay for waste management services. And whether they pay through their taxes or a flat fee, those residents that generate less and recycle more are paying for neighbors that generate two or even three times as much waste. With pay -as -you -throw, residents that reduce and recycle are rewarded with a lower trash bill. This incentive to put less waste at the curb also can make a big environmental difference. When people generate less waste and recycle more, fewer natural resources are used, there is less pollution from manufacturing, and less landfill space is consumed —reducing the need to site new facilities. Are there disadvantages to pay -as -you -throw? While there are potential barriers to a successful program, communities with pay -as -you -throw report that they have found effective solutions. Community officials often raise the prospect of illegal dumping when they first learn about pay -as -you -throw. Most communities with pay -as -you -throw, however, have found that illegal dumping in fact did not increase after implementation. This is especially true when communities offer their residents recycling, composting for yard trimmings, and other programs that allow individuals to reduce waste legally. Others, particularly lower -income residents, worry about the amount they will have to pay. In many communities, however, coupon or voucher programs are being used to help reduce trash collection costs for these households. more about pay -as -you -throw? EPA has developed a guidebook for anyone interested in pay -as -you -throw programs. Pay -as -you -throw: Lessons Learned About Unit Pricing of Municipal Solid Waste (EPA530-R-94-004) contains background information on the advantages of pay -as -you -throw and provides detailed information on how these programs work. To order a copy, call the EPA/RCRA Superfund Hotline at 800-424-9346 or TDD 800-553-7672 for the hearing impaired. For Washington, DC, and outside the United States, call 703-412-9810 or TDD 703-412-3323. Go Back to the Pay -As -You -Throw Home Go Back to the Pay -As -You -Throw Home Page Iy-As-you-'Throw—State Officials http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/paytIstate.htrn I I I Ir L U I I fl I I Pay -As -You -Throw A Fact Sheet for State Officials Like most state environmental officials and planners, you've probably been emphasizing the MSW management hierarchy: recommending that communities reduce and recycle as much as possible. - Today, waste reduction is the focus of MSW planning in most states. ' This has helped recycling programs to spread quickly, and recycling: markets have been developed to purchase and process the collected materials:: Source reduction, however, has fallen behind this pace. While the rate of increase'is slowing, individuals in this country are continuing to generate more waste each year —and, as a result, waste management is growing more difficult. Communities in your state need programs that will do more than increase • `% recycling: they need to encourage residents to prevent waste, too. For growing numbers of communities; "pay -as -you -throw" programs are being used to achieve this goal: While fewer than 200 programs were in existence as recently as the mid -1980s, today, nearly 2,000 communities across the country are using pay -as -you -throw to better manage solid waste. -what is pay -as -you -throw? ray -as -you -throw programs, also known as unit -based pricing orvariable-rate' pricing, provide �a direct economic incentive for individuals to reduce the amount of waste they'generate. Under ' -- - pay -as -you -throw, households are charged for waste collection based on the amount of waste they throw away —in the same way that they are charged for electricity, gas, and other utilities. Aresidents are motivated not only to recycle more but to think about ways to generate less waste in the first place. Pay -as -you -throw programs can be structured in several different ways. Some Q i t� Q communities charge residents based on ro the volume of waste they generate. Under • uC�j bye volume -based programs, residents payTfor - r�t ' =' each bag or can they fill up. Communities also can require that residents purchase ' . tags or stickers:and affix them to their own containers. Other communities bill residents based on the weight of their �., . trash —although, because of the cost of + the equipment needed to weigh the waste t _dniitt+c and record the amount for billing '`'� purposes, weight -based programs are far less common. What are the benefits of pay -as -you -throw? 1' However they are structured, all pay -as -you -throw programs share important benefits for both communi i ties and their residents. First, households under pay -as -you -throw have more control over their solid ' waste management costs. While they may not realize it, residents pay for the waste management services they receive. And whether they pay through their taxes or a flat fee, those residents that generate less and -S !of2 07/25/97 09:33:13 Play=M'You-Throw—State Officials http://www.epa.gov/Op oower/non-hw/payt/state.htm, recycfemore are paying forrteigitbors that genete.two or three times as much waste. With s ou-throw paya =' -y , residenfs=tkat reduce and recycle•are rewarded'ivittia lowertta§h bill. in communities with pay-as=ybua:throw programs, this incentive. has resulted in'reported average reductions in waste amounisYaging from 25 to 45 percent. Recycling tends to increA* significantly as }well, -further cutting down on'ihe amount of waste requiring disposal. This can meaitldwer disposal costs, savings in waste transportation expenses, potentially greater revenues from the `sale .of recovered n1 teriars;and other cost savings. And less waste and increased recycling at the local level translates into an improved sold waste management picture statewide. Increased amounts of recovered materials will becomeavailable to lro-esSors and remanufacturers, encouraging the development of increased recycling capaGityarid other • gnvestments. in the infrastructure of ye cycling. The potential for lower costs can helpuierease the Long-term economic stability :of your cotnmurtities' MS W programs. And less waste means fewer natural 1 \ 1. • P ..L .. - .. .-- - o leas been endorsed Are ,there disadvantages tq pay -as -you -throw? • While there are potential barriers to a successful program, communities with n assume •that i each container be asb c' Ih ciion costs "for these dpffcials, for example, esidents are. asked to pay uifies with iwever, especially when 3 trimmings, acid c therprograms'that allow lower -income resideirts; w.orty about the amount coupon or voucher programs are being used to o}v can Ilearn ore about pay -as -.you -throw? EPAhas a guidebook for anyone interested in pay -as -you-throw programs., Pay as-jotl=ihcow:.Lessons Learned About Unit Pricing of Municipal Solid Waste (EPA$30-R-94-004) contains background. information on the advantages of pay -as -you -throw and provides detailed information on how these programs work. To order.a copy, call the EPA/RCRA Superfitnd Hotline at 800;424-9346: or TDp 800-553-7672 for the hearing' impaired. For Washington, DC, and outside the United States, call 703-412-9810 or TDD 703=:4i2-3323: LIY na . 2• .,, Y.. • •Gd Back to the Pay1s-You=37taow Home Page II I 11 I H I I I I Cl I 1.1 I2of2 07/25/97 09:33:14 �y-As-You-Throw—Throw Away Less and Save http:/fwww.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/paytlpublic.htm I I 1 I [1 I Ii L U I n ro N Nbu Because of these potential cost savings, both you and your neighbors will naturally want to reduce the amount of - waste that you generate. And when people reduce waste, that can mean lower costs for your community, since it costs less to collect and dispose of everyone's trash. This might even free up funding for other municipal services you depend upon —like schools and fire and police protection. @3 "; JSZ In addition, the pay -as -you -throw incentive to put less waste at the curb can make a big environmental difference. When people generate less waste and recycle more, fewer natural resources are used and there is less pollution from manufacturing. Valuable landfill space is conserved as well/reducing the need to site new facilities. Are there disadvantages to pay -as -you -throw? While there are potential barriers to a successful program, communities with pay -as -you -throw report r. that they have found effective solutions. Illegal dumping is a frequently raised issue. While people often' assume that illegal dumping will increase once residents are asked to pay for each container of waste they generate, most communities with pay -as -you -throw have found this not to be the case. This is especially true when communities offer their residents recycling, composting for yard trimmings, and other programs that allow individuals to reduce waste legally. Others, particularly lower -income residents, worry about the amount they will have to pay. In many communities, however, coupon or voucher programs are being used to help reduce trash collection costs for these households. What Can I Do? If you're interested in pay -as -you -throw, talk to your town planner or local elected representatives! Ask them if they know about pay -as -you -throw, and whether they would consider using it•in your community. If you or your town's officials want to know more about pay -as -you -throw, EPA has developed a guidebook you can use..Pay-as-you-throw: Lessons Learned About Unit Pricing of Municipal Solid Waste (EPA530-R-94-004) contains background information on the advantages of pay -as -you -throw and provides detailed information on how these programs work. To order a copy, call the EPA/RCRA Superfund Hotline at 800-424-9346 or TDD 800-553-7672 for the hearing impaired. For Washington, DC, and outside the United States, call 703-412-9810 or TDD 703-412-3323. 0 V When people generate less waste and recycle more, . fewer natural resources are used and there is less pollution from mans facturing. Go Back to the Pay -As -You -Throw Home Page 1 2 of 2 07/25/97 09:32:13 Pay -As -You -Throw —Throw Away Less and Save httP:f/www.eJa.ov/ePaoswer/non-hw/PaYt/PubIic.htmi Pay -As -You -Throw Throw Away Less and Save - 1 Do you know how much you spend per month on electricity? How about your gas utility? The person who pays the bills in your household probably has a pretty good idea. But do you know how much you spend on garbage? , Each time your city or town sends a truck down your street to pick up your waste, it costs money. It costs money even if you drop your trash off at a local dump. Ultimately, you pay for this service, usually through your local taxes. And it's not likely that you have much control over the amount you pay, regardless of how much goYa �� garbage you create. O� There is a different system, however, under which residents are 6 tbctpasked to pay for waste collection directly —based on the amount of garbage they actually generate. They're called "pay -as -you -throw" programs, and nearly 2,000 communities across the country have begun using them. What is pay -as -you -throw? Pay -as -you -throw is a different way of paying for waste collection and disposal services. In some pay -as -you -throw communities, it works on a per -container basis: households are charged for each bag or can of waste they generate. A few communities bill residents based on the weight of their trash. Either way, the system motivates people to recycle more and to think about ways to generate less waste in the first place. For community residents, however, the most important advantage of pay -as -you -throw may be the fairness and greater control over costs that it offers. Do you have neighbors that never seem to recycle, and always leave out six or seven bags of trash? While you may not have thought about it, right now you're helping them pay for that waste. Under pay -as -you -throw, everyone pays only for what they generate —so you won't have to subsidize your neighbor's wastefulness any more. It's only fair. With pay -as -you -throw, when you recycle and prevent waste, you're rewarded with a lower trash bill. Because of these potential S I Li I I I of 2 07/25/97 09:32:12