HomeMy WebLinkAbout180-92 RESOLUTION•
RESOLUTION NO. 1R0-92
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 1993-1997 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DOCUMENT.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS THAT:
Section 1. The City Council hereby approves the adoption of the 1993-1997 Capital
Improvements Program document as prepared by staff to he incorporated into the 1993 Annual
Budget and Work Program. A copy of the program authorized for approval is attached hereto
marked and made a part hereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 1st day of December 1992.
ATTEST -
By:
c-rnuo�
Sherry i° Thomas, City Clerk
APPROVED:
By:
Fred Hanna. Mayor
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
5 -Year
Capital Improvements Program
1993 - 1997
Executive Summary
MICR ()FILMED
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
1993-1997
Staff Proposed
Capital Improvements Program
Executive Summary
Compiled by:
Ben Mayes, Administrative Services Director
Stephen Davis, Budget Coordinator
Scott Huddleston, Financial Analyst
This document is printed on recycled paper
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Transmittal Letter 1-3
Project Map 4-5
CIP Program Overview 6-10
Summary Chart - Capital Improvements Program 11
Summary Chart - CIP By Fund / All Sources 12
Summary Chart - Sales Tax Bond Issue 13
Summary Chart - Sales Tax Pay -As -You -go 14
Combined Summarization 15-18
Comprehensive Detail 19-22
Project Rankings by Funding Source 23-33
Potential Projects List 34
Long -Range Projects List 34
1jay
Err
alis TIILE
THE CITY Of FAYETTEVILLE. ARKANSAS
TO: Fayetteville City Board of Directors andel Citizens of Fayetteville /
FROM: Scott C. Linebaugh, City Manager ,�[L ` A�
Ben R. Mayes, Administrative Se ices Dir ctor v\
Kevin D. Crosson, Public Works Director
Alett Little, Planning Management rectoregt/
Mickey Jackson, Fire Chief f
Richard Watson, Police Chief
DATE: September 14, 1992
SUBJECT: 1993-1997 Capital Improvements Program
Overview/History
1t is our privilege to transmit the 1993-1997 Capital Improvements Program (C.I.P.) for the City of
Fayetteville. The 1993-1997 C.1.P represents the fourth annual update of the five-year plan which was
originally compiled in late 1988. The C.I.P. is a planning guide for future improvements to the City's
infrastructure and other capital items which are in excess of $5,000. An annual update of the C.1.P. is
necessary because of changes in capital project needs and available financial resources. The C.I.P. is a
planning document and does not fund projects, rather it provides an orderly schedule for implementing
projects. All funding for projects listed in the C.I.P. must be approved on an annual basis through the
City's budget process by the City Board of Directors/Council. This is the method utilized to appropriate
funding for the capital projects.
The City faces many challenges in providing for the infrastructure needs of its citizens. The majority of
the projects planned for 1992 have been delayed as a result of the sales tax Iawsuit.The City has
successfully defended the sales tax supporting the 1990 Bond Issue and is currently preparing the
necessary legal documents to uphold the Chancery Court decision that is on appeal to the Arkansas
Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear the appeal this fall. City staff is confident that
the Supreme Court will ratify the lower court's ruling and therefore supports the one cent City sales tax
and bond issue. The 1993-1997 C.I.F. incorporates the 1992 projects the City was unable to undertake
due to the lawsuit. Each project has been thoroughly evaluated and scheduled according to the need to
accomplish the improvement. In some cases projects have been reprioritized and scheduled for later years.
Additionally, each project included in the 1993-1997 C. I. P. reflects current cost estimates to complete
the work.
Sweeping federal legislation concerning handicapped accessibility standards went into effect January 26,
1992. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requires that all City facilities, services. programs,
and communications be "accessible". The ADA has several timeline milestones that must be met: July
26, 1992 transition plan must be complete; January 26, 1993 self evaluation plan must be complete;
January 26, 1995 all structural changes identified in the transition plan should he completed. The City's
transition plan is currently undergoing review by representatives of the disabled community. As a result
of ADA, several new projects were added to 1993 and several projects were rescheduled to nTeet the
timeline requirements of the legislation to bring the City into compliance with this new federal law
113 WEST MOUNTAIN 72701 501 521.7700
1
Funding
In 1989, a review of the City's capital projects showed evidence that funding, from sources other than
current operating revenues, would be required to cover the capital costs identified through the CIP
process. Funding is available from five primary sources: 1) capital improvements bond issue, 2) pay-as-
you-go funding, 3) water & sewer revenue bond issue, 4) operating funds, and 5) federal and state grants.
The citizens of Fayetteville approved a $33,019,000 capital improvements bond issue in 1990 supported
by the City's one cent local sales and use tax. The pay-as-you-go funding, which currently exceeds $2
million annually, is the excess sales tax collections available after paying the annual debt service on the
capital improvements bond issue. A Water and Sewer Bond issue is scheduled to be issued in the fall of
1992. These bonds will be supported by the existing water and sewer rate structure. The major operating
funds to be utilized in funding C.I.P. projects include: General, Water & Sewer, Street, Airport, and
Shop.
Projects
An overview of the C.I.P. shows a total of approximately $69.2 million in projects scheduled during the
1993-1997 period. A summary of the projects is listed below:
• $ 14.8 million for various street improvements
• $ 10.8 million for water system improvements
• $ 10.4 million for parallel 36" water line
• $ 7.7 million for sewer system improvements
• $ 6.9 million for school system improvements
• $ 4.3 million for motor pool replacements and additions
• $ 2.2 million for fire department improvements
• $ 1.9 - million for park improvements
• $ 1.6 million for wastewater treatment plant improvements
• $ 1.6 million for airport improvements
• $ 1.0 million for solid waste/recycling projects
• $ 1.0 million for police/administrative building space renovation
• $ 1.0 million for bikeways and sidewalk construction
• $ .8 million for Dickson St. reconstruction
• $ .6 million for police department improvements
• $ .5 million for traffic controls and signals
• $ .5 million for geographic information system improvements
• $ .4' million for library book purchases & expansion
• $ .3 million for water meter replacements and improvements
• $' .9 million for other various projects
•
•
During the 1993-1997 C.I.P. process, approximately $84.5 million of capital projects were identified.
The resources available to fund these projects totalled $69.3 million. It should be noted that some
resources have restricted or limited usage; thus, they cannot necessarily be used for any project. Due to
the excess of project requests over resources available, prioritization of capital projects has been
mandatory. During the prioritization process, approximately $15.2 million of projects were placed on a
potential projects list meaning they could be done if funding should become available.
In the 1992-1996 C.I.P. approximately $19.5 million of potential projects existed. As a result of issuing
Water and Sewer bonds for 1992 and incorporating the revenue for pay-as-you-go funding for 1997, this
list has been reduced to $15.2 million. After reviewing some of the major projects and improvements that
the City will he faced with in the near future, it is possible that additional revenue sources will he needed
to address the resource shortfall. As always City staff will review the various alternative funding sources
and present options to the Board of Directors/Council and the public as necessary.
Iliehlights
The 1993-1997 C.I.P. continues funding for the Fayetteville School District capital improvements. This
is in-line with the commitment expressed by the citizens of Fayetteville in the November 1988 election.
As mentioned previously, the City is currently involved in litigation over the school funding procedure:
City staff is confident that this funding mechanism will he ratified by the courts and therefore supports
this obligation.
In addition, City staff conducted a series of neighborhood meetings during 1991 which were an integral
part of the Fayetteville Vision project and resulted in the 1991 Vision Report distributed to the City Board
of Directors and the City Planning Commission in November 1991. The Planning Commission is
scheduled to provide their comments and recommendations to the City Board of Directors ih the fall of
1992. As a result of the Fayetteville Vision project, additional projects were incorporated into the 1993-
1997 C.1.P. document. The most noted additions include: approximately S974.000 for sidewalks and
bikeways, $288,000 for a computerized traffic control system, $90,000 for trails in city parks. and,
approximately $277,000 to improve handicap accessibility to City facilities. Numerous projects mentioned
in the Fayetteville Vision were already a.part of the C.I.P. and continue to be included. These pr41ects
include: purchase and renovation of additional library space, purchase of library books, improvements
at various parks, a City- wide storm water study, improvements to youth facilities, and funds to alleviate
odor problems at the waste water treatment plant.
In conclusion, this document has been prepared to explain the goals of the City's 1993-1997 Capital
Improvements Program. The next section of :his document (Program Overview) will be very helpful in
further understanding the C.I.P and hcw it works. It includes information on the various funding sources
and the scope of projects in the document. The Capital Improvements Program is prepared annually under
the direction of the Fayetteville Board of Directors/Council and is subject to public input. Any questions
or comments regarding the document or process are welcomed.
SCLisld
3
C.I.P. Project Map
In an attempt to provide a visual display of both the diversity of the proposed improvements,
as well as the magnitude of this undertaking, a map of Fayetteville has been prepared with
indicators for funded project locations Equipment purchases and City wide infrastructure
improvements are not depicted on this map.
4
mlo MI
I FGEND
GENERAL •
STREET •
WATER •
SEWER •
PARKS •
T
AIRPOP.T •
F RE
LAKE FA'rCTTEV1LLC
-ELI 1
ROMI
NO CPR
IS ,e
IN
•
NEM, El
4
AMR 11 RD
AN A
•
I AYEITEVILLE
DRAKE E E. R
1
12
Y
J
FAYETTEVILLE
Program Overview 1
city of Fayette, Arkansas
5—Year
cap l Zmpravements Program
1993 — 1997
Capital Improvements Program Overview
In 1988, the first five - year Capital improvements Program (C.I.P.) for the City of Fayetteville
was produced. Since that time the C.I.P. has been updated on an annual basis. The City of
Fayettevi le's C.I P. should be considered as a financial planning tool that lists the City's capital
improvement projects, places the projects in pnonty order, and schedules the projects for
funding and implementation. As presented, this is a five-year forecast enabling the City to look
ahead to its capital needs It should also be further considered as a major policy tool for the City
Board of Directors/Council.
Capital Improvement Program Advantages
As with most management tools, the Capital Improvements Program has many benefits and
advantages. It:
A. Promotes advance planning and programming by Department Directors and
Division Heads.
B. Provides for orderly replacement of facilites and equipment.
C. Forecasts needs for new capital investments ahead of time.
D. Helps the Board of Directors/Council and administrative staff to gain an overall
view of growth and development within the City and coordinate capital
improvements within its growth.
E Helps plan for balanced development and capital expenditures without
concentrating too heavily on any ane area or Department.
F. Becomes a fiscal planning tool to forecast capital demands on local revenue, to
foresee future borrowing needs, and State or Federal aid that will be needed.
G. Ensures projects and spending will be earned out in a priority need in relation to
the City's fiscal ability; that is, the most needed projects first.
H. Ensures capital projects will be implemented in accordance with all of the
objectives set by the City Board of Directors/Council and as expressed by the
citizenry.
I. Allows adequate time for projects to be planned and designed carefully including
the opportunity for public input in the process.
J. Permits the City officials to proceed with land acquisition requirements in
advance of need.
6
Capital Proiect Definition
, Capital expenditures, per City policy, are expenditures of five hundred dollars or more that have
a useful life in excess of one year. The annual Capital Improvements Program (C.I.P.) contains,
at a minimum, capital expenditures in excess of five thousand dollars. However, capital
expenditures less than five thousand dollars may be included in the C.I.P. The project can be
a self- contained or stand alone project (i.e. fire truck purchase, purchase of a building, etc),
or an easily defined phase of a multi -faceted projected (i.e. purchase of land or easements for
future construction, purchase and renovation of a building, engineenng and construction of a
new street, etc) or a feasibility or engineering study that could lead to future infrastructure
projects (i.e. a transportation study, a bikeways plan, a sidewalk plan, etc).
Priority Selection
Since Arkansas law requires segregation of funds by source and the City of Fayetteville currently
has over 20 funds that can be or must be used for capital items, it requires the City to prioritize
projects within funds. This C.I.P. will not attempt to rate projects of one fund against another,
but rather within funds with regard to relative merit. A priority ranlang is assigned to each
request after considering the urgency, necessity, and desirability to the City's operations. In
some cases a project may be considered to be desirable but funds are not available. These
projects will be prioritized and considered a "Potential Project". This in effect lists the project
as necessary for future development provided funding becomes available.
Potential and Long -Range Projects
The C.I.P. document process involves a review of all projects and resources during each update.
City staff attempts to identify as many projects for funding as resources will allow.
Unfortunately, staff has identified significantly more projects than resources will fund. This has
resulted in an extensive "Potential Projects" list totalling $15.2 million All projects on this are
considered to be viable projects, but for which no current funding exists.
In an effort to provide additional long-range planning, staff has attempted to identify major
projects which are needed beyond the current five-year penod. These projects will be reviewed
each year as staff compiles the annual update to the C.I.P. In addition, State and Federal funding
will be sought to assist in reducing the City's cost for said projects.
Organization of the Capital Improvement Program Document
The document is organized in four (4) sections:
1. Introduction
This section includes several summary schedules and a map detailing locations of capital
improvements reflected in this document. The Summary of Project Requests and
Resources Schedule reflects totals by fund and lists the resources available for the
projects. It also notes the total amount of potential projects. Four charts with
7
accompanying tables detail: 1) Summary of Project Requests and Resources; 2) Summary
of Projects By Fund - All Sources; 3) Sales Tax Bond Issue Projects; 3) Sales Tax Pay -
As -You -Go Projects. The Combined Summarization lists all requested projects and
details by project whether it is funded through bond issue, pay as you go sales tax,
operating funds, or is a potential project. The Comprehensive Detail shows all projects
by fund and funding source, and the amount of funds anticipated for each year.
2. Funding Details 1993-1997
This section is divided by year, and includes project detail forms for each project. Each
section is preceded by a project ranking list, which specifies the priority funding of the
project. These forms detail the type of project, location (if applicable), project cost,
annual operating cost, as well as a description and justification of the project. The
program detail form is placed in the initial year a project begins. The prionty list for
each year then denotes with an (*) when the project is a continuing project from the prior
year.
3. Potential and Long -Range Projects
The C.I.P. document process involves a review of all projects and resources dunng each
update. City staff attempts to identify as many projects for funding as resources will
allow. Unfortunately, staff has identified significantly more projects than resources will
fund. This has resulted in an extensive "Potential Projects" list totalling $15.2 million
All projects on this are considered to be viable projects but for which no current funding
exists.
In an effort to provide additional long-range planning, staff has attempted to identify
major projects which are needed beyond the current five-year period. These projects will
be reviewed each year as staff compiles the annual update to the C.I.P. In addition,
State and Federal funding will be sought to assist in reducing the City's cost for said
projects.
4. Glossary
This section includes a glossary of terms that will hopefully enable a user to understand
what a Capital Improvement project is and also provide a detail of financial terms.
Project Types
Capital projects between $500-5,000 are not typically included in the C.I.P., rather these items
are included in the operations budget of individual programs as approved during the budget
process. Items under $500 are not considered to be capital, therefore, they are purchased through
the Minor Equipment Account in the Matenals and Supplies category of operations budgets.
Generally, items valued at $5,000 and above are placed in the C.I.P. It should be noted that
the C.I.P. does not finance the projects contained in it. Rather, the C.I.P is a planning
document which places projects in the Annual Budget & Work Program whereby funds are
8
appropnated for them by the Board of Directors/Council. Prior to actual initiation of project
work, required contracts are presented to the Board of Directors/Council for final approval of
expending funds.
The Capital Improvements Program includes the General, Water and Sewer, Street, Shop,
Airport, and Solid Waste fund projects.
General Projects The General fund is projected to be capable of supporting $ 1,380,000
per year for capital construction projects of the Fayetteville School District and selected
capital projects which have a dedicated funding source. All other capital items required
to support services provided by divisions within the General fund must be supported by
the City's Sales Tax.
Water and Sewer Projects The Water and Sewer projects will be funded through the
Sales Tax Bond issue, Sales Tax Pay -As -You -Go, Water and Sewer operations, and a
Water and Sewer Revenue bond issue which is scheduled for 1992. The Water & Sewer
operations are funded by user fees.
Street Projects All street projects will beLfunded either by the sales tax bond issue or
pay-as-you-go sales tax funds. The Street Fund operating budget will only support basic
maintenance and operations.
Shop Projects The shop is an internal service fund. Revenue is generated for the shop
fund through vehicle usage rates charged for the usage of each vehicle. These usage rates
include replacement cost, maintenance cost, and overhead cost. The estimated revenue
to be collected for replacement cost each year avenges $ 950,000.
Airport Projects All airport projects will be funded through Airport Operating Funds.
The Airport operations are funded .by.rents and leases, user fees, and federal and state
grants.
Solid Waste Projects The balance of the cost of the solid waste transfer/processing
center is included in the Sales Tax Bond issue funding in 1993-1994.
Funding Sources
The C.I.P. has several funding sources; the Sales Tax Bond Issue, Pay -As -You -Go (sales tax
collections in excess of the debt service requirements of the Sales tax Bond Issue), Water and
Sewer Revenue Bond Issue, Federal and State Grant programs, and operational funds.
Sales Tax Bond Issue
•
On November 8, 1988 the 'Citizens. of Fayetteville approved the rededication of the 1% local
sales and use tax for the purpose of providing for funding of capital improvements. On May
29, 1990, the citizens approved the issuance of $33,019,000 in capital improvements bonds,
which would be supported by the sales and use tax. The City's Bond Trustee received the
9
proceeds from this sale on October 18, 1990 and the process to complete the projects as
descnbed m the election began; however, a class action lawsuit challenging the sales tax placed
the projects on hold pending the outcome of the litigation. The City prevailed m Chancery
Court in late spring and the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Arkansas Supreme Court. Staff
is confident that the Supreme Court will ratify the Chancery Court decision.
Pay -As -You -Go
The City utilises sales tax revenue in excess of the debt service requirement for the 1990 Sales
Tax Bond Issue to fund additional capital improvements. Currently, several of these projects
have also been placed on hold pending the outcome of the Sales Tax Lawsuit.
Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds
The City periodically issues Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds supported by water and sewer
rates to provide the capital to fund improvements to the City's water and sewer system.
Federal and State Grant Programs
The City utilizes federal and state grant program to fund capital improvements where possible.
Recent examples of federal and state grant participation include receiving an Arkansas
Department of Pollution and Ecology Grant to assist in the purchase of a tub grinder for
Recycling and Composting and receiving FAA grants for Airport Improvements.
Operational Funds
Examples of capital improvement funding from operational funds include Shop Fund equipment
purchases, Airport improvements not eligible for Federal and State funding and Off Street
Parking Fund funding improvements to the parking deck.
Operation and Maintenance Costs
Operation and maintenance costs associated with each capital project are budgeted in the
appropriate operating fund, and are noted on the capital project detail sheets which appear in the
Capital Improvement Program document by year.
Summary
The Capital Improvements Program (C.I.P.) is approached as a valuable tool to be used in the
accomplishment of responsible and progressive financial planning. The program is developed
in accordance with the City of Fayetteville's prioritization of capital needs and budget policies.
These policies and the C.I.P. document form the basis for making various annual capital budget
decisions and support the City's continued commitment to sound long-range financial planning
and direction.
10
Project
Requests
General Fund
Shop Fund
Airport Fund
Water & Sewer Fund
ST Pay—As—You—Go
8ond Issue
Off—Street Parking
Potential Projects
Resources
Available
General Fund
Shop Fund
Airport Fund
Water & Sewer Fund
ST Pay—As—You—Go
ST Bond Fund
Off—Street Parking
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
1993-1997 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUESTS &
PROJECT RESOURCES
1993
$ 2,180,000
1,132,913
274,600
5,118,144
6,732,610
11,833,170
0
5,983,471
$ 33,254,908
1993
$ 2,180,000
971,011
441,214
6,665,942
6,915,843
25,177,385
0
-1994
$ 1,409,500 $
965,389
308,450
2,137,640
2,982,124
7,972,421
0
632,600
$ 16,408,124 $
1994
$ 1,409,500 $
980,411
443,085
1,557,498
3,021,348
357,319
0
$ 42,351,395 $
7,769,161 $
1995
1,380,000 $
1,0471679
322,000
642,440
3,159,876
4,236,609
30,000
1,004,600
11,823,204 $
'1995
1,380,000 $
970, 321
444,795
1,584,355
3,141,400
230,585
30,000
7,781,456 $
1996
1,380,000
786 379
320,000
2,477,400
2,847,006
707,500
0
1,519,600
1997
$ 1,380,000
339,307
347,000
950,000
3,149,925
700,000
0
6,106,400
10,037,885 $
1996
1,380,000 $
960,140
446,337
1,727,393
3,058,605
70,304
0
7,642,779 $
TOTAL
$ 7,729,500
4,271,667
1,572,050
11,325,624
18,871,541
25,449,700
30,000
15,246,671
12,972,632 $
1997
1,380,000 $
949,868
447,700
1,814,349
3,126, 691
44,776
0
7,763,384 $
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
1993-1997
01I -Street Parking
0.04%
Water & Sewer
16.35%
ST Bond Issue
36.75%
ST Pay -As -You -Go
27.25%
11
Airport
2 27%
General
11.16%
Shop
6.1 7%
•
2
84,496,753
TOTAL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7,729,500
4,831,751
2,223,131
13,349,537
19,263,887
25 880,369
30,000 '
73,308,175
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
BY FUND - ALL SOURCES
1993-1997
PRCJECT AREA
General
Water & Sewer
Shop
Airport
Street
Solid Waste
Off—Street Parking
::atei & SeNe
44 86%
tof CC
54.tr
6 's
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
BY FUND — ALL SOURCES
5 YEAR SUMMARY
1993
$ 4 755,232 $
16.139,490
1.132,913
274,600
4,724,202
245,000
0
$ 27.271,437 S
1994
2,831.595 $
6,479,612
965.389
308.450
4,450,909
739.569
0
1995
2,497,351 $
2,506,720
1,047,679
322,000
4,414,854
0
30,000
1996
2,697,026
3,285,400
786,379
320,000
1,429.480
0
0
rg
04°‘
1997
$ 2,621,915 $
2,657,680
339,307
347,000
900,330
0
0
15,775,524 $ 10,818.604 $ 8.518,285 $ 6,866.232 $
TOTAL
15,403,119
31, 068, 902
4,271, 667
1,572,050
15,919,775
984,569
30,000
69,250.082
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SALES TAX BOND ISSUE FUNDING
1993-1997
PROJECT AREA
General
Water & Sewer
Solid Waste
Street
WATER 8 SEWER
35.18%
STREET
56.19%
•
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SALES TAX BOND ISSUE FUNDING
5 YEAR SUMMARY
1993
$ 572,818 $
61500,000
245,000
4,515,352
•
GENERAL
4.76%
SOLID WASTE
3.87%
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1994 1995 1996 1997 TOTAL '
614,500 $ 16,500 $ 7,500 $ 0 $ 1,211,318
2,453,413 0 0 0 8,953,413
739,569 0 0 0 984,569
41164,939 4,220,109 700,000 700,000 14,300,400
$ 11,833,170 $ 7,972,421 $ 4,236,609 $
13
1
707,500 $ 700,000 $ 25,449,700 t
1
1
1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SALES TAX PAY-AS-YOU-GO FUNDING
1993-1997
PROJECT AREA
General
Water & Sewer
Street
Genra.
3424%
Sreec
858%
Nate. 8 Sewe•
..7 •8%
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
SALES TAX PAY—AS—YCU—GO FUNDING
5 YEAR SUMMARY
1993
1994
1995
$ 2,002,414 $ 807,595 $ 1 100,851 $
4,521,346 1 888,559 1 864,280
208.850 285,970 494,745
1996
1997
1.309,526 $ 4,241,915 $
808.000 4,707,680
729,480 200,330
$ 61732,610 $ 2,982,124 $ 3.159,876 $ 2,847,006 $ 3.4.49,925 $
14
TOTAL
6 462,301
10 789,865
1.619,375
18.871,541
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
ICombined Summarization
5—Year
Capital Improvements Program
1993 — 1997