HomeMy WebLinkAbout42-90 RESOLUTIONti7
RESOLUTION NO. 42-90
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ADOPTION OF THE
HAY GROUP PLAN STUDY AS THE PAY PLAN FOR THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE AND THE PAY PLAN FUNDING
OPTION AS THE 1990 SALARY AND BENEFITS BUDGET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY TUE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the Board of Directors hereby authorize
the adoption of the Hay Group Pay Plan for the City of
Fayetteville and the pay plan funding option as the 1990 salary
and benefit budget. A copy of the pay plan and budget authorized
for execution hereby is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and
made a part hereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 20th day of March
m•omil w ip•
ila••
•O•
•• ••
alt•
•••11/4 aa•A
••74> • N...•••• ...... • • 1A'Se
Sf...2t1:TEST -
APPROVED:
, 1990.
"41
k
V
111
tse
WW1-dt-Irria
w I-,
9 Er g •
0 cn
Pcs cno
ct; z o
tl Pd "-.50
Uw
poncnt210"
PliP10<1:15
sa) Era
o z z cn
Eigroyitg.
.91 reg g
cr,
51)
rDI
c.,
d
z p
1-13
CD
'-d
rn
Pfi.11
03a11 AVEI
14
a) CD I -I
tfi
;SI
1.11
l•••4 11
AD0r101a0R12W
0
co -a a) 14
g
rti
1
0
011
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Z
AD
'4C
0 . • 0 1 1 I 1 1 ed
03
1 0
O ri
O 8' 1:13 ej 1:D it 0 5 cn z ri „ern n on
-
zp.CD igs g. g 03 0
0 as sz 0
00 u3 e•-• 0
it
pa 0 tiv ..... a- 00 ca D3 Xs M 0
e. 4.4 0
-• n tra g a o•ocs Tel a
s,- z• a' o co co 0 1-0, o
.
(44 CD CD ;i31 i 9 ra
CD P3 5t a Crg
4
et- CD g 0
re- 0 c. • 02 0 /—'
ep n hi ;17 0
g 0 c.p. CD 4 es- a P el. ps.
o
N
..1.1. 2 0 0 iti 03 g te et•
•-t 1:u
co — 0: e+ 0 0 Er.
CD CD It 2,
4 I.; 0
0 III Z • P°d Fm.' 0 0
CO CD cn 0 g 0-: '4 t5r (72
q 2 N 1 on 0. g
aq CO 0 0a
1-.• go
0 ef- e: CI) e w • co 0 5 piw a
0.0 0-2 rat Os 0 0 F. a.
5
g 0 -• 0
O 0 CD ro•
0 CD Pa 4 4 P3
0.as en CO 0 D3 0 n 0
51
n st 0 4.4
Pi n it 0
CD n D3
Co PI CD 0 PI 0 CI CI
al
ri 0 4 0 ti
Ps CD CD 1.0
C.
0 Eh" 123 0 Ft) a 1.4 0
0 o 0 ts c. 0
O
O " en • o 1 Z. co c•••
0
urk_ 0 e• e‘
t St co FF gm a. co o
O m CD 4 CO
0
••• 0 g
2. 0 0, CD 03 0
CO El a3 CO CD cro
Ul ca SP. CD
0 a. Ca
E. 171 0
0i CD
U2
ii.) co
0 w. co so 'V 4
0 Pais 0 = 0 ca cD e.D..
al n 0 0 0 4 co
A) P4 tl. Ern co 0
1.0 el- 0
CD Cla
0 0 00
r• 0-
co co e. co 0
0. 0 •-.1 "4 P3 1-4 co
O 0
•-1 ca. co pp. asa
0
co 0
s."...
O 0 Po o
co n 0. N 0 ea i
O co
g 5- CA
B x 0• r• -
co 0- 5 10
O g E o 8- co os
o
' 0
Fa t....
O 0 1:1" Fi- eCt-
fad el 1-1
co
00
0
ri. 5 <
Pcs cs"
8. g •
9, CD n P3 P3
O 0 Z. 03 al os .
CD CD 104 5 -..0 et
0
0 0
rp-
te m as 0 e• t•C
0)
et- 0 4 n
. 0
to 1-03 caCD ri 1-41
09 rg 0 tca o ail 0 0
•
Cla ▪ o
g tl ca
5 ail— CD 4-. 4
r; 0 N t••• • Pk n
g. o
0
00 _ .. it 5
a0
0 0 al ca c▪ o
ei: n o Pa ca 0
P3
•-.
al we ea
al
al a) g 2 0 ce-
O crq 0 a- 8
O .
I.. -, 0.1 cp 0s •0 5" 0
:n
a:
•
0
0
O 1 Ow.
CD Can
4 4.
fo
• n
n
m
O c.,.
0 -P•
a 0
0-•
1-1
n
o 0
et -
CD Co
< )4
CD ri-
p, 00
o 2.
P-•••
"C1 et
`.• 0.0)
cn 0
et) 11
0 Cn
PC:1
4. W.
CD 1016
Fh
S • e
11 O.
o
§
co 0
O 0
0.-110
n CD
O 0
O co
o m
,72
0.1
• t".
so g'
D) Cr
O 1
• CP
Go CD
(0.•
1-0)
0 0
al Os
la•
O 04
Ceg
CD
tmi • OD
O 0
• ai
•
Review and evaluation of each job class in the City
•
To be completed in 1990 by Personnel
Editing of class specifications/descriptions
saatoiclula snolatunu Jo senpnu Nsaa
Interviews of management employees
Design and administration of a questionnaire to all employees
Group presentations to employees about the project
Project planning meeting with management
11
1-3
111110
0
0
0
1
I
1
1
'41
0
Implementation by the City immediately
Presentations of results planned for February 1
Development of pay related recommendations
Comparison of City pay to market pay and benefits
Analysis of internal pay equity
Administration with 'the City of a local pay survey
Analysis of six published pay surveys
Review of new job hierarchy with management
1
A
0
•
•
Pay inequity means factors other than proper job content differences are driving pay differences
•
St 5
cp pp
M a4 °
SD
0 ‘44
tC) Ce; M
q pa ri•
Cei 0"
co '0 0
0 co co
5" t< r2
O 1-1. got
(.4- 0 m
Os CD
0
• w
o Sa
it al
fr M
rrr 1
O GO
02
5"
Es- m
P et•
0 0"
m
1-6
0 i.e..:
elq GO
Pig
et
co 02
it 5.
co 0
oi
co 0
al. 1-11
0
EA
i -t. cD
0
et +:
0
03
c -P• CO
p.a.
0
CA g
02 $12
0
ma
0•• as
ad Es
co co
34 n
co Er
co co
O CD
4
"I
ti
M
0
te te
CD PC)
a t)
t
..t. i.s.
q co
S-
b
P
Nonexempt D, nonexempt employees excluding Police and Fire with extreme and continuous ACES
94' Z Z
O 0
eI
X co o
x
m
co
a 5 5
o
es-
oo .0
0
• ai
n )4 )4
0
g 5
O et- 4:3
el -
O • CD .6
O 5 5
CA 10
(1 tie
tti
cn co 'GO
CD
.0
• •E
1•••
P.
.0
• try
O .0
0
.n.
CD :CD
iDD
as
las
frt
1-1
• n
CD
et:
Bt"
• o
.0
a),
!co
'CD in
n
:to
'us
'CD :co
:o
.0
0.6
:c9)
'CO
1C0
• '03
00
ti1 tTj
cn
Nonexempt A, nonexempt employees excluding Police and Fire with minimal ACES
Exempt, the remaining exempt employees excluding Police & Fire
•
•
J
Two unique "technical" jobs were eliminated from this analysis because of the sample size
.9°
co
Z °
g Qs
o p1_.
4 CD 0
A" 0 0,
0s a a.
0
O '<0
4
92 9" 5
-• g,
ra 5 4
O J../ • Ms
Qs 0 as
1:12 e.
5 ep-
-• ep.
P3 0
04 ODI 11
W et- C)
CD ta 02
5
DO CD • p-ol
DV CD 0
CD OS Immi
immo,t o
co o'
•0
cq: 0 RD
LC st co
n
0
T
L
g••
pt
n
- 0 a)
'5Z it
o
os Pic n
ca cp 0-
rir
SINIOd IN3INO0 ElOr
c4S
44
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
co
(71
0
cm
0
1 1 1
co
-01
0
0
Executive Pay Practice Scattergram
3111A3113AVA AO A113
1
1
1
1
.1
SINIOd INMLNO0 or
0
0
0
0
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
rk.)
0
tri
0-
0
7:1
Exempt Pay Practice Scattergram
3111A3.LL3AVA AO A113
SINIOd IN3INO0 80r
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
rv
IV A 0) CO 0 10 A 0 CO 0 Ma CO
- I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11
0
8
o —
o
Nonexempt -A Pay Practice Scattergram
3111AiL3AVA AO &LID
SINIOd 1N31N00 ElOr
•
0
0
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
MIN.INIV1‘)
NJ AMMON] a C00001\)4007
1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
•••I
rs.)
0
•
:6
4
Nonexempt -B Pay Practice Scattergram
3111A3113AVA AO A113
SINIOd 11131N00 E101*
co
•
1=4
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
N.) N
CD CO 0 M CO CO 0 N
I 11111 1
•
•
•
co
0 —1
0
0
Nonexempt -C Pay Practice Scattergram
SINIOd 11131N00 80r
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
N N
ro Cb CO 0 N A 01 CO 0 N A CO CO
I I 1 I I I 1 I I I
co
0
Nonexempt -D Pay Practice Scattergram
3111A3.113AVd AO A113
0
• 'a
e
uospadmoo amadoadda your otp paaappuoo sSETT toye papnpuoa Xanins aliptana,Cad jo alp ma
% differences are shown at the bottom of the graph
•
Remaining exempts are paid below survey averages for the most part
•
"Executives" are shown to be paid very near the survey average
•
. .
5 p
0 s
a
"a 0 tlj n et-
....•
t< s ND 5 >4 g 0
a- F.. ..c)C71 (14 og 1-w 04
0 D,
CD ..o,
S. 0.
.- ern re- e 0 co
CD ' S- cll 3° as o
.....• m a lb t. 0
03 M Fa
0 ° 0 E M n r.•
1:1 0 1—•
b 4 5•'" •-3 os
- CD
CI3 el -
IL -4 So
r
o et- 0.
o Da g EP
0•0 eD cis .5'
o
5
its 0 CO LA" $33 0
4 CD
▪ o § ts cm
g
ei iciri 1 03
er- n
CD 0
o fa :I
O n co 5
11 pa 0 DI t
it •blo .st..8
INS • 0 p•
r) ei •-4 4- p-
c• CD CD
CD
n 5 Qs a Mn
e• 4 ror I:13 5.
.0
•-c o i g.
1:10 a, ts
O 03
a. 0 1-1. '0 (T
o 0 0 0 ps
o ECD k4
omml 13
O t CR1 • • Ira
'el gm
Si% 4
< a 5, 03 CD
DI
el- Ce; a. CP
CD CD as
CO CO DI
CD
n
st. E; 0
4 4
r
ea -c °g g CD
0
0.1 et- CD 4
g On
O 0• 0
<
CD
al 1.... e4-
O pl. 9
as
co
Lc 0 tr,
et- 5. co ts
r• 0 Pi
0
0 11
PS*
Pa • " fai 0
O co 0 0
1.41 03 4 01
cn
LsJ
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
co
1 1 1
co
0
0
0
o —
o
-El
0 in iv 0 .0
rt3
0
4 E 0
.1 la aV
.t.
;
Ems'
cn
0
Executive Pay Practice vs. City of independence, Missouri Survey
3111A3.LL3AVA AO A113
1
1
•
•
Fo•
:smiobiniv440
0
§iai4.1b6;qa §
Ei
r•
•
•
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
0
•
•=1
.. .
F.91
a a I
Exempt Pay Practice vs. Markets
3111A3L3AVA AO A113
MIME.
•=1.
•
a
i
ctor employees is considered most
•
All jobs are compared to the two public sector and one private sector surveys
• 4
•
I I I I 5 't
0 0
4 0
4
ZZ Z co
O ag 0
o et- 04
O Er 0 0 O0 0
co 11 CD 0 0 10
M r• x )4
CD :0 0 co
5 5 9 —
—
cl. V,- tris 0 o
0 0
w
t o Dz‘• 5:
Imml imml • , t • CD
O 0 0 0
0.1
CO Cr Cr 0
0")
co GO
,g.,, g. g a -
ow A.
0
w es:
0.. c.
co an
x n
CD GO 0 0
5 az,
al
a —
4 —
co
O co p3Co
ra 4
to co
O V )0 ps
0a o
5- ci E
n tt
o 0
O 00 .c•C 5..
a. a. a)
o n teat.
O 0 13 o
o i.... .....
o Fs -0 n
tcil.
0
›P 0 `.1;
O 0 0
Co 0
R 0
<
til O
54 o n 4
0
O 4 0 Cret
Co 0 0 CD
O ill 8.1 10
2.. c -p•
4 • 0
trt CD 0 ‘14
5 0 —
/ CD GO •••• •
O 0
4 cr co
6
A-
.- ,
co
co 0 g
4
a+ • 0
Pe
O n
0
e4.4 co
1. 0
6
o
co 0 5
cn 0 4$
4
o) n oi
a
t2i
a
;
el -
St
0
GI 1 0
m
co _ g.
co &
.4
co 0 co
co co
r.
1
•
Z• •
0
144
0 • Ci2 Z
0 0 • • ES Z
st n o
O 1 0 0 0
I—. 0
O o al
t< >1 g4 r SI GI g
it 0 o a, c
8'1E o est a, .pj E
ii st, ii 0 n ; jg
us. et- CD at 0 I<
2r, a x ii 0
ea 0 e-fr PO
SO CD ts 2
t... ova ce t 0
o o n
0, to co ri- i -t 0.
4. ti fas 00 co 0,4
C 'as
CD CD r4.
a 440. Os CD
co cr • a 0 04
il sil
c... 4
O n 0 , E g
‘.‹ 8
os 0
< tge et- at e
O co
O Z. ot 0
0 o co 0 0
01 �q
Ce 14 CD 00
CD g CO
OD1••• •
O e 0 Fa• 0
• 11 c1- .10
CD •—• ,T3 co
00 0 Pcs o
O ce cr te
el- CD 01 co
M co p.a. 0 co
k co 0
g- ca
0. m
c• 0
n co
er• et -
la SI
0. o
a) o ca
o
E 0
0
..... 01 pi ..
:4
si, 0ci-
ep-
‘....<
os. 0.
0 N 0 0
P.1 si) OD
os . 01
CD
P4C5. CR ti
et-
CD
'LS 0 co 2.
E.0.. 0..
a 0
co e+ ci.
i.s. o oo
0 •—•
o cg 5 ii*
tm m 0 r.
4 <
to
pi g- co •-•-4-
qz c. 0
in ps cc
(13 1:1 CD
OD 0
<
0 SO co co
i—P) 0 to
1-6 5 5;
CO S co
ila c4:
0th o mli
Co g.0 Go
0- co t<
Sr cal-.
0 a,
C.
O el° CD
Cia 0
5 0
O 51 5.
•o —
1 0
0
✓
0 te g m
co es 0
co
ti 144
eAOgB ss
•
9
0
1
1
E E E 211
RIR 11
101 copy 1
'
CY CU
a I I
O cs
to a ul a Of 44.1
• i:o b b •-•
• 5•3 co .74 " :6°
0 01 CO *4 Al -6 -•
4
ANNUAL DOLLARS ($000)
N N ▪ N
N CO OD oNa 0 N 0 CO
1 1 1 1 1 II 1 1 1
is
-
Nonexempt -A Pay Practice vs. Markets
3111A3113AVJ AO A113