HomeMy WebLinkAbout122-90 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. 122-90
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE GRANT APPLICATION
AND PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO THE FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to execute the grant application and
proposal to be submitted to the Federal Emergency Management
Agency for a grant, of $27,450 to stimulate the development of
effective civil defense strategies at .local government levels. A
copy of the grant application authorized for execution hereby is
attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 'nth day of Auqust 1990.
APPROVED:
By: /ii.�nJ�/
Mayor
aATTEST:
BV :
City, erk-
FAITTTE`TI LLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
July 91 1990
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Office of Acquisition Management
C/O Eric Rosenberg, Contract Specialist
Mitigation and Recovery Support Division
500 C Street, SW, Room 726
Washington, D.C. 20472
RE: EMW-90-R-3385
Dear Sir:
The City of Fayetteville is very pleased to submit the attached
proposal for the Federal Emergency Management Agency's competitive
challenge grants program to stimulate the development of effective
emergency preparedness public information strategies. We sincerely
believe that our management team presents the best combination of
talent to increase public awareness of natural and manmade hazards,
including nuclear attack preparedness, and to stimulate
preparedness measures for communities, households, business and
industry, schools, volunteer groups, and civic groups.
Fayetteville citizens have been fortunate to live in a community
that is not frequently subject to natural disasters or adjacent to
sites of potential manmade hazards, such as nuclear power plants.
But this fact does not, and can not keep the city from stressing
awareness and providing needed information to the citizens of
Fayetteville.
It is hopeful that when initiated, this program will help minimize
loss of life, personal injury and damage to property, resulting
from hazardous and emergency conditions.
We look forward to the challenge, and thank you for your
consideration of our request.
Sincerely,
cott inebaugh
Cit an er
W. oper
S Administrator
113 WEST MOUNTAIN 72701 501 521.7700 +
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLEj ARKANSAS
TORNADO DISASTER PUBLIC
AWARENESS
PLAN
The purpose of the City of Favetteville Tornado Disaster Public Awareness Plan is to provide a coordinated
approach for City government, households, business and industry, volunteer groups, civic groups, and
disaster organizations in the preparation of information on what can be done to prepare or respond to an
emergency or disaster situation in the City of Fayetteville. The plan provides uniform policies and
procedures for the effective coordination of emergency public Information in making people aware of risks
of a major disaster, such as a tornado which may affect the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents
and visitors in the City of Fayetteville. The plan shall become a supplement to the City of Fayetteville's
Comprehensive Emergency Management Program Disaster Plan, with funding utilized to update the current
plan to incorporate this program. The major component of the plan is the development of a "Tornado
Guide" aimed at informing people with special needs, as well as the general population, about the dangers
of a tornado. Provisions are made for the flexibility of direction, and coordination to accomplish the
following objectives:
• enhance the spread of emergency information messages in order to minimize loss of fife,
personal injury and damage to property, resulting from hazardous and emergency
conditions;
increase involvement of and interaction between local governments, the private sector,
residential communities, school systems and populations with special needs, i.e., elderly,
handicapped, minorities, etc.;
• foster incremental information program development so that efforts can be built on and
expanded;
• enhance emergency preparedness at the family or neighborhood level through the combined
use of public information materials and volunteer resources; and
increase participation of the news media in emergency information dissemination.
SCOPE
The City of Favetteville Tornado Disaster Public Awareness Plan is designed for use in tornados, although
it can be expanded for use in other natural and man-made disasters, including nuclear attack. The Plan
includes the following:
Recognition of the tornado hazards and vulnerability.
Provisions for disseminating tornado watch/warnings through television media sources, and
other informational mediums, with an emphasis toward the population with special needs.
Establishment
of
concepts under which the City
of Fayetteville and relevant disaster
organizations
will
educate the public in response to
tornados by:
Defining the responsibilities and roles of City staff, which include the Public
Information Awareness Committee.
• Provisions for the development of a 7omado Guide' aimed at populations with special
needs, and the general population.
ASSUMPTIONS
In writing this plan, an assumption must be made:
• The City of Fayetteville is more susceptible to tornados than any other natural disaster.
Therefore, this plan will be primarily oriented to this type of disaster.
TARGET AUDIENCE
The target audience for this project is populations with special needs, i.e., elderly, handicapped, minorities,
etc., and the general population. This audience includes the private sector, residential communities, school
children, and other populations with special needs.
GOAL
To increase awareness and stimulate preparedness measures for people with special needs, Including
households, business and industry, schools, volunteer groups, and civic groups.
2
REFERENCES
City of Fayetteville Disaster Plan, Revised 1987
Tele media, 'A Guide for Television Broadcasters on More Effective Emergency Communication With the
Deaf and Hard of Hearing'. FEMA, 1986
American Red Cross, "Assisting Disabled & Elderly People in Disasters.' 1985
E
COMMUNITY OVERVIEW
The City of Fayetteville, County Seat of Washington County, is located in the northwest comer of Arkansas,
some thirty miles east of the Oklahoma border and fifty miles south of Missouri. Sitting near the tallest of
the mountains In the Ozark Mountain Range, the City enjoys four distinct and beautiful seasons in a climate
that for decades has drawn a wide variety of individuals seeking a special environment to live, work and raise
their families.
Settled by some of
the regions'
earliest pioneers in 1828, and achieved town status in 1835. By 1841,
Fayetteville was an
incorporated
city. While Fayetteville played host to both
the Confederate and Union
Troops, it survived both to become one of the states most important centers
for commerce and leaming.
Fayetteville is home to the principal campus of the University of Arkansas system, which has contributed to
higher education in the area for over a hundred years. Its programs in teaching, research, and public service
are constant stimulants to the educational and cultural advancement of the region. Many new industries
locate in the area because of the University, and many industries employ the newly graduated students. The
University also forms one of the strongest supports of the local economy, with students spending about $18
million per year in local businesses, in addition to the Input of the University payroll.
Another contribution of the University has been the development of the Genesis Program to advise, incubate,
and develop new products and businesses, principally in 'high-tech" disciplines. Many of these remain In
Fayetteville. In a unique joint venture, the City has joined with the University to build and operate an arts
complex that will serve the people of the region and the University program alike. When completed in 1991,
the Center will house three theatres for the performing arts, an an gallery, studios for dance and art, teaching
spaces for multidisciplinary arts and an outdoor pavilion.
Drake Field, the City of Fayetteville Municipal Airport, serves as the region's principal airport, and economic
growth of the area is reflected in the average increase of airline boardings for the last five years at 14.8%.
Also, the planned completion of a multi -land highway, south to Interstate 40 and north to Interstate 70 at
Kansas City, puts the city squarely in the fast lane for continued growth in the next decade and into the 21 st
Century. Other available transportation in the area includes rail freight service through Arkansas & Missouri
Railroad, daily bus service through Jefferson Bus Lines, and a number of excellent motor freight carriers.
The City serves the entire region through an outstanding regional medical facility, a Veteran's Administration
Hospital, and a private facility which provides for treatment of mental disorders and chemical dependencies.
The Fayetteville Public School system includes eight elementary schools, two junior highs, and two high
schools. There are also private and parochial schools, and facilities for developmentally disabled children.
In summary, the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is a collective association of nearly 50,000 people in a region
with a population base of over 250,000 who believe that the quality of life is influenced by the quality of the
community. Perhaps that is why we are chosen as one of America's best places to live'.
HAZARDS ANALYSIS
The City of Fayetteville is exposed to many hazards, all of which have the potential for disrupting large areas
within the city, causing damage and creating loss of fife. Potential natural hazards include tornadoes, high
winds, flooding, freezes and lightning. Other disaster situations could develop from a hazardous materials
or hazardous waste accident, or a major transportation accident involving a large aircraft. The hazards listed
on Appendix 1 represents a systematic evaluation of probability and potential occurrence based on past
history. Impact on human fife, damage and/or destruction of property and the potential to disrupt social
'Money, August, 1988;
Bayless, High, 1983. The Best Towns in America: a Where—to—
Go Guide for a Better Life, Houghton Mifflin, Boston,
Massachusetts.
and economic activity within this jurisdiction. The purpose of this Disaster Vulnerability Analysis is to assess
the value of emergency response resources currendy available and to provide a basis for long range
planning for improved comprehensive emergency management, which Includes the enhancement of the
spread of emergency information.
The tornado is the most violent storm produced in nature. The most notable characteristic of the tornado
is the pendent, usually funnel -shaped cloud that is nearly always in evidence. Destruction, almost
Instantaneous and frequently complete, occurs when this cloud dips to the ground. It is virtually impossible
to provide protection against tornado destruction. Tornadoes are exceptionally unpredictable and highly
destructive, and appear with little or no warning.
Flooding
Due to the typography of the Fayetteville area, flooding does not pose a serious threat. During the rain
season of March - May, though, many of the streams in the area have potential for flash flooding.
Airplane Crash
Fayetteville Municipal Airport handles over 400,000 flights a year. The possibility exists for the crash of a
large commercial aircraft resulting in mass casualties. The City currently conducts airport hazard drills
annually which are evaluated by the FAA (Federal Aviation Authority). The drill gives the city insight on ways
to improve current emergency plans, as well as provide valuable training to all persons involved.
Fres
During the dry periods of June and July, fire hazard is increased in areas of the City that has Improved
pasture and grasslands, and stands of trees.
5
"TORNADO GUIDE' DEVELOPMENT
Tornadoes are frightening realities. We can't prevent them or even predict where or when they will strike.
Many of us aren't sure what we should do during a tornado. Some people aren't even clear about the
difference between a tornado 'Watch" and a tornado "warning." But there are some precautions we can take
to minimize danger — to people and property. The tornado season for Arkansas is usually during the months
of March to June, so when the tornado season approaches, the watchwords are: Be informed and be
prepared.
Purpose
The purpose of the Tornado Guide" is to inform the population of the dangers of a tornado, and how they
should prepare should such a disaster become imminent. This plan will include guides for the population
with special needs, i.e., elderly, handicapped, minorities, etc.
Organization of the Guide
The guide is organized in seven sections:
1. Tornado Hazards
This section will describe the most recent tornado occurrence in the region and state, and will provide
pictures of the damage Incurred by the storm. This section is important because it provides a true picture
of what damage tornadoes have caused In this region and the State. This guide is primarily designed for
tornadoes, although it can be designed for hurricanes, ice storms, etc. Also, included in this section is a
description of facts about tornadoes in general.
2. Terms to know
It is important to inform the population of the difference between a Tornado Watch" and a Tornado
Warning". A tornado watch simply means that conditions are favorable for tornadoes to develop. In this
case precautions should be taken to protect yourself and your property, and listen to the radio to keep
Informed. A tornado warning means that a tornado has actually been sighted. If a tornado warning is issued
in your area, you should seek shelter immediately!
3. A Storm Approaches
This section will provide the population with planning tips to follow to prevent unnecessary panic and
confusion if a tornado does strike.
4. What You should do during a tornado watch or warning
This section will provide information concerning precautions to lessen danger, and or how to seek shelter.
And, this section will highlight assistance to people who are disabled, and other populations with special
needs.
5. Mvths and facts about tornadoes
It is important to inform the population of the true facts about tornado safety, and not myths. For example,
a large number of the population believe that windows should always be opened to equalize pressure. This
Is generally incorrect — Opening windows to equalize pressure during a tornado is ineffective in reducing
damage. Don't ,worry about the windows; worry about protecting yourself. Also, flying glass is a real
hazard. This is but one myth about tornado safety. This section will include many more.
Y
6. After the Storm
This section will discuss steps to take after a storm passes, as well as American Red Cross and Regional
Emergency numbers to call if assistance is needed.
7. Regional MaD of shelters and evacuation routes
This section will play an important role by providing the population shelters in the area, and evacuation
routes that shall be utilized If any hazard should occur.
The "Guide" that will be designed by the City of Fayetteville and community will be a "Tornado Guide". But,
this plan may be designed for any hazard that government or the private sector of a state or region feel
poses a threat to the public health, safety, and welfare of the residents of their area.
Community Involvement
The following objective must be accomplished: "increase involvement of and interaction between local
governments, the private sector, residential communities, school systems and populations with special
needs, i.e., elderly, handicapped, minorities, etc."
To accomplish this objective, the following will become an important part of the development of the "Tornado
Plan", including the "Tornado Guide".
The City committee for "Disaster Public Awareness" will expand to include school
personnel, corporate personnel, county government personnel, the American Red
Cross, and the local office of Emergency Management. This committee will help
design the "Tornado Guide". Most importantly, the committee will assist in updating
the "Washington County Disaster Plan" to incorporate a Public Awareness Annex.
This committee should be successful in obtaining the involvement of local
governments.
In order to get neighborhoods involved, a contest will be held for the elementary
school children for the purpose of designing the "Family Plan" picture to be
incorporated within the 'Tornado Guide". The local television station - KHOG-29
will be solicited to participate in the contest.
In order to get the involvement of the business community, logo advertisements will
be solicited for the "Tornado Guide". The goal is to print between 7,000 to 10,000
guides, and much of the cost associated with the printing could be covered by
corporate sponsors.
ORGANIZATION/COORDINATION AND KEY PERSONNEL
The City of Fayetteville is administered by a City Manager under the policy direction of seven Board of
Directors. The City Manager appoints Department Directors to administer key departments through the
City's Personnel hiring process (See Appendix II).
The City of Favetteville Public Awareness Tornado Disaster Plan consist of a 'Emergency Information
Awareness Committee' that will coordinate the pian and will provide a communications link between Bud
Allen, Washington County Coordinator of Emergency Services, and the State Office of Emergency Service,
Emergency Operations Cerner, Conway, Arkansas (See chart below). A profile of many of the City personnel
Involved on the committee are included In this section. As you will notice, our management team presents
the best combination of talent to increase public awareness of natural and manmade hazards. The
committee will be expanded to include other local government personnel, local Emergency Management
personnel, and the business and private communities, which will improve the realm of expertise to ensure
the program is successful.
A comprehensive communications system is essential to Insure a coordinative Public Information capability
within the City, between levels of government, and the community. This communications link will provide
the City with the means necessary to determine the disaster informational needs of the community on an
on-going basis, and to effectively evaluate the performance of the program objectives.
STATE OFFICE OF EMERGENCY
SERVICES, CONWAY, AR
COUNTY DIRECTOR OF MAYOR OF FAYETTEVILLE
EMERGENCY SERVICES William V. Martin
Judge Charles Johnson 575-8330
521-8400
T
COORDINATOR OF CITY DISASTER PUBLIC
EMERGENCY SERVICES AWARENESS COMMITTEE
Mr. Bud Allen
521.8400
—Fire Chief
—Chief of Police
—Public Works Director
—Staff Adninistrator
0
PROFILE: Scott C. Linebaugh
Currently:
City Manager of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Personal:
Born October 22, 1950,
Los Angeles, California.
Married, three daughters.
Education:
B.S. Accounting,
University of Alabama, 1976.
Seminars in management techniques, leadership, MBO, planning, finance, and
budgeting with. the Governmental Finance Officers Association, University of
Arkansas, and Texas Tech.
Professional
City Manager,
Experience:
Favetteville, Arkansas
Population: 47,000 +
May 1990 to present
Assistant City Manaoer,
Favetteville, Arkansas
Population: 40,000 +
December 1987 to May 1990
Administrative Services Director
Favetteville. Arkansas
Population: 39,600
February 1986 to December 1987
Finance Director
Favetteville, Arkansas
Population: 36,000
October 1979 to February 1986
Accountant. Russell Brown & Company CPA's
Little Rock, Arkansas
1976 to 1979
Manager, Universitv Club
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
1974 to 1976
Assistant Manaaer, Universitv Club
Tuscaloosa, Alabama
1973 to 1974
Honors and Arkansas State Representative, Governmental Finance
Special Officers Association, 1984 to present.
Activities: President, Arkansas Governmental Finance Officers Association (AGFOA),
1984 to 1985.
Vice President, AGFOA, 1982 to 1983.
Treasurer, Youth Bridge, Inc., 1982 to 1986.
Treasurer, Fayetteville Creative School Bd., 84 to 88.
United Fund Government Services Division Chairperson, 1986 to 1989.
Arkansas State Representative to Governmental Finance
Officers Association.
President, Walton Arts Center Foundation Board.
0
President of the Board, Youth Bridge, Inc
Treasurer, Police Pension Board.
Treasurer, Fire Pension Board.
Current
Memberships: P International City Managers Association.
Municipal Treasurers Association of the United States and Canada.
Public Risk Managers Association.
American Public Works Association.
Municipal League of Arkansas.
Fayetteville, Chamber of Commerce.
Advisory Committee Fayetteville High School Business Education.
10.
PROFILE: Kevin D. Crosson
Currently:
Administrative Services Director of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Personal:
Born August 26, 1961,
La Junta, Colorado.
Married, no children.
Education:
Master of Science in Public Administration, University of Arkansas, 1990.
Bachelor of Arts in Political Science, University of Arkansas, 1984.
Professional
Administrative Services Director,
Experience:
Fayetteville. Arkansas
Population: 47,000 +
June 1990 to present
Assistant Administrative Services Director.
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Population: 40,000 +
January 1989 to June 1990
Special Projects Officer,
Favetteville. Arkansas
Population: 40,000+
November 1986 to December 1988
Administrative Intern.
Favetteville. Arkansas
Population: 36,000
May 1986 to November 1986
Graduate Research Assistant,
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
January 1985 to May 1986
Administrative Intern,
Arkansas Science and Technology Authority
Little Rock, Arkansas
May 1985 to August 1985
Shop Supervisor,
Old Oak Shop
Springdale, Arkansas
1982 to 1984
Honors and
Secretary and Treasurer, Governmental Finance Officers Association, June
Special
1990 to present.
Activities:
Loaned Executive, United Way of Fayetteville
Current
American Society for Public Administration.
Memberships:
Arkansas Chapter, American Society for Public Administration.
Arkansas Chapter, Government Finance Officers Association.
International City Management Association.
-.-..Arkansas Chapter,
International, City, Management -Association.:---
PROFILE: Mickey D, Jackson
Currently: Fire Chief of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Personal: Bom July 9, 1941,
Henryetta, Oklahoma
Married, two sons
Education: Associate Degree of Fire Protection Technology,
Oklahoma State University, 1962.
Seminars on general management, fire service management, fire protection planning,
incident command, policy issues, et al from the National Fire Academy, several state
fire training academies, and several other accredited fire service training programs.
Professional fire Chi
Experience: Favetteville. Arkansas
Population: 47,000 +
November 1, 1965 to present
Fire Chief.
Springdale. Arkansas
Population: 28,000
November 1, 1964 to November 1, 1985
Plant Protection Officer
Douglas Aircraft, Inc.
Tulsa, Oklahoma
February, 1964 to November, 1964
Fire Training Officer
Henrvetta, Oklahoma
1962 to 1964
Honors and Dictograph National Service Award Summer, 1981
Special Jaycees Distinguished Service Award, Springdale, Arkansas, 1974
Activities: Paul A. Harris Award, Springdale Rotarians, 1985
Validation City Fire Department Master Planning Project,
United States Fire Administration, 1975 to 1976
Springdale United Fund Board of Directors, All executive offices
Ozark Guidance Center, Board of Directors, All executive offices except
President
Mental Health Foundation, Board of Directors
Arkansas Association of Fire Chiefs, All executive offices
Registered Emergency Medical Technician
Arkansas Representative to Southern Building Code
Congress, International, Fire Code Revision Committee
Current International Association of Fire Chiefs
Memberships: National Fire Protection Association
Southwest Association of Fire Chiefs
Arkansas Association of Fire Chiefs
Society of Executive Fire Officers
Municipal League of Arkansas
Robinson Avenue Church of Christ, Springdale, Arkansas
12
PROFILE: John F. Merrell, III
Currently: Director of Planning Management
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Personal: Born September 25, 1949
Greensboro, North Carolina
Education:
Bachelor of Arts, Guilford College (1971).
Double Major: Geography and History.
Minor: Urban and Regional Planning -related
Certificate, Georgia Institute of Technology, Summer Institute of Urban
Planning (1972).
University of North Carolina, urban geography city planning and geography.
Certificate, National Main Street Center of the National Trust for Historic
Preservation (1984).
Downtown Revitalization Institute held at Cornell University.
Professional
Planning Management Director
Experience:
Favetteville. Arkansas
Population: 47,000+
August 1988 to present
Director Planninq Division
Citv of Danville. Virginia
Population: 56,000
December 1978 to August 1988
Associate Planner. Lyles, Bissett, Carlisle & Wolff
Architects, Engineers. Planners
Columbia, South Carolina
April 1973 to December 1978
Assistant Regional Planner
Santee-Wateree Regional Planninq Council
Sumter, South Carolina
April 1972 to April 1973
Special
Honors and
Elected to Executive Board of Directors Virginia Citizens Planning
Activities:
Association.
Served as Chairman of the Virginia Citizens Planning Association Policies
Committee.
Received certificate (one of 100) from National Main Street Center of the
National Trust for Historic Preservation at the Downtown Institute.
Awarded contracts on a private basis for urban planning consulting work
for the towns of Cheraw and Mullins, South Carolina.
Received'Preservationist of the Year award from Danville Historical Society
in 1986.
Current
American Planning Association.
Memberships:
Urban Land Institute.
National Trust for Historic Preservation.
13
PROFILE: Robert (Bob) H. Kelly
Currently: Director of Public Works
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Personal: Born April 11, 1953
Bainbridge, Maryland
Married, two children
Education: Bachelor of Arts, University of Arkansas (1976).
Bachelor of Architecture, University of Arkansas (1977).
Registered Architect, State of Arkansas, #1947
NCARB Certificate, #34241
Commissioned Ensign, Civil Engineer Corp USNR (1982).
Professional Public Works Director
Experience: Favetteville. Arkansas
Population: 47,000+
1989 to present
Assistant Public Works Director
Favetteville, Arkansas
Population: 45,000+
1988 to 1989
Assistant Public Works Maintenance
Favetteville. Arkansas
1987 to 1988
Project Manager Architect
Hailey, Powers, & Froning Architects
Favetteville, Arkansas
1985 to 1987
Project Architect
Cromwell Firm Inc.,
Little Rock. Arkansas
1979 to 1985
Job Superintendent
Kelly Construction
Helena. Arkansas
1977 to 1979
Special
Activities: Lieutenant, Civil Engineer Corps, U.S. Naval Reserve
Served as Chairman of the NW Section of American Institute of Architects
National Trust for Historic Preservation.
Society of American Military Engineers.
American Water Works Association.
International City Managers Association.
National Trust for Historic Preservation.
Fayetteville, Chamber of Commerce.
Current Fayetteville Northside Rotary Club.
Memberships: Planning Committee, St. Paul's Episcopal Church.
14
11 PROFILE: Jerry W. Cooper
Currently: Staff Administrator
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Personal Born July 17, 1961
Pine Bluff, Arkansas
Married, no children
Education: Bachelor of Science in Public Administration, University of Arkansas (1989).
Master of Public Administration Program, University of Arkansas (1990).
First Responder Certification, University of Florida
CPR Certification, American Heart Association
Personal Financial Management, Florida State University.
Military education include: U.S. Submarine school, Nuclear Weapons
Security, Electricityand Electronics, Submarine Sonar, and Sonar Principals.
Professional Staff Administrator
Experience: Favetteville, Arkansas
Population: 47,000+
March 1990 to present
Administrative Intem
Favetteville. Arkansas
Population: 47,000+
1988 to 1990
Street Maintenance
Pine Bluff, Arkansas
Summers of 1985, 1986 and 1987
Sonar Supervisor
USS Sam Rayburn, SSBN 6358
United States Navy
1979 to 1983
Special
Honors and
President, Phi Kappa Psi, University of Arkansas (1987).
Activities:
Treasurer, Phi Kappa Psi, University of Arkansas (1986 to 1987)
Alumni/Public Relations Chairman, Phi Kappa Psi, University of Arkansas.
(1985 to 1987)
Arkansas Chapter International City Managers Association.
Municipal League of Arkansas.
Certificate of Excellence, U.S. Naval Electricity/Electronic School, Orlando,
Florida
Honorable discharge, United States Navy, 1985
Submarine dolphin, deterrent patrol silver star, deterrent patrol ribbon • 2
bronze, U.S. Navy 1979-1983.
Certificate of Appreciation, USS Sam Rayburn, 1983
Good Conduct Award for service, U.S. Navy, 1979-1983
U.S. Navy PRP Program for Nuclear Security
Current
-
Phi Kappa Psi Fraternity, University of Arkansas.
Memberships:
Arkansas Chapter International City Managers Association.
Municipal League of Arkansas.
15
BUDGET/RESULTS EXPECTED
The Fayetteville annual budget is a fiscal plan which presents the services which will be provided to the
community and the funds needed to perform these services. The City's budget is presented on a GAAP
basis which allows for fair presentation of the financial position for the City of Fayetteville. Referring to
Appendices III and IV, the City is dedicating $27,450 for the Disaster Public Awareness Program - $14,450
in personal services, and $13,000 in materials and supplies. The $13,000 Includes a cash contribution of
$3,000, with the hope that at least $10,000 will be granted by your agency, and an additional $2,500 will be
donated through corporate sponsorship of the program. As you will notice by the spreadsheet provided,
the City estimates a loss of $15,450 for the total program. But, the City would only lose $5,500 in cash If
the program is not supported by a grant of at least $10,000.
The type of service and the level of service to be provided by the City under the proposed Disaster Public
Awareness Program is defined by program objectives, which are further defined by performance measures
(See Appendix V for detail). At the direction of the City Board, staff will attempt to prepare a strict
program/performance based budget in 1991. In order to measure expected results of the Disaster Public
Awareness Program, a program/performance based budget will be necessary. Below you will find a
description of the program/performance based budget to be utilized:
The performance measures are detailed on two separate pages. The first page involves the program
description, a program analysis, the staffing levels, and costs of the program. The description of these items
are as follows:
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - This section enables the average citizen to understand: (1) the purpose or
function of the Fire Department; (2) the service(s) provided; (3) how the service is carried out; and (4) the
major components of the organization. The program description Is described by the infinitive form of an
action verb 'TO ESTABLISH, TO CREATE, TO ADVISE; etc., and a statement of the results to be achieved
or maintained.
PROGRAM ANALYSIS - This section is a very important part of Program Performance Budgeting. It is here
that we find the heart of program budgeting. This section is basically an approach for the Department
Directors and staff, as well as the City Manager to examine policy issues relative to the budget. In
developing an analysis statement the Department Directors consider the following: The potential significance
of an analysis of the issue, the consequence, and potential for improvement. The underlining purpose of
a program analysis statement is to establish what a program does.
PROGRAM STAFF,EXPENSE, AND RESOURCES - This section lists the prior year staff levels, expenditure
levels, and resources for each program. This sections enables the City Manager, Department Directors,
Program Managers (Division Heads), and the Board to look at the staff needed to operate the program, the
level of expenses needed, and where the money comes from.
The second page of the performance measures contains the objectives for the program, and performance
measurements of demand, workload, productivity, and effectiveness of the program. Instead of looking at
the input, this page allows the Divisions to focus on the output of the programs. The performance indicators
measure the unit cost of providing the program and allows management to determine whether If the program
is productive and effective, and whether or not a program should be reduced or increased based on the
Demand and Workload. This method of program performance provides the best means for the
measurement of results expected as shown. Also, in order to evaluate the productivity and effectiveness
of a program on an on going basis, the Budget and Research Staff reviews each program on a quarterly
basis. This process will allow the program to be reviewed before reviewal of the Disaster Awareness
Committee, which shall include Washington County Emergency Services. Also, the audit phase is
incorporated during evaluation of the program.
An audit is an "examination of records, facilities, systems, and other evidence to discover or verify desired
Information (Mikesell, 1986). The City utilizes a pre -audit process that begins in the month of September,
and a single audit beginning in January of the new budget calendar year. As a recipient of federal, state and
16
county financial assistance, the City is responsible for ensuring that an adequate internal control structure
is in place to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations related to those programs. Our
Internal Auditor, Yolanda Perez -Beltran, conducts periodic audits on budget adjustments, grants, transfers
to outside entities, and quarterly budget balances to ensure that programs are not over budget for the
quarter evaluated. In addition, the City maintains budgetary controls, and these budgetary controls are
established at the departmental level through the initial process of 'splftouts'. The 'splitout' process is a
procedure where each division reviews each programs line -items or object code of expenditures, and
determines how they want their adopted funds to be appropriated throughout the year. In other words, each
object code of expenditure is split in accordance with prior years appropriations.
17
APPENDIX I
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
****************** DISASTER VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS ****************
N
A
IT
H
A
H
D
E
C
U
T
0
I
I
A
R
X
0
C
T
R
G
R
I
O
T
L
L
A
N
H
5
L
U
R
D
E
C
A
C
( 1)
G
E
Property damage
A
K
D
W
R
S
H
M
> 10% (10)
R
5–
0
I
A
T
T
E
—50 25
25
5
25
N
S
O
35
250 75
75
25
75
25
D
H
R
245
245
TOTAL SCORE
723 635
635
S
390
M
300
HISTORY (HAS IT OCCURED?)
Not is last 100 yrs ( 1) —1
Once in last 100 yrs ( 5)
More than once in last
100 years.(10)
Score weighted factor (x 2) 2
POPULATION & PROPERTY
10
10
0
10-10-10-10-
10
10
10-
20
20
20
20
20
20
20-
< 1% killed or
injured ( 1)
1
1
1
1
1
1-
1 in 1000 to 1 in 10
( 5)
—5
1-10% killed or
injured( 5)
—10
5
5–
< 1 in 10
(10)
10
> l0% killed or
injured(10)
10
Score
(x 7)
35 70
Score weighted
factor (x 5)
5
5
5
5
5
5–
—50
Property damage
< 1% ( 1)
1
( 1)
1
1–
Property damage
1-10% ( 5)
5
5
Is a disaster
5
Property damage
> 10% (10)
—10
5–
A severe disaster
A
(10)
—10 10
10
Score weighted
factor (x 5)
—50 25
25
5
25
5
5–
Score
35
250 75
75
25
75
25
25
MAXIMUM THREAT TO PERSONS
AND PROPERTY
< 1% threat
1-10% threat
> 10% threat
Score total threat
( 1)
( 5) 5 5
(10) —10-
100 50 50
PROBABILITY/SIGNIFICANCE
1
5 5
10 50 50
1-
10
< 1 in 1000
( 1)
1 in 1000 to 1 in 10
( 5)
—5
5
5
5–
< 1 in 10
(10)
10
10
10
Score
(x 7)
35 70
70
35
70
35
35
Significance of 100
yrs:
Not a disaster
( 1)
Is a disaster
( 5)
5-5-5–
5
5–
A severe disaster
A
(10)
—10 10
10
10
Score
(x 7)
—70 70
70
70
35
35-3
35–
5–
Prob./significance score
Prob./significance
371 490
490
371
245
245
245
TOTAL SCORE
723 635
635
426
390
340
300
Source: Washington County. Disaster Plan
w
0
H
U
0
.rq
41
N
r'1
_C
APPaU)IX II
'lino ladplunn I
•Nw•s
wM.s � riots I
-i Iwuou.d I
'.°awes IDWIW
d64S 4 I
.*u
( ;" PWiul I
—I .auowj I
- I
'==
O
UOlised.ul
-,
6uluu°Id 40 '
Lai
6uN.wl"
N —
m
it
V
V
_C
APPaU)IX II
'lino ladplunn I
•Nw•s
wM.s � riots I
-i Iwuou.d I
'.°awes IDWIW
d64S 4 I
.*u
( ;" PWiul I
—I .auowj I
- I
'==
I
UOlised.ul
-,
6uluu°Id 40 '
6uN.wl"
+NW610 1040001
-I '� I
�iwoo" AV* I
1 R.Wouy �Qr� I
mom awmi
y - + UOIW40 i.uiS I
�NNlO i�IV I
;Iam& PROS
l+•_
uepy�p lets I
VJDW
u.MMed I
APPENDIX III
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
CITY MANAGER DIVISION
DISASTER PUBLIC AWARENESS PROGRAM
PERSONNEL SCHEDULE
Number of 1991 Budgeted
Emplovees 1991
Staff Administrator 25 $ 4,856
Administrative Intern 50 7,367
.75 $ 12,223
Overtime
EXPLANATION OF ACCOUNTS
101 -XXX -5-200.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES & PRINTING
Supplies
"Tornado Guide" Printing
Disaster Update
Miscellaneous
101 -XXX -5-304.00 TRAVEL & TRAINING
Seminars/Meetings
.o
$ 1,000
8,500
2,000
1,000
$ 12,500
$ 500
vTpjo 1.
FUND 101 - GENERAL FUND
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
DIVISION 010
CITY MANAGER
DIVISION
ACTIVITY 4.5
DISASTER PUBLIC AWARENESS PROGRAM
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
ESTIMATED
BUDGETED
1989
1990
1990
1991
4-XXX.XX GRANT AWARD
f
f
f
f 100000
4-XXX.XX CORPORATE SPONSORING
2,000
____________
____________
____________
TOTAL REVENUE
f 0
f 0
f 0
f 120000
-ecceeeeeeee
a ve=veecc=
assess=eecee
ee.v eceees
PERSONNEL SALARIES
100.00 SALARIES AND WAGES
f 0
f 0
f 0
f 12,223
102.00 EXTRA SERVICES
0
0
0
0
103.00 OVERTIME
0
0
0
200
105.00 SOCIAL SECURITY TAXES
0
0
0
954
LONG TERM DISABILITY
0
0
0
0
107.00 LIFE INSURANCE
0
0
-0
50
108.00 INSURANCE - HEALTH
0
0
0
732
109.00 PENSION CONTRIBUTION
0
0
0
291
_____
____________
____________
____________
TOTAL PERSONNEL SALARIES
0
0
0
14,450
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
200.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 8 PRINTING
0
0
0
128500
210.00 MINOR EQUIPMENT
0
0
0
0
____
____________
____________
_---- _......
TOTAL MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
0
0
0
12,500
CONTRACTUAL SERVICE
301.00 PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
0
0
0
0
303.00 PUBLICATIONS AND DUES
0
0
0
0
304.00 TRAVEL AND TRAINING
0
0
0
500
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICE
0
0
0
500
CAPITAL
801.00 FIXED ASSETS
0
0.
0
0
________
____________
____________
TOTAL CAPITAL
0
0
0
0
TOTAL EXPENDITURE
f 0
f 0
f 0
f 27,450
____________
____________
____________
----
TOTAL DISASTER PUBLIC AWARENESS
f 0
f 0
f 0
f (15,450)
Program: D1SAbTER P/A
Fund: GENERAL
Program Description:
FAWWW1
Department: GENERAL ADMIN,
Division: CITY MANAGER
Effective coordination of emergency public information aimed
at making the population aware of risks of a major disaster,
such as a tornado which may affect the public health, safety,
and welfare of the residents and visitors in the City of
Fayetteville. The plan shall become a supplement to the City
of Fayetteville's Comprehensive Emergency Management Program
Disaster Plan,
Program Analysis:
This program is to provide a coordinated approach for City
government, households, business and industry, volunteer
groups, and disaster organizations. in the preparation of
information on what can be done to prepare or respond to an
emergency or disaster situation in the City of Fayetteville.
The plan will consist of the development of a Tornado Disaster
Public Awareness Plan, with the major component of the plan to
be a "Tornado Guide" aimed at informing people with special
needs. The revenue source for this program will consist of a
Federal Grant of $10,000, and approximately an initial
corporate sponsorship of $2,500. The goal is to develop
sponsopships to cover the cost of printing the "Tornado
Guide", which is currently estimated to cost nearly $8,500 for
7,000 to 10,000 guides.
Program Staff
Uniformed
Nonuniformed
Part-time
Total
Program Expense
Personal Services
Materials and Supplies.
Contractual Service
Maintenance
Capital -Miscellaneous
Total
Program Resources
General Fund
Federal Grant
Other
Budgeted Estimated Budgeted
1990 1990 1991
75
75
14,450
12,500
500
0
0
$ 27,450
$ 15,450
10,000
2,000
Performance Measures
Demand
1. Number of "Tornado Guides"
2. Volunteer seminars
3. Updated Disaster Plans
4. Number of Elementary Student
involvement in contest
5. Corporate Sponsorship
Workload
1. "Tornado Guides" printed
2. Seminars attended
3. Disaster Plans updated
4. Elementary Student involve-
ment.
5. Arranging Corporate
Sponsorship
Productivity
1. Hours preparing Guide
2. Seminar preparation
3. Hours spent preparing
disaster update
4. Hours arranging sponsorships
Effectiveness
1. Corporate donations as a $
of Tornado Guide cost.
2. % of Elementary Schools
participating in contest
3. Phone Survey - % of
residents receiving info.
Budgeted Estimated Budgeted
1990 1990 1991
8,000
10
50
100
5
8,000
10
50
100
5
600
240
1,200
400
MW
�W
EM
APPENDIX V
Program: U15ASTER P/A � Department: GENERAL AUM1N,
Program Objectives:
1.
Enhance the spread of emergency information messages by
developing a "Tornado Guide" of 7,000 to 10,000 copies.'
2.
Increase involvement of and interaction between local
governments, the private sector, schools etc.
3.
Enhance emergency preparedness at the family or neighbor-
hood level through the combined use of public information
materials and volunteer resources.
4.
Increase participation of the news media in emergency
information dissemination.
5.
Update the Washington County Disaster Plan through the
incorporation of the "Tornado Public Awareness Plan",
Performance Measures
Demand
1. Number of "Tornado Guides"
2. Volunteer seminars
3. Updated Disaster Plans
4. Number of Elementary Student
involvement in contest
5. Corporate Sponsorship
Workload
1. "Tornado Guides" printed
2. Seminars attended
3. Disaster Plans updated
4. Elementary Student involve-
ment.
5. Arranging Corporate
Sponsorship
Productivity
1. Hours preparing Guide
2. Seminar preparation
3. Hours spent preparing
disaster update
4. Hours arranging sponsorships
Effectiveness
1. Corporate donations as a $
of Tornado Guide cost.
2. % of Elementary Schools
participating in contest
3. Phone Survey - % of
residents receiving info.
Budgeted Estimated Budgeted
1990 1990 1991
8,000
10
50
100
5
8,000
10
50
100
5
600
240
1,200
400
MW
�W
EM
APPLICATION FOR
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE
I. T71 of suEaltfawra
AOpfieatlan PnIPp/KJriM
Q construction ❑ Construction
[yt Ntln.CpnsNUCoprr ❑ NatConPructidn
L AsrucaMTINFOPMATON
Laval NaI1M:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
Address (give city. county, stare. and tip coda):
L GATE Suamrnu APyiralt IdentiAW
July 11, 1990
L DAT! RECRIVEo h RATE Stale AGPliashan 1GMhlmor
t. GATT RECEIVED BY FEDERAL AGENCY Federal denOliel
113 WEST tIDUFPAI'id ST.R1=4
FAYEIiIm LEr ARKANSAS 72701
L EMPLOYER IOEMTIFICATON NUMBER rEINI:
= -(6101 (18I�I�I�I
L TVPE OF APPLICATION:
13 NOW ❑ contirnMlm ❑ R"Sion
It Revision, ante approprtate 4ttv(st in Doa(as): 0 0
A Increase Award B. Decrease Award G Mcressa Ouration
0. Decrease Duration Omer lapecity):
In. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC I
ASSISTANCE NUMBER I I a
TITLE
12. AREAS AFFECTED EY PROJECT (Ciao!. cdlPrlies. stales, am).'
CITY OF FAYEITE'VILLE AIM KIZHI111GLON
COUNTY, AETWSAS
Oroanizational Umr:
El4W-90-P.-3385
Attachment C
Total of 8 Pages
ORE, Approval No, 03444041
Name and teleoho" number at the pafadn to be contacted on metten u vafvino
MIS sapticatlon (give ante Codel
JERRY W. COOPER
STAFF ADMINISTRATOR (501) 575-8330
7, rYPE OF APPI,ICAW-, (enNw appropriA a fefaar in Dos) W
A
State
K
NdepMdMlI SCIIOM Gila.
B.
Cowry
L
State Con"lled Wutution of Migl0 Lasrnoq
G
Munipipal
J.
Prnate University ,
D.
Tornsnip
K
Indian Tribe
E
Interstate
L
Individual
F.
InlermuniciDN
K
Profit O'OalMotfon
G
Special District
K
Other (SpetdM:
L NAM/OFFEDEPALA09NCY:
FEDERAL. E[VlERGEZZY MAKAGF3�U" AGENCY
11. DESCRIPTIVE TOL! OF APPLICANT? PROJECT:
STIMUA%: TIDE DEVELOP^7'iNT OF EFFECTIVE
CIVIL DEFENSE STRATEGIES AT STATE AND LOCAL
GOVEi2 -po= L'LVLqS TI.320UGH TIM FUU4A PUBLIC
INFORMATION CHALLENGE GRANT PROGRAD7
I2. PROPOSED PROJECT:
In. CONCRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OF:
SUN Dale
Ending Onto
L AoRieant
[ D. Protect
1/1/91
112/31/91
JOHN PAUL
riAN,hyRSCHMIDT
15. ESTIMATED FUNDING:
1e. IS APPLICATION SUEJECT TO PMEW BY STATE ESECUMVE GROW 173R PROCISS1
A Federal
S
.00
a YES THIS PREAPPLr ATIONAPPUCATION WAS MADE AVAILABLE E TO TIE
0,000
10,000
STATE EKECU TVE ORDER 12777 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON:
e Aoolicy t
B
.O0
15 r 450
DATE
Q state S .00
Is NO. PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372
d. Low S .00
OR PROGRAM NAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW
a Other S .00
1. Progtem Income S .00 17, U THE APPLICANT DEUMOUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT?
21000
TOTAL .00
Yen It 'Yea' attach N oxoi n tion. ' No
o S -
27,450
IL TO THE BEST OP MY KNOWLEDGE ANO BELIEF. ALL DATA IN TNIS APPLICATION9R4PPLICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, TME DOCUMENT MAS EEEN DULY
AUTNOAl2lD BY TNI GOVERNING BOOP OF THE APPLICANT AND TME APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH TME ATTACMED ASSURANCES IF TM! ASSISTANCE IS AWARDED
a r/ped Wine W AvUWntvd Representative -- b Tide c. To4ohoru murn or
S('OTP C. LI'iUM UGHI CITY Z AI'A 575-8330
d Sgnature of Aut leo Reote 11 0. 04, Saoongo
R , NHn Not u �eU� SnrY,aW 'Fa�rn 21 :Rc„ i.,,:
/ / Pre Ixld aY OMd I.,rcrr A-101
V Authorized for Local Reproduction
INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SF 424
This is a standard form used by applicants as a required facesheet for preapplications and applications submitted
for Federal assistance. It will be used by Federal agencies to obtain applicant certification that States which have
established a review and comment procedure in response to Executive Order 12372 and have selected the program
to be included in their process, have been given an opportunity to review the applicant's submission.
Item: Entry:
1. Self-explanatory.
2. Date application submitted to Federal agency (or
State if applicable) & applicant's control number
(if applicable).
3. State use only (if applicable).
4. If this application is to continue or revise an
existing award, enter present Federal identifier
number. If for a new project, leave blank.
5. Legal name of applicant, name of primary
organizational unit which will undertake the
assistance activity, complete address of the
applicant, and name and telephone number of the
person to contact on matters related to this
application.
6. Enter Employer Identification Number (Eli\) as
assigned by the Internal Revenue Service.
7. Enter the appropriate letter in the space
provided.
B. Check appropriate box and enter appropriate
letter(s)in the space(s) provided:
—"New" means a new assistance award.
— "Continuation" means an extension for an
additional funding/budget period for a project
with a projected completion date.
. "Revision" means any change in the Federal
Government's financial obligation or
contingent liability from an existing
obligation.
9. Name of Federal agency from which assistance is
being requested with this application.
10. Use the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
number and title of the program under which
assistance is requested.
11. Enter a brief descriptive title of the project. if
more than one program is involved, you should
append an explanation on a separate sheet. If
appropriate (e.g., construction or real property
projects), attach a map showing project location.
For preapplications, use a separate sheet to
provide a summary description of this project.
Item:
Entry:
12. List only the largest political entities affected
(e.g., State, counties, cities).
13. Self-explanatory.
14. List the applicant's Congressional District and
any District(s) affected by the program or project.
15. Amount requested or to be contributed during
the first funding/budget period by each
contributor. Value of in-kind contributions
should be included on appropriate lines as
applicable. If the action will result in a dollar
change to an existing award, indicate only the
amount of :he change. For decreases, enclose the
amounts in parentheses. If both basic and
supplemental amounts are included, show
breakdown on an attached sheet. For multiple
program funding, use totals and show breakdown
using same categories as item 15.
16. Applicants should contact the State Single Point
of Contact (SPOC) for Federal Executive Order
12372 to determine whether the application is
subject to the State intergovernmental review
process.
17. This question applies to the applicant organi-
zation, not the person who signs as the
authorized representative. Categories of debt
include delinquent audit disallowances, loans
and taxes.
18. To be signed by the authorized representative of
the applicant. A copy of the governing body's
authorization for you to sign this application as
official representative must be on file in the
applicant's office. (Certain Federal agencies may
require that this authorization be submitted as
part of the application.)
sr $24 IPN .-00) Baca
YYd �d
i c
a
Q C
A
9 '
O �
Y Y
w V =
6
O Z
fA
E Y
= M M v M M M
m
an
Im
O
V
d
w t
V �
� � O
7
CL C
' 7n < $
c va s
z
1 C C v d' a I CN 0 N N O� Ln C e(' O J
1 � r
Z z Y 1 _ N N N
O O O
a
40
4 W
N
7 c
a
O a
u. E
O p C O
C O
W p C>
C13
Y M
V w L
w
�^ b
�I
o4cE$ Y
� z u
V E � D
G
4 A
Y OI W
p w = Y O
O C V
a C w O L C ] Y
Y Y V
C�dc
q ° �
p O
� O i a r v i da c
E
9
M
J
C
�
-
2
M
t
O
C
m
00
0
N
O
Q
T
•
F
c
In
�
r
r
d
O
W
OD
L
Y
y
i
z
O
.-1
r
F
C
C
r
W
«
In
r
N
N
W
N
M
N
N
N
Y
—
L
V
Y
p
LO
H
M
n I
J
N
N
W
W
O
N
N 1
0
c
h
Z
L
M
J
<
C
u
�.r
y
C
O
co
CO
O
I
W
M
M �
NQ
Q
V
C
W
o
a
ri
ri
o
O
o
J
C
I
N
N
N
I
N
E
9
M
`
C
�
W
2
M
t
O
C
1
L
h
N
Q
T
•
L
C
H
�
e
ccC
O
W
OD
L
Y
y
i
z
O
M
M
F
C
C
r
W
«
In
r
N
N
W
H
C
N
Cl
2
—
L
V
p
LO
H
M
n I
C
N
N
W
W
O
N
N 1
O
c
Z
M
J
<
C
u
�.r
y
N
z<
2
•'
O
I
W
F�
NQ
Q
V
C
W
o
a
old
N
o
O
o
J
C
V
C
1
•
A
a
O
O
H
0
p
n
Ln
N
Os
co
00
Y
=
o
N
m
C
y
—
C
O
O
m
2
O
E
�
J
_
V
p
t
2
O
a
FFy0
N
F
Y
C
c
H
O
Q
f
�
=
O
O
O .
a
s
O
In
In
O
C
d' i
y
O
r
r 4
1
N j
L
N
N �
E
9
M
`
C
�
W
2
M
t
O
ri
L
Y
N
Q
T
�
q
L
C
H
�
e
ccC
p
Y
Y
L
Y
y
i
z
n
v
F
C
C
r
W
V
p
3
H
C
H
Cl
2
—
L
•
LO
y
N
Y
O1
N
O
q
O
c
M
J
<
C
u
�.r
y
M
r
A
z<
•'
O
F�
Q
V
_
W
o
a
old
N
o
O
o
C
C
C
A
q
0
=
Y
C
y
—
C
O
E
�
J
_
E
Y
N
F
Y
C
c
H
O
Q
f
�
=
a
a c;
W
M
r
M
M
W
9
M
C
�
W
2
M
t
O
ri
L
Y
N
Q
T
�
q
L
C
H
V
ccC
p
Y
Y
L
Y
y
i
z
2
v
F
C
C
r
W
V
p
3
H
W
H
Cl
2
—
N
LO
i
N
W
M
r
M
M
W
M
N
2
In
O
H
Y
N
Q
T
�
q
C
w
V
ccC
p
Y
Y
Y
y
Y
z
Z
v
F
w
C
W
N
p
L
=
M
H
r
m
Ac
E
J
Y
O1
N
�
q
O
c
M
J
<
C
u
�.r
y
M
r
A
z<
•'
O
F�
V
W
o
a
old
N
o
a;
P
r
O
E
J
Y
O1
w
q
M
J
<
C
u
�.r
y
M
r
A
•'
E
�
o
a
old
r�
o
a;
o
^
OMa Approval No. 0348.0040
ASSURANCES — NON–CONSTRUCTIOWPROGRAMS
Note: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions,
please contact the awarding agency. Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require applicants
to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be -notified.
As the duly authorized representative of the applicant I certify that the applicant:
1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal
assistance, and the institutional, managerial and
financial capability (including funds sufficient.to
pay the non -Federal share of project costs) to
ensure proper planning, management and com-
pletion of the project described in this application.
2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller
General of the United States, and if appropriate,
the State, through any authorized representative,
access to and the right to examine all records,
books, papers, or documents related to the award;
and will -establish a proper accounting system in
accordance with generally accepted accounting
standards or agency directives.
3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees
from using their positions for a purpose that
constitutes or presents the. appearance of personal
or organizational conflict of interest, or personal
gain.
4. Will initiate and complete the work within the
applicable time frame after receipt of approval of
the awarding agency.
5. Will comply with the Intergovernmental
Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§ 4728-4763)
relating to prescribed standards for merit systems
for programs funded under one of the nineteen
statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of
OPM's Standards for a Merit System of Personnel
Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F).
6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to
nondiscrimination. These include but are not
limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 (P.L. 88-352) which prohibits discrimination
on the basis of race, color or national origin; (b)
Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as
amended (20 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1683, and 1685-1686),
which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex;
(c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), which prohibits dis-
crimination on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42
L-.S.C.§§ 6101-6107), which prohibits discrim-
ination on the basis of age.
(e) the Drug Abuse Office and Treatment Act of
1972 (P.L. 92.255), as amended, relating to
nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (f)
the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of
1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to
nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or
alcoholism; (g) §§ 523 and 527 of the Public Health
Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. 290 dd-3 and 290 ee.
3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of
alcohol and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title
Vill of the Civil Rights Act -of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §
3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to non-
discrimination in the sale, rental or financing of
housing; (1) any other nondiscrimination
provisions in the specific statute(s) under which
application for Federal assistance is being made:
and (j) the requirements of any other
nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to
the application.
7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the
requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91.646)
which provide for fair and equitable treatment of
persons displaced or whose property is acquired as
a result of Federal or federally assisted programs.
These requirements apply to all interests in real
property acquired for project purposes regardless
of Federal participation in purchases.
8. Will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act
(5 U.S.C. §11501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit
the political activities of employees whose
principal employment activities are funded in
whole or in part with Federal funds.
9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of
the Davis -Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 276a to 276a-
7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. § 276c and 18
U.S.C. §§ 874), and the Contract Work Hours and
Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§ 327-333),
regarding labor standards for federally assisted
construction subagreements.
StandErd Fprn1 4248 14.881
Prescribed by OM8 Ci¢ular a.1U2
Authorized for Local Reproduction