HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-89 RESOLUTION4
•
RESOLUTION NO.
80-89
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE AWARD OF A
CONTRACT TO HILEMAN-MCKINNEY & ASSOCIATES FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF A MUNICIPAL LEAF AND YARD WASTE
COMPOSTING FACILITY; AND A PROCLAMATION FROM
THE MAYOR DESIGNATING SEPTEMBER AS "RECYCLING
AWARENESS MONTH".
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to enter into and execute a contract to
Hileman-McKinney & Associates for development of a municipal leaf
and yard waste composting facility. A copy of the contract
authorized for execution hereby is attached hereto marked Exhibit
"A" and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That in 1989 the month of September shall be
and the same hereby is designated "Recycling Awareness Month" and
the Mayor is authorized and directed to issue a proclamation.
designating and commemorating such event.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 5th day of September , 1989.
ATTEST
By:
t
gra
•
4
•
APPROVED
BY: LC/lrll l,U/lJ
Mayor
4-
7.
-01CRo�0~
STANDARD FORM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
OWNER AND CONSULTANT
FOR
PROFESSIONAL SE CES
THIS IS AN AGREEMENT made as of - 5T , 1
between the City of Fayetteville, Ar a sas, (OWNER) and Hileman-
McKinney & Associates, Waste and Re ource Management Consultants,
108 San Jose Drive, Springdale, AR 72764, (CONSULTANT). Owner
intends to Design and Construct a municipal leaf and yard waste
composting facility for the City of Fayetteville, (herinafter
called the project).
OWNER and CONSULTANT in consideration of the their mutual covenants
herein agree in respect of the performance of professional
consulting• services by CONSULTANT and the payment for those
services by OWNER as set forth below.
Consultant shall provide professional consulting services for OWNER
in all phases of the project to which this agreement applies, serve
as OWNER's professional consulting representative for the project
as set forth below and shall give professional consultation and
advice to OWNER during the performance of services hereunder.
SECTION 1 -BASIC SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
1.1. General.
1.1.1.. CONSULTANT shall perform professional services as
hereinafter stated which include customary enl,ironmental,
ecological, hydrological, chemical, computational, and electronic
data 'processing consulting services and customary incidental
services thereto.
1.2. Needs Assessment Phase.
After written authorization to proceed, CONSULTANT shall:
1.2.1. Consult with OWNER to clarify and define OWNER's
requirements for the Project and submit a work plan.
1.3. Site Location and Evaluation Phase.
After written authorization to proceed with the Site Location and
Evaluation Phase the Consultant Shall:
1.3.1. Provide analyses of OWNER's needs, site, evaluations, and
comparative studies of prospective sites.
1.3.2. Provide all services required to accomplish the work plan.
1.3.3. Provide a general economic and finanacial analysis of
OWNER's requirements applicable to various alternatives.
1.3.4. Prepare a report containing site layouts and sketches with
appropriate exhibits to indicate clearly the considerations
involved and the alternative solutions availible to OWNER and
setting forth CONSULTANT's findings and recommendations with
opinions of probable costs for the Project, including construction
and equipment cost, contingencies, allowances for charges of all
professionals, and allowances for the cost of land.
1.3.5 Furnish five copies :of the Report and present and review it
in person with the OWNER.
1.4. Site Preparation Phase.
After written authorization to proceed with the Site Preparation
Phase, the Consultant shall:
1.4.1. In conjunction with the OWNER, oversee preparation of site.
1.4.2. Guarantee site preparation is in accordance with Section
XV of the Arkansas Solid Waste Management Code, and all Federal
guidelines.
1.4.3. Guarantee'site preparation is in accordance with standard
engineering practices.
1.5. Purchase of Equipment Phase.
1.5.1. CONSULTANT shall make recommendations to OWNER regarding
purchase of necessary equipment.
1.5.2. Consultant shall pursue all possible Federal, Foundation,
and State grant% funding.; Consultant will be resposible for
preparing grant applications for City Staff review.
1.6. Training of Personnel Phase.
After written authorization to proceed with the Training of
Personnel Phase shall:
1.6.1. Train all municipal personnel involved in the Project as
well as any others designated by the City.
1.6.2. Guarantee that such training will provide for the proper
and efficient operation of the compost facility in accordance with
all applicable Federal EPA, ;State of Arkansas Department of
Pollution Control & Ecology, and Washington County Regulations
governing the operation of a composting facility. Failure to meet
these regulations shall be considered reason for termination
of CONSULTANT by OWNER ,if reason(s) for non-compliance are
1
determined to rest with CONSULTANT.
1.6.3. Certify each employee that successfully completes
CONSULTANT's training program. :CONSULTANT will notify OWNER of any
municipal employee that fails to complete the training program.
1.6.4. Prepare and provide all Project employees with copies of
Training and Policies & Proceedures Manauls. An additional five
(5) copies will also be provided. Manuals must be presented to
OWNER for review and approval. Approval by OWNER must be given to
CONSULTANT in writing.
1.7. Project Publicity Phase.
After written authorization to proceed with the Project Publicity
Phase the CONSULTANT shall:
1.7.1. In conjunction with City Staff be availible to prepare and
present public education seminars, educational materials, press
releases, and any other public education needs throughout the first
twelve (12) months of the:contract (mininum of 85 hours). The
breakdown of this phase is detailed in Exhibit C "Detail of Project
Publicity Phase."
1.8. Establishment the Compost Operation Phase.
After written authorization to proceed with the Establishment of
the Compost Operation Phase the CONSULTANT shall:
1.8.1. Provide all on-site consulting and hands-on services to
establish the compost operation.
1.8.2. In conjunction with municipal employees, windrow the
material, oversee the composting of material, monitor the material,
and ensure that material meets all Arkansas Department of Pollution
Control & Ecology regulations, as well as evaluate the process.
1.8.3. Guarantee the proper operation and maintanance of thew
Compost Operation in accordance with all Federal EPA, State of
Arkansas Department of Pollution Control & Ecology, and Washington
County Regulations governing the operation of a compostifig
facility. Failure to comply with these regulation will be
considered reason for termination of CONSULTANT by OWNER,, if
reason(s) for non-compliance is determined to rest with CONSULTAND.'.
1.8.4. Ensure that all 'required and necessary monitoring and
record keeping data is maintained in accordance with all applicable
Federal and State requirements.
1.9. Distribution and/or Marketing Phase.
1.9.1. The CONSULTANT shall work closely with the OWNER to ensure
that all of the availible compost product is distributed.
•
•
1.9.2. CONSULTANT, in conjunction with City Staff, will
investigate use of compost material by the City Parks and
Recreation Department.
1.9.3. With written authorization the CONSULTANT shall explore
marketing alternatives for the compost product.
1.9.4. CONSULTANT will work with the Arkansas Plant Board in
attempting to meet all regulations for marketing of the product.
1.9.5. CONSULTANT will research and recommend methods of
distribution of the compost product to the public.
1.10. 12 Month Warranty Period.
1.10.1. At the completion of the 12 month Project Implementation
phase of the contract the CONSULTANT will provide to the OWNER a
"Final Project Report" stating that all Project goals and Arkansas
DPC&E and EPA Guidelines have been met. Any Project deficiencies
will be documented along with suggested methods of resolution.
Final resolution of any Project deficiences will be undertaken with
the cooperation of both the OWNER and CONSULTANT. At the time that
the Final Project Report is accepted by the OWNER and any
deficiencies corrected then the CONSULTANT will provide a 12 month
warranty period during which time they will provide any needed
consulting services to ensure that the OWNER maintains proper
operation of the compost facility.
SECTION 2 - ADDITIONAL SERVICES OF CONSULTANT
2.1. General
If authorized in writing by OWNER, CONSULTANT shall furnish or obtain from
others Additional Services which are not considered part of this project.
2.1.1. Services to make other investigations or evaluations of existing
conditions or facilities, or to verify other existing problems and develop
solutions.
2.1.2. Services resulting from significant changes in extent of the
Project or its design including, but not limited to, changes in size,
complexity, OWNER's schedule, or character of construction or method of
financing; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, design
documents or Contract Documents when such revisions are due to causes beyond
CONSULTANT's control.
2.1:5. Additional or extended services during construction made necessary
by (1) work damaged by fire or other cause during construction, (2) a
significant amount of defective or neglected work or Contractor(s), (3)
prolongation of the contract time of any prime contract by more than sixty
days, (4) acceleration of the progress schedule involving services beyond
normal working hours, and (5) default by Contractor(s).
2.1.6. Additional services in connection with the .Project, including
services normally furnished by OWNER and services to otherwise provided for
in the Agreement.
SECTION 3 - OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
OWNER shall:
3.1. Provide all criteria and full information as to OWNER's
requirements for the Project, including design objectives and constraints,
space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility and expendability,
and any budgetary limitations; and furnish copies of all design and
construction standards which OWNER will require to be included in the
Drawings and Specifications.
3.2. Assist CONSULTANT by placing at his disposal all available
information pertinent to the Project including previous reports and any
other data relative to design or construction of the Project.
3.3. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for CONSULTANT to
enter upon public and private property as required for CONSULTANT to perform
his services.
3.4. Examine all studies, reports, sketches, drawings, Specifications,
proposals and other documents presented by CONSULTANT, obtain advice of an
attorney, insurance counselor and other consultants as OWNER deems
appropriate for such examination and render in writing decisions pertaining
thereto within a reasonable time so as not to delay the services of
CONSULTANT.
3.5. Furnish approvals and permits from all governmental authorities
having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from
others as may be necessary for completion of the Project.
3.6. Designate in writing a person to actasOWNER's representative
with respect to the services to be rendered under this Agreement. Such
person shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive
information, interpret and define OWNER's policies and decisions with
respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to
CONSULTANT's services, or any defect in the work of Contractor(s).
3.8. Furnish, or direct CONSULTANT to provide, necessary Additional
Service as stipulated in Section 2 of this Agreement or other services as
required.
3.9. Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements of
this Section 3.
SECTION 4 - PERIOD OF SERVICE
4.1. The provisions of this Section 4 and the various rates of
compensation for CONSULTANT's services provided for elsewhere in this
Agreement have been agreed to in anticipation of the orderly and continuous
progress of the Project through completion of the Construction Phase.
CONSULTANT's obligation to render services hereunder will extend for a
period which may reasonably be required for the design, award of contracts
and construction of the Project includingextra work and required extensions
thereto.
4.2. The services called for in the Study and Report Phase will be
completed as per proposal.
4.3. After acceptance by OWNER of the Study and Report Phase documents
indicating any specific modifications or changes in the extent of the
Project desired by OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER,
CONSULTANT shall proceed with the performance of the services called for in
the Preliminary Design Phase, and shall submit preliminary design documents
and a revised opinion of probable Project Cost as per proposed schedule in
proposal documents.
4.4. After acceptance by OWNER of the Preliminary Design Phase
documents and revised opinion of probable Project Cost, indicating any
specific modifications or changes in the extent of the Project desired by
OWNER, and upon written authorization from OWNER, CONSULTANT shall proceed
with the performance of the services called for in the Final Design Phase;
and shall deliver Contract Documents and a revised opinion of probable
Project Cost for all work of Contractor(s) on the Project within the
stipulated period indicated in the project schedule to be determined.
4.5. CONSULTANT's services under the Study and Report Phase and Final
Design Phase shall each be considered complete at the earlier of (1) the
date when the submissions for that phase have been accepted by OWNER or (2)
thirty days after the date when such submissions are delivered to OWNER for
final acceptance, plus such additional time as may be considered reasonable
for obtaining approval of governmental authorities having jurisdiction over
design criteria applicable to the Project.
4.6. After acceptance by OWNER of the CONSULTANT's Drawings,
Specifications and other Final Design Phase documentation including the most
recent opinion of probable Project Cost and upon written authorization to
proceed, CONSULTANT shall proceed with performance of the services called
for in the Bidding or Negotiating Phase. This Phase shall terminate and the
services to be rendered thereunder shall be considered complete upon
commencement of the Construction Phase or upon cessation of the negotiations
with prospective Contractor(s) (except as may be otherwise required to
complete the services called for in paragraph 6.2.2.5).
4.7. The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the
first prime contract to be executed for the work of the Project or any part
thereof, and will terminate upon written approval by CONSULTANT of final
payment on the last prime contract to be completed. Construction Phase
services may be rendered at different times in respect of separate prime
contracts if the Project involves more than one prime contract.
4.8. If OWNER has requested significant modifications or changes in the
extent of the Project, the time of performance of CONSULTANT's services and
his various rates of compensation shall be adjusted appropriately.
4.9. If OWNER fails to give prompt written authorization to proceed
with any phase of services after completion of the immediately preceding
phase, or if the Construction Phase has not commenced within
calendar days (plus such additional time as may be required to complete the
services called for under paragraph 6:2.2.5) after completion of the Final
Design Phase, CONSULTANT may, after giving seven days' written notice to
OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement.
4.10. If CONSULTANT's services for design or during construction of the
Project are delayed or suspended in whole or in part by OWNER for more than
three months for reasons beyond CONSULTANT's control, CONSULTANT shall on
written demand to OWNER (but without termination of the Agreement) be paid
as provided in paragraph 5.3.2. If such delay or suspension extends for
more than one year for reasons beyond CONSULTANT's control, or if CONSULTANT
for any reason is required to render services more than one year after
Substantial Completion, the various rates of compensation provided for
elsewhere in this Agreement shall be subject to renegotiation.
•
PROFESSIONAL FEE PLUS EXPENSES
SECTION 5 - PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT
5.1 Methods of Payment for Services and Expenses of CONSULTANT.
5.1.1: OWNER shall pay CONSULTANT for Basic Services rendered
under Section One a professional fee of a maximum, not to exceed
cost of $23,400 but with a mininum payment of at least $21,500 to
be paid in the following manner:
1. An initial lump -sum payment of $5,500 which will cover the
CONSULTANT's first 110 billable hours, at a rate of $50.00 per
hour. The expenses covered by this payment will be
documented by the CONSULTANT (not to be less than 110
billable hours). This payment will be made by OWNER to
CONSULTANT at the time of CONSULTANT's start on the Project.
2. Upon completion of CONSULTANT's first 110 billable hours,
CONSULTANT will proceed to submit monthly statements for Basic
and Additional Services rendered on a billable hour basis
(beginning with the 111th billable hour), and for reimbursible
expenses incurred. This proceedure is to be used through the
end of the contract.
5.1.2. Additional Services. OWNER shall pay CONSULTANT for
Additional Services rendered under Section Two as follows:
5.1.2.1. General. For additional services rendered under
paragraphs 2.1.1. through 2.1.6. on a billable hour basis (prior
estimate required).
5.1.3. For Reimbursible Expenses. In addition to payments
provided for in paragraph 5.1.1., OWNER shall pay CONSULTANT the
actual costs of all Reimbursible Expenses incurred in connection
with all Basic Services and Additional Services.
5;2 Times of Payments.
5.2.1. CONSULTANT shall submit monthly statements for basic and
Additional Services rendered and for Reimbursible Expenses
incurred. The amount of CONSULTANT's professional fee will be
based upon billable hours ($50.00 per hour). OWNER shall make
prompt monthly payments in response to CONSULTANT's monthly
statements.
5.3. Other Provisions Concerning Payment •
5.3.1. If OWNER fails to make
services and expenses within 60
bill therefor, the amounts due
any payment due CONSULTANT for
days after receipt of CONSULTANT's
CONSULTANT shall include a charge
at the rate of 1% per month from said sixtieth day, and in
addition, CONSULTANT may, after giving seven days' written notice
to OWNER, suspend services under this Agreement until he has been
paid in full amounts due him for services and expenses.
5.3.2. In the event of termination by OWNER under paragraph 7.1
upon the completion of any phase of the Basic Services, progress
payments due CONSULTANT for services rendered through such phase
shall constitute total payment for such services. In the event of
such termination by OWNER during any phase of the Basic Services,
CONSULTANT will be paid for services rendered during that phase on
the basis of Direct Labor Costs times a factor of 1.0 for
services rendered during that phase to date of termination by
principals and employees assigned to the Project. In the event of
any such termination, CONSULTANT will be paid for all unpaid
Additional Services and unpaid Reimbursable Expenses, plus all
termination expenses. Termination expenses mean Reimbursable
Expenses directly attributable to termination.
5.4. Definitions.
5.4.1. Reimbursable Expenses mean the actual expenses incurred
directly or indirectly in connection with the Project for:
transportation and subsistence incidental thereto; obtaining bids
or proposals from Contractor(s); furnishing and maintaining field
office facilities; subsistence and transportation of Resident
Project Representatives and their assistants; toll telephone calls
and telegrams; reproduction of reports, Drawings, Specifications,
and similar Project -related items in addition to those required
under Section 1; and, and, if authorized in advance by OWNER,
overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. Reimbursable
Expenses shall include the amount billed to CONSULTANT by special
consultants employed to CONSULTANT (other than as an authorized
Additional Service under Section 2) for such consultants' services
and Reimbursable Expenses times a factor of 1.10; and shall also
include expenses incurred for computer time and other highly
specialized equipment, including an appropriate charge for
previsouly established programs and expenses of photographic
production techniques times a factor of 1.0
•
SECTION 6 - CONSTRUCTION COST AND OPINIONS OF COST
6.1. Construction Cost.
The construction cost of the entire Project (herein referred to as
"Construction Cost") means the total cost of the entire Project to OWNER,
but it will not include CONSULTANT's compensation and expenses, the cost of
land, rights-of-way, or compensation for or damages to, properties unless
this Agreement so specifies, or will it include OWNER's legal, accounting,
insurance counseling or auditing services, or interest and financing charges
incurred in connection with the Project. (Construction Cost is one of the
items comprising Project Costs which is defined in paragraph 1.2.5.) When
Construction Cost is used as a basis for payment it will be based on one of
the following sources with precedence' in the order listed for work designed
or specified by CONSULTANT.
6.1.1. For completed construction work the total costs of all work
performed as designed or specified by CONSULTANT.
6.1.2. For work designed or specified but not constructed, the lowest
bona fide bid received from a qualified bidder for such work; or, if the
work is not bid, the lowest bona fide negotiated proposal for such work.
6.1.3. For work designed or specified but not constructed upon which no
such bid or proposal is received the most recent estimate of Construction
Cost, or, if none if available, CONSULTANT's most recent opinion of probable
Construction Cost.
Labor furnished by OWNER for the Project will be included in the
Construction Cost at current market rates including a reasonable allowance
for overhead and profit. Materials and equipment furnished by OWNER will be
included at current market prices. No deduction is to be made from
CONSULTANT's compensation on account of any penalty, liquidated damages, or
other amounts withheld from payments to Contractor(s).
6.2. Opinions of Cost.
6.2.1. Since CONSULTANT has no control over the cost of labor, materials,
equipment or services 'furnished by others, or over the manufacturers'
vendors' and Contractor(s)' methods of determining prices, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions, his opinions of probable Project
Cost and Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis
of his experience andqualifications and represent his best judgment as an
experienced and qualified professional consultant, familiar with the
construction industry; but CONSULTANT cannot and does not guarantee that
proposals, bid or actual Project or Construction Cost will not vary from
opinions of probable cost prepared by him. If prior to the Bidding or
Negotiating Phase OWNER wishes greater assurance as to Project or
Constructon Cost he shall employ an independent cost estimator as provided
in paragraph 3.8.
6.2.2. If a Construction Cost limit is established by written agreement
between OWNER and CONSULTANT, the following will apply:
6.2.2.1. The acceptance by OWNER at any time during the Basic Services
of a revised opinion of probable Project or Construction Cost in excess of
the then establsihed cost limit will constitute a corresponding revision in
the Construction Cost limit to the extent indicated in such revised opinion.
6.2.2.2. Any Construction Cost limit so established will include a
contingency of ten percent unless another amount is agreed upon in writing.
6.2.2.3. CONSULTANT will be permitted to determine what materials,
equipment, component systems and types of construction are to be included in
the Drawings and Specifications and to make reasonable adjustments in the
extent of the Project to bring it withinthe cost limit.
6.2.2.4. If the Bidding or Negotiating Phase has not commenced within
six months after completion of the Final Design Phase, the established
Construction cost limit will not be binding on CONSULTANT, and OWNER shall
consent to an adjustment in such cost limit commensurate with any applicable
change in the general level of process in the construction industry between
the date of completion of the Final Design Phase and the date on which
proposals or bids are sought.
6.2.2.5. If the lowest bona fide proposal or bid exceeds the
established Construction Cost limit, OWNER shall (1) give written approval
to increase such cost limit, (2) authorize negotiating or rebidding the
Project within a reasonable time, or (3) cooperate in revising the Project
extent or quality. In the case of (3), CONSULTANT shall, without additional
charge, modify the Contract Documents as necessary to bring the Construction
Cost within the cost limit. The providing of such service will be the limit
of CONSULTANT's responsibility in this regard and, having done so,
CONSULTANT shall be entitled to payment for his services in accordance with
this Agreement.
SECTION 7 - GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
7.1. Termination.
The obligation to provide further services under this Agreement may be
terminated by either party upon seven days' written notice in the event of
substantial failure by the other party to perform in accordnance with the
terms hereof through no fault of the terminating party.
7.2. Reuse of Documents.
All documents including Drawings and Specifications prepared by CONSULTANT
pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service in respect of the
Project. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by
OWNER or others on extensions of the Projects or on any other project. Any
reuse without written verification or adaptation by CONSULTANT for the
specific purpose intended will be at the OWNER's sole risk and without
liability or legal exposure to CONSULTANT; and OWNER shall indemnify and
hold harmless CONSULTANT from all claims, damages, losses and expenses
including attorneys' fees arising out of or resulting therefrom. Any such
verification or adaptation will entitle CONSULTANT to further compensation
at rates to be agreed upon by OWNER and CONSULTANT.
7.3. Controlling Law.
This Agreement is to be governed by the law of the principal place of
business of CONSULTANT.
7.4. Successors and Assigns.
OWNER AND 'CONSULTANT each
successors, executors, administrators,
the other party to this Agreement
executors, administrators, assigns and
party,in respect to all covenants,
Agreement.
binds himself and his partners,
assigns and legal representatives to
and to the partners, successors,
legal representatives of such other
agreements and obligations of this
7.4.2. Neither OWNER nor CONSULTANT shall assign, sublet or transfer any
rights under or interest in (including, but without limitation, any moneys
that may become due or moneys that are due) this Agreement without the
written consent of the other, except as stated in paragraph 7.4.1 and except
to the extent that the effect of this limitation may be restricted by law.
Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written consent to an
assignment, no assignment will release or discharge the assignor from any
duty or responsibility under this Agreement. Nothing contained in this
paragraph shall prevent CONSULTANT from employing such independent
consultants, associates and subcontractors as he may deem appropriate to
assist him in the performance of services hereunder.
7.4.3. Nothing herein shall be construed to give any rights or benefits
hereunder to anyone other than OWNER and CONSULTANT.
•
7.5. Arbitration.
7.5.1. All claims, counterclaims, disputes and other matters in
question between the parties hereto arising out of or relating to
this Agreement or the breach thereof will be decided by
arbitration in accordance with the Construction Industry
Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association then
obtaining, subject to the limitations and restrictions stated in
paragraphs 7.5.3 and 7.5.4 below. This Agreement so to arbitrate
and any other agreement or consent to arbitrate entered into in
accordance herewith as provided in this paragraph 7.5 will be
specifically enforceable under the prevailing arbitration law of
any court having jurisdiction.
7.5.2. Notice of demand for arbitration must be filed in writing
with the other parties to this Agreement and with the American
Arbitration Association. The demand must be made within a
reasonable time after the claim, dispute or other matter in
question has arisen. In no event may the demand for arbitration
be made after institution of legal or equitable proceedings based
on such claim, dispute or other matter in question would be
barred by the applicable statute of limitations.
7.5.3. All demands for arbitration and all answering statements
thereto which include any monetary claim must contain a statement
that the total sum or value in controversy all alleged by the
party making such demand or answering statement is not more than
$200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs). The arbitrators will
not have jurisdiction, power or authority to consider, or make
findings (except in denial of their own jurisdiction) concerning,
any claim, counterclaim, dispute or other matter in question
where the amount in controversy thereof is more than $200,000
(exclusive of interest and costs) or to render a monetary award
in response thereto against any party which totals more than
$200,000 (exclusive of interest and costs).
7.5.4. No arbitration arising out of, or relating to, this
Agreement may include, by consolidation, joinder or in any other
manner, any person or entity who is not -a party to this
Agreement.
7.5.5. By written consent signed by all the parties to this
Agreement and containing a specific reference hereto, the
limitations and restrictions contained in paragraphs 7.5.3 and
7.5.4 may be waived in whole or in part as to any claim,
counterclaim, dispute or other matter specifically described in
such consent. No consent to arbitration in respect of a
specifically described claim, counterclaim, dispute or other
matter in question will constitute consent to arbitrate any
other claim, counterclaim, dispute or other matter in question
which is not specifically described in such consent or in which
the sum or value in controversy exceeds $200,000 (exclusive of
interest and costs) or which is with any party not specifically
described therein.
SECTION 8F- EXHIBITS
.1. The following Exhibits are attached to and made a part of this
agreement:
8.1.1. Exhibit A "Request For Qualifications-Hileman-McKinney"
consisiting of 20 pages.
•
8.1.2. Exhibit B "Professional Fees for Consulting Services"
consisting`of 3 pages.
8.1.3. Exhibit C "Detail of Project Publicity Phase"
8.3. This agreement (consisting of pages 1 to _, inclusive)
together with the exhibits identified above constitute the entire
agreement between OWNER and CONSULTANT and supersede all prior
written or oral understandings. This agreement and said exhibits
may only be amended, supplemented, modified or canceled by a duly
executed written instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have made and executed this
agreement as of the day and year first above written.
MAYOR
a/a/Adisny 7' -7 aCt4.72
William V. Marin, Mayor
City of Fayetteville
CITY CLERK
A)
Sonne McWethy, Ci j, Clerk
City of Fayettevill
CONSULTANT
cTa 1722 , Y1%
G. Thomas McKinne
Hileman-McKinney &`associates
This contract must be executed by the Mayor and City Clerk in
behalf of the City to be legal.
HILEMAN - MC KINNEY & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTANTS
WASTE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
108 San Jose Drive • Springdale, AR 72764 • (501) 751 5288
Ms.Peggy Bates
Purchasing Officer
'.City of Fayetteville
' 113 W. Mountain
,Fayetteville, Ar 72701
Dear Ms. Bates,
Please find enclosed our Request For Qualifications for the proposed
Fayetteville Municipal Leaf and Yard Waste Composting Facility. The firm
of Hileman - McKinney is pleased to see the City of Fayetteville take a
leadership role in addressing municipal solid waste problems.
We feel that we are uniquely qualified to assist the City in setting
up this compost facility. We hope that you will agree with us.
Sincerely,
Tom McKinney
Hileman - McKinney & Assoc.
ege
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
HILEMAN - MCKINNEY & ASSOCIATES
LEAF AND YARD WASTE COMPOST FACILITY
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
AUGUST 21, 1989
The problems associated with the handling and disposal of municipal
solid waste are reaching a critical point in Northwest Arkansas and are
becoming a prime concern of municipal and county governments. Local landfill
capacities are quickly diminishing as they continue to be filled and new
landfills are becoming .more difficult tb establish and operate due to a
combination of increased state and federal regulations, availability of
suitable landfill sites and opposition by residents living near potential
sites. This situation has made it necessary for municipal governments to
explore new methods to reduce the amount of waste they send to landfills.
Reducing the waste stream through alternative solid waste management
techniques has become a principal method in which municipalities can reduce
their landfill costs.
The City of Fayetteville has a unique opportunity to become a leader in
alternative waste disposal techniques in the state of Arkansas. Hy
establishing the first municipal leaf and yard waste composting program in the
state, Fayetteville is not only taking a solid step toward reducing the volume
of solid waste it must dispose, it is also taking the first step to reduce
future waste disposal costs. Such a composting program can serve as a pilot
project for other municipalities throughout the state to help them reduce
their waste stream as well. Leaf and yard waste can compose as much as 5% to
30% of a municipalities waste stream, depending on the season. These levels
can reach as high as 80% of total waste collected in the fall. These
percentages can also be increased over the short run by violent or inclement
weather such as high winds, tornados or ice storms which can bring down large
masses of limbs and entire trees.
The composting of leaf and yard waste not only reduces the volume of
solid waste that must be disposed, but also supplies a useful.compost product
which is classified as a soil enhancer. The product can be used by the
municipality itself or can be given or sold to local citizens. Though the
compost procedure can appear to be relatively simple., the actual chemical
processes that are involved are not. Necessary skills and techniques must be
in place and standard policies and procedures must be followed in order to
carry out a successful compost program. We feel that our firm of Hileman -
McKinney & Associates has the skills and knowledge necessary to help the City
of Fayetteville establish and maintain a model compost program.
Hileman - McKinney & Associates was established in February of 1989:to
provide solid waste and resource management expertise to the municipalities,
counties and businesses of northern Arkansas. Leslie (Les) H. Hileman retired
in December of 1988 from the University of Arkansas as an Emeritus Professor
after thirty-seven years as a research agronomist. During his tenure Mr.
Hileman directed the Soil Testing and Research Laboratory for twenty-one
years, served as the director of the Water Testing Laboratory for twenty-eight
years, served for twenty-two. years as director of Project 536 studying
physical and chemical properties of water for the state of Arkansas and also
served as director of Project 546 for. twenty-five years studying physical,
chemical and utilization properties of municipal, industrial and agricultural
waste.
•
Mr. Hileman has also served as a consultant on many compost projects
including the composting of feedlot waste to formulate a potting soil mix;
development of municipal solid waste composting methodology using air
separation, classification and recycling methodology and using compost to
reclaim brine contaminated soils in southern Arkansas oil and gas fields (see
Appendix A). Mr. Hileman has also written numerous articles relating to solid
waste and resource management, composting, and utilization of waste derived
products (see Appendix B).
G. Thomas McKinney is a life-long .resident of Fayetteville currently
residing in West Fork. Mr. McKinney received his Bachelor of Arts Degree in
Political Science from the University of Arkansas and is currently completing
a Masters Degree in Public'Administration. Mr. McKinney served as an
Administrative Intern and Aide for the City of Fayetteville and is, thus, very
familiar with how a municipal government operates as well as the problems.
which it may encounter. Mr. McKinney has an extensive basic environmental
science background as well as field research work. He acquired practical
private sector business experience while working as a commercial insurance
underwriter for the McKinney Insurance Agency in Fayetteville. Mr. McKinney
also has experience in training, supervising._ and evaluating personnel in
positions exposed to a high degree of public visibility (see Appendix C).
The project in question will involve the establishment of a
comprehensive leaf and yard waste composting program with the possibility of a
shredded paper component. The establishment and implementation of the program
will require twelve months so it may be carried through all four seasons. The
bulk of the project activity will take place in the first six months when the
program is being organized and implemented. The second six months will
involve activities such as evaluating and updating the process and making
preparations to turn the program over to the City. A quick synopsis of the
project as well as Hileman - McKinney's responsibilities for each step will
include:
1
Site Location - Hileman - McKinney & Associates will, in
conjunction with the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Department of
Pollution Control and Ecology and the- Arkansas Soil Conservation
Service, evaluate sixteen factors, patterned after the compost
siting requirements for the state of New Jersey, in determining
the best site for the project. Though the Arkansas Department of
Pollution Control and Ecology currently does not have any specific
✓ equirements for siting a compost operation, such factors as
slope, presence of a floodplain, endangered species, water table
and local runoff patterns will be evaluated. This procedure will
e nsure that the chosen site will qualify under any future
guidelines formulated by the Department of Pollution Control and
Ecology.
2. Site Preparation - Hileman - McKinney will work in conjunction
w ith the City Engineer and his staff using City owned equipment to
prepare the project site. This will ,nclude the preparation of an -
earthen pad for the windrow compost operation, the construction of
catch basins to trap • runoff from the site, security fencing,
storage buildings, office location and project layout.
3. Project Publicity - Public education .is one of the most important
factors when setting up a .compost program. Once the public is
made aware of the operation, understands how it works, that it is
a step in solving a solid waste problem and that they can receive
•
•
a useful product from the program, they. will give the project
their support. Both Mr. Hileman and Mr. McKinney have had
extensive experience with working with the print, radio and
television media in both publicizing and answering questions about
specific solid waste projects. We will work closely with the City
staff to ensure that the public is educated and remains informed
on the implementation and progress of the project.
4. Purchase of Equipment- Hileman - McKinney has an extensive
knowledge of composting equipment as well as personal contacts
with equipment manufacturers. We will evaluate the project and
recommend equipment we feel is most suited for the facility at the
most reasonable cost.
5. Training of Personnel - H.ileman - -McKinney will train all
personnel employed in the project as well any others designated by
the City. We will provide copies of training manuals and policy
and procedures manuals to all project employees as well as extra
copies to the City.
6. Establishing the Compost Operation - Hileman - McKinney will
provide all of the on-site consulting and -hands-on work necessary
to establish the compost operation. This will include training of
personnel, windrowing the material, composting and monitoring the
material to ensure that it will meet all Department of Pollution
and Control regulations, and evaluating the process as well as
distributing the compost to the public or marketing the finished
product.
7. Record Keeping Hileman - McKinney will ensure that all of the
-necessary monitoring and record keeping required by the Department
of Pollution Control and Ecology and the Environmental Protection
Agency will be completed. We- will be using both Word Perfect and
Lotus 1-2-3 computer programs for record keeping and
correspondence purposes. All project personnel will also be
trained in monitoring policies and procedures.
•
8. Leaf and Yard Waste Ordinances - Hileman McKinney, in
conjunction.with City staff, will research and write a model leaf
and yard waste ordinance which will take into account:the needs of
the City of. Fayetteville. Both Mr. Hileman and Mr. McKinney have
extensive experience in formulating rules and procedures to meet
specific needs of organizations which can be applied to ordinance
writing. Most of the current leaf and yard waste compost
operations are located in the east and north east part of the
country. These ordinances will be examined and the pertinent
municipal government or compost operator will be contacted for
their input. Roth the National and Arkansas Municipal Leagues
will be contacted for their input as well.
5 Distribution and/or Marketing - Hileman - McKinney will work
closely with the City to ensure that all of the available compost
product is distributed. Both ."in-house” use of the compost by the
Parks and Recreation Division as well as distribution to the
public either free,or at a nominal fee to cover loading costs will
be researched. We will also -work with the Arkansas Plant Board to
e nsure that the product, will meet any and all pertinent
✓ equirements Ear commercial sale of the compost if such amounts
✓ emain after in-house and public needs are met.
•
•
10. Explore Feasibility of a Full Municipal Compost Permit from the
State of Arkansas - Upon instructions from the City of
Fayetteville outlining the scope of the proposed project, Hileman
- McKinney will begin a feasibility study for a full municipal
compost operation. • In conjunct,on with 'City staff, data
collection procedures and an evaluation program will be designed.
We will make use of computer models available for such evaluations
ensuring that factor unique to' the City of Fayetteville are
included . in the waste stream evaluation. We will contact Mark'
Witherspoon in the Solid Waste Division of the Arkansas Department
of Pollution Control and Ecology regarding the requirements for
'the granting of a full municipal compost operation permit for the
City. We will also contact the Environmental Protection Agency to
ensure that any pertinent federal guidelines are included in the
planning of such an operation.
All of the steps listed above will be the responsibility of Hileman -
McKinney to carry out with the full approval and participation of the City of
Fayetteville. We are capable of performing all of the necessary tasks.as are
now envisioned. However, if a sub -contractor becomes necessary for any
reason, they will only be employed with the full approval of the City.
Since Hileman - McKinney & Associates is a new firm, we do not have an
extensive record of performance to which we may point. We are currently doing
consulting for Mr. Richard Backer of "Backer's Compost" located at Backer's
Variety Store, Gentry , Arkansas, 72734, (501) '730-2507. Mr. Backer is
composting chicken litter. from Tyson chicken houses into a natural organic
fertilizer which we are currently marketing . We can better illustrate our
goals by examining the performances of the laboratories under the supervision
of Mr. Hileman. While working as director of the Soil. and Water Testing
Laboratory at the University of Arkansas, a schedule was set and maintained in
which completion of all routine chemical analysis and result mail -outs were
completed within three working days. An average of 30,000 samples were
analyzed annually with each sample being subject to six individual tests.
With the retirement of Mr. Hileman the time required for analysis and result
mail -out has increased to six days: Similar procedure schedules were
established and met in the other laboratories under the supervision of Mr.
Hileman as .well as schedules for research work such as planting, maintenance,
harvesting and data collection carried on throughout the state.
A primary task of our firm in implementing the compost program for the
City of Fayetteville will be cost control. One factor which will decrease the
cost of the project is the degree to which all of the compost program
activities can be carried out by City staff. Hileman - McKinney will use City
personnel, services and equipment whenever possible to keep overall costs as
low as possible. We will also explore the possibility of Obtaining federal
grant funds from the Environmental Protection Agency as well as from other
sources.
While the compost program is being implemented, we will explore all
aspects of the procedures involved to determine the most economic paths to
follow. The fact that Hileman - McKinney is a local firm will decrease costs
to the City of Fayetteville since we•wiil not have to include in our fee the
costs of air travel, hotel expenses, long distance telephone communication and
other related overhead expenses. There will be no long delays caused by
travel when our service: are requested.
HILEMAN - MC KINNEY & ASSOCIATES
CONSULTANTS
WASTE AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
108 San Jose Drive • Springdale, AR 72764 • (501) 751-5288
Ms.Peggy Bates
Purchasing Officer
City of Fayetteville
113 W. Mountain
Fayetteville, Ar 72701
Dear Ms. Bates,
Please find enclosed our Request For Qualifications for the proposed
Fayetteville Municipal Leaf and Yard Waste Composting Facility. The firm
of Hileman - McKinney is pleased to see the City of Fayetteville take a
leadership role in addressing municipal solid waste problems.
We feel that we are uniquely qualified to assist the City in setting
up this compost facility. We hope that you will agree with us.
Sincerely,
„Doty)
Tom McKinney
Hileman - McKinney & Assoc.
L
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
HILEMAN - MCKINNEY & ASSOCIATES
LEAF AND YARD WASTE COMPOST FACILITY
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
AUGUST 21, 1989
The problems associated with the handling and disposal of municipal
solid waste are reaching a critical point in Northwest Arkansas and are
becoming a prime concern of municipal and county governments. Local landfill
capacities are quickly diminishing as they continue to be filled and new
landfills are becoming more difficult to establish and operate due to a
combination of increased state and federal regulations, availability of
suitable landfill sites and opposition by residents living near potential
sites. This situation has made it necessary for municipal governments to
explore new methods to reduce the amount of waste they send to landfills.
Reducing the waste stream through alternative solid waste management
techniques has become a principal method in which municipalities can reduce
their landfill costs.
The City of Fayetteville has a unique opportunity to become a leader in
alternative waste disposal techniques in the state of Arkansas. By
establishing the first municipal leaf and yard waste composting program in the
state, Fayetteville is not only taking a solid step toward reducing the volume
of solid waste it must dispose, it is also taking the first step to reduce
future waste disposal costs. Such a composting program can serve as a pilot
project for other municipalities throughout the state to help them reduce
their waste stream as well . Leaf and yard waste can compose as much as 5% to
300 of a municipalities waste stream, depending on the season. These levels
can reach as high as 80% of total waste collected in the fall. These
percentages can also be increased over the short run by violent or inclement
weather such as high winds, tornados or ice storms which can bring down large
masses of limbs and entire trees.
The composting of leaf and yard waste not only reduces the volume of
solid waste that must be disposed, but also supplies a useful compost product
which is classified as a soil enhancer. The product can be used by the
municipality itself or can be given or sold to local citizens. Though the
compost procedure can appear to be relatively simple, the actual chemical
processes that are involved are not. Necessary skills and techniques must be
in place and standard policies and procedures must be followed in order to
carry out a successful compost program. We feel that our firm of Hileman -
McKinney & Associates has the skills and knowledge necessary to help the City
of Fayetteville establish and maintain a model compost program.
Hileman - McKinney & Associates was established in February of 1989 to
provide solid waste and resource management expertise to the municipalities,
counties and businesses of northern Arkansas. Leslie (Les) H. Hileman retired
in December of 1983 from the University of Arkansas as an Emeritus Professor
after thirty-seven years as a research agronomist. During his tenure Mr .
Hileman directed the Soil Testing and Research Laboratory for twenty-one
years, served as the director of the Water Testing Laboratory for twenty-eight
years, served for twenty-two years as director of Project 536 studying
physical and chemical properties of water for the state of Arkansas and also
served as director of Project 546 for_ twenty-five years studying physical,
chemical and utilization properties of municipal, industrial and agricultural
waste.
Mr . Hileman has also served as a consultant on many compost projects
including the composting of feedlot waste to formulate a potting soil mix;
development of municipal solid waste composting methodology using air
separation, classification and recycling methodology and using compost to
reclaim brine contaminated soils in southern Arkansas oil and gas fields (see
Appendix A) . Mr. Hileman has also written numerous articles relating to solid
• waste and resource management, composting, and utilization of waste derived
products (see Appendix B) .
G. Thomas McKinney is a life-long resident of Fayetteville currently
residing in West Fork . Mr . McKinney received his Bachelor of Arts Degree in
Political Science from the University of Arkansas and is currently completing
a Masters Degree in Public Administration. Mr. McKinney served as an
Administrative Intern and Aide for the City of Fayetteville and is, thus, very
familiar with how a municipal government operates as well as the problems
which it may encounter. Mr. McKinney has an extensive basic environmental
science background as well as field research work . He acquired practical
private sector business experience while working as a commercial insurance
underwriter for the McKinney Insurance Agency in Fayetteville. Mr. McKinney
also has experience in training, supervising and evaluating personnel in
positions exposed to a high degree of public visibility (see Appendix C) .
• The project in question will involve •the establishment of a
comprehensive leaf and yard waste composting program with the possibility of a
shredded paper component. The establishment and implementation of the program
will require twelve months so it may be carried through all four seasons. The
bulk of the project activity will take place in the Eirst six months when the
program is being organized and implemented. The second six months will
involve activities such as evaluating and updating the process and making
preparations to turn the program over to the City. A quick synopsis of the
project as well as Hileman - McKinney's responsibilities for each step will
include:
. 1. Site Location - Hileman - McKinney & Associates will, in
conjunction with the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Department of
Pollution Control and Ecology and the Arkansas Soil Conservation
•
Service, evaluate sixteen factors, patterned after the compost
siting requirements for the state of New Jersey, in determining
the best site for the project. Though the Arkansas Department of
Pollution Control and Ecology currently does not have any specific
requirements for siting a compost operation, such factors as
slope, presence of a floodplain, endangered species, water table
and local runoff patterns will be evaluated. This procedure will
ensure that the chosen site will qualify under any future
guidelines formulated by the Department of Pollution Control and
Ecology.
2. Site Preparation - Hileman - ;•McKinney will work in conjunction
with the City Engineer and his staff using City owned equipment to
prepare the project site. This will include Lhe preparation of an
earthen pad for the windrow compost operation, the construction of
catch basins to trap runoff from the site, security fencing,
storage buildings, office location and project layout.
3. Project Publicity - Public education is one of the most important
factors when setting up a . compost program. Once the public is
made aware of the operation, understands how it works, that it is
a step in solving a solid waste problem and that they can receive
•
-
( a useful product from the program, they will give the project
their support. Both Mr. Hileman and Mr . McKinney have had
extensive experience with working with the print, radio and
television media in both publicizing and answering questions about
specific solid waste projects. We will work closely with the City
staff to ensure that the public is educated and remains informed
• on the implementation and progress of the project.
4. Purchase of Equipment - Hileman - McKinney has an extensive
knowledge of composting equipment as well as personal contacts
with equipment manufacturers. We will evaluate the project and
recommend equipment we feel is most suited for the facility at the
most reasonable cost.
5. Training of Personnel - Hileman - McKinney will train all
personnel employed in the project as well any others designated by
the City. We will provide copies of training manuals and policy
and procedures manuals to all project employees as well as extra
copies to the City.
6. Establishing the Compost Operation - Hileman - McKinney will
provide all of the on-site consulting and hands-on work necessary
to establish the compost operation. This will include training
personnel, windrowing the material, composting and monitoring t'-
material to ensure that it will meet all Department of Pollution
and Control regulations, and evaluating the process as well as
distributing the compost to the public or marketing the finished
Cproduct.
7. Record creeping - Hileman - McKinney will ensure that all of the
necessary monitoring and record keeping required by the Department
of Pollution Control and Ecology and the Environmental Protection
Agency will be completed. We will be using both Word Perfect ar.d
Lotus 1-2-3 computer programs for record keeping and
correspondence purposes. All project personnel will also be
trained in monitoring policies and procedures.
8. Leaf and Yard Waste Ordinances - Hileman - McKinney, in
conjunction with City staff, will research and write a model leaf
and yard waste ordinance which will take into account the needs of
the City of Fayetteville. Both Mr. Hileman and Mr. McKinney have
extensive experience in formulating rules and procedures to meet
specific needs of organizations which can be applied to ordinance
writing. Most of the current leaf and yard waste compost
operations are located in the east and north east part of the
country. These ordinances will be examined and the pertinent
municipal government or compost operator will be contacted for
their input. Eoth the National and Arkansas Municipal Leagues
will be contacted for their input as well .
9 . Distrihution and/or Marketing - Hileman - McKinney will work
closely with the City to unsure that all of the available compost
product is distributed. }
Parks and Recreation T� u0�h "in-house" use of
the compost by the
Division as
well asdistribution to the
public either free or at a nominal fee to cover loading costs will
be researched. We will also work with the Arkansas Plant Board to
ensure that the product, will meet any and all pertinent
requirements for commercial sale of the compost if such amounts
remain after in-house and public needs are met.
C10. Explore Feasibility of a Full Municipal Compost Permit from the
State of Arkansas - Upon instructions from the City of
Fayetteville outlining the scope of the proposed project, Hileman
- McKinney will begin a feasibility study for a full municipal
compost operation. In conjunction with City staff, data
collection procedures and an evaluation program will be designed.
We will make use of computer models available for such evaluations
ensuring that factor unique to the City of Fayetteville are
included in the waste stream evaluation. We will contact Mark
Witherspoon in the Solid Waste Division of the Arkansas Department
of Pollution Control and Ecology regarding the requirements for
the granting of a full municipal compost operation permit for the
City. We will also contact the Environmental Protection Agency to
ensure that any pertinent federal guidelines are included in the
planning of such an operation.
All of the steps listed above will be the responsibility of Hileman -
McKinney to carry out with the full approval and participation of the City of
Fayetteville. We are capable of performing all of the necessary tasks as are
now envisioned. However, if a sub-contractor becomes necessary for any
reason, they will only be employed with the full approval of the City.
Since Hileman - McKinney & Associates is a new firm, we do not have an
extensive record of performance to which we may point. We are currently doing
consulting for Mr. Richard Backer of "Backer 's Compost" located at Backer's
Variety Store, Gentry , Arkansas, 72724, ( 501) 730-2`07. Mr. Backer is
composting chicken litter from Tyson chicken houses into a natural organic
fertilizer which we are currently marketing . We can better illustrate our
goals by examining the performances of the laboratories under the supervision
of Mr . Hileman. While working as director of
the Soil and Water Testing
Laboratory at the University of Arkansas, a schedule was set and maintained in
which completion of all routine chemical analysis and result mail-outs were
completed within three working days. An average of 20, 000 samples were
analyzed annually with each sample being :subject to six individual tests .
With the retirement of Mr. Hileman the time required for analysis and result
mail-out has increased to six days . Similar procedure schedules were
established and met in the other laboratories under the supervision of Mr.
Hileman as well as schedules for research work such as planting, maintenance,
harvesting and data collection carried on throughout the state.
A primary task of our firm in implementing the compost program for the
City of Fayetteville will be cost control. One factor which will decrease the
cost of the project is the degree to which all of the compost program
activities can be carried out by City staff. Hileman - McKinney will use City
personnel, services and equipment whenever possible to keep overall costs as
low as possible. We will al:U explore the possibility of obtaining federal
grant funds from the Environmental Protection Agency as well as from other
sources.
While the compost program is being implemented, we will explore all
aspects of the procedure.s involved to determine the mood ec_non'ic paths to
allow. _ .cal firm will decrease costs
_ The fn�,, �t.,i'� Hileman McKinney`r �_ 3 �
to the City of Fayetteville since we will not have to include in our fee the
Cosa:o of air travel, hotel expenses, long will
tommu c
` . p g ' a, c:; telephone r� ni ation and
other related overhead expenses . There will be no long delays caused by
travel when our service_; are requested.
•
CHileman - McKinney guarantees the quality of their work. As we stated
earlier, the composting procedure is relatively simple but the chemical
reactions involved are not. Good scientific methodology must be 'followed to
ensure a clean and odor free compost operation. Standard policies and
procedures will be implemented which will ensure just such a clean operation
and a high quality standardized compost product. We take such pride in our
work that as a standard part of any contract we sign, we offer our services
for a full twelve months past the contract dates, at nu extra cost, to ensure
that the program continues to function smoothly. This not only ensures the
City of Fayetteville that we will perform our services as contracted but also
ensures that the operation performs to our satisfaction. Also, for a
reasonable annual fee we will be available for consultation and service to the
City for as many years as they wish.
Hileman - McKinney will be able to meet all of the deadlines set out by
the City. It is fortunate that Fayetteville is beginning the project at this
time. Any necessary equipment purchased by the City can be delivered in time
for the fall leaf drop. We will be able to set up the program and have leaf
compost available for the spring planting s•:ason. For a leaf and yard waste
compost operation the schedules and deadlines are set, in a large part, by
nature. It is possible to forecast, with some accuracy, when a mass of
material will be available for composting and what components, in a large
part, it will consist, This fo toasting capability enable the City to
• use the compost facility to its greatest efficiency.
Hileman - McKinney & Associates proximity to and familiarity with the
City of Fayetteville and the surrounding area is an advantage that will ensure
C a model compost facility. We have recognized that solid waste would be a
problem for Northwest Arkansas for years. Mr . Hileman has spent the last
thirty years researching methods to control and manage solid waste in order to
help solve this problem. He has close irofessicnal relations with all of the
relevant state agencies as well as numerous agricultural societies.
All of the members of the firm have lived in Fayetteville or nearby for
over thirty years and are familiar with the people and how they think. This
is not a project that we will put together and then just walk away. It is a
project that we will live in association with for the rest of our lives and
one in which we will have a personal interest. Its performance will not only
redact upon the City of Fayetteville but on our capabilities as well. For
that reason alone, we will ensure that the project is a success.
•
• APPENDIX A
PARTIAL LIST OF SERVICES OFFERED FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
1. Solid Waste Composting:
a. Municipal organic garbage
b. Commercial organic garbage
c. Leaves and yard waste
2. Recycling and Reuse:
a. Municipal
b. Commercial
c. Marketing recyclable materials
3. Landfill Services:
a. Reduction of volume
b. Cover material
c. Extension of landfill life
4. Home Separation
5. . Funding and Regulations: Federal and State
a. Federal fund availability
• b. Regulation projections
6. Marketing
C7. Equipment Procurement
8. Research - Data Acquisition
9. Communications:
a. Public input
b. Solid Waste and Recycling Seminars
c. Mass media
d. Recycling literature
e. Visual and Multimedia Aides
10. Regional Cooperative Program Development
11. Commercial and Industrial Relations
12. Personnel Training
13. Land and Habitat Reconstruction and Restoration
C
Leslie (Les) H. Hileman, MSA*, CPAg*, CPSS*
• 108 San Jose Drive
i Springdale, Ark. 72764
(501) 751 - 5288
Status: • Retired, Emeritus Professor, University of Arkansas Research
Agronomist for 37 years.
EXPERIENCE
A. University of Arkansas:
1. Directed the Soil Testing and Research Laboratory in Fayetteville
for 21 years. Duties included carrying out field, greenhouse and
laboratory research in fertilizer response studies on forage
crops. The laboratory processed an average of 31,000 soil samples
annually.
2. Became director of the Water Testing Laboratory and served in this
capacity for 28 years. The major work program of the lab vas the
development and expansion of testing methods and service
procedures in the areas of domestic, poultry, livestock, fish,
greenhouses, point-of-use (POU), point-of-entry (POE), and
industrial use and re-use as well as pollution and eater treatment
research.
3. Served for 22 years as research and project director (Prof. 536)
for the study of the physical and chemical properties of water for
the State of Arkansas including surface, ground, municipal and
industrial water. This project included the determination of
water treatment methods as required and the utilization potential
of poor quality water.
4. Served for 25 years as research project director (Prof. 546) for
the study of physical, chemical and utilization characteristics of
poultry manure and other organic wastes of agricultural industrial
and domestic origin. This work included many aspects of waste
management including odor control, liquid-solid separation and
product quality. The work also included the use of microorganisms
as waste destroying agents.
B. Consulting:
1. Using organic compost to overcome soil salt contamination in the
San Joaquin Valley of California using municipal waste as the
source of the compost.
2. Reclamation of brine polluted soils using poultry manure compost
in south Arkansas oil and gas fields.
3. Feedlot composting near Colorado Springs, Colorado: start-up of a
business to make, use and sell compost potting soil.
4. Studied and visited projects in which sewage sludge was composted
using the windrow and static pile methods in Los Angeles,
California, Bongor, Maine and other locations.
C
5. Pulp and paper mill sludge composting in Arkansas, Louisiana and
C Texas. Also the conversion of the paper mill sludge into poultry
and broiler house litter.
6. Arkansas - Kansas garbage composting operation using air
separation, classification and recycling methods. Methods
developed are nov in use in Florida and other states.
7. Evaluating odor control methods for liquid and solid manures and
other similar odor problems.
8. Have been involved in Humic Acid (HA) and Fulvic Acid (FA)
research for humus production and for a high analysis organic
fertilizer.
9. Involved with experiments in compost fortification with chemicals
to be used as a high analysis, fertilizer amendment for rov crop
production.
*MSA Master of Science, Agriculture, 1956
*CPAg Certified Professional Agronomist, 1978
*CPSS Certified Professional Soil Scientist, 1978
• • APPENDIX B
Publications
1. Meinecke, C.F. , E. L. Stephenson, and L.H. Hileman. 1983 .
Papermill Primary Sludge Evaluated as Broiler Litter. Ark.
Farm Res. 32 (6) .
2 . Lawson, E.R. and L.H. Hileman. 1982. Effects of Burning
Plus Planting and Final Shelterwood Harvesting on Nutrient
Distribution in Runoff from Forest Watersheds. Proc. Sec.
Bien. South. Silvarculture Res. Conf.
3 . Lawson, E.R. and L.H. Hileman. 1982. Nutrients in Storm
Runoff from Hardwood Forested Watersheds in the Ozark Highlands.
Proc. Soc. Amer. For. Nat. Cony.
4 . Hileman, L.A. 1982. Fortified Compost Product Shows Promise
as Fertilizer. Biocycle Waste Recycling. 23 (1) .
j 5 . Hurley, W.R. , A.E. Einert, and L.A. Hileman. 1982. pH
Studies with Tall Bearded Iris Grown Under Hydroponics
and in Soil. Bull. Amer. Iris Soc. 63 (2) .
6 . Hileman, L.H. and T.E. Morelock. 1982. In Row Application
of Compost Evaluated in Greenbean Field Tests, Ark. Farm
Res. 31 (6) .
7 . Hileman, L.H. 1981 . Fertilizer Use of A Chemically
Fortified Compost Product. Ark. Farm Res. 30 (5) .
8. Hileman, L.H. 1980 . Composting Agricultural Residues.
Waste Recycling. July-August.
9. Hileman, L.H. , Gerald Crossland, and Emily Burr. 1980.
Performance of Compost in Reclaiming Salt Damaged Soils.
Ark. Agri. Exp. Stn. Mimeo. Ser. 279.
10. Hileman, L.H. 1980. Iron and Manganese Content of Rural
Domestic Water. Ark. Farm Res. 29 (1) .
A
C11. Hileman, L.H. 1979. Water Hardness of Rural Domestic Water `
in Arkansas. Ark. Farm Res. 28 (6) .
12. Hileman, L.H. 1979. Using the Residue in Crop Production.
Proc. Seminar on Biogas and Alcohol Production. Chicago, I1.
13 . Klingaman, Gerald, T.E. Morelock, and L.H. Hileman. 1978.
Variation in Artificial Soil Mixes. Ark. Farm Res. 27 (1) .
14. Hileman, L.H. 1977 . Final Report, Red River Water Quality
Related to the Irrigation Potential of Associated Soils.
Div. Soil & Water Res. State of Arkansas.
15. Hileman, L.H. 1977 . Chemical Analysis and Fertilizer Value
of Turkey Manure. Ark. Farm Res. 26 (6) .
16 . Hileman, L.H. 1976 . Greenhouse Study of a New Soil Conditioner
for Corn and Greenbeans. Ark. Farm Res. 25 (6) .
17 . Tackett, D.L. , J.E. Ellis, and L.H. Hileman. 1976 .
Variations within Water Quality Measurements. Proc. 1976
Texas Fish Farming Conf. , Texas A & M Univ.
18. Hileman, L.A. 1974 . Irrigation Using Arkansas River Water.
Ark. Dep. Comm. Div. Soil and Water Res.
19. Sabbe, W.E. and L.H. Hileman. 1974. Nutrient Composition of
Fescue and Bermudagrass Grown in Arkansas: Summary of a
Statewide Survey. Ark. Farm Res. Nov—Dec.
20 . Hileman, L.H. 1974. Soil Chemical Properties Related to
Soil Type and Irrigation Water Quality. 10th Annual Water
Resources Assoc. Las Croabas, Pnerto Rico.
21 . Hileman, L.H. 1974. Water properties as they may affect
poultry performance. Southeast Poultry and Egg Conf. Auburn,
Al.
C
22. Hileman, L.H. 1974 . Mineral Quality of Fish Pond Effluent '
Related to Soil Properties and Crop Production. Proc.
Wastewater Use in the Production of Food and Fiber. Environ-
mental Protection Tech. Ser. EPA-660/2-74-041 .
23 . Hileman, L.H. 1974 . Using Poultry Manure Compost to Reclaim
Salt Polluted Soils. Compost Sci . March-April.
24. Hileman, L.H. 1973. Fertilization of Warm Season Forage
Species. 22nd Annual Ark. Plant Food and Lime Conf. Jan.
25. Hileman, L.H. 1973. Sensible Use of Chicken Litter and
Fertilizers on Pastures. Proc. 70th Annual Assoc. South.
Agri. Workers, Inc. Atlanta, GA.
26 . Hileman, L.H. , and W.E. Sabbe. 1973 . Summary of Domestic
Water Analysis, 1970-1971. Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. Ser. 209.
27 . Hileman, L.A. 1973 . Reclaiming Land Polluted by Brine
from Oil Fields. Ark. Farm Res. 22 (5) .
28. Hileman, L.H. 1973 . Response of Orchardgrass to Broiler
Litter and Commercial Fertilizer. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep.
Ser. 207 .
29. Sabbe, W.E. , L.H. Hileman, J.L. Keogh, and R. Maples. 1973 .
Summary of Soil Test Data and Fertilizer and Lime Recommend-
ations for 1961 to 1964. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Pub. Rep.
Ser. 205.
30. Hileman, L.H. and W.E. Sabbe. 1972. Response of Common
Bermudagrass in Southwest Arkansas to Three Sources and Two
Rates of Nitrogen. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 778.
31 . Hileman, L.A. 1972 . Transactional Dynamics of Poultry
Manure in Soil. Amer. Soc. Agric. Eng. , Chicago, IL.
C 32. Hileman, L.H. 1972. Effect of Rate of Poultry Manure
Application on Selected Soil Chemical Properties. Compost
Sci. 13 (3) .
33 . Offutt, M.S. and L.H. Hileman. 1972. Effect of Nitrogen,
Phosphorus, and Potassium on Yield and Composition of
Smooth Bromegrass. Ark. Exp. Stn. Bull. 776.
34. Sabbe, W.E. , J.L. Keogh, R. Maples, and L.H. Hileman. 1972.
Nutrient Analysis of Arkansas Cotton and Soybean Leaf Tissue.
Ark. Farm Res. 21 (2) .
•
35. Hileman, L.A. 1971. Response of Bermudagrass to Three
Sources and Two Rates of Nitrogen. Ark. Farm Res. 20 (5) .
36 . Hileman, L.H. 1971 . Effect of Rate of Poultry Manure
• Application on Selected Soil Chemical Properties. Proc.
Int. Symp. on Livestock Wastes. 1969. p. 247-248
37 . Hileman, L.H. 1971. Pollution for use of Broiler Litter
on Pasture. Proc. Assoc. South. Agric. Workers. p. 68-69.
38. Hileman, L.H. 1970. Pollution Factors Associated with
Excessive Poultry Litter (Manure) Applications in Arkansas.
Proc. Animal Waste Conf. , Cornell Univ. , Rochester, NY.
39. Hileman, L.A. 1970. Effect of Soluble Salts in the Soil
on Establishment and Growth of White Clover. Ark. Farm Res.
19 (3) .
40. Sabbe, W.E. and L.H. Hileman. 1969. Manganese in Arkansas
Domestic Water. Ark. Farm. Res. 18 (6) .
41 . Hileman, L.H. 1969. The Relationship Between Soil pH,
Potassium and Calcium. Proc. Ark. State Hort. Soc.
42. Hileman, L.H. , A.E. Spooner, and M.L. Ray. 1968. Results , --
of Pasture Fertilization as Shown by Changes in Soil Tests.
Ark. Farm Res. 17 (4) .
43 . Hileman, L.H. and W.E. Sabbe. 1968. Nitrate-Nitrogen in
Domestic Water Supplies. Ark. Farm Res. 17 (3) .
44. Hileman, L.H. 1967 . The Effect of Broiler Litter on Soil
Under Orchardgrass Sod. Ark. Farm Res. 16 (11) .
45 . Hileman, L.H. , B. Killion, R.M. Maples, L.L. Keogh, and G.W.
Hardy. 1967 . Summary of Arkansas Soil Tests, 1955-61. Ark.
Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. Ser. 161 .
46 . Hileman, L.H. 1967 . The Fertilizer Value of Broiler Litter.
Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. Ser. 158.
47 . Hileman, L.H. and W.E. Sabbe. 1966 . Softening Domestic
Water. Ark. Farm Res. 15 (5) .
48. Offutt, M.S. , L.H. Hileman, and O.T. Stallcup. 1966.
Effect of Lime, Phosphorus, and Potassium on Yield and
Composition of Korean Lespedeza. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn.
Bull. 717.
49. Hileman, L.H. , M.S. Offutt, J.L. Keogh, and L.F. Thompson.
1966. Alfalfa Fertilization. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull.
715.
50. Hileman, L.H. 1966 . Lime- for Pasture and Hay Crops. Proc.
16th Annual Ark. Plant Food and Lime Conf.
51 . Hileman, L.H. 1965. Broiler Litter as a Fertilizer. Ark.
Farm Res. 16 (1) .
52. Hileman, L.H. 1965. Effect of Fertilizers on Pasture Stand
Establishment. Proc. 15th Annual Plant Food and Lime Conf.
C
M
C53 . Hileman, L.H. 1963 . Soil Test Summary. Proc. 12th Annual - --
Ark. Plant Food and Lime Conf.
54 . Hileman, L.H. 1963 . Current Soil Test Summary. Proc.
Plant Food Conf. 12: 45-51.
55. Hileman, L.H. 1963 . Hillside Soils. Ark. Gardener 23 (4) :9-
10.
56 . Hileman, L.H. , R. Maples, J.L. Keogh, and G.W. Hardy. 1963.
Acidity on Arkansas Soils as Reflected in Results of Soil
Tests. Ark. Farm Res. 12 (5) :3 .
57 . Killion, Ben F. and L.H. Hileman. 1962. Domestic Water •
Analysis. Ark. Farm Res. 11 (6) .
58. Hileman, L.H. 1962. Chemical Analysis of Broiler Litter.
Ark. Farm Res. 11 (5) :12.
59. Thompson, L.F. and L.H. Hileman. 1961. Hop Clover in
Pasture. Ark. Far Res. 10 (5) : 9.
60. Hileman, L.H. , R.L. Beacher, and L.F. Thompson. 1961 .
Fertilization and Soil Test Studies on Common and Coastal
Bermudagrass, Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 637 .
61. Hileman, L.H. 1960. Alfalfa Fertilization. Ark. Farm Res.
9 (4) :9.
62. Hileman, L.H. 1959, Soil Test and Fertilization Studies on
Common Bermudagrass. Proc. Assoc. South. Agric. Workers.
1960. p. 75-76.
63 . Hileman, L.H. 1959. Time of Nitrogen Application for
Permanent Pastures. Chilean Nitrate Farm Forum 63: Jan.
64. Hileman, L.H. 1959. Soils. Ark. Gardener 19(4) :10-11.
C
•
65. Hileman, L.H. 1959. Soil Testing and Fertilization Studies
on Common Bermudagrass. Abstr . Proc. Assoc. South. Agric.
Workers 56 :75-76 .
66 . Maples, R. , R.L. Beacher, J.L. Keogh, and L.H. Hileman.
1958. Outlying Cotton Fertilizer Tests, 1956-57 . Ark. Agric.
Exp. Stn. Mimeo. Ser . 71 .
67 . Beacher, R.L. , G.W. Hardy, R. Maples, J.L. Keogh, and L.H.
Hileman. 1958. Experiments with 32% Nitrogen Solution,
1957 . Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Mimeo. Ser. 73 . March 1958.
68. Hileman, L.H. 1958. Soil Tests and Pasture Fertility.
Proc.8th Annual Ark. Plant Food Conf. U of A, Fayetteville. '
69. Hileman, L.H. 1958. Soil Tests and Pasture Fertility.
Proc. Ark. Plant Food Conf. 8:60-62.
70 . Hileman, L.H. 1958. Orchardgrass Fertilization. Ark. Farm
Res. 7 (5) :11.
71. Hileman, L.A. and R.L. Beacher. 1958. Fertilization and
Soil Test Studies on Permanent Pastures, 1954-56 . Ark.
Agric. Exp. Stn. Rep. Ser. 73 . Jan. 1958.
72. Hileman, L.H. , R.L. Beacher, and C.E. Wells.
1958. Alfalfa
Fertilizer Studies, Including Trace Minerals, 1955-57 . Ark.
Agric. Exp. Stn. Mimeo. Ser. 67 .
73. Hileman, L.H. 1957 . Orchardgrass Fertilization, 1957 .
Ark. Farm Res. 5 (5) :11.
74. Hileman, L.A. and R.L. Beacher. 1957. Comparison of Soil
Tests and Fertilizer Response on Summer Pasture. Proc. Assoc.
South. Agric. Workers, p.82-83 .
75. Hileman, L.A. 1956 . Soil Tests and Fertilizer Studies on
Upland Pastures. Thesis, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville.
C
•
76 . Beacher, R.L. , R. Maples, L.H. Hileman, and J.C. Noggle.
1955 . Small grain Fertilizer Trials, 1954-55. Ark. Agric.
Exp. Stn. Mimeo. Series 42.
77 . Hileman, L.H. 1956 . Pastures-Meadow, Fertilizer, Soil
Tests and Yield Response. Proc. 6th Annual Ark. Fertilizer
Conf. , Nov. 1956 .
78. Hileman, L.H. 1955. Pasture-Meadow Fertilizer
Experiments. Proc. 5th Annual Ark. Fertilizer Conf.
79. Beacher, R.L. and L.H. Hileman. 1955. Nitrogen boosts
summer pasture production. Farm Forum. p. 5-6.
C
•
Publications
l
Hileman, L. H. and John Langston, Summary of Mineral Analysis
of Domestic Water Samples by Well Depth, Proc. 31st
Midwest Ground Water Conference, October, 1986.
Barton, T. H. , L. H. Hileman and T. S. Nelson, A Summary of
Water Quality on Arkansas Broiler Farms and its Effect
on Performance Research Report, Southeast Poultry and
•
Egg Association, June, 1985.
Lawson, E. R. , T. L. Rogerson and L. H. Hileman, Nutrients in
Storm Runoff from Undisturbed Hardwood Forested Watersheds
in the Boston Mountains, Proc. Fifth Central Hardwood
Forested Conference, April, 1985.
Lawson, E. R. , T. L. Rogerson and L. H. Hileman, Nutrients in
Storm Runoff from Hardwood Forested Watersheds in the
Ozark Highlands, Third Biennial Southern Siviculture
Research Conference, November, 1984 .
C
C
APPENDIX C
G. Thomas McKinney
• Rt. 2 Box 424
West Fork, Ark. 72774
C.. 751-5288 (W) •
839-8571 (H)
EXPERIENCE
A. Administrative Intern for the City of Fayetteville, 113 West Mountain,
Fayetteville, Ark., 72701, from May, 1987 to Hay, 1988.
Administrative Aide for the City of Fayetteville from August, 1988 to
January, 1989.
Nature of Work:
1. Assisted Division Heads in formulating annual goals and
objectives;
2. Formulated safety procedures for the Administrative Services
Department;
3. Assisted in budget analysis for Administrative Services
Department;
4. Compiled Major Projects Status Report, Administrative
Services Department Monthly Summary, and the Monthly
Departmental Summary for the City Manager's Monthly Report
to the Fayetteville Board of Directors;
5. Chaired the Accident Prevention Committee responsible for
reviewing accidents by City staff and formulating
preventative measures to decrease the accident rate and
Workman's Comp rates for the City;
6. Completed administrative tasks assigned by the Assistant
City Manager and the Special Projects Officer.
B. McKinney Insurance Agency, P.O. Box 1069, 2420 S. School St.,
Fayetteville, Ark., 72701.
- Nature of Work:
1. September, 1983 to January, 1987 - Held position of
Commercial Underwriter whose duties included:
a. Managing commercial insurance accounts;
b. Quoting premiums to prospective clients; _
c. Processing claims for the Agency's policy holders.
•
2. January, 1981 to May, 1983 - Held position of general office
worker whose duties included:
a. Typing various insurance forms;
b. Filing paperwork;
c. General customer service.
EDUCATION
A. Currently completing a Masters Degree in Public Administration at the
University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72701.
1. Scheduled to complete comprehensive exams in August of 1989 to
complete the requirements of the degree program;
2. Currently hold a 3.5 grade point average out of a possible 4.0;
J
y
3. Have studied such specialized areas as:
a. Personnel Management
b. Budgeting
c. Organizational Theory
d. Statistical Methods
B. Graduated from the University of Arkansas with a Bachelor of Arts Degree
in Political Science in June of 1985.
In addition to my Political Science requirements, I also
concentrated on special areas of interest which included:
a. Waste Management (20 semester hours)
b. Environmental Science (30 semester hours)
c. Chemistry (16 semester hours)
d. Business Administration (40 semester hours)
e. Geography (16 semester hours)
f. Soil Science (6 semester hours)
•
Hileman - McKinney & Associates
•+ t Solid Waste & Resource Management Consultants
108 San Jose Dr.
' = Springdale, AR 72765
(501) 751-5288
Budget for professional services for the establishment of a leaf and
yard waste compost program for the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Professional fees - $50 . 00 per billable hour
Total contract hours - 565
Total contract amount - $28, 250 . 00
Duration of contract - 24 months
September 6, 1989 to September 5, 1990 - Program implementa-
tion and evalua-
tion-$28, 250.00
September 6, 1990 to September 5, 1991 - Program warranty
period - no charge
BILLABLE HOURS FEE
SITE PERMITTING & PREPARATION
Section XV of the Arkansas Solid 25 $1, 250
Waste Management Code
16 Criteria for Siting Municipal 25 $1, 250
Leaf and Yard Waste Composting
Facilities, Cooperative •
Extension Service, Rutgers, NJ
TOTAL 50
$2, 500
PUBLIC EDUCATION
Presentations & Speeches (projected ) 40 $2, 000
Printed Material for Distribution 20 $1,000
Video Tape Production 25 $1, 250
TOTAL 85
$4, 250
EQUIPMENT RESEARCH
Grinder 3 . 5 $175
Turner 3 .5 $175
S'reener 3. 5 $175
Kiscellaneous 1.5 $75
• TOTAL 12 $600
ESTABLISHING THE COMPOST OPERATION
E.P.A Grant Assistance 20 $1, 000
Training & Instruction:
Compost Management 70 $3, 500
Leaf Management 5 $250
Windrow Management 10 $500
Grinder 20 $1, 000
Turner 20 $1,000
Screener 10 $500
Chemical & Physical Analysis 50 $2, 500
Sampling Procedures For :
Organic Carbon C
Kjeldahl (Total) Nitrogen N
Moisture
Oxygen 0
2
pH
t Organic Matter
Electrical Conductivity
Potasium K
' Calcium Ca
Magnesium Mg
Arsenic As
Cadmium Cd
Chromium Cr
Copper Cu
Zinc Zn
Lead Pb
Pesticide Residue
Onsite Analysis:
pH
Electrical Conductivity
Temperature
Moisture
0
2
TOTAL 205 $10, 250
RECORD KEEPING
Receiving 5 $250
`
- r
.1
y/
Processing 15 $750
Analysis & Monitoring 15 $750
Collec io ation $500
Distrib» inn 250
J-
..
Equipment Evaluation 5 $250
TOTAL -55-- $2, 750
40 $2,000
DISTRIBUTION & MARKETING
Publicity and Public Education 30 $1,500
Product Registration (For Marketing) 12 $600
Bagging of Product 4 $200
Research on Public Reaction to the 30 $1, 500
Compost Operation & the Product
TOTAL 76
$3, 800
ORDI KITING
Research $1, 200
Drafting 16 $800
TOTAL
40 2 000
ARCH FOR MUNICIPAL COMPOST PERMIT
Waste Stream tion 17 $850
Municipal Compost Facility Ev ion 17 $850
Arkansas DPC&E and EPA P $400
Research
TOTA 42
TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNTS '565 $28, 250
468 $23,400
V
.f
EXHIBIT C
Detail of Project Publicity Phase
CONSULTANT's shall be available, at the request of the OWNER or
through a written or oral request from the media or a community
group or organization, for public education activities including,
but not limited to, interviews, television and radio appearences,
workshops, oral and multimedia presentations and public meeting or
forums for a minimum of 85 billable hours during the life of the
contract in the following form:
Presentations & Speeches
Interviews 10 hrs. $500
Television and Radio Appearences 5 hrs. $250
Public Meetings & Workshops 10 hrs. $500
Oral & Multimedia Appearences 15 hrs. $750
Total: 40 hrs. $2,000
Printed Material for Distribution
Leaf & Yard Waste Facility
Information 10 hrs. $500
General compost information 10 hrs. $500
Total: 20 hrs. $1,000
Video Tape Production 25 hrs. $1.250
TOTAL PROJECT PUBLICITY 85 hrs. $4,250
CONSULTANT will, in conjunction with the OWNER's, make available
to the public information regarding the leaf and yard waste compost
facility including information on the OWNER's facility as well as
generally available compost information.