HomeMy WebLinkAbout53-84 RESOLUTION•
4A•
RESOLUTION NO. 53-84
must
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
WITH SUMMERLINE ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR A STUDY OF THE
LAKE FAYETTEVILLE DAM.
—
BY IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to execute an agreement for engineering services
with Summerline Associates, Inc. for a study of the Lake
Fayetteville dam. A, copy of the agreement authorized for
execution hereby is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A",
and made a part hereof.
PASSED AND APPROVED this 17th day of April, 1984.
APPROVED:
Mayor
dj3?:71412e/i///
4
0
e•Pc
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this ; 17th
day of APRIL , 1984, by and between the City
Arkansas, hereinafter referred to as the "City" or
the engineering firm of Summerline Associates, Inc
referred to as the "Engineer;"
WITNESSETH THAT:
% EXHIBI -TA
of FayetteVille,
H"Owner" and
. hereinafter
WHEREAS, the City has determined that a Phase II Dam Study
should be carried out in relation to the Lake Fayetteville Dam;
and
WHEREAS, the Engineer has demonstrated his ability and
desire to carry out such a study;
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and
agreements herein contained, the City and Engineer, the parties
hereto, stipulate and agree as follows:
Section I - Scope of the Project
The work covered by this agreement is limited to those
engineering services needed to implement a modified Phase II
Dam Safety Inspection Study of the Lake Fayetteville Dem.
Included as part of this Section is the Engineer's Proposal
dated February 6, 1984 and a letter dated February 24th, 1984
from the Engineer containing some modifications to the original
Proposal.
Section II - Scope of Engineering Services
Engineer shall perform the following professional services:
1. Consult with Owner to clarify and define Owner's
requirements relative to the Assignment and review
available data.
2 Advise Owner as to the necessity of Owner's providing
or obtaining from others special services and data
required in connection with the Assignment (which
services and data Engineer is not to provide here-
under but on which Engineer may rely in performing
services hereunder), and act as Owner's representa-
tive in connection with any such services or others;
3. Provide •analysis of Owner's needs with evaluations
and comparative studies of prospective solutions;
(11
•
•
• tk.'
4. Prepare a Report of Engineer's findings and
recommendations, furnish four copies to Owner
and present it in person and review it with
Owner.
5. Additional
Assignment
request of
fee as the
professional services related to the
will be performed by Engineer on
Owner for an additional professional
parties may subsequently agree.
Section III - Owner's Responsibilities
The Owner shall:
1. Provide all criteria and full information as to
Owner's requirements and designate a person with
authority to act on Owner's behalf on all matters
concerning the Assignment;
2. Furnish to Engineer all existing studies, reports
and other available data and services of others
pertinent to the Assignment, and obtain additional
reports and data as required, and Engineer shall be
entitled to rely upon all such information and
services in performing services hereunder;
3. Arrange for
Engineer to
as required
under.
access to and make all provisions for
enter upon public and private property
for Engineer to perform services here -
Section IV - Period of Service
Engineer shall start performing services hereunder within
ten days after receipt of Owner's written authorization to
proceed, which shall not be given later than 45 days after the
date of this Agreement; and will complete such services and
submit the Report within four (4) months thereafter.
Section V - Payment
Payment for services performed under this Agreement shall
be:
1. A lump sum of $ 23,900 is hereby established for all
(2)
•
•
work except the Geotechnical Engineering.
•I
A maximum fee of $ 21,000 is hereby established for the
Geotechnical portion of the work. The fee may be less and
would depend on the actual number of borings required. The
fee adjustment would be based on the unit prices for the
Geotechnical work as shown in Attachment A of Engineer's letter
dated February 24th and made a part of this Agreement.
In no case shall the total fee for work under this contract
exceed $ 44,900.00.
2. Engineer shall submit monthly statements of services
rendered and Reimbursable Expenses.
3. Engineer's above charges are on the basis of prompt
payment of bills rendered and continuous progress of
the work on the Assignment until submission of the
Report.
4. If Owner fails to make any payment due Engineer for
services and expenses within thirty days after
receipt of Engineer's bill therefor, the amount due
Engineer shall include a charge at the rate of .83%
per month from said thirtieth day, and in addition
Engineer may, after giving seven day's written notice
to Owner, suspend services under this Agreement
until Engineer has been paid in full all amounts due
for services and expenses.
Section VI - Cost Control
Opinions of probable construction cost, financial evaluations,
feasibility studies, economic analyses of alternate solutions
and utilitarian considerations of operations and maintenance
costs prepared by Engineer hereunder will be made on the basis of
Engineer's experience and qualifications and represent Engineer's
best Judgment as an experienced and qualified design professional.
It is recognized, however, that Engineer does not have control
over the cbst of labor, material, equipment or services furnished
by others or over market conditions or contractors' methods of
determining their prices, and that any utilitarian evaluation of
any facility to be constructed or work to be performed on the
basis of the Report must of necessity be speculative until
completion of its detailed design. Accordingly, Engineer does not
guarantee that proposals, bids or actual costs will not vary from
opinions, evaluations or studies submitted by Engineer to Owner
hereunder.
(3)
4
- Section VII - Miscellaneous
1. All documents prepared by Engineer pursuant to this
Agreement are instruments of service in respect of
the facility that is to be constructed. They are
not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse
by Owner or others in extensions of the facility
beyond that now contemplated or on any other facility.
Any reuse by Owner without written verification or
adaptation by Engineer for the specific purpose
intended will be at Owner's sole risk and without
liability or legal exposure to Engineer.
2 The obligation to provide further services under
this Agreement may be terminated (a) by Owner with
or without cause upon seven days written notice to
Engineer and (b) by Engineer for cause upon seven
days' written notice to Owner. In the event of any
termination, Engineer will be paid for all services
rendered to the date of termination, all reimbursable
expenses and termination expenses.
3. Owner and Engineer, and the respective partners,
successors, executors, administrators, assigns and
legal representatives of each are bound by this
Agreement to the other party to this Agreement and
to the partners, successors, administrators, assigns,
and legal representatives of such other party in
respect of all covenants, agreements and obligations
of this Agreement.
4. Nothing herein shall be construed to give any
rights or benefits hereunder to anyone other than
Owner and Engineer.
5. This Agreement (consisting of 5 pages) and
attachments thereto constitute the entire Agreement
between Owner and Engineer. The Attachements, made
a part of this contract as though fully copied herein,
consists of:
.011
1. The Proposal of Engineer dated February 6, 1984.
2. Engineers' letter to Owner dated February 24, 1984
clarifying certain points along with attachments
A and B which contain Engineers Fee Proposal.
(4)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused these presents to
be executed in its behalf by its duly authorized representatives,
and the said Engineer by its duly authorized representatives,
and the parties hereto have set their hands and seals on the
date heretofore set out.
•
•,..1
IS
$7:w
,.--cf , X19
Attest': „5:7 -
Attest:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
Paul R. Noland, Mayor
SUMMERLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
honk_ 0 caw
DRB/skb
( 5 )
James C. Summerlin, President
•
•
A PROPOSAL TO '
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
A PHASE II STUDY OF
LAKE FAYETTEVILLE DAM .
FEBRUARY 6, 1984
SUMMERLIN asSOCIATES, INC. engineers -planners -surveyors
1609 South Broadway / Little Rock, AR 72206 / (501) 376-1323
•
"-I •
SU M M ER LI Nr asSOCIATES, INC elhgineers-planners-surveyors
1609 south Broadway/P.O. Box 2661/Little Rock, AR 72203-2661/(501) 376-1323
February 6, 1984
Mr. Donald R. Bunn
City Engineer
115 S. Church St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
4
Dear Mr. Bunn:
We are pleased to submit herein our proposal for performing consulting
engineering services for the City of Fayetteville in connection with
the Lake Fayetteville Dam.
As you know, our firm performed the safety inspection of the dam on
July 9, 1979 for the State of Arkansas and the Little Rock District
Corps of Engineers; so, we are quite familiar with it. Our proposal
is based on the assumption that the same team would be involved as
before for hydraulics, geotechnical and structural engineering.
Also, included herein is information concerning specialized experience
of the firm for this type of work, an organizational chart showing the
personnel responsible for the various specialties and their qualifica-
tions, a proposed work outline, and information on previous projects
and clients of the firm.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit our proposal and look forward
to the possibility of meeting with you further in this regard.
Sincerely,
SUMMERLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
s C. Summerlin, P. E.
esident
JCS:saa
Encl.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
FIRM'S SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE
QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL,
WORK OUTLINE
PAST PERFORMANCE
COMPANY BROCHURE
a
FIRM'S SPECIALIZEDEXPERIENCE
Summerlin Associates, Inc. is a general civil engineering consulting
firm practicing in civil and structural engineering, land surveying,
and planning. The firm consists of sixteen people, six of whom are
graduate engineers that include four registered professional engineers.
with Masters' of Science Degrees in Civil Engineering. The remaining
personnel consist of draftsmen, engineering technicians, surveyors,
construction inspectors, and office administrative personnel. Resume's
of some of the key personnel and descriptions of their qualifications
are included in another section of this proposal.
The firm was formed nine years ago by James C. Summerlin, and has
experienced successful growth since that time, producing over 700
projects in eight states and one foreign country. These projects have
consisted of dams and flood control projects, bridges, culverts, and
drainage improvements, streets'and roads, structural design of buildings,
water supply and sewer facilities, pollution control projects, traffic
and parking improvements, and planning and feasibility studies. The
firm is diversified, therefore, and feels that this is important in
its ability to adequately relate to client's needs and provide quality
services.
The firm has provided a considerable amount of professional engineering
services in connection with dams, lakes, spillways, earthwork and major
drainage projects. Services for this type of work have been contracted
with the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission, Little Rock
District Corps of Engineers, U. S. Forest Service, Tulsa District Corps
of Engineers, and the Oklahoma Water Resources Board. The work has involved
the Phase 1 Dam Safety Inspections of over seventy (70) dams in Arkansas
1
:raw
4
and Oklahoma, the inventory upda4 of several hundred in Arkansas, and
, -
,the preparation of Construction Plans and Specifications for a major
environmental project at the Pine Bluff Arsenal involving dams, reten-
tion ponds, channels, and diversion structures.
The Team's personnel are very familiar with the physical characteristics
of the Lake Fayetteville dam, having performed the Phase I Dam Safety
Inspection of it in 1979. The inspection involved the preparation of
field surveys, visual inspection of the dam's soils, structure and area
geology, hydraulic and hydrologic analysis, and the preparation of a
report. Back up data on this information is still maintained, which would
be useful in the preparation of the Phase II Study.
The Team's personnel are imminently qualified for this project, as
evidenced in their resume's shown in another section of this report.
Briefly and generally, some characteristics to be noted are as follows:
Project Manager James C. Summerlin, P. E. - Has participated in
the inspection and analysis of over 70 dams in
Arkansas and Oklahoma and performed the engineering
design of several major earthwork and drainage
projects.
Project Geotechnical Engineer - Edward K. Anderson, P. E. - Formerly
Chief of the Soils and Foundations Branch of the
Little Rock District Corps of Engineers. Has par-
ticipated in the design and inspection of numerous
federal and non-federal dams around the State of
Arkansas for many years.
Project Hydrologist and Hydraulics Engineer - Mizanur Rahman, P. E.
- Mr. Rahman performed the hydraulics/hydrologic
analysis of the Fayetteville Lake Dam for the Phase
1 Inspection and Study, and has also analyzed other
dams in the are. He is therefore (quite knoWledge-
able of the area hydrology and the particular hy-
draulics associated with this dam.
QUALIFICATIONS OF PERSONNEL
1
ETTEVIL
CITY OF F
tn 4.1
• d 04
o
)•4
01 • 0
0
V • 0
rq 41 9
0
r0
cs4
1.
7. Brief Resume of Key Persons, Specialists, and Individual Consultants Anticipated for this Project
a. Name & Title:
James C. Rice, P. E.
Vice President
4., •
b. Project Assignment: ,
Project Structural Engineer
_
c. Name of Firm with which associated:
Summeriin Associates , Inc.
d. Years experience: With This Firm 5_ With Other Firms
e. Education: Degree(s) / Years/ Specialization
M. S. - Civil Engineering - 1976, University of Virg.
B. S. - Civil Engineering - 1973, University of Ark.
f. Active Registration: Year First Registered/Discipline
Civil Engineer - Arkansas, Texas
g. Other Experience and Qualifications relevant to the
proposed project:
Mr. Rice is an excellent civil and structural engineer,
and has considerable experience in dams, spillways,
bridges, treatment plants and buildings. He served
as the project engineer for the firm on the Phase I
Safety Inspection of seven (7) federal dams performed
by the firm for the U. S. Forest Service about three e
years ago and is very familiar with the requirements
and procedures of the Dam Safety Inspection Program. .
Mr. Rice is also experienced on government projects,
having worked for the Tulsa, Little Rock, and Fort
Worth Districts of the Corps of Engineers and the U.S.
Forest Service. •
a. Name & Title:
James C. Summerlin, P. E.
President
b. Project Assignment:
Project Manager
c. Name of Firrn with which associated:
Summerlin Associates, Inc.
d. Years experience: With This Firm 9 With Other Firms 14
e. Education: Degree(s) /Year/ Specialization
M. S. - Civil Engineering - 1963, Louisiana Tech
B. S. - Civil Engineering - 1962, Louisiana Tech
f. Active Registration: Year First Registered/Discipline
Civil• Engineer - Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee, Oklahoma
Land Surveyor - Arkansas, Louisiana Missouri
g. Other Experience and Qualifications relevant to the
proposed project:
Mr. Summerlin has twenty years of experience as a con-
sulting engineer and has worked on the development of
a wide range of general civil engineering projects in-
cluding dams, spillways', channels, earthwork and drainagc.
projects. He served as the project manager on the pre-
vious Phase I Dam Safety Inspection of the Lake Fayette-
ville Dam performed for the State of Arkansas and the
Little Rock District Corps of Engineers and is very
familiar with the Dam and its problems. He also has
experience on the inspection and analysis of over
seventy (70) other dams in Arkansas and Oklahoma.
0
a. Name & Title:
Ronald R. Carman, EIT, LSIT
b. Project Assignment: •
Civil Engineer / Hydraulics
c. Name of Firm with which associated:
Summerlin Associates, Inc.
d. Years experience: With This Firm 4 With Other Firms
e. Education: megree(s)/YeariSpeckalizauon
B. S. - Civil Engineering - University of'Arkansas
B. S. - Business Administration 7 Henderson State University
f. Active Registration: Year First Registered/Discipline
EIT - Engineer in Training
LSIT - Land Surveyor in Training
g. Other Experience and Qualifications relevant to the
proposed project:
Mr. Carman is experienced'in government projects, having
assisted with the engineering design and preparation of
plans and specifications on seven (7) projects at the
Little Rock Air Force Base (two of which involved the corn-,
plete rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer system), one,(1)
at the Pine Bluff Arsenal, and two (2) with the VA in e
Shreveport. He is experienced with the use of the computer
and would assist with the preparation of surveys and •
construction plans and specifications. Since joining the
firm four (4) years ago, he has also become quite capable
as a construction cost estimator, and in the use of the
computer for calculating hydraulics and drainage.
S-
o
4?
C.)
a)
CL
0
C
I—I
a
0
•
•
1—
.•-•
La
...
1.
W0
4-)
l'-•
TS
CO
•
(-)
c.
.c
0
)7
hi
F-
0
a)
E
a1
Z
ni
S-
o
4?
C.)
a)
CL
0
C
I—I
a
0
.
a
c
/--I
-
tn
0)
4-1
..-
V U
a) 0
- La
. 0
0
o
2 c,
it r
.0
0 S-
.c
E
.c =
g
Ir.
0
a)
Z
(3
Ein
CC
._
0
.c5-.
6
-c
:,...
4:41
g
AC
§
as
0
c
a)
.-.
a
x
0
e
ra
a)
)-
ti
cul
o-
ro
N
0
0
a
CO
(6r
>-
""••
°-(n-4
.....r-
*
I-
0)
a)
0r
E
0
.77:1
e,
-
=
-0
LIJ
ca
vt
0
c
0
-V
c
44-
o
>1
44
••-•
>
I
3
ai
0
C
cn
C
L.0
..-
>
r
0
i
.
v-)
.
co
a)
.-o
a
a -
0
v) Cr)
e.
• '1-
4-
I 0 cil C
(0 0) er 0
a S-• ti > CU 03 -= 't-
in 4-5 4-4
-o o_ u o -1-1 cu ••-• ta
s- cu ill > C 3 7
0 5- '4-) C 4-
13 CL 0 4- 0 CL '0 +4
C S.- a.) in
ni -0 0...0 c w 4.) c
4-)c oc).cinc)
In to ----..- r 4-) ..- tj
co
c op
QJ r C 4- ..- 9-
c ai >
r-
-I-)
ti
s-
.4-)
in
=
0
(-)
'a.--
S-
03
CU
C
cr)
C
LLI
r
.. 0.-
- >
c ..-
cu
E c..)
c
al
-
I..).
0
.0
ill 0 3 21 >
0 >0) 4a ..0 CJ cu c •
.6 0 C C •---• a) c _0 4- 0
0r-1- 0 S. 0 >1
03 L. a
a)
P-
V C
0) ca
•-• 5-
GO
. 1.-
OM
,ts-
LL
a)r
L. C
tO
0) ""
>- ol
C
1...)
C
o
::::. 1
ILI
k... I-
17.) 8-'
o,
0
CC
cu
>
at
U
<
...,
I). C 0 CO n5 fa or- =
...
.0 on- •r- 4- V)
ll 0 1 4-4 Cv.' "0
-CMU•-.-.W.- C
.0.. uuine=0u0
o .•-• o >, ili 44 r r
0 a rm- C.) 4- U. r- 4-) 4-4.)
L. S- _c ..- rcl tn 01 t..)
70 ai 4-11-)L.0 >,C4- 7
0 0- 0 r Ili cil r 0 S.
X -C CL NC C 4-,
0 ai 4-) 0 • s- ..- 4-) cm
V
co 0 ,L2 "ia) 173a ti w3aj -9-) 5 5
0C
as .3 'a ra CC -15 Ln 45) E
an
C ° CU -1-J cv
0
a' P."' 4-I 4/1 c I- cy S. 0r- CI) rty
'ai al .-.. ..- co +4 4-1 nu v) .-
o. to In .-- 4-) cl.) 4-1 -0 c
x la -C 0 0.. r- et- r IZ1 0
CU cc) -V 0 _I C 2. C • S.• .r
I- a s- 4- E rc1 .--- QJ .....
a) 0 cn o a) 0 in 0 -0 U
-C 0 a) c .CL) c ..- 01
•"' "
0 a ••-• C 4-) CU 0 ti) 0.
cin • >0 CU 0 0 C vi
S-
ET
a.
.6
.1.•-•••
a. Narne & Title:
••••
b. Project Assignment:
• .
Survey Crew Party Chief
c. Name of Firm with which associated:
With Other Firrns
d. Years experience: With This Firma_
eering Courses
IMEM.110m.
14- 0 •• 0 17
0r
o o
4-1 -o r
c
-o 0 ro cu
CU 4- r CU C./
CJ
CU CU tr) C
C •r- C CU GI
0 •r- 4- VI •r -
S. CD -0 W 01 0
CU -C CL
0- • 44 4-I V) X S.
X '0 -C 0 a) CU
4-)
0J •1-• •r- CO
011- E 0 7 3
VI 0
>•••i 1-••• 00
>) CD CU 05 0 -14 C
-C 03 0
> +-I S. 4-) al 4-)
44
7 C C
tr) •r- 0
Ur • 0 CU
11- 4- • 1- 41 ofl •••- r,
-C CC$ C 4•3
•
•
.0 031 1- r- 7 CL CU CU •
LI S. 0 CL S.
CU >t 0 C C vl DI CU CU 0
>0-5 0- 'I- 0 c so a cc
o o c x
01 0 4.1 17 4-1 0'- r W
t0 (OrS..
CU Ill S. •r- S. 0 '0 it r- 4-3
> 0 4- +-I -C •1-
0 a (n4_) GI --I
C CU C VI 0
CLI S. CU 0 7 "0 V/
r0 0.1 CL > U 0 MI o< 4-3
.0 -0 CU E 0 0 S...
0 CU 0 S. 0
r- > -C-4--' W Pmt U
N .0 0fl> WC
or- C 0 (0 • S. MI
-C •r- 0 S. v, 0)
U rtl CL CU -C CU 4- 134
• •r- 4.1 al 17 0) C 4- LI
S-. 0 _CI r- r- a• 0
X 3 3 0 a -C r- CC
1.
•8
in
5
Z
I-
1.0
0
...
r-
r
a)
C
C
0
0
(..)
X
CU
c
03
•r-
o
C
TS
'I-
0
•r-
C
-C
U
a/
1-
........
c
0
IA
L.
cu
CL
In
4-I
4-
M0
.;.: L.
C 0
a)•
E
C
0,
_
Ts
0
-a
a.)
.0
0
0
2
ea
o
t
C
..,„
s
g
73
0
E
as
Z
ci
•
0
C
1-1•-•
.
VI
W
-1-1-C
as
r
(-)
v,
tn
.<
c
*r"3.-
r
S.
g
VI
co
E
it
05
-C
5
.0
§.
I
1
g
ii:
in
.0
CD
0
E
as
0
), -
.6
0
et
LA
c
rcs
...NC
S.
•C
0 tl-
ra
.N >,
-0 43
0 LiI
a) s -
a
V) CU
>
...
eta c
Q/ 0
8 LI
CM 4-I
0 r 0
0 E
al
-1-)
0
1-134 I
0•
m '
v ul
LU .
di co
0
C
a1-
co
o
•••.
'0
a)
"
a)
....
ca
._
a
0
X
...-
e
11.
1"
a)
).-
C
0
=
+4
en
c
a,
0.1
>
v
.._:
c
ro
• 1-
_C
1-
a)
c
,.
s-
ill
0./
c
--
c
1....1
1,
W
11-
•r-
S-
CU
1
I-..0
L.)
CU
c
0
z
•4.0
>
CD
.12
c
•0
seti
0
•:--
ra
0
0
C
CO
0.-
g '112.
. 0
C L.
0 CL
a
X.N
UI
0 a
-a 2
a
17 >••
al 4-) I C
I til •• -/L S dr- '0 0 I C
'CI C4-' in 5.- U r- •r- Orrr-il CD 0 LI -14 0 0 0 V1 vl C S.
••-• L) CD 0 3 C C 0 .13 S.
r........-
i
W U 03 Cr 0 0 CU
•r-9- 05... CU 0 3 CU Ur- 't1 -4-'•
r••• 0 5..• 4-) .0 CC r4-' 0-0.1 i C
et 0- in cil "la 4-1 C in in CU CU
oc cuc+Jcutua) n3 S.- C-)
004- A r (i )-• 1- ..0 ..= CCi Cl_
9- 0 01 • 4-) J I-- 4-) •-•
17 +1 4.1 1/1 -I-1 V) 0.1 0 CU 03 0
crovioa, • 4- U U U
its S-• CU CU C .-J ra 0 X r 0.1 S. C •r-
r0 0- r-1 1- al cu 03 0 0 o -a
c a >, o )-- cu >, >, = u_ (11
-C •4-1 in OJ -0 v1 S
•••-• S- O. S- 4-1 r- •r- CU -C 0 1- C
U 0- 4.) CU it 0 0 cil S- ••-- it c< •
*r- co 3 4- 5-
c cu CU CA a.) 0 CU a/ '0 O. 0
-C .0 S- eV VI > -C 0 • 0) Y 0.r
0 4-3 0 C
ID 4- •r- 17 0 V/ O. a ar- 0 C 4-I a
4.) C 4- it c -r- 4-, 0 > CC eil it/
o r S.- 0 4-) S. CO CU ••-• tt1 4-) 0.
4-1 17 17 00 -co -C CU ••• 03 X
c in z.. CU 4- 41 C/1 ..- r- r-- a.)
OJ al >1 •• CU CA 0 4-0)44100)
S. .0 • CU C • r 0.1 •••-• C./
CU 0 E Cr/ 3 Ty al 0- E CL/ -I v) 17 0
ti 3 '0 al CU rt3 1- '0 Al-
x s_•,- ..> c S- •r- C S.- W ca •r-
0
CU in S.- in S- •r- C_O 4- 03 CU 01
-C 7
o3 4- 43 4-I 7 01 CL -1-3 4- -0 a
C 1- V) C 17 W 4-) X 4-
-C r -
IV VLU) o 0 C .0 VI W 4-) 7 WO
'
cu 4-, 01 CL 17 MI 4-) n3 no r" 173 0
C C S. C 4- 4-44 03 0
'•-• VI -C VI CU 1- r ra 0 01 Cr) CV) S. t-
E -0 ro C a 0 cu 4-) cu o
•-• 7 e- an vi • r•-• •r- ..- 0 c 4-) -0
N-- -• V • I-- ••• C 0_ 0- C C a/ •.- if) C
W C 0 vI 7 •rS.. 0- .1-7 S. 1 •r3 CI. MI
C 0 '0 .0 -Y a 0 ns o c cu 0 1-
cu, L. 0- (..) X ••-) 03 > S. al 0 4-)
0 s- c cn ea aa 0 0- -C 4-) L.
OCLIOCO.X.P4-0001 41000
L) O. r- r- 0 0 4-) 0/ •-• E o_
La 4-) in a a)-
z .. C CU I.0 +-I W
4-I L) 7 in _C S- 4- S. •r- r- -.0 et "0 >
• 4- = .- -0 4-1 4-1 cu 0 3.0 a) 0
'0(05-010• VI *•-• 41-' ea r0 X •-•• 4-1 L.
2
CI-
.ci
1O VI •r- S. •r- CI LI O. CJ VI •••-• C.1 Col
a
•••
7. Brief tiesume of Key Persons, Specialists, and Individual Consultants Anticipated for this Project .
—111
a. Name Title: a. Name& Title:
•
EDWARD K. ANDERSON, P.E. — PRESIDENT BILLY RAY ALUMBAUGH, E . I . T .
b. Project Assignment: • • b. Project Assignment:
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER — GEOTECHNICAL GEOTECHN I CAL ENG I NEER •
c. Name of Firm with which associated: c. Name of Firm with which associated:
ANDERSON ENGINEER I NG & TESTING COMPANY • ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
d. Years experience: With This Firm./ - With Other Firms 15 d. Years experience: With This Firm 2A• With Other Firms _1_
e. Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization • e. Education: Degree(s) / Year/ Specialization
BSCE — 1959 SOI LS & FOUNDATIONS BSAE — 1981 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
. MSE — 1973 SOI LS & STRUCTURES •
MSCE — 1982 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING
HARVARD UNIVERSITY — 1967 CERTIFICATE, SOI LS
f. Active Registration: Year First Registered/Disc!pline f. Active Registration: Year First Registered/Discipline
TEXAS: 1964 CIVIL ENGINEERING ARKANSAS E. I . T . GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER
ARKANSAS: 1967 CIVIL ENGINEERING
ARKANSAS' 1967 I AND SURVEYOR
g. Other Experience and Qualifications relevant to the g. Other Experience and Qualifications relevant to the
proposed project:
proposed project:
1. 15 YEARS WITH LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT,
ONE YEAR IN GRADUATE PROGRAM AT OKLAHOMA'
'
U.S. CORPS OF ENGINEERS IN SOI LS &
STATE. THREE YEARS AT ANDERSON ENGINEERING
FOUNDATION ENGINEERING. LAST
AND TESTING COMPANY CURRENTLY SERVING AS THE -4
ASSIGNMENT AS CHIEF, SOIL SECTION.
MANAGER OF OUR ENG I NEER I NG LABORATORY AND •
ASSISTANT ENGINEERING MANAGER. • •
2. 4 YEARS WITH TEXAS HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER.
• . .
3. 3i. YEARS WITH ANDERSON ENGINEERING & •
TESTING COMPANY IN PRESENT POSITION.
4. 15 YEARS OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE ON A
PART—TIME BASIS AS A GEOTECHNICAL •
CONSULTANT.
rimiwn ittigzu iii.va41 Hal kitialii it'atait P41441 Wei iniwi41lif41 kaill 8464 ifiraJ
7. Brief Resume of Key Persons, Specialists, and Individual Consultants Anticipated for this Project . .
a. Name &Title: a. Name &Title:
WALLACE B. TRACEY, F.E. EARL J. COX, CIVIL ENGINEER
b. Project Assignment: b. Project Assignment:
. .
CIVIL ENGINEER CIVIL,ENGINEERING & SURVEYING
--
c. Name of Firm with which associated:, '
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
d. Years experience: With This Firm 5 With Other Firms 5
e. Education: Degree(s) /Years / Specialization
BSCE: 1952 CIVIL ENGINEERING
f. Active Registration: Year First Registered/Discipline •
• g. Other Experience and Qualifications relevant to the
proposed project:
23 YEARS WITH LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT U.S.,
CORPS OF ENGINEERS, WORKED ON FOLLOWING •
PROJECTS:
OZARK
DARDANELLE
TABLE ROCK
ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION
- LAST ASSIGNMENT WAS ACTING CHIEF OF
CONSTRUCTION BRANCH
•
1 c. Name of Firm with which associated:
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
I d. Years experience: With This Firm With Other Firms_LS
5
e. Education: Degree(s) / Year / Specialization
BSME: 1950 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
1: Active Registration: Year First Registered/Discipline •
ARKANSAS: 1967 LAND SURVEYOR
ARKANSAS: 1955 MECHANICAL ENGINEERING
Ig. Other Experience and Qualifications relevant to the
' proposed project:
, .
-
17 YEARS WITH LITTLE ROCK DISTRICT
U. 5. • CORPS OF ENGINEERS •
!
. .
. ,
. .
,
•
YEAGER, P.E.,
0
b. Project Assignment:
HYDRAULICS
c. Name of Firm with which associated: 4
c. Name of Firm with which associated:
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
Specialization
Degree(s)/ Years
e. Education:
ENGINEERING
1956 HYDRAULIC
ARKANSAS:
relevant to the
•
uJ
c‘
uJ Z
UJ 0
Z 1-4
•--• Ln
IL
Z C)
UJ
LI- 0
0
10 YEARS.
FOR ABOUT
Degree(s) / Year / Specialization
e. Education:
1946 GEOLOGY
1976 GEOLOGY
a) c4
.0 I-
2 11)
•-•• 1—
E 00
•--•
> sc • c4
a)
I)
... 0 cz tn
0
c
o uJ 0 0 •-•
;7. LU Z —�
ai --I 0--i In 1- 0
u
.... 1-0<0-J
I-Z3LUO
-ii
—w in al
m
O .J I-- CD
13 LI. Z >-
c SOLUO al
ca . I- E 0 /-
0
ci 0
c a) 311001-
a) cl? cY •-• LLJ v)
'ai a v) 0 V) 0
a Ce 0 V) tll
x V) <
ILI tn U..1 • U. <
(1-3 cinli ).- 1.0 1- LU U.I
•-• >-
..c
.6- 8. —1 • < t
ci•) e) rD -J U cs4
GEOLOGIST,
PART-TIME
••
I
M1
4
1 f
TI
4
1
:i
I
I
i
t
•
L4-
G
C
.44
C
O
•r
W
N
C
Y
C
S. a)
I
O
r
CU
T'o
.0
R
E
W
s
a) G
W
4a
U
y
C J
0
0>
L
C
n a) .r.-
L
•
>
a)
•r
r
N
r
a)
L
a)
N L'
-O
•r
�•ro
C
L
O
ro
ro>
a)
L
a)
4-
C
V
C
iy
Z
•r 4.
•r
•r
ty
>
L
L
O
>
O_ G O. O
ro
N O
n
O) >
C
000
ox
O
>00
ro
N
Wit
2
.r
N
U
O
G
N
`�
E T
O
O
•r
J O
N
N
•--.
O
•r
ro-0
ro i
t^
N
r
C
C
.C
Cr
.r
^
L
L
W
L a)
T
4-
-
CuC
L
0001E
E
O1 a1
O
L N
C
0
C)
N
a)
m
L
C
N
C
4-
>
O.•r
V
•r
Y
C
d
O)2'
QQ
.O
ro
L
or
C
0
E
W •
u I
I
0
a).,
-L
OlrY'O•rN
ci
ro
•Y
ro
7
r ._J
y
.
U
L
OS
Y
LO
N
I=
tm
to
r'
r
p 01 O)
.-
.O
-
N
L
r
O
O Y
C
G
m
W
d
C
Cl..
i
3
W•
r^
O
y
R
U
U ro
•r
•r
>
•r
t0
aJ
a)
N
•C
d
W
>(;
t0
a)
2
•..
C
Vy
0.
T
m N
N
N
CL
--
O
0.
C
L Y
h WW
d
d
O
.O
d'
(n
•r
ro i
-CC
•r
N
^
N
X
tNy
U
O.
ro
•r al
a)
L
•
r
a)
N¢
O)
O)
0
'.
O
t
O
V
Cl)
n.C
N •r)
L
Yc
U
N
ro
€
a)
Y 4-
cc
'`•
•'�
m
Y
U
--
•r O
O
a)
a)
O
LiJW
y
p
a)
.'�
•7
Q
La -0
)_...-W
I-
ro
•r- O.'~
a.
O
yf
C
y
OlU
l_
rr
=
ci
d
C
O.•r'
L
U
.-
Y
O
L
^
t0
Sc
C
I>
•rr
•
ry
>
rr
L
7 N
E
C
N
n
01
L
U
N
0y
W
N •r
d>
>
J
•
tm
L
Q
N
ci
L
p
ro
0
'-
V
I-
L~
L..
Np�.-
>00
'S-
y
LO
C.)
C
E
•r
3
N=
C
N
O
N
O
D.
E
O
dd:
a
r
3
>
T 3
I
1
.'r
V
a)
al
4.
U
•V
•r
O)
Y
d
Cs
C
CU..
W
.r
.Cro
C
..
a)
al
4-
N
7
L
0 O)
C
Y
O
`•"
Y
C)
U
0 J
001
01
0
••
O)
L
G
ro
0
ro
N
E C
•r
7
5%.
E
C
;-
C
C
I
.
1 1
N f.
1�
ro'r
•r
N
r
•C
•E
W
5-0
n•�
•
C
W
CO
C
2
Y
001
€
E
m
nr.�
H.d-1
tea
'C
O`
L�
Er
to
>>N4-
ni
L
r
N
V
LL
C
y
C
01
Ol 01
_
g
a
a)
Y
O
ro
N
N
a)
r
Y O
a)
a)
5a
a)
�-•
r
CO
Q
O
F
O
n
0
•--t
I
ri rl
I 1
1
I
x
p
d
O
U
O
C
O
�,
•r
U
Y
C
R)
L
Y
a)
>
-0
m
'C
tU
o
0
d>
d
_tpp
¢
W
`tX
a)
0>
r
ty
W
3 N
O S
O.
,
M.
Y
r
>
0
L
U
NQO
≥ww
y
•
a)
0
O
`O
ro
'o^
L
E
G
to
J
•
•
•
•
L
L
L
•r
.c
W
W
O)
a)
t0 O
C
O
W
C
a
LY
d
o
Z
W
}
W
mC0
.7
UO.
n.
O
n
f
O.0
Y
LS
t0
Kd
O•r
U
i•r
Z
Q
L..
ld
L
V
•V
d
is
O
0
c
N
C
N
C
N
Y
1
in
1 N
In
n
O
T
O
L
q
Y
U
•r
ro
•r
t0
O
C
ro
C
C
Y
Y
L
r
r
a)
a
O
sr --I-
.c
.C
0)—n.--.4,
it..—
U
Y
Y
•r
Y
N
I�
r
E
3
E
'—II
L
o1
7
LO.)
a)'N
W
o
C
T b
L
C
N
3
C
I I
N
•'�
L
ro
C
2
O t
S.
•r
O
=
Y r
Y
Y
Y
.r
L
O
a)
O
L-
a)
C
O.
t0
O
•Ot
C
C
F
�
c>5-
•
)N...
0-
'•
it n
'r)
5%
U
.•
U
tA
0
W
•r
'C
W
N
C
ty
N
ty
N
V)
O
Y
T�
t0
IL
O)r
2
O)
o..
-'w0
w4-'
Y
S.
C
N
p
J
...
G
O
T
C
^
X
U
>,
O
U
E
a
O
•r
VI
N
C
•"'
ro
L
O)t,z)
O
O
U
O
•p
O
L
m
9
O
m
•ry
y
i
n
O O
-O
y
v
try
o>,r-4
•
•
.
O
4-•
O
C
O
LL
O
LL
C
N
Ln
C
L
n
t
O.LU
rr
O
L.r
,My
a/
L
m.
U
Lr
m
`.
ro
=
n
ro
a'
C
a)
Na)
"
-.
U
n
-D
C
L
4J
•C
N
C)
CM
Y
•r
0(0>,
d
O
•O
N
m
O
N
O
C
N
•t
-Y
.r
T
L
4-
Y
ro
C
O
V�
L
•r
fr,
>
N
00
F-
i40
d
L
ro
O
n
W
ro
O
y
V
Y
.1-1
N?
n_ ro
ro
L
N
N
N
Q1
C
al
O
i
C
2
N
C
•r
4-
U N•r
•"
O
>1N
t0
E
ro.
T
V
ro
0.
•r
It0•
L
O
y C
N
C
a)
O
4-
7
r
•�
CJ
C
Y
O)
Y
'�
Q
C
p ro
•r
r0
•..
O
C
j
p r
E.
Y
n•
L
2
0
r
C •
Y
7
CS-
C>,0
N
\
N
•r
tL
W
O
4-•
r >
L
O
d
C
C
ro
Y•
r
N
C
C
t�
p Y
V•
r
L
Y
vi
do
0
N
j_c
O
i '•"
Q
J
O
E
1.
O-
O
t�
s"
O
O
..
d
to
a)
.-r
O
N
O
M1
•4-:
N 1
1
d°
0
U
V•
O
t0
O
=
I
1
.>
��
C
C
y
L
a)
U
J
t
O
L
OdCi
U
L
0---
L
•C
E
.O
.a
r
too
o,>
G
• o
co
cc 9-r
O
T
•--)
N
b
^
O
V
tS
1
-r-0
L
L
d
N
al
N>
Y=
W
54-J
N
1-
n
J
)
N
•r
V
rJ.-Cr-4
a)
a)
U
'r
2
p
U
Y
O)
O
N
O
C
g'2
C
C
C
W
C
G
Y
I�
o
�y Q)
Ql
=
o)-
a
.O i'
a)
.O
L
•L
t0
'r
ro
v
O
L
1
N
U
L
0
0 fn
'-CC
r
r
J
V
N
Y
0
Y
ro
N 4"'
Y
LL
O
t0
rC-
.
~
L
E
r CC
n
3
a
O
L
•--1
•-.
W
W
ro>
L
a)
p
N
Y
Ol
a1
>.
ro
C
V
J
E
N
G
i
ro U
al
n
c
O
Y
L
ro
V
VCrr
C
C
S
Y
a31th
005-
.2r.-
m
:•'Nr
N
O,L
rT
N
O
K
f
3
a)
c
00
C
b �
•r
c
'O�
tY
ro L
L
p
4-
Q
C
'd'
C
O_1
F
E
d
.0
U
.C
U 4-
N O
U
•d
d
ty
s•
0
0
0
d
L
=O
L
,r
L
Y
C
C
c
0)
V)
V)O
t0
S.
E
O
N
•-
4-
C
a
7
_
O
y
''1
U
lL
O.
Ct
I
I
y
&
L
w
4-
a)
U
O
O C
ci
Q
O.
O
•r
y
1-•
C
<
a)
—5-
O
K
a)
Y
Y
5-.
i
•r
a) O
L
C
L
al
b
d
ro
...
�
••"')
oL
o
m
•r
y
*ru
o
'O >
n
0)
W
-o
'r
C
V
a)
•O
a)
L
o
a)
a)
O)
Y-0
ro
•r
Y
N
O
O
U
N
ro
N>
a)
r
E
ro
•'!
e
L
i s
≥ O)
rn
m
L
L
E
E
s%
•a
Ql
Y
E
O U
L
Y
O
N
'�
i
O
W
t0
CA
U o
V a
.--I
L
O.
C
c
'O
O
s_
L
Y
L
C
C
L
N- O
ro
L
C
A
z
d
m
Z
}
W
Q
p
`�L
0
C
S.
0
it
0
ro
0'—
C.
al
V=
Olt
)
.-•'
Y
C
Y
U
ro
a
3
3
3
E
4-
ro to
>1
ro
:�
t
N
•r
N
n
N
4
U
O
d
a
S.0 CLr E) N Y N ro D CCC
V
• N Y ro. ro •r L Y O E) L
1 •r N El 'r E •r
a I N 'C • EJ V N n' Ql hl 'N L
oFf Cu Y E/ C 4-r > E)In a
lL C •r L E) C V L EJ i> L
roU V 0) y) N V
y ^ C O. 0 O >U) N E) L Y ro
:L • C V
O U
U U C Ili U Y O r •r r •� E) N
c O 0 a ro ro>`^.ro
•--. L F. •r Y r C 7 •r CC CC EE 0 O OO C C
N •r U N r O U E) (0 L L .ro
w ro d)•r > r. 0) L d E) V
C CraJ L O1V C C p
ro 7 O N 'U O S' Y v C 0 •r E)'r O c 0.
y El 'r N Y V .r w
Y r .. 7Y .>
N 0 o f U .N 4- D E) r U E) N
L) C N N0
L U 7 C L
E) 3-a ro ro C r
d' O '1 dC N •r LY n) roD Y'rin
,U M rn •r ` L E) L C a N
D I (00, L y . 0) •r
m rC I y CL(D O
_ O b r E U N
•L y a LL C 'ro C El 0> O C i ro
W mu
• S. L E) F •OI '-W D L Ur V ro-� O- N E)
j a. E) U I---
gc } a E) Y C Q 'r L C C L
•+ E) L ` W r N D
N •" •r ro > r C> X (0 C#3to C U N
C m )T 54-' p •r O •r E) • 0
E C c > C.) F- U 0 c E 1 c ro rn N D • 4-_
o w 3 v c m c
« o c E m v « .m 'o ; N N E) 0) C N ^ V T d
m a Y C 'C '? t ro C a O4-'4-' E E C •r Y V 7 >, 0)
• it yy po D U U C C •r V U E) Y ro ro
I — cc E) - L a CO N rE0 pW •
E) Q) 5 -S - C 7 El C •r 3 C
.,..) x . ,p W 4j 'n'n N N C .- •n C Y L +) •r
-0 C O O> qN yW(0 '.QQ •O0>>ro0Oror O)Nro
Cc ID L m C E U > • r CI... i i L 0 0 r C L r 7 r ro L
uaQ L o O. 0. O) 0) 0r -o. C. EL C.D
Z 0. Z > w ¢ O o
L rd .6 V 'D rV `:
0
Y •d' ^ V V N N C Y E) L
S. Y r N 0 C E) I •r 0 U 0
n O U.i 0• r> ro U U • r C• r)
•L 4-'>r LW_ wi r0 1
i .9.� NI N wJD>CO LN7E
IC.. 1 - C O N w O.r N C
N• y•
C 11 t 1 •r •r E) r1 V C) C O
Y L I C
C .1- W e N ro U ro Y N
td LL 0O = E) >)•r L Wu U V •r
N 0 ro = O O N
L
U U U D r C
C
^ CL") L'O LSN L yr'r L =-
C Y O E) O c E) J E) N
C E) C c U -X C O S ro F L N O E) N 3
C ro O r? L 0 '•-f r > EL Y
b r N 1 rd N O) V >• ^ L r tm= E) ro
y W N I0 N 0 Y C J r N 0 0 0 Y L
N C ^N• C m ro r n O C� E) 0 r D
CS
uq U N O) y C C U V U
n lL
i 7
ro b I ` Q•q Nom`. .w7 tar can Oar
U
u 1.« L (0 .ad L a'
y C LL C LL C _ G a •' - I W • p• r V ro O U V
QCo S L tN r l0 •r 7 C CA r/ ^ a r0 r p• E) Q'
ScN L L E) /-mot O1 m
a E) • E) C ~ L' L`• W Y E) D JC . v N CA - • S d C ,_ ro
O Cl Q N ro v D) L C N ro t
N N C Z O J C D U
it O1 Y C� L X C r IY w J
O N LaCI ; N C •1 c dj LO 1 1_y r.0 C . CO N
m m . yya_ € E .C U of w 'y` 0 C N 4 L J CL4j N E) 0 N L/)
« T Q u . o yy O 1 $ I n N E) ^^ O L O U rrt1 CL Q) E
` x N CD
~ lL .-5--
II aE1 4.D N
t
2 O m> 0V) 0) � -a . 7 L Ur > O D N L L
m r U • •≥ Ol d L 0 0 0 ro C E) L C •r O Y Y
.C E m • O D. E LU O p m u~ 52 `c U 3 d' U •r D 0. ro L U N N
z a` z w ¢ Ca
j
WORK OUTLINE
IT The work would represent a team effort by specialists experienced in the
respective fields of Geotechnical Engineering, Hydrology/Hydraulics, and
Structural Engineering. As much effort as possible will be made to utilize
existing information from previous studies and reports in order to expedite
the work and save costs. Generally, the work process would commence as
follows:
I. Geotechnical
A. Soil Borings
B. Laboratory Analysis
C. Stability Analysis
II. Hydrology/Hydraulics
A. Principal Spillway
B. Emergency Spillway
III. Structural/Civil
A. Spillway Structures
I- B. Dam Modifications
C. Earthwork and Drainage
D. Specifications
E. Quantities and Cost Estimates
F. Prepare Operation and Maintenance Manual
IV. Prepare Final Report
V. Presentation to City
I
Additional details pertaining to the Geotechnical and Hydrology/Hydraulics
portion of the work are found on following pages on this section of the
proposal.
Also in this section of the proposal is a time schedule for various phases
of the work. It is anticipated that the report could be completed and ready
for formal presentation to the City within three (3) months.
M
I
LI
____________
U
,
O
w
N
H
U)
C))
)
z
a
U
H
U7
W
H
0
a
U
U
H
a
H
H
U)
H
H
U)
F
H
.4
O
N
H
H
U
a
O
H
HH
N
a
O
F
H
w
z
`°
H
OH
H
U
.4
W
.3-1
E
F
U)
H
o
H
s
'
J
P4
H
m34
o+
H
z
U
a
ill
o
U)
H
W
W
S
0
a
P.
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
676 ROCKWOOD ROAD. LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72204
1•
I
I
L
w
E
L
F4
PHASE II
SCOPE OF GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES
LAKE FAYETTEVILLE DAM
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
GENERAL
A Phase I study and inspection of the dam structure was
completed in September, 1979, by Summerlin. and Associates,
Inc., Engineers -Planners, for the State of. Arkansas. The
Phase I study recommended.a Phase II investigation in order to
determine numerous physical conditions of the structure in
order to evaluate the integrity and safety of the structure.
To achieve these goals, the following scope of geotechnical
engineering services will be required.
BORINGS
Soil test borings will be required in order to'. obtain
undisturbed samples for laboratory testing, as follows:
Four rows of three
axis in the deeper
in addition four n
shallower portion.
each perpendicular
portion of the dam
ore borings in the
Twenty (20) borings
to the dam's
are, proposed.
crown in the
all totaled.
is Geotechnical Engineering & duality Control Testing of Construction Materials
I
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
i
676 ROCKW000ROAD, LITTLE ROCK. ARKANSAS 72204
r
Lt
4 -
2
SAMPLES
• Undisturbed Shelby tube samples will be obtained from which
laboratory moisture, density, and shear strength properties
can be determined. The samples will be obtained at various
depths as may be required by the soils engineer during the
progress of drilling.
PIEZOMETERS
Approximately twelve (12) piezometers
test borings upon completion of the
are necessary to establish the phrea
stability analyses.
will be installed in the
boring. The piezometers
tic surface needed in the
LABORATORY TESTING
A laboratory testing program designed to obtain the physical
and engineering properties of the embankment materials will be
formulated after thesamples have been returned to the
laboratory and their suitability evaluated.
STABILITY
Stability analyses of embankment dams
physical and engineering properties of the
known to such an extent that these properti
in computations. Also the phreatic
established as it is used in the computation
require that the
earth materials be
es can be utilized
surface must be
also.
Goolochnical Engineering & Quality Control Testing of Construction Materials
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANI
675 ROCKWOOD ROAD. LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 72204
3
SAFETY
This is of course the desired result of the investigation
program. The factor of safety of the structure for various
conditions, namely the normal operations condition is desired.
Various slope stability methods are available for use in this
regard. The primary method is the Bishop's Modified Method.
An adequate number of circles should be evaluated to ascertain
the probable minimum safety factor.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDAT'ONS
From the various phases of the geotechnical study a number of
conclusions will be reached. Recommendations will be made to
correspond with the conclusions reached.
REPORT
Upon completion of this part of the Phase II study an
engineering report will be prepared which will include all
appropriate items.
Geotechnical Engineering & Quality Control Testing of Construction Materials
1
;
HYDRAULIC AND HYROLOGIC ANALYSIS
o Determine hydrologic design criteria
o Determine spillway design peak inflow
o Develop spillway design flood hydrograph
o Perform flood routing to determine maximum water surface elevation
based on spillway design peak inflow.
o Perform flood routing to develop water surface elevation for 100 year
flood, probable maximum flood (PMF) and -.fraction of PMF.
o Determine freeboard available for the design flood and develop
spillway size for required freeboard.
0 Determine emergency spillway size and develop outflow hydrograph for
the design flood.
o Perform breakdown analysis for the design spillway and the design
flood.
o Develop construction documents.
I
I
a
I
4
L
5
L
6
I
I
I
cx
H
If
L
9
PAST PERtORMANCE
Summerlin Associates, Inc. has never worked directly for the City of Fayette-
ville, although the firm has worked at the Lake Fayetteville Dam under contract
with the State of Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission and the
Little Rock District Corps of Engineers. Below is a list of similar projects
and clients relative to the project under consideration:
Project
Phase I Dam Safety
Inspections (70+ dams
in Ark. for 4 years)
Update of Dam Inventory
in State
Phase I Dam Safety
Inspections (4 dams
in Oklahoma)
Phase I Dam Safety
Inspections (7 dams
in two years)
Preparation of Construction
Plans and Specifications for
a Storm Water Runoff Control
Project at the Pine Bluff
Arsenal, AR $1.4 mil.
Client
Arkansas Soil & Water Conservation
Commission
Americ Brynarski - State Dams
John Saxton - Director
Randy Young - Asst. Director
Little Rock District COE - Tom
Papageorge
same as above
Oklahoma Water Resources Board
U. S. Forest Service
Atlanta, Georgia
Tulsa District Corps of Engineers -
Mr. Larry Dearing
Pine Bluff Arsenal -.
Mr. Wendal Fortner
Mr. Tom Shook
Following in this section of the proposal, is additional information on the
experience of Anderson Engineering and Testing Co., Inc. and Evironmentai
Technical Consultants, Inc., along with a brochure of Summerlin Associates,
Inc.
9
t
a-
0
5
0
E
0
C
0
I
U
U
V t N df
N 3 l
•'-3pc0
Y 0 € a
U
Y Y
w co
wa
0
ya
m
I
_O
V
L
I
z
H
a.
E
01
0
>
a
I
w
Y
w
OI
H
O
` I
0
z
€ I
z
3
lL
0
a
a
N
3 I
a
I
m I
I
I
1
1
1
co
I I I I I 11 I
0�i
i0
N
m�
E
v-=
w
WI
H
y
a
z.¢
E
I -
0
O
N
Z
uH
>
0
W
a
a
J
"
o
How
U
m
Z
C
H
or
Zu.D
¢ I
¢
o
Q
€ooz
LLi-4-0
U
aloe
m IW
J
w
aJw
W I
N
Q
O
zI
Z
>
Z
4i
.-'wo
to
N.
N.o0
1.
N.
N-
0'
m
0+ •
0
Z
K Y
0<
N •
Co
z Z
W
Q
w W
0
o S
ZILF-
QOa
zzw
00
0<-
wDF-
tna-.
Z -tutu
•
c !
ai
¢
}
¢a
OD
N
O
I00
ZIO
N
Q
m
Z
m
0_J
2
—
O^
z-
i N
J
a 1
H
w
I¢
¢
'
3
m
tin
a I �
N
O
�
N
I
I
I
I
1
e0
rn
o
rn
o
0
I f�
W
N.
! CO
Gb.
0
0
; rn
I -+
'
H
'+
.w
I
I
Z
Z
z
�.
0
0
0
I
.0
>
H
H
H
I
U'
in
;
N
N
L
W
N
N
N
:
1--
.
N
z
wg
•wZ
•
wE
•
win
z
Y
3
I-EY;I-zY
, F-zs
I O
•
0
<o¢oce.'
¢oa
ux
Iao
H
Q
•3UaU¢
3UQ
I
0!
oz
F-
a
U
Y
I (AQ
! JH
Q
W
w
�
O
Z
,•
W
J
•>
-
Q
o
Y Iz
O
Y
i
UJ
U
Z
J..u!J•-•U
.J.-.0
OX
W
H
WO
U
N�
ww
oa
loQa
! O¢a
I FH
♦
Z
rt
z
J
J
N>
N>
I N>
f
! K
O
O
W
W
J
J
c
W I
K
W
II
D
W
¢
N
I-
ow
2
J
W
W
W
W
J.
W
W
J
I W
w.
3
aF-
X
f
:FNHIF-NI-
I F -NI-
.I><
I-
100
J
WF-
DD
<ZI-¢ZI-
azi-
a'
IZH
'-'I--
CC
I-0
I -OH
: F -OH
00
:ax
O
N
J
Z
t
NUJ
:
NUJ
NUJ
W
W
!=
U
N
J
;
IL
j
a
W
Z
¢
Z
N
ZLL.N
ZILN
i
c!
>
t7
z H O I--
c
O
0
Z
0
o
Z
o
O
Z
I
O
•••
O
.I
HNF-S
F-ZH
F-Z�
I -z
1
K
W
Z
IL
U I
w.
F-
U
O
I- ,
U
O
F-
U
o
F-
I
u.
i
u.
-
o
o
�.
QOZ
JOZK
W
--W--
WHH
`JO
iJO
LL.
01<
O¢
aF-0
ni-o
I aF-o
i'Q
I¢
}
ZZUI
Uw
HW
N¢Z'NQZ
(n
-<Z
UI-
'01-
00
:H
-
Z
J
O�
Z
0
0
! ZOO
-
z
I-
z
(DC
HI-1(JI
ZZ
HU
HJ
UHJU
I HJU
I ZQ
JZ<
Z
Z
V
I -F
-Z
IOOZ
Q
¢
'
a
II-
Xi-
-H
H
LL
0<
-'o
-o-.
}>Oi}>O-
I )->O
' UJO'
UJo
'
�
{!
w.O
-
wFQF-
I -W
IF-Wd'
I F -W
I w0�
!w0K
o
H
c
aJNI
I-¢
N.W
a!
W
Q
W
NQHI
O
U'
a'
LL
O
N!aL
O
N
W
oN
ozo
O
Z
U
Z>XI
w
-ox
¢Z<QZQ
1 ¢Z¢
{ W
O W!
W
o
W
M
K.
H
W
WI
O
-ILIU
N¢
x:N¢
x
I NQ=
(
o
Ch
V
a'
M
a
a
I
I
,
I
:•
.�
Y
z
z
Z
I
w
t
H
I
•-'
I
H
I
�
''
a•
V.
Q
I
11Th
I z
N
Q
{
f>
W
F♦
ZZ
}g
j Wx
z
wQ
'F
-Q
w¢
0
OZ
O
O
I0
WO
.W
iX
IJ¢
J•..
YO
W
W
Q
-a
! N¢
j QY
�Q
..•
♦Q
CL)
'Z
I
v
0
Y
v
o
it
o.
x
:
O
c
!
I
W
N
i.
O
W
¢
W
H
F -.
J
N
O¢
010<
. N
O
Q
I J
♦
Z
F-
N=
W
Y
i
01_I
O
W
N
O
W
N
f D
W
N
Z
N
i
W
W
O
L L
Z
O
I LZ
j OILZ
K
O
J
,
K
f
H¢
J
E
I'
H
I
Q
H
I
Q
f "'^
I
Q
f•
f.
0
W
W
Q
Z
C
ZY
J0
:
—C
I
CO`r
QOM
¢OK
I WQ
j H¢
:
O
Q
_
c
Qa
I3E
>ZQ
>Za
>ZQ
UJ
oC3
J
3
a
I
I
I
:4'
I
H
I
I
L
L
U
C
.c'_ eo
3'
D
0
.
p;
C
O
O
O
O
0
O
0
0
0
L
C a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U)
O
0
0 CC
.--1
•--4
G'
N
•--�
r1
Lb
LL
V
O
0)
4)
O
0)
0)
O
N
•..
•E
_
0)
0)
L
L-
a)
0)
0)
0)
L
lL
LL
C)
C)
U.
LL
U..
4)
_
._ .
v
O
O
O
v
....
O
IL
N
E2
0
0 O
co
O
0
O
O
to
Co
O
W
WO.
In
.y
.y
ti
<'4
(")
l0
rl
In
a
O
c
L
0
O
—
Cr)
N
0
r4
M
rl
M
N
N
N
tX)
Co
00
co
.
co
0300
00
O
03
O
Y
C,'--
cn
rn
0"0,'C%
rn
C
C,'
0)
Eg
4EQ (Ey�
9
N
U
V
.
0
c
ro
}
C
C
C
O
0
O
0
0
Ot
C
zT
L
r
L
r
¢Y
Q
O
N
O
to
O
N
4
a
V
N
N
20
4-V)
0
'0 to
N
4J U
L
E E
O
to
ro
•r
to
etr
•r to
tar
10
4)
N
C 0
Q
L
U
O
YCt
3
E
3
E
3
E
0 a
0)
c
u
u
-vi
a)=
eo
EC
C
EC C
E
N
•r
C
C
ro
eo
•r
to0
C
E
w
W
r
t
00t0
ro
.000
-0
O
ro
L
L e0
L
r
X
LS
—It
CL O
U
0
•r
ro
Q
p
co
X
C
U Y
Co
'0
to
L•
O.Y
r
L
4 -'Ws
O 4
U
N
ro
OF
.O
to
L
ro
L
ro
C
of
O L
•r
¢
to
O
L
r4-20
L
to
0
•„
C
i
b
CC
C¢
C
Oro
0
CC
>
'r'
CQ
(L
O
C
C(0
O
r
0
r
0
r-0
.r
Y
Or
•r
w
Or
>r-
ro
O
ro
>
e
O
•r
•r
w
•r
•r w
•r
•r
4—
L
0) ••
Q)
O
0)
w
O J
O
.C
4-)
.
+�
r
0+Y
OY.
OJ-+
-0¢
.CS
Y0)
YCY
0
r
OL
o
O
In
>
U
(/)'00
V)10
O
UW
U
ro
ro
U
W
U
LY
L¢
00
Z
>0
>O
>
K
w
0
0
J
r
0
0
>,4-'4-'
m
U
0S_
N
0
L
VQ4-C
r
K
4-d'
N L•r
w
w
C
'to)
tow
O
(0
0)
4_r--
O
4.
•r
0
•r O
J
C
O
O
VINO
cnu,oi
vita
O
O
O
O
O>
O
t
O
C Z
C
C
e0
•r
'r
C
'004-'
Cr-
C C
'004-i
Cr-
c C
'00
c C
>,4-
•r
r
4-'0.4-'
tnr
>,C)
r
-I-)
0 tfl1-
O.
+)
J
E'4-4-'
a
•r
YO
E
L
L
L
.C
50
4-'
SO4-
t
YU
Y•0
4J-
L+-
YY
4-+
L++
E 0
L
3
L
Y
V
i
•r
L
•r
L
•r
O
•r
O•r
•r
ro
•r
O
.r
0
O
it
0
7
7
C
V
Q
J
Q
J
Q
UK
JUJ
U
J
__JO
_J
U
Z.
2U..
0C!3
t7
;-t
U'O
Z•
ro
V
-w
L
•'
C
O
C
C
1
!
0)
n
it
•
1
1
C
D
L
co
it
C
C
Oe0W
wO
C C
L
We)
•
-P
00
,
r
p]
-o
1
>l
O
O O
t
c7
C
L
01V)
N
C
O
r.
0
4-
C
I
O
I
L
U•r
N
V
a
O
C
•r
O
C
5-5-0
O
ro
NNOQ
N
0
O
CL
.4-e
•r
O
01
•r0
alt
M
'D
.O
•r
wO
an-
.•
C
tC
+. l
r
>> ,
C
i-1
•r
C>
>1r
-'L.)
>,
0
1
to
-I -'C>
C
•IJ
•r'
.'
Q
Q
3
L
•r
r
•r
04—'
0'l_
2
7
'0
U)
L
0) L
0)
.0_C
-
Y
O
E
e0
r
Wit
•r
O
0.0)
7
Y
Y
woa
O
•r O
•r
O
M
D
U>
I
C
O
0.
5,.
1n
a
E C
-PS..
e0
1
N Cl
VI
•r
.
ro
•r
O
CO-
O
to
ro
O
0
.0
C
O•r
N
O
O
N
I
O
O 7
O
4-
3'
U
t
c3O
0
0
C
c.
00
loO
m
ac
Q
Oa'
ON
0
W
.--1
o
f
.-+
O
J
U
0
O
5-0
+J
O
H
LL
O
4-
•r
L
w
C
•N
r
r
ci
.•-1
_ C
COC
O)
S_
0)0..
0)
O
•U
N.
C
4-
w
0) 0
0)
C
O
O
d
•r
•r
O
O
.p
C
•r
r
•r •r
0
alt
•r
I
C
C •r
C
•r
E
N
.
E4-
1-4-'
O
+�
•r
4-
7
V) N
tar
>,S-
E
O
O
•r
•r Y
•r
0)
E.C
H
n
5-05-
O
7
1-5-
CU
C
>,>-r
0
O
e0
L
0)In
C U
C
C
L
U
C
y
A
O
O
O
L
CL
O.
0
C
ro
7
L
L
O
rr
ro e0
O
•0
L>
'O
L
CL
O
O
+J
L
e0-
w
1
0
0
C 7
e0 L
C
ro
•r
>1
O
e0
O
O
Z
4344-
"a
E
E
CL
.4-'o
SGQi
CCO
SNd
0ULL
0W3
rU
UK
Quo
OUN<L0.N
Q>
.0
-O
U
Ubro
00
0)
0
I
I
•�
00
(0
wC
O 0
.
r
a
F7
r
o)
C)
VU
N
L
O
O) L
X
0
W
E
V-4-"
4-
•1-I
C
to
0
C
ro
e0
00
ro Q
L
L
U
L
.--,
O
e0
0
O
e0
ro
L O
0
C
C
G
•0
•0
>
O
(0
0
to
•r
C
'0
+")r
•e00]
>1
ro
•T
N
C
C
to
U
tar
O
e0
L
0
to
a
0
ro
C
t ro
+)
N
u 0
U>
0
ro
ro
ro
'r
C oi
+�
Y
m
O
L 0
Y
to
r
>
O
O
C] U
,
LL
V
c
RI
O
ro
O
03 r
O
CL
L
,—IC
7
U 4-1
to
e0
Q
>1
LL
O
S...0)(0
ro
a
H
5_.r.
)X
Y
e0
4J
to
cC
elk
ro
e0
ro
L
f
I
0
O
O
7
L C
7
C
Y
L
>1+J
O
C
••
Y
O
CS
_It
O
Y
L
•O)
aL
O
J
>5_C
CL
O Q
e-+
4-
ES.-
U
0)V)
0
0
'ro
O
O
to
r VI
(1
+)
7
X
>
V)
Q
r
E
4-
E
0
e0
<
>1
0
L
0) r
01
••
"0W
4" +'
r
O
N
L
•r
0
�y
b
Y
0
L
O
>,
0
2
r I
O
e0Q
ro
Y
L•r
•r C+1)
L
Q
K
Y
€
2
0
Q
C
N
U=
U
U
+)
O
••
O
r
r
O
U
.00+-'
c
•O
a
c
N
O
ro
Oro
O
•F)
•O
o
a
L to
X
r
O
r
O
7
4-O
Er
.r
Ca
N
O
O
lL
t0
•r
O
Cl.
Q O
r
4-
ro O
r
r
C
-a ro
L
•r
a)
r
S.-0
+•1
Q O
J
0
t0
C
CE
L
Z
=
to
to
L
0
J L
ro
t0
+- N
O
O
w
>
0>
>
U
N
>
ro 0 .C 7
...
C34-'
r
Jm
NV)Ci
C
C
ro
O
.C
>,E
C
U
m
UU
ro
O
7
O
•-+
•r
.--1
4-.4-
C
t0
O
•r
O
r
to
r
•r L
Y
Y
•O
O
tO
ro
>
Q E
E
O
"0"0
w'DY
O
Y
ro
Y
r
V)
O
,<0L
3
fl
3-
0C
r
0
w
CO'-
O-
Cl
O+)<L
w
O
t0Q~
JOJ
f
f
i-
O• •
CV)W
Q
U>
a
N
N
In
,..
^ h..
CO
0)
O
v
St. Louis I
•
Ilsa •.
•
•
1-40 'Ft. Smith .•
• .�
•• emphis.
•
Li le • ck ; "° 1-40
.. •• •
•2 �•
•
•
Dallas
Ft. Worth Shreveport
•
Monroe
Grand Caymon
British West Indies
LEGEND
• Locations of projects =I
• performed by SUMMERLIN
Ii
}
11
ft
ft
l
M
I
0
ftll
THE FIRM
SUMMERLIN aSSOCIATES, INC. is a professional
services firm specializing in civil engineering, structural
engineering, environmental engineering, land surveying,
and planning. Founded in 1974, our firm now has
offices in Little Rock, Shreveport, and Memphis and
has produced projects in eight states and one foreign
country. We have enjoyed healthy growth as evidenced
by more than 600 completed projects. This growth is a
result of the quality services we provide, completed
on schedule, and at reasonable costs.
While reading this brochure, it will become
evident that we are a diversified, medium-sized firm.
We feel these characteristics enable us to do a better
job for our clients. Diversification gives us the broad
experience necessary to provide the comprehensive
and specialized services required for today's complex
projects, thereby enhancing our ability to relate to our
clients and their needs. It also helps bring about a
greater variety of challenging and interesting projects
which helps us attract and retain the finest personnel.
Our size is also an asset. We are small enough to
provide personalized service for the smallest projects,
yet large enough with sufficient qualifications and
experience to handle the largest projects.
Fl
Fl
James C. Summerlin, RE., RLS
President
Education:
Master of Science Civil Engineering
Louisiana Tech
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering
Louisiana Tech
Registration:
Arkansas, Louisiana, Tennessee,
Missouri, Oklahoma
Mr. Summerlin is President and founder
of the firm. He has 20 years of experi-
ence as an engineer in private practice
and has worked as an engineer in all
phases of the development process
including planning and feasibility studies,
surveys, engineering design and analy-
sis, and construction management.
OTHER KEY
PERSONNEL
James C. Rice, P.E.
Vice President
Education:
Master of Science Civil Engineering
University of Virginia
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering
University of Arkansas
Registration:
Arkansas, Texas
Mr. Rice is responsible for structural
engineeringprojects coordination
of land surveys, and also participates
in civil engineering projects. His struc-
tural engineering background includes
design experience in general buildings,
industrial projects, a wide range of
bridges, and public works.
Engineers:,.
Ron Carman, EIT, LSIT
John Burkhalter, EIT
I
1'
I
ii
H
{
0 ,
Ill
NCIPALS
Administrative:
Ann Hamilton, Office Manager
Robert H. Seay, P.E.
Associate
Education:
Master of Science Engineering
Graduate Institute of Technology,
University of Arkansas
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering
University of Arkansas
Registration:
Arkansas
Mr. Seay has a comprehensive back-
ground in general civil and municipal
engineering projects. He has worked
as the City Engineer for the cities of
Hot Springs and North Little Rock and
for 12 years with the Arkansas Highway
Department. He has considerable
experience in drainage, streets, sewers,
dams, and bridges.
Edward M. (Hugh) Teaford, P.E.
Partner, TEAF0RD/SUMMERLIN asSociATES
Memphis, Tennessee
Education:
Master of Science Civil Engineering
Mississippi State University
Bachelor of Science Civil Engineering
Christian Brothers College,
Memphis, Tennessee
Registration:
Tennessee, Arkansas
Mr. Teaford is the manager of
TEAFORD/SUMMERLIN ASSOCIATES
of Memphis. He is an Environmental
Engineer with experience in waste
water treatment, water quality manage-
ment, municipal engineering, and
water resources. He has been involved
in waste treatment facilities planning
as well as the detail design of con-
struction projects.
Technicians/Surveyors:
Dianne Wheeler, CET
Kent Maddox, Draftsman
Jim Mizell, Survey Party Chief
Joey Paxton, Instrument Man
14
11
if ENVIRONMENTAL. ENGINEERING
1 Pollution Control, Sanitary Sewers, Waste Water Treatment
9
w 36Th
Job Description:
Euclid Place Sewer Improvement
District #144 represented a 200 acre
unsewered area in Little Rock that
contained 308 property owners on 615
lots. The firm prepared the engineering
design, construction plans and specifi-
cations, conducted surveys, and in-
spected construction for the project.
Construction costs were approximately
$580,000 and were financed with a
combination of Special Improvement
District Bonds and Community Devel-
opment Block Grant Funds.
Projects:
Sanitary Sewer/Storm Sewer Separation
Study- Little Rock
Capitol Avenue Sewer Line Relocation -
Little Rock
City Sewer Flood Damage Repairs - Little
Rock
Hillsborough Subdivision Phase I Sewer
Lines- Little Rock
Corporate Hill Office Park Subdivision
Sewer Lines - Little Rock
Romine School Sewer Line- Little Rock
Our Way Multi -Family Housing Project,
144 Units- Little Rock
Westbridge Apartments - Little Rock
Aldersgate Methodist Camp Sewer Line -
Little Rock
EPA National Urban Runoff Project (NURP)
for Metroplan - Little Rock
-Storm Water Sampling Plan
-Design and Evaluation of Best
Management Practices
-Receiving Stream Flow Rating Curves
Metroplan 207 Areawide Waste Treatment
Management Planning (Technical
Consultant)- Little Rock
-Waste Treatment Facilities Planning
-Non Point Source Pollution Study for
Agriculture, Silviculture, Mining, Urban
Runoff, and Construction Runoff
Little Rock Air Force Base Infiltration/
Inflow Study of Family Housing Sewer
Area
Little Rock Air Force Base Modifications to
Base Sewer, Family Housing Sewer and
Pumping Station
Little Rock Air Force Base Sanitary Sewer
Force Main
(( Water Supply, Treatment, Distribution
Ill
III
IR
Job Description:
The firm was hired by the City of Many,
Louisiana to solve problems connected
with the water treatment plant. Opera-
tion costs were excessive and water
quality was undesirable. The firm per-
formed a study of the treatment system
and recommended modifications to the
plant which included the addition of
aeration and work on the telemetry
system.
Projects:
Water Improvement District #322 -
Jacksonville
City of Black Rock Water Line Expansion
Hazardous Waste Containment Facility -
Pine Bluff Arsenal
*Study of Quality and Quantity of Liquid
Hazardous Waste - Shelby County,
*Pollution Control Laboratory Work -
Memphis, Shelby County, Tennessee
*Water Sampling of Surface Streams -
Shelby County, Tennessee
*Industrial Waste Water Discharge Sampling
- Memphis, Tennessee
Process Design, Sewage Treatment Plant -
Millington, Tennessee
MATCOG 207 Areawide Waste Treatment
Management Planning (Technical
Consultant)- Memphis
Sewer and Lift Station Design and
Modifications - Osceola
SE Arkansas Regional Planning Commission
208 Areawide Waste Treatment
Management Planning (Technical
Consultant)- Pine Bluff
City of Morrilton, Sewer Line Extensions
Woolly Hollow State Park Sewer Collection
Lines and Treatment Plant
City of Benton Waste Load Allocation Study
for Proposed Sewage Treatment Plant -
Arkansas Department of Pollution Control
and Ecology
City of Warren Waste Load Allocation
Study for Proposed Sewage Treatment
Plant -Arkansas Department of Pollution
Control and Ecology
City of Mountain View Waste Load Allocation
Study for Proposed Sewage Treatment
Plant - Arkansas Department of Pollution
Control and Ecology
Lake Reynolds Clean Lake Study- Paragould
Success-Datto Water Line Expansion
Baptist Medical Center Water Line
Expansion - Little Rock
Hillsborough Subdivision Phase I Water
Lines - Little Rock
Woolly Hollow State Park Water Supply and
Distribution- North Arkansas
Our Way Multi -Family Housing, 144 Units -
Little Rock
City of Gould Water System Modifications
City of Osceola Water Line Expansion
City of Mansfield, Louisiana Water Treatment
Plant Evaluation and Expansion
Application
Corporate Hill Office Park Subdivision
Water Lines- Little Rock
• Indicates Individual experience while in the employment of another firm or agency.
m
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Streets, Drainage, Traffic, Site Development
Job Description:
9th and Bond Streets are major arterial
streets in the industrial area of eastern
Little Rock. The project cost approxi-
mately $700,000 and involved widen-
ing from two lanes to four lanes of
traffic, drainage improvements, railroad
crossings, and traffic signal improve-
ments at intersections.
Projects:
U.S. Highway 82 Relocation at Ouachita
River Bridge -Arkansas
City of Morrilton, Streets and Drainage
Improvements
John Barrow Area Streets and Drainage
Improvements- Little Rock
"M" Street Improvements- Little Rock
Missouri Street Improvements- Little Rock
Corporate Hill Office Park Subdivision -
Little Rock
HillsbQrough Subdivision Phase I Streets
and Drainage- Little Rock
Little Rock Air Force Base Airfield and
Parking Lots Paving Improvements
Little Rock Air Force Base Traffic
Signalization Improvements at 2nd and
Arnold Streets
John Barrow Area Master Drainage Plan -
Little Rock
Our Way Multi -Family Housing Project, 17
Acres -Little Rock
Westbridge Apartments, 15 Acres- Little
Rock
BEFORE
Storm Sewer/Sanitary Sewer Separation
Study- Little Rock
National By -Products Plant Site
Improvements- Little Rock
Boyle Park Improvements- Little Rock
Rodney Parham and Shackleford Road
Intersection (Savers Federal) -Little Rock
*Access Road to Sewage Treatment Plant
- Hot Springs
*Hobson Street Improvements- Hot Springs
*Patterson Street Extension- Hot Springs
*Drainage Reconnaissance Reports,
3 Basins, Memphis District Corps of
Engineers
*Drainage Modifications, Apartment Projects
- Germantown, Tennessee
Woolly Hollow State Park- North Arkansas
Dams, Flood Control, Water Resources
Job Description;
Engineering Evaluation and Phase I
Safety Inspection of Spring Lake Dam,
Arkansas. This is one of over 70 dams
inspected in Arkansas and Oklahoma
during a four year period for the Corps
of Engineers and the states of Arkansas
and Oklahoma. Evaluations were made
of the structure, hydraulics/hydrology,
soils, geology, and included the prep-
aration of detailed reports for each
dam.
Projects:
Phase I Dam Safety Inspection of 60 Dams
in Arkansas, 1977-80
Phase I Dam Safety Inspection of 4 Dams
in Oklahoma, 1979
U.S. Forest Service, Phase I Dam Safety
Inspections of 7 Dams -Arkansas and
Oklahoma
Inventory Up -Date of 325 Dams in Arkansas,
1978
AFTER
Gould, Arkansas Drainage Improvements
Harding Drain Preliminary Engineering
Report- Pine Bluff
Jefferson County(Leeville) Streets and
Drainage Improvements
University of Central Arkansas- Campus
Drainage, Parking Lots and Street
Improvements- Conway
Trinity Road Design - Shelby County,
Tennessee
*Sycamore View Road - Shelby County,
Tennessee
Preparation of Street and Road Standards
- Osceola, Arkansas
Drainage Modifications- Osceola, Arkansas
University Buick Flood Control and Storm
Sewer System, Phase I - Little Rock
*Sleepy Hollow Road Dam Modifications -
Hot Springs
*Dam Spillway at Coleto Creek Cooling
Pond - Gonad County, Texas
Hydrology of Flood Plain -Steele, Missouri
Hydrology of Flood Plain - East Prairie,
Missouri
Reynolds Lake Dam Modifications -
Paragould
International Paper Company Dam
Modifications - Gurdon
rdon
Pine Bluff Arsenal Dams, Diversion
Structures, and Channels for Hazardous
Waste Containment Facility
Little Rock District Corps of Engineers
Flood Reports- Drafting
* Lake Neark Report, Luxora Gin Company
- Luxora
*Upper Cumberland River Transportation
Study -Tennessee
*Foreign Trade Zone Study- Ft. Smith
*Riverfront Port and Warehouse Facility -
Nashville, Tennessee
I
Eli
Iii
LU1
iii
H
,F
Indicates individual experience while in the employment of another firm or agency.
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING•
Buildings- Structural
Job Description:
Paradise Manor Hotel, Cayman Islands,
British West Indies. The structure, a
500 unit hotel, consists of precast
reinforced concrete T -sections cast at
the site which included walls in two
directions and a slab deck. Services
included site consultation as well as
design. The structural concept is inno-
vative, utilizing a special concrete
design -mix placed in pre -fabricated
molds which include built-in vibrators
and heating units for accelerated
curing. The project cost was approxi-
mately $30,000,000.
Projects:
Cedarstone Psychiatric Institute- North
Little Rock
*Walker County General Hospital -Alabama
Romine School Expansion- Little Rock
Terry School Expansion - Little Rock
Cabot High School - Cabot
Student Pavilion at Arkansas State
University - Jonesboro
Blytheville
* Osceola Stadium- Osceola
Fairfield Bay Chalet- Fairfield Bay
City of Morrilton, CDBG Housing Rehabilitation
City of Brinkley, CDBG Housing Rehabilitation
City of Danville, CDBG Housing Rehabilitation
Conway County, CDBG Housing Rehabilitation
St. John's Towers Multi -Family Housing -
Pine Bluff
Our Way Multi -Family Housing - Little Rock
Waymon Dunn Apartments- Lonoke
*Faulkner County Courthouse Addition -
Conway
Sapphire Ridge Condominiums- North
Carolina
Public Works- Structural
Job Description:
Ouachita River Bridge Replacement,
U.S. Highway 82, Union -Ashley County,
Arkansas. This project involved the
structural design, preparation of con-
struction plans and specifications, land
surveys, and highway relocation design
of a replacement for the existing bridge
shown in the photograph. SUMMERLIN
aSSOCIATES, INC. provided the project
management and participated in the
engineering design of all aspects of
the project in a joint venture under
contract with the Arkansas Highway
and Transportation Department. The
construction costs are estimated at
approximately $10,000,000.
Projects:
County Bridges Study for Local Government
Institute- University of Arkansas at
Little Rock
*Little Rock Port Industrial Park Sewage
Pumping Station
*Trinity River Authority Sewage Treatment
Plant- Dallas, Texas
*Jonesboro Water Treatment Plant
Pine Bluff Arsenal Secondary Sewage
Treatment Plant
*Mississippi County Bridges- Arkansas
*Participated in Blackwell Interchange
on 1-40 - Arkansas Highway and
Transportation Department
*Participated in Highways 64 and 71
Bridge at Arkansas River -Arkansas
Highway and Transportation Department
*Orbit Valve Office Building - Little Rock
Dr. Weber Clinic -Jacksonville
Doctor's Clinic Building- Lewisville
Federal Building Foundations - Jonesboro
First State Bank Branch Location - Conway
*Arkansas Revenue Building Expansion -
Little Rock
Arkansas Department of Education
Expansion- Little Rock
Arkansas Baptist Convention Center Parking
Structure - Little Rock
Moore Office Building- North Little Rock
Computronics Building Expansion- Little
Rock
*Blanchard Springs Caverns- North
Arkansas
*Burns Park Administration Building -
North Little Rock
*Dyess Air Force Base Commissary -
Abilene, Texas
*Holloman Air Force Base Commissary -
New Mexico
*Arnold Air Force Station Shopping Center
-Tennessee
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
- Arkadelphia
First United Methodist Church - Malvern
St. Mark's Episcopal Church Rerriodeling-
Little Rock
Stanley Jewelers - North Little Rock
Market Place Shopping Center- Little Rock
Minute Man Restaurant- Stuttgart
Johnson -Williams Building- Little Rock
Stuttgart Shopping Center- Stuttgart
Mexico Chiquito Restaurant- Little Rock
*Participated in Highway 65 Expressway
Bridges at Pine Bluff -Arkansas Highway
and Transportation Department
*Golf Links Road Bridge- Hot Springs
*Trinity River Authority Central Plant Access
Bridge- Dallas, Texas
*Hampton Road Pump Station - Dallas,
Texas
* Highway 156 Bridge over West Fork of
White River- Arkansas Highway and
Transportation Department
*Railroad Bridge over Lake Bob Sandlin-
Mt. Pleasant, Texas
*Railroad Bridge over Highway 1521 -
Mt. Pleasant, Texas
*Picket Spring Branch Road Bridge -
Mt. Pleasant, Texas
*Martin Springs Road Bridge - Mt. Pleasant,
Texas
*Coastal Industrial Water Authority Water
Treatment Plant- Pasadena, Texas
*Coleto Creek Cooling Pond Project-
Goliad County, Texas
-Dam Spillway
-Pump Station
-Bridge over Flume No. 2
-Bridge over Coleto Creek
-Bridge over Turkey Creek
-Pump Station Access Road Bridge
Fl1
0 i
U
• Indicates individual experience while In the employment of another firm or agency. I
'Jr
Jr
I
I
I
n1
Ii
J1
I
f�
I
ILI
Industrial- Structural/Civil
Job Description:
Valley Pump Manufacturing Company
Expansion. The project is a 50,000
square foot expansion to the existing
plant in Conway, Arkansas. Services
included the structural design of foun-
dations and structural steel roof fram-
ing, tilt -up concrete walls, civil engi-
neering design of the site development
for utilities and drainage, and land
surveying of the site for boundary and
topography. The construction costs
were approximately $1,200,000.
Projects:
Gould Manufacturing Company Expansion
- Lexington, Tennessee
Waits Institutional Foods Warehouse
Expansion - Little Rock
Southwestern Bell Equipment Building-
.._
Arktic Ice Plant Expansion - Little Rock
Frazier Beer Warehouse - Hot Springs
Union Rescue Mission Building - Little Rock
Affiliated Foods Warehouse Expansion -
Little Rock
National Wire Company Building Foundations
- Star City
National Center for Toxicological Research
Incinerator Foundation- Pine Bluff
Barrett Hamilton Warehouse Expansion -
Little Rock
National By -Products Plant, Site
Modifications - Little Rock
_.7
RIVER
ARKANSAS
______________
- - NPErP • EMERGENCY DIVERSION
r�'SPILLWAYpp \STRUCTURE
DIVERSION r
EDIMNTT
STRUCTURE J R
RETENTION
•
DIVERSION DIVERSION CHANNEL BASIrj` 0ER
CHANNELS
i o SEDIMENT �D VERSION CHANNEL
Irc RETENTIONf�
RASING DIVERSION
w. Qp E r STRUCTUR
rII o �PROAREA �^
(737 ACRES,)
DIVERSION CHANNEL �` ARSENAL HOOTRS.
qTK/SSON Jr
X40
STRUCTDIVE DN
t
. STRUCTUR_t ENT PP1
?H t 5 RETENTION. GF�60
4i, BASIN T 0J `OP DEXTER
aF'
Pf
Windsor Door Manufacturing Company
Site Plan and Foundation Design- Little
Rock
Leird Manufacturing Company Plant Site
Plan- Little Rock
Alcoa Bauxite Slurry Tanks - Benton,
Arkansas
'Stuttgart Shoe Factory- Stuttgart
'Mead Paper Corporation Expansion -
Kingsport, Tennessee
'Champion Paper Corporation Expansion -
Ashville, North Carolina
'Bo Water Paper Corporation Expansion -
Calhoun, Tennessee
'Ideal Cement Company Plant Expansion -
Okay, Arkansas
'Owens-Corning Fiberglass Company
Plant - Tennessee
'Phillips Fibers Plant - Greenville, South
Carolina
*Navy Missile Assembly Plant- Columbia,
South Carolina
Vertac, Inc. Plant Modifications -Jacksonville
Tecumseh Products Plant Modifications -
Paris, Tennessee
AFCO Wheelabrator Pit Foundation - Little
Rock
Baldwin Electronics Expansion - Maumelle
Baldwin Electronics Structural Evaluation -
Camden
Job Description:
Pine Bluff Arsenal Hazardous Waste
Containment Facility included the
engineering design of a system of
sediment retention basins consisting
of dams, spillways, diversion structures,
and drainage channels in a joint venture
contract with the Fort Worth District
Corps of Engineers. The engineering
work involved hydraulic and hydrology
computations, preparation of construc-
tion plans and specifications, cost
estimates, and preparation of permit
applications to the EPA and the Arkan-
sas Department of Pollution Control
and Ecology.
I • Indicates individual experience while in the emoloymentof another firm or agency.
L
LAND SURVEYING
Subdivisions
Job Description:
Kellwood Subdivision is a Commercial
Development located at the southeast
corner of 1-630 and John Barrow Road
in west Little Rock. The subdivision
consists of 80 acres of hilly and wooded
property. SUMMERLIN aSSOCIATES,
INC. performed the land surveying
and platting of the development and
construction stake out of some of the
improvements.
Boundary/ Topographic
Projects:
Table Rock Lake Area 13 Boundary Survey,
11 Miles, Little Rock District Corps of
Engineers- Missouri
Ozark -St. Francis Natiohal Forest 15 Mile
Boundary Survey -Arkansas
Baldwin Electronics Property, 100 Acres -
Camden
Valley Pump Manufacturing Company -
Conway
Associated Milk Producers Property, 5
Acres- Little Rock
Winrock Farms Boundary -Carlisle
White Bluff Power Plant Construction
Survey, Bechtal- Redfield
Reynolds Metals Plant Expansion Survey -
Benton
Arkansas Electric Co-op Property- Little
Rock
Kinco Building Site, 6 Acres- Little Rock
Christopher Oil Company Property - North
Little Rock
Leird Manufacturing Company Property,
70 Acres - Little Rock
The Southern Company Property- North
Little Rock
Gilliam Concrete Property, 20 Acres- Little
Rock
Hillman Property, 20 Acres- Carlisle
Stuttgart Housing Authority Property
Morrilton Housing Authority Property
Batesville Housing Authority Property
Pulaski Academy Property- Little Rock
Hamburg School Property, 6 Acres -
Hamburg
Arkansas Children's Colony Property -
Conway
MRDDS Property Survey- Booneville
University of Central Arkansas Topographic
Surveys - Conway
Sylvan Hills School, 20 Acres- North Little
Rock
Oil and Brine Museum Property, Arkansas
Parks Department- Smackover
Downtown Cabot Mall Property - Cabot
Interstate City Park Property, 70 Acres -
Little Rock
Sara Lynn Park Property- Little Rock
Yorkwood Park Property- Little Rock
Survey of 70 Dams in Arkansas. and
Oklahoma
Patton Industrial Park Property, 40 Acres -
Little Rock
Construction Stake Out
Job Description:
John L. McClelland Memorial VA Hos-
pital. As a subcontractor, SUMMERLIN
aSSOCIATES, INC. provided complete
construction stake out services for
foundations, site work, and structural
steel verifications. Three survey crews
were utilized at certain times during
the construction period. Construction
costs were approximately $70,000,000
and services lasted about one year.
Projects:
Bayou Choctaw Oil Pipe Line, 10 Miles -
South Louisiana
Fort Roots VA Hospital - North Little Rock
Target Stores Distribution Center- Maumelle
Arkansas Nuclear Power Plant Landscaping
- Russellville
Kinco Building- Little Rock
Westbridge Apartments- Little Rock
Interstate City Park- Little Rock•
Yorkwood Park- Little Rock
Post Office Building- Pine Bluff
Baptist Tabernacle Church- Little Rock
Woolco Shopping Center- Little Rock
Indicates individual experience while in the employment of another firm or agency.
Projects:
Our Way Subdivision, 17 Acres- Little Rock
Westbridge Apartments Subdivision, 17
Acres- Little Rock
J & K Subdivision, 30 Acres- Jacksonville
Hillsborough Subdivision, 100 Acres -
Little Rock
Corporate Hill Office Park Subdivision, 40
Acres- Little Rock
Riley Subdivision, 20 Acres - Little Rock
Yogi Bear Jellystone Park- Benton
"Colonial Park Subdivision, 40 Acres -
White Hall
'Arbor Dell Condominiums - Pine Bluff
Westridge Estates, 60 Acres- Clarksville
Arkansas Game and Fish Commission
Property- Lake Conway
Condominium Site Topographic Survey -
Fairfield Bay
Systematics, Inc. Property- Little Rock
Dailey's Parking Lot Survey- Little Rock
First State Bank Property - Conway
Calvary Baptist Church Property, 5 Acres -
Little Rock
First Baptist Church Property, 8 Acres -
Little Rock
St. Mark's Episcopal Church Topographic
Survey- Little Rock
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
-Arkadelphia
Emmanuel Baptist Church Property- Little
Rock
Abraham Property, 80 Acres- Benton
Gazer Property, 20 Acres- Lonoke
Schafer Property, 320 Acres -Carlisle
Hovis Property, 40 Acres- England
Sutherland Property, 5 Acres- Little Rock
Buford Property, 700 Acres- Forrest City
E.K. Odom Property -Logansport, Louisiana
Isgrig Greenhouse- Little Rock
Leird Manufacturing Company- Little Rock
Euclid Place Sewer Improvement District
# 144 - Little Rock
City Sewer Flood Damage Repairs- Little
Rock
Capitol Avenue Sewer Line Relocation -
Little Rock
Water Improvement District #322 -
Jacksonville
Aldersgate Methodist Camp Sewer Line -
Little Rock
Baptist Medical Center Water Line
Expansion- Little Rock
Success- Datto Water Line - Success
Black Rock Water Line Expansion - Black
Rock
"M" Street Improvements- Little Rock
University Buick Levee- Little Rock
Boyle Park Improvements - Little Rock
Site Improvements, Southwestern Bell
Stagecoach Road - Little Rock
Joel Robinson School Expansion - Little
Rock
I
I
r
I
r
Ii
f
r
r
r
[I
L
r
r
L
L
PLANNING
Job Description:
Corporate Hill Office Park Subdivision,
Little Rock, Arkansas. The property is
located at the northeast corner of the
intersection of 1-430 and 1-630 Inter-
state Highways in west Little Rock. The
project consists of a 40 acre site repre•
senting 11 two acre lots and a 15 acre
tract dedicated to the City for future
recreational purposes. SUMMERLIN
ASSOCIATES, INC. provided planning
and engineering services for the
project development.
Projects:
*Harrison- Bergman Railroad Spur -Harrison
"Markham Street Interchange Credits
Study- Little Rock
Hillsborough Subdivision, 100 Acres -
Little Rock
'Lake Lucas Park -Crossett
Dougherty Property, 10 Acres -Jacksonville
`Hall Property Development, 360 Acres -
Dyersburg, Tennessee
*Colonial Park Subdivision, 40 Acres -
White Hall
*Lake Nicaragua Transportation Study
Dunn's Property Development, 5 Acres-
Lonoke
*Garrison Industrial Park -Texarkana
*Participation in Master Street Plan - Hot'
Springs
`Master Street Plan - North Little Rock
PARKS & RECREATION
Job Description:
Interstate Park, Little Rock, Arkansas.
The project was developed for the Little
Rock Department of Parks and Rec-
reation and is located on a 70 acre
abandoned city land fill site. The project
includes six lighted softball fields,
parking lots, drives, underground
sprinkler system, basketball courts,
and concession building. Services by
the firm included design, surveys,
plans and specifications, and the con-
struction management of five separate
construction contracts. Project cost
was approximately $700,000.
Preparation of Subdivision Ordinance for
City of Osceola, Arkansas
City of Morrilton 3 Year HUD Community
Development Block Grant Project
Conway County HUD Community
Development Block Grant Project
Feasibility Study of High -Rise Office
Building- North Little Rock
Metroplan 208 Areawide Waste Treatment
Management Planning (Technical
Consultant)- Little Rock
-Population and Land Use Projections
-Institutional and Management Planning
-Environmental Assessment
-Implementation Report for Little Rock
District Corps of Engineers
SE Arkansas Regional Planning Commissio
tant)- Pine Bluff
208 Areawide Waste Treatment
ement Planning (Technical
tant) - Memphis, Tennessee
ikham Apartments Development
`Metrocentre Preliminary Engineering
and Planning Study- Little Rock
'Arbor Dell Condominiums Feasibility
Study- Pine Bluff
Projects:
Boyle Park Street and Drainage
Improvements- Little Rock
Yorkwood Park Improvement District -
Little Rock
Sara Lynn Park Improvement District -
Little Rock
*Lake Lucas Park Expansion - Crossett
*Burns Park Administration Building,
Structural- Little Rock
*Blanchard Springs Caverns Building,
Structural- North Arkansas
Student Pavilion at Arkansas State
University, Structural -Jonesboro
Woolly Hollow State Park Phase I and II -
North Arkansas
`Preliminary Engineering Evaluation for
Mud Island Park - Memphis, Tennessee
L• Indicates individual experience while in the employment of another firm or agency.
SUMMERLIN $SSOCIATES, INC. engineers -planners -surveyors
1609 South Broadway/P.O. Box 2661%Little Rock, AR 72203-2661/(501)376-1323
sa
February 24, 1984
Mr. Donald R. Bunn
City Engineer
115 S. Church St.
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Dear Mr. Bunn:
We are pleased to submit herein additional information regarding our proposal
to provide professional engineering services in connection with the dam at
Lake Fayetteville.
It is our understanding that we are to provide the City with a cost estimate
of our fee based on some modifications to the Work Outline submitted in our
proposal of February 6, 1984. Items to be noted regarding our fee estimate
are summarized as follows:
1) Geotechnical - The estimated maximum number of borings
is 16 instead of 20 as noted in the proposal. It is
probable that the number of borings may be reduced after
the work begins and some consistency is found. The
maximum number of 16 is based on the worst possible
situation that would be anticipated. The fee would be
adjusted accordingly, of course, based on the unit prices
listed herewith by Anderson Engineering $ Testing Company
in Attachment A.
2) Hydrology/Hydraulics - A sufficient amount of analysis
will be performed in order to finalize the design of the
spillways for cost estimating purposes. It has been
determined that most of the analysis can be reused from
the Phase I Dam Safety Inspection Report which helps
reduce the costs of this study. A description of the
work and costs are shown in Attachment B.
3) Structural/Civil Engineering - This portion would consist
of enough design to enable the preparation of a construc-
tion cost estimate. Preliminary drawings and details would
accompany the cost estimate. It would not be a sufficiently
complete set of construction documents for contracting
purposes; however, the design would be based on field sur-
vey data which could be incorporated in the final plans.
Mr. I)onald. R. Bunn
Cify.Engineer - Fayetteville
Fabruary 23, 1984
Page 2
4) Operations and Maintenance Manual - A written manual would
be prepared and submitted to the City for the operation and
maintenance of the dam and spillways.
5) Final Report - A written report will be prepared. The re-
port will be submitted to the City in a formal presentation
to be attended by whomever the City selects.
The following is a breakdown of the estimated costs associated with the
various stages of the work:
1) Geotechnical Engineering (maximum) $ 21,000
2). Hydrology/Hydraulics 3,600
3) Structural/Civil Engineering 7,030
4) Operation and Maintenance Manual 4,250
5) Final Report and Presentation 3,390
6) Expenses 1,550
7) Contingencies (10%) 4,080
Total Estimated Fee $ 44,900
Thank you for the opportunity of submitting our proposal. Please let us
know if additional information is needed or if there are any questions in
connection with the above. We will be looking forward to hearing from you
and having the opportunity of discussing the details of our proposal further.
Sincerely,
SIAl1ERLIN ASSOCIATES, INC.
es C. Summerlin, P. E.
President
JCS:saa
.�
C -
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
676 ROCKWOOO ROAD, LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 77204
ATTAcFMENT A
PHASE II
BACKGROUND
{
COST ESTIMATE OF GEOTECHNICAL STUDIES
LAKE FAYETTEVILLE DAM
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
2/23/84
This cost estimate is with respect to the proposed scope of
services proposed for the Phase II Dam Safety Inspection
previously furnished for the subject project. The scope and
corresponding cost estimate have been made with respect. to a
prudent Phase II study utilizing 16 test borings •that would be
considered essential by such agencies as the U.S. Corps of
Engineers for a project of this nature. It was prepared by
the undersigned, formerly Chief, Soils Section, Foundations
and Materials Branch, U.S. Corps of Engineers, Little Rock,
Arkansas (retired, 1978).
The scope of work and corresponding cost estimate is made in
anticipation of moderate to severe conditions being encountered
within the Geotechnical Engineering phase of the study. If
such is not the case, then the scope of work and the corre-
sponding cost can be reduced and a cost savings will be returned
back to the city. The proposed scope of work and cost estimate
is a guaranteed maximum amount which will not be exceeded
unless severer unanticipated conditions are encountered. In
which case, the owners' representatives would be advised and
their concurrence obtained prior to an increase in the scope
and/or charges for additional work.
Geotechnica Engineering & Quality Control Testing of Construction Materials
PAGE 1 OF 3
ANDERSON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
676;ROCKMOOat ROAD, LITTLE ROCK, ARKANSAS 77704
I
A J .
S
•
COST ESTIMATE
UNIT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
PRICE
COST
• 101
Mobilization and
Demobilization
Job
$200.00
$ 200.00
102
Set Up Charges
16
ea.
25.00
400.00
103
Transportation of Drill
400
mi.
1.50
600.00
104
Transportation of Service
Truck
400
mi.
0.75
300.00
105
Transportation of Pickup
600
mi.
0.30
180.00
108
Hollow Stem Auger Borings
340
L.F.
6.50
2210.00
111
NX Coring in Rock
50
L.F.
22.00
1100.00
113
Standard Penetration
Samples
25
ea.
15.00
375.00
114
Shelby Tube Samples
25
ea.
15.00
375.00
117
Per Diem (Man Days)
20
ea.
40.00
800.00
119
Rental of Dozer
10
hrs.
50.00
500.00
120
Difficult Moving Time
5
hrs.
65.00
325.00
121
Location of Borings
5
hrs.
65.00
325.00
126
Geologist
20
hrs.
35.00
750.00
129
Bits and Tools
Job
Job
600.00
131
PVS Pipe Piezometer
200
L.F.
4.00
800.00
132
PVC Screen
30
L.F.
12.00
360.00
133
Bentonite Slurry
SO
L.F.
2.00
100.00
134
Concrete Sand Fill
100
L.F.
0.50
50.00
210
Liquid Limit
10
ea.
22.00
220.00
•
211
Plastic Limit
10
ea.
22.00
220.00
Geolecftnic :l Engineoring & Quality Control Tesl!ng of Construction f latcriats
w PAGE 2 OF 3
ANDESON ENGINEERING & TESTING COMPANY
676 ROCKWOOD ROAD. LITTLE ROCK, ARKA45AS 72204
.. Cost Estimate - Continued
A
UNIT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
PRICE
COST
218
Unconfined Compression
Test (Soil)
10
ea.
$ 18.00
$ 180.00
219
Unconfined Compression
Test (Rock)
10
ea.
30.00
300.00
240
Direct Shear Test
5
ea.
125.00
625.00
501
Supervisory Engineer
40
hrs.
35.00
1400.00
503
Soils Engineer
120
hrs.
40.00
4800.00
504
Senior Geotechnical
Engineer
20
hrs.
50.00
1000.00
509
Draftsman
20
hrs.
20.00
400.00
513
Computer with Operator
300
min.
3.50
1050.00
601
Engineering Report
10.ea.
25.00
250.00
$20,795.00
ESTIMATED TOTAL $21,000.00
SUMMARY
The guaranteed maximum.amount of $21,000.00 may appear to be
more than adequate for the Phase II study, thus some savings
are likely to occur. In which case they will be returned to
the owner based upon the unit price schedule shown above.
SIGNED: Edward K. Anderson, P.E.
President
Anderson Engineering F, Testing Co.
ieolecnnicL Engineering & Quality Control Testing of Construction Materials
PAGE 3 OF 3
U
C,
ATTACHMENT B
.
HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS
LAKE FAYETTEVILLE DAM
1.
Determine
spillway design peak inflow and unit hydrograph
2..
Determine
spillway design flood hydrograph
3.
Develop spillway design flood
4.
Determine
maximum water surface elevations for spillway design
flood
5.
Determine
outflow hydrograph
6.
Determine
free board from wave runup and wind fetch
7.
Determine
primary spillway size based on free board
8.
Determine
emergency spillway size
9.
Modify old breech analysis and determine effect downstream
10.
Report writing
FEE ESTIMATE
$3,600