HomeMy WebLinkAbout33-84 RESOLUTIONr
•
needs, and total capacity acreage needs is made in Table #3. Deficiencies
are derived by subtracting existing acreage from needs.
Page 17
There are six interior sectors, neighborhoods 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, 11 and six
exterior sectors, neighborhoods 2, 5, 6, 8, 9, 12. The park acreage
needs for the six exterior sectors was calculated by applying the park
service area and minimum acres standard since the holding capacity method
could not be applied in the absence of density guidelines. It is expected
that as Fayetteville continues to grow into these sectors they will be broken
into smaller sectors, land use patterns will be established and residential
holidng capacities can be calculated and acreage requirements related to
population derived.
The 1990 needs are determined for all sectors. Neighborhoods 1, 2, 4,
7, 10 and 11 are the sectors in greatest n?ed of new recreational land. The
recreational land needs in these six sectors isexpressed in two forms.
The Fayetteville Parks Plan map shows the needs related to the service area
standard while the text of this report combines the service area standard
with the needs related to population expressed as holding capacity needs.
An example of this can be seen in sector 11. The map identifies one new
neighborhood park while the text suggests a holding capacity deficit of
51 acres. This situation illustrated that, while the existing park locations
satisfy the service area standard the acreage needs related to the number of
people who could potentially live in sector 11 is below the standard established.
This suggests that in addition to acquiring new parks the City needs to
add park acreage to existing parks.
EXHIBIT A
oum
:1: 20
• z
J_
n J 0 O
CI-
iFN
O •O. - Q
W O - 6
LJ
- Q
0 -1 10
• LJ O
O 6
03
m
'
0
• 00
•
1.0
m
0 0 y01
LO
4
b
0
CII
N
d
.1-111 b
111 0
Ln
0-
6 01 Ul al b
CI UZI 0
,_4 r. d
NE 1 GHCONHOW
0
oUl
N
d
0
0
01 In NI
m m
Ie • P
• CO• 10
CO C0
b
O
N
rn
1.0
0
• 0 • • 00 d
CO
0 0 d Ul
CJ r1
•
10 •
W
NN +� O•' lay
▪ I-- ▪ 1. C. 00 N d • • 01 01 0 QO 0`• uO•
• W. ^ • •0 OCr
d 10 ? 000•-.•N NN CI COh `•_ •J
N
W • w ] 0bb .n • 0N� r`0 00� PO �J00-rue, r=NN• 1in --• cu Nh 0.0 •CW ONE
tz,CV • 0
4 e�� n lo. • 4 • • ▪ •.O _ _Tr.
8I abed
1N3WSS3SSV S033N SN21Vd 311IA3113AVJ .
£k 318x1
Page 19
PROGRAM OF ACTION
Establishing policies whereby land for recreational
facilities is acquired prior to or at the time it is needed
is essential to a successful parks and recreation system.
The Fayetteville Parks Plan on page 19A illustrates the
generalized location of future parks and should be used in
conjunction with the standards and needs assessment portion
of•the text to establish the total future acreage and location
needs. An acquisition schedule for public recreational facilities
should be accomplished based on priorities established by
the needs assessment. Recreational land acquisition should
be made a part of a long range capital improvement program
By this method recreational land needs are assessed on a year
to year basis, prioritites are set, and budgeting and purchasing
procedured proceed in a systematic manner.
The capital improvements program should be projected at
five to ten year increments. Development plan should he reassessed
as each year's program is accomplished. Priorities should be
evaluated and new priorities set for the next year.
The information provided in this report establishes acreage
needs by neighborhood. It is now possible to set priorities for
specific land acquisition. Action must be taken in order to assure
that these acquisition policies, procedures and method of acquiring
the needed land are implemented. Typical funding sources include:
1. General Fund Transfers
2. User Fees
3. Donations
4. Grants
5. Special Tax
6. 'Bonds
7. Money in lieu of land from subdivisions
•
RESOLUTION NO.,_ 33-84
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE PARKS AND RECREATION
PLAN OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS.
WHEREAS, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled in City of
Fayetteville V. 'IBI','Inc., 280 Ark. 484 (1983) that the
Fayetteville Parks and Recreation Plan is not sufficiently
definite; and.
WHEREAS, a copy of a proposed amendment to said Parks
Plan is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A" and made a
part hereof; and
WHEREAS, said amendment would make the City's Parks
Plan more definite.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That pages 17, 18, 19 and 20 of the Fayette-
ville Parks Plan adopted by Resolution No. 10-81 are hereby
amended by substituting therefor the text, table and figure
set out in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
21st February
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of
1984.
/,1'L: i, Sa;r r(r
T
;11F'
A SST; x • ''',i
APPROVED:
BY
1
•
"Page 20
S.E.
PARK
DISTRICT
(N - 4, 5, 6)
FAYETTEVILLE
PARK DISTRICT MAP
FIGURE 4
PLANNING AREA
PARK DISTRICTS