Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout141-84 RESOLUTION• RESOIITIZON NO, 141-84 A RESOLUTION APPROVING IN CONCEPT THE EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION SYSTEM RECOMMENDED BY para, INC. • WHEREAS, the City of Fayetteville has retained para, Inc., to prepare an employee classification and compensation study for the City; and WHEREAS, para, Inc., has completed a salary survey of selected local employers and selected municipalities; and WHEREAS, para, Inc., has submitted a proposed employee classification and compensation plan for the City. NOW, HEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF FAYEPTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: That the Board of Directors hereby approves in concept the employee classification and compensation plan recommended by para, Inc., a copy of which is attached hereto marked Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof. lii H t(!{ PASSED AND APPROVED this 4th ria 6 i - ✓� iI w ? LN r day of APPROVED: By: December , 1984. :711 1 SALARY SURVEY DATA The following pages present salary survey data from 18 cities and 25 local employers who responded to our questionnaire. All 18 cities responded, though the data for three of the Cities - Jonesboro, Little Rock and Pine Bluff - is not complete in a. number of classifications. We surveyed 35 local -employers and 25 responded. In general, maximum base salaries of other cities are lower than in Fayetteville. This is the cafe because most of the cities compensate employees with additional pay in what we..refer to as Premium Pay (e.g., longevity pay, educational incentive pay, merit pay, etc.) In making our recommendations regarding base salaries, these differences are taken into account. Regarding local employers, the maximum base salaries of this group are also generally lower than the City of Fayetteville. Local -employers generally do not pay much in the way of premium pay. The base salary information from these surveys is combined with employee benefit survey data to determine a "total cost" comparison. Then a salary and benefit package for City of Fayetteville employees is recommended later in this report. As a result of collecting initial data, it became apparent in the fire service that most cities had some type of Engineer/ Driver classification between the Firefighter and Lieutenant classifications. Consequently we conducted a telephone survey.ofi each of the cities to gather information on that class of employ- ees. 5 Fourteen of eighteen cities surveyed have this classifica- tion. For those cities having the classification, approximately 25% of the employees in the Department fit into this classifica- tion. On a national basis, this classification is being g radually eliminated as the duties are assumed into the basic Firefighter classification as are frequently emergency medical, paramedic and fire inspection duties. The average compensation attached to this classification beyond the Firefighter's maximum base salary is $1,120 annually among the„cities surveyed. It is o ur recommendation that the City of Fayetteville address this issue by creating a Fire Engineer classification with approxi- mately 10 to 12 positions being open for promotion. We would ✓ ecommend that the salary range for this classification be one pay grade above the Firefighter Classification in the Pay Plan. Proper testing and qualification requirements should be estab- lished by the City as for other promotional tests. 2 Cy E SALARY RANGES COMPARATIVE B 23,707 25,317 C W coEc cc to c X P O 2 <J N N 0 1- I N •'+ C N O .. ›- 4./ 1 0 CV C 6 11 0 W M. 21 rl r = G £ 1� or G C. — £ f 0 C. U 17,909 22,922 N • 0 M • ti Ltl 0 •M CO 0 •N N N U LL N- • N Q J 0 1-O'b C 1 0 O 1.0 O) V 0 p1 v 1n P. O OJ O P M 0 M ? U QX r^ r^ P ▪ •w 0 N O N U1 N W i G M 0. < 1n 0 1� 1 10 0 10 V) C' O Q N N N f'f M C M 0 0 N 6 10 — 01 N t- 0 C WI O N U1 N 0 N.. 6 U. = M G N Cr) N 0 10 1. z1 Cr CI £ Ni O e C N 0 Cr)0 H 21 M M N N N M N m CC LLI tl G ~I In 0 N 10 - 6 e 01 C 1) LL 1 ae G, P M O) rn £ I M '+ • ▪ (-4 N Cr OI U G M 01 10 COCO LL = t▪ ') 01 N LLvor• • F £ • N N N CC J U Z o 0 0 X 10 0 O Cr0 0 14.1 BARTLESVILLF 0l 0 m O M N N 01 CV •-• 0 1n N n - O• Po O• O CO CO = U• C I- CC a X ¢ 2 N 6 N 0 ▪ 1- CC I- C O CO LL = JACKSONVILLE N N n CO N 0 01 H CI O N OJ CO Cr < 13,405 17;595 20,139 26,995 23,774 30,202 0 0 rn CO in N • W n N N v 0 N N tD O CO C to O\ 0 M O M CO b ..-i CO N N '"1 10 01 0• m 0 tD N O)1 • • N • O 0 N or fn b OiPcr CV N 1l1 P 0 N N m co f7 M 0 c 1L m • •rn e r CO CV01 A N CO Q N 10 CO• 0 rod - N N H10 N OD 0 n N 01 • Lel n CO e4 ell el N 10 CO C•-•• 0 In ^ CO e CC 1.0O O Yf n ro C11 CV VN) 1n 0 01 0 H 01 p f') N N N 1n 1.0 m N N f7 01 or 0 f0) N 0 0 M M N 10 0 !� 0 1n N N 1� n 0 2) CO0 ▪ m- - 0 0 0 0 C X G 1- W 0 LL W 1 Q C CC CC W C C W = • G H 2 2 W CD r 2 W I— 0 O U 1.4 r m N 00' C lc lc 6 y) — W J G 0 G C = J C C W J C_ 1 S_ 2 X W W —^ G C 2 d N C 2 0 C X X O O G "" • ' 0 X£ 2� J J Cl -11n N !- f FAYETTEVILLE 1 LOMVARATIVF BASE SALARY RANGES TECHNICAL LLASSIFICATIONS I- 2 W 0 2 W CI e CV •-• >CI n0 n X W n 0 m .•1 C f'] N N N eN CC 021 a, en • I- s N 0' •.1 N el W C r 15,988 22,649 US .0 en N 01 CO Cr 0 1 17 m D CO CO NI 0 e v N 15,469 23,201 29,059 38,931 O N X - e b 0' .o Cr m 01 DV f7 N r O n N n • b N N N N N CO N 0 e 1 b b e I. .. n 0 0' a el • 1,. DJ N C • Oi 0 0I 0 N r en N O eT 01 OZ. N. 0 10 N CC N CO V N - 21 e0 •w 1 N 0' b le 01 .• \ b ID 2 I en c 01 n m co H1 e'1 N N Cr N 01 =C • 0 • • F n N X P Iv 01 N n CO n 0 01 0 b 0 0 O N N ._ - N •-• N N .r re - N N J 1-1 =I 21 0 "1 01 W 01 .1 Cr) N n N b e e CO- D On e 0 0 0 0 0 •• C 2 Cr z CO 0 in b0 X 01/4 Cr• 0 :� e... NJ W A 0 N b n e'1 1`l X 10 b O • 10 e7 0u >4I c c 6 CC O 1 W O c CZW LiJb 2 CO e e N OI N N Cr en 0 . N 11 m e 0 ▪ Cr N e. CO N N •• ."i ^ 4-4 N 10 Cr e D 11 01 N 0 10 az 01 10 S n e e I. 10 O e el le e• l 444 el 44-4 0 e 10 0 Cr b 01 1D I1/41 en e 0 +) e1 N t1 S In O b m :V N BARTLESVILLE BROKEN ARROW FORT SMITH JACKSONVILLE Z) 10 0 CO 01 0 N e N N 10 to O D N fD N .1r 0 W CO 2 2 N r. W W J C Z 6 3 O 0 6 -, ^J J LITTLE ROCK 11,378 14,934 14./22 19.510 25,709 34,426 W W 2 W J c W = Cr W0 b 2 CO tel b Cr 0 4 C r N ¢ 2 2 0 C 2 n 2 0. = 2 12,958 15,558 15,558 18,782 STILLWATER TEXARKANA, AR D e IOM .N+ e N 4 Inv Iv. ID v. eD 1-4 O CO v. Tv O N 01 O1 N N CT en r\ N N 0. 0 N.- CO S Cr • 01 - N TEXARKANA, TX 6.1 c OC W c FAYETTEVILLE • V s COMPARA1IVE BASE SALARY CLASSIFICATIONS W u 0 N Q N M '0 e N b N N 0 b O C O O i0 O O N b n M CO 0 N M e a 0 0 C� 0 Q 0 Q b e XI N n h CO 1n 0 a b 0 N M Q C O 0 O .....10. � T D• f O'. M b in n b — .-• 6 0 M Q b • O t0 M Q t- N N M Q N N M N M e Q M M e N N N M N N M M CO e M M n 0 1-. CO O b N N b N M1 co O O e Q• 1, 21 M• co — M 'El l ` bO b H') b M b O CO N N N• M M N N M N N 04 W •I . S C. CCU:fi c of W i W Ci2_I LL IC. CO w2. -IZ F F- wl t LL XIY RACT NOT SETTLED e bN N e b 0 0 - e 0 0 tr-.0 e N CO 0 N o. N M 0 N 0 0- 0 0 e e 40 '0 b 0, O) N 0 0 O e N 0 r N b M e eCPI N ti N •� N N N ti b O ill O M 0 CO N N N N N N N N N N b M 0 e b r- N N 0 0 N 0 Cl en 0 0 1-•b M N n CO COO M 0 m N CD in0 co b 6 b e e •-`le .. N 0 0 b Q • . . 10 M CO .-• .ti .n .ti N cv 0 .-1N •-tN N - N CO - N N r 0 0 N O 0 Y 0 M Q' 0 0 M O O. 0 e Y. .r N N " r.. .+ N N Q CO ON e e N O M b 0 N 1. 0 0 O e ^ e O - .N N . I-. "I ". 17,434 19,054 O a O C` 60 CO r-. 0 r 0 n 0 e e 0, 0 CO 0 b Cr b N CO e 0 .• : CO Cln .-� N N . N N N CO S 0 60 - 0 0 e O r n CO 0 03 PS 01 0 0 0 0 Cr • P 0 e CO 0 rn- ei O 0 b 0 N CO 0 b ^ 0 0 0 M e 1� 0 b T. b N CO n M 0 a CT W O0 M 0 O• CO e• N n — H — N N N M b N 0 0 O —en 0 CO CO en O — b M Q O O b W M M 10 0 M 01 P Cr Z CO 9 CO b W 2 n - - O .b.+ .b-. el O b b CO0 .1lfi .e+ 0 .e -i .0. .bn .br 0 Z N e 0 6 M M 0 0 M M CO t0 O O O+ 0 0 M e N 0 M N n N *0 N P. e 0 N — CT 0 0 CO b U1 C. r. N CO N N 0 P Q CO M n CO O Q P• 0 6 e CO Q n O 01 Q 10 a M M 0 0. N Y'f ^ ti Z 0 rM e V b Q O. M 0 b 61 - • ^ 0 0 b b 0 0 0 0 N ^ M N N b M 0 CO ^ N OD M M - b Q un e 0 e 0 b O 0 O - ~ — in M M 0 M u0 M Cn e N N M Q6 M N M Q BARTLESVILLE BROKEN ARROW f vl0O HOT SPRINGS JACKSONVILLE 0 W O U m .2.. w N ILI „I CC 2 0. 3 O 0 C r, ^J J LITTLE ROCK 5 C X 2 w W La- J W 6_ Q_ 0 W = Q c a et K 0 2 CO... N 0 S Y' 0 et CC C z J Q Cr C CC CC GS S Y r W W et le 7,e. X W 2 VI C .,• 0 0. F W WO. S 2 0 L C N N f f Q FAYETTEVILLE 4 a J• v X1 O N S 10 V; CO CO •-•• N OJ 9 0 10 0 0 0 G C1 C •-• n x N 0 CO N X S — C O 10 O 6 O C Q J1 WIX !) '•1 Q N 0 T u 10 Cr n Q 0' (') T .J Z 1h N UO C £ 1C) •-• 0' - 01 '0 •-i b r1 - .0 u1 Cr n n - N =I IW VI \! e•-•- \I N N N N •-• N V r •-• N N £ W 1 IX) (NJ CO n 0• e N O 0� •-•(0CC C CI 71 X IDN 0 - 0 •-• 0 en O 0 c) C Z' S C Q CC 0• 'Cr - e7 e N n 01 0• 9 T 6 10 1 OI£ I OJ 01 01 ,0 n 1O W u N 9 — 1n m c1 X CO v L-11 [l .�. - .-� - - - - N N - N - — — — — — C LLI Inc m CO e m w o Q 0' w 0 0 o Cr IC e n X I N n Q 01 - C •'+ 0• N 01 Q 0 1•I Cr N 1() 41' Q 01 11 Cr CD N — C rn a t0 k0 — Cr Cr Cr II LLI Q Cr N N f'1 !V O Q J1 f'1 Cr N N r, PI +) (7 0f S' Q e O O O X X 0 CO •O CO 0 m X 0 LO 2I n O 0 N Cr O u) e Cr £ 0 01 10 0 b ") 10 0 DI N 1V r) Q N Cr N 17 -I 2101 CO W 10 n - O 0 u') .0 m e 0 0 u 0 0 0 N CIla I • N Q 01 Cr P N e T T V) n O 0 Cr Cr 10 n v.-. =101>c en 0 0 0 Q T 0 {O r. 0, O N Q e e n O. 1-1C .£ 01 Q ••-i 01 1O n rn — O ^ T .c+ — n 01 O (7 Cr =r. N Y N — N r 11 Cr N N N N y — N N Lair, J IU1 - m 10 O n e e 0. b'• b O Q .u, 0 9 O T. a 10 N 0 T n u S O n G ill !,'CZ UI CO S C •I n e 10 O 0' CO O 10 (n O r I_il I£ — 0 •.. X 0 N. Pe n01 'n CO — r• J.., N N N N N N N N N Cay. C. COMPARATIVE BASE W 0 OI C - e IS ` N r'1 6 C e la 0• 0 0' n N 0 0 n 9 1 W e N :V Cr • n N n N Q DI 0 01 10 CO X N n 10 UXI Z 1I m r u N Cr N N CO Cr n X 1Di V 10 0 LL EI 0 01 n 6 10 Q m - O 9 - Cr 1•) N CO 6 10 n O^ LL u 0 WC V7 N e 01 N 0 Q in 01 O 01 e 9 O 0 O � U 6 14I 0' N N 1() 6 en e O 01 OJ t(1 0 N Q N ID* 21 n 10 I in 10 01 OJ W CO 0 01 !l .DI u Cr N J -•• H• O £ to Q O DI N •-•1[) 10 Cr 2 — Xfn (7 1') VI e 10 Q N O. f 21 £I N N e n_ 6 Cr 01 CV CO 01 O .u• S (D- S 01 X. - - 0 0 ua FI - b Q 9 - 10 9 (7 01SN. 9 re n e 0 0 n DI 01 r) N C n Cr e7 BARTLESVILLE BROKEN ARROW FORT SMITH N LD0 2 JACKSONVILLE COUNTY POLICE N Cr X O) Cr 10 01 9 Cr m O r 9 N 9 .., X Q IX Cr m e 1 u 01 N N CO n X. 1O e 61 X N N 0 0 10 51 X. r LII Cr S S N DI Cr - N - - N - Y u o O 2 CY W Cr CO W o U F J C]^ W a (0 = N W J O W J C 1- S Y 2 C 3 y 2 N C O O 6 q J X Z o J J Y b PINE BLUFF CeC 0 G SPRINGDALE TEXARKANA, AR TEXARKANA, TX FAYETTEVILLE COMPARATIVE BASE SALARY RANGES 113 ".T; M.• 2 La O N 0 C 0• N0 f0 1` 0 C 0 17 0 b e 2 0 11 CO 0 N O 01 CO 0 11 0 0 10 O) W Xi f1 N 10 1"...l0 01 N 0 C — Cr N 11 01 ID I- 6' 2 r' N un N 01 Q 1!) In 1l1 In ° 1- 0 n 1A n 11 Cu N ••N N N N N PI N N N N N C IL C. 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 O O e 0 O) Q. O• ^ CO - r _ - 10 N 10 Q• n m N .n N 2_I If) C I� r )D O) in N f1 Fl r iI n Cr, c0 I. N O) ID 10 ID .+ n (1 0 W N ^ .+ ^ N — — .-� N N r -I N N W C NI D: 0 7 w =XI O CI Nf� N 0 • z'1 u r c 0 18,865 25,313 0 0 C CO 0 0 0 N Ill m C•1 en 10 00 m 0eC O) co e Cu Ih. en e 4O 1h n n r, in ch .. el CO N N N N 0 N — 10 .r 0 H 10 01 N N N e e O) 0 1h. r )0 10 10 1D D` 0 N — n N 10 0 CO CO I% 11 VI N N O) 1- m 10 r N N M. N N N 1D Q 1.. IO ID • 10 Q Q N MI COmo 0 0 0 0 e N N+' N 0 10 10 N N IT - O 0 CO 0) r e CI in in N. ID N N mN N Q 0 mI 0 0 O) 01 0 e N N O Z O) - 12 N O) 0/ 11 S I • e O 0 O 1� 0)CeI 11 MI P co a> VI 0 P CO n m in el ID N Ill C 11 0 N 1. 0 CO LI C W N b O 1\ 10 IO I) 10 N CO N O Q N ▪ O Y O) 0 C CO t1 11 0 0 0 0 111-.0 0 1. C\ 0 C X () O) 1� P 0 0 CO O Q e e •"' Q e O QI 01 I r A a .r O 11 H) 1'1 Q N ▪ ^ ▪ e O !1 ID W U 2 N ID 10 — Q ID N O ID y 10 0 e N Q 10 ID 6 O O) 01 O 0 -..I I. 11 0 0 r- 0 0 0 2.2 .-. Q IO - CO ▪ • 11 Cr) 1.- 0 O) a • • 1� ID 0' N W 01 r� ^ P 0 'tT ^ - CO 0 0 • •• - CO0 r n L BARTLESVIILE BROKEN ARROW JACKSONVILLE U 4 W ¢ W0 C 6 W O 6 O U r W J O 0 2 2 W r 0 0 N 0 W J 6 O C .2.. W ▪ J C r Y W W 2 6 3 = Z V) ` 0 C O 0 6 6 = 0 D. S r D. C N 7 STILLWATER C X 6 r • Q Q Q Q WI ]C ]C :) QC C 6 K La W W W CC r r 6 FAYETTEVILLE 1 f i 2 Q_ xI f I- 2 • • el Q O P1 Q co N N N CO IN LO 0 N N CO Q CS N N 01 01 tO M lY I(I 17 IN Q O. Cr) N 01 N Q Q r. N n o LC) In 0 M1 N N CO N N n ON N 1.0 O CO N N r '+ N No N r nn N N b 0 O 0 N 01 LC N 01 O IN IN '0 O e b V) CO N in V) 0 0 10 P1 N 0 N 00 r, Q CO IN e t0 O' Q 0 A N PI 01 N CO Q CC N N ▪ N O t1' n t7 Cr) n t7 .0 N •O Q N w 0 2 w H N N 10 ` • .m+ N O w x. M C - ce Q Q• • LJ ^ N N f7 f•1 1 P 6_ 'y N N N N N O 0 0 m 2 • N CF 0' N O_ Zi . O N 'O -r Q N. N O CC N N CC W 1 U CLf CC O H K W O r r O O O N Ki CO - co V) c • Ei r 0 CO N • Cr0 N C•1 N N tl Z, m 0 0 t. fI O • r▪ i - 1J, S r O o 01 N • w Vl N N '0 0 - b n N 01 N r 15,434 19,760 r U Q O 1.0 CrNI 4=0 • '0 N n O O n C1 O 01 VI •-• W N 21,674 27,435 r r Q CO '0 u N N N N IN 'O N '0 C N •^ n A '0 N C'1 - CO - et m Q C O Q (11 N 10 N CO N < O' (• O V P • C O 0 N N VI 1.0 Q O N '0 Y x O Q C1 O m0, - N O 0 'IC N0 0 Q O 0 O Q 01 N N N. Cr CC V1 'D WI 17 0 N .r .r .r •+ r •-• r •-• •-• CC F- 2 2 O N 0 0 Q t0 O 0 Q Q O O N V: Q n '0 y n f7 1') N 0 1-1 2 (^ Q 01 '0 O 0, 'O IN Q 01 • 6 Z '0 r r O 01 ^ .Nr 01 P 0 I- n ri 2 CC un BARTLESVILLE BROKEN ARROW HOT SPRINGS JACKSONVILLE 0 CC W o u CO .2 2 N W W J C 2 C\ 2 O O Q J LITTLE ROCK 11 LL W W J 8 = co N O c C • CLi.1 1.14 N Z U 0 r 0 2 2 1 C 8 SPRINGDALE 12,334 14,851 STILLWATER IF. CO IN CO '0 ul N V CO t0 O ^ N - 0 ¢ I- 0 c 0 r r CC Q W Y Y 0 a a FC x W W l I— I a FAYETTEVILLE 4 • • PLANT MANAGER 2 £ C O •1 H X ¢ ¢1 ini a W CC £I N N Q I N 0. m W 0 •-• O 0 W r W •I CO y N ^ H ` ZI C m 5 ¢ u Nrag 29,328 39,291 15,558 20,841 10 CO N ' < O 10 n CO m '0 O N m 01 in 10 10 1:71 10 10 K) 1n 01 10 N N N m N N N N CO 0 N IIINON el 0 rn 0 O n m 0 10 N N N N N N 10 O e •- N CO N. n 1.0 10 10 b 1O 01 n 01 < 03 C CO 10 0) le e al — N N 411 N N 0 O' m O1 O1 1O n < m CT CO -- Co) Q f� C In N 10 N 0 m 10 v n 1� 1n m 0: < O N NC N m 1n m PLANT OPERATOR 2 £ C°) O C C C 6 CO C < • CA n 119 0 N C m N W O Q < Q m44 'N BARTLESVILLE le ilea CO O N NO N /I- CC •-•• A 1C O Ch m c e ICI et • tO LCI 1n •ti 10 1[) < m 03 Q y CNN 1[) 10 0' 10 1� C O 10 41 114 imal N N N N N el CO 0 NO N O) C m m C m N .m-* N Y < N m m N. In b IN OD .-• < 0 m • - - - N - O 0 < e < < NO m 1. P N. 0 r- Co) m N 0, < 3 CC C S K CC = ✓) Y F- O C C 0 co W HOT SPRINGS W J ccO 0 O m 2 2 N o - W W J C U = 6 3 Q C O ¢ LITTLE ROCK LI- Z W ¢ W J 1- W J H C� 2 CO N ¢ O < c = Y r W W 2 N C 2 0 X £ Z C 0 9 v 10 m < 10 CO O CO N 1a N m m 10 N ON •• 10 u9 ID b --• 0e m 0 b O N 1n In C �+ N m O) < .n 1n re e N e 0, m N m m < b N N N O1 SPRINGDALE C < Q 1- W 0 6' 0 • Q W Q Q C 2 Y Y Q ¢< >c r W W N 1- 1 • - YETTEVILLE ti 3 LOCAL EMPLOYERS COMPARATIVE BASE SALARY RANGES O O m O C t0 t� m N N N m N N Oom 000 O O N N 0 r N.yti 0 0 XI C 0 <I N 0 •N tp r. r O N e e 10'00 0 mo 0 N O N t 0 N CON N 0 0 m N N 0 0 CO b r 0 10 0 N O O e N 0 .1. 4 0 m 0 ' N N N M N gm N N N N ✓ N O e mNmom NtOmO r e m W Mmimm 0 O m 0 m N O `Cr r e t0 0 0 m00 e N N N e m b N •. '4 m m m m 0 N N 0 0 N �r-0 m mm N CO N N O o N W MC N MN 0 CO 0 0..0N N MO.. N for N O 0 m t O N N _ r m r m OW o t 0 0 --- N Nm .-1 .-I m..O$OO 0 0NN 0 ON 00000 0 0^ N m m tC 0O1eOe a 0••r N 0m 1, 0 0 0 0 C N 0 N O MN .. .. .. ..� .... c O l^. N r e m t(. m 00" N C 0 N lD 0 P e 1, X mr0 N•. ANN Comm a .�ttN. o y N Y QI 0 00 Nm 0•-I m.'� WON IN O NtONm 0 1,E W ..N NN no tD Ne 0e0 a m0Mmm e N ..1 .. r .... r N MMM MM .. N - - - r m .. U F 4. ZI 0 01, mm rtc O Cm o tc'm-m CO m O Z C e m N N N C m O N T O P P O m t C t 0 O - a r m O m e P e N•` NNN N O N t [. I0CO --ON Nom r.- 0 000.0/•4 0 0 Q I .. - .r .. .. ..•. .... 141 141 C O N N N O O N 0 C 0 N e 0 N e t0 C N m e N e XI Ct000 O r> r NC -Nm CtC tO•• ‘1;)11 e N Orem N ON-NO•-rt0 'C'G'm OCN' '0 e • • Ne0N 0 01...1tON004"111 NNOO inrt00 N e .. .. .. •. �.. .. ry r... .. ..��.. _.. r.. .. ZI EI O CM N m N C C C OC 00 O N N t 0 P t C O NM N O N 0 N C CM VC C t C t C m N r O Nm N; 000PN VW mom ��N m NI O•. NI 1,0000 CO 00 OCNN im4 0 Ni r.. -i ^I r• NI r - \\NI r... r. r O 0 N 0 MW 0 0 0 N r N N r 0 N 0 X C 0 NtotN.D C O •. 0 MO N0•. r r Q C C •. N..'0ePN N m-tD0e O E . . • .• N m N e V' N m N N 0 m O N ..I O r e e m m .. N m m m m m .. C e N r mm N C 0 N 0No0' r 'Cr 21 C N r N06 N C tD m ID00N.. N- 0 CO C 0 O 0001C e m .. N0 NeN w E I 0 N 0 N m N m m 0 O 0\00'-.o' 0 O 4-4 EMPLOYER 0 0 N .. N 0 O O N O O 404/0V O' C e 0 10 NM 0 0 N N O e .. N N -4'0'.D' 1, N 0 m NM V 1 m O m t D O r N O t 0 m m r t 0 N 0 0 10 . . • 0M my N Co 0 e 0 0 0 .l 1, 0 0 O m O N N 00 0M0 OOOON Oe00 >•.N ▪ e ee rer ON .000 NONO 00°. r e r 1, ON N N..m'm N Nme NN O m N •.O ..0r N..000 0000 0O0 O CO NiNO 541 Gm V C tilts o=•-..]Y.JE ZOO.Om 0FC>3 xN 10 5 X M ECA2 O Z 4 E C F Z till 4 Z I 0 rbi 0 41 C e N 0 E I • . O e O N N 1O N N N 001 e' v O• r N N n n .-I e N e e .-1 01 • o n : In H XI4 O 0 VXI O • Z <1 0 2 N O £ 0 • L] 0 N C O > Y C C 0 O 0 0 0 0 e el e Mb 0. 0 0 0' n e n 01 n e C 6 0 C N < G Z 0 N ..] 6❑-. 0 0 < F v. £I U11 < N r O -. .. C < C CO - O E m r 0 O 0 E <1 1:. n n O N > > < EI1 n 461 461 r F V• F N 10 ▪ n r -m < O V]I N N r`9 C C YI < a -II N.. <1 E C Z 0 0 01 O 41 < Z1 O N 0 O F 1-41 N 461 e 0 EI • O.r 01 0 r E .r r N EMPLOYERS •1 0 0 0 V C CO O E- O. CC aC £ L1 o0 ✓ O X EI 21 O0 CO V1 CO 010 N N CO 111 e 1 n ill • lib 0 01 ▪ 0 •-4 o 0 r 0 r 0 o 0 0 O CO ▪ N N ^1 N N N VI CO O r 01 r N CO e N r 0 N ver a1 r n n n N N C •v n N 0 V VI 0 n O CO 1.0 m le N N N N ✓ C N O e r n elO r n -1 n n N CO n N MN ti V c 0 e e 01© 1)- 01 01 N e n 0 v V1 0 .-I el IN N e O r 0 N 0 VI el ✓ 4601 n 1...-1r r- e-. -. VI N 01 o r n V1 e 1.0n 0 e0r 0 .r - .. N N -. -r -. 00 010 ON O N, a ^100 N N 0 010 Or NQ 1ne 01 N CO Q1 n N N 171 ei r 0, Q e N e el CO CO 0 N el 01 01 ▪ 0 -1 a -. .4 - e1 el r1 .y e1 ^1 O 100 N 00100 00 NC O VIN 01 0 XI r 0 N VI a NN n10r ...1 n-1 e v 4 I 0 e N 0` -+ e P V 1 0 N V 1 n 0 N N VI 0 0 E • • lib • • • • • • • • • • • • O Inn N le 1••• Ne en O N1-InN e v .r .-1 .r N - — .-1 r .-1 .1 N 4-1 44 el .a .. H CO 00 N N000 00 CO V)10rN 0 CO Z 10 ev N 10 e0N 00 10n00-4 N 10 CO. r n 10 r e v 10 0 0 in 0 N 1n 10 e E • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 10 - o 01 000-+ CAID 0100000 CO 01 EMPLOYER 01 I O m CO U0L 4. V= •-inx-arZ O a.00 vIF»3XY 4 CC F0 4i 41 •.1 > Y •+ 4 4> CA. 11 COMPARATIVE. BASE SALARY RANGES LOCAL EMPLOYERS Z OD 0 e 10 •. 0 N y' C P C • n N C N n N r N C N / C '0 C 0 C N N N 0 C m '0 10 N o n o eri P 0 0 O e O n N .. CO V ' m N r CO • N n r N O N n ti E . V "' n • r- N r- 2 2 '-' r .. .+ .. .-. -+ .y - .. 4 " Z V C F V n CO e m e ZZ N m N .0. e P N in II -. • O g E 3 o m N 0 Fri P 0 0 N 0 0 N l0 CO CO % n N N P 10 C O C V' C a N N e 0 N CO 10'C r e 4] r ▪ . O N n N CO e N N n n C 2 r - ti .i .y - .ti .y .ti .+ - Z0 C t v F Y N0 N C. 00 Ne N \0 Z C 2 m N 10 J1 n 0 0 t0 n b - ✓ O Lad a Q n 1.0 0' e in 0 CO • N 4 3 Z E P P1-0 m 00 •yN 0 P 4 E F Z Z a al • VIZ x.11.. L1/41 it EMPLOYER C 10 10 10 e r 0 C 0 N CO P P N fV P O N N in C ml O1/4 101/4 0 N N N N N 01 0 •' P CO r CO N P 0 N N IN - 4-4 - PI - .q ti N 0 ▪ N N p. .r .I n 10.r -.. 1u I • fv m V 0m 4. L.1 •-• YJE206 aC NF»2 %> 4 F1w • *- C1/41 I.l 41 .1 a> Ise 12 4 3 • 3r EMPLOYEE BENEFITS DATA AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following pages analyze the employee benefit portion of the City of Fayetteville's compensation package. The data for the two surveyed groups (other cities and local employers) is listed and summarized. Recommendations are then presented including the projected costs and savings to the City where appropriate. { 13 • e SUMMARY OF EMPLOYEE .BENEFITS CITY SURVEY This is a summary of the data presented on the next three pages. Health Insurance Other cities generally contribute more money and make a higher percentage contribution to health insurance coverage than does Fayetteville. The following is a summary of premium costs and contributions: Employer Employee pays Days Employee Coverage Dependent Coverage Employees & Dependents Cities Fay Cities Fay Cities Fay $62.27 $40.U0 $44.39 $26.97 $106.66 $66.97 3.77 -0- 60.93 59.10 64.70 59.10 $66.04 $40.00 $105.32 $86.07 $171.36 $126.07 Fayetteville pays: 100% of employee coverage 53% of employee and dependent coverage Other cities pay: 94% of employee coverage 62% of employee and dependent coverage Dental Insurance 7 of 18 cities have the benefit. Life Insurance Average face value of policies for different groups is as follows: Non-uniform employees - $13,000 face value Police & fire employees - $15,000 face value Management employees - $25,000 face value The average premium paid by the employer is 360/$1,000/mo. 14 • c Pensions r: This category of data is difficult to compare without get- t ing into actuarial studies which are beyond the scope of this study. Generally, it can be concluded that almost all of the municipal employers contribute to a pension plan in addition to t he Social Security system. Contributions to Police and Fire pension funds vary greatly. The percentage figures reported in the survey were found to be greatly understated. Holidays The average number of holidays for non-uniform personnel was 78 hours or .9.8 days. For police employees, practices varied greatly both within Arkansas and outside of the State. In Arkansas, 5 of 9 cities surveyed included holiday compensation in the base salary for the position. The other four cities compensate employees with an average of 43 hours of extra pay per year. Outside of Arkansas, 5 of 9 cities surveyed give time off for holidays. The other four give extra pay or time off for holiday compensa- t ion. The average time off and extra pay is 76 hours. In total 13 of the 18 cities surveyed have time off or extra pay for holidays. For fire employees, in Arkansas, 5 of 9 cities included holiday compensation in the base salary for the position. The o ther four cities compensate employees with an average of 53 hours of extra pay per year. Outside of Arkansas, 6 of 9 15 T ti cities give time off for holidays. The other three cities give extra pay or time off. The average time off or extra pay is 78 hours outside of Arkansas. In total 13 of the 18 cities sur- veyed have time off or extra pay for holidays. Vacation The average vacation schedule for non-uniform personnel is as follows: 2 weeks after 1 year; 3 weeks after 6 years; 4 weeks after 13 years; 7 of the 18 cities„have 4+ weeks. For police employees, the average vacation schedule is as follows: 3 weeks after 1 year; 4 weeks after 12 years (10 of 18 cities grant the 4 weeks). For fire employees, the average vacation schedule is as follows: 3 weeks after 1 year; 4 weeks after 12 years (10 of 18 cities grant 4 weeks). S ick Leave For non-uniform personnel, the average sick leave program is 1 day per month earned, with a maximum accumulation of 90 days. There is no payout for unused sick leave either annually o r at termination of employment. For police and fire personnel, the average sick leave pro- grams is 1-1/4 days per month earned with a 60 day maximum accumulation. There is a payout for unused sick leave per State law in Arkansas. Outside of Arkansas, cities do not pay for u nused sick leave. 16 • u Uniform Allowance The average annual cost of uniforms for police and fire personnel is $250. The majority of cities provide uniforms on a quartermaster or requisition system rather than paying money to the employees. For public works personnel, most cities provide a uniform service as does Fayetteville. Longevity 14 of the 18 cities surveyed have this benefit. The aver- age maximum benefit is $100 to $130 per month depending on the relative base pay of the classification. Shift Differential Only 3 of the 18 cities surveyed have this benefit. Educational Incentive Pay 11 of 16 cities have this benefit for police and fire per- sonnel. The average maximum is $75/hr. for a Bachelor's degree in police or fire science or closely related areas. The pro- gram is usually an incremental one beginning with $25/hr. for an Associate Arts degree and $50/hr. for a Bachelor's degiee. Only four cities have this benefit for non-uniform personnel. Other Premium Pay One city has various types of skill pay up to 12.5% of sal- ary for Police and Fire. Two cities have meal allowance, for 17 j firefighters. The average is $S/mo. for those who have the benefit. One city reported up to a $100/yr. bonus for physical fitness maintenance for Police and Fire. Two cities reported extra compensation for firefighters serving as paramedics. One city reported extra pay for shooting proficiency. Steps in Pav Grades 15 of 18 cities reported Step Plans with approximately 5 to 6 years to the top step. One city is on a minimum -midpoint - M1 maximum salary .range (HAY) system. Two cities have one rate and add longevity steps to it. 18 1 EMPLOYEE.. BENEFIT; 'COMPARATIVE N O cc F • LIFE MIDRANGE MEDICAL & DENTAL INSIRANCF F ELI 0 E 0 LEO 0 e CC CC LEL V N <. FACE. VNJIE L w G 6 C r \ H U 1 C0 ¢ S C Vf < L: 2 -a o. m p G 0 WI O d` N KK • r"+ ¢ N C¢ r•1 C• N N M C M N N1�e O t• Z� O V 2 2+ 0 • )0 01"1N 2 N ^ 2 • N • rr C N N C N r+1 OD )D 0 • )D • pa N_ C N •N r•n N•-• Vit N N M r• N• N N N C P )D C N .'S r"1 L N 0 N 0 2N •- Z N. r =• wit '0Wa 101 • O m N Z ¢ Mt WI 10.Xt N - O M N Z 4le- O V; N () N C • V) 0 ¢ • Vl V) N C V) Vl VI V) CO V) • C' W Z 0) • Cl C) • 0 0 N 0 01 CO 0 0 0 Y Y Y Y 2 Y Y 2 Y Y Y Z Y •Y N. Y Y N • _ • N O 0 0 0 N C N 0 C 0 to 0 C N 0 V) N co • 0 C EL ' C` 0) 0) • C' 0) • 0 0 IV 0 0 0 0 0) 0 Y Y Y Y Y Z Y Y = Y Y Y 2 Y Y Y >' >4 N4 8C 8 8C 8 0 1 C • p0 O- S M a9 0 N N N 0 M 1 O O H 1 P- m \ \- '0 •- \ \ . I - w o )_D x �u'• (r• 4 E N• p LL La. a. al O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 -1 0 CC m C 0 0 0 N o o et! O Co_oc• oo• on• o10V. IdJ 0000L 006 0II x(V C*A.-w w0-4, X Irt x -(i o o> 00 N W C l9 H N' .- - Yi IR M NN t9 - 419 -Y• 2 CL C L C 0 1 I 1 1 1 1 = 1 1 1 N 1 1 0 0 0 1 N 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 1 O 1'1. U t 1 1 0 C 1 )0 1 1 I 1 1 ^ 1 1 1 hC fj FC 4 = 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 c L C L 1 1 Irl P P 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 • 1 1 1 • y' - 1 1 1 IN P CC 1 )0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 V r; 0 It 1 1 ID 5.154 r22 — 22 2 0 0 2 0 >••• 0.4 Y O )0 0 0> 0 O M In 0 0 N - O O CC 1rP• �. • 0 0 tp� • IJ• • 0 0 D• �^ N M•- t(1 P ▪ C t• 0 N > '0 rn 0 0 In tin N= ciD 0= O• \='0 m� m N • 8N NN 0 N r -m vo r•'I V N m N '7, C� •ti r 1 if CO If) `u a -..c FL h•0 6Si 5 m 8�a mCcc mERR4 ▪ `- s'r= 19 pa t a F cu GI tut baCI c - o ¢ ¢ -Pt - L y EN 14 t» _N