HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-82 RESOLUTION•
•
RESOLUTION NO. O / -O
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO
EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CITY'S JANUARY 5, 1982,
AGREEMENT WITH McCLELLAND CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
TO REVISE THE SCOPE OF -THE WORK TO INCLUDE AN AIRPORT
NOISE CONTROL AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STUDY.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to execute an amendment to the City's January 5,
1982, contract with McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc.
to revise the original scope of the work to include an
airport noise control and land use compatibility study.
A copy of the amendment authorized for execution hereby
is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A", and made a part
hereof.
•
;ATTEST=i
PASSED AND APPROVED this ...b:: day of
f7 40
AFS
- I — a
dt-C4- 49s
CITY,CLERK,
APPROVED:
1982.
MAYOR
AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
This Agreement entered into this s�.ly
day of dtn e, 1982, amends
the Agreement for Engineering Services executed August 8, 1980, and
subsequently amended January 5, 1982, between the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas and McClelland Consulting Engineers, Inc.
Purpose. The purpose of this Amendment is to revise the Scope of Services
of the original Agreement to include an Airport Noise Control and Land Use
Compatibility Study. All provisions of the original Agreement shall remain
unchanged except as specifically provided for herein. All provisions of
Amendment No. 1 executed January 5, 1982, shall remain unchanged.
Scope of Services. The scope of the
original Agreement is hereby revised
indicated in Appendix A - Scope
incorporated by reference herein.
engineering services included in the
to include the services specifically
of Services, attached hereto and
Compensation for Engineering Services. It is agreed that the compensation
to be paid to the Engineer shall be increased by the amount of fifty-six
thousand, seven hundred twenty-four dollars ($56,724), as a result of the
additional services included in this Amendment. The amended total
compensation, excluding that for any Additional Engineering Services as
provided for in the Contract, is therefore one hundred twenty-six thousand,
one hundred twelve dollars ($126,112).
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed, or caused to be
executed by their duly authorized officials, this Agreement in duplicate on
the date heretofore stated.
EXH1Btt Z
Y`'>::
Typed Name
Title
City Clerk
(SEAL)
OWNER:
CITY O AYE E
By
---�L'C�
Typed Name
Paul Noland
Title Mayor
ENGINEER:
McCLELLAND CONSULTING
ENGINEERS, C.
4°Bye"')�a utt.�.�• - e tie iaet.Q
TypediName Maurice A. McClelland
Title_` Secretary -Treasurer
Afar. �'.
By
Title
8 Name J. E. McClelland
President
APPENDIX A
TO AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES
SCOPE OF SERVICES
AIRPORT NOISE CONTROL AND LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STUDY
AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR DRAKE FIELD
Fayetteville, Arkansas
Element One/DEVELOP STUDY DESIGN
Task A. Identify Available Information. Existing (secondary)
data andinformation, such as, but not necessarily limited to,
documents, maps, studies and projects currently underway or in the
planning stages will be identified which may directly or indirectly
influence this study effort. This effort will assure initial and
continued coordination and will involve research in locating secon-
dary data sources and consulting appropriate local officials and
agencies in this regard.
Task B. Determine Composition and Organize Planning Advisory
Committee. A Planning Advisory Committee will be established.
The composition of the Committee shall be evaluated and determined,
as will the structure of the meetings, along with their location
and coordination with other planning efforts in the community. Mem-
bers to serve on the Planning Advisory Committee will be determined
jointly by the City and the Consultant. The PAC shall be organized
as a resource entity during the conduct of the study. The composi-
tion would consist of representation from such entities as the tower,
maintenance and operations, airport management, the Federal Aviation
Administration, the City of Fayetteville, the airlines, the aviation
community, the neighborhood organizations, any environmental organi-
zations, among others.
Element Two/PREPARE BACKGROUND INFORMATION INVENTORY
Task A. Inventory Local Plans and Land Use Regulations. The Con-
sultant will inventory and collect all existing land use plans,
transportation plans and other development plans which will affect
airport development and operations. In addition, the Fayetteville
Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Regulations, and other regulatory
mechanisms as well as other local regional and state long-range plan-
ning goals and objectives will be reviewed. The plan for the air-
port environs will be analyzed thoroughly to evaluate any existing
or potential conflicts between it and airport development.
1
Task B. Forecast of Aviation Activity. A summary of aviation
activity for the Drake Field service area will be compiled to show
historical growth and present a basis for statistical analysis of
aviation demand factors. Such a review will be based on a collection
and analysis of based aircraft by airport in the service area, fuel
sales, annual operations and related factors. Aviation demand will
be evaluated for Drake Field and forecasts of aviation activity will
be established. The forecast will be based on statistical trend
analysis. The aviation demand will be forecast by the following
categories: based aircraft by mix, local and itinerant operations
by mix, passenger enplanements and busy -hour operations, with break-
downs by commuter and general aviation. The forecast will also be
by short-, intermediate-, and long-range (5, 10 and 20 year) periods
of time.
Task C. Update Operational Data. Operational data currently
available will be reviewed and updated to assure currency, complete-
ness and accuracy of present conditions. This task will include
a review of aircraft operations, aircraft fleet mix and other opera-
tional procedures.
Task D. Develop Community Socioeconomic Profile. Information on
socioeconomic factors which will influence the demand for air tans-
portation and which may impact the development needs/requirements
for areas surrounding the airport shall be collected and evaluated.
Housing characteristic trends, building costs and availability will
be analyzed as they may affect land use compatibility within the
airport environs.
Task E. Inventory Governmental Structure. This task consists of
an identification and evaluation of local, regional and state char-
ters, ordinances, legislation, trust agreements and other pertinent
data to gain an understanding of the different governmental units
involved in this study. This will establish which governmental units
have jurisdiction over certain matters and which have the authority
to take action which will affect relative issues of the study.
•
Task F. Update Existing Land Use and Zoning. Existing land use
inventories and mapping already available will be updated to reflect
current conditions. In addition, existing zoning will be inventoried
and mapped.
Task G. Idenfity and Analyze Land Use Trends. Type and direction
of development which is most likely to occur in vicinity of the air-
port will be determined. Based on input from previous tasks, the
actual availability of the area to support development will be de-
termined, along with the most realistic type of development which
are most likely to occur. This task will identify the most favorable
balance between types of development and the preservation of natural
conditions.
Task H. Analyze Height Zoning. The existing height zoning map and
ordinance will be analyzed as to its adequacy in light of projected
land use trends and future operations. Recommendations will be made
for the documents to be updated.
2
•
Task I. Refine Preliminary Environs Study Area. Based on input
from the previous tasks, a preliminary study area will be identified.
This will establish the area of concentration for the study and will
set general parameters for impact analysis. The study area will be
further refined and narrowed after the future noise contours are
generated and concurrence is reached.
Task J. Develop Working Paper on Background Inventory. The Con-
sultant will develop a working paper outlining the findings of each
task. The working paper will summarize the major elements outlined
above and will be considered a review copy of a draft for a chapter
in the final Study document. The working paper will provide back-
ground information for subsequent analysis and discussion as the
study proceeds.
Element Three/EXISTING NOISE EXPOSURE DETERMINATION
Task A. Idenfity Noise Measurement Locations. In concurrence with
the preliminary existing airport contours previously generated, the
Consultant will select appropriate sites for taking noise measurements
at the airport. Six (6) sites will be identified for noise measure-
ments, which will be both on and off airport property.
Task B. Conduct Noise Measurement Survey. A noise measurement
survey at six (6) locations around the airport will be conducted.
The measurement sites will be broken into two groups. Measurements
at approximately half of the sites will include comprehensive noise
measurementsof single event (Sound Exposure Level, SEL) noise from
aircraft flyovers. The primary function of these sites is for in-
creasing the accuracy and confidence level of the noise contours.
The results of these measurements can be statistically analyzed and
reported as confidence bands around the airport contour.
The remaining sites will be used for spot monitoring needs such as
determining noise levels at sensitive receptor locations; measuring
noise levels from non -aircraft sources; and providing actual data
of noise sources may be very important to Drake Field. These may
include highways and railroads. The Consultant will define highway
noise levels, and other non -aircraft noise independently and cumula-
tively with the airport.
The Consultant will reasses the measurements taken for run up opera-
tions to revalidate and recheck previous findings. Only a sample will
be taken to assure validity and avoid repetition. At each of the
sites, measurements of ambient noise levels during a day time and
night time period will be conducted. From these data, the non -air-
craft Ldn noise level can be estimated. The measurement survey will
be well documented, with the report containing site information and
all pertinent meteorological data as it affects noise propogation.
Meteorological data will be gathered from the Flight Service Station
and on-site observation. All monitoring will be manned by an exper-
ienced engineer in the field of acoustics and noise measurements.
3
•
Task C. Finalize Existing Noise Contours. By incorporating the
operational data collected in Task III. C. and in previous efforts,
and the results of the measurement survey, a final existing noise
contour shall be presented. Ldn contour values will be computed
for the 60, 65, 70 and 75 dBA level. From the statistical analysis
of the measurement results, a statistical confidence band around
the 65 Ldn will be determined.
In addition to airport noise contours, noise contours for non -air-
craft noise sources in the vicinity of the airport will be determined.
This includes the major highways and railroads near the airport. The
source of noise data for generation of these contours will be the
results of the measurement survey and a highway noise model (FHWA
"Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model", FHWA-RD-108, December,
1978).
To demonstrate the actual impact of the airport operations over the
noise environment without the airport, the non -aircraft noise will
be presented as noise contours cumulatively with the airport noise.
Thus, the product of this task will be a depiction of the existing
noise environment around Drake Field in terms of an airport noise
contour; a non -aircraft noise source contour; and a cumulative aircraft
and non -aircraft noise contour.
Task D. Generate Future Noise Contours. From the aviation forecast
a future noise contour for Drake Field will be developed that cor-
responds to estimated future operational procedures and aircraft.
This contour will serve as a base contour for which alternative scen-
arios can be compared.
Task E. Determine Environs Study Area. After identification of
the existing and future noise contours, the Consultant will determine
the environs study area. This will define the area for all subse-
quent land use analysis and noise impact analysis of the study.
Task F. Develop Working Paper on Existing Noise Exposure. The
Consultant will produce a working paper utilizing appropriate graphics
and summarizing the major tasks of this element. The working paper
will be developed in terms easily understandable by the layman and
will be considered a draft of a chapter to be included in the Study
document. Again, the working paper will provide background informa-
tion for subsequent analysis and discussion.
Element Four/LAND USE ANALYSIS AND NOISE IMPACT
Task A Evaluate Land Use Controls and Regulations. The land use
controls and regulations identified in Task II. A. will be analyzed
to determine their capability to ensure and maintain the compatibility
of the environs study area with the development of Drake Field. State
enabling legislation and case law will be analyzed as to their appli-
cability to initiating new and innovative land use controls.
Task B. Develop Land Use Management Decision Matrix. The Con-
sultant will develop a land use management decision matrix which
will identify the various land use controls and regulatory mechan-
isms available to the community, the responsibility for implementing
these mechanisms and the public acceptance of these mechanisms. The
matrix will be preliminary at this step, as it will continue to be
refined throughout the study process.
Task C. Land Use Compatibility Evaluation. The Consultant will
analyze land use alternatives as to their compatibility with air-
port development and operations. The alternatives will be evaluated
in terms of both the existing and future noise contours.
Task D. Land Use Impacts Analysis. Land Use alternatives will be
analyzed and summarized in terms of impacted land use and population.
The noise impact potential of the alternatives can be compared with
the baseline case as well as with the alternatives. Comparison can
be based on areas inside the noise contours, population inside the
noise contours, and schools inside the noise contours. A noise im-
pact comparison matrix will be developed for each alternative de-
picting the above information.
Task E. Develop Population Weighted Impact Model. The Consultant
will utilize information generated from the previous work tasks to
determine a population waighted impact model. The methodology used
will be that method described by the National Academy of Science in
its "Guidelines for Preparing Environmental Impact Statements on
Noise".
Task F. Evaluate Land Use Impacts Based on Population Impact Model.
The Consultant will utilize the population impact model developed
above to determine the impact of the total noise environment.
Task G. Develop Working Paper on Noise Impact. The Consultant will
develop a working paper utilizing the output from the tasks described
above for this element. All technical elements will be explained in
terms which can be easily understood by the layman. The working
paper will be considered a draft for a chapter in the ANCLUC report
and will provide information for subsequent decisions.
Task H. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting. The Consultant will
hold a Planning Advisory Committee Meeting to present the findings
and analysis of the previous tasks. The Consultant will utilize
graphs, charts, illustrations and slides as necessary. A thorough
discussion of the findings, their significance and effect on future
work tasks will be presented at the meeting. Concurrence of the
working papers and findings will be an objective of the meeting.
Element Five/NOISE ABATEMENT ALTERNATIVE AND PROCEDURES DEVELOPMENT
Task A. Identify Potential Noise Abatement Alternatives. In this
task, alternative airport operational and facility scenarios will
be examined. They may include alternative airport development plans
as well as noise abatement procedures. .The product of this task will
•
•
•
be noise contours for each of the selected alternatives. Alterna-
tive operational procedures that may be considered for analysis in-
clude runway extension and displaced thresholds; preferential runway
system; departure and arrival route modification; restrictions on
operations; night curfew; quieter aircraft fleet mix; and additional
runway construction.
Noise abatement procedures at Drake Field that will be analyzed
include reduced thrust departures; profile decent; and preferential
flight tracks. Analysis of each noise abatement procedure will in-
clude not only the noise impact, but will also consider the feasi-
bility of applying the procedure at Drake Field and its potential
effects on fuel consumption and air traffic control.
Task B. Demand/Capacity Analysis. Based on an analysis of the
existing airports surrounding the City of Fayetteville, the service
area of Drake Field will be identified. Existing capacities of the
various airport facilities will be compared with the forecast avia-
tion demand in order to form a basis for theoretical development of
facilities at Drake Field. With the establishment of a service area,
the aviation demand centers within the service area will be identified
based on population centers, based aircraft, and commercial and in-
dustrial centers.
Task C. Facilities Requirements Determination. In accordance with
the aviation demand forecasts, aircraft types and operational re-
quirements, and established facility standards, the Consultant will
establish and document facility requirements for both airside (number,
type, spacing and amount of facilities needed including runways,
taxiways, NAVAIDS and approaches, lighting and appropriate land area
needs) and landside (number, type amount, and nature of aprons,
automobile parking, access roads, terminal building, and the appro-
priate land area needed for such facilities) activities.
Task D. Develop Alternative Facilities Modifications. The Consul-
tant will identify and select particular facility modification alter-
natives These alternatives will be closely coordinated with both
the FAA and the City, and their concurrence and approval will be
necessary before proceeding to additional tasks. The results of
this task will be closely coordinated with the efforts especially
related to the development of the Drake Field Development Plan.
Task E. Develop Alternative Operational Modifications. The Con-
sultant will identify and select particular operational modification
alternatives. These alternatives will be closely coordinated with
both the FAA and the City, and their concurrence and approval will
be necessary before proceeding to additional tasks.
Task F. Develop Noise Contours for Alternate Scenarios. As out-
lined in Task A above, the Consultant will generate noise contours
for each of the selected operational and facility modification alter-
natives, with a maximum of five (5) contours generated.
6
•
Task G. Evaluate Noise Impacts of Alternate Scenarios. Based on the
generated noise contours, and the land use and population analysis
performed in previous tasks, the impacts associated with each
alternative will be analyzed to minimize the total number of
scenarios evaluated.
Task H. Evaluate and Select Alternate Scenaries. Based on the above
information, the optimum operational and facility midifications will.
be selected. This may result from the alternative scenarios
identified above, but more likely from a combination of those
identified. This will be closely coordinated with the City of
Fayetteville and the FAA to ensure concurrence and approval.
Task I. Identify Recommended Noise Abatement Procedures. As a result
of the previous tasks and discussion with the various groups involved,
the recommended noise abatement prodecures will be identified. This
will include both operational and facility modifications and procedures.
Task J. Develop Noise Abatement Procedure Working Paper. The
Consultant will develop a detailed working paper describing the
alternative scenarios outlined above and the recommended noise
abatement procedures. The technical portions of the paper will be
in terms which are easily understandable to the layman. The
working paper will be considered a draft of a chapter of the Study
document and will provide information for subsequent decisions.
Task K. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting. The Consultant will
hold a Planning Advisory Committee meeting to present the findings
and analyses of the previous tasks. The Consultant will utilize
graphs, charts, illustrations and slides as necessary. A thorough
discussion of the findings, their significance and effect on
future work will be presented at the meeting. Concurrence of the
working paper and its findings will be an objective of the meeting.
Element Six/STUDY AREA COMPATIBILITY RECOMMENDATIONS
Task A. Develop Land Use Compatibility Map and Matrix. The Consultant
will develop a detailed matrix identifying compatible land uses
within each of the noise contours generated for the selected
alternatives. The map and matrix will identify areas of incompati-
bility, marginal compatibility, and compatibility. The map will
also identify noise sensitive uses within each contour.
Task B. Identify and Evaluate Areas of Incompatible Land Use. Based
on input from previous elements and from Task A. above, the Consultant
will evaluate areas of incompatible land use within each contour.
These are incompatible areas which will still be present off airport
after all efforts have been made by the City and which will require
coordinated efforts with other areas of government other than the
airport.
Task C. Formulate Environs Land Use Recommendations. Final off -
airport environs land use recommendations will be made so as to
minimize land use impacts as a resultof the optimum modifications
selected previously. This environs land use recommendation will
be based on both existing and future feasible land use development.
Task D. Identify and Evaluate Initial Land Use Controls. The
Consultant, based on information and findings from Tasks II. A.
and IV. A., will identify the strengths and weaknesses of existing
land use controls to assist in implementing the recommended environs
land use plan outlined above.
Task E. Recommend Land Use Controls and Regulatory Mechanisms.
The Consultant will recommend existing and possible innovative land
use controls and regulatory mechanisms to ensure the implementation
of the recommended environs land use plan. Mechanisms to be
considered would include zoning, subdivision regulations, building
codes, airport noise zoning, noise easements, among others. These
controls and mechanisms will be coordinated with the City of
Fayetteville and the FAA. These will also be coordinated with
the Northwest Arkansas Regional Planning Commission and evaluated as
to their compatibility with regional plans.
Task F. Prepare Environs Land Use Plan. The Consultant will prepare
an environs land use plan in graphic form to represent the
recommendations, determined above. The map will depict land use
zones as determined by noise contours and the recommended uses
within each zone.
Task G. Develop Working Paper on Compatibility Recommendations.
The Consultant will develop a working paper on the recommended
environs land use plan and regulatory controls and mechanisms The
working paper will be considered a draft of a chapter of the Study
document and will provide information for subsequent decisions.
Element Seven/PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Task A. Formulate Operational Implementation Strategies. The
Consultant, in concurrence with theCity of Fayetteville and the
FAA, will formulate operational implementation strategies to
achieve the optimum operational modifications selected in previous
tasks.
Task B. Formulate Facility Implementation Strategies. The Consultant,
in concurrence with the City of Fayetteville and the FAA, will
formulate facility implementation strategies to achieve the optimum
facility modifications selected in previous tasks.
Task C. Formulate a.Land Use Implementation Monitoring System. This
task will involve the formulation of a land use implementation
monitoring system which will monitor land use changes, zoning amend-
ments and other regulatory changes. A system to ensure communication
between the airport staff, the City of Fayetteville, airport users,
8
•
•
the public, affected communities, public officials and agencies,
and the FAA will be established. This system can also function as
a noise complaint file and citizen grievance system.
Task D. Develop a Role and Responsibility Program and Matrix for
Implementation. The Consultant will develop a matrix which will
indicate the roles and responsibilities of each interest group,
governmental agency or airport user in the implementation of land
use controls, operational modifications and facility modifications.
The Consultant will formulate a program which outlines the roles and
responsibilities for different governmental units and agencies,
as to their role in implementing the regulatory controls. This
program will also outline the role of the airport and airport users
in implementing operational modifications.
Task E. Develop Implementation Schedule of Noise Abatement Program.
The Consultant will develop an implementation schedule for noise
abatement which will indicate both immediate, short-range implemen-
tation procedures and long-term implementation procedures. As some
operational and facility modifications are dependent upon each other,
and some land use controls will take time to formulate and implement,
a time constraint and sequence schedule will be necessary to help
monitor implementation progress.
Task F. Develop Working Paper on Implementation and Management
Program. The Consultant will develop a working paper utilizing
output from the tasks described above for this element. This working
paper will be considered a draft of a chapter of the Study document.
Task G. Airport Layout Plan. The existing airport layout plan
shall be updated in accordance with the findings, recommendations
and approvals resulting from this study. The ALP will depict the
configuration and general dimensioning of the initial and proposed
airport facilities. The Airport Layout Plan will continue to include:
1) Airport Layout; 2) Location Map; 3) Vicinity May; 4) Basic Data
Table; and 5) Wind Information. Each of these components of the
Airport Layout Plan will contain the information as required in FAA
Advisory Circular 150/5070-6.
Task H. Approach and Clear Zone Plan. The Approach and Clear Zone
Plan shall be updated in accordance with the findings, recommendations
and approvals resulting from this study. This drawing supplements
information on the Airport Layout Plan.
Task I. Airport Access and Terminal Area Plans. Based on future
airfield configuration, landside facility locations and necessary
internal roadways will be updated in accordance with the findings,
recommendations and approvals and indicated on the Airport Layout
Plan. Based on the ALP and major existing and proposed transportation
systems, appropriate routing modifications shall be recommended.
This plan will be fully coordinated with all appropriate area
transportation studies and entities. The Consultant will prepare an
9
•
•
•
overall plan for the terminal facilities area, generally comprised
of terminal buildings, hangars for storage and maintenance of aircraft
and apron areas. While the general configuration and location of
these facilities will be a part of the Airport Layout Plan, the
Consultant will prepare specific recommendations for internal
circulation, parking and other site amenities for purposes of
enhancing the practical, operational and aesthetic aspects of the
airport and its environs. The plan will be based on internal roadway
systems and external access routes to and from the airport.
Transportation recommendations will be coordinated with all appropriate
entities and studies.
Task J. Schedules and Cost Estimates of Development Plan. The
Consultant, with the assistance of appropriate officials, will
prepare a schedule of proposed development. The stages will be in
5, 10 and 20 -year phases, with the first five-year period being by
single year activities. Cost estimates, based on current dollars, of
facility requirements will be prepared for the first five-year
period; a more generalized cost greakdown consolidating like items
of work will be prepared for the 10 -year period; and an operational
facility breakdown will be prepared for the 20 -year period.
Task K. Financial Program. After development of the plan with the
list of facility requirements during which alternatives for providing
needed facilities were evaluated from both practical and cost
standpoints, an evaluation of the economic feasibility of accomplishing
actions recommended or portrayed by the plan will be made by
comparing the cost of improvements with the amount of annual revenues
expected from the completed facilities or the anticipated benefits to
be realized by the community from the airport. Basically, this
involves making a determination for each development period whether
airport user revenues, plus estimated federal, state and local
financial assistance, will be sufficient to offset the cost of
capital investments plus annual administrative, operating revenues
to defray the cost, the scope and phasing of improvements will be
reanalyzed and revised to assure feasibility of the plan.
An airport improvement financing plan will be prepared for use in
providing funds for capital expenditures (including land acquisition)
needed to implement the plan. Both -local funding resources and
grant programs will be recommended as methods of financing.
Task L. Planning Advisory Committee Meeting. The Consultant will
hold a Planning Advisory Committee meeting to present the findings
and analysis of the previous tasks. The Consultant will utilize
graphs, charts, illustrations and slides as necessary. A thorough
discussion of the entire study will be conducted at this point and
any necessary corrections made to previous working papers will be
made. From this meeting, the final report will be prepared in
draft form.
10
Task M. Conduct Public Information Meeting. A public information
meeting will be conducted to present the various proposals and
recommendations of the study to the community. Presentation material
will be prepared which adequately illustrates and which will be
directed toward assuring an understanding of the study findings on
the part of the public.
Element Eight/DOCUMENTATION
Task A. Draft Report. The Consultant will prepare a Draft ANCLUC
Study and Development Plan report essentially similar to the final
report although no color will be used. This will be for review and
comment only and not intended for distribution to the general public.
Twenty (20) copies shall be printed.
Task B. Final Report. The Consultant will prepare a final report
of the findings of the Drake Field Noise Control and Land Use
Compatibility Study and Development Plan. This report will include
both narrative and graphics. Although by its nature the ANCLUC
Study and Development Plan report is technical in scope, the report
will be written so as the general public can understand and use it.
Thirty (30) copies shall be prepared.
Task C. Summary Brochure. The Consultant will prepare a summary
brochure of the Study and Plan, highlighting the Noise Abatement Plan.
The brochure will be a one page folded document, black and one color
if appropriate, intended for public distribution to promote
understanding of the airport. Two hundred (200) copies shall be
prepared.
Task D. Reproducible Drawings. Reproducible drawings will be
prepared of the Airport Layout Plan, the Approach and Clear Zone
Plan and the Height Zoning Map and furnished to the Sponsor.
11