Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout17-70 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. /7- 70 ;s i f s I WHEREAS, the' -Board of -Directors of the:City of. Fayetteville, Arkansas, a municipal -corporation, did cause studies+to'be made of the needs for street improvement to Crestwood Drive from East Ridge- way to West Ridgeway, and i,, • i � n WHEREAS, pursuant to the�aboveEdescribed studies the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, has received from the City Manager certain findings and determinations, which findings and determinations are as follows, to -wit: REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT OF Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to West Ridgeway 1. In accordance with Resolution passed and approved by the Board of Directors on May 4, 1970, the City Manager was authorized to perform studies for the improvement of Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to West Ridgeway. These instructions required a report to be made to the Board of Directors containing the following listed data: A. Determination of necessary improvements. B . Determination of the approximate cost of said improvements. C. The means available for financing same. D . The portion thereof which the municipality is willing and able to to pay. E . The approximate assessment which would be made against each lot or parcel of property. 2. The proposed street improvement project should include complete street reconstruction on Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to West Ridgeway. Necessary improvements include excavation of the existing pavement; construction of base to meet current City standards; repaving with two (2) inches of hot mix asphalt materials, twenty- six (26) feet wide; installation of curbs and gutters; and in- stallation of a sidewalk. 3. The total estimated project cost for street reconstruction on Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to West Ridgeway is $31,709.00. • 4. It is proposed that the City would pay $15,000.00 of the project cost with an assessment of $16,709..00 being levied against the real property benefited by the proposed improvements to reimburse the City for a portion of'the'cost of the improvements. 5. It is proposed that the property owner(s) be given a choice of paying the assessments levied in a lump sum payable within thirty (30) days after the completion of the proposed improvements, or in ten (10) equal annual installments bearing interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum. If the property owner(s) choose(s) the installment method of payment, the first installment shall be collected on or before October 1, 1970. Second and subsequent installments shall be paid at the time provided by law for paying the final installment of general taxes on the property. 6. The approximate assessments which would be made against each lot or parcel of property are as follows: APPROXIMATE ASSESSMENT TRACT Lot 17, Block 2, Lot 11, Block 1, Lot 12, Block 1, Lot 16, Block 2, Lot 15, Block 2, Lot 13, Block 1, Lot 14, Block 2, Lot 14, Block 1, Lot 13, Block 2, Lot 15, Block 1, Lot 16, Block 1, Lot 12, Block 2, Lot 17, Block 1, Lot 18, Block 1, Lot 19, Block 1, Lot 11, Block 2, B roadview Broadview Broadview B roadview Broadview B roadview Broadview Broadview Broadview B roadview B roadview B roadview B roadview B roadview Broadview Broadview Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision S ubdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision S ubdivision S ubdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision $440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 440 572 440 528 660 462 TRACT Lot 1, Block 2, Lot 1, Block 1, Lot 2, Block 1, Lot 3, Block 1, Lot 4, Block 1, Lot 5, Block 1, Lot 66, Block 1, Lot 2, Block -2, Lot 7, Block 1, Lot 20, Block ?, Lot 8, Block 1, Lot 9, Block 1, Lot 19, Block 2, Lot 18, Block 2, Lot 10, Block 1, B roadview B roadview Broadview B roadview Broadview Broadview B roadview B roadview Broadview B roadview Broadview Broadview Broadview Broadview B roadview Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision S ubdivision Subdivision S ubdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision Subdivision S ubdivision S ubdivision Subdivision APPROXIMATE ASSESSMENT $2,079 1,276 440 440 44o 44o 440 440 440 660 352 440 440 440 440 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that said municipality indicates the desire to undertake the above described improvements provided the owners of a majority in value of the real estate to be assessed agree to repay said municipality the portion of the cost described above through uniform assessed benefits upon each lot or parcel of property described above. PASSED AND APPROVED this • ATTEST: Marilyn Moo e, City Cler day of %"/144-1 , 1970. Garland Melton Jr., May RY.SOLDrlON NO. 17-70 WREREAR• the Board. of. Directors of the City, of Fayetteville. A r k a n- ' ean a mwidpel corporation, did cause 'Z: Studies to he mese of the needs for ,street Improvement to Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to West Ridgeway Una 1 tNIEREAd pursuant to 'the shote-de- strlbed Studies the Boats of Directors of.. the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, has re cNved from the City Manager certainff findings land determinations. which find - inn and detemilnnbons • are as follows, towit. ' t RPPORt.' ON VMPROVEMENr OF ' gREITiWOOD DRIVE FROM EAST : RIDGEWAY. ID WEST RIDGEWAY 7. pi accordance with Resolution passed and arthropod by the Board of Directors ontMap''.4 1970, the City Manager was authorized' to perform studies for the im- hMrerisent -of :Crestwood Drive from Eart'IRIdgewav la Rest Ridgeway.' tIMtrilmlons required a report to he ade' to the Baird of Directors to$teining the following listed data: 1 1 A. Delermmatim of necestery ithprove. meats. H. Dete minatI t. of .ethe- appracimate Mat pf- said_ improvements. C..Tbe means • available for financing tees. D. me' porde, thereof witch the mu- nidpsaty ap SHIM and able to pay. E. The approximate assessment wild, *mild be made slant each lot or parcel or Monett'. an.. " 2 3be Dropnsed street Improvement pdyloct ,should Inetuda complete street recunxtrudind on Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to -Wert Ridgeway. Necea. carp• improveMente Include excavation of the existing .pavement:"bonnWetion of base to meet Current•eity standards; reposing with two (21 laches of hot mix asphalt materials, twenty-six (23) feet wide: Installation of curbs and gutters; and installation of a sidewalk. e . . 3. The total estimated project cost for • Street reconstruction . M Creestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to Welt Ridgeway is $3L709.60. / 4. It is proposed that the City would Pay $18000.00 of the prated Cost with an assessment of $167m.00 being levied against -the real property benefited by the proposed `improvements to re1m- buree the Cit-v.tpr e,•portlw of the cost of the Pnprovements:', S. It is proposed' that the property owner(s1 bejgivenia i choice at Paving the assessments in a lump sum payable within thirty, C,0l, dera:after the comple- tion .ot the .yr.yppeed,i9niprovementa, or in ten (10)x/ egpat annual"instznments bearing ljntMrt:ekeIhe Irate cl'ten .per cent perionift4if the s owner(.) ehot.esral ,&JW 5Staltritett nettled af'pgv- ment rthi rtUf titilaalnt shall be Col- lected osi ri beforeOctdber L 1870. Ree ono enlaetWa *utet,',fn�erthrtenta Shall be I 41 • STATE of ARKANSAS County of Washington Jr SS. hereby certify that I am the (Gene l�tl Manager) of THE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES, a daily newspaper having a second class mailing privilege, and being not less than four pages of five columns each, published at a fixed place of business and at a fixed (daily) intervals continuously in the City of Fayetteville, County of Washington, Arkansas for more than a period of twelve months, circulated and distributed from an established place of business to subscribers and readers generally of all classes in the City & County for a definite price for each copy, or a fixed price per annum, which price was fixed at what is considered the value of the publication, based upon the news value and service value it contains, that at least fifty percent of the subscribers thereto have paid cash for their subscriptions to the newspaper or its agents or through recognized news dealers over a period of at least six months; and that the said newspaper publishers an average of more than forty percent news matter. I further certify that the legal notice hereto attached in the matter of was published in the regular daily issue of said newspaper for__. consecutive insertions as follows: The first insertion on the ____"___ -L c - day of 19-20 the second insertion on the the third insertion on the day of -- — 19 and the fourth insertion on the Sworn to and subscribed before me on this My Commission Expires: 4972' Fees for Printing —__ $____ 1/7.5 1day of —__ -bate __ 19__ 19__7 d Nota Public Cost of Proof Total ___— $_ t r •a L-Nar iec 7 • y i ?,4' •• 4' :'ii or.„,r = ^. y Raid et the 'time provided by law for paylog the Mal tneMliment of general taxes on the property. t me approximate asaesameaI, which would be made against Bich lot er nor - .0014 of sat'e' ' Twp aGIgi( rPA°A w^Irnunsinent Lot 17, Block A Broadview r Subdivision' '- S 5440 Lot 11. Block 1, Broadview •SdbdliSian .,.f 4+1740 Int 12. 'Bloat L Broadview - ret s+,tf 8obdtvtslon-.'we . 1 Ilio Int 18, Bioek t Broadview • - sea • Subdivision rip Int '15,- Block I, Btdedaiew Subdivision 440 Int 13, Block.1,.Broadvlew Subdivision' +a' - e' 410 Lot 4, Bieck 1, Laadnlew BubdlNslom...� .n• • 490 Lot 14. Block 1, BrOedview Subditdsion , 440 Int 18.'Abet y;Bteedvdew w Subdivision • • ' A: J .:440 Lot 15, Block L Brdedview I_Subdivision._ _ ,t -w. .440 '. Lot ttt Block 1, Broadview Lot 12, Blodf'7, Broadview,. SubdiNSlmi,w.. M✓.Y 572 Int 17, thief L Bioadview'24r4 M?; .y " Sdb8lvibfon e• -A 1 r ^n •i 440 Int 1&"Bioek L' Broadview SktiMvielan c at •i{+ SH tot '19,"Blatt L`rEroadolnv Alga SWAMI kin :wawa vnu:. vol +' (;€10 Let 11. Plonk 1, -Brdedview Subdivision �.. -,re.-h1" via 4d lot L Block,A' Broadilew a.i.. Snbdlvlabn. s,,,B o....2tA19 Lot 1. Block'L Broadview. -... Subdivision 1.575 Lot 1 Block -L' "Bteeaview l Tr° SubdiTisiein - LM 3,KBIo€Y.t Erotdvlew .• :. l90 -Subdivision.-'y-�r-e '*0x •S-� j Lot 4. Block L Brvdvleve . 1..x Subdivision -440 IA 5. Block I, Broadview Subdivision" ••.1 Int 6. Block 'L Broadview •• doe oie• 440 Subdivision! ..elfin 1;JAC'i, 440 Int . ?lock ,1, MrotdVietv.. Subdivision 4:f j i9` Lot 7, Block L Br d delete Lot /0, Moocn Si Brog4iiewt, ' ;`, MO IA, 9, Block I, Bioadvtw ria EubdlfWpo 't . yvlt'arB lire,' .&W Let 9. 13100k 1; Bmetivla ssy itssys-se: &Matinees',,,..ti'.s�..7J'�s.ry ,p 449. 5LAt W. Block t,'U3mldview- 4 J Subdivision:...: `>e>!4; '_0...41 ,.4e Lot 11( Blatt A Br4edt tw � ' • 4,e.,, 4'• Subdivision ... c.o.; -:gee . .,..-1,. y9 1411'10. Block L Bmedylew.,. 4 :1 1 subdivision ms -e. : r' NOW, TIES,EPORE,:-rim IT. RE-• SOLVED by the Board cif -Direddra'o! the' City of Feyeueviile,'Arkensee: that maid municipality Indicates the desire le undertake the abovedeseribedcimpmve: mf teats provided the owners of a majority i la value at the real estate to belussemeed agree to repay said ratmidpebtythe portion . of the cost desthMed'• above thrones uniform assessed benefits upon each lot or parte! al proverb described above. PAthED - AND APPROVED this 18th day of'Mey. IMO. /a/ GARLAND MELTON, JR el r GARLAND MELON, JR, Mayor sJ MARILYN: / /s/ MMOOSE MARILYN MOORE. fkty Ole* 0