HomeMy WebLinkAbout17-70 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. /7- 70
;s i f s I
WHEREAS, the' -Board of -Directors of the:City of. Fayetteville,
Arkansas, a municipal -corporation, did cause studies+to'be made of
the needs for street improvement to Crestwood Drive from East Ridge-
way to West Ridgeway, and i,,
•
i
� n
WHEREAS, pursuant to the�aboveEdescribed studies the Board
of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, has received
from the City Manager certain findings and determinations, which
findings and determinations are as follows, to -wit:
REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT OF
Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to West Ridgeway
1. In accordance with Resolution passed and approved by the
Board of Directors on May 4, 1970, the City Manager was authorized
to perform studies for the improvement of Crestwood Drive from East
Ridgeway to West Ridgeway.
These instructions required a report to be made to the Board of
Directors containing the following listed data:
A. Determination of necessary improvements.
B . Determination of the approximate cost of said improvements.
C. The means available for financing same.
D . The portion thereof which the municipality is willing and
able to to pay.
E . The approximate assessment which would be made against each
lot or parcel of property.
2. The proposed street improvement project should include complete
street reconstruction on Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to West
Ridgeway. Necessary improvements include excavation of the existing
pavement; construction of base to meet current City standards;
repaving with two (2) inches of hot mix asphalt materials, twenty-
six (26) feet wide; installation of curbs and gutters; and in-
stallation of a sidewalk.
3. The total estimated project cost for street reconstruction
on Crestwood Drive from East Ridgeway to West Ridgeway is $31,709.00.
•
4. It is proposed that the City would pay $15,000.00 of
the project cost with an assessment of $16,709..00 being levied
against the real property benefited by the proposed improvements
to reimburse the City for a portion of'the'cost of the improvements.
5. It is proposed that the property owner(s) be given a
choice of paying the assessments levied in a lump sum payable
within thirty (30) days after the completion of the proposed
improvements, or in ten (10) equal annual installments bearing
interest at the rate of ten per cent per annum. If the property
owner(s) choose(s) the installment method of payment, the first
installment shall be collected on or before October 1, 1970.
Second and subsequent installments shall be paid at the time
provided by law for paying the final installment of general taxes
on the property.
6. The approximate assessments which would be made against
each lot or parcel of property are as follows:
APPROXIMATE ASSESSMENT
TRACT
Lot 17, Block 2,
Lot 11, Block 1,
Lot 12, Block 1,
Lot 16, Block 2,
Lot 15, Block 2,
Lot 13, Block 1,
Lot 14, Block 2,
Lot 14, Block 1,
Lot 13, Block 2,
Lot 15, Block 1,
Lot 16, Block 1,
Lot 12, Block 2,
Lot 17, Block 1,
Lot 18, Block 1,
Lot 19, Block 1,
Lot 11, Block 2,
B roadview
Broadview
Broadview
B roadview
Broadview
B roadview
Broadview
Broadview
Broadview
B roadview
B roadview
B roadview
B roadview
B roadview
Broadview
Broadview
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
S ubdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
S ubdivision
S ubdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
$440
440
440
440
440
440
440
440
440
440
440
572
440
528
660
462
TRACT
Lot 1, Block 2,
Lot 1, Block 1,
Lot 2, Block 1,
Lot 3, Block 1,
Lot 4, Block 1,
Lot 5, Block 1,
Lot 66, Block 1,
Lot 2, Block -2,
Lot 7, Block 1,
Lot 20, Block ?,
Lot 8, Block 1,
Lot 9, Block 1,
Lot 19, Block 2,
Lot 18, Block 2,
Lot 10, Block 1,
B roadview
B roadview
Broadview
B roadview
Broadview
Broadview
B roadview
B roadview
Broadview
B roadview
Broadview
Broadview
Broadview
Broadview
B roadview
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
S ubdivision
Subdivision
S ubdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
Subdivision
S ubdivision
S ubdivision
Subdivision
APPROXIMATE ASSESSMENT
$2,079
1,276
440
440
44o
44o
440
440
440
660
352
440
440
440
440
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, that said municipality indicates the
desire to undertake the above described improvements provided the
owners of a majority in value of the real estate to be assessed agree
to repay said municipality the portion of the cost described above
through uniform assessed benefits upon each lot or parcel of property
described above.
PASSED AND APPROVED this
•
ATTEST:
Marilyn Moo e, City Cler
day of %"/144-1 , 1970.
Garland Melton Jr., May
RY.SOLDrlON NO. 17-70
WREREAR• the Board. of. Directors of
the City, of Fayetteville. A r k a n-
' ean a mwidpel corporation, did cause
'Z: Studies to he mese of the needs for
,street Improvement to Crestwood Drive
from East Ridgeway to West Ridgeway
Una 1
tNIEREAd pursuant to 'the shote-de-
strlbed Studies the Boats of Directors of..
the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, has re
cNved from the City Manager certainff
findings land determinations. which find -
inn and detemilnnbons • are as follows,
towit. ' t
RPPORt.' ON VMPROVEMENr OF
' gREITiWOOD DRIVE FROM EAST
: RIDGEWAY. ID WEST RIDGEWAY
7. pi accordance with Resolution passed
and arthropod by the Board of Directors
ontMap''.4 1970, the City Manager was
authorized' to perform studies for the im-
hMrerisent -of :Crestwood Drive from
Eart'IRIdgewav la Rest Ridgeway.'
tIMtrilmlons required a report
to he ade' to the Baird of Directors
to$teining the following listed data: 1
1 A. Delermmatim of necestery ithprove.
meats.
H. Dete minatI t. of .ethe- appracimate
Mat pf- said_ improvements.
C..Tbe means • available for financing
tees.
D. me' porde, thereof witch the mu-
nidpsaty ap SHIM and able to pay.
E. The approximate assessment wild,
*mild be made slant each lot or parcel
or Monett'. an..
" 2 3be Dropnsed street Improvement
pdyloct ,should Inetuda complete street
recunxtrudind on Crestwood Drive from
East Ridgeway to -Wert Ridgeway. Necea.
carp• improveMente Include excavation
of the existing .pavement:"bonnWetion
of base to meet Current•eity standards;
reposing with two (21 laches of hot mix
asphalt materials, twenty-six (23) feet
wide: Installation of curbs and gutters;
and installation of a sidewalk. e .
. 3. The total estimated project cost
for • Street reconstruction . M Creestwood
Drive from East Ridgeway to Welt
Ridgeway is $3L709.60. /
4. It is proposed that the City would
Pay $18000.00 of the prated Cost with
an assessment of $167m.00 being levied
against -the real property benefited by
the proposed `improvements to re1m-
buree the Cit-v.tpr e,•portlw of the cost
of the Pnprovements:',
S. It is proposed' that the property
owner(s1 bejgivenia i choice at Paving
the assessments in a lump sum payable
within thirty, C,0l, dera:after the comple-
tion .ot the .yr.yppeed,i9niprovementa, or
in ten (10)x/ egpat annual"instznments
bearing ljntMrt:ekeIhe Irate cl'ten .per
cent perionift4if the s owner(.)
ehot.esral ,&JW 5Staltritett nettled af'pgv-
ment rthi rtUf titilaalnt shall be Col-
lected osi ri beforeOctdber L 1870. Ree
ono enlaetWa *utet,',fn�erthrtenta Shall be
I 41
•
STATE of ARKANSAS
County of Washington Jr
SS.
hereby certify that I
am the (Gene l�tl Manager) of THE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES,
a daily newspaper having a second class mailing privilege, and being not
less than four pages of five columns each, published at a fixed place of
business and at a fixed (daily) intervals continuously in the City of
Fayetteville, County of Washington, Arkansas for more than a period
of twelve months, circulated and distributed from an established place of
business to subscribers and readers generally of all classes in the City
& County for a definite price for each copy, or a fixed price per annum,
which price was fixed at what is considered the value of the publication,
based upon the news value and service value it contains, that at least fifty
percent of the subscribers thereto have paid cash for their subscriptions
to the newspaper or its agents or through recognized news dealers over a
period of at least six months; and that the said newspaper publishers an
average of more than forty percent news matter.
I further certify that the legal notice hereto attached in the matter of
was published in the regular daily issue of said newspaper for__.
consecutive insertions as follows:
The first insertion on the ____"___ -L c - day of
19-20
the second insertion on the
the third insertion on the day of -- — 19
and the fourth insertion on the
Sworn to and subscribed before me on this
My Commission Expires:
4972'
Fees for Printing —__ $____ 1/7.5
1day of —__
-bate
__ 19__
19__7 d
Nota Public
Cost of Proof
Total ___— $_
t
r •a
L-Nar
iec
7 • y i
?,4' ••
4'
:'ii
or.„,r
=
^. y
Raid et the 'time provided by law for
paylog the Mal tneMliment of general
taxes on the property.
t me approximate asaesameaI, which
would be made against Bich lot er nor -
.0014 of sat'e' '
Twp aGIgi( rPA°A w^Irnunsinent
Lot 17, Block A Broadview r
Subdivision' '- S 5440
Lot 11. Block 1, Broadview
•SdbdliSian .,.f 4+1740
Int 12. 'Bloat L Broadview - ret s+,tf
8obdtvtslon-.'we . 1 Ilio
Int 18, Bioek t Broadview • - sea
• Subdivision rip
Int '15,- Block I, Btdedaiew
Subdivision 440
Int 13, Block.1,.Broadvlew
Subdivision' +a' - e' 410
Lot 4, Bieck 1, Laadnlew
BubdlNslom...� .n• • 490
Lot 14. Block 1, BrOedview
Subditdsion , 440
Int 18.'Abet y;Bteedvdew w
Subdivision • • ' A: J .:440
Lot 15, Block L Brdedview
I_Subdivision._ _ ,t -w. .440
'. Lot ttt Block 1, Broadview
Lot 12, Blodf'7, Broadview,.
SubdiNSlmi,w.. M✓.Y 572
Int 17, thief L Bioadview'24r4 M?; .y
" Sdb8lvibfon e• -A 1 r ^n •i 440
Int 1&"Bioek L' Broadview
SktiMvielan c at •i{+ SH
tot '19,"Blatt L`rEroadolnv Alga
SWAMI kin :wawa vnu:. vol +' (;€10
Let 11. Plonk 1, -Brdedview
Subdivision �.. -,re.-h1" via 4d
lot L Block,A' Broadilew a.i..
Snbdlvlabn. s,,,B o....2tA19
Lot 1. Block'L Broadview. -...
Subdivision 1.575
Lot 1 Block -L' "Bteeaview l Tr°
SubdiTisiein -
LM 3,KBIo€Y.t Erotdvlew .• :. l90
-Subdivision.-'y-�r-e '*0x •S-�
j Lot 4. Block L Brvdvleve . 1..x
Subdivision -440
IA 5. Block I, Broadview
Subdivision" ••.1
Int 6. Block 'L Broadview •• doe
oie• 440
Subdivision! ..elfin 1;JAC'i, 440
Int . ?lock ,1, MrotdVietv..
Subdivision 4:f j i9`
Lot 7, Block L Br d delete
Lot
/0, Moocn Si Brog4iiewt, ' ;`, MO
IA, 9, Block I, Bioadvtw ria
EubdlfWpo 't . yvlt'arB lire,' .&W
Let 9. 13100k 1; Bmetivla ssy itssys-se:
&Matinees',,,..ti'.s�..7J'�s.ry ,p 449.
5LAt W. Block t,'U3mldview- 4
J Subdivision:...: `>e>!4; '_0...41 ,.4e
Lot 11( Blatt A Br4edt tw � ' • 4,e.,,
4'• Subdivision ... c.o.; -:gee . .,..-1,. y9
1411'10. Block L Bmedylew.,. 4 :1 1
subdivision ms -e. : r'
NOW, TIES,EPORE,:-rim IT. RE-•
SOLVED by the Board cif -Direddra'o!
the' City of Feyeueviile,'Arkensee: that
maid municipality Indicates the desire le
undertake the abovedeseribedcimpmve:
mf teats provided the owners of a majority
i la value at the real estate to belussemeed
agree to repay said ratmidpebtythe
portion . of the cost desthMed'• above
thrones uniform assessed benefits upon
each lot or parte! al proverb described
above.
PAthED - AND APPROVED this 18th
day of'Mey. IMO.
/a/ GARLAND MELTON, JR el
r GARLAND MELON, JR, Mayor
sJ MARILYN:
/
/s/ MMOOSE
MARILYN MOORE. fkty Ole*
0