HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-69 RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION NO. S — 6
•
•
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas,
a municipal corporation, did cause studies to be made of the needs for. street
improvement to all of East and Block Avenues lying between the north boundary
of Meadow Street and the south boundary of Dickson Street including all property
abutting thereto which improvements consist of:
(1) Removal of existing curb and gutter.
(2) Excavate area from edge of existing pavement to
proposed curb line, 41 feet back to back, (or maximum possible).
(3) Construct new concrete curb and gutter joining
existing or repairable sidewalk.
(4) Install 8" crushed stone compacted base in
excavated area.
drainage iructture,
(5) Relocate all utilities, a c. , as ec e
(6) Prime, and pave to edge of gutters.
AND WHEREAS, pursuant to the above described studies the Board of
Directors of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, as received from John E.
Mahaffey & Associated, Inc., Consulting Engineers, certain findings and
determinations relating to said improvements which findings and determinations
are hereby adopted by said Board of Directors and which findings and determinations
are as follows, to -wit:
REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT OF STREETS
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS
PROPOSED FAYETTEVILLE STREET IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 60
I. GENERAL Sept. 1968
•
.�•t 4 $
In accordance with the instructions received from the City Board of
Directors, received by letter dated July 16, 1968, John E. Mahaffey and •
Associates, Incorporated, Consulting Engineers, Fayetteville, Arkansas,
was authorized to perform engineering studies for the improvement of
North Block Street and North East Street. 1 These improvements were to
be studied on each of the aforementioned streets from the intersection of
Meadow Street to the intersection of Dickson Street.
These instructions required a report to be made to the City Board
of Directors in twenty (20) copies and the report should contain the below
listed data.
1. Determination of the improvement necessary to
widen the streets noted in first paragraph above.
2. The widening of each street to be of approximately
the same width, retaining the existing sidewalks, if
at all possible.
3. Determine the approximate cost of these proposed
improvements including the relocation of public
utilities, various appurtenances such as parking
meters, signs, etc., engineering, and other related
costs.
•
•
Page #2 - Resolution
4. Determine the approximate cost of that which is to be
assessed against each parcel of property fronting on
the improvements.
In accordance with the aforementioned letter, it is our under-
standing that this project is to be authorized under provisions. of Act
251 of 1967, and that this firm will be employed to perform the detailed
engineering plans and specifications for this proposed project.
II. CONSIDERATIONS
As instructed in the letter of authorization delegating this firm
to perform the aforementioned street improvement project, the •
following guides and controlling factors were utilized to estimate
the construction costs, and other related costs, for this proposed
project.
1, The existing street width of North Block Street and North
East Street from Center Street to Meadow Street.
2. Utilization of existing sidewalks wherever possible.
3. Utilization of a minimum of two inches (2") of hot mix -
hot laid asphaltic concrete to provide a good, lasting
surface
Curb and gutter type edge rather, than a sidewalk with
vertical edge. A distance of 40' - 0" face to face of
curb proposed.
III. DESIGN CRITERIA
The design of this proposed street improvement project insofar
as that related to surfacing and side drainage will be in accordance
with the Standard Specifications for Highway Construction of the
Arkansas State Highway Department.
The prime and tack coats are proposed to be single applications
of bituminous material applied to the completed and approved base
course or on the existing pavement or bituminous surfacing. In
general, a medium curing cutback asphalt will be used for the prime
coat and a rapid curing cutback asphalt or emulsified asphalt will
be used for the tack coat. The asphaltic concrete hot mix surface
course shall be a compacted mixture of mineral aggregate and
asphaltic cement constructed ant completed base course or existing
bituminous surface. This surface is proposed to be a mixture of
Type 3 mineral aggregate (approximately 200 pounds per square yard)
and from 5% to 8% (by weight) of asphaltic cement.
IV. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS:
The total estimated project costs for Fayetteville Street Improvement
District No. 60 of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is as follows:
•
Page #3 - Resolution
Approx. Item Description
Item Quantity Complete in Place
•
•
Unit Cost Amount Estimated
1. 7900 S.Y. Hot -Mix Asphalt Paving $1.20 S.Y.
2. 1700 Tons Compacted Base(SB-2) 4. 50/Ton
3. 4500 Gals. Prime Coat (MC -1) 0.50 /Gal.
4. 3800 L.F. Con. Curb & Gutter 1. 75/L.F.
5. L.S. Water & Sewer Relocations
Estimated Construction Costs
Construction Contingencies (5%)
Engineering Costs (10%)
Legal and Administrative
Project Sub -Total
Less: City's Participation
(10%)
Less: Downtown Fayetteville
Unlimited, Inc. Contribution
$ 9,480.00
7,650.00
2,240.00
6,650.00
1,500.00
$27,530.00
1,370.00
2,750.00
2,750.00
$34,400.00
10, 500.00
5,000.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT FINANCING REQUIRED $18, 900.00
V. FINANCING
CERTIFIED CORRECT,
PLAN I
The proposed project funds to be provided are therefore $18, 900.00. If the
project can be funded by direct contribution on the basis of per front foot of adjoining
property the total cost would be approximately $5. 50 per front foot.' (3480 front feet).
PLAN II •
r
1. Assuming the proposed project funding is to be provided by issuance of
Street Improvement District Bonds, at a coverage factor 110% the bonds could be
amortized approximately as shown in the following schedule of conditions:
Interest Annual Prin. &
Principal Years Rate Interest Payment
$19,000 10 5% $2,700
19,000 20 5% 1,670
19,000 10 6% 2,850
19,000 20 6% 1,820
Annual Per Front
Foot Assessment
$ 0.78
0.48
0.82
0.53
2. Assuming he proposed project funding is to be proved by issuance of
Street Improvement Certificates of Indebtedness, at a coverage factor 110% the
Certificates of Indebtedness could be amortized approximately as shown in the
following schedule of conditions:
c
Np d-= i
•
•
Page #4 - Resolution
•
Interest Annual Principal Annual Assessment
Principal Period Rate and Interest Per Front Foot
$19,000.00 5 Yr. 7% $ 5,095.80 $ 1.47
19,000.00 10 Yr. 7% 2,973.50 0.86
19,000.00 15 Yr. 7% 2,293.30 0.66
19,000.00 5 Yr. 8% 5,234.50 1.51
19,000.00 10 Yr. 8% 3,114.10 0.90
19,000.00 15 Yr. 8% 2,441.50 0.71
VI.. SCHEDULE
Construction of this work can move rapidly and could be completed in May
or June of 1969 if so desired.
We have completed full-scale constructions urveys and drawings in order to
determine accurately the quantities and costs involved, and could complete the
needed details and be ready for bidding the project upon two (2) weeks notice to
proceed.
,
We see the project sequence as follows: :(1) iAn'abstractors •report of
property owners names and footages are needed in order to draw a property map;
(2) Preparation and circulation of a petition for signatures of the property owners;
(3) An abstractors certificate as to number and percentages of owners signing to
form said Improvement District; (4) Hearing and Court Order forming the district
and naming Commissioners; (5) Hiring of assessor, attorney and engineer to
proceed with proposed project; (6) Establishing of annual property owners assess-
ments for their approval; (7) Financing and funding of the project; (8) Completion
of plans, specifications, bidding, award, and construction of improvements.
AND WHEREAS, the making of such improvements is for the best interest of the
City of Fayetteville, and particularly for the best interest of that real estate abutting
East and Block Avenues lying between the north boundary of Meadow Street and the south
boundary of Dickson Street, all in the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED bythe Board of Directors of the City of
Fayetteville, Arkansas, that said municipality does hereby agree to make the above-
described improvements and to pay for the same out of funds available to said municipality
for such purposes provided the owners of that real estate abutting its portions lying
north of Meadow Street and south of Dickson Street, all in the City of Fayetteville,
Arkansas, agree to repay said municipality the cost of such improvements through
uniform and ad valorem assessments (according to value) upon each lot or parcel of•
property in the above -defined area.
ADOPTED this 3' 4ay of , , 1969.
ATTEST:
p YjCITY CLERK
RESOLUTION NO. 6-69
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of
the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, a
municipal corporation, did cause studies
to be made of the needs for street im-
provement to all of East and Block Av-
enues lying between the north boundary
of Meadow Street and the south bound-
ary of Dickson Street including all prop-
erty abutting thereto which improve-
ments consist of:
(1) Removal of existing curb and gut-
ter.
(2) Excavate area from edge of exist-
ing pavement to proposed curb
line, 41 feet back to back, (or
maximum possible).
(3) Construct new concrete curb and
gutter joining existing or repair-
able sidewalk.
(4) Install 8" crushed stone com-
pacted base in excavated area.
(5) Relocate alt utilities, drainage
structure, etc., affected.
(6) Prime, and nave to edge of gutters.
AND WHEREAS, pursuant to the
above described studies the Board of
Directors of the .City of Fayetteville, Ar-
kansas, as received front John E. Mahaf-
fey it Associated. Inc., Consulting En-
gineers. certain findings and determina-
tions relating to said improvements
which findings and determinations are
hereby adopted by said Board of Direc-
tors and which findings and determina-
tions are as follows, to -wit:
REPORT ON IMPROVEMENT
•
OF STREETS
ern or FAYETTF,VILI.E
FAYETTFAILLE, ARKANSAS
PROPOSED FAYETTEVILLE STREET
IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. All
I. GENERAL Sept. 1968
In accordance with the instructions re-
ceived front the City Board of Directors,
received by letter dated July 16, 1968,
John E. Mahaffey and Associated, Incor-
porated, Consulting Engineers, Fayette-
ville, Arkansas was authorized to per-
form engineering studies for the im-
provement of North Block Street and
North East Street. These improvements
were to 1* studied on each of the afore-
mentioned streets from the intersection
of Dickson Street.
These instructions required a report
to be made to the City Board of Direc-
tors in twenty (20) copies and the .re-
port should contain the below listed data.
1. Determination et the improvement
necessary to wide% the streets noted
in first paragraph above.
2. The widening of each street to $ ♦f
approximately the same width, at-
taining the existing sidewalks, if at
all possible.
3. Determining the approximate cost
of these proposed improvements in.,
chiding the relocation of public
utilities, various appurtenances such
as parking meters, signs, etc., en-
gineering, and other related costs.
4. Determine the approximate cost of
that which is to be assessed against
each parcel of property fronting on
the improvements.
In accordance with the aforementioned
letter, it is our understanding that this
project is to be authorized under provi-
sions of Act 251 of 1967, and that this
firm will 1* employed to perform the
detailed engineering plans and specifica-
tions for this proposed project.
II. CONSIDERATIONS
As instructed in the letter of authoriza-
tion delegating this firm to perform the
aforementioned street improvement proj-
ect, the following guides and nmitrolling
factors were utilized to estimate the con-
struction costs, and other related costs,
for this proposed project.
1. The existing street width of North
Block Street and North East Street
from Center Street to Meadow
Street.
2, Utilization of existing sidewalks
wherever possible.
3. Utilization of a minimum of two
inches (2" of hot mix -hot laid as-
phaltic concrete to provide a good,
lasting surface.
4. Curb and gutter type edge rather
than a sidewalk with vertical edges,
A distance of 40' - 0" face to face
of curb proposed.
•
STATE of ARKANSAS
County of Washington
Ss.
•
.
, hereby certify that I
am the ((;ienerj l Manager of THE NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES,
a daily newspaper having a second class mailing privilege, and being not
less than four pages of five columns each, published at a fixed place of
business and at a fixed (daily) intervals continuously in the City of
Fayetteville, County of Washington, Arkansas for more than a period
of twelve months, circulated and distributed from an established place of
business to subscribers and readers generally of all classes in the City
& County for a definite price for each copy, or a fixed price per annum,
which price was fixed at what is considered the value of the publication,
based upon the news value and service value it contains, that at least fifty
percent of the subscribers thereto have paid cash for their subscriptions
to the newspaper or its agents or through recognized news dealers over a
period of at least six months; and that the said newspaper publishers an
average of more than forty percent news matter.
I further certify that the legal notice hereto attached in the matter of
Resolution No. 5-69
was published in the regular daily issue of said newspaper for 1
araraitaili insertions as follows:
The first insertion on the
lith day of Mar ch 19 69
the second insertion on the
the third insertion on the
and the fourth insertion on the
day of 1:
day of 19______
day of ___ 19
('
ot.-1
I y �g
Sworn to and subscribed before me on this / day of
2frir
My Commission Expires:
Fees for Printing
Cost of Proof
19_.41 r
97g -
$47.13
$
Total _____Y $ik7_s-23_
_.(0z4 --,1,>•144€6
Nary Public
In. DESIGN CRITERIA street Sm -
The design of this proposed
street
project insofar as that related
to surfacing and side drainage will be in
accordance with the Standard Specifica-
tions for Highway' Construction of the
Arkansas State Highway Department.
The prime and tack coats are proposed
to 1* single applications of bituminous
material applied to the completed and
approved base course or on the existing
pavement or bituminous surfacing. In
general, a medium curing cutback as-
phalt will be used for
the
eprime asphalt oat
at
and a rapid curing cutback
emulsified asphalt will 1* used for the
tack coat. The asphaltic concrete hot mix
surface course shall be a compacted
mixture of mineral aggregate and as-
phaltic cement constructed en a com-
pleted base course or existing bituminous
surface. This surface is proposed to be
a mixture of Type 3 mineral aggregate
(approximately 200 ppunds per square
yard) and from 5% to 8% (by weight)
of asphaltic cement.
IV. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS:
The total estimated project costs for
Fayetteville Street Improvement District
No. 60 of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is as
follows:
Approx. Item DesertPtion
Complete In Place
7900 S.Y. Hot -Mix A sph aIt Paving
1700 Tons Compacted Base
(SB 2)
Knit Cost
Item Quantity 1.20 S.Y.
2. 4.50/Ton
1. $
3. 4500 Gals Prime Coat (MC -1) 0.50/Gal.
4. 3800 LFru ewette1.75/L.F.
5. Water Relocations
Estimated Construction Costs
Construction Contingencies (5 0)
Engineering Costs cirri
>
Legal and Administrative (10%)
Project Sub -Total
Less: City's Participation
Less: Downtown Fayetteville
Unlimited. Inc. Contribution
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT GEIRTkNANCING ,mD REQUIRED
JOHN E. MAHAFFEY, ARK
PLAN 1
The proposed project funds to be provided are therefore $18,900.00. If the
project can
be funded
totby direct contribution on the al cost would be approximatelys
asis of per front foot of ad-
joining property
per front foot. (3480)
front feet). PLAN II
1. Assuming the proposed project funding is to be providedthe
by ndssucanc be
of
Street Improvement District Bonds, at a coverage factor 110%
amortized approximately as shown in the following schedule of Mnl Asressmest
Interest • Annual Principal Per Frost Ft
Tears Rate and Interest
10 5% $2,700 0 $ 0.788
1,670
33 5% 2,850 0.82
0.58
F. FINANCING
Amount Esdmated
$ 9,480.00
7,650.00
2,240.00
6,650.00
1,500.00
$27,530.00
1,370.00
2,750.00
2,750.00
$34,400.00
10,500.00
5,000.00
$18,900.00
. P.E. No. 841
Principal
$19,000
19,000
19,000 10 6r, ,
19,000 20
2. Assuming the proposed project funding is to be proved by issuance
of
Street Improvement Certificates of Indebtedness, at a coverage factor 110%
Cer-
tificates the of Indebtedness could be amortized approximately es shown in the follow-
ing schedule of conditions:
Interest Annual Prindpal Annual Assessment
Front Foot
PtindPer
pal Period Rate and Interest $1.47
66
1 ,000.00 10 Yr,
5 Yr. $ 5,095.80
$19,000.00 7% 2,973.50 0.86
19,000.000.96
15 Yr, 2.293.30 1.51
19,000.00 5 Yr. 8% 5,234.50 0.90
19,000.00 10 Yr. 8% 3,114.10 0.71
19,000.00 15 Yr. 8% 2,44L50
Construction of this work can move rapidly and could be completed in VI. SCHEDULE
May
or June of 1969 if so desired.
We have completed full-scale construction surveys and drawings in order
to determine accurately the quantities and costs involved, and could complete
the needed details and be ready for bidding the project upon two (2) weeks notice
We see the project sequence as follows: (1) An abstractors report oto proceed.
prop-
erty owners names and footages are needed in order to draw a propertyown-
(2) preparation and circulation of a petition for signatures of the propertying; (3) An abstractorsImcertificate as to number Improvement District; (4) Hearing da d Court geOrder forming s of owners sign-
ing
ing to farm namingaid Co Hiring
eer
to proceed andwithproposed Commissioners; %(6) )Establiishiingaof sannual ttproperty owner
Project;
as-
sessments for their approval; (7) Financing and funding of the project (8) Com-
pletion of plans, specifications, bidding, award, and construction of improvements.
AND WHEREAS, the making of such improvements is for the best interest
of the c'ty of Fayetteville, and particularly for the best interest of that real estate
abutting East and Block Avenues lying between the north boundary of Meadow
Street and the south boundary of Dickson Street, all in the City d Fayetteville,
Arkansas. Board of Directors of the
NOW THEREFORE, BE TT RESOLVED by
City of Faprtteville, Arkansas, that said municipality does hereby agree to make
the above-described improvements and to
provided pay
the owners of that real estate
or the same out of funds available
to said municipality for such purposes
abutting its portions lying north of Meadow Street and south id of�� on Street.
et
all in the City of Fayetteville. Arkansas. agree to repay
the
cost
to value) improvements
ea h 1lot or parcel uniform through oropertyand $ Inthevalorem
area
ADOPTED this 3rd day AFebry
GRLND MELTON, JR., Mayor
ATTEST:
Marilyn Moore, City Clerk 11 ltc