The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016-07-25 - Agendas - Final CITY OF Fay -y� l'I'l� AGENDA ARKNSAS Final Agenda Planning Commission Meeting July 25, 2016 5:30 PM 113 W. Mountain, Room 219 Members: Kyle Cook (Chair), Ron Autry (Vice Chair), Matthew Hoffman (Secretary), Tracy Hoskins, Janet Selby, Ryan Noble, Tom Brown, Leslie Belden, and Allison Thurmond Quinlan. City Staff: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director; Jonathan Curth, Senior Planner; Quin Thompson, Planner; Harry Davis, Planner Call to Order Roll Call Consent 1. Approval of the minutes from the July 11, 2016 meeting. Old Business None New Business 2. VAR 16-5502: Variance (EAST END OF CEDAR RIDGE RD./STRIEGLER, 205): Submitted by JOGENSEN &ASSOCIATES, INC. for property located at the EAST END OF CEDAR RIDGE RD. The property is in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA and contains approximately 8.64 acres. The request is for a variance to minimum street frontage requirements in the Fayetteville Planning Area. Planner: Quin Thompson 3. ADM 16-5514: Administrative Item (1503 N. GARLAND AVE./ROTH CUP 14-4722 EXTENSION, 404): Submitted by BAUMANN & CROSNO, INC. for property located at 1503 N. GARLAND AVE. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.18 acres. The request is for a second extension for CUP 14- 4722. Planner: Quin Thompson 4. ADM 16-5539: Administrative Item (MINIMUM STREET STANDARDS CHAPTER 6 AMENDMENT/PAVEMENT STRUCTURE & MATERIALS): Submitted by ALDERMAN MATTHEW PETTY for an amendment to the Minimum Street Standards Manual. The request is to modify CHAPTER 6, PAVEMENT STRUCTURE & MATERIALS to allow allows to be constructed of gravel in certain circumstances. Alderman: Matthew Petty Mailing Address: 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gav Fayetteville, AR 72701 4. RZN 16-5483: Rezone (NE CORNER OF MORNINGSIDE & 15TH ST./RAUSCH COLEMAN 564): Submitted by RAUSCH-COLEMAN, INC. for property at the NE CORNER OF MORNINGSIDE & 15TH ST. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 36.00 acres. The request is to rezone the property to NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION, subject to a Bill of Assurance. Planner: Quin Thompson 5. VAR 16-5507: Variance (NW CORNER OF FLORIDA WAY & CATO SPRINGS RD./LOTS 3- 18-BUNGALOWS AT CATO SPRINGS, 600): Submitted by BATES & ASSOCIATES, INC. for property located at the NW CORNER OF FLORIDA WAY & CATO SPRINGS RD. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is for a variance to Streamside Protection Ordinance. Engineer: Alan Pugh The following items have been approved administratively by staff: x LSP 16-5486: Lot Split (109 S. GRAHAM AVE./NETTLESHIP DEVELOPMENT, 521): Submitted by BLEW &ASSOCIATES, INC. for property located at 109 S. GRAHAM AVE. The property is zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.20 acres. The request is to split the parcel into 2 lots containing approximately 0.10 acres each. Planner: Harry Davis Announcements Adjourn NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE: All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. If you wish to address the Planning Commission on an agenda item please queue behind the podium when the Chair asks for public comment. Once the Chair recognizes you,go to the podium and give your name and address.Address your comments to the Chair, who is the presiding officer. The Chair will direct your comments to the appropriate appointed official, staff, or others for response. Please keep your comments brief, to the point, and relevant to the agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak. Interpreters or TDD, Telecommunication Device for the Deaf, are available for all public hearings; 72 hour notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter, please call 575-8330. As a courtesy please turn off all cell phones and pagers. A copy of the Planning Commission agenda and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the office of City Planning (575-8267), 125 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. 2 CITY OF Ta i'i'le MINUTES ARKANSAS 5:30 PM, Kyle Cook �f' �GIeY w Ali EV some D E SIRS* HNNOMW WW hEMW ®EY 0w 8PS PEW Mw1' 49W MFW Mailing Address: Planning Commission 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville Jul,yy 25,em 1 Fayetteville, AR 72701 ,2016 Item 1 Y July 11,2016 Minutes Page 1 of 7 ❑ ❑❑ ease®mm®o ®®❑❑®m®m❑am®■mom❑❑ Donn 4m®❑ ❑ ■ ❑ a❑ an ❑ ®❑ M® 0 0❑ ED ❑ a■ a ❑ ❑ 6❑ ❑❑ ❑ o 11 m❑ ®® ❑ ® ®❑o 0 EU ❑ o ® ❑ o ❑ ❑ 0 0 ❑ 111 Planning Commission July$,2016 Agenda Item 1 July 11,2016 Minutes Page 2 of 7 ®®666®®2❑ ®6❑ 81190066OEMO ®®mm® 0 6® ® ❑ 6❑ ❑❑ ®❑ 6® ❑❑ ME Ell 11 ❑ ® 0 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ o o ■ 11 H ■= ❑ o ® ❑ ❑ ❑ m® MM 0 ELI ❑ ❑ 11 0 Planning Commission July,2016 Agenda Item 1 July 11,2016 Minutes Page 3 of 7 0 0 ❑ ❑ EM °�❑®m❑ ®A®®❑e■o 0 f❑ ❑ ®❑ 11 ® o ® ❑ 0 0 ❑ o 0 Ell Planning Commission July$,2016 Agen a Item 1 July 11,2016 Minutes Page 4 of 7 ❑ ❑ ® ❑ EM MM&7? »»???>?»> ?>?>? >?>? o ??>>?> » >?>? 171m, R»?>?>?»? MESS? »?MEM ??? MM=ES? SSSS SSSS SSSS ??? 777777 SSSS?? SSSS o MMES .? ?? »W12121??? ??? o ???SEAT ??? M??????? MMMMMMSMM SSSS?? URRVE??? ?? ??SEEN ?MUSS ??? RINSOMMITIP9 PRIPITUVEI ?? IS M777FFF ??? ??? [AMM1221111121 ?? SSSS? o ??????????? ????????? ??? ??????? ?????»»»> SSSS? REM SSSS??? ?? ??? o SSSS?? .? o o SSSS? ?? SSSS? SSSS?? m?????? Elmo ??? MESS? SSSS?? 0?T??? SSSS? ?R????R?? 11110?M ?? SSSS??? 010??? >??I ??? ??7? ?E??I ?E ??? 110??=7 ??? ??7 M?W71 ???= 070 ?? ROWS? SSSS >??W???? ?? ?E MAPIPI >?? MOM MPITFI »?????A? >???? 000 ????? RUVRINA1171217PI SSSS? SSSS ?? ??? SSSS ?? ??? M??????? SSSS SSSS? ??? ????? 0?07M 777777 y0 1y E1E11E137 REDEEMER 0yy ?010 Mh 77777 7701000 777000?77777 777??1y?? ??? 777770100 ?? 00 y?777?? 0100 7777? y0?? 11 000000 00?10 01y0?? ??777 0000?? 77777 1y ?1y 001 REIMIMPI y????? 00 REMPI 7?1y0y?? yy0 701y0y0?y7 PJAMPEI 0000 ?10100 ??1y 77777 TEMPEVIAMPI P077MIPIPIPI 7777 77 77777 7777 77 777777 777777 77777 77 0 0 01701 0y 0101yE001 0000 y0 110 1yE0101 Emmy 01yyy01y00 7777? ??777707 10 MENIMM07 7777??7777 777 77 777 7777 Evow y0M 7100?7777777 0?777 0010 PJAPEVI 0y 21 010110 0? AMAMP U 0y M 101001? 77777777777 77 777 77777 77 777 7777777777 7777777777 770 0777 77777770 777 7777? 77 777 00yyyEyy01 010 000 0100070 1y 00117 1y?1y0?7 0y?10 REOPI y?77777?777 7777 77777 7777 777 yE11E 77777777777 777777 777777777070 17771 0071 M 001000 PEI 7017777 777 7770 1700100100 00 77777777707 00 77777 MATIATIPEFF1 001 17000 0y 01 y0 777777 777700011700 771177? 77777777 MPEI ?77777 REPITI TRIPITI MWPEI 777 777777 777777 7777 0 7777 7? Planning Commission July,�ff,2016 ❑ Agenda Item 1 July 11,2016 Minutes Page 5&7 ❑®®gym ®®®m ®®Om®®®® ❑❑®ID❑❑❑®® ® ❑ ®❑ ❑ 0 BI❑ OU ❑ 0111 0 ELI ❑ o ■ 0 ®®® MI ED ❑ ®® Planning Commission July,2016 F1 July Item 1 July 11,2016 Minutes Page 6 of 7 0 0 ® ❑ ❑ a ❑ ❑ 9®Mm®®9®®❑ ❑ ❑ em 8®9®ERM13®99®®❑ a®®9e■o ❑ 960 9BO®9®990 ❑ 9m®❑ ❑❑ o® ❑ o ®® o ❑ ®❑ o e®e®n ID❑ 0 M Sm ID❑ EU 9❑ ED m® EEEI 0 m ® ®® ❑ n ❑ ❑ o v ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑9❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑w ❑ ❑ ®❑ ❑ ❑ ❑6❑ ® ❑ Planning Commission July,2016 F1 July Item 1 July 11,2016 Minutes Page 7 of 7 CITY OF TayIle PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Quin Thompson, Current Planner Jonathan Ely, Engineer MEETING DATE: July 25, 2016 SUBJECT: VAR 15-5502: Variance (EAST END OF CEDAR RIDGE RD.ISTRIEGLER, 205): Submitted by JOGENSEN & ASSOCIATES, INC. for property located at the EAST END OF CEDAR RIDGE RD.The property is in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA and contains approximately 8.64 acres. The request is for a variance to minimum street frontage requirements in the Fayetteville Planning Area. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of a variance to allow the subject property to be subdivided without required street frontage. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located at the end of Cedar Ridge Road in unincorporated Washington County, and within the Fayetteville planning area.The property is undeveloped and contains 8.64 acres. The parcel is a non-conforming lot as it only has 28 feet of street frontage. Fayetteville Unified Development Code (UDC) Chapter 166.05(A)(3) requires a minimum of 75 feet of street frontage for each lot in the Planning Area. The parcel was formerly part of a larger parent tract that has already been split six times according to Washington County Assessor records, prior to 2005. According to UDC 166.01(B)(1), a property may be divided into a maximum of four lots before it must be processed as a preliminary plat or concurrent plat. Surrounding land use and zoning is listed in Table 9. Table 1 Surroundinn Land Use and Zoning Direction Land Use Zoning North Undeveloped 1 Single-family residential Washington Count South Extraction/Red Dirt Mine Washington Count East Single-family residential Washington Count West Undeveloped 1 Agricultural Washington Count FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural Area DISCUSSION: Request:The applicant proposes to subdivide the parcel into two lots. Tract 1 would contain 6.30 acres and would retain 28 feet of street frontage. Tract 2 would contain 2.34 acres and not street Mailing Address' Planning Commission Julyy 25,2016 113 W. Mountain Street www.fayettevilleAgerR Item 2 Fayetteville, AR 72701. 16-5502 Striegler Page 1 of 9 frontage. At this time the applicant is requesting approval to create a subdivision without street frontage for Tract 2. This requires a variance of Chapter 166.05(A)(3) allowing a new lot to be created without the minimum public street frontage required by code. Public Comment. Staff has received comments opposing the variance. Neighbors have been concerned that future development will reduce property values. WaferlSewer: Water is available to the subject property. Sewer service is not available to this property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the variance, finding that property is suitable for a standards lot and block layout, and that the number of splits allowed by the UDC for the parent tract has already been exceeded, and therefore the preliminary plat 1 final plat process is the appropriate avenue for review of the proposed subdivision. Should the Planning Commission choose to grant the request, Staff recommends the following Conditions of Approval: Conditions of Approval: 1. Planning Commission determination of a variance of UDC Chapter 166.05(A)(3) allowing a lot to be created without the minimum required street frontage. Staff recommends in favor of the variance. 2. The sub-division of land must be submitted for Preliminary Plat review for determination of infrastructure improvements appropriate for a sub-division comprising 7 lots. Planning Commission;Action: ❑ Approved ❑ Forwarded ❑ Denied i Meeting Date: JuIV 25, 2016 Motion: Second: Vote: BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT: None. Attachments: UDC Chapter 166.05 Aerial Image Parent Tract Exhibit Applicant's letter Site plan Maps Planning Commission July 25,2016 G!lETC\Development Services Review120160evelcpment Review\16-5410 CUP 981 N.Starr❑r. Agenda Item 2 (GFB investments)451101 Planning Commission105-23-20161Comments and Redlines 16-5502 Striegler Page 2 of 9 UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION: 166.05 Required Infrastructure improvements and Subdivision Regulations - Development in Planning Area (A) Required Infrastructure Improvements and Subdivision Regulations Outside the City. (1) Within One Mile of City Limits. On and off-site improvements and subdivision regulations for development outside the City limits and within one mile of the City are the same as for those developments within the City limits, with the exception of park land dedication requirement which is not required. (2) Beyond One Mile of City Limits. On and off-site improvements and subdivision regulations for development outside one mile of the City limits shall meet Washington County standards. (3) All lots in the Planning Area shall have direct frontage to a public street, with the minimum frontage required by Washington County pursuant to residential Lot and Block Standards. (B) Developments Outside City Developed to all Inside the City Standards. If the City Council grants access to the City's sewer system pursuant to §51.115. (C) and the owner/developer agrees to petition for annexation as soon as legally possible and develop the subdivision in accordance with all city development requirements including payment of all impact fees, the bulk and area requirements for this subdivision shall conform to those within the RSF-4 Zoning District or as otherwise designated by the City Council rather than those within the planning area. {Code 1965,App.A.,Art.8(11),App.C.,Art,IV;Ord.No.1747,6-29-70; 1750,7-6-70;Ord.No. 1999,5-7-74;Code 1991,§§159.54, 160.120;Ord.No.3925,§6, 10-3-95;Ord.No.4100,§2(Ex.A),6-16-98;Ord.4753,9-6-05;Ord.5215,11-20-09;Ord,5270, Ord.5296, 12-15-09;Ord.5546, 12-04-12) Planning Commission July 25,2016 G:lEMDevelopment Services Review12016\Development Review116-5410 CUP 981 N.Starr Dr. Agenda Item 2 (GF13 investments)451101 Planning Commission105-23-20WComments and Redlines 16-5502 Striegler Page 3 of 9 f , Washington County ri ht-of-way operty z QQGW�[] - CANYO -L04R: ,f or t I M: GGDAR RIDGE LN Y i ti R I J • 'I i I dI' 14 . Fayetteville City Limit ° 'WASHVNG?Mhhwiabj6br6ri�" cion u��, 16 310 155 0 310 Feet Ag Item 2 16-55 triegler Page 4 of 9 I� i I I frI [I I 1 1` Cedar Ridge Lane 1 [parent tract subject parcel f f HFecTorrcoUNMq ing Commission July 25,2016 310 155 0 310 FeetAgenda Item 2 9 16-5502 Striegler Page 5 of 9 124 W Sun4ridge Drive.Suite 5 1 O R(_E N S E N Fayetteville,AR 72703 +ASSOCIATES fl '479.44 Faxi 4]9.582.4860707 6/28/16 City of Fayetteville 113 W Mountain Fayetteville,AR 72701 Att-. Quin Thompson Re: Conditional Use(Tandem tot)(Striegler) Attached please find the application and information pertaining to a conditional use—tandem lot for Striegler. We had originally submitted this as a preliminary plat but after review by the City Engineering it was decided this would be too expensive and complicated(Drainage requirements). Tract 1 would have access off of Cedar Ridge and the tandem lot would be Tract 2. We have shown a 50'access and !JE extending to the west line. The overall tract is 8.54 acres and I have included a copy of the PLA that created this overall tract. Please review and contact me concerning any questions you may have. Thank you; David L.Jorgensen,P.E. Planning Commission July 25,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5502 Striegler Page 6 of 9 •w'aawnaa moLowwomm Ti Lwrar. " �1d1��55t1+ j/a1 lid# Ok x N3SN39UoP M � � I�iS r� i ramaou�na3M v sere 4' 'w� ' aI�&� + rm am aaewra Fins • 1 � pAS �`l t�cE }3 f 3 d' �• + ��ie�g I�c3 �l �yg ag F $ '8� t .a ala Ili F s p g iron ?3a Mi 'Nil a '# 3 € fl � f � � � I $ r\ ;� li t • IMF 1 1 ' LAII 1 iR 1 f 5 � �=1 ♦ t i 1 , i i � �� ` a } tr 3ay r\ 1.� 1111 f ffh j \ $r �r t Plan ing Commission July 25,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5502 Striegler Page 7 of 9 VAR 16-5502 STR!EG LE R Close Up View NORTH Subject Property 00000 pV a o�Q �o 0 oQ �v GG D CcpAR RfpGE LN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f I Z I I RS -3 I r r E Legend Feet RSF-4 Planning Area 0 112.5 225 450 675 900 Fayetteville City Limits Footprint 1 inch = 300 feet Building P Planning Comission .1111%/15,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5502 Striegler Page 8 of 9 VAR 16-5502 STRIEGLER A& One Mile View NORTH ❑ 0.125 0.25 0-5 Miles Subject Property 1, T p _ _ 7 I I RSF4 I I -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - --- 1 ' 1 1 r , 1 i w 1 Q �c�,Sy,� � 3vosun+na Q alp ' y RSF-8 UJ R-A 1 ��• o alT>= LEIRLY Tm��v exTRACTIOH -' RESIDENT LAL SINGLE-FAMILY lE+ MA COMMERCIAL Az, RwW.w.�ORe. Legend RW•i FORM3AASED DISTRICTS F 1 W4 loa.rco,.eede Planning Area RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY FayetteviVle City Limits WF+2 NgywwMep B�xen 11!111 i Trail (Proposed) __ n _____ ++RAF=� PLA H EO ZO NIN6 DISTRICTS Planning Area '- _ I USr AL - Lon•mncai o.nen,a a..n.-.n. Building Footprint � IRsnruno+A� L-� I Mwry Coiwmrc�l.rc iqM iMwv�l Fayetteville City limits --_cif �•z a�«p e�..". Planning Co mission jwly 5,2016 Agenda Item 2 16-5502 Striegler Page 9 of 9 CITY OF Fay -Ile e PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRID: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Quin Thompson, Planner MEETING DATE: July 25, 2015 SUBJECT: ADM 15-5514: Administrative Item (1503 N. GARLAND AVE.IROTH CUP 14-4722 EXTENSION, 404): Submitted by BAUMANN & CROSNO, INC. for property located at 1503 N. GARLAND AVE. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.18 acres. The request is for a second extension for CUP 14-4722. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of ADM 16-5514 with conditions. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on Garland Avenue between Hendrix Street and South Maxwell Drive. Garland Avenue has been recently widened to a 5-lane boulevard along this property. Surrounding properties are a mix of single-family homes and apartments; however, the west side of Garland is predominantly comprised of single-family homes. On July 28, 2014, the Planning Commission approved CUP 14-4722 allowing duplex use for this property. The Planning Commission had previously tabled the request twice. There was significant public comment from the neighbors surrounding the parcel. On July 31, 2015, the City Planning Director administratively approved a one year extension to the approval of CUP 14-4722. The surrounding zoning and land use is listed in Table 1. Table 1 Surrounding Land UselZonin Direction from Site Land Use Zoning North Single-family RSF-4, Residential Single-family South Tri- lex RT-12, Residential Two and Three Family East Townhouses RMF-24, Residential Multi-family West Tri-plex RT-12, Residential Two and Three Family DISCUSSION: Proposal. The applicant requests a second, one-year extension to receive building permits for the proposed duplex. The first one year extension expired on July 28, 2416. The extension would Planning ssion Mailing Address: July 25,2016 113 W. Mountain Street wwwJayettevillephreilf+ltem 3 Fayetteville, AR 72701 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 1 of 32 be for one additional year to obtain all permits to complete the project. If permits to construct the project have not been obtained within the extension period, the Conditional Use Pemrit approval shall be rendered null and void in accordance with City development code. The City of Fayetteville Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 166.20(b) gives the Planning Commission authority to extend the Conditional Use Permit approval by one additional year from the allowed extension period. In order to extend this approval, the applicant must: (1)request the extension within the allowed extension period and (2) show good cause why the tasks could not reasonably be completed within the standard time period. If the second extension is granted, the applicant must obtain all necessary permits within the extension period. Findings: (1) The applicant submitted the extension request to the Planning Division on June 15, 2016, prior to the extesnion period ending on July 28, 2016. (2) As described in the applicant's letter, the project has experienced difficulties in transfer of ownership. Recommended Motion: Planning Staff recommends approval of ADM 16-5514, the requested second extension for CUP 14-4722 with the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall be allowed until July 28, 2017 to obtain all permits necessary to complete the project, otherwise all entitlement approvals for the project shall be rendered null and void. No additional extensions are permitted after this time period. 2. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable zoning and development regulations that may have been adopted subsequent to the original project approval. Neither the site plan nor the elevation have been reviewed for full compliance with development code. 3. All other conditions of approval for the project shall remain applicable. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required Date: July 25,2016 0 Approved O Forwarded ❑ Denied Motion: Second: Vote: Notes: BUDGETISTAFF IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Planning Commission July 25,2016 G:IETCTeveiopment Services Review120161Development Review116-5514 ADM 1503 N.Garland Ave. Agenda Item 3 {Roth CUP 14-4722 Ext.}404103 Planning Commission107-25-20161Comments and Redlines 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 2 of 32 ■ Chapter 166.20{B} ■ Request fetter ■ Site Plan ■ Survey ■ Elevations • CUP 14.4722 Planning Commission approval • One Mile Map • Close Up Map Planning Commission July 25,2016 G:lETCTevelopment Services Review120161Development Reviewl16-5514 ADM 1503 N.Garland Ave. Agenda Item 3 [Roth CUP 14-4722 Ext.]404103 Planning Commission107-25-2016\Comments and Redlines 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 3 of 32 UDC Section 166.24 166.20 Expiration Of Approved Plans And Permits (A) Applicability. The provisions of this section apply to all of the following plans and permits: (1) Preliminary plats; (2) Planned zoning district developments; (3) Conditional uses; (4) Large-scale developments; (5) Lot splits; (6) Physical alteration of land permits; (7) Storm water,drainage,and erosion control permits; (8) Tree preservation plans;and (9) Floodplain development permits. (B) Time limit. (2) Administrative Extension Within One Year. Prior to the expiration of the one(1)year time limit, an applicant may request the Zoning and Development Administrator to extend the period to accomplish the tasks by up to one (1) additional year. The applicant has the burden to show good cause why the tasks could not reasonably be completed within the normal one (1) year limit. Extensions that are not permitted administratively may be requested of the Planning Commission within ten days of the final administrative decision. (3) Planning Commission Extension Within 18 months. Should an applicant miss the deadline to request an administrative extension, within eighteen months of the date of approval the applicant may request the Planning Commission to extend the period up to one (1)additional year from the original date of approval, subject to the burden of showing good cause as described In this section, (4) Planning Commissions Extension. Prior to the expiration of any allowed extension period (maximum of two years from the date of original approval), an applicant may request the Planning Commission to extend the period to accomplish the tasks by up to one(1)additional year, if the plans and permits are substantially the same as those originally approved.The applicant has the burden to show good cause why the tasks could not reasonably be completed within the normal one(1)year limit and the permitted extension period.Extensions beyond three(3)years from the original date of approval shall not be permitted. (5) Ordinance Amendments. To receive approval of an extension, the applicant shall comply with all applicable zoning and development requirements that have been adopted subsequent to the original project approval. Projects that must be substantially modified to meet new code requirements are subject to Ch. 166.05 (F) Modifications. (6) Variances. Variances from applicable zoning and development requirements that have been adopted subsequent to the original project approval shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission prior to approval of the extension. (7) Expiration. If the required task(s)are not completed within one(1)year from the date of approval or during an allowed extension period,all of the above-enumerated plans and permits shall be rendered null and void. Planning Commission July 25,2016 G:\ETC\Development Services Review120161Development Review116-5514 AOM 1503 N.Garland Ave. Agenda Item 3 (Roth CUP 14-4722 Ext.)404103 Planning Commission107-25-20161Comments and Redlines 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 4 of 32 BAUMANN ■ ' S June 29'T 2016 To Wham it May Concern respectfully requesting the extens!On of CUP 14-4772- This extension is Please`ind the c❑r'e5P°ndence nstr t necessary to anew Baumann&C-Osno Construction the o work through ownership detai551bEforeoine hc project retated to CUP 14•+3722-'he parties had hyped time however they have)ust recently settled the matter �t:s cine intent of the AaR.es t°begin this project 4'quarter of 2016 and finisn early 2017, upon review do not hesitate with anything. Respectfully; C Representative-Mike Baumann Managing Partner Baumann&Crosno Constructivn 479-799.4616 r� ❑caner, 1R Meeks Vl esident—Credit Risk Manager bens Ban ;,479 5'82.5005 k Planning Commission July 25,2016 Agenda Item 3 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 5 of 32 L�-uxnw arpn;nn -w-w- ....��i.....,.�...•.ww�r yp A•n•rrinaa ---- ...r..w,..w... u �� oar rwrJrir Irs'i ua ----' �ti++�^.r^..:•�`4w:....rrr r.w*... � r 1fl r iu iurr r m NIi�',t�,�Rr"i Alr„pA,O6 qwnw.i�w.+...rP.�tiywwri,w y.rt [Lii!'/ap'G1L'i'yYi �11YJp1� ,�a,,.1.,n,.rgt• •••�"•�". � ••4•rw m4•,•�yr.sp.•I+...wn ra srsur�ur•rriussesirt� #Ar cN17M M roar„ ,�ra>wrs'� ryra;ao.eae� '9LJ�`S�jB�SS�/ ss�lcm t •cL ..a a 1 4r JU-L% 6 Q\Y 35:11U1 4 O y rG i CV It tip3J�a.'1�7,1�1yS4�D7 N3a.+L`1 F-S y7o7 i Ir.fe JLM}{1 aAY QNS"ILfY, 'Y' F ❑ t�f;�y` SIS PEN •`''Ir,r ll,l„1,11••` a z Wes p«o 25 ��^ :s w.alAt los o E � .;T- Lai:O en w�i a . ••ILIII# pj� r �I a� �I ml 3] 3 V W 65BJs yy..jya- - rvz F-s1 149•rs MAIFT,LpS _�_ _r__ r= - 117; - z�xl i er zz Planning Commission July 25,2016 Agenda Item 3 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 6 of 32 -- rTI'm IT lip Planning Commission July 25,2016 Agenda Item 3 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 7 of 32 I ll fi T � � 1: 3 L-L] Planning Commission July 25,2016 Agenda Item 3 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 8 of 32 72 } i A :t a 41 t. mo.k Planning Commission July 25,2016 Agenda Item 3 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 9 of 32 CITY OF 7ay%i 1.L�l le ARKANSAS 31 July 2015 Mr. Hunter Haynes VIA EMAIL: hunter@hcheonsulting.us HCH Consulting, Inc. 599 S. Horsebarn Road, Suite 106 Rogers, Arkansas 72758 Re: Extension for Conditional Use Permit CLIP 74-4722 at 7503 N. Garland Avenue Dear Mr. Haynes: Thank you for submitting a request for a one-year extension to the approval of the subject conditional use permit located at 1503 N. Garland Avenue. The conditional use permit was approved on July 28, 2014 by the Fayetteville Planning Commission. The City of Fayetteville Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 166.20(B) gives the Zoning and Development Administrator authority to extend approval of a conditional use permit one additional year from the original approval. In order to extend this approval,the applicant must: (1) request the extension prior to the one year time limit; and (2) show good cause why the tasks could not reasonably be completed within the normal one year. (1) The applicant has submitted the extension request to the Planning Division on July 27, 2015 prior to the one year time limit ending on July 28, 2015. (2) The applicant indicated that they have been working through ownership issues and also need to ensure that the timing of constructing the project meets market demand. The applicant also indicated these two issues have been accomplished and anticipate moving forward with the project in the near future. The UDC requirements for the requested extension have been fulfilled and the one-year extension is approved for the Conditional Use Permit to exire on July 28 2096. All conditions of approval shall be met (attached) and building permits obtained by this time. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact the Planning Division at 479.575.8267. Best Regards, I J44.r- k44 � Andrew Garner, AICP City Planning Director Att: Conditions of Approval CUP 14-4722 Mailing Address: CITY PLANNING 113 W. Mountain Street WWWhyettevill" .J .-I_t•: Fayetteville, AR 72701 Planning Commission July 25,2016 Agenda Item 3 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 10 of 32 CITY OF T*4 ay L evi'lle PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO ARKANSAS TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director FROM: Quin Thompson, Current Planner MEETING DATE: 4Z8Y4 UPDATED 7-30-2014 SUBJECT: CUP 14-4722: Conditional Use (1503 N. GARLAND AVEIROTH, 404): Submitted by HUNTER HAYNES for property located at 1503 N. GARLAND AVE. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 0.18 acres. The request is for a duplex in an RSF-4 district. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of CUP 14-4722 with conditions. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located on Garland Avenue between Hendrix Street and South Maxwell Drive. Garland Avenue is currently being widened to a 5-lane boulevard along this property. Surrounding properties are a mix of single-family homes and apartments; however, the west side of Garland is predominantly comprised of single-family homes. The property to the south and west of this lot is zoned RT-12, Residential Two and Three Family. The history of this property dates back to 2002 when the property was purchased for development and then the City determined that a drafting error had occurred when the City's official zoning map was converted from a hand-drawn document to a digitized file. The City Council officially rezoned the property to RT-12 by Ordinance 4384, On June 09, 2014, the applicant requested that this item be tabled to the Planning Commission meeting of June 23, 2014 pending revisions. On June 23 2014, the applicant requested that this item be tabled to the July 14, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. The building plans and elevations were revised following the June 23 meeting, and are included in this packet. On July 14,-2014, the applicant requested that this item be tabled to the July 28, 2014 Planning Commission meeting because there were only five commissioners present and a conditional use permit requires fire positive votes to be approved. Mailing Address: Planning Commission 113 W. Mountain Street www.faye[tPir` I�481 4v Age commission Fayetteville,AR 72701 14.4722 Rot buly 25,2016 Page 1 of 1)kgenda Item 3 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 11 of 32 Surrounding land uses are listed in Table 9 Table 1 Surrounding Land Use/Zoning Direction Land Use Zoning from Site North Single-family _ RSF-(, Residential 'Single-family f� South Tri- lex RT-12, Residential Two and Three Family East Townhouses. RMF-24, Residential Multi-family West - Tri- lex RT-12, Residential Two and Three Family FUTURE LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION- Residential Neighborhood Area DISCUSSION: Request: The applicant is requesting approval of a two-family dwelling (duplex) in the RSF-4 zoning district. The applicant has also received a variance from the Board of Adjustment to allow a duplex on a lot with less than 12,004 square feet of area and fess than 80 feet of street frontage. The lot is approximately 71840 square feet with 52 feet of frontage. Public Comment: Staff received one letter from an adjacent property owner supporting the request, and one letter from a neighbor in opposition to the request. Approximately two to three neighbors have been present at the previous planning commission meetings for this item, expressing opposition to the duplex as an intrusion into their single-family neighborhood. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of CUP 14-4722 with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval- 1. pproval:1. The occupancy shall be limited to a maximum of three unrelated persons per duplex according to the requirements of the Unified Development Code for the RSF-4 zoning district. 2. All other development regulations for the construction of a two-family dwelling shall be met. Compliance with all standards was not evaluated with this request. Planning Commission Action: X Approved ❑ Forwarded 71 Denied July 28 2014 Motion:CHESSER Second:N08LE Vote: 5-4-0 Note:COMMISSIONERS HONCHELL, COOK, SELBY, AND AUTRY VOTED 'NO'. COMMISSION ADDED A CONDITIONAL APPROVAL THAT ALL SIDING MUST BE PAINTABLE, STAINABLE, OR MASONRY. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF Section 163.02. AUTHORITY; CONDITIONS; PROCEDURES. Planning Commission G.'tiETCOevelopment Services Review120140evelopment Review\14-4722 CUP 1543 N.Garland Ave(Rotn)iO3 Planning July 28.2014 Comnssionl7.28-284 &Redlines Ag i ji commission 14.4722 Ratbuly 25,2016 Page 2 of 1,Qgenda Item 3 16-5514 Roth CUP Page 12 of 32