HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5798File Number: 2015-0400
RZN 15-5148 (402 E. 7TH ST./NIEDERMAN):
AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION
RZN 15-5148, FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.20 ACRES, LOCATED AT 402 E. 7th ST. FROM
NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO RMF -12, RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY, 12
UNITS PER ACRE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby changes the zone
classification of the following described property from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to
RMF -12, Residential Multi -Family, 12 Units per Acre, as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the
official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1.
PASSED and APPROVED on 9/15/2015
�itttirrii�
Attest:
My;Sondra E. Smith, City Clerk Treasurer
Page 1 Printed on 9/16115
1111111111111111 11111111111111111111111111111LL11Lll11111111111111111�1111
Doc iD: 0i647877b003 ryPe'
rt .
Kind: aAD' ib102/2015 at 02:05:44 P41
Reoot'ded• 1 of 3
Fee Amt: $ 25.00 Page
Washington teunrircui
{
tcyle 8Y(1�ve15...V002❑ 184
F11e2V 1 p
113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Ordinance: 5798
File Number: 2015-0400
RZN 15-5148 (402 E. 7TH ST./NIEDERMAN):
AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION
RZN 15-5148, FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.20 ACRES, LOCATED AT 402 E. 7th ST. FROM
NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO RMF -12, RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY, 12
UNITS PER ACRE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby changes the zone
classification of the following described property from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to
RMF -12, Residential Multi -Family, 12 Units per Acre, as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B"
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the
official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1.
PASSED and APPROVED on 9/15/2015
�itttirrii�
Attest:
My;Sondra E. Smith, City Clerk Treasurer
Page 1 Printed on 9/16115
RZN 15-5148
Close Up View
�w
a
z
D
z
a
O
_J
15-5148
EXHIBIT 'A'
NIEDERMAN
TWA:
/&
41�1
r
0
MML
r, f
-
SUBJECT PROPERTY
11 I:. � , _
•
Il
f
I
, .
r�
I�
f
l+i
I I
t
1
PM -18
OV&n ier,Neighborhood/Pa c Trail
------ Natural Surface T mil
= RZN 15-5148
- Hillside -Hilltop Ov rlay District
Fayetteville City Limits
- Footprints 2010 0 75 150 300 450 sI eel
15-5148
EXHIBIT 'B'
PT LOT 45 SW (62.5 X 156.5) FURTHER DESCRIBED FROM 2013-29903 AS: Part of the
Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of Section Fifteen (15) in
Township Sixteen (16) North, Range Thirty (30) West, being more particularly described as follows,
to -wit: Beginning at a point 201.5 feet West of the Southeast corner of said forty acre
tract and running thence West 62.5 feet; thence North 156.5 feet; thence East 62.5 feet; thence
South 156.5 feet to the point of beginning.
Washington County, AR
I certify this instrument was filed on
10{02/2015 02:05:44 PM
and recorded in Real Estate
File Number 201 ,S-Q0028184
Kyle Sylvester - . 'rct4it Jerk
by
. _. City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street
F y_ Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
r
r , Text File
File Number: 2015-0400
Agenda Date: 9/15/2015 Version: 1 Status: Passed
In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Ordinance
Agenda Number: C. 3
RZN 15-5148 (402 E. 7TH ST./NIEDERMAN):
AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN
15-5148, FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.20 ACRES, LOCATED AT 402 E. 7th ST. FROM NC,
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION TO RMF -12, RESIDENTIAL MULTI -FAMILY, 12 UNITS
PER ACRE.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,
ARKANSAS:
Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby changes the zone
classification of the following described property from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to RMF -12,
Residential Multi -Family, 12 Units per Acre, as shown on Exhibits "A" and `B" attached hereto and
made a part hereof.
Section 2. That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby amends the official zoning
map of the City of Fayetteville to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1.
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 Printed on 9/18/2015
Jeremy Pate
Submitted By
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form
2015-0400
Legistar File ID
9/15/2015
City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only
N/A for Non -Agenda Item
8/28/2015 City Planning /
Development Services Department
Submitted Date Division / Department
Action Recommendation:
RZN 15-5148: Rezone (402 E. 7TH ST./NIEDERMAN, 524): Submitted by ZARA NIEDERMAN for property located at
402 E. 7TH ST. The property is zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains approximately 0.20 acres.
The request is to rezone the property to RMF -12, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 12 UNITS PER ACRE.
Account Number
Project Number
Budgeted Item? NA
Budget Impact:
Fund
Project Title
Current Budget $ -
Funds Obligated $ -
Current Balance
Does item have a cost? No Item Cost
Budget Adjustment Attached? NA Budget Adjustment
Remaining Budget
V20140710
Previous Ordinance or Resolution #
Original Contract Number:
Comments:
Approval Date:
CITY OF
ttVlle
ARKANSAS
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 15, 2015
TO: Fayetteville City Council
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
THRU: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director
FROM: Quin Thompson, Current Planner
DATE: August 28, 2015
SUBJECT: RZN 15-5148: Rezone (402 E. 7TH ST./NIEDERMAN, 524): Submitted by
ZARA NIEDERMAN for property located at 402 E. 7TH ST. The property is
zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains
approximately 0.20 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RMF-
12, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 12 UNITS PER ACRE.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of an ordinance to rezone the property
to RMF-12, Residential Multi -Family, 12 Units Per Acre.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located at 402 E. 7th Street in the Walker Park Neighborhood and contains
approximately 0.20 acres (9,023 Square Feet) within the NC zoning district. The property is
undeveloped.
Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is compatible with the surrounding mixture of
single and multi -family residential uses. The immediate area contains a variety of housing types,
from single to small multi -family developments.
Land Use Plan Analysis: The City Plan 2030 Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designates this area
as Complete Neighborhood Plan: Walker Park Neighborhood. The plan sought to preserve single-
family neighborhoods while encouraging additional housing types and a mix of uses. The
proposed rezoning is consistent with the Walker Park Plan and the City's overall goals to promote
infill and a variety of housing types and densities in the same neighborhood.
DISCUSSION:
On August 24, 2015 the Planning Commission forwarded this item to the City Council with a
recommendation for approval by a vote of 8-0-0.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
N/A
Attachments:
CC Ordinance
Exhibit A
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Exhibit B
Planning Commission Staff Report
CITY OF
Fay%Zt—lle
ANSAS
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
MEETING DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO
City of Fayetteville Planning Commission
Andrew Garner, City Planning Director
Quin Thompson, Current Planner
August 24, 2015
SUBJECT: RZN 15-5148: Rezone (402 E. 7T" ST./NIEDERMAN, 524): Submitted by
ZARA NIEDERMAN for property located at 402 E. 7TH ST. The property is
zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains
approximately 0.20 acres. The request is to rezone the property to RMF-
12, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 12 UNITS PER ACRE.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends RZN 15-5148 be forwarded to the City Council with a recommendation for
approval.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located at 402 E. 7th Street in the Walker Park Neighborhood and contains
approximately 0.20 acres (9,023 Square Feet) within the NC zoning district. The property is
undeveloped. Surrounding land use and zoning is depicted on Table 1.
Table 1
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
Direction from Site
Land Use
Zoning
North
Single -Family Residential
NC, Neighborhood Conservation
South
Single -Family and two -Family Residential
NC, Neighborhood Conservation
East
Two -Family Residential
NC, Neighborhood Conservation
West
Apartment Complex
NC, Neighborhood Conservation
Request: The request is to rezone the property from NC, Neighborhood Conservation to RMF-12,
Residential Multi -family / 12 units per acre. The applicant has stated that the rezoning is needed
so that the property developed with a duplex.
Public Comment: Staff has received no public comment.
INFRASTRUCTURE:
Streets: The subject parcel has access to East 7th Street. This road is improved along the
subject property's frontage with curb and sidewalk. Any required improvements
to this street will be determined at time of development.
Water: Public water is available to this parcel. An existing 16" and 1.5" main are located
within the East 7th Street right-of-way.
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Sewer: Sanitary sewer is available to this parcel. An existing 8" sanitary sewer main is
located within the East 71h Street right of way.
Drainage: Any additional improvements or requirements for drainage will be determined at
time of development. This parcel does not lie within the 100-yr floodplain,
streamside protection areas, or the Hillside/Hilltop Overlay District.
Fire: The Fire Department did not express any concerns with the request.
Police: The Police Department did not express any concerns with this request.
CITY PLAN 2030 FUTURE LAND USE PLAN: City Plan 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates
this site as a Complete Neighborhood Plan: Walker Park Neighborhood. A central goal of the
plan was to preserve single-family neighborhoods while encouraging additional housing types
and a mix of uses. A digital cony of the adopted document has been orovided separately.
FINDINGS OF THE STAFF
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends RZN 15-5148 be forwarded to City Council with a
recommendation for approval, finding that the proposed zoning allows development compatible
with the existing adjacent uses and consistent with the Future Land Use Plan.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES
Date: August 24, 2015 O Tabled O Forwarded O Denied
Motion: Second: Vote:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required YES
Date: September 15, 2015 O Approved O Denied
1. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use
planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans.
Finding: Land Use Compatibility: The proposed zoning is compatible with the
surrounding mixture of single and multi -family residential uses. The
immediate area contains a variety of housing types, from single to small
multi -family developments.
Land Use Plan Analysis: The City Plan 2030 Future Land Use Map (FLUM)
designates this area as Complete Neighborhood Plan: Walker Park
Neighborhood. The plan sought to preserve single-family neighborhoods
while encouraging additional housing types and a mix of uses. The proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Walker Park Plan and the City's overall goals
to promote infill and a variety of housing types and densities in the same
neighborhood.
G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2015\Development Review\15-5148 RZN 402 N. 7th St. (Niederman)\03 Planning
Commission\08-24-2015\Comments and Redlines
A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the
rezoning is proposed.
Finding: The proposed rezoning is justified at this time, as the proposed zoning will
allow appropriate infill development in an area where it is encouraged.
3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase
traffic danger and congestion.
Finding: The site has access to 7th Street, a partially improved local street. The
rezoning would allow a two-family dwelling to be built on the lot, which is
likely to perceptibly increase neither traffic danger nor congestion.
4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and
thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and
sewer facilities.
Finding: Rezoning the property from NC to RMF-12 will not undesirably affect density
or load on public services. The small lot size (0.20 Acre) would not allow
more than 2 units to be developed on this lot. The Police and Fire
Departments have expressed no objections to the proposal.
If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of
considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed
zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as:
a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted
under its existing zoning classifications;
b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even
though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the
proposed zoning is not desirable.
Finding: N/A
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
None
Attachments:
■ Unified Development Code sections 161.26 & 161.12
■ Request Letter
■ Survey
■ One Mile Map, Close -Up Map, Current Land Use Map, Future Land Use Map
Under separate cover:
■ Walker Park Master Plan Vision Document
■ Walker Park Master Plan Illustrative Plan
G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2015\Development Review\15-5148 RZN 402 N. 7th St. (Niederman)\03 Planning
Commission\08-24-2015\Comments and Redlines
161.26 Neighborhood Conservation
(A) Purpose. The Neighborhood Conservation zone
has the least activity and a lower density than the
other zones. Although Neighborhood
Conservation is the most purely residential zone,
it can have some mix of uses, such as civic
buildings. Neighborhood Conservation serves to
promote and protect neighborhood character. For
the purposes of Chapter 96: Noise Control, the
Neighborhood Conservation district is a
residential zone.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses.
Unit 1 City-wide uses by right
Unit 8 Single-family dwellings
Unit 41 Accessory dwellin s
(2) Conditional uses.
Unit 2
City-wide uses by
conditional use permit
Unit 3
Public protection and utility facilities
Unit 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
Unit 9
Two-family dwellings
Unit 10
Three-family dwellings
Unit 12
Limited Business *
Unit 24
Home occupations
Unit 25
Offices, studios, and related services
Unit 28
Center for collecting
recyclable materials
Unit 36
Wireless communication facilities
Unit 44
Cottage Housing Development
(C) Density. 10 Units Per Acre.
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
(1) Lot width minimum.
Single Family
40 ft.
Two Family
80 ft.
Three Family
90 ft.
(2) Lot area minimum. 4,000 Sq. Ft.
(E) Setback regulations.
Front
A build -to zone that is
located between the
front property line and a
line 25 ft. from the front
property line.
Side
5 ft.
Rear
5 ft.
Rear, from center line
12 ft.
of an alley
(F) Building height regulations.
Building Height Maximum 1 45 ft. II
(Ord. 5128, 4-15-08; Ord. 5812, 4-20-10; Ord. 5462, 12-6-
11; Ord. 5592, 6-18-13; Ord. 5664, 2-18-14)
161.12 District RMF-12, Residential Multi -
Family — Twelve Units Per Acre
(A) Purpose. The RMF-12 Multi -family Residential
District is designed to permit and encourage the
development of multi -family residences at a
moderate density that is appropriate to the area.
(B) Uses.
(1) Permitted uses
Unit 1
City-wide uses by right
Unit 8
Single-family dwellings
Unit 9
Two-family dwellings
Unit 10
Three-family dwellings
Unit 26
Multi -family dwellings
Unit 44
Cottage Housing Develo ment
(2) Conditional uses.
Unit 2
City-wide uses by conditional use
permit
Unit 3
Public protection and utility facilities
Unit 4
Cultural and recreational facilities
Unit 5
Government facilities
Unit 11
Manufactured home park
Unit 12
Limited business
Unit 24
Home occupations
Unit 25
Professional offices
Unit 36
Wireless communications facilities
(C) Density.
Units per acre I 12 or less II
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
(1) Lot width minimum.
Manufactured home park
100 ft.
Lot within a manufactured home
park
50 ft.
Single family
60 ft.
Two-family
60 ft.
Three and more
90 ft
Professional offices
100 ft.
(2) Lot area minimum.
Manufactured home park
3 acres
Lot within a
4,200 sq. ft.
manufactured home park
Townhouse:
Development
10,000 sq. ft.
Individual lot
2,500 sq. ft.
Single-family
6,000 sq. ft.
Two-family
7,000 sq. ft.
Three or more
9,000 sq. ft.
Fraternity or Sorority
2 acres
Professional offices
1 acre
(3) Land area per dwelling unit.
Manufactured home
3,000 sq. ft
Apartments:
No bedrooms
1,700 sq. ft.
One bedroom
1,700 sq. ft.
Two or more bedrooms
2,000 sq. ft.
Fraternity or Sorority
1,000 sq. ft. per resident
(E) Setback requirements.
Front
Side
Rear
A build -to zone
8 ft.
25 ft.
that is located
between the
front property
line and a line
25 feet from the
front property
line.
Cross reference(s)--Variances, Ch. 156
(F) Building height regulations.
Building Height Maximum I 30/45 ft."
*A building or a portion of a building that is
located between 0 and 10 feet from the front
property line or any master street plan right-of-
way line shall have a maximum height of 30 feet.
Buildings or portions of the building set back
greater than 10 feet from the master street plan
right-of-way shall have a maximum height of 45
feet.
Any building which exceeds the height of 20 feet
shall be set back from any side boundary line of
an adjacent single family district, an additional
distance of one foot for each foot of height in
excess of 20 feet.
(G) Building area. None.
(H) Minimum buildable street frontage 50% of the
lot width.
(Ord. No. 4325, 7-3-01; Ord. 5028, 6-19-07; Ord. 5224, 3-3-
09; Ord 5262, 8-4-09; Ord. 5312, 4-20-10; Ord. 5462, 12-6-
11; Ord. 5592, 6-18-13; Ord. 5664, 2-18-14)
Currently this property is a vacant lot. It is zoned Neighborhood Conservation (NC). This allows
for single family dwellings by right. It also allows for two-family dwellings by conditional use. We
would like to develop a two-family townhouse similar to those recently built on Graham St and
Stone St near the
University (see examples
-:
below). Current zoning
requires that a two family
'~' �.t
building must be at least
80' wide. This lot is 62.5'
-
wide. Under RMF-12, two
r' ' '�
family dwellings are
ass
3�, �`
possible by right, and only
tt , C I
s
require 60'. RMF-12
:;-, o_ _ `" Er•n
requires 90' for a three -
:1
-
family dwelling, so this
would not be an option
l;'' 7--- - --_" _ _ -_
{
here. We believe that a
two family dwelling is more
•'"�� l4
es: ' r•is
_ '' _ tN
compatible with the direct
neighbors and that while
c_.
'A 1. � Ii
the actual zoning would
� i. �=• .ti�� ,j E
become different, the
ti's f + ;!
development pattern would
actually be more Figure 2. Property showing the predominance of multi -family dwellings as neighhors
compatible with the
neighbors.
This property is surrounded on the East and West by multi -family units. Two the west is a 3 -unit
and 4 -unit apartment complex. To the east is a duplex, followed by a lot with two dwelling units
on it. Across the street is a duplex, a single family house, a lot with two dwelling units, and a tri-
plex. This is just a block away from the Jefferson Center, which is expected to be a
neighborhood hub in the Walker Park Master Plan. Much of the zoning there is Downtown
General, which allows for dense housing and commercial space.
When the Walker Park Neighborhood Plan was created, much of the neighborhood was zoned
either Downtown General or NC. This area of small multi -family was zoned NC, rather than
Downtown General. At that time, this made perfect
Neighborhood Conservation district Is a
sense here, because NC allowed two-family dwellings
residential zone.
by right, and three-family dwellings by conditional
(6) Uses
use. At that time, the minimum lot widths for two
(1) Permitted uses.
family dwellings were only 50' and only 60' for three-
family dwellings. This lot at the time of the plan could
Units
cl -vAde uses 1 l
unit a
sin le•famll dwellIn s
have had a two or three-family dwelling on it, by right.
units
Two-amlly ctwellln
At a later date, two-family dwellings were allowed by
Unit+lt
Aecessorvdweliin s
right under NC, but the lot width requirement
(2) Conditional uses.
increased from 50' to 80'. In most other parts of the
unit 2
city-wide uses by
Walker Park neighborhood where zoning is NC, the
use rmil
predominant housing structure is single family.
Unit 3
Publonal
Public roteon and Utility taciuues
icclCultural
unt4
and reaeatlonal racilltles
Presumably the lot width requirements were
Unit 10
Three-taml dweliln s
Unit 12
Offices, studios and related services
increased in order to minimize duplexes and triplexes
Unit24
tiomeoccupations
in single family neighborhoods. While we believe this
Uni25
professional services
may provide more consistency and continuity within
Unit 28
Center for collecting
recyciable materials
other parts of the Walker Park neighborhood, it does
Unit 36
Wireless communication facilities
not appear to be consistent here.
(c) Density. lounitsPerAae.
(D) Bulk and area regulations.
Currently, there is 8" sewer and 16" CIP water and (1) Lotwldthminlmum.
sewer on this street, so adding an additional unit I sin ie Family 1403.
should not be an issue. The road is not heavily Two Family 5011
Three FamIN 60 3.
trafficked either, so adding an additional unit should
not appreciably increase traffic either. In addition, this Figure 3. Neighborhood Conservation
is location is in the Walker Park Neighborhood and in Requirements from 2009
South Fayetteville, where the City Plan 2030 states
that it seeks to make infill development its highest priority.
O
0
O
50O5 5 -04 155 Decrees
Figure 4. Utilities
Figure 5. Stone St.
Figure 6. Graham St.
�.r ! ', .`RiRli'fl t I'd • S
~']'� - �.` � 'It's"�' •,
. - ', :'.{-r-mac �y ` .�...ti.Y � ,•a •_� W
L�am{'��', c -. ;�• �,. i .I ". t.;.��-. .
�.tiS►i7��►s�.�..,th� .la .. Q��,i..�• 'i• 1 i if•� ' •� �-• 5 ,i.
r •r'~ � -�' •'' ,erg } - ����� .:,Y.
)$i - •irn.iiiuwi
$�,; - mil.. 'i.' • Y. �• . .
. yr; . �' ;
'",:.
1PL _____
�-�yg �-'_, ..fat1 •'" ,:: . s i.�: .....r•s- .: :4 �
1:rj:
fie` 1 x;; .• a.
J• V;1
�y .t
ski ___•� loy
[ii
F.O. BOX 1607, FAYETTEVILLE, AR, 72702 . 479-442-1700 « FAX: 479-695-1118 ® WWW.NWADG.COM
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Cathy Wiles, do solemnly swear that I am the Legal Clerk of the
Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette, printed and published in
Washington and Benton County, Arkansas, and of bona fide circulation,
that from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files
of said publication, the advertisement of:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
Ord. No 5798
Was inserted in the Northwest Arkansas Democrat
Gazette on:
September 27, 2015
Publication Charges: $ 71.34
0ij
Cathy Wiles
Subscribed and sworn to before me
This ( day of 10(—. , 2015.
No Public ��s�►�oi��tri�
My Commission Expires: to1'gl2l4
**NOTE**
Please do not pay from Affidavit.
NOTARY
PUBLIC
12401379 'ct'Z
Invoice will
OCT 02 2015
I I T CLEt�3 ORCE