HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5716ORDINANCE NO. 5716
AN ORDINANCE TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT OF FORMAL BIDDING
AND APPROVE A COST -SHARE CONTRACT WITH THE BEAVER
WATERSHED ALLIANCE IN THE AMOUNT OF $58,562.00 TO
FACILITATE A WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS OF BEAVER LAKE
WHEREAS, the Beaver Watershed Alliance possesses unique expertise and resources
ideally suited to meet the City of Fayetteville's need for community outreach, scientific
investigation and voluntary best management practice implementation related to the Beaver Lake
watershed; and
WHEREAS, the Beaver Watershed Alliance is uniquely positioned to perform this work
on behalf of the citizens of Fayetteville,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby determines
an exceptional situation exists in which competitive bidding is deemed not feasible or practical
and therefore waives the requirements of formal competitive bidding and approves a cost -share
contract with the Beaver Watershed Alliance in the amount of $58,562.00 to facilitate a water
quality analysis of Beaver Lake.
PASSED and APPROVED this 21th day of October, 2014.
APPROVED./) ATTEST:
1 � f
By:
Ge. RK / Ty ""'*
.y' Kms. �5—�• a e I�
L NE JO AN, Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Tr( \T Y O c'�sG'••
�� • .�%
FAYETTEVILLE
�kANSP
-City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
113 West Mountain Street
- Fayetteville, AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
Text File
File Number: 2014-0412
Agenda Date: 10/21/2014 Version: 1 Status: Passed
In Control: City Council Meeting File Type: Ordinance
Agenda Number: C. 2
AN ORDINANCE TO WAIVE THE REQUIREMENT OF FORMAL BIDDING AND APPROVE A
COST -SHARE CONTRACT WITH THE BEAVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $58,562.00 TO FACILITATE A WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS OF BEAVER LAKE
WHEREAS, the Beaver Watershed Alliance possesses unique expertise and resources ideally suited to
meet the City of Fayetteville's need for community outreach, scientific investigation and voluntary best
management practice implementation related to the Beaver Lake watershed; and
WHEREAS, the Beaver Watershed Alliance is uniquely positioned to perform this work on behalf of
the citizens of Fayetteville,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS:
Section 1: That the City Council of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas hereby determines an exceptional
situation exists in which competitive bidding is deemed not feasible or practical and therefore waives
the requirements of formal competitive bidding and approves a cost -share contract with the Beaver
Watershed Alliance in the amount of $58,562.00 to facilitate a water quality analysis of Beaver Lake.
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 a Printed on 9/28/2015
Billy Ammons, CH2M Hill
Submitted By
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form
2014-0412
Legistar File ID
10/7/2014
City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only
N/A for Non -Agenda Item
9/19/2014
Submitted Date
Action Recommendation:
Wastewater Treatment Plant/
Utilities Department
Division / Department
A Resolution to provide funding of $60,000.00 to the Beaver Watershed Alliance to facilitate a three-phase study of
the assessment methodology, uncertainty analysis, and trend analysis of water quality in Beaver Lake.
Budget Impact:
5400.5800.5314.00 Water/Sewer
Account Number
10027.1001
Project Number
Fund
Phosphorus Standards Management
Budgeted Item? Yes Current Budget
Funds Obligated
Current Balance
Does item have a cost? Yes Item Cost
Budget Adjustment Attached? No Budget Adjustment
Project Title
$ 99,856.00
99,856.00
$ 60,000.00
Remaining Budget I $ 39,856.00
V20140710
Previous Ordinance or Resolution # N/A
Original Contract Number: N/A
Comments:
Approval Date: ID -a1 -a0 [,
CITY OF
FNS
MEETING OF OCTOBER 21, 2014
TO: Mayor and City Council
THRU: Don Marr, Chief of Staff
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO
FROM: Billy Ammons, Wastewater Treatment
DATE: October 3, 2014
SUBJECT: Approval of bid waiver to provide funding to the Beaver Watershed Alliance
(BWA) to facilitate a three-phase study of the assessment methodology, uncertainty analysis,
and trend analysis of water quality in Beaver Lake.
RECOMMENDATION:
City Administration recommends approval of a bid waiver to provide a $58,562 cost -share to the
BWA for a three phase study of water quality in Beaver Lake by the University of Arkansas. A
bid waiver is necessary as it is neither practical nor feasible to bid this work competitively.
BACKGROUND:
Water quality standards for nutrients in Beaver Lake originally developed in 2008 were placed
into the recently Arkansas State Legislature approved Regulation # 2. As currently written and
without any additional data or technical information being provided, these standards would
require the Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) to designate Beaver Lake
as an impaired body of water in 2016. A designation of this type could require ADEQ to perform
a Total Maximum Daily Load study and to develop a Waste Load Allocation to all point sources.
DISCUSSION:
Dr. Thad Scott and Dr. Brian Haggard have already been selected by the BWA to collaborate on
a three-phase study to do an evaluation of the existing data pertaining to the Lake. The initial
phase will produce recommendations to ADEQ regarding how to conduct a scientifically
defensible assessment of the Lake. The second phase of the study will consider uncertainties
related to the existing data and the third would allow a review of water quality trends in the Lake.
This evaluation is important to the City as decisions reached by ADEQ could have a dramatic
impact on the City's overall wastewater and stormwater efforts. Other entities participating in
this cost -share are the Beaver Water District, Farm Bureau, and the BWA.
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
Funds are available within the Phosphorus Standards Management Project.
Attachments:
Staff Review Form -Beaver WQ Study
Signed Contract from Beaver Watershed Alliance
Purchase Order -Beaver WQ Study
Beaver Lake Standard 1 — Assessment Method Scope of Work.pdf
Beaver Lake Standard 2 — Uncertainty Analysis Method. Scope of Work.pdf
Beaver Lake Standard 3 — Trend Analysis Scope of Work.pdf
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-acgov
Fayetteville, AR 72701
City of Request Fayetteville - Purchase Order Re t PO
a � �
Requisition o.:
a e:
y
9119/2014
(Not a Purchase Order)
P.O Number:
All PO Requests shall be scanned to the Purchasing e-mail: Purchasing@fayetteville-ar.gov.
Purchase shall not be made until an actual PO has been issued.
VendorVendor
23661
Beaver Watershed Alliance
Mail r Yes r No
Legistar#:
#:
Name:
2014-0412
FOB Point:
Taxable
Address: Attn: John Pennington, 614 E Emma Ave Suite M438
r— Yes ry No
Expected Delivery Date:
Zip Code:
Ship to code:
Quotes Attached
City: Springdale
State: AR
72764
r Yes r No
Requester's Employee #:
Extension:
Requester: Cheryl Partain
2548
8224
Item
Description
Quantity
Unit of Issue
Unit Cost
Extended Cost
Account Number
Project.Sub#
Inventory #
Fixed Asset #
Three phase study of the assessment
methodology, uncertainty analysis,
1
Unit of Issue
60,000.00
$60,000.00
5400.5800.5314.00
10027.1001
and trend analysis of water quality in
Beaver Lake.
2
$0.00
3
$0.00
4
$0.00
5
$0.00
6
$0.00
7
$0.00
8
$0.00
g
$0.00
10
$0.00
Shipping/Handling
Lot
$0.00
pecial Instructions:
Subtotal: $60,000.00
Tax: $0.00
Total: $60,000.00
Approvals:
Mayor: Department Director: Purchasing Manager:
Chief Financial Officer: Budget Director: IT Director:
Dispatch Manager: Utilities Manager: Other:
Revised 6/18/2014
Beaver Lake Numeric Chlorophyll -a and Secchi Transparency Standard:
Assessment Methodology
Thad Scott and Brian Haggard
University of Arkansas
Background
Site-specific water quality criteria were developed for chlorophyll -a concentrations and secchi
transparency at Beaver Lake. in 2008. Since that time, these standards have been adopted into Arkansas
Regulation #2, which is the state regulation defining water quality standards and assessment. Although
the standard for chlorophyll -a was set as a geometric mean of growing season (May — October) and the
standard for secchi transparency was set as the annual average, no assessment methodology specific to
the water -quality standards were developed. Thus, no guidance exists to define the number of standard
exceedances allowable before water quality in Beaver Lake is considered impaired. The numeric values
of the standards for chlorophyll -a and secchi transparency, and the location in the lake where these
values should be attained, were set based on data collected from upstream and downstream locations
in the lake.
We propose a 0.5 year study to recommend assessment methodology of the site-specific chlorophyll -a
and secchi transparency standards for Beaver Lake. The objective of the study is to derive an initial
assessment methodology based on the method(s) used to develop the site-specific numeric criteria for
chlorophyll -a and secchi transparency in Beaver Lake.
Scope of Work
In order to meet the objective of this work, we will intensively review and utilize the findings of the
original study that was used to develop the water quality standards for chlorophyll -a and secchi
transparency in Beaver Lake. The following activities will also be undertaken:
• Use updated USGS data to re-create analyses from original study used to develop standards in
order to derive initial estimates of uncertainty in chlorophyll -a and secchi transparency
measurements
Evaluate expectations in exceedance based on the existing documentation used to develop the
water -quality standards based on a weight of evidence approach
Recommend an initial assessment method that can be provided to the Arkansas Department of
Environmental Quality in January 2015
The project will initiate on October 1, 2014. A draft final report will be provided to the Beaver
Watershed Alliance on or before Friday January 9, 2015.
Proposed Budget: $15,210 (See attached budget)
Proposed Budget Justification:
Salaries and Wages —Salary and fringe to cover time of Research Associate, PI, or Co -PI.
Supplies - Consumables such as statistical software licensing, paper, and ink.
BUDGET- UniversitWv of Arkansas DatR 8/5/2014
Notes from RSSP.
(1) Do not type in gray -shaded cells.
Institutional Rate:
Faculty/staff academic / calendar salary
Proposed to (Sponsor):
Beaver Watershed Alliance
(2) Follow instructions in cells with a red corner triangle.
GRA(s)
3.10%
Proposed Start & End Dates: October 1, 2014 - January 15, 2015
(3) Delete these notes when the budget is final.
Hourly, enrolled student
0.40%
UA Lead Investigator:
Thad Scott and Brian Haggard
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
Type PERSON -MONTHS
Yr 1
Yr 2
Cumulative
0 0 0
SALARIES & WAGES
Base Salary Appoint. CAL AY SMR sSponsor UA SponSOr UA A Sponsor WN
0
PI, academic or cal. year sal.
9 mo
0
0
0
0
PI, summer salary�:
r, �E
Mo,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Co -PI #1, aced. or cal. year9
Co -PI #1, summer
s mo
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Co -PI #2, acad. or cal. year
Co -PI #2, summer
12 mo. =
12 mo.
12 mo.
F Y, mo.
0
0
8,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Postdoctoral Associate
Research Associate(staff)
Research Assistant or Tech.
Graduate Assistant (PhD)
Graduate Assistant (Masters)
>: mo.
his
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Hourly, non-student(s)
W- ,K, cnrnllari cfilliAnIl
..-., s` .-,. hrs O.
0
0
0
0
Total S&W
0
FRINGE BENEFITS
Institutional Rate:
Faculty/staff academic / calendar salary
27.10%
Faculty summer salary
16.00%
GRA(s)
3.10%
Hourly, non -student
7.30%
Hourly, enrolled student
0.40%
Total FB
Total Salaries + Benerits
TRAVEL - Domestic
TRAVEL - Foreign
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (not fees or services, which are "Other")
JOURNAL PUBLICATION FEES
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Itemize by type, insert extra rows if needed.)
Subtotal Other Direct Costs
Modified Total Direct Costs (above subtotal costs sub' t to F&A Cost)
F & A COST (MTDC x RATE): IN
F &A COST (UNRECOVERED): F & A COST (COST -SHARE):
Modified Total Direct Costs (first $25K of each subaward)
F & A COST (MTDC x RATE)SUB(S): 07/.
8,000 0 0
0
8,000
0
--
GRA TUITION Credit Hours: 21
Rate: $362 0 0
0 0
�
2,168 0 0
0
2,168
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
2,168 0 0
0
2,168
0
10,168 0 0
0
10,168
0
0
0
250
250
0
-
0
z
0
0.. , _.
v,.. _ 0.
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
06_-
w
10,418 0 0
O
10,418
0
4,792 0
4,792
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
(Direct Costs not subject to F&A Cost, with the exception that the
j
first $25K of each subaward is subject to F&A):�
..
--
GRA TUITION Credit Hours: 21
Rate: $362 0 0
0 0
EQUIPMENT @ > $2500 each
0 0
PARTICIPANT (TRAINEE) SUPPORT
0 0
SUBAWARD #1, total (Institution):
0 0
SUBAWARD #2, total (Institution):
0 0
SUBAWARD #3, total (Institution):
0 0
TOTAL DIRECT COST
10,418 0 0 0
10,418 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST
$15,210 $0 $0 $0
15,210 0
Note: Any slight discrepancy in calculation is due to spreadsheet rounding.
NOTE: Tuition is increased 5% per year. In the event your project is funded and there are not enough funds to cover actual
tuition costs, you will be required to rebudget funds from another category to cover the additional cost.
Beaver Lake Numeric Chlorophyll -a and Secchi Transparency Standard:
Uncertainty Analysis
Thad Scott and Brian Haggard
University of Arkansas
Background
Site-specific water quality criteria were developed for chlorophyll -a concentrations and secchi
transparency at Beaver Lake in 2008. Since that time, these standards have been adopted into Arkansas
Regulation #2, which is the state regulation defining water quality standards and assessment. Although
the standard for chlorophyll -a was set as a geometric mean of growing season (May — October) and the
standard for secchi transparency was set as the annual average, no assessment methodology specific to
the water -quality standards were developed. Thus, no guidance exists to define the number of standard
exceedances allowable before water quality in Beaver Lake is considered impaired. The numeric values
of the standards for chlorophyll -a and secchi transparency, and the location in the lake where these
values should be attained, were set based on data collected from upstream and downstream locations
in the lake. Since that time, a substantial database has been created for chlorophyll -a measurements
near Hickory Creek Marina and other locations in the lake. An uncertainty analysis of these data will help
inform the appropriate assessment methodology.
We proposed a 1.5 year study to evaluate the uncertainty in chlorophyll -a and secchi transparency
measurements in Beaver Lake. The objective of the study is to assess the variation in chlorophyll -a and
secchi transparency across multiple spatial and temporal scales in order to validate the assessment
method.
Scope of Work
In order to meet the objective of this work, we will intensively review and utilize the findings of the
original study that was used to develop the water quality standards for chlorophyll -a and secchi
transparency in Beaver Lake. We will also identify and utilize data sources that were not included in the
original study and new data that has been collected from the study in order to assess the effect of
spatial and temporal variation on chlorophyll -a and secchi transparency measurements. The following
activities will be undertaken:
• Obtain chlorophyll -a, secchi transparency, and nutrient data for Beaver Lake from a variety of
sources including USGS, Beaver Water District, peer-reviewed publications, and theses and
dissertations from the University of Arkansas
• Use data to propagate error through the standard development process including variation
across scales that include:
o Horizontal variation across sites along the riverine-transition-lacustrine gradient
o Vertical variation across the photic zone (chlorophyll -a)
o Intra -annual variation during the growing season
o Interannual variation
• Based on the results of the more in-depth error analysis, recommend amendments to the
assessment methodology proposed in Objective 1
The project will initiate on January 12, 2015 and conclude on March 30, 2016. Results from this project
could inform potential amendments to the assessment methodology recommendations previously
derived for Beaver Lake.
Proposed Budget: $29,781 (See attached budget)
Proposed Budget Justification:
Salaries and Wages — Salary and fringe to cover time of Research Associate, PI, or Co -PI..
Travel — Support for travel to project meetings and regional and national scientific meetings.
Supplies - Consumables such as statistical software licensing, paper, and ink.
Journal publication fees - Cost of scientific publication.
UUUW�I-U111-1—-
Proposed to (Sponsor): Beaver Watershed Alliance
Proposed Start & End Dates: October 1, 2014 - March 30, 2016
UA Lead Investigator: Thad Scott and Brian Haggard
Type I PERSON -MONTHS
SALARIES & WAGES Base Salary Appoint. CAL AY SMR
PI, academic or cal. year sal. 9 mo.
Co -PI #1, acad. or cal. year 9 mo
Co -PI #1, summer > -
Co -PI #2, acad. or cal. year 9 mo
Co -PI #2, summer
Postdoctoral Associate 12 mo. I r
Research Associate(staff) $44,0001 12 mo.
Research Assistant or Tech. 12 mo.
Graduate Assistant (Ph D.) � � h T _
mo.
student
Total S&W
0
FRINGE BENEFITS
Institutional Rate:
Faculty/staff academic / calendar salary
27.10%
Faculty summer salary
16.00%
GRA(s)
3.10%
Hourly, non -student
7.30%
Hourly, enrolled student
0.40%
Total FB
Total Salaries + Benefits
TRAVEL - Domestic
TRAVEL - Foreign
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (not fees or services, which are "Other")
JOURNAL PUBLICATION FEES
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Itemize by type; insert extra rows if needed.)
Subtotal Other Direct Costs
Modified Total Direct Costs (above subtotal costs sub'ect to F&A Cost)
F & A COST (MTDC x RATE): IN
F &A COST (UNRECOVERED): F & A COST (COST -SHARE):
Modified Total Direct Costs (first $25K of each subaward)
F & A COST (MTDC x RATE)SUB(S): 0%
(Direct Costs not subject to F&A Cost, with the exception that the
first $25K of each subaward is subject to F&A):
Notes from RSSP: (1) Do not type in gray -shaded ells.
(2) Follow instructions in cells with a red corner triangle.
(3) Delete these notes when the budget is final.
Yr 1 Yr 2
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
r x
_
0 0
0
0
0 0
7,000
3,000
10,000 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
7,000 0 3,000 0
10,000 0
w
1,897 0 813- 0
2,710 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
1,897 0 813 0
2,710 0
8,897 0 3,813 0
12,710 0
r x
_
2,500 2,500
5,000 0
0 0
250 500
750 0
969 969
1,938 0
_ r
_20 .
0�
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
-. 4 t
`
12, 616 0 7,782 0
20,398 0
5,803 3,580
9,383
0
0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0
GRA TUITION Credit Hours: 21 ( Rate: $362 I
EQUIPMENT @ > $2500 each
PARTICIPANT (TRAINEE) SUPPORT
SUBAWARD #1, total (Institution):
SUBAWARD #2, total (Institution):
SUBAWARD #3, total (Institution):
TOTAL DIRECT COST
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Note: Any slight discrepancy in calculation is due to spreadsheet rounding.
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
12,616 0 7,782 0 20,398 0
$18,419 $0 $11,362 $0 29,781 0
NOTE: Tuition is increased 5% per year. In the event your project is funded and there are not enough funds to cover actual
tuition costs, you will be required to rebudget funds from another category to cover the additional cost.
Beaver Lake Numeric Chlorophyll -a and Secchi Transparency Standard:
Long -Term Trend Analysis
Thad Scott and Brian Haggard
University of Arkansas
Background
Site-specific water quality criteria were developed for chlorophyll -a concentrations and secchi
transparency at Beaver Lake in 2008. Since that time, these standards have been adopted into Arkansas
Regulation #2, which is the state regulation defining water quality standards and assessment. Although
the standard for chlorophyll -a was set as a geometric mean of growing season (May — October) and the
standard for secchi transparency was set as the annual average, no assessment methodology specific to
the water -quality standards were developed. Thus, no guidance exists to define the number of standard
exceedances allowable before water quality in Beaver Lake is considered impaired. Preliminary analyses
suggests that, depending on the assessment methodology used, Beaver Lake may be impaired based on
violations of the standards for both chlorophyll -a and secchi transparency. Sufficient data may now exist
to determine if this listing is appropriate based on long-term trends in lake water quality.
We proposed a 1.5 year study to evaluate the long-term trends in water quality in Beaver Lake and the
flowing waters which enter the reservoir. The objective of the study is to quantify trends in chlorophyll -
a, secchi transparency, and nutrient concentrations in Beaver Lake and the major inflowing rivers to
verify any potential water quality impairment.
Scope of Work
In order to meet the objective of this work, we will intensively review and utilize the findings of the
original study that was used to develop the water quality standards for chlorophyll -a and secchi
transparency in Beaver Lake. We will also identify and utilize data sources that were not included in the
original study and new data that has been collected from the study in order to assess the long-term
trends in water quality measurements. The following activities will be undertaken:
Trend analysis on Beaver Lake data including all USGS data since 2001 and any other data
identified in Objective 2 as suitable for the analysis
Trend analysis on inflow data from White River, Richland Creek, and War Eagle Creek
Investigate any methodological differences in sample analysis that could be driving any
observed trends in water quality
The project will initiate on January 12, 2015 and conclude on March 30, 2016. Results from this project
could inform potential amendments to the assessment methodology recommendations previously
derived for Beaver Lake.
Proposed Budget: $29,781 (See attached budget)
Proposed Budget Justification:
Salaries and Wages — Salary and fringe to cover time of Research Associate, PI, or Co-PI..
Travel — Support for travel to project meetings and regional and national scientific meetings.
Supplies - Consumables such as statistical software licensing, paper, and ink.
Journal publication fees - Cost of scientific publication.
BUDGET- University of Arkansas Date 8/5/2014
Notes from RSSP. (1) Do not type in gray -shaded cells.
0
Proposed to (Sponsor):
Beaver Watershed Alliance
(2) Follow instructions in cells with a red corner triangle.
Proposed Start & End Dates: October 1, 2014 - March 30, 2016
(3) Delete these notes
when the budget is final.
2,710 0
UA Lead Investigator:
Thad Scott and Brian Haggard
0
0 0
0 0
0
Type PERSON -MONTHS
Yr 1
Yr 2
Cumulative
SALARIES & WAGES
Base Salary Appoint. CAL AY SMR
,Sponsor UA
Sponsor UA Sponsor_ UA:
r
PI, academic or cal. year sal.
9 mo.
0
0
0 0
PI, summer salary0
9 mo
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
Co -PI #1, aced. or cal. year
Co -PI #1, summer
R
9 Mo.0
0
0
0
0 0
0 0
Co -PI #2, aced. or cal. year
Co -PI #2, summer
_
12 mo.
$44,0001 12 mo.
12 mo.
{ 5 W mo.
0
0
7,000
0
0
0
0
3,000
0
0
0 0
0 0
0 0
10,000 0
0 0
0 0
969
Postdoctoral Associate
Research Associate(staff)
Research Assistant or Tech.
Graduate Assistant (Ph.D.)
Graduate Assistant(Masters)
, r?
mo.
0
0
0 0
Hourly, non -students)
: hrs
>> .,, h,� .._.. , hfs (CD
0
0
0
0
0 0
O O
un. irly PnrnIIPr4 NIv4Pn4
Total S&W
FRINGE BENEFITS
Faculty/staff academic / calendar salary
Faculty summer salary
GRA(s)
Hourly, non -student
Hourly, enrolled student
Total FB
Total Salaries + Benefits
Institutional Rate:
27.10%
16.00%
3.10%
7.30%
0.40%
TRAVEL - Domestic
TRAVEL - Foreign
MATERIALS & SUPPLIES (not fees or services, which are "Other")
JOURNAL PUBLICATION FEES
OTHER DIRECT COSTS (Itemize by type; insert extra rows if needed.)
Subtotal Other Direct Costs
Modified Total Direct Costs (above subtotal costs sub'ect to F&A Cost)
F & A COST (MTDC x RATE): 46%
F &A COST (UNRECOVERED): 0%
F & A COST (COST -SHARE): 0%
Modified Total Direct Costs (first $25K of each subaward)
F & A COST (MTDC x RATE)SUB(S): F
(Direct Costs not subject to F&A Cost, with the exception that the i
first $25K of each subaward is subject to F&A):
GRA TUITION Credit Hours: 21 Rate: $362
EQUIPMENT @ > $2500 each
PARTICIPANT (TRAINEE) SUPPORT
SUBAWARD 91, total (Institution):
SUBAWARD #2, total (Institution):
7,000 0
3,000
0
10,000 0
1,897 0
813
0
2,710 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
1,897 0
813
0
2,710 0
8,897 0
3,813
0
;z
12,710 0
2,500
2,500
—
5,000 0
0 0
250
500
750 0
969
969
1,938 0
s. ,7 _�> >. _�.. _0
__..
0
0 0
0 0
0
0
0 0
�µ
v
12, 616 O
7,782
0.
20,398 0
5,803
3,580
9,383
SUBAWARD #3, total (Institution)
TOTAL DIRECT COST
TOTAL PROJECT COST
Note: Any slight discrepancy in calculation is due to spreadsheet rounding.
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
12,616 0 7,782 0 20,398 0
$18,419 $0 $11,362 $0 29,781 0
NOTE: Tuition is increased 5% per year. In the event your project is funded and there are not enough funds to cover actual
tuition costs, you will be required to rebudget funds from another category to cover the additional cost.
CONTRACT
The Beaver Watershed Alliance and theCi of F tteville, Arkansas agree to enter
into the following contract on this � day of 014.
WHEREAS, The Beaver Watershed Alliance is a non-profit corporation whose
mission is to proactively protect, enhance, and sustain water quality in Beaver Lake and
the integrity of its watershed through public outreach, scientific investigation, and
voluntary best management practice implementation; and
WHEREAS, The City of Fayetteville has to comply with mandates of the Clean Water
Act and ADEQ, and the numeric criteria set forth by ADEQ for Beaver Lake are anticipated to
be accepted by the EPA in January 2015 which could result in the designated impairment of water
quality in Beaver Lake by the ADEQ and EPA,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Beaver Watershed Alliance and the City of Fayetteville
agree as follows:
1. The City of Fayetteville agrees to cost -share in scientific development of a chlorophyll -
a and secchi disk transparency assessment methodology, and scientific investigation of an analysis
of uncertainty, and long-term trend analysis from the Beaver Watershed Alliance for the sum
of Fifty -Eight Thousand Five -Hundred Sixty -Two Dollars ($58,562.00).
2. The Beaver Watershed Alliance agrees to provide source water protection, and
scientific investigation services for the benefit of the City of Fayetteville and its citizens, during
the period of October 31, 2014 through March 14, 2016.
3. The Beaver Watershed Alliance agrees to provide a written report about a
recommended assessment methodology for chlorophyll -a and secchi disk transparency to the
Fayetteville City Council due on January 31, 2015. Additionally, the Beaver Watershed
Alliance agrees to provide a written report about an analysis of uncertainty and long-
term trend analysis regarding the criteria and assessment methodology due in March
2016.
BEAVER WATERSHED ALLIANCE CITY OF F.
Bv:
Executive Director
Lioneld
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT -GAZETTE
NORTHWESTARKANSAS
THE MORNING NEWS OF SPRINGDALE
MEWISIPAPE
LLC
THE MORNING NEWS OF ROGERS
NORTHWEST ARKANSAS TIMES
BENTON COUNTY DAILY RECORD
212 NORTH EAST AVENUE, FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72701 1 P.O. BOX 1607, 72702 1 479.442.1700 1 WWW.NWANEWS.COM
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
I, Karen Caler, do solemnly swear that I am the Legal Clerk of the
Northwest Arkansas Newspapers, LLC, printed and published in
Washington and Benton County, Arkansas, bona fide circulation,
that from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files
of said publication, the advertisement of:
City of Fayetteville -
Ordinance 5716
Was inserted in the Regular Editions on:
October 30, 2014
Publication Charges: $ 77.82
qv�sL,)
Karen Caler
Subscribed and sworn to before me
This ?t day of 9 Z-, , , 2014.
0
Notary Public
My Commission Expires: 7�2b Iz-v
CATHY WILES
Arkansas - Benlon County
Notary Public - Comm# 12397118
My Commission Expires Feb 20, 2024
RECEIVE®
NOV 05 2014
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
* *NOTE* *
Please do not pay from Affidavit. Invoice will be sent.