Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutOrdinance 5331 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIIIII i Doc ID: ' '013551360003 Type: REL Kind: ORDINANCE Recorded: 07/27/2010 at 04:20:43 PM Fee Amt: $25.00 Pace 1 of 3 Washinaton Countv. AR Bette Stamps Circuit Clerk File2010-00021163 ORDINANCE NO. 5331 AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 10-3566, FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.84 ACRES, LOCATED AT 932 GARLAND AVENUE FROM R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT, TO CS, COMMUNITY SERVICES BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as follows: From R-PZD, Residential Planned Zoning District to CS, Community Services, as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section 1 above. PASSED and APPROVED this 6ffi day of July, 2010. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: v By: &W,&, —A� ELD JO N,Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City C erwTreasurer "'111111111f RYlTR e ;FAYETTEVILLE° "%9y KANSP�J=�� EXHIBIT " A " RZN10-3566 932 GARLAND Close Up View R4 s11 VRM41� a.. �, r rr�1 7 # 7r L co, R-0 HOLLY ST aFs JAMESST 10` m a v�x .AtNYA. W '��yy'"'O Iii • z c, >[ S'ST - 10 Am 10 at �y'Ji.GY Clio *R-0 \ III ST _ r zl HUGHES ST J _ RP20 • ' PROPOSED COMMUNITY SERVICES Ifta • EAGLE ST �• , • wr w s UI _ J YEMW WNWW 0 W > LL t�a 63r 8 d' J Q PUBLIC sal Po Y firy ' TAYLOR ST Overview 0 75 150 300 450 600 Feel EXHIBIT "B" RZN 10-3566 SURVEY DESCRIPTION 932 N. GARLAND AVENUES A PART OF LOTS NUMBERED ELEVEN (11), AND TWELVE (12), ALL IN BLOCK NUMBERED FIVE (5) OF ROSE HILL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AS PER PLAT OF SAID ADDITION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11), SAID POINT BEING AN EXISTING IRON REBAR; THENCE N86045'34"E 63.71 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N86°45'34"W 61.32 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) TO AN EXISTING 1/2" IRON REBAR ON THE EAST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF ARKANSAS HIGHWAY #112 (GARLAND AVENUE) AS RELOCATED BY THE ARKANSAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION; THENCE N12°43'57"E 101.05 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON REBAR ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT TWELVE (12); THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S86043'23"E 44.72 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT TWELVE (12) TO A POINT; THENCE S03°16'37"W 99.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY DESCRIPTION HUGHES STREET A PART OF LOTS NUMBERED ELEVEN (11), AND TWELVE (12), ALL IN BLOCK NUMBERED FIVE (5) OF ROSE HILL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AS PER PLAT OF SAID ADDITION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11), SAID POINT BEING AN EXISTING IRON REBAR; THENCE N86045'34"E 63.71 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) TO A POINT; THENCE NO3°16'37"E 99.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT TWELVE (12); THENCE S86°43'23"E 62.36 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT TWELVE (12); THENCE S02°30'00"W 99.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SURVEY DESCRIPTION REMAINDER A PART OF LOTS NUMBERED SEVEN (7), EIGHT (8), NINE (9), TEN (10) ALL IN BLOCK NUMBERED FIVE (5) OF ROSE HILL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AS PER PLAT OF SAID ADDITION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), SAID POINT BEING AND EXISTING IRON REBAR; THENCE N86°50'55"W 109.61 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID 1,07' SEVEN (70) TO AN EXISTING 1/2" IRON REBAR ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ARKANSAS HIGHWAY #112 (GARLAND AVENUE) AS RELOCATED BY THE ARKANSAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION; THENCE N44°02'02"W ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 26.93 FEET TO AN EXISTING 1/2" IRON REBAR; THENCE NO3°48'11"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE 181.10 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON REBAR; THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE S86045'34"E 125.03 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON REBAR AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT TEN (10); THENCE S02°30'00"W 199.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Washington County,AR I certify this instrument was filed on 07/27/2010 04:20:43 PM and recorded in Real Estate File Number 2010-0002116 Bette Stamps-Circuit Cle City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form City Council Agenda Items and Contracts, Leases or Agreements 6/15/2010 City Council Meeting Date Agenda Items Only Andrew Garner Planning Development Services Submitted By Division Department Action Required: RZN 10-3566: (932 Garland, 444): Submitted by Kelly Ellis for property located at 932 Garland Avenue. The property is zoned R-PZD, Residential Planned Zoning District 06-2256 (932 Garland), and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is to rezone the subject property to R-O, Residential Office and RMF-40, Residential Multi-Family, 40 units per acre. Cost of this request Category/Project Budget Program Category/Project Name Account Number Funds Used to Date Program/Project Category Name Project Number Remaining Balance Fund Name Budgeted Item Budget Adjustment Attached ,(J rp5x�,-Mjj Previous Ordinance or Resolution# Departent ector Date Original Contract Date: Original Contract Number: City Attor Date (:� ,&J,_ 5 . Ll -Loto Finance and Internal Services Director Date Received in City ENTERED / ,Ql Clerk's Office 11 io CU( ief of—step Date EPdJEREq r Received in Mayor's Office M or Date Comments: �..__�� JJ Revised January 15, 2009 .rte aft `,& &tm& R,rrlf rte" -/� �D—�S�/O M jjj'''ppp ggqa �/ THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS a v/cc �! DEPARTWN'r CORRESPONDENCE wly�A' AI�Y.ANSAS CITY COUNCIL AGENDA MEMO To: Mayor and City Council �p Thru: Jeremy Pate, Development Services Director 0` From: Andrew Garner, Senior Planner Date: May 26, 2010 Subject: RZN 10-3566 (932 North Garland) RECOMMENDATION Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approval of rezoning the subject property from R-PZI:) 06-2256 (932 Garland) to R-0, Residential Office and RMF-40, Residential Multi-Family 40 Units Per Acre. BACKGROUND The subject property is located on the east side of Garland Avenue, between Berry and Hughes Street. The property contains several parcels totaling approximately 0.84 acres that is currently developed with an office and single family homes. The property is bounded by FIughes Street to the north, Berry Street to the south, Garland Avenue to the west, and a 20-foot public alley to the east. The property was previously zoned R-O, Residential Office and RMF-40, Residential Multi-Family 40 Units per Acre. On December 5, 2006 the City Council approved a request to rezone the property to its current zoning, R-PZD 06-2256 (932 Garland). The PZD zoning district allowed 37 dwelling units and 22,854 square feet of non-residential use. The R-PZD was never developed and the approval expired one year from its original approval. With the expiration of the R-PZD, development or subdivision of the property is not permitted unless the R-PZD is revoked and/or the zoning is changed. The applicant requests to return the property to the zoning that was in place prior to the R-PZD. DISCUSSION This item was heard at the regular Planning Commission meeting on May 24, 2010. The Planning Commission voted 7-0-0 to forward this rezoning request to the City Council with a recommendation for approval. BUDGETIMPACT None. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REZONING THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN REZONING PETITION RZN 10-3566, FOR APPROXIMATELY 0.84 ACRES, LOCATED AT 932 GARLAND AVENUE FROM R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DIS"IRICT 06-2256 (932 GARLAND), TO R-O, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND RMF-40, RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 40 UNITS PER ACRE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as follows: From R-PZD, Residential Planned Zoning District 06- 2256 (932 Garland) to R-O, Residential Office and RMF- 40, Residential Multi-Family, 40 units per acre, as shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section I above. PASSED and APPROVED this day of 2010. APPROVED: ATTEST: By: _ By: LIONELD JORDAN, Mayor SONDRA E. SMITH, City Clerk/Treasurer SN� 5 ta� L� C STT}+• Y� Y�.�I� ��F�j` � 4: � �{t5?4'1 3 S� . .� s��wk f� +F{�i•�y� Ji�c�a w� F£' tST�3 kP ...n. �/�'��a t:t P�'Y'�.N Y LC'� 2 l• 'S -� rely{ ':M c ? Ny .:i`' � �'� ��-,.,c���vzl��_ e' �r � ✓ fa � ks lr e f�"i: �i�r "-. r r r fr EXHIBIT "13" RZN 10-3566 TO BE REZONED R-O,RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: SURVEY DESCRIPTION 932 N. GARLAND AVENUES A PART OF LOTS NUMBERED ELEVEN (11), AND TWELVE(12), ALL IN BLOCK NUMBERED FIVE(5)OF ROSE HILL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS,AS PER PLAT OF SAID ADDITION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11), SAID POINT BEING AN EXISTING IRON REBAR; THENCE N86045'34"E 63.71 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11)TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE N86°45'34"W 61.32 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11)TO AN EXISTING 1/2" IRON REBAR ON THE EAST RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF ARKANSAS HIGHWAY #112 (GARLAND AVENUE) AS RELOCATED BY THE ARKANSAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION; THENCE N 12°43'57"E 101.05 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON REBAR ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT TWELVE(12);THENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE S86043'23"E 44.72 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT TWELVE (12)TO A POINT; THENCE SO')'I 99.64 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TO BE REZONED RMF-40,RESIDENTIAL MULTI-FAMILY, 40 UNITS PER ACRE: SURVEY DESCRIPTION HUGHES STREET A PART OF LOTS NUMBERED ELEVEN (11), AND TWELVE(12), ALL IN BLOCK NUMBERED FIVE (5) OF ROSE HILL,ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AS PER PLAT OF SAID ADDITION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11), SAID POINT BEING AN EXISTING IRON REBAR; 'THENCE N86045'34"E 63.71 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT ELEVEN (11) TO A POINT`, THENCE NO3'16'37"E 99.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT TWELVE(12); THENCE S86°43'23"E 62.36 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON AT THE NORTHEAST- CORNER OF SAID LOT TWELVE(12); THENCE S02°30'00"W 99.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Rc SURVEY DESCRIPTION REMAINDER A PART OF LOTS NUMBERED SEVEN (7), EIGHT(8), NINE (9), TEN (10) ALL IN BLOCK NUMBERED FIVE (5) OF ROSE HILL ADDITION, AN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, AS PER PLAT OF SAID ADDITION ON FILE IN THE OFFICE Of- 'FI 11.1' FTHE CIRCUIT CLERK AND EX-OFFICIO RECORDER OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT SEVEN (7), SAID POINT BEING AND EXISTING IRON REBAR_THENCE N86°50'55"W 109.61 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT SEVEN (70)TO AN EXISTING 1/2" IRON REBAR ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF ARKANSAS HIGI IWAY #1 12 (GARLAND AVENUE) AS RELOCATED BY TI IE ARKANSAS HIGHWAY COMMISSION; THENCE N44°02'02"W ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE 26.93 FEET TO AN EXISTING 1/2" IRON REBAR; TI IENCE,NO3°48'I I"E ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE 18 1.10 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON REBAR; TFIENCE LEAVING SAID RIGHT-OF- WAY LINE S86045'34"E 125.03 FEET TO AN EXISTING IRON REBAR AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT TEN (10);THENCE S02°30'00"W 199.21 FEE`F TG THE POINT OE BEGINNING. Taye PC Meeting of May 24, 2010 r,n1<nnzn<. I III: CITY OF FAY 13" l_FVI1.I.F. ARKANSAS 125 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE releplime:(479)575-8267 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Andrew Garner, Senior Planner Matt Casey, Assistant City Engineer THRU: Jeremy Pate, Development Services Director DATE: M^ 0 Updated May 26 2010 RZN 10-3566: (932 GARLAND/JORDAN HOLDINGS,444): Submitted by KELLY ELLIS for property located at 932 GARLAND AVENUE. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT 932 GARLAND, and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is to rezone the subject property from R-PZD, Residential-Planned Zoning District to R-O, Residential Office and RMF-40, Residential Multi-Family, 40 Units per Acre. Plainer:Andrew Garner BACKGROUND: Property description and background. The subject property is located at 932 Garland Avenue. between Berry and Hughes Street. The property contains several parcels totaling approximately 0.84 acres that is currently developed with an office and single family homes.The property is bounded by Hughes Street to the north, Berry Street to the south, Garland Avenue to the west, and a 20-foot public alley to the east. The property was previously zoned R-O, Residential Office and RMF-40, Residential Multi-Family 40 Units per Acre. On December 5, 2006 the City Council approved a request to rezone the property to its current zoning,R-PZD 06-2256(932 Garland).The PZD zoning district allowed 37 dwelling units and 22,854 square feet of non-residential use. The R-PZD was never developed and the approval expired one year from its original approval. With the expiration of the R-PZD,development or subdivision of the property is not permitted unless the R-PZD is revoked and/or the zoning is changed. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Direction Land Use Zoning North Commercial strip center C-2 South Residential RMF-40 East Residential RMF-40 West Undeveloped R-O Proposal: The applicant proposes to repeal the R-PZD zoning and revert back to the zoning that was in place prior to the R-PZD, R-O and RMF-40. The R-O portion of the site would contain only the building at 932 Garland that is currently being used as an office, and the remainder of the property G IETCVJevelopment Services Revieiv120101DevelopmentRevieiv170-3566 RZN 932 Garland dve.Jordan Pi opetties103-Plarorittg Comniissiou105-24-101Comurenis mvd Redlines would be zoned RMF-40. The process of revolting a PZD as an enforcement action is an option for this property. However, the applicant has submitted a request to rezone the property back to the original zoning. This action would enable the applicant to utilize and develop the property under the standards in place today. INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: The site has access to Garland Avenue, Hughes Street, and Berry Street. Garland Avenue is a four lane state highway in this location. Hughes Street is an unimproved two lane paved city street in this location. Berry Street is an improved two lane paved city street in this location. Street improvements will be evaluated with development. Water: Water is available to the property. There is a 12"public main located across Garland Avenue and a 2"main located on Berry Street. Public water main improvements may need to be constructed to provide domestic and fire flow for any proposed development. Sewer: Sanitary sewer is available to the site. There is an 8" public main located along the west side of this property. The existing sanitary sewer may need to be analyzed to ensure that it has adequate capacity to serve a future development on this lot. Public mains may need to be extended through this property to serve any proposed development. Fire: The subject property is located approximately a '/4 mile from Fire Station #2. Response time to the property is approximately 1.5 minutes. There should be no adverse effects on call volume. Police: At the time of publication of this report not objections to this rezoning were provided by the Police Department. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning to R-O,Residential Office and RMF-40, Residential Multi-Family 40 Units per Acre based on the findings included as part of this report. G IE7Y'IDevelopurenl Services Revieud20101Develapnienl Revieivll0-3566 RZN 932 Garland Ave-Jordan P,opet lies103-Planning Connnission105-24-101Comnvenis and Redlines PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES X Forward to City Council (recommend approval) ❑ Denied Date: May 24, 2010 Motion: Winston Second: Cabe Vote: 7-0-0 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required YES ❑ Approved O Denied Date: LAND USE PLAN: The Future Land Use Plan adopted as part of the City Plan 2025 designates this site City Neighborhood Area. Rezoning this property to R -O and RMF-40 would be consistent with this designation as these zonings would permit a mix of uses and high density residential development in the core of the City. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF I. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: The subject property is located just north of the University of Arkansas in a compact and dense core area of the City with a mix of surrounding uses. This area of the City has existing public services and infrastructure. The site is designated as a City Neighborhood Area on the future land use plan. Rezoning the property to R -O, Residential Office for the existing office at 932 Garland and RMF-40 for the remainder of the property would be consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and to encourage compact, complete development and infill and revitalization in the City's core. The proposed zonings are also consistent with surrounding multi -family and commercial zonings and future development on this site under the proposed zonings would be compatible with surrounding development patterns. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: A rezoning of the property is justified at this time. Due to the fact that the PZD has expired the property cannot be developed or subdivided. Revoking or rezoning the current PZD are the only options that allow further development on the property. Rezoning the property is needed in order to obtain a reasonable economic use of the property. The applicant is requesting that the G V !1 Wevelopment Services Revies120101Developmenl Revieiv110-3566 RZN 932 Garland Ave. Jordan Properlies103- Planning Connnis.sionl05-24-101Connnenis and Redlines site be rezoned to the zoning that was in place prior to the PZD. This is a reasonable and compatible request with the surrounding land uses and zoning. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: Based on staff findings the proposed rezoning would not create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion in the area. The property is located in a busy core area of the City and is located adjacent to Garland Avenue, a Principal Arterial Street, and is also served by Hughes and Berry Streets which are Local Streets. The existing R-PZD zoning would have permitted a 37 -unit multi -family residential development along with approximately 27,000 square feet of non-residential use. The proposed zoning would revert the property back to the R -O and RMF-40 districts. This would result in development with similar average daily vehicle trips and demand on the surrounding street system as the existing R-PZD zoning and would not create adverse traffic impacts. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: Based on the findings from public services providers, as outlined in the introduction section of this report, an undesirable increase in load on public services would not be created. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1) through (4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1) through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A G-UE%ClDeve/opmeni Services Review120101Development Revieiv110-356612ZN 932 Gmdand Ave. Jordan Properlies103- Planning Conniission105-24-J OIConmenls and Redlines 161.15 District RMF-40, Residential Multi -Family — Forty Units Per Acre (A) Purpose. The RMF-40 Multi -family Residential District is designated to protect existing high density multi- family development and to encourage additional development of this type where it is desirable. (B) Uses. (1) Permitted uses. Unit 1 I City-wide uses by right Unit 8 I Single-family dwellings Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 10 Three-family dwellings Unit 26 Multi -family dwellings (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by CUP Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 5 Government facilities Unit 11 Manufactured home park Unit 12 Limited business Unit 24 _ Home occupation Unit 25 Professional offices Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities (C) Density. Units per acre 40 or less _j] (D) Bulk and area regulations. (1) Lot width inininnon. Manufactured home park 100 ft. Lot within a manufactured home park 50 ft. Single-family 60 ft. Two-family 60 ft. Three or more 90 ft. Professional offices 100 ft. (2) Lot area minimum. Manufactured home park 3 acres Lot within a manufactured home park 4,200 sq. ft. Townhouses Development Individual lot 10,000 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. Sinqle-family 6,000 sq. ft. Two-family 6,500 sq. ft. Three or more 8,000 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 1 acre (3) Land area per dwelling unit. G IETCIDevelopment Services Reviem120101Developmenl Revieu,110-3566 RZN 932 Garland Ave. Jordan Properlies103- Planning Conanusion105-24-1 olCourmerns and Redlines Manufactured home park 3,000 sq. ft. Townhouses & Apartments No bedroom 1.000 sq. ft One bedroom 1,000 sq. ft. Two or more bedrooms 1,200 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 500 sq. ft. per resident (F) Setback requirements. Front Side Rear The principal 8 ft. 20 ft. facade of a building shall be built within a build - to zone that is located between 10 feet and a line 25 feet from the front property line. Cross reference(s)—Variance, Ch. 156. (F) Building height regulations. 1 Building Height Maximum 60 ft. Height regulations. Any building which exceeds the height of20 feet shall be set back from any side boundary line of an adjacent single family district, an additional distance of one foot for each foot of height in excess o120 feet. (G) Building area. None. (H) Minimum buildable street frontage. 50% of the lot width. (Code 1965, App. A, Art. 5(tV); Ord. No. 2320.4-5-77; Ord. No. 2700,2-2-81 ; Ord No. 1747.6-29-70; Code 1991,§160.034; Ord. No.4100, §2 (la. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4178, 8-31-99; Ord. 5028, 6-19-07; Ord. 5224, 3-3-09; Ord. 5262. 8-4-09;Ord. 5312, 4-20-10) G:I TCIDevelopntent Services Reviev1201OIDevelopurent Review110-3566 RCN 932 Gar Lind Ave- Jordan Properties103- Planning Counnission105-24-101Cmnnrents and Redlines 161.17 District R -O, Residential Office (A) Purpose. The Residential -Office District is designed primarily to provide area for offices without limitation to the nature or size of the office, together with community facilities, restaurants and compatible residential uses. (B) Uses. (I ) Permitted uses. Unit 1 City-wide uses by right Unit 5 Government facilities Unit 8 Single-family dwellings Unit 9 Two-family dwellings Unit 12 Limited business Unit 25 Offices, studios, and related services (2) Conditional uses. Unit 2 City-wide uses by conditional use permit Unit 3 Public protection and utility facilities Unit 4 Cultural and recreational facilities Unit 11 Manufactured home park* Unit 13 Eating laces Unit 15 Neighborhood shopping oods Unit 24 Home occupations Unit 26 Multi -family dwellings Unit 36 Wireless communications facilities* Unit 42 Clean technologies (C) Density. Unitsper I 24 or less II (D) Bulk and area regulations. (Per dwelling unit for residential structures) ( l ) Lot width ininimurn. Manufactured home park 100 ft. Lot within a manufactured home park 50 ft. Single-family 60 ft. Two-family 60 ft. Three or more 90 ft. (2) Lot area minimum. Manufactured home park 3 acres Lot within a manufactured home park 4,200 sq. ft. Townhouses: Development Individual lot 10.000 sq. ft. 2,500 sq. ft. Single-family 6,000 sq. ft. Two-family 6,500 sq. ft. Three or more 6,000 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 1 acre GAS CIDevelopment Services Revierv120101 Development Review\/ 0-3566 RZN 932 Garland Ave. Jordan P;operties103- Planning Commission 05-24-1 0lComments and Redlines (3) Lined area per drwelling unit. Manufactured home 3,000 sq. ft. Townhouses & apartments: No bedroom 1,000 sq. ft. One bedroom 1,000 sq. ft. Two or more bedrooms 1,200 sq. ft. Fraternity or Sorority 500 sq. ft. per resident (E) Setback regulations. Front 15 ft. Front, if parking is allowed between the right- of -way and the building 50 ft. Front, in the Hillside Overlay District 15 ft. Side 10 ft. Side, when contiguous to a residential district 15 ft. Side, in the Hillside Overlay District 8 ft Rear, without easement or alley 25 ft. Rear, from center line of public alley 10 ft. Rear, in the Hillside Overlay District 15 ft. (F) Building height regulations. Building Height Maximum 60 ft. Height regulations. Any building which exceeds the height of 20 feet shall be set back from any side boundary line of an adjacent single family district an additional distance of one foot for each foot of height in excess of 20 feet. (G) Building area. On any lot, the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60% of the total area of such lot. (Code No. 1965, App. A., An. 5(x); Ord. No. 2414, 2-7-78; Ord. No, 2603.2-19-80; Ord. No. 2621, 4-1-80; Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70; Code 1991, § 160.041; Ord. No. 4100, §2 (Ex. A), 6-16-98; Ord. No. 4178, 8-31-99; Ord. 4726.7-19-05; Ord. 4943.11-07-06; Ord. 5079, 1 1-20.07; Ord. 5195. 11- 6-08; Ord. 5224, 3-3-09; Ord. 5312. 4-20-10) G lETCIDevelopment Services Review120101Development Review110-3566 RZN 932 Garland dve. Jordan Propertiesl03- Planning Conmrission105-24-101Commenrs and Redlines (5/18/2010) Amy Slone Re: zoning review tour Page 1 FIRE DFPAPrMEnT From: Terry Lawson (c: +y of Pafgtkk%II( Fite Mars1,A1I, To: Slone, Amy Date: 5/18/2010 10:05 AM Subject: Re: zoning review tour No objections. TL >>> Amy Slone 5/17/2010 11:30 AM >>> Zoning Review Team: See the requests below for one property requesting rezoning. Please review this item and respond to this email by the end of the day May 19, 2010. Let me or the individual planner assigned to the item know if you have any questions. A map indicating the project location is also attached. Thank you, Amy RZN 10-3566: (932 GARLAND / JORDAN HOLDINGS, 444): Submitted by KELLY ELLIS for property located at 932 GARLAND AVENUE. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT 932 GARLAND, and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is to rezone the subject property from R-PZD, Residential -Planned Zoning District to R -O, Residential Office and RMF-24, Residential Multi -Family, 24 Units per Acre. Planner: Andrew Garner Amy Slone Planning Technician Development Services City of Fayetteville The U.S. Census takes place during March and April of this year. BE COUNTED! Your community is counting on you! ENGIN2£KIN ( DIVISIo� RZN 10-3566: (932 GARLAND / JORDAN HOLDINGS, 444): b..5mitted by KELLY ELLIS for property located at 932 GARLAND AVENUE. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT 932 GARLAND, and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is to rezone the subject property from R-PZD, Residential -Planned Zoning District to R -O, Residential Office and RMF-24, Residential Multi -Family, 24 Units per Acre. Planner: Andrew Garner Public water is available to the property. There is a 12" public main located across Garland Avenuea and a 2" main located on Berry Street. Public water main improvements may need to be constructed to provide domestic and fire flow for any proposed development. Sanitary sewer is available to the site. There is an 8" public main located along the west side of this property. The existing sanitary sewer may need to be analyzed to ensure that it has adequate capacity to serve a future development on this lot. Public mains may need to be extended through the property to serve any proposed development. The site has access to Garland Avenue, Hughes Street, and Berry Street. Garland Avenue is a four lane state highway in this location. Hughes Street is an unimproved two lane paved city street in this location. Berry Street is an improved two lane paved city street in this location. Street improvements will be evaluated with development submittal. Standard improvements and requirements for drainage will be required for any development. This property is not affected by the 100 -year floodplain. R INFORMATION TOTAL AREA TO P0 G RA PH Y S U) 8 #1 0.84 ACRES 1 57.32 36,751.1 SQ. M 359.65 ) 760 76)75 )es.iosoi an 79).lm)uma 1359.63 or cranosrsuxr roucnnrs p�lwxnlgcs x5067071010] 010051 1050707 051)07 I FAYtDIIVp. IIJV'✓.NS.YS 71 ]o) .I W:4Un .n[]t/W M1nf21Il I ./.Nn Sn3 ))MI EN2 S )9.93 392.28 e,85----+'� *' HUGHES STREET -1]92.22 sBL �. ._y-- - 1*`� g[wcv Mwllott yl w� F•� n2or Intn / j}6 O' 35838Os / c 6 °�5 —E 195031 o '1,67 601 C'li I p 367.87 °PVX u" •1365.87 I __ t ��] 9� v yw7 ��0 kA mhun "� SEb 374. ) ., 1 $ ._ �,». 1, , � 0 '13.9) ) .. t`� S } _M1wrwEtaosE '! = 1374.88 _ A w Is '4.38 som 3HW5E e mrUnti =)32 O Nmnry if II 9 38.ln[ . ' 1388.13 ` � 1 L .�_ 2603' CV TROOUI /OROP 60111 /6 �a®mow v edDROP 10117 87 QWNCR MNlSFIOD i ,4R65; 904,920,' MAYSTTEVI 72701 BA5159LEI.fv�pgf{' 4'1 SEAS April 14, 2010 For rezoning of property located at 932 N. Garland, Fayetteville, AR. Rezoning Checklist: Section 5: a. Current owner of this property is Jordan Holdings, LLC, 400 Plaza Street, West Helena, AR 72390. Principle is Henry Jordan, Jr. Home Address is 87 Sologne, Little Rock, AR 72223. Phone: 501.821.6641 or 501.821.2529. Within this block, owner has property at 904 N. Garland listed with Kelly Ellis, Crye-Leike Realtors. b. Reason for Rezoning request: Owner would like to sell 932 Garland as a separate property. Currently, this property has the same parcel number as an additional adjacent property at 1003 Hughes. According to Andrew Garner with the Planning Commission, the entire block needs to be rezoned from a PZD back to its previous zoning, which I believe was RMF24, then the property could be split. c. There would be no change to land use, traffic, appearance, and signage, as the PZD was never implemented. d. Availability of water and sewer — same as before, no changes to this entire block. e. Degree to which it is consistent — reverting back, is consistent to what it had been previously. f. Needed: Yes, this rezoning is needed, as the property at 932 Garland currently is under contract and the sale is contingent on this rezoning and the subsequent lot split that will occur. g. Increased traffic danger: no effect h. Alter population density — no effect i. Why impractical under current zoning — PZD project never went forward, reverting to previous use and zoning. ORDINANCE NO. 4955 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT TITLED R-PZD 06-2256, 932 GARLAND, LOCATED AT 932 GARLAND, BETWEEN BERRY AND HUGHES STREET, CONTAINING APPROXIMATELY 0.84 ACRES; AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE; AND ADOPTING THE ASSOCIATED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1: That the zone classification of the following described property is hereby changed as follows: From RMF-40, Residential Multi -Family, 40 units per acre and R -O, Residential Office, to R-PZD 06-2256 as shown in Exhibit "A" and depicted in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 2: That the change in zoning classification is based upon the approved master development plan, development standards, statement of commitments and the conditions of approval as submitted, determined appropriate and approved by the City Council indicated in Exhibit "C" attached hereto and made a part hereof. Section 3: That this ordinance shall take effect and be in full force at such time as all of the requirements of the master development plan have been met. Section 4: That the official zoning map of the City of Fayetteville, Arkansas, is hereby amended to reflect the zoning change provided in Section I above. PASSED and APPROVED this 5'h day of December, 2006. APPROVED: By: ATTEST: By: SO RA SMITH City Clerk :FAYETTEVILLE El 1 c, xw PC Meeting of October 9, 2006 ARKANSAS THE, CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Jesse Fulcher, Current Planner Matt Casey, Assistant City Engineer THRU: Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning DATE: October 2, 2006 125 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Telephone: (479) 575-8267 MDP R-PZD 06-2256: Residential Planned Zoning District (932 GARLAND): Submitted by ARCHITECTS 226, INC. for property located at 932 GARLAND, BETWEEN BERRY AND HUGHES STREET. The property is zoned RMF-40, MULTI FAMILY - 40 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 0.84 acres. The request is to review a Master Development Plan for a Residential Planned Zoning District with 37 dwelling units and 22,854 s.f. of commercial space. Property Owner: MANSFIELD PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLC. Planner: JESSE FULCHER Findings: Property Description: The property consists of several parcels totaling 0.84 acres that is currently developed with single-family homes within the RMF-40, Residential Multi -family zoning district. The property is bounded by Hughes Street to the north, Berry Street to the south, Garland Avenue to the west and a 20' public alley to the east. The property is currently zoned R- 0 and RMF-40. Surrounding Land Use/Zoning. Direction Land Use Zoning North Commercial strip center C-2 South Residential RMF-40 East Residential RMF-40 West Undeveloped R -O Proposal: The applicant requests a rezoning and Master Development Plan approval for a mixed -use project on the property within one (I) planning area. The proposal includes street - level retail/restaurant space along Garland Avenue and office space on the second level for a maximum of 22,854 square feet of non-residential space. A maximum of 37 residential condominiums, totaling 66,227 square feet will be provided above the non-residential floors. This results in a total density of 44.04 dwelling units per acre and an intensity of 27,207 SF of K: IRepons120061PC Repo, tsil0-09-061MDP R-PZD 06-2256 (932 Garland).doc nonresidential space per acrc over the entire 0.84 acre site. The parking will be accommodated on -site in a two -level parking garage with access from both Hughes and Berry Streets. To meet applicable zoning criteria, the proposed Planning Area has to have established bulk and area criteria, setbacks, height, etc. Otherwise the proposal would have to return to the City Council to address these zoning issues with development. The information is provided both in a booklet form, which describes the intent of the Planning Area along with a conceptual drawing, and by way of the larger plat, which gives much of the same technical information, along with the actual Master Development Plan. The building, street, and parking arrangement indicated on the master plan will likely vary somewhat from that which is presented. However, these issues can be resolved with the development review of the project and additional City Council action, if needed. At this step in the process it is important to make the policy decision of whether the zoning is appropriate and compatible to this area, given the proposed Master Development Plan, statement of commitments, and development standards. Process: The purpose of the subject request is for a rezoning approval in order to secure entitlement for the property with a concept for a variety of uses and infrastructure improvements to support the community. Approval of the Master Development Plan Planned Zoning District would effectively rezone the property based on the conceptual plans and information provided in the booklets. However, it does not give development approval. The applicant is required to return through the large scale development process in order for the Planning Commission to confirm that the development plans presented are compliant with the zoning and Master Development Plans approved by the City Council. Bulk and area criteria, while usually provided within the staff report, have been provided in duplicate by the applicant. The project booklet provided gives the zoning criteria in detail, as do the Master Development Plans. Please reference this provided material for more information. The booklet and plats presented are binding once approved, by ordinance. Water & Sewer: Water and sewer lines are currently available in the area, and will be designed and constructed in accordance with city specifications to serve the development. Access: Access to the site is provided from Garland Avenue, Berry Street, Hughes Street and a mid -block alley. No vehicular access is to be provided directly from Garland Avenue. Sidewalks will be improved in the area to provide pedestrian access. Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: Garland Avenue (Principal Arterial), Berry Street (Local Street), Hughes Street (Local Street) Street Improvements: The developer is proposing to install curb and gutter along Hughes and Berry Streets as well as storm drainage along Hughes Street. The alley along the east side of the property will be rehabilitated and paved with asphalt, resulting in a 20' width for two-way traffic movements. Additionally, the applicant proposes 8' sidewalks along Hughes Street and Garland Avenue and a 4' sidewalk along Berry Street. The sidewalk along Garland will be partially located outside of the dedicated right-of-way and therefore will be located within a pedestrian access easement. Recommendations for additional improvements may be required once K: Ittepa trV 006IPC Repo, esl10-(19-061AIDP R-PZD 06-2256 (932 Garland) dac development plans have been submitted and reviewed, based upon the actual development proposal submitted. Tree Preservation: Ticc preservation requirements will be assessed at the time of large scale development. By ordinance, staff will require preservation of tree canopy on -site unless supportive information is provided as to why on -site preservation requirements can not be met. Supportive information could include a tree inventory provided by a certified arborist assessing all existing tree canopy. Parks: The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board reviewed this project on August 17, 2006 and recommended accepting money -in -lieu to satisfy the Park Land Dedication Ordinance requirement. Based on the number of units proposed at this time (37, less a credit for five existing homes), $20,360.00 would be required. Actual numbers will be generated at the time of development. Public Comment: Staff has not received any public opposition to the project. The applicant did present the plans at a Ward 4 meeting with City Council representatives and citizens for input. Phasing: The development of the 932 Garland project is anticipated to occur over the next 1-4 years. A phasing schedule has been provided within the project booklet, identifying the anticipated construction time frame. Upon Large Scale Development approval, the estimated time frame will be 9-12 months for pre -construction work and 18-20 months for construction. The standard one-year.time frame with a one-year extension available for typical large scale developments is adequate, pursuant to City codes. Recommendation: Staff recommends forwarding a recommendation of approval of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District for 932 Garland (R- PZD 06-2256) to the City Council, with the following conditions: Conditions of Approval: The Master Development Plan, Statement of Commitments and Architectural Standards submitted by the applicant shall be considered binding and tied to the zoning of the property. Conditions of approval as noted herein and other requirements placed upon the project with review of the Master Development Plan — Planned Zoning District by the City Council, including the statement of commitments and development standards presented in the project booklet, shall also be binding and enforceable by law. Approval of this Master Development Plan —Planned Zoning District shall not be construed as development approval. Pursuant to city ordinance, all development of the property shall be approved by the Planning Commission through the large scale development and/or subdivision review process. The large scale development shall be evaluated based on the zoning and development criteria established with the Master Development Plan. Circulation, landscaping, tree preservation, design standards, connectivity, infrastructure improvements and other city policies and ordinances remain applicable with the development review process. The conceptual designs proposed are K: IRepons120061PC RepoiisV0-09-06:MDP R-PZD 06-2256 (932 Gartand)_doe to be used as a template from which detailed plans are produced; however, it is expected that certain items will change, in accordance with the Planned Zoning District ordinance. Zoning and development criteria shall be enforced as approved by the City Council, and currently referenced in the 932 Garland project booklets and on the submitted Master Development Plan plats. Flexibility will be allowed in the development criteria listed in the booklet, but Planning Commission approval of development is required. The approved plans, commitments and standards will be kept on file in the Planning Division, and referenced for subsequent development proposed on the property. All density and intensity information provided is maximum totals for the property. 4. Signage: All signage within each Phase of the Master Development Plan shall be permitted in accordance with the current sign regulations at the time of development. More stringent regulations may be placed on tenants within 932 Garland to ensure a cohesive sign program; however, the sign ordinance may not be violated in doing so. Commercial tenants within the project shall be permitted to utilize signage in compliance with commercial zoning districts; all commercial signage shall be placed on the portion of the structure utilized for commercial activities. No signage shall be permitted above the 2°(1 story of the building, as this is residential in use. No pole or pylon signs shall be permitted within the 932 Garland project site. Phasing: In order to ensure the proposed Master Development Plan meets all of the goals and criteria set forth, a phasing schedule has been submitted (reference the project booklet). If certain permitting times are not met, the Planned Zoning District approval shall be voided, or extended as allowed by §166 of the UDC. The following development phasing shall be enforced: • The applicant shall be granted one (1) year from the date of Planning Commission approval of the large scale development to receive all permits necessary for development of the Phase with a one (1) year extension available. 6. Public water and sewer lines shall be extended as required by city ordinance at the time of development. Detailed analysis of the existing water and sewer systems will be required to be submitted with the development submittal. Future development shall comply with at least the minimum design standards for development in the Unified Development Code as adopted at the time of develoment, including but not limited to landscaping, parking, access, street design, stormwater detention, tree preservation, etc. All structures proposed shall be reviewed to ensure appropriate architectural compatibility, compliance with commercial design standards, and/or conformance with the architectural standards and concepts provided with the subject submittal. 8. Overhead awnings, balconies, stairways, stoops and other appurtenances to the primary structure may not extend within the Master Street Plan right-of-way. Allowances shall K: IRepo, u12006iP(' Repo, isU0-09-06!AlDP R -/'Z/) 06-2256 (932 Gail and).doc be at the discretion of the Planning Commission and City Council to ensure safety measures, clearance and other criteria for zoning and development in the Unified Development Code are not compromised. 9. Street improvements at the time of development shall include those determined necessary by the Planning Commission, based upon the development proposed at the time of submittal. Staff will recommend, at minimum, the following: • Install curb and gutter along Hughes and Berry Streets as well as storm drainage along Hughes Street. The alley along the east side of the property will be rehabilitated and paved with asphalt, resulting in a 20' width for two-way traffic movements. Additionally, 8' sidewalks will be constructed along Hughes Street, Garland Avenue and Berry Street. The sidewalk along Garland will be partially located outside of the dedicated right-of-way and therefore will be located within a pedestrian access casement. Additional improvements may be required once development plans have been submitted and reviewed in detail. 10. All sidewalks shall meet applicable City and A.D.A. requirements. Ii. All development shall meet applicable building codes and other ordinances of the City of Fayetteville. 12. Street lights shall be installed on all abutting streets with a maximum spacing of 300'. 13. Street trees shall be provided pursuant to Chapter 177, Landscape Regulations, pertaining to the provision of urban tree wells in this location. Subject to sight distance limitations, street trees shall be planted along Berry, Hughes and Garland Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES Planning Commission Action: '1 Fowarded ❑ Denied ❑ Tabled Motion: Graves Second: Clark Vote: 8-0-0 Meeting Date: October 9, 2006 Comments: The Planning Commission made the following comments: -. More windows or doors were recommended/or the west elevation at street level, to create a more "inviting" experience at the pedestrian level. - The width of Garland helped balance the height of the structure. - Removal of the existing curb -cuts was an improvement to the site. - Recommended utilizing the same tree species as the University used for the boulevard section. - Height at the northeast corner of the property was a concern. - View of Old Main from Garland. - Good introduction into campus. K:1 Repoas120061PC Reports1/0-09-06 MOP R-PZD 06-2250 (932 Gotland). doe CITY COUNCIL ACTION: City Council Action: Motion: Second: Vote: Meeting Date: Comments: Required YES ❑ Approved LI Denied I I Tabled November 7 2006 The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", stated in this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this rezoning/master development plan item. By Date K-:IReports120061PC Reports110-09-06IM/JP R-PZD 06-2256 (932 Gmiand).doc b. Summary Description of the Scope Nature and Intent of the Proposal 932 Garland is conceived to reflect the role of Fayetteville as the progressive intellectual and cultural heart of Northwest Arkansas. By projecting an image that is at once comfortably substantial and confidently modem, the building capitalizes on the civic prominence of the site and establishes a positive urban vision for the future development of Garland Avenue. Considering the proximity to the University of Arkansas and the ready access to Interstate 540, the intersection of Garland and North/Wedington serves as a primary northern gateway to the city. Unfortunately, this intersection currently suffers from a lack of cohesive vision resulting in a chaotic suburban environment that is not reflective of the urban character of the university and city beyond. 932 Garland intends to counter such suburban banality with a massing strategy that reinforces Garland Avenue as one of the premier boulevards of the city. A symbolic gateway in the form of a large-scale aperture is incorporated in the design on the northwest comer thereby introducing a definitive point of reference for the 13,000 vehicles and thousands of pedestrians that pass the site daily on their way to and from the University of Arkansas (Figure 01). The project is located at the edge of the Rose Hill Neighborhood. Rose Hill is largely composed of rental houses and a discordant array of small- scale multi -family apartments that have developed over time in an ad -hock manner. The area has transformed from an owner occupied neighborhood to a rental zone primarily occupied by students attending the university. The quality of the building stock has sharply declined and the charm that had once marked the area has deteriorated significantly. 932 Garland is, therefore, a significant revitalization effort, demonstrating the future growth of the area. "32 0AffLA I D 4 —v -1 ->', C7QNayny4 - Introduction The City of Fayetteville today is poised to capitalize on two decades of sustained growth and prosperity. Significant improvements to the urban infrastructure in conjunction with a re- discovery of the benefits of urban living have contributed to a revolution in how architecture contributes positively to the improvement of the city. Responding to those influences and decidedly contemporary in its urban vision, 932 Garland presents a new landmark for the City of Fayetteville. Positioned near the intersection of two primary avenues at the northern gateway to the university, this building proposal will project to visitors the cultural aspirations of Fayetteville for the 21st Century. Additionally, the range of uses —residential, retail and office space —are synthesized within an urban infill proposal that reflects the spirit of the Fayetteville 2025 City Plan. The program consists of a single mixed -use structure containing street -level retail along Garland Avenue, rental office space on the second level, and thirty-seven residential condominiums above. The parking will be accommodated on site in a two -level parking garage with access from both Hughes and Berry Streets. The design is directed toward professionals, university professors and families who are attracted to a modem maintenance - free housing option with ready access to the University and other Fayetteville amenities. a. Current Ownership Information 932 Garland will be constructed on a site that is wholly owned by Mansfield Property Management and is bounded by Garland Avenue (Arkansas 112) to the west, Hughes Street to the north, Berry Street to the south, and a mid - block alley to the east (Figure 02). 932 &ARLAP!Q N-f'LD 932 Darla„ j With new residential condominiums 932 will re- introduce more permanent residents into the otherwise transient population and serve as a new anchor for the neighborhood. Although the area is zoned as high -density residential (RMF40) it is currently under-utilized and under -populated. Increasing land values based on its proximity to the University of Arkansas coupled with low occupant density ensure that this neighborhood is poised to undergo a significant process of densification in the coming years. Considering that the University is also developing northward along Garland, such densification of this transportation corridor is inevitable. Anticipating this trend 932 Garland intends to establish a precedent for developing a strong urban character along the broad Garland Avenue Boulevard (Figure 03). The multi -story residential volumes are shifted toward the west and north of the site in response to the institutional character of the nearby university. buildings. This enables the scale of the project to step down considerably to the east and south in deference to the residential scale of the adjacent properties [Figures 04, 05]. Additionally, this PZD approval enables the project to contribute positively to the street life of Fayetteville by introducing new retail spaces along Garland. The ability to distribute that use along the main avenue responds to the volume of pedestrian traffic moving to and from the university. Additionally, providing of small-scale retail opportunities south of Wedington will offer residents of Rose Hill a shopping venue that is an alternative to negotiating the dangerous vehicular traffic along Wedington. 932 Garland is composed of 37 residential condominiums, 10,264sf of street level retail, a possible 4,550sf restaurant and 8,040sf of office space. The parking is accessed on two 932 GMUWR I,• ff ii �i 4Y i., RZN 10-3566 Close Up View I Overview 932 GARLAND no�NrcoMFORr ,, lL a II jJ y 0 75 150 EAGLE ST A 300 m 450 600 BERRY ST Z F RECEIVED JUL 2 72010 NORTHWEST ARKANSAS EWSPAPERSLLC Northwest Arkansas Democrat Gazette The Morning News of Springdale The Morning News of Rogers Northwest Arkansas Times Benton County Daily Record 212 North East Avenue, Fayetteville Arkansas 72701/ PO Box 1607, 72702 PHONE: 479-571-6421 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE I, Cathy Wiles, do solemnly swear that I am Legal Clerk of the Northwest Arkansas Newspapers LLC. Printed and published in Washington & Benton County, (Lowell), Arkansas and that from my own personal knowledge and reference to the files of said publication, the advertisement of: City of Fayetteville — Ordinance 5331 July 15, 2010 Publication Charge : $ 58.36 Signed: Subscribed and sworn to before me Thisa,3-day of , 2010. Notary Public My Commission Expires: Do not pay from Affidavit, an invoice will be sent Jlm Mears Washington County Commission Number/2374647 Notary Public • Arkansas My Commission Expires Jan. 20, 2020