HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-01-19 - Agendas - Final Lioneld Jordan Chairman e;li
Jerry Friend Retired Position 2
Sondra E.Smith TreasurerFayve Tim Helder Retired Position 3
Eldon Roberts Secretary/Retired Position I Melvin Stanley Retired Position 4
ie
Frank Johnson Retired Position 5
ARKANSAS
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Agenda
January 19, 2012
A meeting of the Fayetteville Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund Board of Trustees will be
held on January 19, 2012 at 3:00 PM in Room 326 of the City Administration Building located at
113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Roll Call
Approval of the Minutes:
• Approval of the October 20, 2011 meeting minutes
Pension List Changes:
• Joe P. Black Deceased December 1, 2011. His Spouse Mildred Black will receive
his pension.
Approval of the Pension List:
• Re-approval of the January 2012 Pension List
• Approval of the February, March and April 2012 Pension Lists
New Business:
• Local Pension Fund Report to the Council
• 2012 Estimated Premium Tax Allocation
• Revenue & Expense Report
• Board Contact Information
• Board Election: Jerry Friend and Frank Johnson
• Designate new authorized signors for Northern Trust Account
Discussion Items:
• LOPFI
Longer Investments:
• Longer Investments 4th Quarter 2011 report
• Longer View
• Longer Investments monthly report
Informational:
0 2012 Meeting Schedule
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page I of I1
Lioneld Jordan Chairman Jerry Friend Retired Position 2
Sondra E.Smith Treasurer a e e;lile Tim Helder Retired Position 3
Eldon Roberts Secretary/Retired Position I TMelvin Stanley Retired Position 4
ARKANSAS Frank Johnson Retired Position 5
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
A meeting of the Fayetteville Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund Board of Trustees was held
at 3:00 PM on October 20, 2011 in Room 326 of the City Administration Building.
Eldon Roberts called the meeting to order.
Present: Jerry Friend, Frank Johnson, Eldon Roberts, Tim Helder, Melvin Stanley, Kit
Williams, City Attorney, Paul Becker, Finance and Internal Services Director, Lisa
Branson,Deputy City Clerk,Elaine Longer and Kim Cooper, Longer Investments.
Sondra Smith was absent
Mayor Jordan was absent during roll call.
Approval of the Minutes:
Approval of the July 21,2011 meeting minutes
Jerry Friend moved to approve the July 21, 2011 Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees meeting minutes. Frank Johnson seconded the motion. Upon roll call
the motion passed 5-0. Mayor Jordan was absent during the vote. Sondra Smith was
absent.
Approval of the Pension List:
Re-Approval of the October 2011 Pension List(Adrian Cooper Deceased)
Eldon Roberts: Adrian Cooper, a retired police officer, died September 13, 2011. He does not
have a spouse. He will be deleted from the pension list. His retirement check was sent for
September but there will not be another one sent since he does not have a spouse.
Lisa Branson: The$200 death benefit check has not been sent to the estate because we have not
received a death certificate.
Eldon Roberts: We have a standing policy that we go ahead and mail the check regardless of
the day of the month he died. Social Security breaks it one way or the other. The $200 check
that we send for burial expenses or to the estate has not been sent. We are having problems
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 2 of 11
receiving a death certificate from someone in the family. I assume that check will not be sent
until such time that the death certificate is received.
Lisa Branson: Correct.
Eldon Roberts: That would be proper.
Eldon Roberts moved to re-approve the October 2011 Pension List. Tim Helder seconded
the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed 6-0. Sondra Smith was absent.
Approval of the November and December, 2011 Pension Lists and the January 2012
Pension List
Eldon Roberts: I assume they are the same with Adrian Coopers name deleted.
Lisa Branson: Correct.
Eldon Roberts moved to approve the November and December, 2011 Pension List and the
January 2012 Pension List. Jerry Friend seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion
passed 6-0. Sondra Smith was absent.
Unfinished Business:
Review,Approve and Sign Longer Investment Policy
Kit Williams: I'm going to suggest to the Fire Pension Board that they change their policy
based upon the fact that they are getting close, if they have not hit below $5,000,000, in their
fund. When you get below $5,000,000 in your fund you can hold the investments that you
already have, stocks and whatever you have, and you can sell them, but if you ever sell them you
cannot buy anymore stocks and bonds. You are limited to no load mutual funds, cash, and
government bonds, which obviously are less volatile so that's a plus. The downside is they
usually do not collect as much money for you. You don't earn as much as you do sometimes in
the stock market, even though recently it's not been going in the right direction. This is
applicable to them because they are at or below$5,000,000. You all are not yet.
Eldon Roberts: In the minutes as of September 3001 it was $7,800,000.
Mayor Jordan: I wanted you all to be aware of this because this is the Attorney General's
opinion.
Kit Williams: It was written from questions asked by our own Fire Pension Board.
Mayor Jordan: He says if it drops below $5,000,000 you don't have to liquidate it but you
can't do anymore trading with it.
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 3 of 11
Kit Williams: That's what Elaine does in order to get the best possible results for you all.
Tim Helder: That's just until it goes back up over $5,000,000 again and then you can begin the
process again.
Kit Williams: How are you going to get it up above$5,000,000?
Tim Helder: I'm just asking.
Kit Williams: If you got it back up over$5,000,000 yes, you could have everything again.
Tim Helder: I see what you are saying if they have that ability.
Eldon Roberts: While they are out there close I could see it but when you get to $2,000,000 it
would be hard to get it back to$5,000,000.
Kit Williams: There is not a whole bunch of additional new revenue going into it. She has a
request for a new investment policy.
Elaine Longer: We have a copy of that.
Kit Williams: It's in the agenda.
Paul Becker: That's the one we looked at before and we asked her to make a couple changes. I
reviewed it and it looks like the changes that you requested are incorporated.
Elaine Longer: Did you have a chance to review it?
Paul Becker: I looked at it. What I had brought up and I believe the suggestions everybody had
were incorporated.
Elaine Longer: All that we need to do is have it voted on and eventually signed.
Kit Williams: Have you all had a chance to look at the recommended new investment policy?
Eldon Roberts: Paul looked at it.
Paul Becker: The new one is in your packet. I took the changes Elaine had made, reviewed
them and compared them to my notes and it appears to me that everything we discussed is
incorporated in there.
Eldon Roberts: Has Elaine been notified of the Attorney General Opinion?
Kit Williams: I just gave her that. It just came out yesterday.
Eldon Roberts: Elaine do you want to change anything in this before we sign it today? Are you
still comfortable with the one that Paul looked over?
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 4 of 11
Kit Williams: That opinion would not change what she can do for this fund.
Elaine Longer: It will change what we can do for Fire because you can't go into the ring with
one hand tied behind your back.
Paul Becker: The two basic changes that we talked about is the last one did not have the
objectives in here and this does have objectives incorporated. We talked about adding that
Elaine has the authorization to go over the investment amount percentages and she will notify
you.
Elaine Longer: It is the same thing we are doing now where we notify if we go over the equity
allocation by 10% but it just covers us until we get to the next meeting.
Eldon Roberts: Then we would have a motion like we have done in the past.
Frank Johnson: Kit this is not good. Not that the market is doing that well anyway.
Kit Williams: It guarantees that there will not be sufficient income gains from the amount of
money they have left, unless we go into a giant inflation where they can get some good interest.
I would agree with you Frank that it is not good news for the Fire Pension.
Paul Becker: The intent of it is once your assets get down to a certain level the legislator, I
would assume when they passed that, said you are going to have to start looking at security a
little more. The problem is once you go into more secure assets, which as Kit is saying is going
to get you less of a return, if you are not where you are it's going to lock you in to the situation
like Fire is going to be in. You are not going to be able to generate enough returns unless
something happens and it turns around goes over$5,000,000.
Eldon Roberts: What is their total portfolio right now?
Paul Becker: They are very close.
Elaine Longer: Slightly under$5,000,000.
Paul Becker: I thought it was about$4,800,000 last time we looked.
Frank Johnson: It's kind of a paradox in a way for them. There is the possibility that their
portfolio could take opportunities of some future gains.
Kit Williams: It still can as long as they don't sell what they have. They can hold the stock but
if they ever sell it then they have to convert it to cash or government bonds. The City has money
in reserve and we have to have it invested in the most conservative ways possible.
Mayor Jordan: I'm in TIAA-CREF at the University and that is not doing as well. The TIAA
is a lot safer. If I wanted to transfer all of my CREF into TIAA that's sort of what you have to
do isn't it? You can't get out there and do a lot of stuff on the stock market. When you get older
and closer to retirement then you go to safer,is that what this is like?
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 5 of I I
Elaine Longer: The TIAA is a whole different thing. What this would do is basically every
time I sold something I would be restricted on the reinvestment and that is an impossible
situation for a money manager. Because you can't have responsibility for something you don't
have control over. In a situation like this I would have my hands tied behind my back if I would
still be responsible.
Eldon Roberts: You are being dictated to on how you can invest money.
Elaine Longer: I would have fiduciary responsibility, as a money manager on a public pension
fund, but I wouldn't have the ability to do what I think is best for them. It's an impossible
situation and we would have to resign.
Paul Becker: What the Mayor is saying as you get older, as the fund dwindles, and as the
number goes down it's safer to move to safer investments. Unfortunately the asset level isn't
enough to fully fund it and Elaine is saying she would be restricted to the point that she couldn't
get the additional returns she would need to get it to the level it would have to be.
Mayor Jordan: I'm no longer putting any money in that retirement so it is kind of a closed
retirement. I would be taking it from high risk CREF stuff into the safer TIAA.
Elaine Longer: Except that you don't have a required liability. What happens in this case is
you have seen us fluctuate between 40% equities and 55% or 60% depending on the market. I
can always go back in there. It's always a temporary situation, if I'm at 40% it is because I
anticipate that it is a better buying opportunity to go back up to 50%. But, in a situation like this
once you get to 40% you don't have the opportunity to go back in. What you're required to put
the money into is government bonds, the five year treasury is at 1%, the ten year is at 2%, and
your funding requirement is 5%. It just increases the risk of nun because you can't get your
actuary rate of return that you need to get to meet your liability when you're forced to go into
government bonds.
To give you an idea if you look at the side of the fixed income portfolio that we are invested in
on page one the stocks that we own, which are 40% of total portfolio, getting a dividend yield
which is just the income yield that comes in regardless of what the stock market does is a 3.9%.
It's almost double what you can get in a ten year bond. The other securities listed that we invest
in for income because the bond income is so low, Duke Energies, the utility sector fund, and the
multi asset income index yields almost 5%, and that is a well diversified way to get income into
the portfolio. You wouldn't have that option in the Fire Pension now because the money being
raised would have to go into government bonds. Two year treasury is zero yield because the Fed
has now said we are going to keep these interest rates at zero for two years which clasped the
two yield to nearly nothing. The two year treasury is an average of what the market anticipates
the yields will be for the next two years, if you were parked in short term money, when the Fed
says short term money is not going up for two years the two year treasury drops to almost
nothing. The five year drops to 1% and now the ten year, because of operation twist is at 2%and
we can get 3.9% on stocks, and 4.9% on bonds. We use a combination of funds, which are
investment grade corporate bonds funds, and the short term treasury fund to yield 4%. We have
corporate preferred debts which we weigh very light as a percent of total portfolio because
indeed they are investments on the debt side of individual corporations. AT&T is only 2.7% but
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund -
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 6 of 11
it is a Double A rated credit and GE is 3.5%and that is a Double A rated credit but we are able to
get 6.3% yield off of it. Then you get into the treasuries that you own which yield 4.1% but that
is 4.1% on your book value. The price appreciation the 5 1/8% we paid par for or 100 cents for
the dollar is now trading at 119 because interest rates have gone so much. If you were coming
out of an investment in the Fire Pension portfolio and you had to go into treasuries they are not
going to be yielding 4.1% they will be yielding 1%in the five year or if you go all the way out to
ten years 2%. There is a lot of risk in the ten year treasury. At this point the duration, which is
the measure of the price volatility of a bond for a change in interest rate, is nearly nine. What
that means is on the ten year treasury the 2.2% yield, if the yield goes up to 3.2% you are going
to see a 9% drop in the price of the bond. A I% move in interest rates to the up side can actually
reduce the value of the bond by almost five years worth of income. To say that this is safer, it is
not safer to go into government bonds at 1% on a five year, 2% on a ten year given the fact that
interest rates could rise. You could see a decline in the value in those bonds that clearly swamps
what you are getting on income but also it hampers further your ability to get to funding the
liability.
When you look at the fact that if you are 50/50 bonds and stocks, if you are getting 4% or 4.4%
on bonds, like we are, you can see you use a lot of different asset classes to get to that income
return. Everything is still investment grade or government. It's really hard to get income out
there in the market right now. You can't get it in treasuries so how do you get income but still
adhere to a fiduciary responsibility of protecting the assets. You have to be very careful and you
have to incorporate a lot of different asset classes. If you are making 4.4% on the fixed income
side, like you are, that is 2.2% weighted in your total return. That means to meet your actuary
assumption of 5% you need to make 2.8% on the other side that is 5.6% on equities and about
6.5% before fees. That is a very realistic assumption and that is a safe assumption. That is why
we have always been comfortable with the 6% return assumption. Now if you take the 50% of
the bonds side and you weight between five and ten years so you are making 1.5% on that, that
reduces the return on the bond side of the portfolio to .75%. To make your 5% actuary return
assumption you have to assume that you're going to be making about 12% compound annual on
stocks which is above what anybody would have as any kind of an expected return for the next
decade in the stock market. It paints them into a return that is very low any time anything is
sold. I think it gets them further away from being able to fund their liabilities.
It is amazing that is what they want to do but apparently it is the opinion. That is the reason why
we could not stay involved in this because I would never manage a portfolio in this market this
way. As you can see if I would be willing to manage a portfolio this way that is what your
portfolio would look like right now and it certainly does not look like that.
Tim Helder: Thanks.
Eldon Roberts: When I first got on the board the law then was that the only thing we could
invest in was saving and loans and banks and they had to be in your own town. It had to be in
saving and loans, CD's or whatever you could do with banks. That probably hampered us and
all these funds from doing well but then a few years later the law changed and we could go out
and get money managers and get into the financial gain like we have which has been a plus for
all of us. That's heading back to where we were. We can do business in secure financial deals.
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 7 of 11
Elaine Longer: That begs a question about what is secure. It's like people think bonds are
secure and right now the ten year treasury in our opinion is the scariest trade on my screen. You
don't see me buying a ten year treasury. What you see the Fed doing with quantitative easing
and the operation twist and then the fiscal side of the equation you have the Federal Reserve
pumping the monitory system to try to stimulate the economy. Then on the fiscal side, the
government spending side, we are still running a deficit as a percent of GDP of about 9%. It's
still fiscally very simulative as well. If we hit traction you could see inflation numbers that are
quite a bit different than where they are now and you will see the ten year treasury go up. Right
now the question among money managers is what would the ten year treasury yield be today if
the Fed wasn't in there doing quantitative easing and operation twist and everything else to hold
the ten year yield down. We don't know because basically the ten year yield is being controlled
by what the Fed is doing in the market. The reason for that is because the thirty year mortgage
keys off the ten year treasury and they are trying to help the housing situation to recover by
keeping those thirty year mortgage rates down around 4%.
The question is what happens to that ten year yield when all of this manipulation goes away? I
don't want to be holding it and if that 2% goes to 3% the price of those bonds will go down by
9%. It's not a risk free trade to hold government bonds right now. There is risk. The risk is if
interest rates rise you have a significant price decline in the bond.
Paul Becker: Unless you hold them until maturity.
Elaine Longer: I wish I could hold them ten years to maturity but then you are making 2% and
your funding requirement is 5%.
Paul Becker: Part of the discussion you are having, as far as what is risky and what is not risky,
is because of the unique economic times we are having. Traditionally your treasuries are the
safest but you are right, because of the duration risk that you are talking about that's what makes
them insecure.
Jerry Friend: If you were all in securities, even in good times and bad, don't you still suffer
from inflation? Can you really make quit a bit of money by holding securities?
Elaine Longer: What you do when you are structuring that fixed income portfolio, the bond
side, the two risks that you are always trying to guard against are inflation risk and reinvestment
risk. The reinvestment risk comes from the fact that if you had all short term maturities and then
we had a situation like what we have been through, where the interest rates dropped from 4% in
the short end to zero and you have maturities rolling off too quickly your reinvestment rate
drops. You go from 4% or 5% bond rolling off to reinvesting at zero. That is called
reinvestment risk. You use a ladder portfolio approach where you have enough securities in the
short hand that if interest rates go up, you've got a way to capitalize on it and pull from the short
end and reinvest that and tap into the higher rates. Conversely if interest rates go down
dramatically you still have enough out there in the longer maturities that your over all portfolio
doesn't drop dramatically. It's like straddling the fence and that is why you see bond portfolios
in laddered maturity structure. When you face a situation like this where you really can't trade
government bonds, you lose your flexibility here as well. If I see an opportunity to tap into
higher yields normally we would be selling the short maturities. A lot of times we don't hold the
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page g of I I
bond to maturity, that's cash to us, it is cash and we are going into something longer but in this
policy you can't even do that.
Tim Helder moved to approve the Investment Policy. Eldon Roberts seconded the motion.
Upon roll call the motion passed 6-0. Sondra Smith was absent.
New Business:
Revenue and Expense Report
Lisa Branson: We had not received a copy of the report when I put the agenda together.
Accounting should send it to me in the morning and I will email it to you tomorrow.
2012 Meeting Schedule
A copy was provided in the agenda packet.
Discussion Items:
LOPFI
No discussion.
Longer Investments:
Elaine Longer: On page one of your reports what we have been doing, and I have talked about
this in prior meetings, because of the risk that we saw out there with the budget deal, the high
stakes debt negotiations, and the EURO zone problems, we have been pretty conservative on the
equity side but you can't leave growth completely because you can't really go over on the fixed
income side. On the equities that we've held we've adhered to the high dividend paying stocks
so the blue chip high dividend multi national corporations have really been much more defensive
not just in the US market but also internationally. The dividend yield on your stock part of your
portfolio is 3.9%. The other income categories yield 4%to 6%.
Page two we entered the quarter at about 11% cash. We are down now to 4.5% cash because we
had a good dip the first week of October where we were able to deploy some of the cash. The
overall income yield on the portfolio is 3.8% and that is with 50% of it invested in growth
income. We are still getting a bond portfolio better than the bond portfolio income yield but you
still have a 50%growth.
Page three shows the update on where we are now. The equity side of the portfolio has gone up
from 40% to 44% and that has brought cash down to 4.5%. We can go from 43% back up to
55% if we want to and we have plenty liquidity in the portfolio to do so but we are all sitting
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 9 of 11
there watching the EURO negotiations. October 23rd is suppose to be last final EURO deal and
today the question is whether or not they are even going to have a meeting on Sunday. The
market comes off and the statements come out that they are indeed going to meet and Merkel's
office come out and said there is also going to be a statement next Wednesday. She didn't make
the statement so the market is kind of trading on every single rumor. The fact of the matter is we
don't know what the solution is yet and we don't know if they even from a legal standpoint can
come together and do what some of the rumors are suggesting that they plan to do like
leveraging up the ESFS bailout fund. We don't know if that is constitutionally available for
Germany to commit to that without a vote. We are not out of the woods there.
Even though the valuation of stocks relative to bonds is still very much favoring stocks we don't
want to put all of our chips down until we see some of these bigger issues resolved. The EURO
is one and the second thing we have coming up this quarter is the super committee. We could
get into the brinkmanship that we saw in the summer going up to the debt deadline because of
the fact that you still have quite a void between the parties in terms of how to attack the deficit.
Will it be revenue increases or will it be cutting expenses? When I saw Nancy Pelosi
recommendations to the super committee from the democratic side I thought oh no here we go
again. It's basically the same argument that we faced in the summer and I don't think the other
side of the table is going to be anymore willing to go for tax increases. Basically it's a
philosophical division between the two sides between revenue increases or spending cuts. The
problem is when you go into the next deadline there are automatic cuts that take place in defense
and other things if they don't come to a resolution. We could actually replay what we were
going through in July, waiting to see what happens, and can they come to a resolution and if they
don't, what is going to happen? We are in a holding pattern here the earning season is coming
through just fine. There are pockets of weakness but I would say most the corporations that have
reported have not disappointed. It's a question of these external risks to the market that we are
still kind of waiting to get more resolution.
Page five the realized gains year to date are $178,000. A lot of that is from gains that we took to
lighten up before the market got hit.
Page six shows the bond portfolio. The average yield to maturity is currently 4.4% and that
compares to 4.5% at year end. We have shortened the maturity to 6.1 years, from year end you
were at 8.7 years. You have a more defensive posture in terms of the length of maturity of your
bonds but you haven't given up any income to speak. The average duration is 5.4. The bonds
maturing before five years make up 30% of the bond holdings. The portfolio is structured in a
way that's' still liquid. You have good income yield, we have shortened up maturities to be a
little bit more defensive because of duration risk but we haven't sacrificed any income.
Page seven shows the performance of stocks year to date down 5.5%. The S&P is down about
10% through September 30th. In October we had an improvement of about 5%. The
international stocks are down 15.2%. What's interesting is the United States, America's market,
has really out performed the world. We have out performed Europe, Asia, China, emerging
markets and so that is why you don't have any International in your,portfolio at this time. We
raised cash from the International side to be on the domestic side with a high dividend paying
multi national corporations. As we go back into the market that's still the area that represents the
most value in the world as far as we are concerned. At this point you don't have International
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 10 of I l
exposure. The fixed income side is up 7.3% year to date and that's that much higher than your
income return because of the fact that interest rates have continued to decline this year. The flip
side of duration risk is that when interest rates are declining you're total return is higher than the
income return because you have price appreciation. Your total is relatively flat year to date
down .7%. I updated it through yesterday, your stocks are actually positive now about .8%.
S&P is still down 2% to 2.5% and bonds are up 6.6%. Your total is up about 2% year to date,
and cash is 4.5% of portfolio as of yesterday. The compound annual returns are still doing pretty
well 4.5% on the equities side but 6.2% on the bond side because the 40% negative return in
2008 was what really hit the equities side so that your total return is still at 5.8% compound
annual. When I looked at it today you are at the 6%. You hang pretty close to that 6%
compound annual return,the actuary assumption from 1989.
Page eight is contributions and distributions and year to date contributions have been minimal
just recoveries from various class action lawsuits, only $109 but distributions have been
$623,000.
Page nine is the asset reconciliation from account inception. We update this each time we meet.
The total contributions that came in from 1990 forward have been the distributions have been
about $8.5 million and the net investment return has been about $7.2 million. It is a lot closer,
the distributions verses the net investment return, than what I think the Fire has experienced but
still the net investment return, even though it has achieved the 6% actuary assumption it still has
trailed distribution.
Elaine handed out a couple of charts and stated the first one shows the performance through
September of the US market for the first nine months relative to the other markets in the world.
At that time we were 16.7% off the peak coming off the 2009 low. Italy is down 44%, France is
off 32%,.Germany 31%, and China is off 30%. The emerging markets like Brazil off 27%, India
23%, even Canada is down 19.7% off their peak. It is interesting that the American market has
held up so well but our currency has held up well too because the dollar is the world reserve
currency. You look at the companies that you are invested in like Coke and Wal-Mart, I don't
think I've ever seen Wal-Mart earn a dividend yield that was higher than the ten year treasury
but they do.
The next chart shows you why everyone is so nervous about what is going on in the EURO zone
because this is the ISM manufacturing Index for America, the blue line, and the European five
year credit defaults which are inverted is the red line. You can see what a close fit it is. A credit
default swap basically tells you the risk that the market is attributing to a five year French
sovereign debt. The more risk that there seems to be in the French banking system and the
European zone in the EURO the more the manufacturing index tends to be affected by it. In a
world like this where we are all so interconnected you can see what happens in Europe and
China does affect the US market.
The next chart shows the after tax profits relative to GDP. It breaks down the long term average
and it goes back to 1950. Corporate America is at a level of profitability as a percent of GDP
that we haven't been at in fifty years. Mom and Pop corporate America, which small businesses
are not showing these kinds of trends. When you talk to people and you hear back from them
how awful the economy is but the large cap corporations, the multi nationals that are tapped into
Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund
Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes
October 20,2011
Page 11 of l l
the emerging markets, the growth areas in the world, are doing well and because of the fact that
they stream line and they have invested in capital equipment and technology and their fix cost
and their cost structure is very low right now, their profitability is better than it has been since
1950. That is the reason the stock market is holding up well relative to the rest of the world.
The next chart shows that the ten year treasury yield has not been below the dividend yield on
large cap stocks since 1960. This is the first time since 1960 that you actually have the dividend
yield on the S&P 500 exceeding the ten year treasury yield. We see it in a lot of the stocks that
we purchase. There is still a lot of value in the stock market. Once some of these macro factors
begin to sort out a little bit more, I think that is the most likely place for capital to flow because
there still is value there relative to what you can get in a fixed income side.
Longer Investment Letter Dated August 5,2011
A copy was given to the Board
Longer Investment Letter Dated August 15,2011
A copy was given to the Board
Longer Investments Yd Ouarter 2011 report
A copy was given to the Board
Longer Investment monthly report
A copy was given to the Board
Longer View
A copy was given to the Board
Meeting Adjourned at 3:50 PM
Taye eville City Clerk Division
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas
Sondra E. Smith, City ClerkfTreasurer
ARKANSAS Lisa Branson, Deputy City Clerk
Amber Wood, Deputy City Clerk
Departmental Correspondence
TO: Trish Leach Accounting
FROM: Lisa Branson, Deputy City Clerk
DATE: December 5,2011
RE: Joe P. Black
Death Benefits Policemen's Pension
I am forwarding this memo to you so that you may pay death benefits to the above retired police
officer's estate. Mr. Black was a member of the old pension plan. The following payment
should be made:
1. Pay to the estate of Mr. Black a sum of$200.00 for death benefits.
Death benefits are only paid to the retired Police Pensioner's estate upon their death. .When a
widow/widower of a Police Pensioner deceases their estate does not receive death benefits.
i
0UARIES
Dec 4, f; ,m toy qm •.yd
Joe P. Black y
HerrtagL ui 69iHDipe.,
FAYETTEVILLE—Joe Black, daleestbook
age 76, of Fayetteville went �rttageo Corti
to be with his Lord and Savior A f�al3eriees'will be
on Dec. 1, >1 kl eF:S �t,tJ '
2011, with `. J ligzlte ]#l�-iAaora:k
his family by ilt1+ isimheamer and Ron'
his side. Joe ;*il y. offleiat g A` atc
-was born on aYnil Apt erar1FWat
yu ^xpv a .^^x
May 3,1935,in
Fayetteville to
Jeff Thomas
and MattieBlack, -rayl natJe a,
lee Watts '
Fran ,rnal Or o4rcel
$lackandwas APW ox 225 a�lep
bne of seven g
children. in3?a 34
Joe gradu-
ated ftQzri Peabody High 72A3 1a < k '
School in Fayetteville. He
Served in the Army as a mili-
tary policeman in the S.1.divi-
sion stationed at Fort Sam 3
Houston,Texas.He was also
a•Sgt. 1st Class in the Army
National Guard,and a retired
police officer with the City of
Fayetteville.:
Joe was active N church and
loved his Savior.He ensured
that he shared the precious
gospel with his family. 'Joe
was a loving husband,father,
friend-and grandfather. He
was a talented craftsman,
-painter and avid Razorback
fan.
He was preceded in death
by his parents, three broth-
,.;ers,Stanley Black,Jeff Black
and Jack Black,and one sister
Donna Horner.
Joe is survived by his
wife of an amazing 48 years,
Mildred Hayes Black,whom
he married Nov 21, 1963, in
Fayetteville; four children,
Steven Black and wife Cindy
of Goose Creek, S.C.,Suzie
Mybrberg and husband Steve
of Pacifica,Calif.,Rod Black
'jnd wife.Sheila of Seligman,
Mo.,Shannon Black and wife
Sherri of Conway;two sisters,
Bettye Ross and husband Jerry
of Greenland, Nell Howell
and husband Denton of Ever-
ett, Wash.; and 10 special
grandchildren, Brittany and
husband'Nathan, Melissa,
Stephanie,Marc,Cole,Abby,
Amanda,Sydney,Chance and
Carley.
Visitation will be today,
Fayetteville,Arkansas RECEIVED
POLICEMEN'S PENSION&RELIEF FUND AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF DEC 2 8 2010
)ss:
COUNTY OF G✓�sl� [ ) CITY OF
TOF FAME TEVILLE
CITY
I, �AA i f c A do solemnly swear that I presently receive pension benefits
from the Policemen's ension and Relief Fund and I am eligible to continue receiving pension benefits as governed under state law.
V/�I am a former police officer for the Fayetteville Police Department.
❑ I am the spouse/former spouse/widow of a former police officer of the Fayetteville Police Department,and that I have not
remarried since becoming eligible for benefits.
❑ I am an eligible dependent of a former police officer for the Fayetteville Police Department and have attached an affidavit
verifying my school attendance.
Address: J b /[ ✓ d `�
Telephone: -( � '' Y 7 -7 r
Social Security No.: Birth date: c 3Yj J
PLEASE LISTALL BENEFICIARIES BELOW(complete only for spouse,minor children and/or children under 23 years ofage that are enrolled
in a institute of higher education):
NAME SOCIAL SECURITY No. BIRTH DATE RELAT�IIONNSSHH
/ t edit*` 9 111 •/�• Lf l/v/7
DATED this day of
OFFICIAL SEM.
HEATHERANN RUTHERFORD
NOTARY PUBLIC,ARKANSAS
BENTON COUNTY AF ( gnats re)
COMMISSION 012276M
COMMISSION E%P.
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me,a Notary Public,this _day ofa et In 1 iA—
pati b1�( t it_3'I II��{n 0
Notary Public U _
My Commission Expires:
i
(This affidavit is required annually by the Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund Board of Trustees and must be properly completed and
returned to the Fayetteville City Clerk, 113 West Mountain,Fayetteville,Arkansas,72701 by January 31" each year.)
WIN
' T{
TYPE ITHIN"N ".
'� FERFVHEW
O RACKINA ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HE ALTH
{{ �` GEE Vital Records Section y'>:
:{55'6433 N IxsrRlxTlarvs CERTIFICATE OF DEATH I
Y
IOECEDEWS LEGAL NMIE IWWVAWFJary1FVL AYYY,Lau,OVIM1q - 15E% ]a;ATE OF pEATNIMggM1 ]L.PME OF pEPTN
Joe Penner Black
\ Male December 1,2011 10;27 ❑ PM
Lda1BiM0aY 4pPTE0F 91RTXIMaO>IMI r01flMPlACE(OryaJS4mafuegt Wnuyl
N [SOCIAL Secede'Np $a PGE- 511 TINDER 1 YF.pR 5<UN[Eq 1 DAY
tt3 IYesA MVnlne Days Hotel .!..A I �.-
.4 429-58-5120 76 May 3,1935 Fayetteville,Arkansas s
Ba RE51DENCESTATE W FOREIGN COUNTRY BI,COUNTY Bc,CITU OR TOWN
Arkansas Washington Fa etteville
Ed GLAOER ANDSTREET Be APi NO OI.LIP CODE �IHSIOE CITY LIMITS?
#�
2318 West Lawson Street -- e
:• 0 72703 m.Ye ❑w
REVERIN US ARMED FORCE$t IO MARITALSTATIS ATTIME Of OFAin
p!p pdNPolvmgal S\`.
'>%✓' +L SUgVIVMG$FOUSEs xMAE p+M
f d Yes ❑No Ay,rle0 D 4VNowd1 ❑"d did I14k, a D Wor.J MnsrndadJ ❑G. ❑Nndnw,n Mildred M.Hayes s;,
w12.IFDEATH OCCU0.REDINAM0.5PITAL' I$b FOFA NOCCURRE05OMEW11GRE 0TNER TIWNgIPV3PITTA I$[COUNTY OF OEAM 1
l !i j N,IUYp9 ❑Emagen^Ppem! ❑pee0m ❑aKgk 1'x ❑Nuslnc[ ❑Nu,.ti10 NOm¢/ ❑Oln¢, b
Q11pa M'val Xme RIGN, LMq Torn Cam TI RNEM) Washington B
1 Ali j1 ICI LICgITV NpMEI MMXis.pwmmGm6emyl 1R[.CITY On TOWN 1D 21P CAGE '
tr.•c j s .Washington Regional Medical Center Fayetteville 72703
tj S` 1 3 FATHER S NAME FIA WIN,LodIG.MOTHER
'$-MC
PRWIUGod
e.TO FI RST NARAGE III N .LWI ff 1 j
nP Jeff Thomas Black Mattie Lee Watts I 'u
ab NFORMANIS"dME t4L RELA➢ONSHIP TO DECEDENT +g.MMLING ADO0.ES5 toodew.See.Paso,.,S.adoedl
_ _ d Mildred M Black Wife 2318 W.Lawson Street, Fayetteville,Arkansas 72703 {
I _ +4a METRODOF DISPOSINOR: ❑SuSe KCmesise ❑Co,.. D Emonbnfnl ❑Remma Imm$Wd -❑Ode(N dT j
I I W.hgCE DF DI3 Pp$i1ON Maryd WnabF,uavby,oM,pdg1 18e LOCALSON-CRY TOWN,AND STATE AF,
Na YUv Ozark Crematory,LLC Gentry,Arkansas ,
f]a.EMOALMER5 NAME 0NOI ETMM1e0 Iib Rom /NS c.SIG EIfLN' [I W011@1ARM1
Y� LICENSE-
tA
Richard - 1987
TIO.NAME AND COMPLETE ADDRESS OF FUNERAL FACRITY IIA LICENSE; IFN
Dyyy�ryryry:��e11 d Heritage Funeral Home,PLLC 1591 S.48th Street,Springdale,Arkansas 72762 493
n a�t oa IBa.ORiE PRONOUNCED D 100.TIME,`SWOUNCEDOEAD IB<NAMF AND TITLE OF PEq$ON PRONOUNCING DEATH Moral GN) is WAS NaRCAL EXAMINER
IMWIbi+O A(
1R qM ORC4yo, CONTACTED'/
bR0 f5'; a -�2Ia�z�u lo;2Y ❑PM111o� yy Y6 D No T
P� O-a CWSE OF DEATH
L+ F 3 ]0 PpRi Fn1d 111¢e�1y_Elgvy lS�iaaaaeF Inlures.d<a,1 a N tlWNMQw0a1MMaN DONOTe flood lei.o.—Nx—ree,
10 AR\ z0 IIINI rymall wren— riddid M1 MN0V1¢ngrgp tle iWor, LO NOT ABBREVIATE kmerM YOM muuan A Did O RO%�aNE IMERVAL ( L
...p. ,
MNEOutE CADGE a_. ,,IS�Or +�jL
o rrnxe...sdw.Ib. Ill (tel rt
H edGp d1 INe Ile ae mnadxbmdR
eN.W..1Ne n.— .—__--
- G1e 1 rnemrwrfl ,
gRIL NGCnIKEdole,de—A
< {
NNN.e.mlwsT tl 1 �
PMi11 Enid,axd;gree,GWI FeG SGSpLW nol Cull'n0'n ge,mM,NMGux O^<n 1n PARiI $la WAS AN AUTOPSY PERFpgMEDi
d ❑Yea N
YX $Ip WERE AUTOPSY FINDINGS AVAILABLE TO COMREiE `gv
yAj, 's THE CPVSE OF pFATHT ❑Yds 6.
IR MANNER OF DEATH a�
WNaNml D MIden ❑So. D HpMpO 0 P-ded nven @on D cdutlMeNM
I ib�
1
19vPY b 2]dO TOBACCO USE CGNTRIOUTE TO OEATHi 1 21 IF REM B' ; >
IIPT{i E ❑res O ProWlny ❑RDP,Nnan mnnoa9 rear I]WIWM'1 Lnu WdP n'+iNNai,laye dee am O MXnwmllgpnam,Mn'do"'', Yy
li' j ❑No VnAnom, ❑Pra9naM.1 role MSN ❑N pM1gnOn,Oo v,M' la]mnlof xvOMdeeaaN
VVaI,_ v all GATE Of INJURY $$O TIME OF INJURY DA,M 2`ve."a OF RGUIDedeell We mu lasal.WeelalLxyyJge, 20J:IMo.,ATWI
{tlFr.. 3`Y€ IlopgNrl ❑ PM D Yde ❑No IF•
\ 35e.LOCaT1ON OF(NARY.IN.ede"l.Ipmuq W,cii.eie nd
j 251 CESCRIBEROWINJURYO.I.TME0 IS If TRANFORTATTENINJURV,SPECIFV I4i`
¢. ❑ale lord,
Y Et seemed., 1
A D Pae 4 e,
Color(ANW)
RW CERi1f1ER ICnec4 onMOne1 r
wv yD,edn IPnV.'el ded..1 yYnnMM4a Janda endo A INaN noon.,doi
"✓ yl looll Ad.c ,pP v5an-TONduda amrNwglp e[ pond mlo.an Pu<d.mJud+o Nd nueeltlam ma,nd.aW. \
- . 0WdelEna i an 4a lu mplPM aryVd NMaq 1 dood, and.Na.S.Bald..I pHu der JM Id 1M<weeMsl We sed—addled
r-by ❑LdrnM, Oriel.d . n m..idi= vnpAwn n TV dread Wool avmM dRod'le,Rod,old Arte aw doe+d the wellonn olid mare«su1M. rel.
1ljfX"y ❑eb,I gvpleeded rs 0 ¢' Al [dE... eid-I.Wmvoordimnlannd[Ialm
! 1 i _- _ _ _. fir\
,�� SIGNARME. TTLE_..._11+ a._ DATE I�O @ppgM1,i
,a
M MMEAMCOMPLVAWR A0ONE550FPE."IGNNGnEMM ITHIeFoa) 2 IICEKSE[ 1,
NERATHAEOF REGRTNARtin FOR REGST ?-Fired
O K a �o m'r7E� 5 as t ! 7
THIS IS TO CERTIFY TI[AT 7I1[ABOVE IS A TRUE AND GORRECI COPY OF THE CEn RFICATE ON
`Q' _ n� •e,rpm IT FILE IN THE ARKANSAS LSEPAH'IMENT OF HEALTH.
Y . SEAL y = _ y Mischee Priebe1
'5aef� F e }F. LI1 �11't State Registrar
a �'L
e pQCKe* 1111A O1LIItLi/�`. A1LPRODUCTION OF THIS DOCUMENT RENDERS IT VOID ANDINVALID.DO NOT ACCEPT UNLESS ('foo (^ (� P
tt 1,
WARNING: FM80SSE,0 SEAL.OF THC- ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH IS PRESENT IT IS It LEGAL TO V U u
E°c
At OR COUNTERFEIT THIS DOCUMENT. VR 112
M
a'Q`rr'ff �"a a. _ .1Y.^i,� / 'i:,lir ..�� 'TLN�-- :G,y,�•��,A - .cam zLJ„y, ,y: a �s tifiei 4' �'"-�>_.. k:t�tl
�1�,`4''�: *L�'. . TeII',.. �Ir„� b ,fs',e,.wc. .u;-•,e, i 3
Fayetteville,Arkansas
POLICEMEN'S PENSION&RELIEF FUND AFFIDAVIT
STATEOF
)ss:
COUNTY OF
1, 0�(RA 94L,�— do solemnly swear that I presently receive pension benefits
from the Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund and I am eligible to continue receiving pension benefits as governed under state law.
El I am a former police officer for the Fayetteville Police Department.
El I am the spousetformer spousetwidow of a former police officer of the Fayetteville Police Department, and that I have not
remarried since becoming eligible for benefits.
El I am an eligible dependent of a fbrmer police officer for the Fayetteville Police Department and have attached an affidavit
verifying my school attendance.
Address: SA
CLO I a
Telephone: 942-- & L1 -7
Social Security No.: Birth date:
PLEASE LISTALLBENEFIciARIES BELOW(Complete Only for spouse,minor chil&cn and/or children under23 years ofage that are enrolled
in a institute of higher education):
NAME SociAL SEcuRiTyNo. BIRTH D RELATIONSHIP
DATED this day of 3�10 0,-M\ne 2�61(
01%IM1111111, I --
ra AFFLANI(AOgnature)
SUBSC efore me,a Notary Public,this dayof- DQ-C-e-rnb2=C
Jeflus
My Commission Expires:
(This affidavit is required annually by the Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund Board of Trustees and must be properly completed and
returned to the Fayetteville City Clerk, 113 West Mountain,Fayetteville,Arkansas,72701 by January 3 10 each year.)
POLICE PENSION FUND
Revised Jan 2012 680MBOO
Month 1 Regular Mo 533&00 523�05
1
EMP# NAME Benelft YTD Reg Benefit Suppl. YTD Suppl.
154 ALLEN,CHARLES It 2,584.64 $ 2,584.64 It 50.00 $ 50.00
206 BAYLES,BOBBIJ It 1,587.41 $ 1.687.41 It 50.00 $ 50.00
216 BLACK,MILDRED It 1,125.64 It 1,125.64 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
147 BRADLEY,GERALD $ 4,820.09 It 4,820.09 $ 50.G0 $ 50.00
139 BRADLEY,RANDALL $ 2,860.17 $ 2,860.17 $ 50.01) $ 50.00
167 BROWN.JOHN $ 4,362.01 $ 4,362.01 $ 50.00 It 50.00
157 CARROLL,RONALD L $ 2,106.04 $ 2,106.04 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
151 COLE,RUSTON $ 3,065.74 $ 3j)(15.74 $ 50.0D It 50.00
160 DUGGER,GARY $ 3,163.74 $ 3,163.74 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
140 FOSTER,BILLY D. $ 3,207.35 $ 3,207.35 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
148 FRIEND,JERRY $ 1,970.42 $ 1,970.42 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
211 FRIEND,MICHELE $ 1,182.26 $ 1,162.26
161 HANNA,JANICE It 1,368.59 $ 1,368.59 $ $ -
145 HANNA,MARK $ 1,368.59 $ 1.368.59 $ 50.00 $ 50.OD
169 HELDER,TIM $ 5,838.12 $ 5,836.12 $ 50.00 $ 50.0D
180 HOYT,RICK $ 7,460.01 It 7,460.01 It 50.00 It 50.01)
146 HUTCHENS,BERNICE $ 1,825.54 $ 1.825.54 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
194 JOHNSON,FRANK $ 7,974.81 It 7,974.81 $ S).00 $ 50.00
215 JOHNSON,JOYCE $ 2,465.50 $ 2,455.50 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
103 JOHNSON,WENDELL $ 783.15 $ 783.15 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
118 JONES,BOB $ 3,300.45 $ 3,300.45 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
144 KILGORE,DONALD $ 2,046.48 It 2,046.48 $ 50.00 It 50.00
150 LITTLE,PATSY R $ 730.35 $ 730.35 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
156 MARTIN.KENNETH It 3,692.85 $ 3,692.85 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
12B MCCAWLEY,LARRY $ 1,694.79 $ 1,694.79 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
126 MCWHORTER,KAREN $ 1,012.10 $ 1,012.10 It 50.00 $ 50.00
136 MITCHELL.MICHAEL $ 2,305.29 $ 2,305.29 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
141 MUELLER,ROSEMARY $ 2,063.93 $ 2,063.93 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
158 MUNSON,ANGELA $ 4,198.15 $ 4,198.15 It 50.01) $ 50.00
112 MURPHY,JAKE $ 405.75 It 405.75 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
137 PERDUE,LARRY $ 2,322.67 $ 2,322.67 $ 50.0D $ 50.00
164 PERSHALL,ROBIN $ 1,525.07 $ 1,525.07 $ - $ -
132 PHILLIPS,HOMER GENE It 1,754.44 $ 1,754.44 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
199 PRESTON,NORMA J $ 1.601.37 $ 1,6DI.37 $ 50.00 $ 50.OD
135 RICKMAN,LOREN $ 2,231.07 $ 2,231.07 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
214 RIGGINS,BONNIE $ 1,669.37 $ 1,669.37 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
183 ROBERTS,ELDON $ 4,263.24 $ 4,263.24 $ 50.00 It 50.0D
183 ROBERTS,ELDON Plus 25 add pay $ 587.09 $ 587.09 $ $
212 ROBERTS,CAROLYN K $ 3,216.13 $ 3,216.13 It
212 ROBERTS,CAROLYN K Plus 25 add pay $ 442.89 $ 442.89 $ -
159 SCHUSTERJOHN H. $ 3.117.36 $ 3,117.36 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
168 STANLEY,MELVIN $ 4,880.07 $ 4,880.07 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
155 STOUT,BETTY $ 866.51 $ 866.51 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
133 SURLIES,JERRY $ 2,721.40 $ 2,721.40 $ 50.00 It 50.00
142 TAYLOR,DENNIS $ 2,063.93 $ 2,063.93 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
163 WATSON,RICHARD $ 6,947.05 It 6,947.05 $ 50.GO $ 50.00
183 Watson.Richard Plus 25 Add'l Pay $ 948.76 $ 948.76 $ - $ -
149 WILLIAMS,JOYCE $ 2,539.66 $ 2.639.66 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
195 WITT,BETTY J $ 1,766.83 $ 1,766.83 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
213 WOOD,RUTHIE A 1,5110.93 $ 1,580.93 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
$ 129,60&80 $ 129,605.80 $2.150.00 It 2.150.00
POLICE PENSION FUND 2 2 2 2 2
Feb 2012 6800.9800 ssofi.9800
Month 2 Regular Mo 533&00 533�05
2
EMP# NAME Benefit YTD Reg Benefit Suppl. YTD Suppl.
154 ALLEN,CHARLES $ 2,584.64 $ 5,169.2B $ 50.00 $ 100.00
206 BAYLES,BOBBI J $ 1,587.41 It 3,174.82 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
216 BLACK,MILDRED $ 1,125.64 $ 2,251,28 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
147 BRADLEY,GERALD $ 4,820.09 $ 9,640.18 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
139 BRADLEY,RANDALL $ 2,860.17 $ 5,720.34 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
167 BROWN,JOHN $ 4,362.01 $ 8,724.02 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
157 CARROLL,RONALD L $ 2.106.D4 $ 4,212.08 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
151 COUE,RUSTON $ 3,065.74 $ 6,131.48 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
160 DUGGER,GARY $ 3,163.74 $ 6,327.48 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
140 FOSTER,BILLY D. $ 3,207.35 $ 6,414.70 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
148 FRIEND,JERRY $ 1,970.42 It 3.940.84 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
211 FRIEND,MICHELE 111 1,18216 $ 2,364.52
161 HANNA,JANICE $ 1,368.59 $ 2,737.18 $ - $ -
145 HANNA,MARK $ 1.368.59 $ 2.737.18 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
169 HELDER.TIM $ 5,838.12 $ 11,676.24 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
180 HOYT,RICK It 7,460.01 $ 14,920.02 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
W HUTCHENS,BERNICE $ 1,825.54 $ 3,651.08 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
194 JOHNSON,FRANK $ 7,974.81 $ 15,949.62 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
215 JOHNSON,JOYCE $ 2,456.50 $ 4,911.00 $ 60.00 $ 100.00
103 JOHNSON,WENDELL $ 783.15 $ 1,566.3D $ 50.00 $ 100.00
118 JONES�BOB $ 3,300.45 $ 6,600.90 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
144 KILGORE,DONALD $ 2,046.48 111 4,092.96 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
150 LITTLE.PATSY R $ 730.35 $ 1,460.70 $ 60.00 $ 100.00
156 MARTIN.KENNETH $ 3,692.85 $ 7,385.70 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
128 MCCAWLEY,LARRY It 1,694.79 $ 3,389.58 $ 50.00 $ 10D.00
126 MCWHORTER,KAREN $ 1,012.10 $ 2,024.20 $ 50.00 It 10D.00
136 MITCHELL,MICHAEL $ 2,305.29 $ 4,610.58 $ 50.00 It 10D.00
141 MUELLER,ROSEMARY $ 2,063.93 111 4,127.86 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
158 MUNSON,ANGELA $ 4.198.15 $ 8,396.30 $ 50.00 $ 10D.00
112 MURPHY,JAKE $ 405.75 $ 811.50 $ 60.00 $ 10D.00
137 PERDUE,LARRY It 2,322.67 $ 4,645.34 $ 50.00 $ 10D.00
164 PERSHALL,ROSIN It 1,525.07 $ 3,050.14 $ - $ -
132 PHILLIPS.HOMER GENE $ 1,754.44 $ 3,508.88 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
199 PRESTON,NORMA J $ 1,601.37 $ 3,202.74 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
135 RICKMAN,LOREN $ 2,231.07 $ 4,462.14 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
214 RIGGINS,BONNIE $ 1,669.37 $ 3,33814 $1 50.00 $ 10D.00
183 ROBERTS,ELDON $ 4,263.24 $ 8,526.48 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
183 ROBERTS,ELDON Plus 25 add pay $ 587.09 $ 1,174.18 $ - $ -
212 ROBERTS,CAROLYN K $ 3,21613 It 6,432.26 $ -
212 ROBERTS,CAROLYN K Plus 25 add pay $ 442.89 $ 885.78 $ -
159 SCHUSTER,JOHN H. $ 3,117.36 $ 6,234.72 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
168 STANLEY,MEL%AN $ 4,880.07 $ 9,760.14 111 50.00 It 10D.00
155 STOUT,BETTY $ 866.51 $ 1,733.02 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
133 SURLES,JERRY $ 2,721.40 $ 6,442.80 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
142 TAYLOR.DENNIS $ 2,063.93 $ 4.127.86 $ 50.GD $ 100.00
163 WATSON,RICHARD $ 6,947.05 $ 13,894.10 $ 60.01) $ 50.00
163 Watson,Richard Plus 25 Add'l Pay $ 948.76 $ 1,897.52 $ - $ -
149 WILLIAMS,JOYCE $ 2,539.66 $ 5;079.32 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
195 WITT,BETTY J $ 1,766.83 $ 3,533.66 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
213 WOOD,RUTHIE A 1,580.93 $ 3,161.66 $ 50.00 $ 100.00
$ 129,605.80 $ 259,211.60 $2,150.01) $ 4,250.00
POLICE PENSION FUND 3 3 3 3 3
March 2012 68MWOD ew"800
Month 3 Regular Mo 5335-00 5335�05
3
EMP# NAME Benefit YTO Reg Benefit Suppl. Y7D Suppl.
154 ALLEN,CHARLES $ 2,584.64 $ 7.753.92 $ 50.00 It 150.00
206 BAYLES,BOBBI J $ 1,587.41 $ 4,762.23 $ 50.01) $ 150.00
216 BLACK,MILDRED $ 1,125.64 $ 3,376.92 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
147 BRADLEY,GERALD $ 4,820.09 $ 14,460.27 $ 50.00 Ill 150.00
139 BRADLEY,RANDALL $ 2.860.17 $ 8,580.61 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
167 BROWN,JOHN $ 4,362.01 $ 13,086.03 It 50.OD $ 150.00
157 CARROU.,RONALD L $ 2,106.04 $ 6,316.12 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
151 COLE,RUSTON $ 3,065.74 $ 9,197.22 $ 50.0D $ 150.00
160 DUGGER,GARY $ 3.163.74 $ 9,491.22 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
140 FOSTER,BILLY D. $ 3,207.35 $ 9,622.05 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
148 FRIEND,JERRY $ 1,970.42 $ 5,911.26 $ 50.OD $ 150.00
211 FRIEND,MICHELE $ 1,182.26 $ 3,546.78
161 HANNA,JANICE $ 1.366.59 $ 4.105.77 $ $ -
145 HANNA,MARK $ 1,368,59 $ 4,10517 It 50.00 $ 150.00
169 HELDER,TIM $ 5,838.12 It 17,514.36 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
180 HOYT,RICK $ 7,460.01 $ 22,380.03 $ 50.00 It 150.00
146 HUTCHENS,BERNICE $ 1,825.54 $ 5.476.62 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
194 JOHNSON,FRANK $ 7,974.81 $ 23,924.43 $ SD.00 It 160.00
215 JOHNSON,JOYCE $ 2,455.50 $ 7,366.50 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
103 JOHNSON,WENDELL $ 783.15 $ 2,349.45 $ 50.00 It 150.00
118 JONES,BOB $ 3,300.45 $ 9,901.35 It 50.00 It 150.00
144 KILGORE,DONALD $ 2,046.48 $ 6,139.44 It 50.00 $ 150.00
150 LITTLE,PATSY R $ 730.35 $ 2,191.05 $ 50.00 $ 150.D0
156 MARTIN,KENNETH $ 3,692.85 $ 11,078.55 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
128 MCCAWLEY,LARRY $ 1,694.79 $ 5,084.37 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
126 MCWHORTER,KAREN $ 1,012.10 $ 3,036.30 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
136 MITCHELL,MICHAEL $ 2,305.29 $ 6,915.87 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
141 MUELLER,ROSEMARY It 2.063.93 $ 6,191.79 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
158 MUNSON,ANGELA $ 4,198.15 $ 12,594.45 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
112 MURPHY,JAKE $ 405.75 It 1,217.25 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
137 PERDUE,LARRY $ 2,322.67 $ 6,968.01 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
164 PERSHALL,ROSIN $ 1.525.07 It 4,575.21 $ - $ -
132 PHILLIPS,HOMER GENE $ 1,754.44 $ 5.263.32 $ 50.00 $ 160.00
199 PRESTON,NORMA J $ 1,601.37 $ 4,804.11 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
135 RICKMAN,LOREN $ 2.231.07 $ 6,693.21 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
214 RIGGINS,BONNIE 111 1,669.37 $ 5.008.11 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
183 ROBERTS,ELDON $ 4,263.24 $ 12,789.72 $ 60.00 It 150.00
183 ROBERTS,ELDON Plus 25 add pay $ 5B7.09 $ 1,761.27 $ - $ -
212 ROBERTS,CAROLYN K $ 3,216.13 $ 9,648.39 $ -
212 ROBERTS,CAROLYN K Plus 25 add pay $ 442.89 $ 1,328.67 $ -
159 SCHUSTER.JOHN H. $ 3,117.36 $ 9,352.08 $ 50.00 It 150.00
168 STANLEY,MELVIN $ 4,880.07 $ 14,640.21 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
155 STOUT,BETTY $ 866.51 $ 2,599.53 It 50.00 $ 150.00
133 SURUES,JERRY $ 2,721.4D $ 8,164.20 It 50.00 $ 160.00
142 TAYLOR,DENNIS $ 2,063.93 $ 6,191.79 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
163 WATSON,RICHARD $ 6,047.05 $ 20,841.15 $ 50.00 $ 50.OD
163 Watson,Richard Plus 25 Addrl Pay $ 948.76 $ 2,846.28 $ - $ -
149 WILLIAMS,JOYCE $ 2,539.66 $ 7,618.98 It 50.00 It 150.00
195 WITT,BETTY J $ 1,766.83 $ 5,300.49 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
213 WOOD,RUTHIE A 1,51to.93 $ 4,742.79 $ 50.00 $ 150.00
$ 129,605.80 $ 388,817.40 $2,150.00 $ 6.350.00
POLICE PENSION FUND 4 4 4 4 4
April 2012 68DD-s800 6800-9800
Month 4 Regular Mo 5� =5-05
4
EMP# NAME Benefit YTD Reg Benefit Suppl. YTD Suppl.
154 ALLEN,CHARLES $ 2,584.64 It 10,338.56 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
206 BAYLES,BOBS]J $ 1,587.41 $ 6,349.64 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
216 BLACK,MILDRED $ 1,125.64 $ 4,502.56 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
147 BRADILEY,GERALD $ 4,820.09 $ 19,280.36 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
139 BRADLEY,RANDALL $ 2,860.17 $ 11,440.68 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
167 BROWN,JOHN $ 4,362.01 $ 17,448.04 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
157 CARROLL,RONALD L $ 2,106.04 $ 8,424.16 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
151 COLE,RUSTON $ 3,065.74 $ 12,262.96 $ 50.00 10 200.00
160 DUGGER,GARY $ 3,163.74 $ 12,654.96 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
140 FOSTER,BILLY D. $ 3,207.35 $ 12,829.40 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
148 FRIEND.JERRY $ 1,970.42 $ 7,881.68 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
211 FRIEND.MICHELE $ 1,182.26 $ 4,729.04
161 HANNA.JANICE $ 1,368.59 $ 5,474.36 $ -
W HANNA,MARK $ 1,368.59 $ 5,474.36 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
169 HELDER,TIM $ 5,838.12 $ 23,352.48 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
180 HOYT RICK $ 7,460.01 $ 29,840.04 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
146 HUTCHENS,BERNICE $ 1,825.54 $ 7,302.16 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
194 JOHNSON,FRANK $ 7,974.81 $ 31,899.24 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
215 JOHNSON,JOYCE $ 2,455.50 $ 9,822.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
103 JOHNSON,WENDELL $ 783.15 $ 3,132.60 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
118 JONES,BOB $ 3,300.45 $ 13,201.80 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
144 KILGORE,DONALD $ 2,046.48 $ 8,185.92 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
150 LITTLE,PATSY R $ 730.35 $ 2,921.40 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
156 MARTIN.KENNETH $ 3,692.85 $ 14,771.40 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
128 MCCAWLEY,LARRY $ 1,694.79 $ 6,779.16 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
126 MCWHORTER,KAREN $ 1,012.10 $ 4.048.40 $ 50.00 $ 200A0
136 MITCHELL,MICHAEL $ 2,305.29 $ 9,221.16 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
141 MUELLER,ROSEMARY $ 2.063.93 $ 8.255.72 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
158 MUNSON,ANGELA $ 4,198.15 $ 16,792.60 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
112 MURPHY,JAKE $ 405.75 $ 1,623.00 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
137 PERDUE,LARRY $ 2,322.67 $ 9.290.68 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
164 PERSHALL,ROBIN $ 1,525.07 $ 6,lGO.28 $ - $ -
132 PHILLIPS,HOMER GENE $ 1,754.44 $ 7,017.76 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
199 PRESTON,NORMA J $ 1,601.37 $ 6,405.48 $ 50.00 $ 200,00
135 RICKMAN,LOREN $ 2,231.07 $ 8,924.28 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
214 RIGGINS,BONNIE $ 1,669.37 $ 6,677.48 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
183 ROBERTS,ELDON $ 4,263.24 $ 17,052.96 $ 50.00 It 200.00
183 ROBERTS,ELDON Plus 25 add pay $ 587.09 $ 2,348.36 $ - $
212 ROBERTS,CAROLYN K $ 3,216.13 $ 12,864.52 $ -
212 ROBERTS.CAROLYN K Plus 25 add pay $ 442.89 $ 1,771.56 $ -
159 SCHUSTER,JOHN H. $ 3,117.36 $ 12,469.44 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
168 STANLEY,MELVIN $ 4,880.07 $ 19.620.28 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
155 STOUT,BETTY $ 866.51 $ 3,46&04 $ 50.01) $ 200.00
133 SURLES,JERRY $ 2,721.40 $ 10,885.60 $ 50.00 $ 20D.00
142 TAYLOR,DENNIS $ 2,063.93 $ 8.255.72 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
163 WATSON,RICHARD $ 6,947.05 $ 27,788.20 $ 50.00 $ 50.00
163 Watson,Richard Plus 25 Add'I Pay $ 948.76 $ 3,795.04 $ - $ -
149 WILLIAMS,JOYCE $ 2,539.66 $ 10,158.64 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
195 WITT.BETTY J $ 1.766.83 $ 7,067.32 $ 50.00 $ 20D.00
213 WOOD,RUTHIE $ 1,580.93 $ 6.323.72 $ 50.00 $ 200.00
$ 129,605.80 $ 518.42320 $2�15000 $ 8,460.00
Page 1 of 2
LOCAL PENSION FUND REPORT 2011
In keeping with statutory requirements, I am presenting this report for 2011 on the
local Police and Fire Retirement and Relief Funds for the City of Fayetteville. Both of
these plans were closed, by law, in 1983 and there are no longer any active working
members remaining. There are currently 44 police and 57 fire retirees and beneficiaries
in the system.
At December 2011 projected expenses from the fire pension fund were
approximately $1.5 million as compared to fund revenues of$900,000. Projected police
pension fund expenses were approximately $1.6 million as compared to fund revenues in
excess of$1.2 million. This is before adjusting investments to market value. However, on
a cash flow basis, contributions are not covering expenses.
Actuarial evaluations are the responsibility of the State of Arkansas Fire and
Police Pension Review Board. The last evaluations completed were as of July, 2011 for
the year ending December 3 1, 2010
Based on those evaluations the unfunded pension obligations of the Police and Fire Funds
we.re $6.1 million and$8.3 million respectively and have grown considerably from prior
years. The unfunded actuarially accrued liabilities for these funds were approximately
$13.2 million for police and $15 million for fire. In the annual reports issued by the
Arkansas Pension Review Board neither the fire nor police pension fund were found to be
actuarially sound pursuant to established financial tests. Again, this actuarial valuation is
for the 2010 fiscal year not 2011.
As many of you may remember on October 18, 2010 representatives of the
Pension Review Board came to Fayetteville to present a special report on the Fire
Pension Fund. Both Fire Pension Board members and City Council members attended the
meeting when this report was presented During that presentation,the PRB Board
Actuary indicated that the fund runs a 90%risk of ruin within the next 5 to 10 years. The
Fire Pension Board was, therefore,told of the current status of the fimd in 2011. The Fire
Pension Board has been aware of the unstable state of the fund and has been discussing
the situation and possible options for almost two years but has not decided on a plan of
action by the majority of the pension board. The primary option which has been
discussed is the possible reduction of current benefits. The City Clerk and I have moved
and had numerous votes to reduce benefits but all votes to do so up to this point and time
have failed. However,the pension board has been advised that there is no specific
enabling legislation to reduce benefits and legal issues might prevent that option. All
other options presented would require substantial financial contributions by the City.
However,the City Attorney has advised the Pension Board that the City has no direct
obligation to fund the pension plan; other than a .4 mill dedicated levy for each,plus state
insurance turn back.
In 2011 operating conditions of the Fire Pension Fund have been relatively the same
so no improvement has been made. However the asset value of the fund has fallen to
under$5,000,000 which makes it subject to further investment restrictions. These
Page 2 of 2
restrictions no longer allow investments in individual securities. Investments will be
limited to cash, cash equivalents, government bonds and no load mutual funds. This
means overall returns in the future are likely to be less than previously experienced which
could bring about depletion of the fimd even earlier unless the pension board does
something.
As recently as December the PRB has continued to classify the Fire Pension Fund
as "projected insolvent".
The Police Pension Fund is also considered actuarially unsound but not in
immediate danger of becoming insolvent. The Police Pension Board is also aware of the
Police Pension Fund status and has been considering options that would guarantee long
term solvency.
I will continue to closely monitor these funds in the future and keep you
apprised of any new developments.
Jra Smith -Act 979 of 120.11
From: Denise Reed <sdreed@lopfi-prb.com>
To: "PLEACH@CI.FAYETTEVILLE.AR.US" <PLEACH@Cl.FAYETTEVlLLEAR.US>
Date: 10/13/2011 2:40 PM
Subject: Act 979 of 2011
Attachments: Fayetteville Fire.pdf, Fayetteville Police.pdf
Good Afternoon-
The attached letter provides useful information of one of the changes in Act 979 of 2011. This act created
a new source of funding for local fire and police pension funds titled Additional Allocation.
The letter will inform your Local Pension Fund Board of Trustees of the estimated amount of the
Additional Allocation your pension fund could receive. Please provide a copy of the letter to each trustee.
You may view Act 979 of 2011 by going to the our website at
www.lopfi-prb.com<hftp://www.lopfi-prb.com>. Select the Links tab, General Assembly, and then Acts.
Should you have additional questions you may contact our office toll free at 866-859-1745.
Sincerely,
PRB Staff
One Union National Plaza,Suite 1690
Osbom, Carreiro & Associates, Inc. 124 West Capitol Avenue
Little Rock,Arkansas 72201
ACTUARIES * CONSULTANTS * ANALYSTS (501)376-8043 fax(501)376-7847
October 13,2011
Mr.David Clark, Executive Director
Arkansas Fire and Police Pension Review Board
620 West Third Street
Suite 200
Little Rock,AR 72201
RE: Fayetteville Police Pension Fund
Estimated 2012 Premium Tax Allocation
Dear Mr. Clark:
We have estimated the base benefit calculations needed for the new Premium Tax Allocation
formula created by Act 979 of 2011 and PRB Board Rule 12. This letter will provide these
estimates for the above referenced local fire or police pension fund.
Actual Benefits Valued I/l/2011 $1,578,880
Base Benefits Valued 1/1/2011 $887,035
Actuarial Cost of Base Benefits $346,027
Estimated Premium Tax 2012
(30%of Actuari I Cost) $103,808
Estimated Additional Allocation 2012, if eligible
(10%of Actuari I Cost) $34,603
2011 Employer Contributions for Additional
Allocation 2012 Eligibility(80%of Actuarial Cost) $276,822
Actual 2010 Reported Employer Contribution $645,963
(other than premium tax)
Shortfall based on 2010 contributions $0
Expected Eligibility based on 2010 contributions Yes
The new premium tax formula allocates monies based on an Actuarial Cost derived from a fund's
Base Benefits (that is, 50%of Final Salary, minimum $350 per month for paid members, and $100
per month for volunteer members). Each fund now receives 30%of this calculated Actuarial Cost as
Premium Tax. Each fund is also eligible for an Additional Allocation equal to 10%of this Actuarial
Cost, provided that the Employer Contributions other than Premium Tax made by the location are
equal to at least 80%of the Actuarial Cost. We have included last year's contributions and the
estimated shortfall to become eligible for the Additional Allocation if Employer Contributions were
to remain level in 2011.
As a reminder,these numbers constitute estimates, and they MAY vary materially from the figures
shown here. In particular, an additional employer contribution equal to the shortfall estimate shown
will not guarantee Additional Allocation eligibility in 2012.
We will provide the fund with the Base Benefits amounts to verify with the annual report.
Police Pension Fund Revenue Expense Summary
12131/2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
Revenues:
Employee Contributions $ $ $ - $ $ $ 4,139.00 $ 5,193.00 $ 11,829.00
Employer Contributions $ $ $ $ $ 8,278.00 $ 10,385.00 $ 23,658.00
State Insurance Tax $ 205,694.53 $ 213,357.83 $ 214,429.30 $ 186,429.42 $ 190,192.00 $ 226,826.00 $ 353,271.00 $ 232,007,00
Local Millage(A mills) $ 498,380.57 $ 608,192.07 $ 485,345.06 $ 441,696.50 $ 388,877.00 $ 370,649.00 $ 339,416.00 $ 295,409.00
10%City Fines and Forfeitures $ 126,046.40 $ 130,723.07 $ 123,653.64 $ 131,583.83 $ 106,385.00 $ 119,147.00 $ 126,833.00 $ 126,833.00
Sale of Confiscated Goods $ 5,026.40 $ 5,487.59 $ 9,732.16 $ 7,715.61 $ 10,806.00 $ 6,343.00 $ 120.00 $ 1,160.00
Interest and Dividends $ 263,520�02 $ 267,714.80 $ 256,907.42 $ 359,998.26 $ 356,699.00 $ 373,776.00 $ 347,752.00 $ 382,333.00
Gain(Loss)on Sales $ 209,001.15 $ 362,318.64 $ 153,193.23 $ (885,460.76) $ 395,378.00 $ 420,298.00 $ 231,691.00 $ 243,083.00
Police Supplement $ 40,500.00 $ 42,000.00 $ 31,200.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,300.00 $ 31,275.00 $ 30,600.00
Future Supplement $ 36,450.00 $ 26,061.50 $ 38,350.00 $ 41,370.00 $ 86,040.00 $ 60,060.00 $ 51,199.00 $ 33,140.00
Misc Revenue $ 104.60 $ 1,561.27 $ 5,757.99 $ 161.46 $ 907.00 $ 1,126.00 $ 2,401.00 $ 536.00
Total Revenue $ 1,384,72Z67 $ 1,557,416.77 $ 1,318,568.80 $ 313,494.32 $ 1,565,284.00 $ 1,620,942.00 $ 1,499,536.00 $ 1,380,588.00
Expenditures
Regular Monthly Benefits $ 1,564,986.62 $ 1,582,900.00 $ 1.628,521.36 $ 1,638,067.76 $ 1,581,319.00 $ 1,456,466.00 $ 1,362,068.00 $ 1,226,282.00
Police Supplement $ 26,400.00 $ 27,250.00 $ 29.300.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ 29,600.00 $ 29,800.00 $ 30,600.00
Future Supplement $ 35,640.00 $ 24,952.50 $ 36,816.00 $ 41,370.00 $ 86,040.00 $ 60,060.00 $ 48,245.00 $ 33,140.00
Investment Manager Fees $ 71,050.23 $ 70,369.02 $ 68,150.57 $ 82,754.75 $ 87,712.00 $ 86,243.00 $ 86,672.00 $ 87,994.00
Other Expenses:
Office Supplies/printing $ - $ 84.00
Audit Fees $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,300.00 $ 3,210.00 $ 3,700.00
Professional Services $ - $ 2,000.00
LegalFees $ - $ 1,025.00
Bank Fees $ 164.48 $ 119.34 $ 181.69 $ 203.21 $ 195.00 $ 156.00 $ 156.00 $ 220.00
Total Expenses $ 1,701,741.33 $ 1,709,090.86 $ 1,766,553.62 $ 1,795,895.72 $ 1,788,766.00 $ 1,636,850.00 $ 1,532,151.00 $ 1,381,936.00
Net Income(Loss)Before Market Adj $ (317,018.66) $ (161,674.09) $ (447,984.82) $ (1,482,401.40) $ (223,482.00) $ (15,908.00) $ (32,615.00) $ (1,348.00)
Market Adjustment $ 770,856.91 $ 410,382.51 $ (1,291,031.77) $ 151,740.00 $ 344,973.00 $ (361,860.00) $ 20,566.00
Net Income(Loss) $ (317,018.66) $ 619,182.82 $ (37,602.31) $ (2,773,433.17) $ (71,742.00) $ 329,065.00 $ (394,475.00) $ 19,218.00
Book Value Total Reserve Assets $ 7,468,021.86 $ 7,785,041.00 $ 7,950,21 S.00 $ 8,398,199.00 $ 9,880,601.00 $ 10,104,083.00 $ 10,119,990.00 $ 10,162,607.00
Market Value Total Reserve Assets $ 8,158,105.82 $ 8,555,897.00 $ 8,360,804.00 $ 8,046,356.00 $ 10,819,789.00 $ 10,891,530.00 $ 10,562,465.00 $ 10,956,940.00
*Assets less any liabilities
Market Value calculated at year end
1/18/2012 C:%DOCUME—l\lbranson\LOCALS-1\Temp\XPgrpwise\Police Pension Summary
Policemen's Pension And Relief Fund Board Of Trustees
Chairman Retired Position 3
Mayor Lioneld Jordan Tim Helder
113 W. Mountain 188 Tower Street
Fayetteville,AR 72701 West Fork, AR 72774
575-8330—Work 839-8104—Home
01/01/09-hidef 530-0142—Cell
Replaced Eldon Roberts
Treasurer 05/01/03-05/31/05 lst Term
Sondra Smith 06/01/05-05/31/07 2 nd Term
113 W. Mountain 06/01/07-05/31/09 3dTcnn
Fayetteville, AR 72701 06/01/09-05/31/11 4th Term
442-7838 —Home 06/01/11-05/31/13 5�hTerm
575-8323 —Work
02/03/03-Indef Retired Position 4
Melvin W. Stanley
Secreta PO Box 289
Retired Position I Greenland, AR 72737
Eldon Roberts 839-3106—Home
4199 E. Huntsville Rd. 601-1224—Cell
Fayetteville, AR 72701 Replaced Dr. James Mashburn
521-0183 —Home 11/15/06-05/31/07 Unexpired Term
601-6469—Cell 06/01/07-05/31/09 1"Term
Replaced Randy Bradley 06/01/09-05/31/11 2nd Term
06/01/05-05/31/07 I't Term 06/01/11-05/31/13 3rd Term
06/01/07-05/31/09 2 nd Tenn
06/01/09-05/31/11 3rd Term Retired Position 5
06/01/11-05/31/13 4t" Tenn Frank Johnson
3328 Jasper Lane
Retired Position 2 Fayetteville, AR 72704
Jerry Friend 204-2588—Work
1640 Stewart Replaced Jerry Surles
Fayetteville, AR 72703 06/01/06-05/31/08 ls' Term
283-5287—Cell 06/01/08-05/31/10 2nd Term
444-1747—Work 06/01/10-05/31/12 3rd Tenn
05/01/96-04/30/98 IstTerrn
05/01/98-04/30/00 2nd Term In 2005 Act 386 changed the composition
05/01/00-04/30/02 3' Term of the board eliminating the physician
05/01/02-04/30/04 e Term position and adding one active member.
05/01/04-05/31/06 5th Term The active position is now a retired
06/01/06-05/31/08 6th Term position due to the fact that there are no
06/01/08-05/31/10 7th Term current active members on the pension
06/01/10-05/31/12 8th Term plan. The physician position was also
replaced by a retired member.
34
Page 1 of 2
Sondra Smith - Re: Fayetteville Police Pension Fund
From: Sondra Smith
To: Cooper, Kim
Date: 1/3/2012 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: Fayetteville Police Pension Fund
Attachments: Sondra Smith.vd
Thank you. We will discuss this at our meeting in January. Have a great day!
Sondra E Smith C4MC, CMC
City Clerk Treasurer
City of Fayetteville
113 West Mountain
Fayetteville,AR 72701
(479) 575-8323
ssmith@ci.fayetteville.ar.us
TDD(Telecommunications Device for the Dea�: (479) 521-1316
FAY
a I 'V -L-),' IN
FAYETTEVILLE
>>> "Kim Cooper" <kim@longerinv.com> 1/3/2012 11:00 AM >>>
Dear Sondra:
The original signer on the account documentation for the Police Pension Fund is Scott Linebaugh. You
may use the same fornt for Police Pension to designate new authorized signors for the account. If you
have any questions or if I can be of further assistance,please let me know.
&I Kim M.Cooper,RP
Executive Administrator
Longer investments Inc.
P.0.Box 1269
Fayetteville,AR 72702
file:///C:/Users/ssmith/AppData/Local/Temp/XPgrpwise/4FO2EB4DFAYETTEVILLECIT... 1/3/2012
(1A/M12) Sondra Smith -_RE: agents and tax id number for Police Pension Seite7l
From: Patricia Leach
To: Lamb, Tina
CC: elainelonger@att.blackberry.net; Hertweck, Marsha; Longer,
Elaine; Sm. . .
Date: 1/3/2012 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: agents and tax id number for Police Pension
The agent on file definitely should not be Scott Linebaugh. What do we need to
do to get that changed? I am thinking it should be the Mayor--Sondra, what do
you think?
Trish
>>> -,Tina Lamb" <tina@loncrerinv.com> 1/3/2012 4:50:28 pm >>>
Dear Trish:
The tax identification number we have on file for the Police Pension account
is 71-0584406. This is also the number that is on file at the Northern Trust
Company.
Kim Cooper checked with our representative at Northern Trust to ask about the
authorized agent on the account. She was told the agent on file is Scott
Linebaugh.
Please let us know if you have additional questions.
Sincerely,
Tina M. Lamb, RP
Client Services Manager
Longer Investments Inc.
P.O. Box 1269
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72702
(479) 443-5851
(800) 827-7710
tina@longerinv.co
-----original Message-----
From: Patricia Leach [mailto:pleach@ci.fayetteville,ar.usI
Sent: Friday, December 30, 2011 11:41 AM
To: Tina Lamb
Cc: Marsha Hertweck; Sondra Smith
Subject: agents and tax id number for Police Pension
Tina,
I am sure you are working with Kim on moving the Fire Pension to Garrison and
have heard that the tax id number is incorrect and that the agents have never
been updated.
would you mind checking on the Police Pension arid sending us the current
agents and the tax id number?
AUTHORIZED SIGNORS
member of the City of Fayetteville Policemen's
Pension and Relief Board, which has established a Policemen's Pension and Relief Fund, duly
organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Arkansas hereby certify
that pursuant to a resolution of the Board of Trustees of the City of Fayetteville Policemen's
Pension and Relief Fund dated , 20—, the individuals whose names
appear were duly authorized to act on behalf of the board with respect to all matters pertaining
to the custody Agreement between the Board and Northern Trust Company.
NAME TITILE/SIGNATURE
Lioneld Jordan, Mayor Signature
Social Security Number Title
Date of Birth
Sondra Smith, City Clerk Signature
Social Security Number Title
Date of Birth
Dated this day of 20—.
Member, City of Fayetteville
Policemen's Pension & Relief Fund Board