No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-06-07 - Agendas • Taeiile ARKANSAS THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS 113 W.Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone: (479)575-8267 AGENDA FOR A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MONDAY, JUNE 7, 2010 at 3:45 p.m. Room 111, City Administration Building The following items will be considered: 1. Approval of the minutes from the April 5, 2010 meeting. New Business: 2. BOA 10-3586 (37 S. GREGG AVENUE, 522): Submitted by TODD JACOBS for property located at 37 S. GREGG AVENUE. The property is zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains approximately 0.33 acres. The request is for variances of lot width and minimum buildable street frontage in order to subdivide the property and construct two new single family dwellings. Planner: Andrew Garner All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the office of City Planning (479-575-8267), 125 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. Interpreters or TDD (Telecommunication Device for the Deaf) are available for all public hearings; 72 hour notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter,please call 479-575-8330. • Taye eel e ARKANSAS ORDER OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING A. Introduction of agenda item—Chairman B. Presentation of Staff Report C. Presentation of request—Applicant D. Public Comment E. Response by Applicant/Questions & Answer with Board F. Action of the Board of Adjustment (Discussion & Vote) NOTE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE If you wish to address the Board of Adjustment on an agenda item raise your hand when the Chairman asks for public comment. He will do this after he has given Board members the opportunity to speak and before a final vote is taken. Public comment will only be permitted during this part of the hearing for each item. Once the Chairman recognizes you, go to the podium at the front of the room and give your name and address. Address your comments to the Chairman, who is the presiding officer. He will direct them to the appropriate appointed official, staff member or others for response. Please keep your comments brief, to the point, and relevant to the agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak. Please, as a matter of courtesy, refrain from applauding or booing any speakers or actions of the Board of Adjustment. 2010 Board of Adjustment Members Robert Kohler (Chairman) Sheree Alt Mark Waller Steven Bandy Kristen Knight Board of Adjustment Meeting April s, 2010 Page 1 of 5 MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT A meeting of the Board of Adjustment was held on April 5, 2010 at 3:45 p.m. in Room 111 of the City Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas. ITEMS DISCUSSED ACTION TAKEN BOA 10-3530 (Narrow Escapes, 444) Approved Page 2 BOA 10-3545 (Life Styles for Living, 363) Approved Page 3 BOA 10-3546 (3274 E. Zion Rd., 099) Approved Page 5 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Sheree Alt Steven Bandy Robert Kohler Mark Waller Kristen Knight STAFF PRESENT STAFF ABSENT Jesse Fulcher Andrew Garner Dara Sanders Jason Kelley Jeremy Pate Board of Adjustment Chair Bob Kohler called the meeting to order at 3:45 PM. June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA Minutes 4/5/2010 Agenda Item 1 Page 1 of 6 Board of Adjustment Meeting April s, 2010 Page 2 of 5 BOA 09-3530 (NARROW ESCAPES / NORTH ST & RR, 444): Submitted by BATES & ASSOCIATES for property located ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF NORTH STREET, EAST OF THE RAILROAD CORRIDOR. The property is zoned RMF-24, MULTI FAMILY - 24 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 2.15 acres. The request is for a variance from the minimum buildable street frontage requirements. Andrew Garner, Senior Planner, gave the background for the variance request and the minimum buildable street frontage requirement. Finding several unique circumstances on this parcel staff recommends approval. Board Member Kohler discussed the exceedingly long street frontage on one side of the property and the extremely short street frontage on North Street. Board Member Knight asked about how the minimum buildable street frontage was measured. Garner discussed that it is measured based on the lot width at the right-of-way line, and that the building area is calculated from eave to eave. Geoff Bates, applicant, discussed that they tried to fit this development in with the City's requirements but the unique shape of the parcel requires the variances. No public comment was presented. Motion: Board Member Knight made a motion to approve the request as requested by the applicant. Board Member Alt seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 5-0-0. June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA Minutes 4/5/2010 Agenda Item 1 Page 2 of 6 Board of Adjustment Meeting April s, 2010 Page 3 of 5 BOA 09-3545 (LIFE STYLES COLLEGE FOR LIVING, 363): Submitted by BATES AND ASSOCIATES for property located at CORNER OF W. SYCAMORE ST. AND SADDLEHORN AVE. The property is zoned P-1, INSTITUTIONAL and contains approximately 1.27 acres. The request is for a reduced front setback of 20 feet to allow 10 feet of a canopy over the driveway at the entrance of the building. Dara Sanders, Current Planner, gave the background for overall large scale development that was approved by the Planning Commission in March 2010. She described the property and the variance request for the covered vehicular drop-off canopy within the building setback. Finding that the property can be reasonably developed without the variance, staff recommends denial. Board Member Kohler discussed that the proposed canopy does not encroach further to the street than anything along the street. Board Member Waller asked about other properties zoned P-1, Institutional mentioned in the staff presentation. Sanders discussed that the Physician's Surgery Center and Butterfield Trail Elementary School were two projects that were zoned P-1 and did not have a covered drop-off canopy. Andrew Garner, Senior Planner added that this was mentioned in the findings because staff felt it would be a special privilege denied to other properties in the same zoning district. The other two properties mentioned have discussed with staff the desire to have drop-off canopies, but because of the building setbacks in P-1 did not propose or build one. Board Member Knight asked about a shared driveway. Sanders confirmed that, yes, the driveway was shared with the adjacent apartments. Geoff Bates, applicant, discussed the various features of the site that they felt were unique including the floodway, floodplain, and shape of the parcel. Ken Shireman, applicant, gave further background of the site and discussed that they desired maximum standards with the site being built out as much as possible, that the requirement to dedicate right-of-way for the adjacent street was a hardship. He discussed the shape and design of the proposed canopy, the project, and nature of the institution proposed and the clients served. Board Member Waller asked how big the canopy was. Ken Shireman, applicant, discussed that it is a big canopy so more than one vehicle can park in the drop-off area at the same time. June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA Minutes 4/5/2010 Agenda Item 1 Page 3 of 6 Board of Adjustment Meeting April s, 2010 Page 4 of 5 Board Member Knight asked if the drop-off canopy was a part of the original program. Ken Shireman, applicant, stated yes it was always a part of the program. Charles ?, president of Lifestyles, discussed that the last time they modified their facilities was over 15 years ago. As part of the design of the proposed facility they acquired more square footage from the neighbor, designed the site to maximize parking. Funds come difficult and there was a 3-year campaign to raise funds for this project. We can only construct a one-story building because of the I-540 Design Overlay District. Board Member Waller asked the applicant if they ever designed any alternatives that would meet the City ordinances. Ken Shireman stated, no. Board Member Kohler discussed that this drop-off is for a different group of people because of the nature of the institution. Board Member Alt discussed that the property was located within a floodplain. Jason Kelley, Assistant Attorney, asked if the drop-off canopy was required as part of an ADA requirement. Charles, ?, president of Lifestyles, stated no, it was not required by ADA. Board Member Bandy discussed that if they moved the canopy on other areas of the site they would lose ADA parking. Garner corrected a previous statement of the applicant that only a one-story building could be built. City code would permit a multiple story building on the site. No public comment was presented. Board Member Alt stated that she felt the ordinance deprived the applicant of development rights. Motion: Board Member Alt made a motion to approve the request as requested by the applicant, including the condition of approval recommended by staff on page 4. Board Member Bandy seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 3-2-0 with Board Members Waller and Knight voting `No'. June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA Minutes 4/5/2010 Agenda Item 1 Page 4 of 6 Board of Adjustment Meeting April 5, 2010 Page 5 of 5 BOA 09-3546 (3274 E. ZION RD. V.THOMPSON, 099): Submitted by ED FRANKZE for property located at 3274 E. ZION RD. The property is zoned R-A, RESIDENTIAL-AGRICULTURAL and contains approximately 2.00 acres. The request is for a reduced front setback to bring an existing non-conforming structure into compliance. Andrew Garner, Senior Planner, gave the background for the home that was built on the property prior to the site being annexed into the City, and discussed that the request is to bring the non-conforming home into compliance. Board Member Waller asked when the property was annexed into the City. Garner stated that he did not know. Board Member Kohler discussed that the reasons for the non-conformity were beyond the actions of the applicant. Virginia Thompson, applicant, confirmed that the property was already in the City when she purchased it. No public comment was presented. Motion: Board Member Bandy made a motion to approve the request as requested by the applicant, and added a condition that any expansion of the building into the building setbacks beyond the existing footprint of the home, would be required to be submitted to the Board of Adjustment for review. Board Member Knight seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 5-0-0. All business being concluded, the meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m. June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA Minutes 4/5/2010 Agenda Item 1 Page 5 of 6 June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA Minutes 4/5/2010 Agenda Item 1 Page 6 of 6 TaTeTui Meeting of June 7, 2010 NSAS THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 125 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone: (479)575-8267 TO: Board of Adjustment FROM: Andrew Garner, Senior Planner THRU: Jeremy Pate, Development Services Director DATE: May 27, 2010 BOA 10-3586 (37 S. GREGG AVENUE, 522): Submitted by TODD JACOBS for property located at 37 S. GREGG AVENUE. The property is zoned NC, NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION and contains approximately 0.33 acres. The request is for variances of lot width and minimum buildable street frontage in order to subdivide the property and construct two new single family dwellings. Planner: Andrew Garner BACKGROUND: Property Description: The subject property is located just south of Center Street and within the Downtown Master Plan Area on the west side of Gregg Avenue. The lot is zoned NC, Neighborhood Conservation. On May 6, 2010 the overall 0.70-acre tract was subdivided, with a single family house remaining on the southern 0.37 acres and the northern 0.33 acres a remaining undeveloped lot. The northern undeveloped 0.33 acre tract is the subject property. The subject property is bounded by Spout Springs Branch and its associated floodplain and riparian vegetation along the northeastern half of the lot. Proposal: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property into Tracts IA and 1B with 4,019 and 10,040 square feet, respectively. The applicant proposes to build two single family residences on these new lots. Lot IA would be a conforming lot. However, Lot 1B would have only 34 feet of street frontage when 40 is required, and the applicant is proposing to build a home outside of the build-to zone. These variances are listed in Table 1. The applicant has submitted a survey and site plan showing the proposed lot layout and location of the new homes. Table 1 Variance Re u Variance Ordinance Requirement Applicant's Request Issue Tract 1 B Lot Width 40 feet 34 feet 6-foot variance Build-to zone Structure in build-to zone Structure outside of the build-to zone and 0% with 40% minimum minimum buildable street frontage buildable street frontage G:IETCIDevelopment Services ReviewW 100evelopment Review110-3586 BOA 37S.Gregg Avenue0oard of AdjusimentlComments and Redlines June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St - Agenda Item 2 Page 1 of 12 Public Comment: Staff has not received public comment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested variances to allow for the proposed lot split and development as indicated on the submitted survey and site plan, subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The lot split shall be filed of record prior to building permit approval for Tract 1B. 2. Only two single family detached homes shall be permitted on the subject property. 3. In order to maintain a riparian buffer and tree canopy associated with Spout Springs Branch, a tree preservation plan and review by the City's Urban Forester is required prior to issuance of a building permit on Tract 1B. No trees shall be removed along the north property line. 4. Tracts IA and 1B shall be accessed off of a shared curb cut that shall be placed in an access easement at the time of lot split. Additional Conditions/Comments: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT ACTION- pproved ❑ Dement' Date: June 7,2010 Motion: Second Vote: CITY PLAN 2025 LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Master Plan FINDINGS: City of Fayetteville Unified Development Code Section 156.02 ZONING REGULATIONS. Certain variances of the zoning regulations may be applied for as follows: A. General Regulations/Application. A variance shall not be granted unless and until an application demonstrates: 1. Special Conditions. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. Finding: It is a special condition unique to property in the Downtown Master G:IETCI Development Services Reviewl2O101Development Reviewll0-3586 BOA 37S.Gregg AvenuelBoard of AdjuslmentlComments and Redlines June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St Agenda Item 2 Page 2 of 12 Plan Area that this property is appropriate for single family infill development consistent with the City's adopted comprehensive plan (City Plan 2025). The City's comprehensive plan provides the purpose and intent for zoning regulations. A comprehensive plan must be in place before zoning is adopted, according to state and federal law. Many lots in the Downtown Master Plan Area are not appropriate for infill due to existing development, utilities, lot size, or the general lot configuration. This is a special condition unique to this property. It is also an unusual circumstance that the zoning criteria permits the property to be developed for a two-family or three-family home (duplex or triplex), but the lot cannot be subdivided and developed for two single family homes given the current lot width regulations. The location of Spout Springs Branch and its associated floodplain along the property's northern property line is a unique condition. The creek runs along the eastern portion of the northern boundary before traversing to the north away from the site. The creek and associated floodplain are proposed to be preserved, which requires development on Tract IB to be located away from the street and outside of the build- to zone. The requested variances, if subject to the recommended conditions of approval, would allow infill and revitalization of this property consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. 2. Deprivation of Rights. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the zoning regulations. Finding: In its current configuration, the property may be developed for one single family residence, one two-family residence, or one three-family residence on a conforming lot. The applicant proposes a lot width and a build-to zone variance in order to create two lots in the NC zoning district of approximately 4,019 and 10,040 square feet and develop both lots for single family residences. Staff finds that the variances would not increase density over the current zoning if conditioned appropriately; rather the variances would permit an additional detached single family residence as opposed to a duplex or triplex. The variance would permit infill on the property that would be compatible with the surrounding residential uses and would increase the variety of residential types in the Downtown Area. Staff finds that literal interpretation of the zoning regulations for lot width in this situation conflict with the goals and objectives of City Plan G.IETCIDevelopment Services Review120101Development Review110-3586B0A37S.Gregg Avenue0oard of - AdjustmentiComments and Redlines June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St Agenda Item 2 Page 3 of 12 2025 to encourage appropriate infill development, to encourage and promote attainable housing options, to encourage and provide more opportunities for people to live and work in the City, and to promote compact development in strategic locations. As City Plan 2025 is the overriding adopted land use plan for the City and the background for the zoning code, the policy to encourage appropriate infill is a unique and applicable consideration, and approval of the variance will be, in staffs opinion, "...in keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning ordinance.", in this particular case (Arkansas Code Annotated 14-56- 416(2)(B)(i)(2)). In addition, the variance will be in keeping with the stated purpose of the Neighborhood Conservation, NC, zoning district which, "Serves to promote and protect neighborhood character." (Fayetteville UDC Section 161.23(A)). 3. Resulting Actions. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. Finding: The applicant's desire to subdivide and develop the property creates the need for the variances. However, the special conditions requiring the variances, including the stream corridor, and the unique opportunity for single family infill, are not the result of actions of the applicant. The applicant could build a duplex or triplex on the property in order to obtain a higher dwelling unit yield. However, such a proposal would not be in keeping with the applicant's desire to build single family homes in the Downtown Area, consistent with the policies of City Plan 2025 to encourage appropriate infill and provide a variety of dwelling types. 4. No Special Privileges. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by Zoning, Chapters 160-165, to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. Finding: Granting the requested 6-foot lot width variances and the build-to zone variance will not confer special privileges on this applicant, in terms of density, land use or setbacks. Three dwellings could be permitted on this property by developing it for a triplex; however, it is the applicant's desire to construct two single family residences. Staff finds that the applicant's proposal is consistent with goal No. 1 of City Plan 2025, and appropriate in the NC zoning district. Staff does not find that meeting the goal for appropriate infill is a special privilege in this case; rather it is the implementation of the adopted land use plan for the City. 5. Nonconforming Uses. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same district, and no permitted or nonconforming use of lands, structures, or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance. G,IETCIDevelopment Services Review120101Development Reviewl J0-3586 BOA 37S Gregg AvenuelBoard of AdjnstmenlIComments and Redlines June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St Agenda Item 2 Page 4 of 12 Finding: Existing nonconformities were not considered as a basis of the findings stated in this staff report. Section 156.02 C. Consideration by the Board of Adjustment. 1. Bulk and Area. Applications for variances of bulk and area requirements shall be considered by and may be approved by the Board of Adjustment. 2. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be held. Finding: A public hearing is scheduled for Monday,June 7,2010. 3. Findings. The Board of Adjustment shall make the following findings: a. Minimum Variance. That the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. Finding: Reasons are provided throughout this report that discuss the justification for granting the variances. The variances are the minimum needed to make possible the creation and development of two single family lots. A variance is not needed to construct a duplex or a triplex . on the property. b. Harmony with General Purpose. The Board of Adjustment shall further make a finding that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of Zoning, Chapters 160-165, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Finding: Given the surrounding lot configuration and development pattern in this older neighborhood with a mix of residential types, staff finds that the proposal to create and develop two new lots as shown on the survey and site plan would not be injurious to the neighborhood. Rather, the proposed lot sizes and development pattern would be compatible with the surrounding land use and would allow for the preservation of the riparian corridor on the property, with conditions recommended herein. Also see discussion under Findings No. A.1 and A.2. It is staffs finding that granting the variances would be in keeping with the spirit of the zoning ordinance. C. Conditions and Safeguards. In granting any variance, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the zoning regulations. G:IETCIDevelopment Services Reviewl20101 Development Review110-3586 BOA 37S.Gregg AvenuelBoard of AdjustmentlComments and Redlines June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St Agenda Item 2 Page 5 of 12 Finding: Staff has recommended approval, with conditions that development on the new lots be limited to detached single family homes, and that trees along the riparian corridor be preserved. Future development or re- development of the site will require the property owner to meet all applicable building setbacks. d. No Variance Allowed. Under no circumstances shall the Board of Adjustment grant a variance to allow a use not permissible under Zoning in the district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of the zoning regulations in said district. Finding: N/A G:IETCIDevelopment Services Review120100evelopment Review110-3586 BOA 37 S.Gregg AvenuelBoard of AdjustmentlComments and Redlines June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St Agenda Item 2 Page 6 of 12 TRACT SPLIT FLOOD CERTIFICATION: M;"Cc NO PORTION OF THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED NEI/4,CORNER WITHIN FLOOD ZONE'WOR"AE"AS(NATE SYSTEM,NORTH DETERMINED BY THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FOR WASHINGTON COUNTY, 5©ZIA D BOOK 2004 AT ARKANSAS. (FIRM PANEL#05143CO220F DATED 05/16/2008) :PING,P.L.S.#0056,\ I .TED 09/26/2001 III PARCEL#765-12945-000 I \, \� TOTAL ACREAGE Ikl � MYERS FAMILY PROPERTIES LIy```.. tol, 0.70 ACRES fE PLANE COORD. 3129 E.SKILLEeN RD T I I I FAYETTEVF IU ,AR 72703 \ZONED: NC N 87°18'25" VO IRON PIN PARCEL#76&129W00 22 36399.460 ZONED:MSC .38' 71716.359 \\S 87°1$'25"E 182.78' P.O.B.PARENT TRACT& — 5•B.S.B. — — — — —I 22 5 = a , $CHISELED"X" r>P of ._.-_.-----I—'-�....� _ IDO1 1 I t c $ m i I �I nIC ' 1 N� f y y1�,l IPALCO PORIA E ;I�, , p= "3 y�" $ gMUNICIPPL CORFORAl10N M.m TRACT �L� �� II."L I 1 N3 W.MOUNTAIN ST rl'O e ` O J m q FAYETrEVILLE,AR 72701 0.33 ACRES +/- �� N I a = a Imo" $ PARCEL1055-01867492 O N l V1.3T31 1 ZONED:P-1 U I in m II aflyJ. 1 ¢Z¢ N cn 1 LLO � — . 5'B.S.B. — . 25.0' � w z 187.40' - - DO a y l 1 w ¢ N 88°0904"W ae I- - - - - - e'ess- - - - - - - - - - , rRAcrzmll _ I 1 oI N Z I N, 1' I TRACT HOUSE c �I" ;-..'.+ IN $ � UD i� 0.37 ACRES m O N =I I " 1 ul I N O m "I m b3 'LANE COORD. I PIPEI 22.50' v; $' Diaw mouNr�nnsDTE L — - - 5 8 S 13 CONCRETE 37.329,'--,, _ _ _ _ oR — I I /yJ FAYE ELV65e AR72701 12.325 — — —1 =M �1 PARCELNED:P-116000 N88 p90A'v'=W ,792:`70'..'' GHIS�LE.D X" It L=" MYERS P.WILYPROPFR9ES LLC y I > �• CUME SKIM"RD. PAY6TTEYII3.�qR 27k34 - - n I CRYOFFAYE TEVILLE PARCELR755X4916A6U A MUNICIPAL CORPORAIDON ZONED.NC I 113 W.MOUNTAIN ST FAYETTEVILLE,AR72701 LINE BEARING DISTANCE PARCEL#765A202b000 Ll N87°20'59"W 25.08' APPROVED FOR RECORDATION ZONED:P-1 L2 N01°55'04"W 10.03' FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING 'HIP&DEDICATION: ADMINISTRATION ESENTING ONE HUNDRED AL ESTATE SHOWN ANDl .TE FOR PUBLIC By: Date O AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT 'LAW.THE OWNERS ALSO :.AND TO THE PUBLIC 3LE TELEVISION June 7,2010 FED BY THE CITY OF SURVEY DESCRIPTION AST QUARTER NT TRACT: (PARCEL#765-7 QUARTPaPc of t JVN ON THIS PLAT FOR A PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUAR�(�,QFn$���Tegg t FACILITIES AND THE TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH,RANGE 30 WEST,WASHINGTON COUNTY,AR � 21AvI Icucn ucvcvv Ic PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS,TO-WIT: BEGINNING AT a e o 12 IS 9 June 7,2010 Board of Adjustment BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St Agenda Item 2 Page 8 of 12 5 Bid 18'25"E 182J8' I2� (� ��pp O OFC K TRACT I ° 0.333 ACRES PROPOSED PROPOSED 5'SErBACK— 97.67 PRO OSCD PROP05FO LOT LINE _ O n LOTIB - PROPOSED 5' AOK z V I I 90,040 SF r — — — — — — — — — _ m T N 71 Ij 1'. BUILDABLE ° --4 I ENVELOPE I PROPOSED o LOT 1A 4,019 SF o I i I I 45' 187.4' i j I I i I it 1 I �i I LOT 1B VARIANCE REQUEST SUMMARY RECEIVED VARIANCE #1 : LOT FRONTAGE ON R.O.W. REQUIRED: 40 FEET MAY 10 2010 PROPOSED: 34. 15 FEET VARIANCE #2: BUILD—TO—ZONE PIIAANONING DIVISIONFAYE REQUIRED: BUILDING TO BE BUILT WITHIN BUILD—TO—ZONE WITH 40% MINIMUM STREET FRONTAGE PROPOSED: THE HOME WILL BE BUILT OUTSIDE OF THE BUILD—TO—ZONE =20 (DUE TO THE LOCATION OF THE RIPARIAN CORRIDOR) AND IN SCALE: 1 509095/ NEWELL LAND CO. 509 W. SPRING ST. SUITE PREPARED THE BUILDING ENVELOPE SHOWN AT THE REAR OF THE LOT AS DATE: s-s-lo FAYE EVILLE, Aft z of APPIAN, INC. INDICATED IN THE ABOVE EXHIBIT SUBMITTAL GREGG STREET BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS 31 S. GREGG STREET VARIANCE REQUEST FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS REVISION #0 Board of Adjustment A enda Item 2 Page 9 of 12 Development Summary :— J►. ' ITITI �+ q i 1j� J `t+ 1 IRF '. PA ` A a ZW� �, ! acobs/ Newell Land Company BOA10-3586 37 S. GREGG Close Up View :rz I ?N x z CEIiT .r � n SUBJECT PROPERTY Mee r T � I y'f t ATi t3 ��r of ry tr- ad t . I ti. j Q I W P1 I Q W l I Overview 0 37.5 75 150 225 300 Feet June 7,2010 BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St Agenda Item 2 Page 11 of 12 BOA10-3586 37 S. GREGG One Mile View NFj/O RPZD I4 RBF cl Gt �HBFIRBr4 GI R 1-t AMS sT R8F ORN B k� °RBFd RSF�i ° RBF �F'° R8� ABF RBH PROSPEOT 3T PROW ST - RBF �" t t 1R1. ,: r R R@Fi. RBF RSF RBFI ST LOW 8`�� LTi ReF�uaeF° -/ XBFI'^ 4 Y a, z 6 4 IIAS'f °: JIM NST r r _ x � ��aR'zo Rsrv. AM RD 7 e y. SUTTON ST RRABBLFF�3LEY 223 r' SUBJECT PROPERTY RBF+ k i a as 1 !x l 3?k I F1 R-0IRA i 1 RA t l�l r R-0 Z WM In ° RBF 41 pu9�iC tuo �7,,,y=, 8: N RMF Lt 1.1 j-M L1 GI Overview Legend Subject Property ° BOA10-3586 B .� ❑ !, Boundary 0 0.25 0.5 1 M les June 7 2010 Board of Adjustment BOA 10-3586 37 S.Gregg St Agenda Item 2 Page 12 of 12