Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-05-12 - Agendas - Final AGENDA FOR A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission will be held Monday, May 12,2003 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Administration Building,113 West Mountain Street,Room 219, Fayetteville,Arkansas. Roll Call The following items will be considered: Approval of minutes from the April 28,2003, meeting. Presentation by a representative from OMI, Operations Management International, Inc. (The operation and maintenance of the City's wastewater treatment plant and the 33 sewer lift stations scattered throughout Fayetteville, as well as the administration of the. Industrial Pretreatment Program for Fayetteville's 11 permitted industries, has been outsourced to Operations Management International,Inc. (OMI) since 1987.) New Business: 1. CUP 03-13.00: Conditional Use (Sequoyah United Methodist Church,pp 369)was submitted by Millholland Company Engineering& Surveying on behalf of the Sequoyah United Methodist Church for property located at 1910 Old Wire Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 7.64 acres. The request is for a 1080 s.f. District Superintendent Office and an additional 22 parking spaces. 2. RZN 03-16.00: Rezoning(Lindsey, pp 136)was submitted by Jerry Kelso, P.E. of Crafton, Tull &Associates, hie. on behalf of Lindsey Management for property located at SW corner of Zion Road and Vantage Drive. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 3.0 acres. The request is to rezone to R- 0, Residential Office. 3. LSP 03-37.00: Lot Split(Scott Miller, pp 562)was submitted by Scott Miller on behalf of Gene Barbee for property located at 729 and 815 S. School. The property is zoned C-2 and contains approximately 1.20 acres. The request is to split the property into two tracts of.45 and .75 acres. 4. PPL 02-7.10: Preliminary Plat (Legacy Point,pp 435/474) was submitted by Jorgensen and Associates on behalf of Charles Sloan Properties, Inc. for property located east of Double Springs Road and south of Owl Creek. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and RM-6, Low Density Multi-family Residential and contains approximately 49.80 acres with 132 lots proposed. K.IAGENDAN0200315-12-03.DOC 5. LSD 03-25.00: Large Scale Development (O'Charley's,pp 212)was submitted by Edwards and Hotchkiss Architects on behalf of O'Charley's, Inc. for property located at the northeast corner of Steele Boulevard and Shiloh Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 1.27 acres with a 6413 s.f. restaurant with 76 total parking spaces proposed with 76 total parking spaces. 6. R-PZD 03-3.00: Planned Zoning District (North College Development Company, pp 485)was submitted by Richard Alexander on behalf of North College Development Company for property located at 313 E. Lafayette Street. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 2.0 acres. The request is for a Residential Planned Zoning District for the conversion of the St. Joseph Catholic Church buildings into 39 residential units (63 bedrooms)with 64 parking spaces. The existing duplex on Willow Street and the existing single family home on Sutton Street are proposed to remain. All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the Office of City Planning(575-8267), 125 West Mountain Street,Fayetteville,Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. Interpreters or TDD for hearing impaired are available for all public meetings. 72 hour notice is required.For further information or to request an interpreter,please call 575-8330. KA4GENDAIPCI200315-12-03.D0C ORDER OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A. Introduction of agenda item—Chairman B. Presentation of Staff Report C. Presentation of request—Applicant D. Public Comment E. Response by Applicant/Questions &Answer with Commission F. Action of Planning Commission(Discussion&Vote) NOTE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE If you wish to address the Planning Commission on an agenda item raise your hand when the Chairman asks for public comment. He will do this after he has given Planning Commission members the opportunity to speak and before a final vote is taken. Public comment will only be permitted during this part of the hearing for each item. Once the Chairman recognizes you, go to the podium at the front of the room and give your name and address. Address your comments to the Chairman, who is the presiding officer. He will direct them to the appropriate appointed official,staff member or others for response. Please keep your comments brief, to the point, and relevant to the agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak. Please, as a matter of courtesy, refrain from applauding or booing any speakers or actions of the Planning Commission. 2003 Planning Commissioners Nancy Allen Jill Anthes Don Bunch Alice Church Bob Estes Sharon Hoover Alan Ostner Loren Shackelford Christian Vaught FAYETTEVILLE PC Meeting of May 12, 2003 THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone:(479)575-8267 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Dawn Warrick,AICP, Zoning &Development Administrator THRU: Tim Conklin, AICP, Community, Planning&Engineering Services Director DATE: May 12, 2003 CUP 03-13.00: Conditional Use (Sequoyah United Methodist Church, pp 369)was submitted by Millholland Company Engineering& Surveying on behalf of the Sequoyah United Methodist Church for property located at 1910 Old Wire Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 7.64 acres. The request is for a 1080 s.f. District Superintendent Office and an additional 22 parking spaces. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends approval of the conditional use subject to the following conditions: 1. Planning Commission determination of compliance with Commercial Design Standards. Staff recommends that the brick chosen for the proposed addition match the existing facility in order to tie the two buildings together visually for a unified development on this site. (Color elevations will be required at the time of building permit application; black & white elevations are included with this staff report for initial review.) 2. Planning Commission approval of parking in excess of that permitted by code. Building Square Feet Parking Requirement Parking Re uested Existing 19,800 SF (church) 91 spaces (maximum) 157 spaces (existing) Proposed 1,080 SF (office) 5 spaces (maximum) 22 spaces Total 96 spaces 179 s aces (§172.01.D. Standards for the Number of Spaces, By Use) 3. A grading plan shall be required prior to a building permit being issued. 4. A Tree Preservation Plan is to be reviewed prior to a building permit being issued. 5. Installation of a 6'wide sidewalk along Old Wire Road at the location of the Master Street Plan right of way for this minor arterial (45' from centerline). Coordination K:1Reports120031PC REPORTS105-121CUP 03-13.00(Seluoyah United Methodist Church).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.1 with Engineering staff for locating this sidewalk at the two existing curb cuts will need to be arranged at the time of development. 6. Increased setback from the north property line to accommodate §163.23 which requires a 50' setback between non-residential uses (which are enclosed and fully air conditioned) and adjacent residential property. Planning Commission may reduce this requirement. The applicant is proposing a 19' setback. Staff would support a reduced setback if a row of evergreen trees is installed between the structure and the northern property line. 7. Installation of a 6' tall wood board privacy fence or a continuous planting of trees and shrubs (to be approved by Planning staff to provide a screen between the proposed parking and building addition and the adjacent residences (to the north). PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES O Approved O Denied Date: May 12,2003 Comments: The'"CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" listed in this report are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this variance. "Name: Date: BACKGROUND: Property description: The subject property is the site of the Sequoyah United Methodist Church. The property is currently zoned R-1, Low density residential. In 1966, the property was rezoned from R-1A, Single family residential to P-IA, Special church district to allow the original development of the property. In 1981, Planning Commission approved a conditional use permit to allow the addition of two 20'x20' classrooms to the structure. Further additions have also been made to the structure resulting in a 19,800 s.f church facility. A child day care, Sequoyah Children's Garden, also operates from this facility. Proposal: At this time, the applicant proposes to add a new structure to the site. An office building containing 1,080 s.f. is proposed which serve as an office for the district superintendent K:IReports110031PC REPORTS105-121CUP 03-13.00(Sequo)nh United Methodist Church).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission CUP 03-13.00:S.U.M.C. Page 1.2 and house two employees. Hours of operation for the office will be Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. —5:00 p.m. with an average of 6 patrons anticipated daily. Outdoor lighting will be minimal and only enough to provide security for the office building (at the porch/entry and a small wall light a the back door). With this project,the applicant is also requesting 22 additional parking spaces to serve the new building and to supplement the parking provided for the existing facility. There are currently 157 parking spaces located on the site to serve the church which has a seating capacity of 250 persons (or a total of 2,800 s.£ of assembly area). The parking requirement for this facility is 91 spaces. The office building will require 4 additional spaces. Request: Approval of a conditional use permit to allow the addition of an accessory office building and additional parking for the United Methodist Church on the subject property as shown on the site plan and elevations submitted with this request. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING Direction Land Use Zoning North Single family residences R-1, Low Density Residential South Single family residences R-1, Low Density Residential East Fairview Memorial Cemetery A-1, Agricultural West Single.family residences R-1, Low Density Residential GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Residential § 163.02. AUTHORITY; CONDITIONS; PROCEDURES. B. Authority; Conditions. The Planning Commission shall: 1. Hear and decide only such special exemptions as it is specifically authorized to pass on by the terms of this chapter. 2. Decide such questions as are involved in determining whether a conditional use should be granted; and, 3. Grant a conditional use with such conditions and safeguards as are appropriate under this chapter; or 4. Deny a conditional use when not in harmony with the purpose and intent of this chapter. C. A conditional use shall not be granted by the Planning Commission unless and K:VReportsL0031PC REPORTS105-121CUP 03-13.00(Sequo)nh United Methodist Church).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission. CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.3 until: 1. A written application for a conditional use is submitted indicating the section of this chapter under which the conditional use is sought and stating the grounds on which it is requested. Finding: The applicant has submitted a written application requesting approval of a conditional use permit for a 1,080 s.f. office building and 22 additional parking spaces for the United Methodist Church. 2. The applicant shall pay a filing fee as required under Chapter 159 to cover the cost of expenses incurred in connection with processing such application. Finding: The applicant has paid the required filing fee. 3. The Planning Commission shall make the following written findings before a conditional use shall be issued: (a.) That it is empowered under the section of this chapter described in the application to grant the conditional use; and Finding: The Planning Commission is empowered under§161.04 to grant the requested conditional use permit. (b.) That the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest. Finding: Granting the conditional use with recommended conditions will not adversely affect the public interest. The proposal is for an expansion of an existing use of this property which has been operating as a religious facility since 1966. Staff is recommending conditions to ensure that the addition is an attractive and appropriate structure with screening to buffer the use from nearby residences. (c.) The Planning Commission shall certify: (1.) Compliance with the specific rules governing individual conditional uses; and Finding: The applicant has complied with specific rules governing this individual conditional use request. (2) That satisfactory provisions and arrangements have been made concerning the following,where applicable: K:Weporis12003IPC REPORTS105-121CUP 03-13.00(Sa7uo}nh United Methodist Church).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.4 (a.) Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in case of fire or catastrophe; Finding: No changes are proposed to the ingress and egress patterns on the site. There are currently two access points from Old Wire Road serving the facility which will remain. (b) Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to ingress and egress, economic, noise, glare, or odor effects of the special exception on adjoining properties and properties generally in the district; Finding: Screening along the north property line between proposed parking and adjoining residential property will mitigate the impact of lights and noise caused by vehicles on this site. (c.) Refuse and service areas,with particular reference to ingress and egress, and off-street parking and loading, Finding: No changes are proposed with regard to solid waste disposal for this property. (d.) Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility; Finding: Utilities currently exist to serve this site. Underground extensions will be made to accommodate the new development. (e.) Screening and buffering with reference to type, dimensions, and character; Finding: Screening between the proposed parking and office building and the adjoining residential property to the north is required. (£) Signs, if any, and proposed exterior lighting with reference to glare,traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with properties in the district; K:Teportr120031PC REPORTS105-121CUP 03-13.00(Seluoyah United Methodist Church).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.5 Finding: No new signage is proposed with this request. (g.) Required yards and other open space; and Finding: The project is complying with yard/setback requirements for the R-1 zoning district. The location of the proposed office building does not meet the minimum setback for a nonresidential use in an R district as required by §163.23. The structure shall be relocated to a position no less than 50' south of the northern property boundary. The Planning Commission may reduce this requirement after reviewing a development plan. (h.) General compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. Finding: The proposed building addition is generally compatible with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The proposal is for a small office building which will have normal operating hours and minimal traffic generation. K.MeporisL 003PC REPORTS105-111CUP 03-13.00(Seluojah United Methodist Church).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.6 f View of existing facility from Old Wire Road K:IReportsl20031PC REPORTS105-121CUP 03-13.00(Seguowh United Methodist Church).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.7 § 161.04 DISTRICT R-1: LOW D. Bulk and Area Re ulations. DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. Single- Two-Family A. Purpose. The Low Density Family Residential District is designed to permit Lot 70 ft. 80 ft. and encourage the development of low Minimum density detached dwellings in suitable Width environments, as well as to protect existing development of these types. Lot Area 8,000 sq. ft. 12,000 sq.ft. Minimum B. Uses. Land Area 8,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 1. Permitted Uses. Per Dwelling Unit 1 City-Wide Uses by Right Unit Unit 26 Single-Family Dwelling E. Yard Re uirements (feet). 2. UsesPermissible on FRONT SIDE REAR Appeal to the Planning Commission. YARD YARD YARD Unit 2 City-Wide Uses by Conditional 25 8 20 Use Permit Unit 3 Public Protection and Utility F. Building Area. On any lot the Facilities area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 40% of the total area of such lot. Viii 4 Cultural andIZeezeahc_nak F ¢rllties (Code 1991, §160.031) Unit 8 Single-Family and Two-Family Dwellings C. Density. SINGLE-FAMILY TWO FAMILY DWELLINGS DWELLINGS 4 or Less Families 7 or Less Families Per Acre Per Acre K:IReports120031PC REPORTS105-121CUP 03-13.00(Sequo), h United Methodist Church).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.8 §163.23 NONRESIDENTIAL USES IN Auditorium, Ballroom, R DISTRICTS The following Dining Room or Meeting requlrements;apply to`ofiaritable,"cultural; Room Having a Floor Area educatlonal reereationa) health, of More than 1200 Square institutlonah;rehgious; social;�arid similar Feet, Game Court, Game nonresidential facihtleawhexe erm�ttecl iri Room, Gymnasium, Locker or abutting an R clrstnet he"Plammig or Shower Room, Place Commission may reducc these requirements Where Alcoholic Beverages after'1•ecei'ving and reuiewmg a development are Served, Spectator plan under the provisions of§166.05 or Facilities, Swimming Pool, §166.06. Separation of structures of areas Theater, or Similar Indoor for uses listed above shall be as follows: Facility: -If fully air-conditioned 100 ft. -If not fully air- Type of Structure or Minimum conditioned 200 ft. Element of the Facility Separation Building of a General 50 ft. ft.) Hospital or Convalescent Outdoor Facility or Use: Home Eating or Picnic Area 100 ft. Building of a Hospital, Sanitarium or Convalescent Entrance Driveway 20 ft. Home for Alcoholic, Outdoor Activity Area 75 ft. Mental,Nervous,Narcotic or Contagious Patients 200 ft. Outdoor Lighted Area 200 ft. Allo I Ir - '- Each-, s:, Outdoor Spectator Facilities 50 ft. If.fiilyT=codiioried 50411 -If not fully air- Outdoor Sports Area 100 ft. conditioned 100 ft. Without Spectator Facilities Tool or Equipment Storage 200 ft. ( Code 1991, §160.088; Code 1965, App. Indoor Facilities: A,Art. 7(14); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70) Air-Conditioning Tower or 50 ft. Dispenser Unit K..,Reports110031PCREPORTS105-12 CUP 03-13.00(Seluo),uh United Methodist Church).doc May 12,206 Planning Commission CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.9 //p / 0 /N AoCCan.d Company REGISTRATIONS: n PE: AR, OK, MO L�iz�ireeerinq C7 Suruet�in.�. Melvin L. Milholland, PE, PLS PLS: AR, OK City of Fayetteville April 18, 2003 ATTN.: Dawn Warrick, City Planner Project S-2331 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 125 West Mountain Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 PROJECT: "District Superintendent Office&Parking The United Methodist Church REQUEST: "CONDITIONAL USE" RE: WRITTEN DESCRIPTION OF THIS REQUEST (what is proposed by the applicant): INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: A. Building Sizes in square feet: [I] Existing........19,800 SF [2] Proposed...... 1,080SF B. Off-Street Parking Spaces provided/number required: [1] Existing:....151 Standard+ 6 Handicap = 157 each:::::Required.......75 [2] Proposed.. 22 Standard..................... = 22 eack::::Required..........4 TOTAL SPACES...........................179 each:::::Required ......79 Total Spaces at 130%....................=(79) x(1.3) = ..........103 OWNER/DEVELOPER request to add 22 spaces to existing 157! C. Professional Office(Business)Information: [1] Hours of Operation:...........Monday through Friday...8 AM- 5 PM [2] Number of Employees:.......Two (2) [3] Anticipated Number of Patrons, Clients, Children, Customers, eta (average per day/peak hour):.........Six( 6 )per day [4] Outdoor Lighting:................At Porch/Entry Ceiling & Small Wall Light at Back Door Respectfully Submitted VM � PE, PLS CC:file,Michael Johnson May 12,2003 -_-- - Planning Commission 205 West Center Street; Fayetteville,Arkansas 72701; Phone: (479)443-4724; Fax: (479)443-4707; E-mail:qCen r :se . tU.M.C.M +_. . 29'-0. 3'-4" i— 5' WIDE C{DNC. WALK j i° 10 8 -SEE SITE PLAN PP, 61 1 106-MECH. Y C2A1A Y i m - 106 103-D.S. OFFICE 105-KITCHEN/ A2A1A __. BREAKROOM o CASEMENT -TYP. 4 103A DW A2 o A2 .V.�CARPE7 v REF ! 5'-2" 0i FEC o n 1G4 5A 11 O1: o m- 104-TOILET A2 C2A1A 0 102 101-ADMIN. ASST. A2AIA SOUND BATT. INSUL. O ALL v o� 101 MT. WALLS i r b' 102- OFFICE ___.._._4 o A2A1A 3 ENTRY N r 2 PAIR 2'-6'x41-8'--� A2 CASEMENT i' S0. W FRAMING TP' 4'-10" ! '. 6'-8" 14•_4"; 8'-0" 2 SO. BRICK + 29'-0" 0/0 STUD -TYP. ,--6" O/0 BRICK -TYP - 41. - 54.-10. -----_-- N FLOOR PLAN 1/8" V-0- May 12,2003 Planning Commission - CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Page 1.11 I Y WKL COMINOUS RIDGE YEAR COMPOSRIOR 12 SXINGLES S 5� t2 CONT. MIL BEARING PIAIE-9•-0• . CURER k _WINWW k_i_AI__ME N0. f.tCH - KOM.ERAVE ILMiCX _ W_t -- k P^OR _ o 8RICK _vntRx:W.SILL„m' E00➢NC/ FARE BRICK 5 ROARS OF PR ECMD BRICK EOUNwigN (WiCX f%ISl C) AS MORS O Cq.S d NOTE: 1) VNNSPIS.IAE NOT SXOWN CORNERS-L XH UX G O FOR DMWING CWRY. MINED DROP OFF ' PRWDE 2 O N..5..G E. E S.k3O W.EI .. WEST ELEVATION a = , _p 2 m.o Wx«w COM, RIME YFNi COMPGSIRON SXINGIES 5� COM. MIL ..NG PU1E-9'-0- GI k _ ONIONS _.— _ _ -51L.IR. � m flGWLCCK- M. _ — FSOUION. GFH`IN�� . ._ _ fWTxC/ fME BRq OUIONS EWNMTON (MI,iCX EnSYG) E%ISi G) NOTE: 1)N MECX. k PLUMBING VENTS M BE - ON MS SIDE OF FWF/BLOC. EAST ELEVATION B - 1 _O COM.RIDGE VEM 12 COMPOSRION COM.RIDGE VEM SNINCI£5 UNE OF ROBE BEHIND COM. ML� // BEARING PU1E-9'-0' GVIiER d _NO_.M_. DNSP4- IYP. - ._.. _-. � I, — OPE _ . BRICK ROOLCCN- T9. - _ - ' SLOPING CONC.SLnB '.' —_ C.E FOOTING/ FARE BR.CK� WIENS O COL.'S d CORNERS FWNMi71ox (L Ti EXMG) (w1CH EnsrG) . SOUTH ELEVATION COM.RIDGE VfM COMPOSRICx 12 SHINGLES COM.RIME KM 5� COM. MIL BEARING PUR-9'-0 QIrtER k DxsPrs- m. NO.M. .�. WRINS -- -- _ - OPE _.. RGML«K- May 12,2003 E" _- _•- - °`PIanningCommission "° - _ CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. FOOIIHG/ XGLLGw YR'FRNIE d CWR CORI O COL'S d CO PERS FWNMPON FK BRICK COR PERS ExT'G) 5'W CONC W4W (NRTCH EMDWC) rage 1.12 NORTH ELEVATION �1 q t r 9£^12 'i nc264 M3 _.. Mu. i z 3e 4 . 9rA . . . i C RC [ E 'cfL H £" Y 9SY9 t3 1 Y ^1 �S i� �2 511£i S 2£ £ I Ci 3 2 ft 1 1 E £ E 2 fdE YII.... HhB W. £ Pi d i a yn E..t r '. 2. i2 x.142 s i e e x1.9 f 9£I' LEf 3 a ' 2 2 � . .� . 2. ,, 1 Eu .a ££i IM e S Nx k t r 2A i i e242>^L yfi-�� i v i. jE¢a YL 2 . JP"v �f Pl 5 2 £ i3£. i 3 ! xGSOi i ➢7. 52 dl+r G1C . E-HMi:E 3 t i31 2 C 1 2'ti .I LtC 2^v mag in ..R..t�£ .......... lI}i i .] f 2. Nm i 2 2 S ii :.a 2.. 2i '!3d i t f : R i S Y f 2 1 [ l i l •' f pp 14 zzz S ff L 4 F iQ1Y2a fl 2] ii i :i «: I923i 1 �nEx .. ai. 'f1:E'^''.2lZia:.•4 �c:1.�:.1•'.jj£_£i::1::1:..�:.:�:+'rt]1 • xT, _ 1 1 CUP03-13.00 SEQUOYAH UNITED METHODIST CHURCH One Mile View Wo pUGUSrp R-2 o r 7 rDxsvrHtn DA � y. - ... R „oma ` R-2 -- R-2 0 t' _. -'_/ rfYp 1�R 1 nex3ny�y ' - �a F 1 • �aZZABEirlaug g, _ + �,.+D uuv6 ,. coJHt � � � HIP RTS R"yrragr e, w ,P }61 ., ���'+rr•*i1 r��y. OVLS(it ip5 TD4�Y5_HIYrS "' 1 " R 1 t R_1 �' R T R-1 1I�Y..x..IiT e op3s w M tNAR-T SiA4, r s n C4 gt: R 1 - _ Rt RY `TAS h56A ,53 1/ AR3D _ R .rdkn R 1 SVs`zN rim'. kg F+'DCD^1,OAR5 DR .. m .r!2 si ...I R-� C t » , Err MST El.Mvadn,r R 1-3 R- x Af�1 R_p o � 2 , , g< p� T 3• tWii E- � 5 a, Rwa ' � SUBJECT PROPERTY C_ De R1 �� P1 ::. a R-1H n R t i y sr reLnrs pL _ o C-1 ,C "�,T Si'ns'A�i" yRs� - A-1 . " z R 1 EOZA vC�q(,t�R�s t Fit R=}� - ( aURU i mtj- i 41 C sy° 11 'z� R�' R11i �iR-1 G.awry sr. C 2 �uI R-1 ._,� ". 44WOaD Sty P P-1 R irV R} .R1 ., {�1 lopg s nqR "AnAtfaDRv vp:- em,KtmU R1a{. ann�H r` =r+staKEppsrD� xr� _ o 8 V 1a�ocGyu C. U53�pC�J� - r Ttt, ,r. i pR _ .1 eR[� i ` ._40.t7R h1ANOR AR RD d R 1 R 1' R 1 i'Rt ! 'L- `t saxa"m+ease ar F o D R-1 R 1 9-1 go R 1 R_9 0, z R 1 1i4HHsgruT - cvsrs a1 nrEy+-Rt _ cws' = t+t21 ;', �, wx✓ cast' i Overview Legend Boundary Subject Property Master Street Plan CUP03-13.00 Planning Area 4 .Freay/F pwssway i } . 0 000a �sy ew Oveday District pnndpal Arterial _AJ U Streets L_ 1 City Limits Minor Arsenal L .1 i 4G \_;Exis4rg f Collector �^Outside City ♦. a+a+ Historic CollMor i ` May 12,2003 { 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8Planning Commission Miles CUP 03-13.00: S.U.M.C. Pae 1.14 FAYETTEVILLE PC Meeting of May 12, 2003 THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone:(479)575-8267 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Dawn Warrick,Zoning&Development Administrator, AICP THRU: Tim Conklin, AICP, Community,Planning& Engineering Services Director DATE: May 12, 2003 Project: RZN 03-16.00: Rezoning(Lindsey,pp136) was submitted by Jerry Kelso, P.E.of Crafton, Tull&Associates, Inc. on behalf of Lindsey Management for property located at SW corner of Zion Road and Vantage Drive. The property is zoned R-2,Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 3.00 acres. The request is to rezone to R-0, Residential Office. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the requested rezoning based on the findings included as part of this report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES O Approved O Denied Date: May 12,2003 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required YES O Approved O Denied Dater June 3,2003 fist reading if recommended) Comments: BACKGROUND: Property description: The subject property is located at the southwest corner of Vantage Drive and Zion Road. There are currently three single family homes located on this property which is divided into three lots. The property is currently part of three five acre tracts. The southern portion of the subject property(12 acres)is being adjusted onto the property to the south and is proposed to become a part of a future multi-family development. K..-V2eportsl2003NCREPORTS105-12VtZN 03-16.00(Caldssey).doc May 12,2003 - -- - -Planning Commission - RZN 03-16.00: Lindsey Page 2.1 Proposal: There are no proposals for development of the subject property at this time. Request: The request is to rezone the 3 acre tract from R-2, Medium Density Residential to R-O,Residential Office. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING Direction Land Use Zoning North Single family homes(large lots) R-1,Low Density Residential/A-1, Agricultural South Vacant R-2,Medium Density Residential East Zion Valle PUD/Multi-family residential R-2,Medium Density Residential West Professional offices R-O,Residential Office INFRASTRUCTURE: The proposed rezoning is located at the southwest corner of Zion Road and Vantage Drive. Zion Road and Vantage Drive are classified as Collector Streets. Only the eastern half of Vantage Drive is constructed at this time. Zion Road is not currently improved to meet the City standard for a collector street. The site has access to existing 6"and 12"water mains along Zion Road. Sewer is not available at these lots. A public main will need to be extended in order to serve this site. LAND USE PLAN: General Plan 2020 designates this site Residential. Rezoning this property to R-O,Residential Office is not specifically consistent with the land use plan. This zoning designation will permit residential uses, however,most properties in the R-O zoning district will develop with professional office uses. Professional office and residential uses could both be considered compatible with surrounding land uses in the area depending upon the development plan. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF 1. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives,principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: The proposed zoning is not specifically consistent with land use planning objectives,principles, and policies which have identified this area as Residential. The current use of the property and the current zoning designation applied to the property are consistent with adopted City policy. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The proposed rezoning is not justified or needed at this time. No development proposals are eminent. There are processes available to the K:IReports12003LPCREPORTS105-121RZN 03-16.00(Lhdsey).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission RZN 03-16.00:Lindsey Page 2.2 property owner to request approval of a development for professional office uses (conditional use permit,planned zoning district)which do not require a rezoning action. Either of these processes would allow the City to look more closely at a development for the purpose of compatibility with surrounding land uses and existing infrastructure. This is a transition area between commercial and residential uses which needs to be carefully considered when redevelopment is proposed. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: Development of this property with office uses would create an increase in traffic activity according to ITE Trip Generation software. The existing development on the property (3 single family homes) generates a very small amount of traffic. The maximum density under current zoning would provide an estimated 477 vehicle trips per day and an office development on the subject property is expected to generate approximately 585 vehicle trips per day. Traffic Generation Average Trips/ Use Variable Weekday Volume Existing Condition 3 SFR 29 Max. Density R-2 72 Units/Apts. 477 Office Dev. R-O 3 Acres 585 Engineering-The proposed rezoning to R-O may or may not result in additional traffic danger and congestion for this area. Access to the developed site and the circulation network within the development shall be reviewed in detail as part of the subdivision or large scale development process. The layout, connectivity, circulation plan, ingress and egress provisions will be reviewed in detail as information becomes available. Police- It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that we must return a determination affirming this rezoning proposal would create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and traffic congestion. The traffic way on Zion Road is very narrow and does not allow much room on the shoulder. In addition to the narrowness of this road,there is a blind curve to the east of Vantage Drive and a small hill to the west. The hill and the curve present a problem for motorists that may need to enter Zion Road from Vantage Drive. There is very little response time to react if a vehicle is approaching from either direction. There are several tree and shrubs very close to the roadway reducing visibility even further. The speed limit is set at 25 mile per hour in this area. This is a similar speed for a school zone. This speed limit reflects K.IReportsUOO PC REPORTSI05-12VZZN 03-16.00 aj7dwy).doc May 12,2003 -- - Planning Commission ---- RZN 03-16.00: Lindsey Page 2.3 the traffic dangers in this area without the increased traffic flow created by this rezoning request. (see attached written statement) 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: The proposed zoning would not increase the population density above that which could be developed on the subject property under the current R-2 designation. Engineering—The site has access to existing 6" and 12"water mains along Zion Road. Sewer is not available at these lots. A public main will need to be extended in order to serve this site. The proposed rezoning and ultimate development may increase the loading on the existing infrastructure systems. During the development's review and approval process,the adequacy of the existing infrastructure to accommodate the service requirements will be assessed by the developer's consultant and reviewed by city staff. Any inadequacies,lack of availability, need for improvements and determination of responsibility for the infrastructure improvements shall be resolved during the development's review/approval process. Fire Mileage from fire station #4 on Plainview Street to the subject property is 2 miles,travel time (normal driving time including traffic stops) is 3 minutes 54 seconds. Police- There is a definite likelihood that increased traffic flow and traffic congestion in this area could increase traffic danger and could affect response times for emergency vehicles. (see attached written statement) 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1)through(4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1)through(4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A K-Reportr120031PC REPORTS105-121RZN 03-16.00(Cndsey).doc May 12,2003 Planning Commission RZN 03-16.00: Lindsey Page 2.4 �,� Crafton, Tull & Associates, Inc. 901 N.47th Street, Suite 200, Rogers,AR 72756 479.636.4838 Fax 479.631.6224 www.craftull.com April 19, 2003 Tim Conklin City of Fayetteville, Planning 113 W. Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72703 RE: Proposed Rezoning Request 3 acres of R-2 to R-0 SW Corner of Zion Road and West of Vantage Drive CTA Job No. 021131-00 Dear Tim: The proposed zoning will include 3 acres of existing R-2 to be zoned R-O. As you are aware we are working with Lindsey Management and the city of Fayetteville to develop property just south of this tract as multi-family. The current property owners wanted to rezone the 3 acres they will retain ownership of with Lindsey purchasing the remaining property south zoned R-2. Checklist Item #5 - Each property owner has signed the rezoning application. It is my understanding they will retain ownership at this time. See attached survey, which shows the different parcels. - Rezoning this property is part of the contract Lindsey has with the current property owners to develop south of it. - There is commercial, residential office, and Multi-family development around this property, which makes for a proper use of office space in the area - Water and sewer are available to the site. Access will be from Zion Road. Checklist Item #6 - The property is consistent with the City of Fayetteville's master Land use plan. - The proposed zoning is justified because the current zoning would not allow for Office use. Changing the zoning to R-0 would not create additional traffic from the zones that exist. A residential office zoning would decrease the population density. RECD` RZTH63xg mission Page 2.5 A r c h i t e c t s E n g i n e e r s & S PLANNING DIV s There is currently a multi-family development planned south of this project, therefore a office setting would provide for more of a mixed use plan. Should you have any questions, or require any additional information, please contact us at your convenience. Very Truly Yours, Crafton, Tull &Associates, Inc. Jerry Kelso, P.E. Vice President Attachment: R EC EIMOD003 pA�� Planning Commission ARRN331ldpoft.lindsey Page 2.6 May 7, 2003 Dawn Warrick Zoning and Development Director City of Fayetteville 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Dear Director Warrick, This document is in response to the request for a determination of whether the proposed zoning RZN03-16.00 made on behalf of Lindsey Management Company for medium density residential development on the southwest corner of Zion Road at Vantage Drive would create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and traffic congestion. It is the opinion of the Fayetteville Police Department that we must return a determination affirming this rezoning proposal would create an appreciable increase in traffic danger and traffic congestion. The traffic way on Zion Road is very narrow and does not allow much room on the shoulder. In addition to the narrowness of this road, there is a blind curve to the east of Vantage Drive and a small hill to the west. The hill and the curve present a problem for motorists that may need to enter Zion Road from Vantage Drive. There is very little response time to react if a vehicle is approaching from either direction. There are several tree and shrubs very close to the roadway reducing visibility even further. The speed limit is set at 25 mile per hour in this area. This is a similar speed for a school zone. This speed limit reflects the traffic dangers in this area without the increased traffic flow created by this rezoning request. Zion Road is a heavily traveled roadway due to access from Highway 265 to North College Avenue. There are numerous commercial businesses,two high-density residential apartment complexes, some residential dwellings and a city park on this stretch of road. We feel that is would not be wise to add more traffic to this roadway until there is a more adequate road system to accommodate the additional traffic flow created by this rezoning request. There is a definite likelihood that increased traffic flow and traffic congestion in this area could increase traffic danger and could affect response times for emergency vehicles. Respectfully, Captain Frank Johnson Fayetteville Police Department May 12,2003 Planning Commission RZN 03-16.00: Lindsey Page 2.7 Lindsey Rezoning RZN 03-16 Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 3 Dwelling Units of Single Family Detached Housing May 07, 2003 Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 9.57 3:69 1.00 29 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.19 0.00 1.00 1 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.56 0.00 1.00 2 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.75 0.90 1.00 2 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.65 0.00 1.00 2 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.36 0.00 1.00 1 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 1.01 1.05 1.00 3 Saturday 2-Way Volume 10.09 3.67 1.00 30 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.51 0.00 1.00 2 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.43 0.00 1.00 1 Saturday Peak Hour Total 0.94 0.99 1.00 3 Note:A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS May 12,2003 Planning Commission RZN 03-16.00: Lindsey Page 2.8 Lindsey Rezoning RZN 03-16 Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 72 Dwelling Units of Apartments May 07, 2003 Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 6.63 2.98 1.00 477 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 0.08 0.00 1.00 6 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 0.43 0.00 1.00 31 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 0.51 0.73 1.00 37 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 0.42 0.00 1.00 30 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 0.20 0.00 1.00 14 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 0.62 0.82 1.00 45 Saturday 2-Way Volume 6.39 2.99 1.00 460 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.00 0.00 1.00 0 Saturday Peak Hour Total 0.52 0.74 1.00 37 Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS May 12,2003 - -- --Planning iCommission RZN 03-16.00: Lindsey Page 2.9 Lindsey Rezoning RZN 03-16 Summary of Trip Generation Calculation For 3 Acres of Office Park May 07, 2003 Average Standard Adjustment Driveway Rate Deviation Factor Volume Avg. Weekday 2-Way Volume 195.11 77.46 1.00 585 7-9 AM Peak Hour Enter 23.60 0.00 1.00 71 7-9 AM Peak Hour Exit 2.05 0.00 1.00 6 7-9 AM Peak Hour Total 25.65 15.58 1.00 77 4-6 PM Peak Hour Enter 4.24 0.00 1.00 13 4-6 PM Peak Hour Exit 24.04 0.00 1.00 72 4-6 PM Peak Hour Total 28.28 20.57 1.00 85 Saturday 2-Way Volume 29.33 0.00 1.00 88 Saturday Peak Hour Enter 1.85 0.00 1.00 6 Saturday Peak Hour Exit 0.52 0.00 1.00 2 Saturday Peak Hour Total 2.37 0.00 1.00 7 Note: A zero indicates no data available. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation, 6th Edition, 1997. TRIP GENERATION BY MICROTRANS - - _ May 12,2003 ---- Planning Commission RZN 03-16.00: Lindsey Page 2.10 .h9 RZN03L I N D S EY Close Upp VView iew j t 3J t j ` ---- i I `L PT { n LLO i i III I t i I+ ' SUBJECT PROPERTY t �? r E _ a t i i IK r t 1 l i i I 1 o �o ( o Ff� )r i r 1 Overview Legend Boundary --r4 Subject Property Master Street Plan �RZN034600 Planning Area N. ry000� � Freeway/Expressway mn coo_oo_o°Overlay District �-% Streets L__i City Limits $ ti-Principal Arterial t f------- '�'"^t-„pMinor Arterial Existing ;Outside City _ _--d ..........".".. rt i Collector Planned May 12,2003 o°m®• Historic Collector Planning Commission - 0 75 150 300 450 600 RZN 03-16.00:Lindsey Feet Page 2.11 RZN03_16.00 LINDSEY One Mile View g, : xLL l4 ,v t+.P" rc as LAXE FAIT-, a ¢; x r + C-2 R-0 _- C-2 F SUBJECT PROPERTY - a MF-12 _ meq 1 :C4.�,� - C:-2 it C 2 A-1 -77v - _ R-2 R-2 R 2 a 0 r "; C-2 F"?,r ... -R-2 P R_1 R 22 fix , n C2ae. q1 R2 R 21 R 1 yV C2 + �I 1 C.2ra .. y asr ;,C�e �. y1Ge _ o it .. . I E'2 +'A: '-1 ° 1i C 2 "f n 1 A-1R 1 R ra i RO RO + A u R-O ! R-C$ 4 Btvr w - � C-1 I > E°2 .k'_}I -4 C 2 iso° IR-0 a x, n vim' ° AT' R-O o° � , : ! o °o r o C-2 2 1- 1 - -AA 1 _ R-21 f R-0 t, Gp°' A R. r s gf C2 no00°°1° o C2o R1 -:9 R1 " °R-0 A'y 6 - ► sir ant �.�" 'aW75DR _ as .R-O ;! ;& C-2 R-1 J,uvde xic._ Lnm at .e. - ° �_ `€vb ; .� R=f- Overview. Legend Boundary Master Street Pian - Subject Property `"s Planning r e 9 Area '5��FreewaylExpressway "X - 0 RZN03-16.00 (A000g Overlay District s*,s.Principal arterial Streets -°OI City Limits Aae' rMn°r Arterial !_ —=7 I CWlect°r !,Outside City �,Planned - tummy Historic Collector May 12,2003 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.$N Planning Commission Iles RZN 03-16.00: Lindsey Page 2.12