Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-04-14 - Agendas - Final AGENDA FOR A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission will be held Monday,April 14,2003 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street,Room 219, Fayetteville,Arkansas. Roll Call Election of Planning Commission Officers Consent Agenda: Approval of minutes from the March 24,2003 meeting. 1. VAC 03-6.00: Vacation (Allen, pp 295)was submitted by David Mix of Dykes, Bassett, Mix on behalf of Chris Allen for property located at 2541 Litchfield Lane. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 0.27 acres. The request is to vacate a 43.7 s.f. portion of the utility easement located along the south property line of the subject property for an existing encroaching structure. New Business: 2. PPL 03-9.00: Preliminary Plat(Clabber Creek, Phase 11, pp 322) was submitted by Geoffrey Bates of Keystone Consultants, Inc. on behalf of BMW Investments for property located north of Mount Comfort Road and west of Rupple Road. The property is zoned R-1,Low Density Residential and contains approximately 30 acres with 89 lots proposed. 3. PPL 03-10.00: Preliminary Plat (Copper Creek, Phase Il, pp 61/100) was submitted by Brian Moore of Engineering Services, Inc. on behalf of Gary Brandon Enterprises for property located north of Zion Road and west of George Anderson Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 57 acres with 131 lots proposed. 4. R-PZD 03-3.00: Planned Zoning District(North College Development Company, pp 485) was submitted by Richard Alexander on behalf of North College Development Company for property located at 313 E. Lafayette Street. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 2.0 acres. The request is for a Residential Planned Zoning District for the conversion of Saint Joseph Catholic Church buildings to 39 apartment units (64 bedrooms) with 67 parking spaces with a duplex and single family home to remain and the creation of five parcels with land to be dedicated for a park. 5. LSD 03-12.00: Large Scale Development(Skate Station, 639)was submitted by Steve Clark on behalf of Neal Crawford for property located at 2283 S. School Avenue. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 2.46 acres with a 16,625 sq.ft. indoor skateboard park and a 5,000 sq.ft. warehouse proposed. K.UGENDAIPC1200314-14-03.DOC 6. ANX 03-2.00: Annexation (Williams, pp 363) was submitted by James Williams for property located at the northeast corner of Mt. Comfort Road and Shiloh Drive. The property is currently an island containing approximately 0.57 acres which is surrounded by the City of Fayetteville and property owned by the University of Arkansas(across I- 540). The request is to annex the property into the City. 7. RZN 03-14.00: Rezoning(Williams, pp 363) was submitted by James Williams for property located at the northeast corner of Mt. Comfort Road and Shiloh Drive and contains approximately 0.77 acres. The western tract of property (0.20 acres) is currently zoned R-2,Medium Density Residential and the eastern tract(0.57 acres) is proposed to be annexed into the City with a zoning designation of A-1, Agricultural. The request is to rezone both tracts to C-1,Neighborhood Commercial. 8. RZN 03-13.00: Rezoning(Parker,pp 564)was submitted by Kathy Parker for property located at 741 Huntsville Road. The property is currently zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 3 acres. The request is to rezone to A-1, Agricultural. 9. CUP 03-10.00: Conditional Use (Lindsey, pp 136) was submitted by Jerry Kelso of Crafton, Tull and Associates on behalf of Lindsey Management for property located east of North College Ave. between Joyce Blvd. and Zion Road. The property is zoned C-1, Neighborhood Commercial (4.68 acres), R-O, Residential-Office (10.78 acres) and R-2, Medium Density Residential (11.97 acres) and contains approximately 27.42 acres. The request is to allow multi-family dwellings on the 10.78 acres within the R-O, Residential Office zoning district. 10. RZN 03-15.00: Rezoning (Meadows Enterprises, pp 607) was submitted by James McCord, Attorney on behalf of Meadows Enterprises, Inc. for property located south of Goff Farm Road and west of Dead Horse Mountain Road. The property is currently zoned A-1,Agricultural and contains approximately 67.47 acres. The request is to rezone the property to R-1, Low Density Residential. 11. CUP 03-7.00: Conditional Use (Crawford, pp 639/640)was submitted by Steve Clark on behalf of Neal Crawford for property located at 2283 S. School. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and.contains approximately 2.4 acres. The request is for a warehousing in a C-2 district(use unit 21). 12. CUP 03-8.00: Conditional Use (Harris,pp 370)was submitted by Judy Harris for property owned by Ray& Linda Plack and located at 1997 Greenview Avenue. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 1.15 acres. The request is for a child care in R-1 (Use Unit 4). K:IAGENDAIP02003W-1 J-03.DOC 13. ADM 03-10.00: Administrative Item (DDEP)DDEP has developed and will present a first draft of the plan to aid and assist city planning staff in development of priority and design for streetscape and sidewalks throughout the DDEP district. Ongoing work will include coordination with city planning staff to fully develop these standards and recommendation. 14. Appointment of Subdivision Committee All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the Office of City Planning(575-8267), 125 West Mountain Street,Fayetteville,Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. Interpreters or TDD for hearing impaired are available for all public meetings. 72 hour notice is required.For further information or to request an interpreter,please call 575-8330. K:IAGENDAIPCI2003W-/i-03.DOC ORDER OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A. Introduction of agenda item—Chairman B. Presentation of Staff Report C. Presentation of request—Applicant D. Public Comment E. Response by Applicant/Questions &Answer with Commission F. Action of Planning Commission(Discussion&Vote) NOTE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE If you wish to address the Planning Commission on an agenda item raise your hand when the Chairman asks for public comment. He will do this after he has given Planning Commission members the opportunity to speak and before a final vote is taken. Public comment will only be permitted during this part of the hearing for each item. Once the Chairman recognizes you, go to the podium at the front of the room and give your name and address. Address your comments to the Chairman,who is the presiding officer. He will direct them to the appropriate appointed official, staff member or others for response. Please keep your comments brief,to the point,and relevant to the agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak. Please, as a matter of courtesy, refrain from applauding or booing any speakers or actions of the Planning Commission. 2003 Planning Commissioners Nancy Allen Jill Anthes Don Bunch Alice Church Bob Estes Sharon Hoover Alan Ostner Loren Shackelford Christian Vaught KWGGNDAIP0200314-14-03.DOC VAC 03-06.00 Page I PC Meeting of April 14,2003 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS _ 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 - TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Dawn Warrick,AICP.Zoning&Development Administrator FROM: Sara Edwards,Associate Planner Matt Casey P.E. Staff Engineer DATE: April 10,2003 Project: VAC 03-6.00: Vacation (Allen),pp 295 was submitted by David Mix on behalf of Chris Allen for property located at 2541 Litchfield Lane (Lot 107 Covington Park Phase II). The property is zoned R-1. The request is to vacate a portion of a utility easement. Findings: See the attached maps and legal descriptions for the exact locations of the requested easement vacation. No objections from the adjacent property owners have been submitted to the City. The applicant has submitted the required notification forms to the utility companies and to the City. The results are as follows: UTILITIES RESPONSE Ozarks Electric No Objections AEP/SWEPCO No Objections Arkansas Western Gas No Objections SW Bell No Objections. Cox Communications No Objections. City of Fayetteville: Water/Sewer No Objections Transportation Division No Objections Solid Waste No Objections Engineering No Objections planning Commission. April 14,2003. VAC 03-6.00 Allen Page 1.1 VAC 03-06.00 Page 2 Recommendation: Approval of the proposed easement vacation 03-6.00. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ves Required Approved Denied Date: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ves Required Approved Denied Date: _. _. _ _. .. _.. . . Planning Commission. April 14,2003 VAC 03-6 00 Allen Page 1.2 BASSETTMIX AND ASSOCIATES, INC. To whom it may concern, This is a request from Mr. and Mrs. Chris Allen to vacate the .4 inches that their home encroached on the south utility easement. Al 1 en Reid has drawn the survey to show the encroachment and the legal description. Mr. and Mrs. Allen request that this matter be resolved to provide clear title to their property. Thank you for your considerations Sincerely, David Mix Agent/representative P.S. There are no utilities located in this easement. RESIDENTIAL, FARMS AND COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE 3263 North College Fayetteville, Arkansas 72703 (479) 521.5600- (479) 751-5900 Fax (479) 52V9ift Commission website: www.bassettmix.com April 14,2003 VAC 03-6.00 Allen THE STANDARD OF EXCELLENCE Page 1.3 Working For You ®m jy 09� S Kp . 1�y �pzW N{y ,[z-., Z 2 § U S N px0� O �w Op QU2 d�wv� LiJ !r S rc s �n 0 3 p e �'y, '34Z OggqSwRHN `��+ j i i 51 i o z� i O 660 ttwy5yt +�gO1 r'.W`p w,23n 02 O LJ_I o O z o Wali �a0 ao� O§ _12 8R 0OU Urc� d1 € wi - Zya`�EnOOWO°ap� Sgsa 000009+ax $ $ aQJ �waoow ° w N ly y ooWe z U���oa�z�yga � � N HIP 0 Eg 6 d uz 0x���� w F ih�m p oa 6Ec4 i;GOU® 1x� wa�000� � Oti cam% S (1ltlHdSV) _ 3Nb'1 01313H3111 .000Z ,l0'ZL HinOSAM- p _ y --M/a g 1n 'LYS3 '11111 V 88 ,>P= 'me ,SL ' .m ... .._.......... w ....ROPE 17 Nm0 ,W I= i M O I www �tw in Oa Go 0.0 0 — U) I zoa000 _J bb, bbb omomo •—irs3=tun,0i-- 03;z z z z m w 9L'£B H18ON z J Planning Commission April 14,2003 VAC 03-6.00 Allen Page 1.4 W r♦ t '� SAMPLE PETITION• PETITION TO VACATE A(N)(alley, easement,right-of-way)LO CATED IN(lot.block subdivision),CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS TO: The Fayetteville City Planning Commission and The Fayetteville City Council Wo,the undersigned,being all the owners of the real estate abutting the(alley,easement right-of-way)hereinafter sought to be abandoned and vacated,lying in(lot, bloc$subdivision),City of FayerteAlle,Arkansas,a municipal corporation,petition to vacate a(n)(alley,easemeru,righr-of-way)which is described as follows: (Legal Description of area to be vacated) That the abutting real estate affected by said abandonment of the alley are(lot block subdivision ofeaah adjobemg lot to the area requested to be vacated)City of Fayetteville used by the public for a period of many years,and that the public interest and welfare would not be adversely affected by the abandonment of the portion of the above described(alley,easement.righr-of-way). The petitioners pray that the City of Fayetteville,Arkansas,abandon and vacate the above desonbed real estate, subject,however,to the existing utility easements and sewer easements as required,and that the above described real estate be used for their respective benefit and purpose as now approved by law. The petitioners further pr4y that the above described real estate be vested in the abutting property owners as provided by law. WHEREFORE,the undersigned petitioners respectfully pray that the governing body of the City of Fayetteville. Arkansas,abandon and vacate the above described real estate,subject to said utility and sewer easements,and that title to said mal estate sought to be abandoned be vested is the abutting property owners as provided by law,and as to that particular land the owners be free from the easements of the public for the use of said alley_ t Dated this ddayof 'hrt�otic O3 t Xs A11Q>✓ to S _77-c'Cg Plt)4 printed name etgnatwe *Note:This is a sample-each applicant is responsible fir submitting a petition which accurately reflects their specific request. May 10, 1999 H:IUSE.WCONMONrPLfNNYG1Cl"i.00119991YACAtMMD7g Commission PW 4April 1.4,2003 VAC 03-6.00 Allen Page 1.5 50 39tld 'd'0'0 9NId33NI9N3 doze-SG9-60 T0410 EM/t+0/z0 VACO3-6.00 ALLEN Close Up View EAWOOD WAY ._. .._. - LEAWOOU WAY 01 4 Yr C1 t K V� HATSWO0.TH R0 -_: - � � !:�• . '-CHATSWORTH z a. i _ ..CHAT ... ... ...... _._ __. r.._.. SWbRirr'AD n. £- I ""- CHATSWORTH RD CHAiSWOPTH RO 1 u, 1 I SUBJECT PROPERTY rbivHsnmsr '"_•.. TowrvsNrosT . ..-._.� m t SRS / 1 TOWNSHIP ST "_"'- TOwNSH / I �-- OverviewLe end Boundary_,J"� Subject Property �-%.,Planning Area Master Street Plan VAC03-6.00 � - � 80ooQ Freeway/Expressway 0000000 Overlay District C— Streets L City Limas Principal Arterial c" Minor Arterial Ddsting L_ Outside City Collector Planned - [ • •.. Historic .Planning Commissio 1f_. April 1JAle -- - t 0 75 '150 300 450 .600 -. Feet - VAC 03-6.0 P ` 1 • 11 ,�9:41H7■i1.O��ra■\�'' .■:■7�a■■i a Y� %n,v.:,u�:...a "A gin a / �a�li�4����� w: Mir i•1 iii lI��r/w,.rw J' Irr -Sol 3 ��O'"moi 11719. ���•�����►i���� w,w�—=- oi ►• ♦••r'� 117► �:-� ��a►�� \_ ��. ��,)� >\� •O� '`"' SIGN!-SII •�_ �� +1\ �. IN31 p►7 .�■■•tl eel - ilnnn■1■IIII j,•.T 1►•►„'• WAIN '� 1-�pas Xj 1111111U�II :,� I �►i) Mn on iii 5gf IN �_I,r�t�''�\5�; ��/■■.■ � '� I■ ■■ '�,,II•�' , /e�7unpl�jR{rrrarn i —ti • ■�►� IYIl►'1!�1►-4w7�'��ila:7xNr i�� :�C aI'37/!I� Lag11�1R1� v. •n. . , 1111.-a• 3 it u/�►9 r�--� Mum1- nu..*a /�tg ✓ ®11111. cNUNN oil �--�� � 1 • ►1!311 - 'r� .��,/ INS w"s � -mss r■cl�.9�.►� C am a .IIID—■ -r1 -:a pll►• O>+! Van an 1111/\P ��•Vi [3aii:ai�aC'7nINS f-'Im7.♦ ------ nr ►moi Rl����i�`moi/.,r■,-.-�,�^�Innnu�� i�_��I�r �' gnu �l� �►-�-rte-�® g�■i■ �,I_ nemi�ii►��a ■ '�" .slow April 14,2( Planning Commiss Ssss Was MR VAC03-6.00AI LSD 03-08.00 Page l PC Meeting of April 14,2003 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS Clabber Creek ll,PPL 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Dawn Warrick,Zoning and Development Administrator,A.LC.P. FROM: Sara Edwards,Associate Planner Matt Casey P.E. Staff Engineer DATE: April 11,2003 Project: Project: PPL 03-9.00: Preliminary Plat(Clabber Creek,Phase II,pp 322) was submitted by Geoffrey Bates of Keystone Consultants, Inc. on behalf of BMW Investments for property located north of Mount Comfort Road and west of Rupple Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 30 acres with 89 lots proposed. Findings: Proposal: The development of 30 acre tract into 89 single family residential lots. This is Phase II of Clabber Creek. Phase I was approved in May of 2002 and is currently under construction. Existing Development: Agricultural Surrounding Zoning: North: R-1 South: R-1 East: R-1 West: County, no zoning Surrounding Land Use: North: Agricultural South: Agricultural East: Cemetery West: Single Family Residential Water: An 8"water line is located along Mount Comfort Road Sewer: An 8" sewer connection to the Clabber Creek Phase I on the Eastern property line is being proposed. Right-of-way being dedicated: A 45' Right of Way is being dedicated along Mount Comfort Road. Street Improvements Proposed: Curb and guttering and a 6' sidewalk along the north side of Mount Comfort Road. Planning Commission April 14,2003 PPL 03-9.00 Clabber Creek H Page2.1 LSD 03-08.00 Page 2 Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: None Tree Preservation: Tree preservation is being proposed in the floodplain area to the north of the site. Existing: 3.7% Proposed.• 2.9% Mitigation: Off site mitigation is proposed on property being dedicated to the City. Recommendation: Approval Subject to the Following Conditions Conditions of Approval: 1. Planning Commission determination of required assessment for Rupple Road Bridge. Staff is recommending an assessment in the amount of$10,080.00, based on projected traffic from this development. (See attached memo). 2. Planning Commission determination of required off-site improvements. Staff is recommending that Mt. Comfort Road be widened to 14 feet from centerline with curb, gutter, and storm drainage. 3. A note shall be placed on the final plat which prohibits access to Mt. Comfort Road. Standard Conditions of Approval: 4. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives-AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) 5. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage,water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 6. Sidewalk construction in accordance with current standards to include a minimum six foot sidewalk with a minimum ten foot greenspace along Mt. Comfort Road and a minimum four foot sidewalk along the interior streets. 7. . Preliminary Plat approval shall be valid for one calendar year. Background: The project was reviewed at the March 12, 2003 Technical Plat Review and the April 2,2003 Subdivision Committee Meeting. Planning Commission. . . .April 14,2003 PPL 03-9.00 Clabber Creek II Page2.2 LSD 03-08.00 Page 3 Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included tree preservation, mitigation,off-site improvements, and access. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Preliminary Plat to the full Planning Commission subject to all staff comments. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: yes Required Approved Denied Date: Comments: The"CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. By Title Date Planning Commission April 14,2003 PPL 03-9.00 Clabber Creek H Page2.3 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone:501-575-8264 ENGINEERING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Planning Commission Members FROM: Matt Casey P.E., Staff Engineer DATE: April 3, 2003 SUBJECT: Clabber Creek II Subdivision (PPL 03-10.00) Off-Site Assessments The following is the Engineering Division's recommendation to the Planning Commission for off-site assessments: BRIDGE OVER CLABBER CREEK: The Engineering Division recommends that this subdivision be assessed for a percentage of the construction costs to construct a bridge over Clabber Creek. The following is a rational nexus calculation for this offsite improvement: Approximate Rupple Road Bridge dimensions: Length—250 L.F.; Width—56'; Surface Area of Decking— 14,000 s.f. Projected Traffic from development—(89 Lots *9.57 vpd/lot)- 852 vpd Assume 50%of vehicle trips will use Rupple—426 vpd Assume 50%of vehicle trips using Rupple go north—213 vpd Minor Arterial traffic capacity= 14,800 vpd %Traffic from development= 1.44% Clabber Creek Bridge Costs: 14,000 s.f($50.00/s.f)=$700,000.00 Clabber Creek II Subdivision Percentage of Costs: 0.0144($700,000.00)=$10.080.00 Therefore, the Engineering Division recommends that the Clabber Creek Subdivision Il be assessed $10,080.00 for the future Rupple Road Bridge across Clabber Creek. _.. _. _ . Planning Commission April 14,2003 PPL 03-9.00 Clabber Creek II Page2.4 City of Fayetteville Tree Preservation Plan Review Form Project: Clabber Creek II Developer: BMWInvestments Location Address: Engineer: Keystone Consultants,Inc. This form shall stand as a: OInitial Review/Letter of Confirmation ✓Recommendation to Planning Commission or City Council OFinal Administrative Determination* Submital requirements met: ✓Initial Review ✓Site Analysis ✓Analysis Report ✓Tree Preservation Plan Comments: Canopy measurements: %Tree Canopy Required to be Preserved Total Area of Existing Tree Canopy: Land Use R-1 Acres: 1.11 %To be Preserved 25% Square Feet: 48,405 %of Total Site Area: 3.7% Total Area of Site: Acres: 30.05 Existing Tree Canopy Preserved: Square Feet: 1,308,978 sf Acres: 0.87 Square Feet: 37,835 sf %of Total Site Area 2.9% Mitigation/Off Site Alternatives Requested: ✓Yes ONo 00n-Site Mitigation ✓Off=Site Preservation OOff-Site Forestation OTree Fund Tree Preservation Criteria Met: ✓Yes ONo. (See back for criteria list and comments) Applicant's Plan: OApproved ODisapproved ✓Conditionally Approved Conditions of Approval: Mitigation is proposed as apart of the land dedication given to the city for future wetland and greenspace preservation. I will require that the detention pond be redesigned to preserve existing trees #19, and#21. - - - Planning Commission April 14,2003 SlSne _ ,the Landscape Administrator, datePPT12,020C1& reekIICgez.s Criteria used by Landscape Administrator to evaluate Tree Preservation Plan: 1. The desirability of preserving a tree or group of trees by reason of age, location, size or species. Comments: All of the existing trees exist in the floodplain and flood way. Most trees are in fair to good condition with some minimum priority conditions. 2. Whether the design incorporates the required Tree Preservation Priorities. Comments: Yes, additional preservation is possible with redesign of the shape of the retention pond. 3. The extent to which the area would be subject to environmental degradation due to removal of the tree or group of trees. Comments: High impact if canopy is removed due to proximity to flood plain and flood way. 4. The impact of the reduction in tree cover on adjacent properties,the surrounding neighborhood and the property on which the tree or group of trees is located. Comments Area is surrounded byfarm land. Little immediate impact with no adjacent residences present. 5. Whether alternative construction methods have been proposed to reduce the impact of development on existing trees. Comments: Recommend approval with the redesign of detention pond and preservation of additional significant species. 6. Whether the size or shape of the lot reduces the flexibility of the design. Comments. No 7. The general health and condition of the tree or group of trees, or the presence of any disease, injury or hazard. Comments 8. The placement of the tree or group of trees in relation to utilities, structures, and use of the property. Comments: Utilities are proposed for the fronts of the lots to preserve additional trees. 9. The need to remove the tree or group of trees for the purpose of installing,repairing, replacing, or maintaining essential public utilities. Comments N/A 10. Whether roads and utilities are designed in relation to the existing topography,and routed, where possible,to avoid damage to existing canopy. Comments: Yes 11. Construction requirements for On-Site and Off-Site Alternatives. Comments 12. The effects of proposed On-Site Mitigation or Off-Site Alternatives. Comments: Additional preservation is proposed which is provides additional benefit. 13. The effect other chapters of the UDO, and departmental regulations have on the development design. Comments: Detention requirements will cause removal of trees. 14. The extent to which development of the site and the enforcement of this chapter are impacted by state and federal regulations. Comments 15. The impact a substantial modification or rejection of the application would have on the Applicant.... --... - Planning Commission April 14, 2003 Comments: Recommended for approval with slight design change to pond. PPL 03-9.00 Clabber Creek 1L Page2.6 PPL03-9.00 CLABBER CREEK PHASE II Close Up View d�ii+ ,.€r!##•>j4e€€�€"#ulii?if€�l€rs,'1-;i{Fiirtl-�tr�l!�`:eiiEhil�€-?#!+<iL€�I€�?iei'};�!"r,',(d?i3F'3�€i!#!�IIL,ItIF;±I1+YliFE#;fl+lu'Hstjlr,.El}I 1-€i!!? Int"4€r'ii0ii€+!€EI€?€�Is"I, SUBJECT PROPERTY ----------------- '" t 26+ i _..._ f - - - DR fl �1i Overview Legend Boundary -�'i -- Subject Property Planning Area Master Street Plan rp000a Freevwy/Ex n .000000 Overlay District ' ✓ Presswa Y I City Limits Principal Arterial St - reets L__ p L 't . , F�dsting ul Outside City MinorARerial - in `— y'� Collector �' --.- i ,'-'1�`� Planned - •'••• Historic Collector Planning CommissioApril 14, . tr? 0 150 300 - 000 900 1.200 Feet PPL 03-9-00 Clabber Cree00 .... Paget. PPL03-9.00 CLABBER CREEK PHASE II One Mile View .t S IJ'ilT .•S #y1i '{lfilt5l' '�.Id[ tLM 11RLYlLJ" n Jr R1 b . 1I P-1 ! V 11 If .. ..__ �.__.__. �v SUBJECT PROPERTY i±I=li 1�:1�,.': '' #IFs>•,;tF.el�.€iwlbt{'W€,+,11-1??r+3�`„�•rr3r<ai-ii�r��r<#nl�r.,#�'Fi?if�!1�+;( .1:-�I�^.3!�+l�F!?#! f.<:Ir.!#rlr nim,3n,'i#�t(a±#Frlllr,I�€r�li{1�}nt!rr,:�'„#�i3! � I -ai, de . .... _.. _ R n. a R9 .._ .. R 1 r Y 1 \oew Rr p ,1 R 1 A-1 Ie R :'R3{� I!?�i�6'RTdE'(Tililf�._.._ I ... .. ' _ .. R2 R-1! R 1 $girypC�"q1r, j I R-1"" rr}}���� 9I--•1yF _ I oaveRsx syy I 1 - R ' ;,-I R-1.5 - .......-- 4 ' , euc%RYssr r� J_ 4. _ne°R, 1 HARvann '. :_ ' eAuicsr , -i ' A-11 1 ttnsrYA . / # N,:'A-1 .-- I R-11 F3_1 \`�' ... 1 ,a, '. r ON.n�geAL to '1 ' 2[.. w his. t ps• _ .:_: I .q a' "a � 1fFAYER cN.•�•,:I._ 1 .._ R iyl = !�R�R .. �PRLnLuD 32 y OverviewLegend Subject Property Boundary - .Master street Plan � 1 P rtY ,N� � -'„'N- I'%—, Planning Area ” � ,FmWay/Hpreaaxay 1 ®PPLO&9.00 000% Prindpal Mahal I Overlay District y. Sheets 00000 Mina Altnial Pedsum L_ I Cit'Limits .CdleaOr raRannetlOutside City eeee Hiatark Cdbcror Planning Commis ion 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.✓}, April 14, 003 -- 1'nlles PPL03-9.00ClabberCre kII 2.8 LSD 03-08.00 Page I PC Meeting of April 14,2003 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS Copper Creek IL PPL 113 W. Mountain St Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Dawn Warrick,Zoning and Development Administrator,A.I.C.P. FROM: Sara Edwards,Associate Planner Matt Casey P.E. Staff Engineer DATE: April 10,2003 Project: PPL 03-10.00: Preliminary Plat(Copper Creek,Phase Il, pp 61/1,00)was submitted by Brian Moore of Engineering Services, Inc. on behalf of Gary Brandon Enterprises for property located north of Zion Road and west of George Anderson Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 57 acres with 131 lots proposed. Findings Proposal: The development of a 57 acre tract into 131 single family residential lots. Existing Development: Agriculture Surrounding Zoning: North: County South: County East: County West: R-1 Surrounding Land Use: Single family residential located to the west with the remainder consisting of single family and agriculture. Water: A 12"water line located along Zion Road. Sewer: An 8" sanitary sewer line is located on Hearth Stone Drive Right-of-way being dedicated: A 35' right of way from center line along Zion and George Anderson Road Street Improvements Proposed: Curb, guttering,pavement and a 6' sidewalk along Zion and George Anderson Drive. The developer's side of the street is to be constructed to City of Fayetteville standards and to county standards on the other side. Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: Zion and George Anderson are classified as Collector Streets on the Master Street Plan. ..Planning Commission April14,2003 PPL-03-10.00 Copper Creek H Page3.1 LSD 03-08.00 Page 2 Tree Preservation: Existing: 1.86% Preserved:1.70% Mitigation: $4,050.00 (tree fund) Recommendation: Approval Subject to the Following Conditions Conditions of Approval: 1. A note shall be placed on the final plat which prohibits access from George Anderson Road for all lots and from Zion Road for lots 5 and 113. 2. Planning Commission determination of required offsite improvements. Staff is recommending that both Zion and George Anderson Road be improved 14 feet from centerline with curb, gutter and storm drainage on the sides adjacent to the development with the remaining half of the streets being paved to meet county standards. Standard Conditions of Approval: 3. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) 4. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable)for grading, drainage, water, sewer,fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks,parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 5. Sidewalk construction in accordance with current standards to include a minimum six foot sidewalk with a minimum ten foot greenspace along Sixth Street. 6. Preliminary Plat approval shall be valid for one calendar year. Background: The project was reviewed at the March 12, 2003 Technical Plat Review and the April 2, 2003 Subdivision Committee Meeting. Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included tree preservation, mitigation, off-site improvements, and access. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Preliminary Plat to the full Planning Commission Subject to all staff comments. _.. . _.. .. _...... Planning Commission __... April 14,2003 - PPL 03-10.00 Copper Creek 11 Page3.2 LSD 03-08.00 Page 3 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: yes Required Approved Denied Date: Comments: The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total .without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. By Title Date _ Planning Commission. : April 14,2003 PPL 03-10.00 Copper Creek II Page3.3 City of Fayetteville . Tree Preservation Plan Review Form Project: Copper Creek Developer: Gary Brandon Enterprises Location Address: East Zion Rd. Engineer:ESI This form shall stand as a: QInitial Review/Letter of Confirmation ✓Recommendation to Planning Commission or City Council OFinal Administrative Determination* Submital requirements met: // OInitial Review ite Analysis 43Analysis Report ✓Tree Preservation Plan Comments: Canopy measurements: % Tree Canopy Required to be Preserved Total Area of Existing Tree Canopy: Land Use R-I Acres: 1.06 %To be Preserved 25% Square Feet: 46,167 Total Area of Site: of Total Site Area: 1.86% Acres: 57.00 Existing Tree Canopy Preserved: Square Feet: 2,482,920.00 Acres: 0.908 Square Feet: 42,435 %of Total Site Area 1.7% Mitigation/Off Site Alternatives Requested: ✓Yes ONo OOn-Site Mitigation OOff--Site Preservation OOff--Site Forestation ✓Tree Fund Tree Preservation Criteria Met: ✓Yes ONo (See back for criteria list and comments) Applicant's Plan: ✓Approved ODisapproved OConditionally Approved $4,050.00 is to be donated to the tree fund. Signed: the Landscape Administrator, date3—�3 Planning Commission April 14,2003 PPL 03-10.00 Copper Creek II Page3.4 Criteria used by Landscape Administrator to evaluate Tree Preservation Plan: 1. The desirability of preserving a tree or group of trees by reason of age, location, size or species. Comments: All trees existing on site are located in park and sw corner of site. All shown for preservation 2. Whether the design incorporates the required Tree Preservation Priorities. Comments: Yes 3. The extent to which the area would be subject to environmental degradation due to removal of the tree or group of trees. Comments: Minor, open farmland surrounds the site. 4. The impact of the reduction in tree cover on adjacent properties, the surrounding neighborhood and the property on which the tree or group of trees is located. Comments See above comment 5. Whether alternative construction methods have been proposed to reduce the impact of development on existing trees. Comments N/A 6. Whether the size or shape of the lot reduces the flexibility of the design. Comments: No 7. The general health and condition of the tree or group of trees,or the presence of any disease, injury or hazard. Comments 8. The placement of the tree or group of trees in relation to utilities, structures, and use of the property. Comments Trees are in concentrated areas of the site, largest trees are near property lines. Utilities have been moved to preserve additional trees. 9. The need to remove the tree or group of trees for the purpose of installing,repairing, replacing, or maintaining essential public utilities. Comments N/A 10. Whether roads and utilities are designed in relation to the existing topography, and routed, where possible,to avoid damage to existing canopy. Comments Yes 11. Construction requirements for On-Site and Off-Site Alternatives. Comments N/A 12. The effects of proposed On-Site Mitigation or Off-Site Alternatives. Comments N/A 13. The effect other chapters of the UDO, and departmental regulations have on the development design. Comments Minor 14. The extent to which development of the site and the enforcement of this chapter are impacted by state and federal regulations. . Comments 15. The impact a substantial modification or rejection of the application would have on the Applicant. Comments: Recommended for approval with conditions. *An appeal may be filed against a Final Administrative Determination in accordance with Chapter 155 of the tpified ann,ng Commission Development.Ordinance. City Landscape Administrator determinations/decisions may be appealed by any person April 14,2003 aggrieved to the Planning Commission within 10 business days. Recommendations go straight to Planpmn3-10.00 Copper Creek II Commission,thus no formal appeal is necessary for recommendations. Page3.5 PPL03-10.00 COPPER CREEK PHASE II Close Up View L aZeweiF _- ED o fl SUBJECT PROPERTY ;rsde CN.: w � _._,:!1.wi/RLi pLyDSPf�aF:_wn-rr= �m h? is y e w �I a Iy^— L� © --...:_ ZUJN ^_—_,.�.. _AWN R➢ - Overview Legend �p Subject Property Boundary --- - r Master Street Plan _� ' PPI-03-10.00yoooQ w' Planning Area L nv` 5, � Freeway/Expressway 000ao°Overlay District Streets L. City Limits Principal Arterial Exison9 Outside City Minor Arterial _ Planned -- ' ♦Collector -i =;r • %* Historic Collector Planning Commissio 0 175 350 700 1,050 1,400 April 14,200 Feet PPL 03-10.00 Copper Creek f Page3. PPL03-10.00 COPPER CREEK PHASE II One Mile View 1p ^ i ; � A-1 O; CI' Iib .R � V : j 6 i Q _. ..._ jj �AIBpYNT0.D� SUBJECT PROPERTY A-1 d ----LEI T. ---- r ' p r tr\t0 F .� HOWARD AND 5 FAY EVlLLE 1� ,r ,;�., �srea iy - - - -4t'-9P- ow�agRxnFRsoa x-.90 ... . T I NRD A-1 l Gtra; R- R R o�_vgteate.nD. _ R-2 A- h ST R1 I a A-� J R. ,,;nnuuinx .. 1 Overview Legend Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan PPL03.10.00c Planning Area �+�yFreewaV/ESP••swey 000a Printi (Arterial Streets '000 o Overlay District �.. - oo Mimrgrbrial B s6m L_ I City Limits a%.Cdbcmr Outside City 0%. Histak Cdi �2 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.60.g Planning Commi ion -- MIIeS Apri114, 003 PPL 03-10.00 Copper Cr k II Page3.7 LSD 03-08.00 Page 1 PC Meeting of April 14,2003 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS North Cortege Development,R-PZD . 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Dawn Warrick,Zoning and Development Administrator,A.I.C.P. FROM: Sara Edwards,Associate Planner Matt Casey P.E. Staff Engineer DATE: April 10,2003 Project: R-PZD 03-3.00: Planned Zoning District(North College Development Company, pp 485) was submitted by Richard Alexander on behalf of North College Development Company for property located at 313 E. Lafayette Street. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 2.0 acres. The request is for a Residential Planned Zoning District for the conversion of Saint Joseph Catholic Church buildings to 39 apartment units (64 bedrooms) with 67 parking spaces with a duplex and single family home to remain and the creation of five parcels with land to be dedicated for a park. Findings: Proposal: The request is for a Residential Planned Zoning District for the conversion of Saint Joseph Catholic Church property to include converting the school, church and office buildings into 39 residential units (64 bedrooms). There is currently a duplex and single family home which will remain on the site. The proposal is to create five parcels on this site. An existing playground/parking lot is being dedicated to the city for use as a park. Parking: Regular: 63 Spaces ADA: 4 Spaces Existing Development: Church, school, and administrative facilities. Surrounding Zoning: North: R-1 South: R-1 East: R-1 West: R-1 Surrounding Land Use: Residential Water: Existing Sewer: Existing Street Improvements Proposed: None Planning Commission April 14,2003 R-PZD 03-3.00 North College Development Page 4.1 LSD 03-08.00 Page 2 Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: Lafayette Street is classified as a Historic collector on the Master Street Plan. Tree Preservation: None Recommendation: Forward to City Council with recommendation of approval of the requested rezoning. Planning Commission approval of the proposed development subject to the conditions listed below. Conditions of Approval: 1. Any additional utility meters or equipment will be required to be screened from the street. 2. Planning Commission recommendation to the City Council regarding the rezoning of the subject property to the unique district for R-PZD 03-3.00 with all conditions of approval as determined by the Planning Commission. 3. An ordinance creating this R-PZD shall be approved by City Council. 4. Covenants shall be filed which provide for maintenance of parking areas and greenspace. 5. An access easement shall be filed which allows for access and parking throughout the site for each building. 6. A masonry screen wall shall be installed along the south side of the property. 7. All signage proposed on site shall comply with Chapter 174, Signs of the Unified Development Ordinance and shall be permitted accordingly. 8. The lot split survey shall be titles concurrent plat and shall contain the required signature blocks for filing. 9. Parks fees shall be paid and parks land dedicated prior to building permit. 10. An access easement and covenants shall be filed with concurrent plat. Standard Conditions of Approval: 11. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives -AR Western Gas,SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) 12. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage,water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, Planning Commission April/4,2003 R-PZD 03-3.00 North College Development Page 4.2