Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2002-03-25 - Agendas - Final
AGENDA FOR A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission will be held Monday,March 25,2002 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street,Room 219, Fayetteville,Arkansas. The following items will be considered: Approval of minutes from the March 11,2002 meeting. ConsentAgenda: 1. FPL 02-3.00: Final Plat(Copper Creek, pp 991100)was submitted by Brian Moore on behalf of Gary Brandon Enterprises, Inc. for property located east of Stonebridge Subdivision and north of Zion Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 34.34 acres with 81 lots proposed. Old Business: 2. LSD 01-42.00: Large Scale Development (Karstetter& Glass, pp 402)was submitted by Steve Clark on behalf of Doris Ann Glass for property located at 2530 Wedington Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 1.76 acres with a 1,240 sq.ft. shop expansion proposed. 3. LSD 02-4.00: Large Scale Development (Danaher, pp 681) was submitted by Ken Parker on behalf of Danaher Tool Group for property located at 2900 S. City Lake Road. The property is zoned I-2, General Industrial and contains approximately 38.06 acres with a 15,000 sq.ft. warehouse proposed. New Business: 4. RZN 02-7.00: Rezoning(Lindsey Properties, pp 402) was submitted by Dave Jorgensen of Jorgensen& Associates on behalf of Lindsey Properties for property owned by the estate of Marie Frankie Hughes, Pauline Millsap, Administrator. The subject tract is located west of Porter Road and north of Valley Drive. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 11.94 acres. The request is to rezone to RMF-12, Moderate Density Multi-Family Residential. 5. ADM 01-19.00 Administrative Item (Shared Parking Ordinance)to revise Section 172.01 Off-Street Parking Lot Design Requirements of the City of Fayetteville Unified Development Ordinance to provide a method for reducing off-street parking requirements for properties that share a common parking facility. 6. LSP 02-12.00: Lot Split(Wilson,pp 482) was submitted by Alan Reid on behalf of Troy Wilson for property located at the SE corner of Hotz Drive&Palmer Avenue. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 0.38 acres. The request is to split into two tracts of 0.19 acres and 0.19 acres. 7. PPL 02-7.00: Preliminary Plat(Legacy Pointe,pp 435/474) was submitted by Dave Jorgensen of Jorgensen& Associates on behalf of Charles Sloan of Sloan Properties, Inc. for property located east of Double Springs Road and south of Owl Creek. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and RMF-6, Low Density Multi-family Residential and contains approximately 49.80 acres with132 lots proposed. 8. LSD 02-7.00: Large Scale Development(Dandy/Schmitt,pp 524)was submitted by Glenn Carter of Carter&Associates on behalf of Brian Dandy and Robert Schmitt for property located at the southwest corner of Fletcher Avenue &Rodgers Drive. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 1.01 acres with 9 units proposed. 9. CUP 02-11.00: Conditional Use(Dandy/Schmitt,pp 524)was submitted by Robert Schmitt on behalf of Brian Dandy for property located a the southwest corner of Fletcher Avenue & Rodgers Drive. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 1.01 acres. The request is for 3 parking spaces in excess of the number permitted by ordinance (a total of 35 spaces for the 9 dwelling unit development). 10. VAC 02-1.00: Vacation (Marvin, pp 560)was submitted by Ken and Kathie Marvin for property located east of Rose and south of Rochier. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 0.05 acres. The request is to vacate the alley between lots 8,9 10 and 11 of Block 5 of Rochier Heights. 11. Report from the Nominating Committee regarding a slate of officers for the 2002- 2003 Planning Commission. The election of officers will be conducted at the start of business during the April 8, 2002 Planning Commission meeting. All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the Office of City Planning (575-8264), City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. Interpreters or TDD for hearing impaired are available for all public meetings. 72 hour notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter,please call Hugh Earnest at 575-8330. ORDER OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A. Introduction of agenda item - Chairman B. Presentation of request-Applicant C. Public Comment D. Response by Applicant/Questions & Answer with Commission E. Action of Planning Commission (Discussion and vote) NOTE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE If you wish to address the Planning Commission on an agenda item, raise your hand when the Chairman asks for public comment. He will do this after he has given Planning Commission members the opportunity to speak and before a final vote is taken. Public comment will only be permitted during this part of the hearing for each item. Once the Chairman recognizes you, go to the podium at the front of the room and give your name and address. Address your comments to the Chairman, who is the presiding officer. He will direct them to the appropriate appointed official, staff member or others for response. Please keep your comments brief, to the point, and relevant to the agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak. Please, as a matter of courtesy,refrain from applauding or booing any speakers or actions of the Planning Commission. 2002 Planning Commissioners: Bob Estes - Chairman Lorel Hoffinan-Vice Chairman Lee Ward- Secretary Nancy Allen Don Bunch Sharon Hoover Don Marr Loren Shackelford Alice Church FPL 02-3.00 Page I PC Meeting of March 25, 2002 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS Copper Creek Subdivision,FPL 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Tim Conklin,Planning Director FROM: Shelli Rushing,Associate Planner Ron Petrie P.E. , Staff Engineer DATE: March 21, 2002 Project: FPL 02-3.00 Final Plat(Copper Creek,pp 99/100)was submitted by Brian Moore on behalf of Gary Brandon Enterprises, Inc. for property located east of Stonebridge Subdivision and north of Zion Road. The property is zoned R-1,Low Density Residential and contains approximately 34.34 acres with 81 lots proposed. Findings: The preliminary plat for Copper Creek was approved by the Planning Commission on November 22, 1999. A conditional use request for a private swimming pool with dressing rooms for the property owner's association was approved by the Planning Commission on September 10, 2001 with conditions. Recommendation: Approval subject to the following conditions. Conditions of Approval: 1. Payment of parks fees in the amount of$11,186.00 and dedication of 1.515 acres as public park land. 2. The overhead utility line must be removed from the dedicated park property. 3. Park boundary signs and posts are required to be erected around the park. 4. Note 7 should be revised to state "New sidewalks, driveway approaches, or access ramps constructed in the right of way shall meet Unified Development Ordinance Section 171.13 (a.k.a. Ord. #4005). 5. Proof of payment to the Ozark's Electric Cooperative Corp shall be provided to the Planning Division for the installation of the street lights. 6. Plat Review and Subdivision comments(to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO,Cox Communications). 6. Prior to signing the final plat the following is required: a. Project Disk with all final revisions Planning Commission March 25, 2002 FPL02-3 Copper Creek Page 1.1 FPL 02-3.00 Page 2 b. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by §158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements"to guarantee all incomplete improvements. c. Parks fees paid and/or deed received for parks land dedication. d. Restrictive Covenants submitted and approved by Engineering and Planning. Background: The preliminary plat for this subdivision was originally approved at the November 22, 1999 Planning Commission Meeting. The final plat was reviewed at the February 27, 2002 Technical Plat Review and the March 14, 2002 Subdivision Committee Meeting. Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included the items listed in the Conditions of Approval. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Final Plat to the full Planning Commission. Infrastructure: a.) Water. Existing. b.) Sanitary Sewer. Existing. c.) Streets. Existing. d.) Grading and Drainage. Not applicable for this project. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ves Required Approved Denied Date: Comments: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required Approved Denied Planning Commission March 25, 2002 FPL02-3 Copper Creek Page 1.2 FPL 02-3.00 Page 3 CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required Approved Denied Date: The"CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL",beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. By Title Date Planning Commission March 25, 2002 FPL02-3 Copper Creek Page 1.3 0 f FPL02-O&DO COPPER CREEK Close Up View a --------------------------M--------- ---------- i i •Iv _—_ o ;i _ I z - � I i '� 1 : �C GREVSTONEGRGFEYSf(3NE EIi lL_ / R-1 Q' \ HEARTNSTONg'o - — -_ vi Pan O a_ D 6 G — PrA'rEl+s!"gb1E`D t'� -------------- Iby -. ._..._.. Al RENO ! il' UMMEMA EER o ' i AY Overview Legend Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan - �r r5 FPL02-03.00 — -,t Planning Area 471kso Freeway/Expressway L Streets °°8000 o Overlay District Principal Arterial °° Irl r _ Minor Arterial Existing L I City Limits 'Wl Planned a Outside city 4 **, collector PlanningCommission Collector� • e�� Historic CDlleor 0 125 250 50o 750 1,ODo March 25, 2002 Feel FPL02-3 Copper Creek Pae 1.4 FPL02-03.00 COOPER CREEK One Mile View _ xic r s w��! =.�� ? u w �� {i r n s"i a ,} � ���_ i 3 h -#. -�,✓ht`{4 cxa�t1�5y fi 1 ,�:� i A-t t 5 # <Nl SN rc i T' &m u-aH z A `is as <-s Mt ;~r : a A-t ^' $,52 *'c= i - xk_7+� ,.�.9 { � n R, J.- c x z F t F 1 e .2 w^4.taxE1°e� 1 2 f s F �. : 2– Subject PfOpBTt,/ ......... .. ------- -,RV_.. .. ° -,Rr' res .a fix. L KE FAYETfEVlLLE L I' ' k `"x fitz I J51 norrhU >_•- O �iZION [ a5L4N.R I.- ° C-9. 'i" ai r1 7 td R2 V .� __Its c s ' 't - ..e ,n~i,s.lzFdt •'3 r @-D R Lt YAI--- --- i S L {,- 'x r f "xfl � ...._ .� Iw - e u=s r s x z� a �� ,.�� � °{� r" ra r � r ""►v 3 I � -R�:�,� � l4,,5 s " s" 'S ��_2� �'��L� s �i� -C�""e" z a rc j."�i � '3� i Yya s .a f I A t -*,. f! t- �.s. # E i rn i 4� 1 Rt Rt A.4 r A t �. is V s Y Overview Legend -=: Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan FPL02-03.00 I-N–, Planning Area Freeway/Expressway L" �000g Overlay District Principal Arterial Sheets Fool City Limits Minor Arterial Existing L__ —Y�?__.. Planned C outside city Collector Planning Commission __._Lj L • e�� Historic Collector March 25, 2002 MilesPL02-3CopperCreek 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 Page 1.5 • • PP99-15 - Copper Creek Subdivision - One Mile Diameter a En �� Al I M1 N ZION Z /RANDAL R-1 R-0 R-2 R-0 Gt A-1 AA G1 E VALERIE �. R-0 O A-1 Art R-2 O pYG PO NN O R_, 1400 0 1400 Feet N W+ E Planning Commission March 25, 2002 FPL02-3 Copper Creek S Page 1.6 0 0 FPL02-oaoo COPPER CREEK Close Up View a f� 1-------------"--^------------ i i c I GREVSTONE pd�$,.,._ • � � ' ' _:T 6REVAONEDRG�tEYSTONE�Ui 3:.. .. ©; 4 .._y ......__....... p j u *ARTa5YONF-DR- i 7._ i �l� �:;Ji£ARTHSTON$OR-� ml O •. f . A0�€WAtt ER5 � Y l Q <:> lu �u \ 1. .---'_ sa arapi i A.4A® v Overview Legend Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan -- f i FPL02-03.00 -\,.,. Planning Area Freeway/Expressway 71 Streets 0 000_o°Overlay District Principal Arterial Existing L _I City Limits , Minor Arterial r5 I= Outside City ♦,Collector Plannetl tiu'' ••�� HistooncConecto, Planning Commission o 125 250 soo iso March 25, 2002`. Feet FP102-3 Copper Creek Page 1.7 0 FPL02-03.00 COOPER CREEK One Mile View w � - i RO- yt''Sd'v- Luer.N --•-- t r 3t ° t s:I � y . E53, Ea :;Rii 5 t +E fid' if. K Jl PLa0.1G715 RD fmsen R3 l x iff Subject Property * t_ L t { .f 7. t r r a y s._. a L KE FAYETTEVtLLE 7 - �., "' �+'•• °' ' `L- t`�i:, `£ r - ' ' t r �h ON RDf t "'C' k""+C I t" f if5 4*— ...,.�+PNpPI PG _ I i .•SSC` 'q' L iii'-'ry 3 2 at 7 ��L41'Lp s I c.xaN Ho A t -v sa aN.- ' r a Rad !A. R-0 RG'ff V&ktalaFO R.a-,I t tt-t 'R-1 AA-1 R t'ss f x5iff k r ya R-i tta 1 _ SRI 1ARM Overview Legend Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan FPI-02-03.00 1%, Planning Area Freeway/Expressway 0000g Overlay District Principal Arterial StreetsMinor Arterial Existing L-- I City Limits Planning Commission' I Outside city collector March 25, 2002 �. Planned ••••• Historic Colledo FP102-3 Copper Creek L' Miles 0 0.125 0.25 0.5 0.75 Page 1.8 LSD 01-38.00 Page 1 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS Karstetter&Glass,LSD 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Tim Conklin,Planning Director FROM: Sara Edwards, Associate Planner Ron Petrie, Staff Engineer DATE: March 14,2002 Project: LSD 01-42.00: Large Scale Development(Karstetter& Glass, pp 402) was submitted by Steve Clark on behalf of Doris Ann Glass for property located at 2530 Wedington Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 1.76 acres with a 1240 sq.ft. shop expansion proposed. Findings: The original structure is a legal non-conforming structure. However, an expansion of the facility began without obtaining any building permits several years ago. A stop work order was placed on the expansion and the City has been unable to permit the structure because the use was not in the correct zoning district. The property has recently been rezoned to C-2 in order to allow auto repair. According to the Unified Development Ordinance this property must go through the large scale development process because it is located in the Design Overlay District. Therefore, the applicant is requesting approval of this large scale development in order to obtain a building permit,which will allow the partially constructed addition to be completed. However, because this property developed prior to our current regulations,the existing development on the site does not meet many ordinance requirements. Therefore,the applicant is requesting several waivers that are listed below. Please find at the end of this report the ordinances regarding Commercial.Design Standards,Design Overlay District Regulations and Nonconforming Uses and Structures. The applicant is proposing to replace the metal gates, which are on both sides of the building with wood gates, and to place vines on the chain link fence surrounding the remainder of the property to provide screening. Property to the west is zoned R-2 and property to the north is zoned R-1. The property to the west, across Futrall includes Hank's Furniture and is zoned C-1. The property across Wedington is zoned C-2. There are no trees on the site being affected by this development. The applicant has revised the site plan to include landscaping along Wedington. The elevations have also been changed to include columns. Recommendation: Approval Conditions of Approval: 1. A fire hydrant shall be installed within 500 feet of the building addition pursuant to fire code. Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSDOI-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.1 LSD 01-38.00 Page 2 2. Planning Commission determination of compliance with Commercial Design Standards and Design Overlay District Regulations. The applicant is requesting several waivers from these regulations as listed below.Please see letter form applicant regarding these waivers a. Applicant is requesting a waiver of§161.21(D)(6)which requires that curb cuts be a minimum of 200 feet apart. The proposal is for two driveways which are 39 feet apart. b. Applicant is requesting a waiver of§161.21(D)(2) which requires that 25 feet of landscaped area be provided along all public rights-of-way with one tree planted every thirty feet. The proposal is for no landscaped area along the front property line. C. Applicant is requesting a waiver of§161.21(D)(10)which states that buildings shall be constructed of wood, masonry, or natural looking materials.No structures shall be allowed that have metal side walls UNLESS such metal siding is similar in appearance to wood, masonry or natural looking material. The applicant is proposing metal side walls with brick columns. 3. Planning Commission determination of the requested waiver of§172.01(C)(5)which requires that parking lot entrances and aisles not exceed 24 feet in width. The applicant is requesting aisles widths from 21 to 23 feet, a reduction from 1 to 3 feet. 4. Planning Commission determination of the requested waiver of required right-of-way dedication along Wedington and Futrall. The requirement along Wedington is 55 feet from centerline. Currently, a varying amount of right-of-way exists varying from 40.53 to 44.31 feet. The requirement along Futrall is 25 feet from centerline. Currently, 15 feet from centerline exists. Staff is in support of the request for the right-of-way reduction along Wedington Drive only. This request would require City Council approval. 5. Applicant shall obtain approval from the Board of Adjustment for the non-conforming building with regard to setbacks. 6. The dumpster shall be screened from view of Wedington Drive. 7. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives-AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) 8. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s)and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 9. Large Scale Development approval to be valid for one calendar year. Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD01-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.2 LSD 01-38.00 Page 3 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required: a. Grading and drainage permits b. Separate easement plat for this project c. Project Disk with all final revisions d. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City(letter of credit,bond, escrow) as required by§158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements"to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be completed, not just guaranteed,prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Background: The proposed Large Scale Development was reviewed at the November 14, 2001 Technical Plat Review and the November 29,2001 Subdivision Committee Meeting. Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included the waiver requests from the Commercial Design Standards and the Design Overlay District. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Large Scale Development to the full Planning Commission subject to all staff comments. Infrastructure: a.) Water. Existing. b.) Sanitary Sewer. Existing. c.) Streets. Existing. d.) Grading and Drainage. Not applicable for this project. Relevant Code Sections: §166.14 SITE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND CONSTRUCTION AND APPEARANCE DESIGN STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES. D. Design Elements Guidelines for Commercial Structures. 1. The elements to avoid or minimize include: a. Unpainted concrete precision block walls. b. Square `boxlike"structures. c. Metal siding which dominates the main facade. d. Large blank, unarticulated wall surfaces. e. Large out of scale signs with flashy colors. Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSDOI-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.3 LSD 01-38.00 Page 4 161.21 DESIGN OVERLAY DISTRICT (U.S. 71 HIGHWAY CORRIDOR). D.Nonresidential Site Design and Development Standards. 1.Deleted by Ord No. 4128 2. Green Space. A minimum of 25 feet of landscaped green space exclusive of right-of-way shall be provided along the highway right-of-way and any public street to which the development has frontage. Parking lots shall not encroach into the green space and shall be screened when abutting a required green space area. Trees shall be planted at the interval of one tree per 30 linear feet of green space area when practicable. 3.Deleted by Ord No. 4128 4.Deleted by Ord No. 4128 5. Signage. a. Nonresidential Free Standing Signs. (1). Each separate nonresidential lot will be allowed a single ground-mounted (monument) sign located on the building site. In the case of lots with double frontage,two ground-mounted (monument) signs shall be allowed. (2). The sign shall be a maximum of six feet high, 75 square feet in area, and set back a minimum of 10 feet from the property line. b. Wall Signs. One all sign may be installed per business. Sign area shall not exceed 20% of that wall area or 200 square feet, whichever is less. A second sign may be allowed if it is determined that the structure has more than one front facing a street or highway right-of-way. c. Illumination. Only indirect lighting may be used for illumination of all signs. d. Multiple Tenants. The owner of the building shall be responsible for the provision of one monument sign with sign area for multiple tenants. e. Sign Content. Content of monument and wall signs shall be limited to the name of the business. Advertising shall not be permitted on the structure, wall sign or monument. 6. Curb Cuts. One curb cut shall be allowed per 200 feet of frontage. No curb cuts shall be allowed within 250 feet of any intersection. 7. Lighting. Parking lot lighting shall be designed and located in such a manner to preserve the scenic appearance of the corridor. Lighting shall be shielded and directed downward to the parking lot and light spread shall not reflect into the adjacent neighborhood. Lighting shall not exceed 35 feet in height and shall utilize sodium lighting fixtures. 8.Deleted by Ord No. 4128 9. Exterior Appearance.All structures shall be architecturally designed to have front facades facing all street and highway right-of-way. An elevation drawing shall be submitted for each side of the building that faces a street or highway. 10. Building Material. Buildings shall be constructed of wood,masonry, or natural looking materials. No structures shall be allowed that have metal side walls UNLESS such metal siding is similar in appearance to wood, masonry or natural looking material. Il. Site Coverage. 25% of the site shall be left in open space. 80% of the open space shall be landscaped which may include ponds and fountains. 12.Deleted by Ord.No. 4128 Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD01-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.4 LSD 01-38.00 Page 5 13. Optional Fencing. All fencing shall be constructed of wood, masonry, or natural-looking materials.No optional fencing shall be located within the green space required by section D.2.No metal fencing shall be allowed except in the following cases: a. Wrought iron fencing. b. If other types of metal fencing are necessary for security purposes,they may be used if the area is first fenced off with a view-obscuring natural or natural-looking fencing material. The metal fencing shall be placed inside the view-obstructing fencing, and the view-obscuring fencing shall be at least the height of the metal fencing. 14. Outdoor Storage of Material and Equipment.All outdoor storage of material and equipment shall be screened with natural vegetation. 15. Access. a. Pedestrian. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the street to the entrance of the structure by way of a designated trail or sidewalk. b. Multi-Modal.Multi-modal access may be required on nonresidential sites within the design overlay district. (For example: The provision of bus stops,bicycle racks, parking stalls for car pools, and bicycle and pedestrian walks and trails). 16.Deleted by Ord.No. 4128 E. Nonresidential Developments and Multiple Building Sites. In the case of nonresidential development involving multiple building sites, whether on one or more platted lots,the above described regulations shall apply to the development as an entire tract rather than to each platted lot. §164.07 NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES D. Nonconforming structures. Where a lawful structure exists at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this chapter that could not be built under the terms of this chapter by reason of restriction on areas, lot coverage,height,yards, its location in the lot, or other requirements concerning the structure, such structure may be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful, subject to the following provisions: 1.No such nonconforming structure may be enlarged or altered in a way which increases its nonconformity but any structure or portion thereof may be altered to decrease its nonconformity,provided, the following structures may be enlarged or altered as hereinafter provided: a. Nonconforming residential structures may be enlarged or altered by increasing the height of said structures. b. Carports in residential zones may extend into the required yard setbacks if. the carport is set back at least ten feet from the street right-of-way;the carport is set back at least five feet from any interior side property line; the carport is set back at least ten feet from the rear property line; the area below the roof is open on the sides; and the carport does not materially obstruct vision. c. In residential zones, detachable awnings which are not structurally a part of the building may be erected in any required front yard or rear yard if the awning does not project more than six feet. Detachable awnings which are not structurally a part of the building and which project no more than four feet may be erected in any required interior side yard. d. In residential zones,porch roofs and open porches may extend into Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD01-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.5 LSD 01-38.00 Page 6 required yards by one foot on each side of the entry door to a maximum depth of six feet in required front yards and rear yards and to a maximum depth of four feet in required interior side yards. 2. Should such nonconforming structure or nonconforming portion of structure be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this chapter. 3. Should such structure be moved for any reason for any distance whatever, it shall thereafter conform to the regulations for the district in which it is located after it is moved. (Code 1991, §160.138; Code 1965,App. A, Art. 4(4); Ord.No. 1747, 6-29-70; Ord.No. 3130, 10-1-85) PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ves Required Approved Denied Date: Comments: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: _yes Required Approved Denied Date: The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. By Title Date Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD01-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.6 r lark onsulting J. STEVE CLARK, P.E. CIVIL/ ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING November 15, 2001 Ms. Sara Edwards, Development Coordinator Fayetteville Planning Department 113 West Mountain Street { Crr [UE� Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 Re: Karstetter and Glass Body Shop Large Scale Development Dear Ms. Edwards, The owner of the referenced project requests waivers from the Design Overlay District requirements on the following items: 1. Curb cuts shall be a minimum of 200 feet apart- The two existing curb cuts have been in place since the original building was constructed more than 40 years ago. If one of the drives were required to be closed it would make safe access to the site extremely difficult, if not impossible. 2. Driveway widths shall not exceed 39 feet - The existing driveways widths are the results of multiple road widening projects by the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department and the City of Fayetteville. The driveways were constructed to allow maximum safe access to the site after the last widening project. 3. Aisle widths should be 24 feet wide - The parking lots in the rear of the building will have less than 24 foot access aisles. Due to the limited space available for vehicular parking the parking layout required that the aisles be smaller than normally allowed. This parking area will be used by body shop personnel for temporary parking of vehicles while the vehicles are waiting to be repaired. The employees will be able to readily utilized the smaller access aisles since there will not be two way traffic at the same time. 4. 25 feet of green space is required along all public right-of-ways - There is no available space between the building and the Right-of-Way for a 25 foot landscaped buffer. The owner has agreed to plant landscaping in the only Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD01-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.7 109 Spring Street, Suite 4 • Springdale, Arkansas 72764 • (501) 872-8171 • Fax: (501) 750-3343 • available space in the southeast corner of the tract. 5. Buildings shall be constructed of wood, masonry or other natural looking materials - The original building-was originally constructed with white-painted masonry block. The addition that initiated this Large Scale Development was begun prior to the owner's understanding of the design standards of the overlay district. As such, the building, which is 70 percent complete, is constructed using metal sidewalls. Fortunately, there will be only a small portion of the proposed building that is actually visible from the adjoining streets. 6. No building shall have metal sidewalls unless the metal siding is similar in appearance to natural looking materials - The original building was originally constructed with white-painted masonry block. The addition that initiated this Large Scale Development was begun prior to the owner's understanding of the design standards of the overlay district. As such, the building, which is 70 percent complete, is constructed using metal sidewalls. In addition to the waivers to the requirements of the Design Overlay District requested, the owner also requests a waiver of the right-of-way dedication requirements along Wedington Drive and Futrall Drive. Only a small portion of the total site is currently being used for a commercial business. The remaining portion of the tract is still being used as the residence of the owner, Mrs. Doris Ann Glass. The waiver is requested for the following reasons. Wedington Drive Right-of-Way This business has been in this location for more than 40 years. When the existing buildings were constructed Wedington Road was a two-lane country road. At that time there was a parking lot and approximately 30 feet of green space in front of the building. Since the highway 71 Bypass ( 1-540) was constructed, additional right-of-way(ROW) has been acquired on at least two separate occasions. When the Highway Department acquired right-of-way for the latest widening project, they determined that a ROW width ranging from 40 to 45 feet was sufficient. I realize that the street ROW standards have changed since that acquisition occurred. However, It will be burdensome on the operation of the business if the additional ROW dedication is required at this time. The existing ROW is located less than 30 feet from the body shop building. If the additional requested ROW (55' from centerline) is dedicated there will be no room for vehicles to maneuver into the front parking spaces, without doing so completely on the street ROW. Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSDOI-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.8 • 0 Futrall Drive Right-of-Way Futrall Drive was widened to 27 feet, curbed and guttered when the property to the north was developed. There are no current needs for additional improvements along this street that would require the dedication of additional ROW. Since Futrall Drive is not being impacted by the commercial development that is being expanded by this Large Scale Development we request that the ROW dedication for Futrall Drive be postponed until some future date when the remaining portion of the property is developed. Mrs. Glass continues to use the majority of her property as a singleJamily residence and prefers that her trees and landscaping not be impacted by the dedication of additional ROW at this time. The owner would appreciate the Planning Commission's favorable consideration of this request. If I can provide additional information, please call me at 872-8171. Sincerely, Clark Consulting . Steve Clark, P.E. Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD01-42 Karstetter& Glass Page 2.9 s THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS May 3, 1999 Mr. James Atherton Karstetter& Glass Body Shop 2530 Wedington Dr. Fayetteville, AR 72701 Re: Drainage Improvements Dear Mr. Atherton: hi our recent discussions concerning the Karstetter& Glass Body Shop, we talked about the non- conforming nature of the structure in the R-1, Low Density zoning district. This structure and the site are considered non-conforming based on the City's Unified Development Code and must comply with those regulations. I understand that it is necessary to improve the drainage on this site and you reviewed the changes that you are proposing for that purpose., The drainage improvements that we discussed concerning the Karstetter& Glass Body Shop site will not require a building permit. I do encourage you to verify with the City F,ngineerirlg Division that no grading permit is necessary prior to initiating construction. Sincerely, Dawn T. Warrick Development Coordinator cc: File Conklin Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSDOI-42 Karstetter& Glass 113 WEST MOUNTAIN 72701 501521-7700 Page 2.10. FAX 501575-8257 • ��—tot ttnTC . I ' - .o r> i .Ih ri tl J. 25 1■■■H�1■1/II��iiitiiii MIN ••�•�'+` •.o ,\IA■um■//■I1 ■■�I I■ QST ,,�..WIIIpIIi2■WNirov■■LYI'I■Yp II�t/ ■■■/�. X15 � n r T __ nnm„rvi:1, ,-�.���nn,. i■ ,��� - vi uta =. - LYI■1■11■■ .� / �n-nlr- ►��O�J e.. i1y iInt 11115 iiii° 'LY' � �j- � !�• P� Iii o Is■n�i. �'wil� uT■'p- ..m. . Mill" F ■�1•res3� �- --■-+. �.+ �111511 rar■YFYa�n. JJ III G3915'17Y1� � �`1'•X711 ■ 1 I�� �- .�tttIA4E9i71all ttt@�yt[[..I�11 �! ■ //���'1.ils� r�� / �ttltltttt tttlttttt. 01 � �«Iue11�.� tiiiiiifl tnt.! f 1 „OI R^.ittil Ittt O Lru J ® ® , • •1—(Y ` ■.,J �IIICI71'1711., ONE IIi11f1111P�— �� t ItlIIIIII'WAVE 1171®11�°� ■ �t ■ .. y�Mloffilin fill :1111, 1113-.•.• ..■ice P' . 71111 Ii 111GYf—ii]�IIIIi� 'a3� � ll [tt�j�[i�[I'�3$�iF_.7W�u�.r-ic!`��� r i: h� I1rtLL•Jt16tt[11Ott[is a��l�// v. - toot mill 11 1111111111 !VT J.��■���I .°� � Iliur1111 FYI /ttto�lr�,yl� ►�tittlitasa� a 1���`_�I�_�� . p� n. ■Vin._ ■ Legend- Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan .. Oveday District 4��Principal Arterial —1 City Unnits 4"'%0 Minor Arterial EAsting � • Planned 0000. Historic Collector Planning Commission 1 0.1250.25 0.5 0.75 1 March11 Rt:f 42 Karstetter&Glass LSD01-42.00 KARSETTER Close Up View O ° � a 5 G C o° o � - 0 RRIVA} DR VRIVATI:pR 0 El 4 VALLEY DR ui' fr'2 0 2;7-5, t J > B V o o D 01157 2 O 3 AHN 0 I o EZI 1 YED p o° SUBJECT PROPERTY 8 /. o 0 0 O K 00 L O q 0.0 O O K O a P o RAt ftP ° u-8 0 o ft•2 0 0 o I �aP o°o / Y-9 Overview Legend _ f Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan L ®LSD01-42.00 1"�„r Planning Area Freeway/Expressway Overlay DistrictOn`�Principal Arterial o0_000Streets I °I City Limits Minor M erial 2 � � Existing L— Collector r,iL`i �Planned Outside City 0*�•. Historic Collector Planning Commission 0 75 150 300 450 600 March 25, 2002 Feet LSDO -42 Karstetter& Glass LSD 02-4.00 Page l PC Meeting of March 11,2002 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS Danaher Tool Expansion,LSD 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Tim Conklin, City Planner FROM: Sara Edwards, Ron Petrie P.E. DATE: March 11, 2002 Project: LSD 02-4.00: Large Scale Development(Danaher, pp 681).was submitted by Ken Parker on behalf of Danaher Tool Group for property located at 2900 S. City Lake Road. The property is zoned I-2, General Industrial and contains approximately 28.72 acres with a 15,000 sq.ft. warehouse proposed. Findings: The request is for a 15,000 square foot warehouse to be constructed on an existing concrete surfaced area. Therefore,the Tree Preservation, Grading, and Drainage Ordinances are not applicable for this project. There is existing parking on the site which is sufficient to meet code requirements for both the existing structures and for the addition. Recommendation: Approval subject to the conditions listed below. Conditions of Approval: 1. Planning Commission determination of the requested waiver of the requirement to build a six foot sidewalk along City Lake Road. Pursuant to section 171.13.5 of the Unified Development Ordinance sidewalks are required to be constructed for an addition of 2500 square feet or greater. Please see attached ordinance section and request from Danaher Tool. Also see attached memo from the City Attorney and correspondence regarding sidewalk construction. 2. A minimum of five trees shall be planted along City Lake Road to meet the parking lot landscaping requirements. Pursuant to Section 172.1-1.2. of the Unified Development Ordinance nonconforming parking lots are required to be brought into compliance beginning with an expansion of 10%. The expansion of 10%requires 10% of the parking lot to be brought into compliance. This increases with an increased percent of expansion. With the proposed addition, a 16%expansion in square footage is occurring. Therefore the requirement to bring 16% of the parking lot into compliance is for two landscaped islands with two trees. Staff is recommending that five trees be planted along City Lake Road in place of the two islands in the existing parking lot. These trees shall be a minimum 2 inch caliper hardwood species and shall be placed outside of the right of way on private property. Maintenance will be the responsibility of the property owner. Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD02-4 Danaher Page 3.1 LSD 02-4.00 Page 2 3. The legal description on the plat shall be revised to include the correct acreage. The current legal description reflects property that was sold to the City. The City Engineering Department has written a correct legal for this property to be used by the applicant. 4. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives -AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) 5. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 6. Large scale development shall be valid for one calendar year. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit the following is required: Grading and drainage permits Separate easement plat for this project Project Disk with all final revisions Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City(letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by §158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements"to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further, all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be completed,not just guaranteed,prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Background: The proposed Large Scale Development was reviewed at the February 13, 2002 Technical Plat review and the February 28, 2002 Subdivision Committee meeting. Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included the requested waiver from the sidewalk requirement. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Large Scale Development to the full Planning Commission subject to all staff comments. INFRASTRUCTURE: a) Water. Existing. b) Sanitary sewer. Existing. C) Streets. Existing. Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD02-4 Danaher Page 3.2 LSD 02-4.00 Page 3 d) Grading and Drainage. Not applicable. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: -yes--Required Approved Denied Date: Comments: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required Approved Denied Date / / The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. by title date Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD02-4 Danaher Page 3.3 OLM DANAHER g TOOL GROUP 1609 N. OLD MISSOURI ROAD SPRINGDALE, ARKANSAS 72764 TELEPHONE: (501) 751-8500 FAX: (501) 751-6914 February 14, 2002 City of Fayetteville P. O. Box Drawer F Fayetteville,AR 72702 Attn: Tim Conklin, City Planner Sara Edwards, Associate Planner Chuck Rutherford, Sidewalk Administrator On behalf of Danaher Tool Group I would like to formally request a waiver on the sidewalk ordinance (Ord.#4005) in the addition of the proposed warehouse at our facility in Fayetteville. We understand that an agreement was made with the former owners in 1983,however we did not assume ownership of the building until 1991. Therefore the Bill of Assurance is not with Danaher Tool Group,but with another company. The price of the grading and sidewalk will also exceed the amount of monies we have been approved to spend. Approval for the extra monies will have to go through several signatures from here in Arkansas on to North Carolina and then to Washington D.C. Although I do not have the authority to put a halt to this project,it is my opinion that an extra$20,000 to$25,000 for a sidewalk on an original capital request of slightly over$100,000 would be impossible to overcome, given the current economic climate. It would mean not being able to provide 40 to 50 new jobs in Fayetteville and having to look elsewhere. We look forward to continuing this project and ask for your help in the matter. Please do not hesitate to ask for any additional information. I would be very happy to meet with yourself or any other officers of the city to discuss the matter further. Thank you for your consideration, (John (cell phone)283-5973 Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD02-4 Danaher Page 3.4 7. To provide good civic (2 ). Trees , design and arrangement. shrubs, ground cover and grass shall be the primary source of landscaping and shall be B. Zoning Districts. The standards placed and/or retained in such a manner as to set forth herein shall apply in the following reduce runoff. zoning districts, except as noted: (3). The current property owner shall properly maintain all 1. R-O Residential Office landscaping and shall replace any landscaping •hat-dies-or4s-damaged- 2. 0-1 Neighborhood (4 ).Native Commercial vegetation should be used when possible in 3. C-2 Thoroughfare order to minimize watering. Commercial ( 5 ) . Land - 4. C-3 Central Commercial scaping should attempt to incorporate existing on-site trees and shrubbery. 5. C4 Downtown (6).Providing outdoor spaces and places for people to gather 6. I-1 Heavy Commercial and is encouraged. Light Industrial b. Landscaping along front property lines. 7. I-2 General Industrial (1). Land- scaped area required. A 15 foot wide 8. P-1 Institutional landscaped area shall be provided along the front property line exclusive of right-of-way. 9. E-1 Extraction Entrance drives, exit drives and sidewalks are allowed to cross the 15 foot landscaped area 10. Any other zoning district provided the integrity of the landscaped area when coinmercial, office, institutional and is maintained. Residential uses and zoning industrial uses are allowed as a conditional districts C-3 and C4 shall be exempt from use. this requirement. (Z). Variance. C, Site Development Standards.The The width of the landscaped area may be following site development standards shall reduced in front parking lots when the parking apply when either new development or lot setback reduction option is used pursuant expansion of 25% of the existing building to §172.01. sq�fo4>:_age occurs. (3). Trees. (a). Trees 1.Landscaping. Landscaping shall be planted in the 14 foot landscaped area is required as follows: at a ratio of one tree per 30 feet of front a. Landscaping property line and may be planted together in general provisions. groups. No group may count more than 25% M. Land- of the required number. scaping shall be provided which is sufficient (b). Species to provide soil stability and suitable drainage. selection shall be at the discretion of the developer. However,species which are listed -30- Planning Commission March 25, 2002 LSD02-4 Danaher Page 3.5 ORDINANCE NO. 4311 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 171.12 PROPERTY OWNER TO CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK UPON RECEIPT OF NOTICE, AND ADOPTING A REPLACEMENT SECTION 171.12 WHEREAS, the current sidewalk ordinance occasionally required the construction of a sidewalk in an isolated and impractical location, and WHEREAS, it would be beneficial to use the resources that would be wasted building such an impractical, isolated sidewalk to build a needed, useful sidewalk nearby. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS: Section 1. That 171.12 Property Owner to Construct Sidewalk Upon Receipt of Notice; Subsection A. Receipt of Notice; Subsection B. Application of Provisions of the Code of Fayetteville shall be deleted and the following inserted in its stead: 171.12 Property Owner to Construct Sidewalk or Contribute Cost of Sidewalk A. Requirement The owner of any property abutting a public street or highway for which a sidewalk is required by City's Master Street Plan shall construct a sidewalk along said street or highway upon receipt of notice issued at the time a building or parking lot permit is issued or a lot split is approved. 1. The property owner shall construct the sidewalk in accordance with section 171.13 Sidewalk and Driveway Specifications. s 2. If the City's Sidewalk Administrator determines that construction of the sidewalk would be unfeasible, impracticable, or otherwise unsuitable at the property's location, then the owner has the option to construct the sidewalk anyway or contribute money in lieu of construction as set forth below: A. A cash contribution in lieu of construction shall be at the rate of Three Dollars ($3.00)per square foot of the sidewalk that normally would have been required. The cash contribution amount per square foot shall be reviewed every three years and maybe amended by the City Council. Planning Comm March 25,* LSD02-4 Danaher Page 3.6