HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-06-22 - Agendas - Final CITY OF
a e evl jq AGENDA
Y ARKANS
Final Agenda
Planning Commission Meeting
June 22, 2015
5:30 PM
113 W. Mountain, Room 219
Members: Sarah Bunch (Chair), William Chesser (Vice Chair), Ryan Noble (Secretary), Kyle
Cook, Tracy Hoskins, Ron Autry, Janet Selby, Matthew Hoffman, and Tom Brown.
City Staff: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director
Call to Order
Roll Call
Consent
1. Approval of the minutes from the June 8, 2015 meeting.
2. ADM 15-5110: Administrative Item (1946 N. BIRCH AVE./THE CONTAINER KITCHEN,
367): Submitted by BENJAMIN MILLS for property located at 1946 N. BIRCH AVE. The property
is zoned 1-1, HEAVY COMMERCIAL & LIGHT INDUSTRIAL and contains approximately 1.55
acres. The request is for a Mobile Vendor Annual Permit. Planner: Andrew Garner
3. CCP 15-5085: Concurrent Plat (5648 JESS ANDERSON RD./NOTTENKAMPER, 358/359):
Submitted by JORGENSEN &ASSOCIATES for property located at 5648 JESS ANDERSON RD.
The property is in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA and contains approximately 16.74
acres.The request is to subdivide two lots into four lots containing approximately 4.42, 4.07, 4.14,
and 4.11 acres each. Planner: Quin Thompson
4. VAC 15-5080: Vacation (WEIR & SALEM RDS./HOLCOMB HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION 245):
Submitted by RIVERWOOD HOMES for properties located at the intersection of WEIR & SALEM
RDS. The properties are zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE
and RSF-8, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 8 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately
0.61 acres. The request is to vacate a street right-of-way within the subdivision and portions of
utility easements. Planner: Jesse Fulcher
5. VAC 15-5078: Vacation (EAST OF 4148 W. MILK BLVD./HOLLANDS SUBDIVISION 595):
Submitted by CITY STAFF for property located EAST OF 4148 W. MILK BLVD. The property is
zoned R-A, RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURE and contains approximately 15.20 acres. The request
is to vacate a street right-of-way within the subdivision. Planner: Andrew Garner
Old Business
Mailing Address:
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayetteville-ar.gov
Fayetteville,AR 72701
6. LSD 15-5072: Large Scale Development (2269 N. HENBEST DR./ADVENTURE SUBARU,
325): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES for property located at 2269 N. HENBEST
DR. The property is zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and contains approximately
8.36 acres. The request is for construction of three structures related to car sales consisting of
approximately 14,600 square feet with associated parking and sales lot.
Planner: Jesse Fulcher
7. LSD 15-5070: Large Scale Development (3739 N. STEELE BLVD./UARK CREDIT UNION,
173): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES for property located at 3739 N. STEELE
BLVD. The property is zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and contains
approximately 1.27 acres. The request is for construction of an 8,927 square foot bank with
associated parking. Planner: Quin Thompson
8. PPL 15-4989: Preliminary Plat (SOUTH OF MANOR & RIDGELY DR./REMINGTON
ESTATES SUBDIVISION, 449): Submitted by ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. for property
located SOUTH OF MANOR & RIDGELY DR. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 12.10 acres. The request is
for a 27 lot single-family subdivision. Planner: Quin Thompson
New Business
9. LSD 15-5074: Large Scale Development (SOUTH OF 3203 N. WARWICK
DR./HUNTINGDON APTS., 216): Submitted by COMMUNITY BY DESIGN for property located
at SOUTH OF 3203 N. WARWICK DR. The property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE
FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE, and contains approximately 1.13 acres. The request is for
construction of a 12 unit apartment complex with associated parking. Planner: Andrew Garner
10. RZN 15-5066: Rezone (1324 W. CLEVELAND ST./ARKANSAS LEGACY, LLC., 443):
Submitted by COMMUNITY BY DESIGN for properties located at 1324 W. CLEVELAND ST. The
properties are zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 24 UNITS PER ACRE and RSF-
4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contain approximately 3.98 acres.
The request is to rezone the properties to DG, DOWNTOWN GENERAL.
Planner: Jesse Fulcher
11. ADM 15-5093: Administrative Item (UDC Chapters 161, 164 and 172/SINGLE FAMILY
INFILL STANDARDS): Submitted by CITY PLANNING STAFF for revisions to Chapters 161, 164
and 172 to modify the bulk and area regulations to encourage small-lot, single family infill in multi-
family zoning districts, and to include minimum design standards for this type of development.
Planner: Jesse Fulcher
12. ADM 15-5090: Administrative Item (AMENDMENT TO THE MINIMUM STREET
STANDARDS GUIDELINE- UDC CHAPTER 171, STREETS & SIDEWALKS): Submitted by
CITY ENGINEERING STAFF for revisions to Chapter 171 to modify the Minimum Street
Standards Guideline. Engineer: Matt Casey
The following items have been approved administratively by staff:
2
FPL 15-5083: Final Plat (REDSTONE DR. AND S. SHILOH DR./HAWKINS HOUSE
SUBDIVISION PH 1, 519): Submitted by BATES &ASSOCIATES for property located at
REDSTONE DR. & S. SHILOH DR. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL
PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT and contains approximately 10.74 acres. The request is
for final plat approval of a residential subdivision with 6 lots and 38 dwelling units.
Planner: Jesse Fulcher
Announcements
Adjourn
NOTICE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE:
All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. If you wish to address the Planning
Commission on an agenda item please queue behind the podium when the Chair asks for public comment.
Once the Chair recognizes you, go to the podium and give your name and address.Address your comments
to the Chair, who is the presiding officer. The Chair will direct your comments to the appropriate appointed
official, staff, or others for response. Please keep your comments brief, to the point, and relevant to the
agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak.
Interpreters or TDD, Telecommunication Device for the Deaf, are available for all public hearings; 72 hour
notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter, please call 575-8330.
As a courtesy please turn off all cell phones and pagers.
A copy of the Planning Commission agenda and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection
in the office of City Planning (575-8267), 125 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. All interested
parties are invited to review the petitions.
3
CITY OF
Taye ARKeAN SAS le MINUTES
AN
Planning Commission
June 8, 2015
5:30 PM
City Administration Building in Fayetteville, AR, Room 219
Members: Sarah Bunch - Chair, William Chesser- Vice-Chair, Ryan Noble — Secretary, Ron
Autry, Kyle Cook, Thomas Brown, Matthew Hoffman, Janet Selby, and Tracy Hoskins
City Staff: Andrew Garner— City Planning Director, Jesse Fulcher— Senior Planner, Quin
Thompson — Planner, Cory Granderson — Staff Engineer, and Kit Williams—City Attorney
1. Call to Order: 5:30 PM, Sarah Bunch
2. In Attendance: Thomas Brown, William Chesser, Janet Selby, Tracy Hoskins, Matthew
Hoffman, Sarah Bunch, Ron Autry, and Kyle Cook
Absent: Ryan Noble
Staff: Andrew Garner, Jesse Fulcher, Quin Thompson, and Kit Williams
3. Consent Agenda:
Approval of the minutes from the May 26, 2015 meeting.
VAC 15-5089: Vacation (3215 NORTH HILLS BLVD., 250): Submitted by USI
ENGINEERS for property located at 3215 NORTH HILLS BLVD. The property is zoned P-
1, INSTITUTIONAL and contains approximately 20.28 acres. The request is to vacate a
portion of a utility easement.
VAR 15-5091: Variance (65 W. ROCK ST./CITY PARKING FENCE, 523): Submitted by
CITY STAFF for property located at 65 W. ROCK ST. The property is zoned DG,
DOWNTOWN GENERAL and contains approximately 0.55 acres. The request is for a
variance of the downtown fence height requirements.
Motion:
Commissioner Cook made a motion to approve the consent agenda. Commissioner
Selby seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 8-0-0.
Mailing Address: Planning Commission
113 W. Mountain Street www.fayeN !Qfll�2a?.%§v
Fayetteville,AR 72701 Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 1 of 14
4. New Business:
LSP 15-5065: Lot Split (4705 E. WOODSEDGE RD./LINER, 297): Submitted by
JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES for property located at 4705 E. WOODSEDGE RD. The
property is in THE FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA and contains approximately 5.00
acres. The request is a variance to create a new 4.00-acre tract without street frontage.
Jesse Fulcher, Senior Planner, read the staff report.
No public comment was presented.
Blake Jorgensen, applicant, had no additional comments.
Motion:
Commissioner Chesser made a motion to approve LSP 15-5065 as recommended by
staff. Commissioner Autry seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with
a vote of 8-0-0.
Planning Commission
June 22,20Z
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 2 of 14
PPL 15-4991: Preliminary Plat (4436 E. MISSION BLVD./EASTERN PARK
SUBDIVISION, 296/297): Submitted by USI CONSULTING ENGINEERS for property
located at 4436 E. MISSION BLVD. The property is in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING
AREA and contains approximately 7.66 acres. The request is for a 17 lot single-family
subdivision.
Andrew Garner, City Planning Director, gave the staff report.
Ferdi Fourie, applicant, discussed agreement with the recommended conditions of
approval.
No public comment was presented.
Commissioner Cook gave a Subdivision Committee report.
Motion:
Commissioner Chesser made a motion to approve PPL 15-4991 as recommended by
staff. Commissioner Cook seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with
a vote of 8-0-0.
Planning Commission
June 22,20$
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 3 of 14
CUP 15-5076: Conditional Use(519 W. SKELTON RD./JARDIN HOME DAYCARE, 679):
Submitted by TERRI LYNN JARDIN for property located at 519 W. SKELTON RD. The
property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNIITS PER ACRE and
contains approximately 1.08 acres. The request is for a home daycare for 5 or less children.
Jesse Fulcher, Senior Planner, read the staff report.
Tracy Jardin, applicant, described the back yard and that it didn't provide enough space for
the kids. We can put up a fence in the front yard if needed.
No public comment was presented.
Commissioner Brown stated he was concerned with not having a fence in front due to
proximity to the street.
Commissioner Hoskins asked about the complaint.
Fulcher stated he didn't speak with the complainant and wasn't sure what the issue was.
Commissioner Hoskins asked staff if they were okay with a fence.
Fulcher stated yes.
Jardin discussed the condition of the property next door and described improvements to
their property.
Kit Williams, City Attorney asked the applicant if she could work with staff on the fence.
Jardin stated yes.
Commissioner Hoskins stated he is okay with the request if a fence is put up.
Commissioner Brown asked if the item needed to be tabled until the fence is installed.
Commissioner Bunch stated that the item could be approved with the fence as a condition.
Motion:
Commissioner Brown made a motion to approve CUP 15-5076 as recommended by
staff, except modifying condition #1 to allow the play area to remain in the front yard
with the requirement that the play area be fenced. Commissioner Cook seconded the
motion. Upon roll call the motion passed with a vote of 8-0-0.
Planning Commission
June 22,2016
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 4 of 14
LSD 15-4955: Large Scale Development (335 E. APPLEBY ROAD/APPLEBY
TOWNHOMES, 251): Submitted by BATES &ASSOCIATES for property located at 335 E.
APPLEBY ROAD. The property is zoned RMF-24, RESIDENTIAL MULTI FAMILY, 24
UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 1.03 acres. The request is for a multi-family
project consisting of 11 units in two buildings.
Jesse Fulcher, Senior Planner, read the staff report.
Derek Thomas, applicant, agreed with the conditions.
No public comment was presented.
Commissioner Cook discussed the comments from the Subdivision Committee and that
those items have been addressed.
Commissioner Chesser asked if the sidewalk location was worked out.
Fulcher stated yes.
Commissioner Hoffman thanked the applicant for adding porches to the south building.
Motion:
Commissioner Chesser made a motion to approve LSD 15-4955 as recommended by
staff. Commissioner Hoffman seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion passed
with a vote of 8-0-0.
Planning Commission
June 22,20fE6
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 5 of 14
LSD 15-5072: Large Scale Development (2269 N. HENBEST DRJADVENTURE
SUBARU, 325): Submitted by JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES for property located at 2269
N. HENBEST DR. The property is zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and
contains approximately 8.36 acres. The request is for construction of three structures
related to car sales consisting of approximately 14,600 square feet with associated parking
and sales lot.
Jesse Fulcher, Senior Planner, read the staff report.
Blake Jorgensen, applicant, stated that the pond is now dry, so the engineering elements
are taking care of.
No public comment was presented.
David Nelms, applicant, described the building elevations and changes, and the use of the
building. Adding a door on the north elevation invites public to the building and this space is
only for employees. We've tried to address staff's concerns by using design elements from
original building.
Commissioner Bunch asked staff would they would recommend adding to the building.
Fulcher stated they don't want to design the building for the applicant.
Commissioner Chesser asked if staff thought the building met code.
Fulcher stated no.
Commissioner Hoskins recommended that the applicant utilizing fake glass, spandrel
glass, or other changes that won't interfere with the carwash.
Commissioner Chesser stated he tends to agree with staff. It feels like a big warehouse
and doesn't meet code. Should we table the item date specific.
Fulcher stated two weeks is likely enough, but we should ask staff.
Nelms stated he wasn't sure fake items would improve the look of the building.These delays
cost money. We don't want to the public to come to the building.
Commissioner Autry stated the building mimics the other building. It's a detail shop.
Andrew Garner, City Planning Director, recommended voting on item #1 seperately.
Jorgensen stated that cars will block most of the building from the street.
Commissioner Hoskins asked about the height of the building.
Planning Commission
June 22,206
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 6 of 14
Fulcher stated 15-20 feet tall.
Commissioner Chesser withdrew his motion to table.
Motion #1:
Commissioner Brown made a motion regarding LSD 15-5072 to approve the commercial
design standards for the shop building. Commissioner Autry seconded the motion.
Upon roll call the motion failed with a vote of 3-4-1. Commissioners Hoskins,
Chesser, Cook, and Bunch voted "no". Commissioner Hoffman recused.
Motion #2:
Commissioner Chesser made a motion to table LSD 15-5072 to the next Planning
Commission meeting. Commissioner Selby seconded the motion. Upon roll call the
motion failed with a vote of 5-2-1. Commissioners Hoskins and Autry voted "no".
Commissioner Hoffman recused.
Planning Commission
June 22,2025
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 7 of 14
LSD 15-5070: Large Scale Development (3739 N. STEELE BLVDJUARK CREDIT
UNION, 173): Submitted by JORGENSEN &ASSOCIATES for property located at 3739 N.
STEELE BLVD. The property is zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and
contains approximately 1.27 acres. The request is for construction of an 8,927 square foot
bank with associated parking.
Quin Thompson, Current Planner, read the staff report.
Ken Shireman, applicant, discussed his interpretation of 'entry-way' and stated that he
believed his design was in compliance with the development code, and gave reasons why
banks prefer to have only one public entry.
No public comment was presented.
Matthew Hoffman, Commissioner, discussed options for the design that would meet code
and not require two separate entrances, including a corner foyer.
Tom Brown, Comissioner, suggested ways to bring a covered entry from the north
employee entrance to the east fagade.
Motion:
Commissioner Hoffman made a motion to table LSD 15-5070 until the next Planning
Commission meeting. Commissioner Chesser seconded the motion. Upon roll call the
motion passed with a vote of 4-3-1. Commissioners Autry, Hoskins, and Selby voted
"no". Commissioner Cook recused.
Planning Commission
June 22,20S
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 8 of 14
CUP 15-5026: Conditional Use (SOUTH OF MANOR AND RIDGELY DR.
INTERSECTION/REMINGTON ESTATES SD, 449): Submitted by ENGINEERING
SERVICES INC. for property located SOUTH OF MANOR DR. AND RIDGELY RD. The
property is zoned RSF-4, RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and
contains approximately 12.11 acres. The request is for a tandem lot.
Quin Thompson, Current Planner, read the staff reports for the CUP and PPL together.
Jason Appel, applicant, had no additional comments.
Public comment:
Wanda Walker, neighbor, said that she was opposed to the tandem lot, saying it would be
incompatible with the area and inconsistent with neighboring properties. She discussed
concerns about increased traffic and egress onto Crossover road. She suggested
improvements to the intersection of Manor Drive and Crossover Road to improve safety.
Bobby Babcock, neighbor, said that he was opposed to the development, citing concerns
with traffic, density, and drainage problems that could be caused by the proposal.
Dick Vertz, neighbor, said that Manor drive was a narrow street, without curb or sidewalk,
and said that the development would increase traffic on a street where children and families
walk.
Sue Howarton, neighbor, said that her main concerns was safety. She said that Manor
drive is very narrow, and that a subdivision with small lots and steep grades would likely
become rental property leased to college students, who bring a higher impact than families.
Jay P Greene, neighbor, said that 28' road was too wide and that the intersection with the
narrow Manor Drive would be unattractive. He reminded the Commission that tree
preservation is a primary goal of the City and suggested that the applicant should wait to
develop this property until property to the south is developed, so that a street connection
would be available back to Crossover. He said that profitability for the developer should not
be a consideration for the City. He added that he opposes the tandem lot, as it had no benefit
other than added profit. He said that the Planning Commission should not approved the
development because the proposed street could not be built without permission from
neighboring landowners, which would not be given. He asked that the Commission table the
project to allow the developer time to discuss the project with neighbors.
Tammy Garrish, neighbor, said that was concerned with traffic and safety and that she was
opposed to the development.
Jim Walker, neighbor, said that this neighborhood was very stable, adding that he had lived
in the neighborhood since 1988, and that some of his neighbors had been there since 1966.
He said that the streets had not been improved and were never designed to carry large
traffic volumes. He said that the developer should consider larger lot sizes and a through
connection [to the south.] He said that some neighbors attending the meeting did not intend
to speak and asked those who were opposed to the development to stand.
[10 people in the audience stood]
Planning Commission
June 22,20$
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 9 of 14
No more public comment was presented.
Sarah Bunch, Chair, asked staff for the amount of exiting right-of-way (ROW) on Ridgely
Drive.
Thompson replied that there is 50 feet of ROW.
William Chesser, Commissioner, asked why no improvements to Manor Drive were being
recommended.
Thompson replied that staff felt that improvements to Manor Drive would likely exceed an
amount that would be 'roughly proportional' to the impact this development would cause,
and added that Ridgely drive improvements would be substantial.
Andrew Garner, Planning Director, discussed tests for rough proportionality and the rational
nexus, which limit the amount of infrastructure that can be required. He added that a
subdivision can be denied based on negative impact to safety and traffic.
Chesser asked staff if the developer would be able to grade at the ROW line without
permission from the landowner.
Corey Granderson, Staff Engineer, said that grading was allowed up to the ROW line
without additional permission.
Kit Williams said that the Commission could consider traffic and safety, and should
consider whether the developer can meet code requirements in the real world.
Chesser asked staff if the developer could meet the requirement without grading outside of
the ROW line.
Granderson said that the proposed road section would work, but that it would require
easement to work on the Garrish property. He said that he would be willing to consider
alternative designs.
Chesser asked staff to clarify whehter it would be possible to build the proposed section
without the neighbor's permission.
Granderson said that it would not be possible.
Chesser asked staff to address the tandem lot request.
Thompson replied that there are currently no tandem lots nearby, but that the large lot size
would not be likely to negatively impact property values in the area.
Hoskins asked staff if the road could be constructed within the ROW with a retaining wall.
Granderson said that it would be possible to remain in the ROW if a retaining wall were to
be built.
Thompson noted that retaining walls are not allowed within the ROW unless approved by
the City Engineer.
Planning Commission
June 22,2M
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 10 of 14
Granderson said that this was correct.
Matthew Hoffman, Commissioner, said that he could not find in favor of the tandem lot. He
said that the proposed street section was apparently not buildable. He said that he would
encourage the developer to speak with neighbors and that he hoped a better project would
be the outcome of those conversations.
Bunch said that no one ever wants vacant land around them to be developed, but that this
land had development rights, and added that she would like to see more agreement between
the developer and neighbors.
Appel said that he could provide a design that would work with a retaining wall, and that the
developer had discussed this with the Garrish family.
Bunch asked the Urban Forester to comment on tree removal.
Derek Linn, Urban Forester, said that there were a number of significant trees that would
be removed or damaged for improvements to Ridgely. He said that the code does require
street trees but does not require mitigation for trees in the ROW.
Hoskins asked if the development could be served by private drives rather than public
streets and if this would solve the problem.
Thompson said that private drives are not allowed in a subdivision development.
Garner agreed that this was not an option.
Chesser asked if trees on private property that are damaged as a result of grading within
the ROW would be mitigated for.
Linn said that any trees that were impacted outside of the ROW would be mitigated for.
Chesser asked staff if neighbors have legal recourse if their trees are damaged.
Williams said he preferred not to give an opinion on that now. He added that the roots may
have trespassed into the ROW.
Motion:
Commissioner Chesser made a motion to table CUP 15-5026 until the next Planning
Commission meeting. Commissioner Cook seconded the motion. Upon roll call the
motion passed with a vote of 6-2-0. Commissioners Hoskins and Selby voted "no".
Planning Commission
June 22,2Q115
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 11 of 14
PPL 15-4989: Preliminary Plat (SOUTH OF MANOR & RIDGELY DR./REMINGTON
ESTATES SUBDIVISION, 449): Submitted by ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC. for
property located SOUTH OF MANOR & RIDGELY DR. The property is zoned RSF-4,
RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY, 4 UNITS PER ACRE and contains approximately 12.10
acres. The request is for a 27 lot single-family subdivision.
Quin Thompson, Current Planner, read the staff report.
Motion:
Commissioner Chesser made a motion to table PPL 15-4989 until the next Planning
Commission meeting. Commissioner Cook seconded the motion. Upon roll call the
motion passed with a vote of 6-2-0. Commissioners Hoskins and Selby voted "no".
Planning Commission
June 22,2(L')
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 12 of 14
RZN 15-5075: Rezone (NE CORNER VAN ASCHE & STEELE BLVDS./CMN LOTS 8 &
14, 173): Submitted by CRAFTON TULL ENGINEERS for property located at the NE
CORNER VAN ASCHE & STEELE BLVDS. The property is zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE
COMMERCIAL and contains approximately 17.70 acres. The request is to rezone the
property to C-3, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL.
Quin Thompson, Current Planner, read the staff report.
Thomas Hennelly, applicant, had no additional comments.
No public comment was presented.
William Chesser, Commissioner, said he was excited to see the additional multi-family
projects being planned in this area and added that he hoped the applicant would consider
adding on-street parking with the development as has been planned for the [Uptown]
development to the north.
Motion:
Commissioner Chesser made a motion to forward RZN 15-5075 to City Council with a
recommendation of approval. Commissioner Autry seconded the motion. Upon roll
call the motion passed with a vote of 6-2-0. Commissioners Hoskins and Cook voted
"no".
Planning Commission
June 22,2Q$
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 13 of 14
5. Reports: No reports
6. Announcements: Subdivision Committee meets this Thursday, June 11th, 2015.
7. Adjournment Time: 8:05 PM
8. Submitted by: City Planning Division
Planning Commission
June 22,2(7'6
Agenda Item 1
Minutes 06-08-2015
Page 14 of 14
CITY OF
ayevi le PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO
ARKANSAS
TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission
FROM: Andrew Garner, City Planning Director
MEETING DATE: June 22, 2015
SUBJECT: ADM 15-5110: Administrative Item (1946 N. BIRCH AVE.fTHE
CONTAINER KITCHEN, 367): Submitted by BENJAMIN MILLS for
property located at 1946 N. BIRCH AVE. The property is zoned 1-1, HEAVY
COMMERCIAL & LIGHT INDUSTRIAL and contains approximately 1.55
acres. The request is for a Mobile Vendor Annual Permit.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of ADM 15-5110 with conditions.
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is two parcels under the same ownership located at the southeast corner of
the Poplar and Birch Avenue. The site totals 1.55 acres and is zoned 1-1, Heavy Commercial and
Light Industrial. The Fossil Cove Brewing Company along with several warehouses and parking
lots are located on this site.
The applicant has recently obtained a Mobile Vendor Six Month Permit approved administratively
by City Planning staff on June 11, 2015 and has also submitted an application for a Mobile Vendor
Annual Permit to stay in the same location for one year.-
DISCUSSION:
Request.The applicant requests a Mobile Vendor Annual Permit for location on private property.
The business (a food vendor) will be permitted to operate from June 11, 2015 through June 11,
2016 if this permit is approved. The applicant may then apply for a Six Month Permit or another
Annual Permit year.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of ADM 15-5110, finding that the business meets the minimum
requirements and intent of Chapter 178.04, which states: The purpose [of the ordinance] is to
facilitate and control the ability of mobile vendors and mobile vendor courts to operate on private
property while ensuring such use is compatible with nearby properties, fosters an aesthetically
appealing streetscape and does not create a dangerous traffic condition.
Conditions of Approval:
1. The permit shall be valid for 365 days and allow this business to remain in the proposed
location until June 11, 2016.
Mailing Address: Planning Commission
113 W. Mountain Street www.faefAlOsygov,
Fayetteville, AR 72701 genda Item 2
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 1 of 11
2. In accordance with Federal ADA law and City Code (UDC Section 178.04.D.8),the shipping
container for this vendor does not meet ADA compliance, therefore the general public are
not permitted to access in the interior of the shipping container.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required
Date: June 22, 2015 O Approved O Forwarded O Denied
Motion: Second: Vote:
Notes:
FINDINGS OF THE STAFF
178.04 Outdoor Mobile Vendors Located On Private Property
(A) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to facilitate and control the ability of mobile vendors
and mobile vendor courts to operate on private property while ensuring such use is compatible
with nearby properties, fosters an aesthetically appealing streetscape and does not create a
dangerous traffic condition.
(C) Mobile Vendor Annual Permit- Mobile vendors are allowed to locate for one year in the
same location with approval of the Planning Commission as an administrative item. After the
one year period has expired the mobile vendor may move to another location or may request
a one year renewal from the Planning Commission.
(1) An annual mobile vendor permit may be issued by the Planning Commission after making
the following determinations:
(a) All of the requirements of 178.04(D) have been met. (See attached UDC section)
Finding: The applicant has complied with all requirements of 178.04(D).
(b) The applicant has established that the operation of the mobile vendor will foster an
aesthetically appealing streetscape and will not create a dangerous traffic condition.
Finding: The proposed metal shipping container will be consistent with the surrounding
metal warehouses on property zoned 1-1, Heavy Commercial and Light Industrial.
In staffs opinion, this business can operate without creating a dangerous traffic
condition. The proposed vendor will be located interior to the site with access off
of existing commercial driveways from Birch Avenue and Poplar Avenue which
are both improved, two-lane local streets with limited traffic.
Planning Commission
GAETC\Development Services Review\2015\Development Review 5-5110 ADM 1946 N.Birch Ave June 22,2015
Agenda Item 2
(The Container Kitchen-1 yr outdoor vendor)\03 Planning Commission\06-22-2015\Comments and Redlines
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 2 of 11
(c) The mobile vendor business shall not match or duplicate the primary food or beverage
offerings sold by permanent businesses located upon property immediately adjacent
to and on the same side of the street as the proposed mobile vendor, unless the mobile
vendor predates the aforementioned permanent businesses.
Finding: The business does not match or duplicate offerings of adjacent permanent
businesses.
Planning Commission
ment Services Reviewt20151Develo ment Review\15-5110 ADM 1946 N.Birch Ave June 22,2015
G:\ETC\Development P Agenda Item 2
(The Container Kitchen-1 yr outdoor vendor)\03 Planning CommissionV06-22-20151Commenls and Redlines 15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 3 of 11
UDC Chapter 178.04: Outdoor Mobile Vendors Located On Private Property
(A) Purpose. The purpose of this section is to facilitate and control the ability of mobile vendors
and mobile vendor courts to operate on private property while ensuring such use is compatible
with nearby properties, fosters an aesthetically appealing streetscape and does not create a
dangerous traffic condition.
(B) Mobile Vendor Six Month Permit. Mobile vendors are allowed to operate on a temporary basis
for a maximum of six months in one location during a calendar year with administrative
approval of the Planning Division. Mobile vendors utilizing a six month permit may request to
relocate to a different site at least one quarter mile (1,320 feet) from the original location after
this—six month period has expired. However, a new mobile vendor application shall be
reviewed and approved by the Planning Division for every new location. This permit will expire
six months from the date issued and the mobile vending unit shall be removed from the
property. The mobile vendor owner also has the option of requesting an annual permit from
the Planning Commission at or before the end of their initial six month permit time period.
(1) A six month permit for a mobile vendor business shall be approved and issued
administratively by the Planning Division after making the following determinations:
(a) All of the requirements of 178.04(D) have been met.
(b) The applicant has established that the operation of the mobile vendor will foster an
aesthetically appealing streetscape and will not create or worsen a dangerous traffic
condition.
(c) The mobile vendor business shall not match or duplicate the primary food or beverage
offerings sold by permanent businesses located upon property immediately adjacent
to and on the same side of the street as the proposed mobile vendor, unless the mobile
vendor predates the aforementioned permanent businesses.
(C) Mobile Vendor Annual Permit. Mobile vendors are allowed to locate for one year in the same
location with approval of the Planning Commission as an administrative item. After the one
year period has expired the mobile vendor may move to another location or may request a
one year renewal from the Planning Commission.
(1) An annual mobile vendor permit may be issued by the Planning Commission after making
the following determinations:
(a) All of the requirements of 178.04(D) have been met.
(b) The applicant has established that the operation of the mobile vendor will foster an
aesthetically appealing streetscape and will not create a dangerous traffic condition.
(c) The mobile vendor business shall not match or duplicate the primary food or beverage
offerings sold by permanent businesses located upon property immediately adjacent
to and on the same side of the street as the proposed mobile vendor, unless the mobile
vendor predates the aforementioned permanent businesses.
Planning Commission
G:\ETC\Development services Review\2015\Development Review115-5110 ADM 1946 N.Birch Ave June 22,2015
(The Container Kitchen-1 yr outdoor vendor)\03 Planning Commission\06-22-2015\Comments and Redlines Agenda Item 2
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 4 of 11
(D) Mobile Vendor Permit Requirements. All mobile vendors located on private property with Six
Month or Annual Mobile Vendor Permits shall meet the following requirements and submittals
prior to approval:
(1) Each application for a permit to conduct a mobile vendor business on private property
shall be accompanied by a$100 permit review and processing fee. Mobile vendor permits
shall be issued to the owner of the mobile vendor vehicle.
(2) Application for a permit to conduct a mobile vendor business shall include the following
items in a format acceptable to the Planning Division:
(a) Name, address, contact information and signature of both the property owner and the
mobile vendor requesting to locate on private property.
(b) A valid copy of all necessary permits required by State and County health authorities
which shall be conspicuously displayed at all times during the operation of the
business.
(c) Proof of application for remittance of HMR tax to the City of Fayetteville, when
applicable.
(d) A detailed site plan roughly drawn to scale showing the location of the property lines,
each mobile vendor location, building setback lines, vehicle parking spaces, the
sidewalk location and any proposed dining or sitting areas.
(e) Written authorization, signed by the property owner or legal representative of record,
stating that the mobile vendor is permitted to operate on the subject property for a
specified period of time.
(3) The mobile vendor has the responsibility to dispose of all wastes in accordance with all
applicable laws. Mobile vendors are not permitted to dispose of their trash in public trash
receptacles.
(4) The mobile vendor permit issued shall not be transferable in any manner.
(5) The mobile vendor permit issued shall be conspicuously displayed at all times during the
operation of the mobile vending business.
(6) The proposed use must be a permitted use-by-right within the underlying zoning district.
(7) Mobile vendors shall maintain compliance with parking lot requirements for the existing
business and the proposed mobile vendor business. The number of required parking
spaces is determined by the use and size of the proposed mobile vendor business and by
the use and size of the existing business. The use of parking for a mobile vendor may not
reduce the number of spaces below the minimum required for other uses occurring on the
property. The location of the mobile vendor shall not impede traffic flow or create a
dangerous traffic condition, as determined by Planning Division upon review of the site
plan.
(S) Mobile vendors shall comply with the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
requirements if the public has access to the interior of any mobile vending unit.
Planning Commission
G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2015\Development Review\15-5110 ADM 1946 N. Birch Ave June 22,2015
(The Container Kitchen-1 yr outdoor vendor)\03 Planning Commission\06-22-2015\Comments and Redlines Agenda Item 2
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 5 of 11
BUDGET/STAFF IMPACT:
None
ATTACHMENTS:
• Chapter 178.04
• Request letter
• Menu
• Vendor photograph
• Site Plan
• One Mile Map
• Close Up Map
Planning Commission
WETC\Development Services Review\2015\Development Review\15-5110 ADM 1946 N.Birch Ave June 22,2015
Agenda Item 2
(The Container Kitchen-1 yr outdoor vendor)\03 Planning Commisslon\06-22-2015\Comments and Redlines
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 6 of 11
"The Board"
Business Description
"The Board"will be a mobile vending kitchen providing American Style Tapas at 1946 N. Birch
Ave.This address is also home to Fossil Cove Brewing Co.and will act as the main source of customer
traffic.Fossil Cove has an established tasting room with ample seating,table space, restrooms,parking,
and utilities."The Board" will act as a separate kitchen and business providing food to the customers of
Fossil Cove as well as drive-up customers."The Board" will be a kitchen only with"order"and "pick-up"
windows for service.Customers will place their order and be provided a hand-held vibrating device that
will alert the customer when their order is finished and ready for pick-up.No seperate seating will be
provided by'The Board"at this time.
"The Board"will be housed in a 20 ft.long standard shipping container.The container will be
retrofitted to include a glass store front,windows for natural light,and side entrance for employees.The
inside of the structure will be updated to create a fully functional kitchen with ample room for prep and
storage space as well as operating/cooking space.The container itself is mobile and can be moved as
easily as a trailer by means of a flat bed truck and winch.This process is the same for delivery of an
empty container from the supplier to the site.
This style of mobile restaurant has been successfully utilized in other parts of the country.The
use of surplus shipping containers in innovative ways is a growing trend across the country. We believe
this will a great addition to the Fayetteville mobile vending scene. For an example of a currently
operating container kitchen please fallow this link.
http://containerrestaurant.com/
Thank you very much for your consideration and time.
Benjamin M' , Co-owner
Mitchell Owen,Co-owner
Planning Commission
June 22,2015
Agenda Item 2
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 7 of 11
The Container Kitchen Menu
Beef Brat
100%Beef Brat with Spicy Stone Ground Mustard, Bavarian Sweet Mustard,and House Yellow Mustard.
Served With Sauerkraut
Scandinavian Slider
100%Pure Beef,Sliced Beet,Juniper Mayo,Tomato
Classic Slider
100%Pure Beef, Mayonnaise, Lettuce,Tomato
Cheesy Polente Fries
Pan Fried Polenta Served With Garlic Lemon Noll
Pretzel Sticks
Fresh Baked Pretzels Topped With Salt Served With Spicy House Mustard
Planning Commission
June 22,2015
Agenda Item 2
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 8 of 11
-ice-•• . :.. ._. .
a
y
AFI
r II
i
M1v I
`M
r
1
1
s Planning Commission
June 22,2015
Agenda Item 2
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 9 of 11
[I A
.519
y .F
._. .`4 397
! I
397
v ^r,
7945 r .. r •�. ' `� -
1925
397 397
K 397
y' 1918 1 iB2q�
397
w
-40
r
-planning ommiss on
June 22,2015
Agenda Item 2
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 10 of 11
ADM15-5110 THE CONTAINER KITCHEN
Close Up View
�h INWA
-
'All
}
i '-,� . �.' -• j PEAR ST w
: l I
:.
1SUBJECT PROPERTY -. 74�
POPLAR ST
i
S
a
s
U
0:
11
ASH ST IS
Legend ASH ST
- 'Shared-Use Paved Trail a
Rte"
!Neighborhood/Park Trail RSF-4
Natural Surface Trail
LIU DM 15-5110
Fayetteville City Li its
— Footprints 2010
- Hillside-Hilltop Overlay District
Design Overlay Di trict
0 75 150 300 450 Soo Planning Commission
------ Planning Area Feet June 22,2015
15-5110 Container Kitchen
Page 11 of 11
CITY OF
ayevi le PLANNING COMMISSION MEMO
ARKANSAS
TO: City of Fayetteville Planning Commission
THRU: Andrew Garner, Planning Director
FROM: Quin Thompson, Current Planner
MEETING DATE: June 22, 2015
SUBJECT: CCP 15-5085: Concurrent Plat (5648 JESS ANDERSON
RD./NOTTENKAMPER, 3581359): Submitted by JORGENSEN &
ASSOCIATES for property located at 5648 JESS ANDERSON RD. The
property is in the FAYETTEVILLE PLANNING AREA and contains
approximately 16.74 acres. The request is to subdivide 2 existing lots into
4 single lots containing approximately 4.42, 4.07, 4.14, and 4.11 acres
each.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends forwarding PPL 15-5085 with conditions of approval.
BACKGROUND:
This property is located north of Jess Anderson Road within the City of Fayetteville One Mile
Planning Area. The property contains two lots in unincorporated Washington County and totaling
16.74 acres. The property has exceeded the allowed number of lot splits and must be processed
as subdivision, in this case a Concurrent Plat as no infrastructure improvements are required.
The surrounding zoning and land uses are depicted in Table 1.
Table 1 -Surroun ing zoning and Land Use
Direction Land Use Zoning
from Site
North Undeveloped/Agricultural Unincorporated Washington Count
South Single-family/Agricultural Unincorporated Washington Count
East Undeveloped/Agricultural Unincorporated Washington Count
West Undeveloped/Agricultural Unincorporated Washington Count
Proposal: The applicant proposes a residential subdivision containing 4 single family lots, each
containing more than 4 acres.
Water and Sewer System: The property is served by an 8" water line on the property frontage
along Jess Anderson Road. Public Sewer service is not available to the lots.
Adjacent Master Street Plan Streets: Jess Anderson road is a partially improved, paved 2 lane
road and Master Street Plan designated 'Collector' street.
Right-of-way to be dedicated: Existing right-of-way (ROW) for Jess Anderson Road is
approximately 60' (35' from centerline); no dedication is required. The site is bisected by the
Mailing Address: Planning Commission
113 W Mountain Street wwwfayet*' I92a? b�
Fayetteville, AR 72701 Agenda IN 3
15-5085 ottenkamper
Page 1 of 8
planned extension of 5411 Street (Collector Street). However, because of the limited number of
new lots being created, ROW dedication is not warranted.
Access and connectivity: The subdivision is accessed by Jess Anderson Road, a Master Street
Plan 'Collector' street.
Street Improvements: In recent years, the applicant has improved 1,320 feet of Jess Anderson
Road from gravel to paved street with curb and gutter on one side, including approximately 800
feet of sidewalk on this county road. Staff does not recommend any additional improvements or
ROW dedication given the small number of lots being created and substantial improvements
previously completed by this applicant/owner.
Tree Preservation: The property is outside of the Fayetteville city limit; tree preservation is not
assessed.
Parks:The property is outside of the Fayetteville city limit; Parks fees are not assessed.
Public Comment: Staff has received no public comment.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of CCP 15-5085 with the following
conditions:
Conditions of Approval:
1. Planning Commission determination of street improvements. Staff recommends no
improvements be made at this time, due to the minimal impact of two additional lots and given
the large amount of improvements that have been done to Jess Anderson Road by the
applicant.
SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE RECOMMENDED IN FAVOR.
Standard conditions of approval:
2. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the
applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives: AR Western Gas,
SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications).
Planning Commission Action: O Approved Q Forwarded O Denied
Meeting Date: June 22, 2015
Motion:
Second:
Vote:
Planning Commission
G:\ETC\Development Services Review\2015\Development Review115-5085 CCP 5648 Jess June 22,2015
Anderson Rd.(Nottenkamper)\03 Planning Commission\06-22-2015\Comments and Redlines Agenda Item 3
15-5085 Nottenkamper
Page 2 of 8