The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2008-11-03 - Agendas T P�T• � e �+ 1 � le TENTATIVE ARKANSAS THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 113 W.Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone:(479)575-8267 AGENDA FOR A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MONDAY,NOVEMBER 3,2008,at 3:45 p.m. Room 326,City Administration Building The following items will be considered: 1. Approval of the minutes from the October 6,2008 meeting. New Business: 2. BOA 08-3140(LAKEWOOD/TIM COOPER, 137): Submitted by LAKEWOOD HOMES LLC for property located at 2620 E. RANDAL PLACE,LOT 83 IN THE REPLAT OF THE LAKEWOOD SUBDIVISION. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT and contains approximately 0.10 acres. The request is for reduced setbacks for a new residence. Planner: Jesse Fulcher All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the office of City Planning(479-575-8267), 125 West Mountain Street,Fayetteville,Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. interpreters or TDD for hearing impaired are available for all public hearings;72 hour notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter,please call 479-575-8330. ORDER OF BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING A. Introduction of agenda item—Chairman B. Presentation of Staff Report C. Presentation of request—Applicant D. Public Comment E. Response by Applicant/Questions & Answer with Board F. Action of the Board of Adjustment (Discussion & Vote) NOTE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE If you wish to address the Board of Adjustment on an agenda item raise your hand when the Chairman asks for public comment. He will do this after he has given Board members the opportunity to speak and before a final vote is taken. Public comment will only be permitted during this part of the hearing for each item. Once the Chairman recognizes you, go to the podium at the front of the room and give your name and address. Address your comments to the Chairman, who is the presiding officer. He will direct them to the appropriate appointed official, staff member or others for response. Please keep your comments brief, to the point, and relevant to the agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak. Please, as a matter of courtesy, refrain from applauding or booing any speakers or actions of the Board of Adjustment. 2008 Board of Adjustment Members Robert Kohler (Chairman) Sheree Alt William Chesser James Zant Robert Nickle Mark Waller Steven Bandy MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT A regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment was held on October 06, 2008 at 3:45 p.m. in Room 326 of the City Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas. ITEMS DISCUSSED ACTION TAKEN BOA 08-3111 (MCCARTY/ROCKCLIFF, 450) Tabled Page 2 BOA 08-3112 (MCGOWAN, 365) Approved Page 4 BOA 08-3113 (HOGGATT/ARCHER ST., 442) Approved Page 5 BOA 08-3114 (LOLLEY/HILL AVE., 522) Tabled Page 6 BOA 08-3115 (DICKSON ST. INN, 484) Approved Page 8 MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Robert Kohler Sherrie Alt James Zant William Chesser Bob Nickle Mark Waller Steven Bandy STAFF PRESENT STAFF ABSENT Jesse Fulcher Andrew Garner Dara Sanders David Whitaker Board of Adjustment Chair Bob Kohler called the meeting to order. November 3,2008 Boald of Adjustment BOA minutes for Approval 10-06-08 Agenda Item 1 Page 1 of 8 Approval of the September 02, 2008 Board of Adjustment meeting minutes. Motion: Board Member Nickle made a motion to approve the minutes from the September 02, 2008 BOA Meeting. Board Member Zant seconded the motion. Upon roll call, the motion passed with a vote of 6-0-0. New Business: BOA 08-3111 (MCCARTY / ROCKCLIFF, 450): Submitted by BLEW & ASSOCIATES for property located at 587 N. ROCKCLIFF ROAD. The property is zoned RSF-4, SINGLE FAMILY - 4 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 0.34 acres. The request is for reduced front and rear setbacks to allow for a new deck and an enclosed porch. Andrew Garner, Senior Planner, gave the staff report, recommending denial of the variance requests to construct a new deck and covered porch on the front and rear of the home within the building setbacks and in a utility easement, based on the findings included in the staff report that there is no hardship or deprivation of rights and that if the applicant is concerned with safety they could install a safety rail or fence in the setback. Board Member Zant asked staff if there were other options to construct the proposed additions. Garner responded that there are other options on the site to construct additions as there is plenty of room in the front yard for a front porch or addition. Board Member Kohler discussed that due to the steep terrain there is a potential safety hazard on the site, and also discussed that the location of this house and other structures in this neighborhood is variable due to the steep topography, variety of lot sizes and shapes. Kohler discussed that the only access to the front door was along the sidewalk next to a steep slope. Board Member Waller discussed that there is also access into the house from the garage. Kohler discussed that the covered porch on the rear of the house would not be visible at all to the north. Board Member Chesser asked how much space was between the existing sidewalk next to the house and the building setback. Michael Sebo (applicant) answered approximately 3-4 feet from the sidewalk to the setback. November 3,2008 Boa2d of Adjustment BOA minutes for Approval 10-06-08 Agenda Item 1 Page 2 of 8 Jack McCarty (applicant) discussed that plantings in the front would screen the deck. Yes they could put up a safety railing but it wouldn't look as nice. Kohler discussed that the Board is looking for a hardship, it can't be just an aesthetic or design issue. Sebo (applicant) discussed that improved livability is the main reason for the variance. No public comment was presented. Zant discussed that a deck could be built without a variance. Chesser discussed that if the deck was below 30 inches then it may be allowed to go into the setback, other factors and other options can be done. Staff and board members discussed the ordinance requirement for the height of the deck, railings, and fences. Zant asked the applicant if they would be willing to work with staff on other options for the development. Sebo (applicant) responded that yes they would like to work with staff. Motion: Board Member Zant made a motion to table indefinitely the requested variances. Board Member Chesser seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion was approved with a vote of 6-0-0. November 3,2008 Boa3d of Adjustment BOA minutes for Approval 10-06-08 Agenda Item 1 Page 3 of 8 BOA 08-3112 (MCGOWAN, 365): Submitted by BATES & ASSOCIATES for property located at 1754 N. JANICE AVENUE. The property is zoned RSF-4, SINGLE FAMILY - 4 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 0.36 acres. The request is for a variance from lot area requirements for a new lot, and to bring an existing single family home into compliance. Dara Sanders, Current planner, gave the staff report, recommending approval of the variance requests for the existing nonconforming structure and the proposed Lot B, based on the findings included in the staff report. Board Member Kohler asked staff about the determining factors for the location of the proposed property line between Lots A and B. Sanders explained that the location of the existing home and garage were determining factors in the location, as the structures would meet the side setback requirements with the current location of the property line. Board Member Waller, the applicant, Derrick Thomas, and staff discussed the buildable lot area for Lot B. No public comment was received. Motion: Board Member Nickle made a motion to approve the requested variances with the conditions as recommended by staff. Board Member Chesser seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion was approved with a vote of 5-1-0, with Board Member Waller voting `no'. November 3,2008 Board of Adjustment BOA minutes for Approval 10-06-08 Agenda Item 1 Page 4 of 8 BOA 08-3113 (HOGGATT / ARCHER ST., 442): Submitted by HALLEY H. JR. & CANDACE HOGGATT for property located at 2076 W. ARCHER DRIVE. The property is zoned RSF-4, SINGLE FAMILY - 4 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 0.40 acres. The request is for a front setback variance to bring the existing structure into compliance. Jesse Fulcher, Current Planner, gave the staff report and described the change to the right-of-way for Sang Avenue. The increase in right-of-way from 50' to 70' was initiated by the City with the re-adoption of the Master Street Plan. The house was in compliance with all setbacks prior to the change in right-of-way. Staff recommends approval of the variance request. Board Member Kohler stated that this was a typical request, very straight forward. Board Member Zant stated that nonconforming situation was not an action of the applicant. Halley Hoggatt stated that he just wanted to fix the nonconforming situation. No public comment was received. Motion: Board Member Chesser made a motion to approve the requested variance with the condition as recommended by staff. Board Member Bandy seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion was approved with a vote of 6-0-0. November 3,2008 BoaSd of Adjustment BOA minutes for Approval 10-06-08 Agenda Item 1 Page 5 of 8 BOA 08-3114 (LOLLEY / HILL AVE., 522): Submitted by MIKEL LOLLEY for property located at 20 SOUTH HILL AVENUE. The property is zoned RMF-40, MULTI FAMILY - 40 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 0.66 acres. The request is for a reduced side setback to allow for a new two-car garage. Andrew Garner, Senior Planner, gave the staff report, recommending denial of the side setback variance request to construct a garage within the building setback, based on the findings included in the staff report that there is no hardship or deprivation of rights and that there is adequate space on the property to construct a garage outside of the setbacks. Board Member Nickle asked staff about the building height and the additional setback. Garner responded that since the proposed garage is 25 feet in height the typical 8-foot side setback is increased to 13 feet (an additional 1-foot for every foot over 20 feet in height). The applicant is proposing a 1-foot setback. Board Member Kohler asked why the garage was connected and if it was an enclosed breezeway. Board Member Zant asked about the breezeway and whether the garage would meet setbacks if the breezeway were eliminated. Garner responded that the breezeway was approximately 8 feet in length and if the garage were reduced to 20 feet in height and the breezeway eliminated and the garage pushed next to the house it would meet the setbacks requirements. Mikel Lolley (applicant) discussed the reasons why there was a breezeway. He discussed that the existing plumbing, utilities and existing house foundation were practical considerations that were considered when locating the garage. He also discussed that security, convenience, and aesthetics were factors that were considered. Zant stated that no amount of aesthetic issues could be considered and do not account for ample hardship. Lolley (applicant) discussed the history of restoring the existing house and converting it from multi- to single family home. He felt that historic preservation and maintaining the integrity of the existing home were hardships. No public comment was presented. Zant discussed that because there are several options to construct the garage outside of the setbacks it virtually precludes the need for a variance. Lolley (applicant) discussed the option of purchasing adjacent property to the south and moving the property line over. Could they come back and ask for a lesser variance? Kohler answered that you can always ask. November 3,2008 BocW of Adjustment BOA minutes for Approval 10-06-08 Agenda Item 1 Page 6 of 8 Board Member Nickle discussed that he also thought there were other options for the proposed addition on the property. Zant stated that he does not see a hardship. Lolley (applicant) asked about the breezeway being covered/uncovered and if that would make a difference. Kohler responded that would be his personal preference for it to be a detached garage as opposed to a clear addition to the overall home. He discussed his preference for accessory structures having reduced setbacks similar to other communities and how a draft ordinance for reduced setbacks had been stalled for some time at ordinance review committee. Lolley said that he wasn't sure what a hardship was. Kohler discussed that hardship is not about preference, it is related to deprivation of rights of applicants, however, the Board does look at all of the issues including neighbors' opinions. No public comment was presented. Zant asked if the applicant would be willing to work with staff to look at other options for placing the garage on the property. Lolley stated that yes he could do that. Motion: Board Member Zant made a motion to table indefinitely the requested variances. Board Member Chesser seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion was approved with a vote of 6-0-0. November 3,2008 Boatd of Adjustment BOA minutes for A proval 10-06-08 Agenda Item 1 Page 7 of 8 BOA 08-3115 (DICKSON ST. INN, 484): Submitted by YUME RUDZINSKI for property located at 301 W. DICKSON STREET. The property is zoned MSC, MAIN STREET CENTER and contains approximately 0.13 acres. The request is for variances from the required minimum buildable street frontage and front setback. Dara Sanders, Current Planner, gave the staff report, recommending approval of the request, based on the findings included in the staff report. Board Member Kohler discussed with staff the conformance of the proposed addition and the type development pattern that the zoning district means to encourage. Steve Davis, adjacent property owner, stated his support for the request but wanted to state for the record that he had concern with access to his property from the public alley located at the south, runoff during development, and other issues. Motion: Board Member Chesser made a motion to approve the requested variance with the conditions as recommended by staff. Board Member Nickle seconded the motion. Upon roll call the motion was approved with a vote of 6-0-0. All business being concluded, the meeting adjourned at 5:00 PM. November 3,2008 Boa&d of Adjustment BOA minutes for Approval 10-06-08 Agenda Item 1 Page 8 of 8 Tavvee..Te-vlle BOA Meeting of November 03, 2008 ARKANSAS THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 125 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE Telephone:(479)575-8267 TO: Board of Adjustment FROM: Jesse Fulcher, Current Planner THRU: Jeremy Pate, Director of Current Planning DATE: October 23, 2008 BOA 08-3140 (LAKEWOOD/TIM COOPER, 137): Submitted by LAKEWOOD HOMES LLC for property located at 2620 E. RANDAL PLACE, LOT 83 IN THE REPLAT OF THE LAKEWOOD SUBDIVISION. The property is zoned R-PZD, RESIDENTIAL PLANNED ZONING DISTRICT and contains approximately 0.10 acres. The request is for reduced setbacks. Planner: Jesse Fulcher BACKGROUND: Property Description: The subject property is Lot 83 of the re-plat of Lakewood Subdivision, located at the northwest corner of Randal Place and Zion Road. Lakewood Subdivision is a Residential Planned Zoning District that was approved by the Fayetteville City Council on September 20, 2005. The subdivision was approved for a maximum of 89 residential lots with a minimum lot width of 20' and minimum lot area of 3,000 sq. ft. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Direction from Site Land Use Zoning North Single-family R-PZD 05-1599 Lakewood South Single-family R-PZD 06-2190 Woodbury East Undeveloped RMF-24,Residential Multi-family West Single-family R-PZD 05-1599 Lakewood Proposal: The applicant proposes to build a new residential structure on Lot 83. Request: As shown in Table 1, the applicant requests a 4' setback along the south property line (a 6' variance) and a 6' setback along the west property line (a 6' variance) to accommodate the new house. It should be noted that the 10' setback along the south property line and the 12' setback along the west property line are also utility easements. The easements would have to be vacated by Fayetteville City Council and utility companies prior to development. November 3,2008 K.IReports1200800A Reportslll-November 0300A 08-3140(Lakewood Tim Cooper).doc Board of Adjustment BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Cooper Agenda Item 2 Page 1 of 12 Table 1 Variance Request Variance Location Requirement for R-PZD 05-1599 Applicant's Reguest Setback south 10' 4' setback a 6' variance Setback west 12' 6' setback a 6' variance RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of the requested variances based on the findings herein. CITY PLAN 2025 LAND USE PLAN DESIGNATION: City Neighborhood Area FINDINGS: City of Fayetteville Unified Development Code Section 156.02 ZONING REGULATIONS. Certain variances of the zoning regulations may be applied for as follows: A. General Regulations/Application. A variance shall not be granted unless and until an application demonstrates: 1. Special Conditions. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district. Finding: In staffs opinion there are no special conditions or circumstances that exist which are peculiar to the land or structure. The dimensions for Lot 83 were determined by the applicant when the lot was re-platted in 2008. Additionally, the house plan proposed for the lot has also been determined by the applicant. The request for locating a structure within two of the building setbacks is based solely on the desire to utilize a predetermined house plan that is too large for this lot. 2. Deprivation of Rights. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of the zoning regulations. November 3,2008 K.IReports1d0081BOA ReportsUI-November 031BOA 08-3140(Lakewood Tim Cooper).doc Board of Adjustment BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Cooper Agenda Item 2 Page 2 of 12 Finding: Literal interpretation of zoning regulations related to building setbacks would not deprive the applicant of rights enjoyed by other properties in the same district. The lot dimensions and building setbacks were proposed by the applicant when the re-plat for Lakewood Subdivision was processed this year. All of the lots are approximately 34' wide and contain sufficient buildable area for the homes being constructed within this development. 3. Resulting Actions. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant. Finding: The requested variances are a result of the applicant's actions. The proposed house plan could be located on this lot in conformance with all zoning requirements, given the fact that the house is approximately 24' wide and there is approximately 26' between the south setback and the north property line. If it is the applicant' desire to increase the available side yard, as stated in the attached letter, then a narrower house design should be utilized. The applicant has also stated that the proposed residence when placed on Lot 83 in compliance with building setbacks reduces the separation distance from the residence on the adjacent Lot 84 by a distance prohibited by building code. If building code did in fact prohibit the placement of the.home on Lot 83 due to the location of the home on Lot 84, then staff would recommend a narrower house plan, or that the applicant request a modification to the PZD to reduce the setback requirements. However, the home on Lot 84 has not been constructed, and therefore each building could be located in compliance with the zoning standards and building code. requirements. It should be noted that the adopted building code does not prohibit the location of the homes on Lot 83 or Lot 84, as currently proposed. Locating the homes in such close proximity would prohibit openings on the two neighboring walls and require fire-resistance rated walls, but would not prohibit construction altogether. Ultimately, the lot sizes, building designs, building setbacks and the desire to provide standard side yard dimensions are all actions of the applicant that can be altered to allow development of each lot in conformance with the PZD standards for this development. 4. No Special Privileges. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by Zoning, Chapters 160-165, to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district. November 3,2008 K.IRe or&20081BOA Re ortsUI-November 031BOA 08-3140 Board of Adjustment p p (Lakewood Tim Cooper).doc BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Cooper Agenda Item 2 Page 3 of 12 Finding: Granting the requested setback variances would confer special privileges on the applicant given the fact that the need for the variances are a result of the applicants previous actions and current desire to construct a home that is too large for the properly. 5. Nonconforming Uses. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures, or buildings in the same district, and no permitted or nonconforming use of lands, structures, or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for the issuance of a variance. Finding: Existing nonconformities were not considered as a basis of the findings stated in this staff report. Section 156.02 C. Consideration by the Board of Adjustment. 1. Bulk and Area. Applications for variances of bulk and area requirements shall be considered by and may be approved by the Board of Adjustment. 2. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be held. Finding: A public hearing is scheduled for Monday,November 03,2008. 3. Findings. The Board of Adjustment shall make the following findings: a. Minimum Variance. That the reasons set forth in the application justify the granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure. Finding: The requested setback variances are not justified by the reasons set forth in the application. The applicant can still make reasonable use of the lot as platted, while complying with the required setbacks, which were determined by the applicant. b. Harmony with General Purpose. The Board of Adjustment shall farther make a finding that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of Zoning, Chapters 160-165, and will not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Finding: Granting the setback variances would not be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of zoning regulations. The applicant processed a Planned Zoning District application to allow for an unconventional development with smaller lot sizes and building November 3,2008 K.We orts120081BOA Re ortsll]-November 031BOA 08-3140 Board of Adjustment p p (Lakewood Cooper).doc BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Cooper Agenda Item 2 Page 4 of 12 setbacks, all of which were determined by the applicant. Granting the setback variance may be detrimental to the public welfare by allowing the construction of the residential structure within four (4') feet of the right-of-way of Zion Road, a high traffic collector street. Staff originally recommended a minimum 10' building setback from Zion Road right-of-way during the PZD review process, and still recommends a 10' setback be maintained to ensure public safety. The proper course of action for the applicant is to either reduce the size of the house plan, or to request an amendment to the standards of the PZD and to process a vacation request. Also see Findings No. 1, 2, 3, and 3.a. C. Conditions and Safeguards. In granting any variance, the Board of Adjustment may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the zoning regulations. Finding: Staff has recommended denial of the request. d. No Variance Allowed. Under no circumstances shall the Board of Adjustment grant a variance to allow a use not permissible under Zoning in the district involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of the zoning regulations in said district. <Finding: N/A November 3,2008 K.IReportsld0081BOA Reportslll-November 031BOA 08-3140(Lakewood Tim Cooper).docBoard of Adjustment BOA 08-3141)Lakewood/Tim Cooper Agenda Item 2 Page 5 of 12 MMA October 6, 2008 RE: Variance Request, Lot 83 2620 E. Randal Place Lakewood Subdivision, R-PZD 05-1599 City Project No. FPL 06-2261 Herein and attached please find a description of the proposed variance request. Lakewood Subdivision,Lot 83, 2620 E. Randal Place, a variance of both the south and west building setbacks and utility easements. We request a variance of 6' of the south building setback and utility easement(from the existing 10' to proposed 4') and a variance of 6' of the west building setback and utility easement(from the existing 12' to proposed 6'). The proposed residence has two required off-street parking spaces and a building footprint of 1,708 sf, a total SF of 2,346 sf and heated and cooled SF of 1,557 sf. The proposed residence, with the present building setbacks and utility easements, when placed on lot 83 reduces the separation distance to the adjacent lot 84's residence by a distance prohibited by the building code. The placement with the current building setbacks and utility easements also significantly reduces the residence's side yard from those residences already constructed and therefore reduces the comparable marketability of lot 83. Your consideration and approval of this variance request would eliminate the distance separation and marketability problems. November 3,2008 Board of Adjustment BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Cooper Agenda Item 2 Page 6 of 12 October 6, 2008 Chairperson Fayetteville Board of Adjustment c/o Steve Cattaneo Building Safety Division 113 W. Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 RE: Variance Request, Lot#83 2620 E. Randal Place Lakewood Subdivision,R-PZD 05-1599 City Project No. FPL 06-2261 Attached please find application for variance request for 2620 E. Randal Place, lot#83 of the Lakewood subdivision. Per the application checklist,responses to the checklist criteria are as follows: a. Particular to this lot are building setbacks and utility easements on the east, south and west property lines. Due in part to the design of this subdivision consisting of zero lot line residences and the property lines on the north and south not be being parallel,this lot as configured does not allow for the placement of a new residence to match those already constructed. b. Placing the residence within the existing setbacks and easements would cause the new residence to be built closer to (within approx. 3' of)the next adjacent residence. This would be in direct conflict with current building code requirements as well as altering the current design layout standards of the subdivision regarding the side yards of the residences already constructed. c. These conditions exist due to the restrictions that setbacks and easements place on the placement of the new residence and are not the cause of actions by the applicant. d. Granting this variance will provide the applicant the opportunity to continue the uniform design standards granted for this PZD. Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Sincerely, 12 Tim W. Cooper, Owner November 3,2008 Board of Adjustment BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Cooper Agenda Item 2 Page 7 of 12 o E_RANDAL PLACE - < (50'-0" R. 0. W.-ASPHALT PAVING) EXIST.GONG. N CURB 8 GUTTER I C� I w EXIST.&'GONG. U' SIDEWALK 28,90; t Q Z V 4"GONG.W O M F-" < '• ' ALK amN N O W(9 'E,STEPS _ N�j (IF'RREO'D) 1\ ,I C „O \•, EXIST.STORM �V1�C�1 f o N, - DRAINAGE 4`Or F-3I' t f-I �O�JEU 9'-11/2'. O 'I! ';,'(.r,;' ._0.. R.O.W. T`l F`DN`� haS Y'KSF� I 9'-51/21 r '.r`!: . ; II,,��,,��-- ` �rI ' '-0” of�. r'.r r .�:d'r� •1. X.:, A & .B. LOT 84 s u U• r '` ' LIN F 2624 E. i ' .'O� � . 'd, �`.. RO ABOVE RANDAL PLACE b ' 'i 6S1D NEr (1 N) LINE OF {¢w i';�'r'� i :�r;';•`.1':+' ' ' ROOF AB Y/E , : rr`.,,i s ,,., ,,,' 3...,'. ; 'I i r10"oH) OT 83 < ' c'. 1 i 2620 E.. , p F ANDAL z..:. _ dp ` PLACE = d 9'-11/2" 'r'r' •i 23,.'=8' ' 'Ir' x'-71/ ': I Q I a p r t d 9'-111/2' :�r',� '-'.r,.•;;'.: '" N O P-O" :. r :�•i,'' : PR " ED lyj) � ;4' )",U.E. w i C7i' U , '. ; / .rir j;• • ' . LIN F .. RO ABOVE wF .. .. ra H) ALLEY 4'' .' � O' m Or. (20--0"RO.W.ASPHALT PAVING) 4�COA DRIVE LAKEWO D S BD UI MN Footprint SF=1,708 sf 2620 E. R NQL L E Total Sf=2,346 sf Total H/C SF=1,557 sf C-7 (L) LOT #83 SITE PLA SCALE: 1" = 20' November 3,2008 Board of Adjustment BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Cooper Agenda Item 2 Page 8 of 12 3. The coordinates noted on this plat are based on a different bearing system than the line labels. The coordinates am based on Arkansas State Plane Grid North Zone (NAD83) and the line bearings are based on Lakewood Subdivision Final Plat recorded as File 123A-268 In the Circuit Clerk's Office of Washington County, Arkansas. ZONING CRITERIA Owner/ Developer: Surveyor. USE UNIT CHART Zion Place, LLC H2 Engineering, Inc. USE LOTS P.O. Box 4034 2758 Millennium Drive USE UNIT I (CITY-WIDE USES BY RIGHT) 77-89 Fayetteville, AR 72702 Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 443-9744 (479) 263-0556 USE UNIT 2 (CITY-WIDE USES BY CONDITIONAL USE) 77-89 USE T 24 HOME OCCUP TO 77-89 77-89 UNBUILDABLE COMMON AREA 90 Lai #9 I I' ILOT {6 I' I LOT #7 I I� Lot I16 LOT /5 1 I '0t LOT i LOi f II/_ LOT f 3 I� 2 I {�I I I V 11 I I I.Sa5NB NAHWHW CY 112 ioAF FTVILLE; ARI I72704-s r , a r .......... ---------N8i52 A7 W .. ... P 5 1647 VR- ONTIERELM"�4R � � / /5 y i ' UE d B.S.B. 15 1 N 5 V'E- B B S B , Po Nn31 5 0 S8�T y A • 89 N - NE.: 66E9 26 /77 Z,- JS,% y< o R/W 1 58714'08'E $ ri o m103.50 .o 78 p Jrm,; 120.51 N 141 S ._ 88 - I67 h IN O S{ 58T14'O8"E Uj ._. .M E o S8T7408 E -, 2 uSo ` 1" Jxw 7�.. . r t.�Ey S 879,,,- F. 7 ,.. ," v o h rX .. _ , ... ._@-- 1, N Y ,c m N 58T74'08'E ..'. o .SdLZ'14 8'E--. w j • 103.51 - W ... 120.62'00 + S mN' VQG 120.68' %'%� h :N 5 nnimyN b i1Z5O ._ .. ..58 T 1408E 5 /� W Z_- . o N .. „l .. N � '° i l /� a a.. n S57'14'O8"E 5 Hi .. S87`74'OB"E 1~n s" `n�a ;i ,.,•.�. 103.51 0 �n�s n E3120. , /2_U E 6 B Stiff ....S8 _ j; T 14'08'E� o. Oq 68.40' ii 6 �- //✓°�' {, — ;d .. .................... CATION .. .. . r, .- ;/i, ........ 5 PLAT h _. 5 ). Fr..* 5 iCRES& _,._.,,. _,.__Z1 0 N-, .0...A.D .................._,,,,,,,_l_._ ........... ........... .......... ........- ........ . (RIGHT-pE-WAY VARIES) . N 660570.94' ... ..... _. .. ........ . .__.__. .. E. 685522.98' I ., ..... November 3,,. Board of Adju BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim C 765-15621-000 Agenda PHILIP/YARnN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS. LLC I Page E. JOYCE BLVD SIE Bo Q.. I 765-06169000 n.".vroevo BOA08-3140 LAKEWOOD/TIM COOPER Close Up View o� zl �I I SUBJECT PROPERTY J� ZION RD ZION RD 1 N RD �ry ssR is Overview November 3,2008 o:^ 0 37.5 75 150 225 Soo Board of Adjustment Feet CA 08-3140 LakewoodrFim Cooper Agenda Item 2 BOA08-3140 LAKEWOOD/TIM COOPER One Mile View AR CREEK RD EAR CRERY� �KE RD T— "KEVIE N�R 0 LAKE FAYETTEVILLE E RD PRIVATE36� gg"'�mg......... ------- Overview Legend Boundary -------- Subject Property "'_,Planning Area BOAOS-3140 �-�111116 Overiay District Outside City Legend Hillside-Hilltop 0 erlay District 0 0.25 0.5 1 November IJ21 8 ,�t2 Board of AdjL "nt Coo Mli LeS08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Coo er QQUCU 2 Page 11 of 12 November 3,2008 Board of Adjustment BOA 08-3140 Lakewood/Tim Cooper - Agenda Item 2 Page 12 of 12