HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-03-05 - Agendas FAYETTEVILLE
THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS
113 W. Mountain St.
Fayetteville,AR 72701
Telephone:501-575-8264
AGENDA FOR A MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
A regular meeting of the Board of Adjustment will be held Monday, March 5, 200 1, at 3:45 p.m.
in Room I 11 of the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain, Fayetteville, AR, 72701.
The following items will be considered:
Approval of minutes from the meeting of February 5,2001.
1. BA 01-4.00: Variance (Starling,pp 444)was submitted by Greg Starling for property located at
536 Storer Avenue. The property is zoned R-3,High Density Residential and contains
approximately 0.32 acres. The requirement is for a 25' front setback on Douglas Street and an
8'side setback on the south. The request is for a 19.3' front setback(a 57 variance)and a 7.2'
side setback(a 0.8'variancc).
All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and
other pertinent data is open and available for inspection in the Office of City Planning(575-8264), City
Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street,Fayetteville,Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to
review the petitions.
Interpreters or TDD for hearing impaired are available for all public meetings. 72 hour notice is required. For
further information or to request an interpreter,please call Don Bunn at 575-8330.
FAYETTEVILLE
TBE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS
113 W. Mountam St.
Fayetteville,AR 72701
Telephone:(501)575-8264
PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE
TO: Fayetteville Board of Adjustment
FROM: Dawn T. Warrick, Planner
THRU: Tim Conklin, A.I.C.P., City Planner
DATE: March 5, 2001
BA 01-4.00: Variance (Starling, pp 444)was submitted by Greg Starling for property located at
536 Storer Avenue. The property is zoned R-3, High Density Residential and contains
approximately 0.32 acres. The requirement is for a 25' front setback on Douglas Street and an
8'side setback on the south. The request is for a 19.3' front setback(a 57variance) and a 7.2'
side setback(a 0.8'variance).
RECONEMNDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested variances for the existing structure, additions
to the existing structure and for a new detached garage.
Existing house:
Ordinance Requirement Applicant's Request
Front setback(Douglas St.) 25' 19.30' (5.70' v
Side setback(south) 81 7.20' (0.8' va
Proposed garage:
Ordinance Requirement Applicant's Request
Side setback(south) 81 7.20' (0.80' v
Comments:
H.-I USF-RS�COAEvIONID.49WTV?FPORTSTO,413-5-01 Istarling.wpd
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA01-4 Starling
Page 1.1
BACKGROUND:
The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Douglas St. and Storer Ave. It is
approximately one half block east of the U of A campus between Maple and Douglas
Streets. Surrounding uses include University parking lots, a Christian Student Center, a
Catholic Church and small homes. The house immediately south of this structure appears
to be a single family residence. Many small homes in this area appear to have been divided
into multi-family dwellings. The zoning is R-3, high density residential. The streets are
narrow and parking is permitted on at least one side of each street, however there are
sidewalks on at least one side of each street
According to information provided by the applicant (see attached), this house was
originally built in the early 1940's. In 1956, it was sold to the Episcopal Diocese of
Arkansas to serve as a parsonage and a chapel was added to the structure. Since 1988 the
house has been used as a principal residence by the applicants.
The building sits on two 50' wide lots with frontage (25' setbacks) on both Douglas St. and
Storer Ave. Access is also provided from an alley which runs between the subject property
and the University parking lot to the east. The existing structure is currently encroaching
within required setbacks on the north (front) adjacent to Douglas St. and on the south
(side) adjacent to the alley. At this time, the applicant wishes to make additions to the
existing structure as well as add a new detached garage. In order to do this, the current
structure must be in compliance with current zoning requirements,therefore a variance of
0.8' on the south and a variance of 5.7' on the north have been requested. If granted, the
applicant wishes to apply these two variances to the current structure as Well as proposed
building additions.
Proposed additions include a sunroom /dining room and a new porch on the north,
enlarging the existing storage room on the south and building a new detached garage which
would align with the existing southern edge of the house. The new garage would also
require a 0.8' variance if it is located in line with the existing structure. Once the new
garage is constructed,the existing garage will be finished out as additional living space
within the house.
While this structure is larger and on a larger lot than most of those surrounding it, the mix
of housing types and sizes in this area is appropriate and representative of the stated goal
in the City's General Plan 2020 of"neighborhoods containing a mix of different densities,
housing types, and lot sizes."
H.'I UMS)C0A"0NDAWN=0RTS00A 13-5-01 Warling.wpd
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA014 Starling
Page 1.2
SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING
North: Parking lot for St. Thomas Aquinas Church/ Student Center, R-3
South: Single family residence, R-3
East: University parking lot, R-3
West: Christian Student Center, R-3
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Residential
FINDINGS:
§ 156.02 ZONING REGULATIONS.
Certain variances of the zoning regulations may be applied for as follows:
A. General Regulations/Application. A variance shall not be granted unless and
until an application demonstrates:
1. Special Conditions. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are
peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved and which are not applicable
to other lands, structures or buildings in the same district.
Finding: The original structure and early addition were constructed prior to current
zoning regulations. The site itself is relatively flat with no special conditions
or circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure or buildings.
2. Deprivation of Rights. That literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning
regulations would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other
properties in the same district under the terms of the zoning regulations.
Finding: The literal interpretation of the provisions of the zoning regulations would
not permit the proposed additions. As an owner-occupied non-conforming
structure, the house would only be permitted to be expanded or enlarged by
25%. The expansion as well as the new garage (an accessory building)would
have to comply with current setback requirements. (See attached §164.07(H)
- Nonconforming Uses and Structures)
3. Resulting Actions. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result
from the actions of the applicant.
Finding: The original structures were constructed prior to the enactment of the City's
zoning ordinance. This circumstance is not a result of action of the
applicant.
H.'I UMBSICOA"ONDA WNTREPORMB0,413-5-01 Islarling.wpd
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA014 Starling
Page 1.3
4. No Special Privileges. That granting the variance requested will not confer on
the applicant any special privilege that is denied by Zoning, Chapters 160-165, to
other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district.
Finding: These variances will allow the home to be expanded in areas which encroach
current setback requirements. Current zoning provisions will allow for
limited expansion of existing non-conforming structures if they are owner-
occupied residences, however only when the expansion complies with current
setback and area requirements.
5. Nonconforming Uses. No nonconforming use of neighboring lands, structures,
or buildings in the same district, and no permitted or nonconforming use of lands,
structures, or buildings in other districts shall be considered grounds for the
issuance of a variance.
Finding: No non-conforming uses were considered when formulating this report and
recommendation.
§ 156.02 C. Consideration by the Board of Adjustment.
1. Bulk and Area.
Applications for variances of bulk and area requirements shall be considered by
and may be approved by the Board of Adjustment.
2. Public Hearing. A public hearing shall be held.
Finding: A public hearing is scheduled for March 5,2001.
3. Findings. The Board of Adjustment shall make the following findings:
a. Minimum Variance. That the reasons set forth in the application justify the
granting of the variance, and that the variance is the minimum variance that will
make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or structure.
Finding: Variances requested to make the existing structure compliant are the
minimum variances needed. The variance requested for the proposed garage
is only necessary in order to locate the garage in line with the existing
structure. The applicant is requesting this variance in order to align a
walkway between the structures and for the aesthetic quality of having the
new and old structures line up on the south. There is room on the lot to
construct the proposed garage without needing a variance.
H.-�USERStCOA"ONDAWNTUEPOR7"0,413-5-Olislarling.wpd
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA01-4 Starling
Page 1.4
(L) Harmony with General Purpose. The Board of Adjustment shall further make a
finding that the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of Zoning, Chapters 160-165, and will not be injurious to the
neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
Finding: Granting the variances will be in harmony with the general purpose and
intent of City zoning regulations and will not be injurious to the
neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare.
(2.) Reasons set forth in the application justify granting the variance, and that the
variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of
the land, building, or structure.
Finding: Reasons set forth in the application justify granting the variances for the
existing structure and will make possible the reasonable use of the structure.
b. Conditions and Safeguards. In granting any variance, the Board of Adjustment
may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards in conformity with the
zoning regulations.
Finding: N/A
C. No Variance Allowed. Under no circumstances shall the Board of Adjustment
grant a variance to allow a use not permissible under Zoning in the district
involved, or any use expressly or by implication prohibited by the terms of the
zoning regulations in said district.
Finding: N/A
H.I USERS�COAMOAFtD,4WNTRF-PORTS�ROA13-5-01 Istarling.wpd
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA01-4 Starling
Page 1.5
§161.07 DISTRICT R-3 HIGH D. Bulk and Area Regulations.
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL Lot Width Mobile Home 100 ft.
Minimum: Park
A. Purpose. The High Density
Residential District is designated to protect Lot Within a 50 ft.
existing high density multifamily Mobile Home
development and to encourage additional Park
development of this type where it is OneFamily 60 ft.
desirable.
Two Family 60 ft.
B. Uses.
1. Permitted Uses. Three or More 90 ft.
Unit I City-Wide Uses by Right Professional 100 ft.
U 8 Single-Family Dwellings Offices
and Two-FamilyDwelli no Lot Area Mobile Home 3 acres
Minimum: Park
Unit 9 Multi-Family
Dwellings/Medium Density Lot Within a 4200
Unit 10 Multifamily Dwellings-High Mobile Home sq. ft.
Density Park
Row Houses:
2. Uses Permissible on
Appeal to the Planning Commission. Development 10,000
Unit 2 City-Wide Uses by sq. ft.
Conditional Use Permit Individual Lot 2500
Unit 3 Public Protection and Utility sq. ft
Facilities Single Family 6000
Unit 4 Cultural and Recreational sq. ft
Facilities Two Family 6500
Unit 11 Mobile Home Park sq. ft
Unit 25 Professional Offices Three or More 8000
I sq. ft
C. Density. Fraternity or I acre
[Families Per Acre 1 16 to 40 Sorority
Professional
Offices I acre
H.-IUSERStCOAMONU)AWNTJ?EPORTSOO,413-5-011starling.wpd
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA014 Starling
Page 1.6
Land Area Mobile Home 3000 sq. E.Yard Requirements (feet).
Per FRONT SIDE REAR
Dwelling YARD YARD YARD
Unit: Row Houses & 25 8 F2
Apartments: Cross Reference: Variance, Chapter 156.
Two or More 1200 sq. F. Height Regulations. Any
Bedrooms ft. building which exceeds the height of 20 feet
shall be set back from any side boundary
One Bedroom 1000 sq. line an additional distance of one foot for
ft. each foot of height in excess of 20 feet.
No Bedroom 1000 (Code 1991, §160.034; Code 1965, App. A,
sq. ft. Art. 5QV); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-89; Ord.
Fraternity or 500 sq. No. 2320, 4-5-77; Ord. No. 2700, 2-2-81)
Sorority ft., per
resident
H.,I USERS)COA"0AIDAWNTAEPORTYBOA 13-5-01 Istarling-wpd
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA01-4 Starling
Page 1.7
§164.07 NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES.(Excerpted)
A. Intent.
1. Within the districts established by this chapter or amendments that may later be adopted,if
there exist lots, structure,uses of land and structures,and characteristics of use which are lawful before this chapter
was passed or amended,but which would be prohibited,regulated,or restricted under the terms of this chapter or
future amendment,it is the intent of this chapter to permit these nonconforinities to continue until they are removed,
but not to encourage their survival. It is further the intent of this chapter that nonconformities shall not be enlarged
upon, expanded,or extended,nor be used as grounds for adding other structures or uses prohibited elsewhere in the
same district.
2. It is not the intent of this section to prohibit the improvement of nonconforming residences by
adding bath facilities or connecting to utilities as long as the bulk and area requirements of the R-3 District are met
3. Nonconforming uses are declared by this chapter to be incompatible with permitted uses in the '
districts involved.
4. A nonconforming use of a structure,a nonconforming use of land,or a nonconforming use of a
structure and land in combination shall not be extended or enlarged after passage of this chapter by the addition of
other uses of a nature which would be prohibited generally in the district involved.
(Code 1991, §160.135;Code 1965,App.A,Art 4(l);Ord.No. 1747,6-29-70;Ord.No. 1918,5-15-83;Ord.No.
2126,7-14-75)
D. Nonconforming structures. Where a lawful structure exists at the effective date of adoption or
amendment of this chapter that could not be built under the terms of this chapter by reason of restriction on areas,
lot coverage,height,yards,its location in the lot,or other requirements conceming the structure,such structure may
be continued so long as it remains otherwise lawful,subject to the following provisions:
1.No such nonconforming structure may be enlarged or altered in a way which increases its
nonconformity but any structure or portion thereof may be altered to decrease its nonconfonnity,provided,the
following structures may be enlarged or altered as hereinafter provided:
a. Nonconforming residential structures may be enlarged or altered by increasing the
height of said structures.
b. Caiports in residential zones may extend into the required yard setbacks if: the
carport is set back at least ten feet from the street right-of-way;the carport is set back at least five feet from any
interior side property line;the carport is set back at least ten feet from the rear property line;the area below the roof
is open on the sides; and the carport does not nmterially obstruct vision.
c. In residential zones,detachable awnings which are not structurally a part of the
building may be erected in any required front yard or rear yard if the awning does not project more than six feet.
Detachable awnings which are not structurally a part of the building and which project no more than four feet may
be erected in any required interior side yard.
d. hi residential zones,porch roofs and open porches may extend into required yards by
one foot on each side of the entry door to a maximurn depth of six feet in required front yards and rear yards and to
a maximum depth of four feet in required interior side yards.
2. Should such nonconforming structure or nonconforming portion of structure be destroyed by
any means to an extent of more than 50%of its replacement cost at time of destruction,it shall not be reconstructed
except in conformity with the provisions of this chapter.
H.'I USERSACOMOONDAWNYTEPORMBOA 13-5-01 Istarling.vpd
Board ofAdjustnient
March 5, 2001
BA01-4 Starling
Page 1.8
3. Should such structure be moved for any reason for any distance whatever,it shall thereafter
conform to the regulations for the district in which it is located after it is moved.
(Code 1991,§160.138; Code 1965,App.A,All. 4(4);Ord.No. 1747,6-29-70;Ord.No. 3130, 10-1-85)
E. Nonconforming Uses of Structures or of Structures and Premises in Combination. If lawful use
involving individual structures with a replacement cost of$1,000 or more,or of structure and premises in
combination,exists at the effective date of adoption or amendment of this chapter,that would not be allowed in the
district under the terms of this chapter the lawful use may be continued as long as it remains otherwise lawful,
subject to the following provisions:
1. No existing structure devoted to a use not permitted by this chapter in the district in which it is
located shall be enlarged,extended, constructed,reconstructed,moved or structurally altered except in changing the
use of the structure to a use permitted in the district in which it is located or as required by other ordinances;
2.Any nonconforming use may be extended throughout any parts of building which were
manifestly arranged or designed for such use at the time of adoption or amendment of this chapter,but no such use
shall be extended to occupy any land outside such building.
3.If no structural alterations are made,any nonconforming use of a structure,or structure and
premises,may as a conditional use be changed to another nonconforining use provided that the Planning
Commission, either by general rule or by making findings in the specific case, shall find that the proposed use is
equally appropriate or more appropriate to the district that the existing nonconforming use. In permitting such
change,the Planning Commission may require appropriate conditions and safeguards in accord with the provisions
of this chapter.
4. Any structure,or structure and land in combination,hi or on which a nonconforming use is
superseded by a permitted use,shall thereafter conform to the regulations for the district,and the nonconforming
use may not thereafter be resumed;
5. When a nonconforming use of a structure,or structure and premises in combination,is
discontinued or abandoned for six consecutive months or for 18 months during any three-year period(except where
government action impedes access to the premises),the structure or structure and premises in combination,shall not
thereafter be used except in conformity with the regulations of the district in which it is located;
6. Where nonconforming use status applies to a structure and premises in combination,removal
or destruction of the structure shall eliminate the nonconforming status of the land. Destruction for the purpose of
this division is defined as damage to an extent of more than 50%(or other figure)of the replacement cost of time of
destruction;
7. All outdoor advertising signs(billboards)not conforming with the provisions of this chapter
shall be removed within the period prescribed by§174.06.
(Code 1991, §160.139; Code 1965,App.A,Art. 4(5);Ord.No. 1747,6-29-70;Ord.No. 1806,7-19-71;Ord.No.
2126,7-15-75)
F. Repairs and Maintenance.
1. On any nonconforming structure or portion of a structure containing a nonconforming use,
work may be done in any period of 12 consecutive months on ordinary repairs,or on repair or replacement of non-
H.'I USERSICOA"ONDAWNYWEPORMOA 13-5-01 Islarling.wpd
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BAOI-4Starling
Page 1.9
bearing walls,fixtures,wiring,or plumbing,to an extent not exceeding 10%of the current replacement cost of the
nonconforming structure or nonconforming portion of the structure as the case may be,provided that the cubic
content existing when it became nonconforming shall not be increased.
2. If a nonconforming structure or portion of a structure containing a nonconforming use becomes
physically unsafe,or unlawful due to lack or repairs and maintenance,and is declared by any duly authorized
official to be unsafe or unlawful by reason of physical condition,it shall not thereafter be restored,repaired,or
rebuilt except in conformity with the regulations of the district in which it is located or as required by other
ordinances.
(Code 1991,§160.140;Code 1965,App.A,Art.4(6);Ord.No. 1747,6-29-70)
H. Ownet-oc�upiedNoneoRfonning,#esidences.,Ni�twithstan,"g any otber —Ibi
subclitipter,any own ccupiqdriouponfo iderice,y4*eMa�ged�extended;"�op�tri�ctedT=nstracteo,
Or stmcmraflY Wtqr#d to permit expansion up,fkq5%of the square fbotqge�qf the stin�s it�existcd on the date it
became noncorifibbuirig,and Wstci' so beJo '§d
TarYacces qstru cat,, onpropiert where, owncr-k ed
rich,co*rming residelhee is located, ectlqlhe followihoonditions-�, Ajarowner-occupod�;iqnconfbrmin
resldelncc�, exp ed orgury accessory structure'so located may be enlqW,exteAded,�,bqns"9t"coIi"jqtbd'
structurally altered,c��Alocated in comb w tk ebulk'a"earegula yar4re d b q�ng
I I,, ruuty ,i q*&p im oil
aFea�req ments inthe R-1,low dekoty residenWdistrict
(Code 1991, §160.42; Code 1965,App.A,Art. 5(8);Ord.No. 1747,6-29-70;Ord.No. 1891, 12-5-72)
H'I USERSkCOAeafONDAWNTU"ORTSOOA 13-5-01 Istarling.wpd
Board of Adjustment
March 5, 2001
BAOI-4 Starling
Page 1.10
0 0
Mr. Larry Perkins, Chair of the Board of Adjustment
City of Fayetteville
Administration Building
113 West Mountain Street
Fayetteville,AR 72701
Dear Mr. Perkins:
We are applying for a variance of the building setback ordinance for additions to our
primary residence at 536 Storer Avenue in Fayetteville.
The original house was built in the early 1940s with its north end at variance with the present-
day building setback ordinance. About 1956,the house was sold to the Episcopal Diocese of
Arkansas as a parsonage for the St. Paul's Church Episcopal Priest. Around 1956,the
Episcopal Diocese added a chapel to the south end of the house to serve as an Episcopal
Student Center for University of Arkansas students. This chapel's south wall was built at
variance with the present building setback ordinance also. After St. Martin's Episcopal
Student Center was built nearby on Maple Street,the chapel was converted to a garage to
serve the parsonage. We bought the house from the Episcopal Diocese in 1988, and it has
been our principal residence ever since.
We now wish to make some additions to the house. The historical building setback
variances described in this application are the main cause for our request for variances to the
building setback ordinances in order to make the additions in an historically and aesthetically
pleasing way. This old part of town typically has lots that are 50'wide and 140' deep. 140
feet in depth is completely adequate, but the 50'width is troublesome for building. In fact
our house at 536 Storer is built on two lots, so the resulting building lot is actually 100'wide.
We also own two other houses in this same block,but they are constructed on single lots.
One of these houses would be at variance with the side setback ordinance and the other is
very close to the side setback limit. Indeed,the newest buildings in the immediate area, St.
Paul's Episcopal Student Center(constructed in the 1960s)and the Presbyterian Student
Center(built in the late 1960s)both appear to be at variance with the present-day building
setback ordinance. I don't cite these examples asjustification for issuance of the requested
variance, but only to show that the neighborhood has special character exemplified by narrow
lots that cause difficult problems for aesthetically pleasing construction.
Our house at 536 Storer is the only one in the 500 block of the street that is occupied by
its owners. We would like to have it continue to serve us as a comfortable domicile that
satisfies most of our needs and wishes. Our proposal is meant to effect that end in an
historically pleasing way. We believe that to construct our additions otherwise would not be
as pleasing as would making them align with the older construction as we have described in
the application.
sincerely yours,
Jackie Starling
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA01-4 Starling
Page 1.11
L $25 personal check(included)
2.Legal Description of Property
Lots Numbered four(4) and five(5) in block numbered one(l) of
Leverett's Third Addition to the City of Fayetteville This
description is from the current survey (excerpted from the
deed).
3. Complete written description of the request
A Brief Description of the Request for Variance:
This request is for a variance of the setback ordinance for
buildings from the street(s) and or adjoining property lines at
536 Storer Avenue. New construction at that address on an
existing house and a new garage behind that house are
proposed. Both constructions would require setback variances.
One request for variance is for a 19.3 ft setback from Douglas
Street on the north side of the existing house. This is for a slight
extension to an already existing room on the house. This house
was built in the early 1940s with the 19.3 ft setback. Also we
request a variance for a 7.2 ft. setback from the property line on
the south side of the house. This is for a 5.1 ft. extension of the
south wall of the original 1940s vintage garage to align with the
south wall of the present garage. The present garage was built
around 1956 as a chapel with a setback of 7.2 ft. rather than 8 ft.
It was converted to a garage after St. Martins Episcopal Student
Center was built in the late 1960s. Lastly, we request a variance
of the same setback on the same south side to build a new three
car garage and have it align with the south wall of the present
garage.
The Present House:
The present main house has 1466.48 sq. ft. of heated space
on the main floor(ground level), 652.52 sq. ft. of unheated
garage and storage space(the original 1940s vintage garage) on
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA 01-4 Starling
Page 1.12
the ground level and 583 sq. ft. of heated space on the second
floor of the house. The house has an unfinished heated
basement of 997 sq. ft.
A More Detailed Description of the Request for Variance:
On the north end of the main house, we propose to add an
extension 9' 3" x 12' 10" of dining room at A on the Lot Plan.
This is labeled New Sun Room on the lot plan. This adds
approximately 118 sq. ft. to that room, but note that the
footprint of the extension extends only 2' 8" beyond the eastern
footprint of the present permanent brick steps. On the opposite
end of the house, the 99 end, at B on the Lot Plan we propose
to enlarge the present storeroom by a 5.F x 14' addition on its
M side. This would put the south wall of the storeroom in
alignment with the south wall of the present garage. About
1956 this south wall of the present garage was built 0.8' outside
the present day required setback of 8'. So, this would be a
setback variance of 0.8' for the new wall extension. The
addition to the storeroom would be 71.4 sq. ft. in area. Between
the Sun Room addition and the storeroom we plan to build a
New Porch at C on the Lot Plan. However, the porch would
not be at variance with the building setback ordinance.
Finally, we propose to build a New Three-Car Garage on the
back of the property at D on the Lot Plan. This garage would
have a footprint 24' x 34' and would contain 816 sq. ft. of heated
garage space on the ground floor and approximately 816 sq. ft.
of heated guest house and hobby space on the second floor. The
east facade of this garage building would be set back from the
alley by 22', but the south wall is proposed to align with the
south wall of the storeroom and old garage mentioned above.
This alignment places the south wall of the new garage 0.8' at
variance with the required 8' setback. This alignment is desired
so that the walkway from the back of the storeroom to the new
garage can be conveniently and aesthetically covered. Once the
new garage is constructed, the storeroom and old garage are
expected to be converted to living space in the main house.
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA014 Starling
Page 1.13
12-————— ——————
F
r!
Uj
-a
<
4 kD
L
75W'EX15TI�HOLSE A] 1 0
STORER AVEN
NMH
LOT FLAN
area .52 acres(h),01)
Pro 1"t Infermotion:
Mr. 4 Mrs. Gree Starling 556 Storer Avenue CADesign I&M,
Foyetteville, Arkonsas DrafUAg Serrim Inc.
556 Storer Avenve NOTM; 2049 Reed Avenue
Fa�ottevjlla, Arkansas i.UMMSOM TO M�C�C�. Sheet Number
Z MrnONNG OF HOUM�LOT�M"�Ma�Y. Springdale, Arkansas 72764 1 of
ACTU&POMMIM�K�M By O�M. Phone (501) 756-2738
1 REFM M SUR�M nU FOR�VM& WMAMM. FAX (501) 927-0016
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BAOI-4 Starling
Page 1.14
00.�
—ALLEf wn
a —————-- ——————
F
ILI
—j
DB0.
Id
100 OV
STOP,ER AVENUE
NMH
...==ztUM LOT PLAN
area = .52 0�60 im.ol)
Project Information;
Mr. Mrs. (Srog 5torling 556 5torer Avenue CADesign
556 Starer Avenue Fayetteville, Arkansas WdtiAg Service, Inc. I/le5/01
NOTr5: 2049 Reed Avenu
Fayetteville, Arkansas M�CWL Springdale, Arkansas B72764 heet Number
Z�V�G HWW ON LOT��FM�m MY.
AMML MSUMM V BE�RW BY O� Pho.. (501) 756-2738
TO SURWY 04�FOR�MM&INFUWA�L FAX (501) 927-0016 1 L
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BAOI-4Starling
Page 1.15
LIN.
CS)_
x
0
49
AC 7.. Ae IF
IN
7N
Its 'Zo 7,
r
A..T
CAPIC,
jj.
CERTIFICATION
DESCRIPTION I hereby certify that I have
Lots Numbered Four (4) and Five (5) in Block Numbered One (1 � this day completed a survey
of Leverett's Third Addition to the City ,of Fayetteville, as described and shown hereon
as designated upon the recorded.'plat of said addition filed and found conditions to. be as
in the office of the Circuit Clerk and Ex-Officlo Recorder Drese ed.
1"oPMaphington County,- -Arkansas.
G. INGW
AR. REGISTRATION NO. 852
Buyers: -4 N. College Avenue
Fayetteville, AR. 72701
Albert Gregory Starling and Jacqueline�V.�.Sta�Aing Ph. : (501 ) 442-4962
Sellers: Episcopal Diocese of Arkansas LEGEN
0 —FOUNDIRON
0 —SET IRON PIN
0 —STONE MARKER
-X-X- — EXISTING FENCE
NAME:
rnT.7hTF.T.T._B
PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING CITY: Fayettevil: Board ofAdjusiment
70 N. College Avenue Suite 15 STATE: A Fa—nsas March 5, 2001
Fayetteville, Arkansas BA014Starling
SCALE! 1 '1=30f Page 1.16
Qs
16�
lb4l
eagle"
NX
I
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BAOI-4 Starling
Page 1.17
BA01 -4 Starling Obse Up
0
El
N-
Subject Variance -
-3 4
Ui
Ell
CD R-3 R-3
J�]
Master Street Plan N
Principal Arterial E
Minor Arterial 90 ' 0 90 180 Feet w
Collector
Historical Collector S
Structures (1998)
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA01-4 Starlzng
Page 1.18
BA01 -4 Starling One Mile Radius
R-2
A4
—R-
R-2"' R-1
2
R71
R-1
<1 R-1 -0
R-31
D P-1
S ubiect Variance
R-
R 3
��RA
ELL
P-11 R-1
R-1
P-1 ICKSO 2
C,
-1 &3 2
11 R-3
P-1 R- R-3
LWU M
P-1 -3
P-1 �-3
N
Master Street Plan
//' Freevmy/Expressway
0.2 0 0.2 0.4 Miles w E
/V Principal Arterial Lmwm%wm���
Minor Arterial S
Collector
Historical Collector
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BA01-4 Starling
Page 1.19
Board ofAdjustment
March 5, 2001
BAOI-4 Starling
Page 1.20
IF AAk ')r E=- -r -r E=- Nf I L- L- E-=
C ty.1 FIt-11-R
Office of City Planning
113 West Mountain
Fayetteville, AR 72701
Phone: 501-575-8264
Fax Number: 501-575-8316
If transmission cannot be read clearly please call back as soon as possible at(501) 575-8263.
THANK YOU
Facsimile Transmission Cover Sheet
Number: 442-5477
ATTN: Fredia
FROM- Ianpt Strain. Senior Planning Clerk
DA TE.- 2-21-01
NUMBER OF PAGES (Including cover sheet) 4
NoTEs: Planning Commission & Board ofAdjustment legal ads
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE CODE OF
ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, THE FOLLOWING PETITIONS HAVE
BEEN SET FOR A HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT IN THE CITY
ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 113 WEST MOUNTAIN STREET, ROOM 111,
FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS, ON MONDAY, MARCH 5, 2001,AT 3:45 P.M.
Approval of minutes from the meeting of February 5,2001.
BA 01-4.00: Variance(Starling,pp 444)was submitted by Greg Starling for property located at 536
Storer Avenue. The property is zoned R-3,High Density Residential and contains approximately 0.32
acres. The requirement is for a 25' front setback on Douglas Street and an 8'side setback on the south.
The request is for a 19.3' front setback(a 57 variance)and a 7.2' side setback(a 0.8'variance).
All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed
amendments and other pertinent data is open and available for inspection in the Office of City
Planning (575-8264), City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville,
Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions.
Interpreters or TDD for hearing impaired are available for all public meetings. 72 hour notice is
required. For further information or to request an interpreter, please call Don Bunn at 575-8330.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS 21th DAY OF JANUARY 2001
Tim Conklin
Planning Director
113 W. Mountain
Fayetteville,AR 72701
575-8264
"Please run this legal ad Sunday,February 25,2001
P0900-000-3700-001
Contact Janet with questions or comments at 575-8263,Thanks!
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE
AGENDA NOTICE
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Monday, March 5, 2001 - 3:45 p.m.
City Administration Building, Room 111
113 West Mountain
Fayetteville, Arkansas
PUBLIC MEETING - OPEN TO ALL
The following items will be considered:
Approval of minutes from the meeting of February 5,2001.
BA 01-4.00: Variance(Starling,pp 444)was submitted by Greg Starling for property located at 536 Storer
Avenue. The property is zoned R-3,High Density Residential and contains approximately 0.32 acres. The
requirement is for a 25' front setback on Douglas Street and an 8'side setback on the south. The request is for
a 19.3' front setback(a 5.7'variance)and a 7.2' side setback(a 0.8'variance).
All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and other
pertinent data is open and available for inspection in the Office of City Planning(575-8264),City Administration
Building, 113 West Mountain Street,Fayetteville,Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions.
Interpreters or TDD for hearing impaired are available for all public meetings. 72 hour notice is required. For further
information or to request an interpreter,please call Don Bunn at 575-8330.
**Doug - Please run this display ad Sunday, March 4, 2001**
PO#00-000-3700-001 "Proof Requested"
Contact Janet with questions or comments at 576-8263 fax#575-8316. Thanks!