The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2002-04-22 - Agendas - Final AGENDA FOR A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission will be held Monday,April 22,2002 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street,Room 219, Fayetteville,Arkansas. The following items will be considered: Approval of min Utes from the March 25, 2002 meeting. Old Business: A. Appointment of Planning Commission subcommittee for the review of a Planned Zoning District Ordinance B. Officer Elections New Business: 1. FPL 02-4.00: Final Plat(Pine Valley Phase V, pp 363) was submitted by Al Harris of Crafton, Tull &Associates on behalf of BMP Development for property located at 2726- 2840 Wildwood Drive. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 5 acres with 6 lots proposed. 2. FPL 02-5.00: Final Plat(McMillan Estates, pp 441)was submitted by Steve Hesse of Engineering Design Associates on behalf of TFJ Nominee Trust for property located at the southeast corner of Wedington Drive and Futrall Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 27.48 acres with 10 lots proposed. 3. LSD 02-11.00: Large Scale Development(Guido's,pp 401)was submitted by Mike Anderson on behalf of Engineering Design Associates on behalf of Mark Bariola for property located on Steamboat Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 1.023 acres with a 4,275 sq.ft. restaurant proposed. 4. CUP 02-13.00: Conditional Use (Guido's, pp 401)was submitted by Mike Anderson of Engineering Design Associates on behalf of Mark Bariola for property located at 1290 Steamboat Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 1.023 acres. The request is to allow 14 additional parking spaces for a proposed 4,275 sq.ft. restaurant. H.WERSICOAafONIPLANNING12002 AGENDAIPCI4-22-02.DOC 5. PPL 02-5.00: Preliminary Plat(Lot 17, CMN Business Park II, ph II,pp 173/174) was submitted by Christopher Rogers,P.E. of CEI Engineering Associates on behalf of Marjorie Brooks and Nanchar, Inc. for property located between Mall Avenue and 71B and north of Fulbright Expressway. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 21.55 acres with 5 lots proposed. 6. CUP 02-12.00: Conditional Use(Hatcher, pp 406)was submitted by Rudy Hatcher for property located on the north side of Lawson and east of Gregg Street. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 0.44 acres. The request is for a duplex in the R-1, Low Density Residential zoning district. 7. RZN 02-10.00: Rezoning (Mid-America,pp 251)was submitted by Richard Grubbs on behalf of Mid-America Management Company for property located in the 100 Block of Appleby Road, west of Northwest Nursing Center. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural and contains approximately 0.14 acres. The request is to rezone to R-O, Residential Office. 8. RZN 02-9.00: Rezoning(Archer,pp 481) was submitted by Julian&Jane Archer for property located at 2231 Markham Road. The property is zoned R-1,Low Density Residential and contains approximately 18.80 acres. The request is to rezone to A-1, Agricultural. 9. RZN 02-12.00: Rezoning(Archer,pp 481)was submitted by Julian & Jane Archer for property located at 2231 Markham Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 4.10 acres. The request is to rezone to A-1, Agricultural. 10. RZN 02-11.00: Rezoning(City of Fayetteville, pp 834) was submitted by Ray Boudreaux of the City of Fayetteville for property located on South School at Drake Field. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 3 acres. The request is to rezone to 1-1, Heavy Commercial/Light Industrial. 11. Discussion Item: Refunds of Offsite Assessment for Hamstring Creek Basin Force Main. All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the Office of City Planning (575-8264), City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. Interpreters or TDD for hearing impaired are available for all public meetings. 72 hour notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter,please call Hugh Earnest at 575-8330. H.1GSER4ICOMMONIPLANNING12002 AGENDAIP04-22-02.DOC ORDER OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A. Introduction of agenda item- Chairman B. Presentation of request-Applicant C. Public Comment D. Response by Applicant/Questions &Answer with Commission E. Action of Planning Commission(Discussion and vote) NOTE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE If you wish to address the Planning Commission on an agenda item,raise your hand when the Chairman asks for public comment. He will do this after he has given Planning Commission members the opportunity to speak and before a final vote is taken. Public comment will only be permitted during this part of the hearing for each item. Once the Chairman recognizes you, go to the podium at the front of the room and give your name and address. Address your comments to the Chairman, who is the presiding officer. He will direct them to the appropriate appointed official, staff member or others for response. Please keep your comments brief,to the point, and relevant to the agenda item being considered so that everyone has a chance to speak. Please, as a matter of courtesy,refrain from applauding or booing any speakers or actions of the Planning Commission. 2002 Planning Commissioners: Lorel Hoffman Bob Estes Lee Ward Nancy Allen Don Bunch Sharon Hoover Alice Church Loren Shackelford Don Marr FPL 02-5.00 Page I PC Meeting of April 22,2002 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS Pine Valley,Phase IV,FP 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Tim Conklin, City Planner,A.I.C.P. FROM: Sara Edwards,Associate Planner Ron Petrie P.E. , Staff Engineer DATE: April 18,2002 Project: FPL 02-4.00: Final Plat(Pine Valley Phase V, pp 363) was submitted by Al Harris of Crafton, Tull &Associates on behalf of BMP Development for property located at 2726-2840 Wildwood Drive. The property is zoned R-2,Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 5 acres with 6 lots proposed. Findings: This property is located north of the existing Pine Valley Subdivision. The proposed final plat includes lots 1 through 5 to be developed with duplexes and lot 6 to be developed with a four-plex. Staff has spoken with a resident of Pine Valley who is concerned that a four-plex is not consistent with the surrounding duplex development and would like this phase to adopt the same covenants as previous phases. In order to develop lot 6 with two duplexes in place of a four-plex a variance would have to be granted by the Board of Adjustment for a lack of frontage to meet the bulk and area regulations. Recommendation: Approval subject to the conditions listed below. Conditions of Approval: L Planning Commission determination of the request to remove the access easement that provides for shared access between lots. This was requested at the time of Preliminary Plat approval to reduce traffic conflicts. Please see letter from applicant requesting this change. 2. Payment of off-site assessment in the amount of$3,360.00 for improvements to Salem and Shiloh Drives as required at the time of preliminary plat approval. 3. All street lights are required to be installed prior to signing the final plat. Proof of payment by certified check to the electric company for installation and materials with a receipt is required if not installed. 4. Restrictive Covenants shall be submitted prior to signing the final plat that match the previous phases of the Pine Valley Subdivision. 5. Payment of parks fees in the amount$5,250 (14 units @ $375). This was paid on April 4, 2000. Planning Commission April 22,2002 FPL02-4 Pine Valley Ph. V Page 1.1a FPL 02-5.00 Page 2 6. Plat Review and Subdivision comments(to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives -AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) 7. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage, water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s) and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 8. Sidewalk construction in accordance with current standards to include a minimum four foot sidewalk with a six foot greenspace. 9. Prior to signing the final plat the following is required: a. Project Disk with all final revisions b. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by§158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements" to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Final layer of pavement and sidewalks are the only items which may be guaranteed. All completed improvements will be verified by the City Engineering office and shall include monuments, lot stakes, curbs and gutters, storm drainage, culverts and bridges,water supply, sanitary sewer system, and street lights. c. FEMA approved LOMR. Background: The preliminary plat for this subdivision was approved at the November 22, 1999 Planning Commission Meeting. The final plat was reviewed at the March 27,2002 Technical Plat Review and the April 11, 2002 Subdivision Committee Meetings. Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included access to the lots,proposed use for Lot six and the need for covenants. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Large Scale Development"to the full Planning Commission with the conditions as described and the staff notes." Infrastructure: a.) Water. Existing b.) Sanitary Sewer was extended to serve this development. Planning Commission April 22,2002 FPL02-4 Pine Valley Ph. V Page 1.2a FPL 02-5.00 Page 3 c.) Streets. Existing d.) Grading and Drainage. Not applicable for a final plat. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: ves Required Approved Denied Date: Comments: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required Approved Denied Date: The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. By Title Date Planning Commission April 22,2002 FPL02-4 Pine Valley Ph. V Page I.3a Grafton, Tull Associates, Inc. P.O.Box 549 Rogers,AR 72757 479.636.4838 Fax 479.631.6224 www.craftull.com RECEIVED APR 12 2002 April 11, 2002 PLANNING DIV. City of Fayetteville Planning Department 113 West Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 Re: Pine Valley Phase V— Final Plat CTA Project No. 013036-00 Dear Planning Commissions: On behalf of the Owner, Mr. Mark Marquess of BMP Development, Inc., we respectfully request that the common shared access easements, as now shown on the plat, be removed and not made a requirement for this development. The requirement of a having a shared driveway at every other lot corner will restrict the placement of the garages to the center of the duplex. It will be difficult to have garages on each side of the duplex with the street access point being on the opposite corner of the lot. The neighboring duplexes do not have this restriction and most of them have garages constructed on each side of the duplex. We feel that the removal of the shared access easements will not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, /64V4 AI Harris, Project Manager Crafton, Tull &Associates, Inc. (for BMP Development, Inc.) Planning Commission April 22, 2002 A r c h i t e c t s E n g i n e e r s & FPL02-4 Pine Valley Ph. V Page 1.4 FPL02-04.00 PINE VALLEY PH V Close Up View a 0 ° ® o AMA ® IQ p.1 I 0 / o o °o ° o° Ae R-2 // Bin#111, �E -- WIlDWOOD OR � /-1£ MARIOO�\ GLENMEADOW Dj-k, 07 1 XA io T o \o RA Overview Legend Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan FPL02-04.00 '"N-, Planning Area Freeway/Expressway 11 - k cp°000 Overlay District Principal Arterial r Streets _ (City Limits Minor Arterial Existing — „�;;I ON Outside CiCollector Planning Commission '`� --- Planned City •, Historic Collector April 22,2002 L' 0 125 250 500 750 1,000 FPL02-4 Pine Dalley Ph. v Feet Page I.5a -- `1I �' ... tt tltti� �y.1111 ttltn� ' y Ott��tttt'C li ttlt°tt II � II 41%, WHO ..:q ... ■r�ig�pamm;i-nll 1 n■ 7. Ell Mal ............. ........... .\� �J�t i is .♦ �i-�li- 1II Ian■°- JJ•�p�p•-.,tl[; �� - - ,V' ?}7� 7■�_�ttl ��I. � I� � �1'§/N■� i'-� �'�.I,,��I ��t�t�tl u�i� ...�::_._. _ ■c;_ II/t111H1 �(y ��tttl ►�::LE �� GWIIISII��IIe-I,� ��11111 anon .' IIL3Yi11YY7iilbi �.'i' .•.Ilq. [tetta0n[■■I —�..��\I ionnuign�� JtWttiriN tunnn■� �tt.t1��■in�i�■n.� �11/LII11711_I Eli w a_�■t� R�IM . 121111��IIII,�It1�1 ■��'.w,,.IIt��l/i_ � ® I e ■II■ 1191fT1111�'� 111�� i iIV ®��G� �\t® [MANX >■ . ®el.u..l.�rni� �:I,� i �IIIYiiI�`I�'llllli 1111111,,�'1111�:"�.• :':• �:� ,.' • � `,; .Imo nns:l!�.Il�i- I �'.�. �' .S, ■ ;- 11116y4{ �Illllllllllf j:�'��/ : .nom FPL 02-5.00 Page I PC Meeting of April 22, 2002 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS McMillan Estates,FP 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Tim Conklin, City Planner,A.I.C.P. FROM: Sara Edwards,Associate Planner Ron Petrie P.E. , Staff Engineer DATE: April 18,2002 Project: FPL 02-5.00: Final Plat(McMillan Estates,pp 441)was submitted by Steve Hesse of Engineering Design Associates on behalf of TFJ Nominee Trust for property located at the southeast corner of Wedington Drive and Futrall Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 27.48 acres with 10 lots proposed. Findings: The preliminary plat for this property was approved on December 22, 1999. Streets have been constructed and channel work has been completed in the stream to change the boundaries of the floodway and floodplain as approved by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and FEMA. Recommendation: Approval subject to the conditions listed below. Conditions of Approval: 1. Planning Commission approval of the design theme for the subdivision. Please see convents for proposed design theme. 2. The future buildings on Lot 1 will be required to have front facades facing Wedington Drive, Futrall Drive, McMillan Drive, and Marinoni Drive. The future buildings on Lots 3,5, and 7 shall have front facades facing McMillan Drive, Wedington and Futrall Drive. Note 3 on the plat shall be revised to reflect this requirement. 3. Access from McMillan Drive will be prohibited to Lot 8. An access easement shall be provided from McMillan Drive across Lot 9 to Lot 8. This easement shall be added to the plat. 4. Proof of payment for streetlight materials and installation shall be submitted prior to filing the final plat. This shall be submitted in the form of a copy of a certified check made payable to the electric company with a receipt. 5. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives -AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) Planning Commission April 22,2002 FPL02-5 McMillan Estates Page 2.In FPL 02-5.00 Page 2 6. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage,water, sewer, fire protection, streets(public and private), sidewalks, parking lot(s)and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 7. Sidewalk construction in accordance with current standards to include a minimum six foot sidewalk along Marinoni Drive, McMillan Drive and Scissortail Drive and an eight foot asphalt trail. 8. Prior to signing the final plat the following is required: a. Project Disk with all final revisions b. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City (letter of credit, bond, escrow)as required by§158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements"to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Final layer of pavement and sidewalks are the only items which may be guaranteed. All completed improvements will be verified by the City Engineering office and shall include monuments, lot stakes, curbs and gutters, storm drainage, culverts and bridges, water supply; sanitary sewer system, and street lights. c. Proof of payment for street light materials and installation. d. Final LOMR approval by FEMA shall be received. e. Warranty deed dedicating Wedington right of way. Background: The preliminary plat for this subdivision was approved at the December 22, 1999 Planning Commission Meeting. The final plat was reviewed at the March 27, 2002 Technical Plat Review and the April 11, 2002 Subdivision Committee Meetings. Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included access to Lot 8 and future requirements of the building facades. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Large Scale Development to the full Planning Commission subject to all staff comments. Infrastructure: a.) Water. Existing b.) Sanitary Sewer. Existing c.) Streets. Existing Planning Commission April 22,2002 FPL02-5 McMillan Estates Page 2.2a FPL 02-5.00 Page 3 d.) Grading and Drainage. Not applicable for a final plat. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: yes Required Approved Denied Date: Comments: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required Approved Denied Date: The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL",beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. By Title Date Planning Commission April 22,2002 FPL02-5 McMillan Estates Page 2.3a FPL02-05.00 MCMILLAN Close Up View I I j Ra LL 41 � mA ?�Ri VNTGATFDRRq VTI VA Mal : Vim ERB I I ua o > a y 2 1 - rc ......._ 1 1 0 a-z � R, I R.2 A� ♦ �. � ol. / 1 f zl; f - b RA O. 2 o O O R.2 I 00 1 0 Overview Legend Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan FPL02-05.00 Planning Area Freeway/Expressway sn❑ 000g Owflay District Streets 00000 Principal Arterial Existing L icily Limits Minor Arterial Planned l Outside City Collector �; •'•.• Historic Collector Planning Commission 0 125 2w 500 750 1,000 April 22, 2002 --= Feet Ff 02-5 McMillan Estates FPL02-05.00 MCMILLAN One Mile View R2 `3, fi ix'^+ 'j 1 •Y' � _4 4iT�,? V' ' � v6�2 AtN� 09j�.y L y R-t S k�' 4- ° -a' "S� �,'w,_ �- W -7"I'-LaR"'t xc #t R2 q _ R x . � d 1 �ALF'5FYALExG� v..�e.�$/r ST.d 1y411 R"; Rcpt �'fR� I P-,7 i l REAP OR: -44-So �� e_a_ IR.a h-ti 1R-r r g 1 =.vA3sAR sr \4LiALE R t O_tour�x ttys`- ruwsoN ar' A R -; has o$-T a t rrA t~ay' s Rv tr?Rrz R { r Y` Ee G1 1 0 9 { C7 RE R ..... - o3 zi� f - - R-q �R4 6.i_P -� BERkY ST`,1 •ii �; ._ -10o al I a :- -- �'��1��'�Tie•q ••�as•a•IFw R-� 1 S Subject Property t { ft 2 � t o -rfRCHFRl5'R• "R 1� R? l t11itE'ttS1i1{R} v :1 0 'R+t ' 'aENlJ y LR1 A �.a pp��",. -_ --- ,ZEST M PL£.ST g�h' R4'P 1 INN t o0 Rtj "�' Rtg1 0 `+ yHALSELLRD —,.,9- .. "u-"t a hT oda oo R ?�._:: HALSELL RO _. i j+ ..rL. MARKtlAll D .- {... P 1 P-11 j-`2-'� PRAT4.p R'? o d L. o �; oo -.� Y ....._--Oo--_ ...... VA VAT .e}_ M AbQW SF - S tt o t 1 * 6f P4D S t PIRRBIF,4X- o i'' ♦P .p NETnFSH1F.STi _ 1 oR"2 - 2'. 'Y R2 Overview Legend ...._ " Subject Property Boundary Master Street Plan f.y I� FPL02-05.00 '"N_, Planning Area FraewaYIExPresswaY 'I Oveda District Principal Arterial � _ 't, Streets .00000 Y L I City Limits40%,EWMinor Arterial Existing L �� :: Collector Planning Commission '` Planned Historic Collector Outside City ---�±� „ April 22, 2002 I FP02-5 McMillan Estates Page 2.5 Planning Commission April 22, 2002 FPL02-5 McMillan Estates Page 2.6 LSD 02-11.00 Page I PC Meeting of April 22, 2002 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS Guido's Restaurant,LSD 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission Members THRU: Tim Conklin, City Planner,A.I.C.P. FROM: Shelli Rushing,Associate Planner Ron Petrie P.E. , Staff Engineer DATE: April 18,2002 Project: LSD 02-11.00: Large Scale Development(Guido's,pp 401) was submitted by Mike Anderson of Engineering Design Associates on behalf of Mark Bariola for property located on Steamboat Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 1.023 acres with a 4,275 sq. ft. restaurant and 41 parking spaces proposed. Findings: The proposed restaurant will be located within the Design Overlay District and the Wedington Place Addition. The proposed materials are Amarillo White and Monastery Brown E.I.F.S. and Red Sunset and Park Avenue brick. An"eyebrow" arch feature is incorporated above the entrance and windows. There are no existing trees on the site nor within 50 feet of the property line. Cross access is not necessary due to the short length of Steamboat Drive and no access was required for Country Inn and Suites to the south of the property. The applicant is proposing pedestrian access to Country Inn and Suites. An easement plat is not required because no new easements are being proposed. Recommendation: Approval subject to the conditions listed below. Conditions of Approval: 1. Planning Commission determination of compliance with the Commercial Design Standards and Design Overlay District requirements. The design theme for the Wedington Place Addition requires an "eyebrow"arch feature and brick and ELF.S. materials. The elevations indicate compliance with the design theme which includes an arch feature at the front entrance, over the windows, and on the side fagade. 2. Planning Commission approval of a conditional use to allow 41 parking spaces which is 14 spaces over the maximum allowed by ordinance. 3. Approval shall be provided from the adjacent property owners to the south and east of the site to allow a cut slope up to the property line and onto the adjacent property. 4. Plat Review and Subdivision comments (to include written staff comments provided to the applicant or his representative, and all comments from utility representatives - AR Western Gas, SWBT, Ozarks, SWEPCO, Cox Communications) Planning Commission April 22, 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.1 LSD 02-11.00 Page 2 5. Staff approval of final detailed plans, specifications and calculations (where applicable) for grading, drainage,water, sewer, fire protection, streets (public and private), sidewalks,parking lot(s)and tree preservation. The information submitted for the plat review process was reviewed for general concept only. All public improvements are subject to additional review and approval. All improvements shall comply with City's current requirements. 6. Large Scale Development approval shall be valid for one calendar year. 7. Prior to the issuance of a building permit,the following is required: a. Grading and drainage permits. b. Project Disk with all final revisions. c. Completion of all required improvements or the placement of a surety with the City(letter of credit, bond, escrow) as required by §158.01 "Guarantees in Lieu of Installed Improvements"to guarantee all incomplete improvements. Further,all improvements necessary to serve the site and protect public safety must be completed,not just guaranteed, prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Background: The proposed large scale development was reviewed at the March 27, 2002 Technical Plat Review and the April 11, 2002 Subdivision Committee Meeting. Discussion at the Subdivision Committee meeting included Commercial Design Standards. The Subdivision Committee forwarded the Large Scale Development to the full Planning Commission with all staff comments. Infrastructure: a.) Water. Existing b.) Sanitary Sewer is being extended as part of the Country Inn& Suites Development. c.) Streets. Existing d.) Grading and Drainage. A preliminary grading plan and drainage report has been submitted and reviewed for general compliance. A final review and approval will be necessary before construction can begin. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: yes Required Approved Denied Planning Commission April 22, 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.2 LSD 02-11.00 Page 3 Date• Comments: CITY COUNCIL ACTION: Required Approved Denied Date- The "CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL", beginning on page one of this report, are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this development item. By Title Date Planning Commission April 22, 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.3 the primary structure may be solid up to 30 inches in height. Any part of a fence which exceeds 30 inches in height shall not obstruct the view of the primary structure from the right-of-way. 4. Site Coverage.A maximum of 85% of the development site may be covered by the ground floor of any structure, parking lots,sidewalks,and private streets and 2. Construction and drives or any other impermeable surface. appearance design standards for Zoning districts C-3, C-4 and the design commercial structures. overlay district are exempt from this a. A commercial requirement. structure or development shall be designed to avoid or minimize the elements set forth in 5. Driveways. Shared drives D.I. above. and cross access between properties shall be b. A commercial encouraged to developed and undeveloped development which contains more than one properties, except in C-3 and C-4 zones. building should incorporate a recurring, unifying,and identifiable theme for the entire D. Design Elements Guidelines for development site. Commercial Structures. c. A development should provide compatibility and transition 1. The elements to avoid or between adjoining developments. minimize include: a. Unpainted concrete E. Design Review. precision block walls. 1. Submittals The following b. Square "boxlike" drawings, information, and plans shall be structures. submitted to the Planning Commission for c. Metal siding which design review and approval with large scale dominates the main facade. development applications, when applicable; d. Large blank, - or, submitted to the Planning Division for unarticulated wall surfaces. design review and approval with, or prior to, e. Large out of scale building permit applications for non-large signs with flashy colors. scale development. a. Rendered elevation drawing of main facade at 1/16 inch to 1 foot (minimum) scale showing adjoining context and a description of external building materials. b. Proposed land- scaping to be used as screening shall be shown -34- Planning Commission April 2Z 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.4 on the tree preservation plan or site plan. building permits shall be accompanied by plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing: 2. Build Out. Upon approval of a large scale development or issuance of a 1. The actual dimensions and building permit, build-out of the project shall shape of the lot to be built upon, conform to the drawings, information, and plans approved. 2. The exact sizes and a. Amendments to the locations on the lot of buildings already drawings, information and plans shall be existing,if any, and submitted to the Planning Division. Amendments which are determined to be 3. The location and dimensions insignificant or minor may be approved by the of the proposed building or alteration. Planning Division. Significant amendments shall be approved by the Planning 4.The application shall include Commission when approval was given such other information as lawfully may be through the large scale development process required by the City Planner, including: or by the Planning Division when approval a. Existing orproposed was given through the building permit building or alteration, process. b. Existing orproposed b. Amendments shall uses of the building and land, be considered using the same standards as the C. The number of initial design approval. families, housekeeping units, or rental units c. Failure to build-out the building is designed to accommodate, the project according to the approved d. Conditions existing drawings, information and plans or approved on the lot, and amendments thereto shall render the large e. such other matters as scale development approval or the building may be necessary to determine conformance permit approval void. with, and provide for the enforcement of this chapter. Cross Reference: Appeals, Chapter 155. B. Approval/Denial. One copy of the F. Variances. plans shall be returned to the applicant by the City Planner after he shall have marked such Cross Reference: Variances, 156. copy either as approved or disapproved and attested the same by his signature on such (Code 1991,§160.124;Ord.No.4004,§1, 10- copy. The original of the plans, similarly 15-96) marked, shall be delivered to,and retained by the Building Inspector's office. §166.15 APPLICATION FOR BUILDING (Code 1991, §160.191; Code 1965, App. A, PERMIT. Art, 9(2); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-70) A. Application. All applications for C. Expiration of Building Permit. -35- Planning Commission April 22, 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.5 §161.21 DESIGN OYERLMIFY DISTRICT (U.S. 71 HIGHWAY CORRIDOR). C. Application of Overlay District Regulations and Standards.The regulations A. Purpose. The purpose of establishing a Design Overlay District for the U.S. 71 Highway Corridor is as follows: and standards contained herein shall apply to all nonresidential properties, (including but 1. To protect and enhance the not limited to new development, distinctive scenic quality of the U.S. 71 redevelopment and expansions of existing Highway Corridor by providing for development), located within the overlay nonresidential developments which will district boundaries. Such regulations and maximize preservation and enhancement of standards shall be in addition to and shall the natural, rural, and open character of the overlay all other ordinance regulations and terrain and foliage. standards, including but not limited to 2. To address the issues of traffic and safety. nonresidential zoning district and signage regulations and standards. Should the 3. To address environmental regulations and standards of the underlying concerns which include but are not limited to, and overlay districts conflict, the overlay soil erosion,vegetation preservation,drainage district regulations and standards shall control. and heat islands. D. Nonresidential Site Design and 4. To preserve and enhance the Development Standards. economic value and viability of property within and near the overlay district for the 1. Deleted by Ord. No. 4128 U.S. 71 Highway corridor. 2. Green Space. A minimum B. Overlay District Boundaries.The of 25 feet of landscaped green space exclusive overlay district encompasses all lands lying of right-of-way shall be provided along the within 660 feet of each side of the right-of- highway right-of-way and any public street to way of U.S.Highway 71 from the intersection which the development has frontage.Parking of U.S. Highway 71 and State Highway 471 lots shall not encroach into the green space (a/k/a 71 B) north to the city limits of and shall be screened when abutting a required Fayetteville, (a/k/a the 71 Bypass and/or John green space area. Trees shall be planted at the Paul Hammerschmidt Expressway), and also interval of one tree per 30 linear feet of green that portion known as State Highway 471S space area when practicable. described more fully as that portion of State Highway 471 which connects U.S. Highway 3.Deleted by Ord.No. 4128 71 to State Highway 471 (a/k/a North College) and all future extensions of U.S. Highway 71 4.Deleted by Ord No. 4128 within the City of Fayetteville. Said boundaries are set out on the official plat pages along with a legal description of such boundaries located in the planning office. -23- Planning Commission April22,2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.6 i I j 5. Signage. Standing Signs. a. Nonresidential Free Minimum10 .. f� (1). Each sign separate nonresidential lot will be allowed a single ground-mounted (monument) sign — located on the building site. In the case of lots with double frontage, two ground-mounted (monument) signs shall be allowed. Pro71. (2). The sign shall be a maximum of six feet high, 75 6. Curb Cuts. One curb cut square feet in area,and set back a minimum of shall be allowed per 200 feet of frontage.No 10 feet from the property line. curb cuts shall be allowed within 250 feet of any intersection. b. Wall Signs. One wall sign may be installed per business. Sign l area shall not exceed 20%of that wall area or 200 square feet, whichever is less. A second sign may be allowed if it is determined that the structure has more than one front facing a ,,,,r,_„ street or highway right-of-way. 1—, `m. c. Illumination.Only indirect lighting may be used for illumination of all signs. d. Multiple Tenants. � The owner ofthe building shall be responsible for the provision of one monument sign with — : LLI_D sign area for multiple tenants. e. Sign Content. ' ----- "c Content of monument and wall signs shall be limited to the name of the business. Advertising shall not be permitted on the structure, wall sign or monument. 7. Lighting. Parking lot lighting shall be designed and located in such a manner to preserve the scenic appearance of --� the corridor. Lighting shall be shielded and directed downward to the parking lot and light U Ir4 ` i pread shall not reflect into 'the adjacent neighborhood. Lighting shall not exceed 35 feet in height and shall utilize sodium lighting fixtures. -24- Planning Commission April 22, 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.7 8.Deleted by"Urd. No. 4128 lVFOutdoor Storage of Material and Equipment. All outdoor 9. Exterior Appearance.All storage of material and equipment shall be structures shall be architecturally designed to screened with natural vegetation. have front facades facing all street and highway right-of-way. An elevation drawing 15. Access. shall be submitted for each side of the a . Pedestrian . building that faces a street or highway. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the street to the entrance of the structure by way 10. Building Material. of a designated trail or sidewalk. Buildings shall be constructed of wood, b. Multi-Modal. masonry, or natural looking materials. No Multi-modal access may be required on structures shall be allowed that have metal nonresidential sites within the design overlay side walls UNLESS such metal siding is district. (For example: The provision of bus similar in appearance to wood, masonry or stops, bicycle racks, zpa€kring stalls for car natural looking material. pools, and bicycle and pedestrian walks and trails). 11. Site Coverage. 25% of the site shall be left in open space. 80%of the open space shall be landscaped which may Bike Back include ponds and fountains. 12.Deleted by Ord No. 4128 ntnnt 13. Optional Fencing. All fencing shall be constructed of wood, masonry, or natural-looking materials. No — optional fencing shall be located within the green space required by section D.2.No metal fencing shall be allowed except in the following cases: a. Wrought iron sidewalk fencing. Bns stop ' - b. If other types of metal fencing are necessary for security kt n;-n odal A`cess purposes, they may be used if the area is first fenced off with a view-obscuring natural or Pedestrian Sidewalk-Trails natural-looking fencing material. The metal fe cing shall be d inside the view- ob tructing fenc' ;an view-obscuring —4 forcing shall be ay ight of the metal EJ ' fe cing. I U U —4LO iSecurity Pence% L-Aesthesic Pence Cl ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Q -L Parking Lot -4-' —d- Street —7 - Link Different Zones with Trails Planning Commission April 22, 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.8 16.Deleted PYWOrd. No. 4128 VoNothing contained herein shall limit or prohibit property owners from E. Nonresidential Developments utilizing the variance provisions contained in and Multiple Building Sites. In the case of Ordinance No. 3806 .[§161.21 ]. nonresidential development involving multiple building sites, whether on one or (Code 1991, §160.048; Ord. No. 3821, §§ 1, more platted lots, the above described 3--5, 8-9-94; Ord.No. 3806, 6-28-94) regulations shall apply to the development as an entire tract rather than to each platted lot. Cross Reference: Variances, Chapter 156; F. Large Scale Development. All Appeals, Chapter 155. nonresidential development within the design overlay district shall be reviewed through the large scale development procedure and shall meet all those requirements regulating large scale developments regardless of the size of the tract. G. Exemptions. 1. Undeveloped or partially developed lots in nonresidential subdivisions lying within the design overlay district for U.S. 71 Highway corridor which have received preliminary or final approval as nonresidential subdivision prior to June 28, 1994, are hereby exempt from compliance with Ordinance No. 3806 [§161.21]. 2. Owners of lots within nonresidential subdivisions which obtained preliminary or final approval as nonresidential subdivisions prior to June 28, 1994, and not included in the specifically exempted properties may apply for an exemption to the Fayetteville City Planner. The City Planner shall respond to the application in writing within ten working days of the receipt of the application. 3. Completed development upon property subject to such exemption not in compliance with the standards set forth in Ordinance No. 3806 [§161.21] shall be considered pre-existing nonconforming structures. -26- Planning Commission April 22, 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.9 Planning Commission April 22, 2002 LSD02-11 Guido's Page 3.10 FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone:(479)575-8264 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Dawn T. Warrick, Senior Planner THRU: Tim Conklin, A.I.C.P., City Planner DATE: April 13, 2002 CUP 02-13.00: Conditional Use(Guido's, pp 401) was submitted by Mike Anderson of Engineering Design Associates on behalf of Mark Bariola for property located at 1290 Steamboat Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 1.023 acres. The request is to allow 14 additional parking spaces for a proposed 4,275 sq.ft. restaurant. RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff is unable to make a recommendation on this request. Information provided by V-R- applicant does not contain data necessary to determine the appropriateness of this request. Upon receipt of additional supporting documentation from the applicant, should the Planning Commission choose to approve the requested conditional use, the following condition is recommended: 1. Compliance with all conditions of the accompanying large scale development PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES O Approved O Denied Date: April 22, 2002 Comments: The"CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL"listed in this report are accepted in total without exception by the entity requesting approval of this conditional use. Name: Date: H.I USE"COMMOMDAW VYIREPORTSIPC12002_reportslguidos_mp02-13loc Planning Commission April 22, 2002 CUP02-13 Guido's Page 4.1 BACKGROUND: This property is located within the Wedington Place subdivision which is currently being built out. There are several vacant lots, however projects have been approved for a bank, gas station,restaurants,a hotel and an apartment development. This request is in conjunction with a large scale development for Guido's Restaurant. The applicant seeks conditional use approval for 14 parking spaces in excess of the 27 that are permitted by ordinance for this stand alone restaurant containing 4275 s.f. Staff recognizes that many stand alone restaurants are not provided enough parking under current regulations to meet their customer needs. When shared parking opportunities are available,these requests are not generally necessary. With the proposed increase in parking, the applicant still proposes to preserve approximately 39% of the total site in open space. Additional information including specific statements from the applicant regarding the seating capacity of the restaurant, number of employees on a maximum shift,volume of expected customers and the nature of the activities included in this business venture is needed in order to make an informed decision regarding this request. Generally applicants will provide corporate requirements and comparisons when substantiating a request for additional parking. Staff feels that in the absence of this additional information,a recommendation would be ill advised. Conditional use requests require the Planning Commission to make specific findings which must be based on information that only the applicant is able to provide. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North: Senior Apartments, R-2 (under construction) South: Country Inns & Suites, C-2 (under construction) East: Holiday Inn Express, C-2 West: Vacant, C-2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Regional Commercial § 163.02. AUTHORITY;CONDITIONS; PROCEDURES. B. Authority; Conditions. The Planning Commission shall: 1. Hear and decide only such special exemptions as it is specifically authorized to pass on by the terms of this chapter. 2. Decide such questions as are involved in determining whether a conditional use should be granted; and, H.IUSERSICOMMOA'DAWNTtREPORTSIPC12002_repor[slguidos cup02-13ioc Planning Commission April 22, 2002 CUP02-13 Guido's Page 4.2 3. Grant a conditional use with such conditions and safeguards as are appropriate under this chapter; or 4. Deny a conditional use when not in harmony with the purpose and intent of this chapter. C. A conditional use shall not be granted by the Planning Commission unless and until: 1. A written application for a conditional use is submitted indicating the section of this chapter under which the conditional use is sought and stating the grounds on which it is requested. Finding: The applicant has submitted a written application requesting 14 additional parking spaces for the proposed restaurant. 2. The applicant shall pay a filing fee as required under Chapter 159 to cover the cost of expenses incurred in connection with processing such application. Finding: The applicant has paid the required filing fee. 3. The Planning Commission shall make the following written findings before a conditional use shall be issued: (a.) That it is empowered under the section of this chapter described in the application to grant the conditional use; and Finding: The Planning Commission is empowered under§ 172.01(D)(2) to grant the requested conditional use permit. (b.) That the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest. Finding: Additional information from the applicant is necessary in determining this finding. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with City regulations regarding standard parking stall sizes and aisle widths. Required landscaping and greenspace have also been provided. (c.) The Planning Commission shall certify: (l.) Compliance with the specific rules governing individual H.IUSERSICOMMONIDA WVTIREPORTSIPC12002_reportslguidos_mp02-13ioe Planning Commission April 22, 2002 CUP02-13 Guido's Page 4.3 conditional uses; and Finding: The applicant has complied with specific rules governing this individual conditional use request. (2.) That satisfactory provisions and arrangements have been made concerning the following, where applicable: (a.) Ingress and egress to property and proposed structures thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control and access in case of fire or catastrophe; Finding: Ingress and egress have been accommodated and this is shown on the site plan for the accompanying large scale development. (b.) Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to ingress and egress, economic,noise, glare, or odor effects of the special exception on adjoining properties and properties generally in the district; Finding: Parking and loading areas are shown on the accompanying large scale development plan and have been reviewed through the development review cycle. Staff, utility representatives and the Subdivision Committee have seen the proposed site layout. (c.) Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to ingress and egress, and off-street parking and loading, Finding: Appropriate refuse and service areas have been provided. (d.) Utilities,with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility; Finding: Utilities are available to the site and will be extended at the developer's expense. Utility placement and loading needs have been reviewed by utility representatives. (e.) Screening and buffering with reference to type, dimensions, and character; Ki USERSICOMMOMDAWVY REPORTSIPC12002_reporislguidos_cup02-I Moc Planning Commission April 22, 2002 CUP02-13 Guido's Page 4.4