Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-02-12 - Agendas - Final AGENDA FOR A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION A meeting of the Fayetteville Planning Commission will be held February 12,2001 at 5:30 p.m. in the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Room 219, Fayetteville,Arkansas. The following items will be considered: Approval of minutes from the January 22,2001 meetings. New Business: 1. RZ 01-1.00: Rezoning (Dixie Development, pp 175)was submitted by Ben Israel of Dixie Development for property located at 2091 E. Joyce Blvd. The property is zoned A- 1,Agricultural and contains approximately 4.81 acres. The request is to rezone to R-0, Residential Office. 2. RZ 01-2.00: Rezoning(Lindsey, pp 440)was submitted by Dave Jorgensen of Jorgensen&Associates on behalf of J.E. Lindsey Family Limited Partnership for property located South of Chamberland Square and East of Betty Jo Drive to Shiloh Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 18.25 acres. The request is to rezone to R-2, Medium Density Residential. 3. RZ 01-3.00: Rezoning (NOARK Girl Scout Council, pp 175) was submitted by Wes Burgess of Crafton, Tull & Associates on behalf of NOARK Girl Scout Council for property located at Northeast comer of Joyce Street and Park Oaks Drive. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 0.48 acres. The request is to rezone to R-0, Residential Office. 4. AD 01-2.00: Administrative Item (McDonald's Sign, pp 134) The request is to change the sign approved by Planning Commission for McDonald's Large Scale Development located at the NE comer of Joyce Blvd. & Mall Ave. All interested parties may appear and be heard at the public hearings. A copy of the proposed amendments and other pertinent data are open and available for inspection in the Office of City Planning (575-8264), City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain Street, Fayetteville, Arkansas. All interested parties are invited to review the petitions. Interpreters or TDDI for hearing impaired are available for all public meetings. 72 hour notice is required. For further information or to request an interpreter,please call Don Bunn at 575-8330. ORDER OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING A. Introduction of agenda item - Chairman B. Presentation of request -Applicant C. Public Comment D. Response by Applicant/Question& Answer with Commission E. Action of Planning Commission(Discussion and Vote) NOTE TO MEMBERS OF THE AUDIENCE If you wish to address the Planning Commission on an agenda item,raise your hand when the Chairman asks for public comment. He will do this after he has given Planning Commission members the opportunity to speak and before a final vote is taken. Public comment will only be permitted during this part of the hearing for each item. Once the Chairman recognizes you, go to the podium at the front of the room and give your name and address. Address your comments to the Chairman, who is the presiding officer. He will direct them to the appropriate appointed official, staff member or others for response. Please keep your comments brief and to the point so that everyone has a chance to speak. Please, as a matter of courtesy,refrain from applauding or booing any speakers or actions of the Planning Commission. 2000 Planning Commissioners: Conrad Odom - Chairman Nancy Allen Don Bunch Bob Estes Lorel Hoffman Sharon Hoover Don Marr Loren Shackelford Lee Ward FAYETTEVILLE TEE CITY OF FAYETrEVILLE,ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountain St. FayeUeville,AR 72701 Telephone:(501)575-8264 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Dawn T. Warrick, Planner THRU: Tim Conklin, City Planner DATE: February 12, 2001 RZ 01-1.00: Rezoning(Dixie Development, pp 175)was submitted by Ben Israel of Dixie Development for property located at 2091 E. Joyce Blvd. The property is zoned A-1, Agricultural and contains approximately 4.81 acres. The request is to rezone to R-0, Residential Office. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning based on the findings included as part of this report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES 0 Approved 0 Denied Date: February 12, 2001 ....... COUNCM- . ... .... . . ..... ...... ......... Z. ............ ............. H Comments: H.'�USERS1 C OA"ONDA WNYMP OR TSIPC 12-12-011 dixi e.wpd Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZ01-1 Dixie Development Page 1.1 BACKGROUND: This property is currently owned by the Life Change Community Fellowship congregation which is located on site in a single family home which was converted to serve as a church. Butterfield Trail Village is immediately west of the subject property. The six acre tract to the east was rezoned from A-I to R-0 for this developer last spring for the purpose of developing professional offices. A large scale development plan has been approved by the Planning Commission for that site and permits have been issued to begin construction. This area is designated on the City's adopted General Plan 2020 as Residential. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North: Professional offices, R-O/Vacant, R-2 (Currently being considered for R-0 rezoning) South: Vacant, A-I East: Being developed (Professional Offices), R-0 West: Butterfield Trail Village, R-2 INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: This property is located on and will be accessed from Joyce Blvd. which is designated a principal arterial on the City's Master Street Plan. Water& Sewer: Accessible lines along Joyce Blvd. LAND USE PLAN: General Plan 2020 designates this site Residential. Rezoning this property to R-0, Residential Office is consistent with the land use plan and compatible with surrounding land uses in the area. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF I. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: Residential Office zoning allows for single family and two family dwellings as well as for professional offices. This zoning will allow a mix of residential and office uses and is consistent with the land use plan. H.-IUSERSICOA"O"AWN7V"ORTSIPCt2-12-011dixie.wpd Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZ01-1 Dixie Development Page 1.2 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The proposed zoning would extend the previously approved node of office commercial at the-southwest corner of Joyce and Old Nfissouri. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding: The proposed zoning will bring additional traffic to the area, however Joyce Blvd., a principal arterial is designed to carry large volumes of traffic. The intersection of Joyce Blvd. and Old Nfissouri is signalized and Old Mssouri is designated-for improvements between Mad Creek and Joyce Blvd. At the time of development, cross-access between this site and the office development to the west should be considered. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools,water, and sewer facilities. The proposed zoning would not alter population density. Finding. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1)through(4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning -even though there are reasons under b (1)through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A H.,I USERSC0A&f0ND,4WN=0R7MPC124 2-01 IdLvie.wpd Planning Commission Fehruary lZ 2001 RZ01-1 Dixie Development Page 1.3 §161.12 DISTRICT R-0 (Per Dwelling Unit for Residential RESIDENTIAL OFFICE. Structures) Lot Mobile Home 100 ft. A . Purpose. The Residential-Office Minimum Park District is designed primarily to provide area Width: for offices without limitation to the nature or size of the office, together with community Lot Within a 50 ft. facilities, restaurants and compatible Mobile Home residential uses. Park B. Uses. One Family 60 ft. Two Family 60 ft. 1. Uses Permitted. Three or More 90 ft. Unit I City-Wide Uses by Right Lot Area Mobile Home 3 acres Unit 5 Government Facilities Minimum: Park Unit 8 Single-Family and Two- Lot Within a 4200 sq. Family Dwellings Mobile Home ft. Unit 12 Offices, Studios and Related Park Services Row Houses: Unit 25 Professional Offices I I Development 10,000 2. Uses Permissible on sq. ft. Appeal to the Planning Commission. Individual Lot 2500 Unit 2 City-Wide Uses by sq. ft Conditional Use Permit Single Family 6000 sq. Unit 3 Public Protection and Utility ft Facilities Two family 6500 sq. Unit 4 Cultural and Recreational ft Facilities Three or More 8000 sq. Unit 9 Multi-Family Dwelling- ft Medium Density Fraternity or I acres Unit 10-- Multi-Family Dwelling- Sorority High Density Land Area Mobile Home 3000 sq. Unit 13 Eatinw Places Per Dwelling C. Bulk and Area Unit: Regulations. Planning Commission February lZ 2001 RZ01-1 Dixie Development Page 1.4 Lot Mobile Home Minimum Park Width: Row Houses F. Height Regulations. There shall -&Apartments: be no maximum height limits in R-0 Districts, provided, however, that any ------ Two or More 1200 sq. building which exceeds the height of 20 feet Bedrooms ft. shall be set back from any boundary line of any R-1, R-2, or R-3 District an additional One Bedroom 1000 sq. distance of one foot for each foot of height ft. in excess of 20 feet. Na-Bedroom - 1000-- (CodeA99 1, §160.04 1; Code 1965, App. A, sq. ft Art, 5(x); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-89; Ord. No. 2414, 2-7-78; Ord. No. 2603, 2-19-80; Ord. Fraternity or 500 sq. No. 2621, 4-1-80) Sorority ft., per resident D. Bulk and Area Regulations/ Setbacks. Setback lines shall meet the following minimum requirements. From Street ROW 30 ft. From Street ROW if Parking 50 ft. is Allowed Between the ROW and the Building From Side Property Line 10 ft. From Side Property Line 15 ft. When Contiguous to a R-1, R-2 or R-3 District From Back Property Line 25 ft. Without Easement or Alley From Center Line of Public 10 Alley I E. Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60%of the total area of such lot. Planning Commission Febmary IZ 2001 RZ01-1 Dixie Development Page 1.5 Re-zoning Request Submitted by Dixie Development,Inc. A. The property is currently owned by Life Change Community Fellowship. There is an offer to purchase the property subject to re-zoning from A-1 to R-0. This offer has been made by Dixie Development,Inc.4700 S.Thompson,SuiteB-101,Springdale,AR 72764 B. Zoning is requested in order to build office space for lease on the subject property. C. Property will be developed as Class"A"office space and will fit in with the properties that surround it since they are mostly R-0. Signage,traffic flow and land use will all be similar to its neighbors. D. Water and sewer are available to the property from the North or from a newly approved development by Dixie Development,Inc. on the eastern side of subject property. An eight(8) inch water line is available to the subject property. Sewer is also available. Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZ01-1 Dixie Development Page 1.6 0 0 RZ01 - 1 Dixie Development Close Up coo 0 0 R-2 t E) 0 E-) C-2 C-2 R-2 1) 0 E) A-1 0 1 - D ED 0 C-2 R-0 0 —0 C/) C-2 R-0 — C-2 R-0 E::] E� EP R- A-1 Sub'ect Property R-2 0 C-2 C-2 - a A-1 R-0 R-0 A-1 0 A-1 R-2 R-2 R-2 A-1 R-29 Parcel Polygons Streets N Zoning Districts ,��=(1998)- - 300 0 300 600 Feet assifications ',A," /\/COLLECTOR W E FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY MINOR ARTERIAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL 7�1,4�ning�missi HISTORIC COLLECTOR onr Tehruaq 12-260 Ay RZ01-1 �'Page 1.7 RZ01 -1 Dixie Develo ment One Mile Radius P,wv� MI FAYETTEVILLE TBE CITY OF FAYETFEVELE,ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountam St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone:(501)575-8264 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Dawn T. Warrick, Planner THRU: Tim Conklin A.I.C.P., City Planner DATE: February 12, 2001 RZ 01-2.00: Rezoning (Lindsey, pp 440)was submitted by Dave Jorgensen of Jorgensen& Associates on behalf of J.E. Lindsey Family Limited Partnership for property located South of Chamberland Square and East of Betty Jo Drive to Shiloh Drive. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contains approximately 18.25 acres. The request is to rezone to R-2, Medium Density Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning based on the findings included as part of this report. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Required YES 0 Approved 0 Denied Date: FebruaLry 12, 2001 ........... H 1i n' HIM,I ........ Comments: H.'IUSERSACOI�AdONDAWNTLRFPORTSTC12-12-Olifindsey.vpd Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZ01-2 Lindsey Page 2.1 BACKGROUND: This request is to down-zone a commercial tract of property along the west side of 1-540 to R-2, Medium Density Residential. The site is surrounded on the north and west by existing multi- family developments, property to the south is currently vacant. The zoning of the property is currently not consistent with the City's Future Land Use Plan, however the requested zoning would be consistent with the Residential designation applied to this location. The applicant is requesting this rezoning in order to construct apartments. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North: Chamberland Square Apartments, R-2 South: Vacant, A-I East: 1-540/Single family residential, R-1 West: Multi-family residential (Betty Jo Drive), R-2 INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: Shiloh Drive is located along the eastern boundary of this property. Shiloh is designated a collector on the Master Street Plan. In this location, Shiloh is a one way, south-bound outer road to 1-540. A Master Street Plan collector, Persimmon, is planned to be constructed along the south boundary of this property. Persimmon, when fully constructed, would connect Shiloh Drive and Rupple Road to the west. Water: Available from residential developments to the north and west. Sewer: Available from residential developments to the north and west. LAND USE PLAN: General Plan 2020 designates this site Residential. Rezoning this property to R-2, Medium Density Residential is consistent with the land use plan and compatible with surrounding land uses in the area. FINDINGS OF THE STAFF I. A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. H.,IUSER.51COA"ONDAWNYUZEPORTS)PC12-12-Ohlindsey.wpd Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZ01-2 Lindsey Page 2.2 Finding: -The proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles and policies and with land use and zoning plans. The proposed zoning is actually more consistent with the City's adopted General Plan 2020 than the existing commercial zoning designation which is applied to the subject property. 2. A determination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The proposed zoning is justified in that it is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan 2020. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase --- -traffic danger and congestion—. Finding: Changing the zoning from C-2 to R-2 should not appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water, and sewer facilities. Finding: The proposed zoning would alter population density. It would not however, undesirably increase the load on public services including schools, water and sewer facilities. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1)through(4)above, a determination as to whether the proposed —zoningisjusti-fied and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses u—nderits-exis;—ting zomng­_c1a_ssiTicanom�_ b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1)through (4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding. -N/A- H.-�USFRSICOA�MONDAWNYIREPORTSIPC12-12-01 lfindseympd Planning Commission February lZ 2001 RZOI-2 Lindsey Page 2.3 §161.06 DISTRICT R-2 MEDIUM One Family 60 Feet DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. Two Family 60 Feet A. Purpose. The High Density Residential District is designed to permit Three or More 90 Feet and encourage the developing of a variety of Professional 100 Feet dwelling types in suitable environments in a Offices variety of densities. 2. Lot Area Minimum. B. Uses. Mobile Home Park 3 Acres 1. Uses Permitted. Lot Within a 4,200 Sq. Ft. Unit I City-Wide Uses by Right Mobile Home Park Unit 8 Single-Family Dwellings Row House: Unit 9 Multifamily Dwellings - Development 10,000 Sq. Ft. Medium Density Individual Lot 21500 Sq. Ft. Single-Family 6,000 Sq. Ft. 2. Uses Permissible on Appeal to the Planning Commission. Two-Family 7,000 Sq. Ft. -Unit 2 City-Wide Uses by Conditional Three or More 9,000 Sq. Ft. Use Permit Fraternity or 2 Acres Unit 3 Public Protection and Utility Sorority Facilities Professional I Acre Unit 4 Cultural and Recreational Offices Facilities Unit I I Mobile Home Park Unit. 3. Land Area Per Dwelling Unit 25 Professional Offices Mobile Home 3,000 Sq. Ft. C. Density. Apartments: Two or More 2,000 Sq. Ft. [Families Per Acre 4 to 24 Bedrooms One Bedroom 1,700 Sq. Ft. D. Bulk and Area Regulations. No Bedroom 1,700 Sq. Ft. 1. Lot Width Minimum. Fraternity or 1,000 Sq. Ft. per Sorority Resident MobileHornePark 10017eet Lot within a 50 Feet Mobile Home Park Planning Commission Fehruary IZ 2001 RZ01-2 Lindsey Page 2.4 E.Yard-Requirements (feet). FRONT SIDE REAR YARD YARD YARD 25 8 25 Cross Reference: Variances Chapter 156. F. Height Regulations. Any building which-exceeds the-height of 20,feet shall be set back from any side boundary line an additional distance of one foot for each foot of height in excess of 20 feet. (Code 1991, § 160.033; Code 1965, App. A, Art. 5(111); Ord. No. 2320, 4-5-77; Ord. No. 2700, 2-2-8 1) Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZ01-2 Lindsey Page 2.5 JORGENSEN & ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS 0 SURVEYORS 124 WEST SUNBRIDGE, SUITE 5 - FAYETTEVILLE, ARKANSAS 72703 - (501) 442-9127 - FAX (501) 582-4807 DAVID L.JORGENSEN, RE., P.L.S. THOMAS HENNELLY,P.E. City of Fayetteville 113 W. Mountain Fayetteville, AR 72701 Att: Planning Dept. Re : Shiloh West Rezoning Attached herewith please find a copy of the plat of the above referenced property. On behalf of-the-owners,-w.e-are-requesting a rezoning from C-2 to R-2 for the construction of apartments. The property to the north is zoned R-2 (Chamberland Square Apartments) and to the West is R-2 (Maple Terrace). To the South the zoning is A-1 and is presently vacant. To the east is Shiloh Drive and 1-540. This rezoning request (to R-2) will fit in with the surrounding area. Municipal water and sewer is to the North and to the West. Access to the property will be from the North and South. There will be a street extension on the South to Shiloh Drive. Please call concerning any additional information that you may have. Thank you.- Sincerely; hmu�� � � David L. Jorgensen, P.E. C 1-Pb ry'11�200 e rua STRUCTURAL DESIGN LAND DEVELOPMENT WATER SYSTEMS age'2 6 R,Z01 -2*Lindsey C18se Up E CP C-1 C-2 C-2 C-2 C-2 -1 C-2 0 El o EP r2 11 U U2 C-2 0 0 A-1 0 0 Subject Property 0 0 R-1 A As C_-J A-1 Parcel Polygons Streets N Zoning Districts ��Structu,res,(1998) 400 0 400 800 Feet r tre t C assifications A(- ^,'COLLECTOR W � FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY -VV MINOR ARTERIAL 1 C PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL HISTORIC COLLECTOR gnning �MT!Sslo� F ebrziar Design Overlay District y,12,2001 RZQI-,2 indso Page 2.7 IN T I -W-7 ME FAYETTEVILLE TBE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS 113W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone:(501)575-8264 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Dawn T. Warrick, Planner THRU: Tim Conklin, A.I.C.P., City Planner DATE: February 12, 2001 RZ 01-3.00: Rezoning (NOARK Girl Scout Council, pp 175)was submitted by Wes Burgess of Crafton, Tull &Associates on behalf of NOARK Girl Scout Council for property located at Northeast comer of Joyce Street and Park Oaks Drive. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential and contains approximately 0.48 acres. The request is to rezone to R-O, Residential Office. RECONEMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the requested rezoning based on the findings included as part of this report PLANNING COMINUSSION ACTION: Required YES 0 Approved 0 Denied Date: FebruaEy 12,2001 0OR g Comments: H.,I USERMCOAMONDAWNYVZEPOR7SWC12-12-01 Inoark wpd Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZ01-3 NOARK Page 3.1 BACKGROUND: The subject property is located at the northeast comer of Park Oaks Drive (a private street) and Joyce Blvd. The property is currently being split from the tract to the north which is also zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential and was originally planned to be developed as a part of the Parks Apartment complex. The private street was built to serve the apartments to the north and was a condition of approval of that large scale development. The NOARK Girl Scout Council proposes to develop a council administrative office in this location. Staff has advised that seeking a rezoning would be the best route to take in order to proceed with this development. In the current zoning district(R-2)professional offices would only be permitted as a conditional use. Since this location is designated as office on the General Plan 2020, the rezoning could be recommended and then the use of the site for professional office would be permitted by right. Due to the size of the tract a large scale development plan will not be reviewed by the Planning Commission, when a project is proposed, staff with review the building permit application for compliance with current City ordinances. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North: R-2, Vacant (further north-Park Apts.) South: A-1, Church (also R-O, Vacant-planned office park and R-2, Butterfield Trail Village) East: A-1, Vacant West: R-0, Professional Offices INFRASTRUCTURE: Streets: This property is located at the northeast comer of the intersection of Joyce Blvd. and Park Oaks Drive (a private street). Joyce Blvd. is classified as a principal arterial on the City's Master Street Plan. Water: Available along Joyce Blvd. Sewer: Available along Joyce Blvd. (Existing 8" line) LAND USE PLAN: General Plan 2020 designates this site Office. Rezoning this property to R-01 Residential Office is consistent with the land use plan and compatible with surrounding land uses in the area. H.-I USFRSICOA"ONDAWNY�kEPORT"Cl2-12-01 Inoark wpd Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZ01-3 NOARK Page 3.2 FINDINGS OF THE STAFF I A determination of the degree to which the proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. Finding: The proposed zoning is consistent with land use planning objectives, principles, and policies and with land use and zoning plans. 2. A detennination of whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or needed at the time the rezoning is proposed. Finding: The proposed zoning is justified in that it is consistent with the City's adopted General Plan. While there is some available R-0 property in the City,vacant parcels in the immediate area are developing quickly. 3. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Finding; The proposed zoning will not create or appreciably increase traffic danger and congestion. Joyce Blvd. has been improved recently and is designed to carry a large volume of traffic (principal arterial). The size of this property will not support a very large development. The proposed office building would require approximately 20-parking spaces. 4. A determination as to whether the proposed zoning would alter the population density and thereby undesirably increase the load on public services including schools,water, and sewer facilities. Finding: The proposed zoning will not alter the population density. If the property were to develop residentially, a duplex would be the maximum density permitted by right, a higher density development would require a conditional use permit and Planning Commission review and approval. 5. If there are reasons why the proposed zoning should not be approved in view of considerations under b (1)through(4) above, a determination as to whether the proposed zoning is justified and/or necessitated by peculiar circumstances such as: a. It would be impractical to use the land for any of the uses permitted under its existing zoning classifications; b. There are extenuating circumstances which justify the rezoning even though there are reasons under b (1)through(4) above why the proposed zoning is not desirable. Finding: N/A H.'I USF-RSICOAgfONDAWN=ORTS(PC12-12-01 1noarkwpd Planning Commission February 1Z 2001 RZ01-3 NOARK Page 3.3 §161.12 DISTRICTR-O (Per Dwelling Unit for Residential RESEDENTIAL OFFICE. Structures) Lot Mobile Home 100 ft. A . Purpose. The Residential-Office Minimum Park District is designed primarily to provide area Width: for offices-without limitation to the nature or size of the office, together with community Lot Within a 50 ft. facilities, restaurants and compatible Mobile Home residential uses. Park B. Uses. One Family 60 ft. Two Family 60 ft. 1. Uses Permitted. Three or More 90 ft. Unit 1 City-Wide Uses by Right Lot Area Mobile Home 3 acres Unit 5 Government Facilities Minimum: Park Unit 8 Single-Family and Two- Lot Within'a 4200 sq. Family Dwellings Mobile Home ft. Unit 12 Offices, Studios and Related Park Services Row Houses: Unit 25 Professional Offices Development 10,000 2. Uses Permissible on sq. ft. Appeal to the Planning Commission. Individual Lot 2500 Unit 2 City-Wide Uses by sq. ft Conditional Use Permit Single Family 6000 sq. Unit 3 Public Protection and Utility ft Facilities Two Family 6500 sq. Unit 4 Cultural and Recreational ft Facilities Three or More 8000 sq. Unit 9 Multi-Family Dwelling- ft Medium Density Fraternity or I acres Unit 10 Multi-Family Dwelling- Sorority High Density Land Area Mobile Home 3000 sq. Unit 13 Eating Places Per Dwelling C. Bulk and Area Unit: Regulations. Planning Commission February lZ 2001 RZ01-3 NOARK Page 3.4 Lot Mobile Ho e 100 ft. Minimum Park Width: Row Houses F. Height Regulations. There shall &Apartments: be no maximum height limits in R-0 Districts, provided, however, that any Two or More 1200 sq. building which exceeds the height of 20 feet - Bedrooms, ft. shall be set back from any boundary line of any R-1, R-2, or R-3 District an additional One Bedroom 1000 sq. distance of one foot for each foot of height ft. in excess of 20 feet. No Bedroom 1000 (Code 199 1, §160.04 1; Code 1965, App. A, sq. ft Art. 5(x); Ord. No. 1747, 6-29-89; Ord. No. 2414, 2-7-78; Ord. No. 2603, 2-19-80; Ord. Fraternity or 500 sq. No. 2621, 4-1-80) Sorority ft., per -resident D. Bulk-and Area Regulations/ Setbacks. Setback lines shall meet the following minimum requirements. From Street ROW 30 ft. From Street ROW if Parking 50 ft. is Allowed Between the ROW and the­Building��: From Side Property Line 10 ft. From Side Property Line 15 ft. When Contiguous to a R-1, R-2 or R-3 District From Back Property Line 25 ft. Without Easement or Alley From Center Line of Public 10 ft. Alley I E. Building Area. On any lot the area occupied by all buildings shall not exceed 60%of the total area of such lot. Planning Commission February 12, 2001 RZOI-3NOARK Page 3.5 0 Crafton, Tull & AssAates,, Inc. 0 Architects,, Engineers & Surveyors 2345 Green Acres Road Fayetteville,AR 72703 January 9, 2001 (501)443-035 Fax(501)"2-6966 www.craftull.com Mr. Tim Conklin, Email:cta@craftull.com Planning Director—City of Fayetteville 113 W. Mountain Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 RE: Rezone of NOARK Girl Scout Council lot on Joyce Street Directors Danny L.Bmwn,P.E. Robert M.(Matt)Crafton,RE. Dear Tim: Thomas E.Hopper,P.E. Kurtis J.Jones,RE. R.E.(Gone)Reeoe,P.E. The following is a written description of the rezoning request for the NOARK Girl David Swearingen,A.I.A. Scout Council lot on Joyce Street as we have previously discussed. The lot is James L.Tuil,C.D.A. currently owned by the J. E. Lindsey Family Ltd. Partnership as part of a larger tract Directors Emeritus that is currently going through the lot split process. The tract is described as Tract Bob H.Crafton,F.E. 5C2-B on the attached survey. Once split, the lot will be donated to the Girl Scout Lemuel H.Tull,RE. Council for the purpose of constructing their administrative office. Currently their office Associates is located in Springdale, and they intend to relocate to the Joyce Street lot if rezoning Everett L.Balk,RE. is approved. Wes Burgess,A.I.A. Todd Cox,C.N.E. L.Ronan Gangs],P.E. We are requesting that the property be rezoned from R-2 to R-O for the purpose of James B.Geurin,P.E. Larry Gregory,P.E. construction a 5,400 s.f., 2-story office building to solely house the Girl Scout At Harris,R.L.S. Council's administrative staff. The building itself will be constructed of materials and a Jerry J.Kelso,RE. James W.Koolstra,A.I.A. scale that is compatible with the adjacent office development on Joyce Street with Ken Kuras,R.L.S. either a small monument sign or building mounted signage only. The building will be Cline L.Mansur,RE.,R.L.S. Tom Mansur,RE. sited towards Joyce Street with the parking lot for roughly 20 cars in the back, with Robert C.Reece,P.E. access from the private drive on the west. The traffic impact from the proposed Rick G.Rose,P.L.S. George Strelle,F.E.,D.E.E. development will be minimal: 20 cars making 2-4 trips daily onto the four-lane Joyce James P.Swearingen,A.I.A. Street. Currently, an 8" water line runs along the west side of the property, and an 8" Richard Wright,R.L.S. sewer line is proposed that will connect a commercial development at the comer of Joyce and Old Missouri (currently under construction) to an existing sewer line north of this property. This sewer line will run in an easement on the Gid Scout property and is scheduled to be completed prior to completion of the Girl Scout office building. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please don't hesitate to call. Sincerely, CRAFTON, TULL&ASSOCIATES, INC. Wes Burgebs AIA Architect/ Project Manager Planning Commission February lZ 2001 RZ01-3 NOARK Page 3.6 RZ01 -3NOARK C115se Up LJ L-J Li -- -R-2 R-2 R-0 R-0 A-1 R-0 R-0 R-2 .R- Subject Property A-1 0 R-0 R-0 R-0 R-2 - A-1 R-0 A-1 0 Parcel Polygons N Streets ions 80 0 80 160 Feet COLLECTOR FREEWAY/EXPRESSWAY MINOR ARTERIAL PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL HISTORIC COLLECTOR 'Jn6'nmng&�m4'v"s"ion RZ01-3 NOAkk Page 3.7 RZ01 -3 NOARK One Ole Radius I FAYETTEVILLE THE CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE,ARKANSAS 113 W. Mountain St. Fayetteville,AR 72701 Telephone:(501)575-8264 PLANNING DIVISION CORRESPONDENCE TO: Fayetteville Planning Commission FROM: Sara Edwards, Associate Planner THRU: Tim Conklin, City Planner DATE: February 8, 2001 AD 01-2.00: Administrative Item (McDonald's Sign,pp 134) The request is to change the sign approved by Planning Commission for McDonald's Large Scale Development located at the NE comer of Joyce Blvd. & Mall Ave.. Findings: The large scale development was approved on July 24, 2000. At that time the applicant was limited to a monument sign by the Planning Commission The applicant had proposed a 15 foot tall, 58 square foot freestanding sign, but was limited to a monument sign. The applicant is now proposing a 10 foot high, 49 square foot sign. Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of this request. Staff recommends that McDonald's comply with current city sign ordinances with regard to monument signs. Factors to Address: I. This proposal is not meeting Chapter 174: Signs of the Unified Development Ordinance. There are two types of signs that the applicant may choose form that comply with the Sign Ordinance: a) Monument Sign. The monument sign is limited to six feet in height and 75 square feet in area, as well as a 10 foot setback. b)Freestanding Sign. The freestanding sign has a range of height and square footage based on the setback. (See attached table) In order to meet the Unified Development Ordinance under the freestanding sign provision, a sign with 49 square feet would have to meet a setback of 35 feet and would be allowed to be 27.5 feet tall, 2. If the Planning Commission were to find that this sign is acceptable,the applicant would also have to obtain a variance from the Board of Sign Appeals. Background: The Planning Commission had a lengthy discussion regarding the sign at the July 24, 2000 meeting. (See attached minutes). The decision was reached that the applicant would provide a Planning Commission February 12, 2001 AD01-2 McDonald's Page 4.1 monument sign. The applicant has returned with this new proposal because they have standard sign specifications for all of their stores, and the six foot monument sign is not a standard. Therefore in order to get the six foot tall sign they would have to have one specially made. Planning Commission February 12, 2001 ADOI-2 McDonald's Page 4.2 FREE STAP4DING SIGNS SIZE SET—BACK HE I GHT (s q.f t. (mi n.f t. (max.ft) 26 18 19 19 20 20 21 2N —-------- 21 26 25- M - 200 24' 22 30 25 22-2 32 26 '23 34 27 23�. 2cOj 24 38 29 24� -40 300, 25 42 31 29.� LIL 32 26 416 33 2R 34 27 50 71 35 27� -52 36- —28 37 2R 56 38 2c) % 39 29��.- Planning Commission February 12, 2001 30 ADOI-2 McDona�d's 40 Page 4.3 in z-n V, McDonald's Office A-McDonalffs 518 S.Thompson St., Suite D P.O. Box 1366 Springdale, Arkansas 72765 Bill and Walter Mathews (501) 751-9617 Owner/Operators FEB 0 8 2001 Fax: (501) 751-4089 BY: IL February 7, 2001 Tim Conklin City Planner 113 W. Mountain Fayetteville,AR 72701 Re: New McDonald's Restaurant Joyce Blvd. and Mall Ave. Dear Tim: We will be presenting a request to the Planning Commission on Monday February 12, 2001 to re-visit our freestanding sign at this location. We don't feel that it was totally clear at the July 24, 2000 Planning Commission Meeting on what sign we would be allowed to utilize. We would like to utilize a "monument type" sign which is 49 square feet and is 9'11 1/2" high. We think that this is a good compromise because: 1.) The ordinance allows a 75 square foot which is 30 feet high. 2.) Circuit City has a 72 square foot sign which is 12 feet high. 3.) We will be planting numerous trees along Joyce Blvd. which will block our sign. 4.) You have allowed the NWA Mall to have a second 130 square foot sign which is 8 feet high on Mall Ave. By ordinance (Chapter 158.47 paragraph c) they are only allowed the one sign which they already have on North College. Furthermore, this new sign will block the visibility of our sign from the west. 5.) Customers need adequate notice on where our restaurant is located in order to make safe entry to our restaurant. Much of our customer base is comprised of people traveling who may be unfamiliar with our restaurant locations. 6.) The proposed sign is a standard size produced for McDonald's. Other size signs would have to be specially produced for this location. 7.) The sign we propose is the same sign (although shorter due to the base) which you allowed us to utilize at Crossover Rd. We have already made numerous and costly concessions to the City of Fayetteville in order to build this restaurant. Planning Commission February 12, 2001 ADO.]-2,McDonald's �44 FAYETTEVILLE SPRINGDALE* ROGERS BENTONVILLE qg