HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-09-15 - MinutesTechnical Plat
09-15-04
Page 1
MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE
TECHNICAL PLAT REVIEW COMMITTEE
A regular meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee was held on October 27, 2004 at 9:00 a.m. in
room 111 in the City Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
ACTION TAKEN
FPL 04-1211: Final Plat (WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, 321) Forwarded
Page 2
LSP 04-1217: Lot Split (DAVID MASHIE, 405) Forwarded
Page 6
LSD 04-1214: Large Scale Development (IHOP, 440) Forwarded
Page 7
Large Scale Development (WEDINGTON BUSINESS CENTER, 435) ?
Page 16
STAFF PRESENT
Jeremy Pate
Matt Casey
Brent O'Neal
Suzanne Morgan
Renee Thomas
Allison Jumper
Mike Phipps, Ozark Electric Coop.
Larry Gibson, Cox Communications
Johney Boles, Arkansas Western Gas
Sue Clouzer, Southwestern Bell
STAFF ABSENT
UTILITIES ABSENT
Jim Sargent, AEP/ SWEPCO
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 2
Pate: Good morning, welcome to the agenda for the technical plat review
committee meeting Monday, September 15`". We have four items to
review and to do this morning. There's no one here for number one, I
don't believe there's anyone here for number two. Is someone here for
Wildflower Meadows?
We're here for IHOP.
I'm here for Meadows.
Pate: Okay, so we'll skip over the first two and go directly to number three and
put those other two. Well there's Geoff. Are you here for Wildflower
Meadows, Geoff?
FPL 04-1211: Final Plat (WILDFLOWER MEADOWS, 321): Submitted by
GEOFFREY BATES for property located at MT COMFORT ROAD,
WEST OF CLABBER CREEK PHASE IL The property is zoned RSF-4,
SINGLE FAMILY - 4 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 18.38
acres. The request is to approve the Final Plat of a residential subdivision
with 48 single family lots proposed.
Bates: It's already to me?
Pate: It's already to you.
Bates: Sorry.
Pate: Final plat for Wildflower Meadows for 18.38 acres and 48 single family
lots proposed. Geoff, on the plat comments, some of the pretty standard
ones. Revise adjacent zoning to reflect the current zoning designations.
All utility easements shall be shown along all property lines and called out
as such. Lot frontage dimensions shall be shown on all corner and cul-de-
sac lots at the front building setback line. (Lots 15, 20, 23, 28, 31, 36, 43,
44, 47, 48). We listed all of those for you there. But just go through those
and make sure they have a label on them. Signature blocks must be shown
on both pages of this plat. It's really hard to get here on this.
Bates: How big a page can you do?
Pate: We can do 24x36, I know the county requires small. The graphic scale is
shown at 1 inch = 40 feet, it should be corrected to 1 inch = 80 feet. The
shared drive access is not provided in lots 47-50, this is parking on a
collector, and they need to be accessed from this back drive. So it's an
either or essentially. You have to have all shared access or we won't
permit all four of these. We don't expressly prohibit any access from a
collector, but if you'd like restrict it ... That's something you want to put
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 3
on the plat. Lot 1 and Lot 46, you could have a note saying that you'll
come build both through extension lots. The next comments here are the
conditions of approval. The Mt. Comfort Rd 24 foot width this side -
Verify that Mt. Comfort road between this site and Rupple Road has a
minimum paved width of 24 feet. And of course, all infrastructure
improvements must be completed and inspected by the City prior to the
revision deadline (September 22, 2004) in order to proceed in the current
review cycle. On the third page, there the Rupple Road bridge
assessment, $5,439 must be received prior to signing of the final plat.
Addresses shall be shown on all lots and coordinate that with Jen Johnson.
All proposed utilities are to be underground. Street lights must be placed a
maximum of 300 feet apart. An additional street light is needed on Mt.
Comfort Road at the rear of lot 16. Before final plat, street lights must be
installed or proof of payment for street lights in the form of a receipt from
the electric company. Any signage proposed needs to be indicated if
you're going to have the subdivision sign it. It can't be located in the
utility easement. That's about all for Planning comments. It will be
reviewed on September 22.
O'Neal: Brent O'Neal, staff engineer. You need to add a 20 foot wide drainage
easement through both of the detention ponds and label the 20 foot
drainage easement along the east property where the concrete swale is.
The same comments as planning to label the easements. And you need to
extend the 20 foot utility easement around the cul-de-sacs. And the rest of
them are just our standard comments.
Jumper: We just need to receive fees for the parkland and the fees before final plat.
And coordinate with us on getting the park boundary signs up.
Bates: Okay.
Pate: I don't have any comments on Tree Preservation. That's taken care of at
the last go around for Preliminary Plat. Utility comments?
Phipps: Mike Phipps, Ozark Electric. On the street lights, we're going to need to
change these to get to these lines.
Bates: I think if we put that 20 foot easement right under the...
Phipps: You got 25, 24, you've got a 20 foot coming from that one. You want to
be able to, the cul-de-sac on 27, the access here. The one on 13 is good.
27, 28 on main template is a clean 27, 28. No, I take that back that would
be the rear there wouldn't it. Okay, forget that one. 33 and 34 you've got
a 20 foot drainage easement. You've got a light there. I've got to access
that light. You've got a drainage easement. Why can't you just move the
light over to 35? Just give me a 10 foot easement between 34 and 35.
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 4
Bates:
Phipps:
Bates:
Phipps:
Bates:
Is it a 10 foot in addition to that 20 foot?
Well you don't have a 20 foot easement there.
33 and 34, which one are you looking at?
33 and 34, you've got a 20 foot drainage easement, but...
So you need 10 more feet besides that?
Phipps: No, let's just move the light. I don't want to dig in the ground. Let's just
move the light over between 34 and 35. And whatever your setback is
there just make it setback and UE on that lot line. See you got the same
thing on your next cul-de-sac. 24 and 25, if you'll just move that light
over to 26 and 27.
Bates: 26 and 27, there's a sewer main going down through there.
Phipps: Let's move it over to 24 and 25. Okay. 16 and 17, yeah. What have you
got between 17 and 18. You don't have a sewer through there do you?
Bates: No.
Phipps: Okay, so they'd be a little shorter run to put it there.
Bates: You just need a 10 foot easement?
Phipps: Yep. Then, between 2 and 3, you're going to need one too, to access this
light.
Bates: What about 4 and 5, 10 and 11?
Phipps: Yep. Anything that we have to come through the back on. That would be
4 and 5, 7 and 6, 10 and 11. On that transmission line, did you get with
Robert Ericson on that to find out the dimensions of that? I mean you're
showing a 15 foot on there, and I'm not sure, it's maybe a 40 foot total
there.
Bates: It's 45 total. 25 and 15, or forty. Sorry.
Phipps: Get with Robert Ericson, Ozark Electric. And he's the transmission and
right-of-way specialist. Let's make sure that's right. Before we get a 20
foot building setback and actually it's 25 feet there.
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 5
Bates: I'm 99.9% sure it's right because I talked to him about Clabber Creek and
the church and ... but I'll ask him again.
Phipps: Just make sure that that's right. And what we'll need, one of the things I
need is the disk, in effect I gave the e-mail address for that. And before
we do anything, before I can get you cost, we need that disk. Because
that's for street lights and everything.
Bates: I'll just e-mail it to you today.
Phipps: That's all I have.
Boles: Geoff if you would, I need you to show an easement on the west property
line on 14, 15, and 16.
Bates: Yeah, I'm sorry, the drawings are wrong on that.
Boles: And also the south property line of Lot 42, on the left. I think that's all I
have.
Gibson: Larry Gibson, Cox Communications. No comments.
Clouzer: Sue Clouzer, Southwestern Bell. And just once again if there's any
relocation have one of your developers tell us.
Pate: Geoff, one of the last things you need to look at is the 25 foot building
setback. So you'll have two fronts...
Bates: I'm 90% sure that when the Planning Commission made this, and there
should be a note on here, that they pulled out certain ones that cannot be
accessed to Mt. Comfort. And these can't access ... I'm pretty sure it's the
same way for these because they didn't want these...
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 6
LSP 04-1217: Lot Split (DAVID MASHIE, 405): Submitted by ALAN REID for
property located at 1613 N OAKLAND AVENUE. The property is zoned RMF -24,
MULTI FAMILY - 24 UNITS/ACRE and contains approximately 0.46 acres. The
request is to split the subject property into two tracts of 0.16 and 0.30 acres respectively.
Pate: Great, thanks. If we could go back to Item #1, LSP 04-1217. Lot Split
for David Mashie. The property is located on Oakland Avenue.
Morgan: Just a couple Planning comments. Hickory Street and Oakland Avenue
are identified as collector streets on the Master Street Plan, right-of-way
being dedicated is 25 feet from centerline. Currently there's forty feet of
right-of-way existing. So if you could identify the dimensions of 25 feet
of right-of-way and the additional right-of-way required. By doing so,
building setback will be moved 5 feet and that existing home will be
nonconforming as it is currently in the Master Street Plan, a
nonconforming structure. Also if you could just note that the accessory
building, the wood frame shed, is a secondary structure, and will have to
be relocated with this before the lot split can be filed. That's pretty much
all the Planning comments.
O'Neal: You need to show the water line along Hickory Street. And this
extension, I'm assuming to the mainline. You also need to show the
sanitary sewer as it extends to the south there by the intersection of
Garland. Show all setbacks. The sanitary sewer actually extends to the
south as well. You need to show what it does. Just show all the existing
easements and label them.
Jumper: Parks fees in the amount of $393 for one additional single family lot to be
paid prior to issuance of a building permit.
Sargent: Jim Sargent, SWEPCO. The easements look fine there.
Gibson: No comment.
Phipps: No comment.
Clouzer: No comment.
Morgan: Because the building setback is going to be moved to the north, it will
encroach this building.
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 7
LSD 04-1214: Large Scale Development (IHOP, 440): Submitted by TIMOTHY RICH
for property located at 3153 W WEDINGTON DRIVE. The property is zoned C-2,
THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and contains approximately 2.68 acres. The
request is to approve the development of a 4,386 s.f. restaurant with 71 parking spaces
proposed.
Pate: Moving on to Item #3, LSD 04-1214 for IHOP submitted by Timothy
Rich for property located at 3153 West Wedington Drive for a
development of a 4,386 SF restaurant with 71 parking spaces.
Morgan: I'll go over the Planning comments on this development. This tract was
split just a few months ago and I guess the county hasn't caught up to the
current ownership, so if you could please provide verification of
ownership so that we can verify the signature on the applications.
Rich: Oh, the certificate of ownership.
Morgan: It was part of the application.
Rich: Yeah, I need to do that. There was actually an IHOP's convention, and
the owner wasn't in town. I'll get that.
Morgan: Regarding the plans, if you could upon resubmittal limit the plans to those
listed in here, cover sheet, site plan, grading and drainage plans, and
landscape/planting plan. Details are not necessary at this stage.
Rich: Is that written here?
Morgan: It is. On page 2 under #3 Plat requirements. Also if you could indicate
plat page on the site plan. It's plat page #440. That's the City reference
for this location.
Rich: I don't see the list.
Morgan: Okay, they are right here, these comments. Also the vicinity map that's
shown on page 1, if you could just reference just a few additional streets
on that vicinity map so we know exactly where this site is in reference to
additional developments out there. With the lot split there was a 25 foot
utility easement along the north property line. If you could call that out. I
didn't see that called out on this site plan. And also include developer
information on sheet 1. Additional references. Two minor comments, if
you could include a graphic representation of the scale on the site plan.
More parking than allowed by ordinance is represented on this site, and
you have submitted a conditional use that will go forward with this LSD to
request additional parking.
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 8
Rich: How will that work?
Morgan: The conditional use will be heard at the Planning Commission. That's the
last meeting. So, this will, the Large Scale will be heard at Subdivision
Committee before it goes to Planning Commission. So then at the
Planning Commission they'll vote on it. Our design standards for parking
stalls require a length of 19 feet. It can be reduced to 17 overhanging the
landscaped area, but what's represented on here is 18 feet for all of these
spaces. You might show some need to be lengthened where some can
remain or be shortened by a foot depending on where they are located.
The width of commercial driveway approaches shall not exceed 39 feet
measured at right angles to the centerline of the driveway approach for
driveways that are one-way in and two-way out. I believe this is just
slightly larger than 39. And also commercial driveways shall have a
minimum curb radius of 25 feet. You've shown bike racks on the plan,
two bike racks. Based on parking requirements, three bike racks are
required so if you could add an additional bike rack there. Also parking,
there are certain criteria for parking lot lighting, especially within the
Design Overlay District which is where this is located. Parking lot
lighting shall be shielded and directed downward so that it doesn't reflect
into adjacent property at a maximum height of 25 feet utilizing sodium
lighting fixtures. If you could just note that on the plans. The trash
receptacle needs to be screened with materials complementary with the
building on three sides with access not visible from the street. You
represented that on the plan, if you could just note that as well. Also street
lights are required every 300 feet on at least one side of the right-of-way.
If you could verify if any existing street lights there. If there are not any
on this location, then they will need to be provided at the correct ratio.
Also all free standing utilities need to be screened. I don't know if you
have any out here, just to let you know that that's what we would be
requiring.
Rich: Such as a gas meter?
Morgan: Such as any meter or above ground utility. Screening can consist of
vegetation screening also possibly utilizing the fence. The proposed
monument sign is located within that 25 foot utility easement along the
front property line. We cannot permit a monument sign within a 25 foot
utility. So, please kind of check and see where you can relocate that on
the plan. We will require a full size elevation board so that Planning and
Subdivision Committees can clearly see how the building is going to be
presented and developed so that they can make a determination on
Commercial Design Standards, whether this building structure meets that.
Rich: What size is that?
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 9
Morgan: Typically it's on a 36 X 24 board.
Pate: All elevations can be shown on that one board. All four sides.
Morgan: I know that you did submit a board, it wasn't representative of this
individual site though. It's just that side. And if you could ensure that
cardinal directions are placed on this so that we can reference what
direction they're looking at. Regarding Commercial Design Standards,
the Commission will look at five criteria, the rear of the building or the
south structure, my suggestion is possibly putting awnings that match
those on the other sides to perhaps enhance the articulation.
Rich: Over the doors?
Morgan: Over the doors, yes. All proposed utilities need to be located underground
with the development. If there are any lines above 12 kv, or excuse me,
below 12 kv on the property, they will have to be relocated underground.
There may not be any on the site, but it's something to be aware of
Casey I've got a copy of the comments from our fire marshal's office. He
stopped by our office yesterday and discussed concerns with the access to
your, he was concerned about this being one-way in and one-way out.
And the way it was put to me, if a fire is in the building, there has to be a
way to get out. There was some concern with one access point.
Morgan: And I'm afraid that any other, in the Design Overlay District doesn't allow
curb cuts adjacent to one another, so we may need to discuss that.
Pate: Get a condition of approval for the curb cuts.
Casey: I just wanted to bring that out. I know it's something he mentioned
yesterday. So the rest of his comments are in the packet.
O'Neal: For engineering comments, we have several. I'm just going to hit the
highlights. The additional two foot strip of sidewalk will not be allowed.
Leave the sidewalk as it is. We'll have to relocate it. Truncated domes
need to be used instead of the grooves at all handicap ramps. You can't
have any retaining walls or fences located in utility easements, particularly
along the back side of the detention pond, and that detention cannot be
located within the utility easement. Note what type of connections are
used for water service and show the fire protection to the building if it's
going to be provided.
Rich: There won't be any fire protection.
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 10
O'Neal: Okay. Building service for sanitary sewer can't run down that easement
and it can't be within the detention pond as well so that will have to be
relocated. The 4 inch sanitary sewer force main, that needs to be removed.
I'm assuming that's to connect to the adjacent lot for them to...
Rich: The reason that the civil engineer decided to use that is that he was
looking at the elevation of the sanitary sewer manhole that we connect to,
and one of the conditions that we had is that we had to provide a line over
to the adjacent site, and he was concerned that once he ran that line over
that the depth would only be about 8 inches there for that adjacent lot.
That the cover on the pipe would only be about 8 inches.
O'Neal: Well there is sanitary to the south that you can extend to, in the apartment
complex.
Casey Was that a condition of approval that the sewer be extended at the time of
the first development.
Rich: That was our understanding.
Casey I think we can do a gravity extension from the manhole located over here;
it's a very short distance.
Rich: That's what we were hoping to do. The engineer was concerned about
getting approval from the owners of those other properties. That was the
direction that we wanted to go because we thought it would be a lot
simpler.
Casey Our records show that along the 15 foot utility easement, and that would
be possible because it is a short gravity main extension instead of coming
across this side.
Rich: Is that something that we would have to? What would we have to do
about it?
Casey You can check the conditions of approval on that lot split to see how that
was worded, whether it was that access to the sewer needed to be provided
with both, for both lots at the time of the first development whereas each
development... we'll have to verify that and see.
O'Neal: The rest of the comments are standard comments except for the comments
for the drainage report. And a minimum of pipe size for storm drainage is
18 inch. We also need to see you keep the natural flow pattern the same
for drainage that leaves the site. So that needs to be revisited. On the
matter of the detention, on several locations it's noted as a retention pond.
We don't have any provisions that allow design for retention. We're also
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 11
not comfortable with the storm sewer being pumped to the front. Again
that would alter the drainage pattern instead of following the natural
pattern and directing it out toward the highway. So we need to look at a
different design.
Rich: Do you have any suggestions? You're thinking of going over to the...
O'Neal: I believe with an extension that you can discharge using the natural
channels.
Casey Look like the fall is in this direction now. And the proposal is to pump it
up here. It look like there's some elevation change here that you might be
able to discharge.
Rich: Can we have a discharge off of that adjacent site?
Casey Yes. They tell the offsite pipe to be able to ... out there.
Rich: If the detention pond can't be in the utility easement and it can't be with
the retaining wall?
Casey You can have a retaining wall but it can't be in the easement. We were
concerned with the pumping method the drainage report show in
predevelopment flows and then post development flows, but I don't think
if you're pumping at 100 gallons per minute, that's going to be a constant
flow out. So the drainage report didn't seem to represent what was
actually going to happen. And I'm kind of concerned about pump failure
also. Where's it going to go, what's going to happen if that's not
maintained? If the power's out or...
Rich: I'll have to talk with the civil engineer. Is most of that also detailed in this
report?
Casey One additional comment. If the detention requirements, the changes
significantly alter the site, I would even come back to this level of
meetings instead of going on to Subdivision meeting. We'll work with
you on that. With the utility companies, I don't know if their comments
are going to change much with the variations on the site or not. But we
can look at that.
Pate: A Tree Preservation waiver was submitted and approved. There are no
existing trees on this site. For the landscape plan, there are a couple of
things on here. If you could indicate all utilities, easements and right-of-
way on this plan to ensure that the trees are not planted on the top of
water/sewer lines. Let's see, Dwarf Crape Myrtles are not acceptable
street tree species. If you could go through that list. If you could also
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 12
provide another tree that's acceptable, we'll just look at that. We do have
a list of recommended trees. Additionally, the street tree plantings along
HWY 16 are grouped too closely together. The distance is 30 linear fet
between each tree, and 25% of those based on this frontage I believe,
could be grouped together, that way you can just create the space.
Rich: So you can group them together to create the spaces between?
Pate: Well 25% of the trees could be grouped together. At least a couple could
be grouped in a closer fashion but otherwise we need to space them out
along the frontage a little better. Also this situation is not acceptable, to
either move that island outside of the, or move the walk outside the island
by scooting the island over or creating a larger island in which you could
plant on both sides. That's an option as well. That's actually been used in
town before or you could do like I mentioned earlier and just move the
island over. Also we do need an additional island along this run of 12.
The dumpster location does not count as a landscape island. I'd
recommend it in the middle there as opposed to the end here. I think it'd
probably allow for better access. I believe that's all the comments that I
have.
Rich: I had a question about the sidewalk. I think I'm feeling a little bit
unprepared about what direction we need to go in on the sidewalk. Leave
it as it is?
Casey That was our Sidewalk Administrator's recommendation. Just leave it as a
4 foot.
Rich: I think perhaps we were under the impression that we had to enlarge that.
Casey Our Master Street Plan calls for a 6 foot sidewalk on Arterial roadways.
However, this was all constructed as part of the Highway Department
construction project. It was all placed with smaller sidewalks, but it's
consistent all the way through this business development already. So it
was his recommendation just to leave it as is.
Pate: Question for you, Matt. Through the driveway approach, what preference
would you guys have for the sidewalk? Construct a 4 foot there to match
the existing, or something back in the driveway?
Casey: Yeah, I think that's going to stay in the same location. The sidewalks
need to be continuous through the driveways so, we need to work with you
at the time of construction to maybe kind of help you.
Rich: We need to talk to Shane Reeves. We had a little bit of a problem getting
hold of him, but there will be some changes. But he had a concern about
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 13
this, what we show is an existing, it's something that's on the survey, I
don't know how that ramp's going to exist, and he was concerned about,
how did a ramp get built that goes straight on the road.
Casey: It makes sense if you look here across the street, and there's a ramp in that
location, so that may be why it's there.
Rich: I couldn't tell for sure whether it actually existed.
Morgan: Again fire comments are included as well as comments from solid waste
division. They comment that their gate opening requirements for the
dumpster at this location needs to be a minimum of 12 feet wide post to
post. The plat is representing 1 I foot wide. So they would like to see at
least widened by an additional 1 foot and if at all possible 2 feet. Are there
any utility comments?
Sargent: Jim Sargent with SWEPCO. Are you showing a utility easement there
along Wedington?
Rich: I believe we are. There was some question about whether we.
Pate: It should be there, I don't think it's been labeled.
Sargent: Okay. I'd like to see a 20 foot easement there along Wedington. And also
down along your east property line, I'm showing a transformer kind of
back in the southwest corner there. We'll need an easement from the
easement along Wedington back to that transformer location where we put
in our primary conductors.
Rich: Can you say where that is again?
Sargent: Along your east property line. We need a 20 foot utility easement going
back to that transformer location there.
Rich: And that's something that's handled during easement. There's a process
by which you?
Sargent: It's granted as a utility easement now during this plat, and then we'd have
to get a particular easement to SWEPCO for that.
Rich: We have an easement the west side of the lot already for electrical, and we
had it placed there. Typically those are placed as close to the building as
you can to limit the cost of the secondary. Do you think the process of
getting that easement is going to offset the cost of just putting it back
where we already have a 10 foot easement? I don't want to pay for an
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 14
additional when we already have a secondary. It would save me some
trouble of trying to establish another easement on the property.
Pate: An easement plat will follow the Planning Commission approval for this
project, regardless.
Sargent: Well that's probably the best location where you've got it shown back
there. So if you just show a 20 foot easement there on that east property
line there along Wedington that would take care of our easement
requirements. And we require you to put in two 4 inch conduits from a
pole out along Wedington back to the transformer location for primary
conductors. And provide a transformer pad also.
Rich: Do you have any specifications on that transformer pad? Is it fairly
typical, or do you have details?
Sargent: We do have details we can get to your contractor.
Rich: I think we show 10 X 10. Do you have any particular requirements for
clearance surrounding the transformer?
Sargent: It depends on how much clearance there's going to be between it and your
dumpster or parking area. And what kind of walls you're screening
around your dumpster for how far we're going to need for it. If it's a
noncombustible material, we'll need 5 feet, and if it's something that's
combustible, we'll need 10 feet clearance.
Rich: The dumpster is split based block with a metal gate.
Sargent: If it gets a little further from the dumpster we will require it.
Boles: Johnny Boles, Arkansas Western Gas. At the east end of this project
you're showing a water and natural gas easement. Exactly which
easement are you calling out there?
Rich: On the adjacent lot? I think that the terminology I have came off of
surveys.
Boles: But you are showing on the adjacent lot to the east a utility easement
adjacent to the right-of-way. And do you know what the width of that is?
Rich: I believe it was 20 feet.
Boles: And you are going to install us a 4 inch conduit underneath that driveway
again?
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 15
Rich: Are there details for how we run gas and electric?
Boles: I just need a minimum of 30 inches of cover over the top of that.
Rich: Does it have to be concrete?
Boles: No, just PVC. That's all I have.
Gibson: Larry Gibson, Cox Communications. If there going to request for cable
services in this building? I don't know if they will or not?
Rich: Well that might be at the owner's discretion.
Gibson: Okay. You may want to place from the same hole that comes from
electric, if you'll take a 4 inch for us down to the transformer location, and
turn it up about 4 feet from the transformer. Just turn it up, sweep it up, 14
inch or so. And then from that location, sweep another two inch,
minimum from there over to about three feet of the electric meter. That'll
give us a drop service. And you may want to, if they come back later and
say they want it, then we won't be able to do that.
Rich: So the two inch goes from the transformer over to the meter?
Gibson: Right. We can service it. We'll take the distribution line over to the
location by the transformer and then from there we'll do a drop service
line. And any location of a Cox service line will be at the owner's
expense. That's all I have.
Clouzer: Sue Clouzer, Southwestern Bell. Any relocation will be at the owner's
expense.
Morgan: Revisions are due next week.
Pate: I would suggest the civil engineer or even you contact Matt or Brent and
kind of look through some of these.
Rich: Thank you.
Pate: Thank you very much.
(TAPE ENDS)
Technical Plat
09-15-04
Page 16
Large Scale Development (WEDINGTON BUSINESS CENTER, 435): Submitted by
JAMES KOCH for property located at 6363 WEDINGTON DRIVE. The property is
zoned C-2, THOROUGHFARE COMMERCIAL and contains approximately 5.51 acres.
The request is to reinstate the previously approved Large Scale Development on the
subject property.