No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-07-16 - MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL PLAT REVIEW COMMITTEE A regular meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee was held on July16, 2003 at 9:00 a.m. in room 111 Fayetteville, Arkansas. ITEMS CONSIDERED of the City Administration Building, 113 W. Mountain, FPL 03-06.00: Final Plat (Sage Meadows, pp 396) Page 2 STAFF PRESENT Matt Casey Kim Hesse Jeremy Pate Renee Thomas UTILITIES PRESENT Mike Phipps, Ozark Electric Coop. Larry Gibson, Cox Communications Sue Clouser, Southwestern Bell ACTION TAKEN Forwarded STAFF ABSENT Perry Franklin Danny Farrar Travis Dotson Craig Carnagey UTILITIES ABSENT Glenn Newman, AEP/ SWEPCO Johny Boles, Arkansas Western Gas Technical Plat Review July 16, 2003 Page 2 FPL 03-06.00: Final Plat (Sage Meadows, pp 396) was submitted by Chris Brackett of Jorgensen & Associates on behalf of Mark Foster for property located north of Hwy 16 and east of 51s` Street. The property is zoned RSF-4, Residential Single-family 4 units per acre and contains approximately 30.99 acres with 88 lots proposed. Pate: We will go ahead and start this morning for the Technical Plat Review Committee. Today is July 16, 2003. Items one through three are for in house review only. Item number four is the Final Plat for Sage Meadows and Mr. Brackett is here to represent. Good morning Sir. Planning comments, just the Final Plat will need the surveyor's seal, signature and date. There are a couple of typos in the signature blocks. We need to change the City Planner to the Zoning and Development Administrator. 51st Street right of way, you need to dimension that. This has been inspected correct? Brackett: It is going to be Friday. Pate: It needs to be in before the revision deadline. Addresses for these lots need to be shown on the Final Plat itself. All guarantees and proof of payment for street lights need to be submitted prior to obtaining signatures, the guarantee for sidewalks as well. Matt? Matt Casey — Staff Engineer Casey: If you could change this easement between 36 and 37 to be a drainage easement. Then there are a couple of notes in your comments that I need you to add to the plat. Retaining wall setbacks and also the maximum driveway width and that is it. Kim Hesse — Parks and Recreation Hesse: We agreed last Monday to take that 1.7 acres from Fairfield along with the $1,100 in additional fees. Pate: Just so you know, this particular Final Plat will be recommended to go to the full Planning Commission since this is the first time that we have done that. Brackett: Because of the change in the parks. Pate: Right, because we are using an already banked and it is a new thing. I just wanted you to be aware of that. I do have a question, this lot 44 is listed as unbuildable. Brackett: That is a typo. That is just saying you can't access off of 51s` Street. Technical Plat Review July 16, 2003 Page 3 Pate: It says no access is allowed off of lots one through eight, forty-four through forty-eight, lot forty-four is unbuildable. Brackett: I don't know why it says that, that should be lots 37 and 43 are unbuildable because they are detention ponds. Pate: You meet the minimum requirements there for your lot width? I think you do. Brackett: Yes, we checked that. Pate: Change that note to 37 and 43 as unbuildable. Brackett: Yes. Pate: We don't have any comments from the Landscape Administrator. Utilities? Mike Phipps — Ozark Electric Coop. Phipps: Chris, I don't have the Preliminary with me so I can't really remember what we wanted. Up here on top where we have our 50' utility easement are the other utilities going to go in the front there? Brackett: I don't believe so due to the fact that when, and for some reason we don't have the crossings on there, but at Technical Plat Review, and Tom took this through, we have a crossing along that north line and that is where the crossings are installed is north of that overhead electric between that and the property line. Phipps: The other utilities that serve the subdivision to the east, there is a 20' easement outside of our power line. That is not a problem if it crosses but we don't want anything but our facilities in that easement. Brackett: I assume that it will be coming out of those. Clouser: I will need to check the phone to make sure there is enough capacity to serve that many homes on this site. Hopefully it was sized to accommodate them but I don't know, I will have to check into that. Brackett: I guess if it is not adequate then they will have to go in front. Phipps: You don't have much left between our easement and the setback in the front. Technical Plat Review July 16, 2003 Page 4 Brackett: Phipps: Brackett: Phipps: Brackett: Phipps: I can't speak first hand about how that was handled when this was brought through but I know that that is where we show the utilities and that is all I know. We need a couple more easements to get to lot 70 we will need a 20' easement, 10' on each side, on the lot line of 69 and 71. The same thing on 50 and 72 to access 79. 76 and 74 to access 75, 73 and 87 to access 88. Lots 38 through 42 I take it since there wasn't a back easement there we were to go in front because we have an easement between 45 and 44 that takes us back to the front where we go around the detention pond there. I believe that is because of the tree preservation if I remember correctly. I think that is what it was down there. We will go along the front from 38 and 42 back the detention on 37 and then back to the back of 36 there. I take it there are crossings on 60 and 59 over to 34 and 35. There are crossings including 12 and 11 and 81 and 82 diagonals across there. We will need a 10' UE for the street lights, you've got one between 17 and 18 to get to the street light. The one on 13 and 12 is fine. 86 and 85 I believe is a street light, 25 and 26, 29 and 30. That is all I see, the rest of them I can access through existing easements. Larry Gibson — Cox Communications Gibson: Brackett: Gibson: Those easements that Mike asked for are fine. Chris, what is that dark line right there between 42 and 43? That is a gravel access drive for access to the man hole, you can go up through there. That is all I had. Sue Clouser — Southwestern Bell Clouser: Pate: I agree with those easements requested. Are there any further questions or any comments? July 23rd is the deadline for revisions. Thank you. The last item on the agenda has been tabled at the request of the applicant. That concludes our meeting.