Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-06-26 - MinutesMINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE TECHNICAL PLAT REVIEW COMMITTEE A regular meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee was held on Wednesday, June 26, 2002 at 9:00 a.m. in Room 326 of the City Administration Building, 113 West Mountain, Fayetteville, Arkansas. ITEMS CONSIDERED LSP 02-35.00 & 36.00: Lot Split (Steigman, pp 257) Page 2 LSP 02-37.00: Lot Split (Selby, pp 140) Page 6 LSP 02-38.00: Lot Split (Mardanbigi, pp 410) Page 9 LSD 02-18.00: Large Scale Development (KFC, pp 520) Page 11 LSD 02-19.00: Large Scale Development (Southwestern Bell Telephone, pp 484) Page 18 STAFF PRESENT Sara Edwards Matt Casey Renee Thomas Kim Hesse Keith Shreve UTILITIES PRESENT Larry Gibson, Cox Communications Glenn Newman, AEP/ SWEPCO Mike Phipps, Ozark Electric Coop. Johnny Boles, Arkansas Western Gas ACTION TAKEN Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded Forwarded STAFF ABSENT Fire Department Solid Waste Kim Rogers Perry Franklin UTILITIES ABSENT Sue Clouser, Southwestern Bell Jim Sargent, AEP/ SWEPCO Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 2 LSP 02-35.00 & 36.00: Lot Split (Steigman, pp 257) was submitted by Kirk Elsass of Lindsey & Associates on behalf of Boyd & Kelly Steigman for property located at 2994 Oakland Zion Road. The property is in the Growth Area and contains approximately 7.52 acres. The request is to split the property into three tracts of 2.54 acres, 1.97 acres, and 3.01 acres. Edwards: Welcome to the June 26, 2002 meeting of the Technical Plat Review Committee. The first item on the agenda this morning is LSP 02-35.00 & 36.00 submitted by Kirk Elsass of Lindsey & Associates on behalf of Boyd & Kelly Steigman for property located at 2994 Oakland Zion Road. The property is in the Growth Area and contains approximately 7.52 acres. The request is to split the property into three tracts of 2.54 acres, 1.97 acres, and 3.01 acres. Steigman: My wife and I are the owners of this property now and I tried to get it cleaned up a little bit over the weekend but had some problems with a brush hog. Anyway, we are looking at this 7 '/2 acre tract and we were requesting the possibility of doing a lot split on that. With that being the case, we talked with Sara and Tim and they did some preliminary checking with the water division, also on the streets, and then they said it would be brought before the Planning Commission. I understand that this is plat review or plat approval. I probably don't have all the answers on some of the things but that is why Kirk Elsass is here to help me. He was the realtor that was involved in the transaction. If there is anything that I can help answer just please ask. Edwards: What we typically do is go through all of our City comments and I do have those in writing for you. Because it is outside the city a lot of these are no comment. Parks has no comment, Solid Waste has no comment, Sidewalks has no comment. I just have some minor comments. We still have a $200 fee that has not been paid because it is $200 per split and I think you have been apprised of that. If you can turn that in with the next revision deadline. What that is is that we have got some corrections that need to be made to this survey and Alan Reid is used to doing that and usually it is no problem. I would be glad to talk to him about it after you tell him about it. You can just pay that when that is due which is July 3rd Steigman: Is there someone here at this office that I can make a check payable to? Edwards: Just to the City of Fayetteville and you can just hand it to me or anyone else in the office. Steigman: Alright, I will handle that. Edwards: Also, when Alan brought this in I talked to him a little bit and he felt like there was a way to get both these 30' easements as dedicated right of way Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 3 and he has got it listed as to be dedicated which changes the waiver that was required a lot because when we first talked to you we only knew about the original 30' so if you could get that 30'. Elsass: We have done that. We have got their signatures and itis already to file at the court house. Edwards: What I am going to have him do is just change that to right of way so it is right of way and then that eliminates the need for the waiver that you need from the City. So that is good and we can get this approved at Subdivision Committee I believe. Steigman: Do I contact Alan Reid then? Edwards: Yes, and I will be happy to talk to him about it. Steigman: Alright. Edwards: We are in support of the 12' wide paved road, which is good. There is an issue with our Master Street Plan. What we have is a document, our 2020 plan, which projects future road expansions at some point in the next 20 years and with subdivisions or lot splits we require the right of way be dedicated now. Zion is a collector which requires 35' of right of way. What we will be looking at is just a little 5' right of way dedication right here which I guess isn't going to make a difference. Steigman: That would be something I would dedicate to the city? Edwards: Right. To the County actually. Now that I look at it, since this is going to be right of way that is not going to make a huge difference because you only own right there. Elsass: Right. That is already done. Edwards: So that is no big deal. You need county approval. Celia, did you have anything to add on this? Silkwood: Celia Scott Silkwood, Washington County Planning Director, due to the size of the lots this can not be administratively approved and it will have to be approved by the Planning Board. We can do an abbreviated plat but we will require some signature blocks and some things on here. If you will just call my office I can fax you our checklist and what we will require to be on the plat, and I can give you our submittal dates, and our Planning Board dates, and things like that. Steigman: I didn't know that you were here this morning. It is nice to meet you. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 4 Celia did help me in the process. I was faxing information to her so again, I will be keeping the county involved in the whole process if there is any question on that. Edwards: This is Matt Casey with our Engineering Division and he has some comments about the water. Matt Casey — Staff Engineer Casey: I would just like to see the existing 6" water line along Oakland Zion shown. I also show a 2" line going down the road back to where I assume the meters are located at. Steigman- That is my understanding. There is a 2" line and then it will come off and there is a tap into this house and then there is another home down here that has an existing tap. Casey: I would like to see the approximate location of the existing service and if that service crosses this other lot we will need a private easement for that line dedicated to that lot. Steigman: From what I know, because this lot is cut up into the top of that driveway area. The water easement on that would be how much? Casey: It would be 10' on each side of the line and that would be a private easement, not for a public line. Steigman: Depending on where the gas and the other utilities are do we just need to put an easement in there up to the house if it can encompass everything? Is that usually the easiest thing to do? Edwards: Yes, you might get your cable and telephone and everything. Steigman: Ok. So it is a utility easement that we will try to incorporate. Edwards: All of these comments are in writing. Steigman: Ok. Edwards: Utilities? Mike Phipps — Ozark Electric Coop. Phipps: The only comment I have is that any relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner's expense. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 5 Johnny Boles — Arkansas Western Gas Boles: Kirk, I will just have to locate where the existing line is and then I will call you and give you some comments. Elsass: Ok. Larry Gibson — Cox Communications Gibson: The only comment I have is that if we have to relocate anything it will be at the owner's expense. We do have existing service going to this house and I am not sure after the back of this lot here, where we go. Steigman• I understand that you are just in the process of getting out there with the upgraded line system on cable and if that is the case, if you are bringing cable out to that house would you be able to go ahead and locate a place on each of the three lots? Gibson: Yes. We would be able to service all three of them. Steigman: I know that there is a cable junction that is currently in there if that new line is run down would that provide service to the three lots? Gibson: It would provide seryice to all these houses. Steigman: I know there would be some expense for running the cable from the start of that one property line area. Gibson: I think the older cable that was in this area, I'm not positive, but I think it has already been replaced with the new. It may not be completely tied into the new but I think it has been replaced with the new to this location. Steigman: My wife had talked with your company about service out there on cable and they explained that they are getting ready to upgrade it or to go ahead and implement. Gibson: When they get to this area that those homes are covered. That is all I have. Elsass: Is that it? Edwards: That's it. I will fax a copy of the comments to Alan. Steigman: Thank you for your time everyone. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 6 LSP 02-37.00: Lot Split (Selby, pp 140) was submitted by Philip Humbard on behalf of Janet Selby for property located at 4135 Hungate Lane. The property is in the Growth Area and contains approximately 7.94 acres. The request is to split into two tracts of 1.90 acres and 6.04 acres. Edwards: The next item is LSP 02-37.00 submitted by Philip Humbard on behalf of Janet Selby for property located at 4135 Hungate Lane. The property is in the Growth Area and contains approximately 7.94 acres. The request is to split into two tracts of 1.90 acres and 6.04 acres. Humbard: Good morning. Edwards: I will start with Parks, no comment. Sidewalks and Solid Waste, no comments. From Planning, I am asking that you add plat page 140 for our city referencing system. I know that I have explained the 30 right of way on Hungate in the past but it turns out it is on our Master Street Plan so the requirement is 45' from centerline. When I pulled up our city based on your legal, it looks like that goes to the centerline, their property line goes to the centerline. What we would be looking for is this changed to 45'. Humbard: That is no problem. Edwards: There is an appeal process if you are interested. Humbard: That is ok. Edwards: Gulley is a principal arterial which requires 110', so that is 55' from centerline. I want you to say right of way dedicated by this plat. We need to put right of way and then I've included signature blocks for the owner to sign which dedicates that. It will be to Washington County. County approval if required prior to filing. Celia, did you have anything on this one? Silkwood: This one appears to be the size that we can administratively approve. We've got a 45' right of way going back. Edwards: That is going to be from centerline so there is probably 10' on the other side I would guess, I don't know. Silkwood: That is fine. We can administratively approve it. Edwards: Ok, Matt? Matt Casey — Staff Engineer Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 7 Casey: Philip, I would just like to see the existing water lines shown. There is a 3" across the road, an 18" on the north side and then this is a 2" running along Hungate. Humbard: The 18" on the north side, is it behind the right of way? Casey: Yes. Please show the location of the water meters that service this also and verify there is not any conflict. This is showing as County Road 81. Edwards: Celia, do you know if that County Road number is right or did you happen to notice? Silkwood: On Hungate? Edwards: On Gulley. Silkwood: If you call my office I can tell you. Humbard: I will check that. Edwards: Utilities? Mike Phipps — Ozark Electric Coop. Phipps: The only thing I have is any relocation of existing facilities will be at the owner's expense. Johnny Boles — Arkansas Western Gas Boles: We have an existing gas line on the east side of Hungate Lane. Humbard: Off of our property? Boles: Yes, it is offsite but it could be used to serve either one of these properties. Humbard: Ok. Is it adjacent to the road? Boles: It parallels the road with a two inch plastic. Humbard: Does it run the complete length of it too? Boles: I recall a couple of years ago we ran gas to the Terrys. I know that they have gas, I am not sure that it goes as far north as the Gregg property, I will have to check. I believe before you get to this house there is a concrete drive that turns back to the east. That new house on the east side of the road, that is as far north as our gas line goes. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 8 Humbard: It goes approximately to the drive there. Boles: I believe it goes to the north side of that concrete drive. Larry Gibson — Cox Communications Gibson: We are joint usage on Ozark Electric pole running on the west side of Hungate. Anything that we have to relocate will be at the owner's expense. Edwards: Revisions are due July 3"l at 10:00 a.m. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 9 LSP 02-38.00: Lot Split (Mardanbigi, pp 410) was submitted by Northstar Engineering Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Farhad Mardanbigi for property located at 1304 Crossover Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 1.69 acres. The request is to split into two tracts of 1.14 acres and 0.55 acres. Edwards: Next is LSP 02-38.00 was submitted by Northstar Engineering Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Farhad Mardanbigi for property located at 1304 Crossover Road. The property is zoned R-1, Low Density Residential and contains approximately 1.69 acres. The request is to split into two tracts of 1.14 acres and 0.55 acres. Ging: My name is Jerry Ging. You basically just said exactly what is going to happen. Edwards: I will start with sidewalks. We do not require sidewalks on lot splits so there are no sidewalks required for lot splits however, there is a parks fee due in the amount of $470. That will be required to be paid prior to permit. Nothing from Solid Waste. From Planning, add plat page 410. You can just add it somewhere near the title block. The floodplain reference needs to be filled in. I didn't check the map and the date number but I didn't see any floodplain on the property when I checked. We do require that right of way be dimensioned from centerline. I am not sure, is one of these supposed to be centerline? Ging: No. Edwards: We need that shown. As part of that, our Master Street Plan requires 55' from centerline be dedicated by Warranty Deed prior to filing the plat. That is why we are looking for centerline to be shown so we can verify what is existing and there may be some additional right of way dedication on that. Ging: You are requiring 55' from centerline? Edwards: Yes. That is all that I have. Matt? Matt Casey — Staff Engineer Casey: I would just like for you to show the existing 24" waterline along the property. The valves and the hydrants and meters are shown, just the waterline needs to be added. Edwards: Utilities? Glenn Newman — SWEPCO Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 10 Newman: Our facilities are located on Crossover. Any relocation will be at the customer's expense. Do you anticipate building? Ging: I am sure that he is probably going to be building on it. Mike Phipps — Ozark Electric Coop. Phipps: On your vicinity map you've got the property shown on the west side of Hwy. 265. Ging: It is on the east side. The dark one is Hwy. 265, that is where Crossover bends right there. Phipps: It is real close in there. Ging: The best thing I can tell you is that it is just south of what is called Lovers Lane. Gibson: Right in that corner, that triangle shaped comer. There is an overhead line right on the back of it that goes all the way out to the intersection there and then it goes southeast. Johnny Boles — Arkansas Western Gas Boles: Let me give you a name of a gentleman in our main office. His name is Bill Brandt. His phone number is 521-5400. I know there is a 16" gas transmission line that parallels Hwy. 265 at this location. That was installed as a result of the 265 project but I am not sure what the easement widths were that were obtained on this project because I didn't work on the highway project. I am sure Bill can give you the information. Ging: Ok. Boles: That is all I have. Larry Gibson — Cox Communications Gibson: We have a service line that runs to the back of the property, it runs northwest/southeast. If we have to relocate that it will be at the owner's expense. That is all I have. Edwards: Revisions are due July 3`d by 10:00 a.m. Ging: Thank you. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 11 LSD 02-18.00: Large Scale Development (KFC, pp 520) was submitted by Jerry Kelso of Crafton, Tull & Associates, Inc. on behalf of Jon Dyer of K -Mac Enterprises, Inc. for property owned by Ermel Fox and located at 1860 W. 6th Street. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contain approximately 1.11 acres with a 3,145 sq.ft. restaurant proposed. Edwards: The next item is LSD 02-18.00 submitted by Jerry Kelso of Crafton, Tull & Associates, Inc. on behalf of Jon Dyer of K -Mac Enterprises, Inc. for property owned by Ermel Fox and located at 1860 W. 6th Street. The property is zoned C-2, Thoroughfare Commercial and contain approximately 1.11 acres with a 3,145 sq.ft. restaurant proposed. Love: I am not Jerry Kelso, I am Mark Love. Kim Hesse — Landscape Administrator Hesse: Mark, what I need for you to do is to go through this checklist and make sure that stuff is on the revisions for Planning Commission. When you get a building permit the rest of it will need to be on. Basically, that is what this is saying and I need you to review this. The other item is we need 15' landscaping between here and here and it couldn't all be in the pond. I am concerned that there is not enough room between the pond. Love: When I talked to you before you saw that and you said "Well, lets place them here." Hesse: The bigger issue are the shrubs that have to go along there and have to be visible from the street. Here is where most of your shrubs will go but we will need some shrubs here. They will need to show up. You need to show them on the plan, how they are going to be level enough. Love: On this plan or can we submit something... Hesse: It can be a different plan but it has to be something that the Planning Commission has for their approval. Love: Like I said, KMac's landscaper is in Texarkana, Texas. Hesse: You will have to do at least the minimum which is right here. We talked about an island. There would need to be a tree here, here, and here. That may be the better location, I don't know. Love: I have got one shown here and I have the survey crew out there right now as we speak relocating again every tree on here. Hesse: That is what I need. I can't give you a recommendation until I get that. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 12 Edwards: Kim, are you saying that because of the slopes of the detention pond, there is not room for the shrubs and the detention pond will have to be moved back? I just want to be clear. Hesse: You will need to show what is in there and show if we've got room for them. Love: They have to be along the right of way? Edwards: They have to be within the 15' of landscaping from the right of way in. Hesse: So yes, within 15'. Love: That may just kill it. Hesse: Trees can be in a 3:1 or less slope. This looks like it is 2:1. Love: We will have to look and see if we have to build a retaining wall now because we have no choice for the detention basin, that is the low spot for a bunch of area and that is just where it has got to be. Hesse: You can install trees on a 3:1 but a 2:1 is getting pretty steep and shrubs would have to be on level ground somewhere. Edwards: I will give you comments from everyone else. Sixth Street requires a 6' sidewalk and a 10' greenspace. Sidewalk needs to be constructed in the right of way line shown. Please remove existing asphalt strip located behind the curb. Sidewalk has to be continuous through the driveway with a maximum 2% cross slope and elevated 2% above the top of curb. Also, we have a bicycle parking rack ordinance, which requires one bicycle parking rack. You have a copy of that ordinance, I will be sure to get you one if you don't. Love: We show one. Edwards: Ok, good. Love: Is there any way, I am concerned about not the 2% cross slope of the sidewalk but it being 2% above the existing curb. The detention on this site being what it is and trying to get the volume that is required depth wise, means that we have got to bring the site up in order to create a big enough bowl for detention. Honestly we are above the 2%. How is casting concrete literally above the curb? Keith Shreve — Sidewalk Division Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 13 Shreve: It is pretty strict, Chuck enforces that very strictly. There has been a little bit of variance but not much. In a location like this it would be hard to get a variance from that 2%. Love: Ok. There are a couple of things really just driving this site and that is the low spot on site, which is the detention basin. God made that low spot right there and then trying to save the trees. We are trying not to cut as much so that we can save a group of trees in the back and keep everybody happy. That 2%, just in that space, you perpetuate that back to the site. Shreve: Chuck met with someone out there, was that you? Love: Yes. Shreve: Ok. I knew he looked at it with someone on site. Love: You're saying that if it is 2% then it is 2%. Shreve: Like I say, it would be very hard to get off of that. It has been done, but it is a hard sell to make is what I'm trying to say. Love: t understand. It is a tough site. Edwards: From Parks, there is no comment. Solid Waste supports this request with no recommended changes. He was pretty happy with the dumpster location and the concrete. From Planning, I need you to add Plat Page 520 somewhere near the signature block. That is just a city referencing system. I need a floodplain reference added. Right of way must be dimensioned from centerline. If I recall, we got all the right of way we needed back at the lot split, which should be 55' from centerline so I think that that is fine. A Conditional Use is required for additional parking. We have received that. That is being reviewed. We have standards for parking stalls and aisles, parking stall standard is 9x19. You have got these 9.5 x 19.5. That needs to be 9x19. Love: They need to be 9x19 only? Edwards: Yes. Your aisle width is fine. The maximum has to be between 24' and 27' so when you are adjusting things I just want to make sure you didn't get above that 27'. The entrance striping for the driveway, the requirement is the entrance should be 15' and the two exit lanes should be 12' wide each. I just didn't see those dimensioned on there. Kim talked about the landscaping. We do require an elevation be submitted of this freestanding sign up here along the front along with these elevations and I didn't see that in here so that the Planning Commission does review the Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 14 signage. We also have a maximum square footage for signs of 75 sq.ft. We have got setbacks for signs and I encourage you to have the architect get with our sign division because we have got setbacks. For a 75 sq.ft. sign if you want a pole sign the setback is 40'. If you want a monument sign the setback is 10' and this isn't even meeting the 10'. If you look at JD China next door, they went ahead and went with a monument because of the setback issue so I imagine that that is probably what will happen here. You need to adjust this depending on what they want to use. Love: Ok. Edwards: All mechanical and utility equipment must be screened. If there is any rooftop equipment planned it has to be screened by parapet. I don't see anything shown on here but our rule is to show the rooftop equipment if that is what is planned. We will have a mess if we go out there and there is a bunch of rooftop equipment and it wasn't designed to cover it. Also, the freezer, it doesn't show the material but it has to be architecturally incorporated. That means you have to carry your split face block around to match the rest of the building and then E.F.I.S. Love: I'm clueless. Edwards: I assume you had an architect draw this up. If you want to have him call me I will be glad to talk to him about it. Love: I called the client and he got that from corporate. Edwards: Ok, revisions are due July 3rd at 10:00 a.m. Matt? Matt Casey — Staff Engineer Casey: We have got several minor check list items on the grading plan there. I do want to point out that you are showing existing retaining wall on the drawings. I would like to see some elevations on that to see how it is designed. It is adjacent to your grading, I want to see how that ties together. Also, you had mentioned the possibility of putting a retaining wall in the detention basin if these adjustments have to be made, it ahs to be 2' off the back of sidewalk, keep that in mind. Love: We are going to be at least 10'. Hesse: Probably 5' for shrubs. Casey: Also, in your drainage report a rational nexus was used but the multipliers that are called out in our drainage material manual were not included in that. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 15 Love: Ok, I couldn't tell you anything about the drainage report. Casey: Also, we have got an existing sewer line shown, we need a minimum UE 10' on each side of that line. I would like for you to show the existing 6" waterline across the front of the property. Love: That shows on the first page, we show the water line and also the existing 20' UE along the front. Casey: If you could show those on the grading plan also. Love: There are actually two easements. There is this utility easement and then JD China has a drainage easement. Their drainage pipe actually comes from here to this existing hole, the whole I was wanting to drain to. Edwards: It looks like this is pointing to the wrong place then. Love: That is pointing to that dimension. Edwards: Ok. Casey: I just need to make sure I have a minimum of 10'. Edwards: Utilities? Glenn Newman — SWEPCO Newman: Can we get a 15' UE along the east property line? Love: Is that going to require that I move everything out of the way of that? Newman. The only thing my UE will stipulate is that you can't build a building over it, if it is a parking area that will be alright. Love: We'll have parking lot lights and that kind of stuff and trees, and, and, and. We have a very narrow lot so we are wall to wall. Newman. You are actually going to have 5' between the property and the curb? Love: Right. Newman: The trees will be planted in that 5'? Love: We will have a tree in that landscape island. Again, we are not going to do the landscape, it is in Texarkana, Texas but I can't imagine that there Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 16 Newman: Love: Newman: Love: Newman: Love: Newman: Love: Newman: Love: Newman. would be trees along there but there would be shrubs along there and area parking lot lights. All of this will be underground. If we could get an easement there we could locate that line. It can actually be out in the parking lot area. It can be underground in a 4" conduit is what I will require of the customers. The customer will provide the ditch and the conduit, I will provide the primary cable. Ok. Customer will provide the transformer pad and I will provide the transformer and make all the connections. I have a twelve week delivery time on the transformer so as soon as we can get some load data and some voltages I will get that ordered. All I know is that the contractor tells me that it is 800 amps. We don't know a voltage? No. If I can get that information that will help me try to get that transformer on order, and I may have it on the lot. Our contractor is Gioni, it is on the front page right there on a box. Ok. I will try to call them and if you have an opportunity, tell them to contact us and that will kind of give us an idea of what we're looking for. What is your phone number Glenn? 973-2305. That is all I have. Johnny Boles — Arkansas Western Gas Boles: Larry Gibson Any relocation of existing facilities will need to be done at the developer's expense. The easement shown is fine. I am not sure the depth of our line that runs across the front of that property. We uncovered it east of there when they built the JD China Restaurant and it seems to me like it wasn't very deep so be careful. That is all I have. — Cox Communications Gibson: If you could dip off that overhead pole, the same one you are going to come off of for the electric and get us a 2" over here to within 3' of the Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 17 electric meter, a 2" conduit. You can follow the contour there like you are the electrical, or you can shoot straight across, it doesn't matter as long as there is conduit in there and we will pull it, just sweep it up on each end. Love: Ok. Gibson: That is all I have. Edwards: I do have one question. This thousand gallon grease drop, what is that? Is it hole in the ground? Love: To simplify it, it is almost like a septic tank. Edwards: It is underground? Love: Yes, you will never know it is there. Edwards: Ok, that is fine. That is all we have. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 18 LSD 02-19.00: Large Scale Development (Southwestern Bell Telephone, pp 484) was submitted by Larry Bates of Canino Peckham & Associates on behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone for property located at 138 N. East Avenue. The property is zoned C-3, Central Commercial and contains approximately 0.25 acres. The is for an emergency generator, fuel tank and transformer. Edwards: The last item on the agenda is LSD 02-19.00, submitted by Larry Bates of Canino Peckham & Associates on behalf of Southwestern Bell Telephone for property located at 138 N. East Avenue. The property is zoned C-3, Central Commercial and contains approximately 0.25 acres. The is for an emergency generator, fuel tank and transformer. I will read through different staff comments. There is no comment from Solid Waste. Sidewalks, removal and replacement of broken and deteriated sections of sidewalk along Spring Street will be required. Shreve: Another thing, on your driveway approach, we want to make sure that the sidewalk is continuous through the driveway. You have curb line coming back. Bates: Right. We were going to put a handicap access in there, we just haven't got to it yet. Shreve: I just wanted to make sure you were aware of the new design requirements. Bates: I don't have them. Shreve: I will give you a copy if you like. If you or your contractor has any questions let us know. Bates: Thank you. Edwards: We are requiring a Large Scale Development application with the fee submitted. Have you done that this morning already? Bates: I brought it with me. Edwards: I will take that after we are done. The requirement is that 37 copies of the revised plan be submitted Monday, July ls`. I am asking for a larger plan, I don't care what size, I just what it to be legible and then there is a list of stuff that I need to be added. That is for the Subdivision Committee members. I want you to add plat page 484 somewhere over here on the left hand side. A vicinity map which shows where the project is located, the legal description of the property. Bates: We did that on the CUP I think so I've got it. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 19 Edwards: Ok. I need your right of way dimensioned from centerline. I understand that you are working out the parking information that we require with Dawn or Shelli. They are going to review that. I also want you to show the proposed landscaping, which I think you have discussed with them as well. Lastly, elevations of the proposed screen wall shall be submitted. You have all of this in writing. Matt didn't have any comments. Utilities? Glenn Newman — SWEPCO Newman: Bates: Newman: Larry Gibson Gibson: Bates: Edwards: Bates: Edwards: Bates: Edwards: Bates: Edwards: This is the same project that we are talking with Bob Harp in Little Rock about? Yes. He and I have spoken and he has included our specs for transformer pads and so forth on his plan. As far as I know, we are good to go. — Cox Communications Johnny Boles told me that he had no comments for Arkansas Western gas. I have no comments either. Ok. When I was talking with Dawn earlier we were talking about the dumpster that is in the corner of the property over there. They would like us to look at moving it on the opposite side of the transformer so they could access it from the alley. Did she talk to you about the driveway and the width of it and all of that? No. Ok. The maximum width of a driveway that we allow is 27' and it looks like you have got more. We are 29'. This is all one way parking but I am ok with the parallel spaces. All of those spaces are existing right now and we were just re -striping them. What you could do if you were wanting to get some more spaces in maybe, I don't know how much room you have. Our requirement is that the spaces are 19' long and the aisle has to be 12' for a one way and so you might be able to put some of those back in there. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 20 Bates: I think we looked at that and we really didn't. I apologize for that not being to scale. Edwards: That's the other thing, if you could get us a scaled plat. Bates: Ok. From what I understood, we need to have these back here by July Is'. She suggested that we not necessarily make a lot of changes until after we had met so we wouldn't be drawing, drawing, and drawing. Edwards: That is all we need. Bates: There was quite a bit of talk about the landscaping. Are you the landscape expert? Kim Hesse — Landscape Administrator Hesse: Bates: Hesse: This is a tough one. How much space do you have? None. Dawn thought there was 5' between the property line and your screen fence. Bates: There may be but there was some talk about landscaping on East Street. Do we really want to do that? Hesse: On East? Bates: In front of the building. That is a whole piece of property away from us. Hesse: I haven't heard that. That was from the Planning Commission? Bates: They were just kind of batting it around, I don't know. Edwards: I don't know the answer either, I wasn't there. You might want to talk to Dawn about it. Bates: I have a little sketch here that is possibly what this could look like. Hesse: Are they going to put a water spickett on that property line? Bates: I understood that was one of the comments. This is the Spring Street side, this is the alley right through here and we were just going to put a spickett in this planter or something on this side across the alley. Technical Plat Review June 26, 2002 Page 21 Hesse: Bates: Hesse: Bates: Hesse: Bates: Hesse: Bates: Hesse: Bates: Hesse: Bates: Hesse: Bates: Edwards: Bates: Hesse: Bates: Edwards: So the only soil would be here. Yes. That probably wouldn't sustain any trees. This is a full scale of this, this is only 3'. It is only 3' wide from the edge of brick to the edge of brick? Yes. Let me get with Dawn again to see what the Planning Commissioners requested. You think they did want landscaping? They didn't really know. They thought about well how about down this way and then how about in front of the building. The front of the building has a sprinkler system in it already. What would you add to that to keep from basically covering the building up. You don't have anything up here, all you have got is right next to the building. Let me get with Dawn. Our spickett will be down in here somewhere in a box with a plate on it. You are going to be breaking up the asphalt right? It is partially concrete right now and partially asphalt and it has been patched and cut up and dug across and everything. This walk is deteriated in here. We were going to break that whole thing out. These are ballards that come out on the outside of the pole? We did have ballards here to protect that and then once we got talking about the screens and the planting, I did away with them. Is there any way to move that back to get that 5' space? There is a switch here but we can probably scoot it back another foot. Thank you. I will get with Dawn and then give you a call. I would just like to get all of this by the 1st so it will slide right through. Ok, that is all we have then. Thank you.